WEBVTT - Chris Dawson’s ‘good character’ questioned

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Kristinaviot.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>It's Wednesday, May fifteenth. Treasurer at Jim Chalmers handed down

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>his third federal budget on Tuesday night.

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Speak of this government, and this budget delivers for every

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Australian a tax cut for every taxpayer, wages growing in

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>every industry, a better deal for every working parent, a

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 2>fair ago at every checkout.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>The Treasurer is forecasting a bigger than expected surplus this

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>year to the tune of nine point three billion dollars,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and Labour's going big on cost of living relief, committing

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>almost eight billion dollars to subsidies and rent assistance. That

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>means every Australian will get a three hundred dollars subsidy

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>to help with energy bills. But the Treasurer says it

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>won't send inflation soaring again. But there's no such thing

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>as a free lunch. And the Treasurer will run combined

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>deficits of more than one hundred twenty two billion dollars

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>over the next four years to accommodate the spending. And

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>with the federal election on the horizon, the government has

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>carved out almost seven billion dollars for campaign spending, and

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Chalmers's unique economic strategy could see it called sooner rather

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>than later. You can read our experts detailed reporting and

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>analysis of the federal budget right now at the Australian

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot au. Chris Dawson didn't get a fair go.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the contention of the barrister representing the former rugby

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>league star in the appeal against his conviction for the

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty two murder of his wife Lynn. Public defender

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Belinda Rigg argued Dawson's good character deserves greater consideration, but

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the three Supreme Court justices hearing the appeal aren't so sure.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>That's today's episode. When Justice Ian Harrison convicted Chris Dawson

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>for the nineteen eighty two murder of his first wife, Lynn,

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>he did so on a circumstantial case.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 3>The evidence not reveal how mister Dawson killed Lynette Dawson.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>It does not reveal whether he did so with the

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>assistance of anyone else or by himself. It does not

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>reveal where or when he did so, nor does it

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 3>reveal well and at Dawson's body is now The charge

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 3>of murder in this trial is unsupported by direct evidence.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 3>The case against mister Dawson is wholly circumstantial.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>That means there was no body, no crime scene, no weapon,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>or no eyewitness that could prove beyond a reasonable doubt

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that Dawson committed the crime. When a prosecutor is running

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a circumstantial case, like Craig Everson was in twenty twenty

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>two when Chris Dawson was brought to trial, they have

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to instead rely on other types of evidence like witness testimony,

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>police statements, official documents, video footage, and contemporaneous notes or

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>correspondence to prove it. This huge body of evidence is

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>known in the law as strands of a cable, or

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>links in a chain, or threads in a rope. Basically,

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it means each thread isn't neces necessarily capable of proving

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a case on its own, but they're more powerful, sometimes

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>even undeniable, when they're all woven together. Chris Dawson's case

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was heard by a judge alone. That's what the former

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>rugby league star wanted. He argued in the run up

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to his Supreme Court trial that the publicity generated by

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>The Australian's investigative podcast The teacher's pet meant he wouldn't

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>get a fair trial if the decision were in the

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>hands of a jury. But the thinking is that judges

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't as easily swayed as regular joe's like you and

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I and so. In hearing the case alone, Justice Harrison

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>had to determine the truth of those threads himself. On Tuesday,

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Belinda Rigg, SC, the public defender representing Chris Dawson in

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>his appeal, argued that Justice Harrison got it wrong when

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he accepted that Lynn died on that weekend in early

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>January nineteen eighty two. Remember, Chris Dawson has always maintained

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he received a phone call for from Lynn on Saturday,

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>January nine, while he was working as a lifeguard at

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Northbridge Baths. He claims she said in that call

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>she was going away for a few days to clear

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>her head. Rig had previously argued there was a reasonable

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>possibility that's what happened, because Lynn was confident her beloved daughters,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>then just at four and two years old, would be

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>well cared for by Dawson, who she said was every

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>bit the doting dad. But rig argued that the fact

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of Lynn's death, the thread wasn't born out by the

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>evidence presented at trial. There are no phone records to

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>show that a long distance phone call was received at

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the kiosk at the baths. The teenage attendant who answered

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the phone says she can't remember who was on the

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>other end or if it was the call. Dawson says

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he took Lynn's mum, Helena Simms, and his friend Philip Day,

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>who were also at the bards on that day, didn't

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>see or hear Dawson take the call. Over the course

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of more than two hours on Tuesday morning, Belinda Rigg

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>covered a lot of ground. Some of it was reiterating

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>arguments made on Monday, but there was some newness there too.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Justice Ian Harrison found Chris Dawson was motivated to kill

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>his first wife by an obsession with the teenage babysitter

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>known as j C. The pair later married and had

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a child together. He found Dawson was terrified of losing

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the teenager who'd also been his student, and saw his

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wife as a roadblock to that relationship. But on Tuesday,

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Belinda Rigg told the court Dawson would have carried on

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with j C even if he was still married to Lynn,

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and that it was JAC who wanted out. We've used

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>voice actors to bring you the words spoken in court.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Lynette was never an impediment as far as JAC was concerned,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 4>and he demonstrated himself to be well prepared to lose

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 4>his relationship with his wife if JAC would continue the

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>relationship with him.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>In the final moments of her submission rig swung big.

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>She suggested the better elements of Dawson's character had been

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>overlooked by Justice Harrison in twenty twenty two, and implored

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Justices Julie Ward, Christine Adamson and Anthony Paine not to

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>do the same.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 4>On the issue of the reasonableness of the verdict. The

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 4>applicant's character is something which is required in our submission

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 4>to be taken into account, and we've set out in

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 4>detail in the written submissions the evidence that bears upon

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 4>that issue of his good character.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Justice Adamson responded just in.

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 5>Terms of that good character, he didn't have any criminal convictions.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 5>But when one looks at the evidence of JC and

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 5>how he conducted himself as a married man, as a

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 5>teacher with students under his authority, one might think that

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 5>the good character was not entitled to be given any

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 5>particular weight.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Dawson claims he dropped Lynn, who didn't drive, at a

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>bus stop in Mona Vale, on Sydney's North Beaches on

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the morning of Saturday, January nine. It was later that

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>day that he says she called him at the baths

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to say she needed some time away. JC testified at

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>trial that Dawson allowed her to wear and keep items

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of Lynn's clothing after he moved her into the family

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>home at Bayview. Her wedding and engagement rings were also

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>left there and later made into a new wedding set

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for JC. That wasn't lost on Justice Julie Ward, who

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>said it was convenient that Lynn wasn't wearing the rings

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>when Dawson alleges he took her to the bus stop.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Belindaregg had one more hand to play on Tuesday, before

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>clearing the floor for Crown Prosecutor Brett Hatfield to make

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>his submissions, she attempted to tender more than seven hundred

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>pages of material relating to Chris Dawson's declining mental health.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Hatfield objected to the tender. He said he was concerned

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be used in some kind of opaque attack.

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>On the prosecution case run by Craig Everson in twenty

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty two.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 6>If it's going to be suggested that something improper occurred

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 6>or there was bad faith by the trial Crown in

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 6>how he conducted the matter, then that should be made

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 6>clear and we should be able to respond with proper

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 6>submissions directed at it.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Rick responded that the material, which included medical assessments made

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>by a doctor and a psychologist following Dawson's incarceration, was

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>important in understanding his current circumstances and the ongoing impact

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of the long delay in bringing charges. But Justice Julie

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Ward said a large chunk of time had already been

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to Dawson's so called forensic disadvantage and rejected the

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>tender coming up what the Crown Prosecutor has to say

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>about Chris Dawson's version of events. Subscribers to The Australian

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>get access to this kind of in depth reporting and

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>analysis twenty four to seven, even when it happens on

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the same day as the federal budget. Also breaking news alerts,

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>newsletters and live events. Check us out at the Australian

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot au. We'll be back after this break.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>When he opened his submissions on Tuesday. Crown Prosecutor Brett

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Hatfield got right to the point, we've used voice actors

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring you the words spoken in court.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 6>There is not a significant possibility that an innocent person

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 6>has been convicted in this case.

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Hatfield argued that Dawson's version of events that Lynn had

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>left the family home at Bayview voluntarily and called him

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Northridge Bath to relay her plan to spend

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>some time away wasn't credible. The prosecutor worked his way,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes at breakneck speed, through the evidence given by Lynn's

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>family members, her friends, her colleagues, and even Jc, the

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>teenage babysitter who was installed at Bayview after she disappeared

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in early nineteen eighty two. Hatfield said Lynn never contacted

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone but Chris Dawson after January eighth of that year.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Dawson's public defender, Belinda Rigg, argued that the Sims family

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>weren't particularly close or in any kind of habitual contact,

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>but Hatfield said prolific diary entries and letters panned by

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Lynn's mum, Helena, proved the opposite.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 6>That material does show a very close and regular contact

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 6>between the deceased and her mother.

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>What's more, evidence given by Lynn's siblings, Pat Jenkins and

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Greg Simms showed members of the family spoke regularly and

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>often spent time together at their parents' home in Sydney's

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern suburbs. Hatfield said later that even if her marriage

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to Dawson ended, Lynn wouldn't cut contact with her parents

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and siblings. Next, Hatfield dealt with Rigg's assertion that it

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was plausible that Lynn would leave the family home knowing

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>her children would be in safe hands with their father.

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Hatfield pointed to Dawson's decision to send the two children

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to stay with their grandmother, Helena Simms after their trip

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Northbridge Bards on January ninth, as evidence he

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>possibly wasn't as well equipped as a parent as he'd

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have the court believe.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 6>My learned friend's argument is that he was a fantastic

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 6>father and could take care of the kids himself. Why

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 6>the deceased is disappearing off for a few days. Is

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 6>he specifically asking for the children to go to the

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 6>mother's on that day if she is happy leaving the

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 6>kids with him, and then wanting the kids to go

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 6>to her mother's place, but then not contacting her mother.

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 6>It seems to be part of the implausibility.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor acknowledged Lynn Simms was upset about the deterioration

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of her relationship and the arrival on the scene of

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the teenage babysittert JC, but he said she was also

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>committed to her marriage.

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 6>If she wasn't leaving when those other things occurred, why

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 6>would she leave when it was looking better after the counseling.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>By other things, Hatfield means Dawson's infidelity and his impromptu

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>trip to Queensland with JC just before Christmas in nineteen

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.719
<v Speaker 1>eighty one. The pair ultimately returned to Sydney when j

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>C became ill. The prosecutor also pointed to various attempts

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>by Dawson to leave Lynn, including taking out a lease

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on a property in Manly where he intended to live

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with j C. Hatfield said Dawson's interactions with j C

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>were marked by a degree of desperation and obsession.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 6>An affair is an understatement about this relationship. It's not

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 6>an affair. It's an obsessive, possessive relationship with a between

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 6>the applicant, the former teacher of the girl that turns eighteen.

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Only at that time.

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Where Belinda Brigg attempted to build up Dawson's character in

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>her submissions, the prosecutor, Brett Hatfield took a different tack.

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>He said, Chris Dawson's behavior in the days and weeks

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>after Lynn disappeared wasn't what y'd exct sspeck from a

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>concerned husband.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 6>The applicant conducted himself in a manner which was completely

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 6>irreconcilable with any purported belief that the deceased might be

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 6>alive or return home. So collecting JC from Southwest Rocks

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 6>on the eleventh of January nineteen eighty two, immediately cohabitating

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 6>with JC and sharing the matrimonial bed and the evidence

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 6>about the clothing and the jewelry.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>At that time, Hatfield noted that based on the available evidence,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Dawson was the last person to see Lynn alive, meaning

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he had both opportunity and motive to kill her on

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or about the eighth of January in nineteen eighty two.

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor said, proof of life checks conducted in the

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>months and years after that date had come up empty.

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 1>All of that, taken together, the prosecutor says, means justice

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ian Harrison's finding that Dawson murdered his wife was reasonable.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>He'll continue his submissions today, come back to the front

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow to hear how it all wraps up. And you

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>can read about what the government's new federal budget means

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>for you at the Australian dot com dot au