WEBVTT - Exposing our deadly reality: Dr Vince Hurley Pt.2

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Detective sy a side of life the average person is

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>never exposed to. I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years, I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to my chat with Vince Early, who uses

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>his experience as a cop and an academic to identify

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and address issues relating to policing and the criminal justice

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>system in a very pragmatic way. Are you happy with

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that introduction?

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>That's beautiful.

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>That's beautiful that I say it right, That's what you

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted me to say it. Look, obviously, Vince and I

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>have history and we do joke around a bit, but

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm serious when I'm saying this to you, Vince, not

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the listeners that your opinion on law and all the

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>issues do count. And I like you the view that

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you take on law and order, and there is so

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>much to talk about. Your passion comes across as your

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Q and a outbursts that made you a YouTube sensation,

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>embarrass your children, so many other things about crime I

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about. We left part one talking about

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence and the terrible consequences of it. I had

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with you before you came on, and I

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was talking about meeting Hannah Clark's parents and Sue and

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Lloyd Lloyd Clark, who are just such impressive people. People

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>know the name Hannah Clark and the three children were

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>set alight in a made a vehicle as a result

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of domestic violence, horrendous crime, and Sue and Lloyd have

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>been campaigning. I think they part of the thing that

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>they campaigned for was the introduction of coercive control. I've

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>had them on the been fortunate enough to speak to

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>them on the podcast, and we're talking about domestic violence,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and I made the point to them. I said, if

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the offender was forced to wear an ankle bracelet that

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>notified Hannah if he was in five kilometers, because there

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>were indicators there something bad was going to happen. You

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>could see it. It was building up, and I think

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that was what everyone's frustration was. Ankle bracelets. Criminologist X

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>cop you've got opinions on law and order. I just

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>struggle to understand why we don't utilize ankle bracelets. And

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's such a simple process that if

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the victim and the perpetrator, if the perpetrator comes within

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>five climbers, ten klombs, whatever radius you want to set,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and the victim is notified that person is in the area,

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it might give them some peace, It might give them

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>some comfort. During COVID, the crazy management of that, we

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>managed to track where everyone went in the country. Get

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. Why can't we adopt ankle bracelets? Am I

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at it too simplistically?

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 2>No, you're not surprisingly. No, Yeah, you're right about being

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>a serious issue, but it's just my sense of humor.

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You were never funny. That's why that's why your career ended.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>You've got thrown off a roof. Do you reflect on

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>why that person threw you off the roof?

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>No, but I will on the way home. Ankle bracelets.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a couple of things. And as we spoke about

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a couple of weeks ago at Rainbow Lodge, it's amazing.

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 2>How as to former police, you know, I've seeing the

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>pit of humanity, how your views change about life and

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>about crime and things like that. And it would be

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 2>tragic if our views on life and crime didn't change.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 2>That's what individuals are So ankle bracelets. I won't give

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>the exact number because I know exactly how many there

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 2>are in New South Wales, but we're not talking about hundreds. Unfortunately,

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 2>ankle bracelets are used for medium to high risk offenders

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>who have been identified for violent domestic violence. So there's

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 2>a couple of things. There are going to be offenders

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>like that bloke in Queensland and I won't mention his

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 2>name who, for whatever reason, you will never be able

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to prevent from murdering Hannah and the children. There are

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 2>just recouncilor and says you would well know that's what

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 2>jail's for, thank god. But no matter if she was

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>wearing an ankle bracelet. Having read the coronial report, I

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 2>don't believe that that would have prevented him ended up

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>killing her. If not, then then then.

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Later could I just pose that there what say he

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>had the ankle bracelet. He's been charged with offences and

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>very strict conditions that if he comes within five kilometer

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>radius and he breaches those conditions, And I hate mandatory sentencing,

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you're of the same view. Every case

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>needs to be adjudicated, but there will be a sentence.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And then he gets out and he's got that bracelet

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on again. If the bracelet gets cut off, he's back

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in jail. If he comes within five kilometers of her

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's not justifiable as in a pure accident, he

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>goes back to jail. Couldn't that circumvent it?

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it could. The thing that people have a look

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of ankle bracelets is that as you and I know

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that they get cut off. Secondly, the offender, they will

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 2>let the battery run out. It has to be charged.

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 2>It's just like a mobile phone. It has to be charged,

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 2>and the battery has to be recharged every I don't

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>know how many hours it is, but it has to

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 2>be rech out. So if the offender lets it run

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 2>out or run down, even accidentally, and I know this

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 2>has happen, been in the past, then they can't be

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 2>tracked because there's no signal being given out.

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But okay, and if that's the case, he's breached it

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>again and he gets charged.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The other thing that they do, and I'll answer

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the point exactly in the minute, they wrap it in

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>ol foil so they can't be tracked, or they'll put

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 2>it in another vehicle and that someone will drive out

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>to Whoopwarp where they'll lose its signal. So if you

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 2>look at the East Coast of Australia, most of the

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 2>tracking is on the East Coast of Australia because there's

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 2>a lot of mobile phone towers. But if you went inland,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>it'd be totally different. So you're right. So if he

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 2>had breached that for sure, arrest him, lock him up

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>and you know, just throw away the key. A surprising thing.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>And I actually know a man and I won't say

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 2>who it is that actually wears one and it's not

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 2>for as crimes of violence, but nothing for domestic arguments.

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>And he was saying that his partner when he goes

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 2>within a buffer zone wherever that he is, and it

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>goes off and she goes off with her to let

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 2>her know. It actually causes her a bit of anxiety

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 2>because she knows that he is in close proximity, whether

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>it be coincidental or not, But she also draws strength

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>from that knowing that there is a degree of a

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>buffer zone there. But the problem is that there are

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>only x amount and there's lack of corrective services staff

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to be able to honor the ankle bracelets you would need.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>And I don't crape on this figure, but I think

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>there was last year this year twenty one thousand breaches

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>of a ABO. Even if you had ten thousand ankle bracelets,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to be enough and you need people

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to man that. But I totally agree, you know, any

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>damage to the ankle bracelet, cutting it off, whatever, they

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>should have a mandatory sentence. Absolutely.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Look, I know it comes down the resourcing, but yeah,

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and finances, fiscal everything comes into play. But to me,

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, if someone was stalking me and someone was

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>going to kill me, and that person's got a bracelet

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on and I've got a monitor that lets me know

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if that person's come, that would give me a peace

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of mind. And if it did go off, he's not

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get me unprepared. So I just I think technology,

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got to we've got to embrace it. And I

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>get frustrated because I saw when we're told things can't

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be done during COVID, that poor bloke that went and

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>tried to buy a barbecue tracked all around Sydney. Yeah,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. So I get I'm starting to sound like

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you on Q and A. How stupid do you have

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to be? Sorry, I'm getting whipped up, but it's true. Yeah,

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something there that we've really got to. Okay,

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>how do we address it. We've talked in part one

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>about helping men retrain or focus on development so they

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>don't go down that path, but short term do that. Yeah,

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and you don't get a bracelet first time. Some it's

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>an offence, but then it escalates second defense. Bad luck, buddy,

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you're wearing this bracelet. I don't care if it embarrasses

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you when you're at the beach.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 2>Just a good point, because that's a really good point

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>because if the Bosco News Bureau Crime Statistics Research put

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>out a report earlier this year on its effectiveness, and

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>they are effective. And one of the things that said,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 2>which Nely choked on the weedis was that men are

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>worried about being stigmatized, and I thought, well, since when

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 2>has it ever been about the men being signatized? Who cares? Yeah?

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I think so, And let's make a bright

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>orange right person, it's really embarrassed. Yeah, but anyway, just

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>a thought. Juvenile crime it's yeah, it's in the media.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Got hold of that. That's a topic of discussion. But

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that does really appear that there's a lot of problems

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>going on with juvenile crime. Criminologist x cop, university lecturer

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and all round good guy. Sorry, just check him the notes.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>How can we address juvenile crime?

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>So, as a father of four teenage children.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Ankle bracelets.

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, not one, but two and went around their neck.

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Ah.

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 2>Look, juvenile crime it always seems to be out of control.

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Whether that's fact or whether it's or media, it's hard

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>to know. Certainly lowering the in Queensland to having the

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>age it was criminal responsibility at ten. I think it's

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 2>just appalling. I just think that ten is just is.

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>That what they're looking at?

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, if it's not already law.

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>Okay, explain that to the listener.

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 2>What that So that means that if So generally speaking,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 2>when a person commits a crime, as we know that

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 2>they have the sufficient maturity and intellect to note what

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 2>they're doing is wrong. Exceptional circumstances, someone suffering mental health

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>issues for example. So if I am sixteen and I

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 2>go out and covores an arsenal murder someone, then the

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 2>law says that I have the mental capacity to understand

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the motive and the intent and the consequences of my actions.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 2>So what Queensland has done has the age of criminal

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 2>responsibility has been lowered from fourteen to ten. So that

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 2>means that a person who is fourteen, if they go

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 2>out and steal a car or do shoplifting, the law

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>says that they know it fourteen the difference between right

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 2>and wrong. They've got a moral compass. But now in

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Queensland it's been lowered to ten. Now, to my mind,

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>as a father of fourteen aged children, a ten year

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>old child does not have the developmental capacity or maturity

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>to understand and the consequences of their action. Yes, they

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 2>might know it's wrong to steal or to break in

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 2>into a car or steal a car, but do they

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>understand you know, the consequences that might flow from that.

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>So what they're saying is that someone who is ten

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>should be held fully responsible to the law and punished

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 2>by the law because they know what they're doing is

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.479
<v Speaker 2>not only wrong, but it has an impact on society,

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>which I think is.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Just that's it doesn't seem well, it doesn't sit well

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with me, and even if there is a problem, you're

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>not fixing it by yeah. So you're looking at the

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>ten year old Yeah, that's yeah, and you don't comprehend

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of your actions age.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 2>And just actually taking that similar point. So we talk

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 2>about intergenerational trauma and violence and domestic violence. So I

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>was speaking to a woman a few weeks ago who

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 2>was in who was in a violent relationship and has

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>left her ten year seven Yeah, ten year old son

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 2>during the relationship started belting the seven year old sister. Now,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>she made the valid point, and it's true that he

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 2>didn't he didn't know why he was doing it. He

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>was mimicking his father's behavior. He knew it was wrong,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>but he didn't know he didn't have the mental maturity

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 2>COMPREHENDI yeah, to know that it was wrong. And now

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 2>she's worried that he'll end up like her father. So

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about criminal responsibility and mimicking behavior, no

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:36.479
<v Speaker 2>one at the age of ten you can can fully comprehend,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 2>as you rightly say, the consequences so well.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Partly Queensland's move, it sounds like a political move. We're

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>getting tough with lower the age of the criminal responsibility

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>custody with kids. I have a bad, a real problem

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. And I know they're the form of

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the views, but I really have a problem. A diversion

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>there programs I think is much better, much better for

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a child. Your thoughts on that, once you put them

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in the system, it says so not just their self esteem,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but then the people they're looking up to the older

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>boys in the system and look at them, they're causing problems.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:18.599
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm going to come out and be a

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>real criminal.

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 2>If you'd asked me that when I was like Mount

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 2>drew It in the nineteen eighties, I wouldn't have cared less.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I would have gone. We had a saying, and I'm

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>almost a shame I tell the kids in classes. Kids,

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 2>almost a shame to say. But when I went to

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Mount drew It in nineteen eighty one, which is pretty

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 2>well placed they said we never went We had a

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>saying we never went to work, we went to war,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 2>and straight away the mindset at the time. Yeah, And

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>if you'd said to me about a ten year old

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 2>child at men drew It or Saint Mary's or Blacktown

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 2>or Penwuth, where I spent most of my career, I

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have cared less. But now it's maybe because you're

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a parent and you look back and you go, wow,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you know the things I should have done or could

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 2>have done. But I think that you're right putting children. Look,

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a fine line.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand the society's got to be protective.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I understand that, yeah, and we also understand that the

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 2>kids have to be held responsible. There's no doubt about

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that whatsoever. But you're right about it's being a political

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 2>issue about locking up children when you rightly say that

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 2>they're versionary programs in place. Now, I think and I

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 2>don't I didn't look at this, but when I was

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 2>at the Drug Summit, there was a figure quoted, and

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't quote me on this, if I'm going to

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>say publicly, I think that for every one dollar spent

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>on rehabilitation, it saves the government something like five dollars

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 2>or seven dollars. But the problem is that the governments

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>don't because we mentioned political cycle, they don't say a

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>short term result from that. But it needs to be

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>a long term investment. I think any parent who raises

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>children know it's a challenging time. But you're right. Kids

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>have to be held response for their actions. And just

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>going back to the point I made earlier about when

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I speak to the children at school and at UNI

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>about domestic violence, take the word domestic out of it.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Boys need to be told that you just cannot hit women.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just not on, no, and you have to be blunt.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And having twin sons who are eighteen, they are different

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>from their sisters, and I think boys have to be

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 2>told blunt, you just cannot bloody well do it. It's

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>just not on It's just under no circumstances cannot be done.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 2>And boys, I think are hard wired and I could

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>be wrong, differently from women. It needs to be a

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>clean message. And even when you and Guess came back

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>to the earlier point about moving the word domestic from

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the violence, when you talk to the kids at school

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>and at UNI, even the word sexual violence, they focus

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>on the word sexual rather than the violence. But we

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>know why they call it sexual violence because that's the

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>way that the Crimes Act defines it and it adds

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>an extra layer of you know, depravity to the So

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>again with the boys, it doesn't matter how young they are,

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, there need to be boundaries. They

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 2>need to be told you just cannot hit women under

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 2>any circumstances.

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, the role model is so important in yeah, a

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>young young boy's life, and yeah, you've got to set

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the standards. But that's the type of thing that we're

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at with diversionary role models. Role models are critical.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The amount of people I have sitting in here whose

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>life has gone off track, has turned their life around

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>because of a good role model, or you say, where

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>it go wrong, they had no one steering them in

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the direction I think the figures are And again don't

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>quote me on it might have even come out in

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>one of these speeches at Rainbow Lodge. To keep an

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>adult person in custody over twelve months is one hundred

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand, juvenile is two hundred and fifty thousand.

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a shitload of money that could set up some

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>really good programs. People who have got the lived experience,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>people who have gone in the dark side or done

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the bad things and come out and having these kids

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>look up to them and tell them this is not

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the goal. You can get the trade. You can be

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>part of society and self esteem. Self esteem is what

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they see with a lot of kids that go off track.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>They haven't got a good self esteem because of the

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>environment they've grown up, even education. How many times and

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you would have seen it in the cops when you've

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>got some poor blake you're charging with an the fence

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's too embarrassed because he can't read all right,

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>yeah and yeah, things like that, and so they lash out.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>They lash out at school because they're having trouble reading

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and writing, so they deflect from it by getting into

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>trouble and send out of the class.

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yep, exactly right. Literacy is amazing. You wouldn't think

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty five or twenty twenty four to twenty

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 2>five that would actually be an issue at all. But

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>it is surprising just talking about people going off track.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that if you took that bloke who was

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>at Rainbow Lodge who gave that talk, he would be

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic role model because of his life he is outstanding.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 2>So he obviously speed off the track and did whatever

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 2>he did and now he's a role model. So if

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>a person, a child is raised in an environment of

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 2>violence as domestic violence, and even if they come out

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 2>of that, if they're being exposed to it long enough

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>as a child and they're brought out of it, the

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 2>slightest stress or trigger in their life after that event

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 2>could easily spear them off the rails into a life

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 2>of crime or drugs and alcohol and violence. So when

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about the formative years of children, it is

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 2>really so important that even if they are removed from

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 2>that environment, the damage is saying because once you've seen

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence or violence, you can't undo it. You can't

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 2>undo it. And those poor kids who see it, who

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 2>are terrified by it, it stays with them for the

0:19:58.440 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>rest of their life.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Got to break the cycle and the things that we

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about. It's about getting smart on crime, not tough

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>on crime. And you know, when you speak to victims

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and victims that have been through the ring and I've

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>lost loved ones, if you reduce crime, you reduce victims.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So that pub talk, Oh you're gone soft. You going

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>soft non crime. If you reduce crime, you reduce victims.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>That's a smart way of approaching it.

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and not only that, like crimes coming down in

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>society for decades, and of course of the media cycle.

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, the media pick up on it. And I

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>asked the studness in class, is crime going up or down?

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>And they always say crimes going up? But in actual

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 2>fact it's coming down. Even though it's coming down, it's

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 2>still not acceptable. But you know the Yeah, the impact

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 2>and the cycle of violence and how kids are speared

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 2>into it. But it is, you know, you and I

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 2>and many people you know, we hear the rhetoric. And

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 2>I used to believe it tough on crime.

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I used to believe I know what you're saying. So

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not owning up to it. But I know

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>how ignorant you were early in your police career. Yeah,

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>let's stop them away the key.

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like having decriminalization of cannabis. So I was at

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the drug Summit. I am surprisingly for it to a point.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean a massive fan of pill testing. I think

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>that it should be a health issue. I'm not saying that.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>For example, someone at a music festival If they've got

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>one tablet for that'say, okay, But if they've got five

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>or ten, obviously that's going to be a supply issue.

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not certainly not saying that, you know, drugs

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>should be allowed to come into the country freely. No way,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 2>It's absolutely no way. But I think that the reality

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 2>is that there will be a portion those we know

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 2>people that always use drugs, and if that can be

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 2>managed from a health perspective, that's great. I actually more

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>worry about the mental health impact of cannabis for schizophrenia

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 2>than I actually do about any other crime aspect of it.

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And the notion that you know, cannabis leads to harder

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 2>crime that leads that doorway open. It's just it's an

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 2>urban myth. It doesn't. It just doesn't. It doesn't do that.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>But you're raising the issue of the pill testing, and

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, if any teenagers I know are going to

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>a concert, I'd prefer to have that than not have

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that because of the tragedies that can happen. Okay, we've

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about crime, let's talk about policing. Contemporary policing. Why

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>not just in New South Wales. I think it's across

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the country, and I think it's overseas as well. We're

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>having trouble attracting people to policing. What what do you

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's about. What's your sense of that.

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I think, first of all, I just think it's part

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 2>of it is just the nature of the the what's

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the word I'm looking for, the temporary nature of employment

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 2>now that people go from job to job to job

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 2>to job.

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Just before policing was a vocation.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it was a vocation, it was a career. I

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>also think that because of the fear of crime, so

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 2>people fear crime more than the reality of crime. It's

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 2>because people fee crime. People would never walk down a

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 2>dark alley, but in actual fact, probably nothing will ever

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 2>happen to you.

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So the fear of crime is worse than the reality

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of crime.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So when you talk to parents, and when I talk

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>to students, and I talk to you thousands over the years, Ah,

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 2>the policing is dangerous. But I say, policing is not

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>that dangerous. It's it is, but you don't get thrown

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 2>in at the deep end. You know, you're trained, you're

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>not left on your own devices. So that notion that

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 2>crime is out of control, I don't think really attracts

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>individuals to the to the organization. I also think that

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>adverse publicity doesn't really really help. One can go into

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>whether there's good or bad leadership in a police organization.

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>One could vent.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloody. One could go into whether it's good or bad

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 2>leadership in the organization which in there and reflects upon

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 2>people's attitudes whether they want to go in. I also

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>think that emerging economies, you know, like the gig economy,

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>it is not emerging, it's already here and renewables. But

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I just think that I don't I think the police

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>or take that thing at Kuma just tragic, that just

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 2>beyond comprehension. That does not do anything to attract people

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>to the police.

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, that one event, and we're talking about one event,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's right, the elderly lady that was a taste and

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>die as a result. And I think it's a matter

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that's just come before the court and there was a verdict.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So we won't go into the exactly what happened because

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the sentencings occurred at this stage. But

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I look at incidents, and you've looked at a lot

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of critical incidence. I oversaw a lot of critical incidents,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think there needs to be better training for police. Yeah.

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I won't break it down because it's quite frightening when

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you talk about how often you get to use your

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>weapon and training and all that. But surely with the

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>type of job that we're doing, or we were are

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>doing as police officers, more money should be put in

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the training you want. You want quality over quantity.

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, And I was talking to Darren Bennett, yeah

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 2>the other a few weeks ago actually, and he was saying,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's the people coming through the door. If

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 2>you get the right people coming through the door, then

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the organizational issues aren't as as as big. Now, that's

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 2>that's an obvious statement to make. But the point you

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 2>made earlier about people getting accepted and then those being rejected,

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 2>and when there's a shortage then bringing those other people

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>back in, it doesn't that's not a consistent benchmark. And

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 2>whilst it might in the short term politically seem palatable

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 2>for the electorate and for the commissioner or whoever it is,

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 2>down the track, when the politicians and the commissioner go,

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 2>then the organizations left with this legacy of them trying

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 2>to mold bad individual not bad individual less suitable individuals

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>into something that the organization really does want.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So and like even in the probo, we have that

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>probationary period, and you know, and I know there's people

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>there that should not be police officers. You can you

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>can tell it a mile away. Why do they call

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a probationary period and they get through?

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well that's yeah, yeah, that's exactly right. And I

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 2>think this comes also down to the industry relations laws,

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and the onus is upon the organization to prove that

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Vince Hurley was incompetent and Vin Turley was very incompetent.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>That's why you were That's why you were flowing thrown

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>off the roof, and then you didn't have to go

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>through in dustrial relationship. Sorry, it's tragic and I shouldn't

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>be laughing at it. Did you scream on the way down?

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Actually? To be honest, I was on the ground and

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 2>I just am I allowed to swear. It's on the

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 2>ground on it and I fractured my left leg and

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 2>my skull and I dissipated my shoulder and I'm lying

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 2>on the ground and I'm thinking, oh, this is fucked,

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>this is fucked, this is not this is fun. I'm

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 2>getting to old to chase pea half my age. But yeah,

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>so I was not in a good place. But anyway,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 2>we're not laughing at you.

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>We're laughing at We're full support and we're just trying

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, wow, we can't get police and you are discussing,

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>well when I got praying off the roof. Look, I

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>love it as a career. I know you enjoyed your

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>time there. I enjoyed that. It saddens me that they're

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>struggling to get resources. Pay increase. Yeah, but there's a

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of areas that need money going into it. What

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>worries me that will attract people just for the money.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And I like to work with people. When I was

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in the cops, I like to work with people that

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>weren't focused on promotion, weren't focused on how much over

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>time I can get. We're focused on they were passionate

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>about their job. That's the only thing I worry about.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>With this huge pay increase that New South Wales Police

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have got, You're going to have people that stay in

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there that's not really interested in policing. They're just taking

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar or encouraging people to go there that are

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not really interested in policing.

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, you're right, You're right. I was staggered with

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the pay increase. I couldn't believe. I thought I misheard

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 2>it when I first read. I did, but I would

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 2>have walked in on my crutch as I said, no, no,

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>but I couldn't believe it, Like that's a phenomenal increase.

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that. I mean we were poorly paid,

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the eighties, but you never joined, as

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you rightly so for that particular reason. But you know

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>I would. I would, Yeah, probably an unsurprising comment. I

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 2>would rather see that money going to drug and alcohol

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 2>counseling or mental health, automestic violence, because if you can

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>prevent that, as we know, then be less police. I went,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 2>as I said in the eighties, I went with a

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>bloke name of Chris Clark Shadow and we're working at

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Mount to twenty domestics in one night. Now, admittedly it

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 2>was in the nineteen eighties and you just churned through them,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>but that you know that that massive increase in wage.

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I think you know, as we said earlier, if that

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>could be put into diversionary programs or something like that,

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 2>it would have to you wouldn't see an immediate thing.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>But if we're talking about generational change or even a decade,

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 2>it would have to be more beneficial because people will

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>coming to the organization, as you say, they'll joint X

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 2>amount of time and then leave. But if that money

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 2>was put into drug and rehab and you get better

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 2>role models, then it would have a better impact on society.

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I like to see police people want to do it

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>because they're inspired by working with those people. You would

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>have had people you looked up to. I looked up

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to people, and I'm just thinking, I want to try

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to emulate what they've achieved in their career and the

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>type of people they are. I think that's so important

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that in policing, and I just yeah, I've been away

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>from it a long time too, so I'm mainly looking

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>from the outside. But it just saddens me that people

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't putting their hands up because I still reckon it's

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the world's greatest job. That's in saying many different things

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and the rewards that you can get from it, and

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult job now, Like I understand it's difficult

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>now because the exposure and the criticism if someone does

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>something wrong, they're exposed publicly because we make mistakes and

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you just you learn from your mistake and move on. Yeah,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the leadership. I don't like the we've got

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the commissioner now, Karen where I just get the sense

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that she's not being supported by her own organization and

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that that troubles me because I know the internal politics

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the in the cops, how they climb over each other,

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and that saddens me because really, when you're out of

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the cops, you realize the public don't give who is

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>no superintendent or who is this or who is that?

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't care. You think within the cops, everyone yes,

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>who's going to be the next commissioner? People don't care,

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but they just want the police to do their job.

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>On that, I often get asked about what makes a

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>good police force, And the way I look at it,

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the police your public servantcy. You're there to

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>serve the public. So when you talk satisfaction in regards

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to police, are they delivering what the community they're serving expects?

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that a good way of assessing that it is?

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.719
<v Speaker 2>It is? And I also think that that's an interesting

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 2>point because so when we talk about confidence in policing,

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and how do you make sure that people are satisfied.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 2>First of all, when we're talking about, say, closing the

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 2>gap every time, and I never thought of this at

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the time, it's easy to say now in hindsight, whatever

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 2>you do with the First Nations people or someone from

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 2>culturally diverse background, every time you deal with them and

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>give them tend their needs, you're giving them what they

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>want the expectation. That is part of closing the gap.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>So everyone has a responsibility to do that. But I

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>also think that there will never be unfortunately enough people

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of First Nations or culturally diverse background in the police

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>because it just doesn't attract individuals generally. And then even

0:31:55.520 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 2>those minority groups are never going to be wrecking what

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for. I'm not going to be represented because

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 2>they just don't attract those individuals for whatever reason. So

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 2>from the very beginning, I think there's always going to

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>be a gap between what people expect from culturally diverse

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 2>background or from First Nations and what the organization can deliver.

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 2>But I also think that you're right, it's just you know,

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 2>what would it's not even giving a level of service,

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.959
<v Speaker 2>it's just you know, informing someone or say, well, if

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>that person was my mum, what would she expect?

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is so simple, so simple way. I well,

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you would have heard me when I'm talking to detectives

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>training detectives that treat the victims like you'd want your

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>family to be treated. It's a simple concept.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.959
<v Speaker 2>It is it is, yeah, exactly right. But I can

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 2>also understand, and I'm not making excuses. I can also

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 2>understand that you know when you went to a domestic

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and I would be ashamed now to think how many

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>times you know, and as a generation, how I didn't

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 2>meet the expectations of people. But even now, I think

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 2>sometimes people overlook the fact that when a police officer

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 2>goes and speaks to some a victim, they don't care

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 2>if that police officer and they don't know it's just

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 2>come from a cot death or a fatal motivaticle accident.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So I'm speaking to you as a victim, and all

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you're worried about, and understandably so, is that Vince Earley

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 2>gives you meets your needs. But sometimes expectations of what

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the police can do all hie and that the police

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>can't meet it, or your expectations are not realistic. And

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you don't know that because you've never had anything to

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 2>do with the police before. And Vincehurley comes to you

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 2>at two o'clock in the morning and I'm fatigued because

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I've been out for ten hours driving around and then

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 2>you go, well, he didn't seem very interested. So I

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 2>can understand from that perspective. And that's not an excuse,

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>it's just human nature. But you're right that if you

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 2>police were just more compassionate, and probably some of them aren't.

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's going back to the very first question of it.

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the very beginning, you know, what is the expectation,

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 2>what is the role of the police in society? And

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I said, you know, it's to be a referee, but

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 2>it's to have a degree of compassion at the same time.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I think that you know, when I

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 2>joined and when you joined, it was a different mindset

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 2>to what it is now.

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's definitely definitely changed, but I think the core

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>values need to stay stay with it because otherwise it

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes problematic. And because as you identified that people have

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>assured the career they go in five years of police,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they walk around, go to the next next thing. You

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>want to attract the people that are really passionate about

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>their job, and it doesn't matter which it could be

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>all I don't want to encourage them too much, but

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they do do an important rob job. Passionate highway patrol officers.

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But you've met them and they're as passionate as you

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and I were as detectives doing what they do.

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 2>You need that, Yeah, And I think actually that's a

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 2>good point. When you think about the people that have

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a contact with the police. There's only for four groups offenders, victims, witnesses,

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and those pulled over by the highway patrol, and they

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 2>are the largest percentage. So the straight away, the stereotypical

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 2>or the mindset, well I got pulled over by the

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 2>highway patrol. They're representative of the rest of the police.

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, people will always if I want to join

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the police, they will want to join the police. But

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 2>generally speaking, everyone's concept of what the police are is,

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, is amplified by the highway patrol or by

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 2>the media.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that's their exposure. Speaking of media, the role of

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>media in policing, what's your take on that look looking

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>from an outside this point of view, Now, yeah, I

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's.

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Good and bad. I can only I can honestly tell

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you Gary, if social media was around when I was

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 2>in the police, I would have been sacked. I would

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 2>have been absolutely sacked. But we're looking at it retrospectively

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>now and people coming into the organization would be more

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 2>tact sevy tech sevy and would be aware of, you know,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 2>the media around about around policing.

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>What was questioned again about media and policing and the

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.720
<v Speaker 1>relationship between the media and the police and the changing

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>landscape with social media.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.959
<v Speaker 2>So I think that when I've given interviews on TV

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, they always say to me before we start,

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>or we wants a ten second grab, and that's what

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 2>they concentrate on. And they'll take words that Vince Early

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 2>says either out of context and they'll use that or

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 2>they'll keep it as is.

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>So the media, when you were telling the politicians they

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>are absolute jokes. That was taken out of context.

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe not that way. So I'm so proud to

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 2>say that I've interrupted, but that that's a good example

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 2>because that whole clip was compressed. I said more than that,

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 2>and I went on to actually talk more about those

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 2>particular issues, but that was compressed for social media. That's

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a grab, that's yeah, and that's a grab that they want. Yeah,

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 2>it's been of benefit for a whole host of NGOs.

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 2>But I also think that the media and everyone says this,

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's true, they have a responsibility to portray both sides.

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Because one of the questions I asked in an assignment

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 2>is that is it true something along the lines off

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 2>to the students, is it true that the media portrayed

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 2>police in a good light or bad light? And is

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 2>it necessary to do that? And they really come up

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 2>with interesting answers, because yes, police I have to be

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 2>held accountable for what they do. Social media is fantastic that,

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 2>but it's also can be a prejudicial to the police.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 2>It can also be prejudicial against the police as well.

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 2>So social media is just unwieldy beast. And I'm not

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 2>on social media at all for that reason because it

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't never raise.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But it is a changing landscape and the media and

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the police had a very close relationship. When we're in

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>police and the media, we're getting the information leaked to them,

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and that it was I had an issue and I

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>still have an issue that quite often it's a positive

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:09.439
<v Speaker 1>news story for the police. There's certain journalists that would

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>beholding to the police, giving them leaks of information, and

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>it frustrates me stories that I know, investigations. I know

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the whim toural matter has played out so devastatingly in

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the public for so many different people, and it's been misinformation.

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a responsibility on both sides. But

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the police need to be accountable for their actions.

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>If there's criticism, well you've got to copy it. You

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>get the compliments if you do something good. If you

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>do something bad, you got to cop it. But I

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>see the police just so risk adverse or getting criticized.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Whereas and I reference Boarable. You know, the Commission of

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 1>SCIPPIONI came up there and to the Bearable community. I've

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>been trying for ten years to get a commission to

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>come up there, and he came up there and he said,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>sorry to the community, we could have done better. That's

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>acknowledging it. And that helped the community at that time.

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>So that meant so much to them. Little things like that.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know why the police don't put their

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>hands up sometimes and just you know, okay, we could

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have done that better. Then you can move on from it.

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and not only that, the public, no, the public no,

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, just like you know, it's just like the

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 2>politicians get asked a question and they give an answer,

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 2>and they think that the answer might be smart or

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't address the question, but the rest of the

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 2>world knows what the answer is. It's just like, you know,

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:34.959
<v Speaker 2>what's that saying that the emperor wears no clothes or something?

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you know what is wrong? We've sort of

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 2>putting up your hand and say, look, I'm sorry, we

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 2>could have done better, but you're right. They are so

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>risk adverse that it becomes almost boring and predictable. And

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 2>even that notion of being risk averse doesn't attract people

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 2>to the organization because it makes it the organization look

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 2>so bland. What is wrong with getting up and say well,

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, we got it wrong, because the punter at

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 2>home knows that it's wrong, and they can say, I

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 2>look at the politician or the police officer and or

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 2>whoever it is, the commissioner and say, well, why don't

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 2>you just say we all.

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Know it's what's wrong with it. I know we could

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>manage it better, and I think they better get their

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>act in order, because like with podcasts and all that,

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Teachers Pet and other podcasts and even the one that's

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 1>running at the moment on William Tyrell Witness William Tyrell,

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not just towing the police line and making people

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>calling the question what's gone on with an investigation? Gone

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>are the days where And I'm not just talking New

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 1>South far as police, I'm talking across the board. Law

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>enforcement agencies can control the media because it's gone. It

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>used to be that way, but it's not no longer

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that way.

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 2>And you know, and just an interesting point because the

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 2>media policy or we used to know, you can only

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>comment on facts and speeding and things like that. Even now,

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 2>when you know, the police get up and they talk

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 2>about a particular issue, it is very factual. But there

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 2>is no like humanity or there's.

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>No no personality. And I think when we look at

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>how are you attracting police when everyone's just standing up

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and talking like a dummy, that sounds like a really

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>good job. Inquiries are continuing, we expect an early arrest,

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>like bring some life to it. Yeah, yeah, exactly right, mate. Yeah,

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe that that attracts people, but yeah, I just

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>so saddened by the fact that we're not getting people

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because the more people wandding it into the police, the

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>higher the bar can be. And then one thing for

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 1>credit to New South Wales Police, but it was about

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>time and you know, having worked down the academy, the

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>ludicrous situation where you had to pay to go to

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the academy and now at least the intake they're getting paid,

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to attract a better group of people.

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>You're right, and in fact an actual your spot on

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>as well. I was going to make earlier and I

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 2>forgot to mention it. You're right. Why would someone who

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 2>wants to do a job go and have to pay

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 2>hex fees to join an organization?

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It just it did not make sense.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 2>A tradee doesn't pay.

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I've had so many good people approach me and say

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I was going to join the police, but I couldn't

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>afford because I've got young children that couldn't afford to

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>pay the time down the academy, good people that you know,

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.839
<v Speaker 1>would have made excellent police officers, and we've lost them.

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Fear that that once they get to there, they fill

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 2>their vacancies. Yeah, I think it will revert back. That's

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I know that's my that's I have no idea.

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll get you back on my catch killers and you

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>can have one of your rants and raves in your

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven b and YouTube views because you've lost your

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 1>shop modern policy and you mentioned AI. I look at AI.

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>That will be a tool in investigation, like because you know,

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I imagine set it up right, there's breaking entwers, you're

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at methodology. You scan it within thirty seconds, it's

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>come back. Okay, there's a similar break and enter. It's

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 1>what thoughts on AI?

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Love it? Love it? A big early adopter of it.

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Easier when you're at a UNI student.

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Not that they would use AI no, of course, not

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 2>act to use it.

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Well that I've wondered about that. But you've got to

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>let them have axit. That's a resource like when we

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:31.719
<v Speaker 1>used to go to the library and borough a book.

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a resource that's available. So it's got

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to be a leader in there. Imagine having people go

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>through UNI and not know how to use it AI.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's right, yeah, I mean I'll get backtrack in

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 2>a minute. But I've got friends set on State and

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Commonwealth in interview panels for government jobs and one of

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.799
<v Speaker 2>the questions that many government like common work government jobs

0:43:57.840 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 2>will ask if they get to an interview is what

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 2>is your AI literacy skills?

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Okay, so that's a question.

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah so And all the big like KPMG and Pross,

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 2>water House Coopers and Ey they already they asked those

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 2>questions about the students. What do you know about AI?

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 2>And you know, what's your literacy skill? Can you tell

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 2>between good and bad? But I think that it has

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 2>benefits obviously, and it has disadvantages. The thing with AI

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 2>is that it is because it's Microsoft. For example, open

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 2>ais was initially owned by Elon Musk and he sold it,

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>not sold it, but he works with Microsoft. That's why

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 2>it's on our computers and Microsoft it's US based. So

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 2>all the information is from the Northern Hemisphere. So if

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 2>we type in something like some research on suicide by

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.879
<v Speaker 2>cop in Australia and it came back with information which

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 2>was incorrect about Australia because it's all the Northern Hemisphere based.

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:54.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's the first thing that people have to understand

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.760
<v Speaker 2>is when they use it. Primarily it comes from scraping

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the web of all the Northern hemisphe few information, so

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that's the first. That's the first danger or pitfall of it.

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:06.799
<v Speaker 2>The second thing with AI, and it concerns me. There

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:10.399
<v Speaker 2>was a case in Ohio might have been last year,

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 2>year before or anyway in the States where there was

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 2>a police used AI to identify an offender. So they

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 2>visually identified him, but they didn't know his name. Then

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 2>they used AI and they put the name and the

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 2>name was correct, and went to court and the matter.

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 2>He was convicted for purchasing a handguard I think it was,

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 2>and then it was actually thrown out later on it

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 2>was challenged on the basis of AI that AI was

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 2>used to identify the offender.

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So they they had the face. Did you say all

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 1>that they had the face.

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 2>They had the face, and they didn't know his name, okay,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 2>So they used AI to identify who he was and

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 2>they AI identified him correctly as Gary Jubilan. So then

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:54.760
<v Speaker 2>they went around and arrested him. They didn't arrest him initially.

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a long, long judgment, and then they went around

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 2>arrested Gary or this this handgun purchase. Gary pleaded guilty,

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 2>went to court, and I can't remember what happened to

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 2>him anyway, After you pleaded guilty. The defense Sorry, yeah,

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 2>the defense appealed that decision based on AI, and he

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 2>was Actually the conviction was quashed. The reason was quashed

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 2>is that when you use AI, there's a thing called

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 2>the black box, a notion or a concept that is

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 2>used that when you type something into AI, you don't

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 2>know how that answer is arrived at. So because you

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 2>do not apply any critical analysis to that answer, you're

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 2>accepting that answer to be one hundred percent correct based

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 2>on what and you.

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.359
<v Speaker 1>So you're breaking that down in simplistic terms, you've got

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>no reasonable suspicions exactly right.

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was no independent critical thought or analysis or

0:46:55.920 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 2>independent identification of that individual, and it is set a

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:02.240
<v Speaker 2>precedent in the US.

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's that's interesting. It's going to be interesting times

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>on how that how that plays out. I think with AI,

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we're fortunate in that where we've got to at this

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>point in time, we've learnt our skills. So if we

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>use AI, we can sort of assess it pretty quickly

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because we know what I asked AI to do. A

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fact sheet on the murder. I could scam through and go, no,

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not what's needed in there. People who maybe don't

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>develop those skills because AI is so readily, readily available.

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think it will be fascinating. Like technology in

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>policing too. It's change. I think it's a harder gig

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>being a crook these days and it was back back

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in our day because of all the advantages we've got.

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 1>You did a paper or you did a talk on drones. Yeah, well,

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and that interest man, I'll.

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Just go back to AI for sake. So when I

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 2>gave a talk recently about AI and policing, someone in

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the audience said, well, you know, it's got to be

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 2>good for identification of a weapon, for example, or clothing

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 2>or a scar or a tattoo, And I said, yes,

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 2>it has. It's placed there. But I also see it

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 2>as a bit of a danger because you don't want

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the weapon to be so similar. You don't want it

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 2>to mirror the weapon, because if you identify the incorrect weapon,

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 2>for example, the matter could be tossed out. So AI

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 2>can be that accurately cloned, is that it narrows the

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:35.720
<v Speaker 2>ability of the individual to identify it, like a lineup

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 2>if everyone is too similar looking. Yes, it has to

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 2>be similar, and you have to be able to justify

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the selection of the individual. But I think I worry

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 2>about AI cloning things that are so identical that it's

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 2>hard to say to it. It's hard. But also from

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the fact that if you get into the witness box,

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:59.319
<v Speaker 2>I say, Vince Hurley, now explain to us about AI.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 2>How did your ride at that decision? What did a

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I do? Fuck?

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I am And you will be

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 1>exploited that way, won't.

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Defense barrass is going to jump straight in on that.

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 2>So why would you introduce AI into a brief where

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 2>you don't know much about it yourself, and but you

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 2>know that it's going to cause controversy. So I think, yes, absolutely.

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Will it will evolve. But I remember when we're looking

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for a suspect. We've got a suspect on a case,

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and I go through the cops records and find out

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what we've got to have someone look for that, and

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:39.400
<v Speaker 1>then some young smart ass on the strike forces go, oh,

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this is where he lives. That's a picture of his

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>house because they're on social media, and yeah, that how

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>did this happen? But I would imagine it'll evolved like that.

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It will become it will become a time, it's something

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and I like to think law enforcement we stay ahead

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of the game if we can, so hopefully it plays

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>out plays out that way. Winding back to the drive drones, Yeah, what.

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think drones are going to be as common,

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 2>if not already common, as the car on the road.

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:12.840
<v Speaker 2>The thing that with drones is that now take carry

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:15.239
<v Speaker 2>wheland matters. That's finished, isn't it that? Yeah, that's well

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 2>and done and dusted. So if memory serves me correctly

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 2>at some stage, or aerial surveillance of him, Now, there

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.640
<v Speaker 2>was a person in a helicopter, in a poly helicopter

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 2>which was out of view of things, and they surveiled

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and surveilance helicopter says, you know, it's quite common, and

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 2>he had the visual image of that individual. The thing

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 2>with drones is that it has a visual image of

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that individual. And I could be sitting at the aviation

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 2>command at Bankstown managing it. But drones have a limited

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:53.720
<v Speaker 2>life span and they're not They are subject to bird strike,

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 2>just like planes aren't. But also the wind can affect

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 2>their their clarity on the particular target. Now just like Pollie,

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 2>they can't the target can't necessarily see the drone, but

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it saves immense amount of manpower, and for crime scene

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 2>as you would well know, but also for surveillance of individuals,

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 2>for dropping off resources or something to an individual. The

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:23.720
<v Speaker 2>biggest thing I think the police are going to face

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:27.320
<v Speaker 2>is the CASSAR regulations, so they have to comply with

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the Civil Aviation Authority regulations about flying drones. And given

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:35.239
<v Speaker 2>the churn of police in the organization, everyone has to

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 2>be well not everybody, but they have to be continually

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 2>trained as a drone pilot to keep pace with that.

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:42.720
<v Speaker 2>So they use it. As you know on my brother's

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 2>a surf Life Save up in Queensland, they have an

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 2>individual who does that for sharks and the same thing

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:51.319
<v Speaker 2>can be applied to that. But it can certainly save

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of staff and manpower with the use of drones.

0:51:55.880 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 2>My only concern would be that if something happened to it,

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:02.720
<v Speaker 2>even though it's been back, if something happened to the drone,

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 2>because it worth about a million dollars each once new

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 2>so far as police have, if it was damaged or compromised,

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 2>then you know the possible possible kind of nuity of

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:17.280
<v Speaker 2>evidence possible, yeah, possible conomuity of evidence.

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I was just interested in that because just before the

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 1>end of my career on a and I won't mention

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the investigation with his high profile and looking for someone

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>walking through the bush and seeing where they went, and

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have the capabilities to track this person. And

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I made I said, well, we've got those drones that

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>get up there and look at crime scenes and all that.

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And I've done some work with media where they've got

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:48.799
<v Speaker 1>drones hovering over your head and we use that, use

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that drone, And I just thought that it just opened

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a whole new way of doing things police wise. Exciting

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>time for policing. But we're not in it anymore. No,

0:52:59.320 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you got off the roof and I got frown under

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the bus a good way. Who would have thought our

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>career has ended that way when lecturing detectives. But you

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:11.320
<v Speaker 1>know what I find and I've loved the chat, and

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:12.959
<v Speaker 1>I reckon, I'm going to get you back on because

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>next time you snap, I'm going to get you straight

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:16.840
<v Speaker 1>back on the next day and find out what what

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>set him off this time. But I like the fact

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that the way you look at crime and look at

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>crime not just black and white good guys, bad guys.

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at it and making a difference educating people

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on it and the fact that you enjoyed your time

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in policing, because I really like sitting down with someone

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that it didn't end the way we thought it. We're

0:53:35.760 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 1>even twisted it, but not better and twisted and can

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. And you know, I can ask you the

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:42.800
<v Speaker 1>obvious question, would you recommend joining the police?

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 2>Look, I loved it. Yeah I do. And even even

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 2>as students at UNI say, I tell them it's a

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 2>fantastic job.

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:54.239
<v Speaker 2>It's genuinely a great job. It's you see the best

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 2>of humanity and you see the worst of humanity. Every

0:53:58.160 --> 0:54:01.239
<v Speaker 2>day is different. I would, yeah, I would. Any of

0:54:01.320 --> 0:54:04.399
<v Speaker 2>my children, I would recommend it. And when I speak

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 2>at open days to you know, eight hundred parents, invariably

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll get some parents who put up their hand and say,

0:54:11.239 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 2>would you recommend, And I say, yeah, I said absolutely,

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I would recommend it to my children. I'd recommend to anyone.

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:18.439
<v Speaker 2>And it is it's a great job.

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're going to just cut that and that's going

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a neicement for policing. Policing in this country. Vince,

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for coming on. And I'm not joking.

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 1>We will get you back on because I'm sure you're

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>going to stuff up somewhere and go off on a tangent.

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But the work that you do is very impressive and

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you're always good fun. When our paths crossed, it.

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Mate, I just want to say thanks so much for

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:45.359
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity. It's been fantastic and you know, yeah, look,

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:47.800
<v Speaker 2>it's been a wonderful journey for both of us. And

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, back in the mid nineteen nineties, who would

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 2>have ever thought we would have ended up here. But yeah,

0:54:54.239 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it's just been great and thanks for an opportunity. It's

0:54:56.200 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 2>been absolutely fantastic. Cheers, thanks, mate.

0:55:02.280 --> 0:55:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Vince always bore the smile to my face, and I

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:08.160
<v Speaker 1>like his opinions on all things that law and order.

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>He's got those streets smarts, he's got a sense of humor,

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he cares, he's passionate, and he's also a bit of

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>an academic. So it was really good sitting down having

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a chat with doctor Vince Hurley. I think he's someone

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I might get back on here because I'm sure he's

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:25.080
<v Speaker 1>got some other opinions about all things law and order.