WEBVTT - Inside Danny's PR Masterplan (The Downfall Pt.2)

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome back to the Maths on new podcast,

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And in today's episode, I'm going to be talking specifically

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>about Danny and also once again about like pr master plans,

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to be talking about what's going to

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>happen next for Danny after those unseen moments which were

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on Stan and at the reunion, had this season ending

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>with him as our final villain trying.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>To get some Airtab was fucking little skin, fucking little

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>pissed me off me and drake my name through the

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 2>mud because you've got kicked out early doors and you

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 2>think you know Anton, don't do that to me.

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>By now, I'm going to assume that you've all seen

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>or heard those clips of Danny that showed a very

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>different side to him and proved how he really did lead.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Back on just to get to the end of the show.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's the best you can bring me.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>You want to be shining yourself. There's Bell often walking

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Carls and get a better berg than that. Fuck me.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>The next watch is you're fucking to your jobs. Bring

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>me better women. You can do that if you're about

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>fifteen out of ten.

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 3>And she's not.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, some people have argued that he was right to

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>speak about Beck that way at times, as surely her

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>behavior plus the pressure of the experiment would have led

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to him needing to vent at times, which I get

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of. But in those unguided moments which we've now

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>seen and heard, he was taking aim at Beck's appearance

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as well as their behavior, which is just pretty low

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, especially when you remember how he was

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>continuing to sleep with her while doing this while saying

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>things like Hey, Beck, I am falling in love with you,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>which was just lying to her face, and the fact

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>he was doing that allegedly having sex multiple times of

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>her the week before their final vows and making her

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think that she would get this happy ending she so

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>desperately wanted, despite having such a dislike of her, which

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we now know. Also, he could just have that big

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>TV moment at the end. To me, that's just like

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the lowest of the low. And now, if you're thinking,

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>which is the point of this episode, will, how does

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Danny come back from this? What can he do to

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>change the public narrative? Well, his strategy is already in play.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So firstly, before the worst unseen moments were put out there,

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Danny had started to lean into this new like controversial

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>villain title, and this came off the back of final

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>vows and people were like, ah, that wasn't really very nice,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>how you broke her heart like that. And he was

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok replying to people joking how his back hurts

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>from carrying this season and how despite now dividing viewers

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with those final vowels, you know, he

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>still provided great entertainment all season and he's still like

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the cheeky chappie with like so you know, remember that

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>side of him. But then as the unseen moments did

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>go out and we saw how he speaks about women,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's now losing thousands of followers across socials each day,

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Danny's suddenly gone silent and he's now letting.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Other people speak for him.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You may have noticed that his best friends are in

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>comments sections and they're saying things like, at least he's honest,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're even suggesting that some of those unseen clips

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in audio are AI generated, which come on, guys, we're

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not stupid. And then you've got Scott, who remember is

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 1>mostly loved by fans, he's now risking his reputation by

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>almost leading Danny's redemption master plan, which has surprised me

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to be honest. In an interview with The Daily Mail yesterday,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Scott said that he checked in with Danny and spoke

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to him just ten minutes before that chat. And Scott

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>then suggested that Danny's controversial moments now seen were taken

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>out of context, claiming that viewers didn't see the full

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>picture of what was happening behind the scenes. And Scott

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday in this interview, I think every time they

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>shown those bits of Danny saying stuff, it's because he

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>was checked out. There was a lot happening in their relationship,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>yelling he was dealing with a lot more than.

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>What people really saw.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's Scott essentially saying, hey, Danny might not look

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>great right now, but it's all Beck's fault, which Scott,

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know why you'd come out and say that.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And then similarly, similar similarly, similar oh my god, can

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I not say this word? Similarly similarly anyway, similarly, remember

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Danny's best mate messaged me a week or so ago

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>leaking shit about Beck, which I didn't run about her,

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>apparently taking a zempic, which to me it is just

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>no one's business. And when I asked, hey, is Danny

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>making you leak stuff like this? You know it's a

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>discredit back remember that he said to me, no, but

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea this shit that Beck put him

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>through and what Danny went through again making it clear

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that hey, any behavior of Danny, we may see that's unfavorable.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 3>That was down to Beck.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So again, yes, this was the man blaming the woman

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for the man's behavior.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 3>But that's not the worst.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Of it, because now here is the biggest play in

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Danny's apparent pr master planning.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Even I'm a bit speechless like this.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So in another article with The Daily Mail yesterday which

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>listed like bombshells, we didn't see something like that. Firstly,

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>an insider, which remember an insider is usually always either

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the person being discussed or one of their mates they've

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>had share whatever this is, this insider said, Danny insists

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that viewers didn't see the full story.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Behind closed doors, a.

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Very different narrative has emerged about Danny and his ex Beck.

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Sauces say Danny accused Beck of giving him verbal dressings

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>down during their relationship, and he believes the public has

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>been misled. So again, that's kind of suggesting anything unfavorable

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of Danny is because Beck was mean to him behind

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, which we didn't see, because I suppose we

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>only saw the version of her that was like besotted

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>with him and in love, which again this feels a

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>bit like come on.

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 3>And then in.

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That same article, The Daily Mail also said that Danny

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is sitting on receipts sauces claim Danny has evidence backing

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>his version of events regarding the breakup with Beck. This

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>allegedly includes private messages that never surfaced, and Insider then

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>teased he's got proof that would change everything. He's just waiting, Well,

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Danny or the Insider or whoever this mystery person is

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>giving these.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Quotes, what are you waiting for?

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Because if I was Danny and I had something that

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>really would change everything, I would have dropped it yesterday

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or the night before that when those clips came out

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and the country saw me looking like the biggest just dickhead, Like,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what are you waiting for? Because to me, if they're

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>teasing something they've got nothing, or their planning like how

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to make something out of nothing, or I don't know,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like, yeah, if you've got receipts or

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.679
<v Speaker 1>evidence that would change it, put it out their stock.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Can everybody just stop teasing things if you want to

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>put something out there, And Lissa, if you listening to

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you as well, just tell us. I'm sick of this, like,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>oh well, I've got something, but I'm not going to

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 1>tell you shut up about it then Sorry, I'm getting

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit ranting now because I've had a red bull, but.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 3>God, I'm glad this season.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, right, so what if we learned here when

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Danny's pr master plan? Essentially, it's that

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 1>he's staying silent for now. He's letting his friends blame

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the woman for the man's behavior, which is a story

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as old as time, while also having people suggest he's

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>got evidence that you know, he is the nice guy

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and Beck is the villain and made him say anything bad,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's not gonna show us what their evidence.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Is or tell us what it is. So yeah, this

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 3>is so stupid.

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And before I wrap this podcast up now, I'm going

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to give you my opinion again because you know what

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>my podcasts so here it is I have no doubt

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that being a match with Beck would have been difficult

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at times and Beck, if you're listening, no offense. You

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>know I do like you, but come on, you were

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in constant drama. You had extreme reactions to most things.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You do, love a glass of wine, and.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Occasionally you were unhinged.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So when we're talking about what we look for in

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a potential partner, many of those things don't really I'd

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>say they're not at the top of the list, but

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>often they're not really on the list at all.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 3>And again Beck, no offense, but hey, what is?

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you know that would have been testing for

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Danny at times? Sure, I get that, and especially when

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you factor in like all that added pressures of the

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>show and producers making you do stuff and say stuff

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But does all of that excuse mocking Beck's

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>appearance and just speaking so shit about women like Danny?

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>In the audio he called Steph a and I quote

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>fucking little skank or something like that, like mate, and

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>accusing her of using you for Adam who wants to

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>use Danny for airtime? Who wants to be linked to

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>this man? Not me, I don't know, well, not Steph either,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and now not Beck, who's finally saw like how she

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>was misled. But yeah, again, and does that like, you

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know that side of Beck Danny was with. Does that

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>then excuse him still continuing to sleep with her while

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>knowing he's going to dump her and feeling nothing.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>No, it doesn't.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And does it also excuse leading someone on for what

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>three months, letting them fall in love with you, so

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>watching them fall in love with you while behind closed doors,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like letting them believe you're also falling in love and

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>letting them think that they're gonna get that happy ending

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know they so desperately want, just so you can

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what destroy them at the end in the most public

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>way possible because you think it's gonna make you look

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like a hero and give you this big viral TV

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>moment that the world's gonna applaud Like, No, it doesn't.

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So whatever these receipts may be, if they exist, I

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of it excuses Danny for that.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 3>And again, just to circle.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Back, yes, surely being with Beck would have been difficult

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and testing at times. But one of the reasons I

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like Beck and I think a lot of other people do,

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is because she feels like the most authentic. She's owned

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>that shit behavior inexcusable, sure, but at least she says, Hey,

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to learn from it, and she's also just

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it felt like she just genuinely wanted love. Why am

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I feeling emotional? This isn't my relationship. In a few weeks,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll never speak about these people again.

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Anyway. Yeah, that's today's podcast.

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yesterday I did a really fascinating interview with a

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>woman who works in influencer marketing, and she has like

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>great pr background and insights about what the cast will

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>now do to like desperately try and change their narrative

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>to the public before they then launched themselves as influencers.

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And basically everything I've just mentioned that Danny is doing

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is what the guest I spoke to predicted would be happening.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because we did that chat before I

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>really looked at Danny's plan here, and I'm going to

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>edit that interview to post tomorrow, I think, and it

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>just has like a wider look at what's next for

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the cast who could potentially make it as influencers, but

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>why most of them won't, and what potential money they

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>could now earn, like what's on the table. Yeah, so

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>look out for that tomorrow, but for now, say up