1 00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: From the Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm kristin amiot. 2 00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: It's Thursday, March sixth, twenty twenty five. Brisbane residents will 3 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:16,080 Speaker 1: bear the branch of cyclone Alfred's one hundred and fifty 4 00:00:16,079 --> 00:00:19,440 Speaker 1: five kilometer per hour winds, rain and flooding on Friday, 5 00:00:19,720 --> 00:00:22,599 Speaker 1: when the storm is expected to lash the Queensland capital 6 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:25,919 Speaker 1: for twelve hours. For all the latest on the Category 7 00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:32,440 Speaker 1: two storm, visit the Australian dot com dot AU. Defense 8 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:36,360 Speaker 1: Minister Richard Miles says he's absolutely confident US President Donald 9 00:00:36,400 --> 00:00:39,280 Speaker 1: Trump will follow through on his support of the historic 10 00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:43,239 Speaker 1: August Defense Pact between Australia, the United States and the 11 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: United Kingdom. Bard South Australian Premier Peter Malanowskis says questions 12 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:51,440 Speaker 1: about the White House's commitment are starting to wear thin. 13 00:00:52,520 --> 00:00:55,920 Speaker 1: In a wide ranging conversation at the Defending Australia conference 14 00:00:55,960 --> 00:00:59,240 Speaker 1: in Adelaide on Wednesday, co hosted by The Australian and 15 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:03,560 Speaker 1: our colleagues The Advertiser, the Defense Minister fielded questions about 16 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:08,000 Speaker 1: aucust defense spending and those warships of the Australian coast. 17 00:01:08,600 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 1: In today's episode we're bringing you parts of that fascinating 18 00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:20,360 Speaker 1: conversation with Richard Miles and Shadow Minister for Defense Andrew Hasty. 19 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:24,000 Speaker 2: Minister is going to ask do you trust Donald Trump 20 00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 2: when it comes for his support for aucas. 21 00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:31,959 Speaker 1: That's The Australian's chief international correspondent Cameron Stewart chatting with 22 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:35,080 Speaker 1: Defense Minister Richard Miles in Adelaide on Wednesday. 23 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 3: I do, and I actually have a sense of confidence 24 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:43,000 Speaker 3: about where we can take the alliance under the Trump 25 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:46,760 Speaker 3: administration and the alignment of effort in terms of the 26 00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:49,160 Speaker 3: focus that we're bringing to peer in terms of our 27 00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 3: own security, but what the United States is doing in 28 00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:53,360 Speaker 3: terms of its focus on the hopes. 29 00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:57,840 Speaker 1: South Australian Premier Peter malinowskis, who'd broken ground on a 30 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:01,560 Speaker 1: new shipbuilding academy that'll produce the graduates who'll build August 31 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:05,840 Speaker 1: submarines earlier on Wednesday, alongside the Defense Minister, jumped in, 32 00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:07,040 Speaker 1: can I ask a question? 33 00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 4: I was thinking about this today after our press conference. 34 00:02:09,520 --> 00:02:13,119 Speaker 5: Every single time Richard or I have stood up announcing 35 00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:15,960 Speaker 5: some progress milestone in terms of UCUS or any other 36 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:18,560 Speaker 5: time on radio and South Australia, an event has occurred 37 00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:20,360 Speaker 5: where aucust becomes a tom of conversation. 38 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:21,760 Speaker 4: I get asked that question. 39 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 5: I'm not too sure what more needs to be done 40 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:29,040 Speaker 5: before those questions stop. All three countries have gone through 41 00:02:29,040 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 5: a change in administration or government from one political party 42 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:36,280 Speaker 5: to the other, and not one word has been added 43 00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 5: by any Prime minister, any defense minister, or a defense secretary, 44 00:02:39,919 --> 00:02:43,239 Speaker 5: or the US president of either political persuasion that has 45 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:46,800 Speaker 5: actually said anything on the record that would suggest that 46 00:02:46,960 --> 00:02:47,799 Speaker 5: ORCUS is in. 47 00:02:47,760 --> 00:02:48,840 Speaker 4: An ongoing commitment. 48 00:02:48,919 --> 00:02:53,480 Speaker 5: And yet, while I can understand there's a desire to 49 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:56,800 Speaker 5: ask the question given that things can change quickly, evidently, 50 00:02:57,200 --> 00:02:59,000 Speaker 5: nonetheless there's been no suggestion that this is going to 51 00:02:59,000 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 5: be an issue. 52 00:02:59,520 --> 00:02:59,800 Speaker 4: Sure. 53 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 2: Premier Kolby today spoke about the fact that he thought 54 00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:07,440 Speaker 2: it was great to sell Virginia class submarines to Australia, 55 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:09,920 Speaker 2: but he said if the production of those submarines is 56 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 2: not fast enough, that might be a problem for the US. 57 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:14,960 Speaker 2: That comes to a central question to trust in future 58 00:03:15,000 --> 00:03:19,720 Speaker 2: administrations to actually sell those submarines if their Virginia roll 59 00:03:19,760 --> 00:03:20,839 Speaker 2: out is not fast enough. 60 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:21,119 Speaker 6: Yeah. 61 00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:23,600 Speaker 3: I can understand those comments, but in a sense, let's 62 00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:26,200 Speaker 3: think that through it is really I think the beauty 63 00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 3: of the Optimal Pathway that we announced in March of 64 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:32,440 Speaker 3: twenty three, that there really is something in it for 65 00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:36,080 Speaker 3: all three countries. We are playing a very significant role 66 00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:40,200 Speaker 3: now in increasing the production rate and the sustainment rate 67 00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:43,960 Speaker 3: of Virginia class submarines in America. For America, that's something 68 00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:46,640 Speaker 3: that they acknowledge. That is something which is utterly different 69 00:03:46,880 --> 00:03:49,760 Speaker 3: to any other relationship they have with literally any other 70 00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:53,440 Speaker 3: country when it comes to their bilateral defense relationships. The 71 00:03:53,480 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 3: strategic benefit to the United States of ORCUS is really 72 00:03:57,960 --> 00:04:01,840 Speaker 3: understood by the United States. And if the production rates 73 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:05,920 Speaker 3: don't increase in relation to Virginia's, as both Pete and 74 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:07,840 Speaker 3: I were saying to each other, there's a whole lot 75 00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:10,480 Speaker 3: of issues that America faces in that moment, But what 76 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:14,080 Speaker 3: ORCUS is about is ensuring that we jointly succeed on 77 00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 3: that effort. It is in Australia's interest that America has 78 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:22,240 Speaker 3: a greater availability of Virginia class submarines. We need America 79 00:04:22,600 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 3: to be the most capable they can be, and America 80 00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 3: needs us to be the most capable we can be. 81 00:04:27,760 --> 00:04:30,120 Speaker 3: And they're fundamentally I think you use the word trust, 82 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:34,720 Speaker 3: trust is actually at the heart of the relationship. And 83 00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:37,039 Speaker 3: to Pelee's point, I mean we do keep getting asked 84 00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 3: those questions. I get that we will get those questions. 85 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:41,440 Speaker 3: It is a lot of money, it goes over a 86 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 3: long period of time. But what I'm really confident about 87 00:04:44,520 --> 00:04:46,120 Speaker 3: is we'll answer those questions. 88 00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:47,200 Speaker 4: That means something. 89 00:04:47,560 --> 00:04:50,279 Speaker 3: What means much more is the actions that we put 90 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 3: into place, and that is what's occurring. 91 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:57,960 Speaker 1: In the hours before his defense Minister sat down to 92 00:04:58,040 --> 00:05:03,040 Speaker 1: chat with cam Stewart, Anthony Albanizi was moving to reassure Australians. 93 00:05:03,120 --> 00:05:05,960 Speaker 1: The Royal Australian Navy was keeping close tabs on a 94 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 1: flotilla of Chinese warships currently off the coast of Wa. 95 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:14,040 Speaker 5: The Chinese vessels are currently, as of a very short 96 00:05:14,160 --> 00:05:16,040 Speaker 5: while ago, five. 97 00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:19,840 Speaker 2: Hundred and ninety three kilometers southwest of Adelaide. 98 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:23,400 Speaker 1: The trio of ships entered international waters between Australia and 99 00:05:23,560 --> 00:05:26,680 Speaker 1: New Zealand on Friday, where they conducted a series of 100 00:05:26,760 --> 00:05:30,919 Speaker 1: live fire exercises that sent air traffic control into disarray. 101 00:05:31,440 --> 00:05:35,839 Speaker 6: It, of course, last Friday, caused chaos in the air 102 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:40,279 Speaker 6: between New Zealand and Australia, forcing the diversion of forty 103 00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:44,640 Speaker 6: nine flights when it began a live fire exercise. 104 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:49,200 Speaker 1: The Chinese vessels have been circumnavigating Australia in the day since, 105 00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:52,160 Speaker 1: shadowed by Australian Navy ships. 106 00:05:52,440 --> 00:05:56,719 Speaker 7: In seas never previously sailed by the Chinese Navy. The 107 00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:00,919 Speaker 7: warships are being shadowed by HMAS Stewart, a New Zealand 108 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:04,560 Speaker 7: frigate to Kaha. The federal government believes China not only 109 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:08,480 Speaker 7: wants to show its military reach, but normalize its presence 110 00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:09,120 Speaker 7: in the region. 111 00:06:09,880 --> 00:06:12,680 Speaker 1: The appearance of the ships called the readiness of Australia's 112 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: defense force into question and prompted a diplomatic war of words, 113 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:20,800 Speaker 1: with leaders from Australia and New Zealand claiming China should 114 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 1: have given both nations a heads up before commencing the exercise. 115 00:06:25,720 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 1: In Adelaide on Wednesday. 116 00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:31,080 Speaker 4: It was the question on everybody's lips, how often have 117 00:06:31,120 --> 00:06:31,960 Speaker 4: we seen that before? 118 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:36,360 Speaker 3: We've seen Chinese warships in the vicinity of Australia before. 119 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:39,599 Speaker 3: I would describe it as an unusual event. It's not 120 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:44,800 Speaker 3: a completely unprecedented event, though. When it became clear that 121 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:49,520 Speaker 3: a task group was coming to Australia, we in an 122 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:52,920 Speaker 3: unprecedented way made a decision and it was very much 123 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:55,080 Speaker 3: a direction of mine to make sure that we were 124 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:59,000 Speaker 3: surveiling this to the greatest possible extent. We did that, 125 00:06:59,120 --> 00:07:01,360 Speaker 3: and I did that because it appeared to me at 126 00:07:01,400 --> 00:07:03,640 Speaker 3: the outset that there was the prospect of this Task 127 00:07:03,680 --> 00:07:07,119 Speaker 3: Group being in the vicinity of Australia for some time. 128 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:09,600 Speaker 3: We needed to do two things, which is what we 129 00:07:09,680 --> 00:07:12,600 Speaker 3: have done. The first was to ensure that the Task 130 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:15,720 Speaker 3: Group complied with international law at all times, and I'm 131 00:07:15,760 --> 00:07:18,360 Speaker 3: advised that they have and that is important to understand. 132 00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:21,720 Speaker 3: And secondly, to get a clear understanding of what the 133 00:07:21,800 --> 00:07:23,960 Speaker 3: Task Group is trying to achieve in its mission by 134 00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:26,880 Speaker 3: looking at exactly where it goes, it's configurations, the training 135 00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 3: and the activities that it's undertaken. And we've had a 136 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,280 Speaker 3: close eye on all of that, which of course is 137 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:35,000 Speaker 3: our right. I'd make this point as well, though international 138 00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:37,760 Speaker 3: law has to be our touchstone here. It has to 139 00:07:37,760 --> 00:07:41,680 Speaker 3: be our touchstone because there is much more often Australian 140 00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:45,040 Speaker 3: Navy ships in the vicinity of China than there are 141 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:47,480 Speaker 3: Chinese Navy ships in the vicinity of it. We do 142 00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:51,280 Speaker 3: live firing exercises that we do live firing exercises on 143 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:54,280 Speaker 3: the high seas, which is what China did. But we 144 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:56,960 Speaker 3: also were not happy about the notice that was given 145 00:07:57,000 --> 00:07:59,680 Speaker 3: by the Chinese Navy in that particular event, and we 146 00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:02,800 Speaker 3: made it our concerns known to China, both in Canberra 147 00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:05,120 Speaker 3: and Beijing and at the level of our foreign ministers. 148 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 3: But I come back to the point. We are much 149 00:08:07,520 --> 00:08:10,640 Speaker 3: more present in the vicinity of China than China is 150 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:12,840 Speaker 3: in the vicinity of Austina, and that's not gratuitous. That's 151 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:15,400 Speaker 3: for a reason because that's where our trading routes are 152 00:08:15,680 --> 00:08:17,760 Speaker 3: and it's really important that we are in a position 153 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:21,000 Speaker 3: to continue to assert freedm of navigation in and around 154 00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 3: our trading routes. 155 00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:23,000 Speaker 4: For that to occur. 156 00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:26,960 Speaker 3: To continue, international law has to be our touchstone and 157 00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 3: our bed rock. We're taking this very seriously. We've surveilled 158 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 3: this in a way that was not done previously under 159 00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:35,360 Speaker 3: the former government. But equally, we're not breathlessly trying to 160 00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:38,520 Speaker 3: hand this up either. And it's really important that we 161 00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:42,040 Speaker 3: observe the fact that they have been maintaining their obligations 162 00:08:42,040 --> 00:08:44,560 Speaker 3: in respect of the international law, and that's relevant in 163 00:08:44,559 --> 00:08:46,840 Speaker 3: the context of what we seek to do in the 164 00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:47,800 Speaker 3: proximity of China. 165 00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:48,680 Speaker 4: And that's fair enough. 166 00:08:48,679 --> 00:08:50,920 Speaker 2: Sure, but you've seen what they were doing, and I 167 00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:52,600 Speaker 2: think you said a couple of days ago, you're trying 168 00:08:52,640 --> 00:08:54,480 Speaker 2: to find out a bit more about exactly what they 169 00:08:54,480 --> 00:08:57,640 Speaker 2: were doing. But is it cricket? Are they trying to 170 00:08:57,679 --> 00:09:01,240 Speaker 2: send a message? Is this just bogs navy drills? 171 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:02,480 Speaker 4: Look, I'm not saying that. 172 00:09:02,760 --> 00:09:06,400 Speaker 3: I think it is really important to conduct this surveillance 173 00:09:06,520 --> 00:09:10,199 Speaker 3: to properly understand exactly what they were doing, what they 174 00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:14,520 Speaker 3: were practicing, and I think from there to understand what message, 175 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:16,720 Speaker 3: if any, is being sent to us. And I'm not 176 00:09:16,760 --> 00:09:19,720 Speaker 3: going to leap into that and speculate about that before 177 00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:22,720 Speaker 3: we get the proper assessments coming through in respect of 178 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 3: what we have observed, not for a moment, And I 179 00:09:26,400 --> 00:09:28,640 Speaker 3: don't want to be seen in suggesting that this is standard. 180 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:31,640 Speaker 3: That is not my position. It is the case that 181 00:09:31,679 --> 00:09:34,720 Speaker 3: they've complied with international law. We're not going to fall 182 00:09:34,760 --> 00:09:38,679 Speaker 3: into the trap of breathlessly complaining about activities which are 183 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,360 Speaker 3: in compliance with international law, which would lead us to 184 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:43,839 Speaker 3: being in a compromised position in terms of what we 185 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:47,040 Speaker 3: seek to do within the vicinity of China. That said, 186 00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:49,880 Speaker 3: we are clearly going to observe this really carefully, which 187 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:52,800 Speaker 3: we have been doing to understand exactly what's going on 188 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:56,280 Speaker 3: and to understand exactly what was being practiced and what 189 00:09:56,320 --> 00:09:59,640 Speaker 3: messages are being sent. And I'm not all sanguine about 190 00:09:59,679 --> 00:10:00,040 Speaker 3: all that. 191 00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:06,280 Speaker 1: In a surprise statement on Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanizi 192 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:09,320 Speaker 1: said he's open to sending Australian troops to Ukraine in 193 00:10:09,360 --> 00:10:13,520 Speaker 1: a peacekeeping capacity. It followed a fiery White House exchange 194 00:10:13,559 --> 00:10:18,000 Speaker 1: between Ukrainian President Voladimir Zelenski and US Vice President jd 195 00:10:18,120 --> 00:10:22,200 Speaker 1: Vance that flipped everyone's understanding of the Russia Ukraine War 196 00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:23,400 Speaker 1: on its head. 197 00:10:23,720 --> 00:10:26,840 Speaker 4: What kind of diplomacy? Ggus became aboved. 198 00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:28,679 Speaker 7: What do you mean? 199 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:31,160 Speaker 8: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's going to 200 00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 8: end the destruction of your country as but President, mister president, 201 00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,840 Speaker 8: with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come 202 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:38,520 Speaker 8: to the Oval Office to try to litigate this in 203 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:39,640 Speaker 8: front of the American. 204 00:10:39,280 --> 00:10:42,200 Speaker 1: Media right now, you guys in Adelaide on Wednesday, Defense 205 00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:46,240 Speaker 1: Minister Richard Miles said, comparing Australia's reluctance to send boats 206 00:10:46,240 --> 00:10:48,720 Speaker 1: to the Red Sea during a period of heightened attacks 207 00:10:48,760 --> 00:10:52,040 Speaker 1: on commercial shipping vessels in late twenty twenty three. Isn't 208 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:54,240 Speaker 1: exactly comparing apples with apples. 209 00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:58,040 Speaker 3: I think we need to be clear about exactly what 210 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:01,320 Speaker 3: America asked. We are folk and it is part of 211 00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:04,080 Speaker 3: what comes out of the Defense Strategic Review and is 212 00:11:04,120 --> 00:11:06,520 Speaker 3: now in the national defense strategy. We are very much 213 00:11:06,559 --> 00:11:09,240 Speaker 3: focused on the Indo Pacific. We are focused on our 214 00:11:09,280 --> 00:11:13,000 Speaker 3: strategic task, and that is to build a defense force 215 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:18,600 Speaker 3: which can resist coercion from any potential adversary. Now we 216 00:11:18,640 --> 00:11:22,440 Speaker 3: see that what is happening in Ukraine is relevant to that. 217 00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:26,120 Speaker 3: It's relevant to that because the global rules based order 218 00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 3: that is so central to our national interests as an 219 00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:33,559 Speaker 3: island trading nation where there's a physical manifestation and that's 220 00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:36,760 Speaker 3: our sea lines of communication, freedom navigation goes directly to 221 00:11:36,800 --> 00:11:40,080 Speaker 3: our national prosperity where all of that is under pressure 222 00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:42,520 Speaker 3: in our region and all of that is on trial 223 00:11:42,559 --> 00:11:43,559 Speaker 3: in Ukraine. 224 00:11:43,720 --> 00:11:44,080 Speaker 4: Now. 225 00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:47,560 Speaker 3: We have been supporting Ukraine from the get go and 226 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:51,079 Speaker 3: we will continue to support Ukraine. Right now, there are 227 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 3: Australian personnel in Britain who are involved in the training 228 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:57,880 Speaker 3: of new recruits to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. So we 229 00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:03,080 Speaker 3: actually have Australian men and women committed right now. The 230 00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:05,920 Speaker 3: only point we've made is that as we listen to 231 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 3: our partners, which over the last three years has been 232 00:12:08,160 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 3: the United States, but our partners in Europe, including the 233 00:12:10,320 --> 00:12:14,559 Speaker 3: United Kingdom, including Ukraine itself, when they have asked for support, 234 00:12:14,600 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 3: we have considered that and worked out how we can 235 00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:18,800 Speaker 3: do it. And if there is a request of this kind, 236 00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:21,160 Speaker 3: we'll do the same. We'll consider it and work out 237 00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:22,240 Speaker 3: if we can make a contribution. 238 00:12:22,720 --> 00:12:25,400 Speaker 2: And on that line, if the US military aid to 239 00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:29,360 Speaker 2: Ukraine continues to be frozen, would that be a reason 240 00:12:29,400 --> 00:12:32,880 Speaker 2: for Australia to consider an increase of military aid to Ukraine. 241 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:35,679 Speaker 3: I think the fundamental answer here is we will continue 242 00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:38,840 Speaker 3: to support Ukraine for as long as it takes for 243 00:12:38,960 --> 00:12:42,240 Speaker 3: Ukraine to resolve this conflict on its terms. And again, 244 00:12:42,559 --> 00:12:45,240 Speaker 3: it's an understandable question that's been consistently asked of me 245 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:48,600 Speaker 3: during the last three years, and we have consistently been 246 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:52,200 Speaker 3: announcing packages of support for Ukraine. Will continue to go 247 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:55,480 Speaker 3: down this path, and as requests are made of us 248 00:12:55,520 --> 00:12:58,200 Speaker 3: by Ukraine itself, by our partners who are supporting Ukraine, 249 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:02,640 Speaker 3: will consider them. 250 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:05,760 Speaker 1: Coming up, Shadow Minister for Defense Andrew Hasty sits down 251 00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:23,000 Speaker 1: with The Australian's Foreign Affairs and Defense correspondent Ben Packham 252 00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:26,040 Speaker 1: on Wednesday. Donald Trump's pick for a top job at 253 00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:29,119 Speaker 1: the US Department of Defense put the pressure on Australia 254 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:33,720 Speaker 1: to ratchet up defense spending. Elbridge Colby noted Australia is 255 00:13:33,760 --> 00:13:37,680 Speaker 1: currently well below the three percent level of GDP advocated 256 00:13:37,720 --> 00:13:42,680 Speaker 1: for by NATO, despite our relative proximity to China. Defense 257 00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:46,560 Speaker 1: Minister Richard Miles said Labor is, if re elected, willing 258 00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:48,920 Speaker 1: to engage with the US on defense spending. 259 00:13:49,480 --> 00:13:52,480 Speaker 3: Firstly, we have increased defense spending, as you said, Cam, 260 00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:55,760 Speaker 3: under our government. It's an additional fifty billion dollars over 261 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:58,360 Speaker 3: the decade, which is now actually in the budget. And 262 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:02,120 Speaker 3: to contextualize, that's the big increase in defense spending in 263 00:14:02,160 --> 00:14:06,559 Speaker 3: our peacetime history. So I understand very much the position 264 00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:09,320 Speaker 3: that America is taking. I think it is completely reasonable 265 00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:12,720 Speaker 3: that America is asking its friends and allies around. 266 00:14:12,360 --> 00:14:15,040 Speaker 4: The world to do more. We're totally willing. 267 00:14:14,840 --> 00:14:17,240 Speaker 3: To engage in that conversation with the United States, which 268 00:14:17,280 --> 00:14:18,400 Speaker 3: we've already started. 269 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:23,080 Speaker 1: Males opposition counterpart Andrew Hasty told Ben Packham the coalition 270 00:14:23,200 --> 00:14:24,960 Speaker 1: will pony up if they're elected. 271 00:14:25,640 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 9: Look, we've already indicated very publicly that we will increase 272 00:14:28,680 --> 00:14:31,280 Speaker 9: defense expenditure. We gave a hint of that over the 273 00:14:31,280 --> 00:14:34,720 Speaker 9: weekend with the additional three billion dollars committed towards the 274 00:14:34,760 --> 00:14:37,320 Speaker 9: acquisition of the fourth squadron of F thirty five's but 275 00:14:37,400 --> 00:14:40,880 Speaker 9: will announce our full costings and our budgetary plan in 276 00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 9: Duke Horse closer to the election. 277 00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:45,960 Speaker 10: A whole one percent. That's quite a big leap. Where 278 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:48,240 Speaker 10: does the money come from? Do you think to get 279 00:14:48,280 --> 00:14:50,320 Speaker 10: the defense budget up to that sort of a level. 280 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:52,680 Speaker 9: That's a good question, and I'm sure the Deputy Prime 281 00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:55,200 Speaker 9: minister's working that through as well, because it's a message 282 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:57,840 Speaker 9: to Australia from Bridge Colby, who's going to take a 283 00:14:57,920 --> 00:15:00,120 Speaker 9: very central part in the Trump administration. 284 00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:02,360 Speaker 4: So we've got our plan. We're going to. 285 00:15:02,280 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 9: Announce that in due course and you won't be getting 286 00:15:04,320 --> 00:15:05,760 Speaker 9: a scoop here, Ben, Sorry to say. 287 00:15:06,240 --> 00:15:09,440 Speaker 10: The personnel crisis the defense is facing, it's one of 288 00:15:09,480 --> 00:15:13,680 Speaker 10: the biggest challenges facing the ADF and it could seriously 289 00:15:13,720 --> 00:15:16,800 Speaker 10: limit our capability ambitions. This isn't a new thing. It 290 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 10: was a problem under the former government too. What would 291 00:15:20,520 --> 00:15:24,840 Speaker 10: the Coalition do differently to get more Australians into uniform. 292 00:15:25,400 --> 00:15:30,280 Speaker 10: Is it about offering more money, lowering standards? What's the plan? 293 00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:32,000 Speaker 4: I think there's a range of things. 294 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:35,960 Speaker 9: We are having a recruiting crisis and last year ninety 295 00:15:36,000 --> 00:15:40,200 Speaker 9: percent of ADF applicants withdrew their application from defense. I 296 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:44,400 Speaker 9: think we need to challenge this generation of Australians to 297 00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:48,520 Speaker 9: service fairly old school values of serving your country, defending 298 00:15:48,520 --> 00:15:51,840 Speaker 9: your country, being part of this great Anzac tradition which 299 00:15:51,840 --> 00:15:52,880 Speaker 9: has been handed down to us. 300 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:53,960 Speaker 4: I think that's really important. 301 00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:56,600 Speaker 9: And the point I'm making is political leadership matters here 302 00:15:56,600 --> 00:15:59,000 Speaker 9: and if we're not getting a signal from the government 303 00:15:59,040 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 9: that service in the is important. It's a really great 304 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 9: opportunity to grow as a person, and of course there 305 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:07,160 Speaker 9: are benefits as well. But whenever he ad is about 306 00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:10,640 Speaker 9: self actualization rather than service, if it's not a challenge 307 00:16:10,760 --> 00:16:12,400 Speaker 9: given to these young people, they're not going to take 308 00:16:12,400 --> 00:16:15,280 Speaker 9: it up. I also think there's big problems within recruiting itself. 309 00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:20,920 Speaker 9: Administrative bungles, people being basically eliminated because of previous medical records, 310 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:22,960 Speaker 9: which I think are quite trivial. So there's a risk 311 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:27,000 Speaker 9: aversion within the actual contractors who run recruiting, and I 312 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 9: think we should have more uniforms against that problem, just 313 00:16:29,480 --> 00:16:31,840 Speaker 9: like the Marine Corps do. They put their best officers 314 00:16:31,840 --> 00:16:33,880 Speaker 9: and they're best enlisted against the problem. They give them 315 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 9: targets and it's a part of progression for them in 316 00:16:36,760 --> 00:16:37,280 Speaker 9: their careers. 317 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:42,040 Speaker 10: You've been quite direct in your attacks on Anthony Albanezi 318 00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:45,920 Speaker 10: and Richard Miles, accusing them of weak leadership. You said 319 00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:49,760 Speaker 10: it recently in relation to the Chinese warships. How do 320 00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:53,200 Speaker 10: you think the government has been weak and what would 321 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:55,000 Speaker 10: do you do differently on defense? 322 00:16:55,080 --> 00:16:56,880 Speaker 9: I think the Prime Minister failed to stand up for 323 00:16:56,920 --> 00:17:00,160 Speaker 9: the national interest and he failed to insist on mutual respect. Now, 324 00:17:00,200 --> 00:17:03,400 Speaker 9: the Deputy Prime Minister said that we often do patrols 325 00:17:03,560 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 9: up in waters that are contested under international law as 326 00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:11,800 Speaker 9: part of multilateral formations or groupings, and my understanding is 327 00:17:11,840 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 9: whenever we've done live fire in that context, it's always 328 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:18,200 Speaker 9: been deconflicted, controlled and as part of a wider coalition. 329 00:17:18,600 --> 00:17:21,320 Speaker 9: For example, went not off the coast of China, disrupting 330 00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:24,040 Speaker 9: their commercial flight path, and so the issue was that 331 00:17:24,119 --> 00:17:27,720 Speaker 9: we didn't get notice and it disrupted our commercial flight path, 332 00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:30,359 Speaker 9: and I think the message is quite clear from the 333 00:17:30,440 --> 00:17:33,960 Speaker 9: Chinese government. They're now a global power with a bluewater navy. 334 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:36,719 Speaker 9: They're projecting deep into our waters. And this happened at 335 00:17:36,720 --> 00:17:40,040 Speaker 9: the same time, of course, that Donald Trump was resetting 336 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:43,840 Speaker 9: relationships in Europe with NATO, and I think it was 337 00:17:43,840 --> 00:17:45,760 Speaker 9: a test for US. There's a reason why they sailed 338 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:49,240 Speaker 9: past the Philippines through the Arafuracy, the coral Seed, down 339 00:17:49,280 --> 00:17:52,640 Speaker 9: past Sydney, and they've circumnavigated the country as well. 340 00:17:52,720 --> 00:17:53,360 Speaker 4: So I think there's a. 341 00:17:53,280 --> 00:17:57,399 Speaker 9: Message there, and I think the average person on the 342 00:17:57,440 --> 00:17:59,920 Speaker 9: street with a PhD in Life got the message pretty 343 00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:00,520 Speaker 9: and clear. 344 00:18:02,680 --> 00:18:05,520 Speaker 10: Is it strange to you that Anthony ALBINIZI would be 345 00:18:05,600 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 10: open to sending troops to Ukraine but not Peter Dutton. 346 00:18:09,280 --> 00:18:12,639 Speaker 10: Why shouldn't we back our support for Kiev with boots 347 00:18:12,680 --> 00:18:13,200 Speaker 10: on the ground. 348 00:18:13,520 --> 00:18:16,320 Speaker 9: Look, I think there's been no formal request as I 349 00:18:16,400 --> 00:18:18,960 Speaker 9: understand it, and this would be a decision for the 350 00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 9: Prime Minister and the National Security Committee of Cabinet, and 351 00:18:21,600 --> 00:18:24,640 Speaker 9: so there's a lot to play out yet in the negotiations, 352 00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:27,560 Speaker 9: which reached an inflection point on the weekend in the 353 00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:30,600 Speaker 9: White House. And so I think this is a decision 354 00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:33,440 Speaker 9: for a government of the day when a request comes forward. 355 00:18:33,359 --> 00:18:35,639 Speaker 4: That's not ruling it in or ruling it out. But 356 00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:37,160 Speaker 4: I just don't think we should rush. I just don't 357 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:37,879 Speaker 4: think we should rush to. 358 00:18:37,840 --> 00:18:41,200 Speaker 9: Commit young Australians to a conflict without a request. And 359 00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:44,280 Speaker 9: so I think Peter and I are very closely aligned 360 00:18:44,320 --> 00:18:44,600 Speaker 9: on this. 361 00:18:44,880 --> 00:18:45,520 Speaker 4: On Orcus. 362 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:51,200 Speaker 10: We've seen Donald Trump cozy up to Russia, call Vladimir 363 00:18:51,320 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 10: Zelinsky a dictator and whaka twenty five percent tariff on 364 00:18:54,800 --> 00:18:59,399 Speaker 10: Canada and Mexico. Do you trust Donald Trump to do 365 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:03,199 Speaker 10: what he says? And in your view, is UCAS a 366 00:19:03,280 --> 00:19:04,800 Speaker 10: lock under his leadership? 367 00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:07,720 Speaker 4: Look, I think UCUS is a lock under his leadership. 368 00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:10,880 Speaker 9: But I think Donald Trump as a president studies your 369 00:19:10,880 --> 00:19:15,359 Speaker 9: hand very closely. And I think it's incumbent upon the 370 00:19:15,400 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 9: Prime Minister to demonstrate the strong hand in future negotiations. 371 00:19:19,680 --> 00:19:21,679 Speaker 4: And I think Prime Minister is flat flooded. 372 00:19:21,720 --> 00:19:24,960 Speaker 9: He's not agile, and he should have gone already to 373 00:19:24,960 --> 00:19:26,720 Speaker 9: meet with Donald Trump and to. 374 00:19:26,760 --> 00:19:28,720 Speaker 4: Establish that relationship. We've got a great hand. 375 00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:31,040 Speaker 9: We've got strategic depth here, which is what we're going 376 00:19:31,080 --> 00:19:33,960 Speaker 9: to deliver through Aucus. We're already delivering it through Darwin 377 00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:36,600 Speaker 9: and Alice Springs and the joint facilities that we have there. 378 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:39,840 Speaker 4: And of course we have an abundance of. 379 00:19:39,840 --> 00:19:42,399 Speaker 9: Rare earths and critical minerals which will be essential for 380 00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:44,800 Speaker 9: military and space applications going forward. 381 00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:48,040 Speaker 10: So we need to hume bearing gifts, really. 382 00:19:47,920 --> 00:19:52,400 Speaker 9: Not come bearing gifts, stake our position and argue it 383 00:19:52,480 --> 00:19:52,840 Speaker 9: a bit. 384 00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:56,520 Speaker 4: A hip and shoulder in the Oval Office. 385 00:19:56,600 --> 00:19:59,160 Speaker 9: I think in any sort of negotiation you need strength. 386 00:20:06,960 --> 00:20:10,320 Speaker 1: Ben Packham is the Australian's Foreign Affairs and Defense correspondent 387 00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:14,040 Speaker 1: and Cameron Stewart is our chief international correspondent. You can 388 00:20:14,080 --> 00:20:16,760 Speaker 1: read all our teams reporting and analysis right now at 389 00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:18,560 Speaker 1: the Australian dot com dot au