WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 5 May

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Burray Live.

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Hello, let's hang out on a Monday night in the

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 2>man Cave. I wonder if we'll talk about the election.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course, how can we not.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 3>After the disastrous night for the Coalition, a night of

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 3>incredible success for the Labor Party.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Not easy to say, but that's the way it is.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 3>We'll get into all of that with, of course none

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 3>other than James Morrow, and also with Matt can Evan.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 3>Looking forward to that conversation. Also the wonderful Pauline Hanson.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Now across the country. The vote did go up, not

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 3>as much as some polls may have suggested. But but

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>but but but and I'll get into this in a

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 3>bit more detail. On a second, there is a massive

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>chance that Lee Hanson is going to beat Jackie Lamby

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>for the Senate spot. There is an asterisk on that.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about that in the second. But Pauline is

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 3>on the show tonight now, last night on the program,

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm winning great detail on my thoughts and the future

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 3>and all the rest of that. I'll relive some of

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>those for you in case you were watching footy or

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe missed this on the Sunday night. But I want

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 3>to move to a couple of the silver linings that

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>do come out.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Of the horrible result for those.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.279
<v Speaker 3>Of us who wanted to see a changing of governor,

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 3>at the very least it.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Being put into minority. And here we go.

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Number one, the Greens have gone backwards. You know this,

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I know this, but it's good to double check because

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Adam Bant is right on the line about whether he

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 3>is going to lose his seat or not in the

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 3>seat of Melbourne. Now remember Melbourne had been previously a

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty hardcore Labor seat and then became a massive Green

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 3>seat for a while. It's got way more people under

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the age of fifty than over. But Adam band is

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 3>in a world of pain. And guess who he is

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 3>blaming for not preferencing him when his entire campaign was

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 3>about keeping Dutton out a.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Number of the lower House seats. Of course, in now

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 4>three three cornered contests, and so when there is a

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 4>bit shift from labor to liberala from liberal to labor,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 4>it has flown through consequences.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is part of the problem for the Liberal

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Party in seats where they're not going to win, do

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>they make the decision to preference the Greens to deny

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 3>the Labor Party a seat, or do they preference the

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party, who of course end up getting a seat

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 3>and growing their seat count over the number that the

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>coalition is trying to.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Get at an election.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 3>On a moral sense, I would prefer to have a

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 3>Labor MP than a Greens MP. But there is an

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>electoral consequence to.

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>All of this.

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 3>So let's have a look at the latest numbers on

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>the counting which closed not long ago. Now, as you

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 3>can see on the primary votes right now, Adam bantered

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine thousand, Labor at twenty two thousand.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, assuming that.

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Everyone followed the how to vote, you can start to

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>add the thirteen thousand to the twenty two thousand, and

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 3>that's when you start to get into the two horse

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 3>race right now, which shows fairly obviously, but right now

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the Labor Party is in front. Now those numbers there

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 3>when you see about three hundred and three thousand votes

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>or two thousand votes, obviously that hasn't matched the primary

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 3>vote numbers. But the most important thing to notice here

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 3>is that if Labour wins, it will be because of

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the Liberal preferences and basically What will happen to the

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Greens is what happens to the Libs in most places

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 3>where Labor and the Greens get together to knock them off.

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Fingers crossed, that is what it's on its way. Number two,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>The wonderful die League was re elected to the Federal Parliament.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>How good to see that she is back in the

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>position that she is as the Member for Fowler. She

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>did something spectacular this weekend in the.

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Seat of Fowler.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>She had an increase in her overall vote, which was

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty damn impressive to see that she had an increase.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's maybe perhaps.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Drop the graphics, put it all in order and I'll

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 3>just talk things through if that's okay.

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So Dielee was able to win.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Most importantly, she increased her vote on the vote that

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>defeated Christina Kanneely only speaking when it comes to independence,

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>be they die Le Variety or Rebecca Sharky or Andrew

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Wilkie or Bob Cutter, if you're able to get re elected,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>then you are basically going to hold onto the seat

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 3>for as long as you can. Now there is a

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 3>further extension to that in the seat that formerly was

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 3>held by the National Party, and then an independent of

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Kath McGowan. She ended up taking that seat over and

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 3>when she retired she was able to essentially hand her

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>operation to the next generation in her seat being Helen Haynes.

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 3>So what becomes an independent seat may well often end

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 3>up as an independent seat.

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's good there.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Number three. The Victorian Teals are in trouble. Latest numbers

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 3>tonight are fascinating to watch. Where you can take your

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>pick here where Zoe Daniel looks like she is currently

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>less than one hundred votes in front of Tim Wilson.

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 3>The postal votes, which generally skew very pro labor, they're

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 3>very pro liberal, might be the big difference there. Monique Ryan,

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>who was celebrating things on Saturday night, she's now turning

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 3>around and saying this thing is back into the.

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Too close to call category. Good deceive fingers crossed, but.

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Expect the worst and be surprised if anything else happens.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 3>We'll see what happens whether the Victorian Tales are going

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 3>to suffer. Clyde Palmer is promising to go away from

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Australian politics. The polite spinat it is that he says

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 3>he's too old to be involved in politics. Anymore. We

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 3>all know the ads, we all know the text messages,

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 3>and we all know what the result was, less than

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 3>two percent of the vote. I've got plenty to say

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>about some of the behavior of some of the people

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 3>and how they have reacted, but let's focus on what

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the money man says behind all of this. I'm seventy

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 3>one and I'm getting too old for politics. I'd rather

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 3>spend my time helping out tens of thousands that are

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 3>homeless and hungry in this country, and that's why I've

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 3>donated five million dollars to Food Back. And like all

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>looth Clyde Palmer, I absolutely admire that of all of

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the people that were in this election, he was the

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 3>only one consistently talking about that problem of too many

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 3>people more than three million household so multiple people on

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>top of that, who of course run out of food

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 3>by the end of each and every week. He didn't

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 3>just talk about it, he just run on it. He's

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 3>put some money into it, and he now says that

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 3>his future is in philanthropy. Now, who knows whether he

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>changes his mind with one year to go or six

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>months to go, And it's his money to do with

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 3>what he wants. But Claparmer says he's out of the

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 3>game and the laws that are going to change that

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 3>are going to make it harder for him to run

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the type of campaign he has for the past couple

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 3>of elections will also apply to the Teals in the

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 3>next couple of elections.

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>All of that will be.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 3>To the advantage of the two major parties with the

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>flow on effect to the existing independence as opposed to

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the ones who may want to grow the pie. And

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the fifth most interesting thing, and it is a silver lining,

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 3>but it isn't a full silver lining yet.

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>It is just the faint outlines of one.

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>But still there is a chance Jackie Lamby's going to

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 3>lose her seat. If she does, she'll be losing it

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 3>to Lee Hanson. Lee Hanson's lived in Tasmani for a

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 3>long time but obviously has only put her hand up

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 3>in politics and in a political sense in the past

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>few months. Jack Lamby's vote comes from the north of

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Tasmania and her vote, according to the latest numbers, was

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>down at the last election that this election just gone,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>the One Nation vote it was up and basically it's

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>lamby six point nine percent to One Nation's five point

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 3>three percent. But why is there a chance Jackie Lamby

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>loses a seat. Well, as you'll see at that number

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>there the quota, all right, so you get one seat?

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Point how much is left over? Okay, so you will

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 3>see there that the number for the Liberals is currently

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>at one and a half. Now, if you go and

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>have a look at their how to vote card, it

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 3>would mean that if they don't get the second seat,

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 3>whatever they get over the one, it moves to their

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>second preference. And that, according to the how to vote

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 3>was one nation, So there could be about half a

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>quota of a Senate seat that is out there four

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hanson and Lee Hanson. Now the One Nation party

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>is currently at point three seven of a quota. That

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 3>half a percent will take them to the eight you

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 3>know too, point eight. Then when you throw in other

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 3>preferences that might be around there, that's why it might

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>get a little bit closer. If Jackie Lamby runs away

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>with it, it will be because she was number two

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 3>on the Labor how to vote card. So, as you

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 3>can see, left over in the Labor vote was two

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 3>point four to seven. So Lamby currently sitting at zero

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>point four eight of one quota plus the overhang of

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 3>labor puts her basically that same position about zero point eight,

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 3>and then a whole bunch of other things where we

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 3>work out what people did with their second, third, fourth, fifth,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and sixths. Well, all of that comes into play, including

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 3>people who voted below the line. We'll talk to Pauline

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 3>Hanson about that in a moment or two time.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, let's be honest.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that's going to hurt Anthony Aberzi most

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 3>likely for the next three years. But let's be generous

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 3>and say the first year of his second time as

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister and second term as Prime Minister is going

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>to be well what he does with the size of

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 3>his win.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 5>Not for thirty five years as a labor prime minister

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 5>pulled this off.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Alberzi going back to bat.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 6>He becomes the first leader to clincher's second consecutive term

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 6>in twenty one years and does so with an increased majority.

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 7>The first PM since John Howard back in two thousand

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 7>and four to win reelection and the first government in

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 7>seventy five years to actually increase its majority in a

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 7>first term, a powerful mandate.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 3>So obviously Australia has given him not just a little win.

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 3>They have given him a big one, which means he

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 3>has a big back bench, which means he can start

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>to be bolder, and theoretically, electoral gravity at some point

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 3>means eventually you start to lose seats, and having way

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 3>more than the necessary seventy six means you can afford

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 3>to burn some of the backbench, as John Howard did

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 3>when it came to the Big Idea in the nineteen

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 3>ninety eight election on the GST. That re was alded

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 3>in the Labor Party getting the majority of the popular vote,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 3>but the Liberal Party still maintained the majority of seats.

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Now again, we can't say what happened three elections ago

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 3>is what happens in one or two elections time. We're

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>not really in the red and blue game anymore. We

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 3>know that there's the red, the blue and a bit.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Of a rainbow in between.

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 3>And I thought the Prime Minister was off to a

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>reasonable start when it came to when inevitably hardcore Labour

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 3>people were going to start booing or cheering that Peter

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Dunton had lost his seat, and I liked that he

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>called them out from the stage.

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't do that, we don't do that. That's not Australian values.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Now I know in his heart of hearts and his

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>hard partisan he would have been a generation ago the

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 3>type of person who was yelling out from the floor,

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 3>ding dong and all the rest of it. But it

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 3>was a good thing the Prime Minister didn't do it.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 3>But then he got back to camberd to day and

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 3>we saw.

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Just a little, just a little little.

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Little sign of the bloke who thinks that he is invincible.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Ask a question at a press conference. Watch his reaction

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 3>and of course a very well trained media who don't

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 3>want to upset him, don't want to get cut off

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>from the information teet that is the Prime Minister's office.

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>They're going to play nice. But what's what the Prime

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Minister does when you ask him a question he doesn't

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 3>want to asked?

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, just nonsense.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 6>As you were told yesterday, Greg, you know people who

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 6>have got to stop. You know, the only person who

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 6>knows is me. You were told by my office yesterday

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 6>that was nonsense. The words are coming out, mate, with respect?

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Are we expecting your favorite?

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 8>Now?

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Look, I've said I respect the caucus. I respect the caucus,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 6>but I say to all of you, if you hear something,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 6>it is unless it comes out of my mouth, it

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 6>is nonsense. And you know you were told that yesterday.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Now things can change quickly, but there is no sign

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>of that changing quickly anytime, most likely in the next

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>couple of terms of parliament. Realistic about that, but you've

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 3>always got.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>To be careful.

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Remember the way the poor Keating behaved when he got

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 3>an extra three years he didn't expect. And the nature

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 3>of this victory is that Anthony Abernezi is looking at

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 3>multiple terms that are in front of him. It'll be

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 3>fascinating to see not just what he does and how

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 3>he behaves, but more importantly some of his ministers. His

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 3>ministers think that they are the political geniuses who know

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 3>everything about policy, everything about politics, and everything about social media.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Reality is, it was, of course, the performance of the

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 3>leader and the performance of the machine that is the

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party that turned things around, not to mention a

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>whole bunch of things that nobody could have ever expected,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 3>like tariffs, like the pope dying, like cyclones. But none

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 3>of that is to ignore from the reality that he won,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 3>and he won big, and yes, we will hold him

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 3>to account by using facts as well as what we

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 3>believe in to hold him to account, but I'm not

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 3>going to pretend that it's all going to change anytime soon.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 3>It obviously doesn't, and Australia has made it very clear

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 3>that they want him to be the Prime minister for

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the next little while. So last night, again on the show,

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 3>I took a great amount of time to try to

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 3>be as considered as possible about how millions of people

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 3>are feeling. And millions of people are upset because the

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 3>result wasn't the one that they wanted. But millions of

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>people are always upset by the result, regardless of who

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>ends up winning, because previously half now a third of

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the country doesn't get what it wants. So I explained

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 3>in great detail, and it's up at skynews dot com

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 3>dot a U, and it's on our YouTube channel, the

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 3>five ideas that I have for the future in and

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 3>around the Liberal Party. Now, obviously they are the organization

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>and we the voter make the decision whether we trust

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the organization and the politicians. But my free advice, and

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 3>it's worth what it's paid for sometimes is that they

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>need to take time to be honest about what happened.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Do just tick and flick a quick little revie you

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 3>and do nothing about it, follow through on some of

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the things that are actually put in there. In fact,

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>most of them also, in my suggestion, have multiple reviews

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>coming from lots of different angles. You don't just have

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>to learn a lesson, you have to be seen to

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 3>be learning a lesson. So why not go and have

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 3>town halls all around the country in the places that

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 3>you lost, and find out why you're going to meet

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 3>the people where they are. This idea that it's just

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 3>an arm wrestle and eventually you can pull people in

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the direction you want them to go.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just not true.

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 3>You have to meet people where they are, and where

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 3>they are in twenty twenty five will be different than

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen. That will be different than two and thirteen.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>It'll be different than two thousand and seven. It'll be

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>different that all of those major clean breaks in elections. Also,

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I think they really should think very hard about empowering

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 3>that next generation, listening to the younger voices inside the party,

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 3>not just nodding and saying now go out and do

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the hat of votes. Why not try and lift their

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>voices up into the decision making thing. And also, everything's

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>got to be on the table I'm talking about everything

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 3>from the low go to the quotas to the policy areas.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 3>All of it should be officially reset by whomever ends

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>up being the leader, which brings us to those most

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>likely or those who we think are going to be

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 3>most likely. Interestingly, you have not heard an awful lot

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>from these people in terms of their own voices and

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>doing interviews, because of course right now they're trying to

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 3>shore up what happens next. Susan Lay is the current

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 3>deputy leader. Of course, Angus Taylor was the former shadow

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Treasurer Dantean and maybe even sort of outside voices in

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 3>terms of being the deputy could be things like people

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 3>like Zoe McKenzie. But I, rather than wanting to say

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I think this person is not my choice, it's the

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>choice of the MPs, let's just do the obvious pros

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 3>and cons around all of these people, looking at the

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>reality that this is two terms, all right, two terms

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 3>and potentially many opposition leaders, just as it was for

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the Labor.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Party during the Howard era of dominance.

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 3>A pro for Susan Lay is that she's the deputy

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 3>leader of the part and in the same way that

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 3>people assume Josh Friedenberg would replace Scott Morrison. Peter Costello

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>would replace John Howard. That deputy leadership position is the

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 3>natural successor. There's the obvious issues in and around gender,

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 3>but more importantly, it does signal a change in direction

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>at the very least in terms of presentation. You can

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 3>think that's yay or nay. You can say a little

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 3>to this, a little to that. It's not Goldilocks. It's politics.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 3>The obvious con she made a couple of massive mistakes

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 3>during the campaign and during her time as deputy leader

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 3>where she was too quick out of the gate to

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 3>say the opposition will oppose or the opposition will support,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 3>rather than waiting to find out what either collective brain

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 3>of the party thought would happen, for example Stage three

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 3>tax cuts, or what the leadership group had said. And

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 3>once you go out of the gate, and if the

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>leader contradicts the deputy leader, well then it looks like.

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>An internal fraction.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 3>So you end up perhaps going in a direction that

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe maybe some people didn't want to go. Also,

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 3>there's some local issues here in terms of her seat.

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 3>There are a group of people who are in and

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 3>around her branch of the Liberal Party who have constantly

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 3>tried to knock her out of the seat.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't care why. I don't care what their grievances are.

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't care whether they're right or wrong. But that's just.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Part of the pro part of the con when it

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to Susan lay As for Angus Taylor, and the

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 3>pro and con around him is.

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>That the pro is that he is the shadow treasurer.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 3>He knows the books, he knows where they've hid the money,

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 3>he knows what they put off into the nevern never,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 3>and he knows what happens in the.

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Next couple of years.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>And he's able to with that knowledge to be able

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 3>to exploit some of the broken promises issues. He's a

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Rhodes scholar as well. This is a very smart man.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 3>The con is that he doesn't worry the Labor Party

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 3>at all. And he also, as we saw in some

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 3>of the debates or sometimes interviews, he finds it hard

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>to pick a line that cuts through and hammer hammer hammer,

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>hammer hammer message discipline is really important in politics. Again,

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't know any of these people. I'm not going

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 3>to say one's too left write and again I'm not

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 3>picking I'm just being honest here.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 2>This is part of this next phase of absolute.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Honesty, which is what good friends should do. Now, Andrew

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 3>hasty his offers saying will not be running for the leadership,

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 3>we will imagine there will be absolute confirmation of that

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 3>with his own words in the next at a while.

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 3>I would find that disappointing if he didn't put himself

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 3>into the contest, because while I am not a fan

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of Anthony alban Easy in any way, shape or form,

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 3>when they were blasted from government in twenty thirteen, he

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 3>did put his hand up to be the leader.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Now there's an entire alternative history here where.

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 3>If Albo had ended up being the leader in twenty

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 3>thirteen to sixteen and sixteen to nineteen, that may well

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 3>it would have been Bill short and sitting there in

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two and perhaps being re elected in the

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 3>same manner in twenty twenty five. But one of the

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 3>things I think that you need to send to your supporters,

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>to the community, to the media is to put your

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 3>hand up to say, yeah, I want to have a crack,

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 3>and for whatever reason you may not be able to

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 3>get the crack or not be able to get the numbers,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 3>but people know you have a leadership ambition.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really really important.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 3>Obvious pros when it comes to Andrew Hasty is that

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>he's very telligenic, R good look and rooster. That matters

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 3>why well, because we all know how it can work

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 3>in reverse. It's a former soldier and he served his

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 3>country and obviously would be methodical in executing whatever is

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 3>put in front of him. He represents the next generation.

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 3>This is a necessary turn and change. As we talk

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 3>about under fifty and over fifty the con and this

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 3>is a con for anyone who by the way he

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 3>improved his vote in his seat when the vote was

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 3>going against the lives in Western Australia. That's not an

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 3>unimportant point. A person who's been able to show indeed

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 3>what he would hope to do as leader, that's really important.

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 3>And again Western Australian needs to start to level back

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to fifty to fifty if there any chance of being

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 3>competitive in whenever that moment comes. A con for anyone

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 3>from Western Australia is you're either two hours behind the

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 3>East Coast or you are three hours behind the East Coast.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Now this means.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 3>That if you're trying to do a radio interview at

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>six am in Perth for half the year that will

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 3>be at three am in Perth. He's got a young family.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 3>That's a heck of a lot of disruption. But Kim

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Beasley was able to do that for six years. He

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 3>didn't have as young a family, and frankly he ended

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 3>up spending a lot more time in the East Coast

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 3>that he did in the West Coast.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>The problem for that is, of course, whoever's.

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Hunting you in the West Coast turns around and says

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>you're the part time So yeah, it is complicated, and

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 3>of course the Labour Party will turn around him because

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 3>he has a connection to National Service, will strike him

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>as some sort of too far right Dan Teen another

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.199
<v Speaker 3>person who apparently is in and around the frame be.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>A leadership or deputy leadership.

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 3>Again, when the factions, the groups who's left over make

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 3>their choices. Here's some pros and cons about him as

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 3>a potential opposition leader. The pro is that he easily

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 3>fended off a Teal. Now, his seat of warning was

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 3>one of those ones that a lot of people said, well,

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 3>that's a natural gain for the Teals.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>It didn't happen.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Now, I don't know what happens in three years time,

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 3>but there was a lot of the free media and

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 3>the free exposure to the teal, he was able to

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 3>fend them off relatively easily. He also was able to

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 3>cause huge problems for the Labour Party when it came

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>to question time in and around immigration. Remember that whole

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 3>period of time with clueless Clara O'Neil and useless that

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 3>useless Minister Giles. A lot of that was because of

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the way he was prosecuting things in the Parliament. The

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>obvious anti here is is not well known across the

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 3>country and you've already got a huge hill in front

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 3>of you when you are the opposition leader. But if

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 3>you are not known outside of the political bubble that

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 3>you and I live in or the canber press gallery, obviously,

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 3>police pretty difficult to make an impression. But everyone gets

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 3>a chance at a first impression. Zoey McKenzie now Zoey McKenzie,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 3>who represents the Mornington Peninsula, the pros and consferverts. She's

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty good on TV. I think she presents well on television.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>She represents that next generation and the obvious issues that

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 3>are demographic. What did every single seat have in common

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 3>that the Liberal Party lost? There were more female voters

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 3>than male doesn't automatically mean things change, but if you

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 3>want to show a change, is she in the mix?

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know her behind the scenes. I don't know

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>how she works. So if you're throwing something o the Telly,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. But I'm just saying the names that

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 3>are being put forward. She also was able to hold

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 3>off for Teal that's really important. The con is that

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 3>she had a bigger swing than the state average against her,

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 3>and it is only her second term in parliament. So

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 3>that also brings me to the one that I get

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of emails about what about you in a

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 3>nambigenper Price and if you in an ambigimper Price is

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 3>amazing and should have the frontest of facing positions in

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 3>a shadow cabinet or leadership. But being from the Northern territory,

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>she ends up sort of being countered as part of

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the National Party, which would mean she would either have

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 3>to change party identification to move over to the Liberal Party.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 3>But also she's in the Senate, which would mean she'd

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 3>have to go and win a seat downstairs. And in

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 3>some ways this is kind of a problem for the Libs,

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 3>which is that many of their strongest performers are in

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 3>the Senate, but they are not people who win lower

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 3>houses house seats. Now, yes, technically at some time way

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>back when someone was the leader of the OP position

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 3>from the Senate, but reality is it's going to come

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>from downstairs. It's going to be a Lib not a NAT,

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:06.479
<v Speaker 3>even though the Libs have great to say, and how

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 3>many people are going to be the shadow ministers. So

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 3>if you're saying, why isn't it just into nampijuper Price,

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 3>that is why it's not just into an empertuper Price.

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 3>And there are no CONTs, no cons at all when

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 3>it comes to and her performance at any and every

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to argue the case. A couple of other things

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 3>here which are extra little takeaways, extra little bites to

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 3>discuss here. Some of them are pleasant, some of them

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 3>are not pleasant, but all of them are true. Sadly,

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 3>Western Australia voted not to Keep the Sheep. Now we

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 3>know that keep the Sheep protests was very well funded,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 3>very well organized. It was on radio, it was on socials.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>They were out and about. It didn't matter whether you

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 3>were at Cottislow or we were in Cawgooli. You could

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 3>see the presence of this movement. The result of the

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>re election of the government is that the industry will

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 3>be turned off. The live cheap export trade will be

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 3>turned off. So that is a heartbreaking result for those

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 3>of us who wanted to keep that intry alive. Obviously

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 3>their fight will continue, but the government has been able

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 3>to find a way to say we can win without you.

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Number two, local renewable projects didn't hurt labor. Now in

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>some places, yes, National Party MPs are able to run

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 3>very hard against the solar farm or the wind farm,

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 3>and I agree with them about what it does to

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the communities.

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But let's be honest.

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>The wires didn't The osnet stuff didn't change what happened

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 3>in and around Ballarat, It didn't change what happened in Gilmour,

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 3>it didn't change the offshore wind in the Hunter So

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 3>if anyone has thought this would be enough to change

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a seat, well, these projects will be built by the

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 3>time of the next election, and yes there may be

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 3>some reaction, but that is just the reality. If somebody's

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 3>able to point me in evidence of somewhere else where

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the vote was dramatically changed because of the renewable project.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Happy to hand it on but that's the obvious of

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 3>some of the seats that people thought, oh the Hunters

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 3>in play and Patterson's in play because of the off

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Guess what it didn't It wasn't and they didn't change

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 3>all right. The third one here, thankfully, religion didn't move

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the needle. Now, this Muslim Votes party, the best I

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>think they could do was fifteen percent of the vote

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 3>primary vote running against Tony Burke. Well, of course fifteen

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 3>percent ain't good enough. The preferences were never going to

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 3>go their way, so this was always a furfee. But

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 3>the only way of getting better at elections is to

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 3>keep running at elections. I hope that race, that faith

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 3>and these things do not continue to spoil our politics

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and do not continue to play an oversized role in

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Australian politics. But we'll all have to find out together

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 3>a fourth and really important thing. I think there's a

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.239
<v Speaker 3>very fine line and we're getting very close to it

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 3>about examples of some foreign interference that is on the

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 3>fringes of our elections. There are some candidates right on

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 3>the line, there's some money that's right on the line,

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 3>right on the line. There have been some volunteers right

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 3>on the line, and I want all sides of politics,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 3>regardless of whether they think they are advantaged by certain

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 3>communities or associations or the ones that are disadvantages by

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 3>communities or associations. Let's make this very very clear that

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 3>foreign interference plays no role in Australian politics. Now, any

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 3>and anyone can run for Parliament. But when we know

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 3>that they may well end.

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Up having partial partial.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.239
<v Speaker 3>Allegiances, we've got to deal with that and we've got

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 3>to try to stamp it out. I can't say much

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 3>more than that because I don't want to spend the

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 3>rest of the next three years in court. But there

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 3>are some interesting examples below the line. I hope political

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 3>people are noticing, and I hope that we react otherwise

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 3>we go further in a direction that I don't think

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 3>anyone in Australia wants. All Right, quick break back, with

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 3>more plenty to talk about here on Paul Murray Live,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Matt Canavan and James Morrow. They won't hold back after

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 3>a terrible result on Saturday, where too from now and

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 3>then of course the wonderful Leen Hanson very much in

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the fight. Imagine mother and daughter sitting in the Senate

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 3>together and no Jackie Lamby, thank you very much. Always

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 3>love when James Morrow's in the man Cave because he's

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 3>enthusiastic about the theme doing the egg.

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 7>Always do that.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I love it, all right, you.

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Could see you could see him in many different shows,

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 3>but of course Outsiders on the Sunday and the US

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Report here on Fridays. Matt Canavan, well, he always is

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 3>out and about on the Hustings and now is not

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 3>going to hold back on his view when it comes

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 3>to what happened and where we go from here. Senator,

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 3>thank you very much for joining us. Always good to

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 3>have you on the show. All right, So I'll start

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 3>with you first, Matt, because it's a really easy question.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Why did it happen?

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Look, Paul, I think it happened because we didn't have

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 5>anything to fight for. I've done a few campaigns now

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 5>and I found this one the strangest because I didn't

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 5>really have a passionate thing to throw my whole weight

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 5>into and take up the battle to my political opponents

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 5>in the Labor Party. Every other election I've been to

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 5>where fighting against carbon taxes, trying to stop the boats,

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 5>trying to start a Danni, stop carbon taxes going on

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 5>mines and I've done a lot of that on your show,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 5>and this time I struggle to understand, Okay, what am

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 5>I trying to do that either stops labor doing something

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 5>bad or allows us to do something good, Because in

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 5>the last few days I've shut up. I haven't said

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 5>much since the election. Thankfully, I had to go to

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 5>a soccer tournament for my Chuck, my ten year old son.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 5>He didn't get as sumped as badly as us on

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 5>Saturday night, so that was nice. But every other election

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 5>I've been to, we've had something to fight for and

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 5>this one I just didn't know. And we've got to

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 5>rediscover that fighting spirit. I've heard a lot of people

0:28:58.480 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 5>say I've got to get left, go to get right.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 5>It's not about that, It's about Okay, what do we

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 5>think we can do best for the Australian people, And

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 5>maybe let's start with that. Our pulse has got it

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 5>massively wrong. And the most frustrating thing over my political

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 5>career has been the increasing use of polling and focus

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 5>groups to decide not just how we talk about something,

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 5>how we argue for something, but how and what we

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 5>should do. And I think we need to toss those

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 5>that we need to not talk to the posters for

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 5>about a year. They probably deserve not to be paid

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 5>their bills for a year anyway, So toss them out

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 5>of the room and think about and sit down deeply

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 5>and think about what we think is best for the

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Australian people that are doing it very very tough right now.

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 5>We come up with that, We come up with a plan,

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 5>and then we can invite the pulses back in to

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 5>talk about, Okay, how's the best way to argue for

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 5>this and how should we communicate? Should I have part

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 5>my hair on this side or that or whatever they do?

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 5>But we need to rediscover why we fight.

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I like to fight.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm in this to try and make a difference, to

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 5>take up the battle, to define the battle lines between

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 5>us and the Labor Party, not just because I like

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 5>to do that. In the political context, I think the

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Australian people deserve, that Austrained people deserve at an election

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 5>of this consequence, to have a choice, to have a

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 5>choice of alternatives. And I don't think we're clearly enough

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 5>gave them that choice at this election. And despite the

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 5>twelve interest rate rises, the lack of control of our borders,

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 5>despite this government being one of the first governments, I think,

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 5>the first government history to shut down a whole agricultural

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 5>industry and a live sheep trade. We have made no inroads,

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 5>in fact, gone massively backwards, and that's unacceptable. We've got it,

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 5>as I say, rediscover that fighting spirit and come up

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 5>with a with a I think a more tougher approach

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 5>next time.

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>James, again, you've written some beautiful columns about this. I

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>know you spoke at some length yesterday about it, so

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 3>there will be plenty of people that have heard your opinion.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 3>But for those that happened, why did this happen?

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think Paul, it comes down to a very

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 9>simple question. You know, there's going to be a lot

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 9>of people to get try and overanalyze this and say,

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 9>as you said, you know, quite eloquently before you know,

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 9>it's not about oh, we need to move more to

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 9>the left or we need to move more to the right.

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 9>The fact is across the political spectrum that would be

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 9>voting for the Liberals, because remember the Liberals are supposed

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 9>to be a broad church as defined by John Howard.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.719
<v Speaker 9>That was always the great struggle of the Liberals before

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 9>John Howard managed to come to that settlement. There was

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 9>nothing for anybody across that broad tent to really hook into.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 9>And I think, you know the problem is that the

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 9>Liberal Party decided that all of the failings of the

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 9>Alberizi government were going to overwhelm them and they would

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 9>just simply trip over in just a little bit of

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 9>jiu jitsu and sticking the foot out and boom, Alberizi

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 9>falls over and the whole thing and then we're back

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 9>in government. Well, I said on this program, I sometimesiders

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 9>I wrote it, you know, advising Peter Dutton publicly saying

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 9>there is no shame in losing a first term in opposition,

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 9>but you're not going to win if you don't swing

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 9>for the fences. They didn't even come up to the plate, right,

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 9>And now we're seeing all of these stories about everything

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 9>that went wrong. I think the most shocking thing now

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 9>is the amount of policy that was left on the table.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 9>And I've spoken to people who were sending policies up

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 9>to head office and they were ignored. And we had

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 9>the story in the Financial Review today that bracket creep,

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 9>which is such a key tax reform issue because if

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 9>the tax rates today were set when they were last set,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 9>that top rate. We'll quicking around two hundred and eighty

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 9>or two hundred ninety thousand dollars a year, not one

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 9>hundred and eighty. You want to talk about cost of

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 9>living relief, cut people's taxes, stop taking more out of

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 9>their tax bill every year. This is not hard stuff.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 9>And yet they forgot all of this, They forgot their

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 9>reason for being. I actually think you know, they have

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 9>now left Australia with a potential lost decade to labor

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 9>at a time when you've got defense, you've got debt,

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 9>you've got everything else piling up, and all of these things,

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 9>all of the issues should have been natural advantages for them,

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 9>and they couldn't capitalize on a single what it was

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 9>a discrease, Okay, matte get In, I don't.

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Agree with that at all.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 5>I think we can win the next election, certainly one

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 5>after that. I mean, look that this is the worst

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 5>result since the Liberal Party was founded in at the

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 5>nineteen forty six election. That election they won just seven

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 5>eight seats, and by the next election they came back

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 5>and won over seventy seats in one government. That was

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 5>after the then Labor government sought to nationalize the banks

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 5>and refused to stop rationing petrol and other things. And look,

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 5>who knows how the next few years are going to

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 5>play out, and we're probably in a position where it

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 5>will require the other side to make a few mistakes.

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 5>But given the record of this government, that's a pretty

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 5>sure thing. So you know we're going to be ready

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 5>there to take advantage. And as I say, put this

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 5>strong alternative austrailed people, just like Anastasia Palache did after

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Campbell Newman's victory, after Kevin Rudd did, after John Howard's victory,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Josy and four. Things can change quickly and ultimately here

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 5>we've got a situation where two thirds of people did

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 5>not vote for Anthony Abanez. He just fyt his victory

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 5>lap like he's won the Grand Final today or yesterday.

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of people out there who have not

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 5>voted for this government. There are a third of people

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.439
<v Speaker 5>who are not voting for either major party. That should

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 5>because for deep reflection on my side of politics, on

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 5>all sides of politics, but certainly outside given that we're

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 5>in opposition, why are so many people just sped up

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 5>with all of us? And I do think a lot

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 5>of it is the cynical pole driven approach that we

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 5>have applied to the political process that creates a vacuum

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 5>of leadership, authority, authenticity, and integrity, and we'd be much

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 5>better off deciding what we really believe, truly believe, go

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 5>out there and argue for it. Will show a lot

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 5>more passion by doing that, will convince a lot more

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 5>people by doing that, and maybe maybe we'll stem the

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 5>tide of people going off and flirting with a bunch

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 5>of other minor parts because I just don't say anything

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 5>that attracts them in the major political forces.

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's absolutely right. But I mean, just to chop

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 9>in on that, I mean, an awful lot of people

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 9>I know voted Pauly Enhancement one nation as they're one,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 9>just simply because they said as a conservative there was

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 9>nothing for them, you know, in the liberals. And you know,

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 9>there has to be a very urgent refocusing of what

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 9>the party is about, because we had plenty of problems

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 9>the last three years. Everybody went backwards, the whole country

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 9>went backwards. You've got China circumnavigating the place with ships,

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 9>You've got all sorts of other things, and god knows

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 9>what's going to happen over the next three years. You know,

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 9>there needs to be an urgent agenda, and the thing

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 9>is it needs to start being sold very very quickly.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 9>So many good ideas that were left on the shelf

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 9>if they had been starting to be prosecuted. You know,

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 9>nuclear was one, but then they got kind of wobbly

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 9>back and forth on it. But the other stuff, you know,

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 9>real tax guys, how do you wind up with the

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 9>Labor Party being more technically economically rationalist than you on

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 9>taxas with tax cuts? So I just thought that was just,

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 9>you know, the intellectual halt of the party has gone

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 9>vacant and it needs to come back.

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, something that I found really interesting was one of

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the trinding polls at the start of all of this, right,

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 3>it showed fifty five percent of people didn't think that

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 3>the coalition was ready to govern. By the end of

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the campaign was sixty three percent. So you can move

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 3>an awful lot of people. Now, surprise, surprise, that pretty

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 3>much reflects the idea of the people who thought they

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 3>were ready to govern was the primary vote, and those

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 3>who weren't of that view, well, of course, we know

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 3>where the preferences go, and that's what pushes Labor to

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the result that it's had. So I think in many

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 3>ways you've got to show your ability to govern by

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 3>having the ideas, the brains, the conversation about those big ideas,

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 3>and to argue them in the fashion that Matt is.

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 3>But Matt, I'm going to jump on an elephant in

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the room, which is the words that are sitting behind you. Now,

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I've heard plenty of people on and off air, and

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 3>lots of emails and lots of people when I meet

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 3>them who say exactly what your TV says behind which

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 3>is in net zero. But let's also be honest that

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the trumpet and patriots who screamed that from the rooftop,

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 3>or one nation who've screamed that from the rooftop, that's.

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Not even ten percent.

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 3>So how do those three words behind you become fifty

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 3>plus one?

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 5>But the reality there is, Paul, Obviously, people don't think

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 5>those two parties are ready for governments either. I mean,

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 5>with all respect to both of them. I know mister

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Palmer was saying that his lead been the next prime minister,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 5>but I remember the full page ads and some of

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 5>the profile picks didn't even have people in them. They

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 5>had the blank profile like a reserve grade football player

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 5>they've been brought up and hasn't didn't make the photo

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 5>shoot before the season. Yeah, I think that might have

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 5>limited their vote shares there and not be a due

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 5>reflection of this issue. As I said earlier, Paul, my

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 5>firm belief is the Australian people deserve a real cho

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 5>and that real choice is only going to come from

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 5>differences between the two parties of government, parties that can

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 5>form government or of any prospect of form and government.

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 5>As I say, with due respect to those other parties,

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 5>and we haven't given them that. We haven't given them

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 5>that on this issue. The Labor Party likes to think

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 5>that we've ended the cult of the climate wars. And

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 5>there's no doubt why they like to think that, because

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 5>every time we actually do fight the climate wars, we win.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 5>Every time we've taken it up, we've won. And the

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 5>core perhaps original sin, if you like, the original sin

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 5>of our campaign and everything I'm saying here I said

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 5>to my colleagues of the last few months. I'm not

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 5>trying to be a Monday expert. I've said things like

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 5>this on your show. The original sin of how we

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 5>frame the campaign was, if you ask somebody how would

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 5>we lower the cost of living in the next term

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 5>of government. It was very hard to provide an answer. Now,

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 5>towards the end we had the petrolexcise cut. That was

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 5>for a and it was temporary. We didn't really offer

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 5>a strong answer to the question, how are we going

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 5>to make your life easier under a coalition government? Now,

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 5>this was a cost of living election. Everybody said that

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 5>was the most important issue. All of those posters have

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of other things wrong, said it was the

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 5>most important issue. I think it was the most important

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 5>is show is what people said to me. But we

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 5>didn't have a coherent answer to that question. Now I

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 5>want to end that zero not because I've just always

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 5>had that view of how crazy it is and terrible

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 5>it is. I want to end that zero because I

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 5>genuinely believe it is going to lower the price of

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:39.760
<v Speaker 5>almost everything for people. It will be effectively a wage

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.479
<v Speaker 5>rise for every Australian if we end that zero, because

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 5>we'll bring down the cost of making groceries and bring

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 5>down the cost of transporting yourself around the country. It

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 5>will boost our productivity, which it itself will boost real

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:54.800
<v Speaker 5>wages over time as well. And I think it's about

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 5>time the lower and middle class of this country and

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 5>get a pay rise. They've been promised one by this

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 5>labor government. Instead, they've held a massively backwards and the

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 5>most direct and easy way we could give an injection

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 5>of wealth to struggling Australians would be to remove the

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 5>anchor around everybody's ankle here of net zero of these

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 5>crazy green policies was just impose costs on our economy

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 5>and our people without providing any environmental benefit whatsoever. I

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 5>think we can win that argument with the point alone

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.720
<v Speaker 5>that why is it that we continue to export record

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 5>a record amount last quarter of coal to other countries,

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 5>yet we use none of it ourselves.

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's start using our.

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 5>God given lateral resources again for the wealth of Australians

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 5>and that would make everybody's life easier.

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 3>No, it's just I didn't want to have this conversation

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 3>without dealing with that as to say, hence why a

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:49.240
<v Speaker 3>bit of an elephant in the room, but very well answered.

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 9>Very Look, I'm wan to think that that's absolutely correct.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 9>Net zero is just this absolute weight. It's feederers on

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 9>the entire economy, on everybody. We all pear the post

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 9>that we all know that you try and end it.

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.359
<v Speaker 9>Of course you get accused of fighting a culture war.

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 9>You know, that's the thing that the left is going

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 9>to do to try and shut down these necessary discussions

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 9>on the right. And I think that's something that needs

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 9>to be watched out for. But you know, and again

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 9>not to play after action, you know, Monday morning quarterback here.

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 9>But there are lessons to be learned here. And another

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 9>big thing here is Anthony Albanezy and Labor ran the

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 9>most cynical, dishonest campaign I have ever seen in decades

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 9>of watching elections here and in the United States. That

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 9>is saying something the way Murray Watt laughed, just absolutely

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 9>straight up laughed in the face of people on Saturday

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 9>night here on the panel here on this network when

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 9>he was called out on all of Labour's lives. You know,

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 9>that just shows what they erupted. A guess, but I

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 9>think you know, again, the party didn't come up with

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 9>a way to quickly shut down the six hundred billion

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 9>dollars shut down this that the other thing all in

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 9>the lives. There was no clap back and it looked

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 9>flat footed. And therefore, because there were no other policies

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 9>around which to define themselves. Labor got to define the

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 9>terms of the debate and the real paradox of that

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 9>is Labor created this debate as a cost of living election.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 9>That they created the problem too, and their solution, the

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 9>sugar hits. The coalition just matched it. There was no argument.

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 9>I said, no, we're not going to do anything because

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 9>we don't want to get criticized. And I'm sorry for

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 9>the fiscally responsible party, Like what the hell?

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with you, all right, lads. I appreciate it.

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 3>I look forward to convening again next Monday and many

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 3>chats between now and then. Thank you, senator, future senator,

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 3>looking forward to that again. And another Senator is one

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 3>other than the wonderful Pauline Hanson. She joins us straight

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 3>after the break, her thoughts on the election and hopes

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 3>for a daughter beating Jackie Lamby in Tasmania. Looking okay,

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 3>right on the line. We have followed Pauline Hanson for

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a long time. Next year, can you believe thirty years

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 3>in and around Australian politics. She has been in this

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 3>send it for a significant period of time. Next election

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 3>it'll be her name on the ballot again. But at

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 3>this election, many candidates running in many different seats, a

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 3>better result than last time, But the headline is that

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 3>her daughter Lee Hanson pretty close to a very competitive

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 3>run against Jackie Lamby. We won't know for a few days,

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 3>most likely even in a couple of weeks about what's

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 3>going to happen, but the One Nation leader joins us now, Pauline,

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 3>love you to see you must be a sense of

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 3>relief after an election is over, a chance to put

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 3>your head down for a little while. But unlike previous elections,

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not just your name on the ballot in terms

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 3>of the family. So how are you feeling after this one?

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 10>Look, paul I'm pleased with our vote. We've gone up

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 10>just about in every seat across the country that we

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 10>stood candidates in.

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm very pleased with that.

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 10>I just like to personally say thank you to everyone

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 10>who voted for One Nation this election, and appreciate all

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 10>the help and volunteers that we've got to help us.

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 10>We didn't get to man every polling booth. It's extremely

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 10>hard for a minor party, but the end result, you know,

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 10>I can't can't say I'm not about it.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 3>So give me an idea about this race in Tasmania.

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.240
<v Speaker 3>I saw James was on here a little bit earlier.

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not I think with Peter saying that, you know,

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 3>this picture is really interesting and it's not just blowing smoke.

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>This thing is very, very tight.

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 3>It's all about what are called quotas and the percentage

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 3>of a quota that is left over from the main

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 3>sources of preferences. For one nation, that's going to be

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Liberal preferences. For Lambia, it's going to be labor preferences.

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 3>So again you're not going to say she's going to

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 3>win or Blues, but what's your thought on what's happening here.

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think she's in with the chance Paula.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 10>She said, with preferences, and of course the Libs have

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 10>got about one point five to two percent of the

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 10>quota now system that they have, so therefore those preferences

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 10>will be distributed. Labor at this stage has got two

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 10>just over two and a half quotas. Of course Libs

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 10>are about one half quotas, and therefore the Greens have

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 10>taken on. So if you look at the seats, there's

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 10>still another one there in one that's up for grabs.

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 8>If you think that Libs do get the.

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 10>Second one, I think that a lot of the people

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.879
<v Speaker 10>about I'd say, and I woke the booth down there

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 10>in the heart of Tobart, that about seventy to eighty

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 10>percent of people never even took how to vote cards,

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 10>weren't interest walk past. Everyone had an idea how they

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 10>were going to vote. And another thing about it, Paul,

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 10>is that they vote differently below the line down in Tasmania.

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 10>So most of them will vote a lot will vote

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 10>below the line.

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 8>Also, you've got.

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 10>To think that although Labor gave Jackie Lamb with the

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 10>second preference, a lot of people didn't take the out

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 10>to vote cards. But there's a big issue about the

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:42.959
<v Speaker 10>semen industry in Tasmania. Now, the semon industry employs about

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 10>five thousand people and there's another few companies indirectly associated

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 10>with it as well.

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 8>She's got a lot of workers there.

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 10>She's come out against the semin industry, so as the Greens.

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:57.800
<v Speaker 10>So if they go to vote on the labor ticket

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 10>and who support the seminin industry, do you think they're

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 10>going to give Lamby their second preference.

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 8>I doubt it. So it's going to be quite interesting

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 8>even to see about labors preferences. If they have to

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 8>be distributed.

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 3>How do you think Elbow is going to be with

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 3>a bigger number and presumably many more years in front

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:16.720
<v Speaker 3>of him as Prime minister.

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 10>Look, I don't think he'll walk away from his loll

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 10>his policies. I think that this is given him a mandate,

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 10>possibly not to cut back the immigration levels.

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 8>He'll keep powering head with the renewables.

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 10>Just even down at Singleton people who are hrying out,

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 10>they're out in arms about one hundred and seventy seven

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.919
<v Speaker 10>thousand panels that are going to go on prime agricultural land.

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 10>As you spoke earlier about the wind turbines. That's nothing

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 10>to stop him now whatsoever. And if they get control

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.879
<v Speaker 10>in the Senate with the Greens, they'll just do whatever

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 10>they want to. I think the Libs had a very

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 10>very poor campaign. I had people constantly asking me about Dudden.

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I like Duddon.

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:00.720
<v Speaker 10>I think he's a very good man, been a great

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 10>prime minister for the country, but it wasn't to be.

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 8>He couldn't win the people.

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:09.720
<v Speaker 10>Over and their election campaign was ridiculous. They never fought

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:12.360
<v Speaker 10>back at all, and he should have stood his ground

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:15.959
<v Speaker 10>about those public servants and said, you know, well, once

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 10>they leave the work, we won't be replacing them. We

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 10>could have handled that way. He backed away from a

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 10>lot of it. He didn't put up strong policies about

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 10>you know, tax cuts. If he had to put up

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 10>what we said about the split income income splitting all

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 10>the pension is working, that would have been more beneficial

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 10>to him.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So, as a.

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Person who has stood their ground for thirty years, again,

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 3>you want a strong liberal party because that matters in

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 3>terms of preferences and in terms of an opposition to labor.

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 3>But just for all of those political types that are

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 3>watching us right now, what is the pull enhance and

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 3>advice when all the media is screaming at you, when

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 3>all the interest groups are pushing back, when all of

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:59.320
<v Speaker 3>the lovees are saying, oh, what a detestable thing to say.

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 8>But about what I said about Dunnan or I'm just.

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Saying, I'm just saying about holding your ground.

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 3>About what's your advice to politicians you know who who say,

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, we'll get an advice of saying, oh, I

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 3>can't say that that's going to piss off this group.

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh the polls are telling us this, The poles are

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 3>telling you that how do they get a bit of

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 3>pulling in their spine to say no, no, I believe it.

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:20.800
<v Speaker 3>It's what I believe, and I'll argue it until the

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 3>day we're done.

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.720
<v Speaker 10>That's what people want, Paul, I hear it all the time.

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 10>What do I hear from people all the time. You've

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 10>got the guts to say what we're thinking. People wants.

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 10>Honest politicians. Don't tell us one thing and do another

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 10>thing on the floor of Parliament. Don't see whichever way

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 10>the poll's coming out before you actually make a decision.

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 10>I was first to come out against the Voice, and

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 10>I was proven right first to come out against the

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 10>Cave and the COVID JAB. Again, the evidence that's coming

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 10>out now, people shouldn't been forced to have it. A

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 10>lot of these things I fight based on my inner

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 10>gut and knowing how these strained people think. Because I'm

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 10>one of them. I haven't lost my grassroots contact with people,

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 10>and I wish the politicians a lot of the ones.

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 10>I have no connection with employing people or understanding running

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 10>the business.

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 8>Nothing well.

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things that disappoints me the most

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 3>about the result is the Labor Party's attitude was basically.

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Very anti small business. Anyway, I've got to go.

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 3>We're out of time, but there's plenty more chats and

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:17.959
<v Speaker 3>that exter while all the best to lay and again

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 3>congratulations are on doing much better at this election. The

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 3>people of one nation. All right, that's our show. We'll

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 3>see you again tomorrow when Nigel Farage returns