WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 17 September

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you, Shari. How good

0:00:07.660 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was she today with Kyle Sandilands? I listen every day.

0:00:09.900 --> 0:00:12.270
<v Speaker 2>I'm a paid-up and proud member of the Kyle Sandilands

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.470
<v Speaker 2>Live community. It was good to see her in conversation

0:00:15.590 --> 0:00:17.210
<v Speaker 2>with Kyle today in promotion of the book.

0:00:17.290 --> 0:00:19.550
<v Speaker 1>Again, doing very, very well. Get one over the weekend.

0:00:19.590 --> 0:00:22.350
<v Speaker 2>We've got an awful lot to get to tonight, including

0:00:22.850 --> 0:00:25.450
<v Speaker 2>the kids who just are so much better than anyone

0:00:25.489 --> 0:00:28.190
<v Speaker 2>who's even thinking about voting for One Nation. Wait till

0:00:28.210 --> 0:00:30.510
<v Speaker 2>you hear some of the stuff that you haven't already

0:00:30.550 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>heard tonight. The plans for a big Australia, this stretches

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.729
<v Speaker 2>a little further than migration. I'll explain in a moment

0:00:37.770 --> 0:00:39.850
<v Speaker 2>or two's time. And the Greens have finally belled the

0:00:39.870 --> 0:00:42.620
<v Speaker 2>cat that the social media duty of care is really

0:00:42.780 --> 0:00:45.500
<v Speaker 2>about censorship. A reminder, we're in Bathurst a couple of

0:00:45.540 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>weeks before the race, in a couple of weeks from now. Now,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.260
<v Speaker 2>I've got a very big room, which is the National

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Motor Museum, and we can get an awful lot of

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:54.900
<v Speaker 2>people in, so I want to fill this and fill

0:00:54.940 --> 0:00:57.470
<v Speaker 2>it quickly, which is why I keep talking about it, OK?

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.050
<v Speaker 2>Now is the chance. Please help us fill the room

0:01:00.230 --> 0:01:01.990
<v Speaker 2>right now. If you're a fan of the show, if

0:01:02.010 --> 0:01:03.990
<v Speaker 2>you live in Bathurst, if you're anywhere near it or

0:01:04.010 --> 0:01:04.470
<v Speaker 2>can get.

0:01:04.550 --> 0:01:08.790
<v Speaker 1>To it, ourtownatnews24. com. au. Ourtownatnews24. com. au. So, the big news, the good news.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.819
<v Speaker 2>Is that the Prime Minister and the Veterans Affairs Minister

0:01:17.140 --> 0:01:21.150
<v Speaker 2>have finally had to do what was obvious the first

0:01:21.250 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 2>day we heard about the allied health cap in the

0:01:25.819 --> 0:01:26.660
<v Speaker 2>federal budget.

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Albanese government has caved to pressure from veterans.

0:01:32.819 --> 0:01:35.869
<v Speaker 4>After intense pressure, the federal government has scrapped its plan

0:01:35.910 --> 0:01:39.030
<v Speaker 4>to impose a cap on allied health support for veterans.

0:01:39.150 --> 0:01:41.429
<v Speaker 1>The government has scrapped that plan.

0:01:42.170 --> 0:01:44.010
<v Speaker 2>They should have done it a long time ago. We

0:01:44.330 --> 0:01:47.540
<v Speaker 2>all know about how they were dragged, kicking and screaming,

0:01:47.620 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>first to the meetings... then to getting rid of this

0:01:50.540 --> 0:01:53.940
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous decision. A major part of it happened last week

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.030
<v Speaker 2>when the Senate, all bar the Labor Party, voted to

0:01:57.060 --> 0:01:59.330
<v Speaker 2>get rid of it and then they decided to kick

0:01:59.350 --> 0:02:02.810
<v Speaker 2>it off until October. So all of those that have

0:02:02.850 --> 0:02:06.990
<v Speaker 2>been fighting it, they spoke about the win for veterans today.

0:02:08.790 --> 0:02:09.990
<v Speaker 1>The cap has been scrapped.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 5>And what we've done to back it up in there

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 5>is to make sure that in the future there'll be

0:02:15.660 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 5>no more caps on our health when it comes to

0:02:19.020 --> 0:02:19.420
<v Speaker 5>our health.

0:02:19.780 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That has to stop.

0:02:21.139 --> 0:02:23.770
<v Speaker 4>They never had any answers on how veterans would get

0:02:23.790 --> 0:02:26.190
<v Speaker 4>the help they need. They never had a solution to

0:02:26.210 --> 0:02:28.990
<v Speaker 4>the veterans who said it's already too hard to get treatment.

0:02:30.190 --> 0:02:33.109
<v Speaker 4>After months and months of campaigning from veterans, I want

0:02:33.130 --> 0:02:35.810
<v Speaker 4>to give a shout out to Senator Lambie and her team.

0:02:36.350 --> 0:02:37.390
<v Speaker 1>The connection they have with.

0:02:37.290 --> 0:02:39.609
<v Speaker 4>The veterans community is really important to bring that to

0:02:39.630 --> 0:02:40.550
<v Speaker 4>the floor of the parliament.

0:02:40.610 --> 0:02:45.020
<v Speaker 3>With continued opposition from the veterans community, from the crossbench,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.859
<v Speaker 3>from the coalition, they have now capitulated and said, OK,

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to do this. We have a contract

0:02:51.210 --> 0:02:54.149
<v Speaker 3>with ADF. If you serve our country, if you put

0:02:54.190 --> 0:02:56.500
<v Speaker 3>your body on the line, we will look after you.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>But let's be honest, it's not about politicians. It's about

0:02:59.060 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the veterans themselves. John Armfeld is a man who we

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.430
<v Speaker 2>have spoken to many times, former Navy diver. He has

0:03:04.470 --> 0:03:06.870
<v Speaker 2>been at the absolute front of this, along with his colleagues,

0:03:07.230 --> 0:03:10.730
<v Speaker 2>his friends, his mates. 25,000 people they spoke on the

0:03:10.770 --> 0:03:13.130
<v Speaker 2>behalf of, and they have finally got some fair care

0:03:13.150 --> 0:03:16.740
<v Speaker 2>for veterans. He joins us now from the GC. Congratulations, mate.

0:03:16.780 --> 0:03:18.940
<v Speaker 2>It shouldn't have taken this, but congratulations.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 6>Paul, firstly, I want to thank you on behalf of

0:03:22.580 --> 0:03:25.940
<v Speaker 6>the veteran community and News 24, mate, for all your support.

0:03:26.380 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 6>and rallying the nation behind the veteran community.

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We're truly grateful.

0:03:32.020 --> 0:03:37.020
<v Speaker 6>Mate, Paul, it was great to see Senators Shoebridge, Pocock

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 6>and Lambie unite with the coalition. We thank everyone who

0:03:42.460 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 6>supported the veteran community again. And most of all, we

0:03:46.030 --> 0:03:48.870
<v Speaker 6>thank the veteran community and their families for allowing us

0:03:48.910 --> 0:03:50.910
<v Speaker 6>to fight. And hopefully we did them proud.

0:03:51.370 --> 0:03:52.490
<v Speaker 1>So what does it mean now?

0:03:52.550 --> 0:03:56.750
<v Speaker 2>Does it mean that the anxiety disappears? Because obviously the

0:03:57.050 --> 0:03:59.890
<v Speaker 2>Department of Veterans Affairs continues to be a massive punish

0:03:59.910 --> 0:04:02.500
<v Speaker 2>for everyone who's engaged in it. But now that this

0:04:02.590 --> 0:04:06.380
<v Speaker 2>cap is gone, for people like yourself that have had

0:04:06.420 --> 0:04:07.980
<v Speaker 2>to use it, and again, we're talking about a whole

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.540
<v Speaker 2>bunch of stuff that is virtually life and death, but

0:04:10.580 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't count as the life and death care. This

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.940
<v Speaker 2>cap had to disappear. So does the anxiety disappear, at

0:04:17.860 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>least on this front tonight?

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.540
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Paul, definitely on this front, mate. I've had a

0:04:24.620 --> 0:04:26.620
<v Speaker 6>lot of people reach out in the last month, but

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 6>let me just quickly tell you from a veteran himself,

0:04:28.980 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 6>and it sort of reduced me to tears today. Mate,

0:04:31.660 --> 0:04:34.020
<v Speaker 6>I just want to thank you personally. If I could

0:04:34.060 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 6>give you a handshake and a hug, I would. Your

0:04:36.500 --> 0:04:39.250
<v Speaker 6>efforts and those of the other veterans who have publicly

0:04:39.310 --> 0:04:42.950
<v Speaker 6>fought for us have saved my life. I'm not dramatising this.

0:04:43.470 --> 0:04:47.770
<v Speaker 6>I have complex PTSD, severe anxiety and severe antisocial disorder.

0:04:48.210 --> 0:04:50.810
<v Speaker 6>I have chronic physical injuries that are all degenerative from

0:04:50.830 --> 0:04:54.099
<v Speaker 6>my service as a 31-year infantry soldier, one of the

0:04:54.180 --> 0:04:55.820
<v Speaker 6>toughest and most physical jobs.

0:04:55.660 --> 0:04:56.779
<v Speaker 1>In the ADF.

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.179
<v Speaker 6>But the main thing he said is, also, my wife

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.500
<v Speaker 6>is so relieved. She cried when she heard the news today. Wives, husbands,

0:05:04.620 --> 0:05:09.570
<v Speaker 6>partners of veterans are also collateral damage. So, Paul, this

0:05:09.630 --> 0:05:13.140
<v Speaker 6>man's thanked me. But he's also thanking you and the

0:05:13.180 --> 0:05:14.620
<v Speaker 6>people who supported us. So thank you.

0:05:14.990 --> 0:05:15.510
<v Speaker 1>Oh, good man.

0:05:15.550 --> 0:05:17.430
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's the easiest thing to do because it is

0:05:17.470 --> 0:05:19.690
<v Speaker 2>the social contract, right? It is the social contract that

0:05:19.710 --> 0:05:21.430
<v Speaker 2>if you are willing to risk your life for the country,

0:05:21.750 --> 0:05:24.050
<v Speaker 2>the country should be taking care of you. Now, again,

0:05:24.830 --> 0:05:27.410
<v Speaker 2>what I smelt through all of this was that every

0:05:27.450 --> 0:05:30.510
<v Speaker 2>department was told to find something to cut somewhere. Someone

0:05:30.570 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>somewhere found this inside the Department of Veterans Affairs. It

0:05:33.339 --> 0:05:35.260
<v Speaker 2>gets pushed up to the minister. Minister doesn't want to

0:05:35.300 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 2>piss off the bureaucrats, so finds a way to defend,

0:05:38.450 --> 0:05:40.500
<v Speaker 2>look the other way. And as we spoke about when

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.460
<v Speaker 2>you guys actually got to talk to the Prime Minister,

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't really aware of the unnecessary block that was there.

0:05:48.460 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's be clear, obviously the decisions made by the Prime Minister,

0:05:51.540 --> 0:05:53.060
<v Speaker 2>if you guys didn't get the chance to look him

0:05:53.100 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 2>in the eye, we'd still be going around and around

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.860
<v Speaker 2>and around in circles because the bureaucrats are going to

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.700
<v Speaker 2>defend their decision. The Minister's going to have cover for

0:06:00.750 --> 0:06:03.010
<v Speaker 2>the bureaucrats. There had to be a circuit breaker in

0:06:03.420 --> 0:06:06.810
<v Speaker 2>And the second high-profile trip to Canberra is what has

0:06:06.900 --> 0:06:08.330
<v Speaker 2>broken the circuit here.

0:06:10.170 --> 0:06:11.250
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right, Paul.

0:06:11.810 --> 0:06:14.630
<v Speaker 6>The fact that the Prime Minister and the Prime Minister's office,

0:06:14.690 --> 0:06:17.330
<v Speaker 6>his staff, gave us the opportunity to meet and we're

0:06:17.370 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 6>greatly appreciative. The fact that the veteran community got behind

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 6>us and spoke to their members, their federal members, and

0:06:25.060 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 6>put the pressure on them. And the fact that this

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.980
<v Speaker 6>was such a big story This is a voting issue.

0:06:31.020 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 6>It is political. We don't want it to be, but

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 6>unfortunately it is. And so together we do want to

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 6>thank the Prime Minister and the office. And I sort

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:40.660
<v Speaker 6>of noticed today, Paul, I don't know if you did,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.670
<v Speaker 6>it was actually Mark Butler who made the statement today

0:06:44.710 --> 0:06:45.690
<v Speaker 6>and not Minister Keogh.

0:06:46.770 --> 0:06:49.810
<v Speaker 2>Pretty crazy, right? And even sort of he has to

0:06:49.850 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>get pushed to it later. Again, look, you know, they

0:06:53.830 --> 0:06:56.180
<v Speaker 2>want to never admit a mistake, but this was such

0:06:56.220 --> 0:06:59.620
<v Speaker 2>a massive one. Again, John, to you, to the organisation,

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.620
<v Speaker 2>to anyone who got you behind it, well done. As always,

0:07:02.820 --> 0:07:05.380
<v Speaker 2>you've got the networks now, you know the numbers, you

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>know how to get in touch, and I have no

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.659
<v Speaker 2>doubt that if you need to, you'll be on everyone's

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.340
<v Speaker 2>doorstep straight away, mate. And, of course, keep an eye

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.380
<v Speaker 2>up on faircareforveterans.com.au.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Last one, John, go for it.

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:18.150
<v Speaker 6>Paul, obviously, Phil Thompson, Michael McCormick, thank you. And I

0:07:18.210 --> 0:07:20.570
<v Speaker 6>promised on TV tonight, the last time potentially, I want

0:07:20.590 --> 0:07:22.330
<v Speaker 6>to say hello to my two boys, Zach and Jake,

0:07:22.370 --> 0:07:22.850
<v Speaker 6>who are watching.

0:07:22.890 --> 0:07:23.170
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:07:23.570 --> 0:07:25.530
<v Speaker 2>Get on your boys, mate. You're welcome any time. Even

0:07:25.550 --> 0:07:27.510
<v Speaker 2>if you just want to come back for a shout-out, John.

0:07:27.710 --> 0:07:29.170
<v Speaker 2>Nice to see you, mate. You're welcome any time.

0:07:29.210 --> 0:07:31.750
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, brother. All the best. Well done.

0:07:31.990 --> 0:07:34.430
<v Speaker 2>Man who served his country and continued to serve his mates,

0:07:34.470 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>serve the veterans, they got a win.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>They got a win.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.860
<v Speaker 2>To any and anyone who's been watching the telly over

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the past few months and has joined that website, has

0:07:42.340 --> 0:07:42.900
<v Speaker 2>called their.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Local MP, thank you, thank you, thank you. Because.

0:07:45.410 --> 0:07:47.770
<v Speaker 2>It needed a straw to break the camel's back, but

0:07:47.810 --> 0:07:50.710
<v Speaker 2>it needed to be like hay bales of straws before that.

0:07:50.770 --> 0:07:52.850
<v Speaker 2>So any and every person who was a small part

0:07:52.870 --> 0:07:55.610
<v Speaker 2>of that coalition, all of it together got the right

0:07:55.670 --> 0:07:58.060
<v Speaker 2>thing done. And yes, thank you to the Prime Minister

0:07:58.140 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 2>for finally turning around and yes, admitting a mistake. But

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.300
<v Speaker 2>in the end, the admission has now been made.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:04.980
<v Speaker 1>Thank goodness.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.860
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's compare the people that serve the country to

0:08:09.100 --> 0:08:12.500
<v Speaker 2>the next generation of people. As you know, today there

0:08:12.540 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>was a few hundred, depending on what city you were in,

0:08:15.740 --> 0:08:20.980
<v Speaker 2>of future socialists or already baked socialists, the socialist alternative,

0:08:21.020 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 2>yet again out and about because they had to prove

0:08:23.690 --> 0:08:26.350
<v Speaker 2>that they were better than Pauline Hanson, better than her supporters,

0:08:26.390 --> 0:08:29.590
<v Speaker 2>better than anyone who's even thinking of agreeing with anything

0:08:29.610 --> 0:08:32.750
<v Speaker 2>that Pauline Hanson has to say. Here's part of the

0:08:32.790 --> 0:08:34.550
<v Speaker 2>fun they had while not being at school today.

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.059
<v Speaker 7>Hundreds of students walked out of school today to march

0:08:38.100 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 7>through Sydney's CBD in protest against One Nation and its leader,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:42.740
<v Speaker 7>Pauline Hanson.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.090
<v Speaker 5>Hundreds of students have walked out of classrooms and marched

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:50.110
<v Speaker 5>through the CBD protesting against Pauline Hanson and the rise

0:08:50.170 --> 0:08:50.949
<v Speaker 5>of One Nation.

0:08:52.950 --> 0:08:54.830
<v Speaker 2>They just know more than us. That's what I like

0:08:54.870 --> 0:08:57.390
<v Speaker 2>about these guys. They just know more than us.

0:08:58.130 --> 0:08:58.740
<v Speaker 1>Example A.

0:09:00.420 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 8>The majority of the country here are either queer, immigrants,

0:09:06.340 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 8>like all the minorities.

0:09:08.220 --> 0:09:08.780
<v Speaker 9>It's not fair.

0:09:08.820 --> 0:09:11.990
<v Speaker 8>You're trying to single out an entire group of people,

0:09:13.490 --> 0:09:15.650
<v Speaker 8>but then you're basically just trying to get rid of

0:09:15.670 --> 0:09:16.290
<v Speaker 8>half the country.

0:09:16.570 --> 0:09:18.830
<v Speaker 10>We've seen how America's going. This is just going to

0:09:18.870 --> 0:09:22.010
<v Speaker 10>happen again. Don't make the same mistakes.

0:09:22.050 --> 0:09:24.510
<v Speaker 11>We care about Australia and we care about rights.

0:09:33.550 --> 0:09:35.850
<v Speaker 8>Pauline Hanson's politics are actually so toxic.

0:09:36.030 --> 0:09:37.910
<v Speaker 12>Like, she's for racism and bigotry.

0:09:37.929 --> 0:09:40.780
<v Speaker 10>I would say Pauline is the Australian version of Trump

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:41.900
<v Speaker 10>and I don't think it's fair.

0:09:41.740 --> 0:09:42.300
<v Speaker 13>What she does.

0:09:42.420 --> 0:09:43.100
<v Speaker 11>I agree.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.340
<v Speaker 1>I swore on telly, Mum. I swore on telly.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.620
<v Speaker 2>Now, it wasn't just those that were there and willing

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.569
<v Speaker 2>to speak to truth to power, man.

0:09:54.130 --> 0:09:55.650
<v Speaker 1>There was a whole bunch of people who were given

0:09:55.690 --> 0:09:56.910
<v Speaker 1>the ability to.

0:09:56.890 --> 0:10:01.420
<v Speaker 2>Speak to the protesters and, again, they're all better than us.

0:10:01.460 --> 0:10:03.790
<v Speaker 2>And I just think we should recognise that because clearly

0:10:04.070 --> 0:10:06.709
<v Speaker 2>that's what they felt as they were picking up the pitchforks, sorry,

0:10:06.750 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 2>signs today, that they are just better than us.

0:10:11.100 --> 0:10:12.300
<v Speaker 1>I hope you know damn.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.450
<v Speaker 14>Well that this protest isn't just against Pauline Hanson and

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.750
<v Speaker 14>One Nation. It's against the entire political establishment. If you

0:10:18.770 --> 0:10:22.010
<v Speaker 14>worked at a restaurant, would you say Pauline Hanson?

0:10:30.860 --> 0:10:34.100
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the organisers as well. Remember, they're just

0:10:34.140 --> 0:10:34.770
<v Speaker 2>better than us.

0:10:36.370 --> 0:10:39.709
<v Speaker 12>You can't just look at it in terms of Victoria. Like, they, yeah,

0:10:40.070 --> 0:10:46.310
<v Speaker 12>one secret harbour, Fowler, they've been building a vitriolic, hard, far-right,

0:10:46.410 --> 0:10:49.670
<v Speaker 12>racist base. We can see Trump's America as well, where

0:10:49.850 --> 0:10:54.110
<v Speaker 12>ICE kill people. She wants to bring ICE to Australia. So, yeah,

0:10:54.170 --> 0:10:55.450
<v Speaker 12>we want to fight back against that.

0:10:56.630 --> 0:10:58.730
<v Speaker 1>Just make it up, but I'm wearing high-vis, so, you know,

0:10:58.750 --> 0:10:59.969
<v Speaker 1>it's really important.

0:10:59.990 --> 0:11:01.690
<v Speaker 14>Wow.

0:11:02.970 --> 0:11:05.150
<v Speaker 1>Everyone has the right to protest. Good luck to them, but.

0:11:06.030 --> 0:11:08.410
<v Speaker 2>does anyone actually think that this moves a single vote,

0:11:09.130 --> 0:11:12.790
<v Speaker 2>even for the socialists, right? Now, again, don't you love

0:11:12.809 --> 0:11:15.150
<v Speaker 2>the organisation here, right? There's a Victorian election coming up

0:11:15.170 --> 0:11:18.290
<v Speaker 2>and the Victorian socialists are literally running candidates in places.

0:11:18.309 --> 0:11:20.850
<v Speaker 2>You would think they'd be focused on that as trying

0:11:20.890 --> 0:11:22.470
<v Speaker 2>to get them, but no, no.

0:11:22.809 --> 0:11:26.730
<v Speaker 1>We are Batman. She is the Joker. It goes on

0:11:26.770 --> 0:11:28.010
<v Speaker 1>and on, round and around.

0:11:28.850 --> 0:11:30.890
<v Speaker 2>And, of course, don't you love, though, that when they

0:11:30.950 --> 0:11:33.870
<v Speaker 2>have a protest, there is no counter-protest? So, therefore, there

0:11:33.890 --> 0:11:36.329
<v Speaker 2>is no confrontation. There is no nonsense that happens at

0:11:36.370 --> 0:11:38.850
<v Speaker 2>these things. But, of course, anyone they disagree with has

0:11:38.890 --> 0:11:41.290
<v Speaker 2>a protest. Well, they have to protest to have the counter-protest,

0:11:41.770 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 2>like there's going to be one in Melbourne this weekend.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.380
<v Speaker 2>And I reckon when we reconvene on Sunday night, there'll

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:48.780
<v Speaker 2>probably be some problems.

0:11:49.140 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Not because of the original protest, but because of the counter-protest. Because,

0:11:51.780 --> 0:11:53.380
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're better than us.

0:11:54.410 --> 0:11:57.170
<v Speaker 2>And, yes, I do want to play that grab from

0:11:57.210 --> 0:11:59.349
<v Speaker 2>the middle bit, the guy who just, you know, is

0:11:59.370 --> 0:12:00.710
<v Speaker 2>so powerful and swearing.

0:12:01.030 --> 0:12:02.250
<v Speaker 1>And what a call to action.

0:12:02.610 --> 0:12:05.490
<v Speaker 2>If you work in a restaurant, would you serve Pauline Hanson?

0:12:05.910 --> 0:12:08.270
<v Speaker 2>Would you serve anyone who votes for Pauline Hanson?

0:12:09.850 --> 0:12:10.330
<v Speaker 1>One more time.

0:12:11.370 --> 0:12:13.630
<v Speaker 14>I hope you know damn well that this protest isn't

0:12:13.650 --> 0:12:16.460
<v Speaker 14>just against Pauline Hanson and One Nation. It's against the

0:12:16.500 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 14>entire political establishment. If you worked at a restaurant, would

0:12:21.059 --> 0:12:22.220
<v Speaker 14>you serve Pauline Hanson?

0:12:25.860 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Good on you, guys.

0:12:27.860 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Change the world. So let us talk now about the

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>social media ban, which is on its way. Now, we

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.990
<v Speaker 2>have gone on quite the journey this week from me

0:12:38.050 --> 0:12:40.489
<v Speaker 2>making the obvious observation that if what we're talking about

0:12:40.530 --> 0:12:42.729
<v Speaker 2>here is a button to decide that you only follow

0:12:42.750 --> 0:12:44.750
<v Speaker 2>who you follow or you end up seeing people you

0:12:44.790 --> 0:12:45.260
<v Speaker 2>don't follow.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>which, of course, got the little shout-out in the parliament.

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.900
<v Speaker 2>To the obvious problem with the laws being a big

0:12:50.940 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>red button where the minister can simply decide that's harmful, boom, gone.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:57.300
<v Speaker 1>Now, do you reckon any of the.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.479
<v Speaker 2>People that you've just seen in the protest, if they

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.100
<v Speaker 2>were able to create a pressure on a minister to say,

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.219
<v Speaker 2>get rid of this because it's harmful, do you reckon

0:13:04.260 --> 0:13:06.359
<v Speaker 2>the lefty minister will say no?

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.370
<v Speaker 1>People have a right to say things, even things that

0:13:09.470 --> 0:13:12.189
<v Speaker 1>are unpleasant. No, not illegal. No, not any of the

0:13:12.230 --> 0:13:14.229
<v Speaker 1>lists that we read from the law before. No, of

0:13:14.290 --> 0:13:17.059
<v Speaker 1>course not. But here's the deal.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Of course, the reality is, is that there's plenty of

0:13:22.260 --> 0:13:24.860
<v Speaker 2>people who've said that this legislation is not about the

0:13:25.140 --> 0:13:28.900
<v Speaker 2>basic access to algorithm versus followers, that because of that

0:13:28.940 --> 0:13:32.330
<v Speaker 2>big red button, we are hovering over a world of censorship.

0:13:33.750 --> 0:13:37.490
<v Speaker 6>It's a pretty dangerous bill because it allows the government

0:13:37.610 --> 0:13:41.390
<v Speaker 6>to impose political censorship. What the government needs to do

0:13:41.590 --> 0:13:44.819
<v Speaker 6>is give confidence to the Australian community. that this isn't

0:13:44.860 --> 0:13:46.500
<v Speaker 6>a backdoor pathway to censorship.

0:13:46.620 --> 0:13:50.980
<v Speaker 2>The reality is it's providing a blank check for political

0:13:51.059 --> 0:13:53.780
<v Speaker 2>censorship to the minister, to the government.

0:13:54.380 --> 0:13:58.809
<v Speaker 1>But of course the government says, censorship? Censorship, please.

0:13:59.350 --> 0:14:01.550
<v Speaker 2>We've listed all of the things that are terrible and

0:14:01.570 --> 0:14:03.209
<v Speaker 2>then put a big asterisk at the bottom saying if

0:14:03.230 --> 0:14:05.709
<v Speaker 2>the minister finds it terrible, she'll have the power to

0:14:05.809 --> 0:14:07.620
<v Speaker 2>boot it without asking for parliament.

0:14:09.470 --> 0:14:12.770
<v Speaker 1>It's not about censorship. It's about giving people control.

0:14:12.830 --> 0:14:16.430
<v Speaker 12>What did these leading national organisations hear today from the

0:14:16.470 --> 0:14:17.390
<v Speaker 12>Leader of the Opposition?

0:14:17.410 --> 0:14:17.469
<v Speaker 14>No.

0:14:18.570 --> 0:14:20.990
<v Speaker 9>No to your pleas.

0:14:21.750 --> 0:14:23.290
<v Speaker 11>And what did these leading.

0:14:23.070 --> 0:14:23.810
<v Speaker 9>National organisations hear?

0:14:23.830 --> 0:14:24.510
<v Speaker 10>They heard no.

0:14:25.770 --> 0:14:28.410
<v Speaker 12>They heard no and they heard a straw man argument

0:14:28.530 --> 0:14:29.820
<v Speaker 12>about political censorship.

0:14:30.910 --> 0:14:33.850
<v Speaker 2>By the way, a little bit of news about Annika Wells.

0:14:34.510 --> 0:14:36.850
<v Speaker 2>She did go to the NFL, by the way, not

0:14:36.870 --> 0:14:40.100
<v Speaker 2>in Queensland. Of course, was in Melbourne. And she went.

0:14:40.700 --> 0:14:44.380
<v Speaker 2>And she went as a guest of the Nine Network, right? Because,

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of course, she's the communications minister too. So glad to

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.980
<v Speaker 2>see she's back in the game. How she flew, of course,

0:14:50.020 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 2>from Canberra to... Melbourne or Brisbane to Melbourne.

0:14:52.820 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Who knows? Who knows?

0:14:53.660 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe it might be like the time she

0:14:55.100 --> 0:14:56.660
<v Speaker 2>went to the Melbourne Cup and, you know, she had

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 2>all those meetings either side of having to go to

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.860
<v Speaker 2>the Melbourne Cup. Or when she went to South Australia

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.340
<v Speaker 2>and apparently had a meeting with the member of the government.

0:15:05.540 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Very, very close to a 40th birthday. But whatever, nothing

0:15:08.820 --> 0:15:13.490
<v Speaker 1>to see here. Anyway, today the Greens have told us

0:15:13.500 --> 0:15:16.390
<v Speaker 1>what's really going on. And why do the Greens matter here?

0:15:16.740 --> 0:15:18.980
<v Speaker 2>Because the Coalition have said no, because the crossbench has

0:15:19.020 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>largely said no, there's only one way through the Parliament,

0:15:21.220 --> 0:15:24.780
<v Speaker 2>and that is with the Greens. The Greens have opened

0:15:24.820 --> 0:15:26.900
<v Speaker 2>up the door, and they want a whole lot more

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>than what is currently on the table. Now, again, I

0:15:31.060 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 2>remain completely cool with a conversation about a button where

0:15:36.220 --> 0:15:38.900
<v Speaker 2>you only see who you follow versus access to who

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.810
<v Speaker 2>you don't follow. That's choice, right? I don't Really, I'm

0:15:41.830 --> 0:15:43.690
<v Speaker 2>not going to die on that hill. But I am

0:15:43.730 --> 0:15:46.130
<v Speaker 2>going to make quite a point about the minister having

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.580
<v Speaker 2>a big red button and a definition made up by

0:15:48.660 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>her about what is considered to be harmful or to

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 2>be made up by the people who may pass the legislation.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.150
<v Speaker 2>And what did they say today about the need.

0:15:59.170 --> 0:16:00.109
<v Speaker 1>For the big red button?

0:16:01.630 --> 0:16:04.970
<v Speaker 4>Every time you get Pauline Hanson come out and say, well, actually,

0:16:05.270 --> 0:16:08.770
<v Speaker 4>she wants to promote hateful messages against First Nations peoples,

0:16:09.530 --> 0:16:13.700
<v Speaker 4>or you get the Coalition coming out and saying that

0:16:13.740 --> 0:16:16.700
<v Speaker 4>they want to promote genocide denial, I think it points

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 4>out we need digital duty of care so that those

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:21.900
<v Speaker 4>messages aren't amplified.

0:16:23.870 --> 0:16:24.210
<v Speaker 13>Sorry?

0:16:25.750 --> 0:16:29.390
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, the genocide denial bit? Wow.

0:16:30.410 --> 0:16:32.130
<v Speaker 2>You see, that is the tail that is going to

0:16:32.150 --> 0:16:35.070
<v Speaker 2>wag the dog here. This is why I made my

0:16:35.110 --> 0:16:38.670
<v Speaker 2>observation about when the Coalition should stand up and say no.

0:16:39.230 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Because if there was an opportunity to have a piece

0:16:41.010 --> 0:16:43.460
<v Speaker 2>of legislation to remove the big red button, then there's

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>a different conversation. But if they're not going to remove

0:16:45.900 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the big red button, then the people who are going

0:16:47.380 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>to decide what qualifies for the big red button are

0:16:50.860 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the crazy kids in the room, aka the Greens, or current.

0:16:55.570 --> 0:16:58.310
<v Speaker 1>Or future Greens, like the ones before.

0:16:59.190 --> 0:16:59.290
<v Speaker 11>Nah.

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.220
<v Speaker 2>Now, of course, let's talk about the economy, but let's

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.380
<v Speaker 2>also talk about a really important report which is coming

0:17:08.460 --> 0:17:12.070
<v Speaker 2>out next week, which gives us an indication about how

0:17:12.109 --> 0:17:13.990
<v Speaker 2>bad things are going to get, not in the next

0:17:14.070 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>two to five years, but in the next 10, 20, 30,

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.780
<v Speaker 2>40 years. Now, of course, they all assume they'll be

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.300
<v Speaker 2>in power for all of that, so that's why we

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.100
<v Speaker 2>show you this. I mean, they'll all eventually get the

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 2>chance to become Prime Minister. But I have shown you

0:17:27.340 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>this graph for the best part of three years now.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 2>This came from a thing called the Intergenerational Report. It shows,

0:17:33.380 --> 0:17:35.369
<v Speaker 2>and that's why we've got the red there, how many

0:17:36.010 --> 0:17:42.990
<v Speaker 2>budget deficits are likely to happen between now and the 2060s. Now,

0:17:43.010 --> 0:17:45.270
<v Speaker 2>as you can see, every single one of those is

0:17:45.430 --> 0:17:49.420
<v Speaker 2>added on top of the already existing trillion dollars debt.

0:17:49.980 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 2>So pretty obviously, that gets us pretty quickly towards 1.2, 1.5,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:59.729
<v Speaker 2>T4 trillion dollars debt. Now, Jim Chalmers is the one

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 2>who is going to deliver this report because Peter Costello

0:18:02.220 --> 0:18:05.140
<v Speaker 2>was the first to introduce the idea of the intergenerational report.

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.740
<v Speaker 2>A whole bunch of assumptions about what will be population,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 2>what will be the budget, what will be how many

0:18:11.380 --> 0:18:12.379
<v Speaker 2>old people, what will be the.

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:13.500
<v Speaker 1>Cost to government.

0:18:13.859 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>This is really the roadmap beyond the electoral cycle. This

0:18:19.460 --> 0:18:23.190
<v Speaker 2>is the insight into what the machine thinks is going

0:18:23.250 --> 0:18:25.850
<v Speaker 2>to be our future. Now, of course, they can choose

0:18:25.910 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>to give... rosy pictures they can decide to show us

0:18:29.900 --> 0:18:33.139
<v Speaker 2>really dark pictures or they can show us the structural

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.330
<v Speaker 2>problems that exist right now when there's not enough money

0:18:36.369 --> 0:18:39.389
<v Speaker 2>coming into the government to match the promises that they

0:18:39.430 --> 0:18:43.710
<v Speaker 2>have made in spending from this government and remember the

0:18:43.750 --> 0:18:46.730
<v Speaker 2>assumption of them wanting to rule for not just the

0:18:46.770 --> 0:18:49.780
<v Speaker 2>past four but for the next 10 then all of

0:18:49.820 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the current settings and problems and results will be amplified

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.409
<v Speaker 2>into the future So Jim Chalmers was giving us a

0:18:56.510 --> 0:18:58.340
<v Speaker 2>preview into a report that he already knows.

0:18:58.430 --> 0:19:00.100
<v Speaker 1>Why? Because it was put together by Treasury.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>The very same people who, of course, put the budget together,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.780
<v Speaker 2>and it is being released on Monday. Now, he is

0:19:06.820 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 2>softening us up, which means you're going to see previews

0:19:09.619 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>of this, be it the good or the bad news,

0:19:12.020 --> 0:19:14.750
<v Speaker 2>over the next few days. He did a little bit

0:19:14.770 --> 0:19:16.649
<v Speaker 2>of that in Question Time today.

0:19:17.750 --> 0:19:21.689
<v Speaker 15>On Monday, the government will be releasing the intergenerational report,

0:19:21.710 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 15>which is a really important snapshot. of the serious economic

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:31.060
<v Speaker 15>challenges but also substantial economic opportunities that we will face

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 15>as a country over the course of the next four decades.

0:19:34.660 --> 0:19:36.780
<v Speaker 15>And it's a good way to help us plan to

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.070
<v Speaker 15>make sure that our people are beneficiaries of all of

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.710
<v Speaker 15>this change that is accelerating in our society and in

0:19:42.830 --> 0:19:46.430
<v Speaker 15>our economy rather than victims of that change, Mr Speaker.

0:19:47.470 --> 0:19:49.730
<v Speaker 1>Now, what was the headline?

0:19:50.030 --> 0:19:52.490
<v Speaker 2>That was given to us on the Thursday, before the Friday,

0:19:52.530 --> 0:19:55.050
<v Speaker 2>before the Saturday, the Sunday, before it's released again on

0:19:55.090 --> 0:19:58.630
<v Speaker 2>the Monday? The Treasury says half a billion dollars will

0:19:58.650 --> 0:20:01.220
<v Speaker 2>be wiped off Australia's debt in the long run. So,

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>hang on, we're currently in one T for trillion dollars debt. What,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:07.540
<v Speaker 2>they're going to get rid of half a trillion of that?

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:09.660
<v Speaker 1>Well done. Well done, Jim.

0:20:09.940 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Only problem is, here's the asterisk, that is over the

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.740
<v Speaker 2>next 40 years. So it's not starting at a trillion

0:20:17.780 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and then we go down. It's starting at a trillion

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and trying to slow.

0:20:22.500 --> 0:20:25.470
<v Speaker 1>The growth to 1.1, 1.2, 1.3. It's still going to

0:20:25.490 --> 0:20:27.889
<v Speaker 1>do that because the structural deficit in the budget is.

0:20:32.550 --> 0:20:35.169
<v Speaker 2>Means that unless they're going to do something really crazy

0:20:35.190 --> 0:20:37.469
<v Speaker 2>with taxes, they are spending more than it is coming in.

0:20:37.820 --> 0:20:43.620
<v Speaker 2>Because modern monetary theory, something that people like Albo, Chalmers,

0:20:43.700 --> 0:20:47.479
<v Speaker 2>and virtually everyone in the establishment exists on now, which

0:20:47.540 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>is we can rack up as much debt.

0:20:48.859 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>As possible because nobody will ever call it in.

0:20:51.820 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 2>And while that might be possible, of course, you still

0:20:57.140 --> 0:20:58.850
<v Speaker 2>have to pay interest on the debt. You still have

0:20:58.869 --> 0:21:01.770
<v Speaker 2>to service the debt. So it goes from being the

0:21:01.869 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 2>20th biggest thing that you pay for, to the 15th,

0:21:05.420 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 2>to the 10th, to the top five. That's exactly the

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 2>scenario playing out in Victoria right now. That's the price

0:21:11.859 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 2>of this type of politics. So we will all find

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.740
<v Speaker 2>out together what the roadmap for the next 40 years

0:21:18.810 --> 0:21:19.570
<v Speaker 2>is going to be.

0:21:20.070 --> 0:21:22.429
<v Speaker 1>But I promise you, the same people who were not

0:21:22.590 --> 0:21:23.590
<v Speaker 1>able in this.

0:21:23.510 --> 0:21:26.230
<v Speaker 2>Budget to be able to accurately talk about house prices,

0:21:26.710 --> 0:21:29.430
<v Speaker 2>the same people who weren't accurately able to talk about rent,

0:21:29.940 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 2>are going to do everything they possibly can to present

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 2>a potentially rosy future. But the best predictor of the

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.180
<v Speaker 2>future is the past, and the most recent past under

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:38.660
<v Speaker 2>this mob?

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.290
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you. Another example about planning for

0:21:44.310 --> 0:21:46.209
<v Speaker 1>the long run is, of course, population.

0:21:46.810 --> 0:21:48.990
<v Speaker 2>The Australian Bureau of Statistics has given us a very

0:21:49.070 --> 0:21:50.609
<v Speaker 2>clear idea about where we go.

0:21:50.930 --> 0:21:53.620
<v Speaker 1>In the next 20, 40 years.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 2>They're saying that we're going to be, if we keep

0:21:56.900 --> 0:22:00.420
<v Speaker 2>things at a high level of migration, we'll be at

0:22:00.420 --> 0:22:04.340
<v Speaker 2>45 million people. A little bit less, a little bit less,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.810
<v Speaker 2>but still a lot more than we currently have now. And,

0:22:07.830 --> 0:22:10.690
<v Speaker 2>in fact, today we actually got the, not just the

0:22:10.730 --> 0:22:14.550
<v Speaker 2>population clock, but the actual scoreboard of the population right

0:22:14.570 --> 0:22:17.429
<v Speaker 2>now as it stands. Middle of September, 27.9 million people.

0:22:17.450 --> 0:22:18.670
<v Speaker 2>That's up 300 million.

0:22:21.950 --> 0:22:24.410
<v Speaker 1>And 92,000 people in one year. And guess what? Not

0:22:24.470 --> 0:22:25.650
<v Speaker 1>all of that was birth.

0:22:27.130 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 2>As for New South Wales, it is up, but not

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 2>as much as others, but up to 8.6 million. Victoria, 7.2,

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 2>with 110,000.

0:22:36.220 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>People that population has grown by. Again, it's not all

0:22:39.900 --> 0:22:43.580
<v Speaker 1>from people having babies. It's from people coming into the country.

0:22:43.859 --> 0:22:46.260
<v Speaker 1>But don't talk about that, right? That's racist.

0:22:48.850 --> 0:22:50.890
<v Speaker 2>Even in South Australia, where it's less than 2 million people,

0:22:50.950 --> 0:22:53.990
<v Speaker 2>it is 18,000. Unsurprisingly, one of the places where I

0:22:54.010 --> 0:22:56.810
<v Speaker 2>think only, what, 4,000, 6,000 people ended up moving in

0:22:56.830 --> 0:22:58.530
<v Speaker 2>the past 12 months would be the ACT.

0:22:58.790 --> 0:23:00.699
<v Speaker 1>Where's the place where all the people make the decisions? Oh,

0:23:00.710 --> 0:23:03.300
<v Speaker 1>that's right, the place where there's not a huge population growth.

0:23:03.619 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>The people who get to turn around and say to

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>everyone else around the country, you don't know what you're living.

0:23:10.020 --> 0:23:12.179
<v Speaker 2>So there, of course, was the announcement today from the

0:23:12.340 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Arts Minister, sorry, Home Affairs Minister, sorry, Immigration Minister, Tony Burke.

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 6>The government will reveal its migration overhaul today.

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.100
<v Speaker 10>After six weeks of delays, the government is set to

0:23:25.140 --> 0:23:28.900
<v Speaker 10>announce sweeping reforms to Australia's migration system.

0:23:29.460 --> 0:23:29.900
<v Speaker 1>Sweeping.

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you hear the word sweeping being said,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that is not just a word that they just, you know,

0:23:34.510 --> 0:23:36.650
<v Speaker 2>what's one we can throw into the sentence to make

0:23:36.690 --> 0:23:41.470
<v Speaker 2>it seem more exciting. Sweeping means sweeping, means massive, crazy changes, right?

0:23:41.910 --> 0:23:44.250
<v Speaker 2>Hundreds of thousands of people coming in, two million by

0:23:44.290 --> 0:23:45.630
<v Speaker 2>the end of the next.

0:23:45.510 --> 0:23:47.890
<v Speaker 1>Election, but, you know, what are the changes going to be?

0:23:48.580 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Hit me where it hurts, Minister.

0:23:52.100 --> 0:23:55.260
<v Speaker 16>For international students, we will no longer be allowing the

0:23:55.300 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 16>attaching of family members for international students or for graduate visas.

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow!

0:24:02.410 --> 0:24:06.930
<v Speaker 2>Everything just changed. Everything just changed, right? And what else

0:24:06.990 --> 0:24:09.250
<v Speaker 2>are you going to do? Maybe the people who just

0:24:09.470 --> 0:24:11.390
<v Speaker 2>visa hop all the time. So they turn up here

0:24:11.710 --> 0:24:13.950
<v Speaker 2>on one visa and then they just sort of apply

0:24:13.970 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and then end up sticking around for so long.

0:24:16.420 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And because they end up having kids there, here, they

0:24:18.619 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>get to stay because, well, we didn't want to upset

0:24:20.340 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the kids. What's going to happen there?

0:24:23.180 --> 0:24:26.379
<v Speaker 16>Effectively, what we are going back to doing is simply

0:24:26.420 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 16>being able to make sure that if you overstay, you

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.180
<v Speaker 16>will not be able to say, well, there's no consequences

0:24:31.220 --> 0:24:32.780
<v Speaker 16>as if they're ever going to make sure.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:33.180
<v Speaker 1>That I leave.

0:24:33.869 --> 0:24:36.580
<v Speaker 16>We need, with the integrity of the program... to make

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.310
<v Speaker 16>sure that we can go back simply to what we

0:24:39.350 --> 0:24:40.330
<v Speaker 16>did before 2015.

0:24:40.330 --> 0:24:44.510
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so they're going to hire, like, an extra 100 people,

0:24:45.550 --> 0:24:47.709
<v Speaker 2>whose job it will be to double-check whether people's visas

0:24:47.750 --> 0:24:49.469
<v Speaker 2>have expired or not, and then, of course, they will

0:24:49.490 --> 0:24:50.409
<v Speaker 2>just send them a letter.

0:24:51.070 --> 0:24:52.050
<v Speaker 1>Now, yes, there's a promise.

0:24:52.090 --> 0:24:55.450
<v Speaker 2>There's a promise that somehow these people, if they self-report, because,

0:24:55.470 --> 0:24:57.350
<v Speaker 2>of course, to go and get them would be considered

0:24:57.530 --> 0:25:01.740
<v Speaker 2>Australia's version of ICE. as opposed to you agreed to

0:25:01.780 --> 0:25:04.379
<v Speaker 2>turn up for X amount of days, weeks or months

0:25:04.740 --> 0:25:06.970
<v Speaker 2>and you have now gone way past, perhaps in days,

0:25:07.010 --> 0:25:07.930
<v Speaker 2>months or years.

0:25:08.470 --> 0:25:11.369
<v Speaker 1>But you can't do that. It's Australian ice, remember? It

0:25:11.410 --> 0:25:16.129
<v Speaker 1>all sort of links back to those kids, doesn't it? So, okay, sweeping.

0:25:16.510 --> 0:25:18.189
<v Speaker 1>Sweeping was the announcement.

0:25:19.100 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 2>So exactly how many people in the headline number is

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 2>going to change?

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:27.179
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have one?

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:28.580
<v Speaker 6>Nothing?

0:25:28.940 --> 0:25:29.220
<v Speaker 1>Nothing?

0:25:30.390 --> 0:25:31.990
<v Speaker 2>There is no change in the headline number from what

0:25:32.010 --> 0:25:35.830
<v Speaker 2>the current system is. So the budget has just predicted, okay, look,

0:25:35.869 --> 0:25:40.220
<v Speaker 2>it was this and then maybe to here, right? So, okay,

0:25:40.340 --> 0:25:42.900
<v Speaker 2>what's the number, right? Because the number is apparent. There's

0:25:42.940 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 2>no number. There's no new number. Let's just look back

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.139
<v Speaker 2>to the budget documents that didn't get it right about rents,

0:25:49.500 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 2>didn't get it right about house prices. You trust them,

0:25:52.500 --> 0:25:55.369
<v Speaker 2>the ones that Jim's trying to make it seem like

0:25:55.380 --> 0:25:56.990
<v Speaker 2>they're going to pay off half the debt.

0:25:57.030 --> 0:25:58.669
<v Speaker 1>Come on. Come on.

0:26:00.450 --> 0:26:02.950
<v Speaker 2>Now, remember, this was the policy that's, what, six weeks

0:26:03.109 --> 0:26:05.870
<v Speaker 2>after the first announcement, and either there was an announcement

0:26:05.890 --> 0:26:07.330
<v Speaker 2>that was going to be made six weeks ago and

0:26:07.369 --> 0:26:11.730
<v Speaker 2>nothing's happened, or the announcement back then has been stopped,

0:26:11.750 --> 0:26:13.090
<v Speaker 2>which means there's no real announcement.

0:26:13.109 --> 0:26:13.690
<v Speaker 1>There's some fiddle.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 2>There's some fiddle, and there's a couple of changes that

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:17.980
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a problem with the partner thing when

0:26:18.020 --> 0:26:20.580
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the students, but that's not the major

0:26:20.619 --> 0:26:24.980
<v Speaker 2>problem right now. Now, of course, Angus Taylor and the

0:26:25.020 --> 0:26:29.300
<v Speaker 2>opposition are pilloried by the government because their immigration policy is,

0:26:29.340 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 2>guess what? You have to build more houses and the

0:26:32.290 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 2>number of houses that are built in any one year

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:35.669
<v Speaker 2>is how many people can come in because, you know,

0:26:35.910 --> 0:26:42.130
<v Speaker 2>they need to live somewhere. Well, the analysis was that

0:26:42.170 --> 0:26:47.850
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of the point. Tony Burke has actually sort

0:26:47.890 --> 0:26:51.530
<v Speaker 2>of said, yeah, it's kind of true. Migration and housing, yeah,

0:26:51.730 --> 0:26:53.409
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of linked, right?

0:26:55.830 --> 0:26:59.540
<v Speaker 1>In fact... Let me show you him saying the quiet

0:26:59.580 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>part out loud.

0:27:01.940 --> 0:27:04.659
<v Speaker 16>Immigration will need to be part of the solution to

0:27:04.700 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 16>help provide some space for housing supply to catch up.

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.300
<v Speaker 2>Unsurprising, Pauline Hanson, who said, yeah, let's pause it all

0:27:12.619 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 2>for three years, let the housing catch up, and then

0:27:15.820 --> 0:27:22.580
<v Speaker 2>have only 130,000 people, unsurprisingly, unimpressed by the nothingness of today.

0:27:23.820 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 5>We are still planning to bring it in. I've had

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 5>talks with the tourism industry.

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>They are furious. They're not allowing the right workers in.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.870
<v Speaker 5>They're slowing down visa applications. And a lot of these

0:27:36.930 --> 0:27:39.330
<v Speaker 5>tourist operators don't know whether they're going to get the

0:27:39.390 --> 0:27:41.910
<v Speaker 5>workers to come in and fill the spots that they

0:27:41.950 --> 0:27:45.570
<v Speaker 5>desperately need. So Labor, again, has lied to the people.

0:27:45.790 --> 0:27:49.310
<v Speaker 5>They've sat on their hands. One Nation has forced them

0:27:49.450 --> 0:27:52.850
<v Speaker 5>to reduce this immigration policy, but it's not going to work.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.820
<v Speaker 5>So it's all smoke and mirrors. And again, Labor continues

0:27:56.980 --> 0:27:59.420
<v Speaker 5>to lie to the people with a hidden agenda.

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>To the United States, because apparently everything that happens there

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:08.650
<v Speaker 2>definitely happens here, right, kids? Now, as you know, inflation,

0:28:08.670 --> 0:28:10.550
<v Speaker 2>massive problem around the world. Of course, it's a massive

0:28:10.570 --> 0:28:12.910
<v Speaker 2>problem in the United States for all the obvious reasons.

0:28:14.390 --> 0:28:17.189
<v Speaker 2>And petrol is particularly bad in the United States right now,

0:28:17.230 --> 0:28:19.189
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact that we keep being told that, you know,

0:28:19.210 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 2>they can drill, drill, baby, drill, and they've got their

0:28:21.170 --> 0:28:22.820
<v Speaker 2>own energy independence and all the rest of.

0:28:22.859 --> 0:28:23.100
<v Speaker 9>It, right?

0:28:23.470 --> 0:28:25.750
<v Speaker 1>Petrol, in particular, is going through the roof.

0:28:26.230 --> 0:28:27.830
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons that Donald Trump was able to

0:28:27.869 --> 0:28:29.629
<v Speaker 2>get a second crack at being president was because of

0:28:29.690 --> 0:28:32.710
<v Speaker 2>how high petrol was under the inflation of Joe Biden.

0:28:33.650 --> 0:28:35.310
<v Speaker 1>So even people who used to.

0:28:35.330 --> 0:28:40.470
<v Speaker 2>You know, storm the barricades, metaphorically, for Donald Trump, who

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.980
<v Speaker 2>are now well and truly out of the Trump camp,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.979
<v Speaker 2>are calling Trump out for petrol prices.

0:28:45.980 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>8.49 for diesel in California.

0:28:50.820 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Let me tell you something.

0:28:52.740 --> 0:28:56.940
<v Speaker 2>It's... $ 6.

0:28:52.940 --> 0:28:55.950
<v Speaker 4>59 in Georgia.

0:28:56.330 --> 0:28:59.890
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if it's Georgia or California. It's way

0:29:00.190 --> 0:29:01.110
<v Speaker 1>too high.

0:29:01.850 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 6>This is ridiculous.

0:29:02.930 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Look, everything you buy, your food, your supplies, all of

0:29:07.300 --> 0:29:09.980
<v Speaker 2>your goods gets delivered by diesel.

0:29:10.860 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>The war in Iran has got to stop.

0:29:13.300 --> 0:29:14.340
<v Speaker 3>This is Trump's fault.

0:29:14.820 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>This should not be this high.

0:29:16.500 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 4>It needs to end.

0:29:18.140 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculous.

0:29:19.570 --> 0:29:21.690
<v Speaker 2>It's the same problem here, but, of course, 52 cents

0:29:21.730 --> 0:29:23.890
<v Speaker 2>of every litre that is sold here is taxed for

0:29:23.910 --> 0:29:26.770
<v Speaker 2>the federal government because, you know, they're paying off half

0:29:26.810 --> 0:29:31.070
<v Speaker 2>of the debt. As for the president himself, he keeps

0:29:31.110 --> 0:29:33.590
<v Speaker 2>going back to something that, even if, like me, you're

0:29:33.610 --> 0:29:35.810
<v Speaker 2>a Trump fan, you very much would still vote for

0:29:35.850 --> 0:29:37.830
<v Speaker 2>him over Kamala, right? And you're very glad that he's

0:29:37.870 --> 0:29:39.580
<v Speaker 2>back in the Oval Office You're very glad the woke

0:29:39.620 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 2>and all the rest of it, right? But he keeps

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.340
<v Speaker 2>saying something that is going to sink Republicans in November.

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 2>This matters because if they lose the Senate, he will

0:29:47.940 --> 0:29:50.380
<v Speaker 2>lose the capacity to get any judges that he wants,

0:29:50.740 --> 0:29:52.940
<v Speaker 2>that he will lose the capacity to replace any members

0:29:52.980 --> 0:29:55.570
<v Speaker 2>of the Cabinet that he wants. If they lose the House, well,

0:29:55.590 --> 0:29:57.710
<v Speaker 2>then guess what? We're back to the whole impeachment game

0:29:58.050 --> 0:30:01.070
<v Speaker 2>for the next two years. But he keeps saying this.

0:30:02.510 --> 0:30:06.030
<v Speaker 2>It's a very inexpensive price to pay for what we've done.

0:30:06.210 --> 0:30:09.810
<v Speaker 1>Remember that. It's a little more. It's even if it was, frankly,

0:30:09.910 --> 0:30:12.330
<v Speaker 1>even if it was a lot more. But that's going

0:30:12.350 --> 0:30:14.210
<v Speaker 1>to come tumbling down. That's going to be like a

0:30:14.290 --> 0:30:21.420
<v Speaker 1>rocket ship in reverse. Like very tepid, tepid, right? That's

0:30:21.500 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the home crowd.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:24.940
<v Speaker 2>As for those that are right of centre, that are

0:30:24.980 --> 0:30:27.380
<v Speaker 2>observing things, well, they see what I see.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>This business with prices is just killing this administration.

0:30:34.900 --> 0:30:37.180
<v Speaker 2>And just in case, and this is the horrible thing

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 2>because the Democrats have chosen a whole bunch of far-left crazies,

0:30:40.940 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>in the same way that inflation was absolute political death

0:30:43.860 --> 0:30:45.780
<v Speaker 2>for the Democrats, it's going to be for the Republicans.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.380
<v Speaker 2>This is currently Trump's approval rating when it comes to inflation.

0:30:49.810 --> 0:30:53.590
<v Speaker 2>When he was elected, he had positives. He now has

0:30:53.650 --> 0:30:56.450
<v Speaker 2>a 70% disapproval on that subject.

0:30:57.270 --> 0:30:59.250
<v Speaker 1>Wait, watch and see. Lots more of that between now

0:30:59.370 --> 0:31:01.030
<v Speaker 1>and the first week of November.

0:31:01.070 --> 0:31:01.250
<v Speaker 9>Why?

0:31:01.270 --> 0:31:01.950
<v Speaker 1>Because it matters.

0:31:02.350 --> 0:31:05.150
<v Speaker 2>Because you want an American president that we like to

0:31:05.170 --> 0:31:06.710
<v Speaker 2>be able to have a Congress that he can work

0:31:06.770 --> 0:31:09.580
<v Speaker 2>with as opposed to a system that will just shut

0:31:09.630 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 2>up shop for a whole two years. Imagine what that

0:31:11.580 --> 0:31:12.980
<v Speaker 2>does to the rest of the world.

0:31:13.380 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Quick break. Back with more. Lots to discuss.

0:31:14.860 --> 0:31:16.660
<v Speaker 2>Who's the winner and loser of the week? Jump out

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.459
<v Speaker 2>to our socials and, yeah, we'll have a little more

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:25.540
<v Speaker 2>fun analysing the greatest... protest in Australian history. Where were

0:31:25.580 --> 0:31:28.570
<v Speaker 2>you on the day that they promised to never serve

0:31:28.630 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Pauline Hanson in a restaurant?

0:31:30.020 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Not in a sec.

0:31:34.870 --> 0:31:35.650
<v Speaker 1>Oh, how good's this?

0:31:35.690 --> 0:31:38.030
<v Speaker 2>Lovely to have everyone in the same man cave tonight,

0:31:38.070 --> 0:31:40.130
<v Speaker 2>none other than Linda Scott, labour to her bootstraps, but

0:31:40.170 --> 0:31:42.209
<v Speaker 2>she's free to speak her mind on whatever she wishes.

0:31:42.730 --> 0:31:44.650
<v Speaker 1>And, of course, Lisa Goddard, who's dead down the centre

0:31:44.670 --> 0:31:46.180
<v Speaker 1>of the Dhoni media. Lovely to see you.

0:31:46.190 --> 0:31:46.690
<v Speaker 9>Lovely to see you.

0:31:46.950 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, so did the Greens bell the cat a

0:31:49.620 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit about the reality and scope and dreams of

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.740
<v Speaker 2>the social media changes that are coming? Again, I've copped

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.260
<v Speaker 2>it from both sides all week and I don't care, is.

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:00.620
<v Speaker 1>That the idea of.

0:32:01.370 --> 0:32:04.550
<v Speaker 2>Algorithm versus followers, we can all understand that. The list

0:32:04.590 --> 0:32:06.410
<v Speaker 2>of things that should be banned, again, I read the

0:32:06.470 --> 0:32:09.270
<v Speaker 2>legislation on air. I've got no problem with that. Or

0:32:09.310 --> 0:32:11.450
<v Speaker 2>whatever the minister wants. That's my problem here.

0:32:12.230 --> 0:32:12.620
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:32:13.150 --> 0:32:15.300
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think this is exactly what the Greens don't want.

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.100
<v Speaker 7>They don't want One Nation having a voice and that's

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:19.060
<v Speaker 7>what they want, a silence.

0:32:19.100 --> 0:32:20.820
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, they did bell the cat on this.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 7>But really, if the algorithm could stop stupidity.

0:32:24.100 --> 0:32:25.060
<v Speaker 1>Sorry. Sorry.

0:32:25.810 --> 0:32:28.930
<v Speaker 7>But if the algorithm could stop stupidity, I think that

0:32:28.970 --> 0:32:30.630
<v Speaker 7>would be a win for us because we wouldn't hear

0:32:30.670 --> 0:32:31.590
<v Speaker 7>the Greens' lunacy.

0:32:31.690 --> 0:32:33.570
<v Speaker 2>Hey, hey, hey, I need that segment of Wiley we're

0:32:33.610 --> 0:32:35.390
<v Speaker 2>working each and every day where the politicians go off

0:32:35.410 --> 0:32:39.460
<v Speaker 2>and make those cringey social media videos. Look, again, you know,

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.050
<v Speaker 2>my dear friend Peter Credlin... makes a great point, and

0:32:42.070 --> 0:32:43.830
<v Speaker 2>it's in one of our promos, right? There's the politics

0:32:43.870 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and the policy, right? The politics of social media and

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.860
<v Speaker 2>cracking down on the evils of big tech, like it's

0:32:49.900 --> 0:32:52.780
<v Speaker 2>going to poll 99%, right?

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.870
<v Speaker 1>The policy, though, matters about how it's going to be

0:32:58.190 --> 0:33:00.490
<v Speaker 1>put on the table. And that's my concern.

0:33:00.550 --> 0:33:02.970
<v Speaker 2>Not the obvious politics, which is lots of people are

0:33:02.990 --> 0:33:04.830
<v Speaker 2>going to be into the idea of save our children,

0:33:04.910 --> 0:33:06.430
<v Speaker 2>even though I thought our kids had already been saved

0:33:06.710 --> 0:33:09.710
<v Speaker 2>by this government. But, Linda, what am I missing here?

0:33:09.730 --> 0:33:12.450
<v Speaker 2>Why does the Minister deserve a list of things that

0:33:12.470 --> 0:33:14.540
<v Speaker 2>everyone agrees with, but then whatever she wants?

0:33:15.140 --> 0:33:18.100
<v Speaker 10>Look, I mean, I don't think anyone takes the Greens seriously.

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.719
<v Speaker 10>including you and I, it's about the only thing we

0:33:20.770 --> 0:33:23.030
<v Speaker 10>agree on. So we can just put that to one

0:33:23.070 --> 0:33:25.970
<v Speaker 10>side and move on. But the digital duty of care

0:33:26.030 --> 0:33:28.770
<v Speaker 10>is an important principle, right? I think it is good

0:33:28.850 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 10>policy because it is a worry when people are, you know,

0:33:33.260 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 10>themselves scrolling or seeing their children scrolling through their phones

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 10>and that there is absolutely no obligation on the companies

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:42.350
<v Speaker 10>that are developing these algorithms to keep people safe, to

0:33:42.410 --> 0:33:46.460
<v Speaker 10>keep them feeling like they're not exposed to dangerous things.

0:33:46.580 --> 0:33:49.740
<v Speaker 10>And I think if you want confidence, Paul, in technology, right,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:51.900
<v Speaker 10>if you want people to buy phones, if you want

0:33:51.940 --> 0:33:53.740
<v Speaker 10>them to use the internet, if you want them to

0:33:54.100 --> 0:33:57.510
<v Speaker 10>engage in technology that creates productivity, that you can use

0:33:57.570 --> 0:34:00.990
<v Speaker 10>in new and innovative ways, then having a digital duty

0:34:01.010 --> 0:34:03.950
<v Speaker 10>of care is a good thing. So actually I've seen

0:34:04.090 --> 0:34:07.810
<v Speaker 10>lots of people into technology who are really embracing protections.

0:34:08.190 --> 0:34:11.070
<v Speaker 10>You've got the global, you know, founders of AI calling

0:34:11.110 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 10>for regulation because they know that Only when these kinds

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.729
<v Speaker 10>of businesses are properly regulated and kept safe can they

0:34:19.090 --> 0:34:21.330
<v Speaker 10>make money, can they actually be innovative.

0:34:21.550 --> 0:34:24.530
<v Speaker 1>But, OK, Leigh, sorry, your response and then I've got

0:34:24.830 --> 0:34:27.510
<v Speaker 1>my dead cat on the table.

0:34:28.050 --> 0:34:30.870
<v Speaker 7>No, my point is, though, think of what you like

0:34:30.890 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 7>about Instagram or Facebook, but they've already put it in

0:34:33.100 --> 0:34:34.900
<v Speaker 7>place now. You have to be over 18 to be

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:39.180
<v Speaker 7>able to access certain apps. Being over 18, otherwise you.

0:34:39.060 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 11>Have all these.

0:34:40.250 --> 0:34:42.870
<v Speaker 7>restrictions on you about what you can do in terms

0:34:42.910 --> 0:34:45.969
<v Speaker 7>of parental controls, et cetera, there are already safeguards in

0:34:46.010 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 7>place without the government stepping in and making a decision

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 7>about what they think is hazardous.

0:34:50.580 --> 0:34:52.180
<v Speaker 1>Okay, here's the dead cat on the table. Bang.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.700
<v Speaker 2>The government, thankfully, doesn't have a rule about how much

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.299
<v Speaker 2>booze you can buy. They literally say, okay, they have

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 2>no rule that you can just go to your local

0:35:03.510 --> 0:35:05.870
<v Speaker 2>big box store, fill up the thing and fill yourself

0:35:06.210 --> 0:35:07.790
<v Speaker 2>as much full of booze as possible, right?

0:35:08.790 --> 0:35:11.469
<v Speaker 1>The principle of choice.

0:35:11.590 --> 0:35:14.630
<v Speaker 2>Is fine, that I'll buy into, but the idea of

0:35:15.730 --> 0:35:20.670
<v Speaker 2>the mystery power underneath, that's what's not being engaged with

0:35:20.710 --> 0:35:24.469
<v Speaker 2>here in the conversation, is that I don't trust.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.529
<v Speaker 2>Particularly this minister, but let's imagine there was a Greens

0:35:28.550 --> 0:35:32.810
<v Speaker 2>government one day. David Shoebridge is the communications minister, or

0:35:32.850 --> 0:35:36.049
<v Speaker 2>you may say One Nation and David Farley.

0:35:35.790 --> 0:35:36.830
<v Speaker 1>Is the communications minister.

0:35:37.110 --> 0:35:40.130
<v Speaker 2>Do you want them to have a power to declare

0:35:40.190 --> 0:35:42.010
<v Speaker 2>something to be harmful? They don't have to go back

0:35:42.050 --> 0:35:44.380
<v Speaker 2>to anyone, don't have to check with anyone.

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.140
<v Speaker 1>It's up to them to decide.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.740
<v Speaker 2>And as we all know, if it's decided by the Greens,

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.460
<v Speaker 2>and again, can we roll what they said today? Again,

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.259
<v Speaker 2>imagine if the tail becomes the dog.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Every time you get Pauline Hanson come out and say, well, actually,

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.900
<v Speaker 4>she wants to promote hateful messages against First Nations peoples,

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.660
<v Speaker 4>or you get the Coalition coming out and saying that

0:36:08.700 --> 0:36:11.650
<v Speaker 4>they want to promote genocide denial, I think it points

0:36:11.810 --> 0:36:15.370
<v Speaker 4>out we need digital duty of care so that those

0:36:15.430 --> 0:36:16.870
<v Speaker 4>messages aren't amplified.

0:36:18.850 --> 0:36:20.210
<v Speaker 1>Lindy, can't pretend he didn't say it.

0:36:20.410 --> 0:36:22.930
<v Speaker 2>Can't pretend the Greens' vote isn't necessary to get it passed.

0:36:23.489 --> 0:36:25.090
<v Speaker 10>I can also not agree with the Greens.

0:36:25.860 --> 0:36:26.980
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but do you put a safety.

0:36:27.260 --> 0:36:30.259
<v Speaker 2>So why not just simply remove the minister's capacity to

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.049
<v Speaker 2>invent what she believes, or in this case, he in

0:36:33.090 --> 0:36:34.529
<v Speaker 2>another time, they in another time?

0:36:34.550 --> 0:36:36.670
<v Speaker 10>I mean, to be fair, I think I have acknowledged

0:36:36.710 --> 0:36:39.069
<v Speaker 10>in the past, I don't think it's unreasonable to have

0:36:39.110 --> 0:36:41.580
<v Speaker 10>a stronger set of checks and balances on that. But

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 10>it has to be more than one person.

0:36:42.980 --> 0:36:43.219
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:36:43.380 --> 0:36:46.580
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, yeah, I think having that separate from an elected

0:36:46.620 --> 0:36:48.980
<v Speaker 10>representative is just good governance.

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:36:49.820 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 10>So I don't personally have an issue with that.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.069
<v Speaker 2>And that's my issue, right, is that if you want

0:36:54.090 --> 0:36:56.170
<v Speaker 2>to go back to the parliament, get the majority support

0:36:56.190 --> 0:36:58.969
<v Speaker 2>to say that, you know, I don't know, insert is

0:36:59.010 --> 0:36:59.570
<v Speaker 2>the new harm.

0:37:00.550 --> 0:37:03.109
<v Speaker 1>So they took to the streets today, man, and didn't

0:37:03.130 --> 0:37:04.130
<v Speaker 1>they change everything?

0:37:04.590 --> 0:37:07.250
<v Speaker 2>The kids against Pauline Hanson, I don't know about you,

0:37:07.310 --> 0:37:09.629
<v Speaker 2>but they have completely changed my mind.

0:37:09.690 --> 0:37:09.989
<v Speaker 1>Have a look.

0:37:11.580 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 8>The majority of the country here are either queer, immigrants,

0:37:17.500 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 8>like all the minorities.

0:37:19.380 --> 0:37:19.939
<v Speaker 9>It's not fair.

0:37:19.980 --> 0:37:23.140
<v Speaker 8>You're trying to single out an entire group of people,

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:26.870
<v Speaker 8>but then you're basically just trying to get rid of.

0:37:26.830 --> 0:37:27.450
<v Speaker 11>Half the country.

0:37:27.750 --> 0:37:29.989
<v Speaker 10>We've seen how America's going. This is just going to

0:37:30.030 --> 0:37:33.170
<v Speaker 10>happen again. Don't make the same mistakes.

0:37:33.210 --> 0:37:35.670
<v Speaker 11>We care about Australia and we care about rights.

0:37:44.700 --> 0:37:47.020
<v Speaker 8>Pauline Hanson's politics are actually so toxic.

0:37:47.180 --> 0:37:49.090
<v Speaker 12>Like, she's for racism and bigotry.

0:37:49.219 --> 0:37:51.930
<v Speaker 10>I would say Pauline is the Australian version of Trump,

0:37:52.030 --> 0:37:53.430
<v Speaker 10>and I don't think it's fair what she does.

0:37:56.090 --> 0:37:59.010
<v Speaker 1>You must be excited, Linda. I mean, the furries, right, right?

0:37:59.030 --> 0:38:01.730
<v Speaker 10>I love these kids, you know. So many of them

0:38:01.750 --> 0:38:05.930
<v Speaker 10>can't vote and they're out there, they're protesting, they're making

0:38:05.950 --> 0:38:08.149
<v Speaker 10>their views clear because they're not old enough, right?

0:38:08.210 --> 0:38:11.090
<v Speaker 1>They're not old enough. So they can't.

0:38:10.790 --> 0:38:12.290
<v Speaker 10>Take it out in the ballot box.

0:38:12.510 --> 0:38:14.140
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I love it.

0:38:14.430 --> 0:38:18.620
<v Speaker 10>I love debating with my, you know, teenage sons and

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 10>all their friends. I think we had 27 teenagers over

0:38:21.500 --> 0:38:24.800
<v Speaker 10>at my house the other... Love you all, you beautiful

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 10>young people. But they all sit around and debate the issues.

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.840
<v Speaker 10>They watch the news. They read the newspaper. They care

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.830
<v Speaker 10>about the issues. I think that's great. Of course their

0:38:34.110 --> 0:38:37.170
<v Speaker 10>views aren't perfectly formed and, of course, they can't get

0:38:37.210 --> 0:38:40.009
<v Speaker 10>a good grab out on television. Yes, some of them

0:38:40.050 --> 0:38:40.989
<v Speaker 10>are wearing burly masks.

0:38:41.010 --> 0:38:41.790
<v Speaker 1>Take their head off first.

0:38:42.150 --> 0:38:42.969
<v Speaker 9>But you know what?

0:38:43.010 --> 0:38:44.569
<v Speaker 1>Like, good on them. They're young people.

0:38:44.610 --> 0:38:45.210
<v Speaker 8>They're passionate.

0:38:45.430 --> 0:38:47.420
<v Speaker 10>This is what we need. And, Paul Murray, let me

0:38:47.460 --> 0:38:53.570
<v Speaker 10>say this. Pauline Hanson... You know, drove so many people

0:38:53.750 --> 0:38:56.509
<v Speaker 10>of my era 30 years ago when she entered politics

0:38:57.110 --> 0:39:00.310
<v Speaker 10>into progressive politics. And you know what? She's doing the

0:39:00.330 --> 0:39:04.370
<v Speaker 10>same thing. She is helping people understand that if you

0:39:04.410 --> 0:39:07.069
<v Speaker 10>have politicians like this who have far-right views, they are

0:39:07.110 --> 0:39:10.730
<v Speaker 10>dangerous and they get involved in left-wing movements, they join

0:39:10.750 --> 0:39:11.950
<v Speaker 10>the unions and.

0:39:12.010 --> 0:39:14.469
<v Speaker 1>You know... So you're happy because it's a recruiting tool? Well,

0:39:14.930 --> 0:39:16.549
<v Speaker 1>I'm not happy because it's a recruiting tool.

0:39:16.570 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 10>I'm happy because... 30 years ago when she started in politics,

0:39:21.340 --> 0:39:23.670
<v Speaker 10>a lot of people joined the Labor Party. I don't

0:39:23.690 --> 0:39:26.730
<v Speaker 10>like her. I condemn her politics. But these young kids.

0:39:26.510 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Good on the kids, hey?

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 7>Strangely, those politics are shaping a lot of what the

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 7>Liberal Party and the Labor Party are now putting forward,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 7>by the way, especially look at the immigration policy today, but, hey,

0:39:34.860 --> 0:39:35.700
<v Speaker 7>take that off the table.

0:39:36.060 --> 0:39:38.819
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous.

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.009
<v Speaker 7>Get back into the classrooms and learn. I agree with you, Linda,

0:39:42.050 --> 0:39:42.390
<v Speaker 7>on one thing.

0:39:42.410 --> 0:39:43.810
<v Speaker 1>Do it on the weekend. I don't care if they

0:39:43.830 --> 0:39:44.290
<v Speaker 1>do it on the weekend.

0:39:44.310 --> 0:39:45.950
<v Speaker 7>But the one thing that you said that was correct

0:39:45.989 --> 0:39:48.410
<v Speaker 7>is that you sit down and you have an informed debate.

0:39:48.820 --> 0:39:49.100
<v Speaker 10>with.

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:50.140
<v Speaker 6>These teenagers, right?

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.580
<v Speaker 7>They read the news. Goodness knows if any of those

0:39:52.660 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 7>kids who are out there today have actually read a

0:39:55.100 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 7>newspaper or watched a bulletin or tried to understand.

0:39:58.219 --> 0:39:59.790
<v Speaker 1>Newspapers? What a boomer of us.

0:39:59.930 --> 0:40:02.410
<v Speaker 7>But, hey, you're right, there were furries there. So I

0:40:02.430 --> 0:40:05.270
<v Speaker 7>think Cory Bernardi and the videos that he did, right?

0:40:05.290 --> 0:40:07.390
<v Speaker 7>So these kids went into this today going, I need

0:40:07.410 --> 0:40:09.669
<v Speaker 7>to protect my identity. I'll make a statement as well,

0:40:09.730 --> 0:40:12.010
<v Speaker 7>so I'll stick on a head to a costume.

0:40:12.170 --> 0:40:16.390
<v Speaker 2>So these glasses, the so-called smart glasses that have got

0:40:16.410 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>a couple of cameras either side, right, plenty of local

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:21.780
<v Speaker 2>councils are coming out and saying, not at the pool,

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 2>not at the gym, not at all the rest of it, right?

0:40:23.739 --> 0:40:26.859
<v Speaker 2>Because they can be used for creeping, no question.

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.990
<v Speaker 1>But that's not their exclusive purpose, Linda. Your thoughts?

0:40:31.110 --> 0:40:34.069
<v Speaker 2>Should they be banned for sale or just we have

0:40:34.110 --> 0:40:36.130
<v Speaker 2>to put up signs about where they can't be used?

0:40:36.330 --> 0:40:38.930
<v Speaker 2>Because last time I checked, it's illegal to film in

0:40:39.010 --> 0:40:39.890
<v Speaker 2>any of these places.

0:40:41.330 --> 0:40:45.150
<v Speaker 10>As a mum, I don't want people... filming my kids swimming,

0:40:45.250 --> 0:40:47.110
<v Speaker 10>you know, and I want to be able to go

0:40:47.690 --> 0:40:52.900
<v Speaker 10>for a swim without being filmed, Paul. I think that

0:40:52.940 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 10>the majority of people wear and use these glasses responsibly,

0:40:56.380 --> 0:41:00.260
<v Speaker 10>but the problem is finding the minority who don't for

0:41:00.700 --> 0:41:04.740
<v Speaker 10>these AI glasses is so difficult. As you say, councils

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 10>can't do it. State governments can't do it. We can't

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 10>expect our police to be doing it. I do think

0:41:10.469 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 10>they should be banned. I support banning these glasses and

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 10>I think it's an important step forward that the federal

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:16.380
<v Speaker 10>government should take.

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:16.860
<v Speaker 1>Lisa?

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:20.820
<v Speaker 7>I agree with Linda. I think the number of times

0:41:20.860 --> 0:41:23.259
<v Speaker 7>you could walk into a public space and not know,

0:41:23.300 --> 0:41:25.770
<v Speaker 7>if you put those glasses on now, how would I

0:41:25.830 --> 0:41:29.210
<v Speaker 7>know if they are recording? I think it's Queensland and

0:41:29.230 --> 0:41:32.870
<v Speaker 7>the Northern Territory where only one party has to be

0:41:33.230 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 7>aware that it's being recorded, it's carte blanche everywhere else

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:36.980
<v Speaker 7>in this country.

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, I am not finding any sort of backdoor way

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 2>for creeping with these glasses. I will just say one

0:41:41.410 --> 0:41:44.310
<v Speaker 2>of the advantages, right, in terms of the use of

0:41:44.350 --> 0:41:46.549
<v Speaker 2>them is if you've got WhatsApp, you know, he can

0:41:46.590 --> 0:41:48.670
<v Speaker 2>do a video call every now and then, right? So

0:41:49.070 --> 0:41:51.130
<v Speaker 2>often I'll be driving in regional areas, I'll put them

0:41:51.210 --> 0:41:53.610
<v Speaker 2>on and then I can show the kids the countryside

0:41:53.630 --> 0:41:56.390
<v Speaker 2>as we're driving, right? But then if I post anything

0:41:56.450 --> 0:41:59.549
<v Speaker 2>online that says shot with metaglasses, the number of my

0:41:59.590 --> 0:42:01.069
<v Speaker 2>friends who go, why do you have those?

0:42:01.090 --> 0:42:01.330
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:42:01.570 --> 0:42:02.250
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of them.

0:42:02.590 --> 0:42:05.410
<v Speaker 2>Don't advertise the creepiness of them. So I'm so glad

0:42:05.450 --> 0:42:06.850
<v Speaker 2>I spent those hundreds of dollars.

0:42:06.870 --> 0:42:07.890
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here is one purpose.

0:42:07.910 --> 0:42:09.810
<v Speaker 7>I can tell you, as a former A Current Affair reporter,

0:42:09.870 --> 0:42:11.549
<v Speaker 7>I can tell you they would have been very, very

0:42:11.610 --> 0:42:14.469
<v Speaker 7>handy when you're doing the undercover special investigation.

0:42:14.489 --> 0:42:16.390
<v Speaker 1>I won't bring them to our Christmas drinks. Thank you.

0:42:16.410 --> 0:42:18.609
<v Speaker 10>But people do think you're creepy if you wear them,

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:19.109
<v Speaker 10>don't they?

0:42:19.140 --> 0:42:19.509
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no.

0:42:20.070 --> 0:42:21.540
<v Speaker 10>I'm sorry to say that, Paul.

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.540
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I get it. You're not. All right. Thank you, ladies.

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, no creeping. I get it. I get it.

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, guys. Do appreciate it. Quick break. Back with more.

0:42:28.060 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Colin Flynn joins us straight after the break and he's

0:42:30.380 --> 0:42:40.810
<v Speaker 2>talking Oprah next. Colin Flynn is a beautiful face, a

0:42:40.850 --> 0:42:42.589
<v Speaker 2>lovely voice, and he joins us each and every week

0:42:42.610 --> 0:42:44.350
<v Speaker 2>because we want to end with a smile, all right?

0:42:44.370 --> 0:42:46.580
<v Speaker 2>This is my gift to you after having to see

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:47.859
<v Speaker 2>this ugly mug for the whole week.

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:49.220
<v Speaker 1>And he joins us now to talk.

0:42:49.100 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 2>About, among other things, Oprah Winfrey, brother.

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:52.340
<v Speaker 1>What are we talking about here?

0:42:53.810 --> 0:42:56.489
<v Speaker 13>Paul, you are one of the most, if not the most,

0:42:56.530 --> 0:42:59.810
<v Speaker 13>handsome broadcasters in Australia. Don't fool yourself. You know that, buddy.

0:43:00.150 --> 0:43:05.220
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, on this channel at 9pm. I get it. The caveat.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 13>Out of all the broadcasters on News 24 right now

0:43:07.620 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 13>in the hosting chair, you were the most handsome.

0:43:09.700 --> 0:43:12.089
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm in the top three. All right. What's happening

0:43:12.110 --> 0:43:13.390
<v Speaker 1>with Oprah? What's happening with Oprah?

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, okay, last week when we were talking, I was

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.109
<v Speaker 13>listening to the panel before me, and you were talking

0:43:18.140 --> 0:43:20.850
<v Speaker 13>about government handouts, and you said, look, this isn't Oprah,

0:43:20.890 --> 0:43:24.510
<v Speaker 13>this is the government. And it actually reminded me, because

0:43:24.550 --> 0:43:26.850
<v Speaker 13>I was watching the Oprah podcast the other day, that

0:43:27.370 --> 0:43:31.620
<v Speaker 13>this month, September 2026, she is marking 40 years since

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:35.540
<v Speaker 13>the first ever national Oprah Winfrey show here in the

0:43:35.580 --> 0:43:36.900
<v Speaker 13>United States, September 1986.

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:36.980
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 13>And to tell you how much of a big deal

0:43:40.300 --> 0:43:42.890
<v Speaker 13>this was, Paul, of course, you know, working in broadcasting

0:43:42.930 --> 0:43:46.170
<v Speaker 13>that the Oprah Winfrey show became the most watched television

0:43:46.210 --> 0:43:48.850
<v Speaker 13>show on the face of the planet. Millions of people

0:43:48.890 --> 0:43:52.250
<v Speaker 13>were watching it every single day. It has been broadcast

0:43:52.270 --> 0:43:55.790
<v Speaker 13>in 145 countries across the globe, and she became a

0:43:55.810 --> 0:43:57.290
<v Speaker 13>broadcasting superstar.

0:43:57.730 --> 0:43:58.830
<v Speaker 1>But what makes her story.

0:43:58.870 --> 0:44:01.989
<v Speaker 13>Paul, even more remarkable is, you know, she grew up

0:44:02.430 --> 0:44:06.030
<v Speaker 13>to a single teenage parent in a very poor family

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 13>in rural Mississippi. She came from nothing at a time

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:13.220
<v Speaker 13>when there were no black broadcasters, really, especially in prime

0:44:13.260 --> 0:44:17.010
<v Speaker 13>time on American television, let alone black women in broadcasting.

0:44:17.550 --> 0:44:19.549
<v Speaker 13>And she was only 17 years of age when she

0:44:19.590 --> 0:44:22.110
<v Speaker 13>joined her local radio station. She was still in high school.

0:44:22.150 --> 0:44:25.300
<v Speaker 13>She was determined, then went to a small local television

0:44:25.580 --> 0:44:28.700
<v Speaker 13>channel reading the news. 1984 is when she got her

0:44:28.739 --> 0:44:32.030
<v Speaker 13>big break. She went to Chicago. Because here in America, traditionally,

0:44:32.050 --> 0:44:34.690
<v Speaker 13>if you want to make it in broadcasting, you start

0:44:34.730 --> 0:44:36.730
<v Speaker 13>small at a local market and then you go to

0:44:36.790 --> 0:44:39.610
<v Speaker 13>one of the big three, New York, Los Angeles or Chicago.

0:44:40.010 --> 0:44:43.169
<v Speaker 13>There was a show there called AM Chicago, The Breakfast Show.

0:44:43.730 --> 0:44:46.390
<v Speaker 13>She went and auditioned with a guy called Brian Swanson.

0:44:46.430 --> 0:44:49.590
<v Speaker 13>He was the media executive and he took a chance

0:44:49.630 --> 0:44:52.310
<v Speaker 13>on her. She took a show that was failing in

0:44:52.330 --> 0:44:52.830
<v Speaker 13>the ratings.

0:44:52.910 --> 0:44:53.610
<v Speaker 1>It was bombing.

0:44:53.730 --> 0:44:55.569
<v Speaker 13>She took it to number one within a few months

0:44:55.730 --> 0:44:59.070
<v Speaker 13>and she became this sensation. But then a few years later,

0:44:59.739 --> 0:45:03.250
<v Speaker 13>Everything changed when she got her national break because the

0:45:03.290 --> 0:45:07.589
<v Speaker 13>show then changed from AM Chicago, 1986, September this month,

0:45:07.989 --> 0:45:10.350
<v Speaker 13>it went to the Oprah Winfrey Show, and it went

0:45:10.410 --> 0:45:12.950
<v Speaker 13>across the United States. Here's a clip, Paul, of her

0:45:13.090 --> 0:45:15.819
<v Speaker 13>introducing that first show 40 years ago.

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.460
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody.

0:45:28.620 --> 0:45:28.900
<v Speaker 9>Thank you.

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 11>I'm Oprah Winfrey, and welcome to the very first national

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:38.509
<v Speaker 11>Oprah Winfrey Show!

0:45:39.130 --> 0:45:41.510
<v Speaker 13>It's just brilliant when you see that clip. Of course,

0:45:41.910 --> 0:45:44.610
<v Speaker 13>as they say, the rest is history. The show snowballed.

0:45:44.770 --> 0:45:46.820
<v Speaker 13>It soon went to number one in the United States

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.720
<v Speaker 13>and then right around the world. Huge moments like in 1993,

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 13>she interviewed Michael Jackson in his Neverland ranch. 90 million

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 13>Americans watched it. She started the book club, her famous show,

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:00.989
<v Speaker 13>her favorite things. And then of course, that iconic moment

0:46:01.030 --> 0:46:03.770
<v Speaker 13>when she gave 300 people in the audience a car each.

0:46:03.810 --> 0:46:06.510
<v Speaker 13>You get a car and you get a car. In 2010,

0:46:06.510 --> 0:46:09.170
<v Speaker 13>she brought 300 of her audience members to Australia. They

0:46:09.210 --> 0:46:11.710
<v Speaker 13>did a show from the Sydney house. But there was

0:46:11.730 --> 0:46:14.410
<v Speaker 13>a beautiful moment years later when she was really an

0:46:14.489 --> 0:46:18.009
<v Speaker 13>astronomical star. She went back and surprised that very man,

0:46:18.050 --> 0:46:20.510
<v Speaker 13>Brian Swanson, the person who had given her the job.

0:46:20.910 --> 0:46:22.989
<v Speaker 13>She surprised him live in the show. Here's a clip.

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:25.660
<v Speaker 11>How you doing, Dennerue?

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:28.250
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm doing real good. Not as well as you,

0:46:28.350 --> 0:46:28.950
<v Speaker 1>but real good.

0:46:32.230 --> 0:46:34.830
<v Speaker 11>And I thought, there's no way you're gonna hire a

0:46:34.850 --> 0:46:35.630
<v Speaker 11>black woman.

0:46:35.969 --> 0:46:36.969
<v Speaker 1>There's no way you were.

0:46:36.910 --> 0:46:39.430
<v Speaker 11>Gonna let me do it without a co-host. And I

0:46:39.510 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 11>sat in that meeting and I said to you, you

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:44.620
<v Speaker 11>know I'm overweight. And you said, so what?

0:46:44.700 --> 0:46:45.350
<v Speaker 1>So am I.

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 11>And I said, and I'm black, you know, and that

0:46:49.100 --> 0:46:50.700
<v Speaker 11>ain't gonna change. And you said, yeah, I know, I'm

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:51.219
<v Speaker 11>looking at you.

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.460
<v Speaker 1>If you can lose weight, so can I. Hey, you

0:46:57.500 --> 0:46:59.280
<v Speaker 1>look good. You look good.

0:47:01.260 --> 0:47:03.739
<v Speaker 13>So many great and beautiful moments. Well, Paul, after 25

0:47:03.739 --> 0:47:06.870
<v Speaker 13>years of that show becoming number one all over the

0:47:06.910 --> 0:47:10.710
<v Speaker 13>world in 2011, she said goodbye to her TV audience.

0:47:10.750 --> 0:47:11.150
<v Speaker 6>Here it is.

0:47:12.390 --> 0:47:16.310
<v Speaker 9>From you, whose names I will never know, I learned

0:47:16.370 --> 0:47:21.670
<v Speaker 9>what love is. You and this show have been the

0:47:21.750 --> 0:47:23.350
<v Speaker 9>great love of my life.

0:47:24.700 --> 0:47:25.609
<v Speaker 1>I won't say goodbye.

0:47:26.650 --> 0:47:32.660
<v Speaker 9>I'll just say, until we meet again, to God be

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 9>the glory.

0:47:35.030 --> 0:47:37.270
<v Speaker 2>I always felt for Stedman when she said that. You know,

0:47:38.300 --> 0:47:41.460
<v Speaker 2>the great love of her life was the TV show. But, yeah,

0:47:41.500 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 2>she has, I mean, she's one of those figures, right?

0:47:43.780 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Like I've got to say, I was a Jerry Springer

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:47.820
<v Speaker 2>fella and obviously whenever I had time off school I

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:51.430
<v Speaker 2>was just loving the madness of that show. But, again,

0:47:52.530 --> 0:47:55.509
<v Speaker 2>people need to remember, if they weren't living it, 40

0:47:55.510 --> 0:47:58.830
<v Speaker 2>years ago she was a revolutionary figure on television because

0:47:58.850 --> 0:48:00.339
<v Speaker 2>people didn't look like her on television.

0:48:01.780 --> 0:48:02.300
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:48:02.540 --> 0:48:04.900
<v Speaker 13>And what she said there at the end, until we

0:48:04.940 --> 0:48:07.299
<v Speaker 13>talk again, the amazing thing I find about Oprah too,

0:48:07.340 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 13>from moving from radio to television to syndication, she now

0:48:10.980 --> 0:48:14.020
<v Speaker 13>has a hugely successful podcast that's staying relevant and is

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 13>still broadcasting 15 years after saying goodbye to her TV audience.

0:48:18.700 --> 0:48:21.300
<v Speaker 13>So you're right in saying that she broke the mold,

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 13>she paved the way for so many others. And it

0:48:23.300 --> 0:48:25.620
<v Speaker 13>was at a time when the airwaves were dominated by

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.930
<v Speaker 13>those figures that who didn't look or sound like her. And, again,

0:48:28.989 --> 0:48:32.230
<v Speaker 13>coming from Mississippi, rural Mississippi, the odds were stacked against her,

0:48:32.550 --> 0:48:34.390
<v Speaker 13>and look what she achieved and look what she became.

0:48:34.650 --> 0:48:36.489
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. Colm, thank you so much. I look forward

0:48:36.510 --> 0:48:38.590
<v Speaker 1>to another 40 years of our end to the week.

0:48:38.610 --> 0:48:39.339
<v Speaker 1>You get a car.

0:48:39.570 --> 0:48:40.410
<v Speaker 13>You get a car.

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You get a matchbox. You get a matchbox, but you've

0:48:42.660 --> 0:48:44.790
<v Speaker 1>still got to buy your own. Thank you, mate. Appreciate it.

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>That's our show. One more thing before we're done here

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Murray Live. Thank you so much for watching.

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, let us get to, while you were working,

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the social media videos made by the politicians and the

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:01.410
<v Speaker 2>staffers that you pay for while you're working.

0:49:01.450 --> 0:49:02.589
<v Speaker 1>First, the Australian Greens.

0:49:04.230 --> 0:49:09.510
<v Speaker 9>Have a wonderful weekend.

0:49:09.610 --> 0:49:13.270
<v Speaker 1>Go Tigers, go Yankees.