WEBVTT - Danica De Giorgio | 21 November

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News Australia.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 2>This is to Nika de Georgio.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Hello and welcome to the show.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Coming up tonight, Kelly Sloane elected new South Wales Liberal leader.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 4>So much for the calls for quotas and the party's

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 4>woman problem. Chris Bowen is about to become the country's

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 4>first part time minister, splitting his time between overseeing the

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Renewables only experiment at home while serving as president for

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Turkey's COP thirty one summit. And why it's time for

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 4>a serious debate about immigration in Australia. It's a debate

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 4>that takes courage and conviction. But first tonight, who says

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 4>the Liberal Party has a woman problem? Almost everywhere across

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 4>the country women are now leading the party's respected state branches. Today,

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 4>former journalist Kelly Sloane was appointed new South Wales opposition

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 4>leader in an uncontested ballot after Mark Speakman resigned yesterday.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 5>I don't underestimate the challenge ahead of us, but I

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 5>am ready for the fight and as a team, we

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 5>are ready for the fight.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Her deputy, also a woman, Natalie Ward. In Victoria.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 4>This week, Jess Wilson was appointed opposition leader nationally of course,

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Susan Lee leads the party and in the Northern territory

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 4>Leofanocchiaro is Chief Minister. Now Labor can bang on all

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>they like about quotas, but this all happened without who

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 4>would have thought. And for the record, and I've said

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 4>this before, I could not care less about the gender

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 4>of those appointed to these roles as long as it

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 4>was earned and that they are the right person for

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 4>the job. Now I find quotas offensive personally, but the

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>point is the Liberal Party was considering quotas after this

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>year's election loss and they still filled roles with women

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 4>across the country.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 3>What does that say?

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think if this is not a warning to

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 4>stick to conservative roots, thing.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Will ever stick now.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 4>As for New South Wales, the branch is in a

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 4>total mess. A poll last month found the coalition is

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 4>facing a blood bath at the next state election.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Its primary vote.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Has slumped by five point four percent since twenty twenty three,

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 4>with Labour now ahead fifty nine forty one to two

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 4>party preferred. That's a swing of four point seven percent

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 4>to Labor since the last election and there is no

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 4>doubt about it. Mark Speakman had to go, but the

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 4>branch is riddled by factions and it's toxic, and now

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 4>Kelly Sloane provides a new look party. It's been a

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>quick rise to the top. She was elected as an

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 4>MP at the last state election. She's a very solid

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 4>communicator and will likely have a lot more cut through

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 4>than her predecessor. In fact, I think the party needs

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 4>someone like her to be competitive against the popular Premier

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Chris Mins.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 3>But already an energy fight is brewing.

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Kelly Sloan is a moderate and the member for Vourclous,

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.559
<v Speaker 4>the state equivalent of a llegal spender's seat of Wentworth,

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 4>and already she's at odds with her federal counterpart.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 6>Zero is okay, no change, no change.

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 5>We had a party room meeting this week and there

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 5>was strong support to maintain our existing physition.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 4>So how will this play out when the parties are

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>at odds. I'll get analysis on the new South Wales

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Liberals changing of the Guard with former Police Minister David

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Elliott and Independent MP Tanyama Hayleik later in the show.

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Chris Bowen has broken many records and has had many firsts.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 4>As Australia's Climate Change and Energy Minister, He's overseen record

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 4>power price increases of up to forty percent twenty four

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 4>percent this year alone. He's the first minister to promise

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 4>your power bills would go down by two hundred and

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 4>seventy five dollars. And now he can add a new

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 4>achievement to his growing repertoire. Chris Bowen is going part time. Yes,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 4>in an Australian first, Chris Owen is about to become

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the country's first part time minister, operating on a fly in,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 4>flyout basis and incredibly seeking to serve not just one

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 4>country but two. You see, the Minister for Climate Change

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 4>and Energy is going to split his time between overseeing

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 4>the renewables only experiment at home while at the same

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 4>time serving as president for Turkey's COP thirty one summit

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 4>to be held in that country next year. Yes, he's

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>going to dispense his vast climate and energy expertise and

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 4>talents on the world stage as part of a package deal.

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 4>After Australia seated the summit to Turkey, he officially becomes

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 4>the international man of mystery, just like Austin Powers. And

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 4>it's quite an amazing feat when you think about it,

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 4>for someone who is utterly ordinary and quite frankly subpar.

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he can't keep the lights on in this country.

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Yet has been appointed COP thirty one President for Turkey

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 4>to lea international climate negotiations for the next twelve months.

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, it's a role which will take

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 4>him away from his day job, a role which will

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 4>see him spend a lot of time overseas. Had a

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of time on his jet engine. That's a lot

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 4>of miles to come racking up carbon emissions.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Also, he can be the Minister for.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Turkey or whatever the hecky's title is now and number

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 4>one not to toot his own horn in the process.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 7>As comp President of Negotiations, Iwood has all the powers

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 7>of COP presidency to manage to handle the negotiations, to

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 7>appoint co facilitators, to prepare draft text, how to issue

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 7>the cover decision.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 3>All of the powers.

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 4>He says, what a supreme leader this man has become.

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, look, this really is extraordinary.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Given his portrait track record at home, I think that

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Turkey can have him. Our power bills never came down

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 4>by two hundred and seventy five dollars. We've been worn

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 4>time and time again by experts that we will not

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 4>reach our emissions reduction targets as they are via this

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>experiment of transmission lines, giant wind turbines, green hydrogen, solar

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 4>farms and batteries.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Yet Bowen still.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Unveiled a twenty thirty five emissions reduction target of sixty

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 4>two to seventy percent below two thousand and five levels,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 4>with no clue what it means for your power bills.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 3>Now, if he can't.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Even fulfill his very basic duties as it is, and

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 4>now he's going part time, then surely it's time for

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Anthony Albanezi to sack this minister. He was backed in

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 4>by his constituents. He was appointed a minister here in

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 4>this country. So if he wants to go off on

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 4>this vanity project, we'll go.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 3>But he does not deserve to keep his portfolio on or.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 4>When it suits him based and those calls were echoed

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 4>by the opposition.

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 8>Today, Australians don't need a part time energy minister, a

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 8>minister for global UN summit, someone who's clearly excited about

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 8>the prospect of globe trotting to a variety of countries

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 8>and his real job is here at home.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 9>We've got a part time energy minister in the middle

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 9>of an energy crisis.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 3>We've got power bills going through the roof.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 9>He can actually understand that globally, the renewables only process

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 9>is leading to some of the highest industrial energy prices

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 9>in the world.

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Now, I think Johanna Sleek summed it up in The

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Australian Today with his cartoon saying Australia, my work.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Here is done.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 4>The planet needs me now as Bowen jets off, leaving

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 4>a burning inferno of wind turbines and transmission towers in Australia.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 4>So who exactly is Chris Bowen now? The part time

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Minister for Climate Change and Energy, the Minister for US

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 4>when summit's the international manner mystery, the Minister for Turkey,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 4>perhaps the president of Cop thirty one, the Minister for

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 4>fly and fly out, who really knows? Or perhaps just

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 4>a jack of all trades, master of none. Now it's

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 4>probably going to get uncomfortable and some hard truths will

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 4>be revealed, But it's time for a serious debate about

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 4>immigration in Australia.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 3>What sort of a country do we want to live in?

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 4>This is a debate that takes courage and conviction because

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 4>the left love to label the very topic is racist.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you dare have a debate and suddenly as

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 4>some sort of right wing nutjob load of nonsense. It's

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 4>not racist to have a conversation about the number of

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 4>people being brought into this country. It's not racist to

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 4>have a conversation about the types of people we are

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 4>bringing into this country. It's not only about quantity, it's

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 4>also about quality. Immigration is an acute vote driving issue

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 4>and you know that because the standard of living has

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 4>diminished and social cohesion is collapsing. In fact, Australians are

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 4>now more worried about immigration than climate change. But god forbid,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 4>don't tell the part time Energy Minister Chris Bowen who's

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 4>over in Brazil that whatever you do now. That's according

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 4>to a Spector Strategy poll. Its director Morgan James said quote.

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 4>The results were predictable as both the Liberals and Labor

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 4>were perceived as failing to engage the issue head on,

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 4>despite concerns that recent high migrant intakes have put huge

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 4>pressure on housing markets, infrastructure.

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 3>And social cohesion.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 4>This is a debate that has to happen and I

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 4>think this is why we need a population plebi site

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 4>where you get to have a say on how big

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 4>you want this country to be and what sort of

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 4>a country you want to live in.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>That's what democracy is about, right.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Pauline Hanson has pushed for a national vote on this

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 4>for years and has been overwhelmingly shut down by the

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Senate every time.

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Here she was in twenty nineteen on a Plever site.

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 10>It just makes common sense to understand that more people

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 10>means more demand for services. If those services are not

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 10>established at a pace that keeps up with the growth,

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 10>then lifestyles will go backwards. And with the stagnant lifestyles

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 10>or Australians have been experiencing in the past decade, we

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 10>certainly don't want things to get any worse.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 4>And the reality is it has got worse since then.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Population growth is outpacing infrastructure. There's less housing, it's more expensive.

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Labour has presided over a migration disaster. One point two

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 4>million migrants have come into this country since Labour was elected.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Australia's population will likely reach twenty eight million by twenty

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven alone, and at the same time, Labour has

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 4>failed to deliver on any of its housing targets. The

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 4>supply of new homes is likely to fall twenty percent

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 4>short of Labours one point two million target by twenty

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine. Only one hundred and eighty thousand homes were

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 4>built this financial year. That's well short of the two

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred and forty thousand. So where are we going to

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 4>put all these people? We can't even get every day

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Aussie's into houses.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, Look, if the Liberals.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Are serious, they would come up with a policy that

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 4>puts a figure on.

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 3>The number of people coming in. And that's a hard figure.

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 4>According to The Australian this week, Susan Lee will release

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 4>immigration policy principles and directions rather than a fixed net

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 4>migration number before Christmas.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Now I fear the.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 4>Liberal Party seems destined to do the migration hokey pokey,

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 4>half in, half out.

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 3>How can you have.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 4>An immigration policy without a serious fixed target?

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 3>How can you sell it between now and an election?

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 4>It needs a figure, put a number on it, have

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 4>the courage to do so. Otherwise why have a policy

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 4>at all?

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 3>And it's not just a targeted migration program.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 4>We deserve to protect our values and that means we

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 4>must look at the types of people we're bringing in. Now,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 4>we've already seen our social cohesion break, especially after October

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 4>seven twenty twenty three, and that's not be racist. I

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 4>mean we need to do everything we can to protect

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 4>this country, or do we risk falling the way of

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the United Kingdom, a country that does not know itself

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 4>anymore and has been completely overrun by foreigners and not

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>necessarily ones.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Who share British values at heart.

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 4>Now, the Liberals in the short term are saying that

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 4>they won't put a number on the table.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 3>But we've seen this play out before.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 4>In the weeks leading up to this year's election, Peter

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Dutton did put out a migration plan pledging to cut

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 4>the annual net migrant intake by at least one hundred thousand,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 4>but it seemed to disappear into the never never, just

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 4>like the coalition's nuclear policy, where it was barely mentioned

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 4>and barely prosecuted. Now, Macro Business chief economists Leith Vannsulin,

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 4>who I will speak too shortly, has written about how

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Canada has had a sensible discussion on immigration by linking

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 4>it directly to the rental crisis, infrastructure and living standards.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 4>He says it implemented a three year population freeze in

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 4>mid twenty twenty four and as a result, its net

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 4>overseas migration has pomitted. Now it takes courage, but right

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 4>now we can't seem to have that discussion here and

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 4>no wonder voters are looking elsewhere. There's surging support for

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 4>One Nation from voters who increasingly don't feel heard by

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 4>major parties over population issues. That's according to a poll

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 4>taken between November four to seventeen, which also showed support

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 4>for one Nation has increased by eleven percent to seventeen

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 4>point five percent since the May election. The reality is

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 4>nobody ever voted for a big Australia, yet here we

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 4>are living in a big Australia. Multiculturalism and mass migration

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 4>have been thrust upon us with no room for debate

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 4>about the sort of country we want to become. And

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 4>this is why the left don't want you to have

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 4>this debate, because migration suits labor politically, it props up

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 4>the Ponzi scheme economy, and as I said earlier, why

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 4>not put it to a vote?

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 3>What do you want?

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 4>How many people do you want coming into this country?

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 4>How big should Australia get? And in the meantime, unless

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 4>someone can actually convince me about the merits of a

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 4>big Australia. It's time to put some serious policy in place.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 4>The Prime Minister has spent the past week ducking and

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 4>weaving over the Britney Higgins saga and seem to struggle

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 4>with the difference between the rape claim and the now

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 4>discredited claim of a political cover up by the Liberal

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Party and former Defense Minister Linda Reynolds.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 11>Should your senators, who led.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 12>The charge of a Liberal Party coverer over the Higgins

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 12>case apologize to the traders?

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's not right. I don't accept that characterization.

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Look, the public deserves to know the truth here. Firstly,

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 4>why did miss Higgins receive a two point four million.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Dollar taxpayer payout?

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 4>And secondly did the Prime Minister and mean go Katie

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Gallaher and Penny Wong exploit this saga for political gain?

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Joddy manow Is, the Shadow Attorney General, Andrew Wallace Andrew

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 4>good to catch up. As always, two judicial findings rejected

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 4>claims of a political cover up.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 3>So what's there to hide here from the Prime Minister?

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you think, Well, there's a lot to hide.

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 13>I think I think the Prime Minister is an absolute

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 13>world of hurt on this issue because he knows how

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 13>much the Labor Party and he himself weaponized this issue

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 13>in the lead up to the twenty twenty two election.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I was the Speaker at the time.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 13>I sat there and listened to the Prime Minister absolutely

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 13>categorically weaponize the rape allegation at that stage that Britney

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 13>Higgins was making against Scott Morrison as the Liberal Prime

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 13>Minister and against the Liberal Party directly. You know, they

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 13>weaponized this as being part of what they held out

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 13>to be a woman problem. And we all know now

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 13>that there was no cover up. But it goes deeper

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 13>than that. Janet Orbrickson has done a tremendous job unveiling

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 13>a lot of this just in the last.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Couple of weeks.

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 11>Let's look at it.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 13>We know that the Commonwealth, when Mark Dreyfus was the

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 13>Attorney General, sidelined Linda Reynolds from her own mediation. So

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 13>she was a party to the proceedings, and Mark Dreyfus said,

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 13>you can't take part in the proceedings. If you do,

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 13>we'll stop funding your defense. So Linda Reynolds couldn't go

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 13>to the mediation. She was banned from going to that mediation.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 13>She was banned from being able to defend her own

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 13>good name. We now know that the government extended the

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 13>limitation period for which Britney Higgins was able to sue

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 13>both the Commonwealth.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 3>And Linda Reynolds.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 13>Now they made that decision without any reference to Linda

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 13>Reynolds whatsoever. We now know that there are also other

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 13>letters that have been coming out that have called into

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 13>question the ratio percentage of blame that Britney Higgins said

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 13>that she was entitled to from a psychologist. There are

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 13>so many things that are absolutely stinked to high heaven. Then,

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 13>of course, with just a half day mediation, a half

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 13>day mediation, unprecedentedly the Commonwealth awarded two point four million

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 13>dollars to Britney Higgins. This stinks to high heaven and

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 13>there's a lot of questions to answer for here.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Look, I agree, we still don't know why Britney Higgins

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 4>Higgins was given that two point four million dollars. There

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 4>are so many unanswered questions, but the Prime Minister was

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 4>very clearly ducking and weaving on this issue. This week,

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 4>let's talk about Chris Bowen Andrew in an Australian first.

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Apparently he's going to be the first meed do we

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 3>really need to talk about it. I know, I know.

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Look it's not my favorite topic either. But he's apparently

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 4>going part time. This is an Australian first. Would you

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 4>believe part time energy minister is going to take up

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.479
<v Speaker 4>this role as president of COP thirty one after Turkey

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 4>successfully won the bid, but then also try and continue

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 4>to control the energy grid here at home. The problem

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 4>is Andrew, he can't control the grid here, but now

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 4>he's going fly in, fly out.

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 13>I mean you, you just can't make this sort of

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 13>stuff up to Nika. The only thing I can say

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 13>is our game is the world's loss. But I mean,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 13>this is a guy that promised us, along with the

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 13>Prime Minister, promised the Australian's two hundred and seventy five

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 13>dollars power cuts in the lead up to the twenty

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 13>two election, and we're all paying more than a thousand

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 13>dollars extra for our energy.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 3>And that's just mums and dad.

0:18:58.320 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 14>It's what about.

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Businesses that are going to wall.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 13>Because they can't afford to keep their doors open anymore.

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 13>More businesses are going to the wall in Australia today

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 13>than in any other period in our modern history, and

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 13>it's because of this bloke's energy policies, and according to

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 13>the Prime Minister, he's going to be over there solving

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 13>the world's problems police.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, he's his expertise.

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 4>He's going to show that off to Turkey on the

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 4>world stage, all of his great knowledge about energy. Andrew,

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>before we let you go, Olbow's overseas again, this time

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 4>in South Africa for the G twenty. Another week, another

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 4>summit for the Prime Minister. What is he going to

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 4>achieve this time?

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 13>Well, it is important that the Prime Minister goes to

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 13>these meetings. But I'll tell you what. He will be

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 13>very very pleased to be out of the national spotlight

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 13>in relation to the Britney Higgins issue. But he'll obviously

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 13>be traveling with an Australian press pack and I would

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 13>encourage them to keep the pressure on because there's a

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 13>lot more to come out of this story.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 11>Just yet.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree with you. Let's see how the week unfolds.

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 4>Andrew Wallace, nice to chat as always, as we do

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 4>every week.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much for joining me.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, as I mentioned earlier, Australians are now more worried

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 4>about immigration than climate change. According to a new poll

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 4>in the Daily Telegraph.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 3>The Coalition is.

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 4>Reportedly looking at reducing the annual net migrant intake by

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 4>at least one hundred thousand below current levels. Joining me

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 4>now is Macro Business Chief Economists Leith van Nonsulin, Leif

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 4>thanks for joining me. One hundred thousand that's the figure

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 4>being floated?

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Is that enough?

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's obviously an improvement on labor, but a reduction

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred thousand would merely return immigration back to

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>its pre pandemic level, which was still far too high

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and that resulted in chronic housing infrastructure shortages. So NETO

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>overseas migration average about two hundred and twenty thousand in

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen years lead up to the pandemicdemic, and that

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>was labeled Big Australia. So it seems like the Coalition

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>wants a big Australia as opposed to Labour's Huge Australia.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>But it'd still see a population grew to about forty

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>million people by twenty sixty, Ceddey and Melbourne about eight

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and nine million each, So what the Coalition's proposed is

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>still far too high.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 3>So what does the figure need to be?

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.239
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the Coalition at this point said that they

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 4>might be reluctant to put a hard figure on it

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 4>between now and Christmas. If you had to put a

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 4>figure on the table to make a tangible impact, what

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 4>would it be.

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Look, I'd like to see that overseas migration cut

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to below one hundred and fifty thousand, just kind of

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>what Peter Dutton was proposing. But it needs to be

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on genuine skills the nation actually needs. So we

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>need tradings rather than uber drivers that sort of thing.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the fact of the matter is the numbers

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>are far too high. We've got the wrong type of

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>workers coming in. That's why we've got chronic housing shortages,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>chronic infrastructure shortages. But we've also got perpetual skills shortages

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>despite running a high immigration program. So it's just not working.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned this before.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 4>You have said in the past that Canada is an

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 4>example about a success story when it comes to lowering migration.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 4>What can the Liberals learn from that experience, do you think?

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, like Australia, Canada massively ramped up immigration after

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and it resulted in the worst ever renal crisis,

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>amongst a whole bunch of other issues. But unlike Canada, sorry,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>unlike Australia, Canada's left leaning government implemented a three year

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>immigration freeze population freeze, and that's resulted in a massive

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>reduction in immigration, thirteen months of falling rents, and it's

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>also contributed to lower house prices, and in fact, Canada's

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>bank TD Bank, they released a report last month noting

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that Canad's immigration program has cut rents, reduced pressures on

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>house prices, reduced pressures on infrastructure, economic and social, and

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also stemmed the run up in unemployment after Trump's tariffs,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's also improved per capita growth, So it's been

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a tick in every box. It's also been very popular

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>amongst Canadian voters, so I think the collig can learn

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>from that.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 4>And the left leaning government over there did this with

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 4>courage and conviction. And this is a debate that takes

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 4>courage and conviction because you know, the R word always

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 4>gets thrown up, racism. It's not racis to have discussion

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 4>about this topic. And I mentioned this earlier as well.

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 4>If our leaders are too scared, do you think it's

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 4>time for maybe a population plever site It's been something

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 4>that's been pushed by one nation for years.

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, so, look at Australian voters categorically want low immigration.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Virtually every opinion poll held since the pandemic and before

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic showed they want lower immigration. So we should

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>let us train the vote on the future population size

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>via plever site and these results can then inform the

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>government on the size of the immigration program to meet

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that target. But of course the chances that's happening that

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>each is pretty minimal because our governing elite wants high

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>immigration even though the Australian voter has shown through multiple

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion polls that they don't support it.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 4>And just based on the current trajectory with labor, I mean,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 4>obviously migration suits labor politically, it's propping up this Ponzi

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 4>scheme economy.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Where are we heading to? What is the trajectory we're

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 3>on right now under labor, Yeah.

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>It's unfortunately, it's going to be going to be very high.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So according to former Deputy Secretary of the Department Immigration

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>ab L Rinsby, he reckons that under current immigration set

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>ins because they've made a whole bunch of changes to

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>student visas which have liberalized it a lot he thinks

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of the new annual normal is going to be three

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand. Now it was two hundred and twenty thousand

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>in the fifteen years leading up to the pandemic. Since

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, since the end of twenty nineteen, it's averaged

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy thousand. He thinks the new normals

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>about three hundred thousand, which means we're going to have

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>huge Australia and it just means a perpetual rental crisis.

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 4>And nobody ever voted for a huge Australia or a

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 4>big Australia. Yet yep, here we are with that sort

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 4>of trajectory. It's frightening. Leith van Onslin, good to see

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 4>you as always, Thanks very much for joining me on

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 4>the show. Coming up after the break, A university vice

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 4>chancellor has resigned weeks after she claimed those who worked

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 4>from home on Monday and Friday we're getting four day

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 4>weekends that are more with my panel.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Next welcome back.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now is New South Wales Independent MP Tanium

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Mahlic informed your South Wales police bit as to David Elliott.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Happy Friday to both of you. Big week in New

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 4>South Wales.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 3>David.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Kelly Sloan's been appointed the New South Wales opposition leader.

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 3>You're still a member of the Liberals.

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of how the week's unfolded and

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 4>will she make a good leader?

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think it had to happen. Unfortunately for Market,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 15>he was just not getting the level of support he had.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 15>Agitators they're sniping out, and agitators that then cowardly didn't

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 15>turn up to the ballot when it was time to

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 15>actually vote for a new leader. But I think we'll

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 15>see with Kelly a fresh start. She'll need to surround

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 15>herself with the right people and a good team, and

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 15>I think she knows that. And she's going to need

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 15>to review her relationships outside of the Parliament with the

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 15>business community when it comes to workers' compensation, with the

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 15>Conservative voters when it comes to net zero, and of

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 15>course somehow come up with a strategy that will win

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 15>those two seats back.

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, she's already said no to net zeros.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 15>And that's going to be all about the branding and

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 15>she's with the Liberal Party in New South Wales and

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 15>Victoria for that matter. Between rock and a hard place,

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 15>they go with net zero and lose Conservative voters to

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 15>one nation or they dump next net zero and lose

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 15>moderate votes to the Teels. This is a defining moment

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 15>for the Liberal Party. Never before have we seen a

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 15>policy like this which has the potential to break that

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 15>broad Church into two and in many respects, I think

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 15>this is our DLP moment.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's going to be interesting to see how it

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 4>plays out. When you're just so at odds Tallia a

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 4>huge week on Macquarie Street. What does Kellie Sloan have

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 4>to do in your view to cut through now to

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 4>voters and also obviously go up against a very popular

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 4>premier in Chris Mints.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 16>Look, I think that what she does need to do,

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 16>and she did say this in her press conference that

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 16>she needs to connect with people in Southwest Sydney, Western

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.479
<v Speaker 16>Sydney and out in regional New South Wales. I think

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 16>the first thing she needs to do is tours many

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 16>clubs and pubs and communities as she can across this

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 16>state in the next two months, before the next before

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 16>the February sittings of Parliament. It's so important that she

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 16>gets to meet people and she can argue that she's

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 16>been to every electorate in their state and get to

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 16>know as many people she possibly can.

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 3>I think she's got a really nice.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 16>Character about her. I have to say I find look,

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 16>Chrismians can be often Look he's formidable, but he's often

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 16>aloof She's the sort of person that can be very

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 16>friendly when you see her around the corridor, She's always

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 16>cordial friendly. I think a lot of people do like her.

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 16>And and when you think back, she's had a terrific

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.719
<v Speaker 16>media career in the past. A lot of people know

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 16>who she is and she can relate to people. Look,

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 16>the challenges for her, of course, being from Vaucluse, being

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 16>the electorate of eastern suburbs will be a challenge for her.

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 3>But that's why I've said.

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 16>If she can go out to the electorates in Southwest

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 16>and Western Sydney connect with those families. She is a

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 16>family woman a self a mother and wife that does

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 16>connect with people.

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>And Look, it's going to be hard.

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 16>She's going to have to differentiate and David's right from

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 16>the from Mark speakman, she's going to have to find

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 16>issues of a difference. Someone should be workers com for sure.

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 16>She's got to support small business operators in that regard,

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 16>not what the so fatherly was have been working with

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 16>the Greens shockingly in this South Wales Parliament not wanting

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 16>to reduce premiums. So that's the first thing.

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 3>That's a good point.

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 4>And what does it say to this perceived women woman

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 4>problem in the Liberal Party. You've now got Kelly Sloan,

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 4>her deputy is also a woman.

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Over in Victoria.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 4>This week a female opposition leader was elected in the

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Northern territory. There's a female Susan Lee across the board.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 4>How can you say there's a woman women everywhere?

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 6>Now?

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 15>Well, and you look at you know, one of our

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 15>two most successful premiers in the last ten years has

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 15>been Gladys has been a woman, you know. So I

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 15>think I think the people that accuse the Liberal Party

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 15>of having a woman problem are the ones either trying

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 15>to big note themselves or trying to create some sort

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 15>of non existence division. Now, yes, we have had we

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 15>have had problems with male politicians who have said things

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 15>and have acted in policies that haven't had women as

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 15>forefront of their considerations. But if you can't collectively say

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 15>everybody in the Liberal Party has a problem with women,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 15>I had women chiefs of staff, you know, I served

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 15>with under Gladys. I've served under the a female colonel

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 15>in the army. I mean, this suggestion that we're all

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 15>in the same box is just ludicals.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 3>It's ridiculous.

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, yeah, the Liberals were considering gender quotas.

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 16>They haven't gone. I agree because Kelly got their own merit.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and that's what it always should be. Now, this

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 4>story baffled me. The Adelaide University Deputy vice chancellor has

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 4>resigned weeks after she claimed those who worked from home

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 4>on Friday and Monday were getting four day weekends. Paula

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Ward had called for stricter work from home rules to

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 4>be introduced to prevent staff getting four day weekends by

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 4>working remotely on those days. Workers were outraged, describing the

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 4>remarks as disgraceful.

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 3>And now Tanya, she's suddenly resigned.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 16>She's gone, yeah, look, it just tells you how fragile

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 16>the woke culture really is, particularly in the university climate, where.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 3>You can't you know. I feel sorry for this woman.

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 16>She actually apologized for a comment, and she still appears

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 16>to has been forced to resign. It just tells you

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 16>what university cultures like. It's horrendous. They're just a bunch

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 16>of socialists. I think she actually made a great point.

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 16>Why are people taking Monday and Fridays off regularly, particularly university.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 16>They're getting paid there overseas students. You know, no one

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 16>cares about domestic students. You oversee, students are paying for

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 16>their bills and at the same time our taxes. She

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 16>made a terrific point that and right to say that point. Nevertheless,

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 16>she apologized, but it's not good enough for the woke

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 16>warriors at university.

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 3>It never is.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 4>And I think she made a good point as well,

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 4>what are you doing taking those two days off?

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 15>All the time, every other major employer in the country

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 15>is drawing back on work from home. Every other major

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 15>employer in the country is saying, listen, we have to

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 15>justify the work from home culture.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 3>We have to review it.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 15>We want to make sure that it's balanced with productivity.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 15>And yet it scares me that a CEO at that

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:22.719
<v Speaker 15>level loses their job for making what is essentially a

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 15>flip and remark about whether or not productivity is there.

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 15>Of Course, everybody should be justifying why they should work

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 15>from home. Of Course, everybody should be justifying why they're

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 15>having Mondays and Fridays off. I mean, I know major

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 15>employees in this town that are all saying, Okay, you

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 15>can work from home one day, but it can't be

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 15>Monday and a camp Friday.

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 3>No, exactly.

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Plus also, the employers are at their discretion to decide

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 4>what's best for them for a company, exactly, David, Let's

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 4>talk about your callus are my favorite segment now every

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 4>week your column in the Daily Telegraph. This week, who

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 4>would you invite to a dinner party heaven or Hell?

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Who's your top pick for a dinner party?

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 15>Well, I've had obviously Winston Churchill there. He's certainly the

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 15>god other of conservative politics. I did forget to put

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 15>in Napoleon Bonaparte. I'd like to hear the dirt on

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 15>him and Josephine and maybe throwing a boarde of hope.

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 15>But I think I think, I think Clei Patriory, you know,

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 15>I'd like to think.

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 3>That patre would be great.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 15>Well, I'd like to think that she looks like Elizabeth

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 15>Taylor in the ninety six.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>That's why.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 4>That's the only reason why reason why not just Elizabeth Taylor.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 16>I think he needed a little bit, a bit of fun.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 3>I would have had Elvis.

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 16>Oh, yes, yes, Marilyn Monroe.

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 3>A bit of spice.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I was.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, I agree, Yeah, I would go with John Lennon.

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 4>I'd throw John Lennon in there. I think John Lennon

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 4>would be fascinating, like l do you.

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind, but I just think he would be.

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 3>He would be a fascinating man, his guitar everybody. So

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 3>that's what we can ask for.

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 4>David Elliott Toyle, lovely as always to have you.

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Both, Bott, thank you so much for joining me. Covering up.

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 4>After the break, we'll head to the UK and discuss

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 4>the government's plan to pay asylum seekers even more taxpayer

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 4>dollars to persuade them to leave voluntarily.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 3>That's next. Well.

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 4>The ABC has failed in its duty on many occasions

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 4>to cover stories that matter, opting selectively to choose bias

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 4>over journalistic integrity. One such example is the Giggle Versus

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Tickle appeal, where biological man roxand Tickle argued he had

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 4>injured feelings after being booted out of a female only

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 4>app by founder Sal Grover. The ABC did not even

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 4>bother to cover it. This week, a concession of sorts.

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 4>ABC's Media Watch has criticized the broadcaster for biased reporting

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 4>on the case.

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 14>There are I am sure several reasons for these gaps

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 14>in the ABC's coverage, and I suspect one of them

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 14>is how clamorous the blowback can be reporting this very

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 14>difficult story about a very vulnerable community. But the ABC

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 14>and its journalists have a duty to the public to

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 14>find the courage to do so with just as much

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 14>dispassion as compassion.

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 4>And Johnny me now is Giggle founder Sal Grover, so

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 4>good to catch up. Has the ABC contacted you since

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 4>I know?

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Of course they haven't, No, but they did. Unfortunately I

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 6>missed them. We'd had a bit of an email and

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 6>phone tag situation before the Media Watch piece came out,

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 6>so but they wouldn't have published what I was going

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 6>to say anyway, And what I would have said to

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 6>them is that, like many other media organizations around the world,

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 6>such as the BBC, the ABC made a bet that

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 6>women would not fight back against the absolute nonsense that

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 6>is gender ideology and men claiming to be women, and

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 6>the ABC went all in on this ideology. You just

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 6>have to go to their website, to their Instagram. You

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 6>can even look up something called ABC Queer and find

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 6>out how much the ABC is all in on gender ideology.

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 6>But because they didn't anticipate women fighting back like we have,

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 6>they're now finding themselves in a very very uncomfortable situation

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 6>of it being very very clear they have not reported

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 6>on this issue accurately, not only with gigglev Tickle, but

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 6>also with Lesbian Action Group. Lesbian Action Group wants to

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 6>be able to have lesbian only events, which would be

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 6>female only events, and the Australian Rights Commission has said no,

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 6>you have to allow men and claim to be women

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 6>in there, so heterosexual men. ABC's never mentioned it. They're

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 6>not mentioning, honestly, anything to do with kier Lee Smith,

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 6>who is being dragged through courts of ulification for calling

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 6>men men. I mean, these are all things that are

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 6>happening and the ABC has just decided to ignore it.

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 6>And I think we all know why. It's because they

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.760
<v Speaker 6>know that their viewers, they knew the truth, wouldn't support

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 6>gender ideology. To support it, you're only can only hear

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 6>the light, you can't hear the truth of the pushback.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah and yeah, it's in their charter to be impartial

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 4>on all stories. And we're constantly week in week out

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 4>seeing the opposite, and especially when it comes to a

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 4>topic like this. So this week New Zealand band puberty

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 4>blocker scripts. It's prompted the federal Health Minister here, Mark Butler,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 4>to describe the science underpinning it as contested and evolving.

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 3>But this is a thing that baffled me. Sally, he claimed.

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 4>He's spent quite a lot of time reading and thinking

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 4>about Australia's response. My question would be how much more

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 4>time does he need New Zealand's done it. The judge

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 4>who led Australia's family caught when it gave the green

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 4>light to puberty blockers to children back in twenty thirteen

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 4>says she now has doubts about that ruling. And that's

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.439
<v Speaker 4>only just two examples. And the minister apparently needs time

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 4>to read and think.

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it should be pretty instinctual that you

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 6>don't give children life altering medication based on an ideology.

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 6>And Australia is just looking increasingly stupid on this issue.

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we don't like to be humiliated by New Zealand,

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 6>whether it's in rugby or sterilizing children. But here we

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 6>are the UK, s donate, the US, many states in

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 6>the US are doing it. Australia is just hanging on

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 6>for dear life with this ideology, but I think it

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 6>really is catching up. I mean, I would anticipate that

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 6>sometime next year puberty blockers will actually be banned in Australia.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 6>They just can't get around it now. The evidence is

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 6>out there. It's so compelling, it's undeniable. These do not

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 6>do what their claims do. Like these are children who

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 6>think you can change sex and you can't, and they're

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 6>medicalizing them. And it's evil what has happened, and anybody

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 6>who's been complicit in it actually should be held responsible

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 6>in my opinion, No.

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 3>I completely I agree with you.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Look, I hope that Australia does follow suit, but anything's

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 4>possible under this labor government. Sard Grover, nice to see

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 4>you as always, Thanks very much for joining me on

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 4>the show.

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Really appreciate it. Well. Can you believe this?

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 4>The UK Home Secretary Shabanamah Wood wants to pay asylum

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 4>seekers even more taxpayer dollars to persuade them to leave

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 4>fallen terrily have a listen to this.

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 11>For each asylum seeker in the country, it's thirty thousand

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 11>pounds per individual per year. So there's a big sum

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 11>of money. And if we can persuade people to return

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 11>to their home country with a cash payment, that is

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 11>often better value for the taxpayer. I know it sticks

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 11>in the craw of many people and they don't like it,

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 11>but it is value for money.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now is reform UK Counselor Darren Grimes, Darren,

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 4>thanks as always for joining me. Is that seriously Labour's

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 4>solution to immigration?

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 2>It absolutely is Zanika. Look, they won't leave the clutches

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 2>of the European Court, the ECHR, Human Rights quangos and

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 2>all the rest of it. So they're keeping us locked

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 2>in and this is their solution to say to a

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 2>so called asylum seekers, well we'll.

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Pay you to leave.

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually no, we should just be saying to people

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 2>if you are here illegally, frankly, you ought to go.

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 2>You should never have been allowed to stay in. You

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 2>clog up the so called asylum system, you cost the

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 2>taxpayer an absolute fortune, and then we bribe you to leave.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Only in Britain, could you a failure to actually police

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>your own border be turned into a state sponsored gift voucher?

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 2>And my mood says it's value for money. Who exactly

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 2>is a value for it ain't the British public who

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>are increasingly unsafe. It ain't the British taxpayer who are

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 2>funding this madness, and it certainly isn't down to the

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 2>voters who consistently say they want the Australian style of

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 2>border control where actually people are sent back and the

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 2>asylum seeker actually gets a bigger payout than some of

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 2>our pensioners are actually getting. Right now, it's not border policy,

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 2>it's a clearance sale. Right, it's saying everything must go

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to throw absolutely everything we've got at

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 2>this and we'll pay you to take the exit. We

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 2>are a weak country under this lot. We keep asking

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 2>for control, Danika, but labor are dolen out coupons instead.

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 2>It's absurd.

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a really good way to put it. It

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 3>is absurd.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 4>It is absolutely ridiculous that once again it's all been

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 4>put onto the British taxpayer for Labour's absolute failure to

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 4>control the borders.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Now Darren an inquiry has found the.

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 4>UK response to COVID was too little, too late and

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 4>led to thousands more deaths in the first way. But

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Darren I mean, there would be many that would actually

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 4>think the opposite here, that the response was too heavy handed.

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 3>So what on earth has this inquiry actually achieved.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Danika, this inquiry is a two hundred million pounds

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 2>disgrace in my opinion. You know, it's basically the conclusion.

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I knew if you'd ask me a year ago what

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the conclusion of this inquiry would be, I would have

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 2>told you exactly this, that actually it would be like

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 2>a line for a really dodgy film, a promotion for

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a really dodgy film, in which they say, we ought

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 2>to have gone faster, harder, longer. Right, that's exactly what

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 2>they've concluded two hundred million pounds to tell us that

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 2>we should have locked down even faster, that we should

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.839
<v Speaker 2>have done it even longer, that actually the hurt and

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the pain that was caused by those series of lockdowns

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 2>wasn't enough, and that actually the government should have done

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 2>it even more draconian fashion and natured. To me, it's

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 2>an absurdity. You cannot, I think, in those in that time,

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 2>at that time, you could not have gone any further

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 2>with the response than we did. The likes of Sweden

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't do what we did and actually they came out

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 2>of it a lot better. I think the inquiry was

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 2>always going to conclude this. It was always going to

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 2>be a grotesque waste of money and I'm quite frankly

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 2>sickened and appalled by it. The solution was never to

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 2>do what we did. I think I've always thought after

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 2>the first lockdown, I said it was cruel. I said,

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we should be doing this, and I

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 2>think actually many of us have been vindicated since, with

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 2>even the likes of Piers Morgan, who, by the way,

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>was the sort of broadcasting lockdown in chief, you know, broadcaster.

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 2>He actually concluded that maybe he was wrong on some things,

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think he was ultimately wrong on many things.

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 2>So Denika, I'm not a fan of this inquiry. I

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 2>think actually it's a complete disservice to the British people,

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 2>but also to any pandemic preparedness for the future, because

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 2>I've got no confidence that they wouldn't do this again.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 3>And same in Australia.

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't put it past them either, exactly the same issue. Now,

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 4>before we let you go, we've got to talk about

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:52.800
<v Speaker 4>our favorite Megan Markel. She's done this splash with Harper's

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Bazaarre Darren, and it's been revealed that her staff announce

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 4>her before she enters a room, even if there are

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 4>only two guests Darren. So it's like the Duchess has arrived,

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 4>is what said as she enters a room.

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the vanity knows no bounds.

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, Danika, I'd be delighted if they did that. If

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I was sat there and they announced that Megan Markle

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 2>was entering the room, because I'd very quickly leave it. Look, ultimately,

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, she thinks that she's the second coming, doesn't

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 2>she of Queen Elizabeth the iid Yet she delivers all

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the gravitas of a rejected sort of Hallmark film, one

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 2>of those really dodgy flicks. But we've got a Christmas

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.800
<v Speaker 2>special where Harry's been wheeled out right like the world's

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 2>most ginger prop. He used to fly those Apashi helicopters.

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Now he's basically an emotional support for Netflix content. It's

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a really depressing state of a decline for two people

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 2>that were once much loved by the British public. In

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the Royal Family's it's very sad. It's theater, it's expensive,

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 2>it's California, it's self help theater, Danika.

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you couldn't pay me to watch that Netflix series.

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Let me tell you that I will not be watching it, Darren.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you will not be watching it either, exactly,

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Darren Grimes, lovely to see you as always. Thanks so

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 4>much for joining me on the show. Good to catch up.

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Coming up after the break. The winners and losers of

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:16.720
<v Speaker 4>the week, including the Liberals and newest female leader, plus

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 4>claims Miss Universe is rimmed. It's that time of the

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 4>week where we sought the winners from the losers and

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 4>helping me to do that is skinniest contribute on Louise Roberts.

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Great toe. See you again, thank you for joining me.

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 12>Your winner is Kelly Sloan, absolutely hands down the newly

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 12>appointed leader of the New South Wales Liberals. She has

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 12>not put a foot wrong this week at all. She

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 12>got the top job without knifing anyone. I mean, how

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 12>refreshing is that in politics. But also she's focused immediately

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:48.760
<v Speaker 12>in her press conferences today on the issues that people

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 12>want to know about cost of living, housing, energy and

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.840
<v Speaker 12>as a mum of three teenage boys, she knows the juggle.

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 12>So it's all authentic, and she's not a career politician,

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 12>which I think is really important, and that makes her

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 12>the very person of course labor do not want in

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:03.879
<v Speaker 12>the seat opposite them.

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I agree with you. She was very on

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 3>point today and very on brand, which I think they need.

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 4>And I think she was a former journalist I think

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 4>should be a very good cut through communicator.

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 3>So it was an orderly leadership ballad. You say that

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 3>happens that way. I agree. No kind of blood letting.

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 3>All blood letting, Yeah, very very continues. I agree.

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Now, my winner this week is Anthony Alberneezi, but not

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 4>for the reasons you might think, for actually showing us

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 4>which dance moves to avoid.

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Have a look. Look, it's it's all too cringe. It's

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 3>all too cringe.

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 4>And don't forget this performance from Bill Shorten a decade ago.

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 4>You remember when he was overseas trying to give dancing

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:53.399
<v Speaker 4>a crack.

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 3>There. This is what not to do. That's why I'm

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 3>giving him my.

0:45:56.960 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 12>Winner this week, because you know, don't don't do that,

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 12>just don't do that. It is very cringey to watch.

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 12>There's no kind of fluidity in the moves, you know,

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 12>considering he's such a music fan. You think you've got

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 12>that brute and a bit more slick, but well.

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Is Taylor Swift. He loves Taylor to go the concerts.

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, don't do that. That would be my Now

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 3>you're a loser.

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 4>This week at two Miss Universe judges who have quit,

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 4>a scandal hit pageant drama.

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 3>What's happened? Would you believe?

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 12>Miss Universe is under a cloud apparently for being a rigged,

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 12>slash corrupted competition. Wow, I know, shocking news. That is

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 12>one or two judges have quit. One in particular has

0:46:34.760 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 12>made the allegation that the before they get to the

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 12>thirty finalists on stage, they walk out and announce what

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 12>country they're from, et cetera. This is all pre arranged

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 12>and all decided before they even put on the swimsuit

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 12>in the hills.

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 3>So Miss Universe was.

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 12>Never a career path open to me, but to many

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:55.760
<v Speaker 12>women in certain economies or countries, it is a massive

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 12>global platform and one that they spend a lot of

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 12>money on, working their way up through all the competitions

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 12>to get to the point where they're actually a contestant

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 12>in Miss Universe, and then hoping it will lead to

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 12>a Hollywood career or international modeling career. So if that

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 12>is the case, if it is all fixed and rigged

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 12>before they get on stage, it's very unfair to these

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:17.720
<v Speaker 12>women who that's their job, is actually working towards getting

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 12>this title.

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 3>So I mean they've worked their whole lives to get there. Absolutely,

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I actually think.

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 4>It would take a lot of effort, like physically, you've

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:27.839
<v Speaker 4>got to get there. No, So I mean drama, get

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:30.720
<v Speaker 4>the porn out Miss Universe rigged.

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 3>I had to mention it.

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 11>I was shot.

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I like it too.

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Now, look I had to give my loser this week

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 4>to this insufferable Wicked to Press tour featuring Ariana Grande

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 4>and Cynthia Erevo.

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 17>Have a look at this that continues to grow and

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 17>grow even through this pressed or something's bothering her.

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 3>She's going to be something. I know.

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 17>She's getting the fixing edge. That's the Oh thank you?

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.919
<v Speaker 4>Why there was nothing wrong with the necklace? And look

0:47:57.960 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 4>this parody sums it up.

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 9>Where are you from Deaton?

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Ohio?

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 10>Oh my god, oh my god, oh my god, you do.

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I say something wrong? I thought that was perfect.

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 12>They're insufferable, very performative, and it's not really real, and

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 12>that if we think about the age demographic they're aiming

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 12>at for that film and that talent, that they're just

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 12>going to turn off in droves and think it's just

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 12>this fake you know.

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 4>But they're just dramatic, and that they're all over each

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 4>other and they're holding hands and they're crying at the

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 4>drop of the hat. It's all very uh, it's too

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 4>much for I'm not going to go see it.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Alwis Roberts, have a great weekend. Very much for joining

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 3>me on to see you, but nice to see you.

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 3>That's it for me. I'll be back Sunday at seven

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 3>pm for denekro and James. Steve Price is next for

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Night