WEBVTT - Untold story of William Tyrrell: Dan Box Pt.1

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Detective sy a side of life the average persons never

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>exposed to. I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years, I was catching killers.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode that I Catch Killers. Today, we're

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>going to have a conversation I need to have. I'm

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about an investigation that has had a

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>huge impact, not only in my own life, but has

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>devastated other lives. To talk about the William Tyrell investigation.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I led that investigation for four years before I was

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>removed from the investigation over five years ago, and I

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was criminally charged and convicted. Some people might say, who

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>cares what I've got to say? Well, I've sat on

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the sideline since that time and have witnessed misinformation and

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>seen speculation flourish. Everyone seems to have an opinion of

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.919
<v Speaker 1>what happened to William. It's time the record set straight.

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping the person I'm speaking to today will put

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a spotlight on the issues surrounding the William Tyrell case

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>with an in depth podcast series called Witness William Tyrell.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Our guest is award winning journalist Stand Box, who I

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>have had the pleasure to work with on many occasions.

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I consider him a mate and respect his integrity. Hopefully

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll still be friends after this podcast. If you listen,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll understand where I'm coming from with that comment, Dan Box, Welcome,

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Do I catch killers?

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you?

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a think an awkward conversation

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>because of the subject matter.

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's going to be a sad conversation in places

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>because of the subject matter, and it's going to be

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>an angry conversation I think probably for you definitely, and

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe for me in places as well, because of the

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 2>subject matter. And it's going to be awkward.

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, have you have you You've been a crime reporter

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. Have you been involved in

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>reporting on or investigating a matter such as William Tyrell

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that evokes so much emotion polarizes people. Have you seen

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:39.119
<v Speaker 1>anything like this in your time?

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 2>No, And I was thinking about exactly this on the

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>walk here today. There's things that set this case apart.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just the fact that it's a child

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>at the center of it, because I've worked on cases

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>like you have that have had children at the center

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>of them, and it's not just the emotions. But what

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 2>it is I think is two things for me at least,

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>One is the sheer scale of this case and the

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>work that we've done on it. So we've been on

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>this for two years, working on this podcast series. This

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 2>case or the people involved in it have been to

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>every court in New South Wales local court, District court,

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, Coroner's court. So we've got

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 2>court files and documents, an incredible amount of information with

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 2>three four different coronial cases we've looked at as part

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>of the research into this case, and it will be

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 2>a fifth because I think to get access to that

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.839
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have to probably challenge a suppression order.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's the other thing that sets this case apart

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>is the secrecy that surrounds it. I have never worked

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>on any criminal investigation as a reporter that has been

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>shrouded in this amount of secrecy, non publication orders, suppression orders,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>legal bars and what you can and can't say. And

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe because of all that secrecy, the amount of speculation

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>and the amount of misinformation, and the way people, including

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 2>the media, have split into frankly two camps. You're either

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>four Williams foster mum or you're against her. I've never

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>seen anything like that before.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I think you've summed it up nicely, the

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>type of intensity that surrounds it. But the way that

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>polarizes people and what And I've been sitting on the

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>sideline for five and a half years, almost six years now, Yeah,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.799
<v Speaker 1>watching it. What concerns me. All the opinions don't seem

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to be fact based. It's an emotional investigation. People are

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>very strong one way or the other, but they don't

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the facts. And coming from a homice, I

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>had to take this point of view now myself. Moving

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>into the media, I thought stories would be driven by facts,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but they don't seem to me.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>You're talking about the public response. Look, A good example

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>of that is the stuff that people are saying about

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 2>us online, like I've been abused, which is fair enough,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe I deserve it. The people I work with have

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 2>been abused.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking, this is the people you're working on

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the podcast with.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, called oh look, hohorendous things and yeah, okay,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 2>I went into this with my eyes open. I knew

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>there was going to be a bit of abuse, but

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>to say the things they have and about the people

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>I work with, and about the fact that you and

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I have got a professional relationship that goes back a

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>long time now, even just this weekend, people are I

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>don't go looking for it, but sometimes it finds you.

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>People are saying things. But they're not saying things because

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 2>they know the facts. They're not saying things because frankly,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 2>they've got a legitimate opinion that they'd be happy to

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 2>say in the same room if they were sitting here.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 2>They're saying things because they think we disagree with them.

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>And so people are just throwing these kind of angry

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>online abuse as because it has split into these two

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 2>different camps. And you're right, a factual understanding of what

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>happened in terms of the public response. Sadly, that seems

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 2>to be more than some people can deal with.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, look, I doesn't hold me well when I'm

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>now working in the media, but I hold the media

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>partly responsible for it, because I think I've been in

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the media long enough now to understand that what the

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>story should be based on. And it's some stories that

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I've read, whether it be in print media, on rate audio,

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>or television, that is clearly misleading and all the facts

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't been presented. If you take one point in isolation

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and put that out as a story without giving a balance,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's going to evoke people at reactions.

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is the point where I start to

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 2>lose friends because I am a journalist. I like journalists.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm friends with some journalists. But I think you're right.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>There's been misreporting because people didn't know the facts. And

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that's one thing, like most of the time as journalists,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 2>we're scratching around trying to work out what the truth

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>is and then telling our best version of it. But

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 2>there's been misreporting that is Ah, look, I'd hate to

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 2>say deliberately slanted, but at least subconsciously slanted. And there's

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>been stuff that I've seen reported and then we've gone

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>away and worked on it and come up with a

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 2>bunch of documents or spoken to various people, and I've

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 2>looked at these original reports and gone, you just got

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that wrong. But I go back to the fact that

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>this case was shrouded in secrecy from the start. So

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>William Tyrell is a foster child, and for I think

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>years we couldn't say that. You and the police knew

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>who he knew he was, We in the media knew

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>he was, a bunch of people online were saying he was,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 2>but the laws prevented us from saying it. So there's

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>a secrecy right from the start that has been compounded

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 2>and made more secret by all these different court orders

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>restricting what you can say. And so as a result, Yeah,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 2>people in the media have got some facts, and a

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of them are doing a really good job. But

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>when you've got basically an absence of truth, an absence

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>of facts, yeah, mistruths start to creep in to fill

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a void.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I can say it's been frustrating for me

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the sidelines watching it, for the people involved

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>directly involved in the investigation. I taught the biological parents

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of Foster Pearance. I can only imagine what they're going

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 1>through with the information. But wind it back the genesis

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast. Now people know, and I'm glad you

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that. I mentioned it in the introduction. We've got

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a relationship. It's been a professional relationship from when you're

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a crime reporter and I was in the police. We've

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>since worked together and I think it's fair enough. And

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>don't correct me here because it could be embarrassing. I

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>think you could cause friends at this stage, but we'll

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>depending on what happens here in the podcast. It was

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>always my intent when I found myself out of the

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>police and working in the podcast space, to do a

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast on William tyrrel because I wanted to set the

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>records straight. And it's not about defending my position, it's

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just let get all the facts out. I made a

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>conscious decision that I think it would have been better

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for me to step away from doing a podcast because

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm too heavily invested in it emotionally, professionally and everything else,

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think it could look like it's self serving.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just a narrative I'm putting out you come along,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You're going to do a podcast, and I I said, well,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be involved in it. I'll come

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>in as a guest. And you caution me that you're

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>not going to slant the podcast in my favor. You're

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do a deep dive into the investigation and

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>wherever that goes.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So be it.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I accept that, and I've got to say here

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and you can respond if you want. I was happy

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're doing it because I know the depth of

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>investigative journalism that you do and your ethical approach to things.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on the podcast? Why did you feel

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the need to do the podcast in the first place

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>about William Tirel.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, so just on that question and then going

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 2>back to what you were saying about how the two

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of us do have this pre existing relationship, because that's

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I've got to be frank about that as well. Think

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 2>with the podcast and the reason I like working with them,

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>there's two things. One is there massive So this thing

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 2>is the series we're right in the middle of making

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 2>at the moment. So I'm going to walk out here

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>and I'm going to script one of the episodes. So

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 2>we're right in the heart of it now. That's probably

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 2>going to run to maybe eleven episodes, maybe twelve episodes.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be running until the end of the year.

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Each of those, let's say it's forty five minutes long.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I can't even do the maths in my head, but

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 2>that is hours and hours and hours of documentary reporting.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 2>There isn't a medium available today that gives you that

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>much time that you know, you look at four Corners.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 2>We're going to do multiple the equivalent of multiple episodes

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 2>of Four Corners. We're going to do the equivalent of

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>probably something like sixty to seventy thousand words of script.

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 2>That would be like an entire newspaper, maybe two days

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>worth of a newspaper. So we're going to get into detail.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be able to interrogate those facts that

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 2>have maybe been misunderstood or misreported. We're going to be

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 2>able to challenge different people's accounts and just give a

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 2>better understanding of this thing, which isn't really that well

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 2>understood because a podcast series is so big. So that's

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons to do it. And the other reason,

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 2>and this goes back to something new and I have

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>worked together on is a podcast lets you hear people

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>tell their story in their own words, so you can

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 2>hear the most honest version. And I'm not just talking

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 2>about telling the truth honest, but emotionally honest. So you

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 2>can hear the catch in their throat as they're trying

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>not to cry and they're talking to you. You can

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 2>hear that kind of pause when they're almost trying to

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 2>process just the fact that they're dealing with, in this case,

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the loss of a three year old boy. And that

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 2>is a better way of telling this story than I

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>can do on my own. I can write stuff down

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and it might be in a newspaper, but it's never

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>going to be as powerful or as honest emotionally as

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 2>having the people who are at the center of this

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 2>story tell that story in their own words. But to

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>go back to you and I, because you and I

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 2>first met and first ended up working on something that

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>became another podcast, which was the Bauerville Murders, murder of

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>three children up in little town called Bauerville in the

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 2>mid North Coast. And I remember at the time that

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know you from Adam, You didn't know me.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>You I was a journalist, but you were working on

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>that case and have been for twenty odd years. I

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>came in and said, look, let's let's try doing a

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>podcast about it. And I remember you saying, I think

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember if you said, what's a podcast? But

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>you weren't impressed, like you'd never really heard of.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It in fairness, and then you're quite right, Yeah, that

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>was a great statement. I think I did say, what

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>do you mean a podcast? What's a podcast? But that

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>was that was one of the very early true crime podcasts.

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it worked. It told that story well. And

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 2>at the same time you guys and the police were

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 2>calling for the the a ledged suspect to go be

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>sent back to court. The families were doing the same thing.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 2>And then we came along and at the same time,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and we created enough of a noise and he ended

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 2>up getting sent back to court and that was a

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 2>good result. But it does flag you know, that was

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the best part of a decade ago. Now, so you

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and I have known each other for that long. We

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 2>worked in as much as I was a reporter on

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that case, and then I've reported on other cases you

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 2>worked on, not because I well, you do do some

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting work, but also that was my job. I was

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>a crime reporter and you were working on high profile cases.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>But then you left the cops. You and I co

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 2>wrote a couple of books which were memoirs, so you're

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about your career. And then I came back to

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Australia and ended up working for News Court in podcasting,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>including overseeing the podcast that we're talking on now. So

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 2>you and I have a professional relationship personal relationship that

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 2>goes back a long time. So you talked about with

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>this William Tyrrell podcast wanting to step back, and probably

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the thing I've got to say, and I will say

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>in the podcast is you know, Gary and I have

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 2>got a long and established relationship. That doesn't mean I

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 2>always agree with you on everything, and I don't, and

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I've told you that. But people listening to this today

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and to the William Tyrell podcast, if they do, are

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 2>going to have to judge for themselves. If I can

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>still be objective about you and your actions and what

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you got right and what I think you

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 2>got wrong, even though you and I do know each other.

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, yeah, and I look and I think it's

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>important we get it out in this forum. Talking about

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>your podcast series that people understand we're not hiding the fact.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want people to come out and go, oh yeah,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but Dan and Jubeian know each other and blah.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not a secret.

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But just to reassure people because they're trusting us on

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying here, I got respect for you as

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a crime journalist, and I think I've said this to you.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But in case people haven't heard this story, it was

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>over an investigation. I forget which investigation I was working on,

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>but you were doing an article where there was going

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to be some criticism of the police in an investigation,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and you pulled me aside at the court and you said,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>can we just catch up for a second. I just

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you something, And you said to me, look,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, this is an awkward conversation, but I'm

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be reporting on something. I'm going to be

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>critical of an investigation you were involved in or leading

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. And I think my response was I laughed,

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and I laughed at well, that's your job, Dan, Like

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I had respect for you, that the fact that you

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>would report unbiasedly regardless of whether we were forming a

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>friendship or you knew me, and I respect journalism like that.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I'm comfortable in what you're doing on

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Terial investigation. And I've always said with the Teral investigation,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>bring on an inquiry. I invite your scrutiny. In the

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>William Tyrell podcast, I've deliberately not got involved.

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 2>We're deliberately well you as much as we do interview you,

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 2>but you're not involved in No.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>You interviewed me, and I think you apologized before we

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>walked into this very room. You said you might like

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>me after this and with the stuff that you put

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to me. But from my position, and I challenge everyone

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>for this that unless you ask the hard questions, I

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>can't justify my position. So I didn't want it brushed over,

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm confident with the podcast you're going to do that.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The other thing about the Witness William Tyrell podcast, I've

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>seen how hard you've worked on it, and I haven't

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>stuck my nose and go what are you doing here?

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing there? And I'm mainly listening to

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the podcast episodes when they come out and available to

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the public because I don't want to be involved, because

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I want I don't want criticism saying I jub once

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>had his hands over this, so where it falls, it falls.

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think when I'm talking from a police point

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of view, when you're being handed the responsibility of investigating

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the disappearance of a three year old child, you should

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>be accountable. You should be responsible, and if you've made mistakes,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they should be acknowledged and learned from. So that's my position.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think we can still be friends.

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Are so far so far, but we actually haven't done

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the episodes about you yet.

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Jesus, Okay, no, Look, Dan, I invite it. It needs

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to be scrutinized. It's too important.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Look, I'm with you one hundred percent. I think these

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>things do need to be scrutinized. And I think this case,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and particularly the fallout from the investigation, so in ten

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>years William's been missing, we're still in terms of the

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 2>public still have no idea what happened to him. Maybe

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the police do, but if they do, they haven't charged anyone.

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that does deserve scrutiny because it's it's like

0:18:54.640 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>a collective responsibility to say, what happened here and did

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>we get the response right? If only to stop it

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>happening again or help stop it happening again. That said,

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be uncomfortable. I joke before that I'm

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 2>going to lose friends over this, but I will. I've

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>been aware of that for a while because any account

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of the investigation into William Till's disappearance is going to

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 2>involve saying that some things weren't done well, and some

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 2>things weren't done well by the police, and some things

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 2>weren't done well by the media, and some things weren't

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>done well by the state government, particularly the foster care authorities.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And I know people in all of those groups, and

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>already there's one person who I thought we had a

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 2>really good professional relationship with who is no longer responding

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 2>to text messages. And that's fair enough. You know, people

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>get to make their own judge, but I don't really,

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't really have any choice. I'm committed to doing

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>this the best way I know how, which won't be perfect,

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>and I'll make mistakes, and people have already spotted a

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 2>couple and pointed them out and we've corrected them. But

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 2>if I'm going to do this the best way I

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 2>know how, then it is going to be uncomfortable.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And look at the two I won't say

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>take a stand, that's not the right thing, but to

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>look at something in depth objectively, there is always going

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to be collateral damage. That's the nature of what you do.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Hendley Thomas Teachers Pet, and I use that as a

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>reference point because I'd see here comfortably saying if the

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast series Teachers Pet didn't occur, that that investigation wouldn't

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have been solved. That created an environment where the investigation

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.239
<v Speaker 1>was solved. I think the landscape has changed greatly. And

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I know this from being a police officer for thirty

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>four years that it was very insular in what came

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 1>out in the place. You had your contacts in the

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in the media, and the senior place would be contacting

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>that brief briefing the media. It was very controlled. Podcasting

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>has turned that world upside down. Police can no longer

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>control a narrative. I think with Teacher's Pitt Place lost

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>control of the narrative there and look what resulted.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 2>In One thing that was interesting about Teacher's Pet. And

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I think I probably know this from maybe listening because

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 2>you interviewed Headley on this podcast, and maybe he was

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 2>talking about it then. But at the start, when Headley

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 2>was working on that. The police weren't cooperating at all,

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>which is basically standard, and that's fair enough. They're running

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 2>live homicide investigations. They got to control what said and

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 2>what's known to the best of their ability. So the

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 2>police weren't cooperating with Headley. But then you stop putting

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the series out and things change because people see their

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>under scrutiny. And that's where we are. So we're two episodes.

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Three episodes have been published so far. People now know

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 2>they're under scrutiny and people are coming forward. We're being

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>contacted with tips constantly, which is part of the reason

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm so tired at the moment, because we're trying to

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 2>make the podcast but also investigate all this new stuff

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>that's coming in. And Hedley was doing the same, but

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the big thing that changed with him was the police

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 2>came on board. So I remember Hegley saying he sat

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 2>down and had lunch with the then police commissioner Mick

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Fuller and basically said, you guys aren't cooperating and explained

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:33.719
<v Speaker 2>what he was doing and how he was doing it,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and the relationship changed. So where we are at the

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 2>moment is the police aren't talking to us, and I've

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 2>been in and I've sat down with different heads of

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 2>their media operation, because people have left the job and said,

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 2>this is what we're doing, this is why we're doing it,

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and how we're doing it, and these are the people

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk to, and so far they are

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 2>saying nothing. But if we've got a common purpose, which

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 2>I do think we have, which is to try and

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>establish what was done right and wrong in the ten

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>years since William went missing, to hopefully stop it happening again,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>then the more we can talk to the police and

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the more they can at least engage with us, then

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the better everyone is. That said, we are

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>being quite critical of them, well, you know, and what

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I say in response to that, because I was part

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 2>of the investigation. There's a responsibility that comes with investigating

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a three year old child. It's a big responsibility and

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>to step into that role you need to accept the

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 2>consequences of it. The police not cooperating on a podcast,

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I can understand that. I'll give a benefit of doubt

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 2>on certain aspects.

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>With policing. Sometimes there is stuff that you want to

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>withhold and we're always cautious not to overstep the mark.

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>But We've got an investigation now ten years and there's

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>been missing for the public, the media, the police have

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>gone off in all different directions. It's chaotic. I look

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>from the sideline and I think I'm as confused as

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the public about what's going on. When

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I was involved in leading the investigation, part of my

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 1>responsibility was to keep the public informed, make appeals for witnesses,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and answer questions from the media. So there was no

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>address misinformation. Because there's a lot of rumors going around

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>when I was running, I haven't seen that for the past,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's now it's almost going on six years since

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been off this investigation. I have not seen a

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>senior police officer stand there and take open questions about

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the wim Tyrrell investigation.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.239
<v Speaker 2>And you know the reason they're giving us. So at

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the moment every episode I write, I send the cops

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 2>an email and say this is basically what we're going

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to say. And every news story we write, because we're

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 2>also writing news stories for news dot com dot ae,

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>every one of those right to the cops and we

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 2>say this is what we're going to say. And every

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 2>time they write back and say we cannot comment because

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 2>there's an ongoing inquest, which is right, and the inquest

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>is going to have its next public hearing next month.

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 2>But what they're not doing, and what I've asked them

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>if they want to do, pretty much every single time,

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>is say, all right, let's have a conversation about what

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 2>you're saying. So I'm happy to say to them in

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 2>this upcoming news story or this upcoming episode, I'm broadly

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 2>going to say this, this, this, and this, and there's

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 2>no secrecy because it's all going to get made public

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 2>when it's published. But it gives them an opportunity to

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>tell me if I'm wrong, to say, well, actually you've

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 2>misunderstood that, you've got that fact wrong, so why don't

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 2>you correct that so at least the version that's going

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 2>out to the public is more accurate and for you

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 2>to be honest. The big part of the reason I'm

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to talk to them is so that can happen,

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 2>so we can get the disinformation, the misinformation and corrected.

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 2>And hopefully there's none in our reporting, but it would

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>help if the police would engage on there. Just not

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 2>for me and maybe not for them, but both of

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 2>us would like people's understanding of this case to be

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 2>as accurate as possible, So if nothing else, I would

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 2>have thought they'd want to engage with that. But the

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>attitude at the moment is much more now, we're just

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 2>not going to say anything.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I call it like a hidden the sceand approach. And

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting saying that, And this is my opinion, not yours.

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm amused by the fact that we're not commenting because

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a meta before the coroner. But then they come

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>out and say there's only one suspect, or the senior

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>serving police officer as in the commission that comes out

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and says there's only one suspect in this matter.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Well that is true. So the line we get is

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to comment because it's an ongoing in quest.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 2>But the lead detective detective Chief Inspector laid Law was

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 2>on TV admittedly a couple of years ago, but the

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 2>inquest was still going and he was asked, do you

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 2>know who did this? And he goes he's basically says, yeah,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 2>we've got an idea who did this? And then you're

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 2>right that. Then Police Commissioner Mick Fuller is interviewed and

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 2>he confirms the police have one person they're particularly looking at.

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>And we know the police are speaking off the record

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to different newspapers about the same thing. So there is

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>communication that's happening from the police about this case while

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the inquest is ongoing. When they choose to communicate, and

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not happening with us, And look, that's not sour grapes.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 2>They can do whatever they like. They're running the homicide investigation.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a big, important job. But it's just different at

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 2>different times and in different cases.

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, then I just check your not check you

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>on one thing, but just bring back one one point.

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that you hope with the podcast that you know,

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>if there's failings in the investigation, they're identified so correct

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't happen again one hundred percent. But I

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think we all, all the different parties and the people

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that hate you like you, the people that hate me

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like me, everyone, we all should the hot focus should

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>be on finding out what's happened to William Tyrol. Yeah,

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think with a podcast, what you're doing, a

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>factual podcast, it really opens the door and it opens

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the door to laying the facts out so people fully understand.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>It has to set up the best possibility of getting

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the result with the investigation.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh look, this is one thing I say to people.

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So when I talk to people in my line of

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 2>work as a reporter, and I've had a conversation last

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>week which has said exactly the same thing. You're often

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 2>talking to people who are grieving a loss, and sometimes

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 2>with an unsolved thomicide. They're grieving a loss and they've

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 2>got they're grieving the lack of answers. They just don't

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 2>know why happened to their loved one. And I talked

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 2>to them and I say, look, you might talk to me,

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>we might do an interview, and probably nothing will change.

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 2>And I've got to be honest like that. I don't

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>have the ability to fix things as a journalist. All

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I can really do is say this is the best

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 2>version of events is I've got it, and hopefully point

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>a spotlight to that. But it doesn't always make a difference.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're right, but in my experience solving homicides, it's

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>at one percent that little thing that can your across

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the line.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>You were always interested in that, you were much more

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 2>happy to talk to the media, and let's be honest,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>you weren't doing it out of the goodness of your heart.

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 2>You were doing it because you saw the media as

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 2>a tool one hundred percent to use to help you

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and what you were doing, which was trying to catch

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>a killer, probably I used as a tool. In fact,

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 2>definitely I got used as a tool. That how we

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 2>met was you asked the State Crime Command media officer

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to put you in touch with some journalists to talk

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>about that Bower Ofville investigation because you wanted some publicity

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 2>around the case, probably because you worked on the basis

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 2>that more publicity around the case meant more political pressure,

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 2>meant more resources for your case. And I was one

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of the journalists who came in and went, well, definitely

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to report on that. So did kind of

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 2>what you wanted. But I don't necessarily see that as

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 2>a bad thing.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't I look at it. And if you felt used,

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry.

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't feel used. I think I think we

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>both had to go into that again like with our

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>eyes open. Like definitely I wasn't there to do your

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 2>bidding one hundred percent not and I'm not now, but

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I could see there was a public interest and reporting

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>on that case, you could see there was a public

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>interest in having the media report on that case, and

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 2>so it helped at that point that we had those

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 2>conversations I'm talking about that aren't happening at the William

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Tyrell investigation now.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And look, I don't know what the mindset is in policing,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but as I learned my career as a major crime

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>detective and working with people that I respected, people that

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>were experienced major crime investigators, that the media was a

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>tool to use. It's in the tools of every other

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that you use forensic evidence, you make appeals to

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the media, you keep the public informed. It's a tool.

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that in a disrespectful way or

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>using but every time that I spoke, and particularly on

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the William Tyrel matter, I spoke in consultation with a

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>forensic psychologist on what messaging to get out. When I'm

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>doing those doing the media, I'm making specific appeals. So yeah,

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it is an important role. But just bringing

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it back what we're talking about here with podcasts is

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that police have lost control with podcasting because they don't

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>have the narrative. It was normally the media organizations and

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever camp they are in, they could release information that way.

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>What's happened. Like with Hedley Thomas's Teacher's Pet Bearable, you

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.719
<v Speaker 1>went a little bit rogue. You're reporting on things that

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the police would make no comment on. It makes people

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>scrutinize the investigation. Then I can say, from an ex

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>cops point of view, scrutiny on an investigation is a

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>good thing.

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>You know what to do? You know what you have

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>to accept to do this job is you have to

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 2>accept that you're an outsider and you're going to stay

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 2>an outsider. So Hadley is some Queensland, was reporting on

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 2>a murder case in New South Wales. So by dint

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of that, he's already a bit of an outsider. He's

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>not relying on the New South Wales Police every day,

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Toma his stories and his contacts with this one. I've

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>got to accept that if I do this podcast we're

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 2>working on now about William ty Or, honestly, then maybe

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be people who don't want to talk

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 2>to me afterwards, including maybe the New South Wales Police,

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 2>because we are critical and we're critical of the police

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 2>investigation right from the beginning. I mean right from day one.

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot that was done right, and there's some

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that was done wrong, and we're going to say that,

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 2>but you've got to accept that that means they're not

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 2>going to help me out with stories in the future,

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 2>or there's always that possibility. I'm not saying they are

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 2>that petty, but there's that possibility they're not going to

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>want to talk.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, isn't it, aren't they patheious?

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Well that's kind of human nature, though that's charis but no.

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>But the thing is a lot of journalists don't necessarily

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 2>make that same judgment. And I'm not pointing out anyone

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 2>at the moment at all, but there are journalists out

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 2>there who rely on politicians, rely on institutions like the

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 2>cops to get their stories. And I've been there. I've

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 2>got stories from politicians and I've got stories from police forces.

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 2>And then when you find yourself working on a story

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that's a bit critical, you do find yourself thinking, oh,

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I write this, I might not get that next drop

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 2>of a story. But you have to accept that that

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen, and you have to be happy

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 2>to be the outside.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I see that, and they understand what you're saying. I

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just don't respect that. I don't respect the fact that

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>police who are public servants feel like they've got control

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>over what they'll release because it might reflect badly on them.

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They're there to serve the public.

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 2>But if they are using the media, and I'm not

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 2>trying to pick a fight, but if they are using

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the media to further their investigations like you used to,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>then fine. But the thing is, like all of this

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 2>is done in the shadows, isn't it like that there's

0:34:56.080 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 2>no official rules of engagement. Maybe the police have got

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 2>a long book on media practices, but I'm sure it

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 2>doesn't include the off the record briefings that I know

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 2>happen because I've had them, and I'm sure it doesn't include,

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the very frank exchanges of information when it

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 2>suits the police. And I'd be amazed if it included

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the police can basically decide who they

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 2>talk to because they think this journalist is more sympathetic

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 2>than the other. And all of that's fine, that's their job.

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>But as the journal you have to accept the reality

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 2>of all of that. And if you are going to

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 2>do this, and you're going to do it honestly, it

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to mean possibly that people don't want to

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 2>talk to you afterwards.

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose for what it's worth. I respect the

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>journalists that yeah, I think the journalists I look up to,

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and I've now been in there long enough to understand

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>who i'd like to I won't say follow, but adopt

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the practices. Are the ones that have got the carriage

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to report the truth. I thought that's what journalism is

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 1>all about. And in regards to police, like what you're

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>going to because it doesn't reflect well on you, you're

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>going to withhold that from the media.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 2>But that's the problem with it all being done in

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the shadows, isn't it. Like if it's all done informally

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 2>through these bluntly, fairly cozy relationships, then there's no way

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 2>of knowing if the police are doing this engagement with

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 2>the media because it's in the interest of the investigation,

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 2>or they're doing it because it's in their own interests.

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 2>And look, you've got to be really honest, particularly in

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales, and I do have some experience of

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 2>this because I've been a crime reporter in New South

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Wales for a long time. The police in the media

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>have a really cozy relationship. We're really tight and the

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales police leaks like a sieve, and as

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a journalist that's great, but it means they have the

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 2>ability to leak like a sieve to certain journalists and

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 2>they get to choose who they do work with. Anyway,

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not complain I'm definitely not complaining. I'm definitely not

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 2>saying I'm bitter about it. But it is the reality

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 2>of it, and it has affected this investigation into William

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Thiol's disappearance.

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, look, I'm probably burning bridges for you as

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>we keep talking.

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 2>I seem to be merrily burning the.

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Look, Dan, let me give you some advice. I've basically

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:22.320
<v Speaker 1>burn every bridge I've.

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Ever walked down.

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, I keep moving forward because you can't go back.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>It's probably not the best practice.

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So just one thing that is worth flagging on

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 2>this whole thing about leaking to the press. You've been

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 2>accused of that time and time and time again. Yeah,

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>and I've spoken to people in the course of making

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 2>this podcast who have swarm blind to me that you've

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 2>leaked X to Y as a detective, and it's been

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 2>said in court. I've sat in court when people have

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 2>been talking about how you leaked. No one ever actually

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 2>asked you in court. But he's been said about you.

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I know from the limited dealings I had with you

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that you didn't leak to me, because I tried to

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 2>get you to leak more than once, and I tried

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>quite hard sometimes and you didn't. But I'd be remiss

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 2>if I didn't flag that people have accused you of

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 2>the thing I'm accusing.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Others of speculation here. And sometimes if you don't know

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the answer, shouldn't ask the question. I learned that, but

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask this question. Has anyone said directly

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I leaked, like a journalist said directly?

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 2>I know, But there's a problem. Like journalists, it's kind

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 2>of like an ethica, I can't ask each other. But

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 2>as an example, sorry to interrupt, and we can talk

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 2>about this all now because it's all come out and

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 2>it's all been made public. One of in fact, the

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 2>early we can call him this because he's subsequently been

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>found to be completely not guilty of anything to do

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 2>with William's disappearance. But one of the first high profile

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 2>suspects in that case was a guy called Bill Spedding,

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 2>who was a local washing machine repair man, and one

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 2>of the things the police found when they raided his

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 2>home and his business and searched his cars. Was a

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Spider Man toy in his work fan and that was

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 2>significant because William Tool was wearing a Spider Man suit

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 2>at the time he went missing, or at least it

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 2>was thought to be significant. Now that subsequently came out

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 2>in the papers, and I don't know how it got out,

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and people have speculated it was a deliberate leak from yourself.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I've seen that speculation. But the one thing I do

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 2>know is I found out about that Spider Man toy

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 2>from talking to another cop who wasn't on the strike force,

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 2>who wasn't even in homicide, because it was obviously just

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 2>chatter around the police force. And he mentioned it to

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 2>me over a coffee and I tried to get you

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.879
<v Speaker 2>to confirm it. I can remember the conversation. We were

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 2>actually up near Kendall on the mid North Coast where

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>William went miss and I'd been told this and I

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 2>tried to get you to confirm it so I could

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 2>write it, and you asked me please don't report that

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 2>because it was sensitive for the investigation, and as a result,

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I didn't report it because the most important thing was

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 2>that the investigation did its best job to try and

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 2>find William and if I was going to trip that up,

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 2>then I didn't want to part of that. So all

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I do know is that when I have tried to

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 2>get you to leak, and that's an example, you've actually

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 2>refused to and then said if you think that's true,

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 2>please don't report it.

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks for saying that, Dan, And I just want

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to wind it back because you know, when I talk

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>about the start, we're talking about the rumor, speculation, the

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>neuendos that flow with the Ural investigation. I've been accused

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of so many things. And I say here and this

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is going out to all the public that listen, it's

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>going out to the police, that's going out of the journalists.

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I defy any journalists to put their hand up and

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 1>say I leaked information to them, because because I haven't

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>leaked the information, and the fact that I wasn't going

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to get emotional or cranky during this podcast, but as

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the wim Tural matter evokes that type

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of response. I ran that investigation for four years. There

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>weren't leaks going when I was running the investigator. There

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>were from someone on which issue. So when Bill Spedding

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>got arrested. There was a leak that that was going

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen, because the morning before he got arrested, pretty

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>much every media organization was waiting outside his house.

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 2>And I know because I was there, and I know

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 2>you've been accused in court of leaking that.

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And you heard me give evidence under oath.

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 2>No, because no one asked you about that.

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you get I got I asked, I got asked

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>questions about that.

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and what did you say?

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, it wasn't released by me, and I'm confident

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't people under me.

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 2>In that case. It's come up in two different court

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 2>matters because I was thinking of another one where this

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>was talked about and was basically said that you leaked that.

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I know that I got that from another journalist and

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 2>it was it was kind of chatter, Oh, you know,

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Bill Spedding is going to get arrested on such and

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 2>such a date. You might want to be there. And

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I remember calling you up again and trying to get

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 2>you to confirm it, and you wouldn't. It's really I

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 2>was really frustrated that you wouldn't, because I basically had

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 2>to go to my editor and say, I think this

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 2>is happening. We should definitely pay for the flight to

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 2>get me there. But all I can substantiate that with

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 2>is that another journal told me. Yeah, it turns out

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 2>it was right. So someone was leaking.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So someone was leaking. But that Bill Spedding situation, the

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>arrests there, I think for the four years that I

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>read the investigation, that wasn't names throwing out. This person's

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a suspect. And I think since you've done a deep

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>dive into the investigation, you'd get a sense of how

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 1>many people we were looking at during that four year period. Yeah,

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>never ever came out.

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, other names that didn't come out. Yeah, point that's true.

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing I should say is Bill Spedding

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>was arrested for unrelated offenses, which he was subsequently found

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 2>not guilty of. Bill Spedding has never been charged in

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 2>relation to William Teal's disappearance. No evidence has ever come

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 2>to light that he was in any way involved in

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>or had any knowledge of William's disappearance. He's always protested

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 2>his innocence. He has said he's got an alibi that

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 2>he was at the school watching one of his kids

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 2>get an award. There's evidence to support that alibi. He's

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 2>known to have made a payment in the cafe across

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 2>the road. There is, frankly, nothing that I have seen

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 2>that the police have come forward with to suggest he

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 2>was involved at all. And this is the point where

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 2>we might fall out. That was an investigation that you oversaw,

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 2>and it was subsequently described is the worst case of

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 2>malicious prosecution in the state.

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think I've had the conversation with you

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that hit me harder than when I was criminally charged,

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>like saying a malicious prosecution. I've said my evidence at court.

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how far I can push what I

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>want to say about that. But the way that position

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:24.879
<v Speaker 1>was defended, I, in my humble opinion, think it could

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have been defended in a different, different way. And again,

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and people are probably sick of hearing me say this,

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I stand by what I did on the investigation and

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ivite proper scrutiny not Courts can only make decisions based

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 1>on the information that's provided to them and probably enough

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 1>said that moved on from that, but point not, well,

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to make a point. I want to

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about your podcast. But again, I think what our

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.800
<v Speaker 1>conversation just said it reflects so many people have got opinions.

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>There's misinformation floating around, and what I sincerely hope and

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this is why I keep putting my hand up and say,

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:06.240
<v Speaker 1>let's have a parliamentary inquiry, Let's have a public inquiry,

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sick of the misinformation not just impacting on me,

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>impacting on other people more importantly, whims, foster parents and

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>biological parents of misinformation going around. So I'm hoping, hoping

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that your podcast will shine the light on it. You

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>said you've been working on it for two years. Give

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of the magnitude of what you do,

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because I've seen how you work, and I've got to

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>say this, Dan, you would have made a good homicide detective.

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Ah, that's very coming. But I don't know. That's a

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 2>hard job. I've seen anyway, that's a side issue. Homicide

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 2>detectives work hard. But this, I've never done anything like this.

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean I've done I've worked hard on other cases before,

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 2>for podcasts and books, but the scale of this is

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 2>unlike anything else. Just to give you an idea, just

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 2>a sheer number of documents and it is literally folders

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and folders and folders full of documents and dozens and

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 2>dozens and dozens of interviews, and to give you an

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 2>idea of just how much information we're trying to process.

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I really like to do with

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 2>these long investigations is just build up a timeline, just

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:20.839
<v Speaker 2>bullet points. You know, this happened, then that happened, then

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that happened, then that happened, and put a footnote at

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the end of each bullet point saying, this is the

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 2>source of that fact, and it's always got to be

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 2>a primary source. It's not a newspaper article or another report.

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, witness statement, it's a court transcript or

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:42.399
<v Speaker 2>an interview we've done. So just that timeline, that list

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of bullet points is currently at something over one hundred

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 2>and sixty thousand words, So that's the length of two

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 2>entire books, and that's our starting point. You know, from

0:46:56.600 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 2>there you can follow the footnotes to of those documents

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 2>or to the interview we've done. And it's massive and

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it's overwhelming, and that's also probably part of the reason

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm so tired right at the moment, because we are

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 2>working through that. But that is kind of like the

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 2>keystone in what we do. From everything there. We can

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 2>write those episodes, we can write those new stories because

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 2>we know we've got our facts as best we can

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 2>laid out in order. But yeah, I and the people

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm working with, and there's several of us working on this,

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I've never worked on anything as big or as complicated

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 2>as this.

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:38.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think the nature of this investigation, like this

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is organized crime investigations, there can be a lot of

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>different pathways, different layers to that. This is complex in

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that the starting point with Whim's disappearance, no forensic evidence,

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>no eyewitness Well.

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing, isn't it. Like, Actually, this shouldn't be

0:47:55.960 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that complicated. It's not an organized crime. It's not a

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 2>financial crime, which is you know, huge amounts of financial

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 2>reports and data. This was one child going missing. It

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be that complicated to what it's become now. And

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:15.320
<v Speaker 2>a big part of that goes back to what you

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 2>just said. There's no forensic evidence. And part of the

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 2>reason there's no forensic evidence is when William went missing,

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 2>it was treated as a little boy lost. The police

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 2>were on the scene within minutes, like hugely impressive response,

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and they called in other officers, they called in mounted police,

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.239
<v Speaker 2>cops on trail bikes, they called in the sees, they

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 2>had a helicopter up, they called in divers. Hundreds and

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of people just volunteered their time to look for William.

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's all incredible. But the one thing that wasn't

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 2>done was a crime scene established. So I've spoken to

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 2>people who were there that day and they talk about

0:48:57.480 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 2>people just walking over the lawn in and out of

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 2>house where William went missing, cars being allowed to drive

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 2>up and down the road with no one checking who

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 2>was in them or where they were going, or taking

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 2>note of the regio plates. And as a result, that moment,

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 2>when there would have been some forensic evidence, if there

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 2>was going to be any, and let's be honest, there

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:25.600
<v Speaker 2>usually is, all of that was lost. It either wasn't

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 2>collected or it was literally trampled into the dirt beneath

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the feet of the well meaning people who were looking

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 2>for William because they thought he'd walked off.

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Look, I'm sitting there listening and that I'm agreeing with

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 1>everything you're saying. And I've been asked questions in the

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>past about that and the focus, the primary focus was

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on looking for the little boy loss, which in ninety

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:53.200
<v Speaker 1>nine point nine the central time they find the child.

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:55.400
<v Speaker 1>In those circumstances, I'm.

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 2>Not look, you know, I was. It's dead easy for

0:49:57.840 --> 0:49:59.839
<v Speaker 2>me being the journalist, because I get to just say, well,

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 2>that was done wrong. I don't have to be the

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:06.240
<v Speaker 2>person on the scene, the inspector who's coordinating that massive

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 2>response and is responsible for it. I don't have to

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 2>be that person. So it's really easy for me to criticize.

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 2>But it was done with the best will in the world. Fine,

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 2>it was done under incredible pressure and everyone's concentrating on

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:26.759
<v Speaker 2>finding a missing boy, but the fact remains there's no

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:31.879
<v Speaker 2>forensic evidence, and that meant the investigation was struggling from

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 2>the start.

0:50:32.680 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It made it harder. And I can obviously speak of

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that from my homicide experience. I made recommendations in accountable documents,

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:43.839
<v Speaker 1>progress reports and different things that we've got to look

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at the SAPs for that type of situation standing operating procedure.

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes that I was making this as strong as I could,

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and the recommendations that when a situation presents itself like

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that concurrently running independent of the search operation, there should

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>be a criminal investig that might be after the first

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 1>hour if the child hasn't been found, detective should be

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>called out and they start running a criminal investigation.

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, yeah, you are right on that on

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 2>this one. I think there were detectives, local detectives on

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:16.919
<v Speaker 2>the scene looking at the investigation within about four hours. Yeah,

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 2>so going through the police records, they were there. But

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 2>still the focus is on has William wandered off? And

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 2>strangely that seemed to still be the focus for weeks,

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.240
<v Speaker 2>or at least there was confusion over what the focus

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 2>is because the case is given to the homicide squad

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 2>about a week after William goes missing. But after that

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:45.399
<v Speaker 2>you've got the local police commander is still doing all

0:51:45.400 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 2>the media interviews and it's still saying and I was

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 2>checking this this morning, he's still saying, well, it might

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 2>be a kid who's wandered off, or it might be

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:56.879
<v Speaker 2>human intervention. We don't know. And so you've got these

0:51:56.920 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 2>mixed messages like who's in charge? Is it the locale,

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:02.760
<v Speaker 2>is it the homicide squad? What really is the focus

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 2>in this investigation? It doesn't have that kind of laser

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 2>like focus on this could be a homicide. We need

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.279
<v Speaker 2>to gather all the information and shut this down. And

0:52:14.880 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 2>control the public perception of this. So it felt like

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of confusion.

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Dan look in sitting down with you the day, I

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.560
<v Speaker 1>want to give people an understanding of what's going to

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 1>be presented with the podcast series that you've done, but

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you've touched on things and I can't help but offer

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>an opinion. I've been sitting on the sidelines for a

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>long time, and I think, yeah, it's been ten years

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>since we have disappeared, over ten years now. When I

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:51.359
<v Speaker 1>took over the investigation five months after the very thing

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about there I identified as a problem.

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I made a conscious decision saying, hey,

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>homicide is running this investigation. I'm running this investigation. That

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a strake. My ego that was to get control

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of an investigation that was the wrong messaging was going out.

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>We needed to get that laser focus, as you said,

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're doing, this is why we're doing it,

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and put the pressure on the person or persons that

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.719
<v Speaker 1>might be have knowledge or involvement of William's disappearance.

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 2>So I guess that's the reason for it, isn't it.

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Because I remember being a reporter and covering the case

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:27.840
<v Speaker 2>at the time, and we didn't know who was in charge.

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Was it homicide? Was it the local police? Who were

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 2>they looking at? And if you've got the local police

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:39.759
<v Speaker 2>commander saying bluntly saying, we don't know what happened. It

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 2>could be this, it could be that, then whoever is

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:49.839
<v Speaker 2>responsible isn't feeling the pressure. They're feeling like they might

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 2>have got away with it, and that changes what they do,

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 2>and it changes what the people around them who might

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 2>know something do. And that's when I talk about messaging.

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:01.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't you know, I'm not talking about pr here.

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about was there an opportunity missed to put

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 2>that pressure on to basically use the media to speak

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 2>to that person or the people who know them and

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 2>say we're coming for you. We're going to get you,

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 2>just in case they slip up.

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, Dan, and again I'm not sure if it comes

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:23.400
<v Speaker 1>out in your podcast, but I got a certain amount

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of criticism for going out of aggressively with the media

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>when I said, anyone move in a square kilometer that

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't come forward, I'm wondering why you haven't come forward.

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be looking at you. I've got a

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:37.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of complaints about that, the members of the public going,

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 1>how dare you accuse us of this? But that was

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>done for a reason. That was an aggressive strategy to

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>flush people out and put pressure on.

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look again, it's really easy for me to

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 2>criticize things that aren't done, and it's you know, it's

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:57.399
<v Speaker 2>easy for you to sit here and say, I think

0:54:57.400 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 2>that should be a public inquiry. It's possible that we're

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 2>wrong and that the current police who've been working on

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:05.840
<v Speaker 2>it for the past five and a bit years, have

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 2>identified the right suspect and have gathered all of the

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:14.439
<v Speaker 2>evidence they need and are any moment about to crack

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 2>this case wide open, and that will prove them right

0:55:19.719 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 2>and us wrong. But if they've done that, then why

0:55:24.120 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 2>haven't they done it yet? Why haven't they charged someone?

0:55:28.920 --> 0:55:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Why haven't they made public what they know by going

0:55:34.440 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to a court and saying this is the evidence we've got.

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Why are they still sitting on it? You've got an inquest.

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It's all going to come to a head in the

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 2>next couple of months. The inquest has got hearing in

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 2>November and hearing in December, and I don't see how

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 2>those hearings can happen without the police having to basically

0:55:55.719 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 2>say this is what we've been doing, this is the

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 2>evidence we've got. And if we do get to the

0:56:01.000 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 2>end of that and we still don't know what happened

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 2>to William a decade on, and we do know that

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 2>several lives we talked about Bill Spedding, several lives have

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 2>been damaged by the police investigation, then yeah, I'm with you.

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:18.359
<v Speaker 2>I think if we get to that point, there does

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 2>need to be a public inquiry and some kind of

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 2>public reckoning.

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, an inquest in effect is a public inquiry.

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:29.359
<v Speaker 2>It is, but it's not looking at the police investigation.

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:30.719
<v Speaker 1>That's true, that's true.

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Has specifically said I'm not looking at the police investigation.

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>That is true, but I'm hoping answers information that comes out.

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So with the investigation that you've done and the work

0:56:44.120 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that you've done on the podcast, are you surprised by

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that you've come across.

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I really have been. I knew the case because

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:57.840
<v Speaker 2>I worked on it at the time and probably for

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.760
<v Speaker 2>a few years, and then when we were co writing

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 2>your books, A big part of those was the William

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Tooele investigation because it was the case that did lead

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 2>essentially to the end of your career in the police,

0:57:13.000 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 2>so we had to include it. And then again because

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:19.440
<v Speaker 2>you got publicly criticized by Mick Fuller, the then police commissioner,

0:57:19.920 --> 0:57:21.480
<v Speaker 2>we had to change the way we wrote one of

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 2>those books because we weren't planning on right in the

0:57:23.600 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 2>second one and mentioning the William tool case at all,

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and then he came out and publicly criticizes you, and

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 2>it felt strange not to be including that if you're

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 2>now publicly identified with getting this case wrong and you

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 2>put out a book and pretend that that hasn't been said.

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:43.440
<v Speaker 2>So we changed that book and we put the William

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 2>tool case back in. So I've been reporting on this

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 2>case in different ways for a long time over the

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 2>past decade, and even then, the stuff we've heard in

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the last two years has surprised me, and it's been

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:01.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not been a good series of surprises. I haven't

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 2>been surprised by how well everything's been doing. But like

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the one that stands out is what I've learned about

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 2>how the unsolved homicide team work. Because when I used

0:58:13.400 --> 0:58:15.320
<v Speaker 2>to be a crime report I had a huge amount

0:58:15.320 --> 0:58:18.080
<v Speaker 2>of respect for new South Wales Police probably too much.

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 2>And probably a bit of that was because I did

0:58:20.200 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 2>get stories from them and I thought the Unsolved Homicide

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Team was part of the homicide squad and they did

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 2>a great job catching the bad guys and then working

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:34.400
<v Speaker 2>on this, I've learned more about how the Unsolved Homicide

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Team works and some of this was made public. In fact,

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of it was made public by a Special

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Commission of Inquiry last year. We're talking about missing evidence,

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:48.480
<v Speaker 2>not just bits of evidence, but palette loads of evidence

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 2>that the police didn't know they had. We're talking about

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 2>cases that have gone for decades because bits of paper

0:58:56.920 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 2>were left in a pocket and had never been no

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 2>by police. We're talking about DNA tests that weren't done

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 2>even after the technology became available. They've got a backlog

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 2>of cases that they haven't looked at. It's about four

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred cases haven't ever even looked at them. And yeah,

0:59:17.240 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 2>they're working on all of those things, and you know

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to get it better now since that inquiry.

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 2>But the one that really sticks out is the detective

0:59:26.760 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 2>who's now leading the investigation to William Till's disappearance, David

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Laidlaw is from the Unsolved Homicide team. He's one of

0:59:33.600 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the most senior people in that team. He's the investigations coordinator.

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 2>He has had nineteen files of unsolved homicides sitting on

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 2>his desk for a year, which he hasn't opened. And

0:59:48.320 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 2>these are files that other detectives have gone through and

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:53.400
<v Speaker 2>said I think you should have a look at this,

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and it goes to him to decide whether they take

0:59:56.600 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 2>it to the next step and maybe reinvestigate it. Files

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 2>sitting on his desk gathering dust which he hasn't opened

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:10.360
<v Speaker 2>for a year. So that's nineteen families who don't know

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:12.840
<v Speaker 2>what happened to their loved one. And he was asked

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>in the Special Commission of Inquiry, why why have you

1:00:16.680 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 2>not opened them? And he said, while I was busy

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:22.200
<v Speaker 2>mostly with the William Toole investigation. And they said to him, well,

1:00:23.000 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 2>did you tell anyone about that? And he said no.

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>He said did you ask for any other resources to

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:31.840
<v Speaker 2>work on that? And he said no, And they said

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>why not and he said, I don't know. That shocked

1:00:37.160 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>me that I get he's busy. I get he's working

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:44.439
<v Speaker 2>on the William tool investigation. But in the past few

1:00:44.520 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>years I've seen him sitting in court for fairly minor

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>matters as part of this investigation, day after day after

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 2>day after day. I think thirteen days I counted them.

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>So he's had all those files sitting on his desk

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>and he's chosen not to open them because he's looking elsewhere,

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>and he's not asked for any help to open them.

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>And that did shock me. I can't imagine what those

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen families who sat there not knowing that no one

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>was looking at their loved one's case. I can't imagine

1:01:16.600 --> 1:01:17.200
<v Speaker 2>what they felt.

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It's cruel, really, it's And I can speak speak with

1:01:23.040 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>confidence with dealing with victims families in homicides that that

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>type of thing is soul destroye. They suffer from losing

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>their loved one and then suffer if it's not being

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>followed up properly. And it's a difficult world to work in.

1:01:38.720 --> 1:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose the relevance of that, And this is

1:01:42.040 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking from the outside, the relevance of, Yeah, the

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>inefficiencies or what was happening with unsolved homicide. Willim's foster

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>mother when she gave evidence at my court matter, when

1:01:54.720 --> 1:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I was charged, charged, convicted, appealed, still convicted. So I

1:01:59.240 --> 1:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>put that out there and people have heard the story enough.

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>She gave evidence, and part of her concern was if

1:02:05.480 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I was taken off the investigation, the mother was going

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to be referred to unsolved homicide and you're looking at

1:02:12.880 --> 1:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>unsolved homicide because well, are they legitimate concerns or yeah?

1:02:16.760 --> 1:02:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it good that that went there?

1:02:18.480 --> 1:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's it. I was in court when she said that,

1:02:20.840 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and I remember hearing her say it. She had this

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>fear that William's case would be sent to unsolved homicide,

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and I from memory, I think she was told it

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:32.960
<v Speaker 2>was going to be by a senior officer, and at

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:36.640
<v Speaker 2>that point I remember thinking, oh, yeah, but the unsolved

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>homicide team are pretty good, because I still thought that,

1:02:38.880 --> 1:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, I thought the homicide squad were great. I

1:02:40.600 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>thought the unsolved Homicide team were part of that, and

1:02:42.680 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 2>they were great too, And in fairness, I have met

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:49.080
<v Speaker 2>one or two unsolved homicide detectives subsequently who've been great,

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and so I thought that maybe her fears were a

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>bit overblown. But then what I've learned in the past

1:02:54.720 --> 1:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>two years working on this investigation, her fears were completely accurate.

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Missing evidence cases, you've never reviewed cases that will take

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 2>years and years and years for them to even open

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the file. William's foster mother was right to be frightened

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:19.680
<v Speaker 2>that a case ends up there, and that is shocking.

1:03:20.080 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think you look at now, we're five and

1:03:23.360 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a half years since I've been taken off, or almost

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>six years since I've been taken off. Part of my

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>battle when I was running the investigation was that they

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to shut it down and get it to unsolved

1:03:33.440 --> 1:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Thomas side. And now I look and all there's been

1:03:36.800 --> 1:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>supposedly five and a half years more work to do

1:03:39.440 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on an investigation they wanted to shut down when I

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>was running.

1:03:43.280 --> 1:03:45.479
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. I want you know, one thing the cops

1:03:45.560 --> 1:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>have said to us, because we wrote about these nineteen

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>cases gathering dust. The one thing the cops did say

1:03:53.240 --> 1:03:55.160
<v Speaker 2>was they said, we're not going to talk about William

1:03:55.200 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Tiol other than to say WILLIAMS. Toiol's case has never

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:02.480
<v Speaker 2>been formally refined to the Unsolved Homicide Team. And so

1:04:02.520 --> 1:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I wrote back, and I said, that is true, but

1:04:05.600 --> 1:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the guy running William Tool's investigation is in the Unsolved

1:04:08.640 --> 1:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Homicide Team, and so are some of the other people

1:04:11.200 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 2>on the William Tool strike Force, and they said, yes,

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that's true. So it's not formally an unsolved homicide, but

1:04:17.520 --> 1:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>it is unsolved homicide detectives who are working it's.

1:04:20.840 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>These are the layers of the William Tyrell investigation. I

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't finished with your Dan. Look, we're gonna we'll have

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a break, and then when we get back, I just

1:04:29.480 --> 1:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get more of a sense of the podcast,

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>what people are to expect, and hopefully shed some light

1:04:35.360 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on I think it's fair to say this is the

1:04:38.080 --> 1:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>country's one of the country's biggest mysteries, isn't it.

1:04:40.680 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the biggest case that I've covered, and

1:04:44.920 --> 1:04:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the most high profile case in the

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:51.720
<v Speaker 2>country in the last ten years. Yeah, nothing has come

1:04:51.760 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>a place.

1:04:52.720 --> 1:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at it. Everyone can identify with William and

1:04:55.960 --> 1:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances of disappearing in your grandparents place, playing and

1:04:59.480 --> 1:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>safe space. So okay, we'll take a break and we'll

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>get back shortly.

1:05:09.920 --> 1:05:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm