WEBVTT - Special edition: 2024 Top Advisers list 

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby, Wealth editor at the Australia. Welcome aboard everybody.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It's one of my favorite shows of the year. It's

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the release of the top financial Advisor's List, which we've

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>been doing every year a modest total of fifty advisors.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>It is now expanded this year this morning out this

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>morning to one hundred and fifty advisors, the top one

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty advisors in the market, and it's quite

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the enterprise. It's produced in conjunction with the Baron's Investment

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>magazine of New York and actually they do all the calculations,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>so all I have to do in tandem with the

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Deal editor of the Deal magazine, which is where you'll

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>find the list, or you can find it online. Helen

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Trinker puts it all together. And I know a lot

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of people on the list at this stage, and some

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of them of course have been on the Money Puzzle.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So I want to actually today give you a really

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>good guide about financial advice, about how it works, how

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.559
<v Speaker 1>to find it, and the landscaper within it. Just before

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>I do one thing I want to mention lots of

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>response to the episode about big super funds behaving badly,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and part of that was triggered by your own correspondence

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with me where you had issues about being having trouble

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with big super funds and how they dealt with you.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>If you have let us know the money puzzle at

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the Australian dot com dot au. Send in those emails.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see them and we can actually we

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>can get a response much faster than you can get

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a response. Let's put it that way. Okay, Now to

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>join me today, I have an advisor who's actually been

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the handful of advisors who's been on this

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Top Advice's list since the day we launched in two seventeen.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>His name is Will Hamilton. He is at Hamilton Wealth Partners,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>regular on the show How are You Will?

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Very well, thank you, James, and thanks for having me.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you, Good to have you. So every

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>year since two seventeen, feeling the pressure are you?

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 2>It's an honor to be honest, to be honest, and

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 2>that these things are a team effort. You We've got

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a great team here.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, well, I tell you what. Putting out a

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>list of one hundred and fifty advisors. Is the team effort,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>especially these days when you have print and digital and

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and the joint venture within New York Publication. I

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>can tell you it's no easy task, and I'm happy

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>to say it seems to be out there all bells

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ringing today, So that was really good. There's a couple

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of things I wanted to talk about, and the listeners

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>will be coming in at various angles. Some of them

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 1>will no advice all to well. Some of them might

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have started. If I go on if I know nothing,

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and I go on to Google, which is what most

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>people do to start anything, and they say, how do

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I find a financial advisor? The first thing I'm going

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to get is five or six people selling services. That's

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I'm going to see, okay, because they're sponsored.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And then I'm going to see various sites. But I

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think generally at the very start, people should, perhaps if

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>you know nothing at all, start with money Smart, which

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>is often where people should start. The the ASSEIC website.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That is just to check. That's just to check whether

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the advisor that your friend at the barbecue said was great,

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>whether they're actually registered, and whether there are any whether

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they basically tick the elementary boxes and then I would

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>hope the people on the show would be a bit

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>more advanced than that, and perhaps for a start they

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>could look at this list. There's one hundred and fifty

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>names there, and that is quite a list I from

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>all around the nation now. But one thing that struck

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>me will like almost straight away was the whole game

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is moving up market. That financial advice. I mean, in

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a way, it would always be an up market activity,

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>but in Australia because it costs so much to do it.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw a survey during the week that said fifty

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>percent fifty percent of the fee for your financial advices

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 1>administration costs. So it seems like the whole thing is

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>moving up market. But it seems that it's seriously moving

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>up market now, like it really is starting to be.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The companies that are on the list, even the brands

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that are on the list, if they have multiple arms,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the up market arm of their of their advice

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:37.799
<v Speaker 1>activity that gets the ratings. Basically, so is that what's happening.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Look that I'm not going to mention names, but some

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 2>of the larger firms have pushed right up to a

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 2>minimum five million dollars and yeah, that's a commercial call

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 2>on their part. It's in many cases that decision has

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 2>been made in Hong Kong or New York or something

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 2>like that. And yeah, they're good firms, but that's yeah,

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>so when you talk about it, it's a gone up marker. Yes,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 2>some of those firms have done that. We are wholesale only,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 2>so we have to meet these sophisticated and invest the tests.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>With any client, we will take less, but we also

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>have a minimum that we think is important that we

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 2>can grow it to that. Now that's a commercial decision

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 2>as well, and you need to look at the overall

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 2>revenue you can bring in and the costs to service

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>that client. But you are right, we don't like to

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 2>say no to any client, and if we can't service them,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.239
<v Speaker 2>we like to introduce and introduce them to a firm

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>that can look after them. And we've been working very

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 2>closely with a firm for about a decade, but they've

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>even moved up. Yes, so we've sort of had to

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>go and source another firm in the retail space where

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>they can look after retail clients and some of those

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>smaller ones. Because it's important, as you said, go and

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Google and they then send send something through your website,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 2>but we want to make sure that we can point

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>them in the right direction, even if we're not right

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>for them.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>And I see that there's variations around this, but in

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of what you might expect to pay ongoing annually

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>for financial advice, we're looking at something in the order

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>of four and a half to five and a half

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>thousand a year on average. Now that's a lot. You

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be making lots of money basically for that.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So one thing I wanted to just put to you

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>will before we talk about the landscape out there for

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>top advisors or for very good advisors for listeners who

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just want to get started. It seems to me there

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>was two sort of promises about if we take it

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that the whole financial advice market has moved up upscale

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to the upper end of the mass affluent. And you

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned how your wholesale and a number on the list

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>are wholesale, but the majority aren't. By the way, for

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth, folks, the majority are not wholesale only.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But by that you must be a sophisticated investor. You

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>must have two point five million in net assets. But

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>the promise for everyday investors are start investors. Was that

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>there was going to be sort of two things that

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.679
<v Speaker 1>might save the day. One was digital advice, Digiti advice,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and the other was that the big super funds would

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>come in and offer advice of a type. Now on

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the digit advice side really never came to pass. It

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly didn't come to pass in our market in any way.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I know the stock spot which has been has a

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>course now owned by the big Murray Korean fund and

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they are Digiti advice specialists. But it didn't really get

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It didn't really take off, did it.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Look that's a really good point. I was at the

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>future Proof conference in Los Angeles a few months ago

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and they had this panel of female advisors actually and

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>talking to them look back five years and what was

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 2>being pushed five years ago versus you know what has

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>and what hasn't taken off? And they said there were

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>two things. One was ESG yeah, I know this is

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 2>in America. And the second one was exactly that online

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>b it Digiti advice, be it online platforms for investing.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Low cost, low touch financial advice. So it's come through

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but it hasn't come through on a

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of mass fashion that was expected, and the other

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>part was the big superannuation funds. Now the big superannuation funds,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their efforts to enter financial advice you might say, on

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>their terms has stoled in Parliament. And the big issue

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is that they want, as they always want, they want

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to pool everything and so that you'll pay an advice fee,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>but it won't really reflect how much advice you have

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or how much you have in the bank or in

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the fund. This has been blocked if you like, by

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>other parties in Parliament because it's not transparent. And the

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>issue in big super as we know is the lack

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of transparency is becoming a bigger and bigger issue. And

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>their timing is pretty bad to try and push this

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>because we've just had a flurry of scandals basically in

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>big super often linked with the fact that people couldn't

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>see how their funds were going, couldn't get payments in

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the timeframe they expected, or even issues around on listed valuations.

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're talking about Sebus here, we're talking about Hester here.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But but what I want to ask you is do

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you think that will ever come to pass that the

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>big super funds will if you like, feel the vacuum

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at the starter market.

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 2>They want to, and that because they're worried about when

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>people going through retirement mode and that's where their leakage is,

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 2>so that they gather funds in accumulation and lose funds

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 2>in retirement phase, and so they definitely want to. It's

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>down Outlook, this minister's was going to fix the advice mess.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I think his words, Well, it's still a mess. It's

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>fifteen five hundred advisors. There is a shortage of advisors

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 2>in Australia and there is no what I think, resolution

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>out there at the moment. Will they be able to

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>give impartial advice? No, is the answer. If you talk

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 2>to SeaBus about keeping your money in SeaBus, and that's

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>not impartial advice.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>To what you're saying. If you said to the big fund,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd like to get into investment property and

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>buy something they are not going to encourage, or you

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>would think because the money would live the fund, it's

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>very impartially. Yeah. Yeah, So with impartial advice, with independent advice,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not asking you to justify it. I'm asking you,

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as a player in the industry to justify it. The

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>realistic figure of four to five thousand a year. How

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>does a good advisor justify that to the investor.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>The amount of work that's required to run a small

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>portfolio probably why we don't do that. It's substantial. It

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter if you're looking after a client. Is it's

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 2>the small all the end or the bigger end on

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>a relative basis, The amount of work that doesn't justify

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 2>that increase. And so therefore, unfortunately it might sound a

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 2>lot to people four and a half to five thousand dollars.

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 2>I doubt that the firm is making much money out

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of that, given what they've got to do with respect

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 2>to regulation compliance. And then when I say regulation, therese

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>are documents that have to be prepared and sent to

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the client to meet the regulations reviews running the portfolio.

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the point you made there is really interesting.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd never really thought about that. If someone comes in

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the door with twenty two investments and their whole portfolio

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is worth a million, and someone else comes in with

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty two investments and the whole portfolio is worth ten million,

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the amount of work isn't much different.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>The point you're making.

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 2>It naturally is more, But it's not that it's not

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 2>on it.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not ten times more. Yeah, yeah, I see, I see, yeah, Okay,

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, But one other thing I want to explain

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to people that are listening and are keen about getting advice.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, folks, I would always say this

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>good advice is terrific. Pay for it. I have no

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>problem paying for advice. I have no problem paying fees

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for fund managers as on the assumption that they make

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you money. If someone saves you anything more than their fee,

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>then you're in the money basically, and often I would

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>say to you, as something of a veteran investor this

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>stage myself, the earlier you get that advice, the more

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>important it is because it's structural, and some of that

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>advice could be around, for instance, the structure of an

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>investment or the tax specifics long term, which you probably

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>won't know unless you are happen to be in that

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>area professionally. I think that's the really important thing. And

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they often see things as well that are common knowledge

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>among advisors but are not common knowledge to investors. Even

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>though we might be very much across investment and investment allocation,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the action we're put in together of a portfolio and

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>how that works with the tax office is actually what

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really matters in terms of your returns. Okay, we're going

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to come back in a moment. We'll take a short

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>break and we're going to take a look a little

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>deeper on who's who basically in the standscape for you

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as a listener and how to optimize your way through

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the financial advice system. Hello and welcome back to The

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby, the Wealth editor

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at The Australian and welcome aboard everybody. And one of

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the things will you mentioned there I thought was really

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting is so once upon a time, not that long ago,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>say ten years ago or so, there was thirty thousand

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>advisors in Australia and now there's fifteen thousand point one

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>point two. The fifteen thousand advisors isn't growing, it's stalled

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>basically at that number. There have very few recruits. They're

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>really worried about this. I mean, professional associations are actually

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>recruiting in India trying to get people to come to

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Australia to be financial advisors. At the same time there's

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this huge demand, so more than just finding an advisor,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>how do you get in the door to a good advisor?

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>What would you need to I'm going to put it

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this way, what would you need to offer the advisor?

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Because the point you made at the start there when

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about a minimum, you were saying that

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a minimum, but you're happy if the person is

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>aspiring to get to that minimum.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>If we're confident that they will get there.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And how would the investor persuade you?

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's about their savings and earning's capacity, and we

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>look at the other asset based the other assets outside

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 2>of what they're potentially giving us that they've got. You know,

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>there's when we get into a competitive situation with another

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 2>firm and a client mentions that, and I think this

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is a really important thing. Is I'm not going to

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 2>pitch why we're good or what we do, et cetera.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a personal thing. You know what we've got as

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>a skill set. And you know, I think being an

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 2>advisor is about being a very good listener. And therefore

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I say to them, you have to decide and go

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 2>with the firm that you think you can best work with.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Very person outside of family, your asset basis is the

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>most important thing you've got, so that people have to

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>decide to work with a firm they think they is

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the best thing they can work with. Now, we hope

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>that's us, but in many cases sometimes it's decide that's

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 2>another firm. And I think that's a very important thing.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's not about looking up Google and deciding, oh,

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>look here's one, go and see them. Yeah, they can

0:15:58.000 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>do the job. I really think this is you want

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>to have a long term relationship in the firm that

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you're potentially going to see it wants to have a

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>long term a long term relationship as well, and you

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 2>therefore need to find the person or people that you

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 2>can best work with.

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And what about let's say when you were in your

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>late twenties or thirties, you found an advisor. They were

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, It was all pretty good, got to a point,

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you're older and you say, I'm in a

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>different I'm actually in a different league now and this

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>person is very good. But it's the same thing every year.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm clearly missing I'm not getting this. I'm not getting

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that he or she missed something this year that they

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>should have picked up, et cetera. What about that issue

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of upscaling or switching to a more appropriate advisor.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>That you know. Sometimes you do grow out of relationships,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>don't you. And that's I think what you're talking about.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>And that doesn't just rate financial advisors. It relates to accountants, lawyers,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. A firm that you go to. You were

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>talking about fund managers and fees before. Sometimes the big

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>firms they come out and say, we get feed discounts. Sorry, guys,

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 2>everyone gets feed discounts. Make sure that the advisor gets

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 2>feed discounts with the fund managers. That's nothing unique there.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>The other thing the really big guys say is we

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 2>get access to product that others don't get. That's actually

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 2>not true. Some of the smaller firms get access to

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>things that the larger firms don't get because the larger

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.239
<v Speaker 2>firms are too big. So it goes both ways. So

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 2>you just want to make sure there is a good

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 2>that you are able to access a broad, high quality

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 2>spectrum of solutions, multi asset class across the board and

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>at the right price.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Right and turning it on the other side of the

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>table in terms of the relationship. So a couple comes

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in to an advisor and one person is clearly very numerous, conservative, capable,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be a good client. Unfortunately, the

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>other part in the copple you can see just wants

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to have, just wants to spend, also wants to just

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>knock it out of the park and find a ten bagger.

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Then you have, and let's make it even more interesting.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Someone told you that that there are the point of divorce.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>The point I'm making here is the client changes on

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you too, I'm sure absolutely, and how do you deal

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>with that?

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 2>So one thing we have is that everyone has to

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 2>do a risk profile. And one thing we do, and

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 2>we disclose this to the client, is we used to

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 2>think we'd invested DNA, which has an embedded psychometric test

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 2>in it, so we can sort of sc see them,

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 2>and that's fully disclosed to the client. So we can

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 2>see their stress points and what they rely on when

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 2>they're under stress. And so it's making sure there's the

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:52.399
<v Speaker 2>right advisor is aligned to the right client.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Do the psychometric tests in your experience? Are they reliable?

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing they are.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I had this many times, but I wanted to

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ask you they're very reliable. Yeah, okay, And I think in.

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 2>One client in particular I sort of had in my

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>mind after I've met him, X is going to look

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 2>after him. And back came the test and I was like, WHOA,

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 2>I was wrong there. I've got to go in a

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 2>totally different direction. And that's really important, really important, And

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 2>you know it's sometimes in a relationship, when you have couples,

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you don't realize that one is definitely stronger personality and

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 2>with respect to financial literacy than the other. And in

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 2>that case sometimes you realize that the other part of

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the couple. You've got a dentist is next to it

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 2>to us, and they probably prefer to go to the

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>dentist and come to us.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And that thing that people can be terrific. Someone

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>could be a terrific commercial lawyer and a catastrophic investor.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you come across that all the time.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 2>I always say, if we've and I think this is

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 2>something which is really important as well. And I know

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of the better advisors, it's especially on

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>your list, would do exactly this as well. When you

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 2>know we are right, affirm does things a certain way,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 2>and if someone comes in and wants as always looking

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>for that ten bagger, as you put it, I would

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>introduce them to somebody else. You know, we are as

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 2>iways say, we're a service about keeping wealthy people wealthy,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's and I think another most of

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the other firms on that list, I think if they

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't feel the client was right for them, they would

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 2>introduce them.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>On yes and that and hope and hopefully also making

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>them wealthy on their way, which of course would be

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of listeners would be most keen upon,

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I expect in terms of a mathematical breakdown. Okay, one

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not thing on this. You mentioned you were in LA

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>at a financial advisor conference. You mentioned there was a

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>female panel. Do you know that my numbers on this

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are as followers in Australia, among the fifteen five hundred advisors,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty three percent only our female And on the list

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that came out today, the top one hundred and fifty

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>top financial Advisors list in the Australian only thirteen percent

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 1>are female. And that number hasn't moved much since we started.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought it would have, and I would

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have thought that as an area it would have had

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a much more sort of natural gender balanced by now,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>without any need for encouragement I would have thought of

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it had just happened, but it hasn't at all. Any

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>theories from you as to why.

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 2>It gets back to things like the Royal Commission. Now,

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I very senior female fand manager Tom in Sydney was

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 2>telling me that she was at her daughter's school. She

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 2>was asked to host, you know, the careers night to

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 2>go into finance. You're right, and so she sort of

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>turned up there to host all these young girls and

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 2>that wanted to go on and finance. Not one person

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 2>turned up a leading Sydney private school. And I think

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 2>that at the image of the industry still is it

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 2>front of mind? You know, you want to go and

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 2>do commerce. You've sort of got at the end of mind.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>You want to be a lawyer, you do want it,

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 2>to be an accountant. It's not we're still becoming a profession.

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I think we're well down that road. Have we got

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 2>that to that level yet? It's when society accepts us

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 2>as such that's when you become a profession. But I

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 2>don't think we're front of mind enough for a lot

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 2>of younger people. Oh, I want to become a financial advisor,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's one of the problems in the

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 2>second issue is some of that the bad reputation that

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>we had from years ago, and that was terrible. Whilst

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we've made incredible inroads in cleaning that up,

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I think that's there're two of the

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 2>things that have been an issue now.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 2>We train young women and bring them up, and it's

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 2>very important that we do that. It's the alternative.

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, listeners to the show be familiar with many female

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>advisors that I have on the show all the time.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Sally Winn, of course from Shadforth is on the list

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>as usual. She's another veteran on the list this year,

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Shadforth group really really lifted their presence on

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the list this year. The top, of course is Morgan

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Stanley once again, Garth Hugh a bradmanesque performance, a Lewis

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton like performance in the list. He's number one are

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for the fifth year in a row. And the number

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>one highest ranking woman is also from Morgan Stanley. That's

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Kathy Ding in their at number eighteen. So congratulations to

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>all those. Okay, folks, we'll take a short break and

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back with some really good questions in a month,

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>so welcome back to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast, James

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>Kirkby talking to Will Hamilton. Okay, we have a few questions. Okay,

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I why don't you read the first one because the

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>second one I'm more across. Yeah, from Emma.

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 2>So, Emma asks heard you mention a request for dollar

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>cost averaging in the last episode, and I'd like to

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>ask for this topic to be explained. I've recently set

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 2>up a monthly direct debit investment into high growth ETF

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>for my niece and nephew and would like them to

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 2>understand how this works over time, so you would do

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 2>much better than I could. So, Emma, the thing is

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>saying in the markets that time in the market, not

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>timing the market, and if you can get the top

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 2>or the bottom, you're better than anyone else I know.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>So the thing is it's about averaging in and what

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>you're doing is exactly what you're doing is a monthly

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 2>direct debit, which I presum is going in every month

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>as your averaging a certain amount one hundred dollars, one

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars whatever that is into this ETF. And that's

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>dollar cost averaging because you might be going in at

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 2>a dollar one month and a dollar ten the next month,

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and at ninety six cents the next month, and you're

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 2>averaging in with those amounts, and that's still a cost everaging.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>In a way. ETFs are almost like that, weren't they

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that it was in that that they just follow the market.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And if you, Emma, if you just put in the

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>same amount of money every month, then a month will

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>happen where the market is overpriced and you've paid too much,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but you will balance that off by the month you

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>buy when things are really low and nobody's going in,

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but you're going in, and that habit basically gives you

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the consistency. It's Look, it's a very strong theory, which

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to knock. You could. The only thing

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you can do is there are occasions through history where

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the market doesn't return, rebound or revert to the mean,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's tough during those times, that's for sure. But

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very strong principle and in a way, at its

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>very best, our superinnovation system where you must put in

0:25:55.240 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>so much per month into super by low is it

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>actually okay? We will move on to Greg last weekend

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Weekend Australian with regard to potentially investing in

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the new Trump American market. You mentioned a couple of

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard ETFs. I've since discarded the broadsheet, but I mean,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you mean the single issue of the paper. Greg.

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Can you please remind me what they are happy to

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody that I will not and do not in

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>any way emphasis one product over another, or one advisor

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>over another, or anything like that. And I'll tell you

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a funny story there. There's ETFs index funds you can

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>on American markets. Of course you should be in there.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm in there, and I think any advisor, at least

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>any investor who wants access or exposure to the US,

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a great way in. But here's the thing, and

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>every ETF product maker in Australia will be annoyed on

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>what I'm about to say. They're all the same. I

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>had lunch with a with an employee of a major

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>ETF player and they said, listen, we're like we are

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>like the laundry detergent salesmen in the nineteen seventies. They're

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>all more or less the same, and we have to

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>distinguish ourselves in some fashion. So keep that in mind.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>There's Vanguard, There's Eye Shares, there's Betas Shares, there is

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>global X and others. And I am happy to say

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that as long as you get started with one of them,

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the difference in performance to you over a long period

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of time would be infinitesimal. I imagine between the ETFs,

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>because the promise is that they exactly replicate the market

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're buying in. I'm talking about traditional ETFs here strictly,

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about ETF Greg. I hope that's all clear. Okay,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>A question from Dusty who is I'm guessing male in

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the way of Dusty Slim, Dusty or maybe Dusty Springfield.

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. We'll just have to guess. Anyway, you might

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>read the question.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the yes. Since the election and when Trump has

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 2>been nominating a number of people for a second term

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 2>for the secretaries. Most recently, Robert F. Kennedy Junior was

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 2>nominated as as Secretary for Health and Human Services. The

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 2>following day, most of the vaccine makers stocks went down

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 2>because RFK Junior stants on vaccines. If he ends up

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 2>getting the stocks. What are your thoughts on overall healthcare sector,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 2>especially for our local blue chips yet it's not financial advice,

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 2>but I think you know, with these things, you often

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>get a kick down and you get an overreaction. Things

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 2>balance out if they're quality and they've got a product

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that saves lives, whatever, it's going to continue on its

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>merry way. But just yeh, expect an overreaction, I think

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>is probably what you usually get.

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So when this stever advice is information dusty and all

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the dusties out there having said that, or FK Junior, who,

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, whatever else he is, he's pretty healthy looking,

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he's seventy one. You know, he's openly skeptical about vaccines.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>He is going to get that post. CSL has fallen

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sharply in recent times, and it's supposed to be a

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>blue chip that doesn't fall sharply. It's not having a

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty good run at the moment anyway, and this would

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>not seem to be good for them in the assuming

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it happens in the in the short and medium term.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a reasonable observation. But as you're saying, well,

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it is a quality stock, and quality stocks should should

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>see it through whatever challenging is put to them or

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>put in front of them. And you think, yeah, and

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is there any other Australian stock that would be exposed

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to be like to the idiosyncratic thoughts of Robert F.

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy Junior.

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 2>That's the big one that stands out, and boy does

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 2>it stand out.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, okay, very good. Well, thank you for listening today, folks,

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, will, thank you, James. Always great to have

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you on the show. Well done for being on the list,

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>for being for one of the stayers on the list.

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>There's very few of them. Actually, I looked at the

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>two seventeen list, which is only fifty people. I'm looking

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>at it all week. I'm dizzy from looking at the

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>list because I've been doing it and it's quite different

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>now with one hundred and fifty. But well done to

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone who was on that list. And if you are

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>considering getting an advisor, well I'm certainly happy to say

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to put that list in front of you. Okay. Now,

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>today's show was produced by Leah Samuel Gluu. Thank you

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>very much, Leah. And as I said at the start,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>any correspondence issues, questions, complaints or if you are having

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>problems with big super funds, let me know. The money

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>puzzle at the Australian dot com, dot au talk to

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you soon.