WEBVTT - Cathy McGowan on how to run a community independent campaign

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>From Schwartz Media. I'm Daniel James. This is seven AM.

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>When Kathy McGowan won her seat of Indie as an

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>independent in twenty thirteen, it sent shockwaves through the political establishment.

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>What was supposed to be a safe Liberal seat was

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>no longer safe. Back then, she was one of only

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>two independents in the House of Representatives. Now, heading into

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty five election, the movement she helped ignite

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>is in full force across the country. A third of

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>electorates are organizing to put forward a community back to Independent.

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Today former Federal MP Kathy McGowan on who within the

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>major party should be worried about holding onto their seats

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and if there's such a thing as too many independents

0:00:47.920 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Parliament. It's Wednesday, January fifteenth, Kathy, As we

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.639
<v Speaker 1>head towards the election, can you give me a sense

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 1>of how big the Community Independent movement is right now?

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>How many candidates are running across the country.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>It's really hard to be exact because it's an organic

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 2>movement and there's no one controlling at all. But what

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I do know is in July last year, the Community

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Independent Project hosted an online convention and there was representatives

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>from fifty one electorates at that convention and a thousand people.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>There's one hundred and fifty one electorates in Australia, so

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 2>basically a third of the electorates participated in that convention.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>So the numbers of people involved are big and they're influential.

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>What makes an electorate right for a campaign from an independent.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there's a couple of things that need to happen.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>One is you've got to have a community group. So

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>that's leaders who are going to do the work, because

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>it is work, so it doesn't really matter who the

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>leaders are, but they've got to be people in the

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>electorate with a passion for community and they've got to

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 2>have enough expertise in bringing community together. So that's really important.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>And then the second thing is within that leadership group,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 2>but a bit wider. I want for something different, something better. Now,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 2>if you haven't got that want for something better, it's

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 2>really hard to build the momentum. But we're not short

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>of that. In Australia. We have got huge numbers of

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>electorates where people are thinking they're not getting what they want.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 2>They want a better choice, and they look at what

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>happens in electorates like Indie or Warringa, and they say

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 2>we want some of that. So there's no shortage of

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 2>people thinking that the two party system is not working

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 2>for them and that maybe this option could actually give

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 2>them better outcomes.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>You really kicked off the independent movement we're seeing now.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>When you run in twenty thirteen, coming up against the

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>two major political parties is a very daunting thing. What

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>advice would you give independent candidates on how to cut

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>through when it's coming up against these giant ensities.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>So in twenty thirteen in Indi, we are an isolated

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>rural community. Everyone forgot us. We were taken for granted

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>as a coalition seat. So our group of community leaders

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>said it's actually about community being at the center of

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 2>politics and that if you voted for me, this is

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>what you'd get. You'd actually get a representative who represented you.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't the answer to all their problems, but I

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 2>would represent them and I would always put my community first.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Fifty nine year old Kathy McGowan is a community leader

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>with a long track record in these pasts. She's an

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 3>independent whose form marriage equality is embarrassed by the national

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>debate on asylum seekers and talks about climate change to farmers.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>In reality, it is, of course you're going up against

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the the big parties with a lot of money, but

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>a representative that the community wants has got so much

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 2>going for it. It's got a natural momentum. But there

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 2>was another side as well. We were able to have fun.

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 2>And I don't say this lightly. The major part is

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>it's so heavy and it's so angsty, and they're always

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 2>arguing with each other and they're often very nasty, whereas

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>in the community independence movement that's not the way communities work.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 2>So given a choice of do you want to have

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>fun and have pizza knights and get to know your

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>neighbors and go outdoor knocking and get to know your

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 2>community and be trained in how to do it and

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 2>have an opportunity for leadership and have real impact versus

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 2>being told what to do by Melbourne or Sydney or Brisbane,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, like it was a no brainer. So in

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>one way, ignoring your opposition, ignoring the competition and just

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 2>getting ahead with it was the real skill. And that's counterintuitive,

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 2>isn't it, But it really did feel to me, And

0:04:57.960 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the more we went out and the more we were

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the chain, the more we bought people together, and the

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>more we build community the quick of a movement group.

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's what we're seeing happening around the country now,

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>is that community love being engaged, they love belonging, they

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>love the offer and the hope.

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's not ignore them for a second. Which major

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>party politicians should be most worried about independence this year?

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I actually think the whole system needs to worry. Quite frankly,

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 2>when I first got elected, I can remember just talking

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 2>to the organizers of that Liberal Party at the time

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 2>and said, guys, you should have seen this coming. You

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 2>should see the drop off in your vote. You should

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 2>see that you haven't got grass through its connection. You

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 2>should see that when you have the conferences, you're not

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 2>actually addressing the issues that are real to people. So

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 2>that in disengagement from the parties is really obvious. And

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>unless they can fix their model up by really relooking

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>at not only the issues but the organizing, I can't

0:05:57.800 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 2>see them ever going back to how they were in

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 2>the fifties and the see.

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>So given that, I mean, we saw people like Josh

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Fredenberg and Tim Wilson lose out in the last election

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there anyone in your mind that could meet a

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>similar faith.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think there are three electorates that I'm watching

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>really closely. So the one of one and in Western Victoria.

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>The incumbent there is Dantien. Now Dan's a lovely man,

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 2>a good person, but he's really caught up in being

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a member of his party and the inability of that

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>party to address the regional problems that Australia is facing.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>So Alex Dyson there.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 4>I could just keep up this grassroots independent campaign focusing

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 4>on what the community actually wants, like better roads, shorter

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 4>weight lists when it comes to age care and childcare,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 4>fairer funding for our So very.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Strong candidate, and this is the third time he's running.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I think he's in with a chance. The other one

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 2>is up in Bradfield in Northern Sydney. Now that was

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Paul Fletcher, but he's stepping down. Nick Bulla is there

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and she's running a very strong campaign. She's one then

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 2>independent with me, no destruction from puction with me. The

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 2>third seat that I think is been a really strong

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>contention is in Kauper, New South Wales. Cass heis I.

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Don't work for a party, I'm not beholden to party politics.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm beholden to the community.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 2>So Kauper is based around Port mcquarie and Coffs Harbor,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>so she ran last time as well and did very well.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Now that's a National Party seat again, the demographics of

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>that seat have changed and the sense that community could

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>have something better for itself is very strong.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 2>I say those three because each of those candidates have

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 2>run before and they've built a base, got very sophisticated

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>community engagement. Now that's not to say that there are

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>not other electorates that have got good campaigns. There are,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>but I think those three are really ones to.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Watch after the break are warning for the major parties. Kathy.

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>A lot has been said on this program and elsewhere

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about how we're heading towards a hung parliament where independence

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>will have a lot of power. What's to stop a

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>certain level of chaos going along with that amount of power.

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>That's often what people say, and the people who put

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 2>that out is that a two party opposition is better.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Are the two parties, so it's their vested interest to

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 2>keep that competition. And if you've got closer numbers in parliament,

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>then you actually have to negotiate and if you're negotiating

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 2>with someone who actually represents their community, they are going

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 2>to negotiate from a much much tougher position than someone

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>who just represents a party, and they're safe in their

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>job because they've got party endorsement. So I actually like

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the idea where the numbers are much closer, where the

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>majority she has to actually work with the crossbench to

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>get better legislation. I just absolutely think it's in our

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 2>national interest. And I'll just give you one example. One

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 2>of the issues I've been following closely is the gambling reform.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 5>The Prime Minister is under pressure to enact a total

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 5>ban on gambling advertising, with the cross benches accusing Labor

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 5>of shying away from meaningful reform.

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 2>The current government said, well, we're not going to back

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the recommendations of the committee, and the cross bench said, well,

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>we've all worked really closely. The committee system has come

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>up with this. We think you should back getting rid

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>of gambling on TV. At certain times, I say just

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 2>ban it. Ban gambling advertising on television full stocks.

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 5>Eighty percent of Australians want this, and we have a

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 5>government that doesn't have the guts to actually stand up

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 5>to the gambling industry.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 2>So just do it, shusan goddamn courage for once in

0:09:55.760 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 2>your lives, for this future of our children. So I

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>think when those sort of debates happen, we really should

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>be paying attention because those community independents are actually reflecting

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 2>their community push, whereas I suspect the government has got

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>other interests at play there. But I do say to people,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 2>listen carefully when someone says, oh, it's going to be chaos.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>That's a two party line and it doesn't actually represent

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 2>the reality of our lived experience. This country works very

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 2>very well with parliaments that are well balanced.

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>How many independence is too many?

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's the caliber of the community representatives. Like it's

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 2>a question like how many National party people are too many?

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I refuse to answer that.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the caliber. And then I would say the

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>strong members of Parliament, whichever place they come from, are

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>people of courage who commit to represent their communities and

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>do what's right. And I don't think we've got nearly enough.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Quite frankly, I would like to see a lot more

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>debate and a lot more constructive I suppose ways forward.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>But there's also something else about it. It's not only

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>this election the movement's not going to go away. And

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 2>as I've referred to, the three candidates I hope who

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 2>get elected to the crossbench or ran at the last election.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>So maybe there's thirty candidates running. Some will get up,

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>they'll be running at the next election and the next election.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>So what in fact is the impact of this foundational work.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 2>It's really hard to tie down, but it's also really

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>closely linked with how the major parties respond. If the

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>major parties continue to ignore it and go about their way,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>then that will have huge repercussions on how the parliaments

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 2>work in the future.

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Kath mcgawan, thank you so much for your time.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>You're welcome. Good morning everybody.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>In the news today, lawyers for the family of an

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Australian pilot facing extradition to the United States have launched

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a legal challenge in the Federal Court. Daniel Duggan, an

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Australian citizen and former US Marines pilot, is due to

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>face charges for allegedly training Chinese pilots. Dugan was due

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to be extradited by February after the Commonwealth government agreed

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to surrender the fifty six year old to the US.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>That will be paused until a judicial review is finalized

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Victorian Police Chief Commissioner says an alarming number

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of Victorian police members have been investigated for alleged sex

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>crimes and family violence. Figures released by the force show

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a total of six hundred and eighty three police officers

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and public servants were investigated between twenty nineteen and June

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, with alleged defenses taking place both on

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and off duty. I'm Daniel James. This is seven a m.

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.