WEBVTT - Why Albanese killed a key environment bill

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>From Schwartz Media. I'm Daniel James. This is seven am.

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Albernezi was triumphant on Friday as he talked up

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the government's passing of dozens of bills through the Parliament,

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but there was one key piece of environmental legislation set

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>to sail through that he personally stopped right at the

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>last minute, with no heads up for one of his

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>most senior ministers, the Minister for the Environment, Tanya Plever

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>sec The decision by the Prime Minister puts mining interests

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and the hope of votes in Western Australia ahead of

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a deal that source to say he had already approved. Today.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>National correspondent for the Saturday paper Mirk Secam and why

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Alberanezi did it and whether it's the green till end

0:00:45.280 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>up winning out. It's Tuesday, December three, Mike, thanks for

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us. There was a rush of bills passed last week.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me what went through?

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, thirty one bills on Thursday and forty five over

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>the week. Among them some key pieces of Labour's housing legislation,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>including its Bill to Rent bill. They're twenty two billion

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 2>dollar Future Made in Australia package.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>What we're doing is getting things done.

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>And in a press conference on Friday, the Prime Minister

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Albanez, he talked up the government's success in getting

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the legislation through.

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 4>If we listened and we engaged, we had our amendments

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 4>ready to go to make a difference to people's lives,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 4>so cracking down on supermarkets.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 2>Watching the Parliament, actually, I was reminded of a quote

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 2>by the great Irish actor Richard Harris, you know, perhaps

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>most famous for playing Marcus Aurelius and in Gladiator, and

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>he once observed that the defining characteristic of a successful

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>politician was selective cowardice. And apart from all the stuff

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>that passed, there were also some startling examples in my

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 2>view of selective cowardice last week.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>How so well.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>For one, there was Labour's adoption of a suite of

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 2>draconian measures against immigrants.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Other things, they create powers for the Australian government to

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 4>pay third countries to receive non citizens and give new

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>powers to search for drugs and confiscate phones in detention.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Advocates say the laws are heartless and deplorable.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 2>This was quite clearly put forward in an attempt to

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>prevent the Conservative parties from portraying them as weak on

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>the issue. And I might add that when he announced

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition would support Labour's bills, the Shadow Immigration Minister

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Dan Tien boasted that his side of politics was quite

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>basically running the immigration system from opposition, and I think

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 2>that he's pretty right. But perhaps the most clear cut

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>example is, in my view, related to environment policy. The

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>government had a chance to get its so called Nature

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Positive package of environmental legislation, which was promised at the

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>last election and had long been subject of difficult negotiations

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 2>with the Greens and anothers on the Senate crossbench. The

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Government had the chance to get that wave through the

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Greens and Labour's Environment Minister Taniel Plubsecud reached a deal,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 2>but the Prime Minister blew it up because he was

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>scared of the response from the mining industry, from the

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>logging industry, and above all from the West Australian Labor government.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me about that, yeah?

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Sure. The history of it goes back to before the

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two election. Labour promised to fix Australia's environment laws,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>which they said and which most people who know about

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>them said were inadequate. There was even a template to

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>work from. There'd been an independent expert review of the

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act EPBC ACT presented to

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the former Liberal Environment Minister Susan Lee in twenty twenty

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and it painted a very bleak picture of the state

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 2>of Australia's natural environment and it recommended comprehensive reforms to

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>environmental law and regulation. Anyway, Lee sat on it for

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 2>three months before releasing it and then didn't follow it through.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So Labour promised to do better, and in December twenty

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty two it formally responded with something called the Nature

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Positive Plan, which picked up most of the changes that

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>had been recommended in that expert review, the so called

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Samuel Review.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Our government is getting on with our goal of delivering

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 5>a nature positive Australia. A nature positive Australia which means

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 5>protecting more of our natural environment through our kids and

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 5>our grandkids to enjoy, protecting more of what's what's precious,

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 5>repairing more of what's damaged, and managing nature better for

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 5>the future.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>So central to the plan was the establishment of an

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>independent environmental protection Agency, and when she introduced the bills

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>in May Plebisek called the new body the heart of

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the reforms, a tough cop on the beat that would

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>be able to issue stop work orders to prevent serious

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>environmental damage.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 5>This is an exciting Australia first and it delivers on

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 5>an important, an important promise that we made during the

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 5>election to have a strong independent APA, a tough pop

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 5>on the beat that is operating at arms stakes from government.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>The proposed legislation included potential finds of up to seven

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty million dollars or prison for up to

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 2>seven years for the most serious intentional breaches of environmental law,

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>but the Liberal National Parties wouldn't support it, and the

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Greens insisted that they would neither unless they got into

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 2>it something called a climate trigger, whereby greenhouse gas emissions

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of proposed projects would be factored into the Environment Minister's

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>final decision. And this, I must say was not a

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>particularly new idea. Alberzi himself had argued for this when

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>he was the shadow Environment Minister almost twenty years ago,

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>but nothing came of it. So anyway, if we fast

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>forward to this week, Albanese into our Prime Minister. He's

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 2>not only opposed to the climate trigger, but has spent

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 2>months public liberating the Greens for obstructionism, for advocating essentially

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 2>a policy that he used to champion. So anyway, there'd

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 2>been this long, long standoff between Labor and the Greens

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 2>over this package of bills which were reforming our environment

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>protection laws. Then the week before last we got a breakthrough.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Tanya Plibersek, the Minister, and the Green spokesperson Sarah Hanson

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Young had finally reached an agreement that would have allowed

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>it to go through the Senate. The Greens dropped their

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>calls for a climate trigger and they said they would

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>support the government's legislation package if the government agreed to

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 2>act on native forest logging. Both sides were happy with it.

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>And what happened then, confirmed to me by people on

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>both sides of the negotiation, both Labor and the Greens,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>is that the deal was struck Tuesday morning. It was

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.559
<v Speaker 2>in writing. It went to Alberanizi, who, as I was told,

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>okayed it. Plibbersecond Hands and Young were preparing statements announcing

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 2>the breakthrough for release on Wednesday morning. Everything looked like,

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, it was going and then late on Tuesday,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Alberanzi reversed his position and canned the whole agreement. What's more,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the Greens re informed the deal was off before plebisk was,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 2>which was an extraordinary slap in the face for a

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>very senior labor minister.

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Coming up after the break Alberese's cowardice on environmental reform

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and what it means for ranker in the government's ranks.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Markey spoken to people on both sides of this deal.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Tell me what pussure you formed about why Albanzi killed it?

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's no mystery about it. Frankly, the Labor Premier

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>of Western Australia, Roger Cook, actually claimed responsibility for it himself.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>At a press conference last Wednesday, Cook said that he

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>had spoken at the quote highest level unquote to share

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>his view that the bills should not be progressed, so

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty clearly his intervention had a lot to do with it.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Even before the Premier came out and said that. According

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>to West Australian media, his Minister for Mines and Petroleum

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Dave Michael, told around two hundred mining industry figures that

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the WA government had been assured there would be nodeal

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>so anyway to put it simply, this was a triumph

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of electoral politics over policy, and the reason for that

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>is that Western Australia has not historically been a strong

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>state for federal labor, but in the twenty twenty two

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>election it picked up nine seats in the West, so

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it was a very strong result and essentially the West

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 2>was the state that propelled labor in the government. So

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>labor doesn't want to upset people in the West. Powerful

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>mining interests own most of the West's media, and one

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>might say they effectively owned both major political parties too,

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 2>So really this was indeed an active, selective cowardice on

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Albanese's part.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>How did Tenya Plebasik respond to the way Alberanuzi handled this.

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine she'd be quite annoyed by it all.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, want to imagine she was. But Plibisek is a

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>pro right, she's a stoic. She's not stuck her head

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>up and said that she was screwed over and she's angry.

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 2>But other people have been saying it for her, I

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>might add Sarah Hanson Young clearly is also furious about it.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>She lays the blame squallion LB and easy I.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Walk out of the room, of course, and before we

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 3>know it. The front page of The Australian, the West

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>Australian and virtually every newspaper the next morning was saying

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 3>that the business lobby, the miners and the loggers had

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 3>convinced the Prime Minister to dump these laws. I mean,

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to take my word for it. You

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 3>take the word of that crowing.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 2>But the most concerning thing I think is the internal descent.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Felicity Wade, who's the co convener of the Labor Environment

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Action Network, stressed that the EPA that Albanizi had killed

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>off was an election commitment and had been in the

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 2>national platform since twenty eighteen, and that was backed by

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>five hundred local ALP branches and that it was, as

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 2>she put, a core to their claim of caring for

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 2>the natural environment. So Felicity Wade was furious. I spoke

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>to her and she was really angry, and so are

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of other people in the party.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>So how do you think this has going to player

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>for Alberdez given it sounds like it was merely an

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>electoral calculation.

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, look that waits to be seen, you know, but

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to think it will damage labor with environmentally

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>concerned voters and it will help the Greens, and everything

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>that helps the Greens increases the chances that Labor will

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 2>not command a majority after the next election. You know,

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>we keep hearing from the pundits and sophologists looking at

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the state of things that we're probably heading towards a

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 2>hung parliament in which neither Labor nor the Coalition can

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 2>govern alone. And that makes the Labour Greens dynamic particularly interesting.

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, for most of this term, Labour has sought

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to portray the Greens as being obstructionist and being part

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 2>of a nolition with the Liberal and National parties, but

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 2>that's changed recently. The Greens have become much more accommodating

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 2>of the government's agenda. Some read this shift as evidence

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>that the Greens had realized there was a growing perception

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>that they were indeed obstructionist and were too often voting

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>with the Coalition arties against Labor, and that this was

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>hurting them. I spoke to Adam Band about this, though,

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 2>and he puts a pretty strong countercase. He points out

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 2>that the Greens have finished this year with more seats

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>in parliaments across Australia than they started the year sure,

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 2>they'd underperformed at a couple of recent elections, notably in

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Queens and the Act, but not by much. And he

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 2>also points to the fact that they're still doing very

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 2>well in opinion polls. And it's true. There was an

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>analysis by Guardian Australia early this month which factored in

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 2>all the major polls and found the Greens were sitting

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 2>on thirteen point four percent of the first preference vote,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>which was up from twelve point three percent at the

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two election. By comparison, the same Guardian poll

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>found that Labor was down more than five points, the

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Coalition was up two point two and the independents were

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>also up. So while the Greens aren't happy about this

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>move from Melbourne Easy and they think that ultimately fighting

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>between the Greens and Labor only benefits the coalition, it's

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 2>clear they're trying to pressure the government for outcomes they want,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>but they ultimately believe that when push comes to shove,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 2>it's time to work together because that's in their overall

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 2>best interest. What the Greens want is a minority Labor government,

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>in which case the balance of power will fall to

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 2>them and probably some minor party and independent people who

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 2>also are very environmentally concerned, you know, the so called

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 2>teals and things that there will be much more leverage

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in the new parliament if that happens for them to

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>get their way. What he doesn't want is what he

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>calls the Trumpian Dutton opposition to win the election. So anyway,

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>it was a very interesting week in Parliament. The fact

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>that Labor managed to pass such a huge bunch of

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>legislation at the last minute shows what can happen when

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 2>it works together with the Greens and the minor players.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>The embarrassment suffered by Labor and the environment stuff shows

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 2>how badly it can go when they don't work together.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark, thanks so much for your time.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Lodan.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Also in the years, today, Joe Biden has signed a

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>pardon for his son, Hunter Biden, in one of his

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>last acts as President of the United States. Hunter Biden

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>will be spared a prison sentence for federal felony, gun

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and tax convictions. President Biden had previously ruled out intervening

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in the case, but in a statement, he said he

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>believes politics had infected his son's treatment and that he

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>hopes Americans will understand why father and president would come

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to this decision, a military personnel found guilty or sexual

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>offenses will be expelled. According to the government's response to

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Commission in Defense and Veteran Suicide, there will

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>also be a new formal inquiry into military sexual violence

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Australian Defense Force, with a scope and timing

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>still to be determined. The government has accepted most of

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Commissions one hundred and twenty two findings, three

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>months since the report was released. I'm Daniel James. This

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is seven am. See you tomorrow.