WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 30 April

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Lately.

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.199
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Late Pay.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Great to have your company.

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm James Macpherson with Liz Storer and Joe Hildebrand coming

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 4>up tonight. The campaign endorsement Anthony Albanese did not want

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 4>turns out you really don't want everyone voting for you.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 4>We'll explain why a little later. Plus when we look

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 4>at the papers. The Courier Mail has a front page

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 4>story tomorrow with new polling showing labor surging ahead, and

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 4>activist Noel Pearson reckons there's too much Indigenous cultural studies

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 4>in our school curriculum and it needs to be pared back.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 4>We'll get to all of that a little later. But first,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 4>I always thought we lived in a free country. I thought,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 4>especially during an election campaign, we were free to talk

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 4>about matters of public policy. I thought we lived in

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Australia rather than say, you know, China. But check out

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 4>what happened today outside of polling booth in the Victorian

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 4>electorate of Jagger Jagger, a Family First Senate candidate, was

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 4>told by an Australian Electoral Commission worker that she wasn't

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 4>allowed to advertise her policies because well, some people just

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 4>didn't like them.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 5>I've had a few people who are quite upset.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to speak to about what you're speaking

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to them.

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>What about speaking about.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>About late term abortions? Okay, you don't like that. It's

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>not my opinion. It's a horrible thing, though, and that's

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>why I want to stop it.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 6>If I ask you, if you would like to speak

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 6>to everybody that your policies, you're more than welcome to.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 7>But just that point before now, if I can please.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Ask, can I.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 7>Elsey every other of you?

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not allowed to mention abortion just for now. I've

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>had some compaignts and I just want to run it

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>up the cheam.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you wouldn't mind, thank you now.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>That video went viral after it was posted online by

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Adelaide law professor doctor Joanna Howe, and then doctor Howe

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 4>became a target of the Electoral Commissions penchant for censorship.

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 4>They posted a message on her Instagram age, I'll read

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 4>it for you. We're respectfully asking you to take the

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 4>video down from this person's p for this person's privacy.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 4>They're a hard working temporary officer doing her best to

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.839
<v Speaker 4>fulfill her role in a complicated environment. Maybe someone needs

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 4>to tell the Australian Electoral Commission. It's really not that complicated.

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Whether you're pro abortion or anti abortion, you have the

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 4>right to put forward your position, especially when you're standing

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 4>for public office. Rather than respectfully requesting the video be

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 4>taken down, perhaps the Electoral Commission should respectfully be thanking

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 4>doctor Johannah Howe for bringing it to their attention and

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 4>respectfully apologizing to the Family First candidate for getting in

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 4>the way of her communicating her policies as she's perfectly

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>entitled to do.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 8>Liz indeed, well, this is an election interference, period, plain

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 8>and simple, which is the very antithesis of the AEC's remit.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 8>They should have in fact apologized and said obviously, this

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 8>girl hasn't been trained properly. As someone who's worked in state,

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 8>federal and local governments for over eight years, that person

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 8>being me, I have seen all kinds of biffs on

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 8>polling booths, pre polling especially, it gets incredibly fiery, people

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 8>have massive arguments, but I have never once seen in

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 8>person or in the media an AEC representative telling a

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 8>candidate to shut up about their own policies. Oh, you're

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 8>making people uncomfortable, Well, good congratulations that means those people

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 8>still have a soul.

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>This year's a federal election issue. The other side of

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this debate.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 8>Forty pro abortion organizations have lobbied the federal government and

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 8>let them know that whoever wins.

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Government this time round, they're.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 8>Demanding that they fulfill all their demands.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But you get one pro.

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 8>Life voice, one person giving a voice to the voiceless,

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 8>one person sticking up for the almost round about. We

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 8>don't get exact numbers for obvious reasons, but approximately eighty

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 8>thousand babies a.

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Year in Australia who are terminated.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 8>Just one person, and all of a sudden, you've got

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 8>the AEC flying in the face of their own remit

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 8>to get this woman to shut up at all costs.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 8>It's an absolute disgrace. They should have come out and

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 8>simply said sorry, we do acknowledge that this is the

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 8>very opposite of what AEC stands for, and our jobs

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 8>on pre polling booths and polling booths on the day

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 8>we apologize this person's now being retrained.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>That was the only appropriate.

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 8>Response, and instead they've turned around after people have been

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 8>concerned about the freedom of speech happening at pre polling booths,

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 8>and then ask the pre eminent pro life voice in Australia,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 8>doctor Joanna Howe, to help cover up what they did by.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Taking down their pos. Irony is dead.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 8>It's it's completely unforgivable, Joe, I think.

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 9>Fair enough to say, you know, I don't reveal the

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 9>identity of the worker, who is obviously quite young. And

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 9>obviously all the people who work on these booths, they're

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 9>doing it just on a temporary basis, so they're not

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 9>people who work for AAS.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 8>But they are trained not to tell candidates not to spruit.

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Their lawful you were things.

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 9>I mean, look, obviously it's very it's very concerning if

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 9>that is in fact what is happening and that's been done.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 9>But she did say, look, I just need to speak

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 9>to my supervisor. Would you mind just not doing it

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 9>for now till I can get some direction on this.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 9>So I don't know if it's the end of the world,

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 9>and we don't. I don't do we know what decision

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 9>was ultimately made. I don't know if we do. But

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 9>but I think the real the real story here and

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 9>the real villains is not the AAC worker, but Jagga

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 9>Jagger is a seat based around sort of inner Melbourne,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 9>around the sort of city of Durbin, which is very,

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 9>very heavily green tinged. I think they've probably already signed

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.559
<v Speaker 9>their own treaty and they're always getting in, They're always

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 9>doing exciting new things with theirsh collection to make it

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 9>more sustainable. But so I suspect that there'd be a

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 9>lot of kind of vexatious complainants, very much to the

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 9>left of the political spectrum, who have made a boy

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 9>the sort of people who would say, sorry, this is

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 9>very triggering for me. So I think it's actually them

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 9>who the blame should be leveled at, rather than a

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 9>young worker, a young temporary worker who is just trying

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 9>to respond to this sort of avalanche of compliance. And

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 9>as I said, if you wouldn't mind just not doing

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 9>it for now, please.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Not talk about your policies. I mean, that's utterly that's

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>a joke.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Again. But if the final decision of the AE.

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 8>Worker honestly thought that was appropriate, then she must have

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 8>received no training whatsoever.

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 2>But she would have just received the complaint.

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 9>She wouldn't have known what the what the person had

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 9>been saying, God knows what these sort of these sort

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 9>of hysterical hypercarens were saying about what the.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 4>And I reckon it must have been Hypercarens, because when

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 4>you listen to the response of the family first can

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 4>this seems very She seemed very polite and pretty reasonable

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 4>considering she was being told to shut up about her

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 4>own policies. Indeed, so I thought she treated the AEC

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 4>worker with absolute politeness. So I struggle to believe that

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 4>any complaints about that can that would have been because

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 4>the candidate was being rude or aggressive.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 8>Indeed, and hats off to Ray Rancy there in Victoria,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 8>in the seat of Jagga Jagger.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You are in hater heartland.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 8>Strength to your arm to Spain now where Spanish news

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.559
<v Speaker 8>broadcasts are going to be police to ensure that men

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 8>and women on news programs get the same amount.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Of talking time.

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 8>Yes, this is an actual law that has been passed

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 8>we read today. According to the law, new casts must

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 8>newscasts rather must convey an equal and non discriminatory image

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 8>of men and women. They are not permitted to promote

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 8>directly or indirectly situations of discrimination based on sex. The CIMAC,

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 8>which is their National Commission on Markets and Competition, will

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 8>review between eight hundred and one thousand and fifteen minute clips,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 8>which will be reviewed by a consulting firm that has

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 8>been provided with one hundred and twenty one thousand euros

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 8>for both twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six. So

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 8>they're going to be monitoring Spanish news the two hundred

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 8>and fifty hours of broadcasting per year to ensure that

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 8>men haven't talked more than women, women haven't talked more

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 8>than men. I actually think this is not going to

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 8>work in women's favor when we're all reminded of just

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 8>last week on the ABC and Micas Sucker's Michael Sucker's

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 8>disgraceful treatment by the women there.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 6>Michael Sooker, you say you're going to do it. We

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 6>know how many houses you've built while you were in

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 6>government in that area. It was a few thousand, but

0:08:59.120 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 6>now it wasn't a.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Few thou Sorry, Sarah, I'll get my chance. You will

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>correct the record on that.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 6>Let me just get I'm going to ask you one

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 6>more time, and everyone is listening to me, ask this question,

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 6>how many social and affordable houses will you build?

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, we will fund social and for right.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 10>That's it.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You're not I'm not getting an answer. You'll get an

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>answer out of me.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 6>A minute.

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 8>We've done a hute shortage of housing around our country.

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 8>I'm pretty sure this is going to mean women in

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 8>Spain on news programs have to talk less and won't

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 8>get to talk more.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I find it incredibly funny.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 4>What I find incredible is that you took over a

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 4>minute thirty for that introduction. I took only just over

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 4>two minutes to introduce the entire show plus a topic.

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know. Maybe these laws could work the

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 3>other way.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Listen, that's what I mean. I think that's going to

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>be the outcome.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm very excited.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 9>I can't wait for them to be introduced in Australia

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.119
<v Speaker 9>so that Brodman Bishop will finally.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Let me speak.

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 4>The Spanish government are regarding this, if you allow men

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 4>to speak more than women on a news program as quote,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 4>a very serious offense, and networks face fines of up

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 4>to two point six million Australian dollars if they violate

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 4>the laws. What's amazing to me is that you don't

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 4>need government to do this. We've got broadcasters in the

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 4>UK and then Australia who want to do it to themselves.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 4>The BBC a few years ago set up a system

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 4>to keep track of which genders and which ethnicities were

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 4>represented in TV programs to make sure there was equity,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 4>and SBS back when they reported that said, then I

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 4>quote this is from an SBS journalist. Surprisingly, there are

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 4>no rules on gender or ethnicity based diversity enforced in Australia.

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 4>So you've got SBS journalists being surprised that the government

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 4>aren't mandating certain quotas of different people being represented on television.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 9>From a memory that would have wiped out about half

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 9>the SBS.

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Board because.

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 9>They got a little bit of trouble for being white

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 9>of at a polar bear and a snowstorm. But he's

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 9>pretty I just I just find it very weird that

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 9>we are just sort of ticking boxes based on gender

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 9>or sex or digging into people's ethnic makeup. You know,

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 9>we're going to get the DNA background next or whatever.

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 9>I remember recently someone came to me and wanted to

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 9>into me as part of a sort of panel show

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 9>whatever you want to call it, at the south By

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 9>Southwest Festival that was coming to Sydney, and they have

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 9>a thing now and I was quite surprised. They sent

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 9>me the application to fill out and they have a

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 9>question that says, what is your racial background?

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:37.599
<v Speaker 2>And and you actually have to fill it.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 9>Now, this is the sort of thing that used to

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 9>be done in a part of South Africa.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, are you a colored? Are you a black?

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Are you a white? Are you an Indian?

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I just I just found I mean maybe

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 9>it was like a sort of you know, a re

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 9>education for me so I could under understand what it

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 9>liked to be right Anyway, I knew as soon as

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 9>I finished, as I filled it out, there was absolutely

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 9>no way in hell that's going anywhere near that fest

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 9>of all. I just fill out. You know, aryan superman

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 9>and you've.

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Got a changeo.

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You could easily make something up about you.

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I did know. I did something.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 9>I think I said something like, you know, self hating

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 9>Irish Catholic who everybody thinks he is Jewish.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 2>I didn't get through it.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 4>I've talked before about a mate of mine who worked

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 4>for the ABC and he wanted to go for a promotion.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 4>But as he was filling out the documents to apply

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 4>for it, one of the criteria was what diversity characteristics

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 4>would you bring to the role. The poor guy couldn't

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 4>think of any but what a waste of taxpayer money.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 4>The Spanish government will actually use taxpayer money to pay

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 4>consultants to sit and just trawl through hours and hours

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 4>of news footage calculating who talks for how long and

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 4>whether or not it's fair. I mean, you would be

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 4>irate when you're a taxpayer that's how your money's being spent.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 8>Now, I can't wait to see the results because I

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 8>think it will show that we women, as we're famous for,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 8>do talk more than the men to robots. Now, Elon

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Musk has said that just within a matter of years,

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 8>robots are going to replace the best surgeons in the world.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 8>He tweeted just yesterday robots will surpass good human surgeons

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 8>within a few years and the best human surgeons within

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 8>five years.

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Neuralink, that's his.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 8>Own company, had to use a robot for the brain

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 8>computer electrode insertion that's a brain.

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Chip, as it was impossible for a human to.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 8>Achieve the required speed end presition. This is on the

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:42.599
<v Speaker 8>back of Medtronic Hugo. They've called it robotic assisted surgery,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 8>which is now all the rage.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>They're sprooking their new robotics.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 8>This picture of the mockup of what they're actually doing

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 8>with the robot isn't very reassuring, but they do tell

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 8>us it is now performed over one hundred and thirty

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 8>seven lie on real people surgeries without a hitch. And

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 8>when you look at this next video and the precision

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 8>in which these robots can make incisions and make stitches

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 8>and do all the fine finicky things surgeons do, you

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 8>wonder if they're right.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 11>This is Sony's surgical robot which can perform microsurgery with

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 11>great precision. To demonstrate its procedure, a small cut was

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 11>made on a corn grain which the robot stitched with

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 11>great precision. This robot has been specially designed for performing

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 11>super microsurgery, which allows surgeons to operate on extremely small

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 11>vessels of less than one millimeter. For this, a specialist

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 11>with experience and steady hands is usually required.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 8>Imagine being a surgeon in training at the moment, that's

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 8>eleven to thirteen years of training here in Australia that

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 8>you've undergone to finally work on live and do whatever

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 8>they need done, and you've just learned within five years Mate,

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 8>you're going to be redundant.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe, how would you take it?

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, look, I've got a lot of concerns with this.

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 9>Thank you very much for raising it, Liz, because this

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 9>is the sort of brave new world we're facing, and

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 9>other mainstream media outlets simply do not give it the

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 9>attention it deserves.

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Firstly, if we could go back to.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 9>Elon Musk's original tweet, the graphic that we showed you

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 9>right up the top of the show, Elon Musk says,

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 9>robots will surpass good human surgeons within a few years,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 9>and the best human surgeons within five years.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 12>Shouldn't we be replacing the worst human surgeons?

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>What are we doing replacing the best ones?

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 12>They're the best, which will be starting with the bad ones.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And you know what happens.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 12>When you start replacing the good ones, is that the

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 12>bad ones you get to The next video that we saw,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 12>which was a robot that's so bad at surgery it

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 12>thinks to the human is a cop of corn.

0:15:59.040 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>They're very different.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 12>One's a human being and the other's corn, and the

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 12>Roman can't even tell the.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Difference, and sity there trying to stitch up the corn.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>The cord's fine anyway.

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 9>Thankfully, we also caught a glimpse of just how this

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 9>technology could be applied. In fact, as you know, I

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 9>always do my research, and I've actually found video evidence

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 9>of this surgery being applied not to a cob of corn,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 9>but to a real, live human being. This is the facts, people,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 9>This is what you won't see elsewhere. Now, notwithstanding the

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 9>kind of creepy way that Luke checked out his sister

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 9>as she was walking out the door, that I think

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 9>is a much better application of robot surgery than cutting

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 9>up corn.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 4>Is this really replacing surgeons or is this just robot

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 4>assisted surgery?

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>We have that already.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 8>We have that already, and the doctors using it love

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 8>it because they can do incredible things in tandem with

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 8>the technology that is available to still need just talking

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 8>about the robots themselves being the surgeon, but you would.

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 4>Still need a human being surgeon on hand if things

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 4>go wrong. Surely robots couldn't anticipate every complication, as so

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 4>often happens in an operating theater. My concern would be

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 4>less about surgeons being replaced, because I'm not sure that

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 4>would ever happen. But robots operating don't have a sense

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 4>of compassion, don't have the same judgment or ethics that

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 4>a human being has I'm not sure I want to

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 4>be operated on by someone who is only cognizant of algorithms.

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Rather than you know, my this is human welfare.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 9>This is the theory that always just blows my mind

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 9>because what happens is not so much the robots who

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 9>are doing the actual surgery, but what happens if AI

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 9>gets to the point. So you know, Isaac Asimov has

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 9>got his first law of robotics, which is that you

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 9>can do no harm to humans or whatever. But what

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 9>if you had an AI that was told, right, your

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 9>number one priority, no matter what, is to save human life,

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 9>it's to save the human race.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 2>How long would it be.

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 9>Before that robot says, right, we are so overpopulated that

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 9>the planet is going to use up all its resources

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 9>and it turns into Thanos from the Marvel movies. Or indeed,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 9>you know what happens if a robot surgeon has someone

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 9>and decides that actually, it's quality of life after the

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 9>surgery would be so poor that would be better off dead,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 9>and the robot just and again, this is not a

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 9>decision that the robot surgeon would make in the operating theater.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 9>And by the way, do you know they can stitch

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 9>up blood vessels that are half a millimeter. I mean,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 9>that's amazing, even you know, even like you know, Charlie

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 9>T I can't do that, So that is because amazing.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 9>But again, what if you have robots just making all

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 9>these you kind of I don't know.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 2>There's something really.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Terrifying rational in operating theater, especially if it's an emergency operation,

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 4>that you want a human being making those decisions, not

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 4>a pre programmed computer.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, what you're saying, Joe, is that ultimately there'll be

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 8>far more utilitarian. That's right, Yes, Ultimately, this person's a burden,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 8>and therefore, or.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 9>The robot will say, I know how many people I have,

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, I am like deep thought or like hol

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 9>In two thousand and one or whatever. I know how

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 9>many people are waiting for X number of surgeries, And

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 9>if we expend this amount of time and resources on

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 9>this person here, we could actually better divert those resources

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 9>to save ten lives over here instead of this one

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 9>life here. And therefore it is a perfectly rational decision that.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 8>This organ transplant should go to a better recipient.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 9>I'm not performed, so that's exactly right, or something I'm

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 9>operat on a seventy year old.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 2>And they're hard.

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 9>And I've just become aware that there is a twelve

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 9>year old who suddenly needs a heart transplant, and they

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 9>would have seventy more years than the years I'm giving

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 9>this person. Therefore, I am saving more life if I

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 9>cease operating, pick up the heart and bug it in

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 9>the new kid.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 2>So the question fix.

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 4>The question becomes, is AI the beginning of the apocalypse

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 4>or is it the answer to things like low birth

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 4>rates in western countries and the need for immigration. KPMG's

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 4>digital boss John Money seems to think that AI is

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 4>going to solve a whole lot of problems, especially for

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Western nations. As I said, with falling birth rates, he said,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 4>ultimately the sort of work that we would have traditionally

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 4>offshore to India will no longer need to offshore as much.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 4>We'll keep the revenue here in Australia, obviously because robots

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 4>will be doing the work we're relying on others to do.

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 3>He says to me, this has to be it.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 4>This has to be the opportunity for us to drive

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 4>productivity without having to drive immigration. So, for instance, if

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 4>you've got a warehouse that requires two thousand workers. What

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 4>if most of it was automated and you only required

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 4>two hundred workers, Well, then you could have a shrinking

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 4>birth rate. You wouldn't have to import a workforce from overseas.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 4>You just get robots to do the jobs that otherwise

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 4>would have had to have been done by human beings.

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 4>And this is exactly the point that Larry Fink, the

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 4>CEO of Blackrock made.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 13>Have a listen, We'll be able to elevate the standard

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 13>of living in countries and the standard of living of

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 13>individuals even with shrinking populations. And so the paradigm of

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 13>negative population growth is going to be changing, and the

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 13>social problems that one will have in substituting humans from

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 13>machines is going to be far easier in those countries

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 13>that have declining populations.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 4>Now, I know you don't like Larry Fink, Liz, but

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 4>what's wrong with what he's.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 8>Saying, Well, it is terrify fine, because what we're saying

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 8>is we're going to need less humans. Which you'll notice

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 8>in the backdrop there's speaking at the World Economic Forum,

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 8>which believes that we're so overpopulated, there's too many humans.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 8>They're all about population control. So this would be music

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 8>to their ears. But he said in another part of

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 8>that speech, this will go very well for what he

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 8>called xenophobic countries simply because they haven't thrown their borders

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.959
<v Speaker 8>wide open to people from all around the world. Because

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 8>again for the same reason they've got shrinking birth rates,

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 8>they won't need to rely on immigration anymore. Obviously, for

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 8>a country like Australia, our question is, firstly, once this

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 8>thing takes off, what are we going to do with

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 8>the loads of people that we've imported in February two

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 8>hundred thousand alone, Like we are talking mind blowing numbers

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 8>that we are funneling into our country. Is it a

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 8>surprise to anyone that one third of us wasn't even

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 8>born here in Australia? What are we going to do

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 8>with all these masses of people When you look at

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 8>even the highly skilled, so it's not just low skilled

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 8>like factory workers that robots are going to be able

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 8>to replace. We're talking highly skilled, as we just did

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 8>there with surgeons. How many jobs are going to be

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 8>left for human beings to earn money, put a roof

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 8>over their heads and provide for their families.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 4>There's always been the case, though, hasn't it technology, the

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 4>superseds the last technology. People have to be retrained, they

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 4>find new jobs that progress.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 9>That's right, and it has always had, I suppose the

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 9>question is what happens when you hit the sort of

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 9>event horizon or the tipping point at which robots can

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 9>effectively replace almost They're better at everything, almost all human activity.

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 9>And again what Larry Fingers saying is absolutely terrifying and dystopian,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 9>because what he is saying is that in the so

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 9>the countries with the shrinking populations that are failing to

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 9>reproduce themselves all the wealthiest Western countries. So he's basically saying,

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 9>this new resource that will increase your quality of life

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 9>will only really work in parts of the world that

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 9>already have the highest quality of life. And the way

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 9>that it will and the sort of double bottom line,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 9>if you like, the extra benefit is that it will

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 9>remove any anxieties about social cohesion or any xenophobic instincts

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 9>that people have, because you won't need to bring people

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 9>in anymore. So it basically it basically says, don't worry xenophobes,

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 9>We're going to replace migrants with robots, so you don't

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 9>have to worry about your culture being stolen or whatever,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 9>or crime or whatever.

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I do you think that's xenophobic, But well, this is

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this robots.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 9>The point, the point being is that that happens, what

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 9>about for everyone else in the world, for the vast

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 9>majority of the world's population, this will be unaffordable. They

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 9>still have no population deficit, and so they will probably

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 9>be cheaper and easier to use humans instead of robots

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 9>for manual labor. In the case of China, obviously forced labor.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 8>And although they're leagues ahead of us in Ai, absolutely

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 8>leaks ahead of.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 9>Us in they're also leagues ahead of us in slave labor.

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 9>But the point being that China has because China has

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 9>has all this stuff that it's doing, but still it

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 9>has a much bigger and much poorer population that it

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 9>has to that it has to deal with, and it

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 9>does nothing to serve with anything. There's nothing to you know,

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 9>to deal with poverty in Africa or India.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Of course, the KPMG Digital Bosses point was, if we've

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 4>got robots doing jobs, we don't have to import immigrants,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 4>and then demand for housing becomes less and housing thus

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 4>becomes more affordable. That is a major problem in our country.

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 4>South Australian Council has a solution to the housing crisis.

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 4>They're going to hike rates on privately owned vacant lots

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 4>of land in a bid to force land owners to

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 4>either develop homes on those lots or give them off

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 4>to others who will.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Vacant lots already.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 4>Attract a rate of twenty percent higher than develop lots

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 4>of land. This is in the council area of Onka

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Peringa in Adelaide. Say it with confidence, one of their

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 4>council has said, and I quote, this just doesn't bring

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 4>on more homes in the market. It activates neighborhoods, stimulates

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 4>construction and ultimately contributes to the local economy and activity.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 3>This is about a bit of fairness.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 4>It's about asking whether those who are sitting on undeveloped

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 4>land are contributing equally to the infrastructure and services to

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 4>benefit the land. I get the point. But in terms

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 4>of fairness, is it really fair that the council hike

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 4>up your rates to achieve their goals. If it's your

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 4>vacant block of land and you want to let it

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 4>sit vacant, will you own it? So what's fair is

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 4>whatever you decide as for the council pulling levers, and

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 4>they argue the only lever they have is rates to

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 4>achieve the outcomes they are after, rather than to serve

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 4>rate payers. I'm not so sure that's a good thing,

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 4>and maybe councils should get their own houses in order

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 4>before they start asking everybody else to sacrifice. Councils continually

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 4>run up deficits while they have sister city agreements.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 3>They fly all over the world.

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 4>They give money to stupid social causes that have nothing

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 4>to do with benefiting rate payers. I get that this

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 4>might help produce some more homes, but I just think

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 4>it's bad policy when you're violating people's property ownership rights.

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, property rights have just gone out the window. I mean,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 8>they're in a bad state in this country if you

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 8>ask me to begin with. But no matter how high

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 8>you hike the rates, dear counsel, it's still going to

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 8>be a hell of a lot cheaper than developing the land.

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 8>Do you have any idea how much that costs. Why

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 8>don't you just to start demanding what nature of development

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 8>you want to see on the land. At this point, Oh,

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 8>we want more houses, you have to build housing. What

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 8>if they want to build something else. The owners should

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 8>get to say what and when they do with their

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 8>own land and making it less affordable.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>For it to sit.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 8>There is just shameless revenue raising if you ask me. Sure,

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 8>they're creating an incentive for the land to.

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Be developed, but is it right. No, I really don't

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>think it is.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 9>Councilors tell people what they can do in their land

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 9>all the time. They zone lands for different purposes.

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 8>In the zoning is a different issue. The former counselor,

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 8>I can tell you that.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 9>Say, but you're saying, I own this bit of land,

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 9>I should be able to build a house here if

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 9>I want to say, well, no, you can't because you're

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 9>in an industrial zone. So but if I bought a

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 9>bit of land, or this is my bit of plan,

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 9>I want to build a ten story house, well no

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 9>you can't. They change the rules on me to achieve

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 9>outcomes that they want.

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The story.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 8>This isn't a matter of them refusing a development application

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 8>because they don't like the manner of the development. This

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 8>is a case of there's a vacant block of land,

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 8>the owner's not doing anything with it.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't like that. We're going to try and force

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you to do.

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 9>It's called use or use it or lose it provisions,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 9>and that they exist already in Australia. Everywhere there's there's

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 9>laws that. In fact, in the last last year's budget

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 9>there were a whole bunch of extra but the penalties

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 9>were already there, but they were double, they increased many

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 9>many fold. I can't remember exactly off the top of

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 9>my head of people I think was especially foreign owners

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 9>who had property in Australia, who had a house in

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 9>Australia they bought as an investment property, say, and they were

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 9>just waiting for it to you know, a crew in

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 9>value and to appreciate and then they'd sell it for

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 9>a proper but it just sits empty. They would have

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 9>to pay tens of thousands of dollars. I think we

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 9>ended up being over one hundred thousand dollars or something,

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 9>something so punitive that it basically meant you have to

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 9>rent it out. And that was one of the measures

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 9>for helping to ease the housing crisis. Now I have

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 9>no problem with that whatsoever, So don't I don't see why.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 4>I have no problem with that either. But that's because

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 4>it's owned by Australia.

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I own my house and it is very very full.

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Any vacant locks.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 9>I don't have any vacant punished for owning No, I

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.239
<v Speaker 9>have none whatsoever, and I'm more than happy, more than

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 9>happy to keep it that way. I think we should

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 9>be using every single bit of land that we have

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 9>and in feeling it as much as we have to

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 9>make sure that people are using it as not just

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 9>being sat there left vacant so that the owner can

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 9>then sell it.

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 3>For your mind, you have any vacant bedrooms in your home.

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't. Actually they are also all full.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 4>It's just a matter of degrees as to how far

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>you go once you violate the principle of this is

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 4>my property. I can do what I want on my property.

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 9>I think that at the point, I think they've already

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 9>been suggestions and again whether or not people should you know,

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 9>there should be an extra penalty pay if you have

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 9>an investment property that's just sitting empty. I don't know

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 9>if they yet apply to Australian owners, but certainly certainly

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 9>to foreign owners they do so surely they have property

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 9>rights too, or do they not?

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe they should.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's different with.

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 9>Foreign I believe if you owned a bit of land

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 9>in say Bali, A lot of Australians have a lot

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 9>of a ballet, which is actually impossible because the Indonesians.

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Just make it such a basket case.

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Land in China this is no problem.

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>But I think either you know you have rights or

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't. I think you use it or lose it.

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Can I get in there or.

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Agree to disagree? Well?

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 8>Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair has come out swinging

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 8>against net zero policies.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Today.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 8>I quote votes feel like they're being asked to make

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 8>financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle when they know the

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 8>impact on global emissions is minimal.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Preach brother.

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 8>He says any strategy based on either phasing out fossil

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 8>fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy.

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Doomed to fail.

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 8>Now he's not actually calling for labor to halt its

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 8>push to decarbonize the UK economy. He's simply saying, you

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 8>guys need to rethink the way you're going about this,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 8>because it is not working except for impoverishing the everyday

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 8>person who's just trying to heat their homes in the UK,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 8>where it's possible to freeze to death and have some

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 8>quality of life over there, if you're running a small business,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 8>if you've got a factory, et cetera, and so on.

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 8>Energy prices over there are also extortionate for the same

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 8>reason that they are here. Good on him for saying something,

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 8>but good grief, he's taken.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:16.239
<v Speaker 4>A while, he's slow, but he gets there in the end.

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 4>I was going to start, I can't believe I'm agreeing

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 4>with Tony Blair, but then I realized, no, no, he's

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 4>agreeing with the rest of us, because most of us

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 4>have thought this for a long long time. He's actually

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 4>recommending some interesting things. He's recommending that money be spent

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 4>not on trying to achieve net zero, but rather on

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 4>climate adaptation.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 3>It's not a bad idea.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 4>He's also recommending get this investment in small scale nuclear reactors.

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Remember this is a labor Prime Minister sounds for me,

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 4>and he said, and here's an idea. What if we

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 4>got India and China to reduce their emissions, we start

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 4>destroying our own economies.

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So much to take that guy, Prime Minister.

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 4>The other was he said, you know, the benefits of

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 4>net zero are continually exaggerated, and the debate is said,

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 4>is riven with irrationality.

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Not that we've seen any of that in Australia.

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 14>No, mate, you can shut your mouth.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 2>You can shut you American people your social paths like you.

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 14>Death, disease, displacement, starvation, people dying of first arable farming

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 14>lands turning into desert, and most likely billions of people dead.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 4>I can't imagine why support for action on climate change

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 4>is dwindling. Tony Blair said that the public are starting

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 4>to lose their support for this stuff. I'm not sure

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 4>that politicians ever had the public support for this stuff.

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 4>But good that Tony Blair has finally woken up and

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 4>is now saying what most of us have been saying

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 4>for a long long time.

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Joe, Yeah, I don't.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's one of those things that there is public

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 9>support for it, but that's port very very quickly declines

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 9>as soon as there's a cost attached to it. So

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 9>people say, yes, we should do more on climate change,

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 9>yes we sud this is this, but as soon as

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 9>they have to pay more, so as there's a risk

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 9>of them losing their job, soon as any of these

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 9>things come into play, suddenly it becomes a second edition.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 9>And we've seen, you know, just in this election with

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 9>cost of living, Suddenly all these things that people thought

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 9>were important, everything from climate change to transgender issues, to

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 9>welcomes to country, they've all taken a back seat. And

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 9>these are things that people thought really really important, you know,

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 9>before the cost of living crisis hit. They all take

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 9>a back seat as soon as there's anything economic about

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:40.280
<v Speaker 9>the challenges people are facing.

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 2>So that's what happened. So Tony Blair is absolutely right.

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 9>Yes we have to address climate change, but you can't

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 9>do it in a way that just says, sorry, you

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 9>pour luddite, knuckle dragon, coal miner. You have to sacrifice

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 9>your job and your livelihood so that you know the

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 9>rest of us. Can you sip our arm and lattes

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 9>in peace and not have to worry about the planet

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 9>we go to a break?

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Could the Labor Party be any more contemptuous of voters?

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Senator Penny Wong said today that the Indigenous Voice to Parliament,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, the one that sixty percent of us voted

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 4>no to just a couple of years ago. She said,

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 4>it is an inevitability. Doesn't matter that we've already voted no.

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 4>She's sure there'll be a second vote, and if necessary,

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 4>a third and a fourth vote until voters finally get

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 4>it right.

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 3>Here's what she said.

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 5>He thought it was the right thing to do, and

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 5>you know a lot of the First Nations leaders wanted

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 5>the opportunity. So look, I think we'll look back on

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 5>it in ten years time and it'll be like marriage equality.

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 5>It'll become something to be like. People go, do we

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 5>have an argument about that?

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 4>She's so confident a voice to Parliament will be legislated

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 4>one day, we'll look back and say, I can't believe

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 4>we even had a disagreement about that. Now, listen to

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 4>the Prime Minister tell you that you didn't hear what

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 4>you just heard?

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Is Pennywong right? Is the voice sort of inevitable?

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 10>Well she didn't say that at all, So you just

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 10>played it people will I think I think it was

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 10>a very modest proposal, but it didn't receive the support

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 10>of the Australian people. And that is what Penny Wong

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 10>is saying.

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 3>Can you believe this guy?

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 4>You just heard what Penny Wong said? They played it

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 4>on the radio and then he says, no, no, you

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 4>didn't hear.

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>What you just heard.

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's a very very foolish thing for Penny Wong

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 9>to have said, I forget.

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 3>What Penny Wong said.

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 4>What about Anthony Albineazy there just totally gaslighting everybody.

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, he is desperately trying to make the point that

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 9>the voice, as Tony Abbott says.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Trying to make the point.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 3>But what about what he said about Wong said.

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, she didn't openly say explicitly we will legislate the voice.

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 3>And you know this is like a tactical obfustigation that

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 3>you We're going to go to a break.

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 4>When we come back, we'll look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 4>including the last Redbridge pole showing surging ahead just days

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 4>before the federal election.

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 3>That's coming up in just a moment.

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're talking just before we went to the break

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 4>about Penny Wong bringing up the voice again and suggesting

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 4>it could be tried again. That's the front page of

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Tomorrow's Daily Telegraph.

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it certainly is.

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 9>And also I have to say the subject of a

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 9>something call I wrote about just saying how incredibly smug

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 9>and stupid these comments were, So I'm not defending them.

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 9>But yes, Wong digs up Labour's voice nightmare, throwing campaign

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 9>into chaos. Penny drops get it is the headline. Anthony

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 9>Albaneze's path through election victory has been thrown into chaos

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 9>by his Foreign Minister Penny Wong after she implied the

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 9>dump Indigenous Voice to Parliament would in the future.

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Be considered an inevitability.

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.919
<v Speaker 9>Coalition Indigenous Affairs spokes women just senter Namdjibba Price said

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 9>Labor simply won't take no for an answer on the

0:37:55.239 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 9>voice proposal. So yeah, very very damaging, sloppy, messy, careless

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 9>comments from Penny Wong. But I can certainly say I

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 9>can guarantee you there is no plan whatsoever. Everyone in

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 9>the government is absolutely scared of any sort of rerun

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 9>of the Voice. They don't want to touch any of

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 9>that stuff with a barge pole, and that's why they're

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 9>not touching anything like treaty or any of that stuff.

0:38:17.160 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 4>And itone, except for Penny Wong, her comparison between the

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 4>same sex marriage plebacite and the voice referendum is so

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 4>misplaced for a number of reasons. But I'll give you

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 4>just one when she says, you know, one day the

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 4>voice will be regarded as what was that about?

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 3>As same sex marriage.

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 4>The only reason same sex marriage is now regarded as Okay,

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 4>we've got it is because those who voted no to

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 4>it at the plebacite said, well, you know what, the

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 4>majority of Australian said yes, so we won't continually oppose

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 4>it and continue. I mean it's it, unlike those who

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 4>lost the Voice referendum who continually bring it back up

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 4>and argue that well, Australian's got it wrong. They didn't

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 4>understand they were tricked and insists that will repeat the

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 4>referendum until we get it right.

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's actually irony upon irony because obviously referring to

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 9>it'll be about marriage equalities, So what was.

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 2>All the fuss about.

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 9>She's obviously not referred to the fact that marriage equality failed.

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 9>She's referred to the fact that it got up. So

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 9>clearly she's answering on the assumption that something like the

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 9>Voice or whatever gets up.

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 2>But the biggest irony, of.

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 9>Course, is that the rud Gillard government refused to do

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 9>anything on marriage equality and Penny Wong, and I don't

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 9>blame her at all for she was just towing the

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 9>party line very nobly and it was obviously through gritted teeth.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 9>But Penny Wong would not come out against the government

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 9>and held the party line.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 2>And it was the Liberal Party that actually put it

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 2>to a vote.

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 9>And I believe that people who actually said, you know,

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 9>instead of having a referendum, we could have a postal

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 9>pleba site and that might just be a way to

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 9>solve the issue the postal survey. And I believe it

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 9>was Tony Abbott and one Peter Dutton who actually put

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 9>forward this is a way to sort of break the

0:39:57.880 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 9>impass and get marriage equality up. So Peter Dutton, freedom

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 9>fighter for Australia's Lgbtaiqi plus.

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Community, speaking to put that out in a business card

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 2>to the front.

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Page of the Courier Mail.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 8>Global Uncertainty Strikes reads the splash Dutton slumps on poll eve.

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 8>Global uncertainty caused by the actions of US President Donald

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 8>Trump appears set to deny the Coalition to hear of

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 8>any chance of returning to government. According to new polling,

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.760
<v Speaker 8>the red Bridge Accent polling reveals Labor has pulled clearly

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 8>ahead with fifty three forty seven support. It also finds

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 8>global uncertainty is the biggest driver for people deciding.

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:42.720
<v Speaker 3>How to vote.

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Almost half of those polls.

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 8>Said it would be among the top reasons for them

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 8>in deciding who to oppose at the ballot box on Saturday.

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 8>I do find it so curious that so much media

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 8>that I've read throughout this campaign keeps making it out

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 8>like it's a legitimate race. I've sort of the very

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 8>beginning of this campaign that I didn't think the Liberals

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 8>had a chance for the simple reason of electoral map.

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 8>It would take an act of God to flip twenty

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 8>three seats. For me, it's always been that simple. I

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 8>will not be surprised when Labor inevitably wins on Saturday.

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>So this poll to me, is not shocking in the least.

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, the Libs were very competitive, or much more competitive,

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 9>but the truth is they've just pissed away their lead.

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, so very this is a national pole.

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 9>We've also got Redbridge doing a massive tracking pole in

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 9>the twenty marginal seats. And again the Libs were ahead,

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, fifty two forty eight in February when the

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 9>campaign began in earnest and ever since that rate cut,

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 9>Labor came out of the blocks strongly. The Libs have

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 9>been paying catch up. Ever since there's been slopping this

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 9>over policy. Trump has really, really hurt them and another thing,

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 9>and sadly they seem to keep making the same mistakes.

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 9>Another thing. There's a breakdown of all the number one

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 9>issue or the number one issues, all the issues that

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 9>are driving driving voter anxiety, what they fear, the policies

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 9>that are making them vote for the coming day, every

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 9>single one of them, every single one. All cost of living,

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 9>all cost of living, This cultural war stuff means absolutely nothing.

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 9>And yet Peter Dutton has spent the last week of

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 9>the campaign and talking about welcome to a lot of.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 4>The things that are driving the vote, according to this

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 4>article in the Career Mail, and the polling are just rubbish.

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean the number one issue for people voting labor

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 4>is the promise of free GP visits, which doctors have

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 4>come out and said if Anthony Albanez he thinks everyone's

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 4>going to start bolt billing, I mean he's living in fantasy.

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 4>The second most popular thing was the promise to end

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 4>supermarket price gouging. There's been a dozen or more reports

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 4>saying price gouging is if it is happening, it's a

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 4>minor thing.

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 3>It's not a major thing.

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 4>And the thing that was driving the vote away from

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Peter Dutton, aside from a fear that he was a

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:00.439
<v Speaker 4>minnie Donald Trump. Was the cost of new clear which

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Labour keeps saying will be what six hundred billion dollars,

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 4>which has been two used as a lie. So that's

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 4>what's driving.

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Because there's two sets of figures.

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 4>Always speaking of figures, let's go to the front page

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 4>of the Canberra Times. A bid to cut forty billion

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 4>dollars from debt is the headline. But here's the interesting part.

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 4>The coalition will publish its costings two days out from

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 4>the election, with the figures expected to show it will

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 4>shave off forty billion dollars of total.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Two days too soon, I'll ask me Jane.

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Jane Hume was on Sky News earlier tonight and she

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 4>was saying the coalition's costings would be released imminently. She

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 4>promised it would not be Friday afternoon, so she was

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 4>on with Laura Jay's this morning actually and pretty much

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 4>said it will be tomorrow, Thursday, just two days out

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 4>from the election. I guess it's it's very smart politicking, Liz, No,

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 4>it's not.

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You don't have time to sell anything in two days.

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.959
<v Speaker 8>The average punter who's just working their nine to five

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 8>and trying to get through their lives with some semblance

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 8>of peace. Won't be remotely aware of your plan to

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 8>cut forty billion. They simply will not know when they

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:17.399
<v Speaker 8>go to vote. Millions have already voted, by the way,

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 8>we've set new.

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Records in pre polling. I do not understand why any

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 1>parties wait.

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 8>This long to unveil something, this big, something this great, forty.

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Billion off the debt.

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, take my vote please, Except people don't know.

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And what are you going to do in the next

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>two days to make.

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 8>Them all abundantly aware of your amazing plan that you

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:44.720
<v Speaker 8>revealed forty eight hours prior.

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? I give up?

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Are they just limiting opportunity for I give up? I'm done.

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>You always release your costings at the last possible minute.

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>This is ridiculous. No one will be aware.

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 2>This is their own tactical obfuscation. It's not about that.

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.440
<v Speaker 9>All the policies are out there. All the good stuff

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 9>that they're doing is out there. They've told everyone about that,

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 9>they'd get that out.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 3>How they're going to pay for it?

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 2>They're going to pay for it.

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 9>Obviously, the million dollar question they' say, oh, we're going

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:16.919
<v Speaker 9>to do it by getting forty billion dollars from debt,

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 9>just like that, and of course labor and everyone else

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 9>is going to be all over that like a cheap suit.

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:24.439
<v Speaker 1>No what, it's time to fact check it in forty

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:25.439
<v Speaker 1>eight hours.

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the whole point.

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's right, it's really quick, Joe. Before we go

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 3>to a break, Yeah, advertise a little one that I love.

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 9>The Green's labor boost has Donet on edge in blue

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 9>ribbon seat Liberals. Stertled there is growing concern within Liberal

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 9>Party that Green's preferences could hand Labor victory in Stert

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 9>with PM Anthony Albernezi, Opposition leader Peter dunn't dashing to

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 9>Adelaide campaign today to campaign there, So Stert and Booth

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 9>via the two swing steats suit two marginal seats in Adelaide,

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 9>I say swing steats Labor has never actually won stirt.

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 9>They've been trying for decades, they've never actually done it.

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 9>But it sits on zero point five of a percent party,

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 9>so it's very low hanging through.

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:08.399
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're going to go to a break.

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 4>We'll continue with our political discussions. Because Anthony Albanesi has

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 4>been endorsed by someone he'd rather didn't vote for him

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 4>at all.

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 3>Will explain what happened in just a moment.

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, you think, if you're running for public office, you

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 4>want as many endorsements as you can get, But Liz,

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 4>it turns out there's at least one endorsement. Anthony Albanesi

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 4>would prefer not.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 2>To have no.

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Indeed.

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:34.399
<v Speaker 8>American Joe Exotic, who is the star of Tiger King.

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 1>You may have seen it on Netflix. He's currently a prison.

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 8>Inmate serving twenty two years for a raft of felonies.

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>He's taken to his social media to say keep Australia

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:49.840
<v Speaker 1>safe and awesome. All my friends in Australia vote.

0:46:50.000 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 8>For Anthony Albanesi Well today with a photoshopped image by

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 8>the way, that isn't actually them together rubbing shoulders. Well today,

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 8>Anthony Albanize, he was asked did he pay for this

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 8>star spangled endorsement?

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 7>Joe Exotic from the hit series Tiger King is on

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:15.240
<v Speaker 7>a more serious note is he's serving a prison sentence

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 7>for a murder and has been convicted of animal abuse.

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 7>He's also just endorsed you on Instagram. How do you

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 7>feel about that? Have you ever met him? And has

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 7>anyone in labor paid for his endorsement.

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Goodnessationm Levity.

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 4>I have a very passionate support for one particular animal, Tito,

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 4>and I'm looking forward to voting with her on Saturday.

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>All good laugh from Anthony Albanezy there. I think Toto

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:50.279
<v Speaker 1>is his dog.

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Tto is his dog, and I just.

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 9>You know what, I just we should stop talking about

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:58.400
<v Speaker 9>the dog. But I love he loves he really. I

0:47:58.440 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 9>can tell you that is not an act. He really,

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 9>he really really loves that dog, and that's very sweet.

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 4>The Prime Minister went on to say in his answer

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 4>to that question, which quite amused me.

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:08.360
<v Speaker 3>He said, I think the.

0:48:08.440 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Point of that question was to ask the question rather

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 4>than to get an answer. And I remember watching that

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Press Club interview this afternoon thinking, oh, the state of journalism, Like,

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 4>what a stupid question. But of course I think the

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 4>reporter got exactly what she wanted. It's been all over

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 4>the papers today and here we are talking about it.

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:26.760
<v Speaker 4>I think it's what they call clickbait.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes it is.

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 9>But I'm going to have to fact check the reporter

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.240
<v Speaker 9>because she said that Joe was serving a prison sentence

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 9>for murder. In fact, it was just attempted murder. There

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 9>were two counts of it was convicted. Joe Exotic was convicted.

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 9>This is Wikipedia, so I must be right. Was convicted

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 9>and sends to twenty two years of in prison on

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 9>seventeen federal charges of animal abuse and two counts of

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:54.240
<v Speaker 9>attempted murder for hire for the plot to kill Carl Baskin.

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 9>They put the animal cruelty charges ahead of the attempted

0:48:58.000 --> 0:48:58.720
<v Speaker 9>murder charges.

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>How would you feel if you're cald Baskin.

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, Joe Exotic will not be voting on Saturday, so

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:06.239
<v Speaker 4>we don't ever worry about him.

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 3>That's all from us stick Around. Coming up in just

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 3>a moment is the Reader Penney Show.

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Good Night,