Speaker 1: This is Outside. Good morning, and welcome.
Speaker 2: To Outsiders, the show that does to woke, virtue signaling
Speaker 2: and identity politics on steroids. What Elon Musk and Donald
Speaker 2: Trump are busy doing to the left, What the left are.
Speaker 1: Doing to freedom of speech and free expression.
Speaker 2: Indeed, here are Elon and Donald celebrating their chat on
Speaker 2: X the other.
Speaker 3: Day, staying alive. Indeed, amazing what AI can do for
Speaker 3: your dance moves. Maybe Raygun needed.
Speaker 4: That he is the real Donald Trump.
Speaker 5: This week, the radical Marxist left and these sympathizers of
Speaker 5: the radical Islamic terra who Democrats have imported from all
Speaker 5: over the world, have united around their hatred of America
Speaker 5: and the hatred for Israel. They have hatred the toxic
Speaker 5: poison of anti Semitism. Now courses through the veins of
Speaker 5: radical Democrat Party.
Speaker 6: Can't put it any clearer than that Trump not pulling
Speaker 6: any punches there.
Speaker 7: If you hate America, if you want to eliminate Israel,
Speaker 7: then we don't.
Speaker 8: Want you in our country.
Speaker 7: We really don't want you in our country. I will
Speaker 7: ban refugee settlements from terra infested areas like the Gaza Strip.
Speaker 2: My goodness, there's a thought sounds just like Peter Dutton,
Speaker 2: and I mean that is a definite compliment. And now
Speaker 2: as the lefties lose what passes for their minds, let's grab.
Speaker 1: The latest Outsiders news.
Speaker 2: Well, who'd have thought Reta and James that the left
Speaker 2: wing of the New South Wales Liberal Party would descend
Speaker 2: into bumbling, chaotic, clownish foolishness as they try to ram
Speaker 2: their left wing types into Parliament.
Speaker 1: What are fast we've seen this week?
Speaker 4: Rita, Well, they are a cancer.
Speaker 3: We have said this over and over again, and now
Speaker 3: they're also in nept. It's one thing to be toxic,
Speaker 3: it's another to be inept. At the same time, then
Speaker 3: their eagerist James to push through their smaller liberal moderate
Speaker 3: bedweathers whatever you want to call them. Well, they've now
Speaker 3: stuffed up the whole thing.
Speaker 9: They've stuffed up the whole thing.
Speaker 6: This has huge consequences here. Everybody needs to know about this,
Speaker 6: and maybe people in other parts of the country haven't
Speaker 6: followed it. New South Wales is having big local government
Speaker 6: elections council elections in a few weeks time. There was
Speaker 6: a deadline last week to get all the candidates for
Speaker 6: the election registered and on the ballot and in over
Speaker 6: a dozen really important in councils, councils and areas the
Speaker 6: Libs need to win back at the next election. And
Speaker 6: I'm talking about in areas around where like Teal seats
Speaker 6: are on the northern Beaches, places like the seat of
Speaker 6: mckeller and things like that. They're not going to have
Speaker 6: any candidates on the ballot because and here's the key thing.
Speaker 6: The story goes that they spend so much time scrowing
Speaker 6: around and not doing the paperwork that at the last
Speaker 6: minute they couldn't get all the paperwork in now already
Speaker 6: Richard Shields, who's the New South Wales Liberal Party President,
Speaker 6: he's fallen on his sword, he's been blown out. But
Speaker 6: there's another character.
Speaker 9: In all of this.
Speaker 6: That would be Don Harwin, the great sort of moderate
Speaker 6: powerbroker and the moderates. We all know who the moderates
Speaker 6: are in New South Wales. And he is actually apparently
Speaker 6: going to hang on to his job somehow because of politics,
Speaker 6: because of the politics and the dysfunctional New South Wales
Speaker 6: division of the Liberal Party.
Speaker 9: So this whole rock this.
Speaker 6: Is very similar you know to you remember in twenty
Speaker 6: twenty two at the last election went again they weren't
Speaker 6: able to get candidates in the right candidates in because
Speaker 6: Scott Morrison and Alex Hawk and people like that were
Speaker 6: playing games with the pre selection and you know that
Speaker 6: caused all sorts of disaster running into that election. And
Speaker 6: now again the same sorts of games are seeing the
Speaker 6: New South Wales Liberals lose their spots to there were
Speaker 6: mayoralties that they could have taken over, but then destroying
Speaker 6: the organizational ability on the ground of these key seats
Speaker 6: that they needed to win at the next election just
Speaker 6: quickly rewarded everything.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so my sources tell me that the Liberal Council
Speaker 2: candidate nomination was a fiasco because it was the result
Speaker 2: of this strategy which is often used. It's an underhanded
Speaker 2: strategy by the New South Wales Liberal State Executive Council.
Speaker 2: And what they try and do, and what James and
Speaker 2: Reader have referred to, is they delay the nomination process.
Speaker 1: They keep delaying it.
Speaker 2: This is what my sources are telling me until the
Speaker 2: last minute, so that they can then place their own
Speaker 2: own left wing bed wetting as Rita said candidate under
Speaker 2: the urgency provision of Section twenty one point six point
Speaker 2: three of their constitution.
Speaker 1: Left his playing games.
Speaker 4: Rita and playing it very poorly.
Speaker 3: Because I can tell you one thing, Labor and even
Speaker 3: the Shambali Greens would never make this sort of error.
Speaker 3: They understand how important local government is, the understand how
Speaker 3: important power is, and this is something that it would
Speaker 3: be incredible if how it holds on to his role.
Speaker 1: He just can't.
Speaker 2: He only got in by one vote, didn't He only
Speaker 2: got in by one vote. He's the absolute epitome of
Speaker 2: that whole left wing style yeah politics that has destroyed
Speaker 2: the Liberal Party state after state after state. There is
Speaker 2: only the Liberal Party federally with Peter Dutton as leader,
Speaker 2: that is standing up for conservative principles and doing a
Speaker 2: fantastic job.
Speaker 1: We're going to talk about guards.
Speaker 2: Of visas in a minute, Rowan, You're going to get
Speaker 2: rid of this character, get rid of this.
Speaker 6: There's a thing here that you need to understand. Particularly
Speaker 6: the New South Wales Party. This moderate wing would rather
Speaker 6: fight conservatives within the Liberal Party than they would fight
Speaker 6: the opposition. And then here's what happens then, you know,
Speaker 6: and we saw this happen in the last state election
Speaker 6: in New South Wales. Chris Minns, who has been I
Speaker 6: have to say a very competent Labor premier in New
Speaker 6: South Wales. He came in and is still pushing through
Speaker 6: a raft of common sense measures that people like and
Speaker 6: people feel like, unlike the moderate side of the Liberal
Speaker 6: Party which is actually actively hostile to normal people and
Speaker 6: what they want and need. You know, this is the
Speaker 6: space that the Liberals need to be occupying and they
Speaker 6: have seen it. They've seen it in New South Wales
Speaker 6: to Labor and what they've done.
Speaker 2: This is the same group of mobile people for those
Speaker 2: outside New South Wales. It gave us Matt kin So
Speaker 2: Matt Kain then became treasurer, built all these windmills and
Speaker 2: stuff around the New South Wales and then went and
Speaker 2: joined the Lanfelabor Party, got a job with the Labor
Speaker 2: Party of centers. He you know, I mean, this mob
Speaker 2: have got to be changed within the New South Wales
Speaker 2: Liberal Party so we get genuine conservatives in New Southwest.
Speaker 1: And it has to happen.
Speaker 4: And it's not just New South Wales.
Speaker 3: This same losing philosophy, this same anti conservative sentiment where
Speaker 3: they're more interested in killing any genuine conservatives within the
Speaker 3: National Liberal Party than they are actually defeating labor.
Speaker 4: It exists in Victoria. That's why Victoria is an.
Speaker 3: Absolute faster case because the electorate has no choice and
Speaker 3: the Liberals are just there's no meritocracy there, there's no
Speaker 3: accountability there. And if there's to be any accountability, this
Speaker 3: character has to go.
Speaker 4: You cannot stick around.
Speaker 2: We get rid of him, put someone in decent and
Speaker 2: you know, let's get the Libs functioning properly as a
Speaker 2: conservative party in New South Wales. Speaking of brilliant politically leadership,
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton. Hats off full chairs to Peter Dutton for
Speaker 2: the strong stance he's taken this week. As the clip
Speaker 2: we just played your Donald Trump, that's exactly the same sentiments.
Speaker 1: Will be very very clear here. This is not a
Speaker 1: question of being anti Muslim. This is not a question
Speaker 1: of being racist.
Speaker 2: This is not a question of being anything other than
Speaker 2: a leader of this country putting the safety of the
Speaker 2: community first and foremost. We're talking of course about Peter
Speaker 2: Dutton's call for a temporary suspension on people coming from
Speaker 2: the war zone of Gaza into this country. Labor are
Speaker 2: bringing near close to three thousand people in granting them
Speaker 2: temporary visas bringing them into the country. Peter Dutton has
Speaker 2: said no, we don't want this. We must put a
Speaker 2: halt to this, and it's just been and the reason
Speaker 2: is very very clear and simple. If you are any doubt,
Speaker 2: it is the protection particularly of the Jewish community of Australia,
Speaker 2: but not only the Jewish community of Australia, when we
Speaker 2: have clear and unequivocal evidence that fortunately we have not
Speaker 2: the vetting processes in place to guarantee that people coming
Speaker 2: from Gaza do not hold hamas sympathies and in fact,
Speaker 2: Michael burd just told us it doesn't even matter if
Speaker 2: they do. Now this is insanity reads, it.
Speaker 4: Is absolutely insanity.
Speaker 3: And the attacks against Peter Dutton on this issue, whether
Speaker 3: it's coming from the media, whether it's coming from the
Speaker 3: activist class, or coming from the likes of Zali Stegel
Speaker 3: and Sarah Hanson Young and Tanya Plibersek and the rest
Speaker 3: of labor, including the Prime Minister, utterly unhinged.
Speaker 4: They have gone down the racism route.
Speaker 3: We had Zali Stegel on Sky News doubling down on
Speaker 3: this racist Reetrick trying to paint this policy as inherently racist.
Speaker 3: I don't know how geographic have a quick listen to racist.
Speaker 1: Let's have a quick listen, read to it to Zali,
Speaker 1: then we'll go to James.
Speaker 10: Stop being the opposition is a description of language being
Speaker 10: and unparliamentary remark the policy proposed by Peter Dustan and
Speaker 10: the Coalition is racist.
Speaker 6: Well, this sort of feels a lot like the voice
Speaker 6: all over again, you know. Where as as as soon
Speaker 6: as you know the Conservatives come up with a policy
Speaker 6: they don't like, they scream that it's racist.
Speaker 9: Well, of course not. It's not about racism at all.
Speaker 6: It's about keeping out a population that has huge sympathy
Speaker 6: for hamas in the October seventh attacks. But the bigger
Speaker 6: story here this week, it's not necessarily Zali Stegel, which
Speaker 6: is a lot of sound and light there, But the
Speaker 6: real story was Prime Minister Anthony Albanizi and the way
Speaker 6: that he stitched up and reworded what Mike Burgess said
Speaker 6: about whether it's everybody. Well, essentially, the long and the
Speaker 6: short of it is that Albinizi verbal Asio and said
Speaker 6: that they said that everybody was being checked when they
Speaker 6: said no, no, no, not everybody is getting the full
Speaker 6: suite of checks, which, of course that's Albanzi trying to say,
Speaker 6: oh no, no, everybody who comes in here, you know
Speaker 6: they have been gone the whole vetting process. Well, that's
Speaker 6: a nonsense, and we know it's a nonsense because you
Speaker 6: come from any other country, there's a government that you
Speaker 6: can check with who you know, who these people are,
Speaker 6: what their record are, what they're you know, if there's
Speaker 6: any red flags. You know, there are ways that they
Speaker 6: can know some people are involved with Hamas, but you know,
Speaker 6: not everybody. But the thing is too an awful lot
Speaker 6: of people who are able to get out of Gaza.
Speaker 6: They're able to get out of Gaza because they've got money,
Speaker 6: and you don't have money in Gaza if you are not,
Speaker 6: in one way or another connected with something that is,
Speaker 6: you know, a Hamas enterprise. So there's a lot of conservatives.
Speaker 3: The problem is deeper than that because we've got the
Speaker 3: Ago Boss Mike Burgess saying that if you've got sympathy
Speaker 3: towards the mass, it's not a deal breaker.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable, and believe.
Speaker 3: In Australians it is a deal breaker. And I think
Speaker 3: on this issue in particular, Pedodaton is very much representing
Speaker 3: the views of mainstream majority Australias. Of course, the media
Speaker 3: activist class the left are absolutely an uproar about it.
Speaker 3: I think he's going to get the pen the Abbot
Speaker 3: Trump treatment going forward.
Speaker 6: Well, of course, but there's another important point here, and
Speaker 6: this is the way in which domestic immigration politics is
Speaker 6: affecting our migration policy and eventually potentially our national security.
Speaker 6: You know, all of these frontbenchers in Western Sydney from
Speaker 6: the Labor Party, Troy but Tony Burke who's now the
Speaker 6: Homeland Security, Homeland Affairs Minister, Jason Clair, a lot of
Speaker 6: other big names. All of these seats have large, large,
Speaker 6: large Muslim populations that are very sympathetic to Gaza. So
Speaker 6: what's happening here. Let's be really clear, Labor is pandering
Speaker 6: to the Muslim vote in these Western Sydney seats and
Speaker 6: they're playing politics without security.
Speaker 4: I think it actually goes beyond that.
Speaker 3: Yes, there's the Muslim population in those seats, but I
Speaker 3: think Labour's position on this is as much influenced by
Speaker 3: the Greens positions the Greens can wage them and younger voters,
Speaker 3: because if you look at these protests that are happening,
Speaker 3: it's not just members of the Muslim community, it is
Speaker 3: overwhelmingly the usual suspects the younger activist class, not always younger,
Speaker 3: sometimes that they don't need to be a bit, but
Speaker 3: they're the same people who are the Anti Australia Day rallies,
Speaker 3: climate change rallies, and.
Speaker 1: That voters driving this thing. Absolutely.
Speaker 4: It is very much energized on this issue.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and it's also worth pointing out that there will
Speaker 2: be many, many, many Muslim voters out there watching this
Speaker 2: program probably who are thinking, you know what, I'm with.
Speaker 1: Peter Dutton on this one.
Speaker 2: I escaped from that part of the world because I
Speaker 2: didn't like the aggression and the violence and I really
Speaker 2: don't want those people imported here if they haven't been
Speaker 2: properly vettered. And I guarantee you Peter Dutton is on
Speaker 2: a winner with as much of them Muslim community in
Speaker 2: those western suburbs. They may not be vocal, they may
Speaker 2: not put their heads and I agree with Peter Dunton.
Speaker 1: But I guarantee you they're thinking it.
Speaker 6: And I'll tell you what, Roland, it is pretty interesting
Speaker 6: to me, you know, Zarali Stegel and the left of
Speaker 6: the Greed is you know, they're alsoing Peter dunts racist
Speaker 6: for you know, not wanting to bring in people from Gaza. Well,
Speaker 6: I'm just wondering where are the Arab nations on this?
Speaker 9: And you know, you.
Speaker 6: Would think that needs would be the first one, but
Speaker 6: it may just be that there's some historical events over
Speaker 6: the last several decades in some of these nations that
Speaker 6: have made them possibly Jordan, you know.
Speaker 3: Where that Gaza was a race because we're talking about
Speaker 3: people from that geographic region.
Speaker 4: So how you can determine that to be racist.
Speaker 3: When it doesn't apply to other Arabs? It doesn't apply
Speaker 3: to people even I think from.
Speaker 4: The West Bank. It's only Gaza we're speaking about.
Speaker 3: So to use and misuse the word races, and the
Speaker 3: left's got to understand screaming races is not a substitute
Speaker 3: for an argument. It may have in the past won
Speaker 3: year the argument because people are so terrified.
Speaker 4: But if you've got any.
Speaker 3: Sort of conservative with a backbone and any principle, and
Speaker 3: we never really Dutton is that he's not going to
Speaker 3: bow down.
Speaker 6: There's another word here that also gets abuse an awful lot,
Speaker 6: and that's sort of refugee because people have been This
Speaker 6: is the strangest thing about the West Bank and Gaza.
Speaker 6: This is the only population in the world in history
Speaker 6: that's allowed to have been multi generational refugees. Many many
Speaker 6: people out there watching this program are descendants of people
Speaker 6: who came here as refugees from Europe or some of
Speaker 6: the part of the world. You know what that first
Speaker 6: generation they were the refugees. You cannot have intergenerational refugee
Speaker 6: ship and I get see, I guarantee.
Speaker 2: Politically, Peter Dutton has got at least a sixty to
Speaker 2: forty majority around the country, as he did on the voice.
Speaker 4: Zing on this, which is very interesting.
Speaker 3: So there's been polling down from November March April asking
Speaker 3: do you agree or disagree with this state the conflict
Speaker 3: in the Middle East has made Australia less safe?
Speaker 4: Now initially.
Speaker 3: It was almost even thirty two percent said it didn't
Speaker 3: make a difference, thirty six percent said it made us
Speaker 3: less safe and about a third were unsure. And you
Speaker 3: look at how that's progressed. Now only one in four
Speaker 3: think it doesn't have an impact here and our safety is.
Speaker 6: And Paul after Paul is also shown, Paul is shown
Speaker 6: that Australians also do not want to import conflict. They
Speaker 6: are very very sensitive to that whole idea.
Speaker 9: So it's safety.
Speaker 6: It's also about social cohesion and that's the other big
Speaker 6: part to this.
Speaker 3: Oh absolutely, And I think any Australian politician, any sort
Speaker 3: of leader or future leader, the number one priority has
Speaker 3: to be Australia and the safety of Australians and what's
Speaker 3: in the best interests of this country. Everything else is secondary.
Speaker 3: So when you've got a Prime Minister and a party
Speaker 3: who are tizing that's a hard word for me, the
Speaker 3: interests of people in Gaza over Australians.
Speaker 4: That is a problem.
Speaker 3: And I think the overwhelming majority of Australians are very
Speaker 3: much against people being approved within an hour When how.
Speaker 4: Do the checks necessary?
Speaker 1: You can't and have as good as admitted that.
Speaker 2: And more importantly, it's not more importantly, but as importantly
Speaker 2: it's not only the absolute literal security and safety. It's
Speaker 2: the peace of mind of the Jewish community certainly, but
Speaker 2: of members of the Muslim community.
Speaker 1: As I've also said of the Australian community.
Speaker 11: If you are not absolutely guaranteeing that every person coming
Speaker 11: into this country has only the well being of this
Speaker 11: country at top of mind, then you are negligent in
Speaker 11: your duty. Alban Easy and Wong and the rest of
Speaker 11: them deserve.
Speaker 1: To be booted out.
Speaker 2: They are unfit for purpose, They're not fit for the
Speaker 2: job they are doing to Peter Dutton led government because
Speaker 2: we need security and peace of mind and we need
Speaker 2: conservative values right at the heart of that. So keep going,
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton, You're on the right track. Now, this isn't
Speaker 2: just Australia that's having these similar discussions. Joining us now
Speaker 2: is a former Reform UK candidate Reformers, of course, Nigel
Speaker 2: Farage's party. It's Myron Central Nathan joins us. Myron's great
Speaker 2: to have you on outside, as I've been really keen
Speaker 2: to get you on love watching your various comments on
Speaker 2: YouTube and Twitter and so on over the last few weeks. Now,
Speaker 2: first of all, let's just introduce you to the Australian
Speaker 2: audience who will be very very keen to hear your
Speaker 2: story and particular your thoughts on what is happening now
Speaker 2: with the racism, race riots, race baiting, two tier policing etc.
Speaker 1: In Britain.
Speaker 2: But first of all, Myron, just introduce yourself, tell us
Speaker 2: a bit about yourself.
Speaker 9: I'm hi there, good to be with you. My name's Myron.
Speaker 12: As I said, was running a campaign with Nigel Farag's
Speaker 12: Party Reform UK during the general election. I'm a dentist.
Speaker 12: I'm a British Sri Lankan born and brought up and
Speaker 12: a proud patriot really of of my of my country.
Speaker 12: So that's where I stand on things.
Speaker 1: Excellent.
Speaker 2: So what do you make of what's been happening with
Speaker 2: the with the actions with the riots by I guess
Speaker 2: conservative or working class or traditional English, many of them white,
Speaker 2: but by no means exclusively against I guess the in
Speaker 2: the aftermath of the murder of the three girls and
Speaker 2: how that has knocked on into race, riots and so
Speaker 2: on with in Britain.
Speaker 1: To give us your take on it.
Speaker 12: Yeah, So these this terrible, grotesque crime has triggered something.
Speaker 12: I don't think it's entirely rational, but nonetheless it's tapped
Speaker 12: into something subconscious in the in the British psyche. At
Speaker 12: the same time, we have a government and a Prime Minister,
Speaker 12: Kiirs Starmer, who is ideologically possessed.
Speaker 1: And what I mean by that.
Speaker 12: Is he's he's stuck in an ideological universe, so much
Speaker 12: so that he cannot actually see reality and is unwilling
Speaker 12: to engage with reality. He but he's stuck in a
Speaker 12: world where multiculturalism is the utopia, where mass immigration can
Speaker 12: only be good, where diversity is our strength. And unfortunately,
Speaker 12: what has happened is through these protests and through these riots,
Speaker 12: what we're seeing is British people signaling quite openly that
Speaker 12: they are they are not happy with the situation with
Speaker 12: with mass migration, They're not happy happy with cultural integration.
Speaker 12: So reality is colliding with the ideological universe of our government.
Speaker 12: And what happens when that occurs, inevitably the government, instead
Speaker 12: of actually just dealing with the situation and empathizing with
Speaker 12: the British people, they've invoked an authoritarian algorithm almost where
Speaker 12: they're just kind of stamping out the voice of the
Speaker 12: British people by calling them far right, islamophobic or whatever
Speaker 12: other names. Some of the authoritarian measures they've taken are
Speaker 12: justified because there were thugs that tried to burn down,
Speaker 12: for instance, a migrant hotel which potentially had women and children,
Speaker 12: so absolutely should be condemned and it's right that the
Speaker 12: full force of the law should be dealt to them.
Speaker 12: But however, there's been some growth really far over each
Speaker 12: of the British government. I mean, for instance, we had
Speaker 12: a man who had no previous criminal record who was
Speaker 12: chanting anti Islam chants on the streets in one of
Speaker 12: the protests. And I'm a devout Hindu, I wouldn't like
Speaker 12: to have anti Hindu chance, but we do live in
Speaker 12: a free country. We're allowed to be offended and we
Speaker 12: have to deal with it sometimes. And he was arrested
Speaker 12: put in jail for eighteen months, very very swiftly. And
Speaker 12: that's off the backdrop of weeks of Palestine marches, fair enough,
Speaker 12: but there were chanting anti Semitic, genocidal chant from the
Speaker 12: river to the sea, and that was go on day,
Speaker 12: week after week, and the police stood by it and
Speaker 12: did nothing. So time and time again, there are innumerable
Speaker 12: examples of a two tier system that is going on
Speaker 12: in terms of our policing. And there's just one inside
Speaker 12: I like to bring out that that was really fascinating
Speaker 12: was that there was the West Midlands Police Chief officer
Speaker 12: who openly admitted that he was talking to community leaders
Speaker 12: and discussing with them, almost a bespoke police service. And
Speaker 12: it was just really baffling to find out that he
Speaker 12: was actually talking to certain minority group community leaders and
Speaker 12: giving them the kind of asking what kind of policing
Speaker 12: they wanted and offering them the policing they needed for
Speaker 12: what they desired for their situation. And I didn't hear
Speaker 12: any reports of that happening with say the British working class,
Speaker 12: white workings of the country. So a two tier system
Speaker 12: definitely is in operation.
Speaker 3: And it's not just two tier policing, it's a two
Speaker 3: tier justice system. You've got quasi blasphemy laws there, certainly
Speaker 3: because you're getting people who are having the cops of
Speaker 3: the door for online posts, not just attending these protests
Speaker 3: and some of the riots. And you've got the Guardian
Speaker 3: publishing pieces calling for an Elon Musk to be chucked
Speaker 3: in jail.
Speaker 4: You've got Alistair Campbell, a.
Speaker 3: Fairly significant figure within the Labor Party, to Tony Blazer,
Speaker 3: former spokesperson, trying to get Douglas Murray arrested. I mean,
Speaker 3: what is going on in that country. I don't know
Speaker 3: if people within the UK realize the rest of the
Speaker 3: world is looking on shocked and appalled.
Speaker 12: Yeah, I don't think we're a serious country anymore. And
Speaker 12: I think in a kind of stealth way, we're kind
Speaker 12: of exiting the first world. It feels like I think
Speaker 12: that where we had the world almost looking at us
Speaker 12: and actually laughing. So you brought up online posts. I mean,
Speaker 12: there was a fifty three year old lady, she had
Speaker 12: again no previous criminal record. She put on a very
Speaker 12: vile post asking for moss to be burned down with
Speaker 12: the people in it. Now, I think that justifies some
Speaker 12: kind of police response. But when she put that up,
Speaker 12: she immediately deleted it, realized it was an insane moment
Speaker 12: of madness. She then had three police cars arrive at
Speaker 12: her place and she was taken to taking custody and
Speaker 12: she was given her prison centers I believe of about
Speaker 12: fifteen months and she's a full time career now, a
Speaker 12: very very harsh sentence. At the same time, we had
Speaker 12: Nick Loweles, who's had of hope not hate, a kind
Speaker 12: of hard left organization gave out misinformation about a Muslim
Speaker 12: lady who'd had an acid attack, and that really did
Speaker 12: lead to some kind of violence and mobilization of radical groups,
Speaker 12: and yet nothing has been done. So what's happening at
Speaker 12: the moment is people are looking around going what is permissible.
Speaker 12: The goalposts are moving. We don't know where we stand
Speaker 12: on social media. And they're self censoring because no one
Speaker 12: wants to go, no one wants to be arrested. No
Speaker 12: one knows when the pieces are going to come knocking
Speaker 12: on their door. So very scary times, very unsure and
Speaker 12: uncertain times.
Speaker 6: James, Well, it seems to me, you know, when you
Speaker 6: see cases like the ones you've just talked about, these
Speaker 6: very fast Russias to sentence for certain people. But this
Speaker 6: cars you know, this has not been happening just all
Speaker 6: of a sudden. We've seen this happen with people who've
Speaker 6: posted about transgender issues. We've seen all of the sort
Speaker 6: of the way the state has officially supported all the
Speaker 6: Pride stuff before it's been officially supporting the Islamic community.
Speaker 6: There's a sense among a lot of people watching Britain
Speaker 6: right now that the British political class really has a
Speaker 6: great dislike for heritage, British values, for the British people,
Speaker 6: and much prefers this idea of turning it into this
Speaker 6: very different kind of state than it used to be.
Speaker 6: Is it true that the British political class seems to
Speaker 6: have a real dislike for the country that put it
Speaker 6: in power and that they're supposed to represent.
Speaker 12: Absolutely I mean, I think what's happening at the moment
Speaker 12: is British citizens are feeling like second class citizens in
Speaker 12: their own homeland. And David Starkey made a really good point.
Speaker 12: He's that British historian and he was saying human rights
Speaker 12: used to be about protecting the citizen from the tyranny
Speaker 12: of the state. It now seems to be about prioritizing
Speaker 12: the minority over the majority. And that's the kind of
Speaker 12: twist that has happened with identity politics, and that's why
Speaker 12: everyone is unsure, I mean, really really, Just recently, Angela Rayna,
Speaker 12: our Deputy Prime Minister, she put pushed back at a
Speaker 12: law that was supposed to be giving social housing, that's
Speaker 12: cheap housing and government housing to British citizens. She pulled
Speaker 12: that back and now immigration people coming here new to
Speaker 12: the country are going to be on the same level
Speaker 12: of accessibility as British citizens. And so just small things
Speaker 12: like that, which which are very meaningful to British people,
Speaker 12: are making a huge difference. And if you add things
Speaker 12: like migrant hotels, and I don't know if your audience
Speaker 12: are aware that you know, we have you know, tens
Speaker 12: of thousands of people, young men fleeing from the safe
Speaker 12: country of France, coming to our shores, being put up
Speaker 12: in four star hotels, getting free square meal of the day,
Speaker 12: money in their pocket, and then you have people struggling
Speaker 12: to heat their homes. The sense of injustice is palpable
Speaker 12: and that's the reason why people are really rallying out.
Speaker 12: It add to that the cultural the culture integration issues,
Speaker 12: rising crime, and then you have a recipe for disaster.
Speaker 12: It's not surprising we're having these protests or some of
Speaker 12: these rights, but Kirstarmer and the government have got their
Speaker 12: fingers in their ears and their head in the sand.
Speaker 2: And Mayron, just quickly before we go, you ran in
Speaker 2: the last general election.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately you weren't successful.
Speaker 2: Will you remain in politics and what was it like
Speaker 2: on the ground during the election.
Speaker 1: What sort of response did you get from your constitutor
Speaker 1: of potential constituents.
Speaker 9: I think on the.
Speaker 12: Whole overwhelmingly positive. There is a huge gap in the
Speaker 12: political landscape in Britain at the moment. We have a
Speaker 12: effected We've had a UNI Party, a blob, a centrist
Speaker 12: blob which they class them unders standing as a broad church,
Speaker 12: when in reality that just means you stand for nothing
Speaker 12: and the British people are crying out for a voice.
Speaker 12: I think Nigel Faraje and Reform UK are that voice.
Speaker 12: I think we've got five years to really consolidate our
Speaker 12: position and put it to the people and be a
Speaker 12: proper voice and a representative because there is they are
Speaker 12: aching for it. Think I think the soul of Britain
Speaker 12: is really aching for change, is yearning for change.
Speaker 1: In fact, Maya and Centhral Nathan great to chat to.
Speaker 2: You really pleased to get your hero on Outsiders and
Speaker 2: looking forward to getting you back on many times to
Speaker 2: chat about what is happening in the UK.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much.
Speaker 3: Welcome back to Outsiders with your hosts Rowan Dean, James Morrow,
Speaker 3: and I'm Rida.
Speaker 4: Panahyan Coming up shortly. We'll be delving into the.
Speaker 3: Wacky world of academia and net zero madness. But first,
Speaker 3: when Donald Trump called the media the enemy of the people,
Speaker 3: I never imagined the bulk of the mainstream media would
Speaker 3: work tirelessly to live up to that tag.
Speaker 4: But here we are.
Speaker 3: And from the Fine People hoax to the Russian collusion, hoax.
Speaker 4: To the calm is a great and visionary leader.
Speaker 3: Delusion, the gas lighting and deliberate disinfo has been turned
Speaker 3: up to Thermo nuclear levels. Large segments of the media
Speaker 3: are so shameless that they even took a poignant moment
Speaker 3: from the Republican National Convention when Trump paid tribute to
Speaker 3: Corey Compartoi, the father and fireman who was murdered at
Speaker 3: a Trump rally by the assassin who was trying to
Speaker 3: kill President Trump. Here is Corey's widow this week talking
Speaker 3: about what that moment meant to the family.
Speaker 4: Cory's firefighter gear was displayed at the Republican National Convention,
Speaker 4: which was a special honor.
Speaker 1: That was an honor, that was the big honor.
Speaker 13: All day at the rally, my husband kept saying, he's
Speaker 13: going to call me up on stage.
Speaker 9: You're going to hear him.
Speaker 13: He's going to say, Corey, come on up here, Corey,
Speaker 13: get up here. He was just joking, you know, obviously,
Speaker 13: but he kept saying that you're going to get up
Speaker 13: you know, He's gonna.
Speaker 9: Call me up on stage.
Speaker 13: And we were all like, there's this moment, He's up
Speaker 13: on stage.
Speaker 4: It was a powerful emotional moment.
Speaker 3: But this is how the media spoke of the tribute.
Speaker 4: Let's start with MSNBC.
Speaker 14: I was sickened by the prop that was mister comparatory
Speaker 14: to come.
Speaker 9: Come with exactly comparatory comparatory.
Speaker 14: I was sickened by them using him as a prop,
Speaker 14: his his firefighter jacket, and then they spelled a man's
Speaker 14: name wrong, and so he said, oh, we're so grateful
Speaker 14: that the fire department sent this to us.
Speaker 1: These are local dangon dollars. Okay, this is not, you know.
Speaker 9: Chicago fire.
Speaker 14: It's a bad name about the coming out that their
Speaker 14: names on the back.
Speaker 1: Of the jackets, like who are you from? But then
Speaker 1: they put the name on and they spelled the wrong.
Speaker 14: I was just kind of like, if we're gonna we're gonna.
Speaker 4: Do props, like, let's at least.
Speaker 1: Get it right.
Speaker 4: I'm trying to organize that chaos in my mind.
Speaker 1: Just gross. Gross.
Speaker 4: The truth is it wasn't a prop. It was Corey's
Speaker 4: real uniform.
Speaker 3: And the more on activists in the media who ran
Speaker 3: with that angle would have known that if they did
Speaker 3: even five seconds of research. Because Corey's former colleagues had
Speaker 3: displayed his uniform as a tribute well before the Republican
Speaker 3: National Convention, We'd already.
Speaker 4: Seen this image.
Speaker 3: Those with any interests in the assassination attempt and its
Speaker 3: victims knew that any media reporting on it could have
Speaker 3: checked that within seconds, but no, in their desperation to
Speaker 3: slam Trump, they manufactured a story, giving little thought to
Speaker 3: how it impact a grieving family.
Speaker 4: And that fake news about the Trump camp.
Speaker 3: Misspelling Cory's name went far and wide, and it was
Speaker 3: also evident right here in Australia. They were eager to
Speaker 3: push that fake news from the free tow Are stations
Speaker 3: to the Nine papers.
Speaker 4: Here's how the Age.
Speaker 3: Reported Trump's speech at the Republican National Convention. They aim
Speaker 3: that the tribute to the killed firefighter miss Spell's name.
Speaker 4: They put that in the headline. That was their focus.
Speaker 3: And here is the Sydney Morning Herald and their headline,
Speaker 3: our friend Cory Trump tribute to killed firefighter Miss Spell's
Speaker 3: name just shameful fake news. The eagerness to damage Trump seems.
Speaker 4: To be the highest priority above.
Speaker 3: Facts, reason and any sense of decency. A man was
Speaker 3: murdered in front of his wife and daughter, even if
Speaker 3: the uniform wasn't real and someone had made a mistake,
Speaker 3: is that really something to highlight in the headline? But
Speaker 3: what can you expect from a media that went from
Speaker 3: calling Kamala Harris inept, unlikable and a political liability to
Speaker 3: pretty much overnight declaring her a visionary, capable leader. Remember
Speaker 3: how they used to talk about Kamala when they were
Speaker 3: trying to convince us all that Joe Biden was a
Speaker 3: wonderful president who had no cognitive decline. Watch the leftist
Speaker 3: media seeks to blame the VP for the Biden administration's
Speaker 3: many woes.
Speaker 15: Here there are reports to say that you have the
Speaker 15: lowest approval reading of any vice president. Well, there are
Speaker 15: pulls that also say I have creat approval ratings.
Speaker 1: Swing dughters don't like Harris. How big a drag is
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris on the tech She's.
Speaker 11: A pretty big jag.
Speaker 1: I think she was arguably Biden's worst political decision.
Speaker 2: They don't like her.
Speaker 4: There's lots of reasons they don't like her.
Speaker 6: Kamala Harris's approval rating is now at twenty eight percent,
Speaker 6: which is an historic low for any modern vice president.
Speaker 16: We're hearing it from mainstream media, one outlet after another,
Speaker 16: one league after another, that Kamala.
Speaker 17: Harris is the worst vice president ever, the worst Polish
Speaker 17: distetition ever.
Speaker 4: Yep, that's how they used to talk about her.
Speaker 3: That was all left wing media, by the way, in
Speaker 3: the days when they were boosting Joe Biden, and that
Speaker 3: was the number one priority back then.
Speaker 4: But they could be honest about Kamala. They'd tell us
Speaker 4: things like.
Speaker 1: This, we've been to the border.
Speaker 9: You haven't been to the border, and.
Speaker 1: I haven't been to Europe.
Speaker 15: I don't understand the point that you're making.
Speaker 9: The point that.
Speaker 18: Lester Holt was making was obvious to anyone else who
Speaker 18: was watching this interview, which is that the issues at
Speaker 18: the border are inextricably linked with the portfolio that she's
Speaker 18: been given.
Speaker 8: He picked Kamala Harris to be his running mate. She
Speaker 8: was raped in is right.
Speaker 17: That's the most liberal senator in the United States center
Speaker 17: so he could have gone the other way, but he
Speaker 17: went to the left.
Speaker 3: And now we're told she's a moderate centrist successful and
Speaker 3: she's picked as her running mate, another moderate, not some
Speaker 3: mad communists promoting socialism, open borders and the neo Marxist
Speaker 3: group BLM, even as they destroyed his city, and the
Speaker 3: media campaign for Kamala is rolling along nicely. The Democrats
Speaker 3: have a big boost in the polls, and we are
Speaker 3: treated to this sort of brazen propit. And remember when
Speaker 3: Harris stole Trump's tax policy on tips.
Speaker 7: Because when I get to office, we are going to
Speaker 7: not charge taxes on tips people making tips.
Speaker 15: Eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality worker.
Speaker 3: Now, not only did most of the media not slam
Speaker 3: the vice president for that blatant thievery of her Trump
Speaker 3: policy announced months earlier, but look at how they reported
Speaker 3: the story in their headlines. Here is CBS when Trump
Speaker 3: announced that policy. They said the policy would cost the
Speaker 3: government two hundred and fifty billion over ten years according
Speaker 3: to our nonpartisan watch group. But this is how CBS
Speaker 3: reported that same policy after Kamala announced it as her
Speaker 3: own Vice president. Kamala Harris is rolling out a new
Speaker 3: policy position saying she'll fight to enter axes on tips
Speaker 3: for service and hospitality workers.
Speaker 4: Can you sport the subtle difference there?
Speaker 3: Yes, it's one thing to express opinions on opinion programs
Speaker 3: like this, but there is something rotten in the media
Speaker 3: when so called journalists are supposed to present the news
Speaker 3: and only the news, stripped of their own personal views
Speaker 3: and biases, indulge in the type of Orwellian gas lighting
Speaker 3: and lies. We've just seen slow wonder that trust in
Speaker 3: the media has plummeted to new lows.
Speaker 2: I'm shocked, reader, we're an opinion show what on the screen?
Speaker 1: That's what it says in their opinion.
Speaker 8: Okay, good, We've.
Speaker 1: Got lots of opinions, no shortage of those. Don't worry
Speaker 1: about that. Joining us now is National's MP Keith Pitt. Keith,
Speaker 1: great to see you as always.
Speaker 2: Now we're a little bit concerned here about Queensland, your
Speaker 2: neck of the woods. Fifteen Queensland towns where Aboriginal corporations
Speaker 2: want state land to be handed over to them as
Speaker 2: freehold properties.
Speaker 1: So there is fifteen.
Speaker 2: Places from Rainbow Beach to Roma, to Theodore to Croydon,
Speaker 2: the Miles Mountain. The Miles government has initially refused to
Speaker 2: provide the list, but we now have that list.
Speaker 1: What is going on in the state of Queensland.
Speaker 19: Keith, Well, good morning outside. It's nothing good, I've got
Speaker 19: to say. And the horse has already bolted because in
Speaker 19: that report you'll see that nearly seven million hectares has
Speaker 19: already been transferred across gifted as freehold land. And on
Speaker 19: that list's places like Fraser Island. So nearly seven million hectares,
Speaker 19: and I can tell you it's not ten bucks a
Speaker 19: hectar land.
Speaker 9: It's incredibly valuable.
Speaker 19: But in my view, this is land that belongs to
Speaker 19: the Queensland people, to the Australian people, to all of us.
Speaker 9: So how is it possible that it.
Speaker 19: Can be gifted to organizations and groups as freehold land
Speaker 19: and the value of it goes to them and then
Speaker 19: it creates all of these challenges. I know any number
Speaker 19: of individuals who have been trying to develop on Fraser
Speaker 19: Island for literally decades without success, and yet look.
Speaker 1: Much you have to do and you'll get it for free, James.
Speaker 9: And tell us.
Speaker 6: Also, you know, Peter Dunton got in a lot of
Speaker 6: you know, not strife, but he was attacked because he
Speaker 6: said that the cf MEU and unions were putting excess
Speaker 6: prices and excess costs on things. That's part of the
Speaker 6: reason why everything costs so much. You spoke really eloquently
Speaker 6: the other day about the CFMEU tax and that extra burden.
Speaker 9: That that's costing.
Speaker 6: I think you talked about a medical facility with one
Speaker 6: hundred and twenty one beds that cost one point two
Speaker 6: billion dollars or something like that.
Speaker 9: Have I got that right?
Speaker 6: And how is this government with their ir rules making
Speaker 6: that tax even worse.
Speaker 19: All this federal labe of governments making everything worse from
Speaker 19: the living to the cost of everything.
Speaker 9: And you've got it spot on. So it's in Bunda.
Speaker 19: There was a hospital committed to by the Labour candidate
Speaker 19: four years ago and guess what hadn't even started. They
Speaker 19: pushed a few trees and half a row and some
Speaker 19: construction fencing. But imagine how many more beds you would
Speaker 19: get without the CFMAU tax. And we've got all of
Speaker 19: the other contractors who are not CFMUU aligned locked out,
Speaker 19: including our local ones, and there's some good providers. And
Speaker 19: then on top of that, they go and provide donations
Speaker 19: to the Labor party, which hey, they now are not
Speaker 19: taking the six million dollars anymore, but it seems they
Speaker 19: are taking the paid labor for people to hand out
Speaker 19: from the CFMAU and others who are paid wages, who
Speaker 19: get paid travel, who get paid accommodation to go and
Speaker 19: work on booze and try and impact the outcome of elections,
Speaker 19: whether they're federal or state or otherwise. So guess who's
Speaker 19: paying you are and it is costing an absolute fortune.
Speaker 9: The tax payer deserves better now, Keith.
Speaker 3: Getting back to this, around seven million hectares that has
Speaker 3: been handed to Aboriginal corporations. How much of Queensland percentage wise,
Speaker 3: and indeed how much of Australia do we know has
Speaker 3: been handed back in this fashion?
Speaker 19: Well, in Queensland it's almost four percent under the Ala
Speaker 19: Act that that has been transferred as inalienable freehold land.
Speaker 19: And you know, if the state government wants to give
Speaker 19: land away, I'm open. I'm ready to take as much
Speaker 19: as they'd like. Un So I'll take a million hectares.
Speaker 19: I don't even have to take six million or seven million.
Speaker 19: But this is just getting fastical. On what grounds do
Speaker 19: you make these decisions? And who is going to stand
Speaker 19: up and stop this from happening, Because the impact is
Speaker 19: now in regional towns and regional cities, places like Fraser Island,
Speaker 19: places like Barmheads where I've got exclusive NATed titles on
Speaker 19: the esplanat, created all sorts of headaches.
Speaker 1: Where does it stop.
Speaker 2: Well, we've also seen Keith, you know, beaches closed on
Speaker 2: cultural heritage grounds so people can't go down to.
Speaker 1: The local beach.
Speaker 2: You see these sorts of signs, mountains where you can't
Speaker 2: walk on cultural heritage.
Speaker 1: What happened? You know, a what did the public think
Speaker 1: about all this?
Speaker 2: But more importantly so once they've been given this land,
Speaker 2: can this corporation then go and sell it to whoever
Speaker 2: they want?
Speaker 1: Can they develop it?
Speaker 2: What happens to the cultural red tape? Heritage laws apply
Speaker 2: to them?
Speaker 1: Or because it's a cultural donation of land.
Speaker 2: Are they exempt from you know, they can go and
Speaker 2: do whatever they want?
Speaker 1: What do we know? What any strings attached to these
Speaker 1: generous gifts.
Speaker 19: Well, originally as native title it was only for cultural activities.
Speaker 19: Now I asked the shareholding Minister what cultural activities meant?
Speaker 19: I mean, what's the definition? Because the land and barms
Speaker 19: getting all sorts of things happening, including coffee vans and markets.
Speaker 19: But unfortunately they couldn't give me a definition of cultural activities.
Speaker 19: And as in a lable freehole, well they are entitled
Speaker 19: to develop it and make money from it and do
Speaker 19: whatever the owner pleases. It's freehold land. And I think
Speaker 19: this is the real differential. It is not about cultural activities.
Speaker 19: It is gifting the wealth of the nation to a group,
Speaker 19: which I think.
Speaker 9: Is just wrong.
Speaker 1: It belongs to all of us.
Speaker 19: We shouldn't be shut out from these areas. And I
Speaker 19: don't care what your connection is. We are all Australians.
Speaker 19: You can have a cultural connection, you could have taken
Speaker 19: the oath last week.
Speaker 9: You can be born down the road.
Speaker 19: We are all Austrians and we are one people in
Speaker 19: one country and that's something I'll always stand by absolutely.
Speaker 2: Just quickly on the Garza visa issues. What's your thoughts, Keith.
Speaker 1: We've seen.
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton quite rightly in my opinion, coming out very
Speaker 2: strongly saying temporary hold on anyone from that neck of
Speaker 2: the woods for strong reasons. Labor opposing this, as James
Speaker 2: was saying earlier in the show, Anthony Albanezi tied himself
Speaker 2: up in nots misrepresenting Asio's position.
Speaker 1: Where do you stand, Keith pitt.
Speaker 9: Well?
Speaker 19: I saw the interview with that music this morning on
Speaker 19: Sunday Agenda. I think there's a bet running with the
Speaker 19: cabinet ministers who can say Peter Dutton's name the most
Speaker 19: times in a sentence. I tell you what they didn't say.
Speaker 19: Nowhere did they say the safety and security of the
Speaker 19: Australian people is our priority. And when you look at
Speaker 19: all of these individuals and it is terrible, and of
Speaker 19: course I feel for them and it's awful what's happening.
Speaker 19: But the reality is how many individuals need to come
Speaker 19: into this country to create an enormous problem here and
Speaker 19: actually impact directly the safety of Australians. And the answer
Speaker 19: that is one, You only need one to slip through
Speaker 19: the open door. And mister Houghsick said very clearly this
Speaker 19: morning they're giving visitors visas because it's the fastest all
Speaker 19: I want the one that's the most secure, and I
Speaker 19: think there are other options and they should take them.
Speaker 2: Fantastic Keith Pitt always great to chat to you here
Speaker 2: on Outsiders.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for coming along.
Speaker 2: You're watching Outsiders, and thank you so much for watching
Speaker 2: Outsiders every Sunday morning.
Speaker 1: We certainly do.
Speaker 2: Appreciate you watching us and us being in your living
Speaker 2: rooms or wherever else. We may happen to be lefty lunacy.
Speaker 2: Well sometimes lefty lunacy. It's apparent to us at the
Speaker 2: but it takes a couple of years later and then
Speaker 2: the rest.
Speaker 1: Of the world sees it as well.
Speaker 2: Classic example when Joe Biden walked out of Afghanistan. Gabe
Speaker 2: left all that equipment behind. James, Oh, what would happen?
Speaker 6: Oh gosh, I don't know what would happen with all
Speaker 6: that equipment. Hey, maybe it would wind up being used
Speaker 6: by the Taliban in a huge military parade, with the
Speaker 6: billions of dollars worth of equipment you see there on
Speaker 6: the screen that the US just abandoned when Joe Biden
Speaker 6: chaotically and catastrophically left Afghanistan three years ago. This is
Speaker 6: like such an ad for Trump right here, what you're
Speaker 6: seeing show because you know that chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan,
Speaker 6: the Americans left behind, the equipment left behind, of the
Speaker 6: Afghani people left behind to deal with the depredations of
Speaker 6: the Taliban, when you had people like the atrocious General
Speaker 6: the Joint chiefs of Staff Chief Mark Milly, who said
Speaker 6: he was more concerned about understanding white ray and things
Speaker 6: like that that actually you know, leading American troops. You
Speaker 6: know they had all said, oh no, no, Afghanistan, word
Speaker 6: fall that quickly, it'll be fine, you know, we can
Speaker 6: manage the withdrawal.
Speaker 9: And of course the Taliban swept in within hours.
Speaker 6: This was an absolute disgrace and it was a disaster
Speaker 6: reader and no one.
Speaker 4: Has paid a price.
Speaker 3: Has been zero accountability for the disastrous execution of that plan,
Speaker 3: the fact that American servicemen were killed, the fact that
Speaker 3: they went and droned a family and killed innocent children
Speaker 3: in retaliation, and then they admitted, oh, we got it wrong.
Speaker 4: They had nothing to do with that. That were just
Speaker 4: a innocent family that were brutally murdered. No one paid
Speaker 4: for any of that. It seems incredible to me that
Speaker 4: which is a problem political.
Speaker 3: Prisoners in America right now, all these political persecutions, but
Speaker 3: people who've genuinely done terrible things.
Speaker 6: There is such a disconnect right now in the American
Speaker 6: military between you know, the enlisted men, the officers and
Speaker 6: car brass who just get who are just they fail
Speaker 6: upwards constantly. You know, after Pearl Harbor, Fdr Fire the
Speaker 6: head of the Navy, and you know, there was consequences
Speaker 6: for that, and here people just get promoted. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 6: they finally because they speak all the right wop language,
Speaker 6: because that's what's more important. It's more important going to
Speaker 6: the Congress and saying, oh, well, you know, I don't
Speaker 6: care about you know white rage and racism, and you know,
Speaker 6: I'm gonna wear my Pride medals and all of this stuff.
Speaker 6: But it's not about you know, defending America.
Speaker 9: Who knew.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And the point of course being that there you
Speaker 2: had the Taliban parading all that equipment, billions of dollars
Speaker 2: worth of equipment, snubbing their noses in America, gloating.
Speaker 1: To the rest of the world.
Speaker 2: They had all this incredible equipment which is designed to
Speaker 2: kill people as well as to defend yourself with.
Speaker 1: That's the Taliban. They now have all this And what do.
Speaker 2: You think the rest of the world thinks of this,
Speaker 2: America Joe Biden, Well, of course we've seen after Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: We saw Hamas and attack on October seventh. We've seen
Speaker 2: atrocities throughout the Middle East. We've seen Russia, Ukraine, all
Speaker 2: of which in a heap after Joe Biden withdrew from Afghanistan.
Speaker 2: So all the Taliban are saying is hey, see what
Speaker 2: we got out of it. And the rest of the world, meanwhile,
Speaker 2: is mind and all sorts of problems which would not
Speaker 2: have happened had Donald Trump being president.
Speaker 1: There you go, a nice one for all those people
Speaker 1: who voted for Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: Well done, rita closer to Home bit a lefty lunacy
Speaker 2: from again copying Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Why anyone would copy Joe Biden is beyond me.
Speaker 2: But Jason Claire, the Western Sydney MP, decided, oh, let's
Speaker 2: copy Joe Biden and give away taxpayers money.
Speaker 4: Well yes, he very excitedly announced some breaking news on X.
Speaker 3: I don't know politicians are tweeting like this, but he said,
Speaker 3: We've just introduced legislation to wipe three billion of student
Speaker 3: debt for more than three million of strains.
Speaker 9: Bad luck.
Speaker 3: If you worked really hard to pay back that debt
Speaker 3: and you're not wiping debt, you're just transferring it. And
Speaker 3: this is what the socialists, the far left, the people
Speaker 3: who have got absolutely no understanding of economics, don't said
Speaker 3: to comprehend, is that someone so almost are paying now.
Speaker 1: But you're paying twice.
Speaker 2: If you've paid off your student debts, you're paying twice.
Speaker 2: If you're a trade who didn't go to university, you're
Speaker 2: paying for the kid who went to the university to
Speaker 2: study gender queer.
Speaker 6: Why should why should a treaty who's out there paying off?
Speaker 9: Is you paying off his tools.
Speaker 6: You know, paying off a mortgage on a crippling interest rates.
Speaker 6: Don't have to go help pay off somebody's gender studies degree.
Speaker 9: It makes no sense.
Speaker 3: What we need to actually do here and elsewhere in
Speaker 3: the West is that get rid of these junk degrees
Speaker 3: that don't actually enable the graduate to get a job
Speaker 3: in any way connection in the field of study. If
Speaker 3: you want to go and do that as something for
Speaker 3: intellectual stimulation, then fine.
Speaker 4: You pay for it.
Speaker 3: But the taxpayer the point, the point is for the
Speaker 3: left junk degree.
Speaker 1: The left, labor, the Greens, the Teals.
Speaker 2: No, they get their support. Don't forget the Teals are left.
Speaker 2: Don't forget that the Teals are there supporting all this madness.
Speaker 2: By the way, I'm changing top said, but just fact
Speaker 2: to this. They are simply paying for their supporters with
Speaker 2: your money. They know that their supporters come out of
Speaker 2: these universities doing these rubbish junk courses which don't get
Speaker 2: them any proper jobs. So they're paying them and subsidizing
Speaker 2: them with your tax dollars. You're just paying for left
Speaker 2: wing supporters. It's a disgrace, it's embezzlement, it's theft by
Speaker 2: the labor Party of the Australian taxpayer.
Speaker 9: Clearly, well this is more than that thought.
Speaker 6: You know, the University secretary has been allowed to grow
Speaker 6: like topsy and give out degrees in things that are
Speaker 6: pretty much worthless on the marketplace. And also they've become
Speaker 6: this massive sort of migrant visa scam here basically to
Speaker 6: get to shovel people into the country, give them degrees,
Speaker 6: you know, and things like commerce and things like that.
Speaker 9: You know, who knows what that actually means.
Speaker 3: And the commos is one of the degrees that is
Speaker 3: actually removague.
Speaker 4: Well a lot of these, you know, I'm not saying
Speaker 4: it's going.
Speaker 9: Upstairs, business college, come on up, you know.
Speaker 6: And then and then wives of the housing crisis, the
Speaker 6: infrastructure crisis, all of this stuff here. The universities of
Speaker 6: course a dumping huge amounts, but we try to get
Speaker 6: people to believe in all this. The fact is, you know,
Speaker 6: we need to look at the way we deal with
Speaker 6: the universities. Probably we need more people learning actual skills,
Speaker 6: less people doing.
Speaker 4: A lot about that.
Speaker 3: In Victoria, education is our biggest export and when you
Speaker 3: look at how they come to those figures, you will
Speaker 3: be shocked.
Speaker 1: And as we go to a break.
Speaker 2: I just want to show you some footage of how
Speaker 2: China is helping save the planet with all their beautiful
Speaker 2: solar panels going over three thousand acres of There you go.
Speaker 1: Isn't that beautiful? Yeah? So lovely animals, the dead animals.
Speaker 2: Undern nice work, lovies, nice work. Climate cult at work
Speaker 2: destroying the planet.
Speaker 1: Let's take a break.
Speaker 2: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with the reta Past, Present and future.
Speaker 2: Panahee James Emerging Journalists tomorrow and my self Rowan always.
Speaker 1: Will be Dean.
Speaker 2: This week we learned that a conservative Christian minister, Dave.
Speaker 1: Pellow is a decent bloke. I know him. He's written
Speaker 1: for The Spectator Australia.
Speaker 2: Dave Pello is being hauled before the Queensland Human Rights Commission.
Speaker 2: Why Queensland needs its own human rights Commission beats me anyway,
Speaker 2: but there you go. Dave Pellow is being asked to
Speaker 2: front up to the Queensland Human Rights Commission because, wait
Speaker 2: for it, he didn't perform the welcome to country ceremony
Speaker 2: at one of his Christian conferences.
Speaker 1: According to the Daily.
Speaker 2: Mail, the man who has raised the claim against Dave
Speaker 2: Pellow had paid for a ticket to one of these
Speaker 2: conferences and attended the event and then complained that he
Speaker 2: had been quote racially vilified and humiliated on the grounds
Speaker 2: of his race and religion because.
Speaker 1: There was no welcome to country. Go figure that one out.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 1: This is plainly.
Speaker 2: Ludicrous, But these frivolous culture war claims have a way
Speaker 2: of spiraling out of control and dominating people's lives and
Speaker 2: causing endless grievance and drama. Just ask Bernard Gaynor, the
Speaker 2: ex soldier who had literally years of misery and financial
Speaker 2: ruin because someone sued him over supposed LGBTIQ discrimination. As
Speaker 2: Bernard wrote in September twenty twenty two, the New South
Speaker 2: Wales Local Court dismissed all remaining complaints lodged after wait
Speaker 2: for eight years of farcical litigation against me against Bernard,
Speaker 2: Bernard was lucky. My close friend Bill Leep, the cartoonist,
Speaker 2: died of a heart attack, which I and many other
Speaker 2: people believe was partly, if not wholly, due to the
Speaker 2: stress caused by the Federal Human Rights Commissions repeated persecution
Speaker 2: of Bill over what was, to any fair minded person
Speaker 2: a controversial and provocative shore, but reasonable and certainly not
Speaker 2: a racist cartoon Indeed, as I always point out, Colin Dylan,
Speaker 2: Australia's first ever indigenous policemen, telephoned Bill the morning the
Speaker 2: cartoon appeared to tell him he thought it was one
Speaker 2: of the most insightful and important cartoons Bill had ever done,
Speaker 2: not that their Human Rights Commission or its appalling then
Speaker 2: President Gillian Triggs gave two figs about that. But I
Speaker 2: digress back to Dave Pellow and his ridiculous claim against
Speaker 2: him because he didn't perform the welcome to country at
Speaker 2: the start of his Christian conference. Now, what I'm going
Speaker 2: to say may upset some people, but I'm afraid it
Speaker 2: has to be said. It is time, in my opinion,
Speaker 2: to say goodbye to welcomes to country, to say farewell
Speaker 2: to acknowledgments of country. Not goodbye altogether, but let's put
Speaker 2: them on ice. Whatever purpose has been served by the
Speaker 2: endless repetition of the quasi religious mantras about acknowledging leaders
Speaker 2: past present and emerging traditional custodians and the and we are.
Speaker 1: All on all of that.
Speaker 2: The damage now being done, as we see for example
Speaker 2: in this preposterous HRC claim, The damage done by these
Speaker 2: rituals far outweighs whatever good was originally intended at the moment.
Speaker 1: Welcomes to and acknowledgments.
Speaker 2: Of country are ubiquitous in schools, council meetings, public ceremonies,
Speaker 2: political events, corporate settings, corporate functions, every time an aeroplane
Speaker 2: touches down on Australian soil, at the beginning of zoom meetings,
Speaker 2: and on every other website.
Speaker 1: And I'm sorry it has to.
Speaker 2: Stop for the sake of Indigenous Australians as well as
Speaker 2: for the sake of non Indigenous Australians. Like the Voice,
Speaker 2: which was rejected by an overwhelming majority of the Australian
Speaker 2: population and rejected by every state other than the Act,
Speaker 2: these welcomes and acknowledgments are unbelievably divisive and in my opinion,
Speaker 2: grotesquely racist. They eat away, like termites that the foundations
Speaker 2: that this nation has built on. They turn Australia not
Speaker 2: into one nation, but into two nations, from one people
Speaker 2: under one flag into two tribes under two flags. They
Speaker 2: turn Australia, historically one of the most egalitarian and free
Speaker 2: nations on Earth, from a land of shared opportunity and
Speaker 2: shared values into a divisive and grasping society.
Speaker 1: Of those who belong and those who do not.
Speaker 2: Belong, based entirely on the spurious and ludicrous concept of
Speaker 2: genetic makeup. The strands that have traditionally held this country together,
Speaker 2: love of country, pride in country, the bonds of loyalty
Speaker 2: and shared respect are being frayed and ultimately ripped asunder
Speaker 2: every time these dangerous mantras are muttered. The constant repetition
Speaker 2: of these in incantations, like some kind of cultish chant
Speaker 2: uttered blindly by devotees of the cult, is a recipe
Speaker 2: not for proud and cohesive society, but for a divided, dispirited,
Speaker 2: and dysfunctional society instead. In my opinion, both the acknowledgment
Speaker 2: of and the welcome to country are based on the premise,
Speaker 2: often repeated as part of the mantras, that this continent
Speaker 2: quote always was and always will be Aboriginal land because
Speaker 2: quote sovereignty was never ceeded. That is a political discussion,
Speaker 2: political debate, and I have no problem with activists or
Speaker 2: academics or elected representatives arguing over those assertions and plans,
Speaker 2: so long as they do so peacefully and with good intent.
Speaker 2: But the simple fact is that if you accept those
Speaker 2: twin premises, then again, in my opinion, you are saying
Speaker 2: there is no sovereign law in this country worth respecting.
Speaker 2: And indeed you are saying there is.
Speaker 1: No country worth respecting. You are a denialist, a.
Speaker 2: Sovereign Commonwealth of Australia denialist. I'll have more to say
Speaker 2: on this matter in more detail in coming weeks, but
Speaker 2: I firmly believe whatever worthwhile purpose they once did serve,
Speaker 2: the acknowledgments of and welcomes to country are now way
Speaker 2: past their use by date and have a distinctly unsavory
Speaker 2: and malodorous whiff about them. Their main purpose, it seems
Speaker 2: to me, is to somehow deny genuine legitimacy to anyone
Speaker 2: whose family came to these shores. In the last two
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty years, including up to the present waves
Speaker 2: of immigrants disenfranchised, My family and ancestors have farmed this land,
Speaker 2: lived off this land.
Speaker 1: Developed this land.
Speaker 2: Fed and clothed the people of this land, died and
Speaker 2: bled for this land for the better part of two
Speaker 2: hundred years. I do not need to be welcome to
Speaker 2: my own land every five minutes and then told that
Speaker 2: it is not.
Speaker 1: My own land. Worse, there is an inherent sense of
Speaker 1: shame and guilt blaming in.
Speaker 2: Many of these rituals, patronizingly reminding the listener that sovereignty
Speaker 2: has never been seeded, and so on, as if the
Speaker 2: listener can do anything about it, and begging the question,
Speaker 2: particularly when these mantras are piously uttered by large corporations
Speaker 2: or property owners. Well, then if that's what you really think,
Speaker 2: why don't you hand over your Martin Place head office
Speaker 2: to the local tribe. Maybe if the CEO feels so
Speaker 2: strongly about this issue that he's got to ram it
Speaker 2: down the customer's throats at every opportunity, how about he
Speaker 2: and his missus vacate the Vorklu's mansion and handed over
Speaker 2: to the Redfern Housing Association instead, you hypocrites. Now, don't
Speaker 2: get me wrong, I'm all in favor of celebrating our
Speaker 2: indigenous past, and I'm all in favor for a special
Speaker 2: day of the year, even a.
Speaker 1: Week if needs be, to do so.
Speaker 2: But at the moment, we have and you might need
Speaker 2: to sit down and take notes beacause you'll never remember them.
Speaker 1: All, whether you're indigenous, Indigenous.
Speaker 2: Or not, we have thirteenth February anniversary of National Apology Day,
Speaker 2: sixteenth March National Close the Gap Day, twenty sixth May
Speaker 2: National Sorry Day, Yes, that's right. National Sorry Day is
Speaker 2: different from how to National Apology Day.
Speaker 1: Go figure.
Speaker 2: We have twenty seventh of May nineteen sixty seven Referendum Day,
Speaker 2: twenty seventh May to third June, National Reconciliation Week, third
Speaker 2: June Marbo Day, first July Coming of the Light. Interestingly,
Speaker 2: this is celebrated annually by Torres Strait Islander people and
Speaker 2: it marks the adoption of Christianity through Ireland communities during
Speaker 2: the late nineteenth century. You don't get the active as
Speaker 2: celebrating that one, do you. Seventh July to fourteenth July
Speaker 2: nay doc Week. Fourth of August National Aborage on Torres
Speaker 2: Strait Islander Children's Day. Ninth of August International Day of
Speaker 2: the World's Indigenous Peoples. Well, that's a UN day, so
Speaker 2: that should be ditched along with the UN itself.
Speaker 1: But that's a different argument.
Speaker 2: Fourth of September Indigenous Literacy Day, Okay, I'm all for that.
Speaker 2: And finally, thirteenth of September Anniversary of the UN Declaration
Speaker 2: on the Rights.
Speaker 1: Of Indigenous People.
Speaker 2: Add on top other events like the Gama Festival, which
Speaker 2: we've just had, and it's fair to say Australian citizens
Speaker 2: and more important, the Australian taxpayers, spend an awful lot
Speaker 2: of time and treasure celebrating our indigenous history, even though
Speaker 2: as is clear from every government report that doing so
Speaker 2: has had no tangible benefit on helping the very people
Speaker 2: we should be helping, closing the gap for Indigenous Australians.
Speaker 2: My suggestion is this, Let's scrap all the sorrowes and apologies,
Speaker 2: because in the real world, if you've said sorry and
Speaker 2: meant it, you don't keep repeating it.
Speaker 1: Let's instead choose one important day.
Speaker 2: Like we do with Anzac Day or Australia Day, or
Speaker 2: Christmas or Easter or anything else all the various other
Speaker 2: cultural festivals. Let's choose one day, or if you like,
Speaker 2: one day and an accompanying week.
Speaker 1: To genuinely celebrate Aboriginal Australia.
Speaker 2: Let's call it National Aborigines in Irelanders Day and have
Speaker 2: it in the middle of Natock Week, and do it properly,
Speaker 2: do all the welcomes and acknowledgments on that day, and
Speaker 2: on that day only fly the Aboriginal flag from every
Speaker 2: mast in the land on that day, and on that day,
Speaker 2: only decorate every school in Australia with indigenous cultural artifacts
Speaker 2: for that week.
Speaker 1: But for that week.
Speaker 2: Only give that day and give that week real meaning,
Speaker 2: like we do with everything else we celebrate. When you
Speaker 2: make something commonplace, you rob it of any significance, You
Speaker 2: rob it of real meaning and value. It becomes bland, meaningless, corporate,
Speaker 2: mindless propaganda. Let's save the welcomes to country and the
Speaker 2: acknowledgment of country, and the flag flying and the disparate
Speaker 2: names for one special place. Let's save it all for
Speaker 2: one special day or one special week of the year,
Speaker 2: and that's it.
Speaker 1: Do it properly, do it well, but just do it once.
Speaker 2: The rest of the time, we must celebrate and acknowledge
Speaker 2: that we are all Australians together under one flag, not
Speaker 2: too sharing one sovereign nation, not hundreds of them, not
Speaker 2: being welcomed as if we are passing strangers to many
Speaker 2: ancient nations. I applaud Dave Pellow for taking a stance.
Speaker 2: The other day I landed in Melbourne and the airline
Speaker 2: stewardess was a delightful woman, really lovely, doing a great job.
Speaker 2: But she had a thick non Anglo accent, and as
Speaker 2: she read out the aubiquitous nonsense welcoming as to some
Speaker 2: strange land of unspecified leaders, past, present and emerging, well,
Speaker 2: to my mind, it was patently absurd. Every time I
Speaker 2: a drive over the Sydney Harbor Bridge, I am being
Speaker 2: informed that we are two nations, not one, two opposing tribes,
Speaker 2: not one unified nation. It's time to ditch the virtue signaling,
Speaker 2: ditch the ubiquitous welcomes and acknowledgments, ditch the universal two
Speaker 2: flags flying, ditch the plethora of sorries and apologies and
Speaker 2: phony reconciliations, and ditch the guilt tripping. Let's celebrate the
Speaker 2: history of Aboriginal Australia with genuine pride and emotion once
Speaker 2: a year, like we do with everything else, we genuinely.
Speaker 1: Value joining us.
Speaker 2: Now, I'm delighted to welcome the new spokeswoman for Advance Australia,
Speaker 2: Sandra Burt. Sandra Cans, you've got a new job that's
Speaker 2: always good years. You're the new spokesperson for Advanced Australia.
Speaker 2: Advance Australia do terrific work.
Speaker 1: They were great during the Voice a fantastic job there.
Speaker 1: There's some amazing work done.
Speaker 2: So you'veined you're now the spokesperson for Advanced Australia. You
Speaker 2: yourself have a very interesting story. You're not a political person,
Speaker 2: You're a mom from up central New South Wales.
Speaker 1: Tell us about us and tell us about yourself.
Speaker 20: Yes, thank you, Roan. The reason I've decided to step
Speaker 20: up and become advance as spokeswoman is I want to
Speaker 20: put every day Australians, mom, dads and families front and center.
Speaker 20: So my experience with the reckless Renewables movement has meant
Speaker 20: that I've discovered that every day Australians do not have
Speaker 20: a voice. And really the reckless Renewables movement has indicated
Speaker 20: that not only do we not have a voice, but
Speaker 20: our very values of freedom, freedom of speech, security, national security,
Speaker 20: energy security and of course prosperity, the cost of living,
Speaker 20: our energy bills are at risk. So I'm standing up
Speaker 20: for everyday Australians.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: Tell us where you live and what spurred your political involvement.
Speaker 1: Because it's a great story. Yes.
Speaker 20: So I had ostensibly retired after a lifetime of serving
Speaker 20: my country in law enforcement and defense, and then I
Speaker 20: discovered that Chris Bowen had decided to put three hundred
Speaker 20: massive turbines off our amazing beach where my family have
Speaker 20: lived for one hundred years. As a community, we rallied together,
Speaker 20: we wrote hundreds of letters, we had a protest and
Speaker 20: we realized, in my opinion, that this was a predetermined outcome,
Speaker 20: that the government had no intention of listening to us.
Speaker 20: Then I discovered that this was happening all over Australia.
Speaker 20: Right now, I'm touring around Australia making a mini documentary
Speaker 20: and regional communities in far North Queensland, down to Victoria,
Speaker 20: across to South Australia are being rolled, steamed, roll by
Speaker 20: Chris Bowen's reckless rollout of renewables. And really the communities
Speaker 20: there have no voice. They're being neglected, they're being divided.
Speaker 20: But what makes it even worse, and this is where
Speaker 20: I find it really disturbing, is it just won't work.
Speaker 20: We know for a fact that from an engineering perspective,
Speaker 20: from an environmental perspective, from every perspective, cost, the rebuild,
Speaker 20: the overbuild, this will not work. This will not deliver
Speaker 20: Australia clean, cheap, affordable energy. Australians need to wake up
Speaker 20: and bote the labor, green and teal government out.
Speaker 3: Which I certainly won't give us reliable energy when we
Speaker 3: need it. But these projects, you said, the local communities
Speaker 3: are being ignored, and I wonder how much of the
Speaker 3: rest of the community, those living in cities are aware
Speaker 3: of what's happening and the scale and the destruction of
Speaker 3: the natural environment.
Speaker 20: Well, Rita, that's a great point, and I don't think
Speaker 20: the cities are aware. I think that because of the
Speaker 20: divide the de VI that we first saw with the reconciliation,
Speaker 20: the division under this current government is continuing. So the
Speaker 20: regional communities are screaming out at.
Speaker 1: The top of their lungs.
Speaker 20: And unfortunately in the cities they think this is a
Speaker 20: great thing, but they.
Speaker 3: Don't see it because so many people who live in
Speaker 3: the city don't travel to the countryside in any sort of
Speaker 3: regular base.
Speaker 2: Go to Manly Beach and Bondi Beach.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 3: But I think city people, even the ones who think
Speaker 3: this sort of thing is as sustainable, workable, if they
Speaker 3: saw the destruction, if they saw the beautiful natural environment impacted,
Speaker 3: habitats destroyed, if they knew about the decommissioning costs of
Speaker 3: these massive wind turbines. I think they would very much
Speaker 3: be concerned, but I think it's out of sight and
Speaker 3: out of mind, and Labour seems to be capitalizing on
Speaker 3: that ignorance.
Speaker 20: Oh one hundred percent. I totally agree, and that's one
Speaker 20: of the reasons why Advance is making a documentary to
Speaker 20: show the sheer destruction. And it's astonishing that this movement
Speaker 20: has brought together environmentalists. The greens are nowhere to be seen,
Speaker 20: but true environmentalists. We see the explosive destruction up north
Speaker 20: and right down to the Goi To wind farm, where
Speaker 20: we see whole ridges being exploded to make way for
Speaker 20: these We want to bring that to the city. The
Speaker 20: city needs to wake up and realize that renewables are
Speaker 20: not the solution. It's morally reprehensible for our government to
Speaker 20: believe that rolling out one hundred percent renewables will solve
Speaker 20: our energy problem without putting nuclear on the table, without
Speaker 20: lifting the ban on nuclear power.
Speaker 6: Well, this is what I want to ask you about here,
Speaker 6: because you know I've done a lot of work down
Speaker 6: in Gondari in New South Wales talking to communities that
Speaker 6: are furious about a solar farm that's going in there.
Speaker 6: You know, no one ever asked them if they want it.
Speaker 6: They're just told this is going in there. You're in
Speaker 6: one of these economic zones where this is going to happen.
Speaker 6: Just yesterday I was outside Gilbert and huge wind tower.
Speaker 6: Nobody quite understands how big these things are until you
Speaker 6: drive right up to one of them. You know, polluting
Speaker 6: the landscape of just the visual amenity of this gorgeous
Speaker 6: country is absolutely destroyed. When you talk about nuclear the
Speaker 6: first thing that labor says, Oh, the people don't want
Speaker 6: it out there. You know, people don't want that. They're
Speaker 6: not telling us what communities are going to have to
Speaker 6: absorb a nuclear reactor and all of these sorts of things.
Speaker 6: And yet they seem very willing CenTra to go and
Speaker 6: drop these community dividing amenity destroying projects, agriculture destroying, food
Speaker 6: security destroying projects on these communities. And again it seems
Speaker 6: to me that it's about that country city divide.
Speaker 20: Absolutely, James, and you're absolutely right. I have seen these
Speaker 20: massive solar installations. I was up far north there's a
Speaker 20: massive eighteen thousand hectar one going in. All of the
Speaker 20: farmers are up in arms the footprint of these reckless
Speaker 20: renewables is incredible. Only continue. The footprint has to be
Speaker 20: built over eight times to ensure twenty seven.
Speaker 1: Affordable, and it's not affordable.
Speaker 9: I'll come to that.
Speaker 20: In electricity, the overbuild on our poles and wires, the
Speaker 20: lack of recycling, the environmental damage, the massive footprint compared
Speaker 20: to nuclear is insane. It is as I said, I
Speaker 20: cannot understand why the Labour, Green and te your government
Speaker 20: refuses to listen to our regional farmers, to our families
Speaker 20: who produce our food, who run the cattle, who have
Speaker 20: the sheep. I've stood there in their sheds with them
Speaker 20: while they are in tears as their families being broken down.
Speaker 20: I went to one farmer forty heck tires. They're going
Speaker 20: to take sixty percent of his horticultural farm, cut it
Speaker 20: right through high voltage transmission lines. These people have been
Speaker 20: fighting this for years. The mental toll on these families
Speaker 20: is terrible to see, terrible to witness and people in
Speaker 20: the communities, in our city communities. You really need to
Speaker 20: come and have a long hard look at how the labored,
Speaker 20: Green and Teal government is destroying our government.
Speaker 2: Here here, Sandra Burke absolutely spot on you're going to
Speaker 2: have your work cut out there with Advanced Australia. But
Speaker 2: fantastic job. Get out there, and you're absolutely right. Those
Speaker 2: people who voted teals need to wake up very very fast.
Speaker 1: And you're right. It's all about ideology. These people do
Speaker 1: not care for the Australian.
Speaker 4: But we didn't even get to the food security implication.
Speaker 1: Do that again will get you back here.
Speaker 2: A lot of work in front of you at great job,
Speaker 2: Advanced Australia. Do and people can go to the Advanced
Speaker 2: Australia websites.
Speaker 20: Yes, go to our website and have a look at
Speaker 20: our Green's truth campaign. The Greens are not who they
Speaker 20: used to be and I urge you all to have
Speaker 20: a long hard look at their policies which are destroying Australia.
Speaker 1: And maybe even donate as well. I'll say that because
Speaker 1: Sandra can't.
Speaker 6: Hello, you're watching Outsiders with your hosts rowing the prices
Speaker 6: right Dean and reader the rent is too damn high, panahee,
Speaker 6: and of course time the coupon clipping James Borrow. And
Speaker 6: a special shout out to all our viewers, including Queensland
Speaker 6: viewer Mary Drake, who I am reliably informed never misses
Speaker 6: an episode of Outsiders Helping to make Us so often
Speaker 6: the number one program here on Sky News Australia. Well, anyway,
Speaker 6: isn't this isn't this a funny moment?
Speaker 9: In America?
Speaker 6: There's a crippling cost of living crisis that has seen
Speaker 6: the price of all the basics, fuel, food, energy go
Speaker 6: through the roof. Yet Kamala Harris is so the media
Speaker 6: claims surging in the polls. Now this is interesting for
Speaker 6: two reasons. One, Harris has been vice president through the
Speaker 6: entire Biden administration that brought America this economic horror show.
Speaker 6: And two, Kamala Harris, well, I hate to break it
Speaker 6: to you, but she's simply not that bright. Check Out
Speaker 6: this ad that the Trump campaign has just released, maybe
Speaker 6: the shortest campaign ad in history, in which sees Harris
Speaker 6: confirm both of these points.
Speaker 15: A loaf of bread cost fifty percent more today.
Speaker 4: Than it did before the pandemic.
Speaker 15: Ground beef is up almost fifty percent.
Speaker 7: I'm Donald Trump and I approved this message.
Speaker 9: Grab beef.
Speaker 6: It's all off during the administration in which she served
Speaker 6: and still serves as the loyal vice president. Well done
Speaker 6: to the Biden Harris team and all involved.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 6: That grab of Harris was from a speech she gave
Speaker 6: in the last forty hours, in which she also admitted
Speaker 6: that under the Biden Kamala Harris administration, the American dream
Speaker 6: of owning a home was increasingly well just dream.
Speaker 15: And sadly right now it is out of reach for
Speaker 15: far too many American families. There's a serious housing shortage
Speaker 15: in many places. It's too difficult to build, and it's
Speaker 15: driving prices up.
Speaker 6: But don't worry Americans. Kamala Harris, now unburdened by the
Speaker 6: what has beens of the Biden administration, has a new
Speaker 6: catchphrase that will solve all these problems.
Speaker 15: So now, now, now is the time to chart a
Speaker 15: new way forward. Now is the time to chart a
Speaker 15: new way forward.
Speaker 6: A new way forwards sounds more like a great leap
Speaker 6: forward to me anyway, Gosh, I wonder what this will look.
Speaker 15: Like, your work to pass the first ever federal ban
Speaker 15: on price gauging, on food price gauging.
Speaker 6: I think she meant to say price gouging, unless there
Speaker 6: is some new LGBTQI initiative that I'm unaware of. But
Speaker 6: of course, roughly translated, what she's talking about is price controls.
Speaker 6: And giving the federal government the power to interfere in
Speaker 6: the free market for food. Now, this is of course
Speaker 6: a brilliant idea which has had such amazing success everywhere
Speaker 6: it has been tried, from Venezuela to the Soviet Union
Speaker 6: to Mao's China. Well, no, of course, this is a
Speaker 6: terrible idea. It is, in fact, as the New York
Speaker 6: Post so perfectly put it, communism, and as this meme
Speaker 6: going around today suggests that soon we will be calling
Speaker 6: about the big new movement of the left will not
Speaker 6: be Black Lives Matter, but rather Ran the Lines Matter.
Speaker 6: The real reason prices are so high, of course, is
Speaker 6: that Washington keeps printing money, making each dollar worth less,
Speaker 6: en forcing prices to go up, and I believe shoveling
Speaker 6: cash into the economy, including hundreds of billions of dollars
Speaker 6: at illegal immigrants who will hopefully be shoveled out of
Speaker 6: the country en mass in a Trump administration. So yeah, okay,
Speaker 6: price controls, kolonomics. Communism a terrible idea, but also a
Speaker 6: desperate one, as the Harris campaign tries to put some
Speaker 6: policy meet on a campaign that is so intellectually shallow
Speaker 6: that it makes deposed Immigration Minister Andrew Giles look like
Speaker 6: a deep thinker.
Speaker 9: But don't take my word for it.
Speaker 6: Here's CNN, Yes, CNN, that bastion of old right conspiracy theories. Well,
Speaker 6: here's their own economics car spot at breaking down all
Speaker 6: the ways in which Kamala's price controls are a horrible idea.
Speaker 4: It's not going to be markets.
Speaker 16: It's not going to be supplying demand that's determining how
Speaker 16: much your grocery store charges you for milk or for eggs.
Speaker 16: It's going to be some bureaucrat in DC, which seems
Speaker 16: like totally unworkable. First of all, for the FDC to
Speaker 16: be deciding like how much Kroger charges for eggs in Michigan,
Speaker 16: but it also would be very bad for markets. We've
Speaker 16: seen this kind of thing tried in lots of other
Speaker 16: countries before Venezuela, Argentina, the Soviet Union, et cetera. It
Speaker 16: leads to shortages, it leads to black markets, you know,
Speaker 16: plenty of uncertainty. And beyond that, the specific way this
Speaker 16: bill is written might actually increase prices because of some
Speaker 16: of the other language in it, things like requiring companies
Speaker 16: public companies to just close in their quarterly reports, their
Speaker 16: quarterly earnings reports, how they're setting prices, which is a
Speaker 16: great way to help them collude, which normally we don't
Speaker 16: want them to do.
Speaker 6: It's so bad that even the Washington Post, which basically
Speaker 6: exists as an incind donation to the Harris campaign, has
Speaker 6: called it out in an article entitled when your opponent
Speaker 6: calls you communist, maybe don't propose price controls. Catherine Rampell
Speaker 6: has written that it's hard to exaggerate how bad Kamala
Speaker 6: Harris's price gouging proposal is. Now, Remember this is the
Speaker 6: Washington Post we're talking about, right, If even they are
Speaker 6: calling out Kamala Harris's girl boss socialism, I can see that.
Speaker 6: I can't see anybody thinks this is the idea of
Speaker 6: price controls and bread lines are all coming. I think
Speaker 6: we know just how hard left, an economically reckless Harris
Speaker 6: administration will be.
Speaker 2: Brilliant, fantastic, James. And it's interesting we've often on this
Speaker 2: show talked about Kamala Harris's catch phrase, you know, the
Speaker 2: one that she always does at every rally. Ey, we
Speaker 2: can be what we want to be, unburdened by what
Speaker 2: we have been, or we can be what we imagine.
Speaker 1: We can be unburdened by what we have been.
Speaker 2: And we laugh at this, and rightly so, and we've
Speaker 2: laughing it on Rita's show Left He's losing it, and
Speaker 2: we laugh at it here on Outsiders. But as has
Speaker 2: been pointed out by one commentator, if you actually listen
Speaker 2: to that phrase, it's not just word salad. It is
Speaker 2: actually exactly what James was just talking about. It is
Speaker 2: a communist mantra. Every communist society, the worst of the worst,
Speaker 2: the Soviets, the masts and so on. Basically, that was
Speaker 2: their mantra, back to year one, start again, we can
Speaker 2: be a new society, unburdened by the society we used
Speaker 2: to be. Listen to that commentator talking to Charlie Kirk
Speaker 2: about this very thing so.
Speaker 17: In history, which is exactly what mal Zadong did when
Speaker 17: he launched the campaign of smash the four Olds, the
Speaker 17: four old characteristics.
Speaker 1: Of Chinese society.
Speaker 17: They were going to make a new China that was
Speaker 17: going to be unburdened by what had been in the
Speaker 17: past of China. This is what the Soviets the Bolsheviks
Speaker 17: did when they took over power in Russia. Is that
Speaker 17: they were going to make the new Russia. They're gonna
Speaker 17: make the new Man. As a matter of fact, people
Speaker 17: could become unburdened by what has been.
Speaker 1: So that they could see what.
Speaker 17: Could possibly be in the terms of a socialist utopia.
Speaker 2: Knew that what James is talking about, this new way forward.
Speaker 2: These are all actually just advertising reworkings of communists sayings.
Speaker 3: Well, the policies are fairly Communists, shouldn't be surprised if
Speaker 3: the phrases and these mantras they repeat. Maybe James lindsay,
Speaker 3: there is a He used to be, I think, a
Speaker 3: bit of a left leaning academic until they got red pilled.
Speaker 3: It seems that he was behind that ridiculous paper, a
Speaker 3: series of papers.
Speaker 4: It was like a hoax.
Speaker 3: I think that really exposed him to the depths of
Speaker 3: the left's lunacy, and since then he's just been on
Speaker 3: a different roads. It's very interesting analysis there. And you
Speaker 3: look at the VP she's picked. If she wanted to
Speaker 3: be moderate centrist, wanted to be sort of a sane voice,
Speaker 3: you wouldn't have gone down that road. She picked a
Speaker 3: governor of a state that doesn't matter. A dude who says,
Speaker 3: you know, socialism is like being neighboring.
Speaker 9: She's hit a happy Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 6: That's basically all Tim Watz is here. But beyond that, though,
Speaker 6: you know, we do need to talk about this whole
Speaker 6: unburdened by what has been idea because read it's something
Speaker 6: we've talked a lot about here is just because you're
Speaker 6: not interested in the culture wars doesn't mean the culture
Speaker 6: wars aren't interested in you. And so much of what
Speaker 6: we've seen really since the sixties, but it goes back
Speaker 6: a long time before that has been all about this
Speaker 6: war that the left makes on our culture, the foundations
Speaker 6: of our culture, our history, our traditions, everything that makes
Speaker 6: us who we are. And you see this now in
Speaker 6: a lot of the other things the left is talking about.
Speaker 6: They're talking about changing the way the Supreme Court works
Speaker 6: in the United States so that the left will have
Speaker 6: more power. They are talking about doing all sorts of
Speaker 6: things to change the way democracy, and they use a
Speaker 6: very specific way of using that not a republic, so
Speaker 6: that again the left can get more power. It's all
Speaker 6: about power, and it's about undermining all of the things
Speaker 6: that have been built up by us for centuries that
Speaker 6: keep us prosperous.
Speaker 9: And free.
Speaker 3: That's the philosophy. That's what we just heard. You destroy
Speaker 3: it and you rebuild.
Speaker 1: In accuracy liking it.
Speaker 3: And that is the word equshi. And I've said this
Speaker 3: before on this program. When you hear people talk about equity,
Speaker 3: red flag should go up immediately. Equality of opportunity is
Speaker 3: what we are striving for. If you want equality of
Speaker 3: outcome a ka equity, that's socialism, that's communism. That is
Speaker 3: a doctrine of failure and death.
Speaker 2: Now, the media, particularly in America, keep telling us, oh,
Speaker 2: Kamala is going to win.
Speaker 1: It's all over for Trump. It's all over for Trump.
Speaker 2: Not if you actually get out into the real world
Speaker 2: in America, which this one kid did. He went to
Speaker 2: ask people in different shops Trump or Kamala. He wandered
Speaker 2: around and his results are pretty interesting. Have listened to
Speaker 2: this little Trump or Kamala.
Speaker 21: Clip trumper Kamala Trump trumper Kamala for President.
Speaker 8: Trump, Trumper Kamala who Trump?
Speaker 21: Excuse me, sir? Trumper Kamala Trumper Kamala huh Trumper Kamala
Speaker 21: Oh Trump for sure? Trumper Kamala Trump trumper Kamala for
Speaker 21: President Trump. Not a single person said Kamalia Trumper, Kamala.
Speaker 22: What are you talking about?
Speaker 21: For President Trumper? Kamala Kamala Trump. You were the first
Speaker 21: person to say, Kamala, I don't really like her.
Speaker 8: Well, I don't care.
Speaker 21: What would you say to trum Trump?
Speaker 8: Beat alongs in jail?
Speaker 21: What would you say to Trump if you was here
Speaker 21: right now?
Speaker 8: I was shooting.
Speaker 2: Excuse the color of language there from that gentleman.
Speaker 1: But what was interesting was the left of vulgarity. Well,
Speaker 1: you're right about vulgarity, but also the violence.
Speaker 2: And what is interesting about that is that all these
Speaker 2: random people, it's the same thing. If you go to
Speaker 2: a hardware store here, you ask people, you'll get pretty
Speaker 2: honest opinions.
Speaker 3: That's if perhaps he wasn't doing that at a hardware
Speaker 3: store where people are actually you know, building things void
Speaker 3: contributing to If you went to a university campus, to you,
Speaker 3: it would have been all Kamala, Kamala, kamal, or if
Speaker 3: you went to any number of other establishments.
Speaker 4: So it's all about and this is the divide.
Speaker 3: We've talked about, which exists in the UK increasingly exists here.
Speaker 4: I just think there is in the awareness that it
Speaker 4: exists in Australia.
Speaker 3: But in the US, I think everyone knows about that
Speaker 3: divide and this is going to be the most consequential elections.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. But Reta touched on as well.
Speaker 2: James the without thinking this character, the last one who
Speaker 2: was a Kamala supporter, said oh, just shoot Trump. So
Speaker 2: without even thinking. So we've seen We've talked about this
Speaker 2: before on the show, but for eight years, you know,
Speaker 2: going right back to the comedian who held up the
Speaker 2: head of Donald Trump and through many comments from Biden
Speaker 2: and others about.
Speaker 1: You know, it's violence against Trump.
Speaker 2: It's just instinctive to these people that are left, kill them,
Speaker 2: get rid of him, shoot them.
Speaker 9: It is instinctive.
Speaker 6: It's instinctive, you know, Like you note that when Donald
Speaker 6: Trump was shot a month ago, you didn't see people
Speaker 6: on the right going out and rioting and see you know,
Speaker 6: you basically never see any sort of civil insurrection from
Speaker 6: the right. You can say January sixth, but you know,
Speaker 6: beyond that though, look at the Black Lives Matters, right,
Speaker 6: everything went through through twenty twenty. The instinct of the
Speaker 6: left is when things don't go their way, to take
Speaker 6: to the streets and take to the barricades.
Speaker 4: I want to saw that.
Speaker 3: We're seeing it already with the DNC conference coming to
Speaker 3: Democratic National Convension. They are boarding up shops because even
Speaker 3: amongst their own they can't be trusted not to become
Speaker 3: violent because you've got people within that camp who are
Speaker 3: not as not happy that Kamala isn't as far left
Speaker 3: as they are, so they're.
Speaker 6: Going to You're gonna have Antifa, You're going to have
Speaker 6: a pro Palestinians. It is going to be absolutely on.
Speaker 6: It's going to be a replay of nineteen sixty eight
Speaker 6: when the anti Vietnam protesters descended on Chicago when the
Speaker 6: convention was again there. It's going to be absolute chaos
Speaker 6: because this is how they up I just want to.
Speaker 3: Pick the Mahala didn't pick ship hero, she didn't pick
Speaker 3: the most obvious candidate for her VP. Pick governor of Pennsylvania,
Speaker 3: the most crucial swing stone.
Speaker 6: Also, he's really smart edwould upstage her every Jewish There
Speaker 6: you go, and how's that inclusion? How's that inclusion going?
Speaker 2: I just want to quickly play your grab, which is
Speaker 2: amusing of Donald Trump. They always say, never let the baby,
Speaker 2: you know, never let politicians, you know kiss babies. You
Speaker 2: never know what's going to happen, but this is a
Speaker 2: cute little grab from one of Donald Trump's rallies.
Speaker 8: Have a look, where's your daddy and your mommy?
Speaker 11: Right?
Speaker 8: Do you want to go back? Do you want to
Speaker 8: go back to them or do you want to stay
Speaker 8: with Donald Trump?
Speaker 2: Jum, there you go Trump, And just very quickly, let's
Speaker 2: have a look at Donald Trump talking to people.
Speaker 1: How he does actually relate to real people. Have a
Speaker 1: quick listen to this beautiful job.
Speaker 20: Thank you so much, thank you.
Speaker 8: I want to look like that guy.
Speaker 23: My son is going into the army next over here.
Speaker 9: You'll end up being a general.
Speaker 1: An internship.
Speaker 8: It's just your mom.
Speaker 2: You turn out, Come on, listen, thank you.
Speaker 1: No wonder people love him. After the break, what's more
Speaker 1: coming up? Skin a tick bound shot, wall up, wallop.
Speaker 2: It's the wackiest, wildest, weirdest wokes show.
Speaker 1: In the world.
Speaker 2: It's the Cambo wack clown show where everybody is out
Speaker 2: hunting for wabbits.
Speaker 24: Be ully fully quiet, I'm hunting rabbits.
Speaker 1: Sorry am I mistake? Slip of the tongue.
Speaker 2: They're not hunting for wabbits in Camberer, They're hunting for racists.
Speaker 9: Stop being the opposition.
Speaker 10: Is a description of language being racist and unparliamentary remark.
Speaker 10: The policy proposed by Peter Dutton and the Coalition is racist.
Speaker 1: So what on earth are they all rabbiting on about.
Speaker 2: Well, it turns out earlier in the week the head
Speaker 2: of ASIO, Mike Burgess, made a couple of rather unfortunate
Speaker 2: admissions in terms of where this is going.
Speaker 1: It's across the board.
Speaker 25: Yes, there's plenty of anti Semitism, but there's plenty of
Speaker 25: Islamophobia at the same time. It's kind of an almost
Speaker 25: equal treatment. If they're giving financial support or material aid,
Speaker 25: that can be a problem, and obviously we take each
Speaker 25: case on its merits and the context of the information
Speaker 25: we have before us. But if it's just rhetorical support,
Speaker 25: if it's just rhetorical re support, and they don't have
Speaker 25: an ideology or support for a violent stream as an ideology,
Speaker 25: then that's not a problem.
Speaker 2: Oh, which led to all sorts of con usion. I mean,
Speaker 2: what exactly does support for Hamas Hamas actually entail?
Speaker 1: Did Mike Burgess really say that.
Speaker 2: People can come into Australia from Gaza even if they
Speaker 2: support Hamas, because well, does he mean these people.
Speaker 20: Are you supportive of Hamas, Yes, yes, of course yes.
Speaker 12: Are most Palestinians, Yeah, Ristinian people like ms I'm with
Speaker 12: that is Tims.
Speaker 2: Did you see the videos they posted of what they
Speaker 2: did on October seventh?
Speaker 9: Everything you're okay.
Speaker 4: With honor with everything they did?
Speaker 1: Hmmm.
Speaker 2: Well, one man in Canberra who actually has the moral
Speaker 2: clarity and the spine to confront this left wing nonsense
Speaker 2: was Peter Dutton, who didn't mince his words.
Speaker 26: If people are coming in from that war zone and
Speaker 26: we're uncertain about identity, all their allegiances, but Hamas is
Speaker 26: a listed terrorist organization. They've just committed an atrocity against
Speaker 26: the Jewish people, the biggest attack on people of Jewish
Speaker 26: faith since a Holocaust, and that the government wouldn't be
Speaker 26: conducting checks. I don't think people should be coming in
Speaker 26: from that war zone at all at the moment. It's
Speaker 26: not prudent to do so, and I think it puts
Speaker 26: our national security at risk.
Speaker 9: Correct.
Speaker 2: This in turn led to all sorts of hand winging
Speaker 2: from the usual suspects, including the Prime Minister.
Speaker 9: He sows fear and he sew's division.
Speaker 24: That's what he does, that's where he's done his entire
Speaker 24: political career and that's what he continues to do.
Speaker 1: Wrong.
Speaker 2: But anyway, ever, the loyal supporter Tanya Quibask jumped into
Speaker 2: the fay.
Speaker 27: I think what Peter Dutton was doing in the Parliament
Speaker 27: was once again seeking to win votes by frightening and
Speaker 27: dividing Australians, and.
Speaker 2: Of course wasist hunter in chiefs Our Handsome Young had
Speaker 2: plenty to say, how.
Speaker 4: You say something about the children bangs. Look, Peter Dutton
Speaker 4: is the leader of the Nasty Party.
Speaker 28: It's Trumpian, it's despicable and it needs to be called
Speaker 28: out Trumpian.
Speaker 1: She says that, like it's an insult. Well, anyway, I'm.
Speaker 2: Glad Sauer forcefully showed her concern for innocent civilians and
Speaker 2: children being slaughtered, as any sane person does. But oddly,
Speaker 2: I've looked everywhere online and there has been very little
Speaker 2: from Sarah Hanson Young condemning the murder, the rapes, the
Speaker 2: the headings and the kidnappings of young children, babies and girls.
Speaker 1: On October seventh, of course, what was.
Speaker 2: Really needed was some slightly saner voices and white on
Speaker 2: c Mercifully one popped up.
Speaker 20: The appropriate number of hamas sympathizers.
Speaker 7: In Australia is zero.
Speaker 9: It's zero.
Speaker 25: And anyone that we take from Gaza right now you've
Speaker 25: got to assume is a Hamas sympathy.
Speaker 2: It's worth reflecting on the words too of Nigel Farage
Speaker 2: talking about the European experience of integration from the same part.
Speaker 1: Of the world.
Speaker 22: In nine ninety two, Denmark took in three hundred refugees
Speaker 22: from Palestine. Sixty four percent of them have turned into criminals.
Speaker 22: Thirty four percent of their children have turned into criminals.
Speaker 22: I'm not demonizing any one group, but the risk that
Speaker 22: we bring in the wrong kindor people and those who
Speaker 22: could be linked to Hammers say to me that in
Speaker 22: the name of national security, the time has come to
Speaker 22: say no, enough is enough.
Speaker 2: Correct and speaking as we were of moral clarity or
Speaker 2: the lack of it in the Burley Gwiffin Big Top,
Speaker 2: what a relief it was to hear Tasmanian Senator Clear
Speaker 2: Chandler expose the disgraceful lack of moral clarity at the
Speaker 2: recent Olympics.
Speaker 28: At the Paras Olympics, the world has seen what happens
Speaker 28: when you put the safety of women in the hands
Speaker 28: of fools who say it's impossible to know what a
Speaker 28: woman is. One of the world's most powerful organizations allowed
Speaker 28: eight women to be punched repeatedly in the head.
Speaker 4: By two boxes it had been told.
Speaker 28: Were biological males. And we witnessed the brazen attempt of
Speaker 28: the IOC president to claim the moral high ground even
Speaker 28: while refusing to guarantee female boxes that they wouldn't have
Speaker 28: to fight a male.
Speaker 1: Bravo Claire moral clarity.
Speaker 2: Still, while Claire Chandler raises the moral barrier in Parliament,
Speaker 2: no doubt the rest of the Cambo Crown Show will
Speaker 2: carry on hunting wascists wherever they can find them.
Speaker 1: What would Elma fud say.
Speaker 24: Be very VOI quiet, I'm hunting wabbit wabbitt wabnt cally
Speaker 24: wabbin hitch wabbit cheat.
Speaker 2: Watching outside is interesting to see a fan who wrote
Speaker 2: to Gina Reinhardt letter after the Olympics.
Speaker 1: So let's talk a little bit about the Olympics.
Speaker 2: So someone wrote to Gina saying, we put it up
Speaker 2: on the Screenholo Gina, just penning this letter as a
Speaker 2: huge thank you for our amazing Olympic athletes. Seeing our
Speaker 2: athletes thrive in Paris was truly inspiring. Hope says the
Speaker 2: letter writer, I hope the karma train stops at your station,
Speaker 2: knowing that not only the athletes appreciate your generosity, but
Speaker 2: all the Aussies watching and cheering at home. And that
Speaker 2: was from a gentleman called Stewart. And Gina Reinhardt made
Speaker 2: some interesting comments Reata after the Olympics, talking about the
Speaker 2: funding James and basically saying that she did a massive
Speaker 2: She's basically responsible for the success of our Olympic athletes,
Speaker 2: but she's saying with too much funding is going into
Speaker 2: bureaucracies supports system.
Speaker 1: Rather than athletes themselves Reata.
Speaker 3: And that's why her support is so crucial and so impactful,
Speaker 3: and why so many of the athletes and their families
Speaker 3: thanked her after they perform so wonderfully in Paris, particularly
Speaker 3: the swimmers, the rollers, a bunch of Olympians, because that
Speaker 3: money goes directly to them so they can devote themselves
Speaker 3: to training, to being the best they can be. They
Speaker 3: don't have to have part time jobs, they don't have
Speaker 3: to have full time jobs that can actually get the
Speaker 3: benefit of that, and I think there needs to be
Speaker 3: more of that across all the Olympic sports. That the
Speaker 3: tax pay isn't just funding these bureaucosities mentions, we're actually
Speaker 3: going where it's needed to get the best results.
Speaker 2: Just quickly before you, James, I'll just read out what
Speaker 2: Gina Reinhardt said about that. And she was saying that
Speaker 2: I think we should learn from Europe where countries have
Speaker 2: decided to cut the expenditure of the sports bodies and
Speaker 2: make better use of that funding directed instead to the
Speaker 2: athletes and the coaches. And she said that Britain was
Speaker 2: an example of putting athletes and coaches first, directing money
Speaker 2: accordingly away from the bureaucracy to the athletes and coaches.
Speaker 2: We of course have see the gravy train at these games.
Speaker 9: I mean that's the thing.
Speaker 6: And this is sort of you know, I think Gina
Speaker 6: Reinhart hits on something here which is kind of the
Speaker 6: Australian disease.
Speaker 9: It's not just in sport.
Speaker 6: It's an awful lot of things where you know, all
Speaker 6: the money winds up going to shovel into sort of
Speaker 6: these backcratic bureaucracies and administrative organizations. You know, the way
Speaker 6: that we do our sport is amazing in this country.
Speaker 6: And Gina Reinhart is a huge part of the success
Speaker 6: of our Olympic athletes who on a per capita basis,
Speaker 6: you know, took home. I think Markel said just anybody
Speaker 6: else so that, but you know so, which is why
Speaker 6: I think it's important to recognize her that rather than
Speaker 6: credit the sort of Soviet Institute sport models that we've
Speaker 6: been using, which don't necessarily get the results that she had.
Speaker 3: And I think a lot of the bureaucracy has embarrassed
Speaker 3: itself in the past week because we've had more very
Speaker 3: high profile former athletes who are now prout of that bureaucracy,
Speaker 3: including Karen Perkins and Emirs, coming out and defending this absolutely.
Speaker 4: Shambolic breaking breakdown.
Speaker 3: If they weren't so in that bubble, they would recognize
Speaker 3: what has happened and recognize defending that trying to bully
Speaker 3: Australians into remaining silent and not laughing at that.
Speaker 4: They would see how absurd that.
Speaker 1: Is you had.
Speaker 2: Peter fitz Simon's obvious it's been doubly absurd for that
Speaker 2: blow because he's an ex rugby player and he's saying
Speaker 2: excellence doesn't matter, sorry itself on it's elite sports people,
Speaker 2: the best of the best, participation.
Speaker 3: We care about having a go, but Olympic level isn't
Speaker 3: about to be the best.
Speaker 4: You send your best to the Olympics.
Speaker 6: This is not this is not a progressive preschool sports day.
Speaker 6: We're not giving away participation trophies and oh, everybody, you know,
Speaker 6: here you go, here you go, here's your meddle. Everybody
Speaker 6: gets surprised. But it's really funny.
Speaker 11: Rod.
Speaker 9: I'm so glad you mentioned.
Speaker 6: Peter FitzSimons and his stirring defense of Reygun and this
Speaker 6: whole sort of eld academic class, the same people who
Speaker 6: were there for the Voice. You know, it just reminds
Speaker 6: me of what George Orwell said. We're talking about something
Speaker 6: silly breakdancing, but we see this throughout politics. There's this
Speaker 6: whole group of people who take Orwell's injunction that the
Speaker 6: first order of the party was not to believe the
Speaker 6: evidence before your own eyes. That's exactly what we are
Speaker 6: being told to do with Reygun, as we were told
Speaker 6: to do with the Voice, as we've been told to
Speaker 6: do with so many other things.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, and I would just add the points, and I
Speaker 2: do feel sorry for the brilliant athletes, The brilliant Australian athletes.
Speaker 1: A lot of that raygun stuff.
Speaker 2: Took the deserved emphasis where the rest of the world
Speaker 2: should have been going.
Speaker 1: My god, as Australian is incredible. Did you see what
Speaker 1: the did in the pool? Did you see what those
Speaker 1: Australians did.
Speaker 2: The rest of the world was going Australia haha, breakdancing.
Speaker 1: I mean seriously.
Speaker 2: And the bureaucrats responsible for that decision, and the bureaucrats
Speaker 2: who defended that decision, as Rita says, seriously, don't belong
Speaker 2: in the job, particularly the amount of money we pay
Speaker 2: them for it to do all the trips, Rita, Swift
Speaker 2: is for Trump. Apparently we're getting some Taylor Swift fans
Speaker 2: are out there going Swifties for Trump.
Speaker 4: The reason I'm not across, I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm a lot a fan.
Speaker 23: There's a lot of terrorism going on. I guess she
Speaker 23: had to shut down some shows because of it, and
Speaker 23: a lot of them are just saying, you know, if
Speaker 23: Trump was in office, this would have never ever happened.
Speaker 1: Well, Rita, you don't think that.
Speaker 2: I think it's great if young people are getting behind Trump,
Speaker 2: the more of the Maria.
Speaker 3: No, we don't have the time to argue, but no,
Speaker 3: thank you, and Tayler Swift is a massive lefty and
Speaker 3: we shouldn't care about the opinion into pop stars, let
Speaker 3: alone their fans.
Speaker 4: As you even old enough.
Speaker 9: To vote, I gotta go.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 2: We'll see you next Sunday at nine am, where we
Speaker 2: will have that argument reach and I can't wait to
Speaker 2: see you then