WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 4 June

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>On Scar louds Ostrodio. This is the Reader Panalty Show.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the Riata Panety Show coming

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>up tonight. Well fact check Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>bizarre Sky News rant, the ABC lurching from crisis to crisis.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.959
<v Speaker 2>It's not just legal headaches for the national broadcaster, but

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 2>today's radio ratings were disastrous, the lowest ABC Melbourne has

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 2>recorded since modern records began some twenty years ago. And

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>tonight's Lefties Losing It features Fatties for Palestine.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Fatties for Palestine, what a consapp So these are available

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 3>in an extra large to E six acts. It's just

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>fat folks showing their solidarity because oppression recognizes opression and

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 3>ol oppression is interconnected.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 4>There you go.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>We've had queers for Palestine and now Fatty for Palestine.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Can't wait to see what they conjure up next. Now

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the Minister for Immigration is under attack again this way

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 2>he has been the focal point of question time for

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>five sittings in a row. He's made a number of

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>serious blunders in this crucial portfolio, including Ministerial Direction ninety nine,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>which has led directly to criminals including pedophiles and rapists

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>dodging deportation. Now, as reported first on Sky News, the

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister's hands are.

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 5>Not entirely clean. Not only does he.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Have responsibility as the leader of this inept government, but

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>it was his department that directly instructed the Home Affairs

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Department to find a way to stop the deportation of

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand citizens who had lived in Australia for many years.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 2>This was at the behest of former New Zealand Prime

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>ministerist into Ard Dern. She had made the same requests

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.639
<v Speaker 2>of the coalition government and been rightly ignored, but now

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 2>laborer in power. Sky News was first report on the

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>weekend that the PM's department's instruction came prior to the

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>drafting of Immigration Minister Andrew Giles's Direction ninety nine in

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>January twenty twenty three, which Labor is scrambling to revise

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 2>this week even they realize what a mess up this

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 2>is now. We'll get back to the PM in a second,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>But the Immigration Minister has again this week blamed his

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 2>department after admitting he falsely claimed criminals release from detention

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>were being monitored by drones. Jiles wants to blame the

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 2>aat the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 5>He wants to blame his department.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 2>He takes no responsibility for the mayhem his helped usher in.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 2>But it's not just the Immigration minister. Have a look

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>at how the Prime Minister responded to the news Andrew

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Colonel broke on Sky News about his own department.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 6>Andrew Clanel of Sky News has reported that following the

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister's meetings with Jacinta Adirn and prior to the

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 6>introduction of Direction ninety nine, the Prime Minister's Department directly

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 6>instructed the Home Affairs Department to attempt to find a

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 6>way to stop the deportation of so many New Zealand

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 6>citizens and to quote fix the problem, Prime Minister, is

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 6>this true?

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Sky News Occasionally occasionally don't get things right.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 7>I know it'll come, usually tonight, usually during.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The day before it becomes dark, when truth sort of

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>gets darkened as the day goes.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 2>On Sky after dark, truth gets darkened. Does he not

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>know Andrew Colonel's show Sunday A Gender is on in

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the morning. It's eight am, Albert. I don't know what

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>parallel universe you inhabit, but eight am ain't dark and

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>as far as an amateur hour attacks against Sky News's

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>prime time lineup, Albow is showing yet again he's a

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 2>student activist who's foiled his way up all the way

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 2>into the launch. Joining me now as senior Herald Sun

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 2>columnist Patrick Carlin and Patrick the PM's bizarro rant. There

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>does not distract anyone interested in this issue. They've made

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>a mess of this area, They've pledged to fix it.

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 2>They're going to be replacing Direction ninety nine in the

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>coming days.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, look, I think Rita, I think Greg Sheridan got

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 8>it right today in The Australian he talked about Andrew

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 8>Giles making an error every time he opens his mouth,

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 8>and then the next time he opens his mouth he

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 8>blamed somebody else for the error. And this has been

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 8>going on for weeks. It's put us in danger as

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 8>a community. I've never seen a minister struggle for so long,

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 8>and he really does need to be put out of

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 8>his misery. But that's very interesting what's come out today.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 8>In the last few days. The previous government pushed back

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 8>against New Zealand on changing these rules. It's because of

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 8>what happened in July twenty twenty two and Albo and

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 8>Jacinda Adurn that actually led to this situation now, so

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 8>it's bigger than we thought it.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 5>Was, absolutely and.

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand has been campaigning for that to happen for

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 2>some time. They don't want their criminals sent back to them.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why we would be trying to appease them.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 2>It's New Zealand for for the love of God. Now

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 2>there's labor mistakes are obviously making some within the party nervous,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 2>nervous enough perhaps to leak stories against potential leadership rivals.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>To Anthony ALBERIZI look at this one about NDIS Minister

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Bill Shorten.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Former leader Bill Shorten to Daily Telegraph.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Reveals he's got his own personal speech writer, costing the

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 2>taxpayer six hundred and twenty thousand dollars over two years.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 5>This is a genuine story, but.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting the timing their source is interesting, and particularly

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 2>when you mean it's definitely a story that should be

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>told because this is a minister with a communications department.

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Why does he need to be paying someone six hundred

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 2>and twenty thousand over two years to write speeches? I mean,

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>who's he speaking to the Hague?

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 8>You know the market rate for writers, don't you. Obviously,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 8>given what we do, six hundred and twenty grand over

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 8>two years is pretty good going.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 5>How many speeches is he doing a day against that?

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 8>Bill Shorten, who is savvy, has sort of distanced himself

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 8>from it and sort of said, well, this has nothing

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 8>to do with me, but who's setting the market rate here?

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 8>It's an awful lot of money, absolutely, in an area

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 8>that is plagued with problems with the endis and everything

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 8>else for somebody to be paid that amount of but

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 8>that sort of work just beggars below.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>And he's got a communication, he's got people within his

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>own team who are capable of helping him with his speeches.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it be refreshing if a minister wrote his own speeches,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 2>his own words.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 8>That would never happen now, That would never happen.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Now to Victoria, where landlords are going to have to

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>install ceiling installation and energy effission heating system, whole raft

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of new works. They will have to be undertaken to

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 2>meet new minimum standards to help improve rental conditions and

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>keep the electricity bills down for renters. The Victorian government

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>ministers are very excited to announce these changes.

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 9>We're here to announce today the launch of consultation on

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 9>some new minimum standards.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 7>From October next year. There'd need to be ceiling insulation,

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 7>weather seals, three star cooling systems, four star shower heads

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 7>plus blind court and kor and once a heater or

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 7>hot water system conks out, it'll have to be replaced

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 7>with an energy efficient electric option.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 10>We're looking at annual dollar savings on tenants bills of

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 10>around three hundred and thirty dollars.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 2>The save renters three hundred dollars if they're right with

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>their figures, and the Victorian government often are not right

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>with their.

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Figures three hundred dollars annually.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 2>But I would argue, if the landlord is going to

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>have to spend thousands, and we're talking many thousands to

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>meet these minimum standards, the rents are going to go

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 2>up by a little bit more than three hundred annually.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how monstrously stupid would you have to be

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Patrick not to see this the impact that you're going

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 2>to have less rental properties available, so the rental pool shrinks,

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 2>rents go up, and that the landlords are going to

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 2>try to pass these costs on too rents naturally.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, And look, I mean you can't look at this

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 8>in isolation. Here in Victoria, we've got a land tax

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 8>that's tripled or something like that in the last few years.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 8>The overheads for landlords have just gone through the room.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 8>The Victorian government seems to be driven by ideology and debt,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 8>where the rich people have to pay off this debt

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 8>that just keeps escalating week in week out with the

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 8>big projects here in Victoria. And of course the renters

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 8>they're the ones who are caught in the buying. I mean,

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 8>in a lot of cases, they can't afford to stay

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 8>and they can't afford to go because it is so

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 8>difficult with the cost of living. The Victorian government is

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 8>doing nothing for them on any level, and in so

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 8>many ways they're actually hurting them and making it worse.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Now let's go to this story from the mul Dives

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 2>or the Maldives.

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Which one do you prefer.

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Mold E's I believe.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Is it's correct. I've been there and I still don't

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 5>know what's correct.

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 2>But this popular holiday destination is going to ban Israeli

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>passports from Israelis can no longer holiday there, and thousands

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>do from Israel every year.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 5>This is not isolated.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>There's a number of Islamic majority countries that ban Israeli

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>passports or the likes of Bangladesh, Brunei, Iran, Kuwait, Pakistan, Syria, Libya, Yemen.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 5>As others on the list.

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 2>This is a bold move, then this could have an

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 2>impact far wider than Israel. I'm going to imagine there'd

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 2>be a lot of other people who'd say, I'll find

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else idealic to holiday, not somewhere that bands Israeli passports.

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 8>I think eleven thousand Israelis go to the Maldives each year,

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 8>and there were actually warnings starting to be introduced last

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 8>year within Israel.

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Watch out, you.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 8>Take it carefully if you're planning to go there. I

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 8>think in this rise of anti Semitism that we're feeling

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 8>here in Australia, if anything, this is actually a good

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 8>reason not to go to the Maldives, whether you're Jewish

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 8>or not, because it's obviously targeted against Jewish people across

0:10:56.120 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 8>the board. It's very Islamic driven in its direction, and

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 8>it's actually famil I'd say, well, hang on, if I'm

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 8>going to go here or there.

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I might not go there because of this.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I tell you where it's idyllic and you don't have

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 2>any of these sort of conditions.

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:14.479
<v Speaker 5>The Florida Panhandle.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 2>That's where I like to go beach holidays.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, put that on the list.

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Now to this disturbing story from Europe, the euthanasia slippery

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 2>slope is real. A physically healthy Dutch woman named Zarea

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 2>tur Beek had her life terminated because her depression met

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the requirement for unbearable suffering with no prospect of improvement.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 2>She was only twenty nine years old. A sad, depressed

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine year old who was killed by this stay

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>this is state sponsored suicide. We know she her a

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit of her story. She was bullied as a child.

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 2>She was diagnosed with autism. At twenty one, she started

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>wearing a do not Resuscitate tag around to neck. At

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, she said her psychologist has told her that

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 2>a depression wasn't going to go away and started her

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 2>on her assisted suicide journey.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 8>Patrick, this is awful, just absolutely awful. I find it

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 8>hard to believe that a psychologist would say you're never

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 8>going to get over your depression and then start to

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 8>help this process of dying, that is stay sponsored. I've

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 8>seen elderly people go through terminal illness and linger longer

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 8>than they should, and euthanasia is a good thing in

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 8>a lot of those cases. But a twenty nine year old,

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 8>how can you say, well, the rest of her life

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 8>is doomed, We're going to end it nowtantly healthy.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 2>But they consider mental pain chronic pain. Patrick Carline, thank

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you so much for you one this evening. Joining me

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>now is the Australians media writer Sophie Ellsworth. Sophie, let's

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 2>start with the former ABC present Antoinette Latouffe, who had

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a win this week after the Fair

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 2>Work Commission found she was indeed sacked by the ABC

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.239
<v Speaker 2>midway through her employment. The ABC had argued her contract

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>wasn't actually terminated.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Tell me what.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Impact this decision will have on the case she's pursuing.

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Is she going to now be compensated or does this

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 2>mean she was unfairly terminated.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's now moving on RITA to the Federal Court,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 10>so it's still got some way to play out. But

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 10>the ABC were arguing that she wasn't terminated. She had

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 10>five casual shifts to do and she was let go

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 10>after three, but she was paid for all five. She

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 10>was paid for all five and.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 4>So it's very interesting.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 10>They're saying, you know, you don't need to shop for

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 10>you basically your last two episodes after she put up

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 10>this Instagram post which they deemed was a.

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Breach of social media.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 10>So this is a story that just will not go

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 10>away for ABC Sydney. Been very damaging for them. We're

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 10>six months on and we still don't have a result.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 5>This is interesting.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>So if you've got five shifts under some sort of

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>a casual employment agreement and you're let go but you're

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 2>paid for all five, you can still be deemed to

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>be terminated and then have certain rights that are attached

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>after that.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, that clearly must be the case reto.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 10>Because she was four or five shifts, they said you're

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 10>here for five.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 4>After her third shift.

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 10>On the Wednesday, that's when they made the decision you

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 10>don't need to come back.

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, they've got bigger problems, I would argue here in

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne because the radio ratings came out today and ABC

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Melbourne this is the worst they have recorded since modern

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 2>ratings have been in place. The age saying this is

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the worst they have seen in twenty years. This is

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>quite a setback. What is behind this rating slide? It

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't start in this survey, but this is a new low.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 4>That's right RETA.

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 10>So from all the records I can see, this is

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 10>the lowest that they've had in the existing rating system.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 10>They're down to five point four percent audience share, which

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 10>is very low, and clearly whatever they're doing is not working.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 10>They've had a reshuffle, moving host different spots up. Most

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 10>of the changes were late last year, but it's not working.

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:33.119
<v Speaker 2>Are they going to I don't know, rejigt their offering

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>or are we going to see more of the same

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>because they did seem to have a freshen up, but

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>it's the same old ABC types. There's really not a

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>great deal of diversity of opinion on that, and I

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 2>would argue the appeal of it is fairly limited.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 4>And that's the problem REACHO.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 10>They just you know, shuffle did a bit of musical chairs.

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 10>They don't inject new talent people from outside the ABC

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 10>into the ABC. It's just a reshuffling of staff they have.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 10>And I think this is proving a problem because their

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 10>stations are feeling it right across the country, but particularly Melbourne.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.359
<v Speaker 5>Now let's talk about the Project.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Apparently having a bunch of lefty hosts, that's not enough.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Channel ten want to go even further left, so they

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>bought in a Guardian journalist on as a guest to

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>opine about nuclear energy policies and economics.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Let's have a look.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 11>Because we keep talking about it being a cheaper source

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 11>of zero carbon energy, in which case, right now, yes

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 11>it is, but the reality is as we move forward,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 11>it's not going to be the cheaper source of energy.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when I need economics and energy advice, I go

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 2>straight to your favorite Guardian journalism. I mean really, but

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 2>tell me about the project, how they're traveling. We're hearing

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>about Q and A and other program designed for lefties

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>being in peril. There's talk about it not coming back

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 2>for another season. How are these shows traveling in the

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 2>current environment.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, they've changed the whole rating system RITA, so it's

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 10>hard to compare apples with apples.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 4>But we do know that.

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 10>Freedomware television has struggled in recent years, particularly the growth

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 10>of streaming, and projects like the shows like the Project

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 10>have struggled. They obviously had all that fall out with

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 10>the Britney Higgins interview they did with Lisa Wilkinson. Channel

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 10>ten has a lot of problems and the project is

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 10>really just in this little echo chamber of left leaning voices.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 10>It doesn't very rarely branch out other than having people

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 10>like fellow Sky News host Steve Price on it once

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 10>a week, once a week, for once a week.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 5>As token conservative for once a week.

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 4>That's right, that's right, Rita.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Now Channel nine.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 2>They've got their own woes as now talk about a

0:17:55.520 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 2>class action. Female employees current and former are talking with lawyers.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 5>What's the latest that Channel nine.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 4>So, Rita, this is saga is still going on.

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 10>Obviously, there's a lot of people have spoken out of

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 10>alleged mistreatment at the network, sexual harassment, and now Morris Blackfirm,

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 10>one of the big law firms, has come out and said, look,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 10>women who have been treated badly in the TV industry,

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 10>come and see us.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 4>This looks like.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 10>It's going to gain some momentum Rita. With a lot

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 10>of women coming forward now if they can see that,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 10>they could potentially sue nine again. This is another headache

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 10>for the network that they really don't need right into

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 10>them coming up to the Olympics, which is a big

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 10>investment for them. They've got to deal with all this

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 10>fallout of the departure of Darren Wick.

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Still as Maurice Blackburn in and inviting women to come

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>forward and talk about the culture at nine. Is it

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>limited to nine or are they talking about at other

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 2>networks as well?

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 10>So they've put a post up on social media saying,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, in the television industry, they haven't you know,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 10>reduced it to particular networks. But it's broader than that,

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 10>and I suspect going on what we've seen in recent weeks,

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 10>there will be quite a few people coming forward.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 5>Interesting. So for Elsworth, thank you so much for your

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 5>time this evening.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Rita.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 5>Still to come.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 2>Lefties losing It and doctor Sebastian.

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 5>Gorka tells me what really.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Happened in that Manhattan courtroom. That's up next, Welcome back.

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Now it's time for Lefties losing it. I regret to

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>inform you that Queers for Palestine has some competition in

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 2>the Lefties losing its space. Sorry QFP, but a new

0:19:55.440 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 2>clown show has joined the chat. It's FFP Fatties for Palestine.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, that's a thing now.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Enough.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they even have their own shirts and you can

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 2>get one too if you want, but the size range

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 2>is rather limited.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Are you fat? Are you pro Palestine? Boy? Do I

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 3>have a shirt for you? A look what I just got?

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it beautiful? Fatty is for Palestine?

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 12>What a concept?

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 3>So these are available in an extra large two A

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 3>six x. So basically, you know, it's just fat folks

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 3>showing their solidarity because oppression recognizes oppression and all oppression

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 3>is interconnected. My only complaint is I wish it came

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 3>in other colors then white, because I already go to

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>coffee stand on mine. But you know what, it's okay.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 3>The money went to where it was supposed to go

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>to free Palestine.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 13>Go get one.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Did you hear that oppression recognizes oppression and all oppression

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 2>is interconnected. That's that warped intersectional dogma, just more neo

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Marxist lunacy. And can we stop pretending that fatties are

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>an oppressed group. You literally have more food than you need.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Most of the world's population over most of the history

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>of mankind would be thrilled with that. Now back to

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 2>fattist for Palestine, and they are making an appearance on

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 2>university campuses as well.

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 5>You can't miss them.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 12>We're here at Umas's campus supporting the students in their encampment.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 12>They're demanding for divestment from war properteers and the warmongers.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 12>I'm here with Yaffa, who just come to the students

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 12>in like the most inspiring, beautiful way, and I think really.

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 13>Am ritupid as a crowd.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 14>Thank you.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 5>It's been such a pleasure to be out here.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Pleasure You're able to come out.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 8>Come out if you're not in Massachusetts or Western Massachusetts,

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 8>go out to an encampment, you're in students around here

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 8>starting these encampments everywhere.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, this movement is growing at a rapid pace. I

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>can't wait to see what these lefties losing it will

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 2>come up with next. Now, let's look at a sketch

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 2>mocking the excesses.

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Of the Wok mind virus.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Remember the board game Guess Who. It's still around and

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 2>still good, wholesome family fun. But is the game truly inclusive?

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Does it cater for demi boys and non binary pan sexuals?

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 5>It does?

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 13>Now, Hey, kids who wants to play Guess Who?

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't like that game.

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 5>It's not inclusive. Yeah, it only has two genders, not anymore.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, introducing the all new Guess Who now with all

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 13>four hundred and thirty seven genders.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Is you a person by gender?

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 14>Mom?

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 9>You cannot determine someone's gender based on their appearance.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 5>That's disrespectful and offensive.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Is your person at Demi Boyne?

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 13>Identifying someone solely based on their gender is reductive and offensive.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 14>Does your person look like someone who is trying to

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 14>adopt the appearance of a traditional female?

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 9>Privileging traditional gender stereotypes is patriarchal and offensive.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 13>Four hundred and thirty seven Gender Guess Who great for

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 13>the whole family. Family may include, but it is not

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 13>limited to single parent families, landed families, chosen families, LGBTQIA

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 13>plus families, and should not be defined solely based on

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 13>blood relations or legalized and can be found in friendships, communities,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 13>and other relationships where everyeels valued and respected for who

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 13>they are.

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Scheme is too many visus taking forever?

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you want this game to be easy to play

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>or do you want us to.

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 5>Be inclusive inclusive?

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 13>Four hundred and thirty seven Gender Guess Who Hours of

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 13>endless fun fun is not meant to suggest an enjoyable

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 13>or pleasurable experience, but rather one that elicits a feeling

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 13>of a smoth self satisfaction about being on the right

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 13>side of history, and a sense of superiority over others

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 13>who are not as enlightened or revolved.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh we lack a good parody on this program, and

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 2>now wish this next clip was parody like the last one.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 5>But it's sadly all too real.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Here is an American couple who take their young children

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 2>for an exciting and riching overseas holiday too Afghanistan, you know,

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 2>the country ruled by the Taliban, the barbaric Islamus tyrants

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 2>that stop girls from going to school, that stone women

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 2>to death for sorcery, that torture and kill anyone who

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 2>challenges their backward savagery. Yes, let's take the whole family there.

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 2>The chickpease soup is delicious.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 4>We are here from the United States of America.

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 14>They chose to come here to Afghanistan and May of

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 14>twenty twenty four and.

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 12>We found Let's Go Afghanistan online and it has been

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 12>a great tour.

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 15>We crossed the border into Jikistan, came down through Kunduz's

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 15>and a couple of days in Bamian.

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 5>Now a couple of days here in couple and then

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 5>we will actually through the accident.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 15>We enjoyed the food, we enjoyed the culture, we enjoyed

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 15>the history, the archaeology.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 13>We enjoyed meeting people that which is probably the best

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 13>part of the whole trip.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 3>And we would encourage you to come to Kenna Sensi

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 3>with Let's go.

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm going to play you a short clip of

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Eric Trump referring to the swing of African American voters

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 2>to Trump, and then an epic lefty losing it moment

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>on x.

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And you see them swing.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 13>You look at the African American field right that swing

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 13>over to Donald Trump and speeds.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 2>Now here's the lefty democrat losing it. Because Eric Trump

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 2>used the phrase in spades. Alex Cole tweeted this MF

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>really called black people spades?

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Holy shid. These people are so racist they don't realize

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 5>they're races.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Black people will be swinging over to Donald Trump in spades.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, I've got to say I first thought this was

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a comedy account, but it's sadly not. This lefty losing

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 2>it is Alex Cole, who was around one hundred and

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand followers on x He says is a pilot,

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a software engineer and editor. Is very busy, obviously, and

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 2>he's clearly not the only race baiting democrat with major

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>comprehension issues because that demented tweet had thousands of likes.

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 5>Talk about low information voters.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'm sure we'll be discussing more Left is losing

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it with my next guest, I'm absolutely thrilled to have

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>doctor Sebastian Gorka. He's a former deputy assistant to Donald

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Trump and the host of America First with Sebastian Gorka.

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to the program, Dr Gorka.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 2>You were in that courtroom for this hush money trial.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>You wrote a fantastic piece about it on your sub stack,

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 2>and it really was a trial with an unashamedly partisan

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 2>judge brought by a prosecutor he got into office on

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 2>a Get Trump campaign.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 5>And you wrote of what you saw.

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 2>You you were in that courtroom, and you wrote of

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Judge Merchand's bias. In a back and forth lasting for hours,

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>with scores of requests from either side, Machan accepted every

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 2>demand from Alvin Bragg's team, the prosecutor, and none from

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the defense. At one point he even said to the

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 2>president's attorney, as he was standing up and preparing to

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 2>make a point, sit down.

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to hear from you again.

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this was this is why we didn't

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 2>have cameras in that courtroom, an attempt to hide from

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the public.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.479
<v Speaker 5>Just what a hit job this was?

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh utally. I mean, as the former Attorney general who

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was with me with the president, Matt Whitaker said when

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we had a press conference outside, he said, the judge

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>should be wearing the jersey of the prosecution. This is

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a stitch up. This was a hatchet job. I mean,

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the fact that the person prosecuting for Alvin Bragg, who,

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as you say, campaign because we have this weird thing

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>where we have prosecutors who are elected to officers, campaigned

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on putting President Trump in prison, a man who, by

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the way, was also funded by George Soros in that campaign.

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And then who's his line prosecutor in the case. Now,

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>this is where it gets really fascinating. Matthew Colangelo. Who's

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Colangelo. Well, he parachuted in from the stinking swamp

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that is Washington, DC, where he was the number three,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the third most senior law enforcement officer in Biden's Department

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of Justice. Never before in the history of federal law

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 1>enforcement does the third highest ranking official in the federal

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice just magically fall all the way down

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the snakes and ladders to become a line prosecutor in

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a local court in New York. Why did he take

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that massive pay cup because he's doing the bidding of

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden in that courtroom. The whole thing was a farrago.

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Look the way you understand this, and President Trump even

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>quoted my substack article today on his truth Social Fee

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is that this is how they want to steal the

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>election before the first ballot is even cast. They know

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is going to win. Why New Jersey, New

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Jersey is a Democrat state. President Trump goes there and

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand working class minority Americans go to see

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. Biden is toast if we have a free

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and fair election. That's why they want to put President

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump in prison. On July eleventh, you.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Talked about the third ranking Justice Department dude coming down

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 2>to this local court to be a prosecutor. I mean,

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 2>how do we have a local court in Manhattan prosecuting

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 2>federal election crimes? Mean, on the face of it, it

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>seems so obset. We've had so many legal experts talk

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 2>about the massive inconsistencies and just extraordinary things that have

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 2>seen in this trial. And yet there was a poll

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 2>out today showing that around fifty three percent of Americans

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 2>think this was a fair trial.

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 5>How can that be.

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, because they listen to propaganda halls like CNN and

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post. I mean, that's why. I mean, even

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>your chirn and your introduction is a talking point for

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the mainstreamlining legacy media hush money trial. It's not a

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>hush money trial. It's a non disclosure agreement. I signed

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a non disclosure agreement with mister Trump in twenty fifteen

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>when I came on board to be his national security

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>advisor for the debate. An NDA is a completely standard

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>business practice in Australia, in the UK, in America. And

0:30:55.920 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this is what it's a fabricated crime. The statute of

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>limitation that expired five years ago for what they charged

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>him with, which is what a misstatement on a financial

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>internal document where he said this is legal fees. Well,

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it was because he was paying his lawyer. And then

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they come up with this Rube Goldberg lunatic thing that well,

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the hush money so called payment was made to protect

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the president's reputation during an election. Therefore it should have

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>been paid for from the campaign fund. But here's where

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it gets bizarre. When was that payment to the president's

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>lawyer made. This is an important point, January after the election.

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>How can you undermine an election three months after the

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>election occurred unless the check went into HG. Wells's time

0:31:56.240 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>machine and went back in time. The whole thing is abrurcation.

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And your other point is completely well taken. It's a

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.959
<v Speaker 1>federal election. So what is a state court in New

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>York doing trying to prosecute a federal election allegation? The

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Federal Election Commission deemed there to be no crime. Alvin

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Bragg's predecessor in New York, Saivans Junior, said, yeah, sorry,

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>no crime here. Oh, but President Trump becomes the nominee

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Republicans. He's beating Joe Piden in six of

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the six battleground states. Are now we're going to charge

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>him with the Trump up felony everybody sees through this

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>who's awake, has our eyes open, and has a pulse.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Now you were in court, you know, President Trump. Did

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 2>he appear rattled at any point when those verdicts came

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>through and the thirty four guilties.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 5>Did you sense that at he felt fear or despair?

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>This man is quite remarkable. I've never seen him show

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>fear since I've known him since what twenty fifteen. Look,

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>he said something quite moving that day. He said that

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I am prepared to go to prison because the US

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Constitution is more important than my liberty. What person says that,

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let alone, what politician? He says, I'm doing

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this for all of you. It's not about me. And

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>he's right. I mean, Donald Trump, without any question, is

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the most famous man in the world. He's a billionaire.

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a person who's escorted twenty four hours a day,

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>seven days a week by Secret Service agents carrying fully

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>automatic weapons. That man is very clear about one thing.

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>If they can do it to him, they can do

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it to any American. And that's why he will never

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>ever stopped. And as he said last Thursday, standing in

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that dingy corridor under that neon lighting, the real verdict

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>will be on November fifth, when the American people speak,

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 1>well this law fare.

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 2>There are now debates happening amongst conservatives. Some say Republicans

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 2>must take the high road, they can't play these dirty

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>games the Democrats have played, and others say no, this

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 2>is the only way to deal with this strategy is

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 2>to throw it back at them and their suggestions.

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 5>If you want to talk about.

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>Election interference, what about that letter that was signed by

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 2>fifty one national security experts. Where did that letter originate from,

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 2>who had a hand in crafting it? Those fifty one

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 2>security experts who claimed that Hunter Biden's laptop and all

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 2>the information contained within it about the Biden family was

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Russian disinformation that came out right before the twenty twenty election.

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 2>To credit that New York Post story, and you could

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 2>argue very easily that was a clear case of election interference.

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 5>Did the likes of the.

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Biden campaign, Joe Biden, Anthony Blincoln, did they have any

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>hand in spreading that message? Do you think that's going

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 2>to happen? Do you think the Republicans are going to

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 2>go after Joe Biden, go after Hillary Clinton and other

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Democrats as they've gone against their ideological opponents.

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, first things first, we know who orchestrated that. It

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is Anthony Blincoln, the Secretary of State, and Mike Morell.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Mike Morell has confessed on the testimony in front of

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the House of Representative as acting director of the CIA,

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>which should be a completely non political position, he orchestrated

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the signatures of those fifty one former CIA directors and

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>intelligence officers to lie about the Hunter Biden laptop, which

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we now know is true. The photographs, the video, the prostitutes,

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the guns, the cocaine, it's all real. And they said, no,

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a Russian this information. That's the

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>acting director of the CIA. That is the definition of

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the deep state. Now what are the Republicans going to

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>do now? First thing is, first they're not going to

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 1>go after their political ideological opponents, because then we sync

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to the gutter of those who believe that the state

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is there is a political weapon. What we must go after,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>not politically, but in the terms of justice, is those

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>who have committed crimes. If you worked in the Trump

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>administration leaked secret documents to the Washington Post CNN, you

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>committed a felony. If you're Jim comey former director of

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the FBI. If you're James Clapper, John Brannan directed the

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>DII and the CIA, you affected the illegal surveillance of

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a presidential candidate. It's Operation Crossfire Hurricane. You use the

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>most powerful intelligence agencies in the world as a political tool.

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>You must be charged with abuse of power, and you

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>must stand in a dock and answer for your crimes

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and be judged by injury of your peers. So unless

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we restore faith in our institutions, I mean the biggest

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, President Trump is doing great. He's raised two

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars in the last seventy two hours. I

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that never before seen since the verdict. But God willing,

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>if we have a free and fair election, he will

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be re elected and he will be the president, whether

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he's convicted or not. But the bigger problem is this reader.

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>On Thursday, tens of millions of Americans lost complete and

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>utter faith in the judicial system and the organs of

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the state that have the power to imprison. That takes

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>much longer than one election to fix. Tens of millions

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of Americans say, hang on a second, the FBI, the DOJ,

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the State of New York, if they don't like my face,

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>if they don't like my politics, they can put me

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>in prison for years. That the real damage done to

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Republic, and that has been done by the Democrats.

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>The effect of this trial on the polls, it appears

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 2>to be mixed.

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 5>There's a new.

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 2>ABC poll suggesting perceptions of Donald Trump and Joe Biden

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 2>are statistically unchanged from before the verdict was announced. Roytis

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 2>poll says that one in ten Republicans are less likely

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to vote for Trump post verdict than they were before.

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>There's been a number of other polls talked about them

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend that showed Trump's support actually improved after

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 2>the conviction. What do you think the impact of this case,

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:48.720
<v Speaker 2>this conviction is going to be in November on Trump's

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 2>chances of being elected president.

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's very simple. Just look at what happened. Seventy

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in eight hours from small donors. Then we

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have another one hundred and thirty million from big institutional donors.

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That's two hundred million dollars in seventy two hours. Forget polls,

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 1>look at and go. You know, if you go to

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter feed because I want social media lot, and

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 1>when you see Democrats who bring the receipts and by name,

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>they say, I'm a Democrat, I voted Democrat all my life,

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm voting for President Trump, and I just donated to

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>his campaign. And there's a screenshot John Smith donated one

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. I've never seen that before. I never seen

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats openly on a social media platform where they face cancelation,

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they self dox themselves saying I've had it.

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>You know this is beyond party politics. But we know,

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we know what if any other person had been accused

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of misstating a business entry for their accounting seven years ago,

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't be in the they wouldn't be convicted of

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty four made up felonies. The only reason is it's

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. The only reason is he is the threat

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of all threats to the UNI Party, to the Democrats

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and the fake Conservative Republican in name only rhinos. That's

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>why he must be stopped. This is the only man

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>who isn't owned by any special interest group, not the unions,

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not big farmer, not big oil, not the military industrial complex.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody owns my former boss, and as such, he must

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 1>be stopped. And this is how they think they can

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>stop him. But you know the right thing about all

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what do Americans love more than anything else,

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, from Clint Eastward to you know, Dirty Harry,

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all of those. We love outlaws, we love cowboys. Why

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 1>is hashtag outlaw president trending because they've made him an

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.240
<v Speaker 1>outlaw and Americans love outlaws.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's incredible because even the term convicted felon, which

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 2>they were using, and I saw one of Thesaurus Son saying,

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 2>we've got to get this tag attached to Trump anytime

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 2>is mentioned, say convicted felon, they've completely changed the meaning

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 2>of that because that was trending on Twitter. But it

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 2>was trending because Republicans were pledging to vote for a

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 2>convicted felon, not because Democrats were using that term. So

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 2>in that way it has backfired certainly with the donations

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 2>that have been raised.

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 5>And I look forward to speaking to you again.

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 2>Before the November poll, Doctor Gorka, thank you so much

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 2>for your time this evening.

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you to check out my sab stack

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>and follow me on Twitter.

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.439
<v Speaker 5>God bless you still to come.

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 2>The BBC is confused about what a woman is, and

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.800
<v Speaker 2>so is the safety Commissioner Stephanie bash Journey's up next.

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 2>You're watching the Reader Penny Show. Joining me now as

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 2>research fellow for a Women's Forum Australia, Stephanie Bastian Stephanie.

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with the Safety Commissioner Julian M Grant, who

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 2>seemed genuinely confused about the link between labeling factual claims

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 2>a hate crime and how that relates to a male.

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 5>Predator ending up in a women's prison.

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 15>And that deliberately misgendering someone online is a form of

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 15>gendered violence.

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 5>How do you justify these statements.

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 15>In a country where a male rapist and child's sex

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 15>offender can be placed in a women's prison and access

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 15>women's facilities.

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 14>I fail to see the connection to that specific incident.

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 14>A senator, that's kind of drying a long ball.

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 15>I would say, I'm guessing, given that you've referenced it's

0:42:57.360 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 15>seemingly a long vot draw, that you aren't aware of

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 15>the case that I've referred to. I've spoken about this

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 15>in the Senate before, where a man who was previously

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 15>convicted of raping his own six year old daughter committed

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 15>a serious sexual assault on a woman in Australia and

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 15>was referred to as a woman by the media and the.

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Court before being placed in a women's prison.

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 14>What does this have to do with online safety, Senator.

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think the question is is it your position

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 15>that referring is it the a Safety Commissions position that

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 15>referring to a male rapist or as a man or

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:35.839
<v Speaker 15>as a male in an online forum, posting about it

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 15>on Facebook is misgendering and therefore a form of violence.

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 14>I think I will take that on notice. But I

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.479
<v Speaker 14>am not required to provide a personal opinion, nor would

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 14>I an a case like this, nor would I make

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 14>an honor spite judgment about a particular live investigation without

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:01.840
<v Speaker 14>the proper investigations being done. So I'm not going to

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 14>be drying on that, Senator, thank you.

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 2>She doesn't want to make an on the spot judgment

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>about a live investigation.

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 5>What live investigation?

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 2>The male predator has been charged, convicted and is jailed

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 2>right now in a women's prison here in Victoria.

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Is she just ignorant or is she engaging in a

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:22.919
<v Speaker 5>bit of misdirection there?

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Because I think the question was quite clear that you

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 2>can be called guilty of a hate crime, guilty of

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 2>hate speech if you misgender this person in discussing this

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:39.240
<v Speaker 2>case and the injustice of this case.

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 9>Look, it's hard to tell whether she's ignorant or engaging

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 9>in misinformation when it comes to this particular case. What

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 9>I think it shows, though, is that she hasn't actually

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 9>considered the impact on women and girls when she puts

0:44:56.600 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 9>in these particular directives. If she had, make their position

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:04.840
<v Speaker 9>indefensible at the end of the day, women have the

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 9>right to know if these predators are male or female.

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 9>It also shows that certain male patterns of behavior don't

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 9>change to suddenly start labeling all of this content as misinformation,

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 9>as not just misinformation, but as online violence. Now violence

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 9>is a crime, it's very serious, and I think it

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 9>shows that the Australian Human Rights Commissioner has been overrun

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 9>by activists and is no longer fit for purpose.

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Jillian Mangrant and the bureaucrats she had with her answering

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 2>questions made it clear that they form these policies after

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 2>consultation with transactivists. Do they also speak to any women's

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 2>rights campaigners? Do they consult groups like yours?

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 9>No, they did not, and we fight very hard to

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 9>try and have our voices heard to put this other side.

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 9>We've been running titians. We've got a petition at the

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 9>moment on our website Women's from Australia or slash prisons.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 9>We have met with every state and federal department. You

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 9>would think that if they are putting these policies in place,

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 9>they would be consulting broadly with the Victorian Human Rights

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.800
<v Speaker 9>Commission or the other commissions in each state. If they haven't,

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 9>then there's an issue with their processes. If they have,

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 9>they are clearly and deliberately ignoring the impacts of these

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:25.760
<v Speaker 9>policies to women and girls.

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 2>And she also said that she would not censor any

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 2>political commentary about trans or anti trans material, said that

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 2>was not her role, but as children's rights active ASTs

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Billboard Chris asked, why do I need to hire a

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 2>lawyer in Australia right now? If Julian mngrand isn't censoring

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 2>political commentary about trans, that's a good question, Stephanie.

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 9>Ah, Look, I think that statement would fall foul of

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 9>the government's misinformation bill I might remember Jasmine's had her

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 9>post removed over the fact that she reported a male

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 9>saying a man could not breastfeed We've had raddicks who

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 9>have posted about trans footballers injuring women like there are

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:15.840
<v Speaker 9>so many cases where she's weighed in on this debate

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 9>and tried to censor information that is factual and it

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 9>is relevant to the community safety. So that's a poorky reader.

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 5>And it's always in the one direction.

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 2>If other tweets were getting similarly censored or banned removed

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:38.240
<v Speaker 2>from Twitter, I would go, Okay, I'm not in favor

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of this, but at least it's relatively even handed. But

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 2>we see the most vile, disgusting things sent to women

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 2>who are fighting for women's only spaces, and somehow that

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 2>never crosses the Ease Safety Commissioner's desk that they're not

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 2>removed or there's no sort of campaign to protect the

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 2>those women. The online community, though, I've got to say,

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 2>is getting fed up with the bulk of the mainstream

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 2>media is politically correct reporting. The BBC tweeted an article

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 2>claiming that a seventy year old woman will be in

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 2>court over her husband's death. For that headline, copped a

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 2>community note on x formerly Twitter. It's a community notes

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 2>provide context. It's sort of like a fact checked and

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 2>it added this important clarification. The accused is a male

0:48:34.520 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 2>who identifies as a woman. This is a fairly important

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 2>context I would have thought, Stephanie.

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely. I'd love to know who's running the BBC

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 9>newsroom because they're really behind the rest of the country.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 9>If you have a look that man will not be

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 9>housed in a female prison. It is in the public

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 9>interest to know whether these predators are male or female.

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:55.839
<v Speaker 12>It just provides them cover.

0:48:56.280 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise, what the headline had woman in the headline. So

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're going to identify agenda, make it the right one.

0:49:06.400 --> 0:49:07.400
<v Speaker 5>Stephanie Bastien.

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Always appreciate your time. Thank you for joining me tonight.

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 5>And that's it for me.

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Up next is Newsnight. I'll see you at eleven tomorrow.

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 5>Good night,