WEBVTT - Albanese v Dutton: What's at stake on May 3

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Ready to go.

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 2>You bet.

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Born ready, my fellow Australians. This morning I visited the

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Governor General and her Excellency has accepted my advice. Did

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 3>an election be held on Saturday third of May twenty

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 3>and twenty five?

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Promence Sir Anthony Albanesi's re election pitch is stark and singular,

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>warning of cuts and chaos under a government led by

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton.

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 3>This election is a choice between Labour's plan to keep

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 3>building or Peter Dutton's promise to cut. That is the choice.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>That is your choice, your job, your wages, your child's education,

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 3>and importantly as well this scene here, your Medicare card.

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>They're all in your hands.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton. It's a question of whether Australians are better

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>off now than they were before.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Australians have built their lives and our country on the

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>belief that if you work hard, you can get ahead

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and build a better future for your children. However, right

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>now Australia is going backwards. The Prime Minister's spent the

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>first time two.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>The opposition leader has made a lot of promises about

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the cost of living, housing and immigration, but with scant

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>detail from sports media. I'm Daniel James. This is seven am.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Today's special correspondent for the Saturday paper, Jason gottsukis on

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 2>your choice at the next election and whether having a

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 2>winning personality matters for either leader over the next five weeks.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>It's Saturday, March twenty nine. Jason, thanks so much for

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>speaking with us. What did you make of the Prime

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>minister's speech and what did it tell us about how

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>he wants to fight selection.

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, the Prime Minister talked about how Australia is turning

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 4>the corner. He's talking about the economy there that inflation

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 4>has come down from nearly seven percent to around two

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 4>and a half percent over the last three.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Years today because of all the hard work that Australians

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 3>have done. Inflation is down, real wages are up, Unemployment

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 3>is low, interest rates are falling, and we're cutting taxpayer.

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think the biggest moment of his press conference

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 4>was when he pulled out his Medicare carden. Of course,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 4>he was also able to relate that to his mother

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 4>and the sort of care that she'd been able to

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 4>receive courtesy of Medicare, and he got quite emotional there.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 4>He teared up.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 3>As an invalid pensioner, she got taken up the road

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 3>after having an aneurysm, and she never left RPA, but

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>she got the same care that Kerry Packer got. They're

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the Australian values. That's what I'll fight for.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 4>He talked about the energy relief measure that the government

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 4>has introduced to take one hundred and fifty dollars a

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 4>year off people's power bills, and then he sort of

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 4>compared all of that to the chaotic, dysfunctional Member Morrison government.

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Less than three years ago. The chaotic and dysfunctional Morrison

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>government left bulk billing in free fall, age care in crisis,

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 3>and the ndis at breaking point. A decade of the

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Liberals keeping wages low, sending jobs offshore, and fighting about

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 3>climate change left our nation open to the worst global

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 3>inflation since the ninety eight.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 4>But I thought it was the most effective line of

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 4>the press conference. Was everything in Peter Dutton's record tells

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 4>us that he will start by cutting medicare.

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>That he will start by cutting medicare, and he won't

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>stop there. He will cut everything except your taxes.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 5>I thought that was a very effective line.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Jason. You spent the past few months speaking with labor

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>strategists about their plan for this election. You've also looked

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>at the advertising campaigns they've been rolling out, So what

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 2>have you found out about how they want to use

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Dutton as a foil.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's no question, I think, and Labor strategists have

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 4>been saying this to me for months. There's no question

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 4>that they think Peter Dutton is not very popular and

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be focusing on that very much during

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 4>the course of this campaign.

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 5>They don't think that Peter Dutton is ready to govern, and.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the last News poll, it seems

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>like a majority of voters don't think Peter Dutton is

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 4>ready to govern either. So I think we're going to

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 4>see the Labor Party have some positive advertising, but I

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 4>think most of it is going to be on the

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 4>negative side and really attacking Peter Dutton. The other thing

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 4>the ALP is going to focus on is the what

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 4>has been a real lucky charm for the Labor Party

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 4>ever since Bob Hawk was Prime Minister, and that is

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Medicare and strengthening the health system. That's always been a

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 4>winner for the Labor Party. Their policy that the Prime

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Minister announced a few weeks ago now on Medicare, that

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 4>eight point five billion that they're putting into bulk billing.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 4>I think the ALPA getting very good feedback on that

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 4>from voters, and they're going to keep hammering that issue

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:28.679
<v Speaker 4>as much as they can as well.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Coming up after the break, why Dunton suddenly doesn't want

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>to talk about nuclear.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Hi Ruby Jones Here seven Am tells stories that need

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 6>to be told. Our journalism is founded on trust and independence,

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 6>and now we're increasing our coverage. Every Saturday until the election.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 6>Will bring you an extra episode to break down the

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 6>biggest political moments of the week. If you enjoy seven Am,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 6>the best way you can support us is by making

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 6>a contribution at seven am podcast dot com dot are

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 6>you forward slash support? Thanks for listening and supporting our work.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Jason on Thursday night, We've got a little insight into

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton's plans for the country when he gave his

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>budget in reply speech. He followed that up on Friday

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>once the election was called, what do we learn?

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 4>I think the biggest surprise of the week was when

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 4>we learned that the Coalition wouldn't be supporting Labor's surprise

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 4>tax cuts. Angus Taylor went on seven point thirty report

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 4>straight after Treasurer Jim Chalmers had delivered the budget and

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 4>called the tax cuts a cruel oaks and a bribe.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 7>There are better structural, fundamental solutions to the cost of

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 7>living crisis. That's not what's being offered by labor and

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 7>so we won't support what they're doing here.

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 6>You do not support the tax cuts.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 7>No, Well, look, let's be clear. They are a cruel huax.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, they are not a genuine tax cut.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 4>And it also gave the government the opportunity to kind

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 4>of wedge the Coalition on the tax cuts. They weren't

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>expecting Peter Dutton to oppose them. It's been an enormous

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 4>political gift for the government and they really pounced on

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 4>that on Wednesday morning when they suddenly decided to introduce

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 4>legislation to really lock the opposition into that promise to

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 4>oppose the tax cuts. But we also learned about the

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 4>coalition's promise to have petro exise for twelve months if

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 4>they win the election, and I think that is popular

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 4>with a lot of obviously people who are spending a

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>lot of money a week each week on petrol.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>We're saying that we want to help now pensioners and

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>families and small businesses right across the economy with a

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five cent reduction in fuel excise. So when you

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the bowser and you fill up your car,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>fill up your you you're going to be paying about

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>fourteen dollars.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 4>But we also learned a little bit about the coalition's

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 4>plan to try to lower energy costs for households with

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 4>this policy to force domestic gas producers to keep some

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 4>of the gas that they take out of the ground

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 4>and put it into the domestic market.

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Gas is used to create and generate electricity, and under

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>our policy, we're putting gas back into the energy system

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're doing it for Australians.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Because it's quite a complex policy and it's not clear

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 4>to me that it's going to lower gas prices. Peter

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Dutton also talked about getting rid of the Housing Australia

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Future Fund and the rewiring the Nation Fund, and of

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 4>course Peter Dutton's promise to implement large cuts to the

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 4>public service in Gambra. I think that's also risky for

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 4>the Coalition because it does remind voters very much of

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 4>what Donald Trump is doing over in Washington. Donald Trump

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>is something that the Labour Party are going to be

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 4>trying to link Peter Dutton to very much during the

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 4>course of this campaign. They think Trump is a big

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 4>negative for Dutton and they're going to try to remind

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>voters of that as.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Much as they can. I think over the next five weeks.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 2>So the last couple of days, we've got a bit

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 2>of an insight into some of Dutton's plans. But like

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>you just said, he has talked a lot about cutting

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the public service. Do you think that's going to resonate

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 2>on all with the broader electorate.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so, because during the last three years

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 4>of the Morrison government, yes, on the one hand, they

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 4>reduced the size of the public service, but they massively

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 4>increased the number of consultants that were needed. So I'm

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 4>not sure that Peter Dutton's going to be able to

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 4>square this circle of He's on the one hand saying well,

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 4>we'll cut public servants and we'll save money, but then

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 4>who's going to deliver all all the services that people

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 4>expect government to deliver. And then what we probably see,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 4>if we're going on the coalition's recording government, is that

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 4>they'll have to turn around and employ consultants and that's

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 4>probably going to cost Peter had done a lot more

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 4>than he saves by sacking forty one thousand public servants.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 2>What was interesting to me was some of the stuff

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Dutton isn't talking about. I mean, he's been Defense minister,

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.839
<v Speaker 2>he's been Minister for Home Affairs and immigration, and yet

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in his budget reply speech you want to get into

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>specifics from the coalition's position on defense spending or immigration numbers.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 2>What do you think that is?

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Jason, Well, it's a great question, Denial, and I think

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 4>the answer is that Peter Dutton probably has not worked

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 4>it out himself yet. They've been all over the place

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to what the migration target will be.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 4>They haven't been very clear whether they're talking about reducing

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 4>the permanent intake of migration, which is around one hundred

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 4>and ninety thousand a year, or whether they're talking about

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 4>reducing net overseas migration, which is of course a completely

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 4>different number. If he's going to cut permanent migration by

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 4>as much as he said he will, they're talking about

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 4>reducing I think taking it down from one ninety to

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 4>one sixty, then that's really going to harm the economy

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 4>because the only reason the Australian economy me has been

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 4>able to stay out of recession over the last five

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 4>to ten years is because we've had this quite high

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 4>migration number. And on defense, I wonder whether the reason

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 4>he held back on that is because he knew alban

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Anthony Albanze was going to call the election and he

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 4>probably thought, well, I'm going to not get as much

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 4>coverage of my speech tonight as as I would normally.

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 4>I have to save something for a quieter newsday. And

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 4>so I wonder whether he held back for that reason.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 4>And yet when it comes to the commitments around defense.

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>There was also only one mention of nuclear in his

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>budget reply speech and the first question he was asked

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 2>by Generalist and Friday was why is that coalition.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 7>Has a three hundred billion dollar plan for nuclear energy

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 7>but barely got to mention last night in your budget reply?

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 5>Why was that walking back from yuclear because the elector

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 5>doesn't like it?

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, we spoke extensive about, extensively about our energy plan

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>last night.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.839
<v Speaker 2>And does this scene to you like Peter Dutton doesn't

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>want to speak about what was until recently his flagship policy.

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I think no question. Daniel Jason Claire, the Minister for Education,

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 4>who is going to be the layback campaign spokesman I

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 4>think for the next four or five weeks. He gave

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 4>a press conference last night after the budget in reply

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 4>speech and he said, well, he thinks Stutton's nuclear policy

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.599
<v Speaker 4>is about as popular as a fart in an elevator.

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 4>The Coalition have basically stopped talking about their nuclear policy. Instead,

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 4>Peter Dutton's talking about this new gas policy that they're

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.599
<v Speaker 4>going to try to implement. Peter Dutton knows that the

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 4>nuclear is not polling well, people aren't buying it. I

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 4>think we're probably going to start to see the layback

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 4>campaign strategist trying to put more pressure on him about that.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 4>There's also this confusion about what it's going to cost.

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 4>As we saw on Insiders last Sunday, not even Angus Taylor,

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 4>the Shadow Treasurer, really seems to understand how much the

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 4>coalition's nuclear policy.

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Is going to cost. And I think it's a real

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 5>weak point for them.

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So Jason, over the next five weeks, you're going to

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 2>be out on the campaign trail. Last election, Albanese wasn't

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 2>all that crash hot on the trail. Darton is largely untested,

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 2>so what your read on how they'll connect with voters

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and do you expect they'll try and kiss as many

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>babies as possible.

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, always politicians will try to kiss babies and whoever

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 4>they can. I do think Anthony Albanezi he is very

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 4>patchy when it comes to campaigning. He does tend to

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 4>drift off and he gets into this mode where he

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 4>starts to list all the things he's done in government,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 4>and it I think has the effect of turning listeners off.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 4>But I think in the last four or five weeks

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 4>there are signs that Anthony Alberesi has learnt something. He's

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 4>getting better. His legacy is really on the line now.

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 4>If he loses this election, it will be the first

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 4>time a government has lost an election after just one term,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 4>and I think that is a huge incentive for the

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Prime Minister to campaign as hard as possible. Peter Dutton

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 4>is untested and we have seen the evidence of that

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 4>in the last few weeks. He's started to make mistakes.

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Albanesi of course has been through an election campaign, so

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 4>that experience is going to matter, and I think Peter

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 4>Dutton is going to struggle I think a bit more

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 4>than perhaps the Prime Minister will.

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Well Jason, thank you for joining us, Thank you for

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>your insights and look after your Sava of the next

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>five weeks.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Thanks Daniel.

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 4>I hope we talk again before election day.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Every Chance seven Am is a daily show from Schwartz

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Media and The Saturday Paper. It's made by Atticus Basto,

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Shane Anderson, Chris Dangate, Daniel James, Eric Jensen, Ruby Jones,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Sarah mcveee, Travis Evans and Zultan Vecchio. Our theme music

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.119
<v Speaker 2>is by Ned Beckley and Josh Hoogan of Envelope Budio.

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for listening to seven Am, and if

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>you like the show, please tell your friends it helps

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot. We'll be back on Monday. See you then.