WEBVTT - Melbourne rebound - where are the bargains?

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Australians Money Puzzle Podcast. I'm

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody. My guest today is a

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Nissa Cavallo of the Ida Property Group and she's been

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>on the show actually more than once, and the last

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>time we heard from her, I won't say a voice

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in the wilderness, but she did outdime with some confidence

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>how Victorian property market, which she is an expert on,

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>she had seen it as a bargain. Basically, this is

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when things were pretty pretty bleak and as you know

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>that Melbourne was the worst market for some time on

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a national basis. Now most recently we see that basically

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne prices have been rising at an annualized rate something

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in the order of six percent and were probably gathering

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>pace through this period. So I've invited Anissa back on

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the show to talk first of all about this area

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>because I think from a nation my point of view,

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's where everyone's looking as investors. But I also want

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>her she does have an interesting story which I haven't

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>put to you before for the simple reason I wanted

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to put her to you as a property expert first

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, But how she actually got into all this

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is very interesting, which we talk about in the second

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>segment of the show. But first and foremost, and this

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is Cavallo, try not You could almost gloase there if

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you wished, but but they wouldn't come across on the podcast.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>But thank you. I mean, let's say it was going

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen, right, it was probably going to happen that

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne would turn. I didn't think it would turn quick.

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely well, firstly, thanks for having me back, James. I

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it to glow. And look, I think in many

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 2>cases when you listen to economists, eventually, if you wait

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>long enough, what they say is correct. Right, But we

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>were talking about the next twelve months, so we did

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>get it right. The fundamentals are just there and we've

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>talked about it before. Population growth, we've got stronger wages growth.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>The population growth hasn't really changed other than that little

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>period during COVID. There's just been so many positive characteristics

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>about Melbourne and the last five years in particular have

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 2>set us back ten And I know I've heard that

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>you've spoken about this a lot on the show, that

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the numbers for the ten years is dire and that

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>presents an incredible opportunity for investors that are willing to

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>go against you, against the grain, which is really tricky.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I was right. It's not surprising. I don't

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>think we're not celebrating it, right, We're not popping the champagne.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>But the first indicators are certainly there. And it's a

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>bit of a relief, to be honest, for me, because

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm highly exposed and a lot of my clients are.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, so you professionally put yourself out there. It

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just a notion and you would have acted upon it,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>so you wanted to see it happen. Look, well, take

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it that it is happening. It's not shooting the lights out.

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It's all it's doing so far, it would seem. And

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Calendar twenty five is coming back to something like a

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>normal market what you would expect an Australian city. Five

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>minions should be ticking away at least six percent parannum.

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's just take it down. Is the situation, and

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that it could get better. Now, before we talk about

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>where and style and type of property that might be

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 1>attractive in the city, can you tell us I think

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the tax the role of new taxes that were announced

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>by the Victorian State government at the very depth of,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you like, of the cycles, So when things were really

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at their agrimace, they went and really sort of kicked

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it in the head by adding new taxes, and they

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of attention. Is that still a risk

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>from a broad point of view for people investing in

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this market?

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, as we've discussed, I think it presented an opportunity

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 2>because if you had a look at the true impact

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 2>on the majority of investors, I think it was it

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>was for majority investor property investors. It came to seven

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty to nine hundred dollars extra a year

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that was tax deductible, and if you consider where interest

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>rates have been in the past while property prices go up,

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not really a massive financial disincentive to invest. So

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 2>for me and what we discussed was it was largely sentiment.

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we could have been taxed twenty dollars and

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>we wouldn't have been happy with it because we felt

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't our fault, right, Why are we tacked?

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Why we So you're saying that the dollar terms, it

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't backbreaking, but it was, but it sure was in

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of sentiment wasn't it.

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that the sentiment was also partly because we thought, well,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>what are they going to do next? We'd had enough

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.679
<v Speaker 2>and interstate investors, Melbourne had a good run for many years.

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 2>We were relatively oversupplied in supplied in some areas, not

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>all areas, which isn't always a massive issue. But I

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>think that it had a good run. That we dealt

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>with COVID in a way that wasn't very popular, and

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 2>then it was like what else is this government going

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to do? What else are they capable of? And it

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>was almost like I like to liken it to the

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Carton Football Club, everybody almost really enjoyed the lot, you

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 2>know Melbourne.

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Some Sydney siders enjoy seeing Melbourne's struggle in any fashion.

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't tell that for a moment. We know that

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>we know that all too well. But let's rise above

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>all that as investors and look strictly at the numbers.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So I suppose what I'm asking you is that issue

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that seem government are still in power in Victoria, right,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So is that risk still on the table?

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, okay, So I think that we've seen this

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 2>pan out now for a period of time and realized

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>that not a lot has happened. We haven't had this

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>huge despite what the media says, and even the headlines

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 2>of people are leaving Victoria and drives, it's simply untrue.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 2>If you look at the ABS figures more people left

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Queensland last year than Victoria and that's on a numbers basis,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 2>so on a percentage basis, it's much greater. Right, So

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I think we've got it. People are starting to see

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the truth. There's not anything massive that's happened. We haven't

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 2>grown hugely, but we've also become incredibly a foe audible

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and I know that whilst there are some talks about

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 2>some additional taxes on property in general, it seems that

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the huge, the huge imposition to Victorians in particular, it

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 2>has stopped, right, So we're not not quite sure that

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 2>much more is coming. I think we've had We've watched

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>it play out a bit. There's also been other states

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that have made very unpopular policy decisions, and you know

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>that just hasn't been as as widely publicized.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Actually, Hugh Robinson's The Financial Advisory based out of Brism

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was on the show sometime ago and him at the

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>point that Land tax is actually and the way it's

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>going on the forward estimates inside the budgets of the

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>two states, land tax will be higher in Queensland than

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it will be in Victoria, and so the Victoria might

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have more taxes, but the one that really matters to

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.359
<v Speaker 1>most people is land tax and it's heading to be

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>higher in Queensland. Okay, we've got those things on the table.

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Where in the city of Melbourne are the bargains and

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>what are the type of properties that offer opportunity to

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>our listeners.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, my strong focus for most people that are trying

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to increase wealth, right, not drawing down on their income,

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>but increasing wealth is capital growth and everyone's heard me

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>talk about that a lot. I think that's where the

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>magic is. You change your wealth position by through capital

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 2>growth with property yield after all the costs associated with

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 2>it rarely changes anything. Okay, it's a good way to

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>pay for the asset while it grows in value. So

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 2>my strong focus is how do we find there's nuggets

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>of growth. And you've said affordable anyway, and affordable is

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>actually a really important part of finding these nuggets. Those

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>areas that are less affordable that have bigger supply issues

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 2>have traditionally had a lot of volatility, so you've really

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>got to ride the wave. So I'm really looking for

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>those suburbs that are affordable because if you think about

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 2>it just logically, there's a much greater percentage of the

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 2>population that can afford it, so you've got more buyers.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, always so looking for affordability, and there's different

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>ways to do that. There's going into those sort of

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>those growth corridors, which I do like. Some of those

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>growth corridors that can sometimes appear like they've got a

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of land available, also present the opportunity to build

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 2>more hospitals, to build more schools, to build better roads,

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and so the Victorian State government has done a very

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>good job of building what we call employment clusters. We

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 2>don't build commuter suburbs where you have to commute to

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>get to work. I think it's something like seventy percent

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>of the people that live in the Melton that work

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>and live in melton Shire actually work locally. They don't commute,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>which is a huge number of local workers. So I'm

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>looking for if I'm looking for growth corridors, I'm looking

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of local employment. Could be southeast your Cranburns.

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot of that is now getting quite expensive. And

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you fifteen years ago people looked at

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Cranburn and said it's all land, there's too much available,

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and yet it's been an incredible performer against other inner

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>urban suburbs.

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Of interesting straight away that when you're looking at the city,

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at you were looking at middle to alto suburbs.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You didn't do you mention them first?

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm mentioning them first.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>These are growth, these are new housing estates basically.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>It sometimes new housing estates, sometimes we get a bit

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 2>closer to the suburb. Right now, I'm talking about new

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>housing estates. We've done a lot in Melton, a lot

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 2>in Deanside, a lot in Werribe. I mean, Weerriby is

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 2>an established area, but it has a few little infill

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>sites that we've invested in. So that's one way to

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 2>do it. And the good thing about that is that

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>you're getting the benefit of a lot of migration, a

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of population growth, but a lot of a lot

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>of infrastructure growth. There are new jobs going in which

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>creates household income growth, which in the end is a

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 2>lead indicator for price growth. Right So I love that

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 2>then there's another way to find affordability, but without investing

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 2>in units and townhouses which are unlikely to give you

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the same effects in terms of capital growth. Because we're

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 2>focusing on capital growth, we want as much land as possible,

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's going to those regentrifying suburbs. You know, your Coburgs,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>your sunshines going towards the Monash, further out from the Monash,

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 2>even your seafrets are very expensive now. But finding those

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 2>suburbs that are still a little affordable the problem is

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that a lot of that in

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>my experience, that I've learned the hard way, and that

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people don't take into consideration when they're investing,

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>is one thing, is this property doubling in ten years

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 2>or doing more right? Capital growth great, but you have

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to be able to hold it, and the holding costs

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 2>is often the killer, just like cash flow in a business.

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 2>And if you are buying older properties, because you want

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 2>to spend seven hundred and fifty which is the average

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 2>investment price, so average investor in Australia will want to

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>spend about seven hundred and fifty to eight hundred. There's

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of brand new, beautiful properties that you

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 2>can buy in the inner urban ring for that price.

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 2>So you're often if you're going in an urban, you're

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 2>often buying something that may may cost you a lot

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you know, constantly doing it up, et cetera.

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>And often the yields can be a little bit lower,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and so if it's hard to cash flow and it's

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 2>hard to hold, then you may not be in a

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>position to hold it long term. So I've had a

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of it's James that have purchased older properties. I

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 2>did it myself, It's what I used to do, and

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 2>they've just said, we just simply can't afford it because

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>every cent that we get from the tenant just goes

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>and in repairs.

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Because he used our relatively low, very long. So the

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>red lincome is con considering what they've paid out and

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>come considering what the mortgage is, what's coming in is

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>relatively low. So they get caught in that sort of trap,

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and that's more common in the inner city older style properties.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it, Yes, absolutely absolutely so. Are the only better

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in the subject of the subverbs that you've mentioned, Is

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the yield any better?

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, they are. You can you can get something relatively new,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years old. We're often looking for something

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 2>no more than five years old if we can, right,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>because we want as much as possible to just buy

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>this asset and get on with that day job and

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:46.679
<v Speaker 2>let it go up in value. I just don't even

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 2>want to know about it, I say to some of

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 2>my clients. If my life depended on driving it to

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 2>some of my suburbs, I wouldn't even know where they are,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 2>which is a good thing. I don't want to worry

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 2>about them.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the Warren Buffett line. You know that he

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>should be able to go to the movies for the

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>afternoon care of what the share market is doing, if

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he's made the right.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Decisions, Yes, exactly. Just let them do their thing without

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 2>me worrying about them. And so in some of these

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>suburbs you can still purchase things that aren't necessarily units.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 2>If I am looking at a unit for a client,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll be looking for something that's on as much land

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 2>as possible, and obviously I will rely heavily on site

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 2>inspections and professional building inspections, et cetera to make sure

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>there's no underlying issue. But I'm always looking for as

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>much land as I can get, and also as much

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 2>house as I can get because you need to tenant it.

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 2>So some of these outer suburbs that have got, in

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 2>particular new hospitals, new infrastructure that is under construction, because

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, a promise of a hospital could be twenty

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>years away, right, So I'm looking for a Footscray Sunshine

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>has got an existing hospital. Melton's Hospital has commenced, and I.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Just ask you, as an investor, is that just a

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>signal or is it literally that you will be able

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to rent to people who work in those big areas, hops,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm using hospital probably unfairly, but I love hospitals

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>because they create long term growth and they bring in

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 2>other professionals, and they're bringing in a relatively high income.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 2>And if you're talking about so remember I said that

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>in our experience, the most important factor and characteristic for

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 2>future price growth in Australia globally is something family income growth,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>household income growth. And if a new hospital is going

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 2>in then you're often particularly in these outer rings or

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the inner urban ring, but right on the borders, you're

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>often increasing the employment the household employment income as a

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 2>result of having a lot of health workers. In some

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of the suburbs we're looking at, there's new legal facilities

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>going in, new courts, et cetera, which is also a

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>great thing because what you're looking for is the sort

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of infrastructure that is going to bring a lot of

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>employment and long term employment. Schools are wonderful because it

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>will bring people looking to house their children in a

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 2>good quality school, and certainly a good quality high school

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>can be unbelievable for a suburb. There are many suburbs

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 2>that people just buy or rent just to get their

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 2>children into these really great public schools. But it doesn't

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 2>necessarily create a lot of jobs, whereas there are other

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>types of infrastructure that will create a lot of jobs

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 2>and also entice other workers to come in and service

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the local health workers, et cetera. So it's sort of

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>a you know, snipall effect.

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Just something I really want to put to you, and

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously I'm thinking is very strong and it's

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting and it's interesting how you are looking. Obviously, it

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>turns out we're talking about city of Melbourne being a bargain,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so which areas. But your theme and you're largely could

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be applied at any city. Let's come back in a moment.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about one thing that sort

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of hangs over all that that just me threaten it

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>back in a moment. Hello, Welcome back to the Australians

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzle Podcast. James Kirby here with the Nisa Cavello.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We left you with a cliffhanger. What is it that

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>possibly go wrong with Anissa's concept of the opportunities? Can

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I put words in you about and say, in any

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>city and it just happens to be Melbourne being the

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>one that you are expert in and from a nationwide

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>perspective is clearly the bargain state at the moment. But

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you and you outline how you like these new areas,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>new clusters, new growth developments, for they have new hospitals

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and they have you're really focusing on houses and alone

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>houses with land. The only thing that I would from

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>an economic point of view, the challenge might be supply.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>That scarcity isn't there and that Melbourne and Victoria actually

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>has the best supply in the country. There's a variety

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of reasons for that, but the main one is that

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you can keep building forever. There's no parks, lakes or

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the ocean. To get in the way like other cities.

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to that if I said to you,

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I love your thinking. I'm ready, I've got my checkbook

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>half opened, but I'm worried about supply.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, we don't. I'm not only investing in these growth areas,

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 2>but it is an area that we do like. It

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 2>is one of our themes. Okay, just to say that,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>just a bit clear, but if you looked at it,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I use the example before a Cranburn fifteen

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 2>years ago was just paddocks and many people said, why

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 2>would I invest there? There is so much supply. Now

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>there is nothing. And so often when you have these

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>large land supplies and you have these huge population growth

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to go with it, it's the chicken and the egg.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Why are we getting the population growth? Because there is

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>job opportunity because there is land to build new roads,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>There is land to build new hospitals and new schools,

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>so we are able, we have the capacity to build

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>these employment clusters which will then bring the population. So

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>that's one thing. Sometimes this presents opportunities. And sometimes when

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>you drive out to suburbs like towards Caroline Springs and

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you go on the Western Ring Road, and then you

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 2>end up on the I've forgotten the name. I think

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 2>it's EMA, and just you go past vacant Land, huge

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>industrial estates in vacant Land. A lot of that is

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>not rezoned residential, a lot of it is commercial, and

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 2>so there are huge pockets of future employment in these areas,

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 2>which is exciting. So some of it is actually an

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for Victoria because we have the land to create jobs,

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 2>to create employment clusters. The other thing that people don't

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 2>take into consideration is we've had a lag in building

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 2>approvals and construction, a massive lag, and yet our population

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>growth has accelerated, and so we are now way behind

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 2>where we need to be.

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So it sounds like excepploint doesn't disturb you really

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>because you're coming in with a it's a more optimistic

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>view rather than saying no, we need a bit of serciosity,

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>forget the price. You're coming in a different point of view, really,

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>which is like top down. You're saying no, there's population growth,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so there's going to be literally new towns, and these

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>new towns the values will improve. And I suppose what's

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting with your approaches that century level, Like you said

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>seven fifty, which is, if someone's listening in Sydney, what

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>can they buy for seven fifty I have?

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Again, they're lucky, that's right.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Very little. There's something I wanted to bring in here,

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>which is we have lots of people on the show

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're coming with different perspectives on property to us

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit. I wanted to tell the listeners,

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>now that we know you know that we know your expertise,

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>now that we know what you have to see, it's

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting how you started in property, and you might just

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>synopsize it for us as to how you got to

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>where you are, and just before you do in how

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>many properties are you running now?

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 2>So I'm under my peak. So and I hate answering

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 2>this question because I say all the time to media,

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't want everybody to go up by seventeen properties.

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's ridiculous for most people. Right, yeah, I

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 2>think you know, two, three, four really good place properties

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>is all you need. But I'm in the industry, so

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I buy and sell. I'm now under fifteen. I'm about

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 2>to start buying up again. So I've gone down and

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I go up, and again I don't recommend other people

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 2>do that because the cost of transaction is so high with.

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Property, you're in it all day long. You're a professionally,

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's right. So you're taking three or four properties for

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the serious investor. It's interesting because we talked about stocks

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and we see ten. If you're serious, ten to fifteen,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you should be able to name them, remember them and

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>know how much they are on the d If you've

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>got forty stuction, probably not able to do that. So

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>something similar with the properties had to concentrate. So tell

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>us how did you get to this point? How did

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you get into property?

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a long I won't go back all the way,

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>but I bought property when I was very young, not

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>knowing what I was doing. I was in financial services

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>for many years. But I'm Italian and if you know

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 2>anything about Talian parents, they make you buy property or

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you're not a good girl, right or a good boy.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 2>So you do what you're told. You do what you're told, and.

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So I thought, I think that.

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of helt. So I bought a couple

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of properties, and I unfortunately listened to my parents. I

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 2>didn't do what I wanted to do because I wanted

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to buy a property in footscram my mother said, oh,

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 2>no way, not Footscrad. This is in when I was

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>in my twenties and I'm nearly fifty and so, and

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I wish I bought the property in Footscrad. Tell you what.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 2>I bought an apartment in Sint Kilda and then I

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 2>bought a house with my brother and Cremawn Richmond. And

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I eventually realized that I was working very hard. I

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 2>was virtually a single mum, and I was nowhere near

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>being able to replace my working income. So what I

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do was sell these properties, increase my income

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 2>and have a bit of a break. I was absolutely exhausted,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and I worked out by going to sell them because

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I just sort of left them and didn't think about them.

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 2>That these two properties had made me more money in

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 2>five years than Assex said my portfolio was going to

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 2>do in something like fifteen, right, And so I had

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 2>a light bulb moment and thought, I haven't even performed

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 2>wealth it compared to other property markets because I don't

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 2>know anything about it. So I set out to become

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>very serious about it. And I actually did work with

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Louis Christopher from SQM Research, who's just a legend and

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>a knew end from the industry, and we built a

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>methodology to understand those suburbs most likely to outperform over

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 2>the long term. And I started to follow that and

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>in a very short period of time I did really well,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and I went to areas that The first place I

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 2>invested was Werribe And I can tell you twelve years

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 2>ago when I drive out to wear Abe and wind

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and Veil, I thought, what am I doing, you know?

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>But I did yet that beyond the paddocks and thought, really,

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 2>where where are all the people?

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>But I listened, I said, because I'd been in financial services,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 2>I built financial products. I understood how to listen to

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 2>the numbers and not listen to my heart. So I

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 2>did it. And the two these properties that I bought,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 2>the first ones that I started with, performed a lot

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 2>better than the ones that I bought in urban and

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>they cost me less. It was easier to hold them,

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, all of those things that I'm now teaching

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 2>my clients. I was able to get a second one

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>a year later and build my portfolio very quickly.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So you change your nature of risk. And the first

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>ones you went into well worn, established city suburbs where

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you knew people lived there already, and you moved to

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>a different type of thing where you went to somewhere

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know, yes, possibly had never been. And that's

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>been the case ever since, has it.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 2>That has well? I held on to my older properties

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 2>for a while, and then my personal story is that

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I had marriage breakdown and I had to start again.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 2>That was about six years ago now, And this time

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 2>what I did was I got rid of I had nothing,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 2>no old properties, and I just listened to the advice

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 2>that I gave my clients, because some of them had

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>got to the point where they were doing better than me,

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, well, why don't I just listen to them?

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>And I actually took a little bit of risk and

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I started to buy untitled land. So I put small

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>deposits towards untitled land, and in most cases, after twelve

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 2>months that land had appreciated significantly and I'd put ten

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen thousand dollars down and made fifty to one

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred grand.

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>What untitled land is.

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>So untitled land is where land has been approved for subdivision,

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>but it hasn't titled because the developer hasn't yet built

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the roads, et cetera. So you can that developer is

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>only allowed to take a ten percent deposit as a

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 2>maximum on a piece of untitled land, and you can

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>often negotiate five percent. So I had paid small amounts

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 2>anything that I was getting in from my income. I

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 2>was putting towards taking massive risks. I don't recommend other

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 2>people do this, putting towards this untitled land in areas

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>in very strategic positions that I felt would perform well.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I did six in the first year,

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and then did a few others in the second year

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and built a portfolio very quickly, and luckily it all

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 2>went in my favor.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 1>H I see, Okay, So that was and I presume

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>that was when you in terms of risk, that was

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the most that was the most risk exposed activity compared

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to what you do now.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, now I probably take a bit more relatively speaking,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm probably not taking more risk because I'm

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 2>in a much better position. But I will do things

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>now where I'll test market So I, for example, am

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 2>trialing and NDIS property. I'm really I've got a lot

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 2>of clients that ask me about it, but I won't

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>allow a client to invest in something that I haven't

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>been prepared to invest in myself. So I want to

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 2>trial it. I want to work it out and then

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 2>come back and say, look, I found that too difficult,

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 2>don't bother, you know. And I'm aligned with some great

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>advisors on it. But so I'm testing that, and that

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>to me is a big risk. I see a lot

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 2>of risk in that type of really high yield property.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 2>That's very specialized. It's a very small market.

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It's very high regulation risk. There is the government team,

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 1>it is very high and there's a lot of intermediaries

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>in between.

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Look, there's a lot of issues with oversupply with something

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 2>like that. When there's such high yields. There are a

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of property spookers will say that we'll go out

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>and talk about the guaranteed returns and government backed, which

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 2>is actually not correct at all. There's nothing guaranteed. It's

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 2>not government back to the you, it's government back for

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the tenant. And so there's a lot of misinformation out there.

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>And unfortunately, the property industry is not regulated like the

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>financial services industry, so you can get away with saying

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things that aren't that can be misleading.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think it's a really good point, and we

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>would take a break here of some questions I want

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on Lissa to cover their property questions. Really interesting about

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the NDIS property I didn't want. I didn't even know

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we were going to bring that up in Nissa. Everything

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I've read about them suggests don't go near them. But

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that you can't that you and Nissa

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>can navigate your way through it. But I would be

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>very careful for the inexperienced investor on that one. All right,

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>back in a moment. Hello, Welcome back to The Australian's

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Money Puzzled podcast. I'm James Kirby talking to a Nissa

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Cavallo regular on the show from the Ida EDA property group. Okay,

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a question. It's very good. It's also very long.

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>From Michael. I'm going to just cut it in half

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully it all makes sense, he says. My partner

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and I bought our first home, a villa that'd be

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a villa unit I imagine in Canberra at the height

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of the previous peak, which is twenty twenty one. We're

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>at the point now of looking to upgrade to something bigger.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully don't need to sell our current home in order

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to purchase the next one. The property is a good

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>asset in terms of quality, etcetera. But as a recent

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>guest suggested, you make your profit when you buy, and

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we bought high. We're unsure what to do when we

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>buy our next home. Should we sell the old one

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>immediately and invest elsewhere? Perhaps? Okay, I'll stop it right there,

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'd put it to it. And they said, this

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is not advice, it's information only for all the Michaels

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>in the world. But I like what I like. My

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>imagination is captured by the essential feature of Michael's question

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>is when they bought Camber, they bought the top of

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, and Camber really ran high there at one stage,

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>having done nothing for years. This happens in Australian cities.

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Part really ran high recently having done nothing for years.

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne has done nothing for years, and the earlier part

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of our conversation suggests it will now run. How do

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you get around that when you have a bit of

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>bad look at the very first property you buy because

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it just happened to be top of the cycle.

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was buying at the top of the cycle

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>two years ago with several clients, so I've done it.

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>My mantra is, don't try and time the markets. Economists

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 2>get it wrong all the time. Investment professionals get it

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 2>wrong all the time. So what hope do we have

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 2>of getting it right. There's a saying that we say

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>in the property that you'd never bought too high, you

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>just bought too soon. So hang in there, right, But

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 2>my only qualification of that is if you're in an

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 2>asset that you don't think is going to perform and recover,

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and you're missing out on something that's going to do

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot better for you than you, by all means,

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 2>get out of it. But I'm European. I'm a traditional

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 2>investor that likes to hold by and hold unless my

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>asset isn't performing. So I mean the risk is that

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 2>he gets out of it, and not just Michael, that

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 2>an investor gets out of it an asset at the

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 2>peak and then buys another one at the peak. You know,

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 2>if you're timing markets, if you're timed it wrong once,

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 2>you could time it wrong again, So potentially hanging that particularly,

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 2>as we've mentioned before, due to the transaction costs, James,

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're so high that you really need to

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 2>make significant increases in property in particular in order not

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 2>to sell it a loss. And so I think you've

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>got to look at what is it likely to do

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 2>over the next five years. Is it worth hanging in

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 2>there or could I do so much better in another

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>asset and therefore risk a slight loss in sale.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay, very good, Well, thank you for that answer it.

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's it's a very good point in this.

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>And Meeks, I mean timing and share is a totally

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.719
<v Speaker 1>different thing. In property. You have that thing that you

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just cannot move in and out easily in the short

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>period of time. I mean, what do you think is

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a question without notice like rock bottom shortest time cycle

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>someone should have an investment property for in any market,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all things being even, Look.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 2>If somebody is if it's really underperforming, cut your losses. Right.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So I have had clients that have had it for

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>a year and to at least save on CGT, you'd

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 2>hang on to it for a year, right, Well, you

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 2>won't have any capital gains if it's really underperforming. But

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 2>let's say that it's underperforming in the sense that you

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 2>just can't afford it. You've got to get out of it.

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Et cetera. But I would say that if you've got

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>the capacity to make six percent a year, hang in

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 2>there for a few years. You know, if you've got

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the capacity to make a lot less than that three

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 2>percent four percent, then maybe cut your losses as soon

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 2>as possible. So I think it's not a timing issue,

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a prospect issue. I mean, often clients are going

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to units to tell me that, but I'm going to

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>get good yield and it'll cover the mortgage, right. But

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>if you if it's just covering the mortgage and you

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and as a result of that, you're missing out on

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 2>potentially getting six to seven percent capital growth and another asset,

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 2>just forget about it, get out of it, cut your

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 2>losses and get into something that's going to make you

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>six to seven percent that will make up for the

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 2>loss in that one year.

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and one in five mediourne apartments that salt in

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the last year, so to the loss. So we know

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>who we're talking to. It's terrific. That is probably the

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>perfect place to leave it for the moment. And this

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for coming on the show.

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Pleasure James. Thank you very much for having me.

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you on as always a Nissa Cavallo

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>there of the IDA property group. I hope you found

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that interesting. It was only meant to be a show

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that looked at whether Melbourne was well, we know, I

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's ticking very nicely. What I wanted Danissa to

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>do was to talk about where the opportunities are in

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>their city. But she brought a lot more to the

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>table than that, which was really good. Okay, let's have

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>some more emails the money puzzle at the Australian dot

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>com dot au. Talk to you soon.