WEBVTT - Is this why we still haven’t seen gambling reform?

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel James and you're listening to seven AM. Next

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>week Parliament returns and the government has a lot that

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to achieve, but there's a piece of unfinished business

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we're waiting for movement on, and that's gambling reform. Back

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two, at the start of Albanese's first term,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>his government commissioned a review into the harms of gambling

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and when it reported back, it was unequivocal about what

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>needed to happen to stop the damage. Now, as we

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>enter the second year of Albanese's second term, many of

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>those recommendations still haven't been acted on, despite there being

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>popular support across the community to do something about the

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>harms of gambling. So today I'm bringing you an episode

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we publish back in twenty twenty four which lays out

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence and makes connections about the personal relationships that

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>may be shaping Anthony Albanese's position. One of those relationships

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is with Peter Valandi's the chair of the Australian Rugby

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>League Commission, chief executive of New South Wales Racing and

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the fierce opponent to reform. Today special correspondent for the

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Paper Jason kotsukis with the inside story of why

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the government hasn't acted on gambling ads. It's Sunday, February one.

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>This episode was originally published in December twenty twenty four

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and was hosted by Ruby Jones.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>So, Jason the Prime Minister. He is famously a big

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>rugby league guy. His team is the rabbit Os. But

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 2>not only that, he has friends in the league. He's

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>known to be close to the chair of the Australian

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Rugby League Commission in particular. Can you tell me a

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 2>bit about him and about their relationship.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's exactly right. So Peter landis a huge figure

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>in Sydney, someone the Prime Minister has known for a

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 3>very long time. A measure of how curse they've become

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 3>is that when Joe Biden hosted a state dinner at

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 3>the White House for Anthony Oberenzi in October last year,

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 3>one of the people that the Prime Minister took along

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>with him was Peter Flanders.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Peter blandis, you're here for the state dinner?

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 4>How did this come about?

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I look, we had lunch one day with the Prime

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Minister and we were talking about Australian sport and how

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Much the same way that his predecessor, Scott Morrison took

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>brain Houston.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>To have a PM who's into rugby league. Is that

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a welcome thing for you? Look, it is also welcome.

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But he's also very smart, he can see.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>And then in May this year, Anthony Oberenezi backed the

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>NRLs push to add another team to the NRL competition

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 3>based in New Guinea. The Prime Minister views this as

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>a way of strengthening ties with not just p ANDNG,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>but Australia's whole integration with the Pacific region, where Beijing

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 3>is also competing for influence. They also collaborate on a

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 3>funding agreement to upgrade the historic like Art Oval which

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 3>is in the Prime Minister's Graindler electorate, with the federal

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>government kicking and nearly half of the fifty million dollars

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 3>required to upgrade that oval.

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So there's a close working relationship and also a

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>close personal one. It's fair to say that Albert Easy

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and Flant is their buddies. How significant is that when

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the way that the Prime Minister has

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>approached the issue of gambling reform.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very significant. I spoke to one Labor

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>insider who said that no voice has been more important

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to informing the PM on the consequences

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>of a complete gambling advertising ban than Velandis. That same

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 3>person put the AFL Chief Executive Andrew Dillon a close second,

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 3>and that no one else, not even the Freeware Networks

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 3>or Kerry Stokes or even News Corporation, has mattered as

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>much in this is what the two sporting codes think.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, as you say, we have heard a lot about

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>gambling reform this year. Can you give me a sense

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 2>of why that is, of why this issue has come

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to a head at this particular moment.

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, right back at the beginning of the term, I

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 3>think in September twenty twenty two, the Minister for Social Services,

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Amanda Rishworth, she actually referred this issue to a parliamentary

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 3>inquiry and she asked them to have a look at

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 3>online gambling and its impacts on people experiencing gambling AHM.

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 3>That committee was chaired by a Labor MP, the late

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Peter Murphy, and was made up of ten other MPs

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 3>drawn from both the two major parties and also the

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 3>cross bench. And while they were working on that report,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 3>I think in May last year, Peter Dutton kind of

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 3>got the jump on the committee and preempted one of

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 3>their key recommendations. He used his budget in reply speech

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to announce that a coalition government would move to banned

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>sports betting advertising during the broadcasting of games and for

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 3>an hour before and after the game as well.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 4>In our country, footy time is family time, but the

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 4>bombardment of betting.

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Ads takes the joy out of televised sports.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Ten days later, in Parliament, the Opposition Communication spokesman David

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Coleman asked the Prime Minister.

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Will the Prime Minister work with the Opposition to get

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 4>this initiative implemented?

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Now give a call to the Prime Minister.

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 4>I thanked the member for his question.

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 3>No one likes their footing more than Mate Alban. He's

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>responded by saying that he was very concerned about gamely ads.

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>He said he found them annoying. But he questioned why

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>the Coalition was trying to move on this at that moment.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 4>If only they were in government sometime in the last decade,

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 4>if only they'd had the opportunity to do something.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Also that he was going to be waiting for Peter

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Murphy's inquiry to deliver its final report because you know

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 3>that is what's appropriate, he said at the time.

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So when the inquiry did report back, what did

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>they find?

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, six weeks after Dunton came out with that

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 3>promise to ban sports betting ads during games, Peter Murphy's

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 3>committee tabled its report You win some, you lose more.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 3>The committee unanimously agreed on the thirty one recommendations that

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 3>that report contained. But the one recommendation that's caused all

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the headaches for the government is the one that has

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 3>called for a comprehensive ban on all forms of advertising

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 3>for online gambling, to be implemented over three years.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 2>So will the government listen to the evidence? That's after

0:06:54.760 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>the break so Jason, The government said they wanted to

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.679
<v Speaker 2>wait until they got this report, final report before dealing

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>with the issue of gambling reform. So once they had

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that in their hands, what did they do next?

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, last December, as the Communications Minister Michelle Roland was

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 3>working through the government's response to the inquiry, Peter Murphy

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 3>died from cancer. And I think that added a lot

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>of extra emotional charge to this issue because it was

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>almost Peter Murfy's dying wish that the government act on

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>that key recommendation to ban gambling advertising. So when Parliament

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>returned in February this year, five days ironically before the

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Dunkley by election to fill the parliamentary vacancy created by

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Peter Murphy's death, Zoe Daniel, the Teal Independent, asked the

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister whether he would in fact honor Murphy's call

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 3>for a full ban on gambling ads. What did he say, Well,

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 3>he tried it out a form of words that he's

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of repeated each time he's been asked about this now,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 3>and that essentially has been that the Government is undertaking

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 3>relevant consultations as you would expect us to do, he

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 3>told Parliament then with all stakeholders. But by the middle

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 3>of the year, the same day that Albanezi met with

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the NRL's chief executive Andrew Abdo, the government was in

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 3>fact ready with a compromise proposal that it was prepared

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 3>to share with all irrelevant stakeholders under strict confidentiality arrangements,

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 3>and instead of a blanket ban on gambling advertising, Michelle

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Rowland had come up with a proposal to introduce a

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 3>cap of two gambling ads per hour on each channel

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 3>up until ten pm with a complete ban on gambling.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 3>It's an hour before and after live.

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Sport, right, So that's something, but it's not what the

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>inquiry actually recommended.

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a compromise. But when news of Michelle Roland's

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 3>proposal leaked, the Prime Minister refused to back it, and

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 3>he told journalists at that press conference, you know they

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't believe everything they read in the paper.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, we'll announce what our preferred solution is when we

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 4>announce it, so i'd comment on speculation. Thanks very much,

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 3>One Labor adviser I spoke with told me that he

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't think Michelle Roland was very happy with the way

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister responded to those questions. I think she

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>was hoping that he would say something a bit more supportive,

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 3>that he would even be prepared to back the proposal,

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>and their reading of it was you know that the

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Minister had gone out to stakeholders with a compromise that

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 3>everyone was broadly comfortable with, and that Labor missed an

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to pass what would have been a significant reform

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 3>that was in the public interest and that probably would

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 3>have got a majority of voters on site.

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>It is an interesting situation though, because you have a

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>committee that's looked at the evidence and said that what's

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>needed is a ban for ads on online gambling. The

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>government has opted not to do that, but instead there's

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>this compromise that's been proposed, but then when the Prime

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Minister is asked about that, he won't commit to it.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 2>So what's going on here and why is this becoming

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 2>such a sticking point?

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Great question? And I think you know, one gambling industry

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>executive that I spoke to said that, in his view,

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 3>they didn't really think that the government understood just how

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 3>complex this issue was when they referred it to the inquiry,

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and they said they didn't think that the government really

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 3>listened either to the industry representatives who appeared before that inquiry,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 3>including the sporting codes, the TV networks, in the gambling

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 3>industry itself, who all told the MPs just how difficult

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 3>it would be to implement a ban. And I think

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 3>the key thing here is how to replace or what

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 3>is considered this vital source of revenue that's keeping television

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 3>networks alike.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, So where has all of this left the government? Jason?

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, once the Prime Minister refused to back his

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>own Communication Minister's proposal. Did the possibility of reform die?

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 3>Well, it certainly looks that way right now. I think

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 3>it's left everyone feeling very frustrated. Each week that Parlam

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 3>has sat since August, the Prime Minister has faced questions

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 3>on this issue from not just the crossbench but the

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 3>opposition as well. We saw Tasmanian Independent Andrew Wilkie come

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 3>out on Thursday to call a government a disgrace.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 4>I have not seen a more egregious and shocking abandonment

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 4>of the public interest then this government's refusal to implement

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 4>a ban on gambling advertising.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I think all of this has left members of the

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>government feeling angry too. One senior labor source told me

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>that the whole thing has been very frustrating that they're

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 3>still trying to deal with the unintended consequences for the networks.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think you know, the PM has tried to

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 3>defend the government's record saying.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 4>We've done more in two years to tackle gambling arms

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 4>than has been done by any government since Federation.

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at the list that the PM

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 3>recites often in question time, things like establishing a mandatory

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 3>customer ID verification for online gambling, forcing online gambling companies

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 3>to send their customers monthly activity statements outlining wins and losses,

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and introducing new evidence based taglines and gambling ads, among

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 3>other things. I do think maybe that the PM has

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>a point. The government hasn't done nothing, But I think

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 3>for many people inside the government they think a lot

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 3>of this debate is based on emotion, not hard evidence.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but there is this distinct sense that you get

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 2>that we aren't really getting the full picture as to

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 2>what's happening behind the scenes, because if you look at

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, what's actually occurred. We've got a government saying

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that they don't want to act on gambling reform until

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>an inquiry really properly looks into it. Then that happens.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 2>They find that online gambling ads should be banned during sport,

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and it's now been well over a year, closer to

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>a year and a half since the government got those

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 2>findings and they haven't responded. So bearing in mind what

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>we know about the Prime minister's personal relationships, how should

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>we be thinking about who the Aberanezi government is really

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>listening to when it comes to gambling reform.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think Peter Landez said to the Prime Minister,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 3>don't do it, and he hasn't done it. He said

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be bad for the NFL, it's going

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 3>to be bad for the AFL. But I think really

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the Prime Minister has three bad options. He can impose

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 3>a full ban on gambling ads that will upset the

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 3>sporting codes and the media, and six months out from

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 3>an election he doesn't necessarily want to be doing that.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>He could implement the compromise proposal, and I think a

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>majority of voters who say they want to complete ban

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 3>on gambly ads probably aren't going to be happy with

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 3>a partial ban. And then the other option, doing nothing,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 3>is not really good for him either. The first anniversary

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>of Peter Murphy's death is actually this week, the fourth

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 3>of December, And while I think it's unlikely that the

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Government will announce a decision on this issue, it's still possible.

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Parliament's finished, but Cabinet will still meet right up I

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 3>think until the week before Christmas. This is something that

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 3>has to go through cabinet, So I think it's still

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 3>possible that the Prime Minister could surprise us and come

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 3>out with the decision.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Jason thank you so much for your time.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Thanks.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Ruby seven Am is at Ali show from Solstice Media.

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It's made by Atticus Bastow, Ariel Richards, Chris Dangate, Crystal Color,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Johnston, Sarah mcvee, Travis Evans, Zotonfecho and me Daniel James.

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Ruby Jones is on to comment and we'll be back

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>at the end of March. Our theme music is by

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Ned Beckley and Josh Hogan of bon Below Potier. Thanks

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening. We'll be back tomorrow with an

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>original episode.