WEBVTT - The Media Show | 12 July

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Vince is the Media Show with Jack outing, Hello and

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the Media Show. Tonight, we will discuss spin

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>doctors at Queensland Health, a crisis at Network ten, and

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a toxic on air rant by former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But first, Joe Biden is desperately fighting to keep his

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidacy alive, but the unyielding support he once enjoyed

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>from the US media has dissipated. Today, he spoke at

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>NATO during a lengthy press conference where he trailed off

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>numerous times and made some incredibly damaging gaffes.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Look, I wouldn't have picked Vice President Trump to be

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 2>vice president? Do I think she was not qualified to

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 2>be president? So let's start there.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 3>And journalists were having none of it.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Nearly every question involved bewilderment and why Biden was still

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the race.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Our political future has hung over the NATO summit a

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 4>little bit this week.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You mixed up the president Zelenski and Putin earlier today.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 5>But what makes this moment in history so unique is

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 5>that it is not your enemies who are calling on

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 5>you to reconsider your decision to stay in the race.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 5>It's your friends, supporters, people who think you've done a

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 5>great job.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And after a while it started to get weird. He

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>does this thing where he whispers and I'm not sure

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he thinks it sounds like, but it's bad.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>When unions do better, everybody does better. Everybody does better,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and we talk about how for example and when I went,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>but the airds add things all the time. Very end,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to happen.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Don't say that.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you think the NATO press conference was bad,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the moment he confused the leader

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine with Vladimir Putin.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>And now I want to hand it over to the

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>President of Ukraine, who has as much courage as he

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 2>has to determination, ladies and gentlemen, President Putin.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It's no wonder that even The New York Times is

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>now campaigning for Biden to step down. Biden advises way

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>how to convince him to end his campaign close allies

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of the President of developing a case for why he

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>should step aside. But mister Biden is increasingly isolated now.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Part of the concern is that Biden's crack addled, convicted

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Felon's son Hunter Biden has started to appear in oval

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>office meetings, and the press is not too happy about this.

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 6>So Kevin McCarthy just said that when he was the speaker,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 6>many times when we had meetings in the Oval Office,

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 6>Jill was there as well when the first ladies in

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 6>these meetings. Is she making decisions or is she just

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 6>advising the president?

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 7>The president is the President of the United States, he

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 7>makes decisions.

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 6>Okay, another family member. President Biden has told me before

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 6>he and his son don't have any business dealings together.

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 6>So what is Hunter Biden doing in White House meetings?

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 7>Are you talking about the meeting where they came together

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 7>from Camp David and the two of them walked to

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 7>the President's meeting and he was there.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 6>There's a report that DAIDs were struck by his presence

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 6>during their discussion.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 7>Look, I can't I'm certainly not going to get into

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 7>private conversations that occur. What I can say is, and

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 7>I talked to this, I spoke to this before, is

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 7>that when they came back from Camp David, the President

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 7>spent a couple of days at Camp David with his family.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 7>He is very close to his family, as you know.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 7>It was the week of fourth of July, which is

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 7>why his family members were here last week. They walked together,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 7>and they walked together into the meeting.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 6>Can you say if Hunter Biden has access to classified information?

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's bring in media writer at The Australian, Sophie

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Elsworth and Scott used contributor James James and start with

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you great to haven't you here? This was his opportunity

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to dispel all of the conjecture about his cognitive decline,

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>which is obvious to us.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>How did it go?

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 8>I think that he's done enough to buy him some time,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 8>Like I know all the gaps we just saw there,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 8>the needless aggressive way he was dealing with the once

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 8>friendly press. My favorite one was when he said that

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 8>he's started scheduling vun raises earlier in the day, not

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 8>for him, but for everyone else, because he wants other

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 8>people to be able to go home at ten, Like

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 8>the defensive I'm not tired. You guys are all tired,

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 8>so you guys can leave me alone. I think the

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 8>issue is, though, like when he calls Zelenski Putin, when

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 8>he calls Kamala Harris Trump, how much of that is

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 8>already priced into Joe Biden to candidate who was surprised

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 8>that he would do that, and the people around him

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 8>right now, they're senior Democrats calling on him to either

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 8>stay or go. They're not there out of the love

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 8>of country. They're not there out of a dedication to

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 8>public service. They're there for Team Blue. And if Biden's

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 8>the guy that's going to win for teen Blue this November,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 8>Biden stays. And the problem for them is that they

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 8>don't have like a ninety two Clinton or an oait

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 8>Obama in the wings, because if they did today, said today,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 8>Biden would be somewhere yelling at nurses that his copy

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 8>is too hot. The fact is Biden's still the best

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 8>they've got, and unless the Poles tell you, Marl liyes,

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 8>he's going.

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>To stay on. Yeah.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing is, I think you raise a

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>really good point about the gaffs being bad, but he's

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for three years, and Sophie'd love to

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>bring you in.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I think there is a degree.

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Of Now these journalists have been exposed, they're covering themselves

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>because it is unavoidable. But to James's point, he's been

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>doing this for a long time. There's nothing that significantly

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>an outlier. Why now all the pressure, why now.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 9>I think now because he has got his own people

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 9>internally turning on him.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 10>Jack, and also that presidential debate.

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 9>A few weeks ago was an absolute disaster and the

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 9>media couldn't shy away from that.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 10>So now they actually have egg on.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 9>Their face because I would argue the antics of President

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 9>Biden at various media calls and appearances is not that

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 9>different to what he was like twelve, eighteen, twenty four

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 9>months ago.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 10>But suddenly the.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 9>Media pack, predominantly in the US and also here in Australia,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 9>has woken up and said, we have a problem on

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 9>our hands. So I don't think President Biden will be

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 9>going anywhere. But the media has been exposed, I believe,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 9>for not calling this out earlier, and now it appears

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 9>that they're playing catch up in the lead up to

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 9>the presidential election later this year.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, really, well said.

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Not all journalists, though, are playing that game, and some

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are still covering for the president and some are more

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>subtle than others. Radio host Andrea Lawful Sanders lost her

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>job at WRD Radio after admitting her post debate interview

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>with President Joe Biden was based on questions the Biden

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>camp fed her.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Andrea, let me ask you here about your interviews and

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 4>something I listened to both of them, and there's something

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 4>that's similar here. You each were you asked four questions,

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 4>and maybe that's what you were allowed to ask by

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 4>the campaign or the White House, but they were essentially

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 4>the same questions. Both interviews about accomplishments progress in your

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 4>respective state, what's at stake in the election, what he

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 4>has to say about his debate performance, and what he

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 4>would say to voters who think their vote doesn't matter

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 4>or might sit this election out. Were those questions given

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 4>to you by the White House or did you have

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 4>for the campaign or did you have to submit questions

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 4>ahead of this interview?

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 3>The questions were said to me for approval. I approved

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to them. And it gets worse.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>A radio show in Milwaukee was one of the first

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>places to get a post debate interview with Biden, and shockingly,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the White House asked them to edit the interview to

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>make him look sharper. CNN reports a Milwaukee radio station

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>agreed to make two edits to an interview recorded with

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>President Joe Biden earlier this month at the request of

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>his campaign. The station's owner, Civic Media, which is said

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday now let's bring the panel back in James.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Both egregious situations. Now this isn't me saying, hey, I

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>plan on asking these questions, which is bad. I'm not

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that's acceptable. This is the Biden camp saying you

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>may only ask him one of these questions. Put that

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to one side. Then you've got other people editing him,

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and the background. The context of this is they're doing

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>these interviews to show the American people that he is

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>cognitively there. So not only is it a lie, but

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>contextually it is a lie that is extremely important.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 8>See, this is what infuriates me so much that the

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 8>media this week has decided that they can start talking

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 8>about Biden's decline. These are two terrible examples, but these

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 8>cannot be the only examples in the forty years of

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 8>the Biden presidency of this going on. But now it's

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 8>okay to say, actually, yeah, six months ago, you know

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 8>that I had an interview with him.

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It was weird.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That is not on.

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 8>This is a press pack that for four years has

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 8>either been outright lying to us or at the very best,

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 8>going along willingly with the narrative. The Democratic Party is saying,

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 8>because we've had oh you know, there's the weird clips

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 8>of him, but behind closed doors he's doing skateboard tricks

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 8>and reciting Sonet's backwards and the media was like, oh, well,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 8>I'll take that. Yeah, I'll know, press send on that copy.

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 8>It's a complete lie. They've been caught out now because

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 8>the truth is in front of us after this debate,

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 8>and their reputation's at stake, because how can we trust

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 8>anything that people have been saying, Biden's healthy, Biden's healthy,

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 8>Biden's healthy. But here's my point on another issue. Sorry,

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 8>you're the guy that said Biden's healthy, we don't trust

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 8>you anymore.

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a really good point, Sophie. Institutional trust in

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.599
<v Speaker 1>general has been on the decline. It's something that we

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.359
<v Speaker 1>know how much has this whole saga damaged the credibility

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the institutional media, the journalists who sit there. I

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>take a point that make the point that Peter Doucey

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in the front row from Fox News, he's consistently been

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>asking quite provocative questions. He's someone that's quite a good

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>operator there. But the pack in general has really been

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>running a protection racket for this man and this presidency.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the opposite of holding power to account. They're really

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>protecting him. Why are they doing that and how much

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>damage has this caused their credibility.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 9>I think it's caused immense damage to the media's integrity.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 9>And also they're doing this because a large contingency of

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 9>the media, not just in Australia, not just in the US,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 9>but around the world is left leaning and they want

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 9>to be players. They don't want to do their jobs.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 9>They want to come in and be advocates and activists. Unfortunately,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.599
<v Speaker 9>the media industry is seeing more of this. However, I

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 9>would argue that Joe Biden needs to front the cameras

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 9>and needs to do more live TV so we can

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 9>see him for what he is. Forget the teleprompters, forget

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 9>the transcripts, and that's what we saw in their debate

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 9>with Donald Trump, where it was an absolute dog's breakfast

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.599
<v Speaker 9>because he couldn't cope under that situation. The man is

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 9>eighty one, he'll be eighty two in November, possibly eighty

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 9>six if he wins his next term by the time

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 9>he ends, So if he's like this now, I think

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 9>there's a pretty rocky road ahead until November, and if

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 9>he is the presidential candidate, and does win. I think

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 9>this is incredibly concerning for America and the world.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a really good point.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on now, because Malcolm Turbull went on the

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>project this week and instead of having anything remotely constructive

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, he went on yet another toxic rant against

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the very man who leads his own party.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 10>What sort of prime minister will Peter Dunton make if

0:11:58.320 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 10>he wins?

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that's something we should contemplate with dread.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 10>Really he's a thug.

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 3>So how did Peter Dutton respond?

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 11>I just think people can see through it and I

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 11>wish him the best. I think he diminishes himself by

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 11>making his comments. Malcolm's got an extra grind. I think

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 11>it's sad.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring the paddle back in James. Quite a contrast there,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Dutton choosing to ignore an opportunity to whack this man

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>who was essentially not called him evil, but he's derided

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>him on a moral pretty close, pretty close to calling

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>him evil, a thug, all these really volatile words, and

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dutton is you know, he wishes him well, what

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the two different presers?

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 8>I saw it doesn't handle it really classically because it's

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 8>very tempting and very easy to go on TV or

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 8>radio and say that no one's cared what Malcolm Temple's

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 8>had to say in six years. It's easy to say

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 8>that his two biggest legacies of the NBN and Snowy Highs,

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 8>are a colossal phase. It's really easy to say that

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 8>when Paul Keaton criticizes a labor party as front page

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 8>of the Australian, when Malcolm turn will criticize the Liberals,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 8>it's the third segment of the Sunday episode of a

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 8>middling TV show and a failing network.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 3>But good I'm Peter Dutton for not.

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 8>Raising any of those easy and rewarding points to make

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 8>on TV.

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good point, Sophie. The interview itself on

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Project, it was a bit weak. I thought it

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>was strange they would get Malcolm Turble. There's someone who

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is just essentially an activist. We're talking about activists the

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>media before. He is someone who has become one who

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of credibility and he's turned into this

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ball of hate. Just to sit there and not push

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>back at any of these suggestions and giggle like a

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>bunch of idiots.

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean is that good television for you?

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 10>Not really, Jack, but they are catering to their leftist audience.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 9>You could see the presenters on the program were absolutely

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 9>lapping it up and Malcolm term Will in my view,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 9>completely embarrassed and humiliated himself by showing how bitter and

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 9>twisted he has become.

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 10>But he's going to get these.

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 9>Softball interviews because he's giving the answers. He gave the

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 9>thug line that has been picked up by media all

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 9>around the country. That was what he wanted to do.

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 9>That's his modus operandi is to really attack the coalition.

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 9>And if you want someone to attack the coalition and

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 9>do it day in, day out, his number is on

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 9>speed dial with a large contingency of the leftist media

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 9>in Australia.

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well said, we're going to take a quick break,

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>but when we're back. How highly paid bureaucrats try to

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>use your money to learn how to speak to the media.

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back now to Queensland, where the Department of Health

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>has become embroiled in a cash for spin scandal. The

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Courier Mail reports Queensland Health hired agency to protect image

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>under LNP attack. A furious health miner Shannon Fentaman said

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>she had nothing to do with Queensland Health's controversial move

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to seek media training for executives, but then intervene to

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>axit after becoming aware The Courier Mail had asked questions.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>It was today revealed Queensland Health hired a communications agency

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to teach top bureaucrats how to protect the government's image

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>from L ANDP attack when parliamentary estimates hearing start this month.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Queensland Health allocated tens of thousands of dollars to engage

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Brisbane's communication agency Roland to deliver media training to its executives.

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Now let's bring the panel back in James. I've always

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>got an issue. I've got an issue for a few things.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the Palichet government when Anastasia Palichet was

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the Premier, made a reputation for itself hiring all these

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>spin doctors to about thirty at one point in her

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>office just to massage the messaging to batterway criticism. It's

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>very hard when you're a journalist in an under recent

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>source newsroom to do your journalism in these situations. Queensland

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>has had issues with hospital ramping, shortage of nurses all

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of these major issues which are impacting Queensland as lives.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Instead of fixing it or hiring consultants to help them

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>figuring it out, they're trying to hire people to spin

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it so that it doesn't look as bad.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, And with the Paloja thing, it's like, if you

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 8>hire the journalists, there's no one left to criticize your government.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they hire all the best. Yeah.

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 8>It's the interesting thing for me is that Australians tend

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 8>to have and it's probably good for our society that

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 8>they do, but they tend to have a real faith

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 8>in their institutions, in the public service. They think like

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 8>they're the boffins. They're doing their job, they're getting it done,

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 8>they're not really political. It's stories like this that really

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 8>chip away at that trust. And if people start to think,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 8>in a red hot example like this that the public

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 8>some bureaucrats are getting far too close to one side

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 8>of politics, that trickles down to a situation where if

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 8>people start to really not trust their institution, it's not

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 8>great for how the country is actually going to run.

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>You're right, there is a political element to it as well, Sophie,

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>because part of the brief was specifically to buffer LMP attax.

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But the LMPE tax are about changing policy, so it's

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a really weird area for bureaucrats bureaucrats to get into.

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But I guess i'd make the point all that money

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're spending on spin doctors, what about more frontline nurses,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what about improving facilities? To me, it just doesn't seem

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 1>like the right way to spend taxpayer dollars.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think you make a very good point there.

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 9>It doesn't wash well with the public when taxpayer funds

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 9>are being spent in excess. Some would argue on spin

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 9>doctors to make sure the government's messaging is put out

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 9>in a fashion that they want it to be put out.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 9>This is a government in Queensland that is really struggling

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 9>ahead of the upcoming October election. I believe they're clutching

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 9>at straws and they're trying to do anything to try

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 9>and reshape their appearance in the media, make sure that

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 9>they come off, you know, come out of this looking good,

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 9>and they're doing everything they can to do that. But

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 9>this was highly embarrassing for them to be caught doing

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 9>this and then have to say that, you know, they

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 9>will no longer be engaging spin doctors.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well said Network ten, maybe in the firing line

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>after a major corporate merger involving its parent company has

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>resulted in the need for billions of dollars and cuts.

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Umbrella reports Paramount bosses have earmarked close to three billion

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Australian dollars in cost savings following this week's announcement that

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Skydance Media will acquire Paramount's owner, National Amusements and merge

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with sky Dance with Paramount Global to form new Paramount.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Umbrella goes on to say that this puts Network ten

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in a precarious position, but sources within Network ten have

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>disputed the more severe doom and gloom rumors. Now let's

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>bring the panel back in New Paramount. First of all,

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what a day, What a creative for a

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>company Network ten. It's the project. Obviously, all broadcasters are

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>struggling with transitioning from the traditional linear model to a

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>digital model, but this in particular seems to be the

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>weakest of I guess the three major free to airs.

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 3>How do you think this is going to play out?

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 8>Primarily, it's going to play out poorly for Malcolm Turnbull

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 8>because that listed it's just shrinking by the day. But yeah,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, as you say, the Channel ten is not

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 8>the only freedoware channel under a bit of pressure right now,

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 8>and certainly it's not the first time we've heard the

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 8>Channel ten's on its last day, so we'll see what

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 8>plays out here. But yeah, you raise a good point.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I cannot remember the last time I sat

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 8>down and watched freeware television at all. And I can't

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 8>remember the last time a show that was on seven,

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 8>nine or ten captured the imaginations of my friends or

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 8>anyone younger than me. I just I struggle to see

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 8>in thirty years time, if there is any freeware channels

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 8>at all.

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 3>It'll be interesting. Sophie else worth your.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 9>Thoughts, really, James makes very good points there that there

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 9>is a major overhaul in the way people consume their content. Obviously,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 9>streaming is taking eyeballs off linear freedomware TV, and this

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 9>is the real challenge.

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 10>So the juries out on whether the commercial.

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 9>Networks can sustain this surge in people turning to streamers.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 9>But we know for a long time Channel ten has

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 9>been struggling, and this isn't foreign to many media companies

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 9>at the moment, both here in Australia and globally.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think where Channel ten might actually get

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>into a bit of trouble is if they decide to

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>act some of the rights and the licenses such as

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>The Simpsons or other programs that they aren't necessarily producing

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>here but they're leveraging here for quite financial gain for

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>paramount plus the streaming service, or do they get rid

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>of it. That's something that could end up hurting the

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 1>bottom dollar and leading to more job losses. But look,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to stories of the week, James, what

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>do you have for me?

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So the thing with politicians is they tend to

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 8>be extremely we people, abnormal and just odd strange people.

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>And the reason like and they don't journalists though, yeah,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 3>to be fair, but.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 4>They don't like that.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 8>And they tried to do the social media stunts in

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 8>which they look cool. And I've just got a couple

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 8>of examples of just why they should just embrace the

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 8>fact that they're not normal people. So starting off with

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 8>Stephen Mars this week, who wanted to make a big

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 8>announcement about car registration over in Queensland. The music is fantastic,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 8>so for people not aware that is from the Fast

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 8>and Furious movie franchise. Steve mill is not a cast

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 8>member of it. I don't know how many media advisors

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 8>have stayed on since Palage lost, but.

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that might be. He's the one that would

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 3>always post photos in the gym, wouldn't he? I mean

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 3>sees himself.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 8>I mean he is a big guy, but like still

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 8>not what you wanted a leader. But as if not

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 8>to be outdone, I just want to show you just

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 8>into Alan Victoria Premier today and how she wanted to

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 8>announce her big housing policy.

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 10>We are going to need to get a much big

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 10>out stamp.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Just put out a press release.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what they think building houses is. They're like done it,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs of our mission complete to the Andrews government lives on.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy, That's brilliant. Sophie Elsewhere Story of the week.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 3>What do you have for us?

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, importantly, Jacket's The Australian's sixtieth anniversary on Monday July fifteenth.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 9>There's obviously the Sky News exclusive documentary that will air

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 9>at eight pm on Monday night, and we also have

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 9>a weekend magazine coming out in Saturday's Weekend Australian featuring

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 9>some of the biggest movers and shakers over the last

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 9>sixty years, so very historical time journalism, very important for

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 9>the Australian, so make sure you tune in and read

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 9>The Australian across the weekend.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll definitely be tuning in. I mean, what a brilliant paper.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Some of the stories that you've been involved in, the

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Headley Thomas investigations that have made headlines around the world.

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely brilliant paper. Sophie Elsworth, James Bolt, thank you so

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining me. That's all the time we have

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>for tonight, but up next is Lefti's losing it.