WEBVTT - Time to think about fixing rates? 

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody. If you're a regular listener

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to the show and you tuned in last Tuesday the

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Property Show to hear Tim Lowles, the head of research

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>at the property research group Cautality. He really caught my

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>attention with something. A lot of property investors may not

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>have considered this just yet, or homeowners for that matter.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>But Tim Lowless said, we're getting close to the bottom

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of the interest rate cutting cycle and if there's another

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>cut on Melbourne Cup Day, which is likely ish, it

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>means we may not see one as expected early next year.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And then I am quoting Tim here. And remember that

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy is now this is his whole thing, Okay,

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>property stats, interest rates research, where the market is moving.

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And he said more people are starting to do their numbers,

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't fixing and are weighing up the pros and cons.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that interesting? So I thought, well, let's get someone

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that who would be good on that.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>The ideal person, of course is Sally Tindle, a can star.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about that. We're going to talk

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>first about the whole situation with rates and where they're

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>going on, how much you get for your money, and

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>then we'll go into the idea of fixing.

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh are you Sally, I'm great, James, how are you good?

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you on again. I really think that

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>investors should tune in here because there is a point

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in time, but you might just give us an entrade

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to this entire situation and tell us like basically where

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we are right. We've had this cutting cycle. It's been

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>going on for some time. We think we're coming towards

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the end. I go for money in the banks as

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>opposed to borrowing from them. What's this what sort of

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>guideline at the moment? What are people getting on deposit

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and what would be the best rates at the stage.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 3>It's really interesting to look at the numbers because we

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>saw on the way up, with all the interest rate hikes.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 3>On the way down, banks are still picking and choosing

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 3>which savings accounts get a cut, which might miss out,

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 3>which is a good thing in a cutting cycle, or

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 3>they might they might be juggling between base rates and

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 3>bonus rates to make their profit margins still stack up.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So before the hikes, we saw.

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 3>The average ongoing savings rate at zero point three nine percent.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's just ridiculous, isn't it.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 3>At the peak it was three point four to three percent,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and then today is three point zero six percent.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So banks on.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 3>The way up didn't pass on all the rate hikes

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 3>on the way down, they haven't passed through all the

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 3>rate cuts when you're looking at those average rates. But

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 3>there's a world of difference between an average rate and

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>a competitive one. So I just said three point zero

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>six that's the average ongoing savings rate on our database

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 3>at this point in time.

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>It's excluding kids accounts.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 3>I believe today the highest ongoing savings rate is five percent.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>It's still five percent.

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting. So a call as such, should you

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>should be getting three? But there are better rates than that,

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can still get up to five. This figure five,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you frame it for us? Is it? Is it

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>a term deposit? Is it? Do you have to keep

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it in for years?

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 2>No, it's at call.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 3>There are a world of caveats around it though, because

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 3>it's only for people aged eighteen to thirty four. I

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>believe now it's from west packet that Westpac just increase

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the age bracket.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So you have to be young. It unfortunately rules me

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 2>out in a significant way. I would say, what's that?

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I get it, Yeah, okay, and.

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Looking for first home buyers, right, But you also then

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>have to make twenty plus transactions on a linked bank

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>account in any given month and grow.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Your savings balance in a month.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>So there's lots of terms and conditions to qualify for

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>that five percent rate. And let me tell you they

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>are by themselves at that five percent ongoing rate. A

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 3>competitive savings rate is more around the four point five mark.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>A competitive and realistic savings.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Rape some well term deposits. I know that traditionally people

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were using things like mcquarie. I think has always been

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in the mix. Assn't I in g I'm naming these

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>off the top of my head. There by no means promotions.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Further one, let me tell you, do you have any

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of what are the most popular for investors or

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for people with serious levels of cash that are moving

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 1>within the banking system. They don't have to be in

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the Big four.

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 3>So it's interesting to see because the Big four suddenly

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>aren't posting the highest rates, the highest term deposit rates

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>that I can see for any term is first option bank,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>but it's only a three month term at four point

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>five percent, and these move around all the time. I've

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 3>done this on the balance of fifty thousand dollars as well.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's be clear, for a six month term deposit rate

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at in one bank, there are relatively new

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 3>incomer at four point three eight percent, and then when

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 3>you want to get into the one year, two years,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>three years, they're very much dominated by Judo Bank, Rabobank,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>move Bank, and they're sitting around that four percent mark.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 3>That's for the highest term deposit rates. If you're looking

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 3>at the Big four, very different story.

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Just for the talk about the Big four. So you've

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>seen four and a half percent on a extended time

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>period term deposit two years or so, four and a

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>half percent is what you should that's the maximum, it's

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what's possible.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh only just that was for three months.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying around the four percent mark, and you really

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>have to stretch yourself to go and find that competitive rate.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>They're not that.

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Easy to find at four percent. Whereas you balance it

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 3>up against the APT core savings accounts rates where you

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 3>should easily be able to find an ongoing savings rate

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>at four percent, You just in many cases have to

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 3>meet some prickly monthly terms and conditions.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>And you mentioned.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Mcquarie Bank before because they're one of the ones that

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 3>have no strings attached savings account rates.

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So that might suit.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>People who are betting that there's not many more cash

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 3>rate cuts to come and don't want the fuss of

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 3>meeting certain terms and conditions. Mcquarie certainly is a leader

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 3>in that space, but so is Able Banking and austrayan

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Unity Heartland Bank AMP. They're all offering no strings attached

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 3>savings accounts that are at core with decent balance caps.

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Might I add.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 3>Anywhere between four point twenty five percent and four point

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 3>five five percent?

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay? Then do they have these these are our called okay,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and they have no strings attached. We take that as

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>red hard to believe, but I'll take your word for it.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Ah. The only string that I are the only obvious strings.

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>So there's no age caps, there's no monthly terms in conditions.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Some of them have welcome rates.

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>But we're ignoring them completely because they only last for

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 3>what four or five months maximum. The only cap I'm

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 3>including is a balance cap. And so for example, I

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 3>mentioned Astray and Unity. It has a balance cap of

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand dollars, so as soon as you get just

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 3>over fifty thousand dollars in that account, you won't get

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 3>that high rate. But others like mcquarie offering four point

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>two five percent, they've got a balance cap of two million.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, so ironically if you put in more or your

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>read actually might reduce on the amount over their cap time.

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh look, these accounts lit it with you know, age caps,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 3>balance cats, monthly caps, withdrawal caps, you name it. Same

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 3>as accounts are absolutely littered with terms and conditions where

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 3>if you put one foot wrong in any given month,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 3>you could see your interest rate go from like four

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>and a half down to in some cases zero point

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 3>zero zero percent.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a crucial point. That's a really good point.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Keep that in mind, folks. This is literally it's become

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a game. And I think it would be innocent of

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you to go into a bank and think that you

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>can put your money in and get a certain rate

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>without some conditions. Some of them are more subtle than others,

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like the ones that at least just talking about caps,

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for instance, but they want to know how much you

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>might wonder why they want to do that, But I

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>suppose they just want more customers on these rates, So

0:07:54.640 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>sally do the deposit rates then reflect it's starting to

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>drop basically in anticipation of where we might be going

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>on the cycle, because if Tim is right, and many

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>economists are right, we are coming to the end of

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the cutting cycle.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting. I do think we're also coming to

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the end of the cutting cycle. Look, I'm going to

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.679
<v Speaker 3>throw it out there. We could be at the end already.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>We don't know certainly. You know, there's a meeting coming up,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of speculation about what might happen. But

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 3>with inflation really still struggling to get back to that

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>target band in a consistent manner, I do wonder whether

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 3>we are already at the end. Certainly, if you've got

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 3>money in the bank, if you've got a mortgage, you

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>should not be banking or counting on something happening for.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Certain because we just don't know.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Looking at the Big four bank forecasts, and these could

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 3>change in coming days when we get that inflation data.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 3>But looking at the big four banks, we've got A

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 3>and Z, CBA and NAB all saying one more cut

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 3>and West Facts still saying three, although I do feel

0:08:58.640 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Forecast might change.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 1>That's change, that's yeah.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.479
<v Speaker 3>That can give you a good idea of the spectrum.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Three of the big four banks are saying no more

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 3>cuts this year. West Pak is the only one saying

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 3>one could come at the next meeting.

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>But again time will tell when we get a better.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Read on the inflation data and marry it up with

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>the unemployment data. What's really interesting for the RBA at

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>this point in time is that previously, when inflation was

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 3>really running out of hand, it was really easy decisions

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>for them to just know, hike and get inflation under control.

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Now that they've got inflation under control, the balancing act

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>between their two key priorities keeping his strands in jobs

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 3>and keeping inflation in check is becoming a lot harder.

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the decision making for the RBA

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 3>is quite fought at this point in time.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Now we're getting to the bottom of the cycle.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose what's really important for our listeners I'm

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>going to deal with this and in Moorman, folks, is that

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the banks don't hang around for the official rates to

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>take their turn. They move off and the head of

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the future direction, so you might be thinking of fixing

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. They've been thinking about it for

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some time. Back in a moment, Hello and welcome back

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby and

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to Sally Tindall, who is the data insights

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>director at Canstar, the Comparison rate comparison service. You said

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>something very interesting in the first segment which dovetails very

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>much with what Tim Lowless is saying. And I've got

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>two of you now. I've got someone who's in a

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 1>cross rates and someone who's across property and they are

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>both saying that we're coming to the end of the

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>cycle and people are starting to think about fixing. I

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're saying that, but tell us first

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of all, tell us the picture. I imagine no one's

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fixing right now and that activity has shrunk enormously because

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we've had a cutting cycle. I don't know is that

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the case.

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Ly, and I think I might need to take you

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>on a little bit of a journey just to remind

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 3>ourselves about Australians and our attitude towards fixing. So you know,

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>often it's based on you know, an increasing fixing is

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 3>often based on you know, strategic priorities for the banks,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>what the neighbor's doing, things like that, rather than whether

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>we're at the top or the bottom of the cycle.

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 3>But if you think about it strands, we might like

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>to gamble on what two up or something, but we

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 3>don't like to gamble on our mortgage when just not

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 3>big fixes, I think because we're petrified of the break

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 3>fees that still potentially come with fixed rates and if

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 3>you want to.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Get out early.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 3>So the peak of fixing was in July twenty twenty one,

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>when forty six percent of new and refinance loans opted

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 3>for a fix rate that wasn't even half And this

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 3>was when the banks were offering in some cases four

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 3>year fix rates that started with the one and only

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 3>half of us opted to fix.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that incredible? It is?

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It is really look back. I mean, what were people

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking it was going to go lower? It was still

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>all forever, I wonder.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 2>But really I fixed for two years. I'm kicking myself.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I didn't fix before. I was just so silly.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 3>But the second biggest peak in fixing in recent data

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 3>was right before the GFC and that's when you know,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 3>interest rates are like a discount. A variable rate was

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>sitting at I've looked it up eight point ninety six

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>percent according to the RBA standard variable rates were over

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>nine percent. People thought that rates would be getting over

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 3>ten percent at one point and not everyone, but a

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of people about a quarter panic fixed at that point.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>And then what happened.

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Are people more likely to fix in our market out

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of fear that the rates are going too high than

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they are to take opportunity of the fact that they're

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>super low.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it was a bit of both.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>So absolutely, back in just before the GFC, just before

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 3>rates fell off a cliff yep, that was panic fixing,

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely because rates were sitting at the nine percent mark, right,

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 3>But back you know, then fast forward to you know, COVID.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Maybe there was a little bit of fear in there

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 3>because it was the fear of unknown. Absolutely, but that

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 3>was really driven by the banks offering incredibly sharp rates.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 3>And why were the banks offering incredibly sharp rates because

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 3>they were working with the government, They were working with

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the RBA, and the RBA was handing them out cheap

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 3>six rate funding. So again, it wasn't that we were

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom of the top of the cycle.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 2>So much as there was this other factor at play

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>that we're.

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Driving people to actually lock in their rates, then the

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 3>rate hikes happened.

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Everyone fled from fixing.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 3>The lowest rate of fixing was April twenty twenty four,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 3>so we were almost done with the cash rate hikes,

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and it was one point two percent of new and

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 3>refinance loans.

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It fell from forty six to one one point two.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>What do you think it is right now?

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>So we don't know.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 3>So the ABS unfortunately has stopped publishing this data, so

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 3>we now crawl through the weeds of the big banks

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 3>books so whenever they do half year or full year results.

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 2>But it's still incredibly low.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 3>I do know that much because I'm looking at CBA's

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 3>most recent results. They're full year results, and fixing is

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 3>about one percent of new mortgages coming through and five

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 3>percent of the whole loan book, and some of them

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 3>will still have been you know, legacy fixes from back

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty one, twenty twenty two periods, So really

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 3>incredibly low.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you know why?

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the big question is why, and you're about

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 3>to ask me this, I know, but the lowest fix

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 3>rate on our database is significantly lower than the lowest variable,

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 3>even though there's.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 2>More one more cash rate cut to come.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>We don't know, but you know, I think that's because

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>borrows aren't really sure how many cash rate cuts are

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 3>still to come, and they really want to believe there's

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 3>more than just one coming.

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, but no one rings a bell, of course,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing, right, No one rings a bell

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom, and no one rings a bell at

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the top.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 3>And you can never be certain except with the you know,

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 3>clarity of hindsight. And the penalties for fixing and often

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 3>be far more significant than the penalties for getting it

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 3>wrong un variable.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I have two things here. The first thing I want

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to just before we talk about the penalties, is there

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>anything like an average long term average of fixing.

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't have it, Handy.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like if it was one, it was, it

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>would tell us very little anyway, because if it ranges

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>from forty six to one. Yeah, So like the average

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Meltbourne temperature in January, you know, twenty eight degrees doesn't

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you anything.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to take a punch and I'm going to

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 3>say somewhere between five and ten percent, I'd say it's

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>always been low.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, Now about the penalties, I thought in

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>my naivity that the penalties were more or less gone.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>So exit fees on mortgages are gone.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 3>They hit the curb twenty ten or twenty twelve, one

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 3>of those two years, but a long time ago. Previously

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>banks could sting you, whether you were on a fixed

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 3>or weariable rate, for exiting your mortgage before your thirty

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 3>years are up, and they were astronomical fees, and so

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 3>they've gone. Now there are fees for applying for a

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>home loan. There are fees for discharging a home loan,

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 3>but they're relatively small at about three hundred and fifty

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 3>dollars for those discharge fees, different to exit fees. There's

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 3>some state government fees for you know, switching.

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Lenders as well and things like that.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 3>But you know, all in all, we estimate that someone

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 3>that's switching their mortgage is paying what about one to

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 3>one and a half thousand dollars in fees, some of

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>which are negotiable. So there's not those big exit fee

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 3>penalties on variable rates. But if you sign up to

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 3>a fixed rate and you said to the bank, yes,

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to pay a fixed rate of five percent

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 3>for the next two years, and you break that contract

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 3>early and the bank is out of pocket because you

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 3>broke that contract, they are entitled to charge you what

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 3>they're out of pocket costs.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and they can I see.

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 3>And sometimes yeah, sometimes these are negotiable and sometimes I've

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>can depend on where your next step is. So if

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 3>you say to your bank, I really just want to

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 3>move to a more competitive fixed rate, they might wait

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 3>the feats. If you say, I want to stick with you,

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 3>but I want to go to variable, but I'm going

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 3>to stay with you, guys, maybe they'll negotiate those fees.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>It's always worth having that conversation.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>And obviously the worst one is if you see I

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>can't do it anymore and I'm leaving you entirely, then

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously why wouldn't they impose their charges that they can legally? Okay,

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>So million dollar question, if I talked to you this

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>time next year, what do you think the fixed ratio

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>will be. Do you think if we have no more cuts,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and if we find clear stabilization and if the cycle

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is clearly over, do you think we'll see a lift

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in the number of people fixing or at least considering it.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I do think we'll see a lift in the number

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 3>of people fixing, but I don't think it'll be a

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 3>significant one. I'm not going back to the days of

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 3>where we were close to half of the people.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Opting for a fixed rate.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 3>I think some of those people that tried out fixing,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 3>perhaps for the firs time, in that period of record

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 3>low rates, really liked the certainty that it brought. I

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 3>certainly know that from talking to you know, friends who've

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, always interested in working out you know, what's

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 3>happening with fixed rates because they want to fix again

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 3>because they liked that certainty. So I do think that

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 3>perhaps that period of low rates has encouraged people and

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>opens people's minds to that certainty where I think fixing

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 3>gets problematic and where you know, we won't see these shots.

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 3>Why we won't see this sharp space spike, brother is

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 3>because the break fees problematic.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 2>But also fixed rates tend to be a lot.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Less flexible, so you typically can't get an offset account

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 3>with them. You typically have caps on how much extra

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 3>you can pay in that fixed rate term, and again

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 3>that turns some people off. Although you know, some people

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 3>do then have a foot in both camps, opt for

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 3>a split loan, you know, take a gamble each way,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 3>but also get the flexibility that a variable rate can

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 3>bring on that portion of their homeland, take advantage of

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 3>an offset account whatever they want, and then have that

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 3>security from the fixed rates.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's about.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Working out what suits your finances but also your personality,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 3>because there's some people that hate, absolutely hate the idea

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 3>of locking in a rate and then seeing variable rates

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>fullfill further that's just yes, horrifying to them, whereas other

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 3>people absolutely hate worrying about THERBA like day in and

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 3>day out, although it's only eight meetings a year now,

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 3>so it's helpful.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And those people who will be horrified to have not

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:38.239
<v Speaker 1>taken a fixed rate and watched the variables climb. And

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the thing about the split chorus, folks, is that you've

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>got two sets of numbers, you've got two sets of fees.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I've done it, I've done all the variations. Actually, what

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>advisors say for what it's worth, and I'm always talking

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to advisers and talk to some of the best advisors

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>in the country. What they do tend to see is

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>don't gamble, don't fix to best against the bank, because

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you probably never win. But if you're a fixer, fix consistently,

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>so for instance, you have a home mortgage and you

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>had it for twenty years and you had four sets

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of five year fixes, you'll find that it smooths out

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>really nicely over that period of time. And what your

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage falls back largely to what Sally is saying, which

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is you actually can do your numbers and you can

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>be sure of what your numbers are. I think that

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually the ultimate comfort. Whether you win or lose

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>against the bank. You know, you may win for a

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>passage of play, a passage of time, and you might

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>lose for another part. But really it's about the security

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. That's really good Sally, and very interesting terrific

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I think for us, I haven't seen many people talk

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>about this. It's about time we did. All right, we'll

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>be back in a moment. Hello, Welcome back to The

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. James Kirby here with Sally Tindle

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of Canstar, regular guests on the show. Terrific guest to

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>give us a picture of where it's all going in

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of the market. Both your money in the bank,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>which is just to recap if I get any of

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this wrong, Tanby Sally, you're talking fours is a good

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>way to get now with with deposits and term deposits,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, and three is sort of working average across

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the banks. And we'll put all that, We'll put all

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the tricks and caps and everything else to one side

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for the moment.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting in clearly lovely yes.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And on the borrowing side, no one is fixing. No

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>one is fixing all right. Of course it's not fixing

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>because the rates have been dropping. But if you fix,

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>what if you fix now? What if you fixed at

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 1>these levels at four percent, say, and then it floated

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>back up to eight or nine. Well, I've seen it

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>all happen. Let me tell you. I've seen it all happen.

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I've seen people fixing the I remember people fixing at

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>thirteen percent, Sally because they were worried it was going

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to go higher.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 2>So you see to that panic fixing.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Panic fixing, Yeah, that's right.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 3>The driver is you know what your neighbor's doing, and

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it's because your neighbor's panicking and you feel like

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 3>you should panic too. And I think that's the key

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>with so many things relating to finance is just because

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 3>what your neighbor do doesn't automatically make it a perfect

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>idea for you. You've got to understand what suits your finances.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 3>It's so important. But also don't make any decision in

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 3>a rush. Sometimes these things come with limited time specials

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 3>things like that nothing should be rushed if you need

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 3>to talk through it with a mortgage broker or a

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 3>financial advisor, your accountant, your neighbor, your family friend, take

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 3>that time to work it out and work out what

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 3>suits your finances. And what I did want to say

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 3>before is you know, if you are thinking about fixing,

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>there is a world of difference between say the Big

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 3>four bank fix rates lowest fix rates and then the

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 3>lowest on the market. We've got the lowest on the

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 3>market on our database at the moment at four point

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 3>six four percent four point six four percent, whereas Westpac

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 3>leading the way for the big banks at four eight

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>nine percent for two years at this point in time.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 3>But most of the other fix rates on offer from

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 3>the big four banks are sitting there with a five

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 3>in front of it rather than a four. So you know,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 3>if you are going to fix, go find yourself Gooddale.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay, and be strategic and not panic. All right,

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting, A quick couple of quick questions. I just

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to try and cover them if I could, John

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>j o N. John James. A recent episode you brought

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>up the question asked you whether there was a level

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of employer mandated super at which someone should be allowed

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to choose to have this paid via their way as

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>opposed to having it forced into super. This was me

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about the sg guarantee now being at twelve percent

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and being high I think across the board. Anyway, John

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>points out that there is a thing called the maximum

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>super Contribution base and it tends to be most applicable

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to higher owners, whereby the standard sg C, you know,

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the twelve percent applied against your income would result in

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>breaching the concession and contribution cap which is currently thirty k,

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and thereby in occurring higher taxes. Yeah, that's there. That's

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>very true, John, Thank you for pointing that out. I mean,

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to nobody has to be penalized for

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>paying their SGC. There is that opt out if you like,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the maximum super contribution base, which many people would be

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>hitting at this stage when it's twelve percent and it's

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 1>only thirty grand max contribution. Well, you don't have to

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>do your numbers for long to see how many people

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>would be caught there. Thank you very much, John. I

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>can't cover the rest of your expansive note, but that

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was very useful. Okay, Adam says, I was alarmed to

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>hear you describe our treasure as shrewd. Battery finally reluctantly

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and begrudgingly succumbed to common sense on the superannuation meddling, sorry,

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>the super reforms he has been peddling. Okay, well this

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.959
<v Speaker 1>is from Adam. I said he was politically shrewd, and

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll stand by that because that was a daft policy.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>He shouldn't have gone ahead with it, and he hasn't.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>That is the unrealized gains.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Just a comment about that annuation backflip that Jim Thomas did.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I just thought it was more like a half twist

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>rather than twist. We'll say not half, did I miss well,

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>kept half of it twisted on the other half.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Oh no, I know what you're saying.

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>It'd be interesting to say if it gets through.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, cut to the chase, the tax on super

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings on super amounts above three million have suddenly doubled

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>from fifteen percent to thirty. So there you go, as

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you say, half twist. Yeah, maybe he's half successful, maybe

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he's half shrewd.

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>The other point, then, that Adam really wants to make

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is about Melbourne, where we have people on the show

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>saying it is the bargain basement in the national market.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we've had several people saying it. We've had

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>very few people undermining that concept. Adam says, the idea

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>someone would want to invest money in the economy down

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there is alarming. I keep hearing how cheap it is

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a great time to buy, and can't help but see

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a correlation to Jim Charmers blind refusal to see what

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>everybody else can see. The Victorian government debt is now

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>growing at two million an hour. I honestly think the

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>issues are terrifying, and I can't help think that so

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>many people must put their head the sand down there.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And he mentions other things like crime et cetera, and lawlessness. Okay, well,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>deep breath, it's the second biggest city and the prices

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>are clearly the lowest in the land of all the

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>metropolitan capitals. They're trailing behind. And if you even had

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>to return to anything like remotely like historical averages, I

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>think there would be investors would do very well. And

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>investors are I know anecdotally. I haven't got the stats

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>for you, but I talk to advisors all the time

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and they are bringing investors into Melbourne across. So yes,

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the issue of the death et cetera is is, I

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>think is a big issue. I don't know so much

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>about the crime, whether that's a big issue living in city.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I look, it hasn't affected me in any fashion or way.

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Sally about Melbourne has a bargain basement.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>You pass those prices, right.

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to go past the prices.

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's right when you look at the cost of

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 3>buying just a simple unit in Sydney and Brisbane these days,

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, even Adelaid's going gangbusters.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 2>In many ways, Melbourne is looking increasingly attractive.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of nerves though, and I

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 3>think that's coming through in that email of you know.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 2>The government is in debt.

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 3>The government has made some decisions that can impact people

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 3>like investors. They're worried probably that there's more to come

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 3>in those decision making and there, and that probably has

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 3>contributed to some of the you know cooling in prices there.

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>But people need places to live, and they need places

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to live in employment hubs where there's good transport and

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's you know, opportunities for education, and so

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 3>I do think that you know, Melbourne will I think

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 3>probably pick up pace as you know, as the months

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and years unfold.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 2>I think it might take a little bit of time though.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it very interesting? And thank you very much for

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that stimulating peace of correspondence, Adam, Thank you very much. Okay,

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>keep them rolling the money puzzle at the Australian dot

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>com dot au for any questions, comments, observations, complaints. They're

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>all welcome, and so was Sally. Thank you very much, Sally.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you on the show again. Always terrific

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you. Thanks and talk to you soon.