Speaker 1: On scoring wields Ostrodia.
Speaker 2: This is the Reader Paney Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening, Anne, Welcome to the Reader Panekey Show. Coming
Speaker 3: up tonight. Labor doubles down on incoming Governor General Sam
Speaker 3: Moyston's outrageous pay increase. Professor in Plymer fact check some
Speaker 3: of the left's nuclear claims, and later in the hour,
Speaker 3: an Australian academic, a law professor, claims she's been bullied
Speaker 3: by activists who cannot tolerate her Christian views. Josh Hammer
Speaker 3: will bring us the latest from the US, including the
Speaker 3: deal that freed Wikilis leader Julia Sange, and we never
Speaker 3: neglect to bring you the segment that has millions of
Speaker 3: views online each and every week. Left he's losing it.
Speaker 4: So the reason why people heat fat people is because
Speaker 4: people heat black people. And appearing curvely or bigger is
Speaker 4: associated with blackness, especially black women, and that's where they're
Speaker 4: discriminated in the workplace.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is Harold's Sun colonist Patrick Carline. Patrick.
Speaker 3: Earlier today, you were in the Supreme Court for the
Speaker 3: Greg Lynn case. A astonishing verdict here he was charged
Speaker 3: with double murder. He was found guilty of one and
Speaker 3: not guilty of the other.
Speaker 2: That's right. Look, the jury took seven days to come
Speaker 2: back with their verdict. I think by today most people
Speaker 2: were thinking it might be a mistrial or a hung jury.
Speaker 2: The jury asked some questions yesterday. They gave some indication
Speaker 2: that they might actually try and convict for the murder
Speaker 2: of Carol Clay as opposed to Russell Hill. And it
Speaker 2: seems that the jury basically didn't believe the story that
Speaker 2: Greg Lynn put up about a struggle was resulting in
Speaker 2: a headshot wound to Carol Clay. So look, there was
Speaker 2: some sense of it in the question yesterday. But I
Speaker 2: think a lot of people will be very surprised by
Speaker 2: such a deliberate sort of verdict, very precise verdict.
Speaker 3: There are legal observers, lawyers who are absolutely shocked. But
Speaker 3: I guess when they took manslaughter off the table to
Speaker 3: be not guilty or murder, perhaps that explains today's verdict.
Speaker 3: How long before we get a sentence on this.
Speaker 2: Look, I think it will take months. I think there's
Speaker 2: the next court date is in July. That's just to mention.
Speaker 2: It'll take another few months after that, and you might
Speaker 2: see some appeals as well.
Speaker 3: In this case goes on now. The following story could
Speaker 3: be distressing to some viewers. A new video has emerged
Speaker 3: of three wounded and terrifying young men taken hostage by
Speaker 3: her Mass on October seven. The men Hirsh Goldberg, Poland,
Speaker 3: Or Levi and Elijah Cohen were at the Nova Music Festival.
Speaker 3: The footage shows the terrified, bloodied men on the flatbed
Speaker 3: of a pickup truck. One of the men, Hirsh Goldberg Poland,
Speaker 3: has suffered a horrific injury, with part of his left
Speaker 3: arm blown off by her mass grenade. This footage was
Speaker 3: uncovered by the IDF and was last night shared by
Speaker 3: the families of the three hostages. Oh no good, but,
Speaker 3: a statement from the Hostages and Missing Families Forum says,
Speaker 3: this harrowing footage stands as a damning testament to the
Speaker 3: two hundred and sixty two day long abandonment of our
Speaker 3: loved ones. Hersh Alion or were taken alive and they
Speaker 3: must return alive today, Patrick, This footage again reveals the
Speaker 3: sub human savagery of her Mass, the brutality, and there
Speaker 3: is increasing pressure on President Joe Biden to do something.
Speaker 3: Given one of those men, Hirsh Goldwig Poland is an
Speaker 3: American citizen.
Speaker 2: Oh. Look absolutely, I mean you can understand that pressure
Speaker 2: being applied. I mean, if there was Australian there, you
Speaker 2: would hope that the Australian authorities would do everything to
Speaker 2: free an Australian hostage. You can see why that pressures.
Speaker 2: You're going to ratch that up as time goes on. Look,
Speaker 2: I think it's important that footage is shown because it
Speaker 2: seems that we've got lost in the pro Palestine sort
Speaker 2: of retoric that this actually all started by the massacre
Speaker 2: of eleven hundred people and they saw one hundred and
Speaker 2: thirty six hostages being kept in gas or at the moment,
Speaker 2: if those hostages were released, we wouldn't be having a
Speaker 2: war the way that it is going at the moment,
Speaker 2: would we.
Speaker 3: Well no, And this is the thing that I do
Speaker 3: not understand from the anti Israeli activist, pro Palestinian whatever
Speaker 3: you want to call them. If they at their protest
Speaker 3: at least made some sort of a call for release
Speaker 3: to hostages, made some sort of a call against her
Speaker 3: mass then they would have a lot more credibility than
Speaker 3: they do. But they refuse to do that. And in fact,
Speaker 3: if you turn up to one of these protests holding
Speaker 3: her mass a terrorist sign, you're the one who gets attacked.
Speaker 3: So that kind of tells you the mindset a lot
Speaker 3: of these activists. They are not really interested in a
Speaker 3: sea spy because if you want to see spy, you
Speaker 3: would be calling for the hostages to be released. Now
Speaker 3: the nuclear debate rages on, we've got intelligent discourse, and
Speaker 3: we've got some juvenile scare mongering of some from some
Speaker 3: labor ministers activists, and there's further the evidence. I think
Speaker 3: that the left cannot mean they're just no good at it.
Speaker 3: We've seen Labor pushing various memes as part of this
Speaker 3: ridiculous anti nuclear scare campaign, and their union mates are
Speaker 3: not much better when it comes to putting together videos.
Speaker 3: Look at this effort from the official account of the
Speaker 3: Australian Council of Trade Unions. So so it's been a
Speaker 3: pro loving heat Now let me see, I'm the biggest heater.
Speaker 5: I hate the way that you walk, the way did
Speaker 5: you talk, I hate the way did you dress?
Speaker 2: I hate the way did you sneak this? If I
Speaker 2: test flame, it's gonna be the writ.
Speaker 3: I don't know who that's convincing. But then again, I'm
Speaker 3: not in the TikTok world. That was also on Instagram
Speaker 3: where I spotted it. How do you see this debate going?
Speaker 3: We mock the scare mongering, but it can actually be
Speaker 3: very effective.
Speaker 2: Oh look, it can be. I don't think something like
Speaker 2: that's very efficive, to be perfectly honest. I think what's
Speaker 2: got lost in this debate is Australia's one out against
Speaker 2: so much of the world. You look at the g
Speaker 2: twenty countries fourteen you produce nuclear power two or three
Speaker 2: hours others are looking to do so we're one out
Speaker 2: with this ideological sort of fear that nuclear is going
Speaker 2: to sort of, you know, be dangerous. And what also
Speaker 2: gets lost in this is we're going to be reliant
Speaker 2: on whether it's coal or gas or nuclear for a
Speaker 2: very long time. And if we don't go nuclear, the
Speaker 2: renewals aren't going to cut it, certainly not reliably across
Speaker 2: the board for a very long time. Hopefully they do it,
Speaker 2: but we need something to make energy reliable. Why not
Speaker 2: look at nuclear? Why not look at it?
Speaker 3: Well, we're sitting on the world's biggest reserves of uranium.
Speaker 3: You would think that would be one good reason to
Speaker 3: look at newtu We're not doing much gas exploration or
Speaker 3: coal plants, so base load power has to come from somewhere. Now,
Speaker 3: let's talk about the Governor General. The incoming Governor General
Speaker 3: has been much criticism yesterday about the fat pay increase
Speaker 3: that she's going to receive, But Labor is defending Sam
Speaker 3: Mouston's salary package, which is more than forty percent higher
Speaker 3: than the current GG David Hurley. This really, to me
Speaker 3: is in defensible Patrick. You look at the perks that
Speaker 3: come with this job, the staff, the residents, the first
Speaker 3: class travel. It really should not have a salary that's
Speaker 3: higher than the Prime Minister. How is that justified?
Speaker 2: It's a forty three percent pay rise on the current raide.
Speaker 2: I mean, in this cost of living sort of crisis
Speaker 2: that we're living in, how do you justify that. It's
Speaker 2: been on every front page of every newspaper across Australia today.
Speaker 2: People are talking about it, People are outraged. Why make
Speaker 2: this choice and pegging it to the Chief Justice of
Speaker 2: the High Court. That's a real job.
Speaker 3: This is a ceremonial role. This is someone who goes
Speaker 3: to morning teas and cuts ribbons and attends functions. It
Speaker 3: is not a role that is enormously taxing intellectually, unless
Speaker 3: there's some sort of a constitutional crisis once in a century,
Speaker 3: then you'll be acted on to make some decisions. But
Speaker 3: I think something like this really should go to an
Speaker 3: eminent Australian and it should not have a salary attached,
Speaker 3: because the perks you get with the job are significant.
Speaker 3: I think it should almost be like I don't know,
Speaker 3: afol club president, where you don't get a salary but
Speaker 3: it comes with great prestige and its important role. Yes,
Speaker 3: and I'm sure there will be a lot of eminent
Speaker 3: Australians who still put up their hand to do it. Absolutely,
Speaker 3: Maybe not leftist activists like this one.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, I won't get into that.
Speaker 3: But yes, yes, Now I want to speak about quantas
Speaker 3: because they're not what they used to be. I fly
Speaker 3: them often, I can talk you that firsthand, and they
Speaker 3: used to be considered one of the top airlines in
Speaker 3: the world. They're all normally in the top ten airlines,
Speaker 3: but now they're not even the top twenty. According to
Speaker 3: the latest Skytracks Awards, Qatar Airways is number one in
Speaker 3: the world, with quantas sitting at a lowly twenty four.
Speaker 3: The spirit of Australia ain't what it used to be. Patrick,
Speaker 3: I think.
Speaker 2: Most Australians would be surprised at Corners made the top
Speaker 2: twenty four offline Singapore offlowing Qatar. As we all have
Speaker 2: from time to time. There is such a distinct difference
Speaker 2: between the service of a good airline and then there's quantas.
Speaker 3: They charge like a premium airline, but there's service levels
Speaker 3: I think approaching budget levels.
Speaker 2: Yes, and they've lost the trust of Australians through the
Speaker 2: Shenanigans under Alan Joyce in the last few years. It
Speaker 2: used to be this wonderful brand that we also looked
Speaker 2: up to it as an icon. Now it's not. Now
Speaker 2: it's just a very expensive.
Speaker 3: Plane, that's it. And I think people who travel regularly
Speaker 3: have learned that those who travel infrequently still perhaps old,
Speaker 3: put Quantus on a pedestal, but one bad experience and
Speaker 3: that all changes now. To a report from the Herald
Speaker 3: signs of Michael warnerm Sports Integrity Australia warning that the
Speaker 3: AFL and other Australian sports need to take urgent action
Speaker 3: to combat illicit drug use by their athletes. This week,
Speaker 3: they recommended an immediate overhaul of the AFL's illicit drug policy,
Speaker 3: which allows players to avoid drug strikes and undergo off
Speaker 3: the books testing under what they call a medical model.
Speaker 3: The Chief of Sport of Integrity Australia, David Sharp, said
Speaker 3: significant into vents is required immediately to address the illicit
Speaker 3: drug culture in sport and the increasing and unacceptable risks
Speaker 3: post of players, officials, clubs and Sporting codes. Sport Integrity Australia,
Speaker 3: along with several partner organizations, have identified evidence across Australian
Speaker 3: sports of clear dangers of criminals influencing sports through the
Speaker 3: supply of illicit drugs, including by praying on athletes or
Speaker 3: support staff to access inside information. And this is important
Speaker 3: because we've got gambling, it's enormous sports gambling. You've got
Speaker 3: the criminal world and the manner in which players are
Speaker 3: accessing these drugs. You could see players officials being blackmailed
Speaker 3: to provide information to behave in a corrupt manner. And
Speaker 3: I wonder if the Sporting codes are really treating this
Speaker 3: as seriously as they should.
Speaker 2: I think mister Sharpe makes a very good point there.
Speaker 2: I mean, look, I like bet lots of us, do
Speaker 2: you can bet on the first ball or a cricket
Speaker 2: match being a no ball, or the first serve of
Speaker 2: a tennis match being a fault. Now, if you have
Speaker 2: players who are potentially leveraged by the various elements, I
Speaker 2: mean it's not a big step to imagine that that
Speaker 2: sort of thing and that sort of corruption of the
Speaker 2: sport could happen pretty readily, and certainly off camera as well.
Speaker 2: I think it's a very good point. I think it's
Speaker 2: something that we need to look at very closely.
Speaker 3: Absolutely in the AFL, in particular with that ridiculous drug
Speaker 3: policy which is really designed to make sure no player
Speaker 3: ever gets three strikes.
Speaker 2: And well, the players have been gaming it for years
Speaker 2: and years, are they.
Speaker 3: Obviously, if the loopholes are deliberate, they're not accidental in
Speaker 3: that code. They've got to acknowledge the obvious there, Patrick Harline,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 2: Thanks.
Speaker 3: Vernon joining me now is a steam geologist. Professor Ian Plymer,
Speaker 3: in the Smart Energy Council CEO, appeared on Sky and
Speaker 3: You with Karen Gilbert and he sort of fact check
Speaker 3: Opposition leader Peter Dutton's claims. Let's have a look at
Speaker 3: the clip the Smart Energy Council tweeted itself, which was
Speaker 3: also shared by Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen.
Speaker 6: How other country in the world can keep the lights
Speaker 6: on twenty four to seven with the renewables only policy?
Speaker 2: Where in the world has that?
Speaker 7: Just one at Costa Rica, for example, one hundred percent
Speaker 7: renewables right, there are plenty of examples globally and here
Speaker 7: in Australia, right.
Speaker 6: We know that the government has a renewables only policy
Speaker 6: which is just not fit for purpose. The state of
Speaker 6: Tasmania is entirely powered on renewable energy.
Speaker 2: Actually the Act one hundred percent renewal energy day night,
Speaker 2: twenty four hours a day, three sixty five days a year.
Speaker 3: Costa Rica. Plenty of examples globally, we're told Tasmania act Ian,
Speaker 3: do you care to fact check the fact checkers?
Speaker 8: Well, you've got to understand he's got to snout in
Speaker 8: the trough and he's talk in his own book. Now,
Speaker 8: Costa Rica, you could not in any way compare with Australia.
Speaker 8: It is not a G twenty industrialized country. You cannot
Speaker 8: have an industrialized society without base load power that comes
Speaker 8: from gas or coal or nuclear that is a fact.
Speaker 8: The second thing is to look at Tasmania. Well, there
Speaker 8: is a cable going from the mainland to Tasmania because
Speaker 8: quite often Tasmania doesn't have enough power and they have
Speaker 8: to back up with diesels. There are times when there's
Speaker 8: not enough rainfall in Tasmania and they can't run their hydrate.
Speaker 8: So Tasmania sometimes exports power to the mainland and quite
Speaker 8: often imports power from the mainland. So that is absolutely wrong.
Speaker 8: And to look at Canbra, I mean really, Canbra doesn't
Speaker 8: generate any of its own electricity. It gets its electricity
Speaker 8: from New South Wales, the bulk of which a coal
Speaker 8: fired power station of power going into Canbra. Now I
Speaker 8: admit there are times milliseconds, perhaps minutes, there are times
Speaker 8: when canber and South Australia and Tasmania might be running
Speaker 8: one hundred percent on renewables. But what the people don't
Speaker 8: seem to tell us is that the sun doesn't shine
Speaker 8: all the time and the wind doesn't blow all the time.
Speaker 8: We've had wind routs that have killed off renewables and
Speaker 8: we still get more than sixty percent of our power
Speaker 8: from coal. So that is blazonly misleading. And then to
Speaker 8: claim that it's cheap. There is no country in the
Speaker 8: world where renewables are cheap. The only good thing about
Speaker 8: renewables is that the subodies subsidies keep renewing and going
Speaker 8: to those promoting them. But we, the poor taxplayer and consumer,
Speaker 8: just have to keep coughing up. It's certainly not clean
Speaker 8: energy because when you look at the amount of filth
Speaker 8: that is generated in China to develop wind turbines and
Speaker 8: to build these soul of panels using slave life, that
Speaker 8: is not clear. And it's certainly not environmentally friendly with
Speaker 8: the amount of wildlife and forest lands that we kill.
Speaker 8: And as to being reliable, pull the other one. So
Speaker 8: I think these people are absolutely panicking because all of
Speaker 8: a sudden we have a decision that has been made
Speaker 8: to give us cheap, reliable, twenty four to seven power.
Speaker 3: The activist class, including much of the media, seem to
Speaker 3: be in some sort of a meltdown over this debate
Speaker 3: even occurring. They're terrified that the Australian people will have
Speaker 3: a choice, that will have options come the next election.
Speaker 3: And I'm not sure if you've seen this piece in
Speaker 3: The Guardian that says Dutton's nuclear plan will be an
Speaker 3: economic disaster that would leave Australians paying more for electricity
Speaker 3: because well, because nuclear is the most expensive form of electricity.
Speaker 3: But in this isn't the experience. In many parts of
Speaker 3: the world. The French pay less for electricity than the Germans,
Speaker 3: who went down the renewable's path very strongly. And in
Speaker 3: Finland electricity prices dropped dramatically when the new nuclear reactor
Speaker 3: was connected.
Speaker 8: Well, if you read the Guardian, you deserve to be mislead.
Speaker 8: So I haven't seen in the Guardian something I don't read.
Speaker 8: But we do know the official figures in this country.
Speaker 8: To generate electricity from gas and there's the AMO figures,
Speaker 8: there's fifty nine cents of killer what our. The CSIRO
Speaker 8: report says that to generate electricity from nuclear is thirty
Speaker 8: one cents to killer what our. So the numbers are
Speaker 8: in and the facts don't lie. So we have a
Speaker 8: global example right across the world. Countries that have got
Speaker 8: nuclear have cheaper power. But what people don't seem to
Speaker 8: realize is that it is reliable. You have one decent
Speaker 8: hail storm and you've wiped out solar power. All the
Speaker 8: panels get destroyed. A hailstorm with a nuclear power station
Speaker 8: does nothing. And what people should understand is that one
Speaker 8: atom of the uranium produces twenty million times as much
Speaker 8: energy as burning one atom of carbon. So if you
Speaker 8: want to have a small fingerprint, if you want to
Speaker 8: be energy efficient, and if you want twenty four to
Speaker 8: seven cheap reliable power, nuclear is the only option.
Speaker 3: Now. Mike O'Connor wrote in The Career Mail that Anthony
Speaker 3: Albernizi as unseated greensleader Adam band as looney in chief
Speaker 3: because of his anti nuclear barrage of bull dust. He
Speaker 3: also wrote, when it comes to insulting the intelligence of Australians,
Speaker 3: the decision to suggest that nuclear power would result in
Speaker 3: three eyed coolers was right up there with the best
Speaker 3: and a spectacular own goal. All the PM and his
Speaker 3: genius advisors managed to do was to convince all reasonable
Speaker 3: minded folk that if the Government was prepared to go
Speaker 3: to such extraordinary lengths to demonize nuclear power, then there
Speaker 3: must be some merit in the proposal. When compared to
Speaker 3: the Labor Party, Suddenly the Greens were looking like moderates.
Speaker 3: I'm sure Adam Bant will see that as a challenge
Speaker 3: to step up his game. But on a serious note, Ian,
Speaker 3: are you surprised by the tactics employed by the senior
Speaker 3: ministers here and the Prime minister? They really have gone nuclear.
Speaker 3: Excuse the pun with the scare mongering, with the hyperbole.
Speaker 3: It's not an approach you would expect from the government
Speaker 3: as serious politicians, serious adults determining our country's future.
Speaker 8: Well, I think mister Dutton's announcement of nuclear caught the
Speaker 8: government napping.
Speaker 9: They didn't consider that such words could come out of
Speaker 9: an opposition leader's mouth and forming and behaving exactly the
Speaker 9: same as they did with the Voice.
Speaker 8: They do not accept reality. They treat the electorate as stupid.
Speaker 8: They exaggerate, they have absolute meltdowns, and people are not
Speaker 8: falling for this. People know that electricity is very expensive
Speaker 8: because we pay for it. People know that there are
Speaker 8: other areas in the world where electricity is cheaper, and
Speaker 8: that is nuclear. So I think the Labor Party has totally,
Speaker 8: absolutely misread the electorate. They did it with the Voice,
Speaker 8: they're doing it again, and rather than engaging in constructive argument,
Speaker 8: they're screeching like spoiled brats.
Speaker 3: I've only got thirty seconds, but your thoughts on Matt
Speaker 3: Keane and this new appointment. Is that going to be
Speaker 3: a game changer.
Speaker 8: Well, it's not going to be a game change at all.
Speaker 8: He's been a joke for a long while, and it's
Speaker 8: a case of birds of a feather flock together. He's
Speaker 8: always been in the wrong party and he now is
Speaker 8: that wonderful public face which will be forgotten years to
Speaker 8: come because he will bring down the opposition policy and
Speaker 8: he'll go with it. So I think it's a wonderful
Speaker 8: point which the two and one. It will get rid
Speaker 8: of Keen and it will get rid of mister Bowen.
Speaker 8: So I'm surprised that he was in the Liberal parties
Speaker 8: for that long and wasn't thrown out. And I think
Speaker 8: the elected of Hornsby will now be finally well represented.
Speaker 3: I primer, thank you for your time. This evening still
Speaker 3: to come. Left is losing it and Josh Hammer on
Speaker 3: the politics behind the Julian Assance decision, welcome back. Now
Speaker 3: it's time for lefties losing it. Did you know that
Speaker 3: wanting to be fit and healthy is racist and fat
Speaker 3: phobia is just another form of white supremacy. Listen to
Speaker 3: this intersectional bologny.
Speaker 4: Anti fatness is rooted in anti blackness and The reason
Speaker 4: why people are pursuing thinness is because they're pursuing proximity
Speaker 4: to whiteness. The reason why people hate fat people is
Speaker 4: because people hate black people. And appearing curly or bigger
Speaker 4: is associated with blackness, especially black women, and that's why
Speaker 4: they're discriminated in the workplace, overly sexualized. And this has
Speaker 4: gone back for centuries and centuries, all systems of oppression, capitalism, sexism, racism,
Speaker 4: It all comes back to white supremacy, which is the
Speaker 4: foundation of the fabric of America and rules every sector
Speaker 4: and aspect of our society.
Speaker 3: Now to a lefty dude telling us he's going to
Speaker 3: lose it if Trump wins again, listen to this rant.
Speaker 3: Sounds to me like this unhinged lefty is making threats.
Speaker 3: Is anyone of the FBI watching If.
Speaker 10: Donald Trump wins, There're gonna be a lot of angry people.
Speaker 10: I can't promise that there won't be some fighting, But
Speaker 10: if Donald Trump wins and starts trying to implement some
Speaker 10: of these measures to take away even more rights, you're
Speaker 10: not going to want to be around for that fight.
Speaker 10: I promise you that you're not going to want your
Speaker 10: family to be around for that fight because people will die.
Speaker 2: People will die.
Speaker 3: Interesting time to check in with the most powerful woman
Speaker 3: in the world. Here, Kamala Harris explains presidential elections after
Speaker 3: she's asked why is the race so close?
Speaker 2: Why is the race so close?
Speaker 11: These races are always close. It's the election of the
Speaker 11: president of the United States, and everyone in an election
Speaker 11: for president United States will critically examine all the issues
Speaker 11: and make a decision.
Speaker 3: Profound, profound. I think I might just listen to that
Speaker 3: again because Kamala she just makes you think, doesn't she.
Speaker 3: And I'm sad to report it's happened again. Another Jerry
Speaker 3: Seinfeld show in Australia has been disrupted by anti Israeli activists.
Speaker 3: That's the third or fourth time in about a week,
Speaker 3: and each time Jerry points out these lefties losing it.
Speaker 3: They are in the wrong place. They are only annoying
Speaker 3: people and making Jerry richer.
Speaker 8: Who would want to do well like I am?
Speaker 1: Look at the people here and hear me, look at
Speaker 1: what happened to you.
Speaker 10: Here's the other thing.
Speaker 12: I think you need to go back and tell who's
Speaker 12: ever running your organization.
Speaker 3: We just gave more money to a Jew.
Speaker 10: And cannot be a good.
Speaker 3: Plan for you, and let's enjoy this. Lefties losing a
Speaker 3: Hall of Famer. It's two years to the day since
Speaker 3: we were treated to this.
Speaker 10: My sce.
Speaker 5: My sight, my my.
Speaker 3: Now let's bring in Josh Hammer, Senior editor at Large
Speaker 3: at Newsweek and Article three Project Senior Council. Josh, I
Speaker 3: want to speak about the border crisis and some of
Speaker 3: the horrific crimes being committed by illegal immigrants. But let's
Speaker 3: start with the news today that Wikiles founded. Julia Sange
Speaker 3: is free after agreeing to plead guilty to a single
Speaker 3: count of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified US national
Speaker 3: defense documents. What can you tell me about this steal?
Speaker 3: And White was struck.
Speaker 5: The plead deal appears to be a very favorable one
Speaker 5: for him. The thing to bear in minds here, Rita,
Speaker 5: based on what I've been able to assess so far,
Speaker 5: this is a political move. I mean, this is a
Speaker 5: presidential election year here in the United States is twenty
Speaker 5: twenty four. And the key point is that Julia Soane
Speaker 5: and civil liberties whistleblowers like him are very popular among younger,
Speaker 5: millennial and gen Z voters here in the United States.
Speaker 5: Who is Joe Biden losing right now when it comes
Speaker 5: to the voter blocks, well, a lot of gen Z
Speaker 5: millennial folks are shifting away to Donald Trump. That's the
Speaker 5: lens through which I view this. I think that it
Speaker 5: is a political stunt ultimately at the end of the day.
Speaker 3: And I think Trump has been outspoken recently about pardoning Assange,
Speaker 3: so it could have become a real debate leading up
Speaker 3: to the November poll.
Speaker 5: Yeah, totally, No, Donald Trump has been very outspoken about that.
Speaker 5: You know, Like I said, I have no particularly strong
Speaker 5: underlying sympathy for Julina Song, but he probably has already
Speaker 5: heat his punishment. I mean, he's essentially been in exile
Speaker 5: there in the embassy over in the UK, you know,
Speaker 5: for years and years now, so you know, good for
Speaker 5: this whole situation that's in the rear view mirror. This
Speaker 5: story has been dragging out for many, many years now.
Speaker 5: But I think you're probably right, reader. Is probably Joe
Speaker 5: Biden trying not to let Donald Trump get there on
Speaker 5: a debate stage, potentially as early as this week, this
Speaker 5: Thursday evening here in the US, and say that he's
Speaker 5: going to party Julia Singe and then steal Joe Biden's
Speaker 5: thunder for him.
Speaker 3: Now, the next story has the potential to upset some viewers.
Speaker 3: Prosecutors in Texas will argue the illegal migrants who stand
Speaker 3: accused of murdering a twelve year old girl in Houston.
Speaker 3: They say they these men lured the girl under a bridge,
Speaker 3: tied her up, stripped her naked from the waist down,
Speaker 3: assaulted her for two hours, then strangled her and dumped
Speaker 3: her body in the water in evidence. If evidence is
Speaker 3: found that this girl was sexually assaulted, Josh, the accused
Speaker 3: could face the death penalty.
Speaker 12: Age is not the only consideration in this case, or
Speaker 12: any case, the underlying actions of the criminals. This victim
Speaker 12: was found you bound and without clothing from the waist
Speaker 12: down in the water.
Speaker 1: The DA's office says that they are waiting on results
Speaker 1: of testing to determine if a sexual assault happened. If
Speaker 1: they find that that happened, this case would be eligible
Speaker 1: for the death penalty in the state of Texas.
Speaker 2: Josh.
Speaker 3: These men crossed illegally into the US earlier this year,
Speaker 3: but had initially been fitted with ankle monitors, but one
Speaker 3: of them cut it off and the other had it
Speaker 3: removed after it was determined he had no known criminal history.
Speaker 8: You know, Rita.
Speaker 5: Bill Malougan is a very talented Fox News reporter who
Speaker 5: here in the US tracks the immigration issue very closely,
Speaker 5: and he had a tweet on Friday that I was
Speaker 5: studying very carefully where he said that even holding aside
Speaker 5: illegal immigration, just holding aside and looking at I llegal immigration.
Speaker 5: There have now been over one million migrants who have
Speaker 5: come in through the Customs and Border Protection one mobile
Speaker 5: app between the ports of entry of the US southern
Speaker 5: border along with the Biden administrations very underdiscussed mass parole
Speaker 5: program where he's basically flying in migrants from a lot
Speaker 5: of Latin American countries in the dark of the night,
Speaker 5: shipping them to the interior of the country. That's what's
Speaker 5: being done quote unquote legally. So imagine how bad the
Speaker 5: illegal situation is. I mean, it's absolutely appalling reading this
Speaker 5: has happened in Houston, Texas. I lived in Houston, Texas.
Speaker 5: In fact, when I was clerking for a federal judge
Speaker 5: based in Texas, I actually remember reading a very dark
Speaker 5: and graphic criminal case along these lines. It was an
Speaker 5: international sex trafficking ring involving NS three team, the cartels
Speaker 5: based there in Houston, Texas. They had underage girls as
Speaker 5: sex slaves. Horrific stuff. Anyone who cares, ultimately, at the
Speaker 5: end of the day, anyone who cares about human rights, justice,
Speaker 5: all the concepts that these far left progressives claim to
Speaker 5: care about. If you care about that, you have to
Speaker 5: support a secure border, because the United States Southern border
Speaker 5: being the way that it is right now, is the
Speaker 5: most inhuman, most unjust thing imaginable. And as it comes
Speaker 5: to these illegal aliens, who obviously, by definition of being
Speaker 5: illegal aliens never ever ever should have been in the
Speaker 5: country in the first place. They're not alone. By the way,
Speaker 5: Lake and Riley and Georgia, we saw what happened to her.
Speaker 5: She was murdered in New York City. You had an
Speaker 5: illegal alien who appears to have raped a thirteen year
Speaker 5: old girl as well. This is happening all across the country.
Speaker 5: But when it comes to these people in Texas, I'm
Speaker 5: a barred attorney still in Texas. I live in Florida.
Speaker 5: I'm still a barre attorney in Texas. The death penalty
Speaker 5: is very much still good law in Texas. These two people,
Speaker 5: if they are determined to be the culprits there. They
Speaker 5: should fry at least once, ideally multiple times for this.
Speaker 3: Now you mentioned the leftist progressive and the ones on
Speaker 3: MSNBC seem to be utterly divorced from reality. I played
Speaker 3: footage yesterday of MSNBC host Simone Sanders discussing this case,
Speaker 3: but she seems to be preoccupied with the term illegal immigrants.
Speaker 3: She thinks that's not proper. Watch this footage.
Speaker 2: What do you tell the parents of those people, those
Speaker 2: young girls who were killed.
Speaker 7: This is you're preponderance of these But what is the
Speaker 7: difference between the legal immigrant who unfortunately engages in that activity?
Speaker 2: And we don't like that.
Speaker 5: I want to be clear, we don't do the term
Speaker 5: illegal a document.
Speaker 8: A document.
Speaker 3: Josh, what can you say about that. We can't say
Speaker 3: illegal immigrant to describe an illegal immigrant. We've got to
Speaker 3: use the word undocumented because it's more PC. I mean,
Speaker 3: talk about completely losing sight of the real issue here.
Speaker 5: Yeah, look, I mean it was George or Well who
Speaker 5: famously said that he who controls the language controls the population.
Speaker 5: The left, the left has been doing a very very
Speaker 5: good job of this in recent years in the United States.
Speaker 5: In fact, they've been that they've actually been doing it
Speaker 5: for a much longer time as well. You can go
Speaker 5: back as far read as the nineteen sixties, you know,
Speaker 5: back during the John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson presidencies,
Speaker 5: when they start passing civil rights legislation, when their landmark
Speaker 5: pieces of legislation was called the Voting Rights Sacks. And
Speaker 5: there's this famous Supreme Court oral argument from twenty thirteen,
Speaker 5: or the late great conservative justice Anthony Scalia is talking
Speaker 5: to the lawyers arguing, and he goes the voting right SATs.
Speaker 5: What kind of congressman in the right name whatever vote
Speaker 5: against a bill called the Voting right sack. So the
Speaker 5: fix has kind of been when they come to naming bills,
Speaker 5: when they come to naming identity groups here. But you
Speaker 5: know this individual on MSNBC, You know how hard is
Speaker 5: it to actually use the term illegal when someone is
Speaker 5: here illegally. These are people whose first act, who's literal
Speaker 5: first act, their physical foot stepping across the Rio Grande
Speaker 5: into this country isn't act of illegality and criminality. They
Speaker 5: are illegal aliens still under US law, and the left
Speaker 5: wing media should say it what it is. They are
Speaker 5: illegal aliens, say it illegally. It's not that horidoniously.
Speaker 3: Well for the left, often saying the truth is very difficult. Indeed,
Speaker 3: that's why they would like to come up with the
Speaker 3: prettier words that hide the real issues. I want to
Speaker 3: talk to you about the ESG phenomenon. MasterCard is being
Speaker 3: pressured by SG activists to drop support for organizations such
Speaker 3: as this State Financial Officers Foundation ESG. It stands for Environmental,
Speaker 3: Social and Governance. But it seems to be Josh just
Speaker 3: a way to push the leftist agenda in the corporate
Speaker 3: world using shareholders' money. And it's not just MasterCard that's
Speaker 3: been targeted by these activists. You've got JP, Morgan, Lockeing Martin,
Speaker 3: a whole bunch of corporates. And I wonder just how
Speaker 3: influential and powerful is this ESJ philosophy in the corporate world.
Speaker 5: So I think it reached its apex probably a year
Speaker 5: to a year and a half ago. It's actually been
Speaker 5: on the dcline, is my understanding, since then. You know,
Speaker 5: ESG RITA I think is best viewed as the financial
Speaker 5: wing of the broader DEI diversity, equity and Inclusion movement.
Speaker 5: So the DEI is kind of the social aspect. That's
Speaker 5: how you got the the woke stuff on the university campuses.
Speaker 5: ESG is basically just the investing financial elements of that.
Speaker 5: But you know it's the it's the major institutional investors
Speaker 5: like Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street. It's firms like that really
Speaker 5: who were the biggest proponents of ESG, especially Blackrock probably
Speaker 5: above all Larry Fink, the CEO of there was all
Speaker 5: in on the ESG agenda in recent years there, but
Speaker 5: they actually started pulling back on ESG. I think it
Speaker 5: was The Wall Street Journal had a long deep dive
Speaker 5: of an essay on this last year because the very
Speaker 5: simple reason readA. There's no demand for anymore. I mean,
Speaker 5: the American people and investors don't want this because reasonably speaking,
Speaker 5: when you invest riata, what do you want? You want returns,
Speaker 5: you want ROI, you want to return on A.
Speaker 3: Was there ever any real demand for it or was
Speaker 3: it just something that was pushed by the corporate activist class,
Speaker 3: because I can't imagine shareholders being preoccupied with this staff A.
Speaker 3: Shareholders want to return on their money, and this seems
Speaker 3: to be just relentless leftist activism masquerading as some sort
Speaker 3: of corporate responsibility.
Speaker 5: Yeah, one hundred percent. I mean, there was never a
Speaker 5: demand for this, because again, people who are living check
Speaker 5: to paycheck with a pension fund or retire infund whenever,
Speaker 5: they just want money for goodness it. They don't particularly
Speaker 5: care how it's done as long as it's legal, right.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 5: This reminds me of actually the whole ESGU debate. It
Speaker 5: reminds me actually of the whole bud Light Dylan Mulvany
Speaker 5: fiasco that happened here in the US a little over
Speaker 5: a year ago, where bud Light had the the transgender influencer.
Speaker 5: I mean, was there really a demand among kind of
Speaker 5: college friend boys for drinking a beer with a transgender
Speaker 5: individual like printed on the logan?
Speaker 2: No, of course not.
Speaker 5: I mean, this is some hair brained idea from some
Speaker 5: Ivy League MBA graduate who thought this would be a
Speaker 5: good agenda. And but White, by the way, paid the
Speaker 5: price for it. And that's what you're starting to see
Speaker 5: now when it comes to ESG, when it comes to
Speaker 5: Black Rock Vanguard, there's just no demand for it. And finally,
Speaker 5: finally they're actually just pulling these investment funds from their shelves.
Speaker 3: Well, this is another example of that, IBM is facing
Speaker 3: a lawsuit from Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey over its
Speaker 3: diversity quotas. This is the DEI program Diversity Equity Inclusion.
Speaker 3: Bailey calls it corporate racism. He's accusing the company of
Speaker 3: violating the Missouri Human Rights Act by subjecting job applicants
Speaker 3: to unlawful racial quotas, blatantly favoring applicants of certain skin
Speaker 3: color over others, and facing employees pay an employment status
Speaker 3: on whether they partici pat in these discriminatory practices. This
Speaker 3: is a turn up for the books, and I think
Speaker 3: we're going to say more lawsuits like this because it
Speaker 3: is corporate racism. They're not even ashamed of it. They
Speaker 3: promote these programs.
Speaker 5: Yeah, they shout it from the rooftops. I mean, they
Speaker 5: are extraordinarily proud of the fact that at the corporate
Speaker 5: level they are increasingly openly and overtly discriminating against you know,
Speaker 5: white male Christians would be the absolute, you know, the
Speaker 5: highest quote unquote oppressor status, right, but you know it's
Speaker 5: also Asians, I mean Jews obviously, I mean any number
Speaker 5: of other groups as well. Here, you know, good for Missouri,
Speaker 5: this is a this is a good lawsuit when you
Speaker 5: have a democratic administration, a very activist democratic administration, life
Speaker 5: you bid administration in place. Probably the single most effective
Speaker 5: tip of the spear in terms of fighting back, especially
Speaker 5: with US Congress as divided as it is, it is
Speaker 5: going to come from the state level, and that's going
Speaker 5: to come from the various Republican attorneys general or fortunate
Speaker 5: right now where we have a number of high pro
Speaker 5: file Republican attorney's general. Ken Paxon in Texas would probably
Speaker 5: be the number one, most vocal and most active, So
Speaker 5: it's really encouraging to see others besides Ken pax and
Speaker 5: step up. Here in Florida, we have Ashley Moody who's
Speaker 5: also done a pretty good job of late pushing back
Speaker 5: on the Biden administration's Title nine transgender policy things like that.
Speaker 5: So it's really good from a perspective of wanting to
Speaker 5: stop the WOK agenda. More broadly, speaking of senior Republican
Speaker 5: attorney general step up, so good for the state of
Speaker 5: Missouri when it comes to this particular Lossit hopefully more
Speaker 5: will follow.
Speaker 3: Now before you go, I've got to ask you about
Speaker 3: the latest polls. Donald Trump is leading Joe Biden in
Speaker 3: all seven swing states. According to some recent polling de
Speaker 3: Spy the Democrats Law fair and political prosecutions. In twenty twenty,
Speaker 3: Biden won six of the seven swing states. And we've
Speaker 3: got the great debate happening this Friday, our time. How
Speaker 3: can Biden recover in the polls? What can the Democrats
Speaker 3: and their institutional allies do to fortify another election?
Speaker 5: You know, it's a great question. I mean, there candidate
Speaker 5: is in very very bad shape right now, not just politically,
Speaker 5: but obviously physically and mentally as well. Nothing is going
Speaker 5: particularly well right now for the Biden Harris campaign. And
Speaker 5: it's funny because Joe Biden has essentially been locked up
Speaker 5: at Camp David, at the presidential compound in suburban Maryland
Speaker 5: for the past week while he's trying to prepare for
Speaker 5: this debate. Apparently he realized that the stakes are very high.
Speaker 5: Although I have to say that does raise the obvious
Speaker 5: question as to who is running the country when he's
Speaker 5: just holds up there at Camp Data preparing for this debate.
Speaker 5: I mean, you know, who's managing the world's largest economy.
Speaker 5: I actually have no idea, to be honest with you,
Speaker 5: but the stakes are obviously extremely high in this debate. Now,
Speaker 5: the expectations have been set so low that if Joe
Speaker 5: Biden essentially stands up there and gets at least a
Speaker 5: few coherent sentences in, and if he doesn't keel over
Speaker 5: and has to be rushed to the er before it's over,
Speaker 5: they will probably be able to chalk it up in
Speaker 5: the Democratic Party's fundraising emails as some sort of win.
Speaker 5: So lowering expectations is half the battle, but they're going
Speaker 5: to have to come up with something more than that.
Speaker 5: They're going to run very hard on the abortion issue,
Speaker 5: or they're going to try to do the whole twenty
Speaker 5: twelve playbook. They's so called Republican war on women. They're
Speaker 5: trying to gin that up. But it's not working, reader,
Speaker 5: because ultimately, at the end of the day, the voters
Speaker 5: here care about the economy, inflation, crime, and the open
Speaker 5: border issue, and those are the issues, frankly, that Joe
Speaker 5: Biden has failed epically on, and independent and swing state
Speaker 5: voters see it for what it is.
Speaker 3: I think, Josh Hemma, thank you so much for your
Speaker 3: time this evening. Thank you still to come. A Christian
Speaker 3: academic is facing cancelation, but she is fighting back. I'll
Speaker 3: speak to her next. Welcome back. My next guest is
Speaker 3: an academic, a law professor at the University of Adelaide.
Speaker 3: But she's also a Christian. She's pro life, she's pro
Speaker 3: free speech, and that has seen her targeted in her
Speaker 3: workplace with a multitude of complaints. As we know, with
Speaker 3: these complaints, often the process is the punishment, and activists
Speaker 3: are using the complaints processes at places like universities to
Speaker 3: intimidate those who challenge their worldview. But doctor Joanna Howe
Speaker 3: is fighting back and she joins me. Now, Joanna, you've
Speaker 3: submitted a stop bullying application to the Fair Work Commission
Speaker 3: against the University of Adelaide. Tell me why you are
Speaker 3: receiving so many complaints and have any of these complaints
Speaker 3: stood up.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 13: First of all, Rita, thank you so much for having
Speaker 13: me on your show. And look, I started speaking out
Speaker 13: about abortion close to two years ago on social media.
Speaker 13: I've been researching it that for a couple of years.
Speaker 13: But the decision I made to speak up publicly was
Speaker 13: because South Australia, the state where I live, had legislated
Speaker 13: abortion up to birth and for any reason, and for
Speaker 13: me that was just a bridge too far, and I
Speaker 13: felt that I had to speak out about that, so
Speaker 13: I started posting daily content to Instagram, where you can
Speaker 13: find me at doctor Joanna Howe, and through that I've
Speaker 13: been disseminating my research.
Speaker 3: I'm now on TikTok.
Speaker 13: Facebook, YouTube, and it's a way of getting information out
Speaker 13: to people and starting a conversation on the issue of abortion.
Speaker 13: Of course, I knew that complaints from activists were going
Speaker 13: to be part of the course because I'm challenging the
Speaker 13: pro abortion narrative of academia, of the media, of large corporates.
Speaker 13: You know, this is sort of a situation really of
Speaker 13: David and Goliath, and I knew that I was taking
Speaker 13: this on, and in fact, doctor Debbie Garrett had written
Speaker 13: a book called alarmis Gatekeeping, which traced how anybody from
Speaker 13: Amanda Stoker to the CEO of White Ribbon, if they're dead,
Speaker 13: speak about abortion from a critical perspective. They had been
Speaker 13: try They've been bullied and been harassed and significant attempt
Speaker 13: at cancelation. So I knew there was going to be
Speaker 13: an avalanche of complaints to my employer, but I didn't
Speaker 13: think that that was sufficient to stop me speaking because
Speaker 13: the issue was so important. What I didn't know is
Speaker 13: that the university would would take all of these complaints forward,
Speaker 13: because I guess believed in the fact that there's an
Speaker 13: obligation on the university to protect academic freedom and that's
Speaker 13: first and foremost, and that the idea of a university
Speaker 13: is built on that.
Speaker 3: So I think it has.
Speaker 13: Taken me by surprise to you know, to be doing
Speaker 13: this for two years and to have been the subject
Speaker 13: of five workplace investigations. You know, nobody should have to
Speaker 13: go through that. It has been significant. It has tested
Speaker 13: my resolve. None of the complaints have actually been substantiated.
Speaker 13: I have not been found guilty of any misconduct, and
Speaker 13: to be clear, the vast majority of the complaints have
Speaker 13: come from activists outside the university weaponizing the complaints system
Speaker 13: against me, and to me, that's not fair, and that's
Speaker 13: why I have taken this action in the Fair Work Commission.
Speaker 3: I can understand it would be enormously stressful to be
Speaker 3: under investigation constantly, one after another, even if you ultimately
Speaker 3: are found to have done nothing wrong. But isn't the
Speaker 3: university obliged to investigate every time a complaint is made?
Speaker 3: Are these complaints deemed vexatious or as a university once
Speaker 3: the process is started obliged to follow through.
Speaker 13: The university first and foremost has an obligation to protecting
Speaker 13: academic freedom.
Speaker 3: The idea of a university.
Speaker 13: Is based on the concept that even if you're a
Speaker 13: scholar researching inn and highly controversial area, that you are
Speaker 13: protected because this is a way of finding truth. It's
Speaker 13: the marketplace of ideas, and scholarships shouldn't be controlled by
Speaker 13: what the dominant ideology is at the time. And this
Speaker 13: has been really important in human history to help us
Speaker 13: reach the truth on really important issues of critical importance
Speaker 13: to us as a society, as a civilization. So the
Speaker 13: idea of a university is based on academic freedom. It's
Speaker 13: a right that I have and all academics have in
Speaker 13: the EBA, in our enterprise agreements, and there's actually an
Speaker 13: obligation on the university to dismiss complaints that I made vexatiously.
Speaker 13: And just to give you an example reader of what
Speaker 13: I've been through. On January twenty fourth this year, I
Speaker 13: received an email from my boss which cleared me from
Speaker 13: the most recent investigation, which had landed in the middle
Speaker 13: of December and had happened because a bunch of TikTok
Speaker 13: activists had got together run a TikTok campaign on it,
Speaker 13: complaining to the University of Adelaide. They put in my
Speaker 13: boss's email, they put in research integrity, and so they
Speaker 13: were just you know, riling each other up, and the
Speaker 13: university received an avalanche of complaints and I had to
Speaker 13: you know, receive that notification from my boss. I had
Speaker 13: to respond to the allegations, and ultimately, on the twenty
Speaker 13: fourth of January, I found out that I'd been cleared.
Speaker 13: But less than two hours later, I received another email
Speaker 13: from another department in the university telling me that a
Speaker 13: new investigation had been opened up, this time on research miconduct,
Speaker 13: again prompted by activists outside the universities. These are not
Speaker 13: my students in the classroom who are complaining about my teaching.
Speaker 13: These are not substantive critiques of my research. It's people
Speaker 13: who want to get me sacked because they want to
Speaker 13: shut down what I'm saying, because I'm sharing really uncomfortable
Speaker 13: truths about where we've got to with the regulation of
Speaker 13: abortion in Australia. You know, on social media and even
Speaker 13: on your show, Reader, I've talked about the fact that
Speaker 13: in Australia we have a situation that baby's born alive
Speaker 13: after an abortion can be left to die. They don't
Speaker 13: have a right to legal care. I've talked about the
Speaker 13: fact that abortion is legal up to birth and for
Speaker 13: any reason. Only thirty one percent of Australians according to
Speaker 13: an IPSOS poll, support that up until twenty weeks. And
Speaker 13: I think the other side wants to cancel me and
Speaker 13: shut down my voice because they know that I'm being effective.
Speaker 13: I'm getting my message out there.
Speaker 2: I've reached five.
Speaker 13: Million people in close to two years on social media,
Speaker 13: and so they have to they have to get rid
Speaker 13: of me because it's going to affect change.
Speaker 3: Well, you're right, that message, the pro life message, even
Speaker 3: if you're just arguing against late term abortion, it's not
Speaker 3: something that gets much coverage at all. And polling fairly consistently,
Speaker 3: particularly polling in the US, which has done far more
Speaker 3: often than here, shows that even those who are pro
Speaker 3: abortion pro choice in the first trimester, are against late
Speaker 3: term abortion in the third trimester and even in the
Speaker 3: second trimester. So this is a far more nuanced topic
Speaker 3: for a lot of people than the media. Let on,
Speaker 3: and you're part of that debate. Now, you are a
Speaker 3: mother of five, you're a Rhodes scholar, you're a law professor,
Speaker 3: you're obviously a woman of color. But none of that
Speaker 3: seems to matter to the so called tolerant left who
Speaker 3: tell us they value diversity. The way you've been treated
Speaker 3: that did determined to cancel you, are they going to succeed?
Speaker 3: Would in life be easier for you if you focused
Speaker 3: on your lectures and left the activism to somebody else.
Speaker 13: So I have always devoted my research to addressing vulnerability
Speaker 13: in all its forms, and in speaking out for our
Speaker 13: most vulnerable Australians and using my research and sharing it
Speaker 13: on social media in the way that I've been doing.
Speaker 13: That is something that I will not stop doing. And
Speaker 13: you know, as a mother of five, this is personal
Speaker 13: to me. I am not just an academic, but I'm
Speaker 13: a mother who have children that will one day go
Speaker 13: to university. And if you think about the abuse, harassment
Speaker 13: and bullying that I have been through as an academic,
Speaker 13: as a professor of law and as a Hodes scholar,
Speaker 13: think about what this means for students in the classroom,
Speaker 13: who have every right to demand to be subjected to
Speaker 13: not woken doctrination from the radical left's ideology on everything
Speaker 13: from gender to abortion. They have a right to pursue
Speaker 13: critical thinking and the freedom to do that. So if
Speaker 13: I'm being treated in this way, then I share about
Speaker 13: what's going on for us students.
Speaker 3: And you would hope at university you would be hearing
Speaker 3: diverse viewpoints. That's not the time to be debating these
Speaker 3: issues and just broadening your horizons. I don't know what
Speaker 3: is a doctor, Joanna House, thank you for your time
Speaker 3: this evening, and that's it from me. Up next is Newsnight.
Speaker 3: I'll see you at eleven tomorrow. Good night,