WEBVTT - TMP 120924 - RUDI_mixdown

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to today's episode of The Money Puzzle.

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host James Gerard, standing in for James Kirby

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this week as he enjoys a well deserved break. Today

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got a special episode plan which is all about

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>private equity investments and venture capital investments. It may sound

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>very mysterious, at the end of the day, private equity

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>is just basically investing in a company that's not listed

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 1>on the share market. So imagine investing in your local bakery.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>That could be considered private equity. And for those who

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>have watched the TV show Billions, if you don't have

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars like Bobby Axelrod does to invest there

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>are still some pathways for the everyday mum and dad

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>investor to invest into private equity. But this particular asset class,

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it requires a lot of research into it because it's

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a big case of buyer, where with private equity there's

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot less information there, there's a lot more risks,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's generally a lot more less transparent than the

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>share on the share market. So investors need to be

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot more careful before they invest into private equity.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So today we'll break down the basics, we'll share some

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>tips and tricks, we'll discuss the ins and outs of

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>private equity. And to help us do this, we've got

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a very special guest. Rudy Engelbreck is a close friend

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of mine and also a private investor, and he's kindly

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>agreed to open the books and share his experience on

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>private equity investing in Australia. Have he migrated from South

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Africa around ten years ago. But to be very clear,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Rudy's not providing advice. All his views are his own

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>personal views. He's not acting in any other capacity. So always,

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>as is the case on the Money Puzzle, everything we

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>discuss is general advice. It's not personal advice, and you

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>should seek your own advice from a professional before making

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>any decisions. So, without any further ado, Rudy, welcome to

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the Money Puzzle.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Jane, thank you for inviting me to go

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 2>to the show.

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure. Let's get right into it. So firstly, I'd

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>liked for you to tell our listeners a little bit

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about yourself. So you're your background and what's your history

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of private equity? What he attracted you to this type

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of asset class?

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Sure to be a quick overview. My journey started in

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>two thousand when I was still in South Africa and

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I had an opportunity to join a young fintech startup

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 2>and they were going to build a new wealth management platform.

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>I had experience in that industry and then as a

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>key person in the venture, I wanted to lever reach

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 2>my knowledge, use my experience of wealth platforms and technology,

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and to do that I ask them to invest in

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the holding company who actually owned a fintech startup at

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that time. That was quite nice and two years later,

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 2>when I left the fintech to pursue my next venture,

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I then realized, hang on, these shares are now locked

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 2>up somewhere and I need to find a buyer for

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>my shares or leave it beyond and wait for a

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>future exit. So that was my first introduction. It's into

0:02:55.560 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 2>liquidity and also the premium on buyer and selling the

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>shares and the differences in the prices. So it was

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 2>a good introduction into this unlisted private equew market. It

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>was a good lesson and I managed to sell my

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>shares for a slight loss, but I went on and

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I learned from that.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Great So to start, you fell into it by default

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you joined a company that was a private company that

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was growing. So it wasn't so much you were actively

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>seeking a private equity investment. You were a staff member

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that had equity in this company.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Yes, I wanted to just being a normal

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>STOLF member and also be part of the key team.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to leverach that knowledge and so look, I

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 2>want to take my investment and grow it in a

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 2>higher capacity.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Perfect you started there, and then what happened from that point?

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>What more did you do in private equity?

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Then? Was the normal business world. I started a business

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 2>as well, and when I moved to Australia, I started

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>another business year and through starting that business, I got

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:58.119
<v Speaker 2>involved in another fintech startup, also in the wealth platform industry.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>This was a wealth platform that offered their products and

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>services to Australian financial advisors. So it sounds a bit

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>like a case of deja vu, and it is. So

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>I ended up investing in the startup and I educated

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>myself on shelled agreements, company constitutions, got introduced more to

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>subscription notices, company valuations and your financial statements. And in

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>this case, I also engaged with legal advice and legal

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>counsel to review shelters, agreements and the terms and conditions

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 2>and term sheets. It was a bit expensive because I

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>had to pay the market rates for legal advice, but

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 2>it was a good lesson again because I learned a

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>lot from reading pages and pages of documentation got it.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like that this is another case of

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>using your professional experience be in a company, but also

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>invest in that company as well. Apart from that, have

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you invested in other companies that you haven't worked in

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or you don't work in.

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Definitely, As you can see, at first, I started with

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>companies where I had a deep understanding of the industry

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 2>and I had a passion in that world, and over

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>time I started to look for other opportunities out there.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I branched out into other industries not connected to world platforms,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 2>but still were the heavy focus on technology because of

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 2>my background in technology. So one was a evaluation platform

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>for property, another one was a financial advisor platform providing

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 2>financial advice technology. Another platform was purely building out fund

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 2>management type solutions. And then over time I even ventured

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Speaker 2>into more nuts and bolts type of businesses, VISA businesses

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 2>that would say invest in it's a fund management company

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>that they would then acquire a company that builds patios

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and roofs, for instance, and they have then a different profile.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a lower risk profile, and there's a dividend income

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>coming out of that investment. Yeah, so it actually brought

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>it out to anything.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Else excellent, But it still sounds like that the type

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of companies you invest in, you understand them because they're

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>either in the finance sector or the IT sector, or

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe a crossover of both. So is it fair to

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>say that you have a preference to invest into private

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>companies that you have a finger on the pulse using

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that saying rather than something that might be totally foreign

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to you. So investing into a home tools company, for example.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>At first, I obviously wanted to be engaged and wanted

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to understand a lot about the businesses. And then over

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 2>time the last few investments I've made were more about

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>show me your track record, show me your history with

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 2>a company, show me the returns, look at the balanced statement,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 2>financial statements, and look at the risk profile. I've actually

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I've entered into other more I would say, as I

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>said before, the nuts and bolts. The other one is

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 2>also a building trust company, so they actually provide construction services.

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know anything really about that industry, but I

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>like the fact that there's a sound financial model and

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>it's literally about products and services they sell and then

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 2>they have estimated earnings and then they either deliver on

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>that or not.

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know more about how these opportunities come

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>across your plate, but also how you do the due diligence.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>We might do that a little bit more detail later,

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but for now, I'd like to move on to getting

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>started in private equity. So what type of investor is

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>suited to private equity in your opinion?

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this really depends on each individual. A probaect with

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 2>is quite different from list that shares and some of

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 2>the factors you need to consider for yourself as an

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>individual as your financial capacity, how much savings you have

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that you want to allocate to this. As at last,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>what kind of risk do you what kind of risks

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>are you prepared to take, because many of these investments

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 2>are quite risky and and some you could actually lose

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 2>your whole investment. And then also the other one is

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 2>how long would you are you prepared to keep your

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 2>capital locked up in this investment because they're typically are

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 2>quite lengthy type of investments that could be five plus years,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>ten years, sometimes even love it.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be good to explain a little bit

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>more about what is the whole life cycle of a

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>private equity or a venture capital investment, And maybe we'll

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>start with just clarifying the difference between venture capital and

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>private equity, and then we'll talk through what the life

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>cycle is, and we're going to have a brief chat

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>about the different rounds of funding as well that companies

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>would typically seek. So my understanding is that a venture

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>capital company is more at the incubator early stage, where

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>they're at their infancy. They're either just an idea or

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they're a company that's relatively recently formed that's running at

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a loss because they have wages, but they're not selling

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>any products or services yet, whereas private equity is a

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit further down the track. They're not there as

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a share market listed company, but they're probably developed with

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>regards to their offering, and they still maybe running out

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of a loss and they may need some capital to

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>kicker off marketing further or to develop further, but it's

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>later on. So is that your understanding as well, Really

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>how private equity and venture capital are different.

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. So usually most people will start up

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 2>in the first phase will be I've got an idea

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>and I think I've got a great business that I'm

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 2>going to know bold and typically you could access there

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>are different ways you could access capital. You could go

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 2>to friends and family, if you get your own funds,

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, and you kick that off over time. What's

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 2>what you could do is then go to an early

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 2>stage and again you would talk to angel investors. You'll

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 2>have your pitchtick ready, which will explain later exactly what

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>goes into that. You'll have areas that you highlight and

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 2>that which is your valuation, how much capital that you require,

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and how you're going to sell that to the to

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>the angel investors. And then over time you get into

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 2>a growth phase where you will then do subsequent rounds

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>and this is how you can get more private equity

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 2>companies and also venture capital companies to then invest bigger

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>chunks of capital into your business. And now you're in

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the final stages and if you're lucky, then you could

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>actually have a positive return where you actually have dividence

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>coming out or not, or if it's a growth based company.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>You could focus on growing the business through revenue, and

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 2>even if you're making a loss, as long as there's

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 2>enough growth to back it. You could then get uses

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 2>to come in as well or other institutions, and an

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>exit can be prepared where you could sell the company

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 2>as well and work through the phases, or we could

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 2>ipo it even So, yeah, that was a quick summary

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 2>of that, and you can dive into more detail into

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>each of the phases again now.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that as good as a high level summary.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So basically a company starts up. The first one is

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the angel round, so that's right at the beginning to

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>help kick things off. And then you have the seed round,

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>which is at the early stage of development, and then

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you might have a Bridge round and Series ABC and

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>so forth, and then you might have a pre IPO

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>raise or there there might be other raisers beyond that,

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>but the general cycle there with raises, and what generally

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>happens is that new investors brought in, new shares are issued.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Existing shareholders can be diluted because there's more shares now,

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but generally the company valuations go up every time a

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>company raises capital. That is the hope. It doesn't always happen. Now.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>One thing which I find interesting because I look at

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>private equity investments as well and have invested in some,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is how they come to me and or how they

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>come to you? How do they get in front of us?

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And the first thing that I always think is why

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>is this company come in to me? Because in my

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>head I have this thing called the sucker money, and

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>so I think, is this company trying to find the

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>easier source of money? They're showing a fancy pitch deck,

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a nice PowerPoint presentation with all these charts around the opportunity,

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the billions of dollars of market there, and how they're

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>going to penetrate that market and do great. And they're

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping to to dazzle the mom and dad investor and

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get them to invest into it. But a more seasoned

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>private equity investor or a private equity firm would probably

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to see through that. What are your thoughts

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>around the funding side of things? And also how do

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>they come across your desk these opportunities.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that is certainly true, James. There's, as you said,

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the term the sucker money, or sometimes the triple F

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 2>which is the friends, family and fools. So yeah, you've

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>got to watch out and if you have any they're

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>going after the easy money, then you're probably ninety percent

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 2>of the time, right, there is a lot of that.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 2>What I do is I try to see who else

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>is also part of this investing round. I look at

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>their track record in terms of you are they If

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 2>they're they're like a Macquarie Bank is also investing then

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>or another listed company or even a companies who are

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 2>specializing in this industry with big funds or they've done

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 2>this before, then you know that their due diligence are

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 2>going to be quite thorough because they're not going to

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 2>invest their millions of dollars alongside your few hundred thousand

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>or ten thousand or whatever it is. They're going to

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 2>make sure that they look after themselves at first. So

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 2>you can be rest assured that most of the times

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 2>they've got armies of consultants and auditors, etc. For the

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 2>due diligence. So that's a good one. If you're in

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 2>a scenario we don't have other investors or what co

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>investing that you can lean on, then you've got to

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of your undue diligence. And this literally

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 2>means working through the sessions with the founders, the current

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 2>executive team, the man, the key management, we're working into

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 2>the next level down in the company, the senior leadership

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 2>team in the company. And in my case, because I

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 2>had some of the knowledge in the industry, I worked

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 2>in also quite a lot of details into technology as

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>well as the financial models, and I had some experience

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>in an area where you don't have that experience. You

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>can also then engage with other people who've got similar

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>experience and bring them in. And this is how this

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 2>market works. As people talk to other people, there's a

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>network of people. You start to build up a I

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>like a trusted network. If I trust this person, then

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 2>they trust that person. Then I can probably lean on

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the trust relationship between these parties, and then I can

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>also start to do some more due diligence there. Unfortunately,

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it's ninety percent of the cases. You do tend up

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to tend to do a lot of the due diligence

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 2>for yourself because this is your money that you're going

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>to invest. And yeah, if you don't do that, it's

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a buyableware situation.

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you've told me before with some of the

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you diligence that you do you mentioned doing due diligence

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on the management team, and that can include things like

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at their LinkedIn history, where were they at before,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>were there's companies successful, what was the exit for that company,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and you can get a census to whether they're being

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>successful or whether they're serial entrepreneurs where they're jumping from

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>one startup to another startup. They're raising capital, so ie

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>using other people's money to try and get a business

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>off the ground. If it does great, If it doesn't,

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>they sink it and they start something again. So they're

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the type of entrepreneurs we probably don't want to invest into,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>whereas we have others that have been management in companies.

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>They've grown it it's e the iPod or they've trade

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>so out it and then they go for a holiday

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for a while, they come back they do something else,

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so they've got pedigree, they've got runs on the board. Well,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what we'll do is Rudy will take a quick break

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll come back and have a chat more

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'll jump into private equity jargon. Listeners will be

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>back in a moment. Hello and welcome back to the

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzle. I'm James Gerard, writer a contributor to the

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Wealth section of The Australian and also Financial Advisor with

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Financial Advisor dot com dot Au. And on this week's show,

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I have Rudy angle Breck. So we're going to dig

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>deeper into private equity. But before I do that, I

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just want to remind everybody again that this is general advice,

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>not personal advice, so please seek out a qualified advisor

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>before making any decisions. Now, Rudy, let's have a chat

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about some jargon in private equity. There's all these words

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that sort of flow around burn rates and runways and

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>pitch decks. So what don't we go through some of

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>those top ones and you can just break it down

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in simple English? What are these things? So let's start

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with a pitch deck p t ch deck.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 2>What is that? So a pitch deck is very detailed.

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Usually it's a presentation that could from literally five pages

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to fifty pages, and the whole key is to get

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the message across in thirty minutes or less to invest.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 2>As you can imagine that a founder and their team

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I have to pitch this deck to probably ten two

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred people to raise money, and they want to make

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 2>it as streamline as possible. The details that will usually

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 2>be and that pitch check will be a quick over

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 2>with the company, the market opportunity and the company's unique

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 2>selling proposition, the competitive advantage. They have a bit about

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the management team. If they've got a good management team

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>with a good track record and runs on the board,

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>then they're obviously going to put that in there. The

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 2>business model with their revenue streams and cost structures. And

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 2>I usually look at those numbers and I multiply all

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>costs by three on our revisal revenues and divide by three,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>and then I also look get up and down cases

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and that so I always look at those numbers. Never

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>trust the numbers. Ask these questions on those numbers when

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 2>you see them, the product offering or the service offering

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 2>that they will have in the pipeline. And then they

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:17.640
<v Speaker 2>even should have financial performance a sorry performance as well

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>as future projections and forecasts. And then also a little

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>bit more about the capital structure in terms of how

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>much money they've got in the bank, how much money

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 2>they're inter raise, how much money they have raised, and

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 2>what evaluations they've used in the past. And then basically

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 2>some of the risk factors that they see or companies

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>carry risk and issues that they can try and look

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 2>at and prevent, and then some reasonable excess strategy or

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 2>sometimes they don't have one, but if they have one,

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 2>then usually some clear numbers or in three years they

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 2>want to do this or sell to someone or list,

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Excellent thanks Reddie. What I find is a red flag

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>when I review pitch decks is if there is no

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>financial forecast, if there are no financial numbers in there

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>around income and expense or even projected because in a

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>pitch deck that the company is trying to show you

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>things that they want you to see. If they don't

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>want you to see something that they don't put it

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the pitch deck. So I get a bit concerned

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>when they're light on the financial and the forecasts and

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they're more about the big picture. This is the market

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity because they then have this valuation which could be

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from a few hundred thousand to tens of millions

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, and there may not be as much science

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>behind it as the investor would want, particularly if they're

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>not showing that the financials in the pitch deck. So

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's always prudent that if you're interested in the company

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and you see the pitch deck, but it has even

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>if it has financials, it's generally a good idea to

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>ask for what's called the data room, which is generally

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a cloud based location where the company will store more information.

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So they might have an Excel spreadsheet with financial forecasts,

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting to drill down into that because although

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they may be projecting certain things around the growth of

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the company, you need to check that and be critical.

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>As you were saying, rudy of those assumptions. So is

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the growth rate they're using of say forty percent, is

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that in line with the market growth rate for that

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>particular company. Is it achievable to increase customers from x

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to y over a twelve month period? Is it reasonable

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to only spend this amount of marketing

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to acquire customers. So all these sort of things need

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to be sense checked to get a good understanding of

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>is this a realistic picture of where the company might

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>be into the future. What do you reckon really.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent agree a good check is exactly the

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>historic numbers. Look at the historic numbers, and if there

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 2>was a forty growth rate over the last two years

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 2>and they're projecting a two hundred percent growth rate over

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the next two years. You want to know what events

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 2>are actually going to trigger those and you can ask

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 2>questions around that, and you can see on a growth visually,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>why is this thing spiking up the revenue whatever your

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 2>costs and was the cost not going to go up,

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. So there's a lot of promit there can

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 2>be a lot of promises made without the real backing,

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and that you want to see historic numbers because that

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>gives you good indication.

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it does. And what would be a rule

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of thumb or is there one for valuations? How do

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you value a private equity company? Is there is it

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a multiple of revenue? Is it a multiple of profit?

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>What about in the early stage, whether there is no

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>revenue or profit, there's just an idea or maybe just losses.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>That makes it more difficult to value that type of

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>company as well.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, first of before we jump into the manue,

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the rule of fun could be if you don't have

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 2>any earnings or profits, then you could use revenue or

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>sales and you could use multiples there. You could you

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 2>literally look at other companies in the market who are

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 2>either listed, so you can then get good ratios in

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 2>terms of their revenue is x and their evaluation is

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 2>a multiple of X. What is that multiple? You can

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 2>start to apply that, but remember listed company is different

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>from an unlisted company because they are liquid and they

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 2>have nice financials that you can look at. In this case,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.719
<v Speaker 2>you can then enough to reduce the multiple by a

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 2>factor to so it's unlisted, it's not proven yet, it's

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 2>still in the growth page as well. That's one way.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 2>If there are earnings you can use that. And again

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 2>you can relate it to other companies in the market,

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 2>if they are listed or if they are unlisted. You

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>might get information. You might have had a company that

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 2>you raised, that you were involved and then they raise

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 2>money and you can use similar multiples. And you can

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 2>also then look at the unique areas that they claim

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be better, and then you could adjust

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the multiples. But those are typically the rules of umbers.

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Look at other companies and multiples and try to find

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 2>something that works.

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Got it in the companies that you've invested into. What

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>would be a broad range of multiples of revenue that

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>have been attached to valuations of those companies that are

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we talking in five times revenue, ten twenty times.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a if it's a non if it's non tech,

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 2>you could have three times to five times sale sales,

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>so the revenue so free times. It depends on the industry. Again,

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>look at the industry. Tech companies could sometimes go five

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 2>times or more. And obviously if they have a unique

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 2>product of no one else as then the scars the limit.

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Someone could literally see the idea and value that differently

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 2>and you could get ten times or twenty times. And

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 2>if you look at in the past, you could have

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 2>seen typically crazy types of multiple supply to certain industries

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and certain companies. But look at the average and work

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>with that. But yeah, five to ten times is high,

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>but it can be happened.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's do one more jargon and then we'll move on. Really,

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 1>tell me what is the burn rate? What does that mean?

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, a company obviously, every day that it operates, it

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 2>has expenses and it also has revenue coming in. And

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 2>if you measure that on a monkey basis, then this

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>is how much money is either being burned because they're

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>running at a loss or if they're lucky, they actually

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.959
<v Speaker 2>show profit. But usually because you're investing in a growth

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 2>oriented company, they'll be burning at a loss, and you

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 2>measure this on a monkey basis. And then the other

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>piece of jargon that we can add on is the runway.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>So often you've calculated the burn rate, you can then

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 2>figure out based on these numbers and your future cash flows,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have, say twenty four months of runway left.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>And it's typically used in the context of an aeroplane

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>when they want to take off. There's a piece of

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 2>runway left and the aeroplane needs to be up in

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the air before it runs out of runway. And obviously

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 2>if the runway is going to be too short, then

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 2>we need to raise more money again and that's when

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the next round happens, hopefully at a higher evaluation.

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I like the financial engineering there with

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the wording of it. Rather than saying I'm losing heaps

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.199
<v Speaker 1>of money every month and I'm going to run out

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of money in X number of months, I've got a

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>burn rate of this and a runwate of that. Sounds

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot better.

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right.

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a chat about risks. So what would you

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>say the top couple of risks that you would say

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to investors to think about before they jump into a

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>private equity or adventure capital type investment.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 2>We've touched briefly on this before and when we discuss

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 2>what top investor would like to invest, but and what

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 2>factors you need to consider. So the risk or the

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 2>one is liquidit to your risks. So pe or private

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>equity investments are not traded on public markets, and your

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 2>capital could be locked up for five to ten years.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes you like in less than five, but it's a

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 2>long time. So are you prepared to have it locked

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 2>up and you can't sell it? If you sell it,

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 2>usually sell it at a discount to other investors, and

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to do that market risk. If there's

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 2>a market downturn, then the cost of capital and debt

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 2>becomes quite expensive. So if you raising capital and investing

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>through a downturn, obviously you could invest at a time

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 2>when the company is valued at x, and then two

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 2>years later they valued at a lower evaluation, and then,

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 2>like anything in any investment that could be lower, they

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 2>now need to raise new money. They ran out of

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 2>run way. They raise new money and the shares that

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the issue will be at a lower evaluation. This is

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 2>known as a downrounde and typically it's not favorable and

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 2>it will leave the current shelds even further. And then

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 2>there's the other one, which is the operational and execution risk.

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 2>So the company and management team simply they just could

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 2>simply struggle to execute operationally, or there's no sales or

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 2>something change in the market, some regulation came through and

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 2>closed down the market opportunities for them. So that's a

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 2>few of the risks.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>Got it all right, So we've got liquidity. Money is

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>trapped until there's an exit event. In most cases, there's

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>this market whereso conditions can change and evaluation of the

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>company can be affected. And then we've got operational resk

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so things may not go to plan and that might

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be due to the company itself broader market conditions. That's

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>really good, Rudy. I want to get your tips and

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>tricks for success in private equity. But before we do that,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>let's just take another short break. Hello and welcome back

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Money Puzzle. I'm James Gerard, writer contributor to

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Wealth section of The Australian and also financial advisor

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with Financial Advisor dot com dot Au and on this

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>week show, I have Rudy Engel break. So Rudy, let's

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>have a chat about tips and tricks for private equity investors.

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>So what are some of the things that you've learned

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>over the years that you think would be useful for

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a new investor in this area to know about.

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I would start off with looking at the people, the

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>management team, the key executives, their track record, much of

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>that I'm comfortable with them, then I can actually relate

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 2>to them. Is my own personal way of doing a

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>bit of due diligence on the people. First. Ultimately, companies

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 2>are built by people selling products built by people again

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 2>and selling it to other people, so it is ultimately

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 2>driven by that. The second thing I would do is

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 2>work through the numbers due diligence questions, try to break

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 2>their assumptions and models and ideas. And sometimes it could

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>be that you just don't know enough and they do

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 2>know quite a lot more than you do. But keep

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 2>on asking the questions that would seem obvious even in

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 2>that way. Also, don't be too scared by too much

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>technology talk or other questions. If they cannot explain it clearly,

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>then they're going to have to sell these products and

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>explain it to other people. So it must be simple

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to understand for you. If you don't understand it, then

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's also not for you and you can pass.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Another area that I look at as the industry, I'll

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>look at similar companies or compare it. I compare to

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>aaliations like we mentioned before, look at similar multiples. I'll

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 2>look at how they raise capital, how much capital that

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 2>they raise, just to get another data point and guideline

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>on that. And in general, I avoid companies with debt.

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand why you would want to raise capital

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 2>and then use that to service your current debt, even

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.479
<v Speaker 2>if they promise not to pay back debt and they

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 2>use it working capital as I just don't understand while

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 2>they can't just issue more shares. Again, there could be

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 2>other reasons for that. That's me. I just don't want

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>more debt. And then be patient, ensure that you're comfortable

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that the money that you invest it can be locked

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>up for many years, don't expected to have a return

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 2>next year, and then also accept it not all investments

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 2>will yield the five x or ten x or twenty

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 2>x type of returns and multiples that everyone else talks about. Remember,

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>people talk about the winner, not the ten losers out

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>there or the average return spere that in.

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Mind excellent and in terms of the way that people

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>can get access to private equity investments, we've been talking

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>mainly about the direct pathway where we're investing, we become

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>shareholders on the share register of a private company. But

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>there's also other pathways available to the everyday investor. There's ETFs.

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a ping Ghana or maybe that's not an ETF,

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's a maybe it's a listed investment company or

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a listed trust. Ping Ghana have one and they

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>invest into private equity investments, so that's brought through the ASX.

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a managed fund by Schroeder as well. They've got

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a private equity fund. So you can take a hands

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>off approach and let a professional fund manager invest into

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio of private equity investments for you if you

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go through the trenches and the hard

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>work of doing the du diligence yourself, and also if

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to diversify more and have a whole portfolio

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of investments rather than a smaller amount, because generally private

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>equity investments, if you go direct, they will usually want

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you to be what's called a whole sale investor, which

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>means that they will want you to have an accountant's

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>letter clearance as signed off on, which means that the

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>accountant needs to certify that you earn either more than

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty thousand dollars per it a past

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>two financial years or your net worth is more than

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>two point five million dollars. And then the minimum investment

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's generally one hundred thousand, sometimes two hundred thousand. Some

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>companies will drop it to fifty thousand, but they're larger

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>amounts that they're not like five hundred dollars, which is

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the case when you buy shares on the share market.

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Even for quite wealthy investors. It's quite difficult to invest

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in a whole heap of private equity investments just due

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to the minimum investment restrictions. Funds are another way to

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>do it, and really there's a few websites around, aren't

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>there that they like they crowdfund into private equity investments.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So they put up a campaign about a chili sauce

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, or a new gin distillery, and

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they try and get people into that. That's another way

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that people can get into private equity investments. But I

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>would caution that pathway because my perception is that pathway

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>appeals to more I have to use that term, but

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the sucker money because they're throwing more around the images

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and the market opportunity more than the numbers. In those

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>type of things. It's more of a psychological thing that, oh, yes,

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I use this product. I can actually go buy some

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>shares and be a shareholder. But when you have a

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>look at what you own of the company, it might

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be like zero point zero one percent, whereas you thought

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it might have been a bit more than that. But

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit opaque with regards to the financials

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and evaluations. It's more on the idea, that's right.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. To add on to your comments about investing in

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the listed trusts or on the ASX, there are companies

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>and funds that will offer you a product where you invest,

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 2>say fifty or ten thousand dollars into the fund, and

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 2>then the fund manager will perform all the due diligence

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 2>for you because that's their job, and they will then

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.479
<v Speaker 2>obviously tides an annual fee to manage the fund. There

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 2>will be performance fees that they'll sar. It's based on

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the performance of the assets in the fund and the

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 2>companies invest in and you're just one of the investors

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 2>in this pe fund. However, it can be worth it,

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 2>especially when the fund investing in multiple companies over the

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 2>timeline of the fund. They diversify the risk for you,

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 2>and they will also offer you some liquidity where you

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>might not have to wait five to seven years. You

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 2>could once a year or twice a year be able

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 2>to retraw a percentage of your funds in them. So

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>that is one way instead of going crowdfunding, where James

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 2>totally right. The crowdfunding feels like a hailgun approach. We

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 2>just spray money and hope to get something back, where

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>at least with a fund manager with a good track record,

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 2>they will do a lot of the work for you.

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Really, we're almost out of time. If you

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>could give me one final thought with regards to private

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>equity and venture capital to take our listeners away with,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>what would you say?

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I would definitely take the advice of a financial advisor

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>to walk with me this through the detail and assess

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 2>my risks and my profile and goals before I just

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 2>go and invest. Because the last thing you need is

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to invest a big chunk of your life savings into

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>something and then wait for that. We might not get

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 2>a reach out, so make sure your ascid adication and

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 2>your goals are aligned.

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic. Thank you for that, Rudy, and thank you so

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today. It's been really insightful and

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I've enjoyed our chat and I'm sure our listeners will

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. So thank you again, Rudy Engelbrek for joining

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>us on The Money Puzzle.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, James really enjoyed it. Thanks for the time.

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Excellent, And to our listeners, thank you for tuning into

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>today's episode of The Money Puzzle. Send in a question

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and James Kirby will answer it in a couple of

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks time. I'll be with you for the next two weeks,

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and coming up on next week's episode, we're going to

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>have a return of an accountant named Timothy Ricardo. He

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>was on a few months ago when I last guest hosted,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and he copped a bit of flak from his clients

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and friends because we were talking about what are some

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things that you can claim as a tax

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>deductions and we had a lot of weird scenarios, but

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Tim seemed to say no to everything, so Tim's been

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>given the task of saying yes to something, so he's

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>going to come prepared next week with some tax deductions

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't think that you could get that you

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>could actually get, as well as talking about other contemporary

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>tax issues. So we look forward to that. You can

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>tweet us your thoughts, just use a hashtag the Money

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle or one word or email us on the Money

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Puzzle at the Australian dot com dot au. Until next time,

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm James Gerard. Talk to you soon.