WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 27 May

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Lately.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Late Debate. Thanks for joining us on

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the Late Debate.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm James Macpherson with Caleb Bond and Freier Leach. Coming

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 3>up tonight, the Chinese launch a brand new sport, robot boxing.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Is it RoboCop? I think it's more robo Flop. Will

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 3>show you about a little later. Plus when we look

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 3>at what's making news tomorrow, the Queensland government have got

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 3>an idea for reducing power prices. They're going to open

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 3>up new gas fields.

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Who would have thought.

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>And a former afl umpire gives the most bizarre excuse

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 3>for missing a court hearing. We'll get to all of

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 3>that shortly, but we want to start the show tonight

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 3>in Caleb's favorite place, South Australia, where the City of

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Churches is about to get their very first skyscraper and

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 3>not everybody is happy about it.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Business leaders they're very happy they're going to get a

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty eight story tower right in the heart of the

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>city because it will house five thousand office workers and

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 3>one hundred retail staff.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>But opponents, including the Council, say it will.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Completely overshadow the Historic and National Heritage list in Parliament House.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>You can see an image there. And then the.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Adelaide Parks Association of called the skyscraper a monster, saying

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 3>it's going to impose on Adelaide's beautiful green spaces. Now

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say I am with the opponents of

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 3>this project for two reasons. Firstly, Caleb Adelaide is a

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>beautiful city that is not in spite of the lack

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of skyscrapers, but because there's a lack of If you

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 3>want skyscrapers, go to Melbourne, go to Sydney, go to Perth,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>go to Brisbane. Adelaide is beautiful because it doesn't have

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 3>any of those things. And second, they don't need this.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 3>The commercial vacancy rate in the CBD of Adelaide is

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 3>sixteen point four percent. The national vacancy rate is thirteen percent.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Only Melbourne has a higher commercial vacancy rate than the CBD.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Adelaide doesn't need more office towers. It's beautiful the way

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 3>it is. And as a person who loves Adelaide, I

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>would expect you would agree with me on this.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, because it sounds like you want to tell

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the private sector what they ought to do with their money.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're saying you know the vacancy rate is this,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>therefore you should not be able to build new buildings.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you why the vacancy rate is so high.

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of heritage buildings in the CBD that

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>ought to have things done with them, and nothing is

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>done with them. I mean, I have written about Sir

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Edmund Wright House in King William Street in Adelaide has

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>been sitting there empty for years. In years and years,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it's owned by the state government. They've tried to sell

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it multiple times. No one wants to take it because

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>serious work has to be done to it. So why

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't the state government say, oh, look we've got an

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here to do something with a heritage building. We'll

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. But they don't do that. So the only

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>place you can go is a new building. So someone

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>comes along Lange Walker and says, I want to spend

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the money to put up two towers on this bit

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of what was otherwise basically unused land in the CBD

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>behind Parliament House. I mean, they these sculptures. It was

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>called Adelaide Urban iconography, and people who live in Adelaide

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>will know exactly what I'm talking about. It used to

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be behind Parliament House. It was a weird, rhombous looking

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>thing and it was dilapidated and old. It was done

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in the time of Don Dunstan. It was an eyesore.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>So lane walkerss will put some buildings up. I mean,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you pee investment in South Australia, what is wrong with that?

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And you've got the Greens say, oh, we can't have

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>anything shadowing over Parliament House. The only people really concerned

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about anything shadowing over Parliament House are the people who

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>work with in it. But what's the problem. They put

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>up a brand new building with a rooftop bar and

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant on it, so all the overpaid staffers can

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>go and spend their taxpayer dollars up there. I don't

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>see what the issues.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Put it somewhere else, Freyer, so it doesn't overshadow what

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>is a beautiful historic building, this parkland mine. You have

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 3>the building, just put it somewhere different.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 4>But this is the reality. If Adelaide wants to be

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>an international city, they need to go up and they're

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>surrounded by a ring of parts. It's not like you

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 4>can just infinitely go out. There's a limit to how

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 4>far Adelaide can expand. So they have to go up.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 4>And we've seen this, you know, I'm from Sydney and

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 4>we've seen this in Sydney all the time. People oppose

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 4>huge developments like Barangaroo is a great example. They go, oh, no,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 4>this will be terrible, My harbor of you will be blocked.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 4>How could we possibly do this? And then they go up. Sure,

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>in the early years you deal with a lot of construction,

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 4>but once they're up, everyone enjoys it and the amenity

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 4>for the whole area improves. And that is what development

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 4>does to our cities. The nimbi's oppose it, but the

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 4>ymbi's will win because we all benefit from nice, new,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 4>great cities.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, I'll tell you who else is opposed development,

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 3>and that's the Australian Turf Club. They've rejected caliber what

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 3>a five billion dollar offer from the New South Wales

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>state government to take over that property. They would have

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 3>put twenty five thousand homes there. God knows we need

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>more homes. The Turf Club could have built a new

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 3>facility somewhere else. There was the opportunity to upgrade an

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>existing one elsewhere, but they've declined the offer. They want

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 3>rose Hill to remain as a turf as a racing venue.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Good decision or bad decision.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>As well, they should. I mean you get rid of

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>these things, you'd never get them back. Right. This is

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the premier race courses in the country. Right,

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it has some of the best races in the world,

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the Golden Slipper etc. And the idea that you would

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>turf pardon the party, what is a great race track

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>because mister Mins wants to put some houses on it

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense to me. Let's be clear, this was

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>not a proposal from the state government. It was an

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>unsolicited proposal from the Australian Turf Club to the State

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>government that they could put twenty or twenty five thousand

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>odd houses on it and that the state government ought

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to chip in the money to make it happen. The

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>state government said they were interested, but there was no

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>contract there. So the members of the ATC were essentially

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>asked today to sign a blank check for the club

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to go way and have negotiations with mister Min's to

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>come to an agreement which is probably about five billion,

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe we were told, but who the hell would agree

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to that. There's plenty of space to put houses elsewhere.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there was already a proposal on the table

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to put ten thousand residences next to the rose Hill

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Racecourse that required no touching of the race course whatsoever.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>So why don't they just do that? Why do they

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have to get rid of one of my great loves

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to put up more houses.

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 5>But this is just nimbi logic.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 4>A four seconds ago you were arguing against when it

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 4>comes to Adelaide.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 5>But this is the exact same thing we took me down.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 4>People and Australians value homes in an acute housing crisis

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 4>more than I'm sorry. A few people value horse racing.

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what people horse racing. Yeah sorry, It is one

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest industries. It is one of the biggest

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:54.679
<v Speaker 1>employers in this country.

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Horse and you know what happened.

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 5>We don't have enough. You know what happens if we

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 5>don't have enough homes, week suffer. But you could also

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 5>build the race course next door. You can build the

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 5>races running Western Sydney. This is a silly argument.

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't need to build another race course.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>You've already got the race course and history has shown

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you sell race courses. The SAJC in

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>South Australia sold Cheltenham in two thousand and seven for

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty five million dollars and they said this will secure

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>racing in Adelaide forever. We have an investment fund now

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that will make sure everything is hunky dory. And it

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was never meant to go below fifty million dollars. In

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>their last annual report the investment fund was down to

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen point nine million dollars. So in a matter of

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years they've nearly blown the whole lot, and then

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that we're going begging for more money. This is what happens.

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They never spend it properly and leave it as it is.

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Unlike you, I could care less about horse racing.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>It's not the job of the Turf Club to help

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 3>out the New South Wales government with their poor planning

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>by giving up their property to create more houses. If

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>we've got a housing shortage, it's not up to the

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Turf Club to save it. On behalf of Chris Min's.

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 3>He's the government organize a solution.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 4>I'll just leave it on this. If racing was so profitable,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 4>why are they flogging off their asset?

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 5>But let's move on. Moving on to Victoria. Now, the Victorian.

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Treasurer had a really awkward moment today when she was

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>addressing a group of high rolling property developers and investors

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and she asked the really interesting question.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Of what is your favorite tax?

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, obviously the room was dead silent, and everyone was

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of looking around, going what the heck the treasurer

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 4>of the state that has become uninvestible because of the

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 4>amount of taxes and regulations being put on the property

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 4>sector is trying to make a joke of this situation. Seriously,

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 4>it was truly shocking, and I think it really does

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 4>demonstrate how out of touch the Victorian government is with

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 4>the realities.

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, I just wish Kerry Packer had been part of

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 3>that crowd, because he would have answered something like this,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm wrong.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 6>With minimizing tax. I don't know anybody who doesn't minimize

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 6>their tax, and that you were doing so in ways

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 6>that work contrary to the spirits of the law. Well,

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 6>I just got through telling you what I thought about that.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 6>I am not evading tax in any way, shape or form. Now,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 6>of course I am minimizing my tax. And if anybody

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 6>in this country doesn't minimize their tax, they want their

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 6>head remp because as a government, I can tell you

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 6>you're not spending it that well that we should be

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 6>donating extra.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Imagine a Victorian state premier asking property developers and real

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 3>estate moguls, what's your favorite tax? I mean, you've got

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 3>plenty to choose from. You've got your land tax, you've

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 3>got your fire services levey, you've got your windfall gains tax,

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 3>you've got your congestion levey, you've got stamp duty, all

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 3>of which affects property owners. So what's your favorite tax?

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Or there's so many to choose from. I mean, this

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 3>is a treasurer who asks staff, don't give me economic

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 3>terms in your emails because I don't understand them, and

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 3>clearly she doesn't understand business. To suppose that they might

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 3>have a favorite tax that they could nominate. A better question,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Caylor would have been, what's your favorite term to describe

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the treasurer? Is it incompetent, arrogant or completely tone deaf?

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Look, I know, what's your favorite text? Might fly in

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a room full of boring ato. You know, people weren't

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>good enough to be accountants in that with the ADO

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>public servants. But I mean, it's like asking a room

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>full of people who's your favorite serial killer. Oh yeah,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Dahmer. I mean, you don't ask people what their

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite No one has got a favorite text. There is

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>no such thing as a favorite tax I can only

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine that the discussions between Simes and her staff before

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>she went into the room when something like this.

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 6>Does every tax ryers represent a blur against freedom?

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 2>It depends how big the tax raises.

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 6>That's fascinating.

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Does twenty pence represent a blow against freedom?

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 6>So it's something a blow against freedom simply because it

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 6>can seriously damage your wealth.

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I must warn you of the difficulties.

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I foresee all sorts of unforeseen problems, such as if

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I could foresee them, they wouldn't be unforeseen. They obviously

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't foresee the unforeseen problems in asking a room full

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of people who work in the property sector what their

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite tax is. But it is, you know, to be

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>serious for a moment. It is a window into the

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>way the Andrews then Allen government thinks in that they

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>generally think that there would be people out there who

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>would be able to nominate what they think the best

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>tax is, because of course it's the only way they

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>can think that government at the moment because they need

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the money so much. I mean, they're hurtling towards two

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars sorry worth of debt. I mean, compared

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to other jurisdictions around the world with similar populations, it

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most indebted jurisdictions, state or federal

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in the world. I mean. They are obsessed with

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>taxation because it's the only way they can hope to

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>keep themselves afloat. So she's certainly thinking about what her

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite tax is. She just can't fathom the idea that

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us wouldn't.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like asking what's your favorite way of being robbed? Well,

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>that's pretty much the question.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of your favorite way to be robbed, perhaps your

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>least favorite way to be robbed. Council rates is probably

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it certainly is for me. I mean, you know, we

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bang on every night about these council stories here because

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you might say, look, they're minus stories, but these are

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the things. And I have a background in working in

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>newspapers at a local level, where I started out at

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the local rag in Adelaide, working around the suburbs. You

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>will never find a story that gets people more angry

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're more interested in than a council story because

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it affects them every single day and you pay your

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>rates and you expect something reasonable to be done with it,

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and we constantly show you the examples of how they're

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not doing reasonable things with it. But I can't believe

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>this decision has been handed down by the South Australian

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Remuneration Tribunal. And you would know that this is the

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>mob that sets the pay for senior public servants and politicians.

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So they decide what the premier gets and what MPs get,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and they also decide what council CEOs can be paid.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So they've gone through and done an audit because a

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>number of councils have come to the Remuneration Tribunal and said,

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>for some reason or another, we want to pay our

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO more so, the Remuneration Tribunal has reviewed all of

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the pay bands for CEOs and they do it council

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>by council and for at least half a dozen councils

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they've actually reduced the top end of the paypacket that

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the council CEO can go away. And one of these

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>councils is burn Sad. As they say in Adelaide, Burn sad.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the leafy Eastern suburbs which is actually now turned

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>into labor territory. But they wanted to give their CEO

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>pay rise and at the moment, the upper end of

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that is three hundred and fifty one K that they're

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed to give. Now the Remuneration Tribunal says you can

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>only give three hundred and twenty one. Kid going begging

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for a pay rise, they've actually come back and said, no,

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got to take a pay cut. How good is this?

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What's that? Oh? I thing?

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 2>Be careful what you ask for.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 3>And the reason that the Burnside Council wanted to pay

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 3>their CEO so much money was that they listened to

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 3>three things. Because he's the CEO in a highly engaged

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and affluent population, I should notice a shit. I'm not

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>sure when that matters. They want to pay her because

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 3>she comes under media scrutiny. Will a lot of roles

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 3>come under media scrutiny? And because of political challenges, it's

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 3>not that difficult prayer at last. I remember it was

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>like filling in potholes, arranging for bins to be emptied,

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>mowing the grass, you know, in the public park areas

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 3>for a CEO to earn as much as, or in

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 3>some cases more than the state premiere.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just outrageous.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 3>You've got sixty eight local council CEOs in South Australia

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 3>in a population of two million people, and these CEOs

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 3>are on between two hundred and four hundred and fifty

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars each.

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 2>No wonder they don't want to.

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I know you're a bit of a proponent for amalgamating council.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 3>No wonder they don't want to amalgamate. Why would you

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 3>when you're on that kind of money.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think it shows us a couple things.

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Firstly, defenders of the high renumeration would argue that a

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of these councils have budgets of hundreds of millions

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 4>of dollars. So it actually shows us that these councils

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 4>have expanded well beyond the remit of what councils were

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 4>actually established to do.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 5>And a lot of the functions in the community that.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Used to be carried out by not for profits voluntary

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 4>association's churches are now being taken over by the councils.

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 5>So you end up with these huge.

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 4>Massive, bloated bureaucracies performing functions that used to be perfectly

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 4>well performed by not for profits. But then it also

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 4>does highlight the fact that our politicians in Australia really

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 4>are not paid very much. In New South Wales you

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 4>have ten council CEOs earning over five hundred thousand dollars.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 4>That is far more than the premiere of the state.

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 4>So it is pretty shocking. I mean, I think we

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 4>need to pay our politicians more, and also just in council.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Funny thing though, is, you know, comparatively, we pay our

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>politicians a lot in the present of the United States,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's about two hundred k year, which is probably

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>traditionally why the President of the United States has been

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a rich man, because they're the only people who can

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>afford to get there. But one thing I can guarantee

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is that when people woke up and read the advertiser

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning and discovered that their council ceo was going

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to be paid list, they would have reacted something like

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Clarkson, here.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Bad news. What the Dacia sandero it's delayed?

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, anyway last week.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And so say all of that, I think when we

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>use that cleep a bit more now because there's plenty

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of opportunities I can think of where you're just like, oh, oh,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that is so sad. I just can't believe it's happened.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely love that.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the United States where Donald Trump is

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 3>busy trying to rebuild the US military, and we wish

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 3>him all the best with that. The military really came

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 3>under a lot of pressure because they just couldn't recruit

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 3>enough soldiers. In twenty twenty two, they felt twenty five

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 3>percent short of their recruitment target. Twenty twenty three wasn't

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 3>much better than new Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says it's

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 3>because the.

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Military had gone so woke.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Young Americans just weren't inclined to die for their country

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 3>or serve in a military that was all about transgenderism

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 3>and pronouns. But the Trump administration, well they've addressed that issue.

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 3>And take a look at the new recruitment ad. It's

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty inspiring.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>No more distraction, no more electric tanks, no more gender confusion,

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>no more climate change worship. We are laser focused on

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>our mission of warfighting. We will measure our success not

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>only by the battles we win, but also by the

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>war as we end.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 5>And perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's called peace through Strength.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 3>I like that commercial. It's inspiring and some of the

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 3>other slogans used in the extended version. They talk about,

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 3>we don't fight because we hate what's in front of us.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 3>We fight because we love what's behind us. They talk

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 3>about through power and might, we will lead the world

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 3>to peace. Our friends will respect us, our enemies will

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 3>fear us, and the world will admire us. What I

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.959
<v Speaker 3>like about this Frayer is they're appealing to young people's

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 3>sense of getting involved in something bigger than themselves. And

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't help but think about some of the Australian

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Defense Force advertisements which have as a slogan, or at

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 3>least they did recently, challenge yourself. It was all about

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 3>self fulfillment. It was all about a career. Maybe you

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 3>could get a trade through the military. But the US

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 3>have gone a different way. It's not about you, it's

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 3>about your country. It's not about you, it's about your family.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 3>It's not about doing something for yourself. It's about doing

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 3>something for the common good that will go on beyond you.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a good way to inspire young people totally.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 4>And the kind of twenty five century religion for jen

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Z has been expressive individualism. Find your true self and

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 4>live according to your authentic self and self actualize and

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 4>then you'll be a fulfilled human being. But ultimately that

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 4>actually leaves us empty, as you can see by the

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 4>incredibly devastating mental health statistics. So what the US has

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 4>now said is stuff that it's clearly not working. This

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 4>is the counter cultural revolution of saying it's not about

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 4>just focusing on yourself, focusing on who you are, it's

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 4>about fighting for something greater than yourself. And that commercial

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 4>was so inspiring, but let's compare that to a different

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 4>ad that was released under the Biden presidency.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.959
<v Speaker 7>This is the story of a soldier who operates your

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 7>niece's Patriot missile defense systems. It begins in California with

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 7>the little girl by two moms.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 5>Need I say more? Need I say more? And the

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 5>rest of.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 4>The commercial continued in that vein the fact that they

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 4>are trying to or they attempted to recruit people into

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 4>the army based on silly things like LGBTQ diversity. It's

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 4>just people don't care about that. If they're going to

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 4>die for their country. It better be for a dune

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 4>good reason. It's not going to be because they happen

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 4>to have two mothers.

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And this has not been without consequence and design really

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've ended up in this place. And you know

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the polling the IPA has done recently. You know, if

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>you were in a position, if Australia was in a

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>position like Ukraine, for instance, where you get invaded, how

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>many young people would go to fight, and it's something

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five percent, Like most will not fight. Nearly

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>half say they'd flee the country, they get out of

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the joint because they don't want to be here anymore.

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's because we haven't instilled any level of national

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>pride anyone. If you've got nothing to believe in, then

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you have nothing to fight for. And of course that's

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what the long march through the institutions has been about.

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>The if you can stop the kids from loving the

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>country they live in because they live on stolen land

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and their existence is illegitimate, etc. Then they won't defend it.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>So then someone else will come along who presumably the

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Chinese will then come along and they'll have great regard

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for our indigenous populations. I suppose, I don't know, but

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly the problem that the rest of the

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>West faces. I did think it was curious though, because

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>it was in the early two thousands that they essentially

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>made the movie Team America World Police. That is exactly

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>what this ad was. Carbon copy. I mean, when I

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>saw the ad, I thought, Gee, this is a great movie.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to go and see it. As Tom Cruise

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>put out another version of Top Gun or something, I

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think he is actually putting out in another version of

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Top Gun. Let's go back to my old state of

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>South Australia again for a short moment. They just elected

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the youngest senator in Australian history, Charlotte Walker, twenty one

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>years old, of the Labor Party. She turned twenty one

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on election night. It should be noted as well. Now

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>she was third on the Senate ticket in South Australia,

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Labour Senate ticket that is, and that's generally

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>been an unelectable position for Labor in South Australia, certainly

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>since rud one in two thousand and seven, so they

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't expecting that she would get up. She's just a

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>place filler, as often is the case, in these elections,

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but because the swing was on, we now have a

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one year old senator in the Federal Parliament. She said,

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to do a good job for South Australians,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but I also want to show young people, particularly young women,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is achievable and this is something that they

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>can do. Also, not many people my age get to

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Canberra have the ability to contribute in the

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>way that I will, so I'm also really excited to

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>get into it, and to be perfectly honest, good luck

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to her is what I have to say. I mean, look,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's got very little life experience or work experience.

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>She's been a union she went to work in a union.

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's about the same as anyone who's in the

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party, the Parliamentary Labor Party. So whether you're forty

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>one or twenty one, I don't think it makes much difference.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you can vote at the age of twenty one,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course you can, you can vote from eighteen,

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>then you are as deserving of that spot in Parliament

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>as anyone else.

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I agree with your sentiments. Good on her, well done.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 3>That's no mean feat to be elected to the Senate

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 3>at the age of twenty one. But it's interesting she

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 3>said there that not many people my age get to

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 3>go to Canberra. And I think there's a good reason

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>for that, because at twenty one, you presumably haven't bought

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 3>a house, haven't had kids.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 2>She hasn't worked a real job.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 3>She did one year of university, dropped out, went and

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 3>worked for a union. There's so much life experience she

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have. And it's wonderful that you could be an

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 3>example of what's possible getting to Canberra. But you don't

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 3>go to Canberra to show other people they can go

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>to Canberra. You go to Canberra to enact policy and legislation.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 3>And at the age of twenty one, as Caleb said,

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 3>not a bad twenty first by the way, on election night.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And bloody good Barty would have been thrown.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I really have what it takes to make sensible policy.

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 3>And the worst thing that could happen is that she succeeds.

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Imagine she's in the Senate for the next twenty years.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 3>You'd end up with a forty one year old who's

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.719
<v Speaker 3>never had a real job making legislation for this country.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's in anybody's interests. I remember here

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 3>at the Sky News studios was last year sometime talking

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 3>about Barnaby Joyce and I had my son with me

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and I said to Barnaby, do you reckon my son

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 3>should go into politics? I was stirring my son because

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 3>he has no interest whatsoever. And Barnaby Joyce said, if

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 3>you want to go into politics, my advice is how

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 3>old you My son said eighteen or whatever, and Barnaby said,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>wait until you're thirty and get ten eleven twelve is

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 3>life experience, and then minimum age thirty. Then go into politics,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 3>but get some life experience. I think that's good advice,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 3>good luck to this girl, but I don't know that

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>it's a great thing for our country.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's exactly right, because there are certain

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 4>things that you can only really understand by going through life.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 4>And also the Senate is quite different. So why Roy

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 4>was younger than this new senator. He was twenty when

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 4>he got elected, but he got elected in the lower House,

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 4>so he had to run a campaign, He had to

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 4>engage with voters at town hales do daw knocking the

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 4>whole thing.

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 5>Now, I think that is more justified.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, I ran as a candidate in an unwinnable seat

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 4>in the state election had to do the same thing

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 4>and it was a really good learning experience and.

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 5>You have to come face to face with voters.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 4>The difference with the Senate is no one's really voting

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 4>for you, and it more just underscores the fact that

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 4>the Liberals absolutely tanked at the last election and Labor

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 4>romped it in. But in any case, I don't think

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 4>it'll really matter if she's there or not, because Labor

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 4>senators and members of Parliament for that matter, have basically

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 4>no freedom in what they do. When we saw how

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 4>this all worked out for Fatoma payment last time they

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 4>put a twenty something year old in the settus, I'm.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Going to put you up on something.

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 6>Mac.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>You say, you know, probably as an owner house and

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>no kids and all these things, which is fair. I

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 1>doubt she does. But are they prerequisites to go into parliament,

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>because this is probably.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 3>The prerepposite is you're old enough to vote, you're Australian citizen,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 3>and that's the prerection. I'm just saying, is it great

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 3>to have people who have virtually zero life.

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Experience what you're describing. His whole problem with the party system,

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>not with the age because the party has chosen people

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>who will be loyal foot soldiers of the ALP and

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>they are mostly people who have their history in the

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Union or working in a labor politician's office. Right, So

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>whether you're twenty one or forty one, or fifty one

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>or sixty one, they're all of the same book. They're

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>all from the same gene pool. True. I don't think

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>it makes any different difference. I mean, this is the

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>problem with democracy, I suppose in some respects is that

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it has to represent everyone, and that's the person with

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the lowest IQ up to the highest IQ, and the

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>least successful person to the most successful, and the youngest

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to the oldest, et cetera.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, she's been elected as a labor senator, right,

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Don Ferrell, who's a labor statesman, he described her and

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 3>as I quote, very young and very very lucky. That's

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 3>hardly a rigging endorsement.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's the reality of it. But you do

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 4>make a good point. But I think ultimately we want

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 4>our politicians to be leaders that we can aspire to

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 4>and look up to as well. So we'll see how

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 4>this all plays out. But let's move on now. Last

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 4>week we covered a story of a transgender athlete in

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 4>California who was allowed to compete as a biological male

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 4>against biological females, and predictably, this athlete beat the women

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 4>in their category and took home first place.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 5>And there's now been a development in that story.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 4>The mother of this fleet was confronted by other parents

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 4>at the athletics tournament who were rightfully extremely upset that

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 4>her son was being allowed to compete against their daughters.

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 5>There's not belong competing against those girls, period. What a

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 5>coward of a woman you are allowing that? Telling a woman?

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Telling? Are a woman?

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Telling girls to go and compete against the boy?

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 5>How embarrassing. How you're a mother, You're a mother, Stand

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 5>up like a mother. I am a mother. I'm compecting girls.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 5>You want a boy? How many people.

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Support the boy?

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Girl?

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 4>I can really understand the anger that those parents must

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 4>feel seeing their daughters, who have worked their guts out

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 4>to get there take home second place or third place,

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 4>or no place at all because a male is beating

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 4>their daughters. That's outrageous. And it's also been revealed in

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 4>this article that the male managed to change his birth

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 4>certificate very recently for a small sum of twenty three dollars,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 4>and that's what allowed him to compete in the female category.

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Now he's got the opportunity to access college scholarships, the

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 4>state finals, and all sorts of athletic opportunities. Not a

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 4>bad return on investment, I say, but a very unfair

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 4>outcome for women.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Not bad at all. And have a look at how

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 3>this athlete fared. We'll show you the results in the

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 3>girl's long jump. Ab Hernandez is the male who's competing

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 3>in the female category. You can see there that he

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 3>won the women's event with a jump of five point

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 3>eight eight meters, But if he was to jump in

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 3>the boys event, the winning jump was not five point

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 3>eight eight it was seven point four to zero meters,

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:54.479
<v Speaker 3>So Hernandez would have been two meters short of winning

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 3>the men's event. In fact, his jump was so short

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 3>enough to win the girl's event, but so he would

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>have finished last by sixty centimeters from the next lowest

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 3>placed getter in the boys event. So very clearly identifies

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 3>as a girl. Absolutely smashes it in the female event.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 3>But if he had remained in the boys event, would

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 3>have finished last.

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 2>It would have been nineteenth and by a margin.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, twenty three bucks is a pretty good price of admission.

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm starting to think, James, you and I should

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>go and have a go at the afl W because

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we could show them a thing or two.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, what you saw there was pretty unedifying

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>two parents going at each other. But this is the

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>logical consequence of the authorities that ought to be taking

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff seriously not taking the matter seriously, because, as

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I've said many times, this is a matter of fairness, right,

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're continually told, well, no, it's a matter of

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>inclusion and that everyone ought to feel included in school

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and junior sport. And I get the intention of what

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to say, but you have to teach fairness

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>from a very young age, and fairness is such an

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>important tenet of sport. It's what sportsmanship, or maybe sportswomanship

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>or sports day them ship these days is all about.

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>And when the authorities don't take it seriously that girls

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>ought to be able to compete on a level playing field,

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>then of course you're going to end up in a

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>position where parents will start lashing out like that and

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>saying this is not good enough, and they'll take it

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>out on other people who perhaps they ought not be

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>taking it out on, because these things should be settled

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in much more civil ways. But the people who can

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>settle these things in civil ways seem to have no

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>interest in doing so. That's the biggest problem.

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 2>And you're absolutely right about parents in sport.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I've spent a lot of the time pacing the sideline

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 3>at kids' sport, and you do get emotional, and you

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 3>do get wound up, and when you see your child

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>being disadvantaged, tempers get hot, and politicians should do something

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 3>to head that off. We're coming into flu season, of course.

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 3>An interesting survey from the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Two thousand people surveyed and found a third of parents

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 3>were hesitant to have their children vaccinated. Seventeen percent said

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 3>they wouldn't get their child vaccinated at all, twenty two

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 3>percent said they were unsure whether they would go ahead

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 3>with their vaccination of their child. Of those that said

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.479
<v Speaker 3>they were hesitant, staggering thirty nine percent said the reason

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 3>was they didn't trust doctors or nurses information. That's compared

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 3>to thirteen percent of parents planning to vaccinate, who were

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 3>still a little bit skeptical of what they were being

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 3>told by doctors and nurses. When I read this, I

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 3>got to say, I wasn't that surprised, because it's in

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 3>recent memory that we lived through a period where doctors

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 3>and nurses were pretty much banned from telling you their

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 3>honest opinion about the COVID vaccine nless they be deregistered,

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 3>and so you'd go to your doctor and you weren't

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 3>sure whether they were telling you what they really believed,

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 3>or whether they were just towing the government line. And

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 3>of course everything has consequences, Freyer, Vaccination is an incredibly

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 3>important thing broadly speaking, but now we've got a whole

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 3>segment of our population who were looking at their children saying,

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you should get vaccinated because they've been

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 3>taught you're not always being given the right information. Can

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you blame parents for being a little skeptical. It's all

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 3>very well to anti vaxx's conspiracy theorists, but we've got

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 3>living memory of being told one thing when the opposite

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 3>was in fact the case.

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's really sad because trust is so

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 4>hard to build but so easy to destroy. And the

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 4>really sad part of this is that vaccination rates for

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 4>children across the board are down. So the percentage of

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 4>children around twelve months old who are up to date

0:33:55.760 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 4>on their vaccinations has fallen by about five percent since COVID,

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 4>And that's huge. And once you cross a certain threshold,

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 4>you won't have enough people vaccinated to reach hurt immunity.

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 4>You open yourselves up to a whole lot more dangerous diseases,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 4>et cetera, et cetera. But this is the cost, This

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 4>is the true cost that I think no one wanted

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 4>to consider at the time.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I get from a public health perspective

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 1>why it's bad. But you know, these are the consequences

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of your actions. Right, if you trusted us and treated

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>us a little better during COVID, perhaps we wouldn't be

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>responding to what you did then. I mean, you know,

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it's all good and well to say, Oh, I can't

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>believe it. The numbers are going down. How could that

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>possibly happen? I mean, it's like the big bad wolf

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>saying that you ought to trust him after he came

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and blew your house down. It's fine, it's fine, I've

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>learnt my lesson. It's all good. Now I'll rebuild the

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>house for you. No, I don't want the big bad

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>wolf to come and do it. I'd rather talk to

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>someone else. Thanks, and can you blame people for it?

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to a break good news story very

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly again, another council is going to make an attempt

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of Welcome Country and acknowledgments of Country

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as well they should. This time it's Flinder's Island Flinder's

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Council in Tasmania, where a councilor Gary Blindcorn says, I

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>believe the two protocols are Welcome to Country and the

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Acknowledgement of Country have served their purpose and it is

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>now time to move on. These protocols are not historical

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and have only existed for around fifty years now. They

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>were early adopters to all of this anti Australia Day stuff.

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>As far back as twenty thirteen they were having sort

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of alternative events on Australia Day, Sorry Day, or whatever

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the hell it is they call it. But you know,

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it feels like with every passing day there's more and

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>more people waking up to this and I know people

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pointed to the fact that it was brought up at

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the end of the election campaign and it didn't help

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the coalition because you know, people were voting on cost

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>of living at that election. It's a completely separate thing.

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>But since the voice went down, it does feel like

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>incrementally people have started to wake up to the fact

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that this is so tokenistic, it's overdone, it's lost all

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 1>its meaning. People don't want to sit through it anymore.

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 4>And it's more often being used as a political statement

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 4>to undermine the legitimacy of Australia.

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 5>And push a left wing political bias.

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Rather than actually moving towards practical reconciliation, actually doing things

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 4>to help Australia's most marginalize. How about the Council, instead

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 4>of spending thousands of dollars on welcomes to country, gives

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 4>that money to indigenous communities in a practical way that

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 4>actually helps people.

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 3>This council member says that he's had at least one

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred people come to him wanting to abandon these ceremonies,

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 3>which is ten percent of the town. That's a pretty

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 3>significant number. So they'll vote on that tomorrow, so it

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 3>will be interested to see how.

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 2>That vote goes. We're going to take a break.

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 3>When we come back, we'll look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 3>including the bizarre excuse a former afl umpire gave for

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 3>missing a court hearing that's coming up in just a moment.

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to the program. Let's take a look at

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow's headlines. Kleb, you've got the career mails.

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>State gets on the gas, it says, and I think

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just steam co host here of mister McPherson was on

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the gas a little earlier, but we'll leave that to

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>one side, says. Nine new gas fields will be opened

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>up in Queensland as the state government signals a planned

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to cut red tape and get more of the fuel

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the ground in order to drive down the

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>electricity bills. What a strange IDEA Resources Minister Dale Last

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>will unlock sixteen thousand square kilometers to explorers to tap

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>into gas reserves across the Cooper Erimannga and Bowen Surratt basins.

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe it. I'm literally I'm genuinely lost for

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>words that like this has got to go to. What's

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the date today? Tomorrow's the twenty eighth, So today's the

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventh of May twenty twenty five. That a government,

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a state government was like, I know what we can do.

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We can use the resources that are under the ground.

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is extraordinary in modern Australia. This is

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>legitimately extraordinary. It's a brand new discovering that who knows

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it could spark it? I don't know an industrial revolution.

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Who knows? This is a win on every side.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 3>It means increased royalties, it means increased jobs, and of

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 3>course it will mean cheaper power. And it comes a

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.479
<v Speaker 3>day after we talked last night Freyer about this same

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 3>government nixing a one billion dollar wind turbine farm because

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 3>locals weren't happy about it. This is a much better

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 3>plan and to make it happen. What they're doing ostensibly

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 3>is just getting read of red tape, streamlining approvals so

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 3>that investment will start to flow into gas.

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 5>And that's the thing.

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the people that claim, oh, no gas

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 4>and coal, that's uninvestable, it's not profitable. That's only because

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 4>of all the regulations and the red tape and the

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:54.720
<v Speaker 4>fact that governments.

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Won't approve it.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 4>So if you start approving this stuff, people will invest absolutely.

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if Victoria will take note We've got a

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of gas there that they're not accessing.

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go it comes from Jacqueline SARMs.

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure much good is going to come from there.

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the Mercury. In Tasmania, firebrand MP squeaks

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 3>home in tight Senate count, Jackie's Jackie Lamby grabs fifth seat.

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Outspoken MP Jackie Lamby has survived a protracted battle to

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 3>retain her Senate seat in a tight count which has

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 3>taken more.

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Than three weeks to finalize.

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 3>She edged ahead of six plate Liberal incumbent Richard Kolbeck

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and a challenge from the Labor candidate Bailey Falls. Of course,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hansen's daughter was also involved in that contest and

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 3>just failed to win.

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 2>The seat there.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Lamby, of course started back in twenty thirteen. She's

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 3>been in politics. I just find it extraordinary. He's been

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 3>around twelve years now. Started with Clive Palmer's Mob. Didn't

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 3>last long, as not many of Clive Palmer's mob did.

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:03.959
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a year later she went independent

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 3>and I guess, no matter what you think of Jackie Lamby,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 3>she's been a stayer and now she's going to be

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 3>around for another Don't roll your eyes, frail another six years.

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Would you rather a twenty one year old.

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, I don't know.

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 4>No, she's certainly got a lot of hootspa, she's got

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of pizazz. Australian politics needs a bit more

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 4>of that sometimes, and there's never a dull moment with her.

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Well you know, I think many of us laughed when

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>she first got elected and said, oh, oh, look at

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this idiot. But she's carved a great niche for herself

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 1>as a representative of Tasmania, and that's what you want

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a good state senator to be. She's looking after an

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.399
<v Speaker 1>underdog state and she does that well and that's why

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they keep electing her. And to jump from the sixth

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>spot up to the fifth spot is again another endorsement

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>in that. I was a bit concerned though, because that

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the headlines is Jackie grabs fifth seat and I remember

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>many years ago a story about her saying she wanted

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>a bloke with a big package. So I'm not sure

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>putting grabs sneaks to Jackie Lamby is a terribly good idea.

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 5>Oh my goodness, typical Jackie.

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's move on to The Australian Now and the headline

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 4>says small Business levee cut to boost GDP.

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 5>Cutting the small.

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 4>Business tax rate by five percent would increase GDP by

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.760
<v Speaker 4>up to eleven billion dollars over the forward estimates, including

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 4>cloring back almost all the tax revenue in five years.

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 4>Modeling shows the data places pressure on Jim Charmers to

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 4>consider implementing company tax recommendations from the Productivity Commission.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 5>And now this is the thing.

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Australia has a very high company tax rate, and when

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 4>you actually cut company tax, what you do is you

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 4>boost the supply side of the economy. So all of

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, businesses become more productive, they become better and

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 4>therefore end up paying more tax to actually make up

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 4>the full gone revenue that you've given up when you've

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 4>cut the tax rate. So this is supply side economics.

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 4>It's basically HC economics. But for some reason labor can't

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 4>understand it.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's the problem because you're describing HSC economics and

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 3>clearly that's not something they're.

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 5>FAILUAB not PhDs in political science.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 2>Sorry exactly.

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that we're going to see businesses getting

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a tax cut. Would be great for productivity, as explained

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 3>in the Australian but I'm not sure that's the inclination

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 3>of Jim Chalmers or the left leaning part of the

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 3>Party which are going to be in the ascendency over

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the veryveryation is to.

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Halt productivity by putting in taxes like unrealized gains. And

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the idea of cutting the small business

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 1>tax rate further, because at the moment it's thirty percent

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>on a big business twenty five percent on a small

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>or medium business, so you'd go down to twenty percent

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for small businesses. But I think more precingly we actually

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>need to cut the corporate tax rate for big business

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>because the problem we have as a country with one

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the highest rates in the world is the profit

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>shifting that companies engage in, where they send their losses

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to Australia to claim that on tax, so they pay

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>no TEXT here and then they have their profits in

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>other countries where they pay a much lower rate of TEXT.

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>So if you lower the corporate text rate, you equalize

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that out and we don't bear the losses of the

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, which we're currently doing. Seems like

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>a no brainer to me.

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's pretty straightforward.

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 4>Now if you're thinking ahead to eurosummer or media holidays.

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 4>You might want to think again, because one of the

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 4>headlines in the Australian for tomorrow is TWU chaos.

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 5>We are clear for takeoff.

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Transport Workers Union will investigate deploying multi employer bargaining agreements

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 4>across the aviation industry as flight attendants launch action demanding

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.360
<v Speaker 4>an increase to minimum pay rates of up to thirty

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 4>percent in a new industrial relations flashpoint. The TWU's National

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Council has endorsed a strategy to explore advancing multi employer

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 4>bargaining agreements beyond ground crew to thousands of cabin crew

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 4>and airport staff as well.

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, as if flying.

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 4>At aviation wasn't already expensive enough in Australia. We live

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 4>on an island in a tiny corner of the world,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 4>far away from anything, and now it's effectively going to

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 4>get more expensive if we have everyone going on strike.

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I totally agree with you, except when I read this article,

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I was astonished to find that entry level wage for

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 3>a flight attendant fifty three thousand dollars And people.

0:44:27.880 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Say, wow, there are trolley dolly, they're just serving drinks.

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 2>But you're away from home all the time.

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty taxing at altitude trying to do that job

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 3>fifty three grand?

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Why would you do it?

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And to be perfectly honest, I'm kind of on the

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>union side here because I have no sympathy for Quantus, etc.

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Which illegally sacked workers during COVID and tried to outsource

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it all to Donata, like they have tried to cut

0:44:52.719 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>costs at every single turn and then charge us more

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to give us less servers, and now they're going to

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>win the work. Actually want to be paid a fair wage.

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, good luck to you. Now, let's go

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to the advertiser tomorrow where it says really bad excuse

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>boom boom. A former AFL umpire blamed a kangaroo for

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>his failure to attend court to answer claims that he

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>defrauded his employer of eight point seven million dollars. Troy Pannell,

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>who was umpired two hundred and nineteen AFL games, remains

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted by a police outter. Victoria's Supreme Supreme Court sorry

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>issued a warrant for his arrest last week. A kangaroo,

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh you know, sorry, sorry magistrate or judge or whoever

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it might be. I ran over a kangaroo on the

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>way in. I mean we've all sort of been there

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.280
<v Speaker 1>at one point or another. You get the car fixture,

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 1>rock up to court. I mean court's more important, isn't it.

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Can I just say, as a North Melbourne supporter, the

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 3>kangaroo's always being killed by afl umpires. I tell you

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 3>every weekend when you go to a break when we

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 3>come back, the Chinese have launched a brand new sport,

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 3>robot boxing.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:57.439
<v Speaker 2>You've got to see it to believe it will show

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you in a moment.

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 3>We thought we'd finish the show by showing you some

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 3>unusual sports. We'll get to the Chinese in a moment.

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.760
<v Speaker 3>But Caleb, the British pretty weird when it comes to sports.

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's quite incredible actually, you know they say people

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>will beat on anything two cockroaches or two flies ago

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and have a wall or whatever it might be. Here's

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:20.959
<v Speaker 1>a product they should be selling over in the UK.

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It's become a big thing now. Started out as just

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a small, little local event, it's now a worldwide phenomenon.

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>People tuning in from all over over the world to

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>watch cheese racing in Gloucestershire. No, I am not joking.

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:38.280
<v Speaker 1>They roll a large three kilogram wheel of Gloucester cheese

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>down a hill and get people to chase it. Take

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a look there it is.

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Done on the twenty twenty five prowis. Oh, but it

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:46.240
<v Speaker 2>is the German again.

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>The German looks good. He might be done. I think

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he's done crazy. This was madness. The hill this year

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>was dry and unforgiving. I'm lost for words. In spite

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of I'm looking good. Superman's even better.

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Superman looks like you might witness one.

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Superman has done it.

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 5>When it started going, I don't stop this.

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Up and fantastic. The hill was dry and unforgiving. It

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds like me trying to explain why one of my

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>horses failed to do so well in a race. One

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>bloke had to be flown off to the hospital because

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>he injured himself in all of this palava, and you

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>can understand why that might be. During the height of COVID,

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>when there was like no sport going on, it was

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>like racing and that was it. You could go online

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and bet on Ukrainian and Russian ping pong, table tennis,

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and I was absolutely hammering this stuff because it was

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the only thing you could get your hands on. If

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they had cheese wheel racing, I would have been all

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>over it. I reckon, that's brilliant. You've got the stall

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>gift and cheese racing.

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 2>All right, I reckon.

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Worse than cheese racing is robot boxing. That's what the

0:47:55.440 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Chinese are now into. It's more roboflop than robo cop

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Check this out. Well, they certainly showed their metal. What

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I can't work out is why those robot boxes were

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 3>wearing boxing gloves and helmets frayer while they wearing protective gear.

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 4>And seriously, it would be a lot more fun if

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 4>the guys with the little remote controllers just got in

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 4>the ring themselves and punched on because no one is interested.

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is the fall of men. If you're

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 4>at a point where you have to use remote controlled

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 4>robots to box, like, come on, man up box each other.

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>But we showed vision a few weeks ago of one

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of these robots going absolutely WoT at the bloke who

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>had made the thing. Right, So if these robots really

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to box on, I'm can vinced they good box

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on and I don't want to be getting in the

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ring with one.

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 3>So that is a sport I think it would take

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 3>off robot versus human being.

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I know the answer to that one. The robot wins.

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the point in having this sport in the first place.

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 3>That's all We've got time for tonight, but don't go anywhere.

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Coming up in just a moment is the Reader Penalty Show.

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Good Night,