WEBVTT - The Studio - Seth Rogen’s smash-hit series that skilfully skewers Hollywood

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the weekend edition of The Front. I'm Claire Harvey.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>There's an image of the romantic artist churning out works

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of complete genius while living in poverty, the greatness of

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>their work only being discovered long after their death, like

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Vincent van Gore or Emily Dickinson. Then you have popular

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>artists who understand the power of self promotion and believe

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>there is a product, like Mandy Warhol, who, when asked

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>how he knew a work was finished, replied when the

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Czech clears. The battle between art and commerces raged for centuries. Now.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>In Apple TVs Smash It show, The Studio, Seth Rogen

0:00:51.280 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>and Evan Goldberg take a brutal and hilarious look at Hollywood. Well,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by the France Christen Amiot and Bianca far

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Marcus to talk about Apple TV's latest parody of Hollywood.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.919
<v Speaker 1>It's called The Studio and it's made by Seth Rogen

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and Evan Goldberg.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, honored, Obviously, you know I love movies, but now

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>I have this fear that my job is to ruin them,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the job as a meat gracker.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It comes in the tradition of a long line of

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>satires of Hollywood made by Hollywood, often featuring superstars. My

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite of the genre is Tropic Thunder Ben Steeler's Tribute

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to Hollywood, starring Tom Cruise and a whole host of

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>other stars. But let's start by talking about the studio.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Film is my life ever since second of the studio

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>as a kid and went on the tour. Being the

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>head of Nenel is the only job I've ever wanted.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>That is adorable. All right, Well, listen.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The show starts with a famous studio producer who's been

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sacked and the people who were jostling for her job,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one of whom is seth Rogen.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh I've heard you are really into artsy, fartsy filmmaking.

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Bullshit Me.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that could not be further from the truth.

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 4>I am as bottom line oriented as anyone in this town.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>The character who's been sacked is called in the show Patty.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>We find her at her home in the Hollywood Hills,

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>throwing down cups of tea as if they have vodka,

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>because of course, this being Hollywood, she is a sober alcoholic.

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>She's based on Amy Pascal, who was famously the boss

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of Sony Pictures, who were sacked after Sony's big hack

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and she's played to perfection by Katherine O'Hara. It's a

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>remarkable performance, isn't it.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 3>It is a remarkable performance. Katherine O'Hara, she is a

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>titan of the industry. She has some of the best

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>medic timing I think you will find anywhere, and I

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of her contemporaries would probably say the

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:05.839
<v Speaker 3>same thing.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I just want to come by, you know, see how

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>you're doing.

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 5>How I'm doing?

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 6>Oh I you know, I gave forty years of my

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 6>life to the studio and then the Griffin Mill, some

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 6>dime store. Bob Evans comes in and wants to put

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 6>a stamp on the place, like is your an ending

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 6>at a hydrate?

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's so brutal, it is, but guess what, you're even worse.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Heart.

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 3>The amazing thing about the casting of the studio is

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 3>obviously you have Seth Rogen.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You have people like Katherine o'hari.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 3>You have Katherine Hahn, who is having a bit of

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 3>a moment herself.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>She plays a crazed a marketing executive, which you know

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>she does particularly well. You got Ike Baronholtz, who he

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and Seth Rogan. Their chemistry together in comedy is amazing,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and you also have all of these amazed using cameos.

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>The premise is that seth Rogen gets the job from

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a sinister and frankly terrifying studio boss, Brian Cranston, and

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>then he has to immediately wrestle with the problem that

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>lost Patty her job, which is that she refused to

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>make big budget, entirely commercial movies as vanity projects for

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>big brands. The one that he's immediately asked to make,

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a movie about kool Aid, the soft drink, which

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like being asked to make a movie

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about Fanta and.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 5>A great film fantastic.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>He initially thinks he can do it while remaining true

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to his values.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 3>It is a very chaotic viewer experience to see him

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>go through this kind of emotional process coming to the

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 3>realization that he, Okay, I need to do this if

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to enable these other projects that quote unquote

0:04:55.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 3>deserve to be made. He takes a diversity angle to it,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>where he kind of reviews the people that have been

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>cast in the kool Aid movie and realize that they

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 3>are all very white, and so they decide that, okay,

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 3>we'll give it a more diverse cast. And then they

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 3>realize that kind of leads them into a very tokenistic area.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>And then the writer than the director realized, well, then

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 3>are we the right people to be doing this? And

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 3>it's this insane cat and mouse process of just getting

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 3>this thing to cinema con so they can understand how

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the audience feels about it.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>He comes up early with what he thinks is a

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>genius plan when Martin Scorsese comes in to pitch a

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>movie to him, which happens to be about the Jonestown massacre.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 7>Johnstowne Johnstown.

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, correct me if I'm wrong. Is that the massacre

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 4>where everybody committed suicide by.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Drinking kool aid?

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 7>Exactly?

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the phrase.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 7>They drank the kool aid, drink the kool aid, whatever

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 7>it is, that's the phrase. That's the climax of the picture.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a big, big sequence.

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>That's so in a sense, I guess you could say

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 2>that your film is about cool aide.

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean yeah, coming up our in house film

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 7>school grad pokes around under the hood of the studio.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about cinematic technique. Episode two is called Waner,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's about a movie being shot in one take

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and the director played by Sarah Polly is very proud

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that this is a true oner. It's very self referential,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't it, Because much of the studio is shot in

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>one take? Banky, you're a film school grad? Is it

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fun to see a Hollywood production parodying the nerdy tendency

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of Hollywood to try really difficult things like these one takes?

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 5>I think what's fun about it is the idea that

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 5>finally we can reclaim the art form people have turned

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 5>away from things made with CGI or you just get

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 5>a bit over it. There's that fatigue that everything can

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 5>be more or less manufactured or engineered in the back end,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 5>and you know, no one wants to learn about that

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 5>because it's boring. But the idea that you do see

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 5>these idiosyncrasies come out, and this is like the process

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 5>that you get to lampoon and also understand is just

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 5>so entertaining to me.

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Seth Rogen is very lovable, and that brings us to

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what kind of treatment this production is giving the Hollywood

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>executives who are able to say yes or no to projects.

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Previous versions of this kind of idea, like tropic thunder casts,

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood decision makers is basically pure evil. This is not

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, is it, Chrissy.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not. And that's probably got a lot to do

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 3>with seth Rogen himself. Maybe he has encountered a lot

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>of executives who are in this exact predicament in that

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 3>they do want to create art, but the commercial interests

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 3>of the industry in which they've chosen to build a

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 3>career simply does not allow that if they want to survive.

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's probably like anything, isn't it. Any

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pursuit involves a compromise between what you really want to

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>be doing and what you must do to pay the bills.

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 5>What does that say about us as the audience? Though

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 5>we can all objectively say that a movie about kool

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 5>aid is dumb, and yet that's what keeps getting made.

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 5>So you think there's this disconnect between audience members like

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 5>us who do want that kind of you know, level

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 5>of kind of originality and ingenuity, that's what you expect

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 5>from these people. Yet then you see the studio bus

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 5>as saying, Okay, well, this thing's going to make a

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars guaranteed. These two groups, the audience and the entertainer,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 5>seem to want the same thing, and yet we keep

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 5>coming back to this safe, popular medium.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>But what's wrong with popularity?

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Social media feeds now are full of teenage boys packing

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>out cinemas. And I've been in one of these cinemas,

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing popcorn in the air and singing along to the

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Minecraft movie.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 6>It's the latest rallying cry from millions of.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Moviegoers, strick and trucking.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 6>Those two little words, sending teenage fans of a Minecraft

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 6>movie into a frenzy, resulting and screaming, popcorn throwing and

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 6>soda flying through the air in at least.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>One And I kind of think, although I find the

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>teenage boy's a bit annoying, isn't it wonderful that they're

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>enjoying the experience of sitting in a cinema together and

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>having fun.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think that's where the Barbie reference is

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 3>particularly poignant. It was very commercially successful, but ultimately it

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 3>did in many ways start a conversation a the experience

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 3>of women living in the world today and about feminism

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and about the patriarchy through some very funny Ryan Gosling moments,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and Margo Robbie quite explicitly said we wanted to make

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>a movie that would bring people back to the cinema.

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 3>That experience of going to the movies with your friends,

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 3>with your family, seeing something that you either enjoy or

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 3>didn't enjoy it, and that you can talk about it

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 3>after it becomes part of the culture. So I don't

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 3>think there's something negative about that, except maybe for the

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 3>poor people who have to go and clean up the

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 3>cinemas after the Minecraft movie.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The fact that this critique of Hollywood and exploration of

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>all those issues is showing on television screens at home

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>where we stay because we don't want to go out

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to the movies anymore is also one of those circular

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>self referential moments, isn't it.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 5>They even say it in the show where he says,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 5>we should have just made this with Apple so they

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 5>could give us all the money and we have to

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 5>change nothing.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Kristen Amiott is a producer on the Front and Biancophile

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Marcus is a journalist and videographer at The Australian. You

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>can read here and see their work anytime at Beaustralian

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot a you. This episode of the Front

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was hosted by me Claire Harvey and co produced with

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Jaska League, who edited the episode and also wrote our theme.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us on the front this week. Our

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>team also includes Leat Sammaglu, Tiffany Dimac, Josh Burton and

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Coombs.