Speaker 1: From the Sky News Center. This is Paul Murray Live. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm Sharry. Welcome into the man cave. Oh have I
Speaker 1: got to show for you. We ain't mucking around tonight.
Speaker 1: We hit full gear. If you've been distracted by tennis, cricket, whatever,
Speaker 1: no excuses, welcome back. We've been here for a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks. We're here every night nine o'clock, the og,
Speaker 1: the one that's been here for fifteen years. If you've
Speaker 1: been here since moment one, thank you so much. But
Speaker 1: if you're back, we are fired up, ready to go
Speaker 1: an election year. That's when Sky newses at its best,
Speaker 1: and that's when we have laser like focused on everything
Speaker 1: we want to achieve. I say tonight it's a good show,
Speaker 1: because how's this Meghan Kelly's on the show tonight. Normally
Speaker 1: later in the week she's got to go to Washington,
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. You don't care, but you get to
Speaker 1: see her on TV tonight. Fight up and in.
Speaker 2: Four k this woman has decided to manufacture tears to
Speaker 2: try to work herself up, you know, as an actress
Speaker 2: mate before a scene that could potentially be say oscar worthy,
Speaker 2: and try her best to turn on the water works.
Speaker 1: She's fantastic. You will see her in full flight ladder tonight.
Speaker 1: Oh but we're not done. The Great Nigel Farras joins
Speaker 1: us live from London. A brand new opinion poll has
Speaker 1: dropped in the past couple of hours that shows that
Speaker 1: the Reform Party, if there was an election held, would
Speaker 1: win more seats than the Conservatives and even Labor. Could
Speaker 1: he go from half a dozen seats in the Parliament
Speaker 1: all the way to the Prime Minister. We'll talk. It's
Speaker 1: all going his way. As I say, we're not mucking around,
Speaker 1: and a big part of that is everything we've got
Speaker 1: to deal with. It's in the news today, including a
Speaker 1: lot of stuff that I know you have not heard
Speaker 1: or you're probably here in a couple of days time,
Speaker 1: but you're going to hear it first right now. So
Speaker 1: Prime Minister election year, billions of dollars in promises, ones
Speaker 1: that he knows he can't afford, but he doesn't care.
Speaker 1: The Prime Minister is going from door to door telling
Speaker 1: people how much money he's got for this and how
Speaker 1: much money's got for that. But we don't forget the
Speaker 1: federal budget is in deficit between now and the next
Speaker 1: forty four zero years. And while this bloke wants to
Speaker 1: pretend everything is awesome, everything's okay, we've turned the corner.
Speaker 1: That's all old hands. We're through the worst of it,
Speaker 1: like we've flattened the COVID curve or somehow we're repelled
Speaker 1: the invading forces of World War II. Please, the reality
Speaker 1: of Albo's Australia is that today, as hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of kids went back to school Prince of bleed back
Speaker 1: to public schools in Queensland, there are many more parents
Speaker 1: that are having serious financial trouble. Now. I know this
Speaker 1: is not as exciting as telling you, oh, here's the
Speaker 1: load oft starter about climate change. It's not as much
Speaker 1: fun as oh look what Lydia Thorpe did today. But
Speaker 1: this is a statement of the country and where it
Speaker 1: is under this bloke difficult sacrifice. Parents are making hard
Speaker 1: choices to pay for kids education. According to analysis which
Speaker 1: is done by a group called Good three sixty Australia,
Speaker 1: nearly two in five parents so they are more concerned
Speaker 1: with how's this, more concerned with affording school essentials than
Speaker 1: in previous years. Oh but we've turn the corner. What
Speaker 1: about the two little too? Late tax cuts. Oh, haven't
Speaker 1: we saved everyone two hundred and seventy five dollars in
Speaker 1: their power burs Oh, that's right, no topic. The concerns
Speaker 1: of costs include things like digital tools. You see, way
Speaker 1: back when it was Kevin Rudy was handing out the laptops.
Speaker 1: Now it's you who's paying for them. Making sure that
Speaker 1: your kid has the best possible technology to keep up
Speaker 1: with the latest version of the software that everyone else
Speaker 1: has in the classroom. Otherwise your kid starts to fall back. Meantime,
Speaker 1: you might be paying through the nose for more internet
Speaker 1: than you actually need. And it's not so you can
Speaker 1: stream telling. It's so that the kids can keep up
Speaker 1: with the work that they are doing. If you're a
Speaker 1: grandparent you're taking care, you too may be paying way
Speaker 1: too much for internet that you don't need. Forty three
Speaker 1: percent of families refer to the digital costs of education
Speaker 1: as a quote major burden. The person who founded the
Speaker 1: charity that did this work is somebody I want to
Speaker 1: highlight for you tonight. Alison Covington says, as the cost
Speaker 1: of living crisis continues, our research shows that parents are
Speaker 1: making difficult sacrifices to set poor children's learning. This is
Speaker 1: Ourbo's Australia. Everyone feel good should he get another three years.
Speaker 1: Nobody should be forced to choose between essentials for their
Speaker 1: child's education and basic family necessities such as food and clothing.
Speaker 1: What was his promise three years ago? What is the
Speaker 1: central promise that you count? It has been broken every
Speaker 1: day a labor government will lower the cost of living.
Speaker 1: They didn't you name it. It's higher from the cost
Speaker 1: of the school uniform, to the school shoes, to the
Speaker 1: computers that they're using, to the internet that you have
Speaker 1: to pay for, for the insurance on the car where
Speaker 1: you drop them off, or the cost of the fuel
Speaker 1: that goes into the bus that picks them up, not
Speaker 1: to mention all of the other things to do in life,
Speaker 1: like paying off the house with all there's interest rate rises.
Speaker 1: Nothing to see here, it's all better, I know, that's right.
Speaker 1: It's all worse. The central promise is a lie and
Speaker 1: has been broken. It is the central reason why no
Speaker 1: matter what they pull between now an election day, you've
Speaker 1: got to put the size nine on and be it
Speaker 1: the clerks, the hushpuppies, or if you're able to get
Speaker 1: around in a pair of dock Martins, or you can
Speaker 1: wear some rossy boots, belt them as hard as you
Speaker 1: possibly can when you get the chance. Green's last labor,
Speaker 1: second last. Now, I say all of this because there
Speaker 1: is some early signs that the inflation number, which is
Speaker 1: about to be released in the next couple of days,
Speaker 1: which will feed into the decision making of the Reserve Bank,
Speaker 1: is going to be where we have long needed it
Speaker 1: to be, between the two and three percent margin. But remember,
Speaker 1: it's not just a one off sugar hit. But the
Speaker 1: patients of the federal political gallery do not remember last month,
Speaker 1: last year, the year before, the year before, or all
Speaker 1: the other resets, all the other changes. They're going to
Speaker 1: lock in that when inflation lands at the number that
Speaker 1: they know the Reserve Bank is looking for, no matter
Speaker 1: how artificially it has arrived at because of the b
Speaker 1: billions of dollars that are being spent to artificially hide
Speaker 1: the increases of power prices. When the rates come out tomorrow,
Speaker 1: it seems like the Treasurer has got a preview and
Speaker 1: he has already started doing the victory dance.
Speaker 3: Now, when we came to office, inflation had a six
Speaker 3: in front of it, and it was rising. Now inflation
Speaker 3: has a two in front of it, and that is
Speaker 3: a demonstration of that progress.
Speaker 1: So get ready, mission accomplished. And in fact, from the
Speaker 1: very same people who told us that it was mission accomplished,
Speaker 1: they are all prepared to run the line that everything
Speaker 1: is okay, everything is awesome, and it's time for the
Speaker 1: Reserve Bank to start cutting interest rates. Now. It is
Speaker 1: time for the Reserve Bank to start cutting interest rates
Speaker 1: because we have been in a per capita recession for
Speaker 1: the best part of what seven courters in a row
Speaker 1: I think it is. It's been a huge period of
Speaker 1: time where we the average people have gone backwards. The
Speaker 1: living standards are at nineteen forty nine. This government is responsible.
Speaker 1: This government promised to change it. This government should be
Speaker 1: punished for it. Oh but get ready, get ready for
Speaker 1: the media to say that just because prices are going
Speaker 1: up by a little less than they previously went up,
Speaker 1: then magically the assumption is that we're all too stupid
Speaker 1: to know the difference between what the cost of everything
Speaker 1: was before this bloke became Prime minister at the cost
Speaker 1: of everything now that he is Prime minister and has
Speaker 1: had a full term to screw up the joint perfect
Speaker 1: example how much extra it costs to pay off the
Speaker 1: family home. A third of Australians are trying to pay
Speaker 1: off a house, more than that are trying to pay
Speaker 1: off their own house. So once you start to throw
Speaker 1: in the people that are paying off an investment property,
Speaker 1: the majority of people in Australia care about what is
Speaker 1: happening when it comes to interest rates. And the West
Speaker 1: Australian did a little thing on the average homeland in
Speaker 1: West Australia, which is about four hundred thousand dollars, many
Speaker 1: thousand dollars lower than say what you happening in Citney, Melbourne, Brisbane.
Speaker 1: But how's this about? Sixty thousand dollars is how much
Speaker 1: extra interest you have had to pay since this mob
Speaker 1: came to power. Sorry, that's your interest repayments. It works
Speaker 1: out at the best part of almost forty four zero
Speaker 1: thousand dollars increase since this blow came to power. Do
Speaker 1: your sums? Divide it by twelve, divided by six, divide
Speaker 1: it and whichever way you want. Having to find an
Speaker 1: extra thirty forty fifty thousand dollars depending on where you
Speaker 1: are and how much you're paying off your house is
Speaker 1: a disgrace. You didn't have the money then, you don't
Speaker 1: have the money now, And yes, why there has not
Speaker 1: been a huge number of people that are whacking the
Speaker 1: for sale sign up because they can't pay for the
Speaker 1: roof over their head anymore. You know in your suburb
Speaker 1: there are plenty more places for sal than were a
Speaker 1: couple of years ago, even when the interest rates were
Speaker 1: as low as they were. They said it was a
Speaker 1: cost of living crisis and the ultimate example of why
Speaker 1: been needed to change the government three years ago. Well
Speaker 1: guess what three years later, more people cut back on
Speaker 1: Christmas than they did the year before, the year before that,
Speaker 1: More people are worried about how they're going to pay
Speaker 1: for their kids to go to school, and more people
Speaker 1: are having to find tens of thousands of dollars in
Speaker 1: what limited way as they actually had. Because unless youre
Speaker 1: a public servant, unless you're a politician, you have not
Speaker 1: got the pay rise that matches the increase in your
Speaker 1: costs from interest rates, which in part are because of
Speaker 1: government spending. Australia must remember this. You have to remind
Speaker 1: your family members of this show that promise again from
Speaker 1: elbow from a couple of years ago, I want you,
Speaker 1: if you can, to pick up your phone right now.
Speaker 1: I'll give you a couple of seconds. Pick up the phone,
Speaker 1: lean in and take a pharto with the LBO promise
Speaker 1: that everything would be lower under a labor government. I
Speaker 1: want you to keep this one nice and close. You
Speaker 1: can go and google image it if you want. But
Speaker 1: the cost of everything is going up, and a labor
Speaker 1: government will lower the cost of living. I'll give you a
Speaker 1: couple of seconds here, all right, everyone, five four three
Speaker 1: two one, Take the photo, post it online. Remind your
Speaker 1: family that that was the promise. Did this happen No?
Speaker 1: Two seventy five y twenty twenty five? Nah, everything else
Speaker 1: go up? Yes, and in part because of very sneaky taxes.
Speaker 1: So come over to camera five. One of the ways
Speaker 1: that this federal government has been able to get itself
Speaker 1: to a surplus is not through incredible economic management, not
Speaker 1: by cutting wasteful spending, but of course because they've been
Speaker 1: kissed on the proverbial, because they've been hit by lightning
Speaker 1: and more money out of the mining industry that looks
Speaker 1: like it's about to dry up, which means ah pany panic.
Speaker 1: And why we're going to start the first of the
Speaker 1: next forty years forty four zero kids years in deficit.
Speaker 1: Oh but aren't they fantastic that will go over retreating dollars.
Speaker 1: But don't talk about that. That was the last mob please.
Speaker 1: Now it is now twenty five years since we had
Speaker 1: a discussion in Australia about changing the tax system. You
Speaker 1: might remember the ads uji. Australia is currently being held back.
Speaker 4: We are tied to a tax system that's been patched
Speaker 4: up over and over again since the nineteen thirties.
Speaker 1: Now, imagine the outrage if somebody was doing that. Now, oh,
Speaker 1: there's a child, How did the child's being held by
Speaker 1: the chains?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 1: Goodness me? And there's not enough diversity in the you know,
Speaker 1: all the crap that we go on. Now, twenty five
Speaker 1: years ago we got the GST, which was the major
Speaker 1: change to our system, which was supposed to get rid
Speaker 1: of a whole bunch of sneaky taxes, lots of the
Speaker 1: sneaky taxes that the state and federal government put in
Speaker 1: place in exchange for a overall consumption tax that didn't
Speaker 1: apply to everything, but basically applied to everything bar a
Speaker 1: very few things. That meant that the federal government was
Speaker 1: getting more revenue than ever before. But put simply, the
Speaker 1: people who spend more than other people end up paying
Speaker 1: more tax than the people who don't. It means if
Speaker 1: somebody wants to go and buy a speed boat, they're
Speaker 1: going to be paying more tax than the person who
Speaker 1: is only going to the supermarket to buy the basics.
Speaker 1: That's the general idea in and around it. But something
Speaker 1: that has ever been us but certainly has creeped up
Speaker 1: during this term in government is a dirty little thing
Speaker 1: called excise taxes. Now these are easy because obviously they're voluntary,
Speaker 1: because if you didn't fill up your car, you wouldn't
Speaker 1: have to pay the tax on petrol. If you didn't
Speaker 1: have a drink, you wouldn't have to pay the tax
Speaker 1: on booze. God forbid, you are slightly killing yourself via smoking.
Speaker 1: That is a horrific thing of which you should pay
Speaker 1: more tax because you're a burden on the health system.
Speaker 1: Blah blah blah. And even if you buy a pair
Speaker 1: of shoes, you got to pay some tax on that
Speaker 1: as well, and not the GST. In fact, in Australia
Speaker 1: we now pay an excise tax for all the things
Speaker 1: I've talked about and then the GST on top of it.
Speaker 1: Put simply tax on top of a tax that produces
Speaker 1: for the federal government last year forty seven almost forty
Speaker 1: eight before billion dollars. Keep that number up, soak it
Speaker 1: in petrol, who's smokes shoes? Diesel forty seven point nine
Speaker 1: billion dollars. Let me break this down for you for
Speaker 1: some of the areas, and just how much tax you
Speaker 1: pay if you need to fill the truck or the
Speaker 1: family trucks with diesel seventeen b four billion dollars in tax.
Speaker 1: Guess where that gets passed on to if you're a
Speaker 1: truck that happens to be moving anything around Australia. And
Speaker 1: last time I checked, nothing grows at the supermarket. It
Speaker 1: all has to be driven tax. Tobacco eight point seven
Speaker 1: b four billion dollars. Now they tell us fewer people
Speaker 1: are smoking that ever before. And yes, of course it's
Speaker 1: a terrible thing, you shouldn't do it. But less than
Speaker 1: ten percent of the population is paying eight point seven
Speaker 1: b four billion dollars out of tobacco. But of course
Speaker 1: they decide to move to vaping, but they don't tax vaping.
Speaker 1: So what's going on here? As for petrol, they decided
Speaker 1: to increase it. Remember, increase it. So now they're getting
Speaker 1: seven b for billion dollars out of petrol. I want you,
Speaker 1: every time you drive past a servo to think kuching.
Speaker 1: Every time you see what's being sold behind the counter
Speaker 1: in tobacco, kutching. Every time you go to the boozer,
Speaker 1: spirits three point three b four billion dollars, beer two
Speaker 1: point six billion dollars, other forms of alcohol one point
Speaker 1: seven b four billion dollars. All of that, I remind
Speaker 1: you forty seven point nine billion dollars every time you
Speaker 1: see this stuff. I want you to see it that
Speaker 1: not only do you pay the excise tax, but then
Speaker 1: you pay the GST on top of it. In Australia,
Speaker 1: the system that supposedly had been cleaned up twenty five
Speaker 1: years ago now has a tax on top of a tax.
Speaker 1: Incredible scenario that we have to pay in Australia. And
Speaker 1: this is how this federal government is able to bank
Speaker 1: a surplus. It is exclusively through these areas. If you
Speaker 1: took these areas out of a federal budget, they're nowhere
Speaker 1: near a surplus. So they can bang on about the
Speaker 1: future Fund as much as they want. They can whistle
Speaker 1: Dixie about reforms to this or cutbacks on that. If
Speaker 1: you didn't drink, you didn't smoke, you didn't drive, and
Speaker 1: you didn't wear clothes, they wouldn't be anywhere near able
Speaker 1: to make the type of ludicrous promises that they make,
Speaker 1: and this Prime Minister is making more of them day
Speaker 1: by day by day we are what the twenty eighth
Speaker 1: of January, the Prime Minister has made promises. And I
Speaker 1: gave him the benefit of doubt because when we first
Speaker 1: put this number up, I thought, jeez, we must have
Speaker 1: missed something. No, multiple media sources they came to the
Speaker 1: same number. We did. Have a guess, just have a guess.
Speaker 1: He's made fifteen point one six b for or billion
Speaker 1: dollar promises since the start of the year, not as
Speaker 1: a hangover from the budget fifteen billion dollars. As he
Speaker 1: tries to buy votes, change opinions, just like you did
Speaker 1: last year. But it didn't move the needle, just like
Speaker 1: the year before that didn't move the needle. But magically,
Speaker 1: somehow this one will move the needle. Now. By the way,
Speaker 1: the stuff that he's promising, you can say, some of
Speaker 1: it's good, some of it's bad. It's up to you,
Speaker 1: but have a look. It's everything from you know, the
Speaker 1: brand new version of the NBN fixing roads that he
Speaker 1: promised to fix three years ago. So it's just old money,
Speaker 1: forever money, never going to see it money. This bloke
Speaker 1: is not even one month into this election year, fifteen
Speaker 1: billion dollars. Why am I the only one telling you this?
Speaker 1: Why is everyone else focused on the minutia of today's
Speaker 1: movement in the election? Why is the six PM news
Speaker 1: obsessed with trying to sell the elbow with a day message?
Speaker 1: Because they don't want a change of government. They don't
Speaker 1: agree that this government has poorly performed, so they will
Speaker 1: do everything they can to offer the benefit of the
Speaker 1: doubt to a government who has made everything worse, who
Speaker 1: has got a sneaky form of taxation that, yes, other
Speaker 1: governments have had, but they have ramped it up. So
Speaker 1: every time you hear them say, oh, we've done everything
Speaker 1: we can for cost of living, they increased these taxes
Speaker 1: to drive home the point, by the way, when I
Speaker 1: say when you see petrol stations, when you see a
Speaker 1: clothing shop, when you see all sorts of places, I
Speaker 1: want you to think, kachin, kachinkachin. We did this work today,
Speaker 1: an average tank of petrol twenty five dollars in tax
Speaker 1: fifty cents a liter. If you get a slab one
Speaker 1: of the country's most popular beers, Great Northern, twenty dollars
Speaker 1: of a slab of beer in Australia is now tax
Speaker 1: to the federal government. Tax in the federal government. So
Speaker 1: they can go and make never never promises or pretend
Speaker 1: they're balancing the books. If you happen to be a
Speaker 1: wine person, eight dollars of that bottle is tax. If
Speaker 1: vodka's your thing, it'll cost you about seventy dollars. Thirty
Speaker 1: six dollars. Half of that bottle is now tax in Australia.
Speaker 1: But if you don't drink, you don't pay the tax.
Speaker 1: And then, of course our old mates at Bundy rum
Speaker 1: I'll say it, and I'll say it again. Sixty three
Speaker 1: percent of this bottle, more than half, sixty three percent
Speaker 1: of the bottle show their ad is tax in Australia. Now.
Speaker 1: Should there be a slight excess on goodso okay, maybe
Speaker 1: as a little bit of extra money here or there,
Speaker 1: but they are taking the piece. When a bottle of
Speaker 1: booze has sixty three percent, when a tank of gas
Speaker 1: is twenty five dollars when about a third, maybe more
Speaker 1: depending on what you drink in beer is tax. Oh
Speaker 1: but we're here for the little people, you see. I
Speaker 1: hate to break this to the people who love to
Speaker 1: fly at the front of the plane. I hate to
Speaker 1: break this to the people who were able to have
Speaker 1: the corporate credit card or the government credit card pay
Speaker 1: their lunches. You see, the vast majority of Australians, they'd
Speaker 1: hand lived the high life. The vast majority of Australians.
Speaker 1: They work their backsides off. They get up early, They
Speaker 1: squint as they drive, as the sons in their eyes
Speaker 1: before they got the chance to say goodbye to their kids,
Speaker 1: sit on a motorway where they pay more tolls than
Speaker 1: they did before. If they want to get a coffee,
Speaker 1: it's costing more than it ever did. Once they actually
Speaker 1: get work, let alone meat pie, anything the peak right,
Speaker 1: they work longer, They drive back in the squint and
Speaker 1: maybe after the kids have gone to bed, after the
Speaker 1: homework's been done, they sit down and they watch a
Speaker 1: show like this at a time like this, just before
Speaker 1: they go to bed. The only luxury in their day,
Speaker 1: maybe a little tipple, maybe just a little half glass
Speaker 1: of something, but the bottom for which it comes sixty
Speaker 1: three percent of it is tax That is outrageous. Now,
Speaker 1: you can have the theory about tobacco and taxation because
Speaker 1: of the causation or whatever. Right, I think those taxes
Speaker 1: are too high and I don't believe them to be
Speaker 1: the determinant of the deterrent that they have profited to
Speaker 1: be Why because the making rates, yes, have slain, but
Speaker 1: they have not been blown away. But for the vast
Speaker 1: majority of the country that's not. Yeah, you have a drink.
Speaker 1: I'm a minority because I don't drink, but I definitely
Speaker 1: fill up my carb with petrol, definitely buy a pair
Speaker 1: of shoes. This country is built on a political lie
Speaker 1: when it comes to economic management on the federal budget.
Speaker 1: Without the taxes on your simple pleasures, they would be
Speaker 1: nowhere near being able to balance the budget. So my
Speaker 1: suggestion is that they should reduce the taxes on normal
Speaker 1: people who look forward to that one thing they do
Speaker 1: for themselves for half an hour a day, maybe a
Speaker 1: little more on the weekends because God the pit they
Speaker 1: want to go and see their family and hang out.
Speaker 1: They want to sit around a campfire in the middle
Speaker 1: of winter. They want to have a couple if they
Speaker 1: go to the cricket, the footy, or even the ballot
Speaker 1: boozers everywhere. Now, who's going to have the stones to
Speaker 1: come up and promise this not five percent, not two percent,
Speaker 1: but like half And then you know what they have
Speaker 1: to do. They then have to go through the rest
Speaker 1: of the federal budget and find some stuff to get
Speaker 1: rid of. And yes, there will be some outrage because
Speaker 1: a dollar removed from here means that your political opponents
Speaker 1: could turn around and go cuts, cuts, cuts, cuts and services.
Speaker 1: It's not going to come out of education, it's not
Speaker 1: going to come out of health. It might come out
Speaker 1: of the two hundred and fifty million dollars that the
Speaker 1: government spends on itself to market itself through using your
Speaker 1: taxpayer funds to advertise themselves at an election. Maybe they
Speaker 1: could put off a pay rise. Maybe not everyone in
Speaker 1: the public service should be able to get the free flights.
Speaker 1: Maybe the bosses of the department shouldn't be paid double
Speaker 1: what the prime minister earns. Let alone you pick, but
Speaker 1: let people have their simple pleasures. Stop taxing them, Stop
Speaker 1: pretending that you're an economic genius because you found a
Speaker 1: way to clip the ticket. But because most of your
Speaker 1: mates have either got so much money they don't notice,
Speaker 1: they don't care, or you've got a corporate card or
Speaker 1: you've got the government card paying for it that you
Speaker 1: don't notice. The vast majority of people who will decide
Speaker 1: this election do let them, after a very tough years,
Speaker 1: have some respite. We've got plenty more to say about
Speaker 1: this over the next little while. It will become a
Speaker 1: regular theme, and whichever party stands up to it, expect
Speaker 1: some big, big chat from me between now and the election.
Speaker 1: This is an easy win, an easy political win. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's going to be tough because you're gonna have to
Speaker 1: cut a bit here and cut a bit there to
Speaker 1: get yourself back to a balanced budget. But guess what,
Speaker 1: pull your big boy pants on and you'll find a
Speaker 1: way to do it. Main Tom the interesting bit of
Speaker 1: data in and around some of the latest polling that
Speaker 1: I wanted to show you this evening, which is so
Speaker 1: much of the lefty media resort. Oh dunne is Trump,
Speaker 1: don't it's going to try to be like an Aussie Trump.
Speaker 1: He's so going to be like Orange man bad even
Speaker 1: though he's not orange, but he's still bad right, like
Speaker 1: climate change, like all the stuff you know, like literally
Speaker 1: they must be being paid by the headline in taxpayer
Speaker 1: media or the Turnabul Times, all the rest of the
Speaker 1: papers trying to draw the connection. But one thing that
Speaker 1: is starting to be a provable link between the political
Speaker 1: revolution in the United States and the one here is
Speaker 1: sadly not to do with woke, but it is to
Speaker 1: do with young blokes. Young blokes that have had enough
Speaker 1: are being told what to do by all the different
Speaker 1: Karens in their life, Tired of being told that if
Speaker 1: they are what their father was, then they are toxic masculinity,
Speaker 1: that apparently their default settings are to abuse people rather
Speaker 1: than protect the women in their life. You know this,
Speaker 1: And they've had enough, and they haven't had enough because
Speaker 1: they've found Andrew Tate or they're listening to Joe Rogan.
Speaker 1: They've had enough because they have free will. And in
Speaker 1: the latest politic it shows you that younger men apparently
Speaker 1: are part of the push why the Labour Party is
Speaker 1: on the ropes and why Peter Dutton is moving up
Speaker 1: in the charts. Have a look at the gender differences
Speaker 1: here inside their latest polling, which is worth having a
Speaker 1: look at here Okay, so thirty two percent primary for
Speaker 1: the Labour Party with females thirty six for blokes the Greens.
Speaker 1: Thirty two percent of women are backing the Greens, just
Speaker 1: twenty percent of blokes and you can see the rest
Speaker 1: of it all there for yourself interestingly, as the preferred
Speaker 1: prime minister. This couldn't be starker. Oh, Peter Dutton's got
Speaker 1: a problem with where is the way this gets interpreted?
Speaker 1: Let me explain why this is interesting to watch, and
Speaker 1: it's not just because there is a disparity here where
Speaker 1: more women are backing in Albanesi, but you can also
Speaker 1: see a majority of blokes backing in Albersi. But then
Speaker 1: the overall preferred prime minister is pretty levels. So this
Speaker 1: is all about eighteen to thirty four year olds, not
Speaker 1: men overall, but eighteen to thirty four year olds. It
Speaker 1: just showed you that with the primary art assure you
Speaker 1: that showed you that with the preferred prime minister, I'm
Speaker 1: going to come the approval ratings. Let's not mark around
Speaker 1: eighteen to thirty four year olds, about a fifth of
Speaker 1: them almost quarter don't like Petta Dutton. What a surprise
Speaker 1: that the right on crowd eight is into Peter Dutton.
Speaker 1: But interestingly, the numbers are very different when it comes
Speaker 1: to Anthony Albernezi eighteen to thirty four. Now, generally speaking
Speaker 1: they skew right. So it is very interesting to see
Speaker 1: any movement towards the center or towards the right. And
Speaker 1: that matters because today I went and checked out with
Speaker 1: the AEC the very latest enrollment statistics, the latest people
Speaker 1: who have signed up to vote at this year's federal election.
Speaker 1: There are four point six million people between the age
Speaker 1: of eighteen and thirty four, and it is basically a
Speaker 1: little bit rounding bang on fifty to fifty. So yes,
Speaker 1: if a greater proportion of females versus a greater proportion,
Speaker 1: this is the American election stuff. But remember if basically
Speaker 1: the profile of anti liberals is the same as it
Speaker 1: has always been with women, yet the profile is changing
Speaker 1: more positively with men, that will be a net positive
Speaker 1: for the opposition leader and his team. Again, this is
Speaker 1: why I hope you like the show. I try to
Speaker 1: give you the data. We put the opinion on top
Speaker 1: of it. Bells and whistles showbiz, but I just want
Speaker 1: to make sure that you know the data. So eight
Speaker 1: end of thirty four, maybe actually moving slightly to the
Speaker 1: center or slightly to the right and that will help.
Speaker 1: The ultimate demographic that decides the election basically is thirty
Speaker 1: five to fifty five and then fifty five plus, pretty
Speaker 1: solid for the coalition. That said, one or two things
Speaker 1: in the poll did make me think this is contradictory.
Speaker 1: Right generally speaking, do you think the country is head
Speaker 1: in the right direction despite the fact that the blokes
Speaker 1: are going towards Dutton, They think the country is headed
Speaker 1: in the right direction more than women. So I think
Speaker 1: that women ate into thirty four, it's going in the
Speaker 1: wrong direction, but we think the bloke who's currently leading
Speaker 1: is in the wrong direction. Is the preferment, Okay, that's weird.
Speaker 1: And then Green's voters, young voters, guess what some of them,
Speaker 1: some of them not liking all the garbage that they
Speaker 1: have been offering. And remember they've been firing money like
Speaker 1: a T shirt. Canon the election, they got what was
Speaker 1: twenty five percent About halfway through last year, they got
Speaker 1: up to twenty seven percent same demographic ad into thirty four.
Speaker 1: Now they're down to twenty three percent. Every point matters,
Speaker 1: every vote matters. Why because many seats are on a
Speaker 1: knife edge, and as they laid it out for you
Speaker 1: last night, there is a path, sometimes narrow for some,
Speaker 1: sometimes impossible for others. But it's why I show you
Speaker 1: so no one's waking up in surprise the week before
Speaker 1: an election. Many of those seats exist in Western Australia.
Speaker 1: Now you know. The WA is a place that has
Speaker 1: been visited many, many many times by both of the leaders,
Speaker 1: both trying to Albernizi's case sure up support. They want
Speaker 1: a bunch of seats there at the last election after
Speaker 1: the rejection of Scott Morrison and Peter Dutton trying to
Speaker 1: harness what happened after the Voice, which was quite the
Speaker 1: rejection of the left, and hoping that people that have
Speaker 1: always voted liberal but didn't once come back and do
Speaker 1: so into the next little while. We'll all find out together.
Speaker 1: But here's the Prime Minister in Western Australia. They're both
Speaker 1: there today. That's what I'm talking about it.
Speaker 6: We're building Australia's future, and Western Australia is a key
Speaker 6: to that future because it's driving the present growth. But
Speaker 6: if you look at where the future economy is going,
Speaker 6: Western Australia will continue to be such a key role
Speaker 6: in driving national economic growth as one of the engine
Speaker 6: rooms of our national economy.
Speaker 1: As for Peter.
Speaker 7: Dutton, I think it's obvious to all people in this
Speaker 7: great state. That's when you've got a prime Minister who's
Speaker 7: not being open and honest about the environmental plan that
Speaker 7: they've got to bring in which will USh the mining
Speaker 7: sector here in Wa and agriculture as well, that the
Speaker 7: Prime Minister needs to be asked these questions, Why won't
Speaker 7: he release the detail.
Speaker 1: And why will they be heading west? No, it isn't
Speaker 1: because they are inspired by a pet Shop Boys song
Speaker 1: or they would like to spend some time at Devlen's
Speaker 1: get out to everyone there. I know they watch. Way
Speaker 1: has got fifteen seats, nine of them, the Labor Party holds,
Speaker 1: Libs have got five and the Independence have got one.
Speaker 1: Libs lost a few of the last election, but basically
Speaker 1: there are now four marginal seats. The expectation is that
Speaker 1: if Labour's going to hold on to a minority government,
Speaker 1: they need to hold on to the two that are
Speaker 1: their most marginal. If the Liberal Party is going to
Speaker 1: get any close to it, they have to win the
Speaker 1: two see facts Facts Facts facth that's facts, facts fact.
Speaker 1: I'll look to you each and every night. Look, I've
Speaker 1: got a whole bunch of other stuff, the baggert because
Speaker 1: Meghan Kelly and Nigel Faraja next, our favorite time of
Speaker 1: the week, our favorite person in the world, one of them,
Speaker 1: Met and Kelly. You can see her show on YouTube.
Speaker 1: Hear it on Serious XM. But most importantly, watch your
Speaker 1: right now hanging here on Pull Murray Live.
Speaker 2: Hello, Rockstart, How are you doing? Oh?
Speaker 1: Very good? I got to say the very best and
Speaker 1: the very worst of America on show this weekend. Right
Speaker 1: the best? The president is just rocking around a casino,
Speaker 1: no pressure, hoping that someone's going to hit, you know,
Speaker 1: the double sixes. Come on, Alex. That was awesome. And
Speaker 1: in that lunatic, lunatic Selena Gomez crying and carrying on
Speaker 1: about immigration. Let's focus on the awesome though. What about
Speaker 1: the president running around in Vegas? What about the Vice
Speaker 1: president kicking the media's ass they are on fire?
Speaker 2: How about President Trump having just a rally for the
Speaker 2: hell of it, Like she's Ben swore an inn as president,
Speaker 2: there is no need for additional rallies. He's just dying
Speaker 2: to get out there and be with the voters. It's amazing.
Speaker 2: What you've seen is what energy looks like. You know,
Speaker 2: what an active, engaged president looks like. And it's been
Speaker 2: so long since we've had that, it's totally unfamiliar. But
Speaker 2: also we've never seen what Trump is doing. And I
Speaker 2: was saying this to my husband the other day, I'm like,
Speaker 2: you got to think at some level Obama's sitting back
Speaker 2: saying to himself, Yeah, I wish I had thought of that.
Speaker 2: You know, it's just like just sit at the oil
Speaker 2: and talk to them, just like, let him in, let
Speaker 2: them behind the veil. Don't don't treat it like you're
Speaker 2: some royal, you know, highness kind of guy. Like show
Speaker 2: him the letter. You know what, have a rally, talk
Speaker 2: to the people, Go sit down with the mayor, crash
Speaker 2: her party and say what are you doing? That's too
Speaker 2: long a time. Then go speak with the people in
Speaker 2: North Carolina and let them bitch about their insurance policies
Speaker 2: on camera for all the world to see. You know, like,
Speaker 2: swing through Vegas, have a rally. Why not everybody Vegas?
Speaker 2: You know, here's the dace, walk past the jackpite where
Speaker 2: the people are pulling the slid. It's like, have a
Speaker 2: good time, enjoy yourself. He's seventy eight years old. He
Speaker 2: doesn't have that much time left. Even with Trump's good jeans,
Speaker 2: make it fun to have a great four years. Let
Speaker 2: the country come along with you. We're we're having fun
Speaker 2: with this presidency to the point where even the Democrats now,
Speaker 2: you know, they're like a party. Looks kind of fun.
Speaker 2: I don't really want to be with the unattractive dower
Speaker 2: ones anymore.
Speaker 1: Also, I just love, you know, the fight, fight, fight
Speaker 1: that is just continuing all the way into the office.
Speaker 1: And the Columbia situation is the perfect example where the
Speaker 1: people being booted out of the country, that first round
Speaker 1: of people are the criminals, right, not for the crime
Speaker 1: of illegal immigration, but on top of committing or being
Speaker 1: accused of a crime while in the United States. And
Speaker 1: I love JD. Van sitting opposite, you know, one of
Speaker 1: four hundred boring people in the access old school media,
Speaker 1: and he out as the words that I know just
Speaker 1: filled your heart with joy. Was when they just asked
Speaker 1: him the same question for the Eindhezer to saw me said,
Speaker 1: I don't care.
Speaker 2: That was a very particular case. It wasn't clear if
Speaker 2: he was radicalized when he got here or while he
Speaker 2: was living.
Speaker 1: I don't really care, Margaret. I don't want that person
Speaker 1: in my country, and I think most Americans agree with me.
Speaker 1: I love that, I loved that.
Speaker 2: Don't where Margaret. I don't really care Margaret. Too bad,
Speaker 2: he speaks for us all that Meme is going to
Speaker 2: be with us for a while. She could not have
Speaker 2: beclowned herself worse. I mean, she just made an absolute
Speaker 2: fool out of herself, demanding to know why he hadn't
Speaker 2: solved the economy problems in the first five days, like
Speaker 2: with an executive order. Just a complete moron. Just what
Speaker 2: a wonderful foil for him. Choosing her to sit across
Speaker 2: from was actually brilliant, Like most of what JD does.
Speaker 2: She made an idiot out of herself. And you know,
Speaker 2: all of the Sunday anchors trying to play the little
Speaker 2: heartstrings for the murdering child rapist that Tom Homan, our
Speaker 2: borders are is kicking out of the country right now,
Speaker 2: like we we really don't care, we don't care. She
Speaker 2: was trying to make the point of like, well, it's
Speaker 2: not clear when that one terrorist you're trying to kick
Speaker 2: out was radicalized was he radicalized before he got here
Speaker 2: or once he That's where he said, I really don't care, Margaret.
Speaker 2: I don't want that man in school or near my
Speaker 2: children or yours. And I think that's how most Americans feel.
Speaker 2: It's we're turning into Australia, Paul, when it comes to
Speaker 2: our borders.
Speaker 1: It's a thing of beauty. They were the bad fIF
Speaker 1: actors who are trying to, you know, gin up. I
Speaker 1: don't know who they're trying to fire up, but Selena Gomez,
Speaker 1: you know, actress who cares. But the reason I mentioned
Speaker 1: this is that I think you said tonight's got one
Speaker 1: hundred and forty million people on Instagram, and she decides to.
Speaker 2: Say for one hundred and twenty two million, wow.
Speaker 1: Wow wow. So this is her sphere of influence and
Speaker 1: she's deciding to cry up a storm. Only people are getting.
Speaker 5: Childrenand I'm so sorry. I wish I could do something
Speaker 5: that you care. I don't know what to do.
Speaker 1: There's two things about this I wanted to ask you. Clearly,
Speaker 1: this person is nuts, But secondly, isn't the sign of
Speaker 1: how disingenuous these people are is think about when the
Speaker 1: last time you cried in real life would you have
Speaker 1: even been aware of how to turn on your phone,
Speaker 1: let alone aim yourself at the camera. Normal people don't
Speaker 1: do that. Performers do that.
Speaker 2: No, it's so humiliating. Most people with a touch of dignity.
Speaker 2: And I've been on the air. I mean, the worst
Speaker 2: ever was during the Newtown massacre of twenty six first graders,
Speaker 2: while I was pregnant and already the mother of two
Speaker 2: other children. I mean that the dignified person tries to
Speaker 2: hold back the tears because they know that they have
Speaker 2: something to do. If you're in front of the camera,
Speaker 2: you're there for a reason. Somebody thought your voice was
Speaker 2: important for some reason, so you owe them an obligation
Speaker 2: to share it. It's not to say you should be
Speaker 2: some emotionless troll the entire time you're on the air,
Speaker 2: But that's the normal person's instinct is to approach any
Speaker 2: sort of public messaging with a touch of dignity. That's
Speaker 2: one of the reasons why the Lauren Sanchez naked boobs
Speaker 2: were so offensive at the inauguration. No dignity, but this
Speaker 2: woman has decided to manufacture tears to try to work
Speaker 2: herself up, you know, as an actress might before a
Speaker 2: scene that could potentially be say oscar worthy and try
Speaker 2: her best turn on the water works.
Speaker 1: The reason we're talking to you today is because RFK
Speaker 1: Junior begins his process of making his way towards the
Speaker 1: Health and Human Services Secretary job. Pet Higgsyth was able
Speaker 1: to get up as Defense Secretary. So you've got to
Speaker 1: imagine that there'll be Democrat votes maybe to replace one
Speaker 1: or two or three Republicans who might decide to roll
Speaker 1: their eyes. What are the stakes for this week and
Speaker 1: what does RFK represent? Because we're gonna hear a lot
Speaker 1: about oh, this personal life and he slept with this
Speaker 1: person and a bear. Tell us about what's actually he
Speaker 1: didn't sleep with a bear, by the way, Just there's
Speaker 1: a story.
Speaker 2: A no, she just cut off a bear's head after
Speaker 2: it was already dead. Just facts, facts first. On this program.
Speaker 2: He represents the same thing Tulca Gabbard, who's up for
Speaker 2: DNA Director of National Intelligence represents, and the same thing
Speaker 2: Pete Hegseth represents, and the same thing Pambindi at DOJ
Speaker 2: and Cash Pertel at FBI represent, which is change. Change.
Speaker 2: The way we've been doing things hasn't been working. But
Speaker 2: the vast majority of Americans, and if you want a
Speaker 2: different result, you have to try a different approach. That's
Speaker 2: what Trump is, That's what Trump's top agents are, That's
Speaker 2: what his cabinet is. For the most part, there's a
Speaker 2: couple of exceptions, perhaps, but overall it's we're going to
Speaker 2: try to do things differently, and therefore these people will
Speaker 2: not fit the mold of everybody who was here before.
Speaker 2: You're not going to get different results if you keep
Speaker 2: doing the same thing. I couldn't care less about rfkj's
Speaker 2: marital issues, his drug issue when he was in college,
Speaker 2: the man's seventy weird kennedyisms, and his bare situation in
Speaker 2: Central Park. I couldn't care less. You know what I
Speaker 2: care about. I care about the fact that childhood disease
Speaker 2: has skyrocketed in the past thirty years, Autism has skyrocketed
Speaker 2: in the past thirty years. Cancers among miners and young
Speaker 2: people like thirty year olds has skyrocketed as of late.
Speaker 1: That I care about it, and ikin't wait to watch it.
Speaker 1: You are at the absolute heart of everything, and everything
Speaker 1: in the US is the heart of the world at
Speaker 1: the moment. So so awesome to talk to you, so
Speaker 1: you later.
Speaker 2: Rockstars you next week, My pleasure see you then.
Speaker 1: She is the best. Make sure you watch Megan Kelly
Speaker 1: show You Can Do It Serious XM Live Middle of
Speaker 1: the Night in Australia. But obviously the highlights up on
Speaker 1: her podcast or YouTube. Speaking of highlights, it is all killer,
Speaker 1: no filler. But you're straight after the break. The wonderful
Speaker 1: Nigel Farage, his party Reform is surging. The polls are
Speaker 1: brilliant as people in the UK feel like they wouldn't
Speaker 1: mind a little bit of what's happening in America. And
Speaker 1: the man to deliver it is our guest next. Oh
Speaker 1: we love Nigel Farage. The only place you're going to
Speaker 1: see him on Assie Telly certainly regularly is here pul
Speaker 1: Murray Live every single Tuesday night. I'm telling you all
Speaker 1: killer no filler. And the great Man, the leader of Reform,
Speaker 1: joins us now from mighty old England. Great Man, love
Speaker 1: you to see you. The waft of freedom that is
Speaker 1: moving across the Western world looks like it is up
Speaker 1: and under the wings of reform at the moment five
Speaker 1: million votes, but because of the system, only five seats
Speaker 1: in the parliament. Latest polling in and around seats would
Speaker 1: put you above the Conservatives and even above Labor. Mate,
Speaker 1: this is an incredible start to a movement that is
Speaker 1: only going to get stronger. Mate.
Speaker 4: Yeah, nothing like this has happened since nineteen eighteen, which
Speaker 4: was in a Labor Party after the First World War
Speaker 4: began to replace the Liberal Party. Not for one hundred
Speaker 4: years has an insurgency movement come through and topped a
Speaker 4: national opinion poll. And all of this in a space
Speaker 4: of seven months. So yeah, it's pretty remarkable. I did
Speaker 4: wonder whether it was worth my coming out of political retirement,
Speaker 4: but at the moment, we're on a bit of a roll.
Speaker 1: I also love I saw an interview with you earlier
Speaker 1: today and somebody's talking about the Poles, and then they
Speaker 1: tried that little media trick, right oh, and clearly you're
Speaker 1: being overly confident because the Poles, And then your retort
Speaker 1: in that interview is to say, hey, you're the one
Speaker 1: talking about the poles. I like this because it's one
Speaker 1: thing to be confident, it's one thing to feel like
Speaker 1: you're on a roll. But also, you know, poles are great,
Speaker 1: but it's really like wrestling smoke. That's what's really important
Speaker 1: and what would your lessen be to say, people who
Speaker 1: like to cut of your jib, like the type of
Speaker 1: politics that you put forward in a place like Australia
Speaker 1: where okay, the polls might show that, you know, the
Speaker 1: majority of people think there's going to be a change
Speaker 1: in government. A poll is one thing, reality is another.
Speaker 1: You've got to pick the target and ram ram ram right.
Speaker 4: Yes, and you've got to spread optimism.
Speaker 1: This is the thing.
Speaker 4: Our politics have become so negative. Our politicians and will
Speaker 4: become sort of boring, dull, humorless careerists. And look at
Speaker 4: what Drum did, Look at what Trump has just done.
Speaker 4: What was the vision. We are going to make America
Speaker 4: great again. We're going to make America healthi again. We're
Speaker 4: going to make America strong again. It's all about big,
Speaker 4: buzzy optimistic messages. Is just about policy, it's about vibe.
Speaker 4: And I think all of us living in the Western
Speaker 4: world know that we've been living in serious social decline.
Speaker 4: The values upon which our entire civilization has been built
Speaker 4: have been seriously threatened. The hard left of gone through
Speaker 4: the educational establishment and much of mainstream media. Conservatives have
Speaker 4: been wishy, washy and wet so vibe is really really important.
Speaker 4: That's how Trump won and that's why we're winning at
Speaker 4: the moment in the opinion polls. And if you come
Speaker 4: to a reform meeting, it's like a rock concert. They're
Speaker 4: all chairing, they're all happy. Optimism is what people need.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And also you know detractors, you remember, because you
Speaker 1: seek to disrupt the comfortable way that they have built
Speaker 1: their little world around them. They come with every little angle.
Speaker 1: But something that I think that is starting to spread
Speaker 1: across the world is that there's a very significant group
Speaker 1: of people who are not falling for the old tricks
Speaker 1: at how you demonize the disruptor. And again the free
Speaker 1: advice to the Australian politicians here, I'm not talking about, hey,
Speaker 1: let's all out trump each other. Lets you know, the
Speaker 1: one with the strongest memes wins. That sense of optimism
Speaker 1: and the idea that you're not a shamed to vote this,
Speaker 1: You're not a secret closet this, you're not. You are
Speaker 1: somebody who is actively wanting the best and most positive
Speaker 1: outcome for their country. And to be honest, the Left
Speaker 1: doesn't know how to handle it because the only way
Speaker 1: they know how to come up against a person like
Speaker 1: you is to say, well, but what about this thing
Speaker 1: you said two days ago? Insert group is offended by
Speaker 1: who cares? Or as you said, boring, boring, boring.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, Look, there's a big change going on. We've reached
Speaker 4: Pete woke, We've reached the end I think of the
Speaker 4: extremes of council culture.
Speaker 1: Do you know it was the morning of.
Speaker 4: The election on the fifth of November, and I was
Speaker 4: in Pennsylvania, outside Scranton, Joe Biden's hometown, and I was
Speaker 4: outside of polling station. I said to a woman, what
Speaker 4: do you think. It's really funny? You know, but a
Speaker 4: lot more people have got Trump signs on the lawn
Speaker 4: that I've ever seen before. People aren't afraid to say
Speaker 4: they support Trump. Now, that's what's happening across the West.
Speaker 4: And as you say, the abuse that gets thrown from
Speaker 4: the last left, we're all homophobes, transphobes, I mean, any
Speaker 4: kind of fobe you can think of. We've got to
Speaker 4: the point no one cares.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a wonderful feeling. May it last for as
Speaker 1: long as possible. May you know, the early signs become
Speaker 1: the genuine revolution. A perfect example about something that is
Speaker 1: surging The support for reform is absolute clarity. Right. A
Speaker 1: country doesn't exist unless it has a border. And if
Speaker 1: you let somebody wander over the border at their choice,
Speaker 1: not yours, then you're in a world of pain. What's this?
Speaker 1: One hundred and fifty thousand illegal migrants have come across
Speaker 1: the channel since twenty eighteen. That is madness. And I
Speaker 1: just love that they pretend, oh, there's no way we
Speaker 1: can possibly respond to this rubbish.
Speaker 4: Well Tony Abbott sorted it out at Australia back in
Speaker 4: twenty twelve, and I just love the planes heading to
Speaker 4: Columbia and the Columbian president throwing a real big hissy
Speaker 4: fit and then backing down. Donald has showed us the way.
Speaker 4: We're all open to immigration provided people come legally, don't
Speaker 4: have criminal records, pay for themselves, that's fine. But anyone
Speaker 4: crossing your borders illegally should not be allowed to stay.
Speaker 4: And we have had such weakness from conservative and labor governments.
Speaker 4: Let me promise you if we get a reform government,
Speaker 4: the deportations will begin and the boats will stop coming.
Speaker 1: Is there the correlation between and certain sections of illegal
Speaker 1: migration going on to commit further crimes? Is this something
Speaker 1: that is popping up in the news because the daily
Speaker 1: examples of it from Lake and Riley, the murder of
Speaker 1: Lake and Riley in the United States, it helped crystallize
Speaker 1: the problem, right and again this sort of lefty Jedi
Speaker 1: mind trick. Oh, it's all migration, No, it's not, it's
Speaker 1: illegal migration. Are there exis examples of crimes that are
Speaker 1: taking place after people into the country illegally. Yes, more
Speaker 1: and more.
Speaker 4: It's been very difficult to talk about because as soon
Speaker 4: as you do, suddenly you're put into the racist category.
Speaker 4: But yes, evidence is mounting of those that have entered
Speaker 4: Britain legally committed absolutely heinous crimes. And I would say
Speaker 4: that in France where the problem is worse than it
Speaker 4: is in Britain because of the sheer number that have
Speaker 4: been allowed to cross the Mediterranean and stay. The reason
Speaker 4: Marine Le penn is favorite to win the next French
Speaker 4: presidential election in twenty twenty seven is the dots have
Speaker 4: been joined in France between illegal immigration and serious crime.
Speaker 4: And I think this is going to happen across the
Speaker 4: whole of Europe. And remember, in some cases with these crimes,
Speaker 4: you've got young men coming from countries in which women
Speaker 4: aren't even treated as second class citizens. So the rise,
Speaker 4: especially in sexual crime, it's something people who up are
Speaker 4: really really waking up to.
Speaker 1: I loved it, mate, great chat mate. Be the same
Speaker 1: again next week and every week for the rest of
Speaker 1: the year. We love having you on. Thank you, Nigel Farraj,
Speaker 1: of course, our bossill reform and member of Parliament in
Speaker 1: the United Kingdom. There is a story which has just
Speaker 1: dropped on the Australians website and it is a disgrace.
Speaker 1: You know how Bill Shorton is now off working for
Speaker 1: a university hired by the very people who he hired
Speaker 1: to do the inquiry into the ndis well. His salary
Speaker 1: is going to go from four hundred thousand dollars working
Speaker 1: for the government to now working for the university, which
Speaker 1: is still technically working for the government eight hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred thousand dollars. Here will be paid more than
Speaker 1: two hundred thousand dollars more than the Prime Minister to
Speaker 1: be the boss of the University of Canberra, an important
Speaker 1: institution but hardly the same job. See you tomorrow night