Speaker 1: On Scolds Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Wider Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Reader Panny Show. Coming
Speaker 3: up tonight, the Prime Minister's under fire for sitting down
Speaker 3: for an in depth interview with a reality star with
Speaker 3: virulently anti Israel, anti Australia de views professor and Plymer
Speaker 3: will join me to fact check Climate change Minister Chris
Speaker 3: Bowen's latest claims. We'll have the latest from the US,
Speaker 3: including the Trump administration's pledge to dismantle anwah.
Speaker 1: Josh Hammer will join me after the break, and later.
Speaker 3: In the hour, Kinsey Schofield We'll be here to explain
Speaker 3: why Greg Gottfeld is out rating each and every big
Speaker 3: star on late night TV and we never neglect left
Speaker 3: He's losing it tonight featuring freshly sacked MSNBC anchor Joy Read.
Speaker 4: Particularly Mail wait tears, really wait tiers in general, because
Speaker 4: that's what Carerot's are right their care now, ad Ministerota
Speaker 4: get CODs b waterworks.
Speaker 1: But first.
Speaker 3: The Coalition has achieved its biggest lead in the poll
Speaker 3: since the last election, pulling ahead of Labor in the
Speaker 3: latest Freshwater Strategy poll. The Australian Financial Review reports the
Speaker 3: Coalition now leads Labor fifty two to forty eight percent.
Speaker 3: That represents a four point one percent swing away from
Speaker 3: Labor since the twenty twenty two election, and it could
Speaker 3: mark a turning point for the coalition as the party
Speaker 3: also holds double digit leads over Labor on key issues
Speaker 3: including cost of living, economic management and crime.
Speaker 1: On their current trajectory.
Speaker 3: It's possible that the Coalition could form a majority government,
Speaker 3: but Labor still has some good news. Anthony Alberanizi is
Speaker 3: a head of Peter Dutton as p therred Prime minister
Speaker 3: forty five to forty three percent. Let's bring in the
Speaker 3: deputy executive director at the Institute of Public Affairs, Dan Wild. Now, Dan,
Speaker 3: the coalition is close, but if the election result mirrored
Speaker 3: that poll, well they wouldn't get a majority. We're going
Speaker 3: to look at a labor minority government.
Speaker 5: Well that's right, but I think you'd rather be in
Speaker 5: the coalition camp than the labor camp at the moment.
Speaker 5: You know, people have sort of made up their minds
Speaker 5: about Labor that Labor doesn't deserve a second term because
Speaker 5: they haven't delivered for Australians alls they did to spend
Speaker 5: half a billion dollars in half their first term in
Speaker 5: Parliament on a Voice to Parliament to divide us by race,
Speaker 5: which was rejected by sixty percent of Australians and also
Speaker 5: a significant share of Labor voters. And things have only
Speaker 5: gotten worse since then. And I think that Australians are
Speaker 5: also looking at Peter Dutton because he supports australiat A.
Speaker 5: He's been very strong on the Australian flag and other
Speaker 5: key cultural issues and they see somebody who is going
Speaker 5: to stand up for Australian values. So you know, I
Speaker 5: think things are only going to get worse for Labor.
Speaker 5: Anthony Abernezi historically has not been a strong campaigner. We
Speaker 5: saw that in twenty twenty two when Labour actually did
Speaker 5: the best in the campaign when they said that Anthony
Speaker 5: Abernezi had COVID and they took him off the campaign
Speaker 5: town and maybe he had remember that, I don't know,
Speaker 5: but he was lying in bed and you know the
Speaker 5: polls were going up for Labor when he was lying
Speaker 5: in bed, So you know, not a great campaigner.
Speaker 1: No, I do remember that.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 3: I don't know what excuse they can use this time.
Speaker 3: Perhaps will be busy planning his wedding, or maybe about
Speaker 3: of influenza.
Speaker 1: Will wait and see. But the Prime Minister did.
Speaker 3: Make time in his very busy schedule last week to
Speaker 3: sit down with extreme left hysteric Abbi Chatfield for a
Speaker 3: lengthy interview. This wasn't some five minute phone in chat
Speaker 3: He went on for about nineteen minutes. And Chatfield is
Speaker 3: a dad so intolerant that she has boasted about unfollowing
Speaker 3: friends who hold any sort of gathering or party on
Speaker 3: Australia Day, even if they call it Invasion Day.
Speaker 1: So this is the sort of character we're talking about.
Speaker 3: She's also banded pro Israel people from her platform while
Speaker 3: hosting those who promote all sorts of ugly lies and
Speaker 3: hate towards the only Jewish state. Why is the Prime
Speaker 3: Minister coosing up to a character like.
Speaker 5: This, Well, he wanted a softball interview, you know that
Speaker 5: sort of shows him in some kind of normal setting
Speaker 5: would be the thinking. I mean, I think most I
Speaker 5: didn't watch all of the ninety minutes. It was just
Speaker 5: I mean, I don't know anyone who can get through that,
Speaker 5: to be honest, But the parts I did watch were
Speaker 5: obviously scripted. It wasn't sort of this free wheeling, you know,
Speaker 5: interview like Trump had with Joe Rogan for example, or
Speaker 5: Jadie Vance for that matter, where there was no scripting
Speaker 5: the you know, you could tell that Albin Easy had
Speaker 5: the questions in advance.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 5: It just kind of shows also the kind of people
Speaker 5: he hangs out with, people that don't like Australia, you know,
Speaker 5: that don't support Australia day. This is a long running
Speaker 5: theme of this Prime minister in this government. So look,
Speaker 5: it's hardly surprising that he's talking to these sort of
Speaker 5: pseudo you know, pseudo celebrities on social media who don't
Speaker 5: really speak to the mainstream. Again, Anthony Abnez, he only
Speaker 5: ever speaks to the activist class. He's never spoken to
Speaker 5: mainstream Australians because he doesn't understand mainstream Australian values.
Speaker 3: But he tells us he's governing for the mainstream. Because
Speaker 3: I remember in the election campaign last time around, even
Speaker 3: when he got elected, we kept hearing that he's not
Speaker 3: some woke, far.
Speaker 1: Left ideal loge.
Speaker 3: Remember that famous front page I'm not woke, telling everybody, no, no,
Speaker 3: I'm all about mainstream Australian values.
Speaker 1: And then he.
Speaker 3: Thrust the voice upon US and now this he is
Speaker 3: closing up to people who are very far from mainstream
Speaker 3: Australian values.
Speaker 1: Now, Opposition leader Peter Dutton has.
Speaker 3: A pledge to splurge even more than Labor on Medicare.
Speaker 3: Labor announced a eight point five billion dollar Medicare funding
Speaker 3: package yesterday. Peter Dutton has immediately returned fire. He's pledging
Speaker 3: nine billion, and neither policy dan.
Speaker 1: Appears to be fully costed.
Speaker 3: And I do wonder if this does undermine the coalition's
Speaker 3: pledge to be fiscally responsible, to be different from Labor.
Speaker 3: How can we expect them not to blow up the
Speaker 3: budget if they're spending billions like this.
Speaker 5: Willy nilly, Yeah, I think Peter Dunton recently has said
Speaker 5: that the cutting of public servants would say about six
Speaker 5: billion a year and that presumably would help pay for
Speaker 5: this commitment. So you know, we'll see if that transpires
Speaker 5: in terms of the cutting of thirty one thousand bureaucratic
Speaker 5: penpushes in Canberra, which is a very good idea, you know,
Speaker 5: in terms of the broader issue here well, obviously Anthony
Speaker 5: Albereze's trying to do Mediscare two point zero, which worked
Speaker 5: in twenty sixteen in a political sense for two reasons.
Speaker 5: One is that it was sort of believable to a
Speaker 5: lot of people that Malcolm Turnble would privatize and sell
Speaker 5: off Medicare, which wasn't a fair claim, but a lot
Speaker 5: of people believed it. And secondly, it wasn't actually rebutted
Speaker 5: by Malcolm Turnbull all the Liberals at the time, so
Speaker 5: obviously Peter Dutton's not going to let that happen again.
Speaker 5: And I think it also shows how desperate labor is.
Speaker 5: Elections are about two things. What if you've done for
Speaker 5: me lately and what are you going to do for
Speaker 5: me next? If Labor is reaching into the bottom drawer
Speaker 5: to pull out another scare campaign about Medicare and that's
Speaker 5: all they've got, then I think they're toast.
Speaker 3: Now let's talk about the ABC that don't seem to
Speaker 3: be fearful about any cuts at all, the Department of
Speaker 3: Government Efficiency. I wonder if they're going to have a
Speaker 3: look at the ABC billion plus we give them every
Speaker 3: single year to churn out leftist activist nonsense, including attacks
Speaker 3: against the US Doge. Their Department of Government said the
Speaker 3: ABC is just parroting Democrat talking points with hit pieces
Speaker 3: like this. This one says, as Elon Musk and Doge
Speaker 3: get to work, there is concern that they're slash and
Speaker 3: burn approach will have unwanted consequences. Just ask Megan, us
Speaker 3: AID employee who got one of the billionaires dreaded emails
Speaker 3: that was on X And they've done several articles and
Speaker 3: I guess, Dan, I shouldn't be surprised that we've got
Speaker 3: a taxpayer funded leftist activist organization defending another taxpayer funded
Speaker 3: leftist activist organization.
Speaker 5: Yeah, imagine shock horror getting an email. I mean, wow,
Speaker 5: you know, something to be dreaded. You know, it just
Speaker 5: shows the mentality. It really shows the mentality. Not allowed
Speaker 5: us send emails to people now because they might be
Speaker 5: offended by it. Look, the reality is Australia needs a
Speaker 5: bit of a taste of the of the Doge and
Speaker 5: done in a way that's consistent with Australian policies. You know,
Speaker 5: you're not just going to transplant something that works in
Speaker 5: a and bring it straight here. But you know, Senator
Speaker 5: just Enter Price has been made head of Government Efficiency.
Speaker 5: If the Coalition informs government and we need a more
Speaker 5: efficient government, there's a lot of waste. We just talked
Speaker 5: to before about the public servants. But you know, I reckon,
Speaker 5: if you went through the grant programs, all of the
Speaker 5: woke grant programs that are spent on transgenderism and whatever
Speaker 5: else there is, that all needs to be cut and
Speaker 5: we should go through the bureaucracy and see, well, you know,
Speaker 5: where is the waste, Where can we reduce it to
Speaker 5: get a better return for taxpayers. And you know, clearly
Speaker 5: Elon Musk has gone in there and had a good
Speaker 5: look at the waste that's there and cut back on
Speaker 5: billions and billions of dollars. And Trump has said, well
Speaker 5: some of that's going to be returned back to the
Speaker 5: American people as tax cuts. Now, if we could do
Speaker 5: that here, I think that's.
Speaker 3: A very good thing, absolutely, And I wonder what sort
Speaker 3: of programs we're funding. You look at all the crazy
Speaker 3: expended chain USAID that's been revealed. Just so much money
Speaker 3: go into these ngo, these activist organizations who are pushing
Speaker 3: this far left lunacy. It's not grassroots, it's not organic.
Speaker 3: It's all funded by taxpayer dollars and then pushing things
Speaker 3: that majority of taxpayers don't want. Labour's been accused of
Speaker 3: a mass vote buying scheme amid revelations that they ordered
Speaker 3: twenty five additional citizenship ceremonies to be held, mainly in
Speaker 3: Western Sydney seats. Around thirteen thousand people have become citizens
Speaker 3: through this. Labor claims that these extra ceremonies were scheduled
Speaker 3: to a backlog. They were trying to clear this backlog.
Speaker 3: But we spoke to the Fairfield Mayor, Frank Carbone yesterday
Speaker 3: on Outsiders and his local government area was targeted with
Speaker 3: these additional citizenship ceremonies.
Speaker 1: He said there was no backlog.
Speaker 7: The AEC, which is Australian Litical Commission, informed us that
Speaker 7: we actually didn't have a baitlog.
Speaker 6: If there was a backlog, let us know, we will
Speaker 6: put more on.
Speaker 7: But somehow magically thousands of people have appeared. And it's
Speaker 7: my guest that the Home Affairs Minister or his department
Speaker 7: has asked the AEC to fast track.
Speaker 6: Some citizenship.
Speaker 7: People that receive a citizenship and hasn't told the councils.
Speaker 1: Very curious, Stan, what do you think is going on here?
Speaker 5: Well, it's pretty obvious it's all political, and you know
Speaker 5: this has been the point that we've been making with
Speaker 5: the government's policies. As it pertains to those you know
Speaker 5: in Western Sydney that the migration policy is being driven
Speaker 5: by votes, not by Australian values, not by what's in
Speaker 5: our national interests. The migration program has been a total
Speaker 5: disaster from day one under this government. Something like one
Speaker 5: point four million on a net basis have been brought
Speaker 5: into this country and that's why we're getting poorer. Mass
Speaker 5: migration is making Australians poorer. We've had seven consecutive orders
Speaker 5: of negative per capita growth, which is the longest aclient
Speaker 5: to living standards since Whitlam. And now they're just putting
Speaker 5: more people in without any plan for housing or infrastructure
Speaker 5: or social services that we all rely upon. Now we
Speaker 5: want to be a nation that can welcome migrants. Of
Speaker 5: course that's been the case since the end of World
Speaker 5: War Two, but everybody knows it needs to be planned for.
Speaker 5: You've got to have the infrastructure in first before you
Speaker 5: start bringing people in. And now this is just obviously
Speaker 5: a vote buying scheme by Labor and I think most
Speaker 5: Australians will look at that with a ghast and say,
Speaker 5: we need to have a properly managed migration system, not
Speaker 5: one that's based on winning votes.
Speaker 3: And we're talking here about thousands of new voters, and
Speaker 3: if they skew a certain way, that could decide certain
Speaker 3: seats with small margins. And they are expecting a swing
Speaker 3: against labor in those Western Sydney seats, so it is
Speaker 3: a big issue. Before you go, I want to ask
Speaker 3: you about the elections in Germany. The Conservative Christian Democratic
Speaker 3: Union has won that election. They got twenty eight point
Speaker 3: six percent of the vote.
Speaker 1: They're expected to form a.
Speaker 3: Coalition with other right wing parties, but not the AfD,
Speaker 3: which saw huge gains in its share of the vote.
Speaker 3: They came in second place, record breaking twenty point eight
Speaker 3: percent for them. But I do wonder whether the exclusion
Speaker 3: of the AfD, which is all about shutting those borders
Speaker 3: having a.
Speaker 1: Orderly immigration process.
Speaker 3: I wonder if not including them in the coalition is
Speaker 3: going to mean that we're just going to see more
Speaker 3: of the same in Germany.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I think it's strange that you wouldn't have the
Speaker 5: second the party with the second largest vote share have
Speaker 5: the opportunity to form government in coalition. And I say
Speaker 5: that regardless of the political leanings of the party, you know,
Speaker 5: and I think we've seen this with gert Wielders in
Speaker 5: the Netherlands up until recently, and also Marine le Pen
Speaker 5: in France, which is, if you exclude you know, parties
Speaker 5: from governing that have significant shares of the vote, then
Speaker 5: you are going to anger people and show it reinforces
Speaker 5: the message of these populist parties that regular people are
Speaker 5: being ignored and neglected by the political establishment. So if
Speaker 5: you're a part of the establishment and you're concerned about
Speaker 5: the rise of populism, the best thing you can do
Speaker 5: is to include people in a governing coalition, not exclude them.
Speaker 5: So yeah, sure you'll keep them out of government for
Speaker 5: a few years, but I think it only strengthens the
Speaker 5: hand that many of these populous insurgencies have. And again
Speaker 5: it's going to anger a lot of people who have
Speaker 5: voted for these parties that say, this just proves the
Speaker 5: point people who are in power don't care about us.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, it's an overwhelming result for right leaning parties. And
Speaker 3: yet if you're going to have a coalition that's going
Speaker 3: to keep pushing leftist policies, you wonder about the state
Speaker 3: of democracy in a country like Germany and That's precisely
Speaker 3: what Vice President jd Vance was talking about during that
Speaker 3: groundbreaking speech about the elites almost disregarding what the people
Speaker 3: want and doing as they wish regardless of the election results.
Speaker 1: Dan Wild, thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 1: Joining me now is.
Speaker 3: A esteem geologist and author, Professor Ian Plymer, Professor Energy
Speaker 3: and climate change. Minister Chris Bowen is added again on
Speaker 3: social media. I don't know he thinks he's some sort
Speaker 3: of an instant influencer these days.
Speaker 1: Let's have a look at his latest offering.
Speaker 2: So Peter Dutton reckons we need nuclear to make more
Speaker 2: electricity for things like AI and alminium smelters. But his
Speaker 2: own policy documents show that nuclear would create forty percent
Speaker 2: less electricity for Australia.
Speaker 6: Got it?
Speaker 3: Nuclear will generate less electricity than renewables.
Speaker 1: Ian is there a flaw in that claim?
Speaker 6: Well, mister Bowen is wrong.
Speaker 8: There is a major flaw in his argument. We have
Speaker 8: thirty two countries that use nuclear power. We have nineteen
Speaker 8: of the twenty G twenty countries that have nuclear power.
Speaker 8: We're the only one that does it. The G seven countries,
Speaker 8: all of them have nuclear power. We've had a nuclear
Speaker 8: reactor in Australia since the late nineteen fifties, and the
Speaker 8: first reactor, the High Fi Reactor, operated from nineteen fifty
Speaker 8: eight to two thousand and seven when it was retired.
Speaker 8: Our second reactor, the Opal reactor, is still going now.
Speaker 8: We have a nuclear industry already and our nuclear power
Speaker 8: station provides medicines for people who might be suffering from cancer.
Speaker 8: But if we look around the world, we see that
Speaker 8: there are many countries much smaller than us, like Slow
Speaker 8: only two.
Speaker 9: Million people, they've got nuclear power, Finland five and a
Speaker 9: half million people, they've got nuclear power, Hungry, smaller than thus, Belgium, Israel,
Speaker 9: the Netherlands are media.
Speaker 6: They're all smaller than us and they have nuclear power.
Speaker 8: Spain has more people, but its economies less than ours,
Speaker 8: and they have nuclear power.
Speaker 6: So mister Bowen should actually give you facts right now.
Speaker 3: The labor government in Wa has said that mining giant
Speaker 3: Fordescue Owes between five and ten million dollars in compensation
Speaker 3: for damaging two hundred and forty nine indigenous cultural heritage
Speaker 3: sites during the construction of the Solomon or Iron ore
Speaker 3: mine in the Pilbra. The local people there are fighting
Speaker 3: a Landmark one point eight billion dollars in compensation in
Speaker 3: their federal court case against Fortescue in What else can
Speaker 3: you tell us about this case?
Speaker 6: Well, this is a can of worms.
Speaker 8: We have mining companies that pay royalties, they pay taxes,
Speaker 8: the employees pay taxes, they pay company tax and on
Speaker 8: top of that, you've got another impost and that is
Speaker 8: so called compensation to Aboriginal people. And this becomes fairly onerous.
Speaker 8: The rules are very flexible. It just depends upon whether
Speaker 8: the Aboriginal population can see that there's a gold mine
Speaker 8: there of money that they can extract from you.
Speaker 6: So I'm fairly.
Speaker 8: Dubious about some of the claims that are made because
Speaker 8: we already have very very strict environmental regulations which are
Speaker 8: checked all the way through a process, and we have
Speaker 8: massive royalties that are paid, and yet there's another impost
Speaker 8: that comes on to us.
Speaker 6: So I'm always quite skeptical of these sort of claims.
Speaker 3: Well, we'll watch this case and we'll bring you the
Speaker 3: latest as it happens.
Speaker 1: Before you go.
Speaker 3: So, the Trump administration is looking to develop an LNG
Speaker 3: project in Alaska so you can export gas to its
Speaker 3: allies in Asia.
Speaker 1: This is an effort to.
Speaker 3: Revitalize the US fossil fuel investment in Asia. Donald Trump
Speaker 3: revived this decade's old proposal.
Speaker 1: In his talks with the Japanese Prime Minister.
Speaker 3: Who reported he told Donald Trump that he hoped Japan
Speaker 3: could participate in this sixty nine billion dollar project. And
Speaker 3: this is again just more evidence of the US pressing
Speaker 3: ahead with its fossil fuel projects and not just becoming
Speaker 3: energy independent, but becoming an energy superpower.
Speaker 6: Well, that's quite right. Alastica does have a lot of
Speaker 6: oil and gas.
Speaker 8: It's basically unexploited, and we in Australia export.
Speaker 6: A lot of gas around the world, a lot of
Speaker 6: it to Japan.
Speaker 8: So because we're not active, what it means is that
Speaker 8: the Americans are going to take our markets from us.
Speaker 8: They're also going to take markets from other big gas
Speaker 8: suppliers like Kawait. So we're sitting back while Rome's burning.
Speaker 8: We should be aggressively out there marketing.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 6: We've burnt our bridges some time ago with the Japanese.
Speaker 8: With the green tape, the red tape, the black tape,
Speaker 8: and the UN's blue tape, and what that means is
Speaker 8: that we are now an insecure supplier and the Japanese,
Speaker 8: of course, would look elsewhere to get a supplier that
Speaker 8: is more secure.
Speaker 6: So this is bad news for Australia. It's an own goal.
Speaker 6: State and federal governments have done this to US.
Speaker 3: Professor and Plymer, It's always a pleasure. Thanks for your
Speaker 3: time tonight.
Speaker 6: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Still to come. Lefties losing it plus.
Speaker 3: The latest from the US, including the Trump administration's about
Speaker 3: to dismantle ANWA. Josh Hammer is up next. Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for lefties losing it. Let's start lefties
Speaker 3: with my favorite moment over the weekend where.
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump called out the far left main governor Janet.
Speaker 3: Mills who's refusing to abide by federal laws and protect
Speaker 3: women's sport from male bodies. Grab the popcorn and enjoy
Speaker 3: this exchange.
Speaker 11: Is the mean here the governor of Man, Are you
Speaker 11: not going to comply with it? Well, we are the
Speaker 11: federal law. Well you better do it.
Speaker 1: You better do it.
Speaker 11: Because you're not going to get any federal funding at
Speaker 11: all if you don't. And by the way, your population,
Speaker 11: even though it's somewhat liberal or law, I did very
Speaker 11: well there. Your population doesn't want men playing in women's sports.
Speaker 11: So you better, you better comply because otherwise you're not
Speaker 11: getting any federal funding every state.
Speaker 8: Good.
Speaker 11: I'll see you good.
Speaker 1: I look forward to that.
Speaker 11: That should be a really easy one. And enjoy your
Speaker 11: life after governor, because I don't think you'll be an
Speaker 11: elected politics.
Speaker 1: Oh oh, doesn't she look mad there?
Speaker 3: Imagine being so committed to allowing men to invade women's
Speaker 3: sport that you go to court over it, that you
Speaker 3: defy federal laws. What sort of extreme left simpleton would
Speaker 3: do something like that. Well, ladies and gentlemen, here's something
Speaker 3: the main governor prepared earlier.
Speaker 2: You can rone, but you know insing how to bottle mother.
Speaker 1: Grave, you'll deacon, I have no words for that.
Speaker 3: Let's check in with the former VEEP, the woman who
Speaker 3: was one geriatric heartbeat away from the presidency before she
Speaker 3: squandered billions to run the worst campaign possible and lose
Speaker 3: all seven swing states, apparently being a uniquely awful candidate.
Speaker 3: In titles Kamala to some sort of a participation award.
Speaker 1: I assume this is what this is. I'll have more
Speaker 1: of that later with Josh Hamer. But I know what
Speaker 1: you'll want to hear.
Speaker 3: You want one of those inspirational Kamala speeches. The woman's
Speaker 3: oratory skills are unmatched.
Speaker 10: And while we have no illusions about what we are
Speaker 10: up against in this chapter in our American story, this
Speaker 10: chapter will be written not simply by whoever occupies the
Speaker 10: Oval office, nor by the wealthiest among.
Speaker 3: Us, who should drop the various accents there and actually
Speaker 3: stuck to the script.
Speaker 1: That was a very un Kamela like performance.
Speaker 3: I've got a set's go to a more typical called
Speaker 3: Kamala speech. This is from last week. I know you
Speaker 3: miss her vacuous word salads.
Speaker 1: I miss them because then what do we have left?
Speaker 10: And the way that I see it also is that
Speaker 10: when we think about like these moments where we see
Speaker 10: things that are being taken.
Speaker 1: But also let's see it as you know it. Nature
Speaker 1: reports a vacuum. So where where there's a vacancy, then
Speaker 1: let's fell it.
Speaker 3: Yes, let's do that, Kamala. Let's do that right after
Speaker 3: Happy Hour is finished. Now, I have some depressing news
Speaker 3: for lefties losing at fans around the world. And this
Speaker 3: segment every single night gets millions of views online and
Speaker 3: regular fans would know that MSNBC anchor Joy Reid has
Speaker 3: been a rich, rich source of material for me, but
Speaker 3: alas today she was sacked.
Speaker 1: Where will I find content like this in America?
Speaker 4: There's a thing about both weight vigilantism and weight tears.
Speaker 1: Particularly male wit.
Speaker 4: Tears, really white tiers in general, because that's what karens
Speaker 4: are right. They're careen now and Minnesota get cards breeding waterworks.
Speaker 4: White men can get away with that too, and it
Speaker 4: has the same effect. Even as the right tries to
Speaker 4: politicize the idea that masculinity is being robbed for American
Speaker 4: men by multiculturalism and walkism, they still want to be
Speaker 4: able to have their tears.
Speaker 3: I really do hope she's now got more time to
Speaker 3: post on social media because I need that sort of content.
Speaker 3: This show doesn't put herself together.
Speaker 1: I need the lefties to lose it.
Speaker 3: And not only is Joy read a nasty extreme left
Speaker 3: race beta, but she's also stupendously stupid. Just listen to
Speaker 3: this analysis, if you can call it that, of Kamala
Speaker 3: Harris's election campaign.
Speaker 4: I mean, this really was an historic, flawlessly run campaign.
Speaker 4: She had Queen Latfa never endorses anyone.
Speaker 6: She came out.
Speaker 4: I mean, she had every prominent celebrity voice she had.
Speaker 4: She had the Taylor swiftish at the Swifties, she had
Speaker 4: the beehive like you could not have run a better
Speaker 4: campaign in that short period of time. And I think
Speaker 4: that's still true.
Speaker 3: Even the other MSNBC InCom poops looked embarrassed there. But
Speaker 3: I've got to say I'm genuinely shattered that she's been fired.
Speaker 3: I've just got my fingers crossed that the view give
Speaker 3: her a role and we will have plenty more lefties
Speaker 3: losing it with my next guess, But let's start with
Speaker 3: an antidote to all that lefty craziness. This is the
Speaker 3: VEEP Vice President jd Vance at CPAC with an important
Speaker 3: message for young men and this is as relevant in
Speaker 3: Australia as it is in the US and throughout the
Speaker 3: rest of the Western world.
Speaker 12: My message to young men is, don't allow this broken
Speaker 12: culture to send you a message that you're a bad
Speaker 12: person because you're a man, because you like to tell
Speaker 12: a joke, because you like to have a beer with
Speaker 12: your friends, or because you're competitive.
Speaker 13: It's our cultural message is I think that it wants
Speaker 13: to turn everybody into whether male or female, into androgynous.
Speaker 12: Idiots who think the same talk the same and act
Speaker 12: the same. We actually think God made male and female
Speaker 12: for a purpose, and we want you guys to thrive
Speaker 12: as young men and as young women, and we're going
Speaker 12: to help with our public policy to make it possible
Speaker 12: to do that.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is Newsweek's Senior editor at Large at
Speaker 3: Article three Projects Senior Council, Josh Hamma. Josh, is the
Speaker 3: era of demonizing men, demonizing masculinity as inherently toxic and undesirable?
Speaker 1: Is that era finally over?
Speaker 6: Rita?
Speaker 14: Do I know how I know that America is back
Speaker 14: is because we have a forty year old vice president
Speaker 14: of the United States who uses terms like androgynous idiots
Speaker 14: from the nation's largest conservative political gathering.
Speaker 6: There.
Speaker 14: I mean, I think that the the war on men
Speaker 14: is absolutely over.
Speaker 1: Jd.
Speaker 14: Vance is the perfect Vince President who tried to make
Speaker 14: manliness in America great again. This is someone who is
Speaker 14: forty years old, who comes from the Rust Belt. There
Speaker 14: he wrote about There's a great length in his best
Speaker 14: selling memoir He'll Billiology. He knows exactly what young men
Speaker 14: have been dealing with for the past twenty years. He
Speaker 14: also knows just how badly the Obama Biden Kamala Harris
Speaker 14: manifestation of the Democratic Party has commenced and waged a
Speaker 14: prolific and hideous war on men there because again, he
Speaker 14: has come a political age during this exact same cycle.
Speaker 14: So at this point in the year twenty twenty five,
Speaker 14: with Donald Trump as President jad Vance's vice president, I
Speaker 14: think we can definitively say that the war on men
Speaker 14: as we have seen here in America is over. That's
Speaker 14: not to say that it could not come back with
Speaker 14: a vengeance for eight years from now, god forbid. But
Speaker 14: for now, for now, Rita, from personal experience, I can
Speaker 14: tell you it's a pretty good time to be a
Speaker 14: man in America these days.
Speaker 1: Well, that's good to hear.
Speaker 3: Josh. Now, you wrote a fantastic pace for The Spectator
Speaker 3: on JD. Vance and that speech that put Europe on notice,
Speaker 3: made it clear that Europe's current priorities are no longer
Speaker 3: America's priorities. Tell me what you think will be the
Speaker 3: fallout from Well, that was really a Trump administration rebuke.
Speaker 1: JD.
Speaker 3: Vans may have delivered it, but that came straight from
Speaker 3: the Trump administration, and.
Speaker 1: It was it was a rebuke of the European elites.
Speaker 14: Yeah, and it directly flows from Donald Trump's foreign policy
Speaker 14: the first term too.
Speaker 1: So JD.
Speaker 14: Vance is a very articulate spokesman, and give him a
Speaker 14: lot of credit for being the forty year olds who
Speaker 14: goes there into the belly of the European Union beast
Speaker 14: in Germany and delivering this message. But you're totally right.
Speaker 14: This is bread and butter Trump administration policy, going back
Speaker 14: to the first time. You know, Donald Trump even the
Speaker 14: first time, rubbed a lot of European leads the wrong
Speaker 14: way for multiple reasons. One of those reasons that he
Speaker 14: basically was saying, you guys are not pulling your weight
Speaker 14: when it comes to spending your NATO treaty required percentage
Speaker 14: of gross domestic products on defense spending. There in meidentally
Speaker 14: read a funny how that works. After Donald Trump broke
Speaker 14: that third rail topic, you had the percentage of European
Speaker 14: countries that were actually doing exactly that basically double funny
Speaker 14: how that works. By the way, the media will not
Speaker 14: give Donald Trump credit for such things there. But what
Speaker 14: Jadevans basically said and again on behalf of administration, is
Speaker 14: that Europe You know what once upon a time America
Speaker 14: and Western Europe in particular, we were in lockstep back
Speaker 14: during the Cold War. We were fighting the Communists, we
Speaker 14: were finding the Soviets. There we shared a thing called values.
Speaker 14: But you know, at this point in the twenty twenties,
Speaker 14: do we actually share of the same values. I'm not
Speaker 14: entirely sure what the answer to.
Speaker 6: That question is.
Speaker 14: Maybe the Bien administration share of the same values as
Speaker 14: Emmanuel McCrone, as Olaf Shoals, and as various of these
Speaker 14: other European Union leagues there, but Donald Trump and Jady Vans,
Speaker 14: who care about national sovereignty, who care about realism in
Speaker 14: foreign relations, who care about things like free speech, maybe
Speaker 14: we don't actually share of the exact same value. So
Speaker 14: you know what, europe it's time to get with the
Speaker 14: program a little bit more. Or maybe you actually you
Speaker 14: guys who actually face the consequences. I think, reader, I
Speaker 14: think that much as with the NIDO spending, that the
Speaker 14: Europeans are actually going to get the message more than
Speaker 14: they are willing to admit. At the moments. I think
Speaker 14: that US European relations are going to be okay. But
Speaker 14: this is a message that they frankly desperately needed to.
Speaker 3: Hear absolutely, and their people may make the decision for them,
Speaker 3: because they have been pushing the sort of policies.
Speaker 1: That America doesn't mind.
Speaker 3: I would argue most Europeans don't want open borders, mad
Speaker 3: green policies that are absolutely crippling their economies and also
Speaker 3: suppressing free speech. But there is a backlash in much
Speaker 3: of Europe. Have seen it from Italy all the way
Speaker 3: to Sweden and Finland. So the people may decide for them.
Speaker 3: Now tell me about the last veep Kamala We thought
Speaker 3: we forgot about her, but no, she got an award.
Speaker 3: This was at a ceremony celebrating black excellence, and the
Speaker 3: former Vice President received the Chairman's Award, which is given
Speaker 3: an I quote here to individuals who excel in public
Speaker 3: service and leverage their unique platforms to ignite and drive
Speaker 3: meaningful change.
Speaker 1: Josh, exactly what.
Speaker 3: Meaningful change did she ignite and drive? Other than wasting
Speaker 3: I don't know. Two billion dollars to lose all seven
Speaker 3: swing states.
Speaker 1: Great question.
Speaker 14: I'm mine really sure that I could that I could
Speaker 14: tell you what exactly Kamala Harris did for I mean,
Speaker 14: you know, this is one of those kind of mealy
Speaker 14: mouthed boiler plate prizes that they're clearly just they want
Speaker 14: to give it to Kamala Harris because they want to
Speaker 14: try to make Kamala Harris relevant or keep her relevant.
Speaker 5: There.
Speaker 14: That's the only purpose of this, That is literally the
Speaker 14: only reason why the NAACP is giving her this award
Speaker 14: at this time is they are trying to keep her
Speaker 14: politically relevant because god forbid, she might actually run for
Speaker 14: president again if she is so delusional to do so
Speaker 14: in the year twenty twenty eight. There's nothing there. I mean,
Speaker 14: this is total gobbledego there, It's total gibberation. The woman
Speaker 14: was positively absolutely nothing as vice president of the United States. There,
Speaker 14: she was routinely ranked as one of the least popular,
Speaker 14: if not the single least popular vice president in all
Speaker 14: of modern American history. Her vice presidential office leaked like
Speaker 14: a sieve to Politiico, to the New York Times. There
Speaker 14: was it was extraordinarily leaky by all accounts. She was
Speaker 14: a horrific boss, by the way, people. That's the reason
Speaker 14: that they were leaking is because she treated everyone in
Speaker 14: that office like absolute crap.
Speaker 6: There.
Speaker 14: I can't name a single thing that she actually tangibly
Speaker 14: accomplished other than what you said, which that she wasted
Speaker 14: oodles and oodles and oodles of donors dollars. There many
Speaker 14: of those donors I think are still looking for a refund. Incently,
Speaker 14: I'm not sure they've gone that at this point.
Speaker 1: Good luck.
Speaker 3: Yeah, she was a uniquely terrible candidate, and to get
Speaker 3: this award, I'd hate to think who else was in
Speaker 3: the running for it. Now, we're going to speak about
Speaker 3: the shenanigans at MSNBASA shortly, but let's cover some serious stuff.
Speaker 3: Let's hear from the UN Ambassador, Elise Stephanick, Trump Administration's
Speaker 3: UN ambassador, vowing to dismantle UNWAH.
Speaker 15: And a top priority that I have worked on in
Speaker 15: Congress for years. President Trump defunded UNRA, the pro Hamas
Speaker 15: terrorist group that committed atrocities, on October seventh, And make
Speaker 15: no mistake, hear it now. As President Trump's United States
Speaker 15: Ambassador to the United Nations, we will not only defund UNRA,
Speaker 15: we will dismantle it.
Speaker 1: Josh.
Speaker 3: Our governments give millions to ANOA despite serious doubts about
Speaker 3: what they were doing where that money was going.
Speaker 1: Hamasa's involvement.
Speaker 3: The US is finally bringing some accountability to this body
Speaker 3: and hopefully to the rest.
Speaker 1: Of the un.
Speaker 14: You know, the Trump administration the first time around defunded UNRAH,
Speaker 14: UNESCO multiple of these not just anti Semitic, but frankly
Speaker 14: just anti American, anti wa stern civilization un bodies there.
Speaker 14: The Biden administration, with Biden and Kamala Harris, of course
Speaker 14: then fully refunded them again. But what at least Defaniga
Speaker 14: is saying here, she's taking even further Rida. She's saying
Speaker 14: that we're not merely going to defund UNRA again, We're
Speaker 14: actually going to try to annihilate it. Top the bomb there.
Speaker 14: That would be a monumental accomplishment if she is able
Speaker 14: to do that for one very simple reason, which is
Speaker 14: that UNRA is one of the reasons why we are
Speaker 14: still in this mess in terms of the Israeli Palestinian
Speaker 14: conflict in the first place, after seventy seven years since
Speaker 14: Israel's declared independence. What I mean by that is because
Speaker 14: then I'll be I'll just say say it's briefly here.
Speaker 14: UNRA uses a different definition is very very very solibn
Speaker 14: important point. They use a different definition of the word
Speaker 14: refugee than the United Nations Agency, the Nine Nations for
Speaker 14: High commission refugees for any other population in the world. Typically,
Speaker 14: under international law, a refugee is just you as an individual.
Speaker 14: If you were displaced from a war zone, you are
Speaker 14: a refugee, but your children born wherever you are exiled
Speaker 14: to they are citizens then of that country. UNRA, that's
Speaker 14: not how it operates under unra's definition of refugee. That
Speaker 14: status carries intergenerational down the chain. There, So people who
Speaker 14: have no connection whatsoever to the nineteen forty eight conflict,
Speaker 14: there's still refugees here. The reason for that riata is
Speaker 14: to perpetuate this conflict and to make the Palestinian Arabs
Speaker 14: think that they have a chance of ultimately erratickaing the
Speaker 14: Israel is the so called rate of return fallacy there
Speaker 14: So the whole thing is croped top to bottom there.
Speaker 14: I wished, at least if i'd the best of luck
Speaker 14: and getting read in this garbage.
Speaker 3: Like you said, it's a monumental task, but I think
Speaker 3: she's a cool to it. And one of the issues
Speaker 3: I've got with the UN, one of the things they
Speaker 3: rarely speak about, including the UN Human Rights Council, is
Speaker 3: the persecution of Christians. And this next story is particularly disturbing,
Speaker 3: seventy Christians have been beheaded by Islamist militants in the
Speaker 3: Democratic Republic of Congo. The seventy Christians were rounded up
Speaker 3: by these Islamist terrorists, held hostage in a small Christian
Speaker 3: church where they were tied up, and all seventy were
Speaker 3: be headed. According to Open Doors, which monitors Christian persecution
Speaker 3: around the world, Josh, the group responsible is affiliated with
Speaker 3: Islamic State and sadly these horrific incidents are not all
Speaker 3: that rare in parts of Africa. Open Doors reports on
Speaker 3: this on a regular basis, and it makes for absolutely
Speaker 3: horrific reading.
Speaker 14: Absolutely horrific reading. Indeed, I couldn't believe this headline when
Speaker 14: I saw it. It's just appalling. It's just absolutely positively appalling. There.
Speaker 14: You typically see these sorts of stories, sometimes in Egypt
Speaker 14: with the Copter Christian community, when it comes to Muslim
Speaker 14: brotherhood affiliates. Sometimes you see it in Nigeria with Boko Haram.
Speaker 14: The Congo is somewhat of a plotch whist. The Muslim
Speaker 14: population of the Congo read I locked this up, is
Speaker 14: approximately one point five percent, so that's not exactly high there. Clearly,
Speaker 14: this ice is a film group is punching far above
Speaker 14: its weave there. But it's just another reminder, as if
Speaker 14: we needed it, that radical Islam continues to be a
Speaker 14: genuinely lethal threat for not for Jews and Christians all
Speaker 14: throughout the world. I mean, whether or not we're in
Speaker 14: the West, whether or not we're in the Southern Hemisphere,
Speaker 14: Western Hemisphere, no matter what it is, radical Islam remains
Speaker 14: a terrible threat. Fortunately, we have a commander in Chief
Speaker 14: from the United States, Donald Trump, were things very soberly
Speaker 14: and clearly sees that threat for what it is. I'm
Speaker 14: not entirely sure our European partners do there, but you know,
Speaker 14: certainly the good folks in Africa need all the help
Speaker 14: they can get. I'm not sure that they're going to
Speaker 14: get it though, tragically from the United Nations anytime soon.
Speaker 1: Before you go.
Speaker 3: Josha Joy Reid, and I've got to say, she's been
Speaker 3: one of my favorite lefties losing it and my favorite.
Speaker 3: I mean, she gives me so much material just I
Speaker 3: could do a segment on her almost daily. She's now
Speaker 3: been sacked by low rating MSNBC, and there are rumors
Speaker 3: that Biden's former White House spokesperson Jensaki could be replaced
Speaker 3: seeing her, What can you.
Speaker 1: Tell us about this move?
Speaker 3: She absolutely has been a stand at I'm gonna say,
Speaker 3: joy raid some of this stuff she has said on
Speaker 3: air beggars belief, Yeah, joyless.
Speaker 14: Joy Read is one of my old childhood friends.
Speaker 1: Likes to refer to her.
Speaker 14: You know, it's funny Joylas's. Joy Reid was actually basically
Speaker 14: a free infomercial every night reader for us at the
Speaker 14: Article three Project because she would she makes my Article
Speaker 14: three Project colleague Mike Davis out to be the rast
Speaker 14: food in here in America there was. It was truly
Speaker 14: just free advertising. So, frankly, from our organizational perspective, I'm
Speaker 14: just genuinely sad to see her ago. I'm also sad
Speaker 14: to see her go for the reason that you alluded to,
Speaker 14: which is that this woman was just so positively unhinged.
Speaker 14: You never knew exactly what she was going to say next,
Speaker 14: but you knew that it was going to be completely lunatic,
Speaker 14: backcrap crazy there. I suspect that Jensaki is going to
Speaker 14: be liberal obviously, but not quite as over the top hyperbolic,
Speaker 14: playing the race card every night, all this stuff there,
Speaker 14: So unfortunately, I think it's going to be a little
Speaker 14: bit less entertaining to heat watch, so to speak. There,
Speaker 14: But you know, hopefully Joyless will resurface somewhere across the
Speaker 14: intwels because I can't wait to tune into her next
Speaker 14: unhinged minologu wherever that may be.
Speaker 3: Well, I hope she saved some venom for MSNBC, particularly
Speaker 3: if they replace her with a white woman, because if
Speaker 3: you listen to Joy's monologues, that is a sign of racism,
Speaker 3: mistitutional racism. So I hope we're going to just get
Speaker 3: all the dirty laundry ed everything that's been going on
Speaker 3: behind the scenes at MSNBC. I look forward to hearing
Speaker 3: about it. Josh Hammer, thanks for your time tonight.
Speaker 14: Thank you reader.
Speaker 1: Still to come.
Speaker 3: Why Greg Guttfeld is outrating each and every star on
Speaker 3: late night TV?
Speaker 1: Kinsisco Field has the details.
Speaker 3: You're watching the Rita Patty Show and joining me now
Speaker 3: is celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey Schofield. Now will bring
Speaker 3: you the latest on Elon Musk's alleged thirteen childs. Shortly,
Speaker 3: but first, to the plummeting popularity of The Jinger and
Speaker 3: the Winter, otherwise known as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Speaker 3: This polling from you gov has revealed Kinsey just how
Speaker 3: hated the couple has become.
Speaker 1: There's no other word for it.
Speaker 3: Their disapproval rating has soared with each controversy.
Speaker 16: It's amazing, isn't it. And you know Meghan's getting ready
Speaker 16: to launch a new show, so I highly doubt this
Speaker 16: is the type of press she's warning right now. It's
Speaker 16: interesting there is a new Page six article where one
Speaker 16: TV in Soda claims Meghan doesn't claim to be perfect.
Speaker 16: That's what the gist of the show is. She's just
Speaker 16: having fun, and I'd argue that that's completely an accurate reader.
Speaker 16: I've never seen this woman take accountability for anything. That
Speaker 16: to me is the definition of claiming to be perfect.
Speaker 16: And that's one of the reasons why we don't like
Speaker 16: the Sussexes. They never take accountability, they're not always truthful
Speaker 16: in their accusations, and they just take themselves way too
Speaker 16: seriously and it's always rules for the and not for me.
Speaker 3: Let's talk about Megan Markle's attempt at rebranding her product line.
Speaker 1: She's been hit with another setback. She won't be able
Speaker 1: to sell.
Speaker 3: Her clothing range under the as Ever brand because there's
Speaker 3: another company that owns those naming rights. Does she not
Speaker 3: have access to Google or the people who work for her.
Speaker 3: Surely that's the first thing you check before you decide
Speaker 3: on the name.
Speaker 16: Well, I mean, there's a quick fix. Just name it
Speaker 16: Beije as Ever, because that's all I ever see this
Speaker 16: woman wear. Who went on Netflix and complained about the
Speaker 16: fact that they would allow her to wear color, And
Speaker 16: now every time I see her, she's in a beige,
Speaker 16: a nude, a white, or a black as we look
Speaker 16: at pictures of her in Beiji, nude, white, and black. Hey,
Speaker 16: but I have some breaking news for you. The New
Speaker 16: York Post says that the products for as Ever will
Speaker 16: not be ready to your point about Netflix pulling their
Speaker 16: hair out, will not be ready in time for the
Speaker 16: show's launch. It's going to take a few months for
Speaker 16: them to have those products ready to go. And I
Speaker 16: mean the delay is so bad that they don't believe
Speaker 16: that she's going to have the products carried in the
Speaker 16: Netflix house mall promotion that you and I had discussed
Speaker 16: a few times, probably a few months ago.
Speaker 3: Oh dear, I mean, so far we know about the
Speaker 3: strawberry jam and I don't think she even produced enough
Speaker 3: to actually sell. She just sent a few jars to
Speaker 3: famous people hoping that they'd post it on Instagram's. I
Speaker 3: don't know what sort of a business model that is,
Speaker 3: just sending free staff to influences and hope they posted,
Speaker 3: but then no one can actually buy it.
Speaker 1: Okay, now let's talk Elon Musk.
Speaker 3: He's always got business plans, but he has been tight
Speaker 3: lipped about the conservative influencer Ashley Saint Clair, who claims
Speaker 3: she's at the mother of his thirteenth child. It comes
Speaker 3: amid fresh revelations from influencer Isabella Moody, who posted private
Speaker 3: messages between her and Saint Clair, which he claims show
Speaker 3: that Saint Clair had planned all along to trap Elon Kinzy.
Speaker 3: This is getting unsavory.
Speaker 16: Oh my goodness, But the rocket babies. I want to
Speaker 16: have his, you know, I want to have his rocket babies.
Speaker 16: I don't know if I've laughed so long or so
Speaker 16: hard and quite some time and then we are. Elon
Speaker 16: is not issuing any official reactions, but he definitely is
Speaker 16: enjoying the pyelone because every once in a while he'll
Speaker 16: respond whoa or yikes. He definitely appreciates the support he's receiving.
Speaker 16: And honestly, this does look a little bit like somebody
Speaker 16: that was out to you know, secure babies with Elinor
Speaker 16: and got her way, and now she's not getting her way,
Speaker 16: so she's lashing out, and I, you know, it doesn't
Speaker 16: reflect well on her unfortunately, and I don't I hope
Speaker 16: that that doesn't reflect poorly on me for acknowledging that.
Speaker 16: But I don't think she looks like a winner here.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't think anybody looks like a winner here.
Speaker 3: This sort of tawdry information is best kept private. I
Speaker 3: just don't see what's to be gained other than for
Speaker 3: us it gives us materials, so we shouldn't complain. Now,
Speaker 3: let's turn to Joe Rogan's recent podcast featuring Woody Harrelson.
Speaker 3: And Woody Harrelson had some interesting comments to make about
Speaker 3: RFK jor Bobby.
Speaker 17: I really hope he's able to do some good things
Speaker 17: because he's certainly a man on a mission and a
Speaker 17: man who cares deeply. Yeah, and I think really heroic.
Speaker 1: Very complimentary there.
Speaker 3: He wasn't so complimentary about doctor Anthony Fauci was.
Speaker 17: Very toxic and they finally had to yank it. Yeah,
Speaker 17: and now that you use different chemical cocktails. But like
Speaker 17: Fauci did some extraordinarily evil what he did, he.
Speaker 1: Knows what he did.
Speaker 3: Their bold comments, what is a little bit different is
Speaker 3: not cut from the same cloth.
Speaker 1: It was just about every other Hollywood actor. Is he
Speaker 1: going to get.
Speaker 3: Much flowback for those comments or is he just such
Speaker 3: a wild card that he'll keep on getting roles and
Speaker 3: keep on being a character actor.
Speaker 16: I think you're right. I think he has a big
Speaker 16: enough personality that he might be able to get past
Speaker 16: those types of comments. But he also issues an example
Speaker 16: of a personal experience he had where he lost someone
Speaker 16: that was close to him. You can't argue with that,
Speaker 16: you know. So I do think that he talked about
Speaker 16: on Saturday Night Live, the blowback he got from that,
Speaker 16: he's acknowledged, Hey, look I get I just don't care.
Speaker 1: I've got to speak my truth now, Kinsey.
Speaker 3: Fox News host Greg Guttfeld has made it onto the
Speaker 3: front cover of Variety magazine, and he continues to demolish.
Speaker 1: The late night ratings. He's just winning big.
Speaker 3: He's beating the likes of Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen colebab Bill.
Speaker 1: Mah thew trailing by some distance. What's behind his success?
Speaker 16: Well, I mean he just I mean, of course Greg
Speaker 16: just says they're not that funny, but he says that
Speaker 16: they're kind of in a very narrow agreed upon group,
Speaker 16: think group, and therefore people are seeking other things. You
Speaker 16: know that eighteen to forty nine demo, that is, democrats
Speaker 16: and independents are now watching Greg Guttfeld because they just
Speaker 16: want to see something outside the expected. They want to
Speaker 16: see something outside the you know, generic Trump apps, which
Speaker 16: we've got for how many years.
Speaker 3: Now, while the others have forgotten that they're actually supposed
Speaker 3: to be entertaining and funny.
Speaker 1: They just go there and preach.
Speaker 3: It's almost like a group therapy session about their trumped
Speaker 3: arrangement syndrome. Whilst Godfeldt's show is actually funny, which is
Speaker 3: you know what you want at late night, kiinsis goofield,
Speaker 3: Thanks for your time, and that's all the time I've got.
Speaker 3: I'll see you at eleven tomorrow night.
Speaker 1: Don't go anywhere. Up next is Newsnight