WEBVTT - Credlin | 1 September

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.500
<v Speaker 1>Peter Credlin, live from News 24.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Good evening. Welcome to the program. Here's what's coming up

0:00:10.450 --> 0:00:13.910
<v Speaker 2>tonight on Credlin. Tonight, the latest housing data, which shows

0:00:13.930 --> 0:00:17.430
<v Speaker 2>a freefall in house prices across Australia. Sydney on track

0:00:17.470 --> 0:00:22.170
<v Speaker 2>for its most significant decline in 40 years. 40,000 wiped

0:00:22.210 --> 0:00:27.590
<v Speaker 2>off house values this winter on average. More tonight, too,

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.710
<v Speaker 2>on my News 24 exclusive from yesterday. Just why that

0:00:31.790 --> 0:00:34.690
<v Speaker 2>former AFP whistleblower has not been called as a witness

0:00:34.790 --> 0:00:38.290
<v Speaker 2>to the Bondi Royal Commission, despite sharing bombshell claims of

0:00:38.409 --> 0:00:44.030
<v Speaker 2>critical capability pressure inside the counter-terrorism unit in the lead-up

0:00:44.050 --> 0:00:47.050
<v Speaker 2>to the Bondi terror attack. Plus, Labor's plan to put

0:00:47.110 --> 0:00:50.550
<v Speaker 2>criminal road gangs to work. You heard me right. Prisoners

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.730
<v Speaker 2>used to fix ruined roads this summer in Victoria as

0:00:53.800 --> 0:01:00.910
<v Speaker 2>part of a half-a-million pledge to fill half-a-million potholes. And

0:01:00.950 --> 0:01:03.710
<v Speaker 2>the PM attends a Pacific Islands forum, but quick to

0:01:03.750 --> 0:01:06.730
<v Speaker 2>sit on the diplomatic fence as China ramps up pressure

0:01:06.860 --> 0:01:10.819
<v Speaker 2>on Pacific nations to try and stop them from attending.

0:01:11.900 --> 0:01:15.140
<v Speaker 3>It is a well-attended meeting of the Pacific Islands forum

0:01:16.540 --> 0:01:19.059
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think it's productive to talk it down.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking it up.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Weak, weak, weak again, Albanese. I'll come back to that

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:27.780
<v Speaker 2>in a moment. But first, I want to go back

0:01:27.830 --> 0:01:31.250
<v Speaker 2>to the revelations I brought you last night. that prior

0:01:31.270 --> 0:01:35.330
<v Speaker 2>to the Bondi massacre, a senior federal police commander co-authored

0:01:35.370 --> 0:01:39.060
<v Speaker 2>an internal brief that went to the executive warning of

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:46.770
<v Speaker 2>critical capability shortages in the AFP's counter-terrorism command. In particular...

0:01:46.590 --> 0:01:51.790
<v Speaker 2>a 38% reduction in counter-terrorism capability in New South Wales,

0:01:52.330 --> 0:01:55.330
<v Speaker 2>which on the face of it appears highly relevant to

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the massacre at Bondi the following year. There's been talk,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 2>of course, about this memo for months and months. It's

0:02:01.580 --> 0:02:04.500
<v Speaker 2>been reported in the newspapers and it's been the subject

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:09.739
<v Speaker 2>of heated debate inside Senate estimates. First, its existence was denied.

0:02:10.310 --> 0:02:13.250
<v Speaker 2>Then we were told it was just an HR document.

0:02:13.889 --> 0:02:16.900
<v Speaker 2>Then there was a dispute about who actually saw it

0:02:16.910 --> 0:02:19.940
<v Speaker 2>and how high it went up the federal police chain

0:02:19.980 --> 0:02:24.580
<v Speaker 2>of command until eventually it was blocked from release under

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 2>FOI under the basis it was highly prejudicial to national

0:02:28.740 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>security if it ever was to see the light of day. Now, obviously,

0:02:33.540 --> 0:02:36.260
<v Speaker 2>it can't be all of those things. It can't be

0:02:36.340 --> 0:02:40.550
<v Speaker 2>low level and unimportant one day. and then highly prejudicial

0:02:40.570 --> 0:02:45.739
<v Speaker 2>to national security the next. Australians deserve to know why

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.980
<v Speaker 2>this desperate plea for counter-terrorism resources was not listened to

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>by AFP command. Australians deserve to know What hand the

0:02:56.340 --> 0:03:01.060
<v Speaker 2>Albanese government had in the under-resourcing of the AFP, given

0:03:01.100 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>this memo also references a decision by the Albanese cabinet

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 2>via NSC to prohibit the AFP from putting in a

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>bid for extra money. Right now, we have a Royal

0:03:15.180 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Commission underway into the Bondi attack and we owe it

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.900
<v Speaker 2>to the dead and every other Australian who wants to

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.470
<v Speaker 2>live in a country free from terrorism and to get

0:03:24.490 --> 0:03:27.510
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom of what happened that fateful day, to

0:03:27.550 --> 0:03:30.790
<v Speaker 2>be open and honest about admitting failures, and to be

0:03:30.830 --> 0:03:33.930
<v Speaker 2>determined to do whatever's needed to better protect all of

0:03:34.050 --> 0:03:39.430
<v Speaker 2>us into the future. This is why a transparent investigation

0:03:39.490 --> 0:03:43.230
<v Speaker 2>into this whistleblower submission matters as much as it does.

0:03:43.850 --> 0:03:48.050
<v Speaker 2>Because right now, it looks as though officialdom is trying

0:03:48.110 --> 0:03:50.890
<v Speaker 2>to bury it. There is no doubt that the author

0:03:50.930 --> 0:03:53.900
<v Speaker 2>of this memo should have been called to give evidence

0:03:53.940 --> 0:03:57.430
<v Speaker 2>before the Royal Commission shut down public hearings last week.

0:03:58.250 --> 0:04:02.310
<v Speaker 2>But that did not happen, despite this former police officer

0:04:02.790 --> 0:04:08.370
<v Speaker 2>personally contacting the Commission dozens and dozens of times, asking

0:04:08.750 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>them to let him tell them what he knows. Even

0:04:13.180 --> 0:04:18.020
<v Speaker 2>after submitting his 25-page long submission, including a long list

0:04:18.060 --> 0:04:22.450
<v Speaker 2>of AFP documents that he says the Commission ought to

0:04:22.550 --> 0:04:26.510
<v Speaker 2>compel so that they can best understand where things were

0:04:26.930 --> 0:04:34.390
<v Speaker 2>prior to Bondi, this former counter-terrorism commander has not been called. Now,

0:04:34.450 --> 0:04:37.140
<v Speaker 2>it's madness that he's not been called, given his operational

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:42.450
<v Speaker 2>understanding of counter-terrorism deficiencies But it's also madness that the

0:04:42.490 --> 0:04:47.210
<v Speaker 2>head of the AFP, well, she has never fronted either. Now,

0:04:47.230 --> 0:04:49.330
<v Speaker 2>how can you have a credible Royal Commission into the

0:04:49.370 --> 0:04:52.690
<v Speaker 2>massacre of 15 people in an act of terror on

0:04:52.730 --> 0:04:56.270
<v Speaker 2>an Australian beach and not call the head of the

0:04:56.350 --> 0:05:00.890
<v Speaker 2>Australian Federal Police? And it's not just Chrissie Barrett who

0:05:00.930 --> 0:05:03.490
<v Speaker 2>must give evidence. Where is the head of the New

0:05:03.529 --> 0:05:06.940
<v Speaker 2>South Wales Police, Mel Lanyon? He hasn't been called in

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.020
<v Speaker 2>public hearings either. As I've said before, countless royal commissions

0:05:11.060 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 2>in the past have rightly put politicians in the witness

0:05:14.380 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>box because under our system of government, they are the

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>ultimate authorities under law for the portfolios they administer. In

0:05:23.779 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 2>terms of this, look, Kevin Rudd twice before a royal commission,

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:32.810
<v Speaker 2>John Howard once, Malcolm Turnbull once, Scott Morrison once, Ministers

0:05:32.900 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Peter Garridan, Mark Arbib, Christian Porter, Alan Tudge. Maurice Payne,

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.339
<v Speaker 2>Stuart Robert. I could go on. All the PMs and

0:05:42.380 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 2>ministers before called before various royal commissions to give evidence

0:05:47.550 --> 0:05:50.730
<v Speaker 2>into what they knew and what they did in matters

0:05:50.770 --> 0:05:53.810
<v Speaker 2>of national significance. And yet when it comes to Australia's

0:05:53.870 --> 0:05:58.110
<v Speaker 2>worst ever terror attack, not one minister in the Albanese

0:05:58.130 --> 0:06:01.310
<v Speaker 2>government has been called before this royal commission to give

0:06:01.330 --> 0:06:04.469
<v Speaker 2>an account of what they knew, what they did and

0:06:04.510 --> 0:06:07.289
<v Speaker 2>what they failed to do. The more I have dug

0:06:07.330 --> 0:06:11.570
<v Speaker 2>into this issue, the more concerned I have become. I

0:06:11.610 --> 0:06:15.750
<v Speaker 2>don't think, as a former High Court judge, that Virginia Bell,

0:06:15.910 --> 0:06:19.700
<v Speaker 2>sitting as a solo commissioner, has enough understanding of the

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:24.740
<v Speaker 2>national security apparatus and the labyrinth world of Canberra departmental

0:06:24.779 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 2>bureaucracy to do justice to the gravity of the terms

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.820
<v Speaker 2>of references before her. I just don't. Now, this is

0:06:32.940 --> 0:06:36.970
<v Speaker 2>not a reflection on her obvious intellect or her superior

0:06:37.150 --> 0:06:41.450
<v Speaker 2>legal standing, that much is given. But she's being asked

0:06:41.470 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 2>to investigate a beast that she does not understand and

0:06:45.220 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>has no experience of. And both understanding and experience is

0:06:51.300 --> 0:06:53.300
<v Speaker 2>critical to get to the bottom of what happened in

0:06:53.339 --> 0:06:58.390
<v Speaker 2>December last year and to prevent it from happening again. Now,

0:06:58.490 --> 0:07:01.750
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate critics will say I'm wrong, but there's a

0:07:01.790 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>report from the eminent government insider, Dennis Richardson, that deals

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.500
<v Speaker 2>with the national security elements of Bondi. But I think

0:07:09.550 --> 0:07:13.450
<v Speaker 2>a few things here have been missed. The first is

0:07:13.490 --> 0:07:17.210
<v Speaker 2>that Dennis Richardson did not act and was not acting

0:07:17.590 --> 0:07:21.970
<v Speaker 2>with the powers of a Royal Commissioner. That's right. Dennis

0:07:22.230 --> 0:07:26.430
<v Speaker 2>Richardson's work had the status of an administrative inquiry under

0:07:26.450 --> 0:07:29.630
<v Speaker 2>the auspices of Prime Minister and Cabinet, and it lacked

0:07:29.650 --> 0:07:32.660
<v Speaker 2>the ability to issue warrants for the production of materials,

0:07:33.180 --> 0:07:37.430
<v Speaker 2>and subpoenas for the appearance of witnesses. It also did

0:07:37.510 --> 0:07:41.510
<v Speaker 2>not have the immunity powers of a Royal Commission. Therefore,

0:07:41.610 --> 0:07:47.550
<v Speaker 2>cooperation by anyone with Richardson was merely voluntary. And this

0:07:47.770 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>is because Richardson was announced by the Prime Minister and

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>put in place before Albanese was ultimately pushed into a

0:07:55.260 --> 0:08:00.620
<v Speaker 2>Royal Commission. So Richardson's admin inquiry in Bell's Royal Commission

0:08:01.020 --> 0:08:04.340
<v Speaker 2>crossed over. but they are not the same thing and

0:08:04.380 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>should never be confused. When it was done, Richardson's work

0:08:08.190 --> 0:08:10.810
<v Speaker 2>went to the Prime Minister and that was then provided

0:08:10.830 --> 0:08:14.490
<v Speaker 2>to the Royal Commissioner to feed into what ultimately became

0:08:14.890 --> 0:08:18.750
<v Speaker 2>her interim report. Again, I don't think this is sufficient

0:08:19.010 --> 0:08:22.770
<v Speaker 2>at all. The interrogation of the heads of official agencies

0:08:22.850 --> 0:08:26.780
<v Speaker 2>like ASIO, like the Australian Federal Police, the heads of

0:08:26.820 --> 0:08:30.690
<v Speaker 2>departments of Home Affairs, Attorneys General, attorneys general, of course,

0:08:30.870 --> 0:08:34.050
<v Speaker 2>which was for a time responsible for the AFP, all

0:08:34.090 --> 0:08:38.670
<v Speaker 2>the senior ministers of these portfolios and the prime minister too, well,

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>they should all have been interrogated under the formal umbrella

0:08:44.340 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 2>of the Royal Commission's Act. Now, other than the ASIO boss,

0:08:49.300 --> 0:08:53.020
<v Speaker 2>Mike Burgess, we've not seen the AFP boss before the

0:08:53.059 --> 0:08:57.860
<v Speaker 2>Royal Commission publicly or any minister called to give public evidence. Now,

0:08:57.900 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 2>this must happen in order to restore the faith of

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.730
<v Speaker 2>the community that this Royal Commission really will be as

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:10.530
<v Speaker 2>comprehensive as Australians deserve. Now, I accept that there would

0:09:10.570 --> 0:09:14.510
<v Speaker 2>be elements of testimony from all of these people that

0:09:14.570 --> 0:09:17.550
<v Speaker 2>might have to be given in camera, so privately. I

0:09:17.890 --> 0:09:20.410
<v Speaker 2>accept that. And that some of them may already have

0:09:20.490 --> 0:09:24.110
<v Speaker 2>done this, but by and large, given it was ordinary

0:09:24.150 --> 0:09:28.180
<v Speaker 2>Australians gunned down on that summer's day last year, Well,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.219
<v Speaker 2>then ordinary Australians deserve proximity to the truth. They deserve

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.580
<v Speaker 2>to hear as much of this testimony in public as possible.

0:09:37.780 --> 0:09:42.350
<v Speaker 2>We deserve a proper examination of whether leftist ideology of

0:09:42.390 --> 0:09:45.490
<v Speaker 2>the Albanese government had a bearing on how Bondi unfolded.

0:09:46.350 --> 0:09:49.950
<v Speaker 2>For example, did decisions by the Albanese government ministers to

0:09:50.010 --> 0:09:55.340
<v Speaker 2>demand a greater focus on white supremacists shift resourcing of

0:09:55.380 --> 0:09:59.969
<v Speaker 2>the much larger threat of Islamist extremism, did that cause

0:10:00.390 --> 0:10:04.460
<v Speaker 2>capability gaps? Were things missed that should not have been

0:10:04.500 --> 0:10:09.260
<v Speaker 2>missed as a result? As reported in the Australian newspaper today,

0:10:09.300 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>there were concerns in the AFP's counter-terrorism area that suspected

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>terrorist sympathisers outnumbered the officers monitoring them at least 20

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.550
<v Speaker 2>to 1. 20 to 1. I mean, this is why

0:10:22.570 --> 0:10:26.730
<v Speaker 2>a proper interrogation of the Royal Commission staffing, a proper

0:10:27.170 --> 0:10:31.670
<v Speaker 2>interrogation by the Royal Commission of staffing, of funding, of

0:10:31.850 --> 0:10:38.220
<v Speaker 2>operational decisions and critically ministerial decisions, decisions of government, this

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 2>is why they matter as much as they do. And

0:10:41.059 --> 0:10:43.300
<v Speaker 2>here's the last point I want to make. As it

0:10:43.420 --> 0:10:48.220
<v Speaker 2>stands for our worst ever terror attack, This will be

0:10:48.300 --> 0:10:52.340
<v Speaker 2>one of our shortest ever Royal Commissions. Now that doesn't

0:10:52.380 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>stack up. Once this Royal Commission concludes, there will not

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.070
<v Speaker 2>be another one. We will not have the opportunity we

0:11:00.110 --> 0:11:05.550
<v Speaker 2>have now to revisit terrorism at Bondi in the same way.

0:11:06.410 --> 0:11:09.410
<v Speaker 2>It's therefore incumbent on the Royal Commissioner to seek an

0:11:09.470 --> 0:11:13.510
<v Speaker 2>extension to her term and for public hearings to be reopened.

0:11:14.580 --> 0:11:16.979
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a complete farce that the head of

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.260
<v Speaker 2>Netball Australia has given public evidence to this Royal Commission,

0:11:20.740 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>but not the head of the Australian Federal Police. And

0:11:23.860 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 2>when the only senior AFP officer to front the Royal

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.990
<v Speaker 2>Commission is in and out of the witness box in

0:11:29.990 --> 0:11:33.670
<v Speaker 2>38 minutes flat, well, you've got to ask what the

0:11:33.809 --> 0:11:37.910
<v Speaker 2>heck is going on. How serious are we about getting

0:11:37.970 --> 0:11:43.610
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom of what went wrong that terrible, terrible day? Now,

0:11:43.890 --> 0:11:47.340
<v Speaker 2>I know the game being played here politically. Virginia Bell

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 2>will hand her Royal Commissioner's report to the Governor-General on

0:11:50.820 --> 0:11:54.180
<v Speaker 2>Friday the 18th of December. And then the Prime Minister

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.750
<v Speaker 2>will pop up, ever so briefly, just back from the

0:11:57.809 --> 0:12:01.870
<v Speaker 2>G20 meeting in Miami a day earlier, and he'll say, well,

0:12:02.490 --> 0:12:04.290
<v Speaker 2>thanks for the question, I haven't had a chance to

0:12:04.330 --> 0:12:07.900
<v Speaker 2>read the report yet, but we'll consider it carefully. And

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>then it'll be off to the Christmas break, hoping that

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 2>by the time Parliament resumes in February, this will all

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:19.470
<v Speaker 2>have been washed away. And for what? Police and intelligence agencies, well,

0:12:19.490 --> 0:12:23.070
<v Speaker 2>they won't be any better resourced. The threat of radical Islam, well,

0:12:23.110 --> 0:12:27.370
<v Speaker 2>it won't have gone away. Australians will not be any safer.

0:12:28.630 --> 0:12:36.069
<v Speaker 2>This is just not good enough. Well, let's go to

0:12:36.090 --> 0:12:39.150
<v Speaker 2>Canberra for the headlines. Political reporter Ruben Spargo.

0:12:40.100 --> 0:12:40.579
<v Speaker 4>Good evening.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 5>The Prime Minister is pushing back against warnings from China

0:12:43.980 --> 0:12:48.630
<v Speaker 5>of consequences over Taiwan's inclusion in the Pacific Islands Forum.

0:12:49.030 --> 0:12:53.490
<v Speaker 5>Beijing's envoy is not clarifying what those so-called consequences could be.

0:12:53.830 --> 0:12:56.650
<v Speaker 5>Several regional leaders have also pulled out of the meeting

0:12:56.690 --> 0:12:58.390
<v Speaker 5>in Palau at the 11th hour.

0:12:58.410 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 3>The Pacific Islands Forum determines what happens here, not any

0:13:03.140 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>other country.

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.900
<v Speaker 5>Climate change, regional security and transnational crime are the key

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.630
<v Speaker 5>issues on the agenda today. at the forum this week.

0:13:11.070 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 5>Australian property prices have fallen for the fifth consecutive month

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.100
<v Speaker 5>as high interest rates and the federal government's tax changes

0:13:18.460 --> 0:13:20.980
<v Speaker 5>impact the market. Sydney could be on track for an

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 5>almost 20% price correction over the year if current trends

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 5>continue according to Cotality.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.470
<v Speaker 6>This is not the way to get young Australians into

0:13:30.530 --> 0:13:30.870
<v Speaker 6>a home.

0:13:31.429 --> 0:13:32.670
<v Speaker 4>We need to build more houses.

0:13:32.730 --> 0:13:35.990
<v Speaker 6>We need to have a migration policy that's aligned with

0:13:36.070 --> 0:13:37.010
<v Speaker 6>our housing supply.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Housing values are expected to keep falling, particularly if the

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.250
<v Speaker 5>Reserve Bank raises interest rates again. Treasury is warning Australia

0:13:45.330 --> 0:13:49.410
<v Speaker 5>risks missing out on the AI boom unless businesses embrace

0:13:49.429 --> 0:13:52.890
<v Speaker 5>the technology. Fewer than one in 10 businesses say they

0:13:52.929 --> 0:13:57.890
<v Speaker 5>have significantly adopted artificial intelligence. A Treasury report is also

0:13:57.970 --> 0:14:02.530
<v Speaker 5>warning AI could put further pressure on an already constrained economy,

0:14:02.630 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 5>pushing up inflation and potentially interest rates.

0:14:07.900 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's jump into what's making news out of

0:14:09.740 --> 0:14:13.370
<v Speaker 2>Canberra and those reports today. But yet another Pacific leader

0:14:13.380 --> 0:14:15.550
<v Speaker 2>has pulled out of what is now a very diminished

0:14:15.710 --> 0:14:19.530
<v Speaker 2>Pacific Islands forum. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is there, but

0:14:20.330 --> 0:14:24.270
<v Speaker 2>Fiji is not. There's no Vanuatu. And due to, we're told,

0:14:24.290 --> 0:14:27.530
<v Speaker 2>the heavy hand of China, no longer is the Solomon

0:14:27.630 --> 0:14:31.140
<v Speaker 2>Islands represented. Here to discuss this and more, News24 political

0:14:31.180 --> 0:14:35.290
<v Speaker 2>editor Andrew Clennell. Andrew, the PM tried today to brush

0:14:35.330 --> 0:14:39.430
<v Speaker 2>off those comments that China was pressuring Pacific nations not

0:14:39.530 --> 0:14:42.850
<v Speaker 2>to attend, but this threat's real. The Solomon Islands, of course,

0:14:42.890 --> 0:14:46.010
<v Speaker 2>was due to be there. The leader left. He's now

0:14:46.070 --> 0:14:50.190
<v Speaker 2>facing a no-confidence motion by one of his pro-China opponents.

0:14:50.670 --> 0:14:53.230
<v Speaker 2>But the PM, you know, he still can't bring himself

0:14:53.670 --> 0:14:57.609
<v Speaker 2>to call out China's influence anywhere locally, can he?

0:15:00.060 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, he was in Fiji with that Chinese missile

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.460
<v Speaker 6>test and expressed concern on that. But we can all

0:15:06.540 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 6>see the forum's turning into a farce. So why not,

0:15:10.300 --> 0:15:14.030
<v Speaker 6>you know, confront the truth, basically? I mean, you should

0:15:14.070 --> 0:15:17.590
<v Speaker 6>make comments saying that it's a concern if influence is

0:15:17.650 --> 0:15:20.930
<v Speaker 6>being brought to bear. Look, there are diplomatic considerations always

0:15:21.030 --> 0:15:25.670
<v Speaker 6>in terms of offending various Pacific leaders. But given half

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.390
<v Speaker 6>the Pacific leaders aren't there, may as well just tell

0:15:28.430 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 6>people how it is. I think it's a pretty disturbing development. Obviously,

0:15:33.820 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 6>Palau fired things up by inviting the Taiwanese. And, you know,

0:15:39.900 --> 0:15:41.700
<v Speaker 6>the worrying thing for us is it looks like the

0:15:41.740 --> 0:15:46.460
<v Speaker 6>Pacific leaders are now concerned about annoying China by attending.

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.340
<v Speaker 6>That's what it looks like because Taiwan's invited. And that's

0:15:50.380 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 6>really worrying because what else are they doing for China

0:15:52.850 --> 0:15:54.630
<v Speaker 6>because they're scared of them?

0:15:56.140 --> 0:15:58.350
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, look at the money we're pumping into the region.

0:15:58.370 --> 0:16:00.710
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we literally are putting billions and billions of

0:16:00.750 --> 0:16:04.230
<v Speaker 2>dollars into our region. And the message from Penny Wong

0:16:04.270 --> 0:16:06.850
<v Speaker 2>and Anthony Albanese is we must do this to secure

0:16:06.910 --> 0:16:09.010
<v Speaker 2>our region, to keep it out of the clutches of China.

0:16:09.670 --> 0:16:10.860
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't look like it's working.

0:16:12.140 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, Maurice Payne hardly ever visited the joint, so they've

0:16:15.700 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 6>done better than that.

0:16:16.700 --> 0:16:18.500
<v Speaker 7>But I agree that.

0:16:20.270 --> 0:16:22.700
<v Speaker 6>You'd expect more bang for your buck. The thing is,

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.820
<v Speaker 6>it's a competition with China. China are putting plenty in.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it really feels like the whole thing's on

0:16:28.660 --> 0:16:31.740
<v Speaker 6>tenor hooks and there are no guarantees for Australia.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what is another shocker in terms of money.

0:16:35.700 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>What about Chris Bowen's Fiji COP31 side hustle? This is

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>one of the preliminary meetings. He's chairing it. It's in Fiji. Basically,

0:16:45.580 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>everyone who's been invited is saying thanks, but no thanks.

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>And I want people to understand this is not Fiji's

0:16:51.580 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>summit per se. It might be located in Fiji, but

0:16:54.820 --> 0:16:57.950
<v Speaker 2>poor old Australian taxpayers are ponying up for this and

0:16:58.150 --> 0:16:58.850
<v Speaker 2>it's a no-show.

0:17:00.030 --> 0:17:01.970
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I think they've said things like people

0:17:01.990 --> 0:17:03.870
<v Speaker 6>are going to pay us back when they come, but

0:17:03.910 --> 0:17:08.530
<v Speaker 6>if they don't come, we don't get paid back. And, look,

0:17:08.869 --> 0:17:11.190
<v Speaker 6>I think it shows once you don't get that summit

0:17:11.210 --> 0:17:12.540
<v Speaker 6>in Adelaide that they were after.

0:17:14.300 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 6>I just don't see how worthwhile this is to Australia. Now,

0:17:17.619 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 6>they will say this helps with Pacific diplomacy, for example,

0:17:20.869 --> 0:17:28.409
<v Speaker 6>which we were talking about. But I feel that the

0:17:28.450 --> 0:17:30.770
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister's now got to go to Turkey as well,

0:17:30.869 --> 0:17:35.550
<v Speaker 6>to COP, because we've got this sort of vice president

0:17:35.630 --> 0:17:38.659
<v Speaker 6>type role, whatever that is. And I'm not sure the

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister need go to COP. He's got a lot

0:17:40.619 --> 0:17:42.139
<v Speaker 6>of travel at the back end of the year.

0:17:42.180 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 4>So....

0:17:44.100 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 6>It's all extra cost and where does it get us?

0:17:48.859 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll talk about this because I want to make

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:53.659
<v Speaker 2>it clear to people at home, of course, there's a

0:17:53.810 --> 0:17:57.350
<v Speaker 2>summit season. That's what Andrew's referring to there. It's a

0:17:57.390 --> 0:18:00.570
<v Speaker 2>lot of international travel. You can send other ministers. The

0:18:00.609 --> 0:18:03.409
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister doesn't have to go to all of it.

0:18:03.710 --> 0:18:05.590
<v Speaker 2>This bloke loves the front end of the plane. Of course,

0:18:05.650 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>he will be there, but he's got fires burning at home.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>You and I... looked at this by-election on the weekend

0:18:12.380 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>last week. Before it happened, you said that One Nation

0:18:14.780 --> 0:18:18.149
<v Speaker 2>would comfortably win, will you? A right big swing in

0:18:18.170 --> 0:18:20.650
<v Speaker 2>a safe Labor seat. They now have a lower house

0:18:20.690 --> 0:18:23.340
<v Speaker 2>seat in the WA Parliament. Games on, of course, in

0:18:23.780 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Victoria and New South Wales. I'm told the big game

0:18:27.140 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>for them is New South Wales, not so much Victoria.

0:18:30.300 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 2>But Pauline's splitting plenty of time in Victoria. The numbers

0:18:34.260 --> 0:18:37.690
<v Speaker 2>are still healthy in Victoria. And yet Labor's sort of

0:18:37.730 --> 0:18:40.150
<v Speaker 2>pretending that this is not happening to them, it's only

0:18:40.190 --> 0:18:43.550
<v Speaker 2>happening to the coalition. Well, Sacred Harbour tells you otherwise.

0:18:45.660 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 6>I still think the ultimate game is to control every

0:18:48.140 --> 0:18:50.300
<v Speaker 6>upper house in the country. And I can't see why

0:18:50.340 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 6>they don't end up doing that, including the Senate. I mean, look,

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.390
<v Speaker 6>I mean, anything could happen downstairs. Don't get me wrong.

0:18:59.530 --> 0:19:04.050
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they could develop very big presences in lower houses.

0:19:04.850 --> 0:19:06.669
<v Speaker 6>But if you look at the vote, whether it be

0:19:06.690 --> 0:19:09.790
<v Speaker 6>in Victoria, I'm not as au fait with the Victorian system.

0:19:09.869 --> 0:19:10.710
<v Speaker 7>You'd know more than me.

0:19:10.750 --> 0:19:13.170
<v Speaker 6>But somewhere like New South Wales, even though it's always

0:19:13.230 --> 0:19:17.179
<v Speaker 6>a half house election like the Senate, the Senate, the

0:19:17.220 --> 0:19:23.050
<v Speaker 6>Legislative Council in Western Australia. Why can't they, certainly Queensland, well,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.650
<v Speaker 6>Queensland's one house, actually, now that I think about it. But, look,

0:19:26.130 --> 0:19:30.330
<v Speaker 6>these other places, why wouldn't they get the balance of

0:19:30.390 --> 0:19:33.410
<v Speaker 6>power with 20% to 30% of the vote? I mean,

0:19:33.430 --> 0:19:36.620
<v Speaker 6>they'd probably get a bigger vote upstairs. I think we'll

0:19:36.660 --> 0:19:38.659
<v Speaker 6>end up, you know, no matter what happens at the election,

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.459
<v Speaker 6>even if Labor were to fall into power at the

0:19:41.500 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 6>next election, minority or slight majority... and lose, say, 15,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.700
<v Speaker 6>20 seats, which I can see happening because their margin

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 6>is so big, they're going to have a Senate where

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 6>basically they're going to have to work with the coalition

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.700
<v Speaker 6>like never before because their alternative will be one nation

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.530
<v Speaker 6>who are even further to the right. So I think

0:20:00.570 --> 0:20:03.369
<v Speaker 6>that's a really a thing that people are sort of

0:20:03.470 --> 0:20:06.390
<v Speaker 6>missing here because we're focusing on the New South Wales leader,

0:20:06.410 --> 0:20:09.650
<v Speaker 6>the Victorian leader, One Nation being competitive in the House

0:20:09.670 --> 0:20:14.530
<v Speaker 6>of Representatives. Think about the upper house implications of that

0:20:14.630 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 6>and how much power you have with the balance of

0:20:17.900 --> 0:20:18.940
<v Speaker 6>power in the upper house.

0:20:20.540 --> 0:20:20.780
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.179
<v Speaker 2>Well, talk to me because they have power provided they

0:20:23.220 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 2>keep all their MPs. Talk to me about David Farley.

0:20:27.859 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Lots of rumours that he's getting a bit cranky, that

0:20:30.100 --> 0:20:33.340
<v Speaker 2>he's talking about going independent. He's got an ego he

0:20:33.380 --> 0:20:35.790
<v Speaker 2>can't jump over. That doesn't surprise me that there is

0:20:35.850 --> 0:20:38.010
<v Speaker 2>talk he would go independent. Barnaby Joyce says, well, this

0:20:38.070 --> 0:20:40.169
<v Speaker 2>is not going to happen. Give me your take.

0:20:40.930 --> 0:20:42.709
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think he will go independent, but I don't

0:20:42.750 --> 0:20:46.750
<v Speaker 6>think it's of much consequence because he doesn't really have

0:20:46.790 --> 0:20:50.620
<v Speaker 6>a presence in the House at the moment and ultimately

0:20:50.650 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 6>they're going to win a lot more than one or

0:20:52.140 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 6>two House of Representatives seats. So, you know, he'd just

0:20:57.140 --> 0:20:59.310
<v Speaker 6>be the forgotten man if he went independent, frankly.

0:21:01.070 --> 0:21:04.190
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm going to play for my viewers, Annika Wells.

0:21:04.230 --> 0:21:08.330
<v Speaker 2>Of course, she's the minister for fun and fun times

0:21:08.470 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 2>who had her wings clipped because of the way she

0:21:11.260 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 2>was using her entitlements. She's gone out there and used

0:21:14.859 --> 0:21:17.500
<v Speaker 2>these Oshies. I mean, parents will know what they are.

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:18.780
<v Speaker 2>They get sold at supermarkets.

0:21:18.859 --> 0:21:19.179
<v Speaker 4>Oshies.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.890
<v Speaker 2>There you go. sold at supermarkets, kids love them, they're traded, etc.

0:21:24.430 --> 0:21:28.230
<v Speaker 2>She uses them to try and spruik Labor's budget reforms.

0:21:28.290 --> 0:21:28.710
<v Speaker 2>Have a look.

0:21:29.570 --> 0:21:32.429
<v Speaker 8>What do these guys and the Australian housing market have

0:21:32.450 --> 0:21:35.330
<v Speaker 8>in common? Both the ushy market and the Australian housing

0:21:35.369 --> 0:21:38.290
<v Speaker 8>market are dictated by supply and demand. The problem right

0:21:38.330 --> 0:21:40.630
<v Speaker 8>now is that supply of ushies and supply of housing

0:21:40.910 --> 0:21:41.610
<v Speaker 8>is not keeping.

0:21:41.430 --> 0:21:45.379
<v Speaker 2>Pace with demand. Can you believe she's in charge of

0:21:45.420 --> 0:21:46.379
<v Speaker 2>a budget worth billions?

0:21:48.530 --> 0:21:50.990
<v Speaker 6>Our news director here, Elise Holman, who has younger kids

0:21:51.010 --> 0:21:53.330
<v Speaker 6>than me, Peter, informed me that Ooshies are free from

0:21:53.369 --> 0:21:55.909
<v Speaker 6>Woolies if you spend a certain amount. So they're not

0:21:55.970 --> 0:22:00.940
<v Speaker 6>even an equivalent type comparison, are they? Because houses cost money. But,

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look, I think that this is just, I mean,

0:22:05.700 --> 0:22:08.900
<v Speaker 6>I just, I mean, I've just got to watch my

0:22:09.220 --> 0:22:12.510
<v Speaker 6>words here because I don't want to be really, really unkind.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.290
<v Speaker 6>But I think, well, I've kind of said it, yes,

0:22:15.369 --> 0:22:16.710
<v Speaker 6>I think Annika's lost the plot.

0:22:17.190 --> 0:22:17.650
<v Speaker 7>How about that?

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.420
<v Speaker 4>I mean, she's lost the plot. I mean, who does that?

0:22:20.500 --> 0:22:23.700
<v Speaker 6>Not only has she lost the plot, and you've stopped

0:22:23.740 --> 0:22:27.729
<v Speaker 6>enough politicians doing really stupid things, her staff have clearly

0:22:27.770 --> 0:22:31.510
<v Speaker 6>lost the plot. Because who's ticking off on that? Who's going,

0:22:31.550 --> 0:22:32.109
<v Speaker 6>that's a good idea?

0:22:32.130 --> 0:22:34.610
<v Speaker 2>Mate, I didn't get them all. I didn't get Abbott's onion.

0:22:34.650 --> 0:22:37.330
<v Speaker 2>If I'd seen that onion go anywhere near his mouth,

0:22:37.390 --> 0:22:38.990
<v Speaker 2>I would have stopped that one, but I missed that one.

0:22:39.020 --> 0:22:41.500
<v Speaker 6>Well, you didn't get Prince Philip either, but I heard

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:42.020
<v Speaker 6>you tried.

0:22:42.060 --> 0:22:42.820
<v Speaker 7>But anyway, look.

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I tried. LAUGHTER All right, we'll leave it there.

0:22:48.300 --> 0:22:50.980
<v Speaker 2>We'll start to really uncover some secrets in a moment. Thanks, Andrew.

0:22:51.460 --> 0:22:53.659
<v Speaker 2>All right, now to the latest housing data. It's in

0:22:53.850 --> 0:22:57.990
<v Speaker 2>absolute freefall across our major metro markets. Sydney house prices

0:22:58.010 --> 0:23:01.070
<v Speaker 2>are on track for the most significant decline in 40 years.

0:23:01.090 --> 0:23:05.190
<v Speaker 2>Around 40,000 has been wiped off the average home in

0:23:05.310 --> 0:23:08.740
<v Speaker 2>just this winter season alone. Joining me now, independent economist

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:13.420
<v Speaker 2>with EQ Economics, Warren Hogan. Well, how does this sort

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.129
<v Speaker 2>of drop in value of what is, for most of us,

0:23:16.630 --> 0:23:19.689
<v Speaker 2>our largest asset, play out, Warren?

0:23:21.490 --> 0:23:24.570
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, good evening, Peter. It's not looking good at the moment.

0:23:24.710 --> 0:23:30.690
<v Speaker 7>We're seeing the housing correction downturn broaden. That is, more

0:23:30.730 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 7>parts of Australia are seeing prices fall and, of course...

0:23:34.770 --> 0:23:37.390
<v Speaker 7>Revisions to the latest data going back over the winter

0:23:37.410 --> 0:23:40.129
<v Speaker 7>months show quite a steep pace, steeper than we thought.

0:23:41.490 --> 0:23:44.290
<v Speaker 7>So I think there was reported 93% of suburbs in

0:23:44.330 --> 0:23:47.770
<v Speaker 7>major capital cities are now seeing price decline. So it's

0:23:47.890 --> 0:23:50.730
<v Speaker 7>really more than obviously Melbourne's the worst and then Sydney,

0:23:50.750 --> 0:23:55.189
<v Speaker 7>but it's happening across the nation. But I'd be careful

0:23:55.260 --> 0:23:58.940
<v Speaker 7>about sort of what economists might call premature extrapolation, and

0:23:58.980 --> 0:24:01.500
<v Speaker 7>that is taking what's happened in the last three months

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.540
<v Speaker 7>and pushing it forward over the whole year. That's where

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.060
<v Speaker 7>you get these ideas that the market could fall 18%

0:24:07.060 --> 0:24:11.859
<v Speaker 7>or 20%, the market is starting to see the pace

0:24:11.900 --> 0:24:15.020
<v Speaker 7>of decline sort of slow, the first stage to actually

0:24:15.060 --> 0:24:18.959
<v Speaker 7>a stabilisation. But we just don't know. But we are

0:24:19.020 --> 0:24:24.869
<v Speaker 7>in a full-blown housing correction and we're dealing with unusual circumstances.

0:24:25.150 --> 0:24:27.470
<v Speaker 7>That is the tax changes on top of the sort

0:24:27.510 --> 0:24:30.910
<v Speaker 7>of more ordinary rate hikes and a bit of geopolitical uncertainty.

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.140
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so about 10 to 12 billion dwellings in the country,

0:24:35.859 --> 0:24:38.740
<v Speaker 2>and of that people are either paid off their home,

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>they don't want the value to fall, paying off their home,

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.210
<v Speaker 2>they don't want the value to fall, or renting, they

0:24:44.230 --> 0:24:46.070
<v Speaker 2>don't want their rents to go up. And you've got

0:24:46.109 --> 0:24:49.730
<v Speaker 2>a tiny proportion, what, 100,000 at any time, looking to

0:24:49.750 --> 0:24:52.869
<v Speaker 2>get into their first home. Well, if they are renting,

0:24:53.619 --> 0:24:55.740
<v Speaker 2>they're already paying higher rents or at risk of paying

0:24:55.780 --> 0:24:59.020
<v Speaker 2>higher rents. There's also talk now that the RBA might

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.010
<v Speaker 2>lift rates So how are they benefiting from this fall

0:25:03.070 --> 0:25:04.270
<v Speaker 2>in house prices?

0:25:05.869 --> 0:25:09.550
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, it's looking very messy. We know that

0:25:09.730 --> 0:25:12.830
<v Speaker 7>this sort of tax changes were sort of sprung on

0:25:12.890 --> 0:25:16.050
<v Speaker 7>us in the budget. We know there's been sort of

0:25:16.330 --> 0:25:19.710
<v Speaker 7>lots of changes that have been debated and happened since.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:24.020
<v Speaker 7>But we're getting, you know, because it's not a clear-cut change.

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 7>I mean, investors... can still get negative gearing from new builds.

0:25:28.100 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 7>And so I just heard in Perth last week that

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.830
<v Speaker 7>a lot of sort of new builds on the urban fringe,

0:25:32.850 --> 0:25:36.469
<v Speaker 7>which would traditionally go to first-home buyers because it's affordable housing,

0:25:36.609 --> 0:25:39.230
<v Speaker 7>the investors are rushing there and crowding them out. You're

0:25:39.270 --> 0:25:42.070
<v Speaker 7>getting effects that I don't think was anticipated. So the

0:25:42.109 --> 0:25:45.310
<v Speaker 7>government and the Treasury are hoping for this long-term outcome,

0:25:45.330 --> 0:25:48.970
<v Speaker 7>but right now it's looking very messy, highly disruptive, and

0:25:49.010 --> 0:25:52.150
<v Speaker 7>politically the combination of falling house values and rising rents

0:25:52.450 --> 0:25:55.010
<v Speaker 7>is about as bad as you can get. So I

0:25:55.030 --> 0:25:57.450
<v Speaker 7>better hope that there's a sort of a resolution out there.

0:25:57.490 --> 0:26:01.050
<v Speaker 7>But right now, it's looking very, very messy. And of course,

0:26:01.210 --> 0:26:03.570
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't look like it's going to achieve the underlying

0:26:03.630 --> 0:26:06.260
<v Speaker 7>problem in our housing markets, which is not enough houses.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.180
<v Speaker 7>In fact, the government's admitted that it's going to actually

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.260
<v Speaker 7>hurt new housing supply to the tune of 30,000 houses,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 7>less builds. But it could be worse than that if

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 7>it really gets it and sort of goes worse from here.

0:26:19.380 --> 0:26:22.030
<v Speaker 7>So we're just watching. We don't know. We've never seen

0:26:22.050 --> 0:26:24.929
<v Speaker 7>this before. And it's looking a bit scary, but We're

0:26:24.970 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 7>just an important month ahead for the Australian housing market.

0:26:29.580 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, people clearly weren't watching Sky News or News24 as

0:26:32.300 --> 0:26:34.900
<v Speaker 2>we are now because we warned from the get-go that

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.139
<v Speaker 2>if you change the parameters for investors, you're going to

0:26:38.180 --> 0:26:40.740
<v Speaker 2>put them in the place where, as you say, a

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:42.660
<v Speaker 2>lot of entrants are trying to get in the market.

0:26:43.060 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, Nappy Valley, the houses, the new builds on

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:49.140
<v Speaker 2>the edges of our peri-urban areas, they are now where

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.180
<v Speaker 2>the first-home buyers are being crowded out. That was traditionally

0:26:52.220 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 2>where they went. And anyone else who's got stock is

0:26:54.980 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>not trying to sell in a falling market right now.

0:26:57.680 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>They will sell if they have to sell, but a

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:00.859
<v Speaker 2>lot of people are holding back. So you're not getting

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.770
<v Speaker 2>that downsizing impact, you're not getting the homes turning over,

0:27:04.810 --> 0:27:08.669
<v Speaker 2>which is what the government was hoping. The bloke that

0:27:08.710 --> 0:27:11.190
<v Speaker 2>used to be on Shark Tank, the judge Steve Baxter,

0:27:11.270 --> 0:27:14.389
<v Speaker 2>says these tax changes in the budget, and he's one

0:27:14.410 --> 0:27:17.530
<v Speaker 2>of many critics, but he says this will create an

0:27:17.730 --> 0:27:20.990
<v Speaker 2>economic wasteland. Do you think that's accurate?

0:27:23.109 --> 0:27:25.650
<v Speaker 7>Look, I mean, it's certainly that that's the risk. I mean,

0:27:25.670 --> 0:27:30.449
<v Speaker 7>you know, we're essentially overcooked the size of government in

0:27:30.490 --> 0:27:35.500
<v Speaker 7>many respects, but in terms of just sheer taxation and spending. And,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.620
<v Speaker 7>you know, this guy is at the coalface of innovation.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.910
<v Speaker 7>And if he's telling us that it's going to damage

0:27:43.990 --> 0:27:48.020
<v Speaker 7>our capacity to to encourage young Australians or all Australians

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.030
<v Speaker 7>to innovate and take risks when we're staring down the

0:27:51.070 --> 0:27:53.990
<v Speaker 7>barrel of a once in a hundred year technological revolution,

0:27:54.930 --> 0:27:57.209
<v Speaker 7>I think we should take him seriously. I mean, to

0:27:57.230 --> 0:28:00.350
<v Speaker 7>your point about housing, we've just had a massive cost

0:28:00.410 --> 0:28:04.889
<v Speaker 7>increase for housing construction, which made the economics of housing

0:28:04.910 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 7>development perilous already. And then the government goes and shocks

0:28:08.780 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 7>the market with these tax changes out of the blue.

0:28:11.340 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 7>We're not seeing smart economic policy. We're not seeing smart

0:28:14.820 --> 0:28:19.500
<v Speaker 7>long-term economic decision-making. And I think to his point, the

0:28:19.700 --> 0:28:22.659
<v Speaker 7>consequences could be a lot worse than anyone is thinking

0:28:22.700 --> 0:28:25.050
<v Speaker 7>about right now, which would be devastating for what has

0:28:25.090 --> 0:28:27.129
<v Speaker 7>been one of the most successful economies in the world in.

0:28:27.030 --> 0:28:27.710
<v Speaker 4>The last 30, 40 years.

0:28:29.430 --> 0:28:31.530
<v Speaker 2>Well, you and I both know the problem. We don't

0:28:31.550 --> 0:28:33.470
<v Speaker 2>have many people that have got an economic brain or

0:28:33.490 --> 0:28:36.510
<v Speaker 2>a qualification in a lot of these economic portfolios. I

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.940
<v Speaker 2>think that's a huge problem in Australia. You have to

0:28:38.980 --> 0:28:41.770
<v Speaker 2>be an expert in your portfolio to to be part

0:28:41.790 --> 0:28:44.030
<v Speaker 2>of the president's cabinet in the United States. Yes, it's

0:28:44.070 --> 0:28:46.950
<v Speaker 2>a different system. But here in Australia, you do not

0:28:47.060 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 2>have to be. Talk to me about the risk of

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.300
<v Speaker 2>conflict here. The new chair of Housing Australia, Anne Sherry,

0:28:54.380 --> 0:28:57.180
<v Speaker 2>facing calls that she needs to resign now from her

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.090
<v Speaker 2>position on the board of the Super Members Council. This

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.570
<v Speaker 2>is industry super funds. Warren, do you think there is

0:29:03.610 --> 0:29:04.730
<v Speaker 2>a conflict of interest here?

0:29:06.530 --> 0:29:08.490
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, look, I think the director class has

0:29:08.540 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 7>been running a very, very close to the breeze on

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:15.500
<v Speaker 7>this for many decades, really. I mean, you know, don't

0:29:15.540 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 7>put yourself in a position where your integrity can be questioned.

0:29:19.540 --> 0:29:21.380
<v Speaker 7>So I think there's something to this. And, you know,

0:29:21.420 --> 0:29:24.260
<v Speaker 7>we have a problem of trust and we need leadership.

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 7>So this doesn't look good and it's not what we

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.460
<v Speaker 7>need from our leaders. We need people that the community

0:29:31.500 --> 0:29:33.580
<v Speaker 7>can get behind because we've got a challenging world to

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.780
<v Speaker 7>deal with and we're making it harder for ourselves in

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.970
<v Speaker 7>this country And that leadership and trust around that leadership

0:29:40.130 --> 0:29:43.140
<v Speaker 7>is going to be extremely important in the next three

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 7>to five years.

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.300
<v Speaker 2>Well, Warren Hogan, you are a trusted voice, so thank

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 2>you for joining me tonight. All right, after the break,

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.580
<v Speaker 2>more on my exclusive revelations last night that the Royal

0:29:52.620 --> 0:29:57.820
<v Speaker 2>Commission ignored a submission highlighting big holes in counter-terrorism capability

0:29:58.380 --> 0:30:05.820
<v Speaker 2>at the AFP... Pride of Bondi, that's next. Welcome back.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.050
<v Speaker 2>Coming out, the latest push by the campaign team at

0:30:08.140 --> 0:30:12.270
<v Speaker 2>Fix Victoria. This week, turning their attention to potholes as

0:30:12.350 --> 0:30:15.969
<v Speaker 2>Labor announces a new plan to use Victorian prisoners to

0:30:16.090 --> 0:30:20.310
<v Speaker 2>fill them. I kid you not. But now to the

0:30:20.470 --> 0:30:24.020
<v Speaker 2>ongoing fallout from the exclusive last night that a former

0:30:24.060 --> 0:30:27.630
<v Speaker 2>AFP whistleblower was not called as a witness... at the

0:30:27.670 --> 0:30:32.530
<v Speaker 2>Bondi Royal Commission, despite sharing bombshell claims of critical capability

0:30:32.610 --> 0:30:38.290
<v Speaker 2>pressures inside the AFP's counter-terrorism command some 18 months before

0:30:38.550 --> 0:30:42.130
<v Speaker 2>the terror attack. Here to discuss it further, the former

0:30:42.170 --> 0:30:45.250
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection from

0:30:45.250 --> 0:30:48.850
<v Speaker 2>2014 to 17, and the boss of the Department of

0:30:48.910 --> 0:30:51.410
<v Speaker 2>Home Affairs from 2017 to 2023, Mike Pizzullo. Mike, thank

0:30:51.450 --> 0:30:59.090
<v Speaker 2>you for your time. This internal AFP brief, this minute,

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:05.370
<v Speaker 2>that this individual co-authored alongside three other commanders inside counterterrorism,

0:31:06.050 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 2>it says that they lacked 38% of the operational capability

0:31:10.420 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 2>in New South Wales alone. And also that the NSC,

0:31:14.860 --> 0:31:18.170
<v Speaker 2>so this is a decision of government, had made a

0:31:18.210 --> 0:31:22.130
<v Speaker 2>decision to block any calls by the AFP for extra

0:31:22.230 --> 0:31:27.530
<v Speaker 2>funding and that the ratio of terrorist sympathisers to officers,

0:31:27.590 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and this is in The Australian Today, was some 20

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 2>to 1. Now, surely all of this must be in

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.540
<v Speaker 2>front of the Commissioner and tested.

0:31:42.380 --> 0:31:43.180
<v Speaker 4>Good evening, Peter.

0:31:43.300 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the major problem here, Peter, is we don't know

0:31:47.100 --> 0:31:50.220
<v Speaker 1>whether that is or indeed is not the case. Has

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Commissioner Bell, after she brought down her interim report earlier

0:31:53.780 --> 0:31:55.790
<v Speaker 1>in the year, in fact called for all of this data,

0:31:56.650 --> 0:32:02.790
<v Speaker 1>is she reviewing the papers to test these claims? We

0:32:02.810 --> 0:32:07.610
<v Speaker 1>just simply don't know. On the surface, you would say

0:32:07.850 --> 0:32:11.830
<v Speaker 1>these are matters that need to be examined and commanders

0:32:11.870 --> 0:32:14.010
<v Speaker 1>in the AFP are very senior, but they report to

0:32:14.030 --> 0:32:18.170
<v Speaker 1>assistant commissioners and deputy commissioners and ultimately the commissioner. And

0:32:18.210 --> 0:32:21.220
<v Speaker 1>I've got no doubt, had Commissioner Barrett been called, I

0:32:21.260 --> 0:32:23.820
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine for a moment she would have refused to attend.

0:32:23.860 --> 0:32:27.500
<v Speaker 1>In fact, quite to the contrary. Why wasn't she called?

0:32:27.540 --> 0:32:29.540
<v Speaker 1>It might be that the data was wrong. It might

0:32:29.620 --> 0:32:33.140
<v Speaker 1>be that these commanders were not aware of other budgetary

0:32:33.570 --> 0:32:35.810
<v Speaker 1>manoeuvres or strategies that the Commissioner had.

0:32:35.930 --> 0:32:37.950
<v Speaker 4>Who knows? We just simply don't know.

0:32:37.970 --> 0:32:40.290
<v Speaker 1>Peter, it seems to me that there's two problems here,

0:32:40.910 --> 0:32:42.930
<v Speaker 1>if I can describe them as a structural problem and

0:32:42.970 --> 0:32:46.670
<v Speaker 1>a judgment problem. The structural problem is that the Commission,

0:32:46.710 --> 0:32:50.410
<v Speaker 1>with all due respect, is misconceived in terms of its constructions.

0:32:51.380 --> 0:32:55.380
<v Speaker 1>A similar effort by the Keating government in 94-95 to

0:32:55.420 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>look into very serious allegations about wrongdoing within ASIS. The

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Keating government dealt with that by appointing a very distinguished

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.390
<v Speaker 1>legal mind, Gordon Samuels, of the Supreme Court. of New

0:33:07.410 --> 0:33:11.630
<v Speaker 1>South Wales and a former secretary of the prime minister's department,

0:33:11.690 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Michael Codd. And they sat with all the powers of

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>each each having jointly and individually the powers of royal commission.

0:33:19.540 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And they could test these claims. A lot of it

0:33:21.380 --> 0:33:23.479
<v Speaker 1>had to be done in camera. As you can imagine,

0:33:23.500 --> 0:33:26.540
<v Speaker 1>ISIS matters were very, very sensitive. And indeed, they called

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:30.020
<v Speaker 1>the minister. Gareth Evans was the minister responsible for ISIS

0:33:30.300 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and he was called.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.460
<v Speaker 4>I can assure you he was called.

0:33:33.020 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem we've got here is that you've

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:39.250
<v Speaker 1>got this strange combination of an administrative review by Dennis

0:33:39.290 --> 0:33:42.510
<v Speaker 1>Richardson convened under the authority of the Prime Minister and

0:33:42.550 --> 0:33:45.950
<v Speaker 1>probably administratively handled by his department, which then had to

0:33:45.990 --> 0:33:50.690
<v Speaker 1>be somehow dovetailed or meshed into the Royal Commission led

0:33:50.750 --> 0:33:53.070
<v Speaker 1>by Virginia Bell. So that's a structural problem which I

0:33:53.110 --> 0:33:55.290
<v Speaker 1>think has created this context.

0:33:55.310 --> 0:33:57.470
<v Speaker 2>Can I just jump in there if I can, Mike,

0:33:57.490 --> 0:34:00.150
<v Speaker 2>just for a moment, because I think not many people

0:34:00.190 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 2>have pulled that distinction apart. So The evidence put to

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.129
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Richardson was not of the coverage of a royal commission.

0:34:09.570 --> 0:34:11.989
<v Speaker 2>People could volunteer to be a part of it. They

0:34:12.010 --> 0:34:13.989
<v Speaker 2>didn't have to be a part of it. He had

0:34:14.050 --> 0:34:18.029
<v Speaker 2>no powers to subpoena witnesses, to warrant documents, to call

0:34:18.090 --> 0:34:21.469
<v Speaker 2>in documents. It was basically, I don't want to use

0:34:21.510 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the term, a low-level administrative review because he's not that

0:34:24.739 --> 0:34:27.460
<v Speaker 2>sort of bloke, but it had that calibre, it had

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.739
<v Speaker 2>that distinction of an administrative review, whereas this is a

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 2>royal commission with all the powers of immunity, and so

0:34:34.940 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 2>that's the problem here. You've got a very good legal

0:34:37.980 --> 0:34:42.739
<v Speaker 2>mind trying to investigate a world that she's got no

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 2>understanding of, no operational experience, and when they brought in

0:34:46.580 --> 0:34:49.669
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Richardson... He didn't have the powers of a Royal

0:34:49.690 --> 0:34:51.870
<v Speaker 2>Commission to do what he should have been able to do.

0:34:54.190 --> 0:34:56.460
<v Speaker 4>Peter, that sums it up as we understand it.

0:34:56.540 --> 0:34:59.220
<v Speaker 1>What we don't know is with the appointment of Virginia

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Bell pursuant to the latest patent that the Governor-General signs,

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.779
<v Speaker 1>at that instant she might have been able to transfer

0:35:05.910 --> 0:35:09.969
<v Speaker 1>or veil or clothe some of her powers around the

0:35:10.050 --> 0:35:13.610
<v Speaker 1>latter part of Mr Richardson's report. I don't know what

0:35:13.630 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that is, but in any event, all

0:35:16.219 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the material and data that he assembled initially would

0:35:20.100 --> 0:35:22.779
<v Speaker 1>have been done under what are called administrative auspices. So

0:35:22.860 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>agency heads would be perfectly within their right to say,

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister wants this done, the Secretary of PM &amp;

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:32.299
<v Speaker 1>C has commissioned this, of course I'll cooperate, we'll put

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>our best people on it and we'll give Mr Richardson

0:35:35.020 --> 0:35:35.980
<v Speaker 1>whatever he requires.

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:37.660
<v Speaker 4>The moment the Royal Commission gets.

0:35:38.370 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>called, agency heads quite properly, legally, have to adopt a

0:35:41.890 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 1>completely different persona and procedure, which is to say, I've

0:35:45.900 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>got to understand what my immunities are, whether any protected

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.700
<v Speaker 1>officers from within my agency are going to be given,

0:35:51.739 --> 0:35:54.940
<v Speaker 1>in effect, whistleblower status by the Commission. I've got to

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.739
<v Speaker 1>make sure that I freeze documents in case the Royal

0:35:57.780 --> 0:36:02.860
<v Speaker 1>Commission subpoenas them or indeed exercises a search and seizure operation.

0:36:02.900 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>The Royal Commission subpoenas Act gives the Royal Commissioner search

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.219
<v Speaker 1>and seizure powers. That's the structural problem. But then having

0:36:10.260 --> 0:36:12.660
<v Speaker 1>got to where we got to with this odd combination

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.510
<v Speaker 1>of the Richardson and Bell processes, then I think regrettably,

0:36:16.530 --> 0:36:20.270
<v Speaker 1>and I say this sorrowfully, there's a judgment problem. If

0:36:20.310 --> 0:36:24.370
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at this independently, as I'm sure Commissioner Bell is,

0:36:24.489 --> 0:36:26.710
<v Speaker 1>but with judgment, what you say is, look, the public

0:36:26.750 --> 0:36:30.770
<v Speaker 1>are going to need some transparency, not to name and shame,

0:36:31.010 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>but to explain that From the very top, why do

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.410
<v Speaker 1>we have a National Security Committee? You and I all

0:36:36.469 --> 0:36:38.250
<v Speaker 1>know why we have it, and there's lots of things

0:36:38.270 --> 0:36:40.509
<v Speaker 1>that have gone on in NSCs over the years that

0:36:40.530 --> 0:36:41.870
<v Speaker 1>you and I can never talk about.

0:36:42.469 --> 0:36:44.410
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of what the public's.

0:36:44.070 --> 0:36:48.510
<v Speaker 1>Confidence in the NSC should be, you've got the Prime Minister,

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 1>key ministers who exercise personal powers.

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Let me give you one very quick example.

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The Minister for the AFP, under the AFP Act of 1979,

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.630
<v Speaker 1>has got the power to issue a ministerial direction to

0:37:02.510 --> 0:37:05.290
<v Speaker 1>in relation to the general policy and approach of the AFP.

0:37:05.530 --> 0:37:09.370
<v Speaker 1>They can't direct the AFP to investigate someone, to arrest someone,

0:37:09.890 --> 0:37:10.630
<v Speaker 1>to charge someone.

0:37:10.730 --> 0:37:12.910
<v Speaker 4>That's not the society that we want to live in.

0:37:13.510 --> 0:37:18.510
<v Speaker 1>But they can issue, with legal force, directions about AFP priorities.

0:37:18.550 --> 0:37:19.609
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Mr Burke has.

0:37:19.570 --> 0:37:20.350
<v Speaker 2>Just recently updated his.

0:37:20.430 --> 0:37:21.310
<v Speaker 4>OK, Mike, I'm going to jump in there.

0:37:21.410 --> 0:37:22.150
<v Speaker 2>I'm just conscious.

0:37:22.170 --> 0:37:22.370
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:37:23.010 --> 0:37:26.259
<v Speaker 2>I'm conscious of time. I've got two big questions for you.

0:37:26.500 --> 0:37:26.660
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:37:27.950 --> 0:37:31.610
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about the AFP boss not being called. Should

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:34.259
<v Speaker 2>under this system, and we've seen plenty of royal commissions

0:37:34.300 --> 0:37:37.459
<v Speaker 2>in the past, should we have seen public evidence being

0:37:37.500 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 2>given by the Prime Minister, if required, but certainly ministers

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 2>in this process?

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because what I was about to say is that

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.379
<v Speaker 1>from the time of the Hamas attack, which was almost

0:37:48.420 --> 0:37:51.330
<v Speaker 1>certainly designed to draw out a violent response, let's face it,

0:37:51.969 --> 0:37:54.370
<v Speaker 1>The horrendous themes that we saw at the Opera House,

0:37:54.570 --> 0:37:56.870
<v Speaker 1>you know, kill the Jews and gas the Jews, et cetera,

0:37:57.350 --> 0:38:00.340
<v Speaker 1>leading right up to the change in the threat status

0:38:01.660 --> 0:38:03.300
<v Speaker 1>in August of 24.

0:38:03.300 --> 0:38:04.739
<v Speaker 4>Ministers would have been meeting with.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.980
<v Speaker 1>Their senior officials to tackle the question of resources, priorities, capability.

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Have we got enough coverage? Are we covering all the

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.370
<v Speaker 1>right groups? Ministers are deeply involved in those discussions, as

0:38:14.430 --> 0:38:17.450
<v Speaker 1>they should be. And there are things that they're never

0:38:17.469 --> 0:38:19.330
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to discuss publicly, but they should

0:38:19.370 --> 0:38:22.670
<v Speaker 1>be required to give public evidence about how they approach

0:38:22.710 --> 0:38:23.830
<v Speaker 1>those different milestones.

0:38:25.410 --> 0:38:29.710
<v Speaker 2>Another quick question. This is my last question. Given all

0:38:29.730 --> 0:38:33.819
<v Speaker 2>the things that you know, what would you weight the

0:38:33.940 --> 0:38:42.760
<v Speaker 2>risk between Islamic terrorism in Australia and white supremacists, neo-Nazis types?

0:38:44.489 --> 0:38:47.820
<v Speaker 4>They're the top two, but Islamist terrorism by far.

0:38:48.060 --> 0:38:51.339
<v Speaker 1>Then there's daylight. Then there are the white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.660
<v Speaker 1>Got to keep an eye on them. Absolutely no question.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.950
<v Speaker 1>And then the also-rans are behind them. It's one, two, daylight.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:38:59.370
<v Speaker 1>And between one and two.

0:38:59.390 --> 0:39:01.609
<v Speaker 4>There's a gap. Yeah.

0:39:02.050 --> 0:39:04.890
<v Speaker 2>All right. We will be coming back to this. Mike Pozzuolo,

0:39:04.910 --> 0:39:08.170
<v Speaker 2>you're an expert and I really appreciate your assistance in

0:39:08.190 --> 0:39:10.950
<v Speaker 2>demystifying some of this for us tonight. Thank you. And

0:39:10.969 --> 0:39:14.340
<v Speaker 2>after the break, that unbelievable announcement from Premier Ben Carroll,

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the prisoners out of jail, mending potholes. It's a road gang,

0:39:19.700 --> 0:39:27.509
<v Speaker 2>a pothole gang. I kid you not, that's next. Welcome back.

0:39:27.550 --> 0:39:29.730
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, more warnings about the risk that Chris Bowen's

0:39:29.790 --> 0:39:33.180
<v Speaker 2>home battery scheme could pose to the grid. Not to

0:39:33.219 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 2>mention the fires on homes as well. Tuesday's panel's coming up.

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.690
<v Speaker 2>Lucy Zellick, Senator Sean Bell. But now to Ben Carroll's

0:39:39.730 --> 0:39:42.370
<v Speaker 2>latest promise to try and hold on to power in Victoria.

0:39:42.950 --> 0:39:46.169
<v Speaker 2>If re-elected, the new Premier says... He'll put criminal road

0:39:46.210 --> 0:39:50.070
<v Speaker 2>gangs to work over summer to repair the state's broken

0:39:50.270 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 2>road network. I love the pretenders. I mean, they're saying

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 2>it's minimum security only as part of a pledge, $ 352 million,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.220
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of some half a million potholes statewide.

0:40:09.700 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Joining me to discuss this, the bloke who reckons Victoria

0:40:11.860 --> 0:40:15.150
<v Speaker 2>needs fixing, Gideon Rosner... I had to go to that.

0:40:15.190 --> 0:40:16.510
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I thought this was a joke. I thought

0:40:16.780 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we're not close enough to April Fool's Day. But I

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:21.819
<v Speaker 2>tell you, I don't want to be driving down the

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.410
<v Speaker 2>road in country Victoria late at night having to slow

0:40:25.450 --> 0:40:28.290
<v Speaker 2>down behind the stop and go girl and have a

0:40:28.330 --> 0:40:30.850
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of prisoners. out there on the roads.

0:40:30.870 --> 0:40:32.489
<v Speaker 9>Look, Peter, to be honest with you, when I first

0:40:32.530 --> 0:40:34.190
<v Speaker 9>read it, I thought it was another sweetheart deal with

0:40:34.210 --> 0:40:36.290
<v Speaker 9>the CFMEU. Even if they end up in jail, they

0:40:36.330 --> 0:40:37.630
<v Speaker 9>can still get a piece of the action when it

0:40:37.670 --> 0:40:41.049
<v Speaker 9>comes to road maintenance and public infrastructure and so on. But, look,

0:40:41.070 --> 0:40:43.730
<v Speaker 9>in all seriousness, it just shows how desperate we've become

0:40:43.750 --> 0:40:46.589
<v Speaker 9>in Victoria. We can't afford the basics, we've run out

0:40:46.630 --> 0:40:49.720
<v Speaker 9>of money, so we're resorting to effectively slave labour to

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 9>deliver a core function of government, which is roads that

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.700
<v Speaker 9>don't destroy your car. And I think the reason the

0:40:55.739 --> 0:40:59.570
<v Speaker 9>pothole issue is so... has ingrained itself so much in

0:40:59.610 --> 0:41:02.510
<v Speaker 9>Victorian minds is, you know, we know Victoria's going backwards.

0:41:02.550 --> 0:41:04.049
<v Speaker 9>We know it's not on the right track. We know

0:41:04.090 --> 0:41:06.370
<v Speaker 9>things are falling apart. But when you're driving on a

0:41:06.430 --> 0:41:09.229
<v Speaker 9>third world road, and they are terrible in some places

0:41:09.270 --> 0:41:12.050
<v Speaker 9>in Victoria and a lot of places in Victoria, it's real.

0:41:12.090 --> 0:41:13.950
<v Speaker 4>You can see the decline. You can feel it.

0:41:14.590 --> 0:41:15.410
<v Speaker 2>It's tangible.

0:41:15.530 --> 0:41:17.410
<v Speaker 9>And a lot of people who, again, used to remember

0:41:17.430 --> 0:41:19.489
<v Speaker 9>this state at its prime when it was a great

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 9>world-class place can now just see things. We can't even

0:41:24.460 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 9>get the basics right.

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.940
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the $ 200 billion debt, you're right, it's not in

0:41:27.980 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 2>your face every single day.

0:41:29.180 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 9>Correct.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 2>When I leave here at night and I drive along

0:41:31.380 --> 0:41:33.759
<v Speaker 2>City Road for people in Melbourne and I come around

0:41:33.780 --> 0:41:35.730
<v Speaker 2>the bend across the yard and go to the tennis

0:41:35.750 --> 0:41:39.330
<v Speaker 2>centre and along that way, right at that bend, you know,

0:41:39.370 --> 0:41:42.830
<v Speaker 2>this is a peak tourism road of Melbourne, there's about

0:41:42.969 --> 0:41:47.430
<v Speaker 2>four major potholes in a row and everyone goes around them, right?

0:41:47.450 --> 0:41:49.900
<v Speaker 2>And just every time I do that I think this

0:41:49.940 --> 0:41:52.899
<v Speaker 2>is a showcase road in the Melbourne CBD and that's

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:53.460
<v Speaker 2>the state of it.

0:41:53.770 --> 0:41:55.489
<v Speaker 9>I think it's important as well for your viewers to

0:41:55.530 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 9>understand that these are not just minor little bumpity-bumpity inconveniences, right?

0:41:59.820 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 9>They're seriously dangerous, but they're costing a lot of money too.

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 9>Do a Google search and you'll read some absolute horror stories.

0:42:06.500 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 9>One bloke brought all four tyres, all four rims, $ 8, 000

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:14.250
<v Speaker 9>no compensation. A driving instructor from Warrnambool now has to

0:42:14.290 --> 0:42:17.910
<v Speaker 9>budget $ 7, 000 a year extra for repairs. That's not a

0:42:17.950 --> 0:42:20.510
<v Speaker 9>rounding error for a small business, effectively a sole trader.

0:42:20.670 --> 0:42:22.770
<v Speaker 2>Hey, one of my viewers contacted me. They came down

0:42:22.810 --> 0:42:24.250
<v Speaker 2>from New South Wales, I think it was, to get

0:42:24.290 --> 0:42:27.030
<v Speaker 2>a puppy, pick up a puppy. They blew out their tyres.

0:42:27.070 --> 0:42:28.630
<v Speaker 2>They blew out their rims. They had a couple of

0:42:28.730 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 2>nights extra in a motel. It cost them thousands of

0:42:32.410 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 2>dollars because of the state of Victoria's roads.

0:42:34.580 --> 0:42:37.220
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and as we know, only 2% of compensation claims

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 9>are being lodged. But you're right, Peter, this is what

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:41.299
<v Speaker 9>happens when you run out of money. This is what

0:42:41.340 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 9>happens when you're paying a million dollars a day in interest. Again,

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.420
<v Speaker 9>the basics are not there. The core baseline functions. I

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:51.489
<v Speaker 9>was on last week at this program talking about 24-hour

0:42:51.550 --> 0:42:55.250
<v Speaker 9>police desks being shut down, security being pulled from train stations.

0:42:55.550 --> 0:42:58.110
<v Speaker 4>These are not nice-to-haves. These are must-haves.

0:42:58.450 --> 0:43:00.010
<v Speaker 9>And these are the things we cannot afford to do

0:43:00.050 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 9>because the state has effectively gone broke.

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 2>We might have some voxies. You've been out talking to

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:05.219
<v Speaker 2>real people on the street. Let's have a listen.

0:43:06.739 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 9>What do you think about the roads in Victoria?

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 10>Crap.

0:43:09.140 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 4>They're crap.

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:11.780
<v Speaker 9>And tell me, have you had any experience with potholes?

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.509
<v Speaker 4>Yes, heaps. Mate, tell me about the potholes around here.

0:43:14.530 --> 0:43:16.290
<v Speaker 7>Atrocious.

0:43:16.710 --> 0:43:17.810
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely atrocious.

0:43:17.870 --> 0:43:18.750
<v Speaker 9>How bad is it out here?

0:43:19.190 --> 0:43:20.110
<v Speaker 7>Oh, it's disgusting.

0:43:20.230 --> 0:43:22.180
<v Speaker 2>I live past Nanagoon.

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:23.020
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right.

0:43:23.060 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 8>So, like, that road, like, on the freeway gets pretty

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:27.750
<v Speaker 8>bad when we have a lot of rain.

0:43:27.910 --> 0:43:32.009
<v Speaker 2>And so I've gotten a flat tyre there before. Well,

0:43:32.030 --> 0:43:33.590
<v Speaker 2>good on you getting out and hearing it from real people.

0:43:33.730 --> 0:43:36.070
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, look, and it's important to point out those are

0:43:36.090 --> 0:43:38.440
<v Speaker 9>just the people who were polite enough and calm enough

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 9>to stop and speak to us. A lot of people,

0:43:39.700 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, they didn't want some guy with a little

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 9>fuzzy microphone going up to them when they're trying to

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 9>do their shopping.

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 4>But I'd say, you know, can you talk about the roads?

0:43:45.660 --> 0:43:46.940
<v Speaker 4>The roads, they're terrible.

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.390
<v Speaker 9>You know, Peter, I've been in politics and public policy

0:43:50.430 --> 0:43:53.210
<v Speaker 9>my whole adult life. Over 20 years now, I've never,

0:43:53.390 --> 0:43:54.750
<v Speaker 9>ever seen anger this white hot.

0:43:54.950 --> 0:43:56.109
<v Speaker 4>Never, ever, ever.

0:43:56.190 --> 0:43:56.350
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:43:56.770 --> 0:43:59.890
<v Speaker 9>You know, the 2010 election, some people might remember in Victoria,

0:43:59.930 --> 0:44:01.910
<v Speaker 9>was known as the Frankston Line election because there were

0:44:01.930 --> 0:44:04.070
<v Speaker 9>a lot of victories on the Frankston train line. I

0:44:04.090 --> 0:44:06.710
<v Speaker 9>really think the 2026 election will be known forever.

0:44:06.530 --> 0:44:07.630
<v Speaker 4>As the pothole election.

0:44:07.710 --> 0:44:10.110
<v Speaker 9>This is the barbecue stopper issue of the season.

0:44:10.739 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Buckle up.

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 4>You're needed in Victoria.

0:44:13.340 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, if you're interested in getting involved, go to

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Fix Victoria's website. Speak your mind. Tell them what you

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 2>think needs fixing in Victoria. A quick break after the break.

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Lucy Selleck, Sean Bell, coming up. Let's bring them straight in.

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 2>My panel, Lucy Zellick and One Nation Senator Sean Bell.

0:44:35.340 --> 0:44:39.129
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to you both. Experts today warning Chris Bowen's home

0:44:39.150 --> 0:44:42.450
<v Speaker 2>battery scheme could pose a risk to the stability of

0:44:42.469 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 2>the energy grid. Well, surprise, surprise, because some of these models,

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:49.190
<v Speaker 2>these Chinese models in particular, completely shut down or throttled

0:44:49.230 --> 0:44:52.109
<v Speaker 2>down during cold weather. Of course, we've got issues with

0:44:52.150 --> 0:44:55.430
<v Speaker 2>some of them blowing up. There's fire risks, of course,

0:44:55.930 --> 0:44:59.830
<v Speaker 2>and some at risk of being controlled by their Chinese manufacturers.

0:45:00.350 --> 0:45:02.490
<v Speaker 2>Another bow and balls up. Is this one, Lucy?

0:45:02.510 --> 0:45:03.350
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 2>That's putting it pretty politely, Peter.

0:45:05.940 --> 0:45:08.259
<v Speaker 11>Great to be with you once again. Add to that

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 11>the fact that this scheme is now blown out by

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:14.060
<v Speaker 11>billions of dollars and the fact that now some consumers,

0:45:14.100 --> 0:45:16.210
<v Speaker 11>depending upon which part of the country you live in,

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:19.490
<v Speaker 11>if you are experiencing sub-zero temperatures, which they have been

0:45:19.550 --> 0:45:22.790
<v Speaker 11>this winter for the first time in 60 years in

0:45:22.870 --> 0:45:26.870
<v Speaker 11>some instances, the battery will actually throttle. And then some

0:45:26.930 --> 0:45:29.609
<v Speaker 11>consumers have found themselves in a situation where they're having

0:45:29.630 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 11>to purchase a blanket, a cover for it, and have

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.760
<v Speaker 11>it professionally installed to the tune of hundreds of dollars,

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.259
<v Speaker 11>and then uninstalled when it comes to summertime because of

0:45:39.420 --> 0:45:42.900
<v Speaker 11>overheating risks. I mean, it's just remarkable that this government

0:45:42.940 --> 0:45:46.009
<v Speaker 11>cannot see that these ideological pursuits and fantasies are not

0:45:46.050 --> 0:45:50.390
<v Speaker 11>just bleeding the cost, you know, the taxpayers dry, but

0:45:50.430 --> 0:45:53.850
<v Speaker 11>it's effectively not working and it's not providing stability for

0:45:53.890 --> 0:45:54.730
<v Speaker 11>the grid at all.

0:45:56.650 --> 0:45:58.489
<v Speaker 2>We've got a lot of public opposition already to the

0:45:58.530 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 2>role of these giant data centres. Over 100,000 Australians have

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:08.420
<v Speaker 2>signed at least 36 petitions, Sean. Yes, I know the

0:46:08.460 --> 0:46:11.100
<v Speaker 2>data centres are a big issue and I do think

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:13.540
<v Speaker 2>we need debate, but I also want to see some

0:46:13.580 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 2>debate and some attention on the actual use of AI

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.940
<v Speaker 2>and a debate about the guardrails we want in and

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:22.750
<v Speaker 2>what will happen to jobs. I mean, we went all

0:46:22.770 --> 0:46:26.069
<v Speaker 2>the way in, in deep on social media, and now

0:46:26.110 --> 0:46:30.130
<v Speaker 2>we're grappling with not having enough rules going in. God

0:46:30.210 --> 0:46:32.690
<v Speaker 2>forbid we go into AI and we're all at sea.

0:46:32.710 --> 0:46:35.069
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm with Peter Malinowskis on this. I think

0:46:35.110 --> 0:46:38.090
<v Speaker 2>we need the rules in place before this hits hard,

0:46:38.410 --> 0:46:38.910
<v Speaker 2>don't you think?

0:46:38.930 --> 0:46:40.530
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I agree.

0:46:40.810 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 10>The federal government actually did initiate an inquiry into this issue.

0:46:44.140 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 10>Their report was handed back late last year. One of

0:46:47.980 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 10>the recommendations was that we need to develop whole of

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:56.250
<v Speaker 10>government legislation to protect Australians from high-risk AI. And as

0:46:56.310 --> 0:46:58.710
<v Speaker 10>far as I'm aware, no further action has been taken.

0:46:58.770 --> 0:47:01.430
<v Speaker 10>That particular recommendation has been more or less ignored by

0:47:01.450 --> 0:47:04.530
<v Speaker 10>the Albanese Labor government. And they really risk being caught short.

0:47:04.650 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 10>And also this issue of the data centers, too, is

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 10>a big one. And it might actually be one of

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 10>the biggest issues. It gets brought up more than any

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 10>other issue. And I just want to go into some detail.

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:16.009
<v Speaker 10>The size of these data centers and the amount of

0:47:16.070 --> 0:47:20.069
<v Speaker 10>renewable intermittent energy that they are, the Albanese government wants

0:47:20.090 --> 0:47:22.290
<v Speaker 10>them to uptake. I mean, uh one project in the

0:47:22.330 --> 0:47:25.610
<v Speaker 10>northern territory that's a one gigawatt data center that's 90

0:47:25.610 --> 0:47:28.620
<v Speaker 10>hectares for the data center and they're saying that in

0:47:28.660 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 10>order to power it they're going to build an additional

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 10>7 000 hectares of solar i mean every time the

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 10>federal government says that we need to make sure these

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:40.130
<v Speaker 10>are powered by intermittent energy put that in your head

0:47:40.150 --> 0:47:43.450
<v Speaker 10>that is 7 000 hectares of solar panels for each

0:47:43.510 --> 0:47:46.069
<v Speaker 10>new one gigawatt data center or the equivalent of and

0:47:46.110 --> 0:47:48.580
<v Speaker 10>so i mean it's just a Put that there's the

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:51.399
<v Speaker 10>level and that's going to affect rural and regional areas.

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 10>That's where the data centers are going. So it is

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:55.340
<v Speaker 10>it's a huge concern on both sides. I think the

0:47:55.380 --> 0:47:58.140
<v Speaker 10>government's being caught flat footed. And I think people are

0:47:58.180 --> 0:48:01.700
<v Speaker 10>still yet to grasp the sheer volume of land and

0:48:01.739 --> 0:48:03.420
<v Speaker 10>how this will be used to further prop up the

0:48:03.460 --> 0:48:05.140
<v Speaker 10>net zero agenda from the Albanese Labor government.

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:09.739
<v Speaker 2>Lucy, I want to ask you a question about an

0:48:09.780 --> 0:48:12.779
<v Speaker 2>emotional topic, but I come from the position that I

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.739
<v Speaker 2>think laws must protect the most vulnerable. And this is

0:48:16.780 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 2>about euthanasia. So right now you have to see a doctor,

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:23.259
<v Speaker 2>you have to see two face-to-face doctors, you have to

0:48:23.300 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 2>have a terminal illness and it has to be signed

0:48:25.100 --> 0:48:27.739
<v Speaker 2>off with authority. There's a real push to allow it

0:48:27.780 --> 0:48:30.759
<v Speaker 2>to happen on the phone and doctors have come out

0:48:30.820 --> 0:48:34.390
<v Speaker 2>publicly and said we're very concerned it will make our

0:48:34.430 --> 0:48:38.820
<v Speaker 2>laws far too permissive. One is the Victorian, former Victorian

0:48:38.900 --> 0:48:42.180
<v Speaker 2>head of the AMA, Professor Mark Yates. He's part of

0:48:42.219 --> 0:48:46.439
<v Speaker 2>a group of doctors. He says you require sophistication to

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 2>assess capacity of consent, to assess that there's not coercion

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 2>being put on this person, that there's no mental health

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.859
<v Speaker 2>disorders before they consent to euthanasia. He says you can't

0:48:57.910 --> 0:49:02.230
<v Speaker 2>do this safely via telehealth. What do you think here?

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:06.500
<v Speaker 11>I understand, Peter, it's a very emotional issue, but full

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:08.819
<v Speaker 11>caveat here, I'm a proud Christian woman and I have

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:12.910
<v Speaker 11>very staunchly been against the idea of voluntary assisted dying.

0:49:12.930 --> 0:49:17.330
<v Speaker 11>And doctors themselves also, you've seen professors and medical experts

0:49:17.410 --> 0:49:19.250
<v Speaker 11>weigh in on this who have also been against it

0:49:19.290 --> 0:49:21.980
<v Speaker 11>because they sign an oath to preserve and protect life,

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:25.800
<v Speaker 11>not to end it. Professor Yates is right to address

0:49:25.820 --> 0:49:30.860
<v Speaker 11>the fact that this doesn't take into account coercion, as

0:49:30.900 --> 0:49:33.049
<v Speaker 11>well as other mental health issues in all of this.

0:49:33.090 --> 0:49:35.450
<v Speaker 11>So it's very sad to see that you've got the

0:49:35.489 --> 0:49:39.290
<v Speaker 11>likes of Senator Hanson-Young really pushing something like this.

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it does concern me a lot. We'll stay with

0:49:42.820 --> 0:49:44.940
<v Speaker 2>that issue. It's not going to go away. Thank you

0:49:44.980 --> 0:49:46.860
<v Speaker 2>to you both. See you both next week. All right,

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:49.710
<v Speaker 2>that's it from me. Have a lovely evening. My good

0:49:49.750 --> 0:49:51.509
<v Speaker 2>friend James Ikerferson is up next.