Speaker 1: From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray Live. Hello,
Speaker 1: Happy Thursday.
Speaker 2: Make gift to you tonight for the whole hour, No sooks,
Speaker 2: no leftons, The jewel in the crown. Megan Kelly. Now,
Speaker 2: we took the Megan each and every week in the
Speaker 2: United States and it is always a whole lot of
Speaker 2: our week. She is fun, she's feisty, she fires up. Well,
Speaker 2: I can tell you what tonight I think we have
Speaker 2: our best conversation ever, including her trying to wrap her
Speaker 2: head around a term that maybe only Bogan Nassies used
Speaker 2: but we've used for a while. Hexeth is on his
Speaker 2: third marriage and clearly was a pants man in between
Speaker 2: each of those times.
Speaker 3: Did you say he was a pants man?
Speaker 1: He's a pants man? What do I mean?
Speaker 2: Well, it's a pants man who means often he enjoys
Speaker 2: not wearing them. The only place that his pants look
Speaker 2: better on the floor. Mad ruder is what we say
Speaker 2: in Australia. So ironically, even though you don't need pants
Speaker 2: for the activity, you are referred to as a pantsman.
Speaker 2: If you were a person who has been with many
Speaker 2: dare I.
Speaker 3: Say this is thrilling.
Speaker 4: I learned something new about your beautiful culture every time
Speaker 4: I come on.
Speaker 2: Then you can look forward to this moment, which of
Speaker 2: course looks even better in h day and I have
Speaker 2: you got the biggest house at biggest tilly in your house.
Speaker 2: But there's a reason why this takes place. I'm telling you,
Speaker 2: she's in.
Speaker 1: A great mood.
Speaker 2: I'm in a great mood, and this is a fantastic
Speaker 2: conversation we're among other things, she absolutely rips in to
Speaker 2: some of the people in the media. She can't stand.
Speaker 3: I can't stand it.
Speaker 4: And it wasn't just Hitler and fascist, it was also
Speaker 4: eight years of racist, sexist, rapist. That's what he was
Speaker 4: being called all over their show and MSNBC, and.
Speaker 3: It's all just forgotten. It's nothing. He's not a rapist,
Speaker 3: he's not Hitler. And Trump allowed it, right.
Speaker 4: Trump likes attention, he wants them talking about him, he
Speaker 4: wants them saying nice things about him.
Speaker 3: Doesn't need them.
Speaker 2: Megan Kelly will be the highlight of your week in
Speaker 2: a Nosok's no lefty Thursday. Looking forward to it. All Right,
Speaker 2: let's get into what we need to talk about tonight.
Speaker 2: As always, we start with the immediate, and there are
Speaker 2: some concerns right now around Queensland, where there's been a
Speaker 2: huge amount of rain that's fallen in parts of the state.
Speaker 2: There's worry in the next couple of days that it's
Speaker 2: going to start to move its way even further north.
Speaker 2: About two hundred mills has fallen in the past twenty
Speaker 2: four hours. Police telling everyone to take it easy.
Speaker 5: What we're seeing already at this time of year is
Speaker 5: that a lot of the ground is sodden already. This
Speaker 5: time last year we were still dealing with a lot
Speaker 5: of fires. We've very quickly moved into flood conditions this year.
Speaker 2: Unfortunately, what we see every year.
Speaker 5: Is deaths on our roads as a consequence of people
Speaker 5: driving into flood waters.
Speaker 2: And as I always strength and love to everyone who's
Speaker 2: dealing with this. We are very confident that we can
Speaker 2: handle the volume of water that is coming down Bradley's
Speaker 2: Gully as we speak, and everyone to stay calm.
Speaker 1: We need everyone to look after each other.
Speaker 2: Good on you guys, stay in touch with each other,
Speaker 2: pay attention to the messages that you're hearing from local
Speaker 2: emergency services, and yeah, all the best for what might
Speaker 2: be another wild weekend here in the greatest country of
Speaker 2: them or. But first, let's talk about again what's happening
Speaker 2: in canber right now now, still waiting for a final
Speaker 2: vote on the censoring of the Internet. This is about
Speaker 2: the government to shutting down your capacity to post what
Speaker 2: you want to on your social media feeds. Oh, they
Speaker 2: say it's all about myths and disinformation, but you know
Speaker 2: the reality of what they're trying to shut off here.
Speaker 2: Now the Center will vote on that to no plan today.
Speaker 2: They come back next week. Presumably this thing will get
Speaker 2: killed off next week, or if they're stupid enough, they
Speaker 2: will keep the door open. And an active part of
Speaker 2: the campaign leading into the next federal election will be
Speaker 2: that the Labor Party and the Greens want to sense
Speaker 2: of the Internet and everyone else doesn't. That'll be a
Speaker 2: major issue. It's up to Labor whether they kill it
Speaker 2: off or whether they bring it to the heart of
Speaker 2: our election, which will be a very bad news story
Speaker 2: for them. But today the Prime Minister trying to distract
Speaker 2: from what is going to be this inevitable defeat of
Speaker 2: his attempt to censor adults on the Internet, and we're
Speaker 2: turning towards trying to keep kids away from social media. Now,
Speaker 2: I've said for years that social media is poison. It
Speaker 2: is poisoned for way too many adults and that poison
Speaker 2: should not be extended to children. Apart from what they see,
Speaker 2: the capacity for bullies to message you in the middle
Speaker 2: of the night, for people to gang up on you
Speaker 2: in a digital way means that the problems that you
Speaker 2: and I felt when we went to school will they
Speaker 2: extend home and it means there's a twenty four to
Speaker 2: seven cycle of among other things, that is bullying. Now
Speaker 2: today the federal government introduced its laws to ban people
Speaker 2: under the age of sixteen being able to have accounts
Speaker 2: on all of the obvious social media sites. He's the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister saying why it's good. As a government, we
Speaker 2: have a responsibility to keep our young Australian safe. We
Speaker 2: know that social media is causing social harm. There was
Speaker 2: also some confusion about whether people under the age of
Speaker 2: sixteen will be able to access YouTube. They will because
Speaker 2: YouTube is not going to be included in this. Now
Speaker 2: it wasn't just about access to YouTube, it was about
Speaker 2: whether your kid can have a YouTube account. To be honest,
Speaker 2: I have no idea why anyone under the age of
Speaker 2: sixteen their parents would allow them to have it, but
Speaker 2: that is not going to be affected by the ban
Speaker 2: Elon Musk taking time out from slashing things in the
Speaker 2: American budget, launching rockets, creating electric cars that lefties are
Speaker 2: now oh so happy that they drive around the cities.
Speaker 2: He responded to the Prime Minister today that it seems
Speaker 2: like a back way, a backdoor way to control access
Speaker 2: to the Internet by all Australians. So obviously he doesn't
Speaker 2: want this thing to take place now. Regardless of when
Speaker 2: you think this is a great idea, maybe idea or
Speaker 2: a bad idea, process matters when we are talking about
Speaker 2: something as big and as serious, with all of its
Speaker 2: potential intent and unintended consequences. The way that generally the
Speaker 2: process works is because the government doesn't have a majority
Speaker 2: in the Senate. Now they generally do once they get
Speaker 2: the Greens and the Lefties on the crossbench, but they
Speaker 2: don't have the outright numbers, which means that any piece
Speaker 2: of legislation as controversial as this is normally sent off
Speaker 2: to a committee. Now, I want you to have a
Speaker 2: listen to Channel nine and how they're going to explain
Speaker 2: how the next part of this process works. Put simply,
Speaker 2: the government would like sooner rather than later to pass
Speaker 2: this legislation before Parliament ends next week, because there's every
Speaker 2: chance Parliament won't come back at all. A perfect example,
Speaker 2: and Bromba Bishop mentioned this last night about why the
Speaker 2: government might tell us they want to have a budget
Speaker 2: and tell us they want to have an election in May,
Speaker 2: is that politicians who aren't going to be coming back
Speaker 2: after the next election, people like Bill Shorten, are giving
Speaker 2: their farewell speeches now. Now he's supposed to be doing
Speaker 2: that in February. Parliament could be back in February, unless,
Speaker 2: of course, as a plan for no Parliament to come
Speaker 2: back in February, which is why he gave his farewell
Speaker 2: address today even though next week parliament still continues. But
Speaker 2: have a listen to the review process. Now, think about
Speaker 2: how big this is. This is about limiting kids' access
Speaker 2: to social media and as Elon Musk suggests, the potential
Speaker 2: complicating factors around all of it. Does this sound like
Speaker 2: a government who cares at all what anyone else thinks
Speaker 2: about these laws.
Speaker 6: In an attempt to pass the laws before the end
Speaker 6: of next week, the bill has been referred to a
Speaker 6: quick five day committee for scrutiny, but with only twenty
Speaker 6: four hours given for submissions. Tech companies are concerned the
Speaker 6: laws are being rushed without proper consultation.
Speaker 2: This is pretty well right. So what you're seeing there
Speaker 2: is that tomorrow is the twenty four hour period that
Speaker 2: if anyone wants to respond from Elon Musk to you
Speaker 2: or me to have our say on this space of legislation,
Speaker 2: you've got to do it by tomorrow. Now, anyone who
Speaker 2: knows how to act with government or put a submission
Speaker 2: for government. It's not just like bagging out an email.
Speaker 2: Slightly more complicated the idea that they've issued a very
Speaker 2: narrow window and then just five days to have a
Speaker 2: look at the legislation. Again big tell that the government
Speaker 2: wants this done by the end of next week, because
Speaker 2: most likely you can start to be big that Parliament
Speaker 2: is not coming back no budget, which means we may
Speaker 2: well be looking at a prime minister. And obviously I
Speaker 2: could well be proven wrong, but he could come as
Speaker 2: early as Australia Day and fire a starter's gune on
Speaker 2: an election into February or maybe into March. Any later
Speaker 2: than that then obviously Parliament would have to come back.
Speaker 2: But all the little signs are showing us that it's
Speaker 2: an election sooner rather than later. But there's one thing
Speaker 2: I wanted to say about kids and their access to
Speaker 2: the Internet. Now I've shown you before that there are
Speaker 2: great documentaries that you should be watching with your tween
Speaker 2: and teen kids about the reality of social media, about
Speaker 2: how all of these companies actually work, about how it's
Speaker 2: a sort of digital version of a casino with artificial light,
Speaker 2: lots of stimulus, and the search for the stimulus is
Speaker 2: what makes you keep coming back, right. But as parents
Speaker 2: and grandparents, we play a role here. There is no
Speaker 2: twelve year old in Australia who can buy a phone
Speaker 2: because they don't have any money. They don't have a job,
Speaker 2: which means they can't have the money to sign up
Speaker 2: and get a mobile phone. It is us, the parents,
Speaker 2: the family members, or the grandparents who are in charge
Speaker 2: of when they get access to their devices. Now, I
Speaker 2: am not going to pretend that I'm a person who
Speaker 2: has only had my kids play with wooden toys and
Speaker 2: read intellectually approved books. My kids love mucking around on
Speaker 2: YouTube and they will often sit with me and will
Speaker 2: giggle at some of the other stuff that's on the internet.
Speaker 2: But they do not have access to these devices without
Speaker 2: our knowledge. Please, if the parents of Australia could start
Speaker 2: to unite and in all of those Facebook and WhatsApp
Speaker 2: groups that exist from kindergarten all the way through the
Speaker 2: year twelve. Before the kid can afford to buy a phone,
Speaker 2: let's decide the types of phones they can buy now. Obviously,
Speaker 2: smartphones are things like your Samsung Galaxies or your iPhone
Speaker 2: twenty eighteen or whatever it is right now. The other
Speaker 2: option is to think god a dumb phone, which is
Speaker 2: a telephone, which is a telephone only it does not
Speaker 2: have access to the Internet, It may or may not
Speaker 2: hopefully not have a camera, and you cannot access apps.
Speaker 1: If for whatever reason.
Speaker 2: You think it's time for your kid or grandkid, niece,
Speaker 2: nephew or friend have a phone for goodness sake, make
Speaker 2: it a dumb one, because ultimately they can text you,
Speaker 2: You can text them, they can text their friends. But
Speaker 2: in the middle of the night the apps are not
Speaker 2: going ding ding ding and monitoring them and trapping them
Speaker 2: into a world that in part is creating a scenario that,
Speaker 2: as I told you last night, kids as young as
Speaker 2: eight now are showing serious signs of mental illness that
Speaker 2: in part is being filled by the garbage that they
Speaker 2: are being fed on the internet, and part of how
Speaker 2: they're being fed on it is by what their parents
Speaker 2: are letting them do. Now, I get it. There are
Speaker 2: certain age groups that will go off and find their
Speaker 2: own ways and smarter with technology than their parents and
Speaker 2: potentially their grandparents. But the device they have is up
Speaker 2: to you. In the same way you decide what you
Speaker 2: feed your kid for dinner, you can decide what devices
Speaker 2: they have in their pocket or you have in your home.
Speaker 2: Don't expect the government to do everything on this now.
Speaker 2: When it comes to Australia's economy, there are two songs
Speaker 2: that give the best indication to the attitude of this
Speaker 2: federal government. The first everything and the other one is
Speaker 2: a country music song that I can't get out of
Speaker 2: my head. I love that song. Oh, such a good song.
Speaker 2: I'm getting deep into the country music now. Love Love, Love,
Speaker 2: Love Love because Stapleton. Anyway, I'm distracting. But in terms
Speaker 2: of the reality of the Australian economy, anyone who's trying
Speaker 2: to pay off a house right now is in a
Speaker 2: world of pain. Anyone who's trying to pay off an
Speaker 2: investment property right now is in a world of pain.
Speaker 2: That's two thirds of the people in the Australian housing market.
Speaker 2: We learn today one point six million Australian households are
Speaker 2: currently facing mortgage stress. This is different than the number
Speaker 2: I also gave you this week of three medium people
Speaker 2: who are at the risk of homelessness, mainly because they're
Speaker 2: starting to get squeezed out of the rental market. But
Speaker 2: of course, when it comes to interest rates, the only
Speaker 2: thing that matters is not you or I or anyone
Speaker 2: else who's trying to make it by no. Of course,
Speaker 2: in terms of the Canberra bubble, they only care about
Speaker 2: the future of the Prime Minister, and they're already putting
Speaker 2: a lot of pressure on the Reserve Bank, not so
Speaker 2: they can make things easier for those of us trying
Speaker 2: to pay something off. But no, Alban Eazy needs interest
Speaker 2: rates to fall. If they don't, his reelection chances certainly
Speaker 2: will oh heaven forlfend interest rates in the Prime Minister's
Speaker 2: chances and an election please. The early expectation was that
Speaker 2: if we weren't going to get anything this year, we
Speaker 2: would get it early next year. Just a couple of
Speaker 2: months ago, many of the banks were starting to say
Speaker 2: as early as February and again with an election now
Speaker 2: certainly before May. May of the latest Prime Minister says May,
Speaker 2: but if no one's coming back into Parliament it'll be
Speaker 2: earlier than May. Then February would be okay. However, those
Speaker 2: expectations now need to change. Today Westpac joined in with
Speaker 2: other financial institutions to say you can forget about February,
Speaker 2: you can forget about March, and and forget about April.
Speaker 2: May is when there may be a reduction in interest rates.
Speaker 2: According to the finn Westpac's become the second big bank
Speaker 2: to push its forecast for the Reserve banks Australia's first
Speaker 2: cash rate to May from February. As more economists and
Speaker 2: investors investors dump expectations for pre election mortgage relief, inflation lingering,
Speaker 2: and remember inflation is quite artificial at the moment because
Speaker 2: power prices are part of inflation. But this government is
Speaker 2: falsely trying to make it seem like those things are
Speaker 2: lower than they actually are. And issues when it comes
Speaker 2: to the job market, you can see that May twenty
Speaker 2: is what the NAB City, UBS, Capital Economics, RBC Capital
Speaker 2: Markets and now Westpac think is when this relief is
Speaker 2: going to happen. Now, I have long argued that it
Speaker 2: doesn't matter when an interest rate cut happens. The true
Speaker 2: pain of twelve interest rate rises under the leadership of
Speaker 2: Anthony Obernezi and Jim Chalmers is pressure that does not
Speaker 2: feel awfully relieved. If we go from position number twelve
Speaker 2: to position number eleven, or even position number ten, you
Speaker 2: are still ten movements higher than you were when this
Speaker 2: mob came to power. Now, remember the total amount of
Speaker 2: money that is currently being paid back on homes that
Speaker 2: have a mortgage, either the ones that people are living
Speaker 2: in or the ones that they have as an investment property. Well,
Speaker 2: the total amount of money that people have had defined
Speaker 2: since this government came to power and twelve interest rate
Speaker 2: rises is billions of dollars. A little different than the
Speaker 2: promise that's still on the Prime Minister's Twitter feed that
Speaker 2: a labor government would lower the cost of living. That
Speaker 2: was his promises opposition leader. But every single thing has
Speaker 2: become more expensive while he's been in there, and in
Speaker 2: my view as a result of him being there. To
Speaker 2: give you an idea of just how much we've had
Speaker 2: to find cancer analysis of the Reserve Bank data shows
Speaker 2: that borrowers were charged fourteen and a half billion dollars
Speaker 2: on mortgage repayments in June of this year. Rates have
Speaker 2: stayed the same since, compared to nine billion dollars in
Speaker 2: March of twenty twenty one. Put simply, anyone paying off
Speaker 2: a mortgage has had to find collectively five point five
Speaker 2: billion dollars, or sixty one percent more than they were
Speaker 2: paying when this bloke became the Prime minister. The Candra
Speaker 2: press gallery may think that everything is awesome, everything is fine,
Speaker 2: and it ain't my fault if we go from twelve
Speaker 2: interra straight rises back to the eleven position or the
Speaker 2: ten position. I say people's financial pressure is right being
Speaker 2: a purple right now, and that's why I don't think
Speaker 2: there's going to be the political relief. Another bit of
Speaker 2: evidence to putting on the table as well. Remember the
Speaker 2: bricks of our argument each and every night, data facts,
Speaker 2: that's what we put before you. The mortar is the opinion.
Speaker 2: There's lots of it, and that's what builds our wall
Speaker 2: against this nonsense each and every night. In the Australian
Speaker 2: newspaper today, one of their opinion people was writing that
Speaker 2: the latest JWS True Issues survey has found that Australians
Speaker 2: feel as if they are falling behind. Every three percent
Speaker 2: of people say they are worse off than they were
Speaker 2: two years ago. Repeat, forty three percent say they are
Speaker 2: worse off than they were two years ago. Nineteen percent
Speaker 2: say that they work better off. What was that Prime
Speaker 2: minister's promise that a labor government would make things better
Speaker 2: when it came to cost of living reality, Forty three
Speaker 2: percent of people say it's worse since they took over.
Speaker 2: And that's not just the people that are trying to
Speaker 2: pay off a house, which is why Peter Dutton laserlike
Speaker 2: is not distracted, but the hate campaign which is going
Speaker 2: to come and the fear campaign that's going to come
Speaker 2: from the government in question time today he hit them
Speaker 2: right between the eyes and good on him for doing.
Speaker 7: The Future Fund was set up by the Howard government
Speaker 7: in two thousand and six to strengthen Australia's long term
Speaker 7: financial position. For nearly twenty years, governments of both sides
Speaker 7: have respected the independence of the Fund by not meddling
Speaker 7: with its investment mandate. Having blown the bank and fueled
Speaker 7: inflation with its reckless spending, Labor is now raiding the
Speaker 7: nation's nest egg to cover its economic failures. As to
Speaker 7: WHI are Australians paying for the Albanesi government's economic incompetence?
Speaker 2: Now what's he talking about there? When it comes to
Speaker 2: the Future Fund. Others may have explained it certainly better
Speaker 2: than I can, but let me give it a crack.
Speaker 2: In Canberra, there's obviously the politicians, and then there's all
Speaker 2: of the public servants that exist in and around the
Speaker 2: federal government. Yes, from the front line of the army
Speaker 2: all the way through to the back rooms of the
Speaker 2: tax department. In fact, has this one in five people
Speaker 2: employed in Australia work for a government. Now obviously that's state,
Speaker 2: federal and local. But when we are talking here about
Speaker 2: federal government people, they all of course have superannuation. They
Speaker 2: have superannuation that is at a higher rate than many
Speaker 2: of us in the private sector, and obviously their moneys
Speaker 2: are also on top of their salary. So there's a
Speaker 2: very significant amount of money that the federal government at
Speaker 2: any one time has to have access to for the
Speaker 2: superannuation of the public servants. Now remember that the Future
Speaker 2: Fund is in part for that reason, but also they're
Speaker 2: able to have their own union superannuation and the rest
Speaker 2: of it here, but that basically is one of the
Speaker 2: purposes of the Future Fund. Its point is to invest
Speaker 2: in whatever it wants in order to produce the best
Speaker 2: possible return, to have the biggest amount of money that
Speaker 2: the government has to cover its liabilities with a public
Speaker 2: service that is exponentially growing. One in five Australians work
Speaker 2: for the government. This is not a good number for Australia.
Speaker 2: It is not a good number for our future. And
Speaker 2: it speaks to a political theory of the case that
Speaker 2: I've had for some time. We saw this with a
Speaker 2: Daniel Andrews or a Palichet and Miles, which is that
Speaker 2: they believe that permanent power comes for them. If you
Speaker 2: work for the government, if you're dependent on the government,
Speaker 2: or if you're a business your biggest client is the government.
Speaker 2: That would patch up sixty maybe sixty five even seventy
Speaker 2: percent of people, meaning that everyone who is outside of
Speaker 2: those groups, even if they all voted in the opposite direction,
Speaker 2: it wouldn't matter because the public servants. Hence why the
Speaker 2: political conversation about cut cut, cut, cut cut, it's all
Speaker 2: aimed at those people, and those people are not in
Speaker 2: certain areas. They're found out all the way across the
Speaker 2: country is that the business is connected to the government
Speaker 2: that no one wants to rock the boat. Hence why
Speaker 2: you get Victoria which doesn't move at all, or you
Speaker 2: need sticks and sticks and sticks of jellig nite over
Speaker 2: four years to be able to dislodge labor like Crucifooley
Speaker 2: was able to successfully do with Miles and Palachet in Queensland.
Speaker 2: But today we learn that the Treasurer is going to
Speaker 2: tell the people who run this fund what they should
Speaker 2: start to invest in. Not because it provides the best
Speaker 2: possible financial return for the reasons the fund exists. No,
Speaker 2: it's to help him prop up. I want to increase
Speaker 2: the amount of things like renewable energy construction. Now, remember,
Speaker 2: if the purpose of the fund is essentially just a
Speaker 2: giant extra bit of money for the federal government to
Speaker 2: yank ad that would be okay. But it's not. It's
Speaker 2: meant to be something completely separate that is not going
Speaker 2: to be involved in investing in things that the federal
Speaker 2: government then gets to turn around and cut ribbons on
Speaker 2: to make themselves look better as politicians. Petti Costello, who
Speaker 2: established the Future Fund, he said this in part today
Speaker 2: that this is a particularly bad decision, and he says
Speaker 2: that it is not so small modernization. He said in
Speaker 2: a statement, In fact, there's nothing modern about all of
Speaker 2: this at all. This belongs to a very old tradition
Speaker 2: in politics, interfering with market investment for political purposes. The
Speaker 2: Shadow Treasurer also says this is a bad idea.
Speaker 8: The government is coming after this money, which is Australian's money,
Speaker 8: because of their economic failures. It's not clear where they
Speaker 8: want to go next after this, by the way, and
Speaker 8: the fact of the matter is if they are prepared
Speaker 8: to run the Future Fund, they'll be more than prepared
Speaker 8: to raid Australian's superannuation money, which they've always seen as
Speaker 8: their money.
Speaker 2: As for Jim Chalmers, this is his defense.
Speaker 9: This is not an especially controversial change that we are proposing.
Speaker 9: You know, it's not unusual for governments to indicate what
Speaker 9: are they considered to be their national economic priorities. We
Speaker 9: haven't interfered with the independence of the Future Fund. We
Speaker 9: haven't interfered with expectations around rate of return or risk.
Speaker 2: This bloke is really trying to fiddle with the books.
Speaker 2: He's trying to fiddle with the books to use the
Speaker 2: money that is not for this purpose, for the purpose
Speaker 2: of investing in the things that as a politician he
Speaker 2: would be able to open and cut the ribbons going
Speaker 2: into an election, which seemingly is earlier than what the
Speaker 2: Prime Minister was saying earlier this week, which is in
Speaker 2: and around May. What was that song again? There's no
Speaker 2: need to play that song, but I did because I
Speaker 2: like it's all much. Now, let's talk about something way
Speaker 2: more serious than that, and there's no dancing of music
Speaker 2: involved in this. The TRIPLEO system in Victoria is a disgrace. Now.
Speaker 2: As I've told you before, thirty three people have died
Speaker 2: and the lead up to the last election because the
Speaker 2: TRIPLEO system wasn't working. It meant that they couldn't dispatch ambulances.
Speaker 2: It meant that people ended up dying as a result
Speaker 2: of the TRIPLEO system not working. Now, we were told
Speaker 2: that all of this was going to be fixed, this
Speaker 2: was all going to be put in place, it was
Speaker 2: all going to be made okay. A government spokesperson has
Speaker 2: turned around and has said, in relation to all of
Speaker 2: this that our budget keeps investing in emergency services. Victorians
Speaker 2: rely on the funding allocated for this procedure in a
Speaker 2: new computer aided dispatch system and two million dollars to
Speaker 2: support the tripos. They said this was going to be fixed. Well,
Speaker 2: guess what we learn tonight that the triplo system for
Speaker 2: a couple of hours yesterday in Melbourne was so out
Speaker 2: of kilter that they had to write things down and
Speaker 2: they were posting and passing notes to each other. This
Speaker 2: is exactly the same situation that we had before the
Speaker 2: last state election. Well, the story now has repeated itself.
Speaker 2: It is truly unbelievable now that Deputy Secretary of Emergency
Speaker 2: Management of the Department of Justice and Community Safety had
Speaker 2: to explain what happened here. A parliamentary committee was told
Speaker 2: that there was an unplanned outage of this system at
Speaker 2: five point thirty and the computer aided and dispatched system
Speaker 2: was able to come back two hours later. In the meantime,
Speaker 2: staff were forced to use pen and paper. A quarter
Speaker 2: of the way into the twenty first century. This is
Speaker 2: how the system is currently being held together by pen
Speaker 2: and paper. The opposition we couldn't find them in front
Speaker 2: of a camera today. Why I don't know, but this
Speaker 2: in part is what they had to say, which was
Speaker 2: Labour's managed to give the tripo a triple zero, Victoria
Speaker 2: a new logo, but it hasn't made a start on
Speaker 2: a modern and reliable dispatch system. Good to see a statement,
Speaker 2: why the hell aren't you in front of a camera?
Speaker 2: This is outrageous. Thirty three people died before the last election,
Speaker 2: but because Labor got re elected, because they think it
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. They somehow think you can still have a
Speaker 2: system this far after the state election that has not
Speaker 2: been fixed. Computers break down, but the computers cannot break
Speaker 2: down when we are talking about people who are calling
Speaker 2: TRIPLEO and we are trying to work out where to
Speaker 2: send the people the ambulance to the police or the
Speaker 2: fieries when they call TRIPLEO. But do you expect anything
Speaker 2: different The premier who fiddles while Victoria burns perfect example
Speaker 2: of her priorities, where literally she's just playing games on
Speaker 2: the internet, not even doing her job. She's literally giving
Speaker 2: herself a pat on the back while approving houses that
Speaker 2: are little pictures on printed out pieces of paper.
Speaker 10: We are going to need to get a much big
Speaker 10: out stamp.
Speaker 2: Oh seriously, now, let's get to our beloved members of
Speaker 2: the Australian Defense Force. To anyone who's part of the
Speaker 2: Defense Force or has served our country, thank you for
Speaker 2: your service, Thank you for what you do for the
Speaker 2: families who are either left behind or worry because their
Speaker 2: loved one is involved in defending our country. God love
Speaker 2: you well. Today we learn that again we've got major
Speaker 2: culture problems inside. But this is all about the brass,
Speaker 2: not about the men and women who are on the
Speaker 2: front lines. A twenty twenty four workplace Experience Paul has
Speaker 2: revealed that despite years of efforts to improve defense culture,
Speaker 2: thirty seven percent of personnel so they have experienced unacceptable
Speaker 2: behavior in the past twelve months. How many times have
Speaker 2: they promised to fix this, but thirty seven percent of
Speaker 2: people say they have experienced things like sexual misconduct and bullying.
Speaker 2: The survey found just twenty nine percent of the Army
Speaker 2: thirty two percent of the Navy felt that their senior
Speaker 2: leaders were effective. Seriously, that's less than a third who
Speaker 2: believe that their bosses are up to it thirty four percent.
Speaker 2: Forty two percent was what the number was a couple
Speaker 2: of years ago, so it is getting worse, not better.
Speaker 2: Air Force personnels slightly more satisfied. Thirty seven percent of
Speaker 2: them approve and have a positive opinion of their commanders. That,
Speaker 2: by the way, is down from twenty twenty one. Why
Speaker 2: is this particularly shocking tonight because remember the Royal Commission
Speaker 2: into Veterans' Suicide that was around for you ye, that
Speaker 2: earlier this year had released its final reports, big thick
Speaker 2: documents into the problems in and around our Defense Force
Speaker 2: that in part are leading to members of the Australian
Speaker 2: Defense Force taking their own life. One of the recommendations
Speaker 2: was recommendation twelve to consider the emotional intelligence and performance
Speaker 2: of people who move up into leadership ranks. Remember at
Speaker 2: the time when this was released, the Prime Minister said
Speaker 2: that they respected the report and that they would get
Speaker 2: on and act on its recommendations. Just as our veterans
Speaker 2: and defense personnel step up for our country, we have
Speaker 2: an obligation to step up for them. So September towards
Speaker 2: the end of October, what's best part of six weeks?
Speaker 2: Seven weeks ago total number of recommendations that the government
Speaker 2: has said that they are going to implement from the Veterans'
Speaker 2: Suicide Royal Commission duck, egg, bugger or none, tumblewheed, It's nothing.
Speaker 2: I do not understand how a document of this seriousness
Speaker 2: does not have great urgency. I do not understand why
Speaker 2: the opposition does not ask a question about this, about
Speaker 2: how many of the recommendations are you going to put
Speaker 2: in place? In my opinion, it should be all of them, definitely.
Speaker 2: If we've got less than a third of the men
Speaker 2: and women of our defense force who do not have
Speaker 2: faith in the people who lead them, and there are
Speaker 2: recommendations to change how that system works seven weeks after
Speaker 2: they have been published, and they were as plain as
Speaker 2: the nose on your face, this government simply thinks that
Speaker 2: they could tick and flick do the usual thing. Oh
Speaker 2: we respect our troops, Well, what about a report into
Speaker 2: the difficulties and the fart is that are leading to
Speaker 2: them taking their own lives? Nothing, no urgency whatsoever. But
Speaker 2: because they want to get a win in and around
Speaker 2: social media and trying to ban it for kids, that's
Speaker 2: a twenty four hour process into a five day inquiry
Speaker 2: into a law being passed, all of that within a week.
Speaker 2: If they want to do something, they can do something.
Speaker 2: But the they won't do something, So can I appeal
Speaker 2: to a lady who I'm sure does not think well
Speaker 2: of me, but is in a powerful position, Jackie Lamby.
Speaker 2: Without her vote, it is harder for the government to
Speaker 2: pass a single piece of legislation. Jackie, could you pick
Speaker 2: up the phone. Could you tell the Prime Minister how
Speaker 2: many of these recommendations are you putting in place? Can
Speaker 2: you make it public? Make it now? Or you're not
Speaker 2: voting for anything that they want to do between now
Speaker 2: and the next election. Now, it's a threat that will
Speaker 2: probably be empty because there won't be many days of
Speaker 2: the Senate between now and the next election. But you
Speaker 2: are in a position to do something. And I know
Speaker 2: when it comes to veterans affairs that she is one
Speaker 2: of the best politicians in the country. You wants to
Speaker 2: do something now. I have a crack at an uphill
Speaker 2: Downdale all day every day. But a broken clock can
Speaker 2: be right twice a day. It is right on this Senator.
Speaker 2: Please use your power to get this public. Use your
Speaker 2: power to tell us how many of these recommendations are
Speaker 2: they going to put in place? Can you put the
Speaker 2: pressure on the government and the Prime Minister the next
Speaker 2: time you see him. What the hell is going on?
Speaker 2: Why have they not done anything with this report? They
Speaker 2: are just yet again, letting the men and women of
Speaker 2: our defense force swing in the breeze metaphorically, I say.
Speaker 2: Now in the US, as you know, Trump on his
Speaker 2: way back to power. But there is a ridiculous suggestion
Speaker 2: from lefties who cannot get past their hate of all
Speaker 2: things to do with Orange Man Bad, and they have
Speaker 2: got a new plan, which is to dangle a potential
Speaker 2: jail sentence over Donald Trump all the way through the
Speaker 2: next four years of his presidency. This all comes back
Speaker 2: to the bloke who ran on the get Trump bandwagon,
Speaker 2: who helped fill the dolls and push things. So he
Speaker 2: was found guilty on thirty four counts of bookkeeping charges
Speaker 2: in a trial that didn't even ask as a witness
Speaker 2: the bookkeeper to give evidence, because the assumption was that
Speaker 2: the bookkeeper would end up speaking on Trump's behalf. But surprise, surprise,
Speaker 2: a place that votes very dramatic New York City Democrat
Speaker 2: that the majority of all of the jury conduct with
Speaker 2: those thirty four guilty verdicts. Now, the president was supposed
Speaker 2: to be sentenced before the Republican Convention, it was delayed
Speaker 2: until after the election, and now Alvin Bragg is trying
Speaker 2: to put in place a delay on sentencing for another
Speaker 2: four years. We'll let our difriend Annalise explain this nonsense.
Speaker 11: In a previous filing, the district attorney argued against dismissing
Speaker 11: the conviction, saying, no current law establishes that a president's
Speaker 11: temporary immunity from prosecution requires dismissal of a post trial
Speaker 11: criminal proceeding that was initiated at a time when the
Speaker 11: defendant was not immune from criminal prosecution, and that is
Speaker 11: based on official conduct for which the defendant is also
Speaker 11: not immune. In response to the delay, Donald Trump's communication
Speaker 11: director Stephen Chung said in a statement, this is a
Speaker 11: total and definitive victory for President Trump and the American
Speaker 11: people who elected him in a landslide. The Manhattan DA
Speaker 11: has conceded that this witch hunt cannot continue.
Speaker 1: No Sooks, no Lefties, and the best chat we've ever
Speaker 1: had with Meghan Kelly. What was that song again? I
Speaker 1: love it? Write them cowboy morn A Secer and put
Speaker 1: Marie Lard. No sooks, no lefties, and thanks for watching.
Speaker 2: No Sooks, no Lefties, Meghan Kelly in a moment or
Speaker 2: two's time and speaking your powerful, independent, wonderful women to
Speaker 2: join us now Christie McSweeney of course, the Principal Council
Speaker 2: of the pr Council, Christy Abram, who is a libertarian
Speaker 2: to her heart.
Speaker 1: Both of these ladies are about freedom.
Speaker 12: How I a.
Speaker 3: Great It's great to be here, Good to have you.
Speaker 1: Blackpool, good stuff. I love thee I love her when
Speaker 1: it's in.
Speaker 2: Still lovely ladies, all right, So let's talk about what's
Speaker 2: happening in Victoria right now. So there's a treaty negotiation
Speaker 2: happening between the Victorian government and Indigenous peoples. We've spoken
Speaker 2: about some of what were the apparent demands, which, among
Speaker 2: other things, have been your indigenous people don't have to
Speaker 2: pay counsel rates, Indigenous people can have access to a
Speaker 2: whole collection of financial issues. But at the very heart
Speaker 2: of this is, of course, what is the government willing
Speaker 2: to negotiate on. And Christy they have said previously, look,
Speaker 2: anything's up for grabs, everything's on the table, but we
Speaker 2: don't know what's on the table, and we don't know
Speaker 2: what is being negotiated. In fact, here is just seem
Speaker 2: to alan talking about it today.
Speaker 10: Today is an historic day, an historic day for our state,
Speaker 10: for our strong Victorian community, and it's historic because we're
Speaker 10: about to embark on treaty negotiations will make our strong
Speaker 10: state even stronger, even fairer, even more equal for all Victorians.
Speaker 2: Stated by the way, as we know, the TRIPLEO system
Speaker 2: is currently down to paper and pen But Christy, surely
Speaker 2: we have to know what is being negotiated here, don't we.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 12: I think the Federal Labor Party demonstrated that they don't
Speaker 12: want Australians to know, or Australians don't need to know
Speaker 12: any details in terms of major decisions that the government
Speaker 12: seeks to enact on their behalf or get them to
Speaker 12: vote for. So that's been run already and at lost.
Speaker 12: And of course the next election in Victoria is not
Speaker 12: coming forward to twenty twenty six November twenty twenty six.
Speaker 12: We've got a long way to run in terms of
Speaker 12: these big ideas that don't necessarily have.
Speaker 3: Any details behind them.
Speaker 12: I think that is what politics is these days, with
Speaker 12: some quarters, of course, I will say this. I read
Speaker 12: that press release, I've read the Victorian Treaty Authority website,
Speaker 12: I've listened to the Premier and I've read that transcript.
Speaker 12: I can't understand anything that she is saying. It is
Speaker 12: not communicated, let alone not having any details.
Speaker 3: And I will say.
Speaker 12: This, Paul, One in ten Indigenous children in Victoria are
Speaker 12: likely to be removed from their home, and Indigenous reports
Speaker 12: tell us that in Victoria and actually around Australia, only
Speaker 12: six percent of child protection budgets go towards supporting out
Speaker 12: of home care for kinship and cultural residents for Indigenous children.
Speaker 1: Fix that.
Speaker 12: Fix your budgets before you announce great esoteric ideas that
Speaker 12: don't make sense and don't help one Indigenous Victorian Kristen.
Speaker 2: Again, I'm trying to go best case scenario on this. Okay,
Speaker 2: if they wanted to tell us upfront that a percentage
Speaker 2: of all tax revenue will go for this reason, and
Speaker 2: you know they're okay, that's the starting point, and we
Speaker 2: at least understand right what we can argue in and around.
Speaker 2: But if there's no dayline on this process, what did
Speaker 2: we do.
Speaker 13: Well?
Speaker 14: I'm not surprised that there's no daylight on this process
Speaker 14: or any other process that the government gets up.
Speaker 13: To these days.
Speaker 14: But I feel as though we need to take a
Speaker 14: step back.
Speaker 13: From all of this that's going on.
Speaker 14: You know, we've had the voice and now we have
Speaker 14: the Victorian government talking.
Speaker 13: About a treaty.
Speaker 14: I was in year six when Kevin Rudd said sorry
Speaker 14: and he acknowledged the past of Australia and Australia's history.
Speaker 14: And I remember when the you know, teacher wheeled in
Speaker 14: the television for us to watch that historic moment. And
Speaker 14: I remember in year six thinking, how good, you know,
Speaker 14: for us to acknowledge the past and move forward together
Speaker 14: as one. That's what it was meant to do. It
Speaker 14: was meant to bring us all together. Now, that same
Speaker 14: year six, Kristen used to get really upset when people
Speaker 14: used to say where are you from? And I would
Speaker 14: always turn around and say Australia. I'm Australian because I
Speaker 14: was proud and I I'm proud to be an Australian.
Speaker 14: But you know why I got to upset, Paul, It
Speaker 14: was because people were saying you're different. Every time they
Speaker 14: said where are you're from? They would be saying to me,
Speaker 14: you look different. You don't look like an Australian to me,
Speaker 14: and what are we doing to society and our Aboriginal
Speaker 14: you know comrades by saying they're constantly different from us,
Speaker 14: By going okay, well we need a treaty.
Speaker 13: We need the voice.
Speaker 14: We are all equal together, and you can't unrate history,
Speaker 14: you can only forge a better future.
Speaker 2: Absolutely correct. Why I love the freedom of a libertarian
Speaker 2: talking this stuff. All right, let's talk about kids and
Speaker 2: social media and the laws that are going to be
Speaker 2: raced through before the end of the year. Kristin, what's
Speaker 2: your thoughts on it.
Speaker 14: It's a dangerous question, Paul asking a libertarian what I
Speaker 14: think about a social media bands.
Speaker 13: There's the potential that I'm going to go off on
Speaker 13: a tangent on this one.
Speaker 14: But again, let's take it back. So the oban Easy
Speaker 14: government and the Coalition are saying, let's protect the kids. Okay,
Speaker 14: So is potentially harmful content on social media. When I
Speaker 14: was in high school and social media had just started
Speaker 14: to boom, the people that were as sat as it,
Speaker 14: the most oppressed weren't actually getting bullied on social media.
Speaker 14: It was because largely they didn't have friends. Now, obviously
Speaker 14: mental health manifests in different ways and for different.
Speaker 13: Causes, but let's talk about graphic.
Speaker 14: Content that they're trying to protect children from as well.
Speaker 14: Before social media, you would go, you know, to your parents'
Speaker 14: draws or whatever, and find a magazine, or you'd go
Speaker 14: into the news agency and try and find a magazine.
Speaker 13: You were still kids were still.
Speaker 14: Trying to find that content anyway. So having a social
Speaker 14: media ban on under sixteens takes the choices away from parents.
Speaker 13: And I don't think that the government should be our parent.
Speaker 15: If you, as a parent.
Speaker 14: Want to stop your childs from going on social media,
Speaker 14: you do that, but don't take away other parents' choices
Speaker 14: because you're too weak.
Speaker 13: To parent your children.
Speaker 14: I think that's absolutely ridiculous and I don't think that's
Speaker 14: the Australian way.
Speaker 2: All Right, Me and Kelly in a second, So let's
Speaker 2: get the winners and losers week, Christy McSweeney. Who stands
Speaker 2: out for you? What do you want to give a
Speaker 2: cuddle to or a kick up the backside?
Speaker 12: Oh look, I'm going to say Jim Chalmers, probably the
Speaker 12: Luther of the wake. I don't think he's Treasury's speech
Speaker 12: and he's big vision for Australia. This is the second
Speaker 12: time he's done this. I don't think it landed.
Speaker 2: Paul. Yeah, the remaking of capitalism, of course, is what
Speaker 2: Tea was promising the first time around. Kristin Abram, for you.
Speaker 14: The loser of the week from me would be the
Speaker 14: Sydney commuters which are being held hostage by the unions
Speaker 14: and the labor forcing them into this situation as always.
Speaker 14: And the winner, I would say is probably Ellen DeGeneres
Speaker 14: because she's being able to use Trump as an excuse
Speaker 14: to flee the US.
Speaker 3: Only because she was canceled.
Speaker 12: She's run out and got no more exactly using as
Speaker 12: an excuse.
Speaker 2: Yeah, what about that is a story. She's going to
Speaker 2: pull a pin on the United States. Oh, she hates
Speaker 2: the country that made her so anyway, you get the point.
Speaker 2: She'll take her Emmy's with her. Of course, thank you,
Speaker 2: ladies to appreciate it. Speaking of nosooks, no lefties. The
Speaker 2: ultimate Meghan Kelly. Next, this is the best chat we've
Speaker 2: ever had. You're going to love it as much as we.
Speaker 2: The highlight of our week is when we talk to
Speaker 2: our favorite person in the world, none of them, the
Speaker 2: wonderful Meghan Kelly, who's still radiant, still amazing because she's
Speaker 2: living a brand new world in Trump's America.
Speaker 1: Rockstar. Loving to see you.
Speaker 3: It's great to be here. I'm still riding high.
Speaker 1: Yeah me too.
Speaker 2: Now we sore over the past couple of days that
Speaker 2: a major decision was made to escalate things in Ukraine,
Speaker 2: where US missiles can now be used.
Speaker 1: They have been used to fire into Russia.
Speaker 2: Russia turns around and says, well, we now reserve the
Speaker 2: right to drop a nuke in response. But Joe's missing
Speaker 2: in the jungle. Kamalas buge it off to Hawaii. The
Speaker 2: White House has got a gone fishing sign on it,
Speaker 2: and no one seems to care.
Speaker 4: It's really terrifying, and it's really irresponsible, and I really
Speaker 4: don't think, you know, like we didn't even want to
Speaker 4: confirm a Supreme Court justice nominated by an hour going president.
Speaker 4: Why shouldn't outgoing president be allowed to start World War
Speaker 4: three and then pass the baton to the incoming You know,
Speaker 4: they give security.
Speaker 3: Briefings to the incoming president.
Speaker 4: At this point, he should be involved at a minimum
Speaker 4: in the decision making here, because he's the one who's
Speaker 4: going to have to deal with this.
Speaker 3: Trump, not Biden.
Speaker 4: I mean, Biden can't be reached by anybody, not even Jill,
Speaker 4: I'm sure at this point. So it's really scary, and
Speaker 4: of all times to escalate, and for what point?
Speaker 3: Yes, Okay, they're arguing over.
Speaker 4: Like one last piece of territory that maybe won't be
Speaker 4: Putin's and that Zelensky can with At this point, it's.
Speaker 3: Not worth it. Given the stakes that we are looking.
Speaker 4: At here, people seem to forget that they are in
Speaker 4: nuclear power.
Speaker 3: Putin can be angered.
Speaker 4: He does not want a nuclear war with the United States,
Speaker 4: but we continue to.
Speaker 3: Proceed as though it's not at least a risk.
Speaker 2: Now we're going to spend months talking about whether or
Speaker 2: not the people that Trump is peaking for his cabinet
Speaker 2: will get confirmed or not. And I love getting into
Speaker 2: the detail, but there is something I wanted to get
Speaker 2: to about this whole process before we get into the names. Right,
Speaker 2: there are two people, in particular, the person that he
Speaker 2: wants to become the Attorney General, Matt Gates, and the
Speaker 2: person he wants to become Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.
Speaker 2: Now they're hardcore mag of people, and that's why the
Speaker 2: Left hate them. But the way they're trying to come
Speaker 2: at these two guys to say they couldn't possibly serve
Speaker 2: is because of their personal lives. Hexeth is on his
Speaker 2: third marriage and clearly was a pants man in between
Speaker 2: each of those times. The same when it comes to
Speaker 2: Matt Gates, but also when we go back to say,
Speaker 2: the dug Emov stuff that was playing out during the election.
Speaker 2: I don't think America cares about sex the way that
Speaker 2: it used to, and I don't think that sex in
Speaker 2: your personal life is anywhere near as disqualifying as it
Speaker 2: was ten years ago. What do you reckon?
Speaker 3: Did you say he was a pants man?
Speaker 1: He's a pants man.
Speaker 2: I mean a man who means often he enjoys not
Speaker 2: wearing them.
Speaker 1: The only place that his pants look better out on
Speaker 1: the floor.
Speaker 3: Doesn't that make him like a boxer's man. I don't
Speaker 3: understand not following it.
Speaker 1: It means that he may lay with company. How do
Speaker 1: I say it?
Speaker 3: Adds?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: A mad ruder is what we say in Astralia. So ironically,
Speaker 2: even though you don't need pants for the activity, you
Speaker 2: are referred to as a pants man. If you are
Speaker 2: a person who has has been with many dare I.
Speaker 3: Say this is thrilling?
Speaker 4: I learned something new about your beautiful culture every time
Speaker 4: I come on.
Speaker 3: All right, so indeed a pants man? I agree? That
Speaker 3: is how it looks.
Speaker 4: That won't that won't ruin Hegseth's nomination for his confirmation.
Speaker 4: The fact that he's on marriage number three, and I
Speaker 4: think he's on family number three. He started kids with
Speaker 4: all of them. And it's not it's not ideal. I'm
Speaker 4: not gonna I like Pete. I'm not going to pretend
Speaker 4: it's ideal. However, it's not that. It's the fact that
Speaker 4: now they're saying there's a woman accusing him of raping her.
Speaker 4: And this was not vetted with the Trump campaign, that
Speaker 4: Pete did not disclose it to them and they did
Speaker 4: not know about it because it was just between Pete
Speaker 4: and this woman. But to be honest, Paul, it smells.
Speaker 4: This whole story smells to high heaven. The police investigated
Speaker 4: her claim, they did not bring charges. He was at
Speaker 4: some event. She was like his handler because he was
Speaker 4: a speaker. She's seen on videotape, according to Pete's lawyer,
Speaker 4: bringing him back to his hotel room as his handler.
Speaker 4: He's obviously visibly intoxicated, according to the tapes, and she's
Speaker 4: smiling and not drunk. They go inside, she comes out
Speaker 4: eight or nine hours later, and she claims the whole
Speaker 4: night got very hazy, as though she'd been given a
Speaker 4: date rape drug. That's the obviously the obvious implication. My
Speaker 4: biggest question on it is she says she went for.
Speaker 3: A rape kit the next day.
Speaker 4: Where is the positive drug test for the date rape drug?
Speaker 4: Where is a drug test that says she was given
Speaker 4: her a hypnol Because that's the key of her whole story.
Speaker 3: She remembers nothing except.
Speaker 4: Vaguely a rape and the other nine hours are a blur,
Speaker 4: and she went to rape crisis the next day. Where's
Speaker 4: the drug test? I think if there were one, she
Speaker 4: would have mentioned it. It would have been in the police report,
Speaker 4: which it wasn't. The police declined to bring charges. And
Speaker 4: this man's career should not be ruined over this unsubstantiated allegation.
Speaker 1: Now, we put it off for long enough. And this
Speaker 1: is the thing that I'm most excited to talk to
Speaker 1: you about.
Speaker 2: I hate when people in the media couldn't give a
Speaker 2: stuff about the people who watched their shows listen to
Speaker 2: their shows.
Speaker 1: Instead they do it for the rest of the media.
Speaker 2: Perfect example of that of these two who host Morning Joe,
Speaker 2: and they of course came out and said after calling
Speaker 2: Trump Hitler and just every single day, three hours a day,
Speaker 2: the most boring, boring HEIGHTE on Trump oh well, now
Speaker 2: pace it out. Time they went and saw Trump in
Speaker 2: Mari Lago. I hate the Trump met them.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I do too. I can't stand it. And it
Speaker 4: wasn't just Hitler and fascist. It was also eight years
Speaker 4: of racist, sexist, rapist. That's what he was being called
Speaker 4: all over their show and MSNBC, and.
Speaker 3: It's all just forgotten. It's nothing.
Speaker 4: He's not a rapist, he's not Hitler. And Trump allowed it, right.
Speaker 4: Trump likes attention. He wants them talking about him, he
Speaker 4: wants them saying nice things about him. He doesn't need them.
Speaker 4: And of course I think Trump too is happy to
Speaker 4: see somebody bend the knee, which was fun to see
Speaker 4: bend it, get down nice and low huck her up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he is just I mean, he is so up himself.
Speaker 2: And she's just lost the plot a very long time ago.
Speaker 3: But do you remember, she's an idiot. That's the other thing.
Speaker 3: She's a dope.
Speaker 4: And by the way, she's constantly she's caused it, lecturing
Speaker 4: us about women's rights like she's so okay, she's progressive.
Speaker 4: I forgot to tell you today, I do not have
Speaker 4: my black stretchy pants on. I have the full sweatpant
Speaker 4: on today, Paul Maray, I'm just going to be honest,
Speaker 4: and I need to disclose this because it's a visual.
Speaker 4: So this miss like a champion, Miss feminist. They were
Speaker 4: on the cover of was It New York magazine ten
Speaker 4: years ago and you have a picture of the two
Speaker 4: of them where Joe Scarborough is like this.
Speaker 3: I think he might have his feet up on the table.
Speaker 4: It's like a power pose for him and she she.
Speaker 3: Is up there. This isn't I'm not dressed for this,
Speaker 3: but I'm going to show you.
Speaker 1: Okay, give me, give me, thank you.
Speaker 15: Oh yes, oh my god. That should not be doing this.
Speaker 15: That's what she did.
Speaker 3: And he's sitting there in the power position like.
Speaker 4: Yeah, do it, baby, pose you show him your brain.
Speaker 3: So I am so over her.
Speaker 4: She's about women's rights and empowerment and rapist.
Speaker 3: This you're full of and we all know it.
Speaker 2: Megan, I love you, and to show to show equal vulnerability, Rod,
Speaker 2: I'm not going to stand up and show everyone that
Speaker 2: I'm wearing shorts.
Speaker 1: So I just want to say I love you. I
Speaker 1: love you, Darlin, and we look forward to seeing you
Speaker 1: next week. Okay.
Speaker 3: So he's fun.
Speaker 15: Paul