Speaker 1: Lately, General Man, welcome the late.
Speaker 2: Plays well, good evening and thanks for joining us.
Speaker 3: I'm James Macpherson with Lizstawra and Caleb Bond coming up.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump has called Kamala Harris mentally disabled. It's got
Speaker 3: the media furists, but public don't seem to mind. Will
Speaker 3: show you the amazing reception he got at a sporting
Speaker 3: event overnight. Plus, when we get to the papers, the
Speaker 3: mayor of Alice Springs has taken on a second job
Speaker 3: in order to pay the bills, and Australia's largest Lebanese
Speaker 3: Muslim association has called into question Penny Wong's fitness as
Speaker 3: Foreign Minister. All of that when we look at what's
Speaker 3: making news tomorrow. But first, a new report has warned
Speaker 3: warned that the British Army would literally run out of
Speaker 3: soldiers if they were forced to fight a war with
Speaker 3: similar to casualty rates to the war in Ukraine. The
Speaker 3: House of Lord's Reports says civilians need to be ready
Speaker 3: to fight because Britain's military, with just seventy five thousand,
Speaker 3: one hundred and sixty six regular troops, is simply too small.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 3: They made a number of recommendations under the heading Army
Speaker 3: size and readiness.
Speaker 2: The House of Lord's Reports said, while size.
Speaker 3: Is not the only measure of capability, the committee is
Speaker 3: concerned that the British Army cannot as currently constituted, make
Speaker 3: the expected troop contribution to NATO or sustain prolonged conflict.
Speaker 3: The Committee calls on the government to address recruitment and
Speaker 3: retention challenges and reinvigorate the reserves to.
Speaker 2: Help build up numbers.
Speaker 3: Calablizs as we're reading this this afternoon, it becomes evident
Speaker 3: that this is not a problem unique to the British military.
Speaker 3: This problem is being experienced right around the western world.
Speaker 3: There was a report in June that the Australian forces
Speaker 3: at a minimum requires sixty nine thousand troops. We've reached
Speaker 3: just eighty percent of that recruitment target. And of course
Speaker 3: the federal government recently announced they would allow non citizens
Speaker 3: to serve in the Australian Defense Forces for the first time.
Speaker 3: And I think there's numbers of reasons for this. I've
Speaker 3: come up with five. I'll give you three and you
Speaker 3: can ask for the other two later if you like
Speaker 3: the first three. But firstly, national identity is continually under
Speaker 3: attack in the West, and whether it's a diminishing love
Speaker 3: of country, you're always going to have a diminishing number
Speaker 3: of people willing to fight for their country.
Speaker 2: Why would you fight for a country you're told is.
Speaker 3: Racist, sexist, illegitimate and then oppressor. Third, immigration, I think
Speaker 3: is a major issue, especially as it pertains to multiculturalism.
Speaker 3: We've seen protests on the streets of Melbourne and Sydney
Speaker 3: this week where you honestly start to wonder, are there
Speaker 3: people who, yes, they live in this country, but their
Speaker 3: loyalties like elsewhere, and those loyalties would be tested in
Speaker 3: the event of conflict. And I'll give you one more.
Speaker 3: Western nations now are so committed to a welfare state,
Speaker 3: and a welfare state consumes resources that could otherwise be
Speaker 3: used and are badly needed when it comes to having
Speaker 3: a defense force that's capable of being a deterrent. As
Speaker 3: I said, I've got two more, But let me stop talking.
Speaker 2: What do you think a good idea?
Speaker 4: Look, I will say, though you want to talk about
Speaker 4: welfare state. If you're looking for an opportunity to get
Speaker 4: free health care, a roof over your head, you're a
Speaker 4: young man looking for something to do. The defense force
Speaker 4: is actually a really good place to go. They look
Speaker 4: after you really well in terms of that sort of stuff.
Speaker 4: And the problem, of course is that if you're looking
Speaker 4: for people to sign up to the ADIR for the
Speaker 4: force in Britain or any other country, you know, you're
Speaker 4: not looking for forty five year olds.
Speaker 1: You're looking for young people.
Speaker 4: I was going to say young men, but of course
Speaker 4: they don't just look for young men anymore. They want
Speaker 4: young men and women. But you're looking for young people,
Speaker 4: and it is young people in particular who feel the
Speaker 4: least likely to go and defend their country because their
Speaker 4: brains have been infected with all of this anti Australian,
Speaker 4: anti British, anti Western sentiment. I mean, the IPA here
Speaker 4: in Australia did a survey a couple of weeks ago
Speaker 4: that found that of eighteen to twenty four year olds,
Speaker 4: if Australia was in a similar situation to Ukraine, so
Speaker 4: you've been invaded and you are at war, only twenty
Speaker 4: seven percent of eighteen to twenty four year old said
Speaker 4: that they would stay and fight. Forty eight percent, nearly
Speaker 4: half of young Australians said they would flee the country.
Speaker 4: I mean, that's how much national pride young Australians have
Speaker 4: because they're continually told that you're living on stolen land
Speaker 4: and it's illegitimate and where racist, and on and on
Speaker 4: it goes, and who cares because climate change is going
Speaker 4: to cook us all anyway, So what's the point in
Speaker 4: defending what is right? In order to defend your country,
Speaker 4: you have to not only believe in the land on
Speaker 4: which you live, you have to believe in the culture
Speaker 4: that you would be asked to defend, and that simply
Speaker 4: doesn't exist anymore. So why they can't be surprised that
Speaker 4: people aren't signing up to the defense force. Because if
Speaker 4: you don't agree with, you don't believe in the ideals
Speaker 4: of your country, then what is there left to defend?
Speaker 5: And I think immigration is a really strong point here,
Speaker 5: because especially in England, they have what for years now
Speaker 5: the country be overrun by illegals or legals and increasingly
Speaker 5: don't even recognize England as England anymore. I was just
Speaker 5: astonished by these numbers, because we're talking about a country
Speaker 5: who has twice our populations fifty six million people in
Speaker 5: England alone, and yet we're told by this report the
Speaker 5: British Army is seventy five thousand, one hundred and sixty
Speaker 5: six regular troops. Is that all They've got one hundred
Speaker 5: and eighty three thousand on top of that, But then
Speaker 5: you're counting literally the ADMIN teams and it notes that
Speaker 5: only eighty thousand of this number in total would be
Speaker 5: frontline combat boots on the ground type troops. So when
Speaker 5: we're looking at the tenuous geopolitical situation that we're in
Speaker 5: on more than one front, this is hair raising and
Speaker 5: the fact that not only Australia but the UK this
Speaker 5: is no better.
Speaker 6: In America, trust me, they are also looking at terrible.
Speaker 5: Numbers in terms of recruitment, in terms of retainment in
Speaker 5: their military right across, whether you're talking air Force, Navy,
Speaker 5: or army, and you're wondering, how could you have let
Speaker 5: it get this bad while pushing out all these kinds
Speaker 5: of policies and kind of directives from the top that
Speaker 5: do insinuate that, yes, this isn't a nation worth fighting for.
Speaker 5: We're seeing it in our very own top brass. We're
Speaker 5: seeing it throughout the institutions.
Speaker 6: Like you say, the kids are like, well, why would
Speaker 6: I fight for this place?
Speaker 5: It's increasingly not looking like the country that I thought
Speaker 5: I was being brought up in any way, and we're
Speaker 5: being told that we're some colonious power that's got everything
Speaker 5: to apologize for.
Speaker 4: And if you defend your country, you then end up
Speaker 4: being slandered as some sort of war criminal.
Speaker 1: In the media is a.
Speaker 4: Report written by the ADF saying that you should have
Speaker 4: your medals taken away.
Speaker 1: I mean, why would you put yourself up for that.
Speaker 4: If everything that happens at war, and we know the
Speaker 4: fog of war is real, is going to be examined
Speaker 4: with a fine tooth comb so someone can find fault
Speaker 4: with you. I mean, the Vladimir Putins and the Jiji
Speaker 4: Pings of the world must laugh when they wake up
Speaker 4: every morning looking at the Western world, going look, because
Speaker 4: they have authoritarian countries, which necessarily mean that you have
Speaker 4: will have a much larger army because people are indoctrinated
Speaker 4: the thing that they live in the best country in
Speaker 4: the world.
Speaker 1: That's the way it works.
Speaker 4: There's no other way to disseminate information that would say
Speaker 4: that you're living in a bad country.
Speaker 1: But they go look at the West.
Speaker 4: They are literally killing themselves every single day while our
Speaker 4: armies grow bigger hooray for us.
Speaker 5: The teeth they say we still have seventy at least
Speaker 5: seventy five more genders than there.
Speaker 6: I'm sure they're really worried on that.
Speaker 2: Pronouns are a weapon. We would absolutely blitch any war.
Speaker 3: You raise a great point, and that is our national
Speaker 3: broadcaster is continually belitting our defense forces, even to the
Speaker 3: point where recently they've been accused of doctoring video to
Speaker 3: show our soldiers in a bad light. That's hardly going
Speaker 3: to encourage anybody to fight. I watched the ABC report
Speaker 3: of the protests yesterday, and honestly, you would never have
Speaker 3: known that the Israelis killed a terrorist. You would have
Speaker 3: thought he was some amazing humanitarian. And then on top
Speaker 3: of that, trusting government is at an all time low.
Speaker 3: And if you're going to go to war, if you're
Speaker 3: going to send your kids to war, you want to
Speaker 3: trust that the people making the decisions have got your
Speaker 3: best interests at heart. But instead they're trying to suppress
Speaker 3: our free speech. And finally, to your question, Liz, how
Speaker 3: do we get here? I think we've had a few
Speaker 3: decades of peace and prosperity where war was the last
Speaker 3: thing on our minds and it's allowed all these luxury
Speaker 3: beliefs that only now we're realizing have completely undermined the
Speaker 3: entire nation. And if ever we were in a tight spot,
Speaker 3: we suddenly don't have the wherewith to defend ourselves.
Speaker 5: Yeah, and the people in charge of making sure that
Speaker 5: this never happened of just let it happen on mass
Speaker 5: This is across the West.
Speaker 6: These are the militaries.
Speaker 5: That should anything go wrong, We're all very much relying
Speaker 5: on to the States now where we know here when it.
Speaker 6: Comes to the war on free speech.
Speaker 5: We've got our e Safety Commissioner, a world first yae
Speaker 5: Go Australia. We've got a pending bill combating miss and disinformation.
Speaker 5: We've also got another pending bill focusing on hate speech.
Speaker 5: I was about to say free speech. Wow, that's an
Speaker 5: oxymoll one. But these guys are pumping out this kind
Speaker 5: of legislation that is designed to limit what you and
Speaker 5: I can and can't say in our everyday lives as
Speaker 5: well as online. We make fun of the Scotland's hate
Speaker 5: speech laws.
Speaker 6: How ridiculous that is.
Speaker 5: You can go to jail for up to seven years
Speaker 5: for saying the wrong thing.
Speaker 6: Then there's the UK who.
Speaker 5: So similarly belieged obsess with this last year alone carried
Speaker 5: out over three thousand arrests just of everyday citizens who
Speaker 5: posted something naughty on their social media. Well, in the States.
Speaker 6: It's a little bit of a problem for them.
Speaker 5: They can't just pass legislation cracking down on free speech
Speaker 5: because they've got an entire Bill of Rights that was
Speaker 5: designed to ensure that tyrannical governments simply couldn't do that.
Speaker 5: They've also got this pesky little thing called the Constitution,
Speaker 5: in which the First Amendment says that Congress can make
Speaker 5: no law that a bridges rites to free speech or
Speaker 5: in the press. And this is a very real problem
Speaker 5: for a budding tyrannical government who very much wants to
Speaker 5: be the arbiter of truth. Here's John Kerry. He's talking
Speaker 5: at a World Economic Forum pow Wow recently and talking
Speaker 5: about in terms of climate change. He is the US
Speaker 5: Special Presidential Envoy for Climate They just keep making up
Speaker 5: these new titles. So he's there in that capacity, and
Speaker 5: he's saying, what a bomber it is that free speech
Speaker 5: is so protected in the US, because it's posing a
Speaker 5: real problem.
Speaker 7: But look, if people go to only one source and
Speaker 7: the source they go to is sick and you know,
Speaker 7: as an agenda, and they're putting out disinformation. Our First
Speaker 7: Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to
Speaker 7: be able to just hammer it out of existence. So
Speaker 7: what you need, what we need is to is to
Speaker 7: win the ground, win the right to govern by hopefully
Speaker 7: having winning enough votes that you're free to be able
Speaker 7: to implement change. Democracies around the world now are struggling
Speaker 7: with the absence of a sort of truth arbiter, and
Speaker 7: there's no one who defines what the facts really are.
Speaker 5: This guy is literally the Secretary of State. Wanted to
Speaker 5: make sure I got his former title right, and there
Speaker 5: he is saying he really wants to violate the Constitution
Speaker 5: basically because their trillion dollar media empire is being bought
Speaker 5: low by cat memes and people being able to trade
Speaker 5: information freely on not only social media platforms, but any
Speaker 5: other mechanism that free individuals in the United States can utilize.
Speaker 5: You here him talking there about you know, there's so
Speaker 5: many places people can go to for their own facts
Speaker 5: and figures, and how terrible that is.
Speaker 6: And so we need to be able to win.
Speaker 5: The right to crack down on this. They're not even
Speaker 5: hiding anymore. They are telling you what they intend to do.
Speaker 5: And we all know that even though they can't pass
Speaker 5: legislation in the States like they can here sadly to
Speaker 5: make that happen for themselves. We all know that the
Speaker 5: censorship is already well and truly alive in America. We've
Speaker 5: had Zuckerberg admit that he basically paid played his part
Speaker 5: last election.
Speaker 6: We'd be very naive to believe.
Speaker 5: His then promises that that was never going to happen again,
Speaker 5: and he was back a change. There's a chase, the
Speaker 5: Russell brand of social media. This would never happen in
Speaker 5: this day and age, but these these people who are
Speaker 5: in charge are making it more and more obvious. This
Speaker 5: is fully what we intend to do. This is our agenda,
Speaker 5: and we're going to get there one way, if not
Speaker 5: one way another.
Speaker 4: We also complained that it's really really hard to govern
Speaker 4: today because you know, people are able to question readily
Speaker 4: what we're doing.
Speaker 1: It's terrible.
Speaker 4: That's the point of democracy, Boddy. Represent Entitive democracy is
Speaker 4: where we the people elect you to represent us and
Speaker 4: do what we ask you to do. If we're then
Speaker 4: questioning what you do, whether that be in four years
Speaker 4: time at an election, or in the meantime in the
Speaker 4: letters to the editor, or on Facebook or ex or
Speaker 4: what other social media platform you want to use.
Speaker 1: That is part of the job. I mean, imagine sitting.
Speaker 4: Oh, it's just so hard to be in government now.
Speaker 4: This is terrible because people are questioning what I am saying.
Speaker 4: When you hear a politician or a bureaucrat open their
Speaker 4: mouth and say, we lack a truth.
Speaker 1: Arbiter, and that is a problem.
Speaker 4: What they mean is we lack someone who can tell
Speaker 4: you that what we want you to think is the
Speaker 4: truth and not what is actually the truth. The problem
Speaker 4: for them is that information is at people's fingertips like
Speaker 4: it never has been before, ever since the advent of
Speaker 4: the Internet in people's homes, and of course then since
Speaker 4: things like smartphones have become common and whatever. You know,
Speaker 4: you can look something up anytime of day or night
Speaker 4: wherever you are. If a politician says something, you can
Speaker 4: fact check it in real time.
Speaker 1: That is what they hate and what they want to
Speaker 1: fart against.
Speaker 3: Yeah, like you, I felt very sorry for John Kerey
Speaker 3: watching him there pour out his heart about how difficult
Speaker 3: it is to be an elite in this globalized world
Speaker 3: because it's just so difficult to control people.
Speaker 2: That the arrogance.
Speaker 3: I mean, he literally said, the only problem we have
Speaker 3: is the US Constitution.
Speaker 2: If only we can get rid of that.
Speaker 3: To just come out openly and say that just demonstrates
Speaker 3: how bold they have become and how confident they are
Speaker 3: that they can keep pushing this stuff through and nothing
Speaker 3: will stop them. For him to insist we need a
Speaker 3: referee who can determine what.
Speaker 2: The facts are.
Speaker 3: And I'm wondering who would he have in mind for
Speaker 3: ref Would it be Liz, Would it be Caleb.
Speaker 2: I don't think so. I think he's got John Kerry.
Speaker 1: I think it would be one of them.
Speaker 3: So they imagine this dystopian world in which a select
Speaker 3: group of elite select the news outlets which they control,
Speaker 3: from which you're allowed to source the facts while suppressing
Speaker 3: everybody else. And if only we could have that, then
Speaker 3: the world would just be fine. But you've got to
Speaker 3: keep in mind this the real threat to democracy. It's
Speaker 3: Donald Trump, which.
Speaker 2: Is the absolute craziness of this.
Speaker 3: They keep saying Trump while sprouting stuff.
Speaker 2: Like the US Constitution is the biggest problem.
Speaker 4: He also said it is part of our problem, particularly
Speaker 4: in democracies, in terms of building consensus around any issue.
Speaker 4: I mean, he's lamenting the fact that they actually live
Speaker 4: in a democracy. We can't get a consensus because in
Speaker 4: this bloody democracy thing, people are coming up with different ideas.
Speaker 1: How dare they if only we had a dictatorship.
Speaker 3: As Secretary of Seysier, he did one too many trips
Speaker 3: to Beijing, I reckon this.
Speaker 2: Indeed, you've got a few too many good ideas.
Speaker 4: Indeed, and you mentioned there Trump being a threat to democracy,
Speaker 4: which is because we keep hearing this rhetoric. We heard
Speaker 4: it from Biden, We've heard it from Kamala Harris, you
Speaker 4: hear it from basically anyone who doesn't like Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: And that is probably part of what has led to
Speaker 4: at least two people now trying to kill Donald Trump
Speaker 4: since he restarted his campaign to be the forty seventh
Speaker 4: president of the United States. Well Elon Musk, the proprietor
Speaker 4: of X amongst other things, has taken to his platform
Speaker 4: to point out that it's not actually Donald Trump who
Speaker 4: is the threat to democracy. It is the Democrats themselves.
Speaker 4: You'd think, you know, they're called the Democrats, so they'd
Speaker 4: be all on board with democracy. But we just heard
Speaker 4: from John Kerry that he doesn't like the system very
Speaker 4: much because it.
Speaker 1: Means that people fact check him.
Speaker 4: But Elon Musk has pointed out on x that very
Speaker 4: few Americans realize that if Trump is not elected, this
Speaker 4: will be the last election. Now he is using some
Speaker 4: hyperbole here, but let him continue. He says, far from
Speaker 4: being a threat to democracy, he is the only way
Speaker 4: to save it.
Speaker 1: Let me explain.
Speaker 4: If even one in twenty illegals become citizens per year,
Speaker 4: something that the Democrats are expediting as fast as humanly possible,
Speaker 4: that would be about two million new legal voters in
Speaker 4: four years. The voting margin in swing states is often
Speaker 4: less than twenty thousand votes, so that means if the
Speaker 4: Democratic quote unquote party succeeds, then there will be no
Speaker 4: more swing states. Moreover, the Biden Harris administration has been
Speaker 4: flying asylum seekers who are fast tracked to citizenship directly
Speaker 4: into swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Arizona. It
Speaker 4: is a sure fire away to win every election. America
Speaker 4: then becomes a one party state and democracy is over.
Speaker 4: The only elections will be the Democratic Party primaries. This
Speaker 4: already happened in California many years ago following the nineteen
Speaker 4: eighty six amnesty. The only thing holding California back from
Speaker 4: extreme socialism and suffocating government policies is that people can
Speaker 4: leave California and still remain in America. Once the whole
Speaker 4: country is controlled by one party, there will be no escape.
Speaker 4: Everywhere in America will be like the nightmare that is
Speaker 4: downtown San Francisco. And we know this is exactly why
Speaker 4: more than six million people have been allowed to pour
Speaker 4: over the border illegally, the southern ten million now from
Speaker 4: Mexico under the Biden Harris administration all the while, and
Speaker 4: we'll get to this soon. But of course Harris is
Speaker 4: now saying, oh, I'm going to be tough on the border,
Speaker 4: and they've been pretending.
Speaker 1: Oh, you know, we're going to do something about it.
Speaker 1: We're going to do so were the borders are.
Speaker 4: The whole point has been to get people into America
Speaker 4: who eventually the Democrats can turn into citizens. And then well,
Speaker 4: who are you going to vote for? The people who
Speaker 4: allowed you into the country or the people who didn't
Speaker 4: want to let you in in the first place. It
Speaker 4: is so obvious, and Musk has just turned the debate
Speaker 4: around said, well, look, you keep talking about threats to democracy.
Speaker 4: Let's talk about what you're trying to pull off here,
Speaker 4: and he illustrates it brilliantly.
Speaker 5: And the truth of the matter is it's actually going
Speaker 5: to happen a lot faster than that, because, as we've
Speaker 5: covered on this show and others before, these illegals can already.
Speaker 6: Register to vote. Who is the time of the admin
Speaker 6: power to vet them all?
Speaker 5: You can simply go sign up to vote and then yes,
Speaker 5: on polling day, actually cast your vote. And it gets worse.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 5: Carmala's Department of Justice, the joke is in the name,
Speaker 5: is pursuing Alabama for taking over three thousand people off
Speaker 5: their voter registration polls. Why because these people were found.
Speaker 6: To be illegals.
Speaker 5: They were issued non citizen identification numbers by the Department.
Speaker 6: Of Homeland Security.
Speaker 5: You guys aren't legals. You cannot vote in the up
Speaker 5: and coming election. And now the DOJ is suing Alabama
Speaker 5: for doing this.
Speaker 6: Now they say.
Speaker 5: It's because you're not supposed to do this less than
Speaker 5: ninety days out to an election, and that ship has sailed.
Speaker 5: But surely a Department of Justice worth a pinch of
Speaker 5: salt would say, look, you're a few days short, but
Speaker 5: these people are illegals. We don't want them voting in
Speaker 5: these elections.
Speaker 6: Instead, we literally have.
Speaker 5: An outright admission these guys are trying to cheat.
Speaker 6: That is what this looks like.
Speaker 5: Why would a Department of Justice now go after a
Speaker 5: state for cleaning up their voter registrations. And let's be
Speaker 5: clear here, Obama is a dead red state like Alabama.
Speaker 5: That's who they are, it's what they do it to
Speaker 5: make They're a famously redneck state. Why would you even
Speaker 5: bother prosecuting these guys for this unless you're probably trying
Speaker 5: to send a message to others.
Speaker 6: But this is a government who clearly wants.
Speaker 5: To keep illegals on the voter rolls, and they're doing
Speaker 5: nothing to hide it.
Speaker 2: It doesn't make sense, does it.
Speaker 3: They say, on the one hand, non citizens won't vote,
Speaker 3: so you've got nothing to worry about, and on the
Speaker 3: other hand, we're going to sue to make sure non citizens.
Speaker 2: Stay on the electoral role.
Speaker 3: So clearly there's mixed messages there. As you said, it
Speaker 3: was only six days they were out in terms of
Speaker 3: cleaning up and the law. As I understand is to
Speaker 3: design to stop a mass clean up of the electoral role.
Speaker 3: This is less than three thousand names, and it would likely.
Speaker 6: Just go over three thousand, two hundred and.
Speaker 3: Presuming not every single one of those is illegal once
Speaker 3: they sought it through.
Speaker 2: So it's a small number of people.
Speaker 3: And for electoral integrity, especially when there's been debates about
Speaker 3: you know, was it legitimate the last election and so on,
Speaker 3: you'd think they would do everything they possibly can to
Speaker 3: make sure there is no argument.
Speaker 2: You know, when they talk.
Speaker 3: About January six and they want to make sure that
Speaker 3: there's a smooth handover of power, Well, why wouldn't you
Speaker 3: when you're in power, and if you're confident that your
Speaker 3: candidate is the best person, why would you not go
Speaker 3: to every length possible to make sure the process is
Speaker 3: squeaky clean and that after November is going to be
Speaker 3: a peaceful transfer of power and you won't end up
Speaker 3: in the courts or with something worse.
Speaker 4: I mean, you know, Alabama may will have missed the
Speaker 4: legal deadline by five or six days. Just let that
Speaker 4: go through to the keeper in the interests of maintaining
Speaker 4: the veracity of the election, right, I mean, crimes are
Speaker 4: committed every single day that are never prosecuted because it
Speaker 4: just wouldn't be worth a police or the DPP's time
Speaker 4: actually going through with it, because they've got bigger fish
Speaker 4: to fry. So this was absolutely at the discretion of
Speaker 4: the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: They didn't have to follow this up.
Speaker 4: They're not duty bound to do so, but they have
Speaker 4: done it because they want to send the shot across
Speaker 4: the bow to anyone else who might dare to now
Speaker 4: go and try and clean up.
Speaker 1: Their voter roles.
Speaker 4: And I mean being to say the Assistant Attorney General,
Speaker 4: Kristen Clark said, the right to vote is one of
Speaker 4: the most sacred rights in our democracy. As election day approaches,
Speaker 4: it is critical that Alabama redress voter confusion resulting from
Speaker 4: its list maintenance mailing scent in violation of federal law.
Speaker 4: You know, it's our most sacred right to vote. And
Speaker 4: she then goes on about voter confusion. Okay, so if
Speaker 4: you are on the electoral role but you're not actually
Speaker 4: legally allowed to be on the electoral role, I'm not
Speaker 4: sure it's really voter confusion.
Speaker 1: It's frauds. A confusion, is what it is. But they
Speaker 1: are just so boord faced in attempting.
Speaker 4: We're not even attempting, just doing what they want to
Speaker 4: do here, which is to get as many possible Democrat
Speaker 4: voters on the electoral role as possible by any means necessary.
Speaker 3: And they don't care what it does to the electoral
Speaker 3: systems integrity, but nor do they care what it does
Speaker 3: to the country. Immigration and Customs Enforcement released figures over
Speaker 3: the weekend showing that six hundred and sixty two thousand,
Speaker 3: five hundred and sixty six people with criminal convictions, six
Speaker 3: hundred thousand people have been admitted into the US, sixty
Speaker 3: two thousand people with assault convictions, fifty six thousand with
Speaker 3: drug offenses, fifteen thousand people with sexual assault offenses, fourteen
Speaker 3: thousand burglars, thirteen thousand people with homicide convictions had been
Speaker 3: allowed into the US. And clearly this is being done
Speaker 3: to help the Democrat at the next election, who cares
Speaker 3: what it does to the fabric of American society. And
Speaker 3: of course, the great irony on top of all we've
Speaker 3: just talked about is Kamala Harris is now repositioning herself
Speaker 3: to be the one.
Speaker 2: To save the day and to secure the border and.
Speaker 3: Make sure everything is going to be okay, despite the
Speaker 3: fact she's been in charge for the last three and
Speaker 3: a half years and done absolutely nothing, but the rebranding
Speaker 3: of Kamala continues apace. She recently released a tweet, how's
Speaker 3: this for gas lighting the American public? As Attorney General
Speaker 3: of California, I prosecuted transnational criminal organizations that trafficked guns, drugs,
Speaker 3: and human beings. I know the importance of safety and security,
Speaker 3: especially at our border. She could have added in brackets,
Speaker 3: which is why I allowed thirteen thousand murderers into the country,
Speaker 3: but she continued, today, I love this. Today I visited
Speaker 3: the US Mexico border. Hasn't been there much while she's
Speaker 3: been Vice president of time. Yeah, with an election looming,
Speaker 3: she visited and spoke with Customs and Border Protection officials
Speaker 3: about our progress to secure our border and disrupt the
Speaker 3: flow of a legal fentanyl into our nation. And I
Speaker 3: can tell you the Border patrol officials were so thankful
Speaker 3: for her visit, so encouraged by it, and they are
Speaker 3: full of optimism that this represents a.
Speaker 2: New day for the United States, as.
Speaker 3: Represented by this tweet from the Border Patrol Union.
Speaker 2: Her going to go look at this. This is their response.
Speaker 3: Vice president Harris has ignored the border problem she created
Speaker 3: for over three years. She goes down there for twenty
Speaker 3: minutes for a photo op and decides to repeat some
Speaker 3: of the things the NPBC has said before. But again,
Speaker 3: where she been for the last three and a half years.
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris is almost is repositioning herself as the challenger.
Speaker 3: In fact, her running mate Tim Waltz said the other day,
Speaker 3: we can't have another four years of this, which was
Speaker 3: a Freudian slip, of course, because the last four years
Speaker 3: has been Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: It's almost like he's running against herself.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 5: Well, Trump has joked, I've got to get this woman
Speaker 5: a maga hat because she's now just copying from my playbook.
Speaker 5: She's going to be strong on the border all of
Speaker 5: a sudden.
Speaker 6: Unbelievable.
Speaker 5: But again, the Border Union weren't having a bar of
Speaker 5: this nonsense from Kamala Today in another tweet, they said,
Speaker 5: we have apprehended over eight million illegal immigrants over the
Speaker 5: last four years, and now you realize we need by help.
Speaker 6: Thirty days thirty eight.
Speaker 5: Days before the election. So they're making it very well known.
Speaker 5: We have been frustrated for years. We have begged you
Speaker 5: for more resources. You have facilitated this invasion by design.
Speaker 6: This is not our fault.
Speaker 5: And don't you dare come down here at two minutes
Speaker 5: to midnight in your election campaign bid and make everyone think.
Speaker 6: That, oh you're going to turn it around now.
Speaker 5: Now your care thirty eight days out to an election.
Speaker 5: Now you're saying, oh, yeah, this is my number one issue.
Speaker 6: Do me a favor. Meanwhile, her do oj one state
Speaker 6: for just being like, hey, we've just.
Speaker 5: Knocked about three than two hundred illegals of our voter
Speaker 5: registration and they're like nope, not having any of it
Speaker 5: with one of those jebs.
Speaker 2: To tell here is that she's running as.
Speaker 3: The former attorney general of California, which she finished that
Speaker 3: job in twenty seventeen, and she's not running on her
Speaker 3: most recent role as vice president.
Speaker 1: And the borders are, by the way, during her term.
Speaker 6: She visited one Sarena Cayleeb.
Speaker 4: Yes, good point, good point, but you know she visited
Speaker 4: once until now, I mean this is her second visit
Speaker 4: to the border.
Speaker 1: She'd visited the border once.
Speaker 4: As borders are when we know that people were sent
Speaker 4: in to clean up the borders, so it didn't look
Speaker 4: like there were so many illegal migrants hanging around the joint.
Speaker 4: And of course part of her thing now is that
Speaker 4: she said she would bring back the formerly failed border bill,
Speaker 4: and part of that border bill was to recommence the
Speaker 4: construction of the wall.
Speaker 1: The wall that.
Speaker 4: She had previously said was an American that she said
Speaker 4: was nonsense, that she had not support.
Speaker 1: Now she's saying build the wall, and I had to laugh.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry.
Speaker 4: I should have thought of this earlier so we could
Speaker 4: actually bring you the clip. But I played it on
Speaker 4: the US Report on Friday. The Energy Secretary in the
Speaker 4: US being asked if it was, of course a Democrat,
Speaker 4: being so Kamala previously was not in support of the wall,
Speaker 4: said it was an American. Now she's saying she's going
Speaker 4: to continue building the wall.
Speaker 1: How is it any different?
Speaker 4: And the Energy Secretary said, well, Donald Trump's version of
Speaker 4: the wall was nonsense.
Speaker 1: Basically, We're going to build it properly.
Speaker 4: I mean, a wall is a wall, like it's a
Speaker 4: little bit of a border or of fence or whatever
Speaker 4: it is to stop people crossing a border. But the
Speaker 4: Democrats are going to build it biglier and better. And
Speaker 4: the other thing, of course, to her, remember is that
Speaker 4: Texas when they tried to put up yes their own fences,
Speaker 4: barbed wire fences to stop people from crossing from Mexico
Speaker 4: into Texas, the Biden administration went to court to force
Speaker 4: them to take the fences down. And now we meant
Speaker 4: to believe that Harris actually wants to keep building the wall.
Speaker 4: And when she went down to visit the other day,
Speaker 4: she was wearing this necklace that is widely believed to
Speaker 4: be a sixty four thousand US dollar Tiffany necklace.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what you'd wear to.
Speaker 3: Go and visit the sun trying to give the illegals
Speaker 3: a vision of what's possible.
Speaker 4: I know, you like me can move into a middle
Speaker 4: class neighborhood with people who really care about their lawn
Speaker 4: and one day, despite the fact that you can't get
Speaker 4: three words out straight, end up with a sixty four
Speaker 4: grand Tiffany necklace and be in the running for presents.
Speaker 6: The worst part is they know that they can do this. Now.
Speaker 5: The Dems can suddenly pretend and make all these ridiculous
Speaker 5: promises about building a wall and being just as tough
Speaker 5: illegal immigration as that Trump campaign is promising to be,
Speaker 5: because they know the damage is already done. As further
Speaker 5: story the tweet we just read you from Elon Musk
Speaker 5: crunching the numbers, the damage has already done. You've got
Speaker 5: over ten million illegals that have flooded into the country,
Speaker 5: many of them directly into key swing states. These guys
Speaker 5: have already short up their future success and now now
Speaker 5: they can say no, no, we genuinely will be tough
Speaker 5: on the border.
Speaker 3: On her claim that you know, as prosecutor, I prosecuted
Speaker 3: all these illegals, well, she was only able to prosecute
Speaker 3: illegals because someone provided the resources and the policy for
Speaker 3: law enforcement to do their job. So she shouldn't get
Speaker 3: any credit for that either.
Speaker 2: I know.
Speaker 4: Well, they used to call her Kamala the Coop, and
Speaker 4: then that all sort of disappeared when she went off
Speaker 4: to be a rep. And now she's tough on the
Speaker 4: border again. Good luck to you, Good luck to you.
Speaker 4: While we're talking about Kamala Harris, Sir, her husband Doug
Speaker 4: im Hoff, of course, is often seen standing behind her.
Speaker 4: He does his dues and just sort of, you know,
Speaker 4: looks like he's the handbag, which is his role of
Speaker 4: course in this situation. But he fronted up for an
Speaker 4: interview with Jen Saki, who you might remember was a
Speaker 4: former speaking Doctors White House spin doctor for Joe Biden.
Speaker 4: She is now on American television and she's interviewing Doug
Speaker 4: asking him, you know, you potentially.
Speaker 1: Being the first first.
Speaker 4: Man of the United States and the first second man
Speaker 4: of the United States, you are reshaping masculinity.
Speaker 8: Important part of an interesting part of how people have
Speaker 8: talked about your role here is how your role has
Speaker 8: reshaped the perception of masculinity. And I'm not sure you've
Speaker 8: planned on that, but you are an incredibly supportive spouse.
Speaker 8: Has that been an evolution for you? And do you
Speaker 8: think that's part of the role you might play as
Speaker 8: first Gentleman's funny.
Speaker 1: I've started to think a lot about this. I've always
Speaker 1: been like this. My dad was like this. Your dad
Speaker 1: was like what what does he mean?
Speaker 4: My dad was like this newsflash, man supports wife, it's
Speaker 4: breaking news.
Speaker 1: Can you believe he's doing it?
Speaker 4: But he may well actually be reshaping masculinity When you
Speaker 4: look at some of the blokes who are supporting Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: Do.
Speaker 4: You remember the day you lost your dignity when you
Speaker 4: filmed that?
Speaker 1: To put it up on TikTok or wherever it goes.
Speaker 1: What are you sitting around at night?
Speaker 7: Oh?
Speaker 4: I think I'm reshaping masculinity is the potential?
Speaker 1: First jed, what does he want to be?
Speaker 3: In response to that interimate, someone wrote on social media,
Speaker 3: if any man is influenced by this guy, then they
Speaker 3: weren't a man.
Speaker 2: To begin with.
Speaker 3: I thought it was very good, but I mean, the
Speaker 3: Democrats can't tell you what a woman is.
Speaker 2: So how do they know what a man?
Speaker 3: In this way to be able to redefine masculinity.
Speaker 2: There was a lot of Feta energy there in that interview.
Speaker 5: Very strong, very strong vibes in an American first, now
Speaker 5: staying in America, and some good news for humanity. In
Speaker 5: my humble opinion, this is how we win in an
Speaker 5: American first. Young men are now more religious than young women.
Speaker 6: Check this out.
Speaker 5: A quote from the New York Times says, for the
Speaker 5: first time in modern American history, young men are now
Speaker 5: more religious than their female peers. They attend services more
Speaker 5: often and are more likely to identify as religious. Another
Speaker 5: article puts it thus, gen Z men pour into church
Speaker 5: pews more often than women, flipping the trend on faith.
Speaker 5: What's the Lord doing well, whatever's happening?
Speaker 6: More of this, please.
Speaker 5: Because as we've discussed with these young men, this phenomenon
Speaker 5: of young men being drawn to Islam and these really
Speaker 5: hardcore faiths, it seems the same is happening with Christianity
Speaker 5: here in this society, in this day and age that
Speaker 5: we've created in the West, where everything is identity less,
Speaker 5: your religion is meaningless, it's all just a pile of nonsense.
Speaker 6: Your gender can change on a whim.
Speaker 5: Family, patriotism, nationalism, everything's.
Speaker 6: Been thrown out the window.
Speaker 5: Young people are going looking for meaning purpose in their lives,
Speaker 5: and the more they turn to the religion, so much
Speaker 5: the better.
Speaker 6: I say.
Speaker 4: Well, it's interesting though, because it's young men going to
Speaker 4: church as opposed to young women. Women are turning away
Speaker 4: from the church. So the Good Lord is baggering things
Speaker 4: up a little bit before we all's chairs.
Speaker 5: No, no, we don't know that that's happening. We just
Speaker 5: know now that there's more men than they used to be.
Speaker 5: So it doesn't suggest that they.
Speaker 4: Say suggest the reporting is saying that there is a
Speaker 4: decrease in women going to church and an increase in
Speaker 4: men going to church. I think it's least about the
Speaker 4: religion itself. It's about the fact that as a culture
Speaker 4: we have demonized men and masculinity to the point where
Speaker 4: young men in particular feel raddleus and they're looking for
Speaker 4: something to hold on to because in a world that
Speaker 4: now tells them that their place in the world as
Speaker 4: a man is invalid, that somehow inherently as part of
Speaker 4: being a man, they're probably going to want to beat
Speaker 4: their future partner that everything that makes them a man,
Speaker 4: their strength, their want to protect family and country, etc.
Speaker 1: Is bad.
Speaker 4: They need to find something to anchor themselves to. I
Speaker 4: suspect that is why young men in particular would be
Speaker 4: flocking to religion, because in the absence of anything else,
Speaker 4: they're very being being challenged.
Speaker 1: They need something to believe.
Speaker 2: I think that's definitely true.
Speaker 3: Popular culture basically teaches young men that they are effeminate,
Speaker 3: weak and immature and keeps them that way, and they're
Speaker 3: discovering the Bible actually upholds the value of women and men,
Speaker 3: and the Bible actually celebrates the differences between the two
Speaker 3: whilst admit that both are equally made in the image
Speaker 3: of God.
Speaker 2: The other thing I think that is appealing.
Speaker 3: To young men, and I've spoken to a lot of
Speaker 3: people in media and politics lately who say we've started
Speaker 3: going to church for the first time, and when I
Speaker 3: ask them why, they say, because over the last number
Speaker 3: of years, we've realized evil is real and we are
Speaker 3: convinced maybe there is more to this world than what
Speaker 3: we're seeing with it, and so we're open to spiritual things.
Speaker 3: And I think young men in particular, I'm looking at
Speaker 3: what's happening in the world right now and thinking, you
Speaker 3: know what, I'm open to exploring and understanding if there's
Speaker 3: something more going on and that I think is probably
Speaker 3: contributing as well.
Speaker 2: We're going to go to a break. When we come back, we'll.
Speaker 3: Look at what's making news tomorrow, including the mayor of
Speaker 3: Alice Springs has taken on a part time second job
Speaker 3: in order to pay the bills that's.
Speaker 2: Coming up in just a moment. Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Let's take a look at what's making news tomorrow. We'll
Speaker 3: start with the Courier mail who are counting down Caleb
Speaker 3: to the state election.
Speaker 4: Indeed, as are most queenslander Is because they can't get
Speaker 4: away to get rid of that giggling little bugger on
Speaker 4: the front of the paper. There. Yeah, but they say
Speaker 4: tomorrow first strike medi Scare countdown begins with union's fear
Speaker 4: campaign over health privatization. Gee, where have we heard this
Speaker 4: one before? Around Hollensland's largest union has launched a medi
Speaker 4: scare style campaign that falsely claims the LNP plans to
Speaker 4: privatize health services. Ahead of Premier Stephen Miles firing the
Speaker 4: starter's gun on the official election campaign today with twenty
Speaker 4: five days to go, I mean, you know, the desperation
Speaker 4: to pull out medi scare again, which, of course Bill
Speaker 4: Shorten tried on back in twenty nineteen. He then ended
Speaker 4: up losing the unlosable election. It may have had nothing
Speaker 4: to do with medi Scare. But like truth in advertising,
Speaker 4: and we talk about misinformation and disinformation laws that the
Speaker 4: federal government wants to include, they're not going to come
Speaker 4: after political speech or political.
Speaker 1: Campaigns, are they.
Speaker 4: So you can go around saying that your opposition candidate
Speaker 4: killed their dog and whatever else, and there's no repercussions
Speaker 4: for that whatsoever. But of course if you go on
Speaker 4: social media and say something, you're in the firing line.
Speaker 4: I mean, while you can spell they're going to privatize
Speaker 4: all the medical services.
Speaker 1: It's rubbish.
Speaker 3: The poles are so bad their electoral strategy, clearly from
Speaker 3: this point is just throw as much mud against the
Speaker 3: wall as they possibly can and if some of it sticks, well,
Speaker 3: good luck to them. Because before it was Madi scared.
Speaker 3: Do you remember last week? I think it was that
Speaker 3: they were warning the LNP are going to ban abortion,
Speaker 3: women's rights are going to be trashed, and the l
Speaker 3: ANDP have never suggested doing any such thing. Now they
Speaker 3: do have numbers of MPs who are pro life, but
Speaker 3: they haven't put forward as a policy position to end abortion.
Speaker 2: It's just more mud against the wall.
Speaker 3: That's all Steven Miles has pretty much got at this point.
Speaker 5: Indeed, and in the same article in which that's featured,
Speaker 5: there's a direct reprieve from Chris A. Fooley saying no
Speaker 5: such thing is going to be happening, much like this
Speaker 5: article in The Career mal which says that these claims
Speaker 5: are baseless. There's an advertising blitz on social media that
Speaker 5: the LMP is planning to privatize health services.
Speaker 6: It's completely bases.
Speaker 5: As Rod's Bates, the opposition Health Minister has pointed out,
Speaker 5: Labor and the unions can't even get their scare campaigns straight,
Speaker 5: so you're quite right. They're genuinely just making up whatever's
Speaker 5: going to make headlines, scare enough ignorant Queenslanders into voting
Speaker 5: labor at the polls, and it's just a bunch of lives.
Speaker 3: I reckon Queenslanders would be happy with this new strategy
Speaker 3: from the Males government because go back a couple of
Speaker 3: weeks prior to all of this and they were just
Speaker 3: throwing money left, right and center. So better throw mud
Speaker 3: than money, because that's cheaper for taxpayers. Let's go to
Speaker 3: the Northern Territory News where the headline reads pay pressure,
Speaker 3: wage review push as Northern Territory mayor takes on a
Speaker 3: second job. Sure, I don't think that's a bad idea
Speaker 3: for our federal politicians. Imagine if they all had second
Speaker 3: jobs where they had to actually go and do real working.
Speaker 5: Around at Bunny that's in Aisle five.
Speaker 3: Yeah, anyway, the article reads, after revelations Ali Springs mayor
Speaker 3: has taken on a second job, questions around the low
Speaker 3: wages of mayors and councilors in the Northern Territory have
Speaker 3: been raised.
Speaker 2: There's calls now for how lack of.
Speaker 3: Benefits for elected members meant the sector would struggle to
Speaker 3: attract good candidates. Now, Matt Patterson is the al Springs mayor.
Speaker 3: He's been the mayor since twenty twenty one, when he
Speaker 3: was elected at age thirty. He's an electrician by trade,
Speaker 3: so I am imagining he's doing some some cashies jobs
Speaker 3: as a sparky. The mayor's wage at twenty twenty two
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three was eighty seven six hundred dollars. It's
Speaker 3: not a great wage, So look after the mayor if
Speaker 3: you're going to be the mayor of Alice Springs, given
Speaker 3: the money to do the job, so he doesn't have
Speaker 3: the moonlight fixing people's fuses.
Speaker 4: It's not unprecedented for mayors to also have other jobs.
Speaker 4: I know when I was covering councils in Adelaide that
Speaker 4: there were a few mayors that did have other jobs,
Speaker 4: including in the public service, that were quite well paid.
Speaker 1: So you got your little top up on top of
Speaker 1: that and how bad we.
Speaker 2: All the problems in Alice Spring But yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4: Like it's it's a hands on job being the air
Speaker 4: of Alice Springs. And if you're just an ordinary counselor
Speaker 4: in Alice Springs and you know, far be from me
Speaker 4: usually to say that councilors deserve anything, but just as
Speaker 4: an ordinary counselor. In twenty twenty two to twenty three
Speaker 4: it was fifteen thousand, seven hundred dollars. And you know,
Speaker 4: and that is like you, as a councilor, you are
Speaker 4: working full time in another job anyway, unless you're retired
Speaker 4: or a stay at.
Speaker 1: Home or whatever it is.
Speaker 4: But to then get fifteen grand to do all the
Speaker 4: stuff that you have to do as a counselor, sending
Speaker 4: mail outs to residents, doing all the stuff that you've
Speaker 4: got to do, that is not a lot of money.
Speaker 4: If you want them to be hands on, you do
Speaker 4: actually have to pay them to be hands on. And
Speaker 4: that's why I like the system they have in Queensland
Speaker 4: where they have much larger councilors.
Speaker 1: I mean the Brisbane Council. It covers pretty much, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's covers pretty much all of Greater Brisbane. It's got
Speaker 1: more than a million people in it.
Speaker 4: Consequently, it has the money and wherewithal to run the
Speaker 4: public transport system up there as opposed to the state government.
Speaker 4: And the counselors are on about two hundred grand a
Speaker 4: year and they work full time, they have portfolios, They
Speaker 4: actually look after stuff and do stuff, rather than the
Speaker 4: piddly stuff that we expect counselors to do across the
Speaker 4: rest of the country.
Speaker 5: At the front page of the Canberra Times and we
Speaker 5: learn yet more about the fact that our government is
Speaker 5: not about transparency at all.
Speaker 6: Gag clauses on rise.
Speaker 5: The splash reads lawyers and alleged victims of workplace bullying
Speaker 5: and abuse in the public sector.
Speaker 6: So the Commonwealth is.
Speaker 5: Using confidentiality clauses to silence those who have been mistreated
Speaker 5: Gordon Legal, head of Industrial Law Marcus Clayton, who runs
Speaker 5: employment law cases for victims of bullying, sexual assault and
Speaker 5: harassment in the public and private sectors, said it was
Speaker 5: quote very common end quote for Commonwealth employers to insert
Speaker 5: secrecy clauses in settlement agreements. He goes on to say
Speaker 5: the effect of the two together he's talking about also
Speaker 5: separately a non disparagement clause, the effect of the two
Speaker 5: together is to gag to silence the complainant. I thought
Speaker 5: they were all about transparency. I thought someone who had
Speaker 5: suffered bullying and sexual harassment while on the taxpayer dime
Speaker 5: and employed by somebody else on the taxpayer dime would
Speaker 5: be able to tell their story.
Speaker 6: So we can ferret this out and all be.
Speaker 5: Rightly outraged and stand by the victims. No, no, just
Speaker 5: gag clauses, non disparagement clauses and.
Speaker 6: A nice little settlement paypacket. Thank you very much. Please
Speaker 6: don't say anything ever about this.
Speaker 2: Goodbye. I agree with your sentiment.
Speaker 3: My only question is when you're talking about bullying and
Speaker 3: harassment are they're often great areas where you know you
Speaker 3: wouldn't prove it in a court of law.
Speaker 2: So therefore, all right, look, we will pay you.
Speaker 3: But in return you agree we don't speak of this again,
Speaker 3: and that arrangement is done because it's a little bit
Speaker 3: gray and there's not an outright acknowledgment on either side
Speaker 3: of what's actually happened.
Speaker 1: It's also done for the protection of the department.
Speaker 4: And this goes on in the private sector all the
Speaker 4: time as well, as it's not like it's unique to government.
Speaker 4: But I think the point is that if the federal
Speaker 4: government then wants to go and complain about how people
Speaker 4: are treated in the private sector, then they need to
Speaker 4: look inwardly first before they start making those complaints very quickly,
Speaker 4: before we go to the break on the front of
Speaker 4: The Australian tomorrow, it says anger in Heartland and Alpe
Speaker 4: to blame.
Speaker 1: The face of Australia's largest liberties.
Speaker 4: Muslim organization has questioned Pennywong's fitness to serve and said
Speaker 4: labor had itself to blame for Muslim voters abandoning it
Speaker 4: as he encouraged people to vote with their conscience amid
Speaker 4: pro Palestine dependence looking.
Speaker 1: To topple the alp Oh.
Speaker 4: I've got a spare of thought for poor old Penny
Speaker 4: Wong here. You know, on one side she's copying it
Speaker 4: from supporters of Israel. He say, look, woman, you have
Speaker 4: equivocated on this the whole damn time. And then the
Speaker 4: Musulims are joining in as well, saying you've equivocated on
Speaker 4: this the whole damn time. The problem is, of course,
Speaker 4: when you try to sit on the fence, you get splinters,
Speaker 4: and that is what Pennywong is starting to discover.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so give us some credit. She's managed to unite
Speaker 3: the country. Everybody agree, doing a terrible job and should go.
Speaker 3: We're going to go to a break when we come back.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump, says Kamala Harris is mentally deficient. The media
Speaker 3: are out age, but people just seem to love Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Will show you in just a second, welcome back.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump keeps saying outrageous things, but Liz, it doesn't
Speaker 3: seem to affect his popularity.
Speaker 5: It's certainly going well in Alabama, where he was for
Speaker 5: a college football game recently. Check out the crowd's reaction
Speaker 5: when they realize as Donald J. Trump was in the
Speaker 5: stadium and the crowd goes a while at the dead
Speaker 5: red state for a reason. I'm sure he knew he
Speaker 5: was going to receive a very resounding reception there. He
Speaker 5: was also at a rally recently where he basically summed
Speaker 5: up the problems of the nation over the last almost
Speaker 5: four years in one simple little joke.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden became mentally impaired.
Speaker 5: Kamala was born that way?
Speaker 1: Where's the light?
Speaker 6: Where's the lie?
Speaker 1: How is he wrong?
Speaker 5: He's just saying what everybody thinks, but he's too polite
Speaker 5: to say.
Speaker 6: Trust Trump to troll.
Speaker 3: The crazy thing is that media are more upset about
Speaker 3: that comment and they are about the damage that Kamala
Speaker 3: Harris has done to the country.
Speaker 4: I know exactly, and the damage that Biden has done
Speaker 4: to the country while for the better part of four
Speaker 4: years they propped.
Speaker 1: Him up while he clearly had dementia.
Speaker 4: Anyway, very quickly before we go, I want to give
Speaker 4: the yae for the day to Adam Vonderhoff, who owns
Speaker 4: the Griffins Hotel in the Adelaide CBD. He has come
Speaker 4: through and every day hero recognizing the problems with the
Speaker 4: cost of living, and he is cutting the prices in
Speaker 4: his pub. I know he's a sky viewer. Adam, if
Speaker 4: you're watching, good luck to you mate. I've enjoyed his
Speaker 4: hospitality before. The Schnitzels have gone from twenty eight bucks
Speaker 4: out of twenty four hand goods that and they have
Speaker 4: capped the cost of everything on the menu at thirty dollars.
Speaker 4: The most expensive thing on the menu is a Porterhouse
Speaker 4: steak for thirty dollars and some beers have been slashed
Speaker 4: from eleven dollars fifty to seven dollars fifty. I mean,
Speaker 4: where can you get a pint of beer for seven
Speaker 4: dollars fifty anymore? This bloke deserves anam because he's come
Speaker 4: through for the people of Adelaide.
Speaker 3: Great Australia. That's it from US stick around. Coming up
Speaker 3: in just a moment is the Reader Penny Show.