WEBVTT - Sharri | 31 March

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry, Thanks Andrew and good evening. Yep, it's

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>a massive show tonight. Kevin Rudd begs the Trump administration

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to cut a secret deal on Tariff's. My sources say

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 2>he's citing the election. Our exclusive in a moment, plus

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>my revelation today that a Chinese spy ship is circumnavigating

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Australia's south coast. Well Albanese's weak response as the coalition

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 2>questions want intelligence.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It's collecting this group has made big news.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 3>More on that coming up.

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Nine hold into court today over the secret recordings where

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>journalist Nick McKenzie admits to breaching his own ethics in

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the war crimes case against Ben Robert Smith. The Victoria

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Cross recipient's parents make an emotional plea, and Albanze finally

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 2>responds to the outcomes from our Sky News Anti Semitism summit,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>but his letter firms he's not going to implement a

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 2>single one. Alex Driftin will be on the show a

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>bit later to respond to this disappointing but not unsurprising news.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Plus who will.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 2>Dial Lee back in a hung Parliament? Well, she'll tell

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>us live tonight now. As I said this is a

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>big show. It's the first official day of the election

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 2>campaign and these exclusive stories from day one are exactly

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>what you can expect from our journalism every night of

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the campaign. You won't get them on the ABC or

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>any other network, so make sure you're watching here at

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>eight o'clock every night and first tonight, Yes, the election

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>campaign is on with Peter Dutton kicking off in Queensland,

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 2>then Western Sydney on the weekend and to Margo in

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>the Newcastle region and tonight back in Brisbane with my

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>mate Paul Murray. The Prime Minister started in Dutton's seat

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of Dixon in an aggressive sign he was coming after

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the opposition leader. Over the weekend, Albinizi also went to

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Bundenberg the Bell where the seat of Eden Monaro, and

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>he was in Perth today. Now Peter Dutton enters this

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 2>contest from behind and against the grain of history. The

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>last time a government lost after one term was in

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen thirties, nearly a century ago.

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Buddies in with a chance a good chance.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Although the polls have tightened, with Albenizi now ahead in

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 2>news poll, but it's only a one point lead and

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 2>ahead as preferred prime Minister in the Herald's Resolved Political Monitor,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 2>but Freshwater's poll in the finn Review still had the

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Coalition ahead just at fifty one forty nine two pp.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Now there's a long way to go.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>It's still just under five weeks until polling day, and

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the scrutiny of Albanesi's monumental broken promises and lies is

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>only just beginning. The Australian reports today that Albanezi promised

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>before the last election that there'd be two seventy five

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>dollars off your power bills, and of course it's a

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>promise no one can forget.

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 4>Deducing power prices by two hundred and seventy five dollars

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and seventy five dollars a year. There'll be

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 4>reduction for households of two hundred and seventy five dollars.

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>At the time.

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister or Albanizi then said that this promise

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 2>was based on the most comprehensive modeling ever undertaken.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 4>This as good policy, but we made sure we could

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 4>back it up with the most extensive independent modeling ever

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 4>carried out for any policy by any opposition ever since federation.

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 2>And he repeated that promise again at a press conference.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Prices will be loud, the modelings out there for all this,

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 4>we need independent modeling by reputex the most extensive modeling

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 4>for any policy by any opposition since federation.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Well that was a total lie, because now Albin Ezi

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>is walking away from this modeling, claiming, no, it couldn't

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>be trusted, it was undertaken by someone else.

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 4>It's reputexas modeling.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Excuse me, you took that was what you base your

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 5>policies on. It's Reputex's model ownership of that modeling. It's

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 5>reputexas modeling. From that time, you don't support the modeling anymore.

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 5>This is you walking away from that modeling.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 4>It's reputexas modeling based upon the circumstances at that time.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is simply a true reflection of Albanese's own character,

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 2>his disregard for the truth or accountability. Another example today,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 2>he stood in front of a Medicare sign and claimed

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>that medica would only be safe under his government, but

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 2>not under Peter Dutton.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>This is a choice this election. It's a choice between labor,

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 4>building Australia's future and strengthening Medicare and a coalition led

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 4>by Peter Dutton that wants to cut everything except for

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 4>your taxes, a coalition that will cut medicare as sure

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 4>as not.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Follows day now our Monday panelist who's going to be

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 2>on the show tonight, Cameron Milner.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>He writes this evening.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>In The Nightly that he was personally in the labor

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>back room when they first, in his words, cooked up

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Maddie Scare in twenty sixteen, and he's going to speak

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>about that on the show tonight. But he notes that

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Alban Easy is now in a brilliant mood.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>He's flying.

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 3>He thinks he's going to win this election easily.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 2>But the poll's show this is what Cameron Milner writes,

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>These poles show Albo might be suffering from a case

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>of premature election, peaking too early, with so long yet

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to go in this campaign. He says, it's still early days.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>And let's not forget Albo's best campaign week in twenty

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty two was when he had COVID, only the company

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 2>of Toto and an excuse not to be a nightly

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>reminder of why voters detest his presence, and Biona then

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>goes on to say that he really hopes for the

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party's sake that Albanesi doesn't condemn the party to

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>being a one term wonder through his self harming actions

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 2>yes to the Albow Voice, Copacabana retirement purchase, Quantus upgrades

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>and Nathan's Chairman's lounge membership or mark Labour down due

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to his insipid weakness in government from everything from Beijing

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to Trump and actually fighting the cost of living crisis.

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, indeed, but.

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 2>Albanzi has repeated the many Scan lie several times since Friday.

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>He stood at press conferences, He's waived the Medicare card around,

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 2>claimed this was under threat. Yet as far as I've seen,

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>no one has properly called him out in this. No

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>one has pulled him up and said, actually, Prime Minister,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 2>where is the evidence that the coalition will cut Medicare?

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Albaneze's claim is knowingly unethical and untruthful.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It's simply a lie Dutton.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Everyone knows that Dutton has no plans to scrap Medicare now.

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>The tactic was still successful in the past.

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>It reduced their loss in twenty sixteen, and we just

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 2>have to hope that surely voters can't fall.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>For the same lies yet again.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's turn to some of our exclusive stories tonight,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Rudd's secret push for tariff exemptions plus a Chinese

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>spy ship circling our coast. Like in tonight reveal that

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Right has been begging the Trump administration to give

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Australia a reprieve on aluminium and steeled tariffs, arguing specifically

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>that this needs to happen before the election.

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>He's also been.

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Seeking to have Australia exempt from the Liberation Day tariffs

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 2>by offering a deal that involves giving America a guaranteed

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>stake in Australia's critical minerals. Now, Trump has said that

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>April the second is Liberation Day, when he plans tougher

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 2>trade tariffs that are hit America's largest trading partners.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 6>We are we have Liberation Day, as you know, on

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 6>April second, because and I'm not referring to Canada, but

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 6>many countries have taken advantage of us the likes of

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 6>which nobody even thought it was possible for many, many decades,

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 6>for decades.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 2>The renewed push for tariff exemptions comes amid the Albanzy

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>government's panic about the election outcome and It follows out

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>downing revelations that Trump wouldn't take Albanese's phone call. Now

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Kevin rad Australia's Washington ambassador, is understood to have been

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 2>actively trying to get tariff exemptions over the line before

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the May third election. There's no love for Rudd among

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration. His past comments calling the President a

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 2>village idiot, among.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Other insults a well known.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 2>But Trump has also rebuffed Albanese's repeated requests for a

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 2>phone call, and this was highly embarrassing for Albanesi.

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>He tried to deny.

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 2>This completely when I first broke the story, but then

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>was forced to reluctantly confirm that he couldn't get another

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 2>call with Trump when he was asked about it a

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 2>week later. The Prime Minister Anthony Albanesi has not managed

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 2>to schedule another call with President Donald Trump, despite trade

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 2>tariff's due to take effect in just eight days.

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 4>We have continued to put in a request for another

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 4>discussion with President Trump.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Are you disappointed that requests to have second phone calls

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 5>with Trump couldn't be fulfilled?

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 7>Friends should pick.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Up the phone, shouldn't They? Web engaged Web engaged, including

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 4>through writing, including at senior levels.

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 8>Of the government.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 2>And again when I asked the Albanezi government about this

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>story today, once again a denial. A spokeswoman for Penny

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Wong said it was not true that Rudd has cited

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 2>the upcoming election during negotiations. They said, the claims from

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>your unidentified source are fabricated and untrue. Well, we can

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>take that with a grain of salt. Perhaps Kevin Right

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 2>is right and he never said that, But Peter Dutton

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 2>at least believes he'd have a better working relationship with

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Trump if he were elected Prime minister.

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 9>It's obvious that Anthony Aubernezi and Kevin Wright have had

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 9>a shocker. The Prime minister can't secure a phone call

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 9>a little at a meeting with the President of the

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 9>United States, and how on earth can an outcome be

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 9>negotiated if the President won't even take the prime minister's call.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 2>I've mentioned this before that sources close to the United

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 2>States president say Alban Easy is viewed as an anti Trump,

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>left wing globalist. But despite the rocky relationship between Trump

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 2>and the alban Easy team, I'm told that a tariff

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 2>exemption could happen this week, and this could be the

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 2>liberation day tariffs or an exemption on steel and aluminium.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 2>As I mentioned, it's understood that the alben Ezy government

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>has been working on a deal to have Australia exempt

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 2>from Trump's tariffs in exchange for access to critical minerals.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>If this is granted, it would be in spite of

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Rudd and not because of him. It would be a

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:02.559
<v Speaker 2>reflection on the enduring Australia American alliance and not because

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of any work done by the Albanese government. In fact,

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the United States under both the Biden administration and now Trumps,

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 2>have been disappointed, to say the least, with Australia's foreign

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>policy positions. This includes Albanesi CosIng up to China and

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>also Australia's voting record at the United Nations, which has

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>been against United States interests, particularly on Israel and the

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Middle East. Now, the US was already growing agitated with

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 2>the Albanese government on both China.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And Israel, and that was under Joe Biden.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Relations are now even more out of step under Trump,

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and China is reasserting its dominance in our region. Earlier today,

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 2>I exclusively revealed on the Sky News website that a

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Chinese government sponsored deep sea research vessel is circumnavigating the

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>southern coast of Australia. It's a path that's tracking a

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 2>similar route to our deep sea submarine cables. Now, this

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Chinese vessel is understood to have a dual purpose. It's

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>got legitimate scientific research while it's collecting intelligence. It's therefore

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>considered by national security experts to be a spy ship.

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Now Here was Dave Shama and Chris Kenny Show and

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Asby's Michael Schubridge speaking to Kieran Gilbert about this question earlier.

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 7>This is not an innocuous research vessel.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 10>This is undoubtedly doing hydrographic research that's an exercise in

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:41.719
<v Speaker 10>intelligence gathering.

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 7>There is no distinction between civilian and military research from

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 7>these Chinese vessels, so everything that it collects will be

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 7>passed to the People's Liberation only.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese ship called Tanso Yihow is currently the coast

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 2>of South Australia and it is with it Australia's.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Exclusive economic zone.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Now this follows a similar route to Australia's submarine cables,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 2>which it could be mapping, or it could even be

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>signaling that it has the capability to cut the cables.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Journalists asked the Prime Minister about this after my story

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 2>went online at his press conference in Perth earlier today,

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and he tried to brush it away and just move

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 2>on quickly.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 4>It's been in New Zealand on a joint research operation

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 4>and this isn't the first time that a similar vessel

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 4>has been around the Australian coast. It occurred in twenty

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty for example, just to give one example. Australia, as

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 4>you would expect, is monitoring this.

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>But it's the Chinese ship's ability to drop a mini

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>submersible that can reach up to ten thousand meters below

0:14:58.800 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 2>sea level.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 3>It's the route of concern.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean picture that ten thousand meters below sea level.

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Now again, Albanezi was asked about this point today.

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 3>On this research vessel.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 11>It's come back for a second time. Do you know

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 11>it's different?

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So do you know what it is researching?

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>What have you done to protect our undersea cables from

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 2>any monitoring or sabotage and have you communicated anything to

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese government about this?

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 4>What we have done is we continuing to monitor it.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 4>We won't for obvious reasons, broadcast everything that we're doing

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 4>but we're keeping an eye on this as we do

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 4>as we do well avents.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>What does monitoring actually mean?

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 4>What it means is that the Australian Defense Force are

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 4>monitoring what is happening. It's going from New Zealand, we

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 4>expect it to go around to China around that way.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 2>So the ship was in Wellington on a legitimate joint

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>exploration exercise with New Zealand, but instead of taking the

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 2>most direct route to China to return, it is instead

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>going around the Australian coast and maps show it has

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 2>traveled through the Tasman Sea between New Zealand and Australia,

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>then the bas Strait and is now off the coast

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of South Australia, a similar route to the one taken

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>by the Chinese warship last month after its live fire

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>exercises off the coast of the Tasman Sea. Now Shadow

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Home Affairs Minister James Patterson told Peter Kredline earlier that

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 2>what this Chinese ship is doing is nothing like Australian

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 2>ships in Chinese waters, as Albanese claimed, now.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 10>Non Australian vessel is engaging in deep seabed examination in

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 10>the territorial waters off the coast of China. We don't

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 10>even have these sorts of vessels, so to compare the

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 10>two was a false moral equivalence and the slur on

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 10>men and women of the ADF.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 2>And the comparison or the excuse that Albanezi gave is absurd.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Australia is helping to enforce freedom of navigation exercises.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 3>In international waters.

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>While the Chinese ship is in Australia's territorial waters. It's

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a distinction that Albanese just isn't smart enough to understand.

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 2>First the Chinese warship and now about a month later,

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a possible Chinese spy ship is circling our nation. No

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 2>matter how Albanezy tries to downplay this, it's a highly

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 2>concerning sign of aggression from the communist dictatorship and once

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 2>again it highlights the Prime Minister's limp response and weakness

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>in the face of hostile nations. Now a week ago

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 2>today I played you this explosive recording of nine Star

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 2>reporter Nick mackenzie claiming he'd engaged in unethical behavior during

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the Ben Roberts Smith War crimes case. He claimed he'd

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 2>breached his ethics by obtaining part of the Victoria Cross

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 2>recipient's legal strategy from his ex wife and her friend.

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Here were those devastating comments, again.

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Breaking us on his leadership to you respected you, No,

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 5>I shouldn't tell you.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 11>I've just preached my.

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 12>Ethics in doing that.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 11>Like this is where like this is to really se positioned.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 12>Now if they knew that and pet to.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 13>You that I can.

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 2>And this related to Nine's defamation case against Robert Smith,

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>where the allegations of war crimes were found to be

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 2>substantially true. Now after our revelations, Robert Smith's lawyers launched

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 2>a bid to have those findings overturned and for there

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 2>to be a retrial. Well, there was an initial hearing

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 2>on this in court today.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 14>The decision in mister Roberts Smith's appeal was yet to

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 14>be handed down. Now it's up to the court to

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 14>decide whether everyone will be dragged back inside to be

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 14>questioned on this fresh recording.

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Ben Robert Smith's parents Len and Sue, who were in

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>court to show their support.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 9>I was very concerned, as I said, that's about all

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 9>we can say at the stays given the court because

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 9>now has to deal with it.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>And they also told Sky News in a statement that

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>their son had been the subject of vilification by Nick

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>mackenzie and nine. They said the audio recordings were extremely

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 2>concerning on a number of levels. These include questions about

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 2>what legal strategies of Ben's was mackenzie referring to, and

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 2>how did knowledge of them affect the conduct of the

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 2>case before Justice Bisanko.

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Worryingly, that might.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Be impossible to know. The issue is whether or not

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 2>it resulted in an unfair trial. Now, Lenn Robert Smith,

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Ben's father, is a former Justice of the Supreme Court

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of Western Australia. He said there were questions too about

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>what privileged information or material Ben's ex wife, Emma and

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 2>her friend Dannielle.

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Scott told mackenzie or gave to him.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Further, if mackenzie was prepared to speak to Person seventeen

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>as he did on the recording, did he have similar

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>conversations with other witnesses, If so, who and what did

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 2>he say to them? Now McKenzie won major journalism awards

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>for the reports accusing Robert Smith of war crimes. The

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Walkley Board has released a statement saying they'll discuss questions

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not this affects Mackenzie's Walkley award at

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the next board meeting. They said a question about reporting

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 2>by Nick mackenzie relating to a defamation trial would be

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 2>referred to the next board meeting in mid April, in

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>line with standard operating procedure. It's devastating for the Nine

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>network that this recording of their most celebrated journalist is public,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 2>where he's openly confessing to.

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 3>A breach of ethics.

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 2>The network still hasn't properly answered questions about this, beyond

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>saying they defend their journalism. But now this will likely

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 2>come under intense scrutiny at the federal court when mackenzie

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 2>himself could be called to give evidence. All right, a

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 2>busy show tonight to discuss. Let's bring in form a

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Speaker of the House, Bronwin Bishop and Sky News host

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Joe Hildebrand.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Welcome.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Now let's start with the story about the Chinese spyeship.

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 2>How weak do you think Albaneze looked in his comments

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 2>there tonight.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Bromin pathetically weakened.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 15>Indeed, as I watched him pick up a baby and

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 15>cuddle it, trying to get I guess some sympathetic reaction,

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 15>it just screamed to me that Albanizey had no care

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 15>in the world about that future of safety of that child.

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 15>To say that he'd prefer that the that that ship

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 15>wasn't there was just to me asking the question, what

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 15>sort of deal did China's handsome boy do with the

0:21:55.480 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 15>Chinese Communist Party in order to again sell why and lobsters.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 15>What other deals have been done to ensure that whatever

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 15>messages come out of China on their version of we

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 15>Chat or whatever it is they have to the Chinese

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 15>diaspora in Australia. What sort of deals have secretly been done.

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 15>I watched him cuddle that baby and I thought, what

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 15>a hypocrite. You have no care at all for the

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 15>future of that baby's safety.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 12>I did not say that connection.

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>No, there was a lot of.

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 12>Sounds like they steal the baby and sell it to

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 12>the Chinese Communist Party.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 15>Know, Joe, that was not the point. If you cared

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 15>about the future of that child, you would care about

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 15>the future of this nation.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You would start buying drones.

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 15>And use them so you could properly track. When he

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 15>said the idea of his tracking track it because we

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 15>haven't bought them, that's why. So if he said they're

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 15>monitoring how are they monitoring them. There are all sorts

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 15>of things that are so wrong with the defense policies

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 15>of this government that I am quite justified in saying

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 15>that he has no care for the future safety of

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 15>that child.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 12>So you would like to buy drones and one of

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 12>the ship. What else is he meant to do? Is

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 12>he meant to jump up and down?

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>He's meant to.

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 15>Have a proper defense policy. You're not to say.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 12>It's okay baby.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 15>Not to say that he's doing the same thing as

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 15>was carefully laid out those earlier interviews, that in fact

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 15>there's some sort of moral equivalence with us being in

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 15>the South China.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 12>See moral equivalents.

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 15>Well, you're Prime Minister, I think so, and you're going

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 15>to try and stick up and you've got you've got

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 15>a very difficult case.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Let's see's response here or.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 12>Different the fact that matter? I mean again, I don't know.

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 12>Obviously I would rather this ship wasn't there, as well,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 12>I would rather the Chinese warship wasn't doing Li Fi.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>No, it's absolutely not earlier.

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 12>I know I read it because I read the news

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 12>and he said he'd rather not be there. But again,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 12>what is the alternative apart from jumping up and down

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 12>and saying, I mean, do you want China to put

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 12>the bands on our exports again? Do you want? You know,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 12>are we going to pick a pick a fight with

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 12>China when we don't even know how secure our treaty

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 12>is with the United States of America under Donald Trump?

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 12>You guys support I mean.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 13>I just what what? What?

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 12>What is? Actually?

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 8>What is?

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 12>Actually?

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 13>You've got an ambassador.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 15>Begging, begging that's something to be done in Australia's interest.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>What on earth?

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 11>What on earth?

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 15>What on earth is the ambassador in Beijing doing to say,

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 15>get out of our waters?

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 11>Where is that or the prime? And I'm not going

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 11>to tell anybody what they're going.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 12>To So you think that they're here because this giant

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 12>ambassador hasn't said to Beijing, please don't sing.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>That's not the point I'm making a response.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Chinese al response to the Chinese warship was very weak.

0:24:55.840 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 2>In fact, what is Sait even claim that he had

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>been given notice of the live fire exercises when he

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 2>wasn't given notice, So that weak response shows that he's

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 2>not standing up for Australia's interests, And then it invites

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 2>China becomes more emboldened in the face of that weekness.

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 12>Surely it's weaker to say I had no idea. It

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 12>was a complete surprice of me. Of course, you want

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 12>to be able to project strength. Of course the Chinese

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 12>are doing things Clandesteinley which we don't want them to

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 12>be doing. And it is a spy ship.

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 11>Why was it called the Handsome Boy.

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got to be able to count.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 12>Right, there is Chinese propaganda, but you don't believe what

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 12>comes out of the Australian government.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 15>What I'm saying, I am saying, Shoe is you've got

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 15>no right to see that what Alberanzi is doing is

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 15>in the Australian's interest.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 16>So.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 12>Legitimately having secret talks with Beijing. Exactly, he has no

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 12>secret deal because you implied I want to know a secret.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.479
<v Speaker 13>I want to know what has started to resume.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 15>I didn't mentioned.

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 12>But if you start, okay, if you start buying our

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 12>lobsters lobsters you mentioned, but it is if you start again,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 12>you can send out spires the.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 15>Prime Minister Song the Chinese Communist Party.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 12>You think he's having secret talks to the Chinese? Comment

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 12>they're handsome about letting.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 15>A handsome boy our prime minister, I am saying against Australia.

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think saying this. She's saying, play.

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 12>The exactly what for me? You said? What boxes? You said?

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 13>Exactly talking?

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 12>You said, what did he promise them during getting out?

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 15>Next?

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it begs the question, let's not yell.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>She's saying there's been acquiescence that we've seen Albanezi repeatedly

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 2>fail to publicly stand up for Australia's interest. That includes

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 2>when navy divers have been injured, when they've been nar

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Let me finish well. I think what she means is

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>that there's been silence and acquiescence, and that this has.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 12>Seen baby he was holding. I mean that's she was.

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>The baby's future.

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 2>She meant, he's not worried about that baby's future that

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>he was holding it.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 3>There's been a lot of baby.

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 12>Maybe that's secret talks.

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>And on that note, Brahma Bishop, Sorry we didn't get

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>through more topics.

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 12>Very much, always a pleasure so much.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Now we were speaking about the Australians front page earlier

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>where Alban easy you know, claimed that the modeling was accurate.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 3>Now he's walking away from it.

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's bring in the journalist who wrote that story,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 2>The Australians Chief Political correspondent, Jeff Chambers. Jeff, do you

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>think voters are looking at this broken promise and just thinking.

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 3>This is this is typical?

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>They know the Prime minister promise that that energy would

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 2>be turned in seventy five dollars cheap, and now he

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 2>can't even stand by the modeling behind.

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 8>That, Hi, Charry, I think what's even more concerning obviously

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 8>that the price reduction of two hundred and seventy five

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 8>dollars by mid twenty twenty five this year was repeated

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 8>at nauseum by labor ministers and the Prime Minister. But

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 8>there was another additional one hundred and ford dollars that

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 8>was apparently supposed to be saved between twenty twenty five

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 8>and twenty thirty. And when my colleague Greg Brown put

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 8>that to the Prime Minister yesterday, he just blamed it

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 8>all on reputects the people that did the modeling. And

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 8>I was there in December twenty twenty one when Anthony

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 8>Albernezi and Chris Bowen released that modeling and they declared

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 8>it and we had that in the piece today and

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 8>We had a video in there that it was the

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 8>greatest modeling that any opposition had ever done since federation.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 8>So they picked that modeling up and ran with it

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 8>very hard. But the other element to it, Charry, is

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 8>that it underpins literally all of Labour's energy and climate

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 8>change agenda, so forty three percent admissions reduction, the big

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 8>one which is eighty two percent renewables penetration, which Chris

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 8>Bowen is still not walking away from these targets.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 13>They're not on track.

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 8>For those and it might be convenient to walk away

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 8>from such modeling and to criticize the Coalition for not

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 8>having their own numbers. But I think a bit of

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 8>pressure should be applied as to what Labour's now going

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 8>to do.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Jav, I want to ask you to read on the

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>latest news poll today did have alban Ezi slightly ahead,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>but he shouldn't be doing victory lapse just yet.

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 8>No, the poles are really close, and I've said this

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 8>before on your show.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 13>They're going to move either way for either leader. Now,

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 13>obviously there is a bit of pressure.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 8>On Peter Dutton to really put his head down, and

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 8>I know some in his own ranks have sort of

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 8>looked at his petrol policy from last week to half

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 8>fuel excise and thinking, well, it's all good to head

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 8>to the factories and the big industry visits.

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 13>They're all very.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 8>Important, but you know, maybe you sort of double down

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 8>on what you're trying to sell. So you know, there

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 8>is a bit of consternation in Coalition ranks, but for

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 8>Labor they shouldn't get too confident. They're clearly very confident

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 8>either way. They've got a very slim margin in terms

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 8>of their current majority, and I think even people in

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 8>Labor realize that they're going to lose seats and it

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 8>just comes down to how many they lose and how

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 8>many the coalition can pick up.

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's always a question of mathematics. And look, the

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>coalition's targeting around twenty seats and the outer suburban area.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's their strategy.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what strategy do.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 2>You think Labor has, apart from just winning the message

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of the day and trying to limit the swing.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think as an incumbent, a first term incumbent

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 8>after all ten years of Coalition rule, and then you

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 8>have these global factors Donald Trump, and on Thursday he

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 8>has Liberation Day and tomorrow there's a.

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 13>Reserve Bank meeting.

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 8>I think they've picked this date because you've got two

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 8>got two weeks of school holidays, two to three weeks

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 8>of school holidays Easter and Anzac Day, and.

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 13>Then you've got two weeks of pre pole at the end.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 8>So they've tried to really narrow this contest and put

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 8>the pressure on Peter Dutton to really roll out his

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 8>policies at a really tight three week window.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 2>No true, in the school holidays, I mean people go away,

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 2>they tune out from the daily news agenda, So you know,

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess that'll be like the period when Albo had

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 2>COVID and we didn't see him for a week, much

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 2>like Joe Biden when he went into the bunker a

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 2>couple of elections ago. All right, Jeff Chambers, thank you

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>so much for your time, So much more to come

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 2>on the show tonight. Alban Easy fails to commit to

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 2>even one recommendation from our Sky News antisemitism sum At

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Alex Rifchino join me later on. Plus, who will Independent

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 2>dially back in a hung parliament, I'll ask her after this.

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Quick break welcome back.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, we saw that Independent MP Rebecca Sharky came out

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 2>today publicly and said that she would support Peter Dutton

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 2>if there's a hung parliament.

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 3>In my view, the Teals need to.

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Be transparent as they claim to be and firs up

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 2>publicly tell voters who they plan to support if there's

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>a hung parliament. Well, let's ask one true independent, the

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 2>independent MP for Fowler Dially Dian. Great to see you again,

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>so let's get right into it. Who would you support

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in the event of a hung parliament.

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 17>First of all, I don't want to be presumptuous. I

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 17>mean I have to win the election first, and if

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 17>I am privileged enough to win the election, of course

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 17>I'll sit down and negotiate with whoever got the most

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 17>when they you know, at the election, we don't know

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 17>which of the parties will have, you know, the numbers

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 17>of more MPs. That's yet to be you know, the

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 17>results still to come out on election day.

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>But that's how you decided whoever has won the most

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 2>seats if there is a hung parliament, whoever's won the

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>most seats, that's.

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Who you would sit down to negotiate with.

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's right. So we have to wait to see

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 11>the results.

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 17>Don't know who's going to win in terms of most numbers,

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 17>not win, but you have the numbers, then we sit down,

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 17>negotiate with whichever leader and hopefully it will be you know,

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 17>for the benefit of the community in Fouler.

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Voters do deserve to know the answer to this question,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 2>don't they, from all independents, who they would support if

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 2>there is a hung parliament or a close outcome.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, look, I understand that's what the voters would like,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 17>but it's really hard to gauge into, hard to predict,

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 17>hard to see that crystal ball in terms of who

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 17>will have the most seats at the election. And as

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 17>we all know, this election is going to be quite interesting.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 17>It's going to be very complicated, and which is I

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 17>think it's a good good. It doesn't look like anyone

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 17>will have the majority, which sounds like that's the case,

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 17>but that.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 11>Means that whoever have the most numbers of seats will know.

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 17>That they have to focus on the issue at hand,

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 17>which is the cost of living issue. And that's what

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 17>I'm going to be driving for. And like I said, look,

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 17>I don't want to be presumptuous, Shari. It's really it

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 17>is my first term to get re elected and I

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 17>need to focus on my community in making sure that

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 17>I win this election.

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 11>I don't take anything for granted.

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 2>And of course Fouler the seat arena only has a

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>one point four percent margin, so we'll be a battle

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 2>to hold on to it. You've said the policies on

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>cost of living could.

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Sway your decision.

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 2>So how do you compare Labour's tax cuts that come

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>in next July with the Coalition's petrol price reduction.

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 17>Well, I actually when I first got elected in May

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 17>twenty two, that first twelve months, my questions to the

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 17>government and to the Prime Minister Albanzi and his Treasurer

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 17>was around bringing back reintroducing the fuel excise tax cut,

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 17>which I know that under the Coalition they introduced it

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 17>during the COVID era, which really was.

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 11>Very helpful for those that were driving.

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.439
<v Speaker 17>And I kept on calling for that fuel excise tax

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 17>cut that would alleviate a lot of the costs for families,

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 17>especially in Fouler and Southwest Sydney, because a lot of

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 17>our community here.

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 11>They drive petrol field cars.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 17>Many of our famili's owned an average three to four

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 17>cars to drive, you know, kids, grandparents, parents drive themselves

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 17>to work, and so think that's a very common sense approach,

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 17>and also it will help pensioners who will not benefit

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 17>from a tax cut, or who are not working will

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 17>not benefit from a tax cut. Students who don't have

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 17>that income thresholder will benefit from a tax cut, So

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 17>there are more people that will actually have the benefit

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 17>of the few excise tax cut that was announced by

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 17>the opposition leader as opposed to a one percent tax

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 17>cut by the government which won't come.

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 11>Into effect as you mentioned to after July. You know,

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 11>I think fifteen months time.

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, but Dalley, I really appreciate your time in

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.479
<v Speaker 2>the show and appreciate you being upfront and actually willing

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to have this conversation with voters.

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 3>So thank you very much for that.

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, Still to come, Alban Easy fails to commit

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to a single recommendation from our Sky News Anti Semitism summit.

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the Greens blame Israel for her muss executing

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Palestinian protesters.

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll speak about all of that with Alex rif chin Lay.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Plus Cameron Milner's prediction that Alban Easy might well be

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 2>suffering from a case of premature election.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>You'll joined me after the break.

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back.

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the start of a five week election campaign.

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>The parties are basically neck and neck. This election could

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 2>go either way or to discuss a regular Monday political panel,

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Scott Morrison's former media advisor Andrew Carswell and Bill Shotton's

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 2>former chief of staff Cameron Milner and Cameron, I have

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 2>to say I know you and no the Prime Minister

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 2>basically more than anybody else in your column tonight in

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the night they will be no different because you say

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 2>he's celebrating from a premature election.

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 3>He is on a high.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>He does think he's going to win.

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 2>His overconfident, isn't he He is.

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 12>He's effervescent at the moment.

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 18>But it's only going to be one way traffic from

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 18>here and that's what Labour strategies are really worried. He

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 18>has definitely peaked too early three days into thirty three

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 18>day campaign and that's going to be a problem for

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 18>him to sustain it from here. So that's a real

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 18>problem for Labor. But these poles also show, despite the

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 18>headlines that it's still a hung parliament, that Labour's best

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 18>option is to be one seat short Shari, and that's

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 18>still not good enough in this election campaign.

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 2>The polls do show that there has been this slight

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 2>however slight it is two percent or so recovery for

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 2>labor Andrew inside the coalition, how worried is everyone by

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 2>this shift back to Albanezi in the polls.

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 19>I don't think there's any concern Shari. I think was

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 19>what happened at the weekend was entirely expected. The coalition

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 19>have had a pretty rough couple of weeks. So they

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 19>had a very good week last week in getting their

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 19>messaging right in and around the budget and the budget reply.

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 19>But before that you had a period of two or

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 19>three weeks where they were off message. There was z ill discipline,

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.359
<v Speaker 19>they made stumbles, they threw some balloons up in there

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 19>to try and get an interest. It was a messy

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 19>kind of couple of weeks. So they were expect in

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 19>this little blowback. But they're coming up at pretty high

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 19>I mean, it was only four five weeks ago that

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 19>we were thinking, hang on, they're getting pretty close here,

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 19>and they still are close enough, if good enough, and

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 19>they should take confidence in the fact that there is

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 19>a massive, massive number of soft voters out there. It's

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 19>in the order of forty percent. They're going to leave it.

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 19>We're not going to go. It's the biggest I've ever

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 19>seen it.

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, they're going to leave it late.

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.399
<v Speaker 19>They're not going to go early like the decideds will.

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 19>They will leave into the last week and go bang

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 19>bang bang in that last week. So it's all to

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 19>play for.

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 2>I find it so hard to understand that there could

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 2>be soft voters because you've got these two completely different

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 2>political leaders with different policies that you could argue that

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 2>never has there been such a policy contrast going into

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 2>an election. You think back to two thousand and seven

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 2>and the policies between John Howard and Kevin rud were

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>so similar apart from some of the values.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Cameron, what do you think?

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 18>Well, I agree with Andrew and I was only speaking

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 18>to Tony Barry at Redbridge tonight. I mean their latest

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 18>poll on Friday had forty five percent soft vote. This

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 18>is unheard of, unheard of, and I put it down

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 18>to kind of the lyrics of Pearl jabs better man.

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 18>This is about a girl who wants to leave her

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 18>bloke but can't find a better man. That's the dilemma

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 18>that voters have got right now. They know how bad

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 18>Elbow is, they know what they're lived experience with elbows

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.399
<v Speaker 18>like but they're not yet convinced that Dutton's the better man,

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 18>and that's the dilemma for voters. I think once soft

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 18>voters lock on to this election, once they focus on

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 18>the policies and the Coulton is going to get some

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 18>policies out there to be fair, then I think it

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 18>could be an avalanche of votes for the Coalition because

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 18>there's there's so many undecided voters out there.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 12>Shari.

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing that I have noticed over the

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 2>past few days, Andrew, is that the Prime Minister, as

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 2>frustrating as he is, he has the lines ready to go,

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, the lines about Peter Diden wants to cut

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 2>everything except your taxes. He's got these very clear messages,

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 2>whereas I've noticed that the Coalition does and have those

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 2>same slogans which we know work, we know stop the

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 2>boat's work.

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 3>For example.

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the retail messaging needs to be sharper

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 2>from the coalition?

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 3>It does, Sharon.

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 19>I think it will get there. I mean, this is

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 19>the first time Peter Darton has faced an election, has

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 19>faced the rigors of an election campaign which are extreme,

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 19>so getting and staying on message, he'll get better and

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 19>better as the campaign goes along, and that needs to occur,

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 19>and there's there's still some loose moments of the creeping

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.919
<v Speaker 19>and that's to be expected. I mean, you can't look

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 19>down on him too much for making little missteps here

0:41:37.440 --> 0:41:39.919
<v Speaker 19>and there. They'll be hind out and when it really matters,

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 19>at the end of the campaign, he'll be fit and

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 19>ready to go. But you're right, and how been easy?

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 19>I mean he is sharper I think at the moment.

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 19>And he said he's had the benefit of having a

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 19>campaign behind him to really work out what works and

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 19>what doesn't work, and so far he's doing an okay job.

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's interesting, it's not it for it.

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 18>I was just going to say, it's not about election.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 18>It's not about getting being right by election day. Andrew

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 18>pre Pole starts two and a half weeks before that,

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 18>so it's only three weeks until people start voting. I

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:12.280
<v Speaker 18>mean May three is when voting stops. So the colation

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 18>is going to get their act together.

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 19>No, it's been a lot of decideds vote though in

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 19>pre Pole, where whereas the software usually leaves it until

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 19>the last week or so.

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:22.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 2>No, it's really interesting now we saw because often in

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 2>an election campaign, you know, a conversation that one of

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the leaders will have on an FM radio station in

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the morning will then be the main story for the day.

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 2>We saw that today when Peter Dutton was asked whether

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to live in Canberra or Sydney and he

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 2>kind of gave an answer about not staying in the

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 2>camera bubble and instead living at Kuribilly House, and then

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Albanizey came in and criticized him for this, saying he

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 2>was already measuring the curtains, you know, overly confident Andrew.

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, how do you think voters react to this

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 2>sort of quabble from the leaders.

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 19>I think it looks poorly on Alberanezi more than anything,

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.720
<v Speaker 19>and it says a lot about him as a person

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 19>as well, Like he was very keen to say that, oh,

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 19>I stay in Canberra and I need to be close

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 19>to the cabinet suite. I need to be close to

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 19>the National Security suite. And that just shows that he's

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 19>craving this power. He loves his power, he loves being

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 19>there over his dominion. But the thing he didn't kind

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 19>of communicate is that there is a cabinet suite in Sydney.

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 19>You can do those meetings in Sydney. There's a National

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 19>Security suite in Sydney, so there's no real difference in

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 19>terms in terms of location. I think it was just

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:36.920
<v Speaker 19>a cheap shot.

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 2>We saw that Albanezi was in Perth today. He said

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 2>it was his thirtieth trip as Prime Minister, which is

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 2>about ten visits to West Australia every year, so it's

0:43:49.000 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 2>not even one a month, so it actually sounds more

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 2>than it is. But he pledged two hundred million dollar

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 2>upgrade for a Perth hospital. Cameron, this shows how critical

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 2>WA is to this contest.

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you think it's playing out at the moment.

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 18>Well, I think we've talked about this, and Andrew Carsle

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 18>I think wrote about this. I mean there's three seats

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 18>in the West that would have been lost even with

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 18>the landslide state voting vote that Labor received at the

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 18>last day election only a few weeks ago. So the

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 18>West is critical. Quest is crucial for Labor to hold

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 18>and at the moment it looks like two to three

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 18>seats are potentially in the lost pile with no gains,

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 18>so he really has to do what he can in

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 18>West Australia.

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, it is indeed just very quickly because

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 2>we've got to get to a break. But Andrew, how

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 2>many seats do you think the coalition will pick up

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 2>in w A.

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:39.839
<v Speaker 19>I think the coalition pick up two seats, but none

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 19>of them from Labor. I think they pick up Curtain,

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 19>which is a til seat, and I think they pick

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 19>up Bullwinkle as the new seat. It's a real battle

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 19>contest to see whether that fifty to fifty kind of

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 19>contest in teeny goes either way.

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 12>It's pretty tight.

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 2>And now but Easy was of course speaking about his

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, he felt he was confident in Bullwinkle Today

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 2>see Andrew Kazwa, Karra Milner and Cameron love your article

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 2>tonight and even love even more the fact that you

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 2>are getting on Albanezy's nerves so much.

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>The only Labour figure to speak out.

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you both for your time.

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Now after the break, why Albaneze should hang his head

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 2>in shame? He hasn't agreed to a single outcome from

0:45:19.000 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 2>our Sky News antisemitism summit, plus Hamas's reprehensible revenge at

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 2>least six executed after protests against them in Gaza yet

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Adam Bant finds a way to blame Israel. I'll talk

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 2>about this with Alex Ripchin next. Welcome back. Now, you

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.479
<v Speaker 2>recall that the whole purpose of our Sky News Andti

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Semitism Summit was to bring together the brightest minds in

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 2>the nation across all fields to come up with tangible

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 2>solutions that would actually address anti Semitism. There were fifteen

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 2>recommendations at the end of the day, and they included

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>putting anti Semitism education in the national curriculum, putting Holocaust

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:07.759
<v Speaker 2>education back in the national school curriculum, more public awareness.

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 3>And advertising campaigns.

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 2>A judicial inquiry into anti Semitism at universities. There were

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 2>many others, including changes to the Migration Act, others that

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 2>affected national security, not allowing anti Semites into the country. Now,

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Alex Rifchin wrote to both Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanezi

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 2>asking them if they'd endorse these uncontroversial, quite sensible and

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 2>rational outcomes from the summit. Peter Dutton responded saying he

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 2>would endorse every single one that fell under the federal

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:47.399
<v Speaker 2>government remit. But today Alex Riftin received a letter from

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister, a three page letter where he failed

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to endorse a single outcome, and let's bring it now

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 2>to discuss Executive Council of Australian Jury's co CEO, Alex Rifchin.

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Alex, what is your response when you receive this letter?

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 16>I was thoroughly disappointed, Shari. As you said, it was

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 16>a very long and comprehensive response from the Prime Minister

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 16>which he very passionately and I believe very sincerely condemned

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.840
<v Speaker 16>anti Semitism as an evil and as something on Australian

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 16>and listed the government's measures to date in combating antisemitism.

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 16>But as you point out, when we hosted this summit,

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 16>it was with a very clear intention of purpose, and

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 16>it was to move the conversation beyond platitudes and easy

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 16>self evident condemnations and to talk about the solutions, to

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 16>come to grips with what's happening in our streets and

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 16>in our country. To talk about things like the need

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 16>for judicial inquiring to campus antisemitism, to talk about the

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 16>Migration Act, to talk about the ideological rigidity that occurs

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 16>in cultural institutions which contributes to anti semitism. All of

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 16>these things schools, public campaigns, and the fact that the

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 16>Primeister said so much in that letter that totally ignored

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 16>what we actually asked of him, which was to consider

0:47:58.440 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 16>the action plan, what aspects of the government would endorse

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 16>and what aspects had a problem with. I don't open

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 16>up that conversation, but instead it was all missed in time,

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 16>and I think it's a missed opportunity. It's totally disappointing.

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 16>There was a chance to achieve genuine bipartisanship and political

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 16>consensus around anti Semitism, and I think the Primister's missed

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 16>that opportunity.

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 2>And you know, your use of the word bipartisan is

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 2>a good one, because our summit was bipartisan. We invited

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 2>both sides of politics, gave both sides an equal voice,

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And I just think back to that mother.

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Who was on Q and A.

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Asked Albanezier question.

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 2>About anti sevmentism on Q and A a few weeks ago,

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and he said in response, we've done everything the Jewish

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 2>community has asked of us.

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, here you had.

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 2>The Jewish community sending a letter say these are fifteen

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 2>things that would actually make a difference, and he just

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 2>won't even consider them.

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned platitudes.

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 2>In my view, that letter was purely platitudes, so disappointing, Alex.

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 3>But you know we won't stop.

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Neither you or I will not stop campaigning on this absolutely. Now,

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I just want to talk about the brave Palestinian protesters

0:49:07.080 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 2>who've come out against Hamas. Now we've seen them protest

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 2>on the streets.

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Have a quick look.

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Now in response, Hermas has executed six Palestinians. They've also

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>been public beatings, and among those murdered was a twenty.

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Two year old o I al Rubai.

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 2>He was beaten and tortured, only to be later dumped

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 2>on his family's doorstep.

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Alex, this is grotesque.

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 16>No question about it, Charry. And what's happening on the

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 16>streets of Gaza, it poses a real dilemma for the

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:00.439
<v Speaker 16>Proplsian movement, which you and I know is really aciously

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 16>anti Israel and pro Hamas movement for the most part,

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 16>because what's happening in Gaza shows that Hamas is overwhelmingly

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 16>responsible for the part of the Palestini people, which goes

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 16>against the propaganda of the Palestinian movement that Israel is

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 16>the root of all evil in the Middle East and

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.839
<v Speaker 16>all suffering for the Palestinians and indeed the world often

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 16>speak about how the removal of Israel will be a

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 16>great step forward for world peace. The other problem posed

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 16>by these protests is that it's very clear that the

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 16>sort of freedoms that Palestins are now enjoying to be

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 16>able to march and voice their opinions and express themselves

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 16>as they wish, the sort of freedom that israelis cherished

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 16>and enjoy every single day, are being granted to them

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.839
<v Speaker 16>by virtue of Israeli military power. It is the near

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 16>destruction of Hamas that has allowed these freedoms which the

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 16>leaders of the Palestine people would never entrust to their

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 16>own people. But Adam Bant and those who reflexibly condemn

0:50:55.480 --> 0:50:58.319
<v Speaker 16>all of this, they are so wedded to that ideological

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:03.720
<v Speaker 16>position of Israel being uniformly and unequivocally and unavoidably evil,

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 16>but they can't look at the facts. Mcgrod and I

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:09.880
<v Speaker 16>can't express a scheric of solidarity with these braces who

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:11.240
<v Speaker 16>are being brutalized by Hammon.

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 2>We're out of time, Alex, thank you very much, and

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 2>here I can't wait for this. Paul Murray with the

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton pod test