WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 16 July

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>From the Sky News Center.

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Paul Murray Live.

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, hello and good evening. Thank you Anika James Borrow

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>here for Paul Murray Live tonight and throughout the rest

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of the week. Well buckle up, kids, because we've got

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a big night here tonight with one of your favorites,

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>none other than the Great Bronwyn Bishop. And we're also

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>going to have an update very soon on the all

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>important Tasbanian election which is coming up this Saturday. But first,

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but if I were the

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Australia and someone compared me to Guff Whitlam, well,

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd say them's fighting words and ask whoever called me

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that if they wanted to step outside. But not our

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Earthny ALBINIZI not our elbow. The Prime Minister today took

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in the sites in China on day four of his

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Great Tour, visiting the Great Wall and taking plenty of

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>tourist snaps for back home, though I'm not sure whether

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>or not he got the fact that this was the original.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>The Great Wall was the original Trumpian, big beautiful wall

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>designed to keep invading foreigners out. That's right. They weren't

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all that hashtag welcome back to the Ming dynasty, which

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>had not yet realized how enriching diversity could be. But

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>there was Albert Easy on the wall, proudly stating that

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>his trip there well was in the footsteps of that

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>great helmsman of the Labor Party, the man I mentioned

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a moment ago Guff Whitlam.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Here today, of course, I have the sense of history

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>following the footsteps of the Labor Prime Minister Goff Whitlam,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 3>who was the first prime minister to visit here in

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventy three, had followed the correct decision that he

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 3>made as leader of the Labor Party in nineteen seventy one,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and that was, of course at the time when that

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>was a controversial decision to recognize the paper's Republic of China.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Ah.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Albo standing on the shoulders of good old Saint Guph,

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>another prime minister who hated the US president at the time,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in his case it was Richard Nixon and also trashed

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the Australian economy. So yeah, you know what, I'm actually

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to see the resemblance there between Albo and Guff Whitlam.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And I tell you what, the Chinese Communist Party sure

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is laying it on thick for alban easy, but worse,

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>he's eating it up literally.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>The fact that President She didn't just have a meeting,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 3>but we had a lunch where President She as well

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>invited Jody to attend. That lunch was a sign of

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 3>respect to Australia, to our country.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>They had a large Oh goody goody. I wonder if

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you got to show off how good he is. It's chopsticks,

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>how but he is. He also revealed the extent that

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government has gone to make him and Jody feel

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>at home.

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say that the band there in the

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Great Hall played a different version of Paul Kelly's to

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>her Door of mid not ELL's power and the passion

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of a range of songs as well that obviously took

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 3>them a long period of time and those gestures matter

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 3>powder Finger as well. They did the full kitten.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Cavertle powder figure. You don't see Paul Kelly got. This

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>guy's a really cheap date, isn't he now. The Prime

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Minister also revealed that he'd had eight hours of beatings

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>oh gosh, but he didn't reveal too much more about

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>them or what came out of them. In essence, we

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to take him at his word at

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>this point that what we are agreeing to and where

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we are disagreeing when we must, that's all going to

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>work out. But there are some signs, and we flagged

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>them last night and two nights ago, that behind the

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>scenes things might be a little less rosy because there

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is still that issue of the Port of Darwin and

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it has come up again today. You see, Wal Jijin

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Ping was happy to play the smiling chieftain. He left

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the dirty work to his number two head kicker Lee Kang, who,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in a thinly veiled swipe and Australia is now bipartisan

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>position on the Port of Darwin, said quote, we hope

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Australian side will treat Chinese enterprises visiting Australia

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>fairly and properly and solve the problems encountered by enterprises

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and market acts, investment review and other aspects. That's code

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for we don't want you kicking us out of Darwin. Now.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but I wonder if the

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister had the wit to turn this demand around

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and say short thing, premiere. I mean, Chinese companies already

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have a great deal in Australia. They can invest in agriculture,

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>buy farmland, mining, critical industries, operate without mandatory cultural integration

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and face far fewer restrictions. So how about it, China,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>if we turn this around and say you can keep

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>your lease on the Port of Darwin when Australian agribusiness say,

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>can operate farms in mainland China, or we can buy

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>property there, or all sorts of other things that they

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>can do here that we can't do there. But yeah, nah,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that happening. Meanwhile, though, there's been another

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>glowing editorial in the state masthead Global Times, which gave

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>its lead editorial the upbeat title today looking forward to

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing China Australian relations cruise steadily into the stratosphere. They

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote that, compared with the minefield status described by the

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Global Times editorial three years ago, Today's China Australia relationship

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is like a plane flying in the stratosphere after passing

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>through the storm zone. Well gosh, how colorful, although at

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what cost? Which has basically been that now Australia has

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to shut up about everything China does in international forums

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and elsewhere. It only raises protest at the absolute minimum

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>when there's no other choice in the press. But despite

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>what that paper claims, China does not see us as equals. Indeed,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a trap. It's being set for us and

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for Anthony Albanesi and Anthony Albanese's commitment commitments to the

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>paper to what the paper called multilateralism means that in

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the long run there will actually be more global conflict,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not less. And kudos to one of the journalists on

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the trip who picked up on this when Albanzi spoke

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Great Wall.

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 5>We have seen this kind of piece through trade approach,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, between Europe and Russia, and that did not

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 5>really turn up to well and the fact that it

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 5>led to significant vulnerabilities and energy supplism.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Are you not concerned that this will happen.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 7>With Yeah, well, our relationship is very different and I

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 7>don't think you can translate one thing across some other

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 7>part of the world of which Australia is not a participant.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not sure what the biasis of that is.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>That's your the basis of that is. You know, the

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>question there is really really straightforward. But Albaniz he was

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>doing kind of his old play dumb and act like

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't understand really what the guy is talking about. Routine,

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, this is the issue here. Australia

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>has to play a really careful game right now. You see,

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about this before, and we see what China

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is doing. China is trying to make itself look like

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the reasonable actor on the world stage, the reasonable great power.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>And here we have to admit that Donald Trump hasn't

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>made it easier for US and for the West, because

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they've now made trade an issue, a wedge issue that

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>China can use. But really, Albin Easy, Prime Minister, the

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>alliance with a free democratic nation like the United States

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is far more important in the long run, because what's

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>happening right now is that as the Prime Minister travels

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>through China, he is being told exactly what he wants

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear about Australia being the good boy of the

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>global order. It's patronizing and he's falling for it. And

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>now they're saying to the world. China is saying to

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, look at Australia, be like them, trade with us,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>break away from the US and we can all be

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>friends and there will be what's the phrase, I'm looking

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for peace in our time. It's all very clever, but

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's also very sinister and dangerous. You know, we know

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>how the cuddly panda can turn fierce and at some

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>point there will be a real conflict of visions, of values,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of interests.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>There is a limit to how close we can get

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to a close totalitarian state. Here's National's leader David britt

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Little Proud earlier today.

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 8>The reality is is that there are strategic threats that

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 8>are arising in China is lifting their military military dominance.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 8>In fact, Penny Wong even said that last week. So

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 8>the fact this just points and highlights to the inadequate

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 8>situation that Anthony Albanezi hasn't seen the importance or urgency

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 8>to go to Washington and meet with President Trump to

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 8>shore up Orcus and the relationship that we have there.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting to note that Petty Wong has also

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>previously in recent months even said quite correctly that Australia

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>needed to diversify its trading relationships so that we weren't

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so reliant on China. And yet now her boss, the

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister, is saying no, no, no, we're all in

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to double down. But as to that

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>meeting with Donald Trump that David little Proud referred to, well,

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we know why that's not happening.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>When Albinizi goes to ge he gets faded and toasted.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's now looking more and more like whatever meeting

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>does occur between Albo and Donald Trump, well that's going

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a far less pleasant interaction, which I think

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>is really sad that it has come to it that

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>this is the way it's going to be, because it

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>did not have to be like this. Remember, it doesn't

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>matter that Albanese is a labor left ee and that

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is a right wing Magga Republican. Keir Starmer

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Trump, different sides of politics get along just fine,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but Alberizi has chosen a different course. If Albanzy wasn't

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>more concerned though, with domestic politics, well then maybe we'd

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have a better foreign policy. All right, let's move on

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>now to some other critical matters. Now we all saw

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>last week when Gillian Siegel headed down her report on

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitism. The government was quick to accept this. Now

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that the election is over, gosh, what a coincidence. But

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not everyone in the government is happy. Ed Husick, the

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>deposed Cabinet minister, was on Radio National this morning and

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he was having a chat about Jillian Siegel's report, and

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>guess what. It turns out that ed Husick did not

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like what he read.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 9>I think I'd be concerned the suggestion that young people are,

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 9>as a report is suggesting, at risk of becoming fully

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 9>fledged anti Semite studio missing disinformation, I think runs the

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 9>risk of being a bit too sweeping.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>At Husick also did it like the report singling out

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the ABC of all institutions for bias when covering the

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Israel Gaza war.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 9>I wasn't entirely comfortable that she just singles out public

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 9>public broadcasting. You know, there's a role to play across

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 9>media on these issues, and I didn't necessarily think it

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 9>was justified to point out the public broadcaster.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Look, I watched the ABC and listen to it, so

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to, and I could tell you they

0:12:55.760 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>deserved to be called out for their bias reporting around Israel,

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and particularly the case that Jillian Siegel spoke about, which

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was that hospital that was supposedly bombed by Israel but

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>turned out to have been hit by a shell fired

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>by Hamas. Anyway, Cusick was also concerned about the definition

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of anti Semitism that the report urged Australia to adopt.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 9>I just think the issue of definition instantly brings into

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 9>question whether or not people will be able to raise

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 9>their concerns about the actions, for example, of what the

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 9>Nyahu government is doing in Gaza and how that would

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 9>be traded under a definition.

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Look, I mean Ed Musick has his point of view,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course he is one of the first two

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Muslim members of Parliament. But I think we have to

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>take some issue with this because, as I said before,

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 1>the ABC has been biased demosterbly so. And while I

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone can deny that young people are more

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at risk of falling under this way of anti propaganda

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>from left or right, we also have to note that

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as incidents such as the recent attacks on

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>synagogues and restaurant goers go, well, there's no way that

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about any of that stuff coming under

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the banner of legitimate criticism of Israeli policies, which is

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>what we always hear when people worry about defining anti

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Semitism in that sort of way. And as well, I'd

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>also note that Ed Husick, who was booted from cabinet

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in the most recent reshuffle, is now freelancing on this

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>issue all over the place. I'd be curious to see,

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, if he is as critical of an expected

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>forthcoming report on Islamophobia and what sort of restrictions that

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>report urges on Australian society. I suspect that he won't

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be quite as enthusiastic because he also was talking about

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>policing the Internet with the Australian Financial Review and he

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.239
<v Speaker 1>said that he had quote watched this from the perspective

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of Islamo phobia for years, that the platforms don't take

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this seriously unquote, So I think that there might be,

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to anheustic in these issues, a bit

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of a double standard at work. But there's also another point,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and I want to make this pretty clear either way,

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking about anti semitism or islama phobia. And

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's far more anti semitism out there

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of incidents and reported attacks and all sorts

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of things like that, that islama phobia and that antisemitism

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is a real scourge on our society that needs to

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be stamped out. Because in my opinion, it is a

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>symptom of a deeper sickness in our society. The way

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we combat it as a free society matters. And when

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about limiting free speech, I think we

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be very careful about either way calls to

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>restrict speech that might just be offensive, because frankly, I

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>think Australian society could do with more free speech, because

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the best way to fight hate and bad ideas is

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to expose them and fight them and argue back with

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the truth and good ideas. Now, finally, while we're on

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the subject of multiculturalism, which of course that touches, there

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is an absolutely bonker's story out of the UK. You

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>need to know about why well, because things that happened

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in the UK tend to wind up landing here in

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Australia eventually. Now look at you're screen here. This girl

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is Courtney, right, she's twelve. She's a British school girl

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and she wore this Union jack dress to her schools

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>cultural celebration day recently. The only problem, well, the culture

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>she was celebrating was her own British culture. And I know, yeah,

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Left says, oh well British, they don't have any culture.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>White people don't know culture. But there she was, and

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>she went in the dress, and she was turned back

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and not allowed to participate, despite having prepared a whole

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>little speech about British culture and fun things like drinking

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>tea and the royal family. Here's her dad, Stewart Field,

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>explaining precisely what happened.

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 4>What did Courtney do?

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 10>She came home a few days before with a letter

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 10>saying that she was going to take part in the

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 10>Cultural Diversity Day at school. She wanted to pick her

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 10>own dress. Quite an independent younger went into school and

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 10>I had a phone called an hour from work saying

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 10>from Courtney saying that she wasn't allowed into school, that

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 10>she was being isolated, and what.

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 4>Was she wearing that meant that she was not allowed

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 4>into school?

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 10>He was wearing the you would say, a typical Jerry

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 10>sort of stroke spos girl's union jack dress with a bolt. Yeah.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, the school has since apologized sort of, and even

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Labor Prime Minister Kiir Starbar's office has weighed in, with

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a spokesperson saying, I think the school has put out

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a statement on this, so I'm not going to comment further.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>But the Prime Minister has always been clear that being

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>British is something to be celebrated. Oh really, I think

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of funny because it is in Britain, a

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>country where saying you are proud of your country or

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that things like say Western culture is under threat from

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>mass migration can get you labeled a far right terrorist

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ideologue by the government, and where tweeting about that sort

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of thing can earn you a visit from the cops.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I'm buying Keir Starbar on this one here,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but as I say, let's not get too cocky here,

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>because in many ways Australia is going down the same

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>path all right now as we know hot times in

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Tasmania where they have been in a state of political

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>chaos since Premier Jeremy Rockliffe lost a motion of no

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>confidence last month, which has sent voters back to the

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 1>polls this Saturday in a snap election. How much fun

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is democracy here? Joining me now to discuss is Matthew Denham,

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>regional correspondent for The Australian. Matthew Denhalm. There have been

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>talks of another hung parliament. Give us your ideas here,

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>what is the most likely result this Saturday. What's the tip.

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, it's much like it will be a hung parliament.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 11>It's very hard to see either major party Labor or

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 11>Liberal getting the required eighteen seats for a majority. So

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 11>really at the moment, the Liberals are on fourteen seats,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 11>Labors on ten. The polls are suggesting that the lib

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 11>are kind of holding their ground and Labors kind of

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 11>going nowhere. So it looks like a pretty similar result

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 11>to the one that basically resulted in a situation where

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 11>the parliament and the Premier couldn't get on. So it's

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 11>a pretty interesting time down here.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, so if it's another hung parliament, what happens? How

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>does the state run itself?

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, hopefully we won't have another election that would be

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 11>three within sixteen months, which would just be ridiculous.

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 6>Two is bad enough. Look, hopefully there's number of scenarios.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 11>Really, I mean, you could have a very minority Labor

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 11>government supported by the Greens. Today the Sky News Debate

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 11>leaders debate, Dean went to the Labor leader under questioning

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.479
<v Speaker 11>eventually kind of agreed that he would potentially govern with

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 11>Green support kind of passive support if you like, not

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 11>not a formal coalition. So that's a possibility with a

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 11>few independents thrown in. Or we could get the Liberal

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 11>Party trying to smooth things over with some independence and

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 11>and you know, win enough over to continue in minority

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 11>with independent support.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Well let's have a little look at that debate. Here's

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit of what the candidates had said.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 12>We just heard the premiere says extolling the virtues of

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 12>public ownership. Last month he wanted to sell a Royal

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 12>networks and past to get rid of it, extolling the

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 12>virtue I want to sell them. This is that you

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 12>believe school Guard debate, then.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>This is serious stuff.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>This is for the Premier of Tasmania.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 4>You cannot make things up.

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 8>The person at this debate that has suggested we sell

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 8>energy assets is mister Winter.

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Go back to your tweets if you like, a few years.

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 12>Ago and now you say you never wanted to sell

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 12>energy energy outsets.

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>You cannot make things up.

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm making this o Matthew. That looks pretty fiery here.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things I've been fascinated by, and

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people of the mainland are watching,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is the question about Tazzi's AFL team, which now hangs

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the ballots ahead of the election. Now the Greens

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and Cross batches apparently they're against this whole deal for

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the AFL to come to Tasmania. Can you explain to

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>our viewers who might not be across all this, what

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>these possible outcomes could mean for this stadium in Hobart.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. Look, the stadium is a major issue.

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 11>It's really divided opinion and there are people who post

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 11>for it for a very different reasons. Some people are

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 11>worried about the cost of it. It's about a billion dollars,

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 11>probably more because these things usually blow out even more

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 11>than they already have at a time in the States,

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 11>heading toward a record debt more than a doubling of

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 11>debt under this government.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Across the Ford Inestamates, so.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 11>Antasi has a debt bomb and they're worried that really

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 11>this is just extending that. And other people are concerned

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 11>who live in the northwest or the north of the state.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 11>They want the stadium to be at your park in

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 11>a lot of system which is more convenient for them.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 11>So look there there's this overall, there's quite a bit

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 11>of opposition to the stadium, to the team.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 6>Everyone wants the team, but.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 11>The IFL has made it clear that the two go

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 11>hand in hand and they want they want a stadium

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 11>at that side in McCrory point that you're looking at.

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 11>And if they don't get it, then Tessy doesn't get

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 11>the team. So really, the Greens and some of the

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 11>cross benches and independents are arguing that, well, you know,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 11>maybe we could renegotiate the deal with the IFL. Look

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 11>that's possible, but so far the AFL has shown no

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 11>appetite for that whatsoever.

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 6>So the states are pretty.

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 11>High and it will be fascinating to see how far

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 11>either Labor or the liberals. Liberals will go in terms

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 11>of budging on that position in support for the stadium.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 11>If there is a home Parliament and they need people support,

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 11>they're saying they're not budging on it. We'll just have

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 11>to wait and see.

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Sport, money and politics makes for a fascinating contest. We'll

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all be watching on Saturday. And good luck down there,

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and how about one of my favorite cities. Thank you

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>so much, Matthew Dennel. Now stick around because after the

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>break we're gonna be joined by your favorite Bronwyn bishop

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and a new face on Paul Murray Live. Ed Cavanaugh,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>fascinating fella with a lot to say, So stick around,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>don't go anywhere, We're gonna have some fun. Welcome back

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to the program, Paul Murray Live. Here, James Morrow sitting

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 1>in for the Great Man throughout the week, and we

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are on Wednesdays, so we're almost through it all. But

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we got a great, great panel here tonight on my

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>right here the fantastic Bronwin Bishop. You know her very

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>very well and she's got a lot to say tonight

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as well as a new face here on Paul Murray Live.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Ed Cavanaugh from the McKell Institute in Adelaide. Ed,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for coming on the program. A warm

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Paul Murray Live. Welcome to you both of you. Though,

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to start talking about because this is really

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the only game in town right now. News wise. It

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>is this big Albanezi trip to China six days, no

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>other countries, no allies on this trip here. But this

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>issue of the port of Darwin keeps coming up, and

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we all recall Anthony Albanezi at the very tail end

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>of the election there jumping onto the radio in Darwin

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and saying, hey, we're going to take that back to

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>try and gazump Peter Duttwell, he's made a rod for

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>his own back. The Chinese is saying we'll have none

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of that. Here's Anthony Albanez earlier today.

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 3>So I've had the same position as when I was

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the Shadow Infrastructure Minister when the decision was made to

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 3>provide a federal incentive by the Liberal Party to flog

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 3>off the Port of Darwin.

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, Bronwin Bishop me thinks he's rewriting history just a

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>little bit here. But the thing that I'm fascinated about

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>here is China saying that we are not welcome to

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>take back the lease of the Port of Darwin, but

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't, you know, have a lease over any major

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>commercial port, any port at all in mainland China.

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 4>I thought to our editorial was spot on. The fact

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 4>of the matter is that before he went into any

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 4>meeting in China he said, oh, well, I won't raise

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 4>the Port of Darwin with Presidency, but if Presidency raises it,

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell him we want to take it back. Then

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 4>he comes out and says, oh no, that was never raised.

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 4>But of course Premier Lee is the one who's doing

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 4>the dirty work. Yes, and he's the one who says

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 4>you take it back and we won't buy your iron,

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 4>or this is the country that put twenty billion dollars

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 4>of tariffs on our products because we asked a legitimate

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 4>question about COVID and if our rat once, I'll rat twice.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Isn't that the socialist dictum? Absolutely it is, and that

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 4>means immediately there's a thought that we will do something

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 4>that they don't want their way, coercion coming our way.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 4>I just find that on this entire trip at the

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Prime Minister has become the ventriloicus dummy for President Z.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 4>He is actually putting out arguments that are legitimizing actions

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 4>that China has taken against us, whether it's attacking our

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 4>divers naval divers, or whether it's pilots in surveillance ACRA

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 4>or a warship with live far going around our coastline. Oh,

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 4>they did not do anything that we are doing. I

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 4>mean it was pathetic, it was embarrassing, and honestly and truly,

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 4>we cannot have a prime minister who won't stand up

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 4>for his own country.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think exactly said you framed the problem very well,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>ed Kavanaugh let's bring you in on this here from

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the perspective where you're sitting. Has Albanezy gone too far?

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Has the Prime Minister gone too far in trying to

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>stabilize the relationship to the point now where we can't

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>speak up against things that the Chinese Communist Party regime does,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, all of the things that Broad

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bishop just mentioned, or other sorts of human rights

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>abuses around the globe around China, or their actions in

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the Philippines and in the South China Sea. Have we

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>lost our voice in the process of trying to create

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a better and as the Prime Minister says, more stable

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and orderly relationship with China, which to me seems like

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>code for going along with what China wants.

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think that's a pretty entrepreneurial reading of the

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 13>situation here. You know, you mentioned where I'm sitting tonight,

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 13>and where I'm sitting is in Adelaide, and if you went,

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 13>you know, to a three hundred klometers to the north,

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 13>there's still hundreds of jobs that have been lost because

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 13>of you know, the wine trade backlash that we had

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 13>under the former government, the deterioration of the relationship between

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 13>Australia and China. Basically under Scott Morrison, that was not

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 13>serving anyone well, that was not serving Australia well, it

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 13>was not serving Australian workers well in jobs that are

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 13>trade exposed to China. I completely agree that we need

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 13>to have a broader trade relationship than just with China,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 13>but we are just in denial if we're not going

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 13>to admit that the relationship that we have with China

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 13>is critical to well Australia's economy. I think it's yeah,

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 13>go ahead, go ahead.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just curious because you know, you mentioned the

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>loss of the trade. But I'm curious because you know,

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Scott Morrison asked a very legitimate question, where did COVID

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>come from? And can you open the books? And they said, well,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't like that question, so we're going to try

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and break your wine industry.

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 13>And then put out forty I think that's very I

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 13>think that's incredibly poor behavior. Australia didn't acquiesce to those

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 13>fourteen points. I think that was, you know, belligerents from

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 13>Beijing's part, but it was also reflective of a deterioration

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 13>under the former government of that relationship. I think you know,

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 13>it's very sensible the line that the Albanese government has

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 13>with its relationship China. I think that's the stuff of

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 13>a mature government and I think frankly, most people in

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 13>Australia want to see stability in this relationship. Most people

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 13>in the southeast of South Australia, my home state, who

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 13>lost their jobs in the lobster industry, would be championing

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 13>just this normal, steady issue goes approach to one of

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 13>our most critical relationships.

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Brunwin, do you want to respond to that?

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, very nice to meet you tonight, but let me

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 4>say you are so wrong. The bottom line is that

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 4>we don't want to tie ourselves in trade more to China.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 4>We want to diversify more so we're less dependent on China,

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 4>because China has already shown by its behavior with its

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 4>first twenty million dollars worth of tariffs. And then there's

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 4>coercion again. If you dare take back your own port,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 4>we will stop buying your iron ore, which is our

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 4>major export. We know that they are not relations with

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying that we've got to diversify our feed That's

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 4>what I'm saying, and we have got to have a

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 4>prime minister that stands up for us and is not

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 4>a toady. We have got to have somebody who is

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 4>prepared to say when when the Prime Minister used the

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 4>words respectful, he means obsequious and I'm sorry that is

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 4>not acceptable to the Australian spirit. We have got to

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 4>make our way in the world.

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 13>I think there's there's a lot of there's a Brunno,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 13>there's a.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Lot of sport in this, there's a lot of theater.

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of fun sort.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Of No, there's no fun at all program this. But

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 4>in fact, in fact, when I watched when I watched.

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Him of that type of approach, when I watched him on.

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 4>The Great Wall of China today, I looked at it

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 4>and it's been there a hell of a long time

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 4>and it hasn't changed any since I was there in

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 4>nineteen seventy five, and it's still the same stuff that

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 4>s trotted out. Mao was alive then, and z is

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 4>perpetuating the sort of China that Mao had. We had

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 4>a change in direction that the worst for Seed under Ping,

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 4>and I had indeed did meet Domsaping when he was

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 4>standing in for Cho and Lie when China LII was dying.

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 4>That was a different path they were taking. But under

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 4>this president, President z when he says he wants to

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 4>have war and he's preparing for war, you've got to

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 4>take him at his word. He means it. And I

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 4>think we are seen as the vassal state they want.

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 4>You've got bloggers in China who are saying Australia's the

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>next Taiwan, and why bother with Taiwan. Take Australia its

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 4>defenses and it's much richer, and it's got the food

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 4>and the minerals we want. Now, if we have a

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 4>prime minister who speaks more like the governor of a

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 4>vassal state instead of the prime minister of a sovereign nation,

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:41.959
<v Speaker 4>we are in trouble.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And do you want to respond to that?

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, look, I just think you know Bronwin mentioned her

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 13>lengthy engagement with China, I too you. I've been on

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 13>the ground in China. I've been through his Injiung. I

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 13>remember crossing the border from Mongol enters in Jihan getting

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 13>apprehended at the border. I'm not endorser of the Jijinping

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 13>model of governance in China. I'm just a pragmatic viewer

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 13>of this, this relationship we have over decades built.

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Up and economic dependence of some form with Beijing.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 13>I completely support diversifying that relationship, but it is just

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 13>not in the interests of everyday people in Australia to

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 13>be just beating the chess for its own sake and

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 13>then sacrificing jobs in states like mine. I just don't

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 13>support that. Well, I don't know that people do in

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 13>Australia arether No.

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think I think.

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 4>That is worth more than I loves.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I think go up to make

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that the last word on that here, because there's so

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>much more to talk about here. One thing here now

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not sexy, but it is important. Tax reform. The

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Commonwealth Bank Australia has urged Chim Chalmers to consider major

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>tax reform to revive productivity. That includes slashing income taxes,

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>changing the GST, capping superannuation concessions, and even introducing wealth taxes.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot, probably I think, for both sides of

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>politics on this, but one thing that I find really

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>vexing is the way income tax keeps getting turned up

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>every year through bracket creep and the lack of indexation.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>This was brought up very briefly during the campaign, but

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I did some mass on this. If the top tax

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>rate of one hundred ninety thousand dollars a year had

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>been indexed from the time of two thousand and seven

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>when it was just one eighty, but it only just

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, there'd be like two hundred and ninety

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year. And so we see how the

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>government keeps taking more and more money, and it's the

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>pay as you go taxpayer who keeps copying it every year. Broadway, Bishop,

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is tax reform dead in this country?

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, under this government, tax reform is a euphemism, and

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a euphemism for it's how do we increase the

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 4>tax take. That's what they want because they are a

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 4>spend and tax organization. Not tax and spend, but spend

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 4>and tax. Now, before the election, the snake charmers I

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 4>call the treasurer said the budget's in great shape. Immediately

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 4>after the election, it's unsustainable and we're going to have

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 4>a round table and guess what I'm going to put

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 4>up taxes? That is what he has got in mind.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 4>And when you start to read all that stuff, history

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 4>will tell you that We did in fact have indexation

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 4>of Marshall tax rates under Malcolm Fraser, and it was

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 4>not a success because people didn't appreciate it, and the

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 4>tax tape went down and he had to find other

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 4>ways to look at tax tax to be raised, and

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 4>so they reversed it. And the other reason that the

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 4>difficulty will come about the GST. And I was at

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 4>the forefront end fighting for the a GST to come in,

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 4>but it was to replace the wholesale sales tax, which

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 4>had taxes of thirty percent on and that was the

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 4>real trade off that allowed that tax to get up

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 4>when John Hart took it to the election in ninety eight.

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 4>But if you do the calculation, you will still find

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 4>that you will raise more money through bracket creep than

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:16.399
<v Speaker 4>you will by raising the gs.

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well, I'll sort of add on this. Your thing

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>takes an awful lot of work I think around tax

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and tax reform. One of the things I'm concerned about though,

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and I want your thoughts on this, is while the

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 1>tax take goes up, so to do the number of

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs created by government. So four and five jobs recently

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have been created in the public not the private sector.

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>It's crowding out the private private enterprise. This isn't sustainable.

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 1>What does what do you and your institute make of

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this current situation where the Treasury says, well, we're going

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to have to both raise taxes and cut spending.

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 13>Look, I welcome this debate that has been put on

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 13>the table. I think you know, Ron is right. We

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 13>haven't really seen substantial tax form in this country for

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 13>a quarter of a century. Been a pretty long time coming.

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 13>There's a couple of things going on here. I think

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 13>you're right in calling out the fact that we have

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 13>way too much tax coming from just regular working people.

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 13>It's just that is unsustainable in the long term. It's

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 13>disincentivizing work, it has all these sort of problems. I

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 13>generally am supportive of the fact that we need to

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 13>shift away the tax burden from working people towards other

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 13>forms of revenue. The question then becomes, what is that revenue?

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 13>What does that actually look like? And I really welcome

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 13>what the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, you know, hardly a

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 13>socialist den sort of came out with this week, and

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 13>that is, you know, looking at creative ways of taxing

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 13>effectively wealth better in this country while also incentivizing investment

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 13>and that type of Well, at some point there will

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 13>have to be certain taxes that increase in to compensate from.

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 4>No, there's another way.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 2>There's another way about tax reform.

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 4>There's another way.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're going to say.

0:37:56.040 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 4>There are three big expenditure items in the budget, Defense

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 4>anddis and the entire renewable energy program, particularly rewiring the nation.

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 4>That rewiring the nation, you free up a huge number

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 4>of tradespeople who are able then to go into the market,

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 4>and we won't have a shortage of skills exactly. We

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 4>will be able to afford both defense increases and the

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 4>ndii IS.

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>And bron will want to leave it there because we're

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>going to go to a break here. But I'm glad

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned rewiring the nation because when we come back,

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of controversy around offshore wind farms and whose

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fault could it be? Is name Donald Trump? Well we'll

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>find out after the break. Stick around. Welcome back to

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the program. James Morrow filling in for Paul Murray live

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>tonight and throughout the week. We're having a lot of

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>fun here. We've got Bronwin Bishop here in the man Cave.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>It's an open all genders band cave tonight here and

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>joining us from adelaide Ed Kavanov from the McKell Institute,

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a newcomer here to the panel. We spoke a moment

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>ago about rewiring the nation and green energy in the transition. Here, Bronwin.

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>There was a story here on the ABC website that

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>caught my eye and it said offshore wind companies cool

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Australian interest as public investment is considered. And then it

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>went through a whole bunch of sort of different reasons

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>why offshore wind farms aren't actually taking off and why

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they're being canceled. But what this article said was that

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the real problem was when Donald Trump intervened to stop

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>construction on a multi billion dollar wind from off the

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>coast of New York. The decision reverberated around the world.

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert bench If, I did a little research on this,

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure which one they're talking about, but

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that wind farm has been being canceled at

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:52.280
<v Speaker 1>least since twenty twenty three, when Joe Biden was office,

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 1>off the coast of Sweden, off the coast of New

0:39:54.880 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and elsewhere. Can we stop blaming Donald Trump for everything? Oh?

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't think they will because he is all powerful,

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 4>and he is making a huge number of decisions that

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 4>are right for the world, like canceling wing farms, which

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.919
<v Speaker 4>we do not need here, and we don't need net

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 4>zero by twenty fifty commitments either, and we don't need

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:23.879
<v Speaker 4>a cop conference here either. So I think we're seeing

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the world seeing that the world cannot

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 4>get by without fossil fuels and all nuclear impossible. There

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.919
<v Speaker 4>is a place for renewables, but we cannot have renewals

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 4>only it does not work. The rest of the world

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 4>has woken up to it, and we, as usual, are

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 4>a couple of years at least slow behind.

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>What's funny because we have been you know, adopters have

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 1>many things in the past, but now we see to

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 1>be lagging ad around the world, governments are saying we're

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>going to walk back our net zero commitments here, our

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>power bills are going up and up and up, and

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we're never going to get that two hundred and sew

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and five dollars back. Is it time? I mean, if

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>we're really honest about it and take the politics out

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of it, to wind back this headlong rush for net zero.

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 13>I think, frankly, it's incredibly sad that perspective. I think

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 13>that the perspective where you have, you know, basically there's

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 13>been people in power for the last like thirty years

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 13>in Australia that have led us into this general situation

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 13>we're in around you know, the issues we're having with

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 13>climate and just saying, oh, don't worry about it, it's

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 13>not an issue. Let's us not do anything about it.

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 13>That's just a fatalist approach. It's just not constructive. It

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 13>doesn't help people in my generation, the people coming up

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 13>at all. One of the bizarre things about that argument too,

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 13>is just how fundamentally opposed it is to the opportunities

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 13>in the economy that are driven by net zero. You know,

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 13>Australian jobs in renewal energy construction, Australian jobs that are

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 13>enabled by the improved investment environment from net zero. So

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 13>I just think, you know, that is a frankly, a

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 13>really sad approach, just saying, look.

0:41:58.080 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 2>We should just not pursue this at all.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 13>We have the most unique capacity in the world to

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 13>take advantage of net zero.

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 2>We should be seizing that opportunity. We shouldn't be scared.

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Of it, right not.

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 4>That argument just makes my blood boil. We are blessed

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 4>with an energy source in this country. We've got uranium,

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 4>we've got oil, we've got coal, we've got the abs

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 4>of gas. We have got everything here, and yet we

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 4>export it to every aspect of the world and we

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:34.240
<v Speaker 4>don't use it here. Now, I am shamedly voted for that.

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 4>I voted for the legislation that said that nuclear power

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 4>was to be banned. And I apologized profusely for ever

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 4>having voted for it, because it was wrong. But the

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 4>fact of the matter is that other parts of the

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.280
<v Speaker 4>world are waking up to the fact that you cannot

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 4>do without fossil fuel. You just cannot do it.

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:59.799
<v Speaker 14>And in this country, Sydney, and you live in South

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 14>Australia on an extension cord from Victoria because you blew up,

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:05.440
<v Speaker 14>you're only got out.

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 4>The extension. And if the extension cord is cut, you

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 4>have no power. You're gone. And in New South Wales.

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 2>We're taking it from extraordinary to listen.

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's give let's give it a chance.

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Literally the truth. I'm sorry, that's right. I will first point,

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you made my point for me.

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 13>You were in Parliament voted against nuclear energy twenty five

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 13>years ago. Now you're you know, on TV saying we've

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 13>got to adopt it now.

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 2>But you were, but you were.

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.359
<v Speaker 13>The idea that we're not using coal and oil is

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 13>just bizarre. We have you know, Victoria has seventy percent

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 13>of its entire energy is based on coal an entire state.

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 13>Fifty of the Australian energy mix is still coal. The

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 13>idea that South Australia is reliant on East Coast and

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.359
<v Speaker 13>is just in an inverse of the truth pretty much

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 13>every single summer day in Australia in South Australia. South

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 13>Australia exports energy to the rest of the country because

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 13>of it's zero policies. So you have a beautiful and

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.959
<v Speaker 13>colorful story about the issue here, it just literally does

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 13>not bear any reality with what's happening on the ground

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 13>here in this state and frankly in the energy mix

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 13>across the entire country.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And the one question though about all of this, I

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>think people want to hear about this is why their

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>power bills are so high. And I'm going off of

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:31.319
<v Speaker 1>memory here, but I think South Australia has some of

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the highest power bills in the country.

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 13>The power bill was a lower in summer when we're

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 13>not actually dependent on coal on coal imports.

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 2>This is the reality of situation.

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Just go ahead, go ahead, go ahead.

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Please look.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 13>The one point I'd make is the energy mix that

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:55.280
<v Speaker 13>Bronwin is calling for, an entire dependency infinitum in Australia

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.919
<v Speaker 13>on coal and on oil, is basically exposing the entire

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 13>Australian economy the oscillations of a global energy market. It

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 13>is completely crazy. Basically, no one should be doing that,

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 13>No one should be advocating for that. We have incredible

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 13>sovereign capacity to generate energy here in Australia.

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Why would we not seize that?

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, all right, let's let's let's uh, let's call that

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>one a drawer there for now, because we got a

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>couple of seconds left here. I wanted to ask about

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this one final topic because it does have to do.

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's tied to China. Labor has refused to reveal whether

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>TikTok lobbyists pushed for YouTube to be included in the

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ban on under sixteen's accessing the Internet. Broadwin, having been

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in government, do you understand why the Communications Minister's office

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is being so cagy about this introductory meeting that they

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>had with the Chinese own TikTok, Yes, I do, because.

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 4>The Albanize is in China and was this part of

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 4>the deal? Is what pant went on closed doors when

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:57.800
<v Speaker 4>the media were removed from the meeting to our meeting

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 4>between presidency and alban What has he gone into? They

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 4>want to broaden the so called broaden the free trade

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 4>agreement and increde AI Chinese AI coming into Australia. I mean, seriously,

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 4>we said Huawei couldn't come. How are we going to

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 4>look after our own integrity as a nation? And TikTok

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.359
<v Speaker 4>of course belongs to the Chinese, and YouTube of course

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 4>belongs to Americans. So is it part of this again?

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 4>This trade off that's going It's.

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>A great question. Ed got fifteen seconds here? Can you

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>give you a quick take? How concerned should we be

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>about tech talk and all of this?

0:46:39.239 --> 0:46:41.920
<v Speaker 13>We look conspiracy is always fun to play around with.

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 13>I think the reality in this is you have a

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 13>lot of politicians who are a little bit older, who

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 13>don't know really how young people actually interact with a

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:51.240
<v Speaker 13>lot of social media platforms, including YouTube. I don't support

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 13>the ban on YouTube, and I think that's necessarily a good

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 13>idea I think it's a useful tool for a lot

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:56.280
<v Speaker 13>of younger people.

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with it. We will agree on that.

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Unity, team less and more ignorance.

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, hey, listen, let's all end on that agreement

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that we all like the kids on the YouTube great

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff for the math homework and a lot of other things. Yeah,

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. And Kavanaugh, thank you so much for the

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Kell Institute for joining us here on Paul Murray Live.

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Braden Bitcham has always now stick around because we've got

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>some fun with AOC after the break. Welcome back to

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the program. James Morrow here for Paul Murray Live. Well,

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has been out there again having a chat

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about none other than Alexandria Okazia Cortes, who is a

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 1>potential candidate for the twenty twenty eight presidential election, although

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>she's only pollie at six percent, and he says that

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in a contest of IQs against AOC, he'd win. Have

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at what he had to say earlier today,

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, HEOC.

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 15>Look, I think she's very nice, but she's very low

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 15>IQ and we really don't need low IQ. Between her

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 15>and Pocket. We're gonna give them both an IQ test

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 15>to see who comes out past.

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:08.439
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 15>I took my test. I took a real test. I'd

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 15>walt to Reed Medical Center and I haste it. I

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 15>got every one of all those questions. Right now, it's

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 15>time for them to take a test. Anyway, have a

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 15>good time.

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:26.879
<v Speaker 1>You gotta love it. AOC dumb what me worry? Well,

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the woman who, of course was claimed that

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>unemployment was only low in the US because everyone had

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>two jobs, and once got in trouble for tweeting that

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>she thought oil was going up was a good thing

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>because of green policies. Well, there you go. That's all

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the time I've got tonight. But stick around here because

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>coming up right now, it's the Late Debate