WEBVTT - The Bolt Report | 22 October

0:00:15.610 --> 0:00:18.509
<v Speaker 1>Tonight, the Prime Minister tells another lie about the dirt

0:00:18.530 --> 0:00:21.270
<v Speaker 1>sheet that his office put out about Helen Haynes, plus

0:00:21.329 --> 0:00:26.790
<v Speaker 1>the case of..... a case that shows how desperate Labor

0:00:26.910 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is to use multiculturalism to bribe religious groups for votes.

0:00:31.300 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You won't believe the video. Plus a strange... face of

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.450
<v Speaker 1>the riots in France, telling shopkeepers to suck up being looted.

0:00:39.830 --> 0:00:45.150
<v Speaker 1>Plenty more, including Barnaby Joyce. But first, back in June,

0:00:45.970 --> 0:00:48.729
<v Speaker 1>I got a text from one of our top lobbying

0:00:48.830 --> 0:00:52.269
<v Speaker 1>companies and it said, hi, Andrew, saw your piece on

0:00:52.330 --> 0:00:54.830
<v Speaker 1>Ben Roberts Smith. Would you like to talk to Ben? Because,

0:00:55.450 --> 0:00:58.220
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was apparently keen to talk to me.

0:00:59.050 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And I said, sure. I never heard another word, which

0:01:02.940 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is not surprising. Now, you know, I may be billed

0:01:07.740 --> 0:01:10.100
<v Speaker 1>as the best red columnist in the country, you know,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:15.410
<v Speaker 1>with the largest audience on News 24, but I don't

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.649
<v Speaker 1>tolerate bull. It makes me a good platform, a natural platform,

0:01:19.670 --> 0:01:23.030
<v Speaker 1>but I don't tolerate bull or play sides or play

0:01:23.069 --> 0:01:26.170
<v Speaker 1>for applause. And I have made clear that the charges

0:01:26.190 --> 0:01:30.050
<v Speaker 1>against Ben Robert Smith, they're extremely serious and must be

0:01:30.110 --> 0:01:34.810
<v Speaker 1>sorted out in a court. and not by a campaign

0:01:34.990 --> 0:01:39.370
<v Speaker 1>outside it, a campaign which includes spin, big bucks, politics,

0:01:39.930 --> 0:01:43.970
<v Speaker 1>a hunger for clicks and appeals to the mob. And

0:01:43.990 --> 0:01:46.850
<v Speaker 1>for all the abuse I will once again get tonight

0:01:47.090 --> 0:01:49.890
<v Speaker 1>from people who are told that this is about defending

0:01:49.940 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a patriot, I am going to speak out again. You see,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.380
<v Speaker 1>I may never have heard again from Robert Smith, but

0:01:59.420 --> 0:02:03.070
<v Speaker 1>I sure am suddenly hearing now a lot of about

0:02:03.250 --> 0:02:05.950
<v Speaker 1>our war hero, the VC winner, who has now been

0:02:05.970 --> 0:02:08.940
<v Speaker 1>charged with five alleged war crimes. And you are hearing

0:02:08.980 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot too, especially today.

0:02:11.980 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>When you know that you would have died for this country,

0:02:19.260 --> 0:02:20.179
<v Speaker 2>it stings a little bit.

0:02:23.740 --> 0:02:26.370
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is a part of an interview that we're

0:02:26.380 --> 0:02:27.850
<v Speaker 1>going to run on News 24 at 8.30 tonight, backed

0:02:27.870 --> 0:02:32.210
<v Speaker 1>by Articles in our News Corp newspapers you may have

0:02:32.230 --> 0:02:36.510
<v Speaker 1>already read. Papers that have been given photographs by Robert

0:02:36.550 --> 0:02:39.410
<v Speaker 1>Smith of him as a child. And, of course, this

0:02:39.470 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is a legitimate news story. He must be allowed to

0:02:41.940 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have his say. But you also need to know that

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>for Robert Smith, this is also part of a coordinated

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:54.030
<v Speaker 1>campaign by him and his backers. That includes now his

0:02:54.090 --> 0:02:56.810
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend releasing a video on Instagram of happy snaps of

0:02:56.850 --> 0:03:00.049
<v Speaker 1>Ben Robert Smith and his new line of clothing called

0:03:00.070 --> 0:03:02.830
<v Speaker 1>the Epic 1-2, named after his call sign in the

0:03:02.850 --> 0:03:06.980
<v Speaker 1>Special Air Services Regiment. And this campaign includes also a

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>pre-recorded and long interview with Ben Fordham on 2GB this morning.

0:03:13.020 --> 0:03:16.460
<v Speaker 2>Just think about if it was your son or your

0:03:16.500 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>husband or your brother in that position, would you like

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.180
<v Speaker 2>them to have a fair go? That's all I'm asking,

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.970
<v Speaker 2>just some perspective and a bit of bloody fairness, mate.

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's more. One of the two billionaires backing Robert Smith,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>mining tycoon Gina Reinhart, invited him to last week help

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>open a home for mentally wounded veterans that she has funded,

0:03:40.300 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson also there, also backing

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Robert Smith. In fact, Hanson's Please Explain cartoon keeps attacking

0:03:47.650 --> 0:03:51.490
<v Speaker 1>Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie, calling him a traitor. Just a joke,

0:03:51.550 --> 0:03:55.650
<v Speaker 1>they say. And I know there's also behind the scenes

0:03:56.210 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a powerful campaign to smear Hastie as a traitor... even

0:03:59.570 --> 0:04:02.540
<v Speaker 1>though he's actually a former SAS captain who's put his

0:04:02.580 --> 0:04:05.860
<v Speaker 1>life on the line for us. And this campaign to

0:04:05.900 --> 0:04:07.940
<v Speaker 1>smear him is quite obvious. It's because he was one

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of the, well, about 40 former and current soldiers to

0:04:11.740 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>give evidence when Robert Smith sued the nine newspapers for

0:04:16.500 --> 0:04:21.790
<v Speaker 1>accusing him of war crimes, and he lost. Now, I

0:04:21.870 --> 0:04:24.950
<v Speaker 1>know for a fact about this campaign of denigration because

0:04:24.990 --> 0:04:27.729
<v Speaker 1>I was approached to be part of it, approached in

0:04:27.790 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>confidence by someone else, so... I can't say more. But

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.100
<v Speaker 1>in that defamation case that he lost, Robert Smith appealed

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to the full federal court and lost again. The court

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.770
<v Speaker 1>found that he had given false evidence and that he

0:04:43.810 --> 0:04:47.669
<v Speaker 1>had changed his story, that on the balance of the evidence,

0:04:47.710 --> 0:04:51.029
<v Speaker 1>he had indeed shot or ordered the shooting of unarmed,

0:04:51.450 --> 0:04:57.180
<v Speaker 1>bound prisoners, and it wasn't, as some still claim, including here,

0:04:57.940 --> 0:05:01.049
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't shot in the heat of battle, in the

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:07.350
<v Speaker 1>fog of war. Since then, his loss in court, he's

0:05:07.390 --> 0:05:11.050
<v Speaker 1>been charged with five such alleged war crimes and now

0:05:11.089 --> 0:05:14.610
<v Speaker 1>faces trial by jury and with a higher standard of proof,

0:05:14.710 --> 0:05:19.070
<v Speaker 1>not on the balance of probabilities now, but beyond reasonable doubt. Now,

0:05:19.110 --> 0:05:23.870
<v Speaker 1>let me be clear. Robert Smith must be presumed innocent.

0:05:24.670 --> 0:05:28.049
<v Speaker 1>He is also brave. And he risked his life for

0:05:28.150 --> 0:05:31.229
<v Speaker 1>us and is entitled to fight like hell to save

0:05:31.250 --> 0:05:35.729
<v Speaker 1>himself from being jailed as a war criminal. Indeed, he's

0:05:35.770 --> 0:05:37.450
<v Speaker 1>now going full out to tell us he is a

0:05:37.650 --> 0:05:41.190
<v Speaker 1>war hero being made a scapegoat by the deep state,

0:05:41.910 --> 0:05:49.950
<v Speaker 1>by failed politicians and, you know, officers who failed as well.

0:05:50.589 --> 0:05:52.770
<v Speaker 1>And that's the kind of red meat that One Nation

0:05:52.810 --> 0:05:55.450
<v Speaker 1>voters and battlers, they especially love.

0:05:58.250 --> 0:06:03.830
<v Speaker 2>No strategy, no win. 42 guys dead, over 200 wounded.

0:06:04.610 --> 0:06:06.830
<v Speaker 2>And what are we still talking about? We're talking about

0:06:06.950 --> 0:06:09.980
<v Speaker 2>a private and a corporal who have been alleged to

0:06:10.020 --> 0:06:13.220
<v Speaker 2>have done the wrong thing on a mission because it's

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>a great distraction.

0:06:16.580 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, many people watching tonight will find Ben Robert Smith

0:06:20.339 --> 0:06:23.710
<v Speaker 1>very persuasive and fellow hosts here clearly do as well,

0:06:23.830 --> 0:06:26.940
<v Speaker 1>as do the guests that they have chosen. Yet there

0:06:27.100 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are things you should know. I'm not now going to

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.810
<v Speaker 1>act like a prosecutor and go line by line through

0:06:33.850 --> 0:06:37.210
<v Speaker 1>what Robert said, fact check, you know, what he said

0:06:37.290 --> 0:06:39.770
<v Speaker 1>this morning to Ben Fordham, what he's going to say

0:06:39.790 --> 0:06:44.130
<v Speaker 1>tonight to us. These really are matters for the court.

0:06:44.890 --> 0:06:47.220
<v Speaker 1>And I do not want to see him found guilty.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 3>I do not.

0:06:48.860 --> 0:06:52.300
<v Speaker 1>Unless he is guilty, but I don't... You know, I don't... No,

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:57.740
<v Speaker 1>I don't have... a dog in this fight. But two

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.340
<v Speaker 1>things in particular I do want to address, and not

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.790
<v Speaker 1>least because they do demonstrate the need to at least

0:07:03.830 --> 0:07:07.290
<v Speaker 1>keep an open mind, to not automatically accept everything Robert

0:07:07.330 --> 0:07:11.690
<v Speaker 1>Smith says. For instance, he says he's fighting a government

0:07:11.730 --> 0:07:15.950
<v Speaker 1>whose tamed police are intimidating witnesses. In fact, the only

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.940
<v Speaker 1>evidence in court so far of witnesses being intimidated are

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.100
<v Speaker 1>the three witnesses the Federal Court says were intimidated by

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.350
<v Speaker 1>Robert Smith himself. is also found to have colluded with one.

0:07:29.430 --> 0:07:32.170
<v Speaker 1>And what's more, one of his own witnesses, an SAS major,

0:07:32.270 --> 0:07:36.470
<v Speaker 1>even told the Federal Court that four SAS sergeants told

0:07:36.510 --> 0:07:38.870
<v Speaker 1>him a decade ago that Ben Robert Smith was unfit

0:07:39.150 --> 0:07:42.230
<v Speaker 1>to be awarded the Victoria Cross. They accused him of

0:07:42.510 --> 0:07:45.750
<v Speaker 1>claiming battlefield kills made by other soldiers, accused him of

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.540
<v Speaker 1>bullying fellow soldiers. Whatever.

0:07:50.740 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:07:52.110 --> 0:07:55.750
<v Speaker 1>He is, I have to say, completely right to be

0:07:56.070 --> 0:07:58.730
<v Speaker 1>outraged in these interviews that someone in government or its

0:07:58.770 --> 0:08:03.970
<v Speaker 1>security agencies tipped off reporters. Tipped them off so there

0:08:03.990 --> 0:08:07.060
<v Speaker 1>were TV crews to witness him getting arrested at Sydney

0:08:07.140 --> 0:08:10.700
<v Speaker 1>Airport over these alleged war crimes. And that was something

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.780
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely condemned at the time. It's appalling. That said,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.740
<v Speaker 1>there is still a hunt for the leaker. It was

0:08:16.860 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not sanctioned by the Australian Federal Police, as some conspiracy

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.670
<v Speaker 1>theorists suggest. And I may have something to reveal about

0:08:23.710 --> 0:08:29.510
<v Speaker 1>that soon. But back to the interviews today. There was

0:08:29.550 --> 0:08:33.170
<v Speaker 1>also this admission by Robert Smith that the vast majority

0:08:33.220 --> 0:08:35.739
<v Speaker 1>of witnesses in his federal court defamation case were in

0:08:35.780 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>fact fellow soldiers. They were not Afghans or civilians who

0:08:40.780 --> 0:08:46.059
<v Speaker 1>know nothing of battle, as some people still insist. Those

0:08:46.620 --> 0:08:53.830
<v Speaker 1>witnesses in that court case included 19 SAS soldiers, fellow

0:08:54.030 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>SAS soldiers, past and present, most of whom testified against him.

0:08:59.380 --> 0:09:02.780
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there was 19. I accept that. The majority

0:09:02.820 --> 0:09:05.740
<v Speaker 2>of them were subpoenaed and didn't want to be there.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 2>Out of those 19 guys during that case, four of

0:09:11.740 --> 0:09:17.210
<v Speaker 2>those people gave evidence or direct evidence to these allegations.

0:09:17.230 --> 0:09:23.970
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's actually misleading. Ben Robert Smith there is excluding

0:09:24.070 --> 0:09:27.110
<v Speaker 1>eyewitnesses who saw a very great deal. Let me take

0:09:27.150 --> 0:09:30.569
<v Speaker 1>you through one of the killings examined by the federal court,

0:09:30.610 --> 0:09:33.370
<v Speaker 1>for which Robert Smith has since been charged, and again,

0:09:33.490 --> 0:09:39.170
<v Speaker 1>he pleads innocent. In April 2009, Robert Smith, then a corporal,

0:09:39.690 --> 0:09:43.450
<v Speaker 1>was among SAS soldiers searching a compound in Afghanistan for

0:09:43.490 --> 0:09:47.770
<v Speaker 1>weapons and for any Taliban guerrillas. Now, three federal court

0:09:47.809 --> 0:09:50.750
<v Speaker 1>judges wrote in their judgment, this is in the appeal,

0:09:51.370 --> 0:09:55.380
<v Speaker 1>that two Afghan nationals were discovered in a concealed tunnel

0:09:55.820 --> 0:09:59.110
<v Speaker 1>and brought out into a courtyard. The judges say one

0:09:59.150 --> 0:10:01.619
<v Speaker 1>was an old man. the other a man with a

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>prosthetic leg. They were tied up and Robert Smith brought

0:10:05.740 --> 0:10:10.170
<v Speaker 1>one to a private referred to as Person 4, name withheld.

0:10:10.910 --> 0:10:13.390
<v Speaker 1>The judges write, Robert Smith kicked the old man in

0:10:13.410 --> 0:10:15.450
<v Speaker 1>the back of the legs just behind the knees until

0:10:15.490 --> 0:10:18.710
<v Speaker 1>he was kneeling in front of Person 4. He then

0:10:18.830 --> 0:10:21.090
<v Speaker 1>pointed at the old man and said to Person 4,

0:10:21.090 --> 0:10:24.290
<v Speaker 1>shoot him. Person 4 did so with a single shot

0:10:24.309 --> 0:10:26.850
<v Speaker 1>to the old man's head and the judges say Robert

0:10:26.910 --> 0:10:30.670
<v Speaker 1>Smith was then later spotted by two SAS soldiers, frog-marching

0:10:30.690 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the one-legged man outside and one saw Robert Smith throw

0:10:34.620 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the man on the ground on his back. Robert Smith

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>reached down, grabbed the man by the shoulder and flipped

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>him over to his stomach. He then lowered his machine

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:46.380
<v Speaker 1>gun and shot approximately three to five rounds into the man. Now,

0:10:47.700 --> 0:10:53.699
<v Speaker 1>One of the witnesses in this particular incident, one that

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Robert Smith is not including among the four soldiers, he say,

0:10:59.740 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>were directly witnessing, said the shootings, was a soldier who

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>said he'd heard and seen Robert Smith ordering the execution

0:11:10.420 --> 0:11:12.949
<v Speaker 1>of the old man. He didn't want to watch, so

0:11:12.990 --> 0:11:15.830
<v Speaker 1>he ducked inside a door, heard the shot, looked out

0:11:15.950 --> 0:11:19.500
<v Speaker 1>and saw the Afghan man dead in the sand, bleeding

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>into the ground. Now, this is the evidence of the

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:32.330
<v Speaker 1>story of a soldier that Robert Smith says can't be

0:11:32.370 --> 0:11:36.910
<v Speaker 1>included in those four witnesses. I think that's pretty powerful stuff.

0:11:37.730 --> 0:11:39.929
<v Speaker 1>The guy also said that the soldier that Robert Smith

0:11:39.970 --> 0:11:45.489
<v Speaker 1>had ordered to shoot, that Afghan, looked shocked. Now, Robert Smith,

0:11:45.530 --> 0:11:49.130
<v Speaker 1>of course, denies seeing any execution at all, denies these

0:11:49.630 --> 0:11:51.690
<v Speaker 1>bodies were implanted with weapons to make them look like

0:11:51.710 --> 0:11:56.290
<v Speaker 1>they'd been shot fighting. But that was also contradicted by

0:11:56.330 --> 0:11:58.750
<v Speaker 1>an SAS soldier who had actually found and photographed the

0:11:58.790 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>weapons stored somewhere else before they were found on the bodies. Now,

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I get it. There are a lot of people who,

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>despite all that, say, so what? Why prosecute our own? Well,

0:12:12.660 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>here's why. Because we are shamed and put in danger

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.700
<v Speaker 1>if we allow allegations of such conduct in our name.

0:12:21.140 --> 0:12:24.059
<v Speaker 1>There's a moral issue. I mean, for us, supposedly only

0:12:24.100 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>barbarians murder their prisoners. And that's why we loathe the Nazis, say,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.979
<v Speaker 1>for executing five Australian airmen caught after the Great Escape.

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That's why we condemn Japan for beheading Australian Commando Sergeant

0:12:36.460 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Leonard George Sifleet in 1943. And machine-gunning 21 Australian nurses

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:49.340
<v Speaker 1>on Banker Island. So are we really just fighting for

0:12:49.380 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a side and not for principles, for our values? And

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>then there's the legal argument. One of the oldest of

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.709
<v Speaker 1>international rules of war is that you don't murder prisoners.

0:12:59.750 --> 0:13:02.750
<v Speaker 1>That's the most fundamental rule of the Geneva Conventions, first

0:13:02.830 --> 0:13:07.290
<v Speaker 1>passed in 1864, now signed by 194 countries, including us.

0:13:08.190 --> 0:13:11.090
<v Speaker 1>These are rules that we hope protect our own soldiers

0:13:11.170 --> 0:13:14.620
<v Speaker 1>too if they are captured. And what's more, if we

0:13:14.650 --> 0:13:17.540
<v Speaker 1>don't investigate credible claims of war crimes by our own,

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>then the International Criminal Court is licensed to do that

0:13:21.020 --> 0:13:25.700
<v Speaker 1>for us. Now, if Australia gets a name for allowing

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.179
<v Speaker 1>its soldiers to allegedly act like Nazis, we are going

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.580
<v Speaker 1>to horrify our allies and excite our enemies and inspire them.

0:13:34.420 --> 0:13:36.300
<v Speaker 1>I know, I will have angered enough of you already,

0:13:36.370 --> 0:13:39.490
<v Speaker 1>so I'll finish with a consolation to anyone who doesn't

0:13:39.530 --> 0:13:42.210
<v Speaker 1>care about the morality, doesn't care about the law, doesn't

0:13:42.250 --> 0:13:44.670
<v Speaker 1>care about the truth, who does say Ben Robert Smith

0:13:44.890 --> 0:13:48.290
<v Speaker 1>is an Australian hero, full stop, and believes what he says,

0:13:48.429 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>which you're entitled to do. Don't worry. The very clever

0:13:53.890 --> 0:13:57.100
<v Speaker 1>campaign you are now seeing will work, in my opinion.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.860
<v Speaker 1>It will help to make a fair trial impossible, whether

0:14:00.940 --> 0:14:03.740
<v Speaker 1>or not that was the intention. And my fear too

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.300
<v Speaker 1>is that witnesses might even be scared off giving evidence

0:14:06.620 --> 0:14:09.569
<v Speaker 1>when they see how Andrew Hastie is being treated, even

0:14:09.610 --> 0:14:12.930
<v Speaker 1>if that too isn't the attention of the people vilifying him.

0:14:14.410 --> 0:14:17.270
<v Speaker 1>And if the trial does still go ahead, here is

0:14:17.350 --> 0:14:21.430
<v Speaker 1>my tip. Robert Smith will be found innocent. The trial

0:14:21.470 --> 0:14:23.790
<v Speaker 1>must be before a jury of 12 and Robert Smith

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:28.660
<v Speaker 1>goes free if just one of them says not guilty. So,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a very clever campaign. Let me move to politics of

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>today before I come back to this briefly. The Prime

0:14:43.980 --> 0:14:47.890
<v Speaker 1>Minister had another shocker today. And I just wonder, why

0:14:48.050 --> 0:14:52.850
<v Speaker 1>can't this man just say sorry? Why the lying again?

0:14:52.870 --> 0:14:56.430
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Albanese has been telling us to be more civil

0:14:56.690 --> 0:14:59.210
<v Speaker 1>and to cool the temperature after the horrendous attack on

0:14:59.250 --> 0:15:03.250
<v Speaker 1>Monday on independent MP Helen Haynes, who's now lost both

0:15:03.490 --> 0:15:07.739
<v Speaker 1>her legs. But this is the same man, as I

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.190
<v Speaker 1>told you on Monday, whose own office, before the accident,

0:15:11.230 --> 0:15:14.170
<v Speaker 1>sent journalists a dirt file on Helen Haynes after she

0:15:14.270 --> 0:15:18.990
<v Speaker 1>dared to criticise Albanese's dodgy $ 6 million grant to the

0:15:19.010 --> 0:15:22.070
<v Speaker 1>Marrickville Golf Club near his home, falsely claiming he had

0:15:22.110 --> 0:15:24.430
<v Speaker 1>no role in giving the grant and falsely claiming he

0:15:24.460 --> 0:15:26.250
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a member of the club and hadn't set foot

0:15:26.290 --> 0:15:26.510
<v Speaker 1>in it.

0:15:27.540 --> 0:15:32.100
<v Speaker 4>Sports rots was pork barrelling by deception. This is pork

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:33.380
<v Speaker 4>barrelling by design.

0:15:35.910 --> 0:15:38.050
<v Speaker 1>Now, the Prime Minister is coming under a lot of

0:15:38.090 --> 0:15:44.270
<v Speaker 1>fire now for that dirt file, and today declared, no,

0:15:44.290 --> 0:15:48.190
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a dirt file, and he pretended it was

0:15:48.350 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>actually a document praising Helen Haynes.

0:15:53.020 --> 0:15:58.740
<v Speaker 5>Let's be very clear, because apparently it's been published somewhere...

0:15:59.630 --> 0:16:06.390
<v Speaker 5>It's a list of funding us from Helen Haynes just

0:16:06.430 --> 0:16:10.340
<v Speaker 5>showing that people of integrity stand up for their electorate.

0:16:11.180 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 5>No personal criticism of Helen.

0:16:15.580 --> 0:16:21.100
<v Speaker 1>Pants on fire. I have seen the document. It sure

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.900
<v Speaker 1>is a smear sheet. Let me read some of it

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.970
<v Speaker 1>out to you so you can see for yourself how

0:16:25.990 --> 0:16:28.660
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister just lied about It says in the

0:16:28.700 --> 0:16:30.700
<v Speaker 1>lead-up to the election, the member for Indo, which is

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.210
<v Speaker 1>Helen Haynes, wrote to Treasurer Jim Chalmers requesting more than

0:16:35.210 --> 0:16:38.670
<v Speaker 1>$ 845 million of Commonwealth funding for local projects. And it

0:16:38.690 --> 0:16:41.010
<v Speaker 1>goes on to imply Haynes is something to hide, might

0:16:41.030 --> 0:16:44.530
<v Speaker 1>even be wink-wink corrupt. It says it is unclear what

0:16:44.550 --> 0:16:48.460
<v Speaker 1>interest the member has. in businesses, community groups, sporting organisations

0:16:48.500 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or clubs that would benefit from these wide-ranging and expensive

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.740
<v Speaker 1>projects that she has flagged as worthy of funding. And

0:16:55.760 --> 0:17:00.620
<v Speaker 1>just in case journalists didn't get the message, it went on, adding,

0:17:00.730 --> 0:17:03.729
<v Speaker 1>for instance, of one of the projects, given she has

0:17:03.850 --> 0:17:06.909
<v Speaker 1>pushed for funding for this project, has the member for

0:17:06.930 --> 0:17:12.590
<v Speaker 1>Hindai ever visited, received, undeclared gifts, including wine maybe or

0:17:12.770 --> 0:17:16.389
<v Speaker 1>food or, Has she held business interests with or received

0:17:16.430 --> 0:17:20.530
<v Speaker 1>political donations from or had professional personal associations with any

0:17:20.570 --> 0:17:25.870
<v Speaker 1>local companies or organisations on Prosecco Road, this project? This

0:17:26.150 --> 0:17:30.450
<v Speaker 1>clearly was not, as Albanese claims, a list showing Haynes

0:17:30.470 --> 0:17:34.130
<v Speaker 1>was a person of integrity, but a dirt file inviting

0:17:34.190 --> 0:17:38.170
<v Speaker 1>people to think that she might not be a woman

0:17:38.210 --> 0:17:42.310
<v Speaker 1>of integrity at all and without giving any proof of that.

0:17:43.010 --> 0:17:45.710
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is my Thursday regular commentator, One Nation MP

0:17:45.750 --> 0:17:49.330
<v Speaker 1>Barnaby Joyce, the former Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby. Why can't

0:17:49.369 --> 0:17:52.550
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister just confess and apologise instead of telling

0:17:52.590 --> 0:17:56.100
<v Speaker 1>these outrageous lies? It's pathology.

0:17:56.730 --> 0:17:59.780
<v Speaker 6>And not only is the fact that he's lying again,

0:18:00.100 --> 0:18:03.300
<v Speaker 6>lying again... But obviously their office is dumb as a

0:18:03.500 --> 0:18:06.340
<v Speaker 6>bag of hammers. I mean, they sent through a Word document.

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 6>And a Word document, you just jam it back through AI,

0:18:09.020 --> 0:18:11.500
<v Speaker 6>get all the metadata out. We can tell you whose

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 6>office it came from, Anthony Albanese's. We can tell you

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 6>who wrote it in Anthony Albanese's office. We can tell

0:18:17.900 --> 0:18:20.700
<v Speaker 6>you what they changed. We can even tell you what

0:18:20.740 --> 0:18:23.419
<v Speaker 6>time they started on the document and what time they finished.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is just.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:26.220
<v Speaker 6>Why would someone sit.

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Back there and write that?

0:18:27.420 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 6>It's instructed as if they all didn't know about it.

0:18:30.220 --> 0:18:33.790
<v Speaker 6>And we're all supposed to sit back and go, oh, no,

0:18:34.010 --> 0:18:37.810
<v Speaker 6>nothing to see here. No, we believe you, Albo. It's

0:18:37.910 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 6>just pathetic. This government's pathetic. It's coming asunder at the seams. And,

0:18:45.180 --> 0:18:49.500
<v Speaker 6>you know, God bless Helen Haynes. She called them out.

0:18:50.460 --> 0:18:53.220
<v Speaker 6>They got a massive chip on their shoulder and they're

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:54.100
<v Speaker 6>all upset about it.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.970
<v Speaker 1>So they've gone and said, oh, we'll get her. We'll

0:18:57.010 --> 0:18:58.190
<v Speaker 1>get her. Watch this.

0:18:59.109 --> 0:19:01.930
<v Speaker 6>And, you know, and I do really mean God bless

0:19:01.970 --> 0:19:02.550
<v Speaker 6>Helen Haynes.

0:19:02.869 --> 0:19:03.300
<v Speaker 1>I hope she.

0:19:03.430 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 6>We don't want to grandstand on this complete tragedy, so

0:19:08.140 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm just referring just to what Mr Albanese's office has done,

0:19:12.580 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 6>and I would say I can't prove it, but I

0:19:15.580 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 6>would say it's highly, highly unlikely that Mr Albanese didn't

0:19:19.859 --> 0:19:23.060
<v Speaker 6>know about it. And that interview with your stable, all

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.100
<v Speaker 6>these weasel words where he said, oh, she's always fighting

0:19:26.140 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 6>for things for her electorate.

0:19:28.250 --> 0:19:29.550
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't the question that was asked.

0:19:29.570 --> 0:19:32.770
<v Speaker 6>You know the tenor of the question was, did you

0:19:32.830 --> 0:19:37.070
<v Speaker 6>put out a slime sheet on Helen Haynes? And, of course,

0:19:37.109 --> 0:19:39.889
<v Speaker 6>he didn't answer that because, and by not answering it,

0:19:39.869 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 6>you're lying because you're not being fulsome with the truth

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.250
<v Speaker 6>and we all know what the truth is.

0:19:46.250 --> 0:19:49.370
<v Speaker 1>I should actually clarify, I don't think he should just

0:19:49.470 --> 0:19:52.169
<v Speaker 1>apologise to us for lying, lying to our face. He

0:19:52.190 --> 0:19:55.899
<v Speaker 1>should apologise to Helen Hughes for trying to imply she

0:19:55.940 --> 0:19:59.580
<v Speaker 1>was not the woman of integrity that he now... Helen Haynes, sorry,

0:19:59.619 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Helen Haynes, that she was not the woman of integrity

0:20:02.619 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that he now claims she is. Yeah, I know. It's

0:20:05.820 --> 0:20:07.580
<v Speaker 1>just so pathetic. How can you do that?

0:20:08.410 --> 0:20:11.929
<v Speaker 6>It's just, I don't know, Andrew, it's just so infuriatingly

0:20:12.230 --> 0:20:15.409
<v Speaker 6>ridiculous that you think we're all that stupid when the

0:20:15.470 --> 0:20:17.230
<v Speaker 6>only people who are as dumb as a bag of

0:20:17.270 --> 0:20:21.980
<v Speaker 6>hammers are residing in the Prime Minister of Australia's office. Because,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.780
<v Speaker 6>you know, it was a pathetic attempt to.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.210
<v Speaker 1>Demean and diminish......

0:20:29.180 --> 0:20:33.230
<v Speaker 6>A very decent lady, a very decent lady who's now

0:20:33.270 --> 0:20:37.109
<v Speaker 6>been seen by this tragic accident to be... See, at

0:20:37.130 --> 0:20:39.150
<v Speaker 6>first she's extolled to the Australian people, even though she's

0:20:39.530 --> 0:20:41.150
<v Speaker 6>really not on the same side of the political fence

0:20:41.210 --> 0:20:44.230
<v Speaker 6>as me, but I'm disgusted by a Prime Minister's office

0:20:44.250 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 6>that A, would do this, and B, would just front

0:20:47.580 --> 0:20:49.940
<v Speaker 6>up with the gall of just.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:51.609
<v Speaker 1>Just front......

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.020
<v Speaker 6>Pathetic lies just in your face.

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:58.780
<v Speaker 1>If he had apologised... If he had apologised... On day one, Monday,

0:20:59.100 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>this will not still be a story on Thursday and

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it will be tomorrow again. I mean, this is the thing.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.460
<v Speaker 1>This is the thing. It's the attempted cover-up that gets

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:12.810
<v Speaker 1>you every single time. Front up, say sorry. Barnaby, I

0:21:12.940 --> 0:21:15.550
<v Speaker 1>need to go back to the Ben Roberts-Smith publicity campaign.

0:21:15.590 --> 0:21:19.210
<v Speaker 1>Your reaction to it? Look, I'm going to leave it

0:21:19.230 --> 0:21:25.010
<v Speaker 1>to the court. Where I agree with you is this, Andrew...

0:21:25.590 --> 0:21:27.410
<v Speaker 1>As I think a Section 80 case in.

0:21:27.350 --> 0:21:31.109
<v Speaker 6>The Constitution, it's a Section 80 case because it's happened overseas,

0:21:31.130 --> 0:21:33.889
<v Speaker 6>it has to go before a jury. And finding a

0:21:33.930 --> 0:21:39.710
<v Speaker 6>jury to convict with it beyond a reasonable doubt in unison,

0:21:39.770 --> 0:21:42.090
<v Speaker 6>that means the whole lot of them, for an event

0:21:42.130 --> 0:21:45.230
<v Speaker 6>that happened 17 years ago is going to be extraordinarily

0:21:45.730 --> 0:21:48.830
<v Speaker 6>difficult no matter what the circumstances. And I'll let the

0:21:49.070 --> 0:21:50.830
<v Speaker 6>court deliberate over the circumstances.

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'd wish that everyone would just do that, just

0:21:56.340 --> 0:21:59.179
<v Speaker 1>leave it to the court, let them decide. But I

0:21:59.220 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just think... I just think this is trying to try it,

0:22:04.700 --> 0:22:06.580
<v Speaker 1>you know, mob rule. We saw that with George Pell,

0:22:06.619 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, and I'm not implying one way or

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the other whether he's guilty or not. I do not know.

0:22:11.980 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I do not know. I'm just saying I really believe

0:22:15.790 --> 0:22:18.390
<v Speaker 1>in leaving these things to the courts. Barnaby Joyce, thank

0:22:18.410 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>you so much for your time. After the break, a

0:22:22.580 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>desperate Labor government promises a Hindu temple half a million

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:31.190
<v Speaker 1>dollars if this government is re-elected, showing that multiculturalism is,

0:22:31.290 --> 0:22:41.690
<v Speaker 1>as I've always said, politically corrupt. Victoria's going to the

0:22:41.750 --> 0:22:44.330
<v Speaker 1>election in a month, and the Labor government, the worst

0:22:44.369 --> 0:22:47.780
<v Speaker 1>in the country by a mile, now looks and sounds

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.419
<v Speaker 1>and acts like it's already had the stuffing knocked out

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.429
<v Speaker 1>of it. And no wonder, of course, it's racked up

0:22:52.450 --> 0:22:55.570
<v Speaker 1>the biggest state debt in the country. It's let $ 15

0:22:55.510 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>billion approximately of taxpayers' money get stolen by organised crime

0:22:59.980 --> 0:23:04.580
<v Speaker 1>and corrupt unions. The roads are a disgrace, a lethal disgrace.

0:23:04.660 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>It's record crime. And one measure of how desperate the

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:12.170
<v Speaker 1>government is, yet how reckless it still is with cash.

0:23:13.250 --> 0:23:16.230
<v Speaker 1>Just look at what it's now doing. Last week, of course,

0:23:16.270 --> 0:23:17.449
<v Speaker 1>it even promised to pay people to.

0:23:19.380 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>They'll get paid even more to abort babies, can you

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.180
<v Speaker 1>believe it, which is just sick. Now it's gone to

0:23:25.220 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a Hindu temple in Craigieburn, where about 13% of voters

0:23:29.580 --> 0:23:34.689
<v Speaker 1>are Indian, and promised a great fat multicultural bribe.

0:23:35.609 --> 0:23:39.810
<v Speaker 7>Labor is the only government that has supported Temple, and

0:23:39.830 --> 0:23:41.369
<v Speaker 7>we will continue to do so.

0:23:41.390 --> 0:23:44.830
<v Speaker 4>To start with.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.430
<v Speaker 7>We will do that, a re-elected Labor government will do

0:23:49.470 --> 0:23:54.909
<v Speaker 7>that with $ 500, 000 for infrastructure upgrades.

0:23:59.710 --> 0:24:02.340
<v Speaker 1>The excuse of spending half a mil, well, the temple

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.100
<v Speaker 1>needs better safety. Got to also make it easier for

0:24:05.180 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>worshippers to get to. But why? Your temple is your responsibility.

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:14.590
<v Speaker 1>Your mosque is your responsibility. Why should we be paying

0:24:14.630 --> 0:24:16.619
<v Speaker 1>for a Hindu temple or a mosque or even a

0:24:16.700 --> 0:24:20.189
<v Speaker 1>church if we're not believers ourselves?

0:24:20.390 --> 0:24:20.630
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.619
<v Speaker 1>And this half a million dollars from a broke government

0:24:23.660 --> 0:24:27.020
<v Speaker 1>to this temple comes on top of another $ 80, 000 it

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>gave the same temple earlier this year for supposed security upgrades.

0:24:32.260 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is multiculturalism at its most politically corrupt and divisive.

0:24:37.369 --> 0:24:40.590
<v Speaker 1>This government is handing out millions and millions to at

0:24:40.630 --> 0:24:46.660
<v Speaker 1>least 24 ethnic communities, 14 religions... which it says, you know,

0:24:46.780 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>all this is for ensuring all Victorians have safe, accessible

0:24:49.580 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and culturally appropriate spaces to gather and celebrate their heritage.

0:24:54.530 --> 0:24:56.870
<v Speaker 1>Why is it the role of government to fund any

0:24:56.930 --> 0:25:00.830
<v Speaker 1>heritage except a heritage that unites us all, like an

0:25:00.869 --> 0:25:04.189
<v Speaker 1>Australian one? Why is it the role of government to

0:25:04.230 --> 0:25:09.380
<v Speaker 1>fund 14 religions or more Like I say, your religion,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.460
<v Speaker 1>your business. It's a rort and it really shows that

0:25:12.540 --> 0:25:16.750
<v Speaker 1>multiculturalism is just an excuse and a machinery and a

0:25:16.790 --> 0:25:22.530
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy for politicians to bribe immigrant communities for votes. And

0:25:22.570 --> 0:25:24.910
<v Speaker 1>bribe them, in this case, with money we can no

0:25:24.970 --> 0:25:27.669
<v Speaker 1>longer afford. I was joined a short while ago by

0:25:27.690 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>James Campbell, National Weekend political editor for Weekend News Corp

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.929
<v Speaker 1>papers around the country. James Campbell, thank you so much

0:25:34.950 --> 0:25:38.810
<v Speaker 1>for your time. You would never guess from that grant

0:25:38.850 --> 0:25:41.850
<v Speaker 1>and all the others that they're, you know, throwing out

0:25:41.910 --> 0:25:45.490
<v Speaker 1>as they stroll from temple to mosque to goodness knows what,

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you would never guess that Victoria was actually broke. Well, no,

0:25:51.420 --> 0:25:51.900
<v Speaker 1>they're not.

0:25:51.980 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 8>So Labor is now, I think, in two modes in

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 8>this election. One is saving the furniture where they can

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.730
<v Speaker 8>save the furniture and So they're throwing money at people

0:26:02.770 --> 0:26:07.010
<v Speaker 8>where they think it'll make a difference, such as the

0:26:07.030 --> 0:26:09.550
<v Speaker 8>Islamic Council got some, I think. There was that grant

0:26:09.570 --> 0:26:13.460
<v Speaker 8>you had there. They're throwing money at various ethnic and

0:26:13.500 --> 0:26:17.020
<v Speaker 8>religious groups. But they're also now moved... The real sign

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 8>that they're in trouble is they've moved into salting-the-earth mode.

0:26:21.060 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 8>If you have a look at the changes that they're

0:26:23.380 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 8>bringing in to the broad-based anti-corruption... organisation down here they're

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 8>broadening the definition of things that it can look at

0:26:32.300 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 8>into thing anything that would constitute a sackable offence so

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 8>let's say you got sacked for shouting at somebody that

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.150
<v Speaker 8>would be now something going forward that the that IBAC

0:26:44.170 --> 0:26:47.550
<v Speaker 8>down here could look at now clearly that's designed to

0:26:47.710 --> 0:26:50.670
<v Speaker 8>create trouble for the next government and in the same

0:26:50.770 --> 0:26:56.419
<v Speaker 8>mode today the uh Fairfax media reported excitedly that the

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:02.459
<v Speaker 8>government has signed, agreed to so-called full funding of the

0:27:02.510 --> 0:27:06.890
<v Speaker 8>Gonski agreement. Now, this is something that Victoria had not

0:27:06.970 --> 0:27:10.190
<v Speaker 8>signed up to because it simply can't afford it. But

0:27:10.430 --> 0:27:13.570
<v Speaker 8>they've now, at the death knock of this parliament, agreed

0:27:13.790 --> 0:27:17.870
<v Speaker 8>going forward to add billions of dollars to the government

0:27:17.910 --> 0:27:21.220
<v Speaker 8>spending to basically, I think in a little bit of

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 8>an attempt to curry some favour with the teachers, which

0:27:23.740 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 8>they're not going to get, but more reasonably, I think,

0:27:27.109 --> 0:27:30.270
<v Speaker 8>to really make trouble for the next government because it's

0:27:30.310 --> 0:27:33.129
<v Speaker 8>going to punch a giant hole in the budget as

0:27:33.190 --> 0:27:34.450
<v Speaker 8>if we needed that down here.

0:27:35.050 --> 0:27:39.629
<v Speaker 1>Look, honestly, this is the most despicable government, state government

0:27:40.130 --> 0:27:43.530
<v Speaker 1>I can recall in Victoria at least and probably beyond that.

0:27:43.930 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Who knows? And look, it really looks to me like

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a government that's just about given up all hope.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.660
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got staffers that are here already looking

0:27:56.700 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>for jobs elsewhere. And this is more than a month ago.

0:28:00.060 --> 0:28:02.570
<v Speaker 1>What other signs of distress are you seeing?

0:28:05.530 --> 0:28:07.389
<v Speaker 8>It's been a long time since I spoke to anyone

0:28:07.430 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 8>in the ALP who thinks they can win. And Every

0:28:12.100 --> 0:28:15.460
<v Speaker 8>time you talk to them, the areas where they acknowledge

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.390
<v Speaker 8>they're in trouble get bigger and bigger. Most of their

0:28:19.450 --> 0:28:22.570
<v Speaker 8>seats in the eastern suburbs are cooked. They're in trouble

0:28:22.630 --> 0:28:26.990
<v Speaker 8>in the outer north. They're in trouble in the outer west. Everywhere,

0:28:27.190 --> 0:28:31.959
<v Speaker 8>the regional seats are in dire straits. There's trouble all over.

0:28:32.180 --> 0:28:37.420
<v Speaker 8>And the published polling shows this. Low to mid-20s, there's

0:28:37.460 --> 0:28:42.410
<v Speaker 8>simply no way Labor can win. It's become a pile-on.

0:28:42.470 --> 0:28:45.690
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you live here, you walk around, people... The

0:28:45.730 --> 0:28:49.270
<v Speaker 8>metaphorical baseball bats are out and some. It's more like

0:28:49.290 --> 0:28:51.910
<v Speaker 8>the assault rifles are out for them. People just want

0:28:52.050 --> 0:28:52.670
<v Speaker 8>them gone.

0:28:53.210 --> 0:28:55.830
<v Speaker 1>It's now... Look, One Nation looked like, you know, being

0:28:55.870 --> 0:28:59.190
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming threat, et cetera, et cetera, in Victoria as well,

0:28:59.260 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>even though Victoria is probably the reddest state in the country.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>There's now a hot chance that the Liberals could rule.

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:13.370
<v Speaker 1>Without needing One Nation support. We'll see how that pans out.

0:29:13.390 --> 0:29:16.690
<v Speaker 1>I notice that this is a very, very important win

0:29:16.750 --> 0:29:20.070
<v Speaker 1>for the Liberals. You had Angus Taylor, who, now that

0:29:20.090 --> 0:29:22.270
<v Speaker 1>he's a bit more popular in the polls, he was

0:29:22.410 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>out campaigning again this week in Victoria. He's loaned at

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.540
<v Speaker 1>least one senior official to help the Liberals here out.

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>How important is a Liberal win in Victoria, not just

0:29:34.220 --> 0:29:40.270
<v Speaker 1>for Victoria, but for the federal Liberals? Angus Taylor... Oh,

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:41.230
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely vital.

0:29:41.300 --> 0:29:44.300
<v Speaker 8>Obviously, they need to be able to show that they're

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:46.700
<v Speaker 8>a viable concern somewhere. They can govern in their own

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 8>right and that they're not just losing ground to the right,

0:29:52.180 --> 0:29:56.540
<v Speaker 8>to Hanson. I actually, I'll put a kind of controversial thought.

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:01.340
<v Speaker 8>I don't think I think that Pauline Hanson and James Ashby,

0:30:01.500 --> 0:30:04.220
<v Speaker 8>the Brains Trust, actually want the Liberals to win in

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:05.980
<v Speaker 8>a majority here.

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.330
<v Speaker 1>And I'll walk you through it.

0:30:08.470 --> 0:30:08.850
<v Speaker 6>Why?

0:30:08.870 --> 0:30:12.450
<v Speaker 8>I think they want to because, first of all, because

0:30:12.830 --> 0:30:14.770
<v Speaker 8>the main game for One Nation is first the New

0:30:14.790 --> 0:30:17.450
<v Speaker 8>South Wales election, then the federal election. They know this

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 8>is kind of an away game down here that they've

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:24.870
<v Speaker 8>got to get through. They know that the worst thing

0:30:24.890 --> 0:30:26.690
<v Speaker 8>that could happen to One Nation is that if they

0:30:26.710 --> 0:30:29.890
<v Speaker 8>do well enough down here, but through preference leakage, somehow

0:30:29.930 --> 0:30:34.910
<v Speaker 8>Labor gets back in. That is a terrible message that

0:30:34.930 --> 0:30:36.990
<v Speaker 8>would come out of this election if it were to happen.

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:42.060
<v Speaker 8>They also don't want, I think, any situation in which

0:30:42.300 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 8>One Nation ended up in a coalition or a minority

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 8>government situation with the Liberal Party would be unstable. It

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.590
<v Speaker 8>was really a potential mess. There'll be a lot of

0:30:51.690 --> 0:30:54.930
<v Speaker 8>focus on it. Every shortcoming of every One Nation candidate

0:30:54.970 --> 0:30:58.550
<v Speaker 8>or MP by then would be... There'd be enormous focus

0:30:58.610 --> 0:31:01.450
<v Speaker 8>on them. And it would really muddy the water for

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 8>One Nation in the lead-up to the New South Wales election,

0:31:04.500 --> 0:31:07.540
<v Speaker 8>where they are travelling really well, and the federal election,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 8>which is the main game for them. So I think

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.380
<v Speaker 8>they want to do better than they did at the

0:31:11.420 --> 0:31:14.620
<v Speaker 8>last election, but they want the Liberals to win in

0:31:14.660 --> 0:31:17.050
<v Speaker 8>a majority so that they don't have to have the

0:31:17.110 --> 0:31:19.290
<v Speaker 8>burden of either governing or supporting.

0:31:21.270 --> 0:31:25.830
<v Speaker 8>A state government with people who they don't themselves, I suspect,

0:31:25.870 --> 0:31:27.110
<v Speaker 8>have that much faith in.

0:31:27.570 --> 0:31:31.190
<v Speaker 1>James Campbell, thank you so much for your time. Thank you, Andrew.

0:31:31.210 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure. After the break, politicians are demanding a

0:31:36.900 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>kinder culture now that one of their own has been

0:31:39.140 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so cruelly attacked. But why wasn't this an issue when

0:31:43.780 --> 0:31:53.690
<v Speaker 1>checkout people and homeowners and people like that were being assaulted? Now,

0:31:53.710 --> 0:31:58.110
<v Speaker 1>after this ghastly attack on MP Helen Haynes, every Canberra

0:31:58.150 --> 0:32:01.530
<v Speaker 1>politician is now talking about this new culture of nastiness.

0:32:02.490 --> 0:32:06.100
<v Speaker 1>But most Australians get reminded of this nastiness every time

0:32:06.140 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they go to the shops. I mean, why do you

0:32:08.500 --> 0:32:12.860
<v Speaker 1>think they have signs like this one at Woolies? Aggressive

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.850
<v Speaker 1>and abusive behaviour will not be tolerated. We never needed

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>these signs or saw them. Even 10 or 20 years ago,

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we never needed to be told not to attack the

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>checkout staff at Bunnings or Woolies or Coles or IGA

0:32:27.460 --> 0:32:31.500
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Joining me are News 24 host James McPherson

0:32:31.820 --> 0:32:35.420
<v Speaker 1>and communications consultant Christy McSweeney, who's worked for Coalition Prime

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:39.370
<v Speaker 1>Ministers and Premiers. James, public manners is a huge issue

0:32:39.410 --> 0:32:42.710
<v Speaker 1>now for politicians after an attack of on one of

0:32:42.730 --> 0:32:45.970
<v Speaker 1>their own. Why wasn't it such a big issue before?

0:32:46.410 --> 0:32:49.290
<v Speaker 9>It's a really great question. It does seem a little

0:32:49.310 --> 0:32:51.510
<v Speaker 9>bit self-serving on behalf of our politicians.

0:32:51.550 --> 0:32:53.630
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's not. But you're quite right.

0:32:53.690 --> 0:32:55.770
<v Speaker 9>When I grew up, when you grew up, I mean,

0:32:55.890 --> 0:32:57.730
<v Speaker 9>we would have thought it ludicrous that there had to

0:32:57.780 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 9>be signs to remind us not to be rude or

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.060
<v Speaker 9>not to be violent towards the checkout chick or the

0:33:04.140 --> 0:33:07.460
<v Speaker 9>nurse who was manning the emergency department. But now these

0:33:07.540 --> 0:33:08.940
<v Speaker 9>things are par for the course.

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.060
<v Speaker 1>They're everywhere. And it demonstrates.

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 9>Was it the Yeats poem that talks about the centre

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.500
<v Speaker 9>not holding and everything just falls apart?

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 10>Yes.

0:33:16.980 --> 0:33:19.219
<v Speaker 9>And I think we're seeing that right through society. The

0:33:19.260 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 9>centre will not hold.

0:33:21.900 --> 0:33:22.010
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:33:22.030 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:22.610 --> 0:33:23.670
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we could talk about why that. Well, I

0:33:23.670 --> 0:33:25.990
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I reckon, James, this will be... This will be...

0:33:26.190 --> 0:33:29.010
<v Speaker 1>This will speak to your heart, but I think... One

0:33:29.030 --> 0:33:32.430
<v Speaker 1>thing Christianity did was drag a lot of kids and

0:33:32.470 --> 0:33:35.330
<v Speaker 1>youths and adults into a church once a week to

0:33:35.370 --> 0:33:39.900
<v Speaker 1>be told, do better, rise to these standards. Now, what

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have they got? Christy, what do you make of this?

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just about every shop you go to says,

0:33:45.340 --> 0:33:48.140
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't yell at people, don't be abusive to

0:33:48.180 --> 0:33:51.130
<v Speaker 1>our staff, we will not tolerate. That should have been

0:33:51.170 --> 0:33:53.390
<v Speaker 1>warning enough that something really has gone wrong.

0:33:53.410 --> 0:33:53.470
<v Speaker 2>Mm.

0:33:56.310 --> 0:33:58.510
<v Speaker 4>And you're right, and that's gone on for so many

0:33:58.730 --> 0:34:00.470
<v Speaker 4>years now. It's not a recent.

0:34:00.890 --> 0:34:04.450
<v Speaker 3>It's recent enough that we're remarking on how we never

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.300
<v Speaker 3>used to see it when, you know, we were growing

0:34:07.420 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 3>up or, you know, when I was in high school.

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.919
<v Speaker 3>But it's recent enough that we are now all desensitised

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.940
<v Speaker 3>to the fact that Coles and Woolworths are putting signs

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.100
<v Speaker 3>up saying, please, you know, be mindful and polite to

0:34:19.180 --> 0:34:24.270
<v Speaker 3>our staff. Coles in Elizabeth Street in Melbourne has said...

0:34:24.469 --> 0:34:28.190
<v Speaker 3>Retail crime, the violence and the abuse of our staff

0:34:28.310 --> 0:34:31.890
<v Speaker 3>is too much in that pocket for other viewers from

0:34:31.930 --> 0:34:34.609
<v Speaker 3>other states, not from Melbourne. It sits right in front

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 3>of Flinders Street Station in the main thoroughfare on Elizabeth Street.

0:34:39.020 --> 0:34:43.460
<v Speaker 3>It is a pit of crime and homelessness and antisocial

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.580
<v Speaker 3>activity at night time. Coles will not renew their lease

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.189
<v Speaker 3>because of the crime and the difficulties it causes their

0:34:50.310 --> 0:34:53.670
<v Speaker 3>staff and customers and the behaviours in their store.

0:34:54.090 --> 0:34:57.350
<v Speaker 4>And this is amplified all over Australia.

0:34:57.910 --> 0:35:03.410
<v Speaker 3>Teachers, particularly female teachers, are facing violence and abuse in

0:35:03.469 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 3>their own workplace. And as you already said, nurses and

0:35:06.620 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 3>other healthcare workers and first responders, it becomes a really

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 3>difficult problem of retention in a lot of these key

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:18.270
<v Speaker 3>service professions, this kind of abuse of behaviour and violence

0:35:18.350 --> 0:35:19.650
<v Speaker 3>that they're forced to endure.

0:35:21.860 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>It is really quite extraordinary when you think about it.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:26.860
<v Speaker 1>We've been frogs in boiling water, I guess, or at

0:35:26.900 --> 0:35:30.090
<v Speaker 1>least people in Canberra seem to have been. James, here's

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:35.930
<v Speaker 1>an example of the anti-capitalist, anti-Western far-left using or abusing

0:35:35.989 --> 0:35:39.069
<v Speaker 1>Aboriginal culture, which you're seeing quite often now, in its

0:35:39.190 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>war on Australia. You see pro-Palestine groups also using the

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.890
<v Speaker 1>Aboriginal flag, etc., One of those far-left groups released this

0:35:47.969 --> 0:35:51.510
<v Speaker 1>video this week of what they called a sacred Aboriginal

0:35:51.590 --> 0:35:54.630
<v Speaker 1>birthing tree in Victoria being cut down.

0:35:54.650 --> 0:35:54.710
<v Speaker 5>No!

0:35:55.670 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 11>They're dowsing the sacred fire. They're extinguishing the sacred fire.

0:36:11.140 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 11>This is genocide. This is genocide.

0:36:17.530 --> 0:36:19.469
<v Speaker 1>As far as I can tell, the main spokespeople for

0:36:19.489 --> 0:36:22.630
<v Speaker 1>that group are not Aboriginal themselves. In fact, local traditional

0:36:22.710 --> 0:36:25.610
<v Speaker 1>owners approve these plans to straighten the road, and the

0:36:25.650 --> 0:36:29.170
<v Speaker 1>group wailing about sacred trees and sacred fires is the

0:36:29.630 --> 0:36:33.549
<v Speaker 1>Anti-Militarism Action Network, or AMAN, which it says is an

0:36:33.950 --> 0:36:37.890
<v Speaker 1>Arabic word meaning safety, and it calls itself a decolonial,

0:36:37.950 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 1>decentralised and anti-capitalist grassroots collective that's against Israel as well.

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:49.380
<v Speaker 1>Of course, honestly... James, the hard left has become beyond parody.

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.180
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm going to stay with religion for a moment, Andrew,

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 9>because GK Chesterton said when people stop believing in God,

0:36:55.340 --> 0:36:57.660
<v Speaker 9>it's not that they believe in nothing, it's that they'll

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.940
<v Speaker 9>believe in anything. And once you remove objective truth, you

0:37:02.100 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 9>lose all objectivity. And that's the culture in which we live.

0:37:05.590 --> 0:37:09.890
<v Speaker 9>There's no objectivity. Anything goes. No one can criticise anybody

0:37:09.910 --> 0:37:12.609
<v Speaker 9>because if you criticise me and say that's wrong, I'll

0:37:12.650 --> 0:37:15.610
<v Speaker 9>reply to you, says who? And we've removed any higher

0:37:15.650 --> 0:37:18.549
<v Speaker 9>authority to appeal to. So it's a free for all

0:37:18.650 --> 0:37:23.190
<v Speaker 9>and we see it everywhere. It's interesting as well that spirituality,

0:37:23.250 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 9>having rejected pretty much Christianity, we still have a hunger

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.180
<v Speaker 9>for meaning and for purpose. And so if we won't

0:37:30.219 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 9>worship God in the heavens, we'll worship a tree. It's ludicrous,

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.380
<v Speaker 9>but it's not that surprising to me.

0:37:39.020 --> 0:37:41.410
<v Speaker 1>Chrissie, it is interesting, isn't it, that the hard left

0:37:41.450 --> 0:37:44.489
<v Speaker 1>has become a collective of causes, all of them aimed

0:37:44.550 --> 0:37:49.310
<v Speaker 1>at destroying Western capitalist societies. You see it in France.

0:37:49.330 --> 0:37:50.450
<v Speaker 6>I think.

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.089
<v Speaker 4>I think, Andrew, that is their own motivation.

0:37:55.290 --> 0:38:00.810
<v Speaker 3>And they're masquerading as being deeply offended and deeply passionate

0:38:00.890 --> 0:38:05.450
<v Speaker 3>about various causes, whether it is chanting from the river

0:38:05.489 --> 0:38:08.530
<v Speaker 3>to the sea and wearing a kefir for a country

0:38:08.650 --> 0:38:11.469
<v Speaker 3>and a religion and a history that they have no

0:38:11.550 --> 0:38:15.150
<v Speaker 3>understanding of and no understanding of the phraseology of which

0:38:15.190 --> 0:38:18.810
<v Speaker 3>they're chanting for, to, you know, remarking that cutting down

0:38:18.850 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 3>a tree is a genocide. Again, very ignorant use of

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:30.420
<v Speaker 3>language and terminology. Both of those examples. I am not

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 3>surprised that I have just seen that clip on screen.

0:38:33.860 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 3>But and neither am I surprised that that normal people

0:38:37.180 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 3>feel that they're not allowed to criticise that.

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.419
<v Speaker 4>But, you know, I wish it wasn't so.

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Chrissie, let me just stick with you because there's been

0:38:48.060 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a small win in this battle today. In New South Wales,

0:38:51.660 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Liberals attacked the release last week of a new

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>government policy on breastfeeding that removed the words mother and female,

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:05.220
<v Speaker 1>replacing them with gender-neutral terms like parent, carer and lactating parent,

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.970
<v Speaker 1>because you don't know, it could be the dad. And

0:39:09.010 --> 0:39:11.589
<v Speaker 1>there's today now a backdown. Have a look.

0:39:13.050 --> 0:39:16.750
<v Speaker 12>Yesterday, the Parliament updated its breastfeeding policy to remove all

0:39:16.790 --> 0:39:20.370
<v Speaker 12>reference to the word mother. The Premier's Department Lactation and

0:39:20.390 --> 0:39:23.270
<v Speaker 12>Work Policy Circular was also updated in January this year

0:39:23.570 --> 0:39:26.490
<v Speaker 12>to remove all references to the word mother and women.

0:39:26.969 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 12>Do you support this change and if not, what's action

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:32.259
<v Speaker 12>will you take in response?

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 10>The truth of the matter is the terminology used in

0:39:35.820 --> 0:39:39.750
<v Speaker 10>it is... And I don't think that we need to

0:39:39.790 --> 0:39:42.540
<v Speaker 10>be in a situation where these documents should have anything

0:39:42.620 --> 0:39:47.140
<v Speaker 10>other than common sense language like mother and breastfeeding. And

0:39:47.180 --> 0:39:50.300
<v Speaker 10>that's what the public expects and that's what I expect.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.730
<v Speaker 10>And I understand that state government guidelines of a similar

0:39:53.810 --> 0:39:57.710
<v Speaker 10>nature will from now on reflect that terminology.

0:39:59.730 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Christy, should we applaud Chris Minns for showing rare good

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.989
<v Speaker 1>sense these days, or should we wonder why it was

0:40:07.030 --> 0:40:08.110
<v Speaker 1>allowed to get that far?

0:40:10.980 --> 0:40:12.739
<v Speaker 3>First thing I'll say is, look, some of those people

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.470
<v Speaker 3>in the right, hard right faction of Labor aren't too bad.

0:40:15.489 --> 0:40:17.390
<v Speaker 4>It's a shame they're not running our country.

0:40:18.150 --> 0:40:21.690
<v Speaker 3>It is dominated by the left faction in Canberra, led

0:40:21.730 --> 0:40:23.069
<v Speaker 3>by Anthony Albanese.

0:40:23.170 --> 0:40:25.370
<v Speaker 4>We know that. Look at the difference there.

0:40:25.969 --> 0:40:29.950
<v Speaker 3>So I will commend Chris Minns for having the common

0:40:30.150 --> 0:40:34.650
<v Speaker 3>sense But why does a Premier have to take this on?

0:40:35.210 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 4>This is stupid.

0:40:37.180 --> 0:40:42.060
<v Speaker 3>It should never be allowed to be written into bureaucracy.

0:40:42.460 --> 0:40:46.860
<v Speaker 3>This phraseology has seeped in and seeped in and seeped

0:40:46.940 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 3>in to so many parts of health and education policy.

0:40:50.870 --> 0:40:54.750
<v Speaker 3>It is ridiculous that a Premier has to stand up

0:40:54.810 --> 0:40:57.690
<v Speaker 3>there and stop this bureaucracy in its tracks.

0:40:58.090 --> 0:41:00.490
<v Speaker 4>May they all do it across all states.

0:41:02.620 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>James, first, I'm actually out of time, but I've got

0:41:04.660 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to have a quick comment from you on this.

0:41:06.900 --> 0:41:09.299
<v Speaker 9>Let's not give Chris Minns too much praise. In the

0:41:09.340 --> 0:41:11.740
<v Speaker 9>state of New South Wales, you can change your name

0:41:11.860 --> 0:41:14.859
<v Speaker 9>on your birth certificate three times. You can change your

0:41:14.980 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 9>gender every single year as many times as you want.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:23.009
<v Speaker 9>He shouldn't be praised too much for this small bit

0:41:23.030 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 9>of common sense.

0:41:25.870 --> 0:41:31.170
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that little reality check. Good on you. Yeah, absolutely.

0:41:31.250 --> 0:41:35.350
<v Speaker 1>James McPherson, Christy McSweeney, thank you to you both. After

0:41:35.390 --> 0:41:38.549
<v Speaker 1>the break, the strange face of the French riots and

0:41:39.070 --> 0:41:47.450
<v Speaker 1>why this makes them even worse. I did say these

0:41:47.510 --> 0:41:49.910
<v Speaker 1>protests in France were actually a civil war and there

0:41:49.930 --> 0:41:52.410
<v Speaker 1>are more signs now of that. The French government will

0:41:52.450 --> 0:41:56.340
<v Speaker 1>now send in the army to help police on Saturday...

0:41:56.430 --> 0:41:58.739
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the latest wave of protests that are

0:41:58.780 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 1>being organised, despite the chaos last week, still being organised

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 1>by hard-left groups. Now, President Emmanuel Macron today, or overnight,

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:13.219
<v Speaker 1>blasted Donald Trump as stupid for saying that immigrants were

0:42:13.540 --> 0:42:17.300
<v Speaker 1>behind the riots. And he does have a little point,

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:21.060
<v Speaker 1>because there were indeed a lot of riots, in fact,

0:42:21.700 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>rioters from clearly Middle Eastern and North African background. But

0:42:26.890 --> 0:42:29.790
<v Speaker 1>the man now arrested for burning down the historic Limoges

0:42:29.850 --> 0:42:33.930
<v Speaker 1>Town Hall, actually filmed setting a light to it, is

0:42:33.969 --> 0:42:37.470
<v Speaker 1>a hard-left extremist with a long record of extremist causes,

0:42:37.950 --> 0:42:41.730
<v Speaker 1>albeit this guy does have Basque ancestry, so I don't

0:42:41.770 --> 0:42:45.450
<v Speaker 1>know whether the Spanish count as foreigners. But I've got

0:42:45.489 --> 0:42:50.469
<v Speaker 1>to show you something else. There was shocking looting during

0:42:50.489 --> 0:42:53.170
<v Speaker 1>the riots, as you know, but Check which protests that

0:42:53.210 --> 0:42:55.870
<v Speaker 1>went on French TV to say that she was a

0:42:55.930 --> 0:43:00.150
<v Speaker 1>daughter of a poor mother, there was hunger, the looting

0:43:00.190 --> 0:43:03.020
<v Speaker 1>was justified, and the shopkeepers who were next to her

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in the studio complaining they'd been looted should just suck

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it up.

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.260
<v Speaker 13>In fact, your shops, it's cute, great, OK, the footlockers

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:13.700
<v Speaker 13>who were robbed, but in fact, there's a reality, a

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.219
<v Speaker 13>real suffering of the French. And I'd like to talk

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:17.550
<v Speaker 13>about this suffering tonight.

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:18.839
<v Speaker 1>You did it, I gave you my answer.

0:43:18.860 --> 0:43:19.870
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but I'm the only one who did it.

0:43:23.450 --> 0:43:25.989
<v Speaker 1>One of those shopkeepers born in the Congo let her

0:43:26.130 --> 0:43:26.489
<v Speaker 1>have it.

0:43:27.650 --> 0:43:31.129
<v Speaker 13>You're telling me I'm crying because my window is broken. Lola,

0:43:31.150 --> 0:43:34.049
<v Speaker 13>I arrived in France when I was 9 years old.

0:43:34.190 --> 0:43:38.630
<v Speaker 13>I left the Democratic Republic of Congo. I had to adapt.

0:43:38.969 --> 0:43:42.529
<v Speaker 13>When I arrived here, I had the choice to go

0:43:42.550 --> 0:43:47.110
<v Speaker 13>through a situation or to recover. Today, as a business manager,

0:43:47.130 --> 0:43:51.510
<v Speaker 13>I regularly employ 130 people. You're telling me about misery.

0:43:51.530 --> 0:43:54.170
<v Speaker 13>You're telling me I'm crying because my window is broken.

0:43:54.390 --> 0:43:55.310
<v Speaker 1>But it's my life, Lola.

0:43:55.989 --> 0:44:00.410
<v Speaker 13>C'est ma vie, j'ai des enfants... Non mais quelle chance.

0:44:00.430 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Non mais quelle.

0:44:01.430 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 13>Chance j'ai, quelle chance on a d'avoir eu nos entreprises cassées,

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 13>de devoir ramasser nos salariés.

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Attendez, laissez-la parler, laissez-la parler. Laissez-la parler, laissez-la parler.

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.319
<v Speaker 13>Non mais on doit aujourd'hui récupérer nos salariés. Moi j'ai

0:44:17.340 --> 0:44:23.180
<v Speaker 13>des salariés qui sont terrorisés. Quelle réponse vous leur apportez?

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:24.739
<v Speaker 4>On leur dit quoi?

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:29.489
<v Speaker 1>Well, she went on and on. It was great stuff.

0:44:29.510 --> 0:44:31.290
<v Speaker 1>Joining me from London, as he does each week, is

0:44:31.370 --> 0:44:35.130
<v Speaker 1>GB News star presenter Patrick Christies. Patrick, what do you

0:44:35.150 --> 0:44:39.420
<v Speaker 1>make of that story? Particularly when what is so symbolic,

0:44:39.460 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at least for me, is that that protest that was

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 1>defending looting turned out to be Lola Fleur Whittaker, who

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is not poor. She's the daughter of an oil executive

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and a teacher. She graduated from the University of Manchester

0:44:52.940 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Paris Institute of Political Studies. She has filmed

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:59.930
<v Speaker 1>herself in lovely places, on ships, in Croatia, in Oman

0:44:59.969 --> 0:45:02.610
<v Speaker 1>and wherever, and she stood for election for the hard-left

0:45:02.670 --> 0:45:05.670
<v Speaker 1>party La France Insoumise. What does this tell you?

0:45:06.820 --> 0:45:09.580
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it reminds me back in 2010, we had student

0:45:09.620 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 14>protests here in Britain and it turned out that the

0:45:11.739 --> 0:45:15.100
<v Speaker 14>son of a Pink Floyd guitarist, David Gilmour, was arrested

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:17.950
<v Speaker 14>and imprisoned for climbing on the cenotaph. We've had actress

0:45:18.090 --> 0:45:21.670
<v Speaker 14>Emma Thompson flew first class over from America to London.

0:45:21.989 --> 0:45:24.350
<v Speaker 14>to take part in climate protests, and were then pictured

0:45:24.390 --> 0:45:27.549
<v Speaker 14>holidaying on a super yacht in the Mediterranean. When you

0:45:27.590 --> 0:45:30.690
<v Speaker 14>see climate activists or hard-left activists, they usually have a

0:45:30.730 --> 0:45:33.630
<v Speaker 14>triple-barreled surname, and it turns out they went to a

0:45:33.650 --> 0:45:36.930
<v Speaker 14>£ 60, 000- a- year private school. But it's easy to be far left

0:45:36.969 --> 0:45:39.170
<v Speaker 14>when your daddy owns a yacht, you can take private

0:45:39.210 --> 0:45:41.969
<v Speaker 14>jets everywhere, and you've got a gold-plated trust fund to

0:45:42.010 --> 0:45:44.299
<v Speaker 14>fall back on. But it's a story as old as

0:45:44.340 --> 0:45:48.180
<v Speaker 14>time itself, this. The wealthy far left essentially need the

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:51.140
<v Speaker 14>mob to seize power. And we're dealing here, I think,

0:45:51.180 --> 0:45:56.260
<v Speaker 14>with people who are, A, dealing maybe with generational guilt, B,

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:58.960
<v Speaker 14>so thick they never thought their own hypocrisy would be

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:02.100
<v Speaker 14>pointed out, and C, have never actually worked a proper

0:46:02.140 --> 0:46:03.980
<v Speaker 14>day in their lives, which is why they have no

0:46:04.060 --> 0:46:06.450
<v Speaker 14>sympathy for the working man and woman who are having

0:46:06.469 --> 0:46:09.810
<v Speaker 14>their lives ruined by this violence, looting and lawlessness. But

0:46:09.850 --> 0:46:13.450
<v Speaker 14>what they don't realise is that the real hard left,

0:46:13.510 --> 0:46:15.870
<v Speaker 14>the real people who are your kind of typical.

0:46:16.210 --> 0:46:16.410
<v Speaker 8>you.

0:46:16.330 --> 0:46:19.170
<v Speaker 14>Know, kind of like, you know, actual working class that

0:46:19.290 --> 0:46:22.710
<v Speaker 14>are kind of violent in this sense, will actually come

0:46:22.790 --> 0:46:26.089
<v Speaker 14>for them too, no matter whether or not they like

0:46:26.140 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 14>to say that they're an ally. And we do have

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 14>a real problem here, I think, across the West with

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 14>a lot of these kind of deranged, radical, well-to-do lefties

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.460
<v Speaker 14>who are useful idiots for a much bigger problem.

0:46:41.070 --> 0:46:45.390
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a marvel to see a beautiful, privileged,

0:46:45.630 --> 0:46:51.489
<v Speaker 1>white French socialist girl lecture a shopkeeper born in the

0:46:51.550 --> 0:46:54.930
<v Speaker 1>Congo who came from nothing to suck up having a

0:46:54.989 --> 0:47:00.130
<v Speaker 1>store ransacked. Tremendous story from Britain, though. The lovely Kelvin

0:47:00.170 --> 0:47:04.650
<v Speaker 1>Grove Art Gallery Museum in Glasgow. Wonderful place. It has

0:47:04.830 --> 0:47:09.900
<v Speaker 1>removed its Egyptian mummies from display, Patrick, for reasons I

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.830
<v Speaker 1>struggle to believe. Tell us about it. Tell us if

0:47:12.910 --> 0:47:14.190
<v Speaker 1>this story is true.

0:47:14.950 --> 0:47:15.290
<v Speaker 5>Brilliant.

0:47:15.310 --> 0:47:18.010
<v Speaker 14>So the items removed from this museum include a painted

0:47:18.090 --> 0:47:21.310
<v Speaker 14>coffin containing the remains of the high priest Necht, a

0:47:21.370 --> 0:47:25.210
<v Speaker 14>mummified male head, various different other mummified remains. What they've

0:47:25.230 --> 0:47:31.130
<v Speaker 14>said is they couldn't get informed consent from these deceased mummies.

0:47:31.550 --> 0:47:32.150
<v Speaker 1>They've removed them.

0:47:32.370 --> 0:47:35.810
<v Speaker 14>There's so many jokes here, right? Forget walk like an Egyptian.

0:47:35.850 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 14>This is woke like an Egyptian. They couldn't get consent

0:47:38.700 --> 0:47:41.540
<v Speaker 14>from the high priest Necht, maybe? Maybe they should have

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:44.300
<v Speaker 14>asked for his neck of kin. You know, the museum

0:47:44.340 --> 0:47:49.180
<v Speaker 14>clearly has mummy issues, doesn't it? The high priest is

0:47:49.180 --> 0:47:51.460
<v Speaker 14>4,000 years old, so struggle getting him to sign a

0:47:51.500 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 14>consent form, I think. But, look, this is the first

0:47:53.980 --> 0:47:57.510
<v Speaker 14>step towards either returning these artefacts to Egypt or paying

0:47:57.570 --> 0:48:00.029
<v Speaker 14>reparations or something like that, and it's a shame because

0:48:00.090 --> 0:48:03.529
<v Speaker 14>now nobody gets to see them. People can't be inspired

0:48:03.590 --> 0:48:06.090
<v Speaker 14>by it. It's like the animal rights activists. They'd rather

0:48:06.130 --> 0:48:08.750
<v Speaker 14>that some animals were never even born, as long as

0:48:08.810 --> 0:48:11.850
<v Speaker 14>it meant that they were never... in captivity. It is

0:48:11.890 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 14>a real shocker from the hyper-woke tip of the UK

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:16.720
<v Speaker 14>here in Scotland.

0:48:16.739 --> 0:48:21.780
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I just wonder who it was that complained.

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:26.210
<v Speaker 1>Which descendant today said, that's my... I don't know what

0:48:26.290 --> 0:48:30.230
<v Speaker 1>that would be. Great, great, great, great, great. Wait for

0:48:30.230 --> 0:48:30.730
<v Speaker 1>10 minutes.

0:48:30.770 --> 0:48:31.509
<v Speaker 5>Great, great, great, great.

0:48:31.550 --> 0:48:35.770
<v Speaker 1>Grandfather. I mean, seriously, Patrick. Oh, my goodness. Thank you

0:48:35.830 --> 0:48:41.470
<v Speaker 1>so much for your time, mate. Really appreciate it. Honestly,

0:48:41.489 --> 0:48:45.779
<v Speaker 1>you either... Times are so crazy, you either feel the

0:48:45.860 --> 0:48:50.580
<v Speaker 1>chills or you start laughing, and not really that happily either.

0:48:51.140 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Mad times. Well, that's it from me. Coming up next

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:56.270
<v Speaker 1>is Shari Markson. Goodnight.