WEBVTT - Sharri | 10 April

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry Good Evening Tonight, Peter Dutton calls Albanezi

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 2>a liar as yet another minister declines to apologize for

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the two hundred and seventy five dollar energy bill. Broken promise,

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 2>we'll get stuck in in a moment and breaking news tonight,

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>a formal apology over a Brisbane mother's delivery of a

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>stranger's baby in a major IVF bungle. Those details coming up.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Plus we'll get the inside story behind Donald Trump's tariff reversal.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>That's with Adam Crichton shortly.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>And we'll hear the coalition plan to reverse the tariffs

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>if they win office. I'll speak with Shadow Trade Minister

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Hogan, but first tonight, Peter Dutton has accused the

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Albanese government of lying, a downing accusation that comes as

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>ministers refuse to apologize for promising power bills would be

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and seventy five dollars less and ag you

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>minace that. Chris Bowen today was the latest who refused

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 2>to concede that energy prices had risen under his watch. Instead,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 2>he attacked the journalist who asked the question, deriding him

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 2>for supposedly having strong opinions, and even for appearing on

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Sky News in the evening God forbid. Here was the

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 2>very sensible question Chris Bowen was asked, a question he

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 2>should have been expecting this campaign.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 3>Chris Bowen. In December twenty twenty one, you commissioned modeling

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 3>which showed and you pledged that you would drop power

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 3>prices by now by two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 3>for residential homes. You committed to it again in April

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two, when you were told that modeling was flawed.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>You continued to commit to it. In twenty twenty three

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>and twenty twenty four, even though electricity prices were rising.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 3>You continued to be committed to it when you started

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>subsidizing power bills. And now this year, as subsidies now

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>through a new record and they're going through to the

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>end of the year, you're spending billions of dollars on that.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 3>You are now claiming that electricity price falls due to

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 3>subsidies are a fall in an electricity bill. Now, electricity

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 3>prices are rising, aren't they, Minister. That's written into a

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 3>level every electricity bill, isn't it Minister. And if you

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 3>can't admit that simple fact here today, why should anyone

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 3>believe anything that you say?

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 2>An excellent question from Chris Hillman, but of course Chris

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Bowen refused to admit the obvious fact that power prices

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 2>are rising.

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 4>You've got strongers about these matters, which you express on

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Sky News in the Evenings, and that's your right. I

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 4>disagree with the way that you look at these matters.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 4>I disagree with the approach that you take. It's disingenuous

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 4>and dishonest of you to blame all this so renewable

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 4>energy as you do on Sky in the Evenings. It's

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 4>just not right, sir, It's just not fair.

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Accuses the journalist Chris Hilman of being disingenuous. But isn't

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>he being disingenuous when he indicates that any price rises

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 2>are because of global factors, not because he's deliberately repositioned

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the energy market and rushed the transition to rely on

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>more renewables.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And have less cheap, reliable energy.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>And what about the way he has to say on

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 2>Sky in the Evenings is which.

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 4>You express on Sky News in the Evenings, and that's

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>your right, as you do on Sky in the evenings.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 4>It's just not right, sir, which you express on Sky.

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Your premise.

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>As if it's a criticism to be on Sky News.

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Orman as a former ABC and nine political editor, and

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>he didn't let Chris Bowen get away with slurs instead

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 2>of actually answering the question.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Have electricity prices risen on your watch? The exact opposite

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>of what you pledged?

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Have that we have denied. We have never denied that

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 4>energy prices are higher than we would like. That's why

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 4>we've delivered three rounds of energy to be relief bill relief satage.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 3>You wrote, electricity prices have fallen. That's not true, is it?

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 4>The fact of the matter is, if you look at

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 4>the recent data, Australia's had the lowest energy inflation in

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the world. You know, because you might deny that, and

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 4>I know you deny several things.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 5>Reason for it?

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>What is the reason for mister.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>You when you're ask you a question or are your debating, it's.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Just that you are completely avoiding it, as you always do.

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 6>We get a blast.

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 4>I know you're a man of strong us on these matters,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 4>and I said, I've always had respect for you, but

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 4>I have a fundamentally different view to the one that

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 4>you have developed in recent years.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 2>It's truly so absurd how each member of the alban

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Eazy government can stand up there and can claim that

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 2>energy prices aren't rising after they promised some ninety seven

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 2>times that they'd fall by two hundred.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And seventy five dollars or more.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Reducing the cost of living was Anthony Albanese's central attack

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 2>line against Scott Morrison, when at the time there'd only

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>been one interest rate rise. But as you know Albanez,

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>he blamed Morrison for that single rate rise, yet then

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 2>took no responsibility for the subsequent twelve under his watch.

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 2>It's utterly preposterous to try and explain away the central

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 2>broken promise on cost of living. It's like they're trying

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to claim black is white, and voters can see through

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 2>this deception. Chris Bowen would have more integrity today if

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>he just stood up there and apologized for getting it wrong,

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>for making a promise he was never going to be

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 2>able to keep a promise he shouldn't have made.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Instead, he tries to come up with.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Excuses, including attacking the journalist, and so questions around accountability

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>will keep coming we'll keep following him. And it was

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>a question on the two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>broken promise that even the unimpeachably objective and politically neutral

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Ross Greenwood asked of the Treasurer last night twice, will.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 7>You apologize to the people of Australia tonight for having

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 7>your government having said that energy prices would come down

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 7>by two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 8>I take responsibility for all of the decisions that we've

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 8>taken in our budget, so you will apologize, including let

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 8>me finish.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 7>Will you look down the battle of the camera and

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 7>apologize for that? Because is that something you should do,

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 7>because again, that was a promise, it was not fulfilled.

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, the two hundred and seventy five figure that you're

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 8>referring to from the modeling in twenty twenty one predated

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 8>two important developments and.

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>When Alberizi has been asked this question, no apology either.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 2>This gives credence to accusations that alber Ezi is not

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 2>being upfront with the Australian people, not on power bills

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>or other matters of public interest.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>The polls show there.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>There's a live possibility of a hung parliament and Green's

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>leader Adam Band came out yesterday and outlined the list

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 2>of demands he'd make of Albanesi in the case of

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a hung parliament. They included negative gearing and capital gains

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>tax changes.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 9>I can announce today that the Greens will make reforming

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 9>negative gearing in the capital gains text discount a priority

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 9>in the next parliament, including when there's a minority government.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 9>The Greens plan would see negative gearing in the capital

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 9>gains text discount scrapt for wealthy property investors, but preserved

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 9>for what are often called mum and Dad investors with

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 9>one investment property.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, all of this is a terrifying prospect, the idea

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that a radical extremist left party could be co governing Australia,

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Adam Band being Albernizi's.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Partner in crime.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton last night said that both Alberzi and Adam

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Bant have similar ideologies.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 11>Their blood brothers Anthony Albernesi and Adam Bent had joined

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 11>at the hip. Only their mothers can tell them apart.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Only their mothers can tell them apart. It was a

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>great line from Peter Darton when he spoke to Chris

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Kenny last night. But in truth, the Greens are so

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>grotesque that they're even backing a candidate who once joked

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that Hitler was having fun. And as you'd expect, Albinezi

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>was far from pleased with this intervention from the Greens

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 2>leader right in the middle of the election campaign, and

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>he even criticized journalists for asking questions about it.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 10>Can you rule out any changes to negative gearing and

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 10>capital gains tests?

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 12>How hard is it for the fiftieth time? Just here,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 12>just here, just here, to form a government? What are

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 12>you talking about?

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 10>Sorry, if the Greens come to you and you need

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 10>their vote to pass legislation, will you rule out changing

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 10>negative gearing settings and capital gains?

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 12>And you might have noticed, I'm mean you're a state correspondent.

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 12>But let me explain. There are twenty five votes we

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 12>have in the Senate in order to get legislation through.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 12>We're in that situation, have been in that situation for

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 12>this entire term.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, the prospect of a partnership with the Greens, if

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi wins minority government or if there's a hung parliament,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>this is a realistic prospect. It's a legitimate line of

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 2>questioning for public accountability and transparency.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Albanezy needs to answer questions about this.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 2>He can't be allowed to get away with brushing them

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>off by getting angry at journalists and adopting.

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>A patronizing tone.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 13>Well.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Peter Darton seized on this frustration felt by voters today

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>when he launched a spectacular spray against the Prime Minister,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>accusing him of being a liar. Now Dartan is in

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the fight of his political life with just three weeks

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and two days until the election.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Three weeks in two days, and.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Instead of simply responding to a question from a journalist

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>about a Liberal candidate, he took the press conference into

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 2>his own hands to frame this message.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 11>The Prime Minister has lied about the two hundred and

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 11>seventy five dollars Australian families have suffered because of that.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 11>He's lied about the fact that power prices have now

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 11>gone up by thirteen hundred dollars. That's the reality. The

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 11>Prime Minister lied about falling off the stage for some reason.

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean it was caught on camera.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 11>Anthony Albertezi is out there telling people that he won't

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 11>form a government with the Greens. People know he's lying

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 11>about that. The Prime Minister has been lying about the

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 11>medi Scare campaign. We increased hospital funding by sixteen percent,

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 11>we increased education funding from thirteen billion to twenty five

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars and the Prime Minister is out there looking

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 11>Australians in the eye saying that we did the opposite,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 11>but the numbers show that he's lying.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, the Opposition leader has been warming up to his

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>attack that he claims Albaneze is a liar, and he

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 2>raised the theme of dishonesty during Tuesday Nights Leader's debate. Now,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 2>accusing Albin Easy of being a liar will likely become

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a daily feature of his campaign appearances, and the message

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 2>is effective because Australians are feeling the pain with the

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 2>cost of living and as the campaign rolls on, no

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>one can forget the promises made at the last election

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 2>that grocery prices would be cheaper, power bills would be

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 2>less and the cost of living would be easier, all

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>under Anthony Alban Easy. Okay, We're going to get to

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tariffs in a moment with Adam Crichton, but now

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>let's bring in Sky News host Joe Hudebrand and Wa

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>opposition leader Basil Zemplus.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Great to see you both.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Love Well, let's stick with this energy minister's debate today

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>because we saw Ted O'Brien again call on Chris Bowen

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to apologize for the broken promise.

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>This is now becoming a theme.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Will you apologize for your commitment that power bills would

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 2>be churnentrent for five churndrences seventy.

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Five dollars less, Joe?

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it just be better for Alban easy to be

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 2>upfront and go, Yep, we got it wrong, I'm sorry.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, I think there is a way to do that,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 6>and I thought there was a way for charmers to

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 6>do it last night as well. But I think the

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 6>fear is with this culture and it sort of goes

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 6>beyond politics as well, where you demand that someone apologizes

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 6>for something and then as soon as they do it said, haha,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 6>you apologized, you admitted it, you were wrong. So instead

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 6>of making the issue go away, it makes it worse.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 6>But I think certainly there's no point in telling people

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 6>that black is white. There's no point saying I know actually,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 6>if you close your eyes and squint in the half light,

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 6>your power.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Bills down page.

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 6>And there's a way also, I think of just being

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 6>honest about it that actually tells a fairly positive story

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 6>as well, so I can say, yes, look, there were

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 6>huge rises in twenty twenty two twenty three, in part

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 6>as the result of the war in Ukraine. But yes,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 6>there were some issues with renewables because people were buying

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 6>power at spot highest spot prices because of.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 1>A lot Wow you're doing but and you're trying to

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>explain it.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 6>There's aay of instead of just sort of trying to

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 6>change the change the line of attack the journalist or whatever.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 6>You can't say yes, in part that was dree but

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 6>also was these other factors as well.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I just think the news of those premier chrismins has

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 2>shown how you can say, I'm sorry, I got that wrong.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I regret that I wanted to make power bills cheaper.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 2>In fact we made them more expensive because of our

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>rush to renewables.

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Basil, what do you think, because this.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Is definitely a vulnerability for labor during this campaign, that

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 2>promise that they never kept on cost.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 14>Of living, There's no doubt about that. And I think

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 14>to Joe's point, actually that digging in and trying to

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 14>defend the indefensible position actually is far worse to the

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 14>voting public. And then just saying yes, the gas prices

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 14>have gone up electricity before the rebates has gone up,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 14>here's the reasons why. And even though that might be

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 14>a touch uncomfortable, it's a much better position than trying

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 14>to defend something that is clearly inaccurate. And they've dug

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 14>themselves a massive hole now, and this close to the election.

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 14>I'm not sure how they change tack on it, but

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 14>it's hurting them. It certainly makes Bowen look bad. It

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 14>doesn't help Albanesi, it doesn't help any of them.

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>And you know, just to that point, we did see

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton on Monday come out and go I got

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 2>this wrong in the working from home policy.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So it can't be done, you know it. Dunn's done

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it. It would be done Sharry.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 14>And we're not talking about it today, are we. And

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 14>that's the point. If you come out, you deal with it,

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 14>as uncomfortable as it might be to have to go

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 14>through that mea culpa. It's done and dusted. We're pretty

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 14>forgiving in Australia. Even the journals are pretty forgiving in Australia.

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 14>But by digging in they've made it worse.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you cauterize the wound exactly now.

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Senator Nampa Jimpa Price has claimed that the Albanesi government

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>may proceed with plans for an indigenous treaty and a

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Macarata truth telling commission. She says that they've been absolutely

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 2>opaque incented estimates with regard to Macarata, the twenty seven

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>million dollars that they supposedly put in a contingency and

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>what direction they're going to take.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So, Joe, what do you think is there any chance.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 6>Of there's no I mean, I can't understand just into

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 6>saying that you know that they're not ruling it out

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 6>or it's still possible that they might or whatever. And

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 6>probably the government is not wanting to emphatically say there's

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 6>no way we're ever going to do this because that

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 6>would upset certain members of the left who would jump

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 6>up and down and make a noise and that's obviously

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 6>incredibly unhelpful in an election campaign or ever. But no,

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 6>their government is doing nothing. And I know this for

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 6>a fact from figures right up the very top.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Once the voice.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 6>You've asked about this, once the voice, Once the voice

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 6>went down, it was all about practical reconciliar actually all

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 6>about service delivery, all about just getting in there, you know,

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 6>cleaning up those communities, getting more money for education, getting

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 6>those grog bands back in place, getting more money for

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 6>housing for Indigenous people. And it's all practical stuff, now

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 6>anything any of that symbolic kind of big picture history, rewriting,

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 6>truth telling, apologizing. It's the furthest thing from the PM

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 6>or the government's mind upon us Basil.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 2>We saw Peter Dutton speak about the failed Voice referendum

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>in the Leader's debate and it seems like a lot

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 2>of voters have forgotten about this and this was really

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the point where Albinezi started losing momentum and the public

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>turned against him. But it reminds people how actually Dutton

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>can campaign very effectively. Was a sixty to forty vote

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to begin with in support of the referendum.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>He campaigned against it and it switched. So but you know,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it is.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>A reminder that he can be strong at campaigning. There's

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 2>three weeks to go.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to see a bit more of his fight?

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you think?

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 14>Well, he's a good campaigner, there's no doubt about that,

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 14>and he can construct and hold an argument very well.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 14>I'm not certain though that making more of the voice

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 14>and referring back to the referendum would necessarily be a

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 14>smart or the correct policy for Peter Dutton and the Libs.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 5>At this point.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 14>They take their win in the referendum, They've got the

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 14>result that they campaign for. I think people do see

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 14>the election, the general election and the referendum is quite

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 14>separate issues and I think the smart play is to

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 14>keep them that way.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Agree. Well, let's turn to this story.

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Shocking revelations today around teaching standards. The Australian reports that

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 2>some universities are taking students who have HC results as

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 2>low as thirty nine percent.

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 2>The report says that there's fifteen universities who are accepting

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>students into teaching degrees with atars lower than sixty now.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 2>The Education Minister Jason Clair was asked if teachers need

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 2>to be more intelligent than their students.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Pretty reasonable question.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Here's what he said, we'll read out his comments. He said,

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a given Joe. If this is his attitude,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>then why is a doing.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Something about this? Because it is a good point.

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 2>We've got children who can't read, can't write, and you know,

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 2>perhaps it's because the teachers didn't even pass their HSC

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>or VC.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 15>Yeah.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 6>I think there's a couple of things. One is that

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 6>teacher burnout has been so high that there's a teacher shortage,

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 6>and that in course increases the chance of being burnout

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 6>because the teachers that are left behind do more, and

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 6>then there's a panic and think, oh my god, we've

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 6>got to get more teachers, which we have right now.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 6>There's a huge teacher shortage, to the point where people

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 6>are bringing teachers out of retirement back into the classroom

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 6>to try and do it. Teaches a job sharing the

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 6>same class, and of course the instinctive thing to do

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 6>is say, all right, well, we need to lower the

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 6>mark so we can get more people into teaching degrees.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 6>And in fact, as Jason clair Well knows and as

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 6>he is working towards doing, it's the opposite that you do.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 6>It's not the lower mark that attracts people to teaching.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 6>It's actually teachers having respect and prestige within the community,

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 6>with them actually being given the freedom to be able

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 6>to teach a class with worlds best practice methods with

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 6>actual scientific results instead of the latest sort of trending

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 6>mumbo jumbo. So that is something that Jason Clair is

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 6>doing and the Telegraph we've done big sort of features

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 6>on what he's doing attracting people from other careers into teaching,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 6>making it easier to get into teaching degrees with the

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 6>universey of TASMI. Obviously as a very small university, it

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 6>has to attract people right to the very bottom of Australia.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 6>People have to obviously move there and so it's atars

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 6>are always going to be lower than a Sydney or

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 6>Melbourne university. But certainly teaching should be like, you know,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 6>like lawyers and doctors. It should be a profession that

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 6>people aspire to and actually want to compete to get into.

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>And the way to do that is or part of

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the way to do that is improving pay.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, don't you think basil teachers need to be

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>paid more. We need to have the absolute smartest, brightest,

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 2>most creative people teaching our next generation.

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we despair the fact.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>That there are teenagers and children who can't read and write,

0:19:58.520 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and this.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Is why this is part of the problem.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 14>Pay them more well, talk about respect, and nothing shows

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 14>that we respect our teaching staff. Right around Australia more

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 14>than paying them the right amount of money to do

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 14>the such important work that they do for the next

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 14>generation of Australians they're shepherding them through. Now the point,

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 14>i'd say, a really basic point, we have to make

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 14>schools safer. We know lots of schools are perfectly safe,

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 14>but we also know that violence in schools, at times

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 14>directed at teachers can be very, very frightening, and it

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 14>has discouraged lots of good teachers away from classrooms and

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 14>the next generation potentially coming through thinking I'm not sure

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 14>that's the environment we need to be in or want

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 14>to be in. That has to be a priority as well.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good point.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Now let's turn to that breaking news that I mentioned

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>at the start of the show. The Herald Sun has

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 2>revealed that a Brisbane IVF clinic has apologized after it

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 2>implanted the wrong embryo in a woman. Now, the mother

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>at the center of this bungle gave birth to a

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.479
<v Speaker 2>stranger's baby. This baby, it was believed to have been

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 2>born last year. It was reportedly human error. Now, the

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.719
<v Speaker 2>monash IVF Chief executive set in a statement on behalf

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of Monash IVF, I want to say how truly sorry,

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I am for what has happened. All of us that

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Monish monash ivf are devastated and we apologize.

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>To everyone involved.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 2>We will continue to support the patients through this extremely

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>distressing time. So that's an extraordinary embryo mix up where

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 2>a mother believed to be in Brisbane has given birth

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>to a stranger's baby. Extraordinary, Joe. And it would be

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 2>such a difficult dilemma as well.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you've had that emotionally, it would just absolutely

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.239
<v Speaker 6>screw with you so much. Can you just I mean,

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 6>I can't even imagine but being a woman and giving

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 6>birth to something you think is your own flesh and

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 6>blood and then seeing some I mean, I'm I mean

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 6>of course I would probably say you would care for

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 6>the baby, and you'd want to keep it and try it,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 6>raised it as your own best. I mean, it's just

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 6>so mind blow I mean, my eldest son is you know,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 6>he's hit every branch on the way down in terms

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 6>of health, had all sorts of health. Indend, he climbs,

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 6>he's fallen off, cut his head over and everything. So

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 6>we're in and out of hospitals all the time. They

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 6>don't even give you a panadol without checking your name

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 6>and your date of birth. I cannot, for the life

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 6>of me figure out how this mistake was made.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>There's so much more we don't know about this story,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 2>understandably for privacy reasons, Basil, But you know, I would

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>expect the mother would still love that baby, you'd assume,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 2>even though it wasn't.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Her genetic material.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 2>But then could there be a legal battle from the

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 2>person who's embryo. It actually is so I mean, there's

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 2>just it's just a minefield.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 14>It's so incredibly challenging for all of the people involved,

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 14>notwithstanding the staff and the complications there with mine ash

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 14>and we understand that, or the mother who has carried

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 14>that baby for nine months and then now to have

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 14>to go through the mental dilemma, not even a dilemma,

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 14>but just the total conundrum in her mind and the

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 14>family's minds of how do I feel now about this

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 14>person knowing what I know now? And I mean, you

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 14>just feel so desperately that these people have been put

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 14>in that situation. Is it is such a confronting challenge,

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 14>and how you work your way through it is just

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 14>so difficult. You just do not know where to begin.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 14>That mental process, So.

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 2>You'd think an apology would not be good enough. There'd

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 2>probably have to be some compensation in here as well.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, the error was reportedly discovered when

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the birth parents requested the transfer of their remaining embryos

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 2>to another IVF clinic. So major drama, all right, Basil Zemblas.

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Hudebrand, very right, Joe.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Now let's turn out to the tariff retreat that has

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the whole world talking. This has been a monumental u

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>turn from Donald Trump. He has pressed the ninety dight

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 2>pause button on his tariffs, but they will now still

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 2>be a base ten percent tariff. Here was the President

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>rationalizing this shock move.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 7>Somebody had to do what we did, and I did

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 7>a ninety day pause for the people that didn't retaliate

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 7>because they told him, if you retaliate.

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>We're going to double it.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 7>And that's what I did with China.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 2>So, as he says, China will still have the full

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>weight of the tariffs.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 5>As I told everyone a week ago there in this

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 5>very spot, do not retaliate and you will be rewarded.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 5>So every country in the world who wants to come

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 5>and negotiate, we are willing to hear you. We're going

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 5>to go down to a ten percent baseline tariff there

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 5>for them and China will be raised to one twenty

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 5>five due to their insistence on s.

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>That's of course US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessont there. Well,

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 2>let's bring you now, Institute of Public Affairs Chief Economists

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Adam Crichton.

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Adam, great to see you, as always.

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Look, this has been the most roller coaster of a

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 2>two week period on these tariffs. Donald Trump did tell

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>reporters that he pulled back on these tariffs because people

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 2>were quote yippie and afraid of the stock market volatility.

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Is this his logic here? What's happened behind the scenes?

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 16>Well, look, certainly Donald trump supporters think it's the art

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 16>of the deal, and his critics think that it's the

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 16>art of the deal, But no one really knows here,

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 16>you know, what the actual reasoning was behind the scenes.

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 16>But look, certainly I think Trump is you know, is

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 16>coming out of it reasonably. Well, so far, he's got

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 16>this ten percent tariff flow so far, which is applying

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 16>to all imports.

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Into the US.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 16>That's about three hundred and eighty billion dollars a year

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 16>of extra revenue, which the un US can sorely need,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 16>of course, given the two trillion dollar annual budget deficit.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That it has.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 16>So yeah, so I think it's going fairly fairly.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Well for him, fairly well for him. Certainly not in

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 2>the media. Would Elon Musk have played into this. Well,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 2>not in the media, but this, yeah, continue, so gone, continue.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 16>So much focus on the stop No, there's so much noll.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 16>There's so much focus on the stock market. But really

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 16>there's too much focus on the stock market. I would

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 16>say it's not really a good indication of the real economy.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 16>You know, what matters for Trump and his supporters is

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 16>that jobs are brought back to the US. Now it

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 16>remains have you seen whether these tariffs are the solution

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 16>to that? But we have to give it a chance

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 16>to work.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I would say, I'll get to some of the unintended

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 2>consequences in the moment, the issue with the debt market.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But first I want to ask you about Elon Musk.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 2>We saw he came out publicly against Trump's trade advisor,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Pete Navarro, said very public.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Insults about him. So clearly Elon Musk was against the tariffs.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Now you'd have to say that Donald Trump is ultimately

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>against tariff's as well. He was trying to get the

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 2>base down to no tariffs on both sides. But do

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 2>you think Elon Musk's push also Trump donors like Bill Ackman,

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 2>he said there should be a ninety day pause. Would

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 2>these sort of figures have influenced the president's thinking.

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 16>Well, I think one of the things that's come out

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 16>of all this is that Trump is not in the

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 16>pocket of Wall Street. That's how he's caricatured all the

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 16>time by the left. But of course for the last

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 16>the last fortnight, it's been chaos on Wall Street. It's

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 16>been chaos for stock investors. I mean, he's smashed their returns.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 16>They're still down by seven or eight percent, even though

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 16>there's been a recent rebound. So I think it's you know,

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 16>it's smashed that there was obviously disagreement amongst his supporters

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 16>Elon Musk on the one side, Peter Navarro on the

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 16>other side. But I think it's healthy that all of

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 16>these debates are out in the open and that people

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 16>can see them. I mean, it seems Trump's crosshair are

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 16>still very much on China. The trade deficit with China

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 16>has fallen quite a bit.

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it was four.

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 16>Hundred and twenty billion dollars roughly in twenty eighteen. It's

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 16>something like two hundred and sixty billion dollars now. And

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 16>the tariffs still remain on China. I think, you know,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 16>more than one hundred and twenty percent, you know, which

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 16>is highly disruptive and is probably going to lead two

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 16>imports into the US from third countries.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I would say, so, I want to return to this

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 2>issue with the debt bonds because there's been so much

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>focused on market volatility and yep, it's still down. But

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the reality is markets do go up and down. They

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 2>react to news that are panicked investors. But this issue

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 2>with the debt bonds is far more serious. Can you

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 2>tell me about how that could play out for the

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 2>US with China?

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, certainly.

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 16>The bond markets have been just as volatile as the

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.959
<v Speaker 16>stock markets, even though they don't get as much attention

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 16>in the press. I mean, it's interesting in recent in

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 16>recent days, the US government ten year bond yield's been

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 16>even higher than Australia's I think about four point five

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 16>by four point three. The concern here is that China

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 16>is a big holder, relatively large holder of US government debt,

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 16>and that in a fit of peak or anger, it

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 16>may decide to sell some of those bonds, which of

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 16>course would put up their ten year bond yield. But

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 16>the reality is, if you look at the actual ownership,

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 16>I think, and this is my view, China simply doesn't

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 16>own enough to be a huge problem for the US.

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 16>It owns about ten percent of the outstanding stock of

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 16>US bonds that are held by foreigners and two percent

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 16>of the actual total. So I think it's very unlikely

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 16>that China will sell, you know, will suddenly try to

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 16>sell it's US government bonds because of course it itself

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 16>would make capital losses very significant, very significant capital losses,

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 16>and it is the most liquid asset in the world.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 16>So look, there is a concern that foreigners could dump

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 16>US government bonds, and of course the US government is

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 16>extremely susceptible to that because it has thirty six trillion

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 16>dollars of debt. It's borrowing about two trillion dollars every

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 16>single year, so it is susceptible.

0:29:58.920 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that.

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 16>China is going to well, we'll press the big red

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 16>button on that.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 17>Well.

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Another economist I spoke to off air last night, Warren

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Hogan was worried about this and said it could impact

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>on US continuing to meet its debt repayments. But anyway,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll see how that plays out.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 16>Cold who knows, No one knows what's happening. No one

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 16>knows what's happening.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Adam Crichton, love having you on as always, Thanks for

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>your time. Now still to come.

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Ted O'Brian doesn't rule out ditching the Paris Climate Agreement

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in today's debate, and then he later says that the

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 2>L and P is.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Committed to the target.

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Well is the Prime Minister planning to weaponize this? Plus

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Howard Dutton handle Trump and the tariffs? His shadow Trade

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 2>minister will tell us next.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, the issue now is that China is trying to

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>step in to fill the potential void left by the US.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.719
<v Speaker 2>And the question is how will Albin Easy respond to

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 2>China's offer today to hold hands with Australia amid the

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tariff agenda? Will Alban Easy dodge the invite?

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Have a look?

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 5>We will speak for ourselves.

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 12>The US administration changes its position on a regular basis.

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 12>That is why you have to be an adult, not

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 12>have dial it up to eleven at every opportunity, which

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 12>is what Peter Dutton's plan is on everything, and just

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 12>to say first thing that comes into your head and

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 12>then pretend that you haven't said it and wind it back.

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>And Shadow Trade Minister Kevin Hogan joins us now from Lismo,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 2>good to see you, Thanks for your time.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 18>Good to see you, Shary.

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, how would.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 2>You be responding to this invitation from China?

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 18>Well, Shary, we obviously have a very comp elementary relationship

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 18>with China. They are our biggest export market. We sold

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 18>over two hundred billion dollars worth of goods and services to.

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Them just last year.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 18>So we compliment each other what they want we have.

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 18>So that's been a good relationship for them, and it's

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 18>been a good relationship for us. But very importantly, we

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 18>have a very close relationship with the United States and

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 18>a very important national security relationship with the United States.

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 18>And I've said previously that I think Orcus will outlive

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 18>Trump's presidency, that will outlive Kersteiner's Prime ministership and our

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 18>Benez's prime ministership. So this isn't about holding hands with anyone.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 18>We have a trading relationship with China. That is a

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 18>complimentary one, and we have a very important national security

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 18>and economic relationship with the United States as well.

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 2>You say China has been good to us and there's

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>been a complementary relationship, Well that wasn't the case just

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago. I mean during the COVID pandemic,

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 2>China imposed egregious tariffs and even trade bands on Australia.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, complementary relationship, but yes, hasn't always been a good relationship.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 18>They banned a lot of products to us, which we

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 18>think was egregious. We as you know, when we were

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 18>in government, we took wto action against China for some

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 18>of those bands or some of those tarots that put

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 18>on products. So that was resolved. So, look, we've had

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 18>a complementary relationship, that's what we've had. That's obviously been

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 18>good for both countries. But certainly there's been issues there

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 18>as well as we're having an issue now with the

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 18>United States, which as friends sometimes do we need to

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 18>talk through with the United States.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>So are you concerned that we are seeing adversaries like

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 2>China try and take advantage of the Trump chaos.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 18>Well, look, China will do what they will with their neighbors,

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 18>with their relationships with you know, all their neighbors and

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 18>all people that they are around. But look, this for

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 18>US isn't about doing one thing with one and one

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 18>thing with another. We have a complementary relationship with China

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 18>that has been a good trading relationship in the sense

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 18>good for our exporters. But our relationship with the United

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 18>States is a very important one, Charia, as you know,

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 18>a national security and economically orcas is I think the

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 18>primary thing of importance to us to keep our people safe.

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 18>And as I said, I hope, I'm sure that it

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 18>will outlive Trump's presidency, Albernieze's prime ministership and Steiner's Prime

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 18>ministership in the UK.

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Donald Trump was right to pause for

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 2>ninety days his tariffs.

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:29.479
<v Speaker 5>Look, I'm glad he did.

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 18>I think the tariffs are a bad idea and bad policy.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 18>I think it's inflationary for the US consumer, puts the

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 18>price of things up, and I think it could do

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 18>great damage to world growth. And if there's a trade

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 18>war like we're seen a bit between China and the

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:47.800
<v Speaker 18>US now, I don't think.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 6>That's good for growth.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 18>We're a big exporting nation. We sold six hundred and

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 18>fifty billion dollars worth of stuff overseas last year, and

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 18>that depends on good global growth, so we don't want

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 18>to see that retract. So I was happy to see

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 18>the poor and hopefully these are more. You know, you

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 18>hear different reports out of the States that these transactional.

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 18>Did he do this to get leverage in other areas?

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 5>We'll wait and see.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 18>I hope that's what it is to ask you to

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 18>get removed.

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about that because one thing

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that he has put in the agenda also other members

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 2>of his team, is the bound on American beef that

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Australia has in place. Yes, we've got it in place

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 2>for biosecurity reasons, but his team.

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Say that that's fake.

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>They literally use that word fake in Senate hearings this week.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we should be revisiting those bands? Seeing

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 2>as it has been a long time since there was

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 2>any mad.

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Cow disease in the United States?

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 2>The burgers are safe to eat when you're in the

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>United States, as many Australians know.

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 18>Well, look, showy, what I wouldn't say is that we

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 18>should change our bias. This is bias biosecurity as you know,

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 18>it's mad cow disease that they had now quite a

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 18>while ago. What I don't think we should change is

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 18>our biosecurity protocols. But as part of those protocols we

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 18>we've is it this all the time anyway in the

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 18>normal course of business, So the Department of Ag will

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 18>go through a process and regularly review it to see

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 18>if the band should stay in place. So it's not

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 18>this band isn't in place forever, but it will be

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 18>removed when the protocols our biosecurity rules say we should

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 18>lift the ban. So I think we stay with the

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 18>biosecurity rules we have and not change them. And there

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 18>may be one day where they say lift the ban.

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 2>This is one of the things that the Trump administration

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>has put on the table that they'd like to see

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Australia lift that ban.

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>There is no mad cow disease.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 2>So should that be something that the Australian government sits

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>down and negotiates.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 18>Well, I don't think it should be something that we

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 18>negotiate as part of this deal. And I don't think

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 18>we should say we're going to lift the ban on

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 18>your beef to get a deal. I don't think we

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 18>should say that. No, But I think we just keep

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 18>our biosecurity rules in place. They're there for a reason,

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 18>and we adhere to what our biosecurity protocols tell us

0:36:57.880 --> 0:36:59.399
<v Speaker 18>to do and not change them.

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 2>All right, Kevin Hogan, appreciate your time, Thank you very much.

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Now still to come the liberal candidate trying to unseat

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Josh Burns in the Victorian seat of Macnamara.

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Why he's now in with the chance.

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Plus revelations that Labour six hundred billion dollar figure came

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 2>from an activist group.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>That's next. Welcome back.

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's return to the energy debate between Chris Bowen

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 2>and Ted O'Brien today. Now, for weeks, Labour has claimed

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that the coalition's nuclear energy plan will cost six hundred

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars, but they haven't said where that figure comes from. Well,

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bowen was finally pressed on this today.

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 13>Six hundred billion dollars is the figure you've quoted a lot.

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 13>The CSIO on next Gen report found the costs of

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 13>nuclear just the actual building cost would actually be one

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 13>hundred and sixteen billion. Isn't that a better authority to

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 13>use than the Lobby Group's Smart Energy Council which is

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 13>thrown up up to six hundred billion, not six hundred bill,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 13>but up to what Tom.

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't agree with respect the premise of the way

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 4>you've asked the question, because absolutely the CSIRO should be

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 4>the organization we listened to mister a Brien claims they've

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 4>used the CSI roh is.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 5>That's not true.

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just not right.

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 2>And then Chris Bowen refused to say how much Labour's

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 2>own plan would cost.

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 19>That wasn't.

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 4>I didn't interrupt your question.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Well it was my.

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 20>Question, so I will interrupt you. We're not after the NPV.

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 20>No one here walks into a shop and says, oh,

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 20>how much is the bottle of milk? And you know

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 20>the shopkeeper says, or do you want an MPV on that? No,

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 20>I just tell us how much it costs? So how

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 20>much is it going to cost?

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 4>You can dismiss the way that AEMO says is the

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 4>most accurate way of describing it. I choose criticizing the

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 4>way you're describing it because your avoid your question.

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Unbearable.

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Well to discuss, let's bring in The Australian's Environment editor Graham.

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Lloyd Graham, good to see you. Well, So how credible.

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Is this figure the six hundred billion supposed cost of

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the coalition's nuclear policy, Well.

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 19>Good Edny Schari. It was quite a revelation in the

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 19>debate there that this figure has come from the Smart

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:15.439
<v Speaker 19>Energy Council, which is unashamably a lobby group for the

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 19>renewable energy industry. There's obviously a big range of cost

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 19>things that can be applied, but the csiro O report

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 19>is one hundred and sixteen billion dollars. The coalition was saying,

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 19>look about one hundred and fifty billion dollars, so way

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 19>different to the six hundred and it's fascinating to see

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 19>how that figure of six hundred was arrived at.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it really is interesting, but in the end it

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 2>almost doesn't matter because Albanize is using it all the time.

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>We heard in the leader's debate on Tuesday night here

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.760
<v Speaker 2>kept saying that Dutton was planning secret cuts to fund

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 2>the six hundred billion dollar nuclear plan. So again, you know,

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 2>you repeat it often enough and it's to become reality.

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 19>Well, that's certainly how this is being played, that the

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 19>six hundred billion has been constantly rolled out as the

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 19>cost of the coalition's plan. So I think it is

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 19>really important that the truth behind where that figure comes

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 19>from is widely understood and that process is really started,

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 19>I think today.

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Look, another key moment today was when Tet O'Brien didn't

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 2>really rule out the coalition ditching the Paris climate target.

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 20>Here he was, we want to ensure that we are

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 20>growing this country, not decarbonizing it is good. Deindustrializing it

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 20>like labor is bad. Once we've done that analysis, then

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 20>we'll be making decisions along the lines that you pose.

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 20>So I won't be pre empty today, with all due

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 20>respect that hypothetical.

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 18>You're prepared, all of those things considered that if it

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 18>is in the national interest to potentially leave Paris, I can.

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 20>Commit that we will always act in the national interest

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 20>and we'll be upfront with the Australian people.

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Graham kind of an odd response.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 2>He then had to issue a statement clearing this up afterwards.

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 19>That's right. This is quite an encendry area and it

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 19>will be interesting to see how it's received. If this

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 19>had come up in the last federal election campaign, you

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 19>would expect there would be a huge outcry from around

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 19>the place. I suspect that the outcry will be slightly

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 19>more muted this time, because there's a much better understanding

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 19>of how difficult this all is. And if you look

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 19>at the coalition's approach. We saw it from Queensland with

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 19>the LMP this week and Ted O'Brien was indicating the

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 19>same things that it's time for a stock take to

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 19>see how our ambitions match with the reality. And it's

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 19>no good just going along with huge ambitions and figures

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 19>if they can't be met, and so the process of

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 19>a stock take. And then I think the twenty three

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 19>five figure is the one that's the most sort of

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 19>key at the moment. The twenty fifty figure of net

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 19>zero by twenty fifty. I think they're still bipartisan support

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 19>for that because it's a long way away, but the

0:42:12.239 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 19>closer targets there's a lot more difficulty in actually justifying

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 19>whether you're going to meet them or not.

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's just amazing.

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's just the space of three years and

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 2>yet barely anyone, even the Teals, are not mentioning climate

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 2>change this election.

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>They campaigned on it heavily last time and.

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Again you know you mentioned Labour's twenty thirty five targets.

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>How can they get.

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Away with not saying they're twenty thirty five targets, it's

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 2>in ten years time, yet they haven't put that forward. Look,

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I just want to ask you to end off about

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the gas reservation, the East Coast gas reservation. It seems

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 2>like the leftist media, including the ABC, just a fighting

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 2>tooth and nail against this, having a lot of activists

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 2>on their programs who don't support it. Why would they

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 2>be against more gas into the market.

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 19>Well, it's an article of faith for a lot of

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 19>people on the left to not let more gas into

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 19>the system because that will push out of renewables and things,

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 19>which is really a misreading of how this transition is

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:21.399
<v Speaker 19>going to work into the future. But there's you know,

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 19>the one thing you can say about the gas reservation

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:29.240
<v Speaker 19>policy is as a sort of a slogan gas reservation

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 19>that works pretty well. It's when you get to the

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 19>details it's more difficult. I think the coalition has some

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 19>pushback from the industry from everywhere in terms of how

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 19>it's going to do this. But the most important thing

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 19>is to get more gas into the system. And if

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 19>the companies have to really agree to cop something on

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 19>their existing production, they need to work out a way

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 19>to develop new fields that with enough incentive for the

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 19>companies to make it worth their while to do so.

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, all right, Grahame Lloyd, great to have you on.

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much.

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Now after the break, as Jewish Labor MP Josh Burns

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:11.879
<v Speaker 2>fights alban Easy to allow him not to preference the Greens, well,

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it seems the Liberals may be in with a chance

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in this critical Victorian seat.

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll speak with a coalition candidate next.

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 2>The last thing that Jewish Labor politician Josh Burns wants

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 2>to do is preference the Greens in his seat of McNamara,

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>but it seems he hasn't been able to get permission

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 2>from Alban Easy all Labor headquarters so far.

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 2>The Australian has reported on a leaked audio recording where

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Josh Burns tells Waiders to give him time and to

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 2>watch this space when asked if he deny preferences to

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the Greens.

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:49.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll joining me now.

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Is the Liberal candidate up against Josh Burns in McNamara,

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Benson Salo Benson.

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you on the show. Now, this is

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>an unusual seat.

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 2>That you're running in from a demographics pace, because yes,

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a large Jewish population but also many Greens voters.

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So how do you deal with this when you're campaigning?

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 15>Well, thanks so much Harry for having me on, and

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 15>our team has been out since July knocking on doors,

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 15>meeting with people at the shops and understanding what are

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 15>the key issues impacting people and right now across McNamara,

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 15>cost of living is the number one issue that's really

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:28.240
<v Speaker 15>impacting household budgets. It's impacting businesses right across the electorate.

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 15>And the second one, which most people would consider it

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 15>being a state issue, is really crime and community safety.

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 15>But a part of that is also anti Semitism, which

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 15>we've seen rear its ugly heads since October seventh here

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 15>in Australia.

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have.

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Indeed now preferences with the Greens has become quite a

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 2>big issue in Macnamara and Benson last night at the

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 2>community forum you were at with Josh Burns, he was

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 2>asked about whether he'd preferenced the Greens last Here's what

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 2>he had to say.

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 17>I really like Benson, is ay, but he's not the

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 17>person I'm worried about winning this seat. The only people

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 17>who can win this seat and me.

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Or the Greens.

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.720
<v Speaker 17>And if the Greens form into the top two, then

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 17>you think about the people who make up this electorate,

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 17>a young progressive people from Ellwood, from Sint Kilda, from

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 17>Winsor from South Melbourne, from South Bank.

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 5>Now we are a proud and.

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 17>Large Jewish community, but we're only ten percent of the

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 17>electorate of McNamara.

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.879
<v Speaker 1>So, Benson, what's your response to what Josh said?

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we are looking at a Greens MP

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:31.919
<v Speaker 2>winning McNamara here?

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:36.439
<v Speaker 15>Well, the only way that a Greens MP can win

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:40.439
<v Speaker 15>you if the Jewish community and the broader community vote

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 15>for a party that actually is preferencing the Greens. And

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:46.280
<v Speaker 15>that party right now is Labor. And at that forum

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.840
<v Speaker 15>and there was over four hundred people, they're eagerly waiting

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 15>on Josh Burns to confirm that he was not going

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 15>to preference the Greens, and unfortunately he has been, like

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 15>he has been over the last eighteen months, noncommittal to

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 15>actually preferencing the Greens last and actively calling out their

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 15>open and active anti semitism that we've seen continuously being

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 15>shared right across the community. So it continues to ask

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:15.839
<v Speaker 15>the question. The community continues to ask the question, will

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 15>Josh show leadership within his own party and push back

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 15>against Albert Ezi, and push back against Benny Wong, and

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 15>push back against other leaders within his own party, to

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 15>stand up for his community and to put this the

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 15>concerning and anti Semitic and divisive Greens last.

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 2>And it seems we don't, you know, we don't know

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 2>where this is going to land. But it seems at

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:41.759
<v Speaker 2>this point he hasn't been allowed to put the Greens last.

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 2>He's also been in a very difficult position.

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh Burns.

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 2>He's Jewish, he supports Israel, but he's sitting within.

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>The Albanese government.

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think he's done enough to defend the Jewish

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 2>community and fight back against the Albanese government's hostility towards Israel.

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:04.919
<v Speaker 15>Look, Josh's is an important voice within Labor, but unfortunately,

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 15>what we've seen is that Labor has actively abandoned and

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 15>walked away from the Jewish community. We've seen that at

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 15>the un we've seen that federally, We've seen this playing

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 15>out on our streets and across our university campuses. And so,

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 15>while I do applaud Josh Burns's efforts internally, clearly he

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 15>doesn't have the ear of the Prime Minister in highlighting

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 15>the impacts of anti Semitism. And now when I speak

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 15>to the community, they are disappointed, they're frustrated, but also

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 15>they're scared. They're they're they're scared of what the future

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 15>for their children and their community look like. When we

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 15>are seeing unchecked hate speech and anti semitism across across

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 15>Melbourne CBD, across Jewish schools in Melbourne and across the

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 15>community more broadly, so the community is eagerly waiting on

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 15>Josh to to show leadership, to push back and to

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 15>put the Greens last.

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:07.399
<v Speaker 2>It's actually worth pointing out that there still haven't been

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 2>any arrests made for the perpetrators behind the Adas Synagogue

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 2>fire bombing. I mean that's been months now and yet

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 2>no arrests at all by Victorian police. New Southwalans police

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 2>have been very active. They've arrested at least more than

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 2>fourteen people for a spate of different incidents, but we

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen those arrests from Victorian police yet. Are the

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 2>incidents in Victoria as well outstanding. So look, we hope

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that we will see those soon. But at this point

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you can understand why the community is living in fear,

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 2>not just the Jewish community, but as you say, that

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 2>crime wave across Melbourne is affecting so many Melbournians.

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Benson Sallow. Great to meet you on the show and

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have you on. Thanks for your time.

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 15>Thank you very much, Sherry.

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Now it's Eastern next week. Of course, the East the show,

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm told opens tomorrow. I love the East of the show,

0:49:57.320 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's also passover this weekend, so I want to

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 2>wish all of our Jewish viewers at Kagsa Meyer for

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 2>this weekend. I've been making mutter balls with my ninety

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 2>one year old grandmother Yaya this week, so it'll be

0:50:09.200 --> 0:50:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a great say to now. I'll see you on Monday

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 2>at eight. But right now, here's Paul Murray in the

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 2>man Cave.