WEBVTT - Could you handle a share market crash?

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby, the Wealth editor at the Australian. Welcome aboard everybody.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Now imagine, imagine as an investor, a share investor, how

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>would you feel if this happened? You wake up tomorrow morning,

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at your phone of the television and you

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>find out that the wars treat is down twenty three

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>percent in the day overnight. You say, oh my god.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You hope Australia when it opens will be better. Maybe

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a recovery, maybe there'd be some bargain hunting.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>The ax in a fashion which was established way back

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when and continues to this day, overdoes it and actually

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>falls harder than the American market and it falls twenty

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent in a single session. Now, I wanted to

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>keep this in mind at the moment. These days, we

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>get terribly worried. If we have a bad day on

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Essex. We have a three percent drop, it's a

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>big deal. If we have a five percent drop, it's

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>front page news. Its billions have been wiped off the

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>stock exchanges to the londondumbers. The thing is that in

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven, we had a twenty five percent drop.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It was the greatest stock market crash of our time.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It was the biggest since nineteen twenty nine, the.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Crash of eighty seven. Around the world, shear market pandemonium,

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>good evening. The stock market sale of the century continued

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 2>around the world today, with more than sixty billion dollars

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>wiped off the value of Australian shares in the past

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>thirty hours. At the end of and.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>It's worth knowing this, the previous worst day Essex before

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty five percent drop was her four percent drop,

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So it was like five times six times anything that

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>people had seen before.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day's trading on the Sydney

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Stock Exchange, the market's leading indicator, the All Ordinaries Index,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>had fallen five hundred and fifteen points. As the selling

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 2>stampede continued around the world, some economists in now forecasting

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the start of a worldwide recession with.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>All Now, what's that line, the historic line, If you

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>forget the past, you're condemned to repeat it. So I

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to remind people that crash happened this week. In

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>The Sydney Stock Exchange fifteen minutes before opening the cab

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>before the collapse with history that no one wanted to

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>make as Australian investors played a leader in a line

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>that I.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Was actually in the market, very junior, but I was

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in the market, and I can remember there was a

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>lead up to the Spring Racing Carnival in Melbourne. There

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was a Melbourne cuff looming. I had just arrived in Australia.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>By that, I mean I was here a couple of

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks and I was a reporter on the Financial Review,

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and I can still remember how difficult it was for

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>us to grasp this because we didn't have the communications

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we have now. We were basically standing around what they

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>call a wire machine and I wanted to talk to

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>someone in the market who would be good on this,

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>who recalls it clearly. And my guest today was in

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the thick of it all at the time. He's an

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Australian who was in London at the time, but he

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was right across it. His name is Alex Moffatt. He's

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Joseph Palmer Group. Hi, Alix, how are you?

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Good morning, James, thank you for the invitation. It's good

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 3>to speak to you with you. It's delightful to have

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 3>you on.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So it turns out, funnily enough, you're the Australian, but

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in London, and I was here on that day,

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>which was a Monday in New York and a Tuesday

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, the last great crash we had. And I

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to our listeners today about this, because folks,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be another crash. I don't know the

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>skal of it, and I don't know when, but crashes

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are part of the market and we possibly as investors

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are having it's so good that we've probably forgotten just

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>how scary it is. Where were you, Alex, and tell

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>me about the d okay.

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 3>I was in London. I was working in Irving Trust

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Companies dealing room in Abchurch Lane in London, and for

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>those who know London well, Abchurch Lane is just up

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the road from the Cannon Street railway station. Living Trust

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Company was not a stockbroker. They were an American bank

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 3>that was running their global bond dealing operation from London.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 3>New York at the time was the secondary operation because London,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 3>of course at the time was the center of the universe.

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 3>The Australian firm that sent me. There was one of

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 3>the discount houses at the time in Australia, trans City Discount,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and I was running the Australian bond operation for trans

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 3>City Discount through irving trust officers in London.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>What was the atmosphere like, well, how do people react

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with the cell of the orphant news? So James, there

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was You were right in your earlier comments the week before.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>If I can just paint a little bit of a

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>picture the week before the Obviously, as a bond dealer,

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at all the markets around you and we

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>keep half an eye on the stock market.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>The bond market globally is about double the size of

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the total of the world's stock markets, but you do

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 3>keep an eye on it. But it's important a lot

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 3>of investment dollars go there. In the week prior to

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the Friday night, the sixteenth of October in London, the

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred dropped about ten percent, not

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>in one day, but over the course of that week,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 3>and you alluded to that in your comments. You could

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>tell that there was something wrong. We went home on

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 3>the Friday night and it just didn't feel right. Now,

0:05:55.560 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 3>when the stock market has issues, credit spreads also start

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>to widen against the risk crew rate, against government bond yields,

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 3>and so the pressure was being felt in credit spreads,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 3>which is the market that I dealt in, as well

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 3>as in the stock market. Now in adding it a

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit of further color, and some of your listeners

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 3>may be very young. On Sunday night, the eighteenth of October,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.679
<v Speaker 3>a wild hurricane hit London and decimated a very large

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 3>part of certainly Hyde Park, which was near where I

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>was living. To the end that when I got a

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 3>phone call very early on Monday morning, the nineteenth of

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 3>October and someone said, Mop, look out your window and

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 3>tell me what you see. We were living in devere

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 3>cottages in Kensington at the time, and out on Kensington

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>High Street I could see a double decker bus on

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 3>its side. I walked to work that day.

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>There was a sense of doom in the airport. There

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>was separate to the markets. There were a lot of

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>trees down in Hyde Park.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>I walked to work and in the city of London

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 3>in at Church Lane, and the morning was it just

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>you could feel the black clouds around the dealing room.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.679
<v Speaker 3>The American Central Bank had been holding monetary policy fairly tight.

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Alan Greenspan was the new president of the Federal Reserve.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>It just it was a surreal day. And then when

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>the Dow jones components, and for your listener's information, the

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Dow comprises the thirty largest stocks in the US, and

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>when they open those thirty stocks, they opened one stock

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>every minute for half an hour. They started about one o'clock,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and by ten quarter past one, the Dow was down

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 3>very hard, indeed down probably ten days. Were they're trying

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 3>to stage manage such a crash that then do was happening.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good question, James, And at the time

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 3>there were. It was basically the start of program trading

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and ground trading is probably was the lead into the

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess the artificial intelligence inspired program trading that we

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 3>have now. But there are an awful lot of cell

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>orders going into the stock market, which was why the

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>market was going down at a rapid rate. And this

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 3>was impacting credit spreads. As I said, people started selling

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 3>just to cover risk positions, So people were selling good

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 3>assets like bonds to cover their bad assets like stocks.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>At the time, the downdrop twenty percent on that day

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 3>as the S and P was down twenty percent. It's

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 3>probably the worst day since the nineteen twenty nine crash,

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the anniversary of which is coming up very shortly.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's interesting, isn't it. The big crushes are this

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>time of year. They are so what Stutterbolt, do you

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>think I have my own theory on that.

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>We in the Southern Hemisphere have our holidays around Christmas time,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>But in the Northern Hemisphere school breaks up for summer

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>in late journe and a lot of the big fund

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 3>manager and captains of industry go away to their summer

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 3>houses in Spain or wherever for a long summer break,

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>take the children with them, and they leave the juniors

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 3>on the desk, go to the summer period. Oh yeah,

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 3>when they come back in September, late August, September and

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>school resumes, university goes back, They have investment committee meetings

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 3>and they readjust their risk settings, their investment parameters, et cetera.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 3>And program trading at the time was in its infancy.

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 3>There were no buffers built into the programs. That controls

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 3>came after that, so the setting perpetuated setting exactly. It

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 3>was like a rolling snowball and it just kept rolling.

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting with people off and ask about what were

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the causes of the eighty seven crash. And one of

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the things about it's almost like a sort of a

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>mirror inmature of what were the causes of the First

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>World War? There's the pilot causes. What were the causes

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of the eighty seven crash? Nothing in particular jumps out

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for the crash. One of the things was that not

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>only did it so that was the day everybody listeners

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure the vast majority of listeners don't remember.

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>I may not even know about this. It fell twenty

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent on the day, and for what it's worth,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it kept going and the next few months were worse,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and in the end it fell forty percent. And the

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>bottom at that time was about five or six months

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>later in February eighty eight, and then it started to turn. Now,

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the most recent crash that we're familiar with wasn't so

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>much a crash as a slow what did they call it,

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the slow motion train wreck, which is the GFC where

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>because the authorities were trying again to stage manage how

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>bad things were, shares fell fifty percent, but they took

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>two years to four fifty percent from two oh seven

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to two nine.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Now what I want to.

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Ask you, Alex is tell me about having been in

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the thick of things and you were credential profess in

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven, I was a junior reporter. I was

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>just standing there with my mouth, just watching me and

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>watching everybody. I remember someone saying to me, you should

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>go around to the stock exchange, because there was a

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>physical stock exchange on Corlett Street in the Melbourne and

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you could go and there was choveboards and all that.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>And I remember trying to go in, but the crowds,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>of course, had were around the doorways. You couldn't really

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>get in. Normally there was no one in there apart

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the traders and chokies and all that. But you

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get in because it was like sixty But I'll

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>never forget it. But what I want to ask you

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is having witnessed, and professionally witnessed as an investor, the

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>worst crash of our time being the Great Crash at

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty seven, did it change you did in the

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>way that people say, Oh, I grew up in the

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Great Depression, my parents grew up with the Great Depression,

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and it characterized me. It formed me did it? What

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>did it do to you as an investor? From then on?

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 3>It was a real water change to see change for

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 3>me James, and the word valuation took on a real

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 3>new meaning. And when I transitioned from the bond market

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>to the stock market twenty years ago, valuation became all important.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 3>And there's a number of companies now which people probably

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 3>are watching the technology stocks going up and up, exceeding

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 3>their realistic valuations. And there's a means of calculating your

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 3>company's valuation and measuring it against its peers. And I

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>think that's what drove it into me. So I became

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 3>a value investor after that. And that goes for bonds

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 3>as well as stocks. Buy when it's cheap, and so

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 3>when it's expensive.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's hard to sell. When it's expenses. It's hard

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to sell when you've made a lot of money out

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of something, isn't it?

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 3>You can always take some off the top, though. You

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 3>can always take your capital out and let the the

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 3>profit run.

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you listening, waste tech investors? Are you listening NEXTDC investors?

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>My dear waist tech is selling off for you, so

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worries. But are you listening, shall

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we say Nvidia Investors one of the most popular overseas

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>stocks on the Australian market at the moment, and all

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the big tech stocks that are that our listeners love,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the meta and alphabeta et cetera, et cetera, Facebook and Google. Okay,

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what we might do is take a short break and

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to going to do with the second part

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is I'm going to put the key question to Alex,

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>which is all very interesting. But those were different days?

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Or were they different days? And could it all happen again?

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a moment. Hello and welcome back

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby talking

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to Alex Moffatt of Joseph Palmer and Sons. Alex is

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a veteran of the market. He also writes a newsletter

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for his clients which he very nicely a few years ago,

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>put me on the Put me on the circle and

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a look at it every morning and it's

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>very interesting and he has a historic perspective of the

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>wider market which is invariably missing. Can I say from

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of from a lot of commentations that we read,

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's really important to know what has happened in

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the past, Alex, you were going to I know you were,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>just I could see you were heading towards something there

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a minute ago before we talk about the prospects of

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it all happening against about the big companies, when in

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that at that time some of the biggest companies in

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Australia nineteen eighty seven, that was companies like specific dun

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Lopigon which was a giant company. Btr night X was

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a giant companies. There was the great the Buccaneers, the

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>John Elliots with Elders, the Adnate Steamship Group for John

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Spalvin's Homes of Court and his various enterprises, and of

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>course the iconic figure the one, the one that stands

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>out to this day, Alan Bond and his empire. They're

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>all gone and many of them were. That was the

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the end for them, wasn't it from any

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of them? The eighty seven craft Well, I think so

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>different today.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 3>The difference, James, and you've highlighted a lot of them.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Quintex is another one that comes to mind. Christopher Scayes,

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>who I stood in front of his desk in Collins

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Street in Hardy House while he signed a mountain of

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>bills exchange for me. You wouldn't let me sit down

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 3>while he did them. But nonetheless, I think the difference

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 3>between those days and these is there's one word missing

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>in those days profit And a lot of those companies

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>were going up on promises, expectation, sheer flow of investor money,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 3>but they weren't delivering profit or dividends. And certainly I

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>remember that was the case in ad Steam Quintech's bond corporation.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>There was a lot of sharp practices and you may

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>remember a practice which was called bottom of the harbor.

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The tax ski they were around when at that time,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but I was only vaguely aware of really for result.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>They started in about the mid seventies and went through

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 3>till the late eighties. And that's where entrepreneurs would come

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 3>in by a company strip of its strip it of

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 3>its assets and put some bogus directors in and then

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>avoid any tax payments. And if you go back through

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>your history books and there's James I'm a real fan

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>of history, you learn a lot from it. The painters

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>and dockers in Victoria were probably very helpful to some

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of these companies. In providing stand in directors for some

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>of these shell companies that were stripped through the bottom

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of the harbor schemes. So profit is the answer.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>When things are really good, then the nature of scandals change,

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think people are not as worried. But it's

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a tough look on Chris Ellison and min As Miners,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the big lithium player. They're holding it out as an

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>example this morning both why not because there's an investigation

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>going on now and Asika has come from. They're investigating

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>how he's dealing with his with some sort of what

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>would seemed to be an alleged tax arrangement that should

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not have happened at Minrais. But what I want to

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the point I want to make is not so much

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>about him, But it seems to me that the scandals

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we get at the top of the market in a

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>hoff market are scandals of greed, and that is at common.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>That was a common theme in terms of how people

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>were dealing in around that time. In the later he said,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a terrible crash, and we had the Harlan

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>scheme if you remember at Elders, and we had various

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>issues at quintechs, not to mention the sort of mind

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>bending stuff that was going on at Bond and we

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have something this week now at Minrais where there is

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>again a see you under suspicion for trying to make

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>even more money than they're already making. And I just wondered,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>do you detect in the bull market that we have now,

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>do you detect some sort of tremors or signals that

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>would lead us to a reprise of eighty seven?

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 3>The only things I can detect James and stewardship, And

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 3>you very rightly raise that is very important. Certainly, stewardship

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>in our company analysis through our own business is a

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 3>key factor of our due diligence process before we invest

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 3>a penny of our clients' funds into any company. You're

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 3>quite right in raising that it's just simply appalling, and

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 3>he has put his hand up astic of course will

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 3>go in and do what they do, But have my

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 3>own opinions of Chris Ellison, and I certainly won't share them.

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Hear it, But it's not a stock that I would

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>happily buy into. To me, the I think paul Ford

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Australia has come a long way since nineteen eighty seven

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>and you look at company CEOs and boards, and there

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 3>is a very high degree of probity amongst those boards.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>And see to the second part of the question. I'm

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 3>looking also at the overall market valuations, and your observation

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>is quite right. Our market at the moment is the

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 3>A six two hundred is valued at about twenty one

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 3>times historic earnings. The long term average long term is

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty years. It's a fair measure is about just under

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>fifteen times. So our market's expensive at the moment, and

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 3>it is being driven by weight of money. And you

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 3>would be very well aware that superannuation contributions assist that

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 3>weight of money going in. It's yes, the mandatory wit

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 3>of money correct, exactly right. And a lot of that

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:45.119
<v Speaker 3>weight of money is going into two very large Australian superfunds,

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Australian Super being one of them, and so that money

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 3>has to be invested, and it's invested at the time.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 3>So our market is trading expensively. I think it goes

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 3>back to what I mentioned before. It's very hard finding

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 3>value in the current market, and I think investors have

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 3>every right to be cautious, and in being cautious, you

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 3>spend more time doing your due dilsions before buying.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Now, one of the things about all our crashes,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know much about what happened in nineteen twenty

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>nine here, except that obviously there was a perfect reflection

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of that crash, and the perfect reflection of the later depression,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression in eighty seven, there was a mirror

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>image of the crash. In the two thousand dot Com crash,

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>there was a mirror image of the crash. So we

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>tend to mirror Wall Street, and when they have a crash,

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>for all our conservatism, this is recent counteratism. And for

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>all our emphasis on dividends, for instance, so it's less

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the less our share market gives better dividends, but it

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't give as good price appreciation as the US market.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But for all that, when things go bad, we fall

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>with them just as just as much, if not more worth.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>If the US has the shaft downturn, and no one

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>knows why it would happen, but a black Swan event, okay,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so we just can't see what it is. But something

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>happens that no one thought was going to happen, and

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone loses a nerve and there's a big fall on

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>War Street. Will we fall with them like we always do.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 3>We definitely will, James. And the analogy is the end

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 3>of the tail on the dog. The dog wags his

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 3>tail in Australia can be right at the end of

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 3>the tails. Yes, we always overreact and then the recovery

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 3>is slow. As you've pointed out.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>If we're at twenty one times and the average is fifteen,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is there a number of foot qu get seriously scared

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and say this has to Tom Belova. Look, I thought

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>when the market fell over in two thousand and twenty

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with Covid our market Sorry edition p. Five hundred dropped

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about thirty five percent. That was a very fast drop,

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>but recovered very quickly. You mentioned before the downturn in

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven eight, and you mentioned how long

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it took to fall that. I think it went down

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>eventually about sixty odd percent. It took until twenty twelve

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to recover. I've noticed too that through the clients who

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>we act for, we haven't had a single instance of

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone panicking. So it's been people have held their nerve

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>generally and recognized the downturns for what they are, typically

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>an overreaction to an event, whether it be COVID or

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a housing crisis in the US, or lack of corporate

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>profitability and bottom of the harbor in nineteen eighty seven.

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>The markets will eventually right themselves.

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at a chart of say the

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred or the Dow or the

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Australian All Ordinaries Index over the last fifty years, it's

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 3>a very gentle, upwardly sloping line. Yes, there are bumps

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 3>and ticks, but if you go back and look at

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 3>that fifty year chart of the S and P five hundred,

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 3>the crash in nineteen eighty seven is a minuscule move.

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 3>And time in the market.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Is very important. Yeah, time heels all wounds exactly, including

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent sell offs. I I just before one,

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think before we go to the break, talked about

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>how it was five years for the market to come back,

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and it was only six months actually six months to

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom in eighty seven, two years to

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom in two oh seven, and the

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>COVID crash very quick, that is. But that a short,

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>sharp crash with a short sharp rebound, which is what

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone would prefer. Nothing is worse than the sort of

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>death of a thousand cuts where you have this long,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>slow decline which you had in the GFC. But what

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you is this, there's a theory

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's an acceleration of everything, an acceleration of speed,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>acceleration of trading, acceleration of all business cycles. Would that

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that if we had a crash that it probably

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>would rebound faster than historically.

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>It probably would. And they mentioned before the program trading

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 3>was was aligned large part of the cause of the

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven crash. The authorities after that put it measures

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 3>in place so that when the market drops a certain percentage,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 3>they stop trading for ten minutes, so people can never

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 3>think about it. So those buffers are brought in to

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 3>try to slow a disaster. Now it doesn't happen on

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the up side, it happens on the downside, and it's

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 3>a protection mechanism. It's to stop a total meltdown. So, yes,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 3>it will happen again. I have no doubt it will

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 3>happen again. I don't know what's going to cause it.

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 3>You use the term black swan. I think that's exactly right, James.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.959
<v Speaker 3>But we know there are there cushions put in place

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 3>to ease the falls when they happen, and allow people

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 3>time to think and take stock with thieves about the

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 3>earth cushions when it comes that is inevitably will folks,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 3>and I just say that, and I meal for the

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 3>blow of my heart too, who was relatively new to

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 3>the markers, particularly for instance, if you came in just

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 3>after the COVID period and you've had nothing but uphill

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 3>enough upheld. But if you've had nothing but and upswing

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>basically since the day you started, just be careful that

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 3>it's not as easy as it seems. And in the end,

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the value investing dry though it is, is very.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Strong approach to the market. Okay, we take a break

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>with customer, really good questions. Hello, welcome back to the

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Australian's Money Puzzle James Kirvely with Alex Moffatt. Today we're

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>talking on the week that is the adversary of the

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Great Crash of nineteen eighty seven. Now, interesting, really appropriate

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>question from Paul. Are the Australian US and other markets

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>approaching long term pe value peaks? Don't they tend to

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>correct at this point? What does history tell us you

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would think of, Paul that you trigger the whole show

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>which is just a useful coincidence. It's there a point

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of which I was saying that to you. You said

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the long term average is fifty. Then you said that

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it we're currently trading at twenty one, right, folks, that's

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty one times price earnings value ratio, which is still

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the metric that people use in terms of the value

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of a stock. How much is it worth, in other words,

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for the amount of money you put in the amount

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of getting back, how is its value? But the US

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks often go into the thirties. So we've had stocks

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that go into those stratosphere and they can be justified

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because they've got extraordinary earnings growth or whatever is it.

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But can it ever be justified with the market getting

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>up to that? Does it have to go back to that?

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Does it have to return to the mean as such

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen times?

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think so, James. In fact, I was looking

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 3>at some data only last night in preparation for this discussion,

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 3>and I note that China, the current average market pee

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 3>there is trading below it's long term average. You're trading

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 3>currently at ten point six times long term average is

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 3>about twelve times. Australia, I mentioned where we're above, but

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 3>we're nowhere near the top of the twenty year range.

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.719
<v Speaker 3>India is the most expensive market at the moment, at

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 3>about twenty five and a half times it's earnings with

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 3>the long term average. The US is expensive. Japan is

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 3>probably the cheapest at the moment, trading at about fourteen

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 3>and a half times against a long term average of

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 3>about sixteen times. So I think it's horses for courses.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 3>And this is and parcel of choosing not blindly just

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 3>to invest in the US, but selecting the market that

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 3>you want to invest in and going for the value

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 3>in that market. So what currency do you want to

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 3>be in, which geopolitical area, which sector of market do

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 3>you want to be in? Because I know a rising

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 3>tide floats all boats, but some boats float higher than others.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, what was our what's our high than we said

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it don't come averages fifteen. We're at twenty.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 3>One, okay, our high point our in Australia the twenty

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.959
<v Speaker 3>year this is average, mind you, for the whole market,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 3>not just single stock, is about twenty one times, so

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 3>we're close to it. So we're pretty close to the

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 3>high point at the moment.

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>If you had an ETF know that, folks, because that's

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what ETFs reflect. Okay, the entire average market. All right,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>great question. Hope that was useful to you, paulled Lewis.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I would like to get some observations, not advice, but

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 1>sage wisdom. Thank you for reminding me to us this

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is never advice. These information folks on next DC, as

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a current shareholder with the company next DC, have recently

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>receives another announcer of the share purchase plan which has

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>been completed, etc. Yes, indeed they are always raising money.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>My question is are these guys burning cash too quickly?

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>There is no target CAF at the raising with shareholders

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>cafter thirty thousand pound investors this time around. Is there

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>something fishy here? Okay, I don't We would hope there's

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing fishy at all at next DC. It's a certain

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>type of common beney folks. I have mentioned it the show.

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I've actually mentioned the fact that it's in my own

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>SMSF thankfully, very happy to say it is, and it's

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest holdings I have. I didn't choose that.

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It just swelled on me where it's gone up to

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen dollars at the moment. It's got a couple

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of issues. It's a data center company. The two outstanding issues.

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>One is it's become the share market proxy along with

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Macquarie Technology for AI in our market, though it isn't AI, okay.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a freely conservative semi property type of company

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 1>that fills data centers. It is very well regarded. And

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say what I think about is,

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'll just quote, and this is some public record

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.719
<v Speaker 1>from a fund manager, Andrew Mitchell of o Fair Asset Management,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>who was in others, who has had them for a while,

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>even longer than I have, and of course loves them

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>as you would when you've done very well out of them.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's just quoting from a report he recently said.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Makes this He has been the most successful operator in

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the space, reporting a solid full year result with revenues

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>growing thirty percent on the prior year and EBITDA plus

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. And he basically spells out what he likes

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>about them, that they have lots of tenants if they're

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>very well positioned, and there remains over fifteen hundred multi

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>tenant data center providers globally. The top ten now account

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>for more than half of the industry's revenue, and we

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>would expect that portion to grow as further consolidation plays out.

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So fun I just like them. I don't like the

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that they continually raise money, and I didn't go

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>into the last raising. But I'm an individual investor, I'm

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>not an institution. There was no discount whatsoever. I thought

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on that, so I didn't Why would you go in

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you goodbye any days for the more or less the

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>same price that That's why I held off on that one.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>There was one other point I wanted to make. Yes,

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>air Trunk of course sold for inextraordinary multiple recently, and

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they're in the same business. Everything's going their way at

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the moment. That might be a problem for someone like

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Alex who's a value investor. Have you looked at the

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>AICNE Have you looked at next DC? Alex?

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I have, and I like the business. I like the

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 3>data center business. Another one that is starting to move

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 3>into that area is the Goodman Group, and I think

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 3>certainly they're worthy of investor intention, but I'd look closely

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 3>next to DC.

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just too.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Expensive for me to buy James. I think he's trading

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>at about nearly fifteen twenty percent above what a fair value,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 3>but certainly keep an eye on it. I think hYP

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 3>to reserate. I like the business, it's what.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you do with these companies never come into value

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what I often see value investor seeing it's fallen six percent,

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's nearly there another three it will be in our ends,

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>but it never comes down that little really good companies.

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 3>When did Goodman ever come in to value? It's a

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>really good point, James. For my own self managed superfund.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 3>If I really like a company and I own next DC,

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll buy a small amount and put a toe in

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the water and then use when there's a major drop.

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Like Wise, texts happened, assess the situation, what is the

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 3>reason for the drop? Watch the nature of the change

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 3>of the business. Is rich and White going to be

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the MD forever? And then adds that position or leave

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it alone? Yeah, certainly a toe in the water. It

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't hurt.

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, just on that key person risk. It's an issue,

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Richard at Ways Tech, Chris Ellison at Menrez.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>As a value investor must be really hard to assess that.

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>If you've got someone like Jerry Harvey at Harvey Norman.

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking now, I'm talking twenty years ago. If

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you were looking at you see this company is completely

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>dominated by the sky. It's called Harvey Normous Jerry Harvey

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as a value investor. Can you put that to one side?

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Kerry Packet publishing, in broadcasting in un Musque. The companies

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I simply won't invest in, just simply will not invest in. Okay,

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, the principal risk is too great. It's all right,

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just because because it's personality exactly dominant personality. Okay, very interesting,

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>very interesting, Okay, terrific. Folks just were not saying we

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>had someone had come in talking about revolution. Disappointed I had.

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I had recently done a lot of the said something

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and written quite enthusiastically about revolution. Which is of course

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the big card services provider that I think is really

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>impressive in how they operate and will give our banks

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a real run for their money when they really take

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>off here. They've got some remarkable features to their to

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>their cards which I think will challenge the banks in

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a big ways in Europe. You can keep your money

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on deposit with them, of course, which I would really

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>frighten our banks if you could do that. Here and

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>they have this extraordinary credit card not credit card, but

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>card arrangement where everyone's worried about the security of their

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>cards when they use it, particularly overseas, but they've come

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>up with this thing where you've once off disposable numbers,

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so if you don't trust who you're dealing with, you

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>can just use your card and you can have a

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>once off number of which evaporates basically after you've finished it.

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was brilliant actually as a financial innovation.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Now the list made the point that Revoluta has had

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>UK National Reporting Center for Fraud received ten thousand reports

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in relation to Revolute and was disappointed that I didn't

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>make more of this fair enough. The only thing I

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>would say is that, yes, that all did happen, and

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>after that happened, the Bank of England signed them off

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and give them a license. And I did make the

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>point in the piece I wrote that it took them

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>three years to sign it off. Normally they take a

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>year to sign these things off, so they did very

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughly go through. Left just thought we keer off on that, okay,

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Alex Moffat Joseph Parmer and sons, thank you very much.

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>That was really good. I knew it would be. It

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting. I hope our listeners learned something from

0:34:55.920 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that pretty scary story, which is not that long ago,

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and in the same market that we offer it. And

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we are in a pretty hot market right now. And

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it's the hot markets that boil over as oppose to

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the cool ones. Let just keep them.

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Hint every money can I leave you with one thought

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 3>you can on my wall in my study here, I

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 3>have a certificate a share I'm sorry, A bond certificate,

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 3>a bond statement which I got framed. The bond was

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 3>brought by Bond Corporation on the sixteenth of October nineteen

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven. That was a Friday. The lead manager was

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Meryl Lynch. It was an eighteen million pound issue paying

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.959
<v Speaker 3>six and a half percent interest. It was very successfully

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 3>delve into the market by Meryl Lynch, and by one

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 3>o'clock on Monday, the nineteenth of October, it was worth zero.

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 3>It went from one hundred pounds per unit per bond

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 3>eighty million pounds turned to zero by one o'clock Monday.

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 3>I have one on my study wall.

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I tell you it has us two things, not just

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>about but it tells you that the biggest institutions in

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the world get involved in these things, and just because

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>marilynch or anybody else is involved. Don't think that's actually

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>some sort of guarantee, folks.

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:12.439
<v Speaker 3>Exactly wrong.

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Hey, thank you Alex. Great to talk to you.

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, and thanks for listening. Everybody, do mention us

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to your friends and mentioned the show. We'd really appreciate that.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We have an email. We'd like to get some more

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>questions in. They were very good today. I really enjoyed them.

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Their money puzzle at the Australian dot com

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>dot au is the email. Thank you very much. We'd

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to you soon.