WEBVTT - #215 Tony Abbott: Australia Has Lost Its Courage &  It’s Costing us

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Tony have it. Welcome to straight Talk, Mark.

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 2>It's wonderful to be with you.

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 3>You are, by the way, my mum's it sounds very

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 3>tried and commonplace, but my mum's favorite politician.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, your mum must have been a wonderful woman.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Good start mate, Thanks very much for coming in.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 3>So maybe, if possible, I don't know if many people

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 3>know much about you other than the fact you were

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister of the country for that matter, and there's

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>some instances where they remember you with you know, the

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Budji smuggler's shirt f and the onion and I want

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>to talk about those things because they're their fun things.

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 3>But if we could just go back a bit, you know,

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>ideology is an important thing in the way we conduct

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>ourselves and our behavior, all of us, and it's also

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 3>what we tend to believe in. And our ideology I

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 3>think is formed largely from how we grew up influences

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>as on ask.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>When we're kids, et cetera. So who's Tony Abbott the kid?

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Well? I had two wonderful powers parents, my late father

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>my mum who's still with us at ninety two. I

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 2>grew up in a lovely tranquil neighborhood in a house

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>backing on the bush, Sydney or in Sydney. Mum and

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Dad had a good marriage. I had three younger sisters

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 2>who claim to worship me, although they don't give that

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>much evidence these days. Mum reckoned they did. I went

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>to school, first of all the Holy Family Convent, Linnfield,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>then at Saint ala Wish's College, Nelson's Point, then at

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Ignacious College Review Sydney University Economics law. Was lucky enough

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to get a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Could you just stop then? What is a Rhodes scholarship? Everyone?

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>He talked to me that no one knows what it.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Is, okay, Well, A Rhodes scholarship is a scholarship funded

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>out of the bequest of Cecil Rhodes, who was a

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 2>mining magnate in the country which was known as Rhodesia

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 2>after him. He was the first Prime Minister of Rhodesia

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 2>back in the eighteen nineties, mining magnate and when he

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 2>died in nineteen hundred and two, his fortune, which doesn't

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>sound like much in these days money, but it was

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 2>about three million pounds. It funded the Rhodes scholarships it's

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>done that to this day because it's been very well invested.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 2>The Rhodes Scholarship is essentially a leadership scholarship. Cecil Rhodes

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>said that he wanted men for the world's fight, and

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>so every year each state, each of Australia's sixth states,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>sends a Rhodes Scholar to Oxford. There are three Australia

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 2>at large Rhodes Scholarships, so that's nine Rhodes Scholars go

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 2>from Australia every year to Oxford. They've got to be bright,

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>they're supposed to be potential leaders. In the old days,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>at least, they were usually people who had achieved a

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>bit in sport, and so I guess I didn't have

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>a stellar academic record by any means, but I've been

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>the president of the student's Counselor at Sydney UNI. I'd

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>played quite a bit of first grade rugby, so I

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 2>guess that's how I got there as a Rhodes Scholar.

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Previous Rhodes Scholars in politics included Bob Hawk, Kim Beasley.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Turnbull was also a Rhodes Scholar a couple of

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 2>years before me. So there's been a lot of Rhodes

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Scholars over the years going too public life. And I

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 2>guess that's fitting because in his will Cecil Rhoades said

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to produce leaders and the idea was to

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>bring the leaders of the English speaking world as thirty

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 2>odd Rhodes scholar a year from America. There are some

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>from Canada. There are quite a few from South Africa

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>as well. For a while there were Rhodes Scholars from Germany.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 2>The idea was to bring the potential leaders of the

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 2>major countries of the world, particularly the English speaking world,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>to Oxford, where it was thought by Cecil Rhodes, these

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>young men and subsequently young women would get the best

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 2>possible education and would develop the kind of comradeship between

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 2>each other that would lead to a more peaceful and

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>harmonious world.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 3>That's a probably good introduction to asking you a question,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>and I know it's probably bit early because we are

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about yourself growing up, and I'll come back to

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 3>that in a moment, But what do you think about

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 3>leadership today? I mean, what do you think Cecil rhads

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 3>would think about? And of course Rhodesia used to be

0:04:55.400 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Rhodesia now called Zimbabwe. What would he now think aboutleadership

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>outside of the Hodes scholarships. But think about leadership and

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>what does it mean? What does leadership mean? I don't

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>know what it means to someone like you.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, Well, a leader is someone who can make

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 2>a decision that involves people other than simply himself or herself,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and can make the decision stick. So a leader's got

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>to know his or her own mind, has got to

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>be capable of turning thoughts into resolutions, communicating successfully those

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 2>resolutions to others, and encouraging, inspiring, persuading others to join

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>in with those resolutions. That's essentially leadership. And whether the lead.

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Whether leadership is exercised in persuading your mates that we

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>should go and see film X rather than film why,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Whether the leadership is exercised in getting together a group

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>of people to go on a holiday, whether it's starting

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>a business, whether it's leading a country. Leadership is exercised

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 2>in all sorts of different ways, by all sorts of

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 2>different people. But without leadership, nothing happens.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So where does courage fit in in leadership? That virtus?

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 3>Because you know, I just don't think we talk about

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>virtues enough. But where does the virtue of courage fit

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 3>into leadership. For rate, say running a country. Let's not

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 3>decide who's going to go to the movies. Let's just

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 3>say we're running country because that's your area of expertise,

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 3>or you're certainly your formal era expertise. And you mentioned

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 3>a number of other former prime ministers in the same

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 3>category or leaders of the opposition, you would have seen

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>common traits.

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Was courage or common trait?

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I think courage is an important part of good leadership.

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 2>I think courage is pretty rare. It was Lord Slim

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 2>who said moral courage is a far higher and rarer

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 2>virtue than physical courage. It was our old friend, father EMMITTT. Costello,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>who used to frequently quote an obscure French cardinal that

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I'd never heard of, But nevertheless Emmett loved.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>His phrase, being a Jesuit priest for review.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Emmett kept quoting this cardinal pa from the nineteenth

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 2>century who said, prudence is everywhere, courage is nowhere. We

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>will all die of prudence. And I must say, I

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 2>think that's quite a useful reminder that prudence is a virtue,

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>but it's not the only virtue. Courage is equally and

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>no less important.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Because I mean, I will come back to you history

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>in a second because I want to know more about it.

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But just on that topic, I.

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Think it was Aristotle said that there was the courage

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>was He talked about the golden mean, which is the

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 3>point between reckless or fearless.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Fearless reckless or I should.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Say, which is down one end of the scale and

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>on the other end of the scale, was you know

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>you were coward and courage was the gold means somewhere

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 3>that somewhere in between, not in the middle, but somewhere

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and different for everybody. But if you're becoming a leader

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 3>of a country, it would seem to me that finding

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>that golden mean as a leader of the country, as

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 3>a prime minister leading your party in this case in Australia.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>In america's leading the country a bit different.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>But do you think that we've lost that courage a

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit?

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you look at our political leadership, Mark, I

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>think that it peaked in the Hawk Howard Era Hawk

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>and Howard each in his own way, they were both very,

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>very effective and quite brave prime ministers. Hawk defied labor

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 2>or that I to I guess deregulate the labor market,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>to privatize or begin privatization processes, to reduce tariffs, to

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>keep the unions more or less in their lane. And

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 2>then Howard did things like introduce work for the doll

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 2>he brought in tax reform, he reformed the waterfront. Howard

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Hawke did most of his reforms with the support of

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition, so at one level they were easier to

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>do because they weren't opposed in the Parliament the way

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Howard's reforms were ferociously opposed by the Labor Party. But nevertheless,

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't underestimate the courage that both Hawk and Keating

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>showed in the economic sphere, because frankly, it's a very

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 2>unusual labor leader who can get out of the old

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Marxist capital versus labor paradigm and appreciate that workers do

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>best when the boss does well too. So we had

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 2>a quarter century of good leadership, really excellent, outstanding leadership

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 2>under Hawk and Howard. I think it's been of lesser

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 2>quality since then. And that's not because the individuals are

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 2>necessarily of lesser caliber, but I suspect there's certainly been

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 2>less courage, And I think in some instances less character.

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 3>And how much do you think courage is or courage

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 3>derives from what as possible? So it would seem to me,

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 3>particularly these days, with the ability to know what people

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>think polls, polling, and the ability to try and satisfy

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>as many people as you possibly can in order to

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 3>stay in government, because if you're not in government.

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't make change.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 3>How much do you think courage is being diluted by

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 3>more information and not as ideologically based as it would

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 3>have maybe in the past.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I think political leadership is more difficult today because social

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 2>media and the twenty four to seven news cycle means

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>that you tend to be more distracted. I mean, in

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Howard's time, you basically have to worry about the nightly

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 2>news and the morning's papers. But you're constantly being besieged

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 2>by the media today. So I think in one sense

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 2>leadership is more difficult. But what do you want in

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 2>a leader? You want character, You want conviction, you want courage,

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 2>you want judgment, and frankly, you also want luck. Some

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 2>people have it, some people don't. But I think that

0:11:55.040 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>far too often these days politicians consult the polls, they

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>consult the focus group, and they allow themselves not to

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>give the public what the public needs, but they try

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 2>to give the public what the public wants. Now, we're

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 2>all human, so we tend to want to have our

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>cake and eat it too. And the truth is you

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>can't mostly do that. You've got to make choices, often

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 2>hard choices. And in the Hawk Howard era, there was

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a greater tendency on the part of our leadership to say, look,

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 2>this is what's right for the country. This is the

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 2>argument in favor, and they would prosecute the case. That's

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>much less common. I mean, let's take the vexed subject

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of climate change for instance. Now the Liberal Party is

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 2>having a huge inter discussion at the moment about energy

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>and climate policy. One of the reasons why we are

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>so angst written over abandoning the straight jacket of net

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 2>zero is because we think the public have been totally

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 2>if you're like, they've basically been brainwashed into excepting that

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 2>there is a climate crisis. Now, I don't think there

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>is a climate crisis. I think reducing emissions is nice

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 2>to do, but I don't think it's something that should

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 2>dominate our policy making as it does right now. I

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>think what the coalition should be prepared to do is

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>to say, look, frankly, net zero is leading us down

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a path of economic ruin. We have to abandon it.

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 2>My former colleagues are very worried that doing this will

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>cost them seats and prevent them from winning the so

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>called Teal seats back. But if it's actually right, I

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 2>think the important thing is to make the case and

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>argue it day in day out between now and the

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>next election. And if you fail and you still believe

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>it's right, keep arguing it. I mean, take the GST

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>for instance. The GST, or at least a general Goods

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and Services Tax, was first proposed by Keating at the

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>time of the tax summit in nineteen eighty five. The

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister Hawk decided it was a step too far.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 2>That was when I suppose Hawk's caution and judgment trumped

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Keeping's innovation and political courage. Then the GST was proposed

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>by John Houston, as you'd remember Mark in the fight

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Back package, and Keating, having supported it back in eighty five,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>ferociously opposed it in the ninety three election. And then

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>eventually the GST was brought in because John Howard had

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>the guts to take it to the people in the

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety eight election. So the GST was an idea

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 2>that even its proponents eventually shied away from. Then it

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>was an idea that was ferociously fought about, initially in success, unsuccessfully,

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>finally successfully, and now it's totally accepted. So it is

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 2>possible to put forward policy initiatives that you think are

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>right but which are fiercely resisted, and you just argue

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>your way through to success. And it is the mark

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>of a six successful country that it can make tough

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 2>decisions and that it's leaders can successfully persuade people to

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 2>change their minds on things. And I think that if

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>you believe as I do, that reducing emissions is no

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>more than nice to do. If you think that the

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>important thing for the long term well being of our

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>country is economic growth, more jobs, more successful and more

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>dynamic industries, all of which requires an abundance of cheap

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and reliable power, all of which requires continuing our mineral resources, agricultural,

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Development. If you think this is necessary, well,

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and if you think that the net zero straight jacket

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is gravely impeding all of this, well, then you should

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>be prepared to argue the.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Case and that's leadership. That's leadership, thank you.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 2>And another example, if I may say so, mark of

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>successful leadership, initially very much against the odds, was the

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 2>whole Voice debate that we had a couple of years back.

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, initially the Voice was pitched as just a lovely,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 2>gracious mark of politeness and courtesy towards our Aboriginal fellow Australians.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 2>In fact, this was a trojan horse in the heart

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of government. And thanks to courageous individuals, particularly just Enterprise

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>and Warren Mundine, also Peter Darton and others. Thanks to

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>those courageous individuals, the public were persuaded that something that

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>they'd initially supported out of an abundance of goodwill was

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 2>something that they should oppose out of an abundance of

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>political judgment.

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>And in your world when you were the Prime minister,

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 3>what points do you remember where you had to tap

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 3>yourself on the shoulder and say, okay, Tony, it's time

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 3>to stand up straight and exercise courage in relation to

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 3>leading this country. What's some examples that you experienced.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>What wars are like to doing do you have to

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>fight within your own party? Where does it go?

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a very good question.

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Apart from daily.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess one of the biggest fights in my

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>time was what to do about illegal boat rifles. And

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 2>you'll remember that it started up at the end of

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the Keeping era. It got worse during the Howard era

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>after the Tampa business. Effectively the boats were stopped and

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>then they started up again under Kevin Rudd when Kevin

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 2>Rudd closed down offshore processing and abolished temporary protection visas

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 2>and so on. And in I think August of twenty thirteen,

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 2>we had five thousand illegal arrivals by boat, so it

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 2>was a real crisis. We think that during the course

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 2>of the Rudd Gillard government, as well as fifty thousand

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 2>illegal arrivals in one thousand boats, there were at least

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 2>a thousand people who died at sea doing this very

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 2>unsafe business of jumping in a leaky fishing boat trying

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 2>to cross the three hundred kilometers of open sea between

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Java and Christmas Island. Anyway, it was very important to

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 2>stop this. What was happening at the time was that

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 2>as soon as an Australian naval or customers vessel hove

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>into view, the people smugglers would scuttle their boats. The

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 2>passengers would be in the water, our personnel naturally had

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to pick them up to stop the from drowning. Under

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Rutt and Gillard, they were all taken to Christmas Island,

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 2>where effectively all of them eventually got to Australia and

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 2>many of them are still here to this day. I

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 2>determined we would do and obviously this was done in

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>consultation with my shadow cabinet colleagues, particularly Scott Morrison, who

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 2>was the relevant Shadow Minister. We decided under Operation Sovereign Borders,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 2>that we would hold the people, the people that would

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 2>be illegal migrants. We would hold them on a mother

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>ship until a calm night when we would put them

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 2>in a big orange life raft just outside Indonesian territorial

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 2>waters came from with just enough fuel to get back

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>to Java. And this was hugely controversial at the time.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>When I said that we would turn boats around when

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 2>it was safe to do so, Kevin Rudtha, prime Minister

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 2>at the time, said that this would this was not

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>only illegal, it was not only immoral, but it was

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it would cause conflict with Indonesia, and that certainly was

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the view of many of the officials. When I became

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister and I said, look, no self respecting country

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 2>can accept what amounts to a peaceful invasion, No self

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 2>respecting country can lose control of its borders. We simply

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 2>have to stop this. And frankly, we should not allow

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>somewhat nebulous concepts like international law which can't be enforced

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>in any court that has effective control over the actors.

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 2>We shouldn't let that stop us. And because it was

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 2>so remarkably successful so quickly, a policy that was hugely

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>contentious at the time is now, however begrudgingly by the left,

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>is now accepted. And to its credit, the Albanezy government

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 2>has largely maintained the border protection practices that began in

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 2>my time and that were then continued through the Turmbul

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and morrison eras as well.

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>And when you when you came up with this idea

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 3>to do this, what was your objective was it? Was

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 3>it a matter of principle or is it a matter

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 3>of principle that people should meag just out to turn

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 3>up whenever they feel like it and coming through a

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>legal processes et cetera. Or was there something else beyond that,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 3>like you know, economically made sense or it didn't make

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 3>sense economically, What was the what was your objective behind it?

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, Mark, the principle is countries have got to keep

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 2>control of their borders. I mean, the mark of a

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 2>sovereign country is that it keeps control of its borders.

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>It controls who comes or doesn't come into the country.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>So that was the principle, and the mechanism for realizing

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 2>the principle was to stop the illegal boats. And the

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 2>best way to stop the illegal boats was to turn

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>them back. And if the original boats were sunk or

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>otherwise destroyed, we gave them substitute boats and sent them

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>back in the unthinkable orange life raft. So the end

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 2>was national sovereignty. The means was turning boats around, and

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the mechanism was supplying boats where the people smugler's boats

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 2>were no longer available.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 3>And I asked John Howard a couple weeks ago about this,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 3>but is national sovereignty? Is that?

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Should that be a value that gets attributed to the nation.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, Marke, ask yourself this, what might people make huge

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 2>sacrifices for even their life if necessary, your family, your faith,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 2>your country. I think that patriotism, love of country is

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the most powerful emotions that people have and yes,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I think we certainly should respect it and in appropriate

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 2>circumstances appeal to it.

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>That's very interesting. It's a high order.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Value, very high order value, and maybe one that some

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 3>generations might be not that tuned into today these days.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you go back to the generations that fought

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the First and the Second World Wars, they obviously had

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 2>a very strong sense of patriotism. Now it's possible, indeed,

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 2>it's certain that the patriotism of Australians at the time

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Two World Wars was, if you like, an

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 2>empire patriotism as well as simply a national patriotism. But

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that Australians today still feel strongly patriotic. I

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 2>think that official Australia is less inclined to appeal to

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>people's patriotism. One of the reasons why I wrote my

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>book Mark was because I think we've got a proud history.

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I think there's far more to look back on with

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 2>pride and satisfaction than there is to look back on

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 2>with shame and embarrassment. But I think these days official

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Australia has very much imbibed what Jeffrey Blainey once called

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 2>the black armband view of our history. It's interesting that

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 2>many people on the left of politics don't want us

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to be particularly excited about Australia Day because they see

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>that in terms of sorrow more than they see it

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>in terms of pride and achievement. So I think it

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 2>is important if citizens are to feel appropriately proud of

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 2>their country, that they have a good understanding of our history,

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 2>particularly given that our history is on balance such a

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 2>shining success. But yes, patriotism is very important and if

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 2>our country is to flourish, people have a need to

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 2>have a strong sense of commitment to it and a

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>strong desire not just to succeed themselves, but have the

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>country succeed too.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that one of the reasons perhaps that

0:26:53.800 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 3>patriotism as opposed to nationalism patriots is feeling and feeling

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 3>pride in your country has somewhat diminished over the past

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe ten years, because Australia has done so well economically.

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Our unemployment is so low and it always has been

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 3>for a long and definitely even during the COVID period,

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, the government managed to keep unemployment where no

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 3>one else was and post COVID austrai as unemployment was

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 3>at record levels because you know, generally speaking, unemployment up

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.719
<v Speaker 3>in the fives these days are still down before when

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 3>it gets the four point five, it's the headline. Do

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 3>you think that there's a generation of people here who

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>have had it so good that they just think this

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.719
<v Speaker 3>is a place. Australia is a place and we use

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 3>it like a utility, and therefore we don't need to

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 3>have any patriotism because we don't work hard enough for it.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's a point? Because I'm in you

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and I similar generation. You know, important to get your job,

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 3>important to work hard, important to respect the boss, is

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 3>portant to respect the.

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Business that you work for.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 3>You didn't jump between jobs to job generally speaking state

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 3>for period time because it was really important to have

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 3>a job. It was jammed into us respect as well

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 3>for your boss. But these days people can leave a

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 3>job six months and they get another one because there's

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 3>unemployment so low. Do you think that there is a

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 3>correlation between unemployment and maybe the diminution in patriotism towards

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 3>the country that you know that is looking after you.

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Mark, I certainly do think that we've had it very

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>good for a very long time in this country, and

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I do think that these and luxury can breed indulgence

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>and entitlement, and I think their vices, if you like,

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I suspect that we might suffer from those vices a

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 2>little more than we did, and I personally wish it

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 2>were otherwise. I mean, earlier generations of Australians did have

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a tougher life physically financially, and I think they were

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>more alive to the need for sacrifice, to do one's duty,

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>to be prepared to live a life of service. I

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 2>think people were more in tune with that. And again,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons why I've written this history is

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to remind people today of the strengths of applebears, both

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 2>individually and collectively. Because you never know what's around the corner.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 2>We think that the world will continue more or less

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 2>as it is, that our country will always be rich,

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 2>that our country will always be safe, that our country

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 2>will always be free. But look at other countries where

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>people aren't safe, they aren't free, they aren't rich, or

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 2>they might be rich enough, but they're certainly not free.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the world over the last two hundred years

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 2>has basically been shaped by the long Anglo American ascendancy.

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 2>We are a product of the long Anglo American ascendancy.

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Our institutions, our attitudes, our way of life, all fundamentally

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 2>shaped by the Anglo American ascendancy. If the world of

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the future is dominated by China, for instance, it'll be

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 2>a very different world, much less free, certainly, I would say,

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 2>much less fair, and fundamentally in the long run, I

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>suspect much less rich, because I don't believe that a

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>basically totalitarian society can be as creative as a free

0:30:55.040 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 2>society such as ours can be. And it's quite possible,

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe even likely, that tensions between the democracies and the dictatorships,

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 2>which are operating in a kind of informal alliance of

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians, the North Koreans, it's

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 2>quite likely that tensions at some point could boil over

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 2>into conflict. I mean, we've got conflict in Ukraine, We've

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 2>got conflict in the Middle East, We've got enormous tensions

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 2>in East Asia. And as a country, we have to

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 2>be prepared economically, militarily, and above all else psychically for

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 2>whatever might come. And I just hope that if we

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>do face much fiercer challenges than we have in recent

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 2>times that we will be ready for it, it up

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 2>for it.

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it's often ponder on this particular question,

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and in terms of attitude and mindset, do you think

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 3>it's often? I think to myself, you and I just

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 3>a couple of old blokes who have gone through a

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 3>different but I competed to the younger generation relatively speaking,

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>who have just gone through a different type of upbringing.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We have different set of values, or probably a different

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 3>set of values, a different set of things that are

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 3>more available to us relative to the younger generation.

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't we don't buy and buy. We live on

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>an island.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 3>We're nice and safe here and everything's going to be great.

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 3>No one's going to come near us, whereas the other generation,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 3>younger generations tend.

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>To think that.

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that there's that possibility that there is?

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 3>We are over over egging it and we are over

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 3>worrying about these things. And because as we get older,

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 3>we play more defensive. Do you think that's a possibility

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 3>of from wondered myself, will test myself all the time about.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Well Mark, I go back to the twenty nine in

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>election campaign in Warringa, which I lost. I had young people,

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 2>often kids still at school who no doubt had been

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>put up to this by their teachers, but literally quite

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a quivering with fear and anxiety, telling me that they

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 2>would probably be dead in a few years time because

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>of climate change that my government was not or the

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>party that I was part of, was not doing enough

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to fix. So young people today, I think are being

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 2>scared to death over climate anxiety in a way that

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe earlier generations were worried about nuclear war for instance.

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Now I've got to say, I think major conflict between

0:33:55.440 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 2>great powers is vastly more scary to me than the

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 2>possibility of a couple of degrees of warming several decades,

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 2>hence which we can easily adapt to. I mean, there

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 2>have always been storms, there have always been floods, There've

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 2>always been fires, There've always been droughts. And the richer

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and stronger we are, the better we will be able

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to cope with these things. And if some areas of

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:31.760
<v Speaker 2>agriculture shrink and others grow, well, so be it. Again.

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 2>We can deal with it in the future as we've

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 2>always done in the past. But a major war, particularly

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 2>one involving nuclear weapons, would be a complete catastrophe, an

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 2>unimaginable disaster. I mean, imagine Sydney being like Marier Poll.

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Imagine Sydney being like Gaza. That's what war does. And

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter whether your cause is just. If your

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 2>country is subject to bombardment, it's ghastly beyond belief. So

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 2>that's the sort of thing that I think we should

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 2>be worried about. And the best way to ensure that

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't come is not to be weak, because weakness

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 2>is provocative. It's to be strong, not aggressive, but strong

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and certain and clear, because the only way we will

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 2>deter aggresses is by being strong and certain and clear

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 2>in response. I mean, if Ukraine had been in NATO,

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Pudin would never have invaded. Pudin only invaded Ukraine because

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>he thought it would all be over in a week.

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's immensely to the credit of the incredibly gallant

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and heroic Ukrainian. So I think of fighting for everyone's

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 2>freedom that they have been able to resist so successfully

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 2>for so long. But this is an object lesson in

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 2>what to do or not to do. If your country

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 2>is to survive and flourish, it is to be strong,

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 2>economically strong, militarily, strong, psychologically and if possible to have

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 2>strong alliances as well.

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.920
<v Speaker 3>So someone like you, when you see Dan Andrews standing

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:35.240
<v Speaker 3>there in China alongside Putin presidency and the North Korean president,

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 3>it must make your blood boil, because isn't that the opposite?

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Isn't that to what you just said, that's the opposite?

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Like Well, there was a phrase mark that I think

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Lenin used of the capitalists who were going to sell

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the communists the rope by which the capitalists were hanged.

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 2>The phrase was useful idiots, useful idiots. And I think

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of useful idiots in Australia at the moment.

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 3>So when we come when you look at let's call

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 3>it left of politics, it seems to me that there's

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ideology pushed into the left and obviously

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 3>ideologies pushed into the right.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Term.

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 3>We were talking about the things that form your ideologies,

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.479
<v Speaker 3>and you talked about your schooling, and you talked about

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 3>your education, and I might just ask you quickly, because

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 3>we know you became the Prime minister, but how did

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 3>you get into politics?

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>What were you doing before politics?

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, my mother, my father, people like father Amer Costello

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 2>had well and truly engendered a great interest in history,

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in you, in me, In me, I was fascinated by history.

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And Australian history, and history.

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>History generally, but not certainly, not excluding Australian history, but

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 2>history generally. And I am by the great Man theory

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 2>of history that the world is shaped by strong individuals

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.919
<v Speaker 2>who make a difference. I think the world gets better

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 2>or worse person by person, and if more people make

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>good choices, things improve. If more people make bad choices,

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 2>things get worse. And obviously, the further up the leadership

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 2>ladder you are, the more significant your choices become. So

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I was interested in history. When I got to university,

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 2>which even in those days the mid seventies, was dominated

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 2>by the Green Left, I thought, well, this is ridiculous.

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's do what I can to change that. So I

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>ran for student politics, eventually became the SRC president. Worked

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 2>out along the way that Canes was right to this

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 2>extent at leastomists, that Knes the economist was right, at

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 2>least to this extent, that practical men are slaves to

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the ideas of long dead economists. So I thought, let's

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 2>try to enter the battlefield of ideas. I started writing

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 2>stuff for the Sydney University paper Honi Swar. Eventually the

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Honi Swire editors wouldn't.

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Publish me because.

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Left, so I started getting stuff published in the Herald,

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the Australian, the Bulletin. Eventually became a journalist and then

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I became a political staffer press seguri to John Hewson

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 2>when he was leader of the Opposition. Then after the

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety three election, for a year or so I

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 2>was the initial executive director of Australians for Constitutional Monarchy.

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 2>And then in nineteen ninety four, when a fellow called

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Michael mckeller retired as Member for Ringer, I was on

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 2>holidays at the time. A bit bored. I called my

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 2>office to see what was happening and I was told

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that John I would have wanted to talk to me.

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 2>So I rang John and he said, look, Toney, Michael

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 2>McKell is just retiring as a member for Ringer. I

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 2>think you should throw your hat into the ring for

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 2>the Liberal preselection, which I did. The two favored candidates

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 2>were Kevin McCann, at that stage a senior partner in

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Sydney's biggest law firm, and Peter King, at that stage

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 2>a leading barrister now Kevin McCann went on to become

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 2>chairman of mcquarie bank. Peter King became for a time

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 2>member for Wentworth. But they were the two leading candidates

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and I sort of came up the middle and snagged

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 2>the pre selection. And I guess then followed twenty five

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 2>tumultuous and largely successful use in the parliament.

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Would you say you loved being in poond?

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 2>I loved making a difference, and being in Parliament is

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 2>probably the pre eminent way of making a difference in

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:04.720
<v Speaker 2>this country.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 1>And what about the joust that happens every day? Like

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you're down there in the mother sheep in camera.

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess you're walking down the aisles and you're brushing

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 3>past various oppositions.

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>What about the jousts? Did you love that part?

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 3>And no?

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean I was regarded as a pretty ferocious parliamentary

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 2>warrior because you had to be, you had to be.

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 2>These days, I listened to Parliament and I think, geez,

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 2>there's far too much mindless abuse, far too much the

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 2>other marble all wrong and our marble all right. When

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the truth is, no one has a monopoly on wisdom,

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 2>no one's judgments are perfect. All governments get something's wrong,

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 2>and the truth is best advanced by a civil debate

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 2>which at least respects the good will of most of

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the participants. And I think that there's not enough of

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 2>that in our national conversation these days, and there's certainly

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 2>not enough of that in the Parliament now. Some people

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 2>will say, oh, but Abbott you were when you were

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the Leader of the House. You're always getting up and

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 2>having a go at the other side, And that's true.

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 2>But I'd like to think that I was playing the ball,

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 2>not the man, and I'd like to think that I

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>was attacking the other side's positions rather than attacking the

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 2>other side personally. Although I did once say of Kim

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Beasley that he was a sanctimonious wind bag.

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Well all jawbone and no backbone, had that go.

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I got kicked out of the Parliament for that.

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 2>And look, i'vectually got a lot of time for Kim Beasley.

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Kim Beasley is probably that by far the

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 2>most substantial figure on the labor side of politics, at

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 2>least in recent decades, not to become Prime Minister. And

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 2>for what it's worth, I think Kim Beasley would have

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>been a pretty good prime minister, arguably better than the

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>people who did succeed him and go on to be

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 2>prime minister.

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 3>You'll never be accused of being a shrinking violent in

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 3>politics and probably in life for that matter. Once you

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 3>famously shirt fronted them and it was over, you know,

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 3>the plane going down, and I actually I loved it,

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 3>to be frankly, I thought it was fantastic. But not

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 3>everybody likes that sort of stuff. And I just want

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 3>to ask you about the Australian mindset, the psyche of Australians.

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Why wouldn't someone like for example, do well in Australia.

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Have we inherited some Anglo Irish thing about people being

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 3>too tough or is it a tall poppy syndrome thing? Well,

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 3>what is it that you know Trump will sent up

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to everybody used it up? I'm not sure whether people

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 3>actually in Australia really like that. What do you think

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 3>about that?

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Look, our system is different from the American system, and

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 2>to become a national leader in Australia, you've got to

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 2>be able to secure a parliamentary majority, which means that

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you've got to have a degree of respect and perhaps

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 2>some level of affection from your peers, yours, your political peers,

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 2>your fellow members of parliament in your particular party. The

0:44:56.320 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 2>American system is quite different because the party structures a

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 2>much looser. Party discipline is not nearly as tight. The

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 2>primary system means that charismatic individuals can emerge from nowhere.

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Donald Trump had never held elective office when

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 2>he ran for the Republican nomination. He'd actually been a

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Democrat as well as a Republican, as well as neither.

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 2>Over the years, he'd created I suppose some kind of

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:37.919
<v Speaker 2>a profile via reality TV, and I guess the fact

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that he was a billionaire who was often in the media,

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 2>at least in New York, gave him a certain cachet.

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think someone like Donald Trump could emerge

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. I think the most that someone like Donald

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump could do in Australia would be who perhaps elbow

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 2>his way into the Senate, where if you can get

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 2>a quota, which is about I think twelve percent of

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the vote or fourteen percent of the vote, you're there

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 2>as a senator. But I don't think a Trump like

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 2>figure could readily emerge in Australia.

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you think Australians because I mean, I'm not sure,

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 3>but I think I feel as though Trump did not

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 3>help Peter Dutton in the last election.

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's interesting that Anthony Albanesi is now best mates

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 2>with Donald Trump.

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>That might worked against.

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Because during the election the Labor Party tried to smear

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Dutton via association with Donald Trump.

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Now you probably didn't even know him.

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, Look, I'd be very confident that Peter Dutton didn't

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:59.919
<v Speaker 2>know Trump certainly. And our country is different. I mean, yes,

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of commonalities between Australia and the

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 2>United States. I do think that the English speaking countries

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 2>are in a sense family. But your brother and your

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.359
<v Speaker 2>sister can be quite different from you, even if there

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 2>are some things you've got in common. So look, America

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is a great country. Americans are great people. Their political

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.879
<v Speaker 2>system is quite different from ours. Their political psyche, I think,

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 2>is quite different from ours. And Trump plays better in

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the United States than he does anywhere else. But this

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 2>is not uncommon. I mean, I can remember George W.

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Bush didn't play very well in Australia, whereas Tony Blair,

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 2>and they were both I suppose very frequently in our

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:57.840
<v Speaker 2>media at the time of the Iraq War. Personally, I

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 2>thought Tony Blair was a vastly better advocate for the

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:08.279
<v Speaker 2>policies that Britain, Australia and America were pursuing at that

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 2>time than George W. Bush was. And that's not because

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 2>George W. Bush was a lesser man. I just think

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 2>that American style sometimes doesn't translate very well to other countries.

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 3>So it would not be advisable for any Australians who

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 3>are ambitious and aspiring to be perhaps the leader the

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 3>leader party in this country to run that type of politics.

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think if you're in Australia would be Australian leader.

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 2>On the left, Bob Hawk should be your exemplar, and

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 2>on the right, John Howard should be your exemplar.

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 3>It's very interesting. So I want to talk about your book.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm dying to know why you wrote a book.

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's.

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 3>You're not doing it for the money, because I know

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 3>there won't be any money in it. I've written books.

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:56.840
<v Speaker 3>There's any money in.

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Books and there, and they take a long time to

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>do that. It's a mission, it's a massive mission. How

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>long it take you write for a start?

0:49:03.280 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think I was from start to finish. It

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 2>would have been probably three and a half, maybe even

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 2>four years. I mean it all started when John Roscombe,

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the then head of the Institute of Public Affairs, with

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 2>whom I was doing an occasional podcast, We were talking

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 2>about I guess what ailed our country, and we mutually

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:30.720
<v Speaker 2>decided that not enough people were sufficiently familiar with our history,

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and those that were tended to see it all in

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 2>black armband terms of dispossession, even genocide against original people,

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:44.399
<v Speaker 2>and I guess. I then decided that I could put

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 2>together a general history of the country, a more upbeat

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 2>general history of the country, and John very kindly offered

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:58.399
<v Speaker 2>to give me some research assistance. So work started three

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half four years ago. Eventually I had what

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:11.879
<v Speaker 2>I thought was a good draft. I suggested to Paul

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Whittaker that maybe HarperCollins might like to publish. HarperCollins eventually agreed,

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and they had various queries suggestions, which involved a lot

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 2>of rewriting. If you like, revising, adding, subtracting, and so on.

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:37.720
<v Speaker 2>So I know, if I'm writing a speech, for instance,

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it'll flow very easily, and the first draft is

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty much the final draft but sometimes I'll write it

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'll rewrite it, and I'll rewrite it again, and

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 2>it might go through three or four major iterations. This one,

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 2>this book, I have read it so many times, and

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:04.240
<v Speaker 2>every time I read it, I would change something because

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking to myself, do I really need that fact?

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 2>Should I include this fact? Is that the right way

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 2>to look at this? Maybe I need to be more

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 2>generous about that. So yeah, in the end, these things,

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 2>the facts are sacred, and you've got to try to

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 2>ensure that all the important facts are there and are

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 2>accurately presented. Then of course there's I suppose your interpretations,

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 2>and I guess it is in a sense part of

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the subjective process deciding which facts are relevant and which

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:53.800
<v Speaker 2>ones aren't. But facts are so important. And this was

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 2>the first book I've done which was if you like

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a study as opposed to a piece of advocacy, I mean,

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:08.720
<v Speaker 2>if if what you are doing is putting forward an argument,

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 2>you can often write it out of your own head,

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:16.319
<v Speaker 2>particularly if it's an argument that you've been making for

0:52:16.360 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 2>a long time. But if it's if it's going to

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:21.879
<v Speaker 2>be a credible study, you've got to do a lot

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of research or get a lot of research done.

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 3>So you see, you're you're I think what you're saying, though,

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 3>correct me if I'm wrong.

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't you prosecuting any case.

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:39.479
<v Speaker 2>It was well except for the fact that I think

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 2>the Australian story, on balance is a very good one.

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So did you discover that during the research or you

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 1>already thought that?

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I have always I have always been that instinctively and

0:52:51.160 --> 0:52:55.880
<v Speaker 2>based on my general knowledge of Australian history, I have

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 2>always thought that our story was a good one, and

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I've always tended to arc up when people have suggested otherwise.

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 2>And I thought, well, let's given the degree of ignorance,

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 2>given the degree of what might be described as prejudice,

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I thought, let's tell the story. Let's tell the story again,

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 2>more or less from the beginning right up to the

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:29.719
<v Speaker 2>present time. Let's try to be as objective as possible.

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's try to respect all the important facts, and let's

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:39.840
<v Speaker 2>see what they amount to to me. When you think

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:44.759
<v Speaker 2>that modern Australia began when fifteen hundred draggled souls were

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 2>dumped not far from here, half a world away from

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 2>their home, in a completely strange, unfamiliar, alien landscape within

0:53:56.400 --> 0:54:01.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred years, they had created colonies with the world's

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 2>highest standard of living at the time. They had become

0:54:06.480 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 2>democratic pioneers. Almost the first places where every man and

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 2>then every woman and indeed people of all races had

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:23.479
<v Speaker 2>the vote was in Australia, Australian women absolutely in South

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Australia by the eighteen nineties, men, women and Aboriginal people

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:32.800
<v Speaker 2>they could all vote, they could all run for office.

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:36.560
<v Speaker 2>And there's almost nowhere in the world at the time

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 2>where that was true.

0:54:38.520 --> 0:54:40.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you put that down to in your research?

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 2>There was a liberal humanity to modern Australia from the

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 2>very start. I mean the British government instructed Governor Phillip

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.760
<v Speaker 2>to live in amity with the natives. And when Governor

0:54:56.800 --> 0:55:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Phillip was speared at Manly Cove quite badly hurt at

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Manly Cove on the search for Benelong, instead of mounting

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 2>a punitive rate and slaughtering all the Aboriginal people he

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 2>could find, Philip put it down to a misunderstanding and

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Benelong eventually came back and continued to live with Philip

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:21.760
<v Speaker 2>at Government House and eventually went to England with Philip.

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 2>When Philip went back in seventeen ninety two. So there

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 2>was a liberal humanity about Australia from the very beginning.

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 2>We should never forget that white men were hanged for

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the murder of black people after the Mile Creek Massacre

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 2>as early as eighteen thirty eight. By the time the

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 2>free settler started to come in very large numbers the

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:50.680
<v Speaker 2>eighteen twenties the eighteen thirties, Chartism was very much alive

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and well in England, and a lot of the free

0:55:54.320 --> 0:55:58.239
<v Speaker 2>settlers were highly influenced by that. Henry Parks in particular,

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:05.040
<v Speaker 2>who became great statesman of nineteenth century New South Wales,

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 2>he was a Chartist originally. So there was a strong

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 2>instinct in colonial Australia for free institutions. Where Jack was

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:23.520
<v Speaker 2>as good as his master. We were a fundamentally, we

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:25.280
<v Speaker 2>were fundamentally liberal societies.

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:28.359
<v Speaker 3>Liberal you mean, you don't mean as a liberal party now,

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 3>you mean liberal thinking.

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Liberal thinking, liberality if you like hu humanitarianism. Now, political

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:46.040
<v Speaker 2>liberalism developed slightly differently in Victoria and in New South Wales. Liberalism.

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Deacon liberalism in Victoria was statist liberalism. In order to

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 2>better secure human flourishing, we need a big state, Parks

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Bart Parks read, liberalism in New South Wales was more

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 2>small government liberalism. In order to secure human flourishing, we

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:15.040
<v Speaker 2>need government to stay in its lane and allow individuals

0:57:15.080 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the greatest possible freedom. So there were two strains, two

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 2>strands of liberalism in colonial Australia, but nevertheless it was

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 2>a fundamentally liberal project.

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of we're talking on modern history, obviously,

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:36.920
<v Speaker 3>how do you treat Indigenous Australia within the book?

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I say constantly in the book that modern Australia

0:57:43.120 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 2>rests on three pillars, an Indigenous heritage, a British foundation,

0:57:47.560 --> 0:57:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and an immigrant character. And I think that's unarguable. I

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 2>think these are simple facts that all must accept, how

0:57:56.400 --> 0:57:59.800
<v Speaker 2>much emphasis they wish to place on them as of

0:58:01.400 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 2>a question for people's individual judgments. But I think modern

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Australia's I guess mindset owes something to the fatalism, the

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:24.960
<v Speaker 2>laconic endurance of Aboriginal people. These days, it tends to

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 2>be very much portrayed as the horrible colonists, oppressing, exploiting,

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and often enough killing the innocent Aboriginal people. That's a

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 2>total caricature of what happened. Let's take very early modern

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Australia and its relationship with Aboriginal people. There was ben

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Along who exemplified the cooperation between the settlers and Aboriginal people,

0:58:56.920 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 2>and then there was Pemlowi, who exemplified, if you like,

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the conflict between settlers and Aboriginal people. The interesting thing

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 2>is that both Benelong and Pemelwe were respected and admired

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 2>by the best of the settlers. Pemeilwe was a warrior,

0:59:20.000 --> 0:59:23.600
<v Speaker 2>as was Benelong, but Pemilwe was a warrior who often

0:59:23.640 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 2>engaged in acts of violence against the settlers, for which

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 2>ultimately he was killed, but he was well respected. I

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:36.080
<v Speaker 2>mean Governor King, who was the governor at the time

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Pelwey was killed, said he was a stout fellow who

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:45.360
<v Speaker 2>fought for his people. And as we as our history

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 2>develops and the great partial expansion takes place beyond the

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Blue Mountains. Obviously on the frontiers there was tremendous conflict,

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the mild Creek massacre simply being the best known instance

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of a terrible conflict. But at the same time there

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>was also great cooperation. I mean, none of the explorers

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>would have got to where they got without Aboriginal guides.

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:21.080
<v Speaker 2>None of the pastoralists would have been able to flourish

1:00:21.120 --> 1:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>without Aboriginal stockmen and shepherds and so on. So this

1:00:26.120 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>idea that the history of Australia is of bloody conflict

1:00:31.440 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 2>between white and black, it's simply not true. There was

1:00:35.760 --> 1:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>at least as much cooperation as there was conflict, and

1:00:39.040 --> 1:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>at all times official Australia was determined to do the

1:00:44.760 --> 1:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>right thing towards the Aboriginal people that every stressed were

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>as much British subjects as the white settlers were.

1:00:56.560 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you think Australians, once I read your book should

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>be or maybe I'll put it another way, do you

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>think you're much proud of being Australia, being an Australian

1:01:07.080 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>as a result of writing a book.

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think I had a strong sense of the

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>history already. In the course of writing the book, that

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I was reminded of things that I'd forgotten, and I

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>discovered things that I didn't know. But I believe that

1:01:28.800 --> 1:01:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I had a strong sense of a history anyway, and

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I certainly had a great pride in our country anyway.

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Anything surprising, Well, figures who you hardly heard of suddenly

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 4>leap out of the page when you go into their

1:01:50.240 --> 1:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>lives more deeply.

1:01:51.720 --> 1:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, one person who I think should be better

1:01:54.960 --> 1:01:58.840
<v Speaker 2>known to contemporary Australians is John Plankett, who was the

1:01:58.880 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>first Attorney General of New South Wales. It was Plunkett

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:07.000
<v Speaker 2>who insisted that the Mile Creek massacre perpetrators be put

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:10.480
<v Speaker 2>on trial, and when the first jury refused to convict,

1:02:10.520 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it was Plunkett who brought fresh charges against a slightly

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>lesser number of perpetrators and persuaded a couple of the

1:02:20.600 --> 1:02:27.560
<v Speaker 2>perpetrators to turn queen's evidence, and with another judge who

1:02:27.600 --> 1:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>said it the second trial's close that this was an atrocity,

1:02:31.960 --> 1:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>crying out to Heaven for justice. The second jury did

1:02:35.520 --> 1:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>convict and seven of the perpetrators were subsequently hanged, which

1:02:40.520 --> 1:02:44.920
<v Speaker 2>was justice according to law in those days. Now, Plunkett

1:02:44.920 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>was an Irish Catholic with a strong sense of justice,

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a strong sense of the universality of rights, and he

1:02:55.400 --> 1:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>did a lot to try to ensure that the law

1:02:59.840 --> 1:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>was and just fair, but was fairly applied in the colony.

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think that he's a fragrant individual who deserves

1:03:08.280 --> 1:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to be much better remembered than he is.

1:03:10.760 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 3>You just talked about some pretty important words there, fairness, justice,

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 3>just to pick two. And you mentioned Irish Catholic, and

1:03:23.800 --> 1:03:26.240
<v Speaker 3>you know you're it's well known that you're a man

1:03:26.280 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 3>of faith and that you are and faith is really

1:03:29.040 --> 1:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>important to you.

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't put me on any pedestal of virtue, please.

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:33.960
<v Speaker 3>But I'm not going to put you on a virtuous

1:03:34.280 --> 1:03:35.920
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, you know a lot of people

1:03:35.920 --> 1:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>of people of faith, that's the last place I should

1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 3>be put because sometimes they struggle, you know, with humanity

1:03:45.880 --> 1:03:47.680
<v Speaker 3>and faith and everything else. And one of the things

1:03:47.680 --> 1:03:49.360
<v Speaker 3>I've always wanted to ask someone like you, if you

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:54.160
<v Speaker 3>don't mind me asking you, is how does somebody who

1:03:54.640 --> 1:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>has a strong belief in their faith and probably turns

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 3>to their faith often and has been brought up in

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>that environment, how does something like you reconcile belief with

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 3>You're also many history with facts? How do you reconcile

1:04:19.320 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>those things?

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>You know? Do I believe in God?

1:04:24.080 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, I'm quite practical. I'm now

1:04:26.520 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 3>a person of history and I'm watching the facts and

1:04:29.640 --> 1:04:32.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm writing about the facts about the way things happened.

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do you reconcile those two things?

1:04:37.840 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Well? Maybe I haven't thought deeply enough about it, Mark,

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:43.320
<v Speaker 2>But I've got to say that I've never had a

1:04:43.360 --> 1:04:50.040
<v Speaker 2>particular problem. I think I guess the thing that most

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 2>perplexes people are most frequently perplexes people is the problem

1:04:55.720 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of evil. How does a good God allow evil things

1:05:00.880 --> 1:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to have?

1:05:01.200 --> 1:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>For example?

1:05:02.360 --> 1:05:08.720
<v Speaker 2>And I've always accepted that God gave human beings agency,

1:05:09.520 --> 1:05:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and often enough flawed agency values. Yeah, flawed infallible human

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:23.959
<v Speaker 2>beings will make bad choices, sometimes downright evil choices. And look,

1:05:24.760 --> 1:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>he created a natural world where I suppose nature does

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>things which hurt people, storms, floods, et cetera. But again,

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>this is the natural world that God created, and we

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:49.160
<v Speaker 2>are in this natural world to make the best of things,

1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to make the most of things. And it's how we

1:05:53.160 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>handle the challenges that we face in our lives, which

1:05:58.400 --> 1:06:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess is the measure of us. And hopefully we'll

1:06:02.200 --> 1:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>measure up and one day Saint Peter will welcome us

1:06:06.000 --> 1:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>through the pearly gates.

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Is well, because I often think about someone like Albert Einstein,

1:06:10.160 --> 1:06:13.680
<v Speaker 3>who was a Jewish by faith and obviously lived by

1:06:13.760 --> 1:06:16.160
<v Speaker 3>that faith, but at the same time, you know, he

1:06:16.400 --> 1:06:20.960
<v Speaker 3>was pining on relativity and all sorts of formulas like

1:06:21.440 --> 1:06:24.840
<v Speaker 3>equals M three squared working out you know he didn't

1:06:24.920 --> 1:06:26.840
<v Speaker 3>quite get to this point, But did you know his

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:30.040
<v Speaker 3>stuff led to sub atomic particles, and all of us

1:06:30.080 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>are made up of these little bits and pieces that

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:33.720
<v Speaker 3>we can't even see or even contemplate.

1:06:33.800 --> 1:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>But knowing do you think knowing more? Knowing more? I

1:06:38.760 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>think just adds to the sense.

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Of war and wonder where did it start?

1:06:43.320 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>At, how at how it's all come about? And I

1:06:46.440 --> 1:06:52.640
<v Speaker 2>guess I don't think something as incredible and as wonderful

1:06:52.680 --> 1:06:56.600
<v Speaker 2>as the natural world, and indeed the human world in

1:06:56.640 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the units, happened by accident. I accept that at some

1:07:01.920 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 2>point in time a good God created all of this

1:07:06.040 --> 1:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>and our challenges people who are in some way, and

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the image of likeness of God is to be our

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 2>best selves, to come closer to being our best selves

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>every day?

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Does Tony Abbott ever struggle with these things?

1:07:23.080 --> 1:07:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you ever look at what's going on and say,

1:07:24.800 --> 1:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>place where people are in terrible conditions and dying, do

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 3>you ever struggle with that?

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Well? I lament it, But the struggle is to make

1:07:34.880 --> 1:07:39.600
<v Speaker 2>things better, not to despair. So I think the problem

1:07:39.640 --> 1:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>with the problem with atheism, as I understand it, is

1:07:45.440 --> 1:07:50.840
<v Speaker 2>that it often leads people to despair, and despair can

1:07:50.960 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 2>lead people to suicide. It can lead lead people to

1:07:56.600 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>neglect of their fundamental responsibilities. And I mean, for instance,

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>how many atheist hospitals are there, how many atheist schools

1:08:05.440 --> 1:08:09.240
<v Speaker 2>are there. So much of the things that we value

1:08:09.280 --> 1:08:15.640
<v Speaker 2>and take for granted the product of religious endeavor, or

1:08:16.240 --> 1:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>more broadly, the inspiration of religious faith. And I just

1:08:24.040 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>think that's almost self.

1:08:26.040 --> 1:08:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Evident making things better.

1:08:27.720 --> 1:08:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's one of the things that drove

1:08:29.240 --> 1:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Tony Abbott to one day become or want to become

1:08:32.280 --> 1:08:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the leader of this country.

1:08:33.520 --> 1:08:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Look, the Jesuits back in my day had this, if

1:08:39.600 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>you're like injunction to be a man for others. And

1:08:44.160 --> 1:08:49.040
<v Speaker 2>while there are all sorts of different and valid ways

1:08:49.080 --> 1:08:52.439
<v Speaker 2>of being a man for others, I always thought that

1:08:52.680 --> 1:08:55.400
<v Speaker 2>for me, being a man for others was making a

1:08:55.439 --> 1:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>difference in as widespread a way as possible. And I

1:09:00.680 --> 1:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>guess that's what led me into journalism and politics.

1:09:06.520 --> 1:09:09.639
<v Speaker 1>In your book it's called Australia.

1:09:09.160 --> 1:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Australia a history can ask you about.

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:12.599
<v Speaker 1>A history, not the history.

1:09:13.120 --> 1:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Was there some thought about which in definite article or

1:09:17.360 --> 1:09:19.360
<v Speaker 3>definite article is going to put in front of the history,

1:09:19.400 --> 1:09:21.679
<v Speaker 3>did you decide it should be a history? In other words,

1:09:21.680 --> 1:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>it's an objective and not subjective.

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, plainly, it is possible to put a different interpretation

1:09:29.080 --> 1:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>on the same facts. I mean, for instance, let's take

1:09:32.920 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>fraguments sake the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The

1:09:37.040 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>American interpretation is that this was necessary to end the

1:09:40.400 --> 1:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>most destructive war in history. I suspect the Japanese interpretation

1:09:44.520 --> 1:09:50.200
<v Speaker 2>is slightly different. Yes, although to the great credit of

1:09:50.320 --> 1:09:51.520
<v Speaker 2>modern Japan.

1:09:52.520 --> 1:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>They have accepted or reconciled that, And I.

1:09:57.240 --> 1:10:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Reconciled very much to the Americans, and have greatly embraced

1:10:04.439 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>democracy and the rule of law and concepts of justice

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and freedom and so on. So it was, in the end,

1:10:14.280 --> 1:10:17.439
<v Speaker 2>you're right, I thought a history was a better title

1:10:17.479 --> 1:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>than the history.

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I know.

1:10:21.960 --> 1:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I accept that others might see things differently, but I

1:10:26.160 --> 1:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>have tried to tell the story of Australia as objectively

1:10:30.400 --> 1:10:34.080
<v Speaker 2>as I can. And the subtitle how an ancient Land

1:10:34.120 --> 1:10:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Became a Great Democracy, I think is an indication of

1:10:37.920 --> 1:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the fact that I, at at the very least want

1:10:42.840 --> 1:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to see our story as a glass half full rather

1:10:46.000 --> 1:10:47.120
<v Speaker 2>than a glass half empty.

1:10:47.400 --> 1:10:53.799
<v Speaker 3>And do you think Tony Abbott today more mature past

1:10:54.640 --> 1:10:57.320
<v Speaker 3>those periods in your life where you were a PM

1:10:57.360 --> 1:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>and an active politician is a much more humble person.

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:06.799
<v Speaker 3>It displays much more humility. Do you feel that about yourself?

1:11:07.880 --> 1:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, Mark, I am a little reluctant to put tags

1:11:11.320 --> 1:11:13.720
<v Speaker 2>on myself because.

1:11:13.840 --> 1:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, how important is humility to you?

1:11:15.240 --> 1:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Then? Well, humility is very important human quality, a very

1:11:20.200 --> 1:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>important human quality. And none of us like individuals who

1:11:24.960 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>are full of themselves and who are self obsessed. And

1:11:33.040 --> 1:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I would not want to claim to be free of

1:11:38.720 --> 1:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the vice of self importance, but I certainly I dislike

1:11:44.280 --> 1:11:48.960
<v Speaker 2>it in others, and if it's present in myself, I

1:11:49.000 --> 1:11:50.519
<v Speaker 2>should try to get rid of it.

1:11:50.920 --> 1:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, my sense is that it's not present in yourself

1:11:54.720 --> 1:11:57.679
<v Speaker 3>in just in terms of this conversation. And I think

1:11:57.680 --> 1:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>as we get older, maybe only one of the few

1:12:01.920 --> 1:12:04.040
<v Speaker 3>bet of us getting on is a wisdom sort of

1:12:04.080 --> 1:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>bestows a few of these things upon us, and we

1:12:05.800 --> 1:12:07.519
<v Speaker 3>start to be able to reflect on ourselves a bit

1:12:07.560 --> 1:12:10.320
<v Speaker 3>better than we ever did when we were younger.

1:12:10.439 --> 1:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>But I think I think some of us improve with

1:12:13.360 --> 1:12:19.719
<v Speaker 2>age because we become wiser and perhaps more compassionate, perhaps

1:12:19.800 --> 1:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>more sensitive, others become more impatient, more difficult. Perhaps in

1:12:31.840 --> 1:12:37.479
<v Speaker 2>some ways we can be both deeper and less patient

1:12:37.520 --> 1:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>at the same time. I know I'm less patient now

1:12:41.200 --> 1:12:43.599
<v Speaker 2>that I was. I was probably never very patient.

1:12:44.080 --> 1:12:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm the same. Are you still a member of the

1:12:46.520 --> 1:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>surf Club?

1:12:47.720 --> 1:12:50.759
<v Speaker 2>I am still. I'm a life member of our surf club.

1:12:52.880 --> 1:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I haven't done patrols for a couple of years. The

1:12:56.120 --> 1:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>pandemic and the fact that there were no patrols for

1:13:00.040 --> 1:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous reasons in twenty twenty two kind of that was

1:13:07.320 --> 1:13:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the end of my patrolling. But I'm still a very

1:13:09.960 --> 1:13:15.000
<v Speaker 2>active member of the rural Fire Service. I'm now a

1:13:15.080 --> 1:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>member of two brigades, the Davidson Brigade, which I've been

1:13:17.960 --> 1:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>in for twenty five years or more, and in more

1:13:21.200 --> 1:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>recent times I've become a member of the North arm

1:13:23.280 --> 1:13:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Cave Brigade up at Port Stevens.

1:13:25.280 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>And famously you were, you know, the budget smugglers. Yeah,

1:13:28.600 --> 1:13:29.880
<v Speaker 3>do you still get in your.

1:13:31.280 --> 1:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Good man?

1:13:32.040 --> 1:13:35.800
<v Speaker 3>And do you ever I said to you earlier about

1:13:35.800 --> 1:13:40.360
<v Speaker 3>the shirt fronting of Putin. I think that was for

1:13:40.400 --> 1:13:44.000
<v Speaker 3>me one of the great moments in Austry politics.

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we don't get enough of that today.

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wish I'd been able to do more than

1:13:49.240 --> 1:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>just shirt front Putin, because Putin he's done monstrous things,

1:13:54.520 --> 1:13:57.519
<v Speaker 2>absolutely monstrous things. I mean, the initial invasion of Ukraine

1:13:57.520 --> 1:14:02.560
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fourteen was was a horrible, horrible, active aggression,

1:14:03.240 --> 1:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>and what he's now embarked upon is effectively a campaign

1:14:06.080 --> 1:14:10.639
<v Speaker 2>of extermination against the Ukrainian nation. And I just think

1:14:10.680 --> 1:14:15.599
<v Speaker 2>that's evil, absolutely evil, and it must be resisted. And

1:14:16.160 --> 1:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I wish we were doing more to help the Ukrainians.

1:14:18.400 --> 1:14:22.479
<v Speaker 3>As an Australian. Yeah, me too, Well, Tony, it's been

1:14:22.520 --> 1:14:24.840
<v Speaker 3>a great pleasure. I'm good luck with the book mate.

1:14:25.000 --> 1:14:26.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess people can buy it on book Toby in

1:14:26.439 --> 1:14:29.000
<v Speaker 3>all the usual places, all usual places.

1:14:28.720 --> 1:14:31.519
<v Speaker 2>And there's a doco as well that they can get

1:14:31.680 --> 1:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>on the Sky website. They've got the foxtail app they

1:14:35.880 --> 1:14:36.760
<v Speaker 2>can get it through that.

1:14:37.640 --> 1:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>The doco three part series, three part.

1:14:39.920 --> 1:14:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Documentary is outstanding, wonderful.

1:14:43.960 --> 1:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I've actually listened on the radio.

1:14:45.560 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 3>You can listen on the radios because what happens, the

1:14:47.280 --> 1:14:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Sky plays it and you can actually listen to it

1:14:50.520 --> 1:14:51.360
<v Speaker 3>as well on radio.

1:14:51.439 --> 1:14:52.599
<v Speaker 1>So I've been listening to it at night.

1:14:52.800 --> 1:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>But the pictures are worth watching too. I mean it's

1:14:55.479 --> 1:14:59.400
<v Speaker 2>been it's beautifully done. Now the book, I take one

1:14:59.439 --> 1:15:04.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent responsibility for the doco I presented, and the

1:15:04.720 --> 1:15:07.479
<v Speaker 2>doco was inspired by the book and it is faithful

1:15:07.520 --> 1:15:11.519
<v Speaker 2>to the book. But in the end the credit belongs

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:14.559
<v Speaker 2>to Sky and the producer Alex Garipoli, who did just

1:15:14.600 --> 1:15:15.719
<v Speaker 2>the most wonderful job.

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there many illustrations in the book.

1:15:18.360 --> 1:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>The book's got I think sixteen pages or something of

1:15:21.120 --> 1:15:25.519
<v Speaker 2>photographs and if you want to get a rough idea

1:15:25.560 --> 1:15:28.640
<v Speaker 2>of where I'm going, flick through the photos because the

1:15:28.720 --> 1:15:32.760
<v Speaker 2>captions and the little narrations the bottom of the photos

1:15:33.240 --> 1:15:34.479
<v Speaker 2>helps to tell the story.

1:15:34.720 --> 1:15:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for signing, Tony.

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:38.639
<v Speaker 3>So this is the book How an Ancient Land Became

1:15:38.680 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 3>a Great Democracy Australia A history.

1:15:41.439 --> 1:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I really love the cover actually, and.

1:15:43.600 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 2>It's beautifully beautifully presented.

1:15:45.600 --> 1:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it really is something you should be proud of.

1:15:48.040 --> 1:15:50.879
<v Speaker 3>Digital and audio book mate, I did in your voice.

1:15:50.800 --> 1:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>My voice. It was about twelve hours of Narrasian.

1:15:53.640 --> 1:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:15:53.920 --> 1:15:56.240
<v Speaker 3>And it's quite hard, isn't it, Because you're sitting in

1:15:56.240 --> 1:15:59.639
<v Speaker 3>there as a dude in a box with a soundprov box.

1:15:59.520 --> 1:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Stating telling you no, you didn't get that right. You're mumbled,

1:16:03.280 --> 1:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>or I think you've mispronounced that word or something like that.

1:16:05.920 --> 1:16:06.799
<v Speaker 1>The word you wrote.

1:16:07.120 --> 1:16:09.160
<v Speaker 3>And what's interesting too, when I have found I did

1:16:09.160 --> 1:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>it like again? I wonder what you found is that

1:16:10.920 --> 1:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>when you were reading aloud what you had written for

1:16:14.920 --> 1:16:19.439
<v Speaker 3>someone to read, did you think to yourself at any stage, Wow,

1:16:20.160 --> 1:16:21.599
<v Speaker 3>maybe I could have changed it a little bit.

1:16:21.800 --> 1:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, obviously, if you are writing for something to be read,

1:16:29.720 --> 1:16:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that is often a bit different to writing for something

1:16:34.000 --> 1:16:39.879
<v Speaker 2>to be spoken. Ye, And occasionally I thought this sentence

1:16:39.920 --> 1:16:42.040
<v Speaker 2>is a bit too long. It should have been broken

1:16:42.160 --> 1:16:48.040
<v Speaker 2>up for the purposes of the audio book. But I've

1:16:48.040 --> 1:16:52.519
<v Speaker 2>got to say there were fewer moments than I thought

1:16:52.520 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>there would be. When reading it out aloud, I felt

1:16:57.360 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>that there was infelicity of one sort or other. I

1:17:01.000 --> 1:17:04.920
<v Speaker 2>did come across one error, one a grageous error, which

1:17:04.960 --> 1:17:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I like to think must have been the fault of

1:17:07.280 --> 1:17:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the publisher as opposed to the author. But nevertheless, I've

1:17:12.160 --> 1:17:14.840
<v Speaker 2>got to say that I think that it's come up

1:17:15.600 --> 1:17:18.840
<v Speaker 2>wonderfully well. The publishers have done a great job. The

1:17:18.880 --> 1:17:25.839
<v Speaker 2>cover is I think beautiful. Interestingly, Graham Edwards Peacock, the

1:17:25.960 --> 1:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>artist whose painting forms the cover exemplifies if you like

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the early Australian story. He was a lawyer in London

1:17:37.040 --> 1:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>who was sentenced to death for forgery. It was commuted

1:17:41.960 --> 1:17:46.839
<v Speaker 2>to transportation for life. He gets to Port mcquarie because

1:17:46.840 --> 1:17:51.719
<v Speaker 2>of his education. He's immediately given a ticket of leave

1:17:52.040 --> 1:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and works in the administration of the penal settlement at

1:17:57.120 --> 1:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Port mcquarie. He brings his family out to join him.

1:18:01.439 --> 1:18:06.479
<v Speaker 2>He then gets a job as effectively a meteorologist at

1:18:06.520 --> 1:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the south Head Weather Station and while there develops his

1:18:11.160 --> 1:18:15.360
<v Speaker 2>skills as an artist, becomes one of our more notable

1:18:16.040 --> 1:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>early colonial artists. And his work, as I said, a

1:18:19.080 --> 1:18:24.599
<v Speaker 2>dawns the cover. But he is typical of how people

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:28.599
<v Speaker 2>made the most of their second chants, made the most

1:18:28.640 --> 1:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of the opportunities that life in Australia gave them.

1:18:31.560 --> 1:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank God, because my mother's.

1:18:35.240 --> 1:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>One of my mother's family or mother's side, was on

1:18:37.360 --> 1:18:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the series and they first as you know that, they

1:18:41.160 --> 1:18:45.080
<v Speaker 3>first arrived in south Head and stopped at place called

1:18:45.120 --> 1:18:45.759
<v Speaker 3>Camp Cove.

1:18:46.200 --> 1:18:48.360
<v Speaker 2>And there's a plaque there marking the spot.

1:18:48.439 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 3>And I live in the very first house ever building

1:18:51.479 --> 1:18:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Camp Cove in ninety six and it was given to

1:18:54.840 --> 1:18:59.880
<v Speaker 3>a Russian scientist because it was the first marine by

1:19:00.120 --> 1:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>logical station in the Southern Hemisphere. And I feel as

1:19:04.360 --> 1:19:06.360
<v Speaker 3>though and the reason why I've always wanted to live

1:19:06.400 --> 1:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>there is because of my mother's side of the family

1:19:09.479 --> 1:19:11.640
<v Speaker 3>first coming in on one of the ships.

1:19:12.280 --> 1:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a wonderful place to live. I occasionally have

1:19:15.120 --> 1:19:17.759
<v Speaker 2>a cup of coffee at Camp Cave when I'm cycling

1:19:17.760 --> 1:19:21.040
<v Speaker 2>around the Eastern Suburbs and it's a gorgeous spot.

1:19:21.160 --> 1:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You're one of those guys.

1:19:21.960 --> 1:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I can hear get in there early in the morning

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:26.840
<v Speaker 3>up the top there up the first place called green Point,

1:19:27.000 --> 1:19:29.479
<v Speaker 3>and I can hear voices. I'm going to be looking

1:19:29.479 --> 1:19:31.680
<v Speaker 3>out for we next so I'm going to come and say, hey, mate.

1:19:31.840 --> 1:19:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Could possibly be there on Saturday morning.

1:19:34.040 --> 1:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I might see turning of it. A great pleasure, mate

1:19:37.000 --> 1:19:37.559
<v Speaker 2>Thank you make