WEBVTT - The Media Show | 7 June

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Vince is the Media Show with Jack Houghton.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the show. I'm Jack Houghton,

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and tonight my guests are the Australians Darren Davidson and

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>James bolt Off Sky News. Later in the show, we're

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 2>going to get into a crisis at the ABC. But first,

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the fallout of Donald Trump's hush money convictions continues and

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>some of the media have been claiming that this is

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be the end of the former president.

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 3>But other than his breathless seke of fans whose entire

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 3>identity is wrapped up in their slavish devotion to the guy,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 3>there was no major show of support, no protests, certainly

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>no violence, and that's going to be especially worrisome for Trump,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 3>considering his strength is derived from the optics that his

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 3>supporters will heed his every back and call. Once that

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>illusion is pierced, it becomes clear that Trump's power is

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>built on a house of cards and starting to come down.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>And while MSNBC thinks Trump's days are number back here

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, our journalists have a different take.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Say they're worried about the leadership in the United States.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Whatever the result in November's election. Even before Donald Trump

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 4>became a convicted felon six in ten, Australians were concerned

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>about him returning to the wine house. According to a

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 4>new pole commissioned by Q and A, it's a big

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 4>year for elections India, the UK and of course America,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 4>and the results will have implications for the future of

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 4>democracy itself.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Democracy itself. That does sound serious and where have I

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 2>heard that kind of rhetoric before.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Arnold Trump wants to destroy not only the city but

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 5>the country, and eventually he could destroy the world and

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 5>elections forget about it.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>That's over, that's done.

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 6>If he gets in I can tell you right now

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 6>he will never leave.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 2>But surely the media is not just following the lead

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of crazy actors. The media would never be inflammatory. I mean,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>this is a serious issue Q and A have just

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the democracy is on the line. So I look forward

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to this very serious analysis of that very real.

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Threat, because, as Nick said, the media just endlessly obsessed

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with him.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 3>I never want to hear the words Donald Trump ever.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Again in my life. Yeah, and as someone who is living, Yeah,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting part of the problem. I am part

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. And every time they do it. I

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>think I'm giving this day. Yeah, come on, come on,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>where is the point?

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Where is the point?

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But the point is people love me?

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, bring in the panel, Darren. Thanks for joining us

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>on the show. For Q and A to assert that

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>democracy is on the line and then to transition to

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>some asonine impersonations of Donald Trump. It seems to me

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>like they're not taking their own fears too seriously.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think the well, nobody doubts the sincerity of

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 6>the jurors in the case. I think many American voterism

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 6>and a lot of people around the world will conclude

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 6>that while Trump may be a bit of a cad,

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't actually the case. The judgment doesn't disqualify him

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 6>from running the White House again. And I think with

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 6>this legal action, which a lot of people perceive to

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 6>be a tool for a political agenda on part of

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 6>the Democrats, what it really does is just open up

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 6>another kind of destabilizing period in American politics.

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, James, let's bring you in. What do you make

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 2>for Do you think Donald Trump is a very real

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>threat to democracy? And do you think by publishing an

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 2>effective impersonation of him, Q and A is going to that.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Ten seconds so well, he's done it.

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, But like I mean, the whole thing about

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 7>the American democracy. People do tend to forget that America

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 7>was literally involved in the Civil War. As to whether

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 7>or not America can survive four years of Trump presidency,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 7>they literally survived the Civil War and they're still in America.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 7>So I think those concerns are a bit over the top.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 7>But the problem that the freakouts like Q and A

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 7>have and their sister freakouts over in the US have

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 7>is that I think it actually fuels Trump's base. In

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 7>that twenty sixteen Trump was the outside of candidate. He

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 7>was there to shake things up, and you know the

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 7>system that works against you. He's going to come in

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 7>like a wrecking ball and everything's going to be different.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 7>And in twenty twenty you're no longer the outside of candidate.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 7>You're the sitting president. And in twenty twenty four you're

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 7>also the former president. You're not an outsider. Now that

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 7>there's a legal case against him and all those same

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 7>threat to democracy, this is the birth of fascism. We're

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 7>all worried he becomes the outsider again. Now the phrase

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 7>convicted fellon Maybe that alienates true true neutrals in Trump v.

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 7>But if you're a Republican vote and you go, I

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 7>don't really want to vote for Trump, but then this happens,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 7>they are actually out to get us. That is a

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 7>motivating factor for people to get out and vote for him.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 7>So I think freak outs like what we just saw

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 7>there aren't doing themselves any.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Favors you could have, not playing in the Republican's favor.

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 2>And it's something interesting from that Q AND episode as well,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Patricia Carvella cited the figure of six out of ten

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Australians are concerned about Trump. You have to wait till

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>halfway through the show before she explained that fifty two

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 2>percent or five out of ten Australians were worried about

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden taking offers.

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So shows as.

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's worried no matter which way it goes either one

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 6>And the truth of the matter is that what American

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 6>boaches ready care about is immigration, jobs, economy. Those are

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 6>the issues that matter. And I think by the time

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 6>the election comes around this this case will be forgotten about.

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well said, well, let's move on now to a

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>crisis at nine, which just got a whole lot worse

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 2>yesterday when cher Peter Costello appeared to shoulder charge a

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 2>journalist to the ground.

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 8>Were you aware of the allegations against mister Wick before

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 8>he left nine?

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you?

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 8>Were you aware of those allegations? Mister Costillo? Why won't

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 8>you support mister sneezebe publicly good to see? Well, you've

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 8>got to answer the questions, mister Costello. It's great.

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You've just assaulted.

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 8>You've just assaulted me.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>The reporter was the Australians Liam Mendez. And if you

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>think he went too hard in his pursuit of Costello,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 2>as I have seen a lot of commentary suggests, keep

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 2>in mind that Costello is the boss of nine. It's

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the company which brings us scenes like this one from

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>last week all the time that was.

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Anything I'm not here to answer question yep.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>From this reaction, it's hard to believe he wanted anything

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to do with this.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Hands off, hands of hands off.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Costello is a big boy and his reporters play the

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>game just as hard as anyone else. So what did

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Costello say about the incident? Well, for them, it was

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 2>all a simple accident.

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 6>A reporter walking backwards with his phone filming as I

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 6>walked past him, he walked back into an advertising placard

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 6>and he fell over. I did not strike him.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Gee, it must have been a fairly transparent placard because

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>you could not see it on the video, and that's

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>not how multiple witnesses described the event. But whoever you

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>back in this blue, one thing's for sure. It was

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 2>big news and well done to the Sydney Morning Herald

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 2>for not shying away from this fact. They ran the

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 2>story digitally within an hour of the incident and even

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 2>published this front page in the morning. And interestingly, we

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>couldn't help but notice even the SMH wasn't buying the

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 2>chair of their own company's excuse. Costello assaults reporter. Now,

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 2>those tiny quote marks do little to water down the assertion,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and it raises the question if Nine's own publishing arm

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 2>things Costello likely told a porky. How does the bloke

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 2>keep his job? Well, Darren sensational story by The Australian.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Now linam Mendez is one of your reporters. Can you

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>walk me through what he is saying to you guys

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>about the shoulder charge? Can you give me any of

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the background, Scoop.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, Liam doesn't want the story to be about Liam.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 6>Liam wants the story My apologies, Yeah, Liam wants the

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 6>story wait to be about the story which he was

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 6>asking some very personal, important questions about serious misconduct allegations

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 6>that have been leveled by many members of staff at

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 6>Channel nine, and many of them are female members of staff.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 6>Cassello fronts and chairs a publicly listed company. It's his

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 6>job to answer those questions, and a Liam was doing

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 6>his job as a journalist and behaved in a very

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 6>professional manner. I think it's remarkable that Liam managed to

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 6>get up from being pushed over, gain his composure and

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 6>continue to ask very good, important questions. Now there's a

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 6>good piece actually on this straining his website today by

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 6>Tim Burrows, the publisher of Our Made and Media Remarking outlet,

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 6>And what Tim says is really really interesting. He makes

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 6>a couple of points. One is he questions Cassello's behavior

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 6>after the sharp pointing out that he doesn't actually ask

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 6>how Liam is Lian falls on his back, and that's

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 6>that's quite a serious that's a serious thing, and that

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 6>The second thing that Tim makes a point about is

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 6>that Costello shares a company that every single day asks

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 6>its journalists to go to put them in harm's way

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 6>and ask important questions, and he no longer has the

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 6>moral authority to do that, and he should resign. I mean,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 6>it's pretty clear from that video that he he chugs Liam.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That's very, very very clear.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 6>And as you pointed out, as well as eyewitnesses that

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 6>can corroborate that as well, Liam was just going about

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 6>doing his job as a journalist, and hats off to him.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 6>It's an important story and the way in which Lim

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 6>behaved was beyond approach.

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 2>You can see Costello's shoulder drop slightly in the moment

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 2>for impact. That to me is quite telling also the witnesses.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 2>But James Darren raises a good point. There was actually

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>a moment in the clip when Liam actually said to Costello, well,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you're the head of nine, and your nine reporters do

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.239
<v Speaker 2>this all the time. There is a bit of hypocrisy,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I think a lot of punters because

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 2>I've read some commentaries saying, well, the reporter shouldn't have

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>gotten in front of him.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>The reporter got on the road.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 2>But that's the game that Costello plays. His media organization

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>operates like that. And now that he's got a bit

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 2>of a taste of his own medicine, he appeared to

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>lose his cool and allegedly assault this journalist.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a tough one for me because I'm personally

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.839
<v Speaker 7>close to some members of the Costello family and also

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 7>Liam is a friend of the.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Show that I produce here at Sky.

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 7>So as to what happened, I'll wait for the CCTV

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 7>to come out the Australians version of the Separuta film.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll go over a frame by frame.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 7>I will acknowledge that if you have to give a

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 7>second doorstop after your first door stop, the first door stop.

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Probably didn't go the way you were wanting it to.

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So I'll leave that one there.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 7>But the other thing that I'm noticing about this story,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 7>and Paul Murray pointed it out in his show last night,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 7>is that at the second doorstop, where Costello talks about

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 7>the incident, no reporter mentions any of the questions that

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 7>Liam was rightfully asking Peter Costello.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>They're all about, you know, did you show the charge,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>did you strike? What's next?

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 7>So if I'm Andrew Giles, for instance, I'm seeing, Okay,

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 7>this is how I can change the conversation, Like maybe

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 7>next time he's a depressor. Does he just launch himself

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 7>with the first journalist knowing that no one's going to

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 7>follow up with a question about ZD and ees.

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>All they need to do is just ask them about

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder charge.

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's a good point, and you're already touched

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>on this a little bit. But their share price is plummeting.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 2>And one of the allegations, which involves Costello and it

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 2>involves the CEO, Mike Sneezeby, is that shareholder money potentially

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>was paid to Darren Wick. Well, they knew they had

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 2>all these allegations hanging over his head. Instead of sacking him,

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>they arguably had cause they took shareholder cash and paid

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>him a sum. We don't know what it is. It's

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>between half a million dollars up to a million by

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>some reports. There is an onus on Costello to explain

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:49.599
<v Speaker 2>that to the shareholder.

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 6>Surely, absolutely, I mean the numbers being speculated are not

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 6>insignificant at a time when the share Chentleman knows halved

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 6>in three years on Sneezebe's watch, So that does take

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.199
<v Speaker 6>some explaining. They've opened an investigation and that will buy

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 6>them more time. But I kind of feel instinctively, and

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 6>it's just my view that that castello will go and

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 6>eventually sneez people go.

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 2>As well, yeah, we'll said, well, there's been shareholder class

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 2>actions over less over negligence leading to dramatic drop, So

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>we will see what happens, but plenty more to come

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 2>in the moment. We're going to take a quick break.

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back now to the ABC, which is struggling with

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>what seems to be a toxic culture right with bullying

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 2>and sexual harassment. ABC News staff survey reveals one in

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 2>four respondents experience bullying, one in ten was sexually harassed

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 2>over the past two years. Now blossing over the fact

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that the ABC journalist who wrote that headline can't even

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>spell the word harassed, which only has one are we

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>should take these findings very seriously, even if the sub

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>editor didn't. Any other statutory body or government department posting

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>these sort of fears would cause an outcry, But for

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the ABC, criticism is always somewhat stifled.

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>According to this report, women are twice as likely to

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>be bullied at the ABC, and the report found that

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>women were reluctant to come forward with complaints after being

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>sexually harassed. So what will happen to clean up the

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>culture in the ABC well managing director David Anderson says

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the bullies and sexual harasses should leave, but that is

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 2>yet to be seen. Yeah, well, Darren, this is a

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 2>very serious issue. And I make the point that if

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 2>this happened at another organization there would be some call

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 2>for an inquiry. But those kind of stats, they speak

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>to a systemic issue, an issue of culture where women

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>aren't feeling confident to step up. And what I didn't

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>see from David Anderson is some kind of resolution for

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that issue. And for him to come out and say

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>you will get rid of you if you're not following

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the rules, that to me doesn't seem to address the

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>core issue that people have not felt comfortable to speak up,

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 2>presumably because of some sort of retribution.

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, women have a right to feel safe in a

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 6>work environment, and this survey has revealed some really staggering,

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 6>alarming numbers. I was quite shocked when I read the

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 6>report and went back and read the report again, and

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 6>this morning when I came in and I learned that

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 6>we were discussing this topic today, I did some research

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 6>to find out what actions they were taking as you say,

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 6>and I kept feeling like I was missing the story

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.119
<v Speaker 6>or had some incomplete information because there was no inquiry.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 6>There were some statements from the chairman and the managining

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 6>director condemning that bad behavior in a workplace, but it

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 6>felt to me and maybe they've corrected this since that

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 6>wasn't there's no inquiry that there are no remedies actions.

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 6>What are they doing to make people and particularly female

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 6>start at the OBC feel safe going forward, and what

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 6>are they doing to give them the confidence to actually

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 6>speak up and bring these problems to the attention of

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 6>senior management.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And to be fair to the ABC, this is not

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 2>a problem which is isolated to that newsroom or even

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 2>newsrooms in general. Every other business is grappling with how

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to deal with this. But for people watching on to

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 2>bad behavior in the media, we've had the Channel seven allegations.

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>We've had massages put on company cards, three hundred dollars

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>t bone stakes, you know, prostitutes, arguably that kind of culture.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Channel seven, Channel nine, we've had the culture with Darren

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Wick allegations. There must be people watching at home saying, God,

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>what on earth are these self righteous journalists doing behind

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 2>closed doors.

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the reason that the ABC should be held to

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 7>a higher account is because these are the people that

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 7>for years morally lecture us from on high I mean

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 7>just recently we've been told our a racist country by

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 7>an ABC journalist. Recently, you know, last year we had

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 7>the Voice shut down at threats, and stories like this

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 7>come out and they just show you that their moral certainty,

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 7>their moral high ground, is built on false foundations.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm reminded by and I'm not.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 7>Comparing this, it's a completely different situation, but I'm reminded

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 7>when I read Ronan Pharaoh's book on his reporting on

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 7>the Harvey Weinstein trial, and he talks about what he

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 7>was hearing from women with completely blanking on the name here.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 7>I've got a written down it is Mel Streep. Sorry

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 7>for that, but he talks about with Mel Streep. He

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 7>puts all the stuff he's hearing to Merl Streep and

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 7>she goes, oh, but he donates to such good causes,

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 7>And I just go like, isn't that just relevatory of

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 7>how well, if someone's got the morally correct things on

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 7>moracally correct.

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 5>Views on certain issues, we ignore things about He's one

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 5>of us. He thinks one of us, so you can

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 5>give you a pass. I think there is a bit

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 5>of that as well. I think as well there is

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 5>a bad trend with companies where they put out this

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 5>corporate statement acknowledging they have issues, and the acknowledgment they

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 5>think is enough. You saw it in America with universities

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 5>saying that they were we acknowledge we have systemically racist ties,

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 5>and then there was the argument, well then why are

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 5>you taxpayer funded? And you could also make that argument

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 5>here if you have such a systemic issue, and it's

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 5>great that you're commissioning these reports and putting it out,

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 5>but if you're finding that we're paying for that, fix

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 5>it up.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely, those should be bringing in an external, independent

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 6>investigator to have a look into these complaints, and should be.

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>They're released four out of ten people alleging that being

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>bullied by ABC management and their peers. It's absurd to

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 2>do anything less. But anyway, let's move on. The Safety

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Commissioner Julie Evan Grant has been forced into a humiliating

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>retreat from her fight with Elon Musk, granting the billionaire

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 2>of major victory against her bid to censor the global Internet. Now,

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>we've covered this issue on the show a few times.

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, Grant's overreach was bizarre, illogical, and embarrassing.

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 2>The language that she uses is inflammatory and there is

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>an arrogance about this person which delegities her mission.

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>The battle has been lost.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I made a strategic decision to withdraw here, but.

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 5>The e Safety Commissioner warns the fight is just beginning.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's face it, the war is going to be much

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 3>longer and more extended.

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>The war. Who do you think you are? You are

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 2>not a soldier. The courts were clearly poised to side

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 2>against you because it is not your place to decide

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 2>what content is shown in other countries, they have sovereignty

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 2>and make up their own minds. And it was strange

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 2>and suspicious that Grant has done nothing to censor the

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 2>constant images of war from Ukraine and Gaza which are

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>flooding social media. Her outrage over showing vision of a

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 2>radicalized Muslim allegedly attacking a preacher did not extend to

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>other content areas. How much of your money did this

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 2>full waste taking on this unwinnable legal position, Well, Darren,

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the main issue that I have with the E Safety

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Commissioner's approach to this is she was probably never going

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to win it. The conversation the court centered around jurisdiction

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 2>and is it fair do we have the power to

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 2>tell another country can we go, Oh, Lithuania, we don't

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 2>want you to see this video that originated from Sydney.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>But also why would we even try to do that?

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Why wouldn't we be focusing on what Australians can see?

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look, I do get that there are legitimate concerns

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 6>from security agencies about copycat attacks. At the same time,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 6>it's probably not an interest of a fair trial for

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 6>the accused of the unedited footage to be available on

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 6>the Internet. But with this one, I think what we're

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 6>seeing really is that the federal governments just tiptoeing around

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 6>Muslim extremism. And that's really linked to the fact that

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 6>there are large numbers of Muslim voters in labor seats,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 6>and I think that's really what's going on here in

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 6>the background.

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, James, I a cynical part of me

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 2>would tend to agree as well, because you have images

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 2>of babies which have been horrifically blast to pieces, which

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>are finding the way into social media and Australians are

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 2>watching that and it is confronting, and it's far more

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>confronting than that. So where using a selective lens to

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>pick what Australians can see. And it appears to me

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that the narrative behind it does matter. And so the

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 2>narrative of the guards and injuries are well, Israel's doing

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 2>a bad thing. She's happy for that that narrative to exist,

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 2>but she's not happy with the narrative of radicalized Islamic

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 2>terrorists to be shown.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 7>I might add cynicism your cynicism here because I think

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 7>it was more okay if you're the labor government, if'

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 7>Julian mcgrint you want power over what people can spread

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 7>on the internet because you feed this information and you

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 7>know the public gets a bit queasy with that. But

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 7>when you have scenes outside the church like we saw,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 7>you might have the starting pista to be like, well,

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 7>I think the whole public we'd never want to see

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 7>that again. So why don't you just give me the

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 7>power to say what videos can go out. I'll take

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 7>the interest in it, and then no one will be

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 7>able to see those videos.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>And we're we going to see a Wakely Church scene.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 7>Ever again, now that is something that the Australian public

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 7>could agree with, and that is what I think they

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 7>were trying to get. So I'm glad that this is gone.

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 7>I think it was stupid. It was ever brought in,

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 7>but she says there was not over. I don't think

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 7>it is because when Albanez he's asked about this, he

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 7>says about Elon Musk, he's in social media, but he

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 7>does have a social responsibility in order to have that

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 7>social license to say that there's a social responsibility to

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 7>say that there's a social license. That's not how you

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 7>speak about a company in a free market. That is

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 7>how you speak about someone you view as a subject.

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 7>To say, I'm giving you the license to have Twitter

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 7>in this country, you have a responsibility to me to

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 7>prove that you should be able to operate it.

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>That's the framework he's putting it.

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 7>That makes me scared that when this isn't the last

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 7>we're going to hear from Julian m Grant's about misinformation.

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Darren Stories of the Week, what do you have for us?

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 6>Sorry from the US, but an NBA player who plays

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 6>for the Mavericks Dallas Mavericks Luka Donnick. I'm twenty five

0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 6>years old. He sets to earn a billion dollars in

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 6>his career, more than Lebron James, who's still playing, and

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 6>Michael Jordan combined. He might earn more this season than

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 6>Michael Jordan earned in his entire career. And it just

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 6>speaks to the power of live television, whether it's news,

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 6>which you guys do so well, or whether it's sports,

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 6>And in an age of kind of chord cutters and streamers,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 6>that the importance to advertisers and viewers of appointment viewing,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 6>whether it's live sport or news, just grows and grows

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 6>and grows.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, said James, what do you have for us?

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 7>And Luca has to win this year because beating the

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 7>Celtics system moral challenge that all of us need to

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 7>be a part of.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad we're talking about that. My one.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 7>So, John Ross is a Republican congressman. He was giving

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 7>a speech in Congress today and no one paid any

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 7>attention to what he was saying, because well, you'll figure

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 7>it out pretty.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 9>Quickly, regardless of one's opinion of the current Republican nominee.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 9>We'd be well served to remember the long and cherished

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 9>tradition we have in this country of settling our political

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 9>differences at the ballot box for nearly two and a

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 9>half centuries.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 7>I thought Anne Ellie was the queen of Question Time reactions,

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 7>but you might have a new challenge.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Of James Bolt. It's always a pleasure, Darren Davidson, thanks

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 2>for joining me. That's all we have time for tonight.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 2>But up next is a lefties losing it with Rita

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Panahe