WEBVTT - Sharri | 20 August

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:05.559
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry.

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Good Evening.

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to the show tonight bombshell revelations about how Palestinian

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 4>visas were issued without any manual checks at all. Security

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 4>insiders tell me visitor visas have been approved in an

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 4>automated process, with intelligence agencies later scrambling those exclusive details

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 4>in a moment.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 3>The Prime Minister.

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:35.959
<v Speaker 4>Today under pressure over questions around national security. Shadow Immigration

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Minister Dan Tian will be on the show a bit

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 4>later and will cross live to the US after the

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 4>first day of the Democratic National Convention. I'll get Republican

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 4>US Acting Attorney General Matthew Whittaker's take on the star

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 4>studded show later on, But first tonight to our exclusive

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 4>revelation that visas to Palestinians have been approved without any

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 4>manual security checks at all. Concerned security insiders told me

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 4>today that visitor visas have been approved for Gazans in

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 4>an automated process. This has left intelligence agencies later scrambling

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 4>to ensure that none pose a risk to national security.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 4>This shocking revelation comes as figures show Australia is taking

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 4>more Palestinians from Gaza than almost anywhere in the developed world,

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 4>and far more than surrounding Islamic countries. Yet the Albanezi

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 4>government security process is weaker than other nations. Data shows

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Australia has issued visas to two nine hundred and twenty

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 4>two Palestinians, one thy five hundred are already in the country.

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>By contrast, Japan, Sweden, Switzerland, Norway and Spain were among

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 4>thirty five countries not to take in any Palestinians since

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 4>octob seven. Of our five Eyes allies, the US accepted

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 4>only seventeen one hundred and sixty eight to the UK,

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven to New Zealand, and forty one to Canada.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Neighboring Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia have taken in none,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 4>according to data compiled by the Coalition, and Spain is fascinating.

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 4>It's one of the leading pro Palestinian countries politically, it's

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 4>already recognized Palestine as an independent country. Yet it's taken

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 4>in no Palestinians since October seven. And there's a reason.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 4>The intense security risk. It's something the powerful chair of

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 4>the United States Congressional Foreign Affairs Committee spoke to me

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 4>about on Thursday. Michael McColl said that her mask sympathizers

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 4>could be ticking time bombs.

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 5>You have to properly vet individuals before you bring them

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 5>in to your country, otherwise you could be bringing in,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, ticking time bonds, hamas or other terrorists that

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 5>could cause problems.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 4>Now, these guasans were given visitor visas, as ad Husick said,

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 4>because it's faster. Well Inside has told me today that

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 4>the visitor visa process is clunky and out of date.

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 4>It involves an online questionnaire where an electronic assessment classifies

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 4>people into.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Different risk categories.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 4>There would be a ping an alert if a person's

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 4>name hits a watch list, an Interpol red notice or

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Australia's Movement Alert list. But unless someone's name is flagged

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 4>on a watch list, then they're not referred for a

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 4>manual security assessment, no manual checks. I'm told there's a

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 4>bias in the system to grant the visa because these

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 4>visas are usually for people visiting family members, not for

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>people coming from.

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>A terrorist hotspot.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 4>If there's no red flag based on someone's name or

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>their own answers to the online questionnaire, then the visa

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 4>is automatically granted. And this can happen as we know

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 4>in as little as one hour.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 4>I asked Home Affairs about this today. They said they

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 4>couldn't respond to my questions until tomorrow, and I'll bring

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 4>you their answers if I have them tomorrow night. But

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 4>we know that a visa was granted in just one

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 4>hour after an online application filled out by this man

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 4>am Endlan for his mother. And as you know, DEFAT

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:45.799
<v Speaker 4>officials have admitted that visas are coming through in one hour.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 5>Taken look globally, a very large number of.

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Visit of visas would be done inside. And now.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 4>This follows the admission by the AZO Director General, Mike

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Burgess that security checks for Palace Indians were only done

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 4>if certain triggers were established, and that was the line

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 4>that the Prime Minister misquoted and misled Australians over. Now

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 4>it's actually a fraudulent use of the visa system to

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 4>give Gazans visitor visas.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Are they here in a holiday?

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Well no, because Tony Burke, the Minister, has said that

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 4>he's not going to send anyone back to Gaza. The

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Coalition hounded the Albanese government in parliament again today about

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 4>why our security process is weaker than other countries Today.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 6>It was reported that before approving visas for people coming

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 6>from the terrorist controlled gars of war zone, Canada requires

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 6>applicants to submit to face to face interviews and biometric

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 6>testing in a third country, Egypt. Why didn't the government

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 6>have a similar arrangement in place before granting more than

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 6>two nine hundred tourist visas.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 4>In response to the Prime Minister says, not all Palestinians

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 4>support Hamas.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 7>People are from Gaza or the West Bank for that matter,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 7>certainly not automatically Hamas supporters and shouldn't be set still

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 7>as boys.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's right. Of course.

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Not all Palestinians support Hermas, but many do. The government

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 4>itself has rejected more than seven thousand visa applications from

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Gaza on security grounds, and there were many civilians who

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>took part alongside Hermas in the October seven attacks, and

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 4>other civilians went in and looted homes, stepping over children

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>and families still lying there warm and bleeding. Civilians also

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 4>celebrated on the streets of Gaza as bloodied Israeli bodies

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 4>were paraded around and hostages dragged in. But Albinizi is right,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 4>not all Palestinians support Hermas. And here's the point, what

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 4>is he doing to ensure that her Musk sympathizers or worse,

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 4>actual her Musk members aren't coming to Australia. Automated visa

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 4>visitor visas are not the answer. Security checks that take

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 4>as little as one hour without any manual assessment is

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 4>certainly not going to sort through those posing a risk

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 4>from the refugees.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, Peter dartenass today.

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 4>If there was a third country where security assessments were

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 4>being completed.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 8>Processing a visa application, or somebody is offshore in a

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 8>third country like Jordan, means a person of concern can

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 8>be stopped before getting to Australia. The last government used

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 8>this process when bringing people in from Syria. The Prime

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.119
<v Speaker 8>Minister says the process for granting twenty nine hundred tourist

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 8>visas to those coming from the terrorist control of Gaza

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 8>zone followed the same process. Can the Prime Minister advise

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 8>in which third party country these people were sent to

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 8>for screening before they come to Australia.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 4>There's not now, Dante and who'll be on my show

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 4>A bit later, he asked five times how many of

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 4>the two nine hundred visas from Gaza have been counseled

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 4>five times. The Prime Minister wouldn't answer and instead attack

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 4>to the coalition for asking questions about this instead of

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 4>other topics.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 7>I could have asked a question about the cost of living,

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 7>could have asked a question about order from about the

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 7>visit of the president elective Indonesia promised to doesn't.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 4>He think national security is important to worry about. It's

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 4>so utterly confusing to see this lack of regard for

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 4>our safety, for our children's safety. It's so utterly confusing

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 4>that the Albanezy government and even Asio think it's okay

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 4>for people to come here who support Humus, because Mike

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Burgess has said as much.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 9>If it's just rhetorical report and they don't have a

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 9>ideology or support for a violent extream as an ideology,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 9>then that's not a problem.

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Foreign Affairs editor Greg Sheridan said today that in his

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 4>forty five years of journalism he can't recall any minister

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 4>or official saying that it was okay to rhetorically support

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 4>a terror group, let alone someone who was seeking to

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 4>come to Australia. Greg Sheridan asks, is it okay to

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 4>give verbal support to al Qaeda or Islamic State or

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 4>even the Ku Klux Klan. He says, Jimas is not

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 4>only a terrorist organization, its charter contains the most foul

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 4>and vicious traditional anti Semitism.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 3>He says.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 4>The government must clarify what it means to say some degree.

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Of support for Hamas is no problem.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 4>He says, the Opposition would be failing its duty to

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 4>the nation to leave this matter unresolved, and it is

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 4>a good point. Is the Prime Minister not concerned that

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 4>he's bringing people potentially to our country who hate Jews?

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't this change.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Australia's social fabric? It seems the Prime Minister has quickly

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 4>forgotten the barbarities inflicted by Hermas on October seven. He

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 4>must have forgotten, or perhaps he doesn't care, because as

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 4>the data shows, Australia is taking in a near record

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 4>number of Palestinians from Gaza without any adequate security checks.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's bring in tonight's panel, former Speaker of

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 4>the House Bronwyn Bishop and Menzies Research Center executive director

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 4>David Hughes.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to you both. Great to see you. Brown.

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 4>The Prime Minister today five times refused to say whether

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 4>any Palestinians who'd already arrived in Australia have now had

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 4>their visas revoked.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Is this good enough?

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 10>What is first becoming our cover up? Isn't it?

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 11>The denials and the pathetic way in which Albanezi today

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 11>tried to avoid answering those questions was made face of

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 11>the political process. And you can only say that he's

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 11>continually covering up of the issue.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 10>Means there's something to hide. What is it? We need

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 10>to know, we need to be told.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 11>We hear the old adage that you know, to make

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 11>a mistake is one thing, but to try and cover

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 11>it up there's entirely another.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 10>And that's what's happening now. So when you.

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 11>Look at the seriousness of national security, you realize that

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 11>Albanezi removed the head of ASIO from the Security Committee

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 11>of Cabinet, had to put him back.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 10>But who do you replace him with?

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 11>Bowen with his climate change rubbish. You realize that there

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 11>was the question of national security doesn't matter to him.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 11>He's like the kid who was still at university with

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 11>his megaphone yelling out pro Palestinian stuff. Then he hasn't

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 11>changed I say again again, he hasn't changed his spot

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 11>he hasn't.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 4>David, the government tried to say today that the Coalition

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 4>had a similar process when they accepted people from other

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 4>dangerous parts of the world.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that argument stands up to scrutiny.

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 12>Well, I can assure you that's not the case. I

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 12>was there in a senior role in the government at

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 12>the time, and there's a number of visa pathways that

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 12>governments can use, and those other nations that you mentioned

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 12>that have taken less than one hundred people from Gaza

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 12>are clearly using the humanitarian pathway, and there's two conditions

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 12>that need to be met, and it's a lengthy process.

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 12>You need to demonstrate that you meet the criteria on

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 12>humanitarian grounds and you need to undergo a very comprehensive

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 12>security check. Now that's a pathway that other countries are

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 12>following that we followed in the past, particularly from people

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 12>from war zones where it's all the more important. What

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 12>concerns me here is we're letting people in on tourist visas.

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 12>It's very hard once somebody's in the country, if they

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 12>do found to have said something averse or support for Hamas,

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 12>effectively need to be deported, which is a very lengthy

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 12>process if the government goes down that path, and to

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 12>have the head of our domestic intelligence service to say

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 12>that somebody can still be allowed in and kind of

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 12>offered support for a terrorist group is deeply, deeply concerning.

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 12>So thank you for providing scrutiny on these issues, and.

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 3>We'll continue to do so.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 4>And we're going to come back to this topic in

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 4>the show I've got as I said dantean on a

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 4>bit later. But now let's have a look at the

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 4>fiasco in the New Southwle's Liberal Party and in breaking news,

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 4>the New Southwello's Liberals have abandoned their bid to take

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 4>the electoral Commission in New South Wales to court Brnwan.

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 4>This has been a massive internal fiasco, extreme incompetence here

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 4>that there are dozens of councils which now won't have Liberal.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 3>Candidates, including mine, oh including yours as well. So what

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 3>do you think needs to happy?

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean there's questions over Mark Speakman's involvement, what he

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 4>knew about this, the opposition leader in New South Wales.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 4>For people who don't know, he's got a very low profile.

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Do you think you know he needs to take some

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 4>responsibility as well?

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 11>Look, Cherry, I have never seen a mess like this.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 10>It's unprecedented.

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 11>And what needs to happen is the slate has to

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 11>be wipe clean in order that something can be done

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 11>to show that the division can in fact run a

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 11>federal election. There are still people, including in my olef set,

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 11>which does not have an endorse candidate, despite the fact

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 11>that requests have.

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 10>Been made again and again for preselection.

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 11>So we need to have a situation arise whereby there

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 11>can be not only a competently run division, but it

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 11>has to be believably competently run. Now there's been a

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 11>sacrificial lamb in that the Richard Shields has been the

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 11>sacrificial lamb, but that's not enough.

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Because it needs to go as well.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 11>All the people won't until action is taken, and the presidency,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 11>under the Constitution as it is now, has a very

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 11>important role to play in. Certain decisions can't be made

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 11>without the president, so he really has to consider his position.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 11>He really does, because the whole of the division is

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 11>now a laughing stock and the leadership has to be

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 11>seen to be in charge and it needs to have

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 11>a clean fleet.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 3>David.

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 4>The Daily Telegraph has reported that the Opposition leader Mark

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Speakman was warned that the party was headed for an iceberg,

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>so I don't think there's a suggestion that he should

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 4>step down, but clearly enough people knew that this process

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 4>wasn't going to be met.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 12>John Howard said earlier in the year that he had

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 12>concerns with running indoors Liberal candidates local governments because it

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 12>depletes resources and the main game, of course is Canberra,

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 12>and of course situations like this do take resources away

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 12>from the cort responsibility of the Liberal Party, which is

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 12>providing a Liberal prime minister in Canberra. Some good news, though, Sharhi,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 12>in the last ten minutes or so, I've just seen

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 12>that Brian Locknae has been appointed to head a review

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 12>into this situation in New South Wales, and of course

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 12>no Brian was John Howard's former campaign director, so hopefully

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 12>he'll steady the ship.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 10>I just think.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 11>It has to be seen by people that responsibility has

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 11>been taken and it can be a competently run division and.

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 10>That can't happen really if Don Harwin remains, if he's

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 10>still that.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 4>But David, when you say that it takes resources away

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 4>from focusing on the federal Liberal Party are you saying

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>that perhaps long term the New Southeales Liberal Party or

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 4>even other state Liberal parties shouldn't be in charge of

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 4>the local council process.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 12>Well, Dean John Howard's view to an extent, think about

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.239
<v Speaker 12>it this way, Shari. For a federal election, the New

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 12>South Wales division has to select fifty fifty candidates for

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 12>fifty lower House seats. I think it's around ninety three.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 12>For state parliament. In this instance there would have been

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 12>around six hundred applications, so it is a very big

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 12>drain on resources.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 3>So who would run it than just individual people do

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 3>it themselves.

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 11>To be blunt, that's where it used to be done.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 11>Every local government conference ran a lodge its own documentation,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 11>and quite frankly, if they'd just said the day before,

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 11>look we're having probably we can't get it all through

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 11>the portal, do your own, which some people did because

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 11>they got win that things weren't doing too well, then

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 11>they could have been saved. I mean in terms of

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 11>those people who have missed out. Take my own area

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 11>for instance, there is.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 10>Nobody to vote for.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 11>We're disenfranchised, and there are the personal stories of people

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 11>who have already spent money ready to buy core flutes

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 11>and money on their own credit cards.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 4>But of course it matters not It matters as well

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 4>for residents, for people who don't want radical policies or

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 4>prop activism on the street.

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 11>And we're in the difficult position where because of the

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 11>incompetence of the division, then people are disenfranchised.

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 10>They have not someone to vote for.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's quickly turn to the RBA, because the

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 4>minutes from their meeting on August fifth to six, the

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 4>two day meeting, have just been released and they put

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 4>more cold water on any chance of a rate cut

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 4>before next year, saying it would result in inflation remaining persistent. David,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 4>though we keep hearing that there might be rate cuts.

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this talk, especially politically, won't let up despite.

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 3>The minutes being there in black and white.

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 12>It's extraordinary. Shari Anthony Alberanezi might be the first Prime

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 12>Minister to never preside over an inflation rate within the

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 12>RBA's target since they started setting target rates in the

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 12>nineteen nineties. So their target for inflation ideally should be

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 12>between two and three percent. At the moment, it's running

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 12>close to four percent, and there's no likelihood of that

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 12>being down for another two years.

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 4>What do you think, Brian Wan, are you expecting we

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.880
<v Speaker 4>might see a rate cut at the start of next

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 4>year or are you pessimistic given the level of both

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 4>state and federal government spending, that inflation just might not

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 4>come down enough to even have a rate cut at

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 4>the start of next year.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 11>While the particularly the snake Darmer the Treasurer refuses to

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 11>acknowledge that he's spending policies and that of other labor

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 11>state governments US keeping those rates high and pleasure rates high,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 11>the Reserve Bank has no option but to keep saying

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 11>that we are thinking about putting them up. If you

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 11>don't get your wreck together, government, we will put them

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 11>up to try and make them stop the outrageous extra

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 11>spending that they're doing.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 4>All right from Bishop David Hughes, Great to see you

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 4>both again. Now let's cross to the United States, where

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 4>the Democratic National Convention kicked off in Chicago, and for

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 4>day one, the Democrats brought out the who's who of

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 4>the party to speak, including Hillary Clinton.

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 13>Kamla cares cares about kids and families, cares about America.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 13>Donald only cares about himself. So it is no surprise,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 13>is it that he is lying about Kamala's record. He's

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 13>mocking her name and her laugh sounds familiar. But we

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 13>have him on the run now.

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 4>And eyes were also on Joe Biden, who was trying

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 4>to salvage his own life. I see just as much

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 4>as he was speaking about Kamala.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 14>COVID no longer controls our lives. But God from economic

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 14>crisis to the strongest economy in the entire world. Record

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 14>sixty million new jobs, record, small business growth, record high,

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 14>stock market record high far one case wages up, inflation down,

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 14>way down, and continue to go down.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 4>It can talk up the US economy all he wants,

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 4>but the truth is there are concerns about a recession.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 4>Well let's bring in now former US Acting Attorney General

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Matthew Whittaker. Thank you, great to see you again. Look,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 4>what were your main takeouts from the first day of

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 4>this convention.

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the Democrats going to be with you, Shari.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I think the Democrats feel that the more you say things,

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not true, the more it might resonate.

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Because what's happening is is that the things that were

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>being said from the stage last night are just not

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>what the ordinary Americans are experienced in places you know

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that I travel all the time, and places where I

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, where I spend a large majority of my time.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I just I see, for example, a lot of discussion

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about Kamala Harris and her policies. She hasn't announced any

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>policies except price controls, which is kind of a failed

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>socialist idea that that ultimately has never worked, and it's

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a cover up for when overspending by the government inflates

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the goods and services that people use on an everyday basis.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, this was a way for

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>them to get some of those folks on the stage

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and then off the stage. I think you're going to

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>see much more messaging about policy, I hope, but you know,

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>at the same time time, Kamala Harris hasn't really announced

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>any policies except price controls.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 4>At this point, well, it seems to be that the

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Democrats are running a campaign mostly based on personality not policy,

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 4>as you say, because the attacks on Trump came thick

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 4>and fast. He was called a loser, a plague on

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 4>the American conscience, a scab, even chance saying.

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Lock him up.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 4>So perhaps we are headed for what do you think

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 4>a campaign that's more based ony on personality, on attacking

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Trump personally, rather than on key policy planks.

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the case. You know, I was

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>at the Republican National Convention as a delegate, and I

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>don't remember that many speakers worrying about or addressing Joe Biden,

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>who is the nominee at the time before they did

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>their you know, switch out a month ago. But you

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>know you were going to see. I think the left

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to not be honest about what they stand for.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of the what I would call the

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Obama strat know, he very much ran as a centrist.

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He very much ran as as kind of this idea

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of hope and change without any really policy provisions. And

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what they're trying to do with Kamala

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Harris is not allow her to talk about what she

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>would do and her policies at least based on how

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>she ran in twenty twenty and what her core philosophies

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are as a California Liberal, I think you're going to

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>see her want to be very much a left wing

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>radical in her policy approach.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we'll speaking of left wing radicals.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean we saw I say up there endorsing Kamala,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 4>which should have many people worried. We also saw Joy

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Biden again have problems with his teleprompter.

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I have a look at this quote.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 14>Women are not without electrical not allowed, not without electoral,

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 14>electoral or political power.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 4>Us women, we can be electric of it. Matthew, what

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 4>did you make of that moment to and Biden's speech.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>More broadly, well, I mean, you see again someone he's

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>trying as hard as he can, and I think that's

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of his biggest undoing and why he's not their

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 1>nominee and why this isn't a convention about Joe Biden,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>as I think, you know, he did not instill confidence

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that he even understood what he was talking about. I mean,

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, at the same time, I think the

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>American people are really wanting authentic You know, you see,

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.359
<v Speaker 1>for example, Donald Trump stand up and do press conferences

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and take questions from a hostile press that is not

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in favor of him being elected. And then at the

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>same time you see Kamala Harris and Joe Biden and

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really all of these politicians speak from teleprompters with remarks

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't even write themselves about policies and about

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas and issues that they don't even know what they

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>stand for. So but yeah, she could still with to

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>start contrast. Yeah, there's no doubt. There is no doubt.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a coin flip election right now, and it's

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>going to all depend on who shows up to vote.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 4>All right, Matthew Whittaker, thank you very much for your

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 4>time now after the break, Shadow Immigration Minister Dan Tian

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 4>hounded Albinizi today about how many guards and visas have

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.239
<v Speaker 4>been canceled after they were already issued. And I'm going

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 4>to ask him what he knows about this when he's

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 4>on the show next and still coming up. Will America

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 4>step in to defend Taiwan if China invades and.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Could this spark a world war?

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, an influential US congressman gives me his view. Welcome

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 4>back with Shadow Immigration Minister Dan tin pursued the Prime

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 4>Minister in question time today about how many Palestinian visas

0:26:56.000 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 4>had been canceled after they were issued. Refuse to answer

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 4>the question five times. You think this would be a

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 4>critical question to answer. Has the government brought people into

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 4>Australia who pose a risk to our national security and

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 4>if their visas have been revoked.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, what has happened to them?

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 4>Home Affairs figures show that forty three visitor visas were

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 4>canceled between October seven and August this year. Twenty were

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 4>then restored on appeal. Well, who was the appeal made

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 4>to and where are those twenty three who've had their

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 4>visas counceled to discuss? I spoke with Dantean a little earlier.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Dantein thank you very much for your time. You asked

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 4>the Prime Minister five times today how many visas had

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 4>been canceled. Is it your understanding that people were already

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 4>here in Australia when their visas were canceled.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 15>Well, we're not quite sure, Sharhi, but we think that

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.479
<v Speaker 15>that information is incredibly important for the Australian people to know.

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 15>And what we saw from the Prime Minister today was

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 15>him being slippery and evasive to the most basic of

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 15>questions and that these questions fundamentally go to the security

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 15>of Australia. And I think this is really now becoming

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 15>a character test of the Prime Minister, the fact that

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 15>he's looking slippery and evasive, the fact that he won't

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 15>provide this information to the Australian people. I think starts

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 15>to raise big question marks about his character.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.719
<v Speaker 4>Look at the Prime Minister, as you say, he wouldn't

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 4>answer the question five times you asked it. If your

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 4>proposition is accurate, and Palestinians from Harmas controlled Gaza were

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 4>here in Australia when their visas were canceled, well what

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 4>would happen to these people if they didn't have visas?

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Would they have to go into detention?

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 15>Well it's a very good question and maybe one of

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 15>the reasons why the Prime Minister refuses to answer this

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 15>question because we don't know whether proper security checks were

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 15>done before people came here. As a matter of fact,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 15>it seems that some people weren't given proper security checks.

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 15>We don't know whether Azio was consulted before the government

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 15>decided to issue tourist visas to these people coming from

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 15>the Gaza war zone, because we asked that question yesterday

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 15>and the government wouldn't answer it. So everywhere we go

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 15>the government is just refusing to answer these most basic

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 15>of questions. There has to be something that they are hiding.

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 15>The PM has been slippery and evasive and it's beginning

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 15>to smell. But we just don't know why he's doing this,

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 15>but in the end he's going to have to come

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 15>clean because it's important that the Australian people know this information,

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 15>and we're going to keep asking the questions.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Look, we know that nearly three thousand powers Estinians have

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 4>been given visas by the Australian government. Around one thy

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 4>five hundred are already in Australia for those that were

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 4>given visitor visas to fast track the process. Look, these

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 4>are not designed for security screening. They're meant for visitors,

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, people who were coming here to visit family

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 4>members for example. So the security screening isn't as thorough

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 4>for electronic applications. My understanding is, and I've been briefed

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 4>by people who have been involved in this process from.

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 3>A security perspective, is.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 4>That applicants can fill out a form online, it can

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 4>be approved without any manual processing at all. So if

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 4>the person's name doesn't hit a terror watch list or

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 4>any other watch lists, it would simply be approved. This

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 4>is why visas have been approved in as little as

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 4>one hour. Does this sound adequate to you for the

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 4>her Musk controlled wall zone.

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 15>No, it doesn't, and that's why we've been asking the

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 15>government these questions and that's why today one of the

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 15>five questions that I asked the Prime Minister that once

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 15>again he refused to answer, was were there any cancelations

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 15>from people on shore? And he refused to answer that question.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 15>So there is something going on here. The Prime Minister

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 15>has been slippery and evasive. And there's only one reason

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 15>that we can think of that he's been slippery and evasive,

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 15>and that is that him and Andrew Giles cooked up

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 15>some scheme in a rush and now it's come back

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 15>to bite them because what they're now having to do

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 15>is chase their tails to make sure that the security

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 15>of the Australian people has been looked after, and the

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 15>Prime Minister doesn't seem to want to admit that, he

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 15>doesn't want.

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>To run up to it.

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 15>Have to remember that Andrew Giles and the PM are

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 15>from the left wing of the factions in the Labor Party.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 15>Andrew Giles was obviously a lawyer that did a lot

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 15>in the humanitarian space, so we knew where his heart

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 15>lay when he was appointed. And it seems like him

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 15>and the Prime Minister have heard in this case. And

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 15>Minister Giles might have been removed, but the Prime Minister

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 15>is still there, and I think we've got every right

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 15>to keep pursuing him and keep asking these questions of it.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Just finally, we've seen data today that Australia has been

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 4>more generous, if you can put it that way, or

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 4>you risking national security is another way to put it.

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 4>But Australia has taken more people from Gaza than any

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 4>other virtually any other developed country around the world. Even

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 4>pro Palestinian countries like Spain have taken no one from Gaza.

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 4>What has this said say to you about our approach

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 4>to national security under alban Easy.

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 15>I think the big question that this raises is was

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 15>that a vision that was taken by Prime Minister Albanesi

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 15>at the time with the then former Immigration Minister Andrew

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 15>Giles more about politics than about a humanitarian solution or

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 15>about trying to do something that was in our national interests.

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 15>So I think what it keeps pointing to is that

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 15>this was a political decision, it was made in political haste,

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 15>and it has jeopardized our national security. That seems to

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 15>me what these figures show. Now, if the Prime Minister

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 15>would come clean, we might be able to say, well,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 15>maybe it wasn't all about politics. But the fact that

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 15>he won't come clean I think points to the fact

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 15>that this was all about politics and national security was

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 15>a secondary consideration in the haste. We know that they're

0:33:55.240 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 15>being attacked by the Greens constantly on this issue. I

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 15>think they've panicked and I think that's what we're starting

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 15>to get to the bottom of. And you know, I

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 15>think if we keep pursuing this, sadly, I think we're

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 15>going to see that the Prime Minister and Anthony Albana easy, sorry,

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 15>the Prime Minister and Anthony Andrew Giles were up to

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 15>their eyeballs in this again and it's a calamity.

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, all right, Dante, and really appreciate your time.

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 15>Thank you very much, Thanks Shari.

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 4>And after the break, a powerful US politician tells me

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 4>whether he thinks America would step in to defend Taiwan.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 5>Unlike Ukraine, Taiwan cannot win this by themselves.

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 4>And if former intelligence officer will also join me to

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 4>discuss what a potential Chinese invasion would mean for Australia.

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 3>That's coming up.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 11>Well.

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 4>China's aggression in our region is sparking concern both here

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 4>and in the US. As Foreign affairs experts prepare for

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 4>how they would respond to a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan.

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 3>But when I sat down with.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 4>The United States Congressional Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Michael McCall

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 4>on Thursday, I asked him about this very topic. We

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 4>haven't played these remarks before.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Here's what he had to say.

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 4>There are concerns about China invading or reunification with Taiwan.

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 4>What time frame do you expect this could happen in

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 4>And I know you confident that the US would intervene

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 4>and come to Taiwan's defense or aid in the event

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 4>that that should happen.

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 5>It's a great question. I mean, unlike Ukraine, Taiwan cannot

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 5>win this by themselves. That you would need to help

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 5>in the United States, in the allies in the Pacific.

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 5>And I think the people of the United States will

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 5>have to answer that question the people Australia.

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:56.399
<v Speaker 2>But I will tell you the one thing that.

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 5>Gives me some hope in the last year and a

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 5>half are these alliances we've seen take place between Japan

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 5>South Korea, who were bitter enemies, the Philippines all being

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 5>allies reaching out to Vietnam, and now Indonesia and now

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 5>recently August the United States, UK and Australia coming together

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 5>in an alliance to basically deter this Malayan influence that

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing from China. Remember, we don't have a NATO

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 5>in the Pacific like we have in Europe, and so

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 5>the alliances are so important and that has come.

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Together rather well.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 5>In addition to the supplemental bill that I helped get

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 5>passed provided funding for the region and for protection, and

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 5>then the final piece that I got passed in the

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 5>Congress was.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 4>The August But just to clarify that answer, when you

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 4>say it would be up to the American people and

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 4>the Australian people whether America would come to the aid

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 4>of Taiwan, given as you just said, it wouldn't be

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 4>able to defend itself without that help.

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 3>So do you think it's not.

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 4>We don't know for certain whether the US would step in,

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 4>that's an open question at this point.

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I think deterrence is key.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 5>You project power of strength, you get peace, you project weakness,

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 5>you invite aggression.

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Conflict and war.

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's where we're seeing ourselves today, whether

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 5>it be in Ukraine and Eastern Europe, Middle East, and

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 5>now that I call it two hot wars and.

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 2>One hot zone, you know right here.

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 5>I think ultimately the American people would because they don't

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 5>want to see an aggressive communist China, but they also

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 5>would need to be educated as to why and isle

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 5>off the coast of China is so important. And we

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 5>can talk about freedom and democracy. But you know TSM

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 5>st at a recent tour, that's ninety percent of the

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 5>advanced global manufacturing of semi connector chips for the world.

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 2>If China invades.

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan, that facility shuts down and so does ninety percent

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 5>of the global supply of advanced semi connected chips. Think

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 5>about the economic downturn, the economic chaos and catastrophe that

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 5>that would bring to the world.

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 4>You are on a bipartisan trip, but do you think

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 4>there would be a different position should Kamala Harris be

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.760
<v Speaker 4>in the White House versus Donald Trump when it comes

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 4>to coming to Taiwan's defense.

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can tell you this.

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 5>The current administration, I think is responsible for a lot

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 5>of this aggression we've seen. We haven't led like the

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 5>United States has in the past, and we've invited aggression.

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 5>And quite frankly, it started with Afghanistan. I know Donald

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 5>Trump will tell you this never would have happened under

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 5>his watch. I personally a grieved that when I talked

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 5>to him, you know, he said, look, I told Putin,

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 5>if you invade Ukraine, I'm gonna hit you hard.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 2>And he told, you know, Chairman Chief, excuse me.

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 5>If you invade won I'm gonna bomb the you know what,

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 5>And you know what he meant it. And that's a

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 5>fear factor of deterrence that we really don't see from

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 5>this administration.

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 2>But we had it then. We don't have that now.

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 5>And I think Kamala Harris would just be an extension

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 5>of the Biden administration.

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 2>It's up to China.

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 5>It's up to Chairman she if he wants to continue

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 5>this aggression, if he invades Taiwan, if he threatens the Philippines.

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 2>If he takes the China South China Sea. We have

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 2>to respond to this. We have to be leaders of

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the freeway.

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 3>It's America up to the font.

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I believe they would be.

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 5>And if you look at not only the principles at

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 5>stake here and communists China trying to take the Pacific,

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 5>I think, but also the economics of sixty percent the

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 5>trade goes through the Taiwan Straits South China Sea and

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 5>then again shutting down ninety percent with the advanced semi connectors,

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 5>the world would have an economic.

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Shutdown, all right.

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 4>And that full interview, if you're interested in looking at

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 4>it somewhere, will be on the Sky News website a

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 4>bit later. But joining me to discuss this further is

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 4>the former head of the China Desk for the Defense

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Intelligence Organization here in Australia, also an author of Thunder

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 4>from the Silent Zone Rethinking China, Paul Monk.

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 3>Paul, great to have you back on the program.

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Look that response, Sure, that response there from the chair

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.280
<v Speaker 4>of the Foreign Affairs US Congressional Committee. That doesn't fill

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 4>you with a high degree of confidence that the US

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 4>necessarily would step in to defend China. What did to

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 4>defend Taiwan? What did you think of what he just

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.919
<v Speaker 4>had to say?

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 16>Well, it brings to mind remarked by Henry Kissinger made

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 16>as the Arab Spring unraveled, that being America's enemy is dangerous.

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 16>Being its friend is likely to be fake because of

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 16>the nature of US political system and the freedom of

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:09.399
<v Speaker 16>speech in the country. It's actually very difficult in many

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 16>circumstances to sustain a foreign commitment if it becomes costly

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 16>and drawn out. This has been demonstrated again and again

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 16>in the last half century. So what has to be

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 16>thought through here is what exactly are American options to first,

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 16>as Michael McCall expressed, a deter China from attempting to

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 16>invade Taiwan or an event that that begins to do

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 16>something decisive that requires a lot of thought and.

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 4>That deterrence apologies, go ahead, go on, Well, that determines

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 4>going to say that deterrence is so important. But I

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 4>think Joe Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan, the way he did it,

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 4>the fact that he has withheld weapons from Israel, all

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 4>of this seems makes it look like the US is

0:41:58.719 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 4>weak on a global stage.

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 3>So do you think that terrence is there at the moment?

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 16>It's being sorely tested because we all know now that Moscow, Beijing, Tehran, Pyongyang,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 16>for what it's worth, are increasingly aligned in the belief

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 16>that if they push hard enough, the US system will crack.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 16>And without a strong leadership from the United States and

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 16>the cloud that it has, the rest of US would

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 16>be to drive we don't have the independent capacity to

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 16>deal with the world in which those rogue states are

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 16>going becoming openly aggressive. We've more or less held the

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 16>line to this point in the Middle East and Russia,

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 16>but it is tenuous in both cases. And if we

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 16>have an American administration of whatever stripe that says, look,

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 16>we're jack of this, we don't think there's votes in

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 16>sustaining these efforts, then it's by no means clear that

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 16>the line will be held either in Ukraine or in

0:42:58.200 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 16>the Middle East.

0:42:59.000 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 2>In Israel.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, that's seriously drubbling. If in those circumstances she says, right,

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 16>now's the time to strike, then chaos comes to Asia.

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, indeed, it's very concerning, especially that alliance you speak

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 4>about between Iran, China, North Korea and Russia. We're seeing

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 4>the supplying of weapons as well among them.

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 3>So all of that.

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Next time we will have more time with you. I apologize,

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 4>but great to see you again. Now up next to

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 4>New South Wales labor clashes with the Albanezi government over

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 4>the move to block a mine.

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 3>My panel will discuss this next. Welcome back.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Chris Mins's labor government in New South Wales is a

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 4>loggerheads with the Albanesi government and in particular Tanya Plibisek

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 4>over a new gold mine in New South Wales. Now

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Tanya Plibiseka the eleventh hour decided to block it under

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 4>indigenous heritage legislation, and The Daily Telegraph reports that she

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 4>issued a Section ten statement blocking the site despite the

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Orange Local Aboriginal Land Council not opposing the mine, with

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 4>the minister instead backing a rival indigenous group who are

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 4>against the project. Look, the New Suteas government is very

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 4>annoyed about this to discuss. Let's bring in tonight's political

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 4>panel Nationals MP Keith Pitt and Gillard's fromer Presek Darren Barnett.

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to you both.

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 4>Keith, Is there a reasonable excuse for this mind.

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:30.200
<v Speaker 3>To be blocked?

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 17>Well, sharing not in my mind, and you've seen the

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 17>New South Wales government approved it and for Aboriginal heritage.

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 17>The only y my understanding is for the federal government

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 17>to overrule it using Section ten as the state government

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 17>has already made a decision which was the opposite of

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 17>this one. So we've seen activists get involved with Barossa v. Shaw,

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 17>We've seen the federal labor government crack down and make

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 17>changes around the gas sector for L and G after

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.959
<v Speaker 17>they spent fifty billion dollars over ten years and put

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 17>market prices in place, and now you have this decision

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 17>for a gold mine in your South Wales, which received

0:45:05.440 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 17>every single approval that it needed. As far as I'm aware,

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 17>being rubbed out by Tanya plebisk for one group regarding

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 17>original heritage, this is sovereign risk, writ large Darren.

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 4>There seems to be a repeat pattern of behavior here

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 4>from Tanya Plebisek.

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 3>What do you think.

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 9>Look, I think there's a lot of wariness from everyone

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:31.319
<v Speaker 9>in Parliament in Canberra regarding any sort of repeat of

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 9>Juk and Gorge, the disaster that we saw in twenty sixteen,

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 9>and that's bipartisan. There was lots of activity on that

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 9>from Susan Lay when she was Environment Minister under the

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 9>previous government. Now, no one in that environment portfolio wants

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 9>a repeat of that scenario, and I imagined that that

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 9>would be why Tania Pilibusek has acted with such caution

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 9>in this case. Now, I also think there will have

0:45:59.880 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 9>to be a common sense solution that if they are

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 9>able to change the design of the mind or the

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 9>tailing stam that there might be a way through, but

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 9>it does seem an interesting decision, to say the least,

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 9>if it was to be blocked solely on these grounds.

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 9>Let's hope there's a middle way and that all the

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 9>parties can work together to find it.

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Keith, do you want a quick response to that.

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 17>Absolutely, They've already done the hydrology, the design, the infrastructure,

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 17>they've costed it, looking for a final investment decision and

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 17>everything was approved. Why would you invest in this country

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 17>if you can have tenure plebosec knock your project out

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 17>when you've done everything right, all right.

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 4>From the start of next week, and by the way,

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:44.439
<v Speaker 4>we'll keep coming back to that topic this week because

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:46.359
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be a very big political story as

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 4>this war heats up between Men's and al but easy government. Now,

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 4>from the start of next week, Labour's contentious right to

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 4>disconnect laws will take effect. This, of course, empowers employees

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 4>to ignore their bosses outside of work hours. Darren, do

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 4>you think this is going to change the way businesses operate?

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 9>I think it will, but it depends on the type

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 9>of work that you do and frankly, the level that

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 9>you are in that company that junior workers who perhaps

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 9>are not on high wages, they may have a very

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 9>good case in being able to plan their day and

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 9>do their work when they get to work, but certainly

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 9>people in senior positions, you cannot expect to turn your

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 9>phone off at five pm and go home and nothing

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 9>else will change before the next morning. The modern world

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 9>doesn't work that way. So I think it's going to

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 9>depend on the workplace and depend on the job. But

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:42.360
<v Speaker 9>if it means that some people who are currently expected

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 9>to do things that are unfair have some form of recourse,

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 9>then I support it.

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:51.479
<v Speaker 4>It's not even about unfair, it's about that hours, Keith Peter,

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 4>Are you going to stop contacting your staff after six

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:57.439
<v Speaker 4>o'clock even if it's a parliamentary sitting day?

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 17>Jari I wouldn't bear that didn't happen, and they get

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 17>paid allowances for those things. But out in the real world, Shaw,

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 17>I'll give you a live example. In the sugar cane industry,

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:11.359
<v Speaker 17>people drive haulouts. That's where you put the sugar cane

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 17>in the back and your toilet with a tractor or

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 17>truck or whatever you might be doing. And you know

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 17>they're not super highly paid individuals but almost every single

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 17>day they start time depends on the weather, crop availability,

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 17>where you can get on the land, but that something

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 17>changes overnight, whether you've got bins, and they'll receive a

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 17>text to say we're starting at five, we're starting at eight,

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 17>we're starting at seven. How on earth can you run

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 17>that business if you can't contact them to change their

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 17>start date because you've got nothing for them to do.

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:39.919
<v Speaker 17>These are the challenges. Labour just wants to plaster things

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.240
<v Speaker 17>across the country. It doesn't always work.

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you what the lawsuits related to this legislation

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 4>are going to be extraordinary or the industrial action all right,

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 4>Keith Pitt, Darren Bunnett. Great to see you both, Thank

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 4>you and thanks thanks everyone for watching us. See you

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 4>tomorrow at eight o'clock. And right now, as always, here's

0:48:59.040 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Paul Murray.