WEBVTT - Artemis and the new China-US Space Race

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I grew up with science fiction flash Gordon buck Rogers.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 2>What play thing can you offer me today?

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>An obscure body in the sc system, your majesty.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 3>The inhabitants refer to it as the planet Earth.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I was a little boy before there was a space program.

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I remember watching the V two rockets get

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>launched out in the Western desert, and then I saw

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>spootn It go up. I saw the first astronauts, and

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, like every red blooded American kid, I thought

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it'd be great to be an astronaut and go in space.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Tomorrow, forming NASA astronaut and Jeffrey Hoffman, we'll be watching

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 3>the Artemis two shuttle takeoff from the Kennedy Space Center

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 3>in Florida. It's NASA's first journey back to the Moon

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>in almost fifty years. It's a voyage deep into space,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 3>but it won't land. The spacecraft will fly past the Moon.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Everybody who comes back from space will tell you that

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this feeling of weightlessness, the ability to look out the

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>windows at the Earth and see are planet in a

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>completely new perspective, is also one of the unique aspects

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of space play, and.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Looming over it all is the great Space race. I'm

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Nicole Johnston and you're listening to seven AM today Jeffrey Hoffman,

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 3>who flew five Shuttle missions, on why Artemis matters, When

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 3>will humans land on the Moon again and who will

0:01:46.840 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 3>get there first? The US for China. It's Wednesday, April one, Jeff.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>The last time people went to the Moon was Apollo seventeen,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>and that was decades ago. We now have the countdown

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 3>on Finessa to fly past the Moon this week. How

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>will that mission work and what will we actually see?

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I wish we could see what they're going to see,

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to be farther away from the Earth,

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in fact, than any human beings have been before, about

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hundred kilometers further out than Apollo thirteen, which

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>had the previous record, and they'll have a beautiful view

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>back towards the Moon and the Earth. What we'll see,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, is after the launch, they'll go into Earth

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>orbit for a little while just to check out all

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>their systems, and then translunar injection and they'll be on

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>their way to the Moon. It's important to recognize they

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>will be on what's called a free return trajectory, which

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is the way the first few Apollo missions were launched,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and this means that they'll be in an orbit such

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that if their propulsion should fail, the Moon's gravity will

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>swing them around and send them back to the Earth.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>So they'll swing around the Moon once and then come

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>right back to the Earth and the whole mission will

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>last about ten days.

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 3>So, Jeff, if this launch all goes to plan, what

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 3>is it that it will have actually achieved and what

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>would come next? Where do you go from here?

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, the original plan was that Artemis IIIE was going

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to actually land on the Moon. There were many of

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>us who were a little concerned that there wasn't actually

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>nearly the amount of testing of the hardware in space

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that we had in the Apollo program. And I'm glad

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that NASA has now instituded one more Artemis

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>mission before the attempted lunar landing, and so Artemis three

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>will be in Earth orbit to actually test a lot

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the hardware which is going to be used. Space

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>is a very unforgiving environment, and that's why we just

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>test and we test and we test before the actual mission.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's what this is. It's it's basically a test

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>flight like the early Apollo missions were. You know, we

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>had Apollo seven, eight nine, you know, all those flights

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>before we got to Apollo eleven and actually landed on

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the Moon.

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Three two one zero, all engine running lipt off. We

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 4>have a liptop thirty two minutes past the hour lipped

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 4>off on Apollow eleven.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 3>So when will we see NASA actually in a position

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 3>where it's ready to land people on the and again.

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Up on all the land on a land Well, I

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>wish I could tell you. What I can tell you

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is they're working as fast as they can to get

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ready for Artemis three, which, as I said, will be

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in Earth orbit to test a lot of the hardware

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>which will be used in the future. And the other

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're waiting on. And this is another difference

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>between Apollo and Artemis. In Apollo, the Saturn five rocket

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 1>was able to with a single launch send not only

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the Apollo module to the Moon, but the lunar lander

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and everything that the crew needed to land on the

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Moon and get back. Artemis cannot do that. It does

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not have the capability of carrying a lander all the

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>way to the surface of the Moon. It can't actually

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>send as much mass to the Moon as we were

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>able to do in Apollo, and so the Artemis Lunar

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>landing mission will use the Orion capsule to take people

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to the vicinity of the Moon. But the current architecture

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is they will then be picked up either by a

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX starship or by a Blue Origin lunar lander, and

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that will take the crew to the ground. Artemis has

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the capability of taking people close to the Moon, but

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll need some help to get them actually down to

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the surface.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Now, Jeff NASA's budget has been a major political issue

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 3>for years. It had those two Shuttle disasters. Does the

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Challenger in Columbia?

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 2>You saw it just a few moments ago, about forty

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 2>five seconds after leftoff, a huge fireball in the sky.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 4>We have a report from the flight dynamics officer that

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>the vehicle has exploded.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Flight director confirms there.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 3>And at one stage we had President Trump proposing to

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 3>slash its budget by twenty five percent. This mission has

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 3>also been delayed a number of times. So, more broadly,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 3>how much pressure is the space program under in the US?

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, at the moment I think people well hopefully they

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>will pay some attention to the launch, but the space

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>program certainly does not occupy anything like the fraction of

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the budget that Apollo did. You know, Apollo was done

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as part of a Cold war competition with the Soviet Union.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, who would get first into space, who would

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be the first to land on the moon. We're not

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of a competition anymore.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>We choose to go to the Moon and this decay

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and do the other things, not because they are easy,

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>but because they are hard, because that goal will serve

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills,

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 2>because that challenge is one that we're willing to accept,

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.679
<v Speaker 2>one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to win. And the others too.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I will say, despite Trump's original threat to cut NASA's budget,

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Congress has been very supportive. NASA doesn't have anywhere like

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the budget that it did back in the Apollo era,

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's been one of the challenges, is to go

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the Moon without an Apollo budget, and that's

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>why you see delays. And I think that NASA has

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the support in Congress that it will need. So I

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think that it's NASA's budget which is really gonna

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>be holding us up. If we can get through the

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>next to Hartemis test flights without any major problems, then

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we should be ready to land on the Moon, I hope.

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 3>So coming up who will land on the Moon first?

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 5>Again? This launch is yet another step in a growing

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 5>space race, a battle which could even decide who owns

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 5>the Moon, Jeff.

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.599
<v Speaker 3>Over the last couple of years, the leaders of NASA

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 3>have been raising concern also about the US China space race,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 3>especially the min straight at Jared Isaacman.

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 4>This is not the time for delay, but a time

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 4>for action, because if we fall behind, if we make

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 4>a mistake, we may never catch up, and the consequences

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 4>could shift the balance and power here on Earth.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 3>Could you tell us about their competing programs to try

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 3>and establish the first permanent crude presence by the early

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirties.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm very impressed by what the Chinese have been

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>able to accomplish in space. They've gone through a lot

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the stages that the US and the Soviet Union

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>did back in the sixties. But of course they're not

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>doing it for the first time, so it's a little

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>easier to know what they're doing and how to do it.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>But you know, having said that, I'm very impressed by

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>they're putting a lot of resources into their space program.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.479
<v Speaker 1>They definitely want to go to the Moon, and the

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>critical thing is that there there are some very interesting

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>places on the Moon, like near the South Pole. And

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a real question once somebody lands and establishes a base,

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>how close to that base can anybody else go to land?

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, when you land something on the Moon,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it kicks up a lot of dust and lunar regolith

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>can do damage to equipment. Whoever gets there first really

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>has a good position. What that will mean for the

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people who get their second and third still remains to

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be seen. So I'd like to see the US get

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>there before the Chinese. I mean, we had a space

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>race with the Russians, who would be the first to

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>get to the moon. It sounds a little bit strange

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, who's going to be the first

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>to get there the second time, But nevertheless, whoever does,

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they will have a very very imposing position vis a

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>vis whoever is going to come next in terms of

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.479
<v Speaker 1>where they can go and where they can land. Possession

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is nine tenths of the law, as they say, and

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>whoever gets their first possesses that amount of land.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, I know what you mean about China. I was

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 3>recently working there for a year and it was incredible

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 3>the progress that they'd made with satellites and rocket launchers.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 3>I think they became the third nation in the world

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 3>to bring back rocks from space.

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it's been incredibly impressive what what they've

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>been able to do. They've put a relay satellite on

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the far side of the Moon so that they can

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>operate rovers on the far side of the Moon. We

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't done that yet, and.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I know that India has also been expanding its program.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Russia is trying to rebuild it. Why is it that

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>they all want to go to the Moon anyway? Is

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 3>this about prestige or is it still pure science?

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think there are several reasons. There is a

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>certain international prestige, and particularly if the Chinese get there

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>before the Americans, you know, that will definitely resonate in

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>world opinion. But why we want to get to the

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Moon Over and above the prestige and the international impact.

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>There may well be useful resources on the Moon. I mean,

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we're going to the south pole

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Moon is because there is indication that there

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>may be significant deposits of water or water ice in

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.239
<v Speaker 1>some of the craters there, and that would be extremely

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>useful resource. Also, you know, the Moon has been bombarded

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>by asteroids for billions of years. We know that a

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>certain percentage of asteroids are metallic and have a lot

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of rare Earth elements, which are very valuable here on Earth,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>both economically and geopolitically. I would anticipate that, you know,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in another generation or two, the Moon will have become

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>part of the Earth's economy, and in a similar way

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that Earth orbit is now part of the Earth's economy.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Exactly how it will play out depends on what we

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>find when we go to the Moon. But whoever gets

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there first and does the surveying, they're going to know

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>where the value is if there are valuable materials to

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>be found on the Moon. So that's another potential economic

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>reason for wanting to explore the Moon.

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, as the Atomist two launches this week, will you

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 3>be watching feeling a little bit jealous perhaps and wishing

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>that you could be up there too.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, of course I'd love to be up there, but

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be a little bit small minded of me

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>after all the incredible experiences that I've been fortunate enough

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to have in space. You know, I've done things that

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>are going up and fixing the Hubble Space telescope that

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>other people also may have been jealous about. So no,

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel jealous. I wish them well. Obviously, if

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I had a chance to go back into space, i'd

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>do it in a moment. But you know, life goes on,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is the new Artemis generation and I wish

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>them well. It's going to be a great mission.

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, It's been a real pleasure to speak with you.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Pleasure on my part as well. Nice talking with you.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Also in the news, more planes carrying Australians from the

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Middle East have arrived in Australia. The Department of Foreign

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Affairs and Trade says there's been more than one hundred

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 3>repatriation flights in recent weeks, but says future flights are

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>not guaranteed and could be disrupted by war at any time.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Foreign Minister Pennywong has repeated advice to Australians not to

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>travel to the Middle East, urging those who are there

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 3>to leave if it's safe to do so, and detention

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>is turning to those who may have assisted Desi Freeman

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 3>during his time on the run before he was shot

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>dead by police on Monday. Victorian Chief Commissioner Mike Bush

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>says the accused killer of two police officers likely had

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 3>help in evading police for seven months ahead of the

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 3>confrontation on the Victorian New South Wales border. Victorian Police

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 3>says it plans to speak with anyone suspected of assisting

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 3>mister Freeman in avoiding arrest. I'm Nicole Johnston. This is

0:16:53.680 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 3>seven AM. Thanks for listening.