WEBVTT - Credlin | 10 November

0:00:01.940 --> 0:00:07.610
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:07.750 --> 0:00:08.290
<v Speaker 2>Good evening.

0:00:08.490 --> 0:00:11.850
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the program. Here's what's coming up tonight on Credlin. Tonight,

0:00:11.890 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 3>more blame shifting from the Prime Minister, insisting yet again

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 3>that it's the war in Iran to blame for your

0:00:17.860 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 3>high interest rates, all the while backing in the troubled

0:00:20.940 --> 0:00:24.530
<v Speaker 3>Treasurer and even claiming that he doesn't lose his cool.

0:00:25.110 --> 0:00:28.510
<v Speaker 3>The bloke can't lie straight in bed, can he? The

0:00:28.550 --> 0:00:32.010
<v Speaker 3>teenager who researched a mass casualty terror attack at the

0:00:32.070 --> 0:00:36.220
<v Speaker 3>Sydney Opera House walks free, no jail sentence. So why

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 3>did the court go soft? And where's the deterrent for

0:00:40.140 --> 0:00:43.860
<v Speaker 3>other would-be terrorists? Plus the hundreds of thousands of dollars,

0:00:43.900 --> 0:00:48.330
<v Speaker 3>your money, spent on smoking ceremonies ahead of rabbit culls

0:00:48.810 --> 0:00:51.010
<v Speaker 3>on an uninhabited island.

0:00:51.710 --> 0:00:53.790
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, this is bonkers.

0:00:54.610 --> 0:00:56.730
<v Speaker 3>And out on the ground in a must-win seat for

0:00:56.750 --> 0:00:59.050
<v Speaker 3>the Liberals where Labor's very much on the nose with

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.580
<v Speaker 3>voters and people are sick of empty promises and the spin.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.060
<v Speaker 3>We'll catch up with Libby Pettit fighting to win a

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 3>seat near Geelong.

0:01:09.900 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>People don't trust politicians anymore.

0:01:11.660 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 4>They want someone from the community who understands what they're

0:01:14.380 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 4>going through and to be their voice and to be

0:01:17.020 --> 0:01:20.780
<v Speaker 4>a real voice and use their experience in Parliament to

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:21.740
<v Speaker 4>be a strong voice.

0:01:21.540 --> 0:01:22.180
<v Speaker 2>For the community.

0:01:24.060 --> 0:01:26.539
<v Speaker 3>I love getting out on the campaign trail. I spoke

0:01:26.580 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 3>to Libby there on the weekend. I'll give you all

0:01:28.300 --> 0:01:32.110
<v Speaker 3>those details in a moment. But first, those headlines today

0:01:32.170 --> 0:01:34.910
<v Speaker 3>that the Coalition has done a preference deal with One

0:01:34.990 --> 0:01:40.140
<v Speaker 3>Nation in Victoria. Well, they're lazy and simplistic, written by

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.820
<v Speaker 3>people who don't understand politics clearly.

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:44.260
<v Speaker 2>And here's why.

0:01:44.980 --> 0:01:49.030
<v Speaker 3>First up, no political party can do any deal on

0:01:49.060 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>your preferences.

0:01:50.530 --> 0:01:51.090
<v Speaker 2>They can't.

0:01:51.630 --> 0:01:55.070
<v Speaker 3>Because in the end, as the voter, you get to

0:01:55.130 --> 0:01:58.450
<v Speaker 3>choose the order in which you number your ballot paper.

0:01:59.010 --> 0:01:59.490
<v Speaker 2>You do.

0:01:59.510 --> 0:02:00.630
<v Speaker 5>You do.

0:02:00.690 --> 0:02:05.510
<v Speaker 3>Not Labor, not Liberal, not One Nation. It's your call

0:02:06.030 --> 0:02:10.620
<v Speaker 3>and yours alone. Now, sure, political parties can make a recommendation,

0:02:10.630 --> 0:02:14.929
<v Speaker 3>and they do, Come polling day, volunteers will thrust a

0:02:14.970 --> 0:02:17.190
<v Speaker 3>piece of paper at you as you walk in to vote.

0:02:17.950 --> 0:02:21.090
<v Speaker 3>It's called the how to vote card, but it's up

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.060
<v Speaker 3>to you whether you follow it or tear it up

0:02:24.419 --> 0:02:25.380
<v Speaker 3>and put it in the bin.

0:02:26.020 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>So that's the first point.

0:02:27.580 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 3>The second point is about the substance of today's headlines,

0:02:32.620 --> 0:02:35.940
<v Speaker 3>that the Liberals are recommending that voters support One Nation

0:02:36.340 --> 0:02:41.370
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Labor and the Greens. Well, where's the breaking

0:02:41.430 --> 0:02:45.540
<v Speaker 3>news in that? After all, no sane Victorian can want

0:02:45.860 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>more debt, more crime, more corruption and more potholes than

0:02:49.700 --> 0:02:53.370
<v Speaker 3>they've got now. So if you want to change the state,

0:02:53.380 --> 0:02:57.150
<v Speaker 3>you've got to change the government. You have to vote

0:02:57.290 --> 0:03:01.750
<v Speaker 3>Labor out. And to do that, the Liberals, the Nats

0:03:02.290 --> 0:03:05.510
<v Speaker 3>and One Nation, well, all of them have to be

0:03:05.630 --> 0:03:10.750
<v Speaker 3>in front of the Labor candidate in every seat right

0:03:10.930 --> 0:03:15.100
<v Speaker 3>across Victoria. Now, if you think Labor's bad, then you're

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 3>hardly going to want to see any government where the

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Greens hold the balance of power, are you? So none

0:03:21.300 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>of this should come as a shock to anyone. But

0:03:25.020 --> 0:03:28.620
<v Speaker 3>that's the sort of manufactured outrage we saw from the Premier,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:30.810
<v Speaker 3>Ben Carroll, today.

0:03:31.370 --> 0:03:31.820
<v Speaker 6>Here he is.

0:03:32.930 --> 0:03:36.930
<v Speaker 7>Liberal Party have just done a preference deal with the

0:03:36.990 --> 0:03:42.290
<v Speaker 7>most anti-worker party this state has and this nation have

0:03:42.430 --> 0:03:46.630
<v Speaker 7>ever seen. More than 15 times Jess Wilson has said

0:03:46.650 --> 0:03:51.110
<v Speaker 7>there'll be no deals with One Nation. Today the cat

0:03:51.150 --> 0:03:54.529
<v Speaker 7>is out the bag. She has done a deal with

0:03:54.670 --> 0:03:58.770
<v Speaker 7>One Nation that goes to the heart of hurting working people.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.500
<v Speaker 3>Now understand what that was all about. This is about

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.430
<v Speaker 3>the Liberals announcing that they will recommend to supporters that

0:04:09.450 --> 0:04:11.910
<v Speaker 3>a Liberal goes at the first spot on the ticket

0:04:12.490 --> 0:04:16.190
<v Speaker 3>and that a One Nation candidate comes next or certainly

0:04:16.250 --> 0:04:19.940
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Labor and the Greens. It's not about what

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 3>might happen should Jess Wilson win the election in three weeks' time.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.620
<v Speaker 7>Jess Wilson, what deals have you done with One Nation?

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.910
<v Speaker 7>Is Warren Pickering going to be the Treasurer? in the

0:04:32.970 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 7>future Wilson Liberal government.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.380
<v Speaker 2>Now that's a straight out Labor lie. It's about the

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.630
<v Speaker 2>how to vote card. That's it.

0:04:43.490 --> 0:04:45.930
<v Speaker 3>But Carol's going hard with the lie and he'll keep

0:04:45.990 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>it up because he's bleeding votes across the board.

0:04:50.410 --> 0:04:50.990
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:04:51.029 --> 0:04:55.950
<v Speaker 3>Ever since he rolled Jacinta Allen from Labor's left faction, Carroll,

0:04:56.010 --> 0:05:00.290
<v Speaker 3>who's from the right, is losing hardcore activist votes to

0:05:00.310 --> 0:05:04.859
<v Speaker 3>the Greens and is also losing Labor's sensible working class

0:05:04.940 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 3>voter to One Nation and to the coalition. So that

0:05:09.060 --> 0:05:11.980
<v Speaker 3>carry on today from Carroll's about trying to lock in

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 3>what's left of Labor's dwindling base. And there's not much there,

0:05:16.940 --> 0:05:22.180
<v Speaker 3>is there, if yesterday's poll, which recorded an 18% Labor primary,

0:05:22.580 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 3>is accurate. And Labor's rank hypocrisy on preferences, let's call

0:05:27.580 --> 0:05:30.669
<v Speaker 3>that out as well, because Labor's in no position to

0:05:30.700 --> 0:05:35.330
<v Speaker 3>lecture anyone about voting recommendations that they make when they

0:05:35.390 --> 0:05:40.590
<v Speaker 3>get into bed every election with the Greens, as they

0:05:40.750 --> 0:05:44.349
<v Speaker 3>are in this election. Labor could barely win a seat

0:05:44.390 --> 0:05:48.110
<v Speaker 3>across the country without Greens preferences. Now, I bet you've

0:05:48.130 --> 0:05:50.349
<v Speaker 3>seen almost as many election nights as I have. And

0:05:50.670 --> 0:05:53.380
<v Speaker 3>how many times have you seen the Liberals win the

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>most on primary but lose the seat once the preferences

0:05:58.120 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 3>are distributed.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.210
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's the work of the Greens, because Green.

0:06:03.029 --> 0:06:06.650
<v Speaker 3>Preferences end up in Labor's column 90% of the time.

0:06:07.110 --> 0:06:11.090
<v Speaker 3>Not so for parties on the right. One nation preferences, well,

0:06:11.110 --> 0:06:14.890
<v Speaker 3>they can spray everywhere and anywhere. In some seats, you

0:06:14.910 --> 0:06:18.540
<v Speaker 3>might get one booth return, preferences back to the Liberals

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 3>from one nation about 65% of the time. And you

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.770
<v Speaker 3>might move in the same seat to another booth, and

0:06:24.830 --> 0:06:28.650
<v Speaker 3>find you're lucky to get 50% of those preferences. So

0:06:28.670 --> 0:06:33.390
<v Speaker 3>don't fall for Labor's sanctimony here. Yes, the coalition will

0:06:33.430 --> 0:06:37.210
<v Speaker 3>have a how to vote card with a recommendation for voters.

0:06:37.940 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 3>But in the end, you, the voter, decide the order

0:06:41.420 --> 0:06:46.420
<v Speaker 3>of your ballot paper. And that's critical too if you

0:06:46.460 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 3>vote Labor, because this time, inside the privacy of the

0:06:50.860 --> 0:06:55.570
<v Speaker 3>voting booth, this is the election you need to walk

0:06:55.730 --> 0:07:01.330
<v Speaker 3>away from Labor. Vote as though your family's safety depends

0:07:01.430 --> 0:07:11.220
<v Speaker 3>on it, because in Victoria, it absolutely does. A lot

0:07:11.260 --> 0:07:14.140
<v Speaker 3>of you write to me, send me emails about preferences.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.430
<v Speaker 3>I hope that's helping it. We'll keep at it all

0:07:16.470 --> 0:07:19.350
<v Speaker 3>the way through to the 28th of November. Let's get

0:07:19.370 --> 0:07:22.450
<v Speaker 3>the national headlines now with our political reporter, Ruben Spargo.

0:07:23.420 --> 0:07:23.860
<v Speaker 2>Good evening.

0:07:23.980 --> 0:07:27.180
<v Speaker 8>The Albanese government is seeking to legislate new guardrails for

0:07:27.340 --> 0:07:31.739
<v Speaker 8>artificial intelligence in Australia. Six mandatory actions would be enforced

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.540
<v Speaker 8>by a new regulator armed with powers to impose so-called

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.310
<v Speaker 8>significant penalties on tech giants that breach the rules.

0:07:39.700 --> 0:07:42.700
<v Speaker 9>We want to make sure that we continue to work

0:07:43.230 --> 0:07:46.110
<v Speaker 9>so that we can reap the potential benefits from AI,

0:07:47.170 --> 0:07:51.950
<v Speaker 9>boosting productivity, bolstering economic resilience, but we need to ensure

0:07:51.970 --> 0:07:53.230
<v Speaker 9>that we get it right.

0:07:53.670 --> 0:07:57.010
<v Speaker 8>The government has also released recommendations from a rapid review

0:07:57.150 --> 0:08:01.010
<v Speaker 8>into an earlier breach of government databases involving an open

0:08:01.150 --> 0:08:04.070
<v Speaker 8>AI model. The Prime Minister is backing Jim Chalmers to

0:08:04.130 --> 0:08:07.850
<v Speaker 8>remain Treasurer, at least for now. It follows a series

0:08:07.890 --> 0:08:11.030
<v Speaker 8>of leaks targeting the Treasurer, calls for his removal and

0:08:11.090 --> 0:08:15.130
<v Speaker 8>reports of growing tension between the two. Anthony Albanese says

0:08:15.330 --> 0:08:17.850
<v Speaker 8>it's his preference for Jim Chalmers to remain in the

0:08:17.890 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 8>job through to the next election. The Prime Minister is

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 8>also rejecting suggestions he struggles to control his temper. The

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.700
<v Speaker 8>Liberal Party has pointed to several examples of the Prime

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 8>Minister appearing irritated during public exchanges. The Coalition has accused

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.250
<v Speaker 8>you of losing your cool. Do you agree that sometimes

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:38.210
<v Speaker 8>you lose your cool?

0:08:39.070 --> 0:08:39.370
<v Speaker 9>No.

0:08:39.809 --> 0:08:40.469
<v Speaker 8>Stop, guys.

0:08:40.809 --> 0:08:41.189
<v Speaker 5>Stop.

0:08:44.450 --> 0:08:45.550
<v Speaker 2>Where are my.

0:08:46.850 --> 0:08:47.230
<v Speaker 9>People?

0:08:47.860 --> 0:08:51.010
<v Speaker 8>Australians will decide whether the Prime Minister is telling the

0:08:51.070 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 8>truth when he says he doesn't lose his cool.

0:08:55.540 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Where are my people, he says. Let's get into all

0:08:58.500 --> 0:08:59.060
<v Speaker 2>of that with our.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.969
<v Speaker 3>News 24 political editor, Andrew Clennell. The blame game, let's

0:09:03.990 --> 0:09:05.970
<v Speaker 3>start with the economic stuff first. The blame game from

0:09:05.990 --> 0:09:09.730
<v Speaker 3>the PM, Andrew, saying that the RBA's assessment when it

0:09:09.790 --> 0:09:13.210
<v Speaker 3>comes to rate hikes isn't accurate, that it's still all

0:09:13.270 --> 0:09:16.670
<v Speaker 3>about the war in Iran, and also that claim that

0:09:16.730 --> 0:09:20.510
<v Speaker 3>the economy can't go backwards or won't go backwards.

0:09:21.030 --> 0:09:21.930
<v Speaker 2>Here he is today.

0:09:22.690 --> 0:09:28.010
<v Speaker 9>We live in turbulent times. turbulent times with a land

0:09:28.050 --> 0:09:31.690
<v Speaker 9>war that continues in Europe, turbulent times with a war

0:09:32.130 --> 0:09:34.349
<v Speaker 9>and conflict in the Middle East that has had an

0:09:34.429 --> 0:09:38.390
<v Speaker 9>impact on global inflation, that's had an enormous impact on

0:09:38.429 --> 0:09:42.550
<v Speaker 9>cost of living. My government focuses each and every day

0:09:43.070 --> 0:09:47.709
<v Speaker 9>on cost of living, on how we can make a difference.

0:09:49.530 --> 0:09:52.430
<v Speaker 3>OK, that poll out yesterday that only one in five

0:09:52.429 --> 0:09:55.730
<v Speaker 3>voters trust the Prime Minister... Is he going to get

0:09:55.730 --> 0:09:57.020
<v Speaker 3>away with that line?

0:09:57.020 --> 0:10:01.980
<v Speaker 10>Not for too much longer. I mean, if inflation stays up,

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.780
<v Speaker 10>and I admit the war has an impact, if the

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 10>war were to suddenly end, they'd have a better chance.

0:10:07.020 --> 0:10:09.770
<v Speaker 10>But if it stays up and they don't make meaningful cuts,

0:10:10.809 --> 0:10:14.370
<v Speaker 10>aren't even being seen to properly attempt to get inflation down,

0:10:15.130 --> 0:10:15.990
<v Speaker 10>they're in all sorts.

0:10:16.090 --> 0:10:16.370
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:10:17.210 --> 0:10:19.030
<v Speaker 10>There's just been a hell of a lot of spin

0:10:19.070 --> 0:10:23.110
<v Speaker 10>around this. We've got $ 180 billion worth of savings because

0:10:23.150 --> 0:10:25.860
<v Speaker 10>the size of the budget's gone up 130, even as

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.500
<v Speaker 10>while they say we've saved 180. So I just think,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 10>This is a big test, what happens in December. And

0:10:34.540 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 10>will the PM even be here? He might be at

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 10>the G20 and Jim Chalmers might deliver at this mid-year statement.

0:10:40.179 --> 0:10:42.540
<v Speaker 10>But they've got to be seen to be trying to

0:10:42.580 --> 0:10:44.380
<v Speaker 10>do something. Now, my mail is they're going to do

0:10:44.420 --> 0:10:47.380
<v Speaker 10>another cost of living relief measure. And it has to

0:10:47.700 --> 0:10:51.180
<v Speaker 10>make sure that it's not inflationary. Well, that's pretty difficult

0:10:51.210 --> 0:10:53.550
<v Speaker 10>to do. Chief of Medicines is probably the only one

0:10:53.570 --> 0:10:56.650
<v Speaker 10>which strictly qualifies on that. But I think that's a

0:10:56.690 --> 0:10:59.750
<v Speaker 10>measure too, given we're mid-term of the trouble that the

0:10:59.770 --> 0:11:03.380
<v Speaker 10>PM knows they're in, Peter, because... otherwise he wouldn't be

0:11:03.420 --> 0:11:08.540
<v Speaker 10>doing some cost of living relief measure now. He would

0:11:09.059 --> 0:11:11.630
<v Speaker 10>wait for the next budget. So, you know, they see

0:11:11.670 --> 0:11:15.250
<v Speaker 10>that number heading to the 20s, the primary vote, and

0:11:15.590 --> 0:11:16.950
<v Speaker 10>as I said to you last week, they don't want

0:11:16.970 --> 0:11:17.790
<v Speaker 10>to get it baked in.

0:11:19.929 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 3>I know you get the concept of net saving because

0:11:22.700 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure everyone else in the Canberra Gallery does

0:11:25.059 --> 0:11:26.250
<v Speaker 3>because he gets away with it.

0:11:26.660 --> 0:11:30.939
<v Speaker 2>You know, they get up and say we've made, you know, $ 100.

0:11:29.340 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Billion of savings or $ 80 billion of savings, but when

0:11:32.900 --> 0:11:36.140
<v Speaker 3>they have as much on the spending side of the ledger,

0:11:36.220 --> 0:11:38.340
<v Speaker 3>all they're doing is shifting the money around in columns.

0:11:38.820 --> 0:11:41.970
<v Speaker 3>It's not a true saving, unless it's banked to the

0:11:42.030 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>bottom line. And as Peter Costello said when I spoke

0:11:44.540 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 3>to him not so long ago, there has been no

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 3>attempt in this government's era to pay back anything in.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Terms of the debt.

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.230
<v Speaker 3>We're not even making surplus budgets to have that free

0:11:56.330 --> 0:11:58.350
<v Speaker 3>money or freed.

0:11:58.210 --> 0:11:59.790
<v Speaker 2>Up money, if I could call it that.

0:12:00.190 --> 0:12:02.790
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, we've got my EFO coming in the

0:12:02.809 --> 0:12:05.940
<v Speaker 3>next couple of weeks. Surely someone's got to call this out.

0:12:07.230 --> 0:12:08.929
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, they had a couple of surpluses, but that

0:12:08.980 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 10>was at the very start of the term when inflation

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.939
<v Speaker 10>and mining receipts was helping that along.

0:12:14.059 --> 0:12:16.939
<v Speaker 2>But they didn't pay down debt.

0:12:17.020 --> 0:12:19.140
<v Speaker 3>Costello tells me, and I looked at the numbers, they

0:12:19.179 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>didn't pay down debt.

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, they hired 45,000 public servants. That's the bottom line.

0:12:23.260 --> 0:12:26.050
<v Speaker 10>Now they say, well, we didn't have as many consultancy contracts,

0:12:27.510 --> 0:12:30.130
<v Speaker 10>but now they're handing out redundancies. I've had two ministers

0:12:30.190 --> 0:12:33.050
<v Speaker 10>in two days on Tell me that. Tanya Plibersek today

0:12:33.110 --> 0:12:35.770
<v Speaker 10>told me she'd cut 20% of her department in the

0:12:35.809 --> 0:12:39.150
<v Speaker 10>last year, which I found pretty interesting because it shows

0:12:39.190 --> 0:12:41.740
<v Speaker 10>that they realise now they've made a mistake. We had

0:12:41.770 --> 0:12:45.300
<v Speaker 10>this COVID-level spending. They said we're delivering surpluses. They were

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.620
<v Speaker 10>focused on the politics the whole time and they didn't

0:12:48.660 --> 0:12:51.059
<v Speaker 10>make the hard decisions in the first term clearly they

0:12:51.100 --> 0:12:55.270
<v Speaker 10>needed to make and they haven't really made them yet either.

0:12:56.150 --> 0:12:59.070
<v Speaker 10>And the question is, is Jim just full of spin?

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.620
<v Speaker 10>And it's starting to look that way because you get

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.540
<v Speaker 10>up and you have these glib lines, X amount of savings,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.210
<v Speaker 10>et cetera. I mean, this is the problem I have

0:13:07.230 --> 0:13:10.729
<v Speaker 10>with the Scott Morrison administration, as you know, Peter, like

0:13:11.150 --> 0:13:16.590
<v Speaker 10>make the announcement, say you're doing something, but not actually

0:13:16.630 --> 0:13:19.270
<v Speaker 10>do it. Okay. So they say they're cutting the NDIS,

0:13:19.890 --> 0:13:23.100
<v Speaker 10>but they're actually, you know, they're letting it grow less slowly.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.620
<v Speaker 10>They're not actually cutting it, but we haven't saved a

0:13:26.660 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 10>dollar on that yet. And that drives inflation and it

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.420
<v Speaker 10>takes away from the private sector economy. So there's been

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.699
<v Speaker 10>a lot of talk, not much action on the spending front.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 10>And Michelle Bullock, I think, just put a minute last week.

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:42.860
<v Speaker 10>She could have said it was about the war. She

0:13:42.900 --> 0:13:45.140
<v Speaker 10>could have lent more into that. She said some of

0:13:45.220 --> 0:13:47.650
<v Speaker 10>it was about the war. But in a press conference,

0:13:47.670 --> 0:13:51.890
<v Speaker 10>she said domestic capacity pressures. So That speaks for itself.

0:13:51.950 --> 0:13:55.059
<v Speaker 10>They went with all these big spending promises on Medicare

0:13:55.100 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 10>and whatnot into the elections. I know governments do that.

0:13:59.020 --> 0:14:01.300
<v Speaker 10>They had a rate cut before the election. Happily for them,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 10>we can now say that rate cut should never have happened, surely.

0:14:04.020 --> 0:14:08.970
<v Speaker 10>And this is what everyone's reaping, what the government and

0:14:08.990 --> 0:14:10.429
<v Speaker 10>the Reserve Bank sowed on that one.

0:14:11.970 --> 0:14:13.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when we talk about.

0:14:13.090 --> 0:14:16.050
<v Speaker 3>The impact of fuel costs on inflation, and it is

0:14:16.130 --> 0:14:20.670
<v Speaker 3>right to point to the constriction point of it, the

0:14:20.690 --> 0:14:24.950
<v Speaker 3>Strait of Hormuz. But dear old New Zealand's geographically, about

0:14:24.970 --> 0:14:28.370
<v Speaker 3>the same distance from the Strait of Hormuz as we are,

0:14:28.390 --> 0:14:31.290
<v Speaker 3>they've got interest rates that are much lower than us.

0:14:31.310 --> 0:14:34.010
<v Speaker 3>They've got inflation that's much lower than us. They're a

0:14:34.430 --> 0:14:39.650
<v Speaker 3>heavily diesel-dependent agricultural economy. How can they get it right

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and we get it so wrong?

0:14:41.180 --> 0:14:43.359
<v Speaker 10>Well, because they went for the narrow path of keeping

0:14:43.380 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 10>unemployment as low as they possibly could, and it was

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.100
<v Speaker 10>a mistake. It's clearly a mistake. I mean, they kept saying,

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.580
<v Speaker 10>you know, Anthony Albanese said they were trying to land

0:14:52.660 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 10>a jet on a really small runway. Well, great, you

0:14:54.940 --> 0:14:58.070
<v Speaker 10>landed it and worked for about six months. You know,

0:14:58.090 --> 0:15:01.010
<v Speaker 10>everyone's wise in hindsight. The bloke as wise as Warren Hogan,

0:15:01.050 --> 0:15:04.030
<v Speaker 10>he'd be loving that. But, you know, he's had a

0:15:04.090 --> 0:15:06.530
<v Speaker 10>war to help that sort of narrative along. But there's

0:15:06.570 --> 0:15:10.330
<v Speaker 10>absolutely no doubt that they just had an election coming

0:15:10.370 --> 0:15:14.650
<v Speaker 10>and they just went, inflation, we've got it pretty much tamed,

0:15:14.690 --> 0:15:15.830
<v Speaker 10>haven't we? Well, guess what?

0:15:15.870 --> 0:15:16.330
<v Speaker 1>You haven't.

0:15:16.450 --> 0:15:18.990
<v Speaker 10>And what it means for ordinary people, which is why

0:15:19.030 --> 0:15:22.340
<v Speaker 10>they're going to One Nation, is apart from Bondi, that

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.660
<v Speaker 10>was a huge uplift for One Nation, obviously, is 20%.

0:15:26.660 --> 0:15:30.980
<v Speaker 10>Everything's gone up 20% in four or five years. Now,

0:15:31.020 --> 0:15:33.590
<v Speaker 10>there's no one out there, whether they got a job

0:15:33.620 --> 0:15:35.550
<v Speaker 10>or whether they got a pay rise or whatever, who

0:15:35.630 --> 0:15:39.250
<v Speaker 10>is sitting here going... I'm happy with how things are

0:15:39.270 --> 0:15:42.350
<v Speaker 10>at the moment. When have we seen that in my lifetime?

0:15:42.390 --> 0:15:44.230
<v Speaker 10>You know, like it probably it would have happened in

0:15:44.250 --> 0:15:47.820
<v Speaker 10>the 1970s. I was born in the 1970s, so I

0:15:47.860 --> 0:15:50.660
<v Speaker 10>didn't see it. It happened in the early 80s. We

0:15:50.700 --> 0:15:54.820
<v Speaker 10>had stagflation. But the problem's always been unemployment. We haven't

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.660
<v Speaker 10>had this level of an inflation problem for decades.

0:15:59.170 --> 0:16:01.910
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go to the, and it'll sound like

0:16:01.930 --> 0:16:04.130
<v Speaker 3>an insider issue for people at home, but I want

0:16:04.150 --> 0:16:06.030
<v Speaker 3>them to stick with us because I think it's really

0:16:06.570 --> 0:16:10.430
<v Speaker 3>instructive about how cornered I think Jim Chalmers is feeling.

0:16:10.930 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>He's blocked the independent advice that Treasury would normally make

0:16:15.940 --> 0:16:18.020
<v Speaker 3>on a whole lot of policy proposals. These are called

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the pinks, they're coordinating comments. So So when documents go

0:16:22.660 --> 0:16:25.540
<v Speaker 3>up through the Cabinet process and they land with various

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 3>ministers around the table, there's usually information provided by Treasury

0:16:29.940 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>and other commentary about spending. Well, he doesn't want that

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.100
<v Speaker 3>available to the room. Now, you need it, I think,

0:16:37.210 --> 0:16:40.550
<v Speaker 3>because you want every Cabinet minister who are all equals

0:16:40.610 --> 0:16:43.950
<v Speaker 3>around that table to have all the best information so

0:16:43.990 --> 0:16:44.990
<v Speaker 3>we get good decisions.

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:46.740
<v Speaker 2>If he shuts down.

0:16:46.540 --> 0:16:50.590
<v Speaker 3>The pinks, the process of these pink coordinating comments, that

0:16:50.650 --> 0:16:55.070
<v Speaker 3>says to me he's scared of frank and fearless advice.

0:16:55.530 --> 0:16:59.010
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps he's scared that some of those fierce comments from

0:16:59.090 --> 0:17:01.850
<v Speaker 3>Treasury might be leaked to someone like you, Andrew Clennell.

0:17:02.290 --> 0:17:05.530
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think they make all the decisions in ERC anyway, Peter,

0:17:05.550 --> 0:17:07.890
<v Speaker 10>to be honest. But, yeah, I mean, that's one way

0:17:07.930 --> 0:17:11.149
<v Speaker 10>of getting those ERC decisions through, isn't it?

0:17:11.230 --> 0:17:11.530
<v Speaker 3>Because.

0:17:12.530 --> 0:17:15.450
<v Speaker 10>expenditure review committee, I should say, to the viewers, because then,

0:17:15.670 --> 0:17:18.820
<v Speaker 10>you know, Chalmers and Gallagher and Albanese and co have

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.940
<v Speaker 10>made those decisions without any contradictory Treasury advice appearing before

0:17:22.980 --> 0:17:25.420
<v Speaker 10>Cabinet can go, this is the right decision and Treasury

0:17:25.460 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 10>supports this.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a rubber stamp, though. It turns it into a

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:29.659
<v Speaker 2>rubber stamp.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 10>I think Cabinet is a bit of a rubber stamp.

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.540
<v Speaker 10>I think that's a problem. I think caucus is a

0:17:33.580 --> 0:17:37.020
<v Speaker 10>rubber stamp. I think that's a problem. I mean, Albanese

0:17:37.060 --> 0:17:40.180
<v Speaker 10>was so intent on not having the Rudd-Gillard years division

0:17:40.220 --> 0:17:43.100
<v Speaker 10>that he's taken it too far the other way. You know,

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 10>this is one of the great things about the National

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.770
<v Speaker 10>Party and the coalition, especially for journalists, but just generally

0:17:47.810 --> 0:17:50.330
<v Speaker 10>for debate. You're always going to have more debate in

0:17:50.369 --> 0:17:53.149
<v Speaker 10>that party room because you can't control the Nats. So

0:17:53.190 --> 0:17:55.510
<v Speaker 10>then some of the Libs pitch in. And that's when

0:17:55.530 --> 0:17:58.700
<v Speaker 10>you get proper feedback from your electorates and a bit

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.379
<v Speaker 10>more of an idea of the people out there, not

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 10>just the bureaucrats and the politicians in Canberra. So there's

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 10>a benefit to that. There's a benefit to dissent. Quashing

0:18:08.530 --> 0:18:10.350
<v Speaker 10>it can be dangerous, you know.

0:18:10.369 --> 0:18:14.629
<v Speaker 3>Hey, look, I was out in South Barwon. It's a

0:18:14.650 --> 0:18:17.230
<v Speaker 3>key seat just outside of Geelong on the weekend. I

0:18:17.470 --> 0:18:19.790
<v Speaker 3>checked in with a Liberal candidate there. It's a must-win

0:18:19.850 --> 0:18:22.909
<v Speaker 3>seat if the government's going to change in Victoria. I've

0:18:22.950 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 3>got a package to show my viewers in a moment.

0:18:24.980 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>But I ran into one of, I'll say, our biggest fans,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.100
<v Speaker 3>but he was a huge fan of you, Andrew Clennell.

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 2>Have a listen. Who are your favourites on News 24?

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Clennell, you've got to go a little bit harder, Andrew.

0:18:38.420 --> 0:18:40.500
<v Speaker 10>You've got to get in there and go for the jugular.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Come on, you can do it.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.570
<v Speaker 2>He absolutely loved you. He said we're his number one duo.

0:18:45.609 --> 0:18:48.590
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't mind Paul Murray, but he thinks you're the

0:18:48.630 --> 0:18:50.250
<v Speaker 3>duck's guts, as my dad would say.

0:18:50.290 --> 0:18:51.070
<v Speaker 2>So there you go, Andrew.

0:18:51.450 --> 0:18:54.209
<v Speaker 10>Thanks for that, Peter. Always get plenty of feedback, especially

0:18:54.230 --> 0:18:54.889
<v Speaker 10>from this segment.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, you get some good feedback too. There you go.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.230
<v Speaker 2>That's absolutely on camera. Terrific bloke. All right, that's it.

0:19:01.500 --> 0:19:02.580
<v Speaker 2>Leave it there. Thanks, Andrew.

0:19:02.980 --> 0:19:06.449
<v Speaker 3>Let's get our Victorian election wrap now. 18 days to

0:19:06.470 --> 0:19:10.230
<v Speaker 3>go until polling day. Of course, pre-polls will open from

0:19:10.470 --> 0:19:13.790
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday next week. So, Will and Trulia, the pointy things

0:19:13.810 --> 0:19:17.530
<v Speaker 3>have A pointy end of things now. The Liberals today

0:19:17.550 --> 0:19:20.430
<v Speaker 3>were out there promising to cut red tape, making it

0:19:20.690 --> 0:19:23.810
<v Speaker 3>easier for business to operate in the state. For Labor,

0:19:23.850 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 3>their focus was on family violence. But the Premier really

0:19:27.740 --> 0:19:31.740
<v Speaker 3>under some pressure after another day of bad polls for

0:19:31.859 --> 0:19:35.899
<v Speaker 3>his government. Here's our reporter, News 24's Georgie Dickinson, on

0:19:35.940 --> 0:19:36.420
<v Speaker 3>the ground.

0:19:37.420 --> 0:19:40.379
<v Speaker 11>Pubs, clubs and live music are the latest focus for

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:45.139
<v Speaker 11>the Coalition. with Jess Wilson promising to revitalise Victoria's nightlife.

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.629
<v Speaker 11>The Liberals say they'll cut red tape and make it

0:19:47.730 --> 0:19:52.100
<v Speaker 11>easier for businesses to operate. It'll streamline liquor licensing, simplify

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 11>festival approvals and offer incentives for venues hosting live music.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.379
<v Speaker 11>It says hundreds of venues have closed in recent years.

0:19:59.700 --> 0:20:03.590
<v Speaker 12>We used to be the destination here in Australia. We've

0:20:03.609 --> 0:20:06.450
<v Speaker 12>said before that Melbourne was the place that people wanted

0:20:06.490 --> 0:20:09.470
<v Speaker 12>to come to experience the nightlife, the culture. I know

0:20:09.490 --> 0:20:11.139
<v Speaker 12>that we can be that again. We want to make

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.129
<v Speaker 12>sure that we consult. We want to make sure that

0:20:13.150 --> 0:20:16.290
<v Speaker 12>we have the appropriate regulations in place that will take

0:20:16.310 --> 0:20:17.850
<v Speaker 12>time with the industry, but we want to get this

0:20:17.940 --> 0:20:20.110
<v Speaker 12>out as quickly as possible, certainly within our first year.

0:20:20.410 --> 0:20:24.030
<v Speaker 13>Meanwhile, Labor is promising a crackdown on family violence, including

0:20:24.090 --> 0:20:28.190
<v Speaker 13>new criminal penalties for convicted family violence and sexual offenders

0:20:28.310 --> 0:20:31.230
<v Speaker 13>using dating apps. It also wants to extend restrictions on

0:20:31.290 --> 0:20:34.770
<v Speaker 13>smart glasses to swimming pools, change rooms and sporting venues,

0:20:35.090 --> 0:20:38.810
<v Speaker 13>and promising a domestic violence disclosure scheme, which allows people

0:20:38.850 --> 0:20:41.939
<v Speaker 13>to check whether their partner has a violent history. But

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.100
<v Speaker 13>the Coalition had already committed to introducing a similar scheme

0:20:45.220 --> 0:20:49.889
<v Speaker 13>under Clare's law almost two years ago, something Labor voted down.

0:20:50.190 --> 0:20:51.650
<v Speaker 2>They are going to support.

0:20:51.670 --> 0:20:54.030
<v Speaker 14>That it wouldn't work back then, that what was proposed

0:20:54.090 --> 0:20:54.590
<v Speaker 14>wouldn't work?

0:20:54.790 --> 0:20:57.150
<v Speaker 2>That is correct. That is correct. In what way was

0:20:57.170 --> 0:20:57.890
<v Speaker 2>it not going to work?

0:20:58.050 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 15>Because there hadn't been adequate consultation with the sector. And

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.020
<v Speaker 15>we will always ensure that we work hand in hand

0:21:05.220 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 15>with the sector and that they are part of the discussions.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.889
<v Speaker 15>and the development and implementation of these significant reforms.

0:21:13.290 --> 0:21:17.050
<v Speaker 13>On election day approaching, attention is shifting to preference deals.

0:21:17.530 --> 0:21:20.609
<v Speaker 13>The opposition leader says it will be a case-by-case basis,

0:21:20.730 --> 0:21:23.609
<v Speaker 13>but Labor, the Greens and the Socialists will be at

0:21:23.650 --> 0:21:24.890
<v Speaker 13>the bottom of the ticket.

0:21:26.770 --> 0:21:29.790
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget, set your calendars for a reminder next Tuesday night,

0:21:29.830 --> 0:21:35.450
<v Speaker 3>the historic first four-candidate People's Forum, live here on News 24. Labor, Liberal,

0:21:35.570 --> 0:21:39.770
<v Speaker 3>One Nation and the Greens. It's the only debate like

0:21:39.830 --> 0:21:41.929
<v Speaker 3>this anywhere across the state.

0:21:42.470 --> 0:21:44.910
<v Speaker 2>And have a look at this. My social media feed

0:21:44.950 --> 0:21:45.850
<v Speaker 2>threw this up today.

0:21:46.390 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 3>Gen Z and millennials are now making up 44% of

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.419
<v Speaker 3>all Victorians.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Enrolled to vote. There you go.

0:21:53.500 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Just before Remembrance Day, of course, tomorrow. Don't forget Remembrance

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.780
<v Speaker 3>Day at 11 o'clock. We'll all pause, won't we, and

0:21:59.980 --> 0:22:01.980
<v Speaker 3>remember the sacrifice of so many who have gone before us.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.500
<v Speaker 3>There's been a bit of military good news and I

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.220
<v Speaker 3>want to bring it to you. The documentary film, we

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.179
<v Speaker 3>talked about it, we showed it here on News 24,

0:22:10.180 --> 0:22:14.980
<v Speaker 3>Bravery and Betrayal, the true story of the SAS in Afghanistan.

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 3>It will now be officially added to the permanent collection

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.610
<v Speaker 3>at the Australian War Memorial on the 27th of November.

0:22:23.950 --> 0:22:25.950
<v Speaker 3>There's a QR code there if you want to watch

0:22:25.990 --> 0:22:30.429
<v Speaker 3>it again or know more. Of course, go to wanderingwarriors.org

0:22:30.670 --> 0:22:33.940
<v Speaker 3>for more information. After the break, out in the ground,

0:22:34.180 --> 0:22:37.699
<v Speaker 3>down in South Barwon near Geelong, my old stomping ground,

0:22:37.820 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 3>but I tell you what, the locals are angry.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:41.010
<v Speaker 2>They feel let.

0:22:40.830 --> 0:22:44.810
<v Speaker 3>Down and overlooked, but it's a key marginal. Is that

0:22:44.970 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 3>enough to win a seat for the Liberals? Coming up,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 3>the e-safety commissioner, she was in the hot seat this afternoon.

0:22:56.740 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to that issue, the digital duty of care,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>and the woman who put her under some pressure joins

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.500
<v Speaker 3>me in just a moment. But let's go down to

0:23:05.540 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 3>Geelong because over the weekend I jumped in my car,

0:23:07.660 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I headed down the highway that way.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:10.620
<v Speaker 2>I know the area well.

0:23:10.660 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 3>I finished high school down there and mum, of course,

0:23:13.380 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 3>lives locally still. And I was in the marginal seat

0:23:16.460 --> 0:23:19.260
<v Speaker 3>of South Barwon where I stopped to catch up with

0:23:19.300 --> 0:23:22.580
<v Speaker 3>a Liberal candidate there, Libby Pettit, who must win the

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>seat if Jess Wilson's to have any chance of throwing

0:23:25.619 --> 0:23:30.510
<v Speaker 3>out the Carol Labor government. Now Libby's a really interesting candidate.

0:23:30.609 --> 0:23:34.250
<v Speaker 3>She's not a political insider. She's someone who founded a

0:23:34.290 --> 0:23:38.650
<v Speaker 3>small business and turned it into a multi-million dollar international brand.

0:23:39.170 --> 0:23:44.030
<v Speaker 3>She's also a former national athletics champion, mum and a

0:23:44.070 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>very proud Geelong region local. To win the seat, she's

0:23:47.780 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 3>got to beat a former staffer of Dan Andrews, one

0:23:50.940 --> 0:23:55.930
<v Speaker 3>of the ultimate Labor insiders who's been parachuted in from Melbourne.

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 3>And as I got around and talked to some locals

0:23:58.220 --> 0:24:00.580
<v Speaker 3>in South Barman, if there was one thing that was clear,

0:24:01.020 --> 0:24:04.060
<v Speaker 3>they want Labor gone. But it's where they put their

0:24:04.140 --> 0:24:08.340
<v Speaker 3>vote that will be critical. And that's what Libby's fighting for,

0:24:08.820 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 3>the vote of Geelong locals who want change. And for

0:24:12.300 --> 0:24:15.030
<v Speaker 3>the first time in a long time, many of those

0:24:15.090 --> 0:24:18.330
<v Speaker 3>we spoke to said finally, They felt they had a

0:24:18.430 --> 0:24:22.990
<v Speaker 3>candidate willing to listen to them and make things happen.

0:24:23.020 --> 0:24:40.750
<v Speaker 5>Music My name's Libby, I'm the Liberal Party candidate for

0:24:40.770 --> 0:24:43.409
<v Speaker 5>South Barwon and I'm out talking to the community today.

0:24:43.450 --> 0:24:45.910
<v Speaker 2>It's really unique and delicious.

0:24:45.970 --> 0:24:46.850
<v Speaker 8>Very flavoursome.

0:24:47.150 --> 0:24:50.129
<v Speaker 16>So this is an umami lime salt to bolster flavour

0:24:50.170 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 16>on everything.

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.500
<v Speaker 4>That is delicious. I'm just concerned about the debt, the

0:24:54.540 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 4>level of debt. The interest that we're paying each hour

0:24:57.780 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 4>is just... It's a deal breaker, isn't it?

0:24:59.840 --> 0:24:59.939
<v Speaker 14>Yeah.

0:25:00.260 --> 0:25:03.900
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's completely irresponsible. It's been promised since 2012. It's

0:25:03.980 --> 0:25:08.429
<v Speaker 4>now almost 2027 and yet still hasn't been delivered. So

0:25:08.450 --> 0:25:10.930
<v Speaker 4>we're going to get it done. It's something that you

0:25:10.950 --> 0:25:12.270
<v Speaker 4>have to put a lot of hard work into.

0:25:12.310 --> 0:25:12.889
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:25:12.970 --> 0:25:15.149
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy it, it doesn't feel like hard work.

0:25:15.410 --> 0:25:18.890
<v Speaker 3>You're exactly the sort of candidate parties love, but this

0:25:18.970 --> 0:25:20.130
<v Speaker 3>is not your natural.

0:25:19.850 --> 0:25:20.389
<v Speaker 2>Space, is it?

0:25:20.859 --> 0:25:22.820
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not my natural space at all. But I

0:25:22.859 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 4>tell you what I do love is talking to people.

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm a real people person. I've loved door knocking. I've

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.300
<v Speaker 4>loved getting to know this community. And that's who I

0:25:32.340 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 4>want to represent. I want to be a strong voice

0:25:34.220 --> 0:25:37.139
<v Speaker 4>for the community. As you say, I haven't worked for

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 4>the government and I'm not.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:39.419
<v Speaker 2>A career politician.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 4>For me, this is about standing up for the community

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.540
<v Speaker 4>and using my real life experience to get the outcomes

0:25:45.580 --> 0:25:46.340
<v Speaker 4>that they deserve.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:47.859
<v Speaker 2>What got you going?

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 3>What motivated you to put your hand up for this election?

0:25:51.090 --> 0:25:54.470
<v Speaker 4>Um, look, I don't like where Victoria's heading.

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in a Victoria.

0:25:56.660 --> 0:25:59.100
<v Speaker 4>Where there was opportunity and I felt like I could

0:25:59.140 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 4>do anything.

0:25:59.740 --> 0:26:01.580
<v Speaker 14>Yours are so cheap.

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.260
<v Speaker 2>I think you're too cheap.

0:26:05.010 --> 0:26:07.990
<v Speaker 5>We try to make them cheap so everyone can enjoy them.

0:26:08.420 --> 0:26:10.139
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's nice. That's really sweet.

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.700
<v Speaker 9>The things that we notice is, well, firstly, the potholes.

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:16.420
<v Speaker 3>The lack of maintenance around.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.550
<v Speaker 15>The streets and roads is another one.

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.170
<v Speaker 3>The amount of graffiti.

0:26:20.630 --> 0:26:21.190
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:26:21.230 --> 0:26:25.350
<v Speaker 4>So that's a visual reminder of where the state is heading.

0:26:25.490 --> 0:26:28.450
<v Speaker 2>So you can't see the debt, but you can see

0:26:28.490 --> 0:26:30.169
<v Speaker 2>the roads. You can see the potholes.

0:26:31.020 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 4>It's something that people drive past every day, so it's

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 4>a reminder of where we're heading.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:36.940
<v Speaker 2>And it's symbolic.

0:26:37.430 --> 0:26:41.230
<v Speaker 9>It's emblematic of where the state is.

0:26:41.650 --> 0:26:43.730
<v Speaker 4>I felt like, you know, if I worked hard enough

0:26:43.790 --> 0:26:46.190
<v Speaker 4>and made sacrifices, I could buy a home, I could

0:26:46.230 --> 0:26:49.470
<v Speaker 4>start a business, could get a great education and, you know,

0:26:49.490 --> 0:26:53.669
<v Speaker 4>invest and be creative and be innovative. I'm a Geelong local.

0:26:53.770 --> 0:26:57.410
<v Speaker 4>I'm Geelong born and bred. Labor has definitely taken... the

0:26:57.430 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Geelong community for granted. We've got four seats down here

0:27:00.820 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 4>that are held by Labor. We've got Lara, Bellarine, South

0:27:05.140 --> 0:27:08.379
<v Speaker 4>Barwon and Geelong, and they're just not getting their fair share.

0:27:08.500 --> 0:27:11.740
<v Speaker 10>The stuff I care about locally, it would be crime rates,

0:27:12.050 --> 0:27:15.730
<v Speaker 10>would be the state of the roads, the state of

0:27:15.790 --> 0:27:19.490
<v Speaker 10>green spaces covered in weeds. Public transport, getting to work.

0:27:20.670 --> 0:27:21.550
<v Speaker 2>More frequent V-lines.

0:27:21.670 --> 0:27:24.970
<v Speaker 5>A high school that was promised....

0:27:25.770 --> 0:27:31.530
<v Speaker 2>Six years ago that didn't get built. Groceries, my mortgage rate.

0:27:31.550 --> 0:27:32.990
<v Speaker 4>Petrol.

0:27:33.090 --> 0:27:37.740
<v Speaker 2>Petrol, yeah, everywhere. Cost of living, obviously, is the major

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 2>one for us.

0:27:39.900 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 4>And obviously, well, it's not local, but it's superannuation because

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 4>we're close to that age, unfortunately.

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.270
<v Speaker 2>I can already feel, again, the locals, they want one

0:27:50.310 --> 0:27:53.150
<v Speaker 2>of their own. People don't trust politicians anymore.

0:27:53.170 --> 0:27:55.830
<v Speaker 4>They want someone from the community who understands what they're

0:27:55.869 --> 0:27:58.469
<v Speaker 4>going through and to be their voice and to be

0:27:58.490 --> 0:28:02.260
<v Speaker 4>a real voice and use their experience in Parliament to

0:28:02.300 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 4>be a strong voice for the community. We have a

0:28:05.060 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of councillors, we have a lot of career politicians,

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 4>but we need more people from business and more people

0:28:11.020 --> 0:28:12.619
<v Speaker 4>with deep roots in the community who are going to

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.740
<v Speaker 4>stand up for what this community deserves. Look, I'm a

0:28:15.770 --> 0:28:19.510
<v Speaker 4>pretty determined person and I like putting myself in challenging

0:28:19.570 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 4>situations and someone's got to do it.

0:28:22.470 --> 0:28:25.210
<v Speaker 2>And if you want something done, the best person to

0:28:25.250 --> 0:28:25.929
<v Speaker 2>do it is yourself.

0:28:26.730 --> 0:28:29.990
<v Speaker 3>You've got three weeks now in a polling day. It's

0:28:30.130 --> 0:28:32.500
<v Speaker 3>a bit like the back end of a race. You

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.060
<v Speaker 3>can lose it from here or you can win it

0:28:35.140 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 3>from here.

0:28:35.619 --> 0:28:38.250
<v Speaker 2>How do you feel? That is true.

0:28:38.470 --> 0:28:41.050
<v Speaker 4>It's getting to the last few weeks and I can

0:28:41.070 --> 0:28:43.010
<v Speaker 4>feel the temperature actually rising.

0:28:43.650 --> 0:28:45.490
<v Speaker 2>You're an athlete. How does this make you feel?

0:28:45.790 --> 0:28:48.450
<v Speaker 4>It is a sprint to the finish line.

0:28:48.870 --> 0:28:49.930
<v Speaker 2>You've got to make sure that you.

0:28:49.870 --> 0:28:52.130
<v Speaker 4>Don't make any mistakes, that you don't run out of

0:28:52.210 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 4>steam and just really focus on the issues that matter.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.540
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to get distracted by issues that are

0:28:58.580 --> 0:29:01.700
<v Speaker 4>not affecting my electorate. I don't want to, you know,

0:29:01.740 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 4>there's so much noise and there's so much going on

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 4>and I just really want to make sure I focus.

0:29:07.420 --> 0:29:08.460
<v Speaker 4>and just take it home.

0:29:09.020 --> 0:29:11.020
<v Speaker 2>That is a great answer from a candidate who wants

0:29:11.060 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to win. I do want to win, but more than that,

0:29:14.620 --> 0:29:15.340
<v Speaker 2>I want change.

0:29:23.820 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Shout out to all my friends and family down that

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 3>way who reached out and said, you've got to meet

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.660
<v Speaker 3>Libby Pettit. Get down to Geelong, Peter, have a look

0:29:29.700 --> 0:29:31.340
<v Speaker 3>and see what's going on. And I'm glad I did.

0:29:31.380 --> 0:29:33.780
<v Speaker 3>It's no good, you know. Commentators like me sitting behind

0:29:33.820 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the desk. I'm a campaigner. I've worked on plenty of

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.370
<v Speaker 3>campaigns and I don't really understand what's going on. beyond

0:29:40.390 --> 0:29:43.580
<v Speaker 3>the polls unless I get out in electorates right across

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.060
<v Speaker 3>the state. So thanks for your hospitality, Libby, and we'll

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.340
<v Speaker 3>see what happens, won't we? It's going to get tighter and.

0:29:49.300 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Tighter and tighter.

0:29:50.890 --> 0:29:53.530
<v Speaker 3>Let's get on to some national issues now. And one

0:29:53.550 --> 0:29:56.090
<v Speaker 3>of the biggest issues there is, is Labor's push to

0:29:56.150 --> 0:30:00.190
<v Speaker 3>silence critics and shut down free speech in this country.

0:30:00.650 --> 0:30:03.900
<v Speaker 3>We're talking here about Labor's digital duty of care legislation.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.300
<v Speaker 3>And we haven't, as we've learnt actually more and more

0:30:07.340 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 3>about this bill, we've learnt how devastating, how diabolical this

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 3>legislation is. And much of what we've learnt has come

0:30:16.690 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 3>from the good work of my next guest. Liberal Senator

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.460
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Henderson is the Shadow Communications Minister, and she's really

0:30:23.500 --> 0:30:27.460
<v Speaker 3>gone hard today after the eSafety Commissioner.

0:30:27.830 --> 0:30:28.370
<v Speaker 2>Have a listen.

0:30:29.590 --> 0:30:32.770
<v Speaker 16>In some respects, this bill is worse than the exposure draft.

0:30:33.570 --> 0:30:37.850
<v Speaker 16>And you're talking about risk assessment. All the mandatory codes

0:30:37.910 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 16>and standards which are enforceable under the Online Safety Act

0:30:42.410 --> 0:30:45.580
<v Speaker 16>are being removed. Isn't that letting the digital platforms off

0:30:45.620 --> 0:30:45.900
<v Speaker 16>the hook?

0:30:47.450 --> 0:30:50.010
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean, I suppose what I'm saying is we

0:30:50.050 --> 0:30:52.490
<v Speaker 4>do want to have our cake and eat it too.

0:30:54.310 --> 0:30:57.230
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Henderson joins me now. Senator, give us some context here.

0:30:57.290 --> 0:31:01.030
<v Speaker 3>Help us understand that point you are making. It feels

0:31:01.090 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 3>like we're more exposed now, you know, in terms of

0:31:04.780 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 3>a safety risk than ever before.

0:31:09.300 --> 0:31:10.740
<v Speaker 2>Peter, that's absolutely right.

0:31:10.780 --> 0:31:13.540
<v Speaker 16>We know this bill is all about shutting down Labor's

0:31:13.620 --> 0:31:16.790
<v Speaker 16>political opponents and The Prime Minister let the cat out

0:31:16.830 --> 0:31:19.030
<v Speaker 16>of the bag when he gave that speech in New York.

0:31:19.410 --> 0:31:22.950
<v Speaker 16>But it also undermines our current Online Safety Act because

0:31:22.990 --> 0:31:26.140
<v Speaker 16>it removes the mandatory codes and standards. That's what I

0:31:26.180 --> 0:31:30.300
<v Speaker 16>was asking the Safety Commissioner about, which prescribe very detailed

0:31:30.340 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 16>obligations on the digital platforms to combat and remove child

0:31:35.140 --> 0:31:41.430
<v Speaker 16>sexual abuse material. pornography and other harmful and age-restricted material.

0:31:41.910 --> 0:31:44.990
<v Speaker 16>And now there's just this vague general duty with all

0:31:45.020 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 16>of these discretions, including the ability of the Safety Commissioner

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.229
<v Speaker 16>to make regulatory guidance, which is not enforceable. So the

0:31:53.310 --> 0:31:57.190
<v Speaker 16>whole thing is a dog's breakfast. It's clearly designed to

0:31:57.250 --> 0:32:00.990
<v Speaker 16>control what Labor wants to see online. There's no doubt

0:32:01.030 --> 0:32:06.060
<v Speaker 16>about that. But it's also undermining online safety. And that

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 16>is really concerning also, after all the work that we

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.860
<v Speaker 16>did when we were in government, including, of course, enacting

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:13.219
<v Speaker 16>the Online Safety Act.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.100
<v Speaker 3>Isn't part of the problem, Sarah, that with the growth

0:32:19.140 --> 0:32:22.300
<v Speaker 3>of the online medium and a whole lot of people,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.420
<v Speaker 3>and I know my content goes out on social media,

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.060
<v Speaker 3>but there's a lot of podcasters out there who are

0:32:27.140 --> 0:32:31.290
<v Speaker 3>changing the conversation and Labor can't control the media like

0:32:31.330 --> 0:32:34.710
<v Speaker 3>it used to control the ABC and the major networks

0:32:35.030 --> 0:32:38.150
<v Speaker 3>who they, as we know through that funding agreement, pay

0:32:38.230 --> 0:32:42.450
<v Speaker 3>money to now but also threaten big networks that they

0:32:42.470 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 3>don't do what Labor wants them to do. Isn't that

0:32:45.820 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 3>part of the reason why they need this legislation to

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 3>get the media back under control?

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.239
<v Speaker 16>There is no doubt about that. I specifically raised that

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.719
<v Speaker 16>with the IPA yesterday, and this does give Labor the

0:32:59.780 --> 0:33:03.500
<v Speaker 16>ability to shut down the podcasters who are really cutting

0:33:03.580 --> 0:33:06.660
<v Speaker 16>through and getting their message directly to Australians without the

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:10.530
<v Speaker 16>use of mainstream media. But it's so much worse than that, Peter,

0:33:10.570 --> 0:33:14.250
<v Speaker 16>because it drags every small business which runs a website

0:33:14.690 --> 0:33:19.750
<v Speaker 16>or a social media platform into risk assessment compliance obligations.

0:33:20.220 --> 0:33:23.930
<v Speaker 16>There were churches and Jewish groups today raising concerns about

0:33:24.370 --> 0:33:29.150
<v Speaker 16>threats to freedom of religion. And there's also big concerns

0:33:29.210 --> 0:33:33.420
<v Speaker 16>about the control of user empowerment tools, the so-called algorithm,

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.180
<v Speaker 16>which could give the ability of the government to shut

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:42.460
<v Speaker 16>down electoral advertising programs which could impact on the outcome

0:33:42.500 --> 0:33:46.270
<v Speaker 16>of elections. So the powers in this bill are completely

0:33:46.370 --> 0:33:52.390
<v Speaker 16>sweeping and unlimited. It's incredibly concerning. Traditionally, our online safety

0:33:52.430 --> 0:33:55.890
<v Speaker 16>laws focus on the really serious harms and there are

0:33:55.990 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 16>strong prohibitions against serious harms. But now there is this

0:34:00.780 --> 0:34:04.960
<v Speaker 16>general duty to keep Australians safe online, which could mean

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.900
<v Speaker 16>almost anything online. with huge powers being removed from the

0:34:08.980 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 16>parliament to the executive. And of course, that has very

0:34:11.940 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 16>dire consequences for our democracy.

0:34:16.219 --> 0:34:18.330
<v Speaker 3>Talk to me about a submission that arrived late this

0:34:18.410 --> 0:34:24.509
<v Speaker 3>afternoon from Professor Anne Toomey, who extensively chronicles the flaws

0:34:24.670 --> 0:34:25.549
<v Speaker 3>in the legislation.

0:34:27.350 --> 0:34:30.090
<v Speaker 16>Well, she thinks that this is a serious threat to

0:34:30.270 --> 0:34:34.700
<v Speaker 16>small businesses because of the very major compliance obligations that

0:34:34.780 --> 0:34:38.490
<v Speaker 16>could be imposed because there are no limitation. The Safety

0:34:38.510 --> 0:34:42.370
<v Speaker 16>Commissioner has complete discretion to make any sort of risk

0:34:42.489 --> 0:34:46.649
<v Speaker 16>assessment tools without any safeguards. She's concerned about the very

0:34:46.710 --> 0:34:51.029
<v Speaker 16>substantial transfer of power from the Parliament to the executive.

0:34:51.070 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 16>She's concerned about the algorithmic control. So there are just

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.140
<v Speaker 16>so many. And also there's big concerns.

0:34:57.739 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 2>About age assurance.

0:34:59.340 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 16>So right across the internet, she's raised concerns that when

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:06.980
<v Speaker 16>you are requiring material to be age assured to protect children,

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 16>that means the entire internet effectively gets censored. And if

0:35:11.900 --> 0:35:18.150
<v Speaker 16>you don't comply, there are fines of up to $ 109 million.

0:35:18.670 --> 0:35:21.610
<v Speaker 16>So the consequences of not complying with the duty of

0:35:21.670 --> 0:35:26.790
<v Speaker 16>care are frightening. But there is no consideration whatsoever about

0:35:26.810 --> 0:35:29.310
<v Speaker 16>the importance of free speech in this bill. And that's

0:35:29.350 --> 0:35:31.970
<v Speaker 16>why I say it is such a dog's breakfast. Can

0:35:32.010 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 16>I also say, Peter, please, I'm running a petition, protectfreespeech.com.au.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.259
<v Speaker 16>Please go to that website and sign up and just

0:35:41.300 --> 0:35:42.940
<v Speaker 16>show how much you care about this issue.

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.900
<v Speaker 3>Okay, just a quick one. I know you know the

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.069
<v Speaker 3>Geelong region well. I was down there on the weekend.

0:35:49.300 --> 0:35:53.489
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I've felt the antipathy against Labor like

0:35:53.550 --> 0:35:55.850
<v Speaker 3>that for a very long time.

0:35:56.370 --> 0:35:57.450
<v Speaker 2>Give me your read of things.

0:35:58.900 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 16>Well, Libby Pettit is doing an amazing job in South Barwon.

0:36:02.500 --> 0:36:06.620
<v Speaker 16>Callum Whitehead in Ballerina and Andy Pobjoy are also... are

0:36:06.660 --> 0:36:11.100
<v Speaker 16>working very hard in Geelong and in Geelong. There is

0:36:11.860 --> 0:36:15.009
<v Speaker 16>absolute anger on the ground, Peter. People are fed up

0:36:15.070 --> 0:36:17.970
<v Speaker 16>with Labor. And the fact that there is a former

0:36:18.110 --> 0:36:23.010
<v Speaker 16>Daniel Andrews staffer running against Libby Pettit, that is enough, frankly,

0:36:23.450 --> 0:36:27.310
<v Speaker 16>for Geelong people to say, no way whatsoever are we

0:36:27.350 --> 0:36:30.330
<v Speaker 16>going to entertain a candidate like that. People are really hurting.

0:36:30.370 --> 0:36:33.770
<v Speaker 16>The cost of living is hurting. The lack of infrastructure investment,

0:36:33.810 --> 0:36:38.050
<v Speaker 16>the lack of investment in schools, Libby has already announced

0:36:38.070 --> 0:36:42.350
<v Speaker 16>some fantastic commitments, including to build a new local school.

0:36:42.710 --> 0:36:43.529
<v Speaker 2>Labor sat on.

0:36:43.530 --> 0:36:45.750
<v Speaker 16>Its hands for a very long time. So she's a

0:36:45.830 --> 0:36:50.620
<v Speaker 16>genuine local, like Callum, like Andy. And I'm really, really

0:36:50.660 --> 0:36:53.140
<v Speaker 16>hoping that we are going to see some major change

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 16>across the Geelong region. We've got to turn the Geelong

0:36:56.380 --> 0:36:59.069
<v Speaker 16>region blue and we've got to turn Victoria blue.

0:37:00.540 --> 0:37:05.210
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no surprises, Dan Andrews, former staffer, isn't that forthcoming

0:37:05.270 --> 0:37:06.590
<v Speaker 3>with her CV to the electorate?

0:37:06.610 --> 0:37:08.830
<v Speaker 2>That's why I keep mentioning it wherever I can. Sarah,

0:37:08.850 --> 0:37:09.930
<v Speaker 2>I've got to leave it there. Thank you.

0:37:10.270 --> 0:37:13.410
<v Speaker 3>We'll stay across the digital duty of care. After the break,

0:37:13.469 --> 0:37:18.240
<v Speaker 3>the teenager found guilty of researching a mass casualty terror

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 3>attack allowed to walk free. Our national security expert, Daniel Craig,

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:31.730
<v Speaker 3>David Craig, is next. Walking back, the hundreds of thousands

0:37:31.950 --> 0:37:35.950
<v Speaker 3>of dollars on those Indigenous smoking ceremonies, this is extraordinary.

0:37:35.969 --> 0:37:41.610
<v Speaker 3>It's your money to have these ceremonies on an uninhabited island.

0:37:41.469 --> 0:37:43.390
<v Speaker 2>Before they do a rabbit cull.

0:37:43.969 --> 0:37:45.330
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to that in a moment, but first I

0:37:45.350 --> 0:37:47.890
<v Speaker 3>want to go to the issue regarding a teenager who

0:37:47.950 --> 0:37:51.690
<v Speaker 3>researched plans to carry out a mass casualty terror attack

0:37:52.050 --> 0:37:56.810
<v Speaker 3>at Sydney's Opera House in 2024. Well, yesterday he was

0:37:56.870 --> 0:38:00.930
<v Speaker 3>spared a jail sentence. We can't identify the boy because

0:38:00.950 --> 0:38:03.850
<v Speaker 3>of his age, but he'd just turned 14 when the

0:38:03.890 --> 0:38:07.830
<v Speaker 3>court heard he'd started viewing extremist material on TikTok and

0:38:07.870 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 3>had become brainwashed as he delved deeper and deeper into

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 3>violent content. The New South Wales Supreme Court was told

0:38:14.219 --> 0:38:17.580
<v Speaker 3>the schoolboy got instructions on how to make a pressure

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.980
<v Speaker 3>cooker bomb and then gathered information about security arrangements at

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.590
<v Speaker 3>the Opera House for when there'd be a huge crowd

0:38:25.610 --> 0:38:29.529
<v Speaker 3>of that would gather for the end of Sydney's marathon. Now,

0:38:29.570 --> 0:38:32.350
<v Speaker 3>he pleaded guilty to one count of planning a terrorist

0:38:32.469 --> 0:38:38.710
<v Speaker 3>attack and admitted sharing 15 videos of violent jihadist or

0:38:38.830 --> 0:38:44.590
<v Speaker 3>terrorist acts via the encrypted messaging service Telegram. In sentencing

0:38:44.630 --> 0:38:49.750
<v Speaker 3>the boy to a three-year community corrections order, Justice Stephen

0:38:49.830 --> 0:38:54.020
<v Speaker 3>Campbell said he accepted the boy was hesitant, at best 50-50,

0:38:55.540 --> 0:38:58.629
<v Speaker 3>about actually going ahead with the attack and did not

0:38:58.770 --> 0:39:02.989
<v Speaker 3>want to achieve martyrdom. His statements do not betray an

0:39:03.210 --> 0:39:07.860
<v Speaker 3>ardent would-be jihadist desperate for martyrdom, said the judge. Well,

0:39:07.900 --> 0:39:11.989
<v Speaker 3>here to discuss it, former AFP Detective Superintendent David Craig. Well,

0:39:12.010 --> 0:39:15.109
<v Speaker 3>we talk about radicalisation of young people. We talk about

0:39:15.150 --> 0:39:18.669
<v Speaker 3>how quickly they can go from zero to 100. But

0:39:19.430 --> 0:39:23.780
<v Speaker 3>when he has been, in this case, convicted of planning

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:28.180
<v Speaker 3>a terrorist attack, David, but gets no sentence, gets a

0:39:28.260 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 3>corrections order.

0:39:29.460 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, where's the deterrent?

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>And there needs to be one, Peter. Look, Justice Campbell

0:39:36.300 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>has completely missed the mark with this. Since 2020, we've

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>had youth offenders investigated by the AFP for terrorism plots. Now,

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>people are getting radicalised online at a younger and younger age,

0:39:51.580 --> 0:39:56.410
<v Speaker 1>and then we send out this sentence where you don't

0:39:56.450 --> 0:39:59.450
<v Speaker 1>have to go to jail if you prepare, seriously prepare,

0:39:59.510 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>for a terrorist attack. And I read through the judge's

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.380
<v Speaker 1>sentencing remarks, Peter, and it is clearly he's got the

0:40:06.420 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>balance completely out of line with what the community expects.

0:40:10.750 --> 0:40:15.390
<v Speaker 1>In one particular paragraph, paragraph 82, he talks about, he

0:40:15.469 --> 0:40:21.210
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges that this person's de-radicalisation process hasn't finished yet, so

0:40:21.250 --> 0:40:23.700
<v Speaker 1>he's still radicalised. So he's going to be released, but

0:40:23.739 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>he's still radicalised. And then later in that paragraph, he

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>says that there's no particular science, cogent science, that will

0:40:31.060 --> 0:40:33.820
<v Speaker 1>identify or predict his behaviour. And at the end of

0:40:33.860 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that same paragraph, he says, but he's satisfied that he

0:40:38.020 --> 0:40:41.370
<v Speaker 1>won't re-offend. Now, I don't know that there's any logical

0:40:41.430 --> 0:40:46.870
<v Speaker 1>basis for a judge to make such an optimistic prediction

0:40:46.950 --> 0:40:51.540
<v Speaker 1>of a terrorist threat when they acknowledge these inconsistencies and unknowns.

0:40:53.610 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 3>And he's acknowledged that the kids are only partway through

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 3>a DRAD program. And you and I have spoken often

0:40:58.460 --> 0:41:01.500
<v Speaker 3>about this. We don't think that they're really worth the

0:41:01.540 --> 0:41:03.779
<v Speaker 3>paper they're printed on in terms of the announcement that says,

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.060
<v Speaker 3>you know, $ 100 million for this one and $ 100 million

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.980
<v Speaker 3>for that one. I've read the reports from overseas where

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:11.569
<v Speaker 3>they've collected sort of a decade of data on these

0:41:11.610 --> 0:41:12.550
<v Speaker 3>DRAD programs.

0:41:12.590 --> 0:41:13.930
<v Speaker 2>I've seen no evidence.

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:18.710
<v Speaker 3>That they consistently and appropriately change the behaviour of people.

0:41:20.190 --> 0:41:22.890
<v Speaker 3>The ISIS women, we spoke about this before and the

0:41:22.950 --> 0:41:26.129
<v Speaker 3>children coming back, there was that press conference, I think

0:41:26.170 --> 0:41:29.010
<v Speaker 3>it was Chrissy Barrett, certainly the AFP, they were pushed

0:41:29.070 --> 0:41:33.700
<v Speaker 3>about whether they would be put into mandatory programs and

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.500
<v Speaker 3>the AFP said, well, they'll be asked to be in

0:41:36.540 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 3>a DRAD program.

0:41:37.820 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Do we know what happened with all of that?

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.950
<v Speaker 1>Well, in relation to... In relation to this particular matter,

0:41:44.450 --> 0:41:48.700
<v Speaker 1>Justice Campbell, in his sentencing remarks, said that this youth

0:41:48.930 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 1>terrorist offender will be given the opportunity to participate in

0:41:52.860 --> 0:41:55.540
<v Speaker 1>a psychological assessment. So that probably tells you.

0:41:55.500 --> 0:41:57.620
<v Speaker 2>Where we're going. Oh, he doesn't have to. He doesn't

0:41:57.660 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 2>have to.

0:41:57.940 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>He'll be given the opportunity. It's a disgraceful way to

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:04.740
<v Speaker 1>treat them. I mean, the Parliament has written these very

0:42:04.820 --> 0:42:07.700
<v Speaker 1>strict laws for preparing a terrorist attack.

0:42:08.540 --> 0:42:09.340
<v Speaker 2>And the judge was.

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.140
<v Speaker 1>Taking issue, as took a bit of an issue, with

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he didn't actually have a bomb. We

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.300
<v Speaker 1>don't want our law enforcement to not do anything until

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.420
<v Speaker 1>someone has a bomb. We want to get them in

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.259
<v Speaker 1>the act of preparing a terrorist attack. By the time

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they've got a bomb, you can miss it and people

0:42:23.420 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 1>get hurt. And Justice Campbell's judgment today or yesterday's sentencing

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.069
<v Speaker 1>is manifestly inadequate and it needs to be appealed.

0:42:31.969 --> 0:42:34.350
<v Speaker 3>Look, I'm out of time, but I want to come

0:42:34.370 --> 0:42:36.140
<v Speaker 3>back to the issue of the Muslim Brotherhood. If you

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 3>don't mind, I'll get you back on, probably on Thursday

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 3>night if I can, because it came to the fore

0:42:41.140 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 3>out of that US election race in a number of

0:42:43.660 --> 0:42:47.540
<v Speaker 3>key seats. I think it's absolutely critical that we in

0:42:47.580 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Australia now have a proper conversation.

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 2>It's not banned in Australia.

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's banned in a number of Muslim countries overseas.

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.020
<v Speaker 3>So if I could leave that now for a moment, David,

0:42:58.040 --> 0:42:59.740
<v Speaker 3>we'll come back to that a little later.

0:43:00.350 --> 0:43:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. You're right. Quick break after the break.

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:04.879
<v Speaker 3>We've got the panel coming up and all of that money,

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:10.260
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on smoking ceremonies for

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:13.900
<v Speaker 3>rabbits of culled on an uninhabited island.

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:21.300
<v Speaker 2>The panel's up next. Welcome back. Three mugs and a mug.

0:43:21.420 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Don't you miss it?

0:43:22.420 --> 0:43:26.310
<v Speaker 3>Collector's item. Liberal Party website, there you go. Let's bring

0:43:26.330 --> 0:43:29.330
<v Speaker 3>in my panel now. Tuesday night regulars, Deputy Executive Director

0:43:29.350 --> 0:43:31.910
<v Speaker 3>at the Institute of Public Affairs, Dan Wild, and broadcaster

0:43:31.950 --> 0:43:32.690
<v Speaker 3>Lucy Zellick.

0:43:33.150 --> 0:43:34.450
<v Speaker 2>Well, welcome to you both.

0:43:34.930 --> 0:43:38.529
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you almost think that someone's got a, you know,

0:43:40.450 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 3>April Fool's joke going in the paper almost every other

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 3>day in Victoria. Seven Victorian government departments have spent.

0:43:49.020 --> 0:43:50.379
<v Speaker 2>Close to $ 400, 000 in just three years on.

0:43:52.989 --> 0:43:56.660
<v Speaker 3>On these welcome to country ceremonies, but there's one that

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.100
<v Speaker 3>just gets in my craw. You've got an uninhabited island.

0:44:00.620 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 3>They're about to cull the rabbits. That's why someone's on

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the island. But before they can go ahead, Dan Wild,

0:44:06.660 --> 0:44:10.740
<v Speaker 3>they have to do a smoking ceremony at, you know,

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 3>great expense to management, release a few tree frogs and

0:44:15.219 --> 0:44:16.180
<v Speaker 3>do a back burn.

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:17.430
<v Speaker 2>Now give me a break.

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think Australians have had a gutful of this nonsense.

0:44:23.780 --> 0:44:26.529
<v Speaker 6>As you say, every day, every week, we hear more

0:44:26.570 --> 0:44:28.250
<v Speaker 6>about this. And, of course, it goes back to the

0:44:28.270 --> 0:44:31.170
<v Speaker 6>voice to Parliament referendum. We don't want this racial division

0:44:31.650 --> 0:44:34.100
<v Speaker 6>taking place in our society. And the problem that you've

0:44:34.140 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 6>got with these smoking ceremonies or welcome to country, acknowledgement

0:44:37.500 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 6>to country is... Yes, they have a role to play

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.890
<v Speaker 6>in our society. Yes, they can be a very important

0:44:42.950 --> 0:44:47.170
<v Speaker 6>part of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture, but it

0:44:47.250 --> 0:44:50.510
<v Speaker 6>has just grown so much. In every nook and cranny

0:44:50.550 --> 0:44:54.370
<v Speaker 6>of our society, it has become a complete and total rort,

0:44:54.530 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 6>a total joke. It's taken away all of the meaning

0:44:57.940 --> 0:45:02.180
<v Speaker 6>that's associated with these ceremonies and performances. Australians are completely

0:45:02.219 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 6>fed up with this, and it feels like, you know,

0:45:04.300 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 6>we're not welcome in our own country, that we have

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.969
<v Speaker 6>to sit there and be demeaned and diminished by these practices.

0:45:10.050 --> 0:45:12.290
<v Speaker 6>So it is time to put a stop to this,

0:45:12.350 --> 0:45:16.070
<v Speaker 6>particularly when it relates to official government businesses, because Australians

0:45:16.110 --> 0:45:16.850
<v Speaker 6>have just had enough.

0:45:19.070 --> 0:45:22.340
<v Speaker 3>It's not my culture, Lucy. I'd be just upset if

0:45:22.380 --> 0:45:24.779
<v Speaker 3>I went to a ceremony and every time something happened

0:45:24.820 --> 0:45:27.310
<v Speaker 3>at the footy, it was a Hindu saying, welcome to

0:45:27.370 --> 0:45:31.350
<v Speaker 3>country or some other religion. I mean, we can't honour

0:45:31.590 --> 0:45:35.970
<v Speaker 3>our one national flag, but we spend all this time

0:45:36.010 --> 0:45:41.270
<v Speaker 3>and money basically creating a whole industry around Aboriginal culture.

0:45:41.450 --> 0:45:42.709
<v Speaker 2>And I agree with Dan, it's.

0:45:42.610 --> 0:45:46.149
<v Speaker 3>Had the perverse outcome of making people more hostile than

0:45:46.270 --> 0:45:46.910
<v Speaker 3>ever before.

0:45:48.610 --> 0:45:51.620
<v Speaker 14>More hostile, but also can I raise a more poignant

0:45:51.660 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 14>question in amongst all of this, Peter? What is it doing?

0:45:55.330 --> 0:45:58.009
<v Speaker 14>What is it doing with respect to reconciliation? What is

0:45:58.050 --> 0:46:00.740
<v Speaker 14>it doing to address the real issues that are actually

0:46:00.820 --> 0:46:03.879
<v Speaker 14>occurring in the Territory? Last year, I conducted this really

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:08.100
<v Speaker 14>eye-opening interview with Robin Cahill, who's the Minister for Domestic

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.860
<v Speaker 14>Violence Prevention there in the Territory and Child Protection. Over

0:46:11.940 --> 0:46:17.620
<v Speaker 14>roughly 57% of incarcerations in the Territory there are domestic violence-related.

0:46:18.010 --> 0:46:23.750
<v Speaker 14>We've seen these shocking allegations of abuse, of child neglect,

0:46:23.810 --> 0:46:27.410
<v Speaker 14>of child sexual abuse, the death of Kumanjai little baby.

0:46:27.870 --> 0:46:31.069
<v Speaker 14>And all of this is going on while the champagne

0:46:31.190 --> 0:46:34.550
<v Speaker 14>socialists down there in Labor think that the real issues

0:46:34.610 --> 0:46:38.149
<v Speaker 14>are smoking ceremonies and welcomes to country in land that's

0:46:38.190 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 14>not being occupied. I mean, it's an absolute and utter

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 14>joke and shame on all of them who are ignoring

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:46.739
<v Speaker 14>the real issues that are going on with our Indigenous

0:46:47.140 --> 0:46:48.060
<v Speaker 14>brothers and sisters.

0:46:49.910 --> 0:46:52.969
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the Royal Commission into the CFMEU and

0:46:52.989 --> 0:46:57.710
<v Speaker 3>other corruption in Victoria. In 2022, and it started taking

0:46:57.750 --> 0:47:00.350
<v Speaker 3>hearings and other evidence on Monday, of course, the CFMEU

0:47:00.850 --> 0:47:04.770
<v Speaker 3>urged two labour hire companies to donate to the ALP,

0:47:04.790 --> 0:47:07.489
<v Speaker 3>the Victorian branch of the Labour Party. And two weeks

0:47:07.670 --> 0:47:12.180
<v Speaker 3>after that, the two same companies were shoehorned into a

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.340
<v Speaker 3>taxpayer deal at the expense of a.

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:16.660
<v Speaker 2>Cheaper commercial rival.

0:47:17.219 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 3>We've also got evidence of traffic controllers that their pay

0:47:20.140 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 3>increasing from $ 600 a day to to well over $ 1, 200

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.930
<v Speaker 3>a day. And people like John Holland, the big construction outfit,

0:47:28.950 --> 0:47:31.989
<v Speaker 3>saying you basically had to have a good relationship with

0:47:32.030 --> 0:47:36.009
<v Speaker 3>the CFMEU to get anywhere with ministers or have any

0:47:36.110 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 3>influence on a tender. Now, Dan, this is criminal if

0:47:41.580 --> 0:47:42.240
<v Speaker 3>this is true.

0:47:44.260 --> 0:47:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's right.

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it seems that almost every project or every

0:47:48.060 --> 0:47:52.720
<v Speaker 6>meaningful project across Melbourne and across Victoria involves these kind

0:47:52.780 --> 0:47:55.819
<v Speaker 6>of elements. And this is why we have to actually

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:57.700
<v Speaker 6>have a proper Royal Commission. I don't think the current

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:00.090
<v Speaker 6>Royal Commission that's been called is worth the paper that

0:48:00.140 --> 0:48:04.410
<v Speaker 6>it's written on. Victorians and Australians deserve to know where

0:48:04.469 --> 0:48:07.050
<v Speaker 6>has their money gone, who has been involved with this. Also,

0:48:07.070 --> 0:48:09.930
<v Speaker 6>to what extent has the federal government been involved? I

0:48:09.950 --> 0:48:13.950
<v Speaker 6>want to know how much Commonwealth, how much federal taxpayer funds...

0:48:14.070 --> 0:48:16.870
<v Speaker 6>have gone into these corrupt projects. I think someone from

0:48:16.890 --> 0:48:20.129
<v Speaker 6>the federal government needs to front this Royal Commission for

0:48:20.170 --> 0:48:21.070
<v Speaker 6>it to have real teeth.

0:48:23.250 --> 0:48:25.029
<v Speaker 3>Now, Lucy, a little bird time. You had a big

0:48:25.070 --> 0:48:28.299
<v Speaker 3>birthday the other day, the big 4-0. You might be

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:29.850
<v Speaker 3>sort of, oh, I can't believe she said that on air,

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 3>but I tell you, I'd love to be 40. So

0:48:31.780 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 3>I hope you were spoiled rotten by your family and

0:48:33.739 --> 0:48:34.379
<v Speaker 3>had a lovely day.

0:48:35.530 --> 0:48:39.910
<v Speaker 14>I certainly was, Peter. There's nothing shameful about ageing. In fact,

0:48:39.969 --> 0:48:42.060
<v Speaker 14>it's a real privilege. So thank you very much for

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.580
<v Speaker 14>the shout-out. 40 things are just getting started, but we

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.240
<v Speaker 14>have to hold this rotten government to account, Peter.

0:48:47.260 --> 0:48:48.100
<v Speaker 2>That's our number one job.

0:48:48.120 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 6>We do.

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, leave it there. Thank you both. See you

0:48:52.340 --> 0:48:54.029
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow night. Andrew Bolt's up next.