WEBVTT - Why Biden pulled out: 'Money is the mother's milk of politics'

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>From Schwartz Media. I'm Ruby Jones. This is seven AM.

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>With just over one hundred days to go until the

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>US election, President Joe Biden has announced his dropping out

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of the race. In a letter posted to X, he said,

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe it is in the best interest of my

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>party and the country for me to stand down and

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>focus solely on fulfilling my duties as president for the

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>remainder of my term. Biden's announcement comes after weeks of

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>intensifying pressure from donors and colleagues, concerned he was facing

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>certain defeat by Trump. The question now is whether the

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Democrats will unite around Karmala Harris, president Biden's pick for

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>his successor. Today, senior fellow at the United States Studies

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Center Bruce Wolpy on the key players who pushed Biden

0:00:52.479 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>out and whether Karmala Harris can win. It's Tuesday, July

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. Bruce, Hello, welcome back to seven AM.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Wonderful to be here, Thank you so much.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>Ever since that disastrous perst debate against Trump, Biden has

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>been under this intense and growing pressure to step aside.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Yet he and He's inner circle they have seemed completely

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>immovable until this moment, So why did he cave?

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Now, you're exactly right. And so this all happened on

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Sunday in the United States. Well, Sunday morning was a

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>continuation of the fierce reporting that Biden was angry, he

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 2>was resentful, he wasn't going anywhere. He had announced he

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>was going to campaign in this coming week. He felt betrayed,

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>he felt underappreciated, and he hated it. He said, I

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>am the nominee. I was in the primaries. I want

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 2>millions of votes, got all the delegates, and you're telling

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 2>me I can't be the nominee of our party. Look,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a young guy.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>That's no secret. But here's the deal.

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 2>I understand how to get things done for the American people.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 2>He entered the twenty twenty presidential campaign to do one thing,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>stop Donald Trump.

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump believes the job of the presidents to take

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 3>care of Donald Trump.

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 2>He said in twenty twenty four, I am the best

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 2>to stop Donald Trump.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I know him well, and I know the danger he

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 3>presents to our democracy, and we've been down this road before.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>And so for him to be denied that opportunity when

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 2>he fervently believed he was the best he didn't believe

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the polls, he didn't believe the material the people were

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>bringing him. But the key thing to watch in this

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>were about five or six pivotal people President Obama, President Clinton,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who is

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>the most cunning and revered strategists that the Democrats have,

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the Leader of the House Hakim Jeffreys Democrat and the

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>maori Arty leader in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, and the

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>most prominent Black representative in Congress, Jim Clyburn, whose support

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>for Biden in twenty twenty sealed his nomination and ultimately

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>his victory. And most of them, Clyburn aside, we're hearing

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 2>from their members that we're dead. We will go down

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 2>with him. Trump will win, he will win control of Congress.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>He will have an unfettered hand to rule with an

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>iron fist, and we can't let this happen. All these

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>leaders ultimately met with Biden, and finally there was a

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 2>realization by the President and his staff, who's been loyal

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>with him for decades and who are excellent, that this

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>is over. He's going to lose, and it's going to

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 2>be a catastrophe for the Democratic party, and ultimately he

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>had to accept it.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just Biden's Democratic colleagues that have been

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>losing faith in him, is it its donors as well?

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>How critical has that fact been for Biden?

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you're in a jet plane, you need fuel

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>and when the fuel runs out, you crash. And Yeah,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 2>when George Clooney says I'm not doing any more money

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>for you, well it gets everyone's attention.

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Disney eras Abigail Disney withdrawing her support.

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Telling CNBC yesterday that she plans to stop all donations

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>as long as the president remains the front runner. What's

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>really interesting is in the first hours of Kamala Harris

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>saying that she is running tens and tens of millions

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 2>of dollars from small dollar contributors has flown in. So yes,

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>money is the mother's milk of American politics, and it

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 2>was pretty important.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>And Joe Biden he's endorsed his vice president Kamala Harris,

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and she has said that her intention is to earn

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and win this nomination. So what does that process actually

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>look like.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>We've never been here before, so we don't have clear

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 2>definition of it. It's unprecedented. Yeah, you know, I get

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 2>tired of saying how unprecedented we are in these unprecedented times,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>But no major parties Canadon for president has dropped out

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 2>of a presidential race this close to the election throughout

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 2>American history. A lot depends on who else enters the

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>race and wants to get the nomination, And I think

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>the party will probably set up some events around the

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>country where whoever is contesting the nomination will have debates

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 2>or town halls or whatever, so you get a sense

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of them and how they're doing. But question is, do

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>you have a sort of clean process or a messy

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>process where some people get in a race and they say,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't want Kamala Harris, You've got to stick with me,

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and you divide the party. Now, I think at the end,

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>given the stakes involved, that the party will work a

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 2>process that finds itself coalescing around Kamala Harris in the

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Convention which begins August nineteenth.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>After the break, can Kamala Harris beat Donald Trump? Bruce? If,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as you're predicting, the whole party does get behind Kamala

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Harris without this traditional nomination process playing out, does that

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>leave the Democrats open to criticism that they're acting undemocratically.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it could, and I think that we got a

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>little flavor of that today. President Obama made public a

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>letter to the American people on Joe Biden's presidency and

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 2>it was really high praise for what Biden and his

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 2>legacy will be. And then people are saying, oh, he

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 2>didn't endorse Kamala Harris. Does that mean he's not for

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris? And I think two things. First, that President Obama,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>being the man that he is, understands that this is

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a day for Joe Biden, this is a day for

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 2>honoring his presidency, and that if he had endorsed Kamala

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Harris in the same breath, well, then that inside baseball

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 2>deal would be a parent. Ah, they all conspired, it's

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 2>all in. It was all a plot. And so I

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>think there will be some distance between what happened today

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>with President Biden and other very prominent people coming in

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 2>to support her.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And we know that the Trump campaign they've already been

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>preparing for a race against Kamala Harris. Tell me about

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what their line of attack against her will be.

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>With Kamala Harris, they'll attacker is a radical extremist, communist,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 2>deep state type person, the very figurine that they hate.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>They're going to go after her appearance, their voice, how

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>she talks, her mannerisms and so forth. But there are

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>a couple things here. She's a prosecutor. She was district

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>attorney in San Francisco, attorney general of the state of California.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>She goes after criminals. Well, guess what Trump is a

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 2>convicted felon. She's going to attack him, and he hasn't

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 2>faced that kind of criticism from the Democratic nominee throughout

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>this campaign. Effective criticisms, criticism that sticks, and I think

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 2>she will make every effort to make it stick. The

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>other thing about Trump is I don't think he has

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>high regard for women, women that have been prominent and powerful.

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 2>He attacks. He calls Nancy Pelosi, the former speaker, crazy Nancy.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>If you're a prominent anchor at Fox News, he says

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>horrific things about you, the same about journalists at MSNBC.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>And so I think a woman of color presents a

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 2>really rich target for him to denigrate. And in Australia,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>we've learned from Julia Gillard over ten years ago, what

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>can happen to a woman who becomes who can test

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the position.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was Biden's debate performance that really led us

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to this moment. So will we see another debate against Trump?

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And if so, how would Kamala Harris perform against him?

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 2>She is a debater, She was in the Senate for

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 2>many years, so I think she has all the attributes

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 2>to do it. She also has a wealth of experience

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>from being vice president for almost four years. She is

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 2>in all the meetings, she goes overseas on missions for him.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>I think she's underestimated, and in politics, you always want

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 2>to be underestimated. On the other hand, if she makes bloopers,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 2>if she misssteps, and in her early days as vice president,

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.479
<v Speaker 2>she was not effective in the media. She was uneasy,

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 2>she had staff churn, She was weak on immigration, she

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't establish her mandate over that. But she's evolved. She

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>has grown as vice president. When Florida passed a really

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>restrictive a six week ban on abortions, she went immediately

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 2>on the day after the legislature did that, and she

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 2>confronts the governor, confronts the voters in Florida. It was

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>a stunning coup.

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 3>This is a fight for freedom the fundamental freedom to

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 3>make decisions about one's own body and not have their

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 3>government tell them what they're supposed to do.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>When there's a massacre, gun mass current schools, she goes

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>there and says, why are we doing this? Aren't we

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 2>better than this?

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 3>So part of line I'm here today is to challenge

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 3>every state has a red flag law.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think she has that ability and will see it.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know whether Trump actually wants to debate Kamala Harris,

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 2>because there's only one way that can go. I think

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>he'd probably be afraid of debating her, and I think

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't want to give her too much prominence and attention.

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 2>In other words, who's this selection going to be a

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 2>referendum on on Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. If it's

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>on Kamala Harris, she'll probably lose. If it's on Trump,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats will probably win.

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that until this moment,

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Harris has been in Biden's shadow. Her approval ratings their week,

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and there is a lot of uncertainty around whether she

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>can actually meet this challenge. Even if she does run

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the absolute best version of her campaign, I still wonder

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if she can win against Trump, because it seems unlikely

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>right now that anyone could with less than four months

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to go. Trump has never seemed stronger.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 2>That is exactly right. And if you look at the

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 2>swing states, they've been going hard towards Trump since the debate,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>and that's trouble. On the other hand, what Biden was

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>suffering from was a lack of enthusiasm. Now I think

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Harris can regenerate a lot of enthusiasm, particularly younger voters,

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I think, among black voters, among women, among some Hispanic Americans,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and so she has a chance to get some ground back.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>It's uphill, absolutely.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So as we speak, Kamala Harris is on the brink

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of making history. She would be the first woman of

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>color to be a presidential nominee, and if she were

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to win, she would be the first female president. Do

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you think that those facts about her have the power

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to galvanize voters, that Harris is someone who can convince

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>people enough people to turn out and to vote for her.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>I think next month is really crucial in that regard.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 2>If she has a good performance, she brings the party together,

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 2>if she gets enthusiastic crowds in groups of Americans, who

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 2>were not going to vote for Joe Biden. Then the

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>answer is yes, Trump is not going to lose any

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 2>of his voters. The question is can she accumulate enough

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 2>voters to out vote those guys And just as Biden did,

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, seven million votes in twenty twenty. So to

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 2>be seen, but it's going to be really.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, Bruce, Thank you so much for your time.

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much. It's only the future of the

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 2>free world. We'll see how we go.

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Also in the news today, tens of millions of dollars

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>in donations continue to flow into the Democrats campaign coffers

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>as backers show support for Kamala Harris as the preferred candidate.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Harris raised over twenty seven point five million US dollars

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in just the first five hours of per campaign on Sunday.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>By nighttime, that figure had grown to nearly fifty million,

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>according to fundraising platform act Blue. The donations are largely

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>coming from small dollar or grassroots supporters. VP Karmala Harris

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>also stands to inherit around ninety six million US dollars

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in President Biden's campaign fund, and Australia is one of

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>several nations to respond to the weekend's landmark ICJ ruling,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>which found that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is in

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>violation of international law. The ruling marks the first time

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the ICJ has handed down an advisory opinion on the

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>legality of Israel's occupation of the Gaza Strip, West Bank

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and East Jerusalem. The ruling called for Israel to end

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>its occupation and that it's obligated to pay reparations for

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the harm coust. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said in statement

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the government is carefully considering the ICJ ruling and said

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they want to see concrete science taken to end the settlement.

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Over the weekend, is Rail Prime Minister Benjamin Ettniahu called

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the court's ruling a quote decision of lies. I'm Ruby Jones.

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This is seven am. See you tomorrow.