WEBVTT - The Bolt Report | 27 October

0:00:14.860 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Tonight, another politician grubbly exploiting the attack on MP Helen Haynes.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Is the Prime Minister waiting for something like what happened

0:00:23.860 --> 0:00:27.500
<v Speaker 2>to Dr Helen Haynes to occur to my office, to me,

0:00:27.950 --> 0:00:30.130
<v Speaker 2>for him to take our request seriously?

0:00:30.710 --> 0:00:34.489
<v Speaker 1>Why this Albanese government minister is the last person to

0:00:34.530 --> 0:00:38.940
<v Speaker 1>now teach politicians to be nicer. Also tonight, the prime

0:00:38.950 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>minister shows how hard it is to even get him

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.260
<v Speaker 1>to admit to what could be just an honest mistake,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>never mind admit to a lie. Plus Matt Canavan and

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.710
<v Speaker 1>lots more. But first, before I show you the latest

0:00:52.870 --> 0:00:56.350
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bowen scandals that should really finish him as our

0:00:56.410 --> 0:01:00.110
<v Speaker 1>climate change minister, First, an insight into how it's got

0:01:00.150 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>away with it for so long. Our facts don't actually

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.300
<v Speaker 1>count with global warming, true believers. On Saturday in Sydney,

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>leftist podcaster Hannah Ferguson addressed a crowd to demand more

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:17.620
<v Speaker 1>action to stop this alleged climate crisis. We are here today.

0:01:17.470 --> 0:01:20.490
<v Speaker 3>And we have hundreds if not thousands of young people.

0:01:20.390 --> 0:01:25.510
<v Speaker 4>Standing in the shade in October because we can't stand in.

0:01:25.430 --> 0:01:27.110
<v Speaker 5>The sun because of the overwhelming heat.

0:01:27.860 --> 0:01:32.410
<v Speaker 1>The bizarre thing that this overwhelming heat she was talking

0:01:32.450 --> 0:01:36.430
<v Speaker 1>about was, as she spoke, somewhere between a beautiful 22

0:01:36.430 --> 0:01:42.250
<v Speaker 1>degrees and a balmy 24. So that's about the long-term

0:01:42.330 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>average for that time of day in that time of year.

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>A normal spring day, in other words. But to a

0:01:49.180 --> 0:01:54.820
<v Speaker 1>global warming believer, even normal is now climate hell. Which

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.980
<v Speaker 1>brings me to Chris Bowen. Now, Bowen is not just

0:01:59.140 --> 0:02:02.820
<v Speaker 1>blind to facts, he's also incompetent. So even if you

0:02:02.860 --> 0:02:06.930
<v Speaker 1>believe there is a climate crisis, which there's not, and

0:02:06.990 --> 0:02:09.950
<v Speaker 1>even if you believe we could stop it, which we can't,

0:02:10.870 --> 0:02:14.049
<v Speaker 1>surely even Labor MPs must now figure that Bowen's got

0:02:14.150 --> 0:02:18.010
<v Speaker 1>to go. Now you just take for a start his

0:02:18.130 --> 0:02:23.570
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary run this week of embarrassments. Remember its climate conference

0:02:23.650 --> 0:02:26.670
<v Speaker 1>in Fiji and Tuvalu this month, which turned into such

0:02:26.690 --> 0:02:30.710
<v Speaker 1>a farce and a snoozefest? Bowen invited world leaders but

0:02:30.730 --> 0:02:34.049
<v Speaker 1>got just two to come from outside the Pacific, the

0:02:34.090 --> 0:02:39.930
<v Speaker 1>leaders of mighty East Timor and world power, the Maldives. Now,

0:02:39.990 --> 0:02:42.850
<v Speaker 1>Bowen told us three weeks ago the cost of this

0:02:42.990 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>flop was about $ 20 million.

0:02:46.250 --> 0:02:49.130
<v Speaker 6>Is it 20, as reported, 20 million, or is it more?

0:02:49.169 --> 0:02:53.010
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, that's... Yeah, no, no, that's in keeping with

0:02:53.050 --> 0:02:55.010
<v Speaker 7>the estimates at this point, yeah.

0:02:56.310 --> 0:02:59.810
<v Speaker 1>Now, $ 20 million is already bad enough, but yesterday, Bowen's

0:03:00.060 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>own department admitted in Senate estimates it actually cost much,

0:03:04.860 --> 0:03:05.500
<v Speaker 1>much more.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:12.980
<v Speaker 8>To date, we have contracted commitments associated with pre-cop delivery

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:20.419
<v Speaker 8>of $ 34. 6 million, $ 35 million?

0:03:20.419 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>$ 35 million? Nearly? $ 35 million? No, look, it's true. It

0:03:25.700 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>might turn out to be less than that because so

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.179
<v Speaker 1>few people turned up. Few of them were budgeted for.

0:03:31.180 --> 0:03:33.380
<v Speaker 1>$ 35 million, though. And then there was a blowout to

0:03:33.460 --> 0:03:37.490
<v Speaker 1>Bowen's plan to give billions of dollars in handouts to

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.270
<v Speaker 1>help people, mainly rich ones, buy home batteries. Another blunder.

0:03:41.590 --> 0:03:45.340
<v Speaker 1>This scheme... had already blown out to triple the original

0:03:45.380 --> 0:03:51.100
<v Speaker 1>budget of $ 2. 3 billion. Triple that. And Bowen's department admitted

0:03:51.140 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>last night the scheme had been too generous and was

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:58.340
<v Speaker 1>already running again out of cash. It just goes on.

0:03:59.380 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Also today, news that almost a quarter of the wind,

0:04:03.180 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>solar and battery projects that Bowen is back to replace

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.850
<v Speaker 1>the coal generators about to close have left his scheme.

0:04:10.050 --> 0:04:13.910
<v Speaker 1>We need the power of some replacement. They're off. The

0:04:13.930 --> 0:04:17.190
<v Speaker 1>cost is just too much, you see. And unbelievably, there

0:04:17.210 --> 0:04:21.070
<v Speaker 1>was a fourth flop this week. You know, we now

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>learn that Bone not only spent $ 2 million on broadcasting

0:04:26.500 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>services for a stud climate summit, we knew that already,

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:35.700
<v Speaker 1>but his official YouTube channel attracted just 90 subscribers. Just

0:04:35.700 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>90 for Bone's taxpayer-funded... blog about how he's saving the planet,

0:04:41.820 --> 0:04:44.340
<v Speaker 1>when even a vlog by a woman filming her pet

0:04:44.460 --> 0:04:50.140
<v Speaker 1>rats got over 10 times more. So that's four Bowen

0:04:50.220 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>flops just this week, and it's still only Tuesday. And

0:04:55.460 --> 0:04:57.300
<v Speaker 1>this keeps happening with him, as you know. I mean,

0:04:57.339 --> 0:04:59.730
<v Speaker 1>last week, Bowen admitted to the biggest blowout of all.

0:05:00.490 --> 0:05:03.750
<v Speaker 1>The Snowy 2.0 scheme went from an estimated cost of

0:05:03.750 --> 0:05:07.730
<v Speaker 1>$ 2 billion when Malcolm Turnbull first thought of it, the

0:05:08.220 --> 0:05:16.050
<v Speaker 1>foolish man, and to now $ 25 billion, or really $ 50

0:05:15.310 --> 0:05:17.089
<v Speaker 1>billion when you add the wires to hook it up.

0:05:17.089 --> 0:05:21.219
<v Speaker 1>$ 50 billion. Now, this, of course, is kind of battery

0:05:21.339 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>using wind and solar power to pump water uphill and

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:28.250
<v Speaker 1>let it fall again when you need hydro power. $ 50 billion. Now,

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.510
<v Speaker 1>add all these flops. To Bowen's many other disasters that

0:05:32.529 --> 0:05:35.750
<v Speaker 1>have listed over the years, especially the $ 9 billion he

0:05:35.790 --> 0:05:40.070
<v Speaker 1>committed to developing green hydrogen, a miracle green gas made

0:05:40.110 --> 0:05:44.850
<v Speaker 1>from water with massive amounts of green energy. Bowen drank

0:05:45.050 --> 0:05:45.950
<v Speaker 1>that Kool-Aid.

0:05:46.790 --> 0:05:50.910
<v Speaker 6>Our green hydrogen future is fundamental to that clean energy future.

0:05:51.980 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But now even Andrew Forrest, the billionaire who helped persuade

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Bowen that green hydrogen is going to work and save us,

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.710
<v Speaker 1>save the planet... Even he has now scrapped his own project.

0:06:02.730 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So Bowen is trying to con you into thinking he

0:06:07.260 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was always a bit sceptical, always, despite throwing out $ 9

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:12.730
<v Speaker 1>billion at it.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.370
<v Speaker 9>I never quite bought all the hype on green hydrogen.

0:06:17.930 --> 0:06:20.650
<v Speaker 1>I get it. By now you're probably, you know, eyes

0:06:20.770 --> 0:06:24.870
<v Speaker 1>are spinning or glazing over from all these billions, billions

0:06:24.930 --> 0:06:27.690
<v Speaker 1>wasted on this, billions wasted on that. It's like fantasy money,

0:06:27.750 --> 0:06:30.690
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean? So let me make it personal

0:06:31.650 --> 0:06:38.109
<v Speaker 1>to help you relate to this unforgivable waste. Bowen is

0:06:38.170 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>even spending your money to send people around the world

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.700
<v Speaker 1>to say that climate change is terrible and Bowen will

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:47.220
<v Speaker 1>help stop it. They're often unqualified people, but as long

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as they repeat his bull, they get all this international

0:06:50.020 --> 0:06:53.589
<v Speaker 1>travel and why wouldn't they? Examples.

0:06:54.529 --> 0:06:54.630
<v Speaker 10>One.

0:06:55.510 --> 0:06:58.030
<v Speaker 1>Bowen paid for former Labor Prime Minister Julia Gillard to

0:06:58.050 --> 0:07:02.690
<v Speaker 1>go to his climate conference to back him up. Julia Gillard. Two,

0:07:02.950 --> 0:07:05.779
<v Speaker 1>Bowen paid for friendly union officials to go as well.

0:07:06.060 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, union officials. Three, Bowen also has a climate

0:07:11.860 --> 0:07:15.310
<v Speaker 1>change ambassador spending nearly $ 150, 000 of your money in just

0:07:15.430 --> 0:07:19.450
<v Speaker 1>one year on travel around the world. Four, because it

0:07:19.470 --> 0:07:24.620
<v Speaker 1>keeps going on, Bowen is giving $ 650, 000 of your money

0:07:24.660 --> 0:07:27.660
<v Speaker 1>to send Aboriginal Australians and young Australians to go with

0:07:27.700 --> 0:07:31.100
<v Speaker 1>him to next month's climate conference in Turkey and babble

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:37.860
<v Speaker 1>his lines, keep him company, look decorative at the Australian pavilion.

0:07:37.860 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>$ 20, 000 each. And five, he's got this youth climate champion,

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>another $ 50, 000 for her to say stuff like this.

0:07:47.730 --> 0:07:51.710
<v Speaker 4>Hi, I'm Sally Higgins, the COP31 Presidency Youth Climate Champion.

0:07:52.100 --> 0:07:55.940
<v Speaker 4>So we're seeing climate impacts all through our lives. And

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.900
<v Speaker 4>for example, even in our food systems, we see that

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 4>climate change is impacting our ability to produce food and fibre.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.990
<v Speaker 1>Even our food systems, she's wrong, of course, just like

0:08:07.050 --> 0:08:09.170
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Ferguson was wrong at the top of the show.

0:08:09.930 --> 0:08:13.310
<v Speaker 1>The facts show that the Australian Bureau of Agricultural Resources

0:08:13.830 --> 0:08:19.130
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Sciences estimated that Australia's agricultural production value last

0:08:19.190 --> 0:08:24.770
<v Speaker 1>financial year just ended. It would hit a record $ 101 billion.

0:08:25.060 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>We are actually growing more, not less. Or we're earning

0:08:29.740 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>more from it. There is no crisis there. But, of course,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.470
<v Speaker 1>that's not a useful fact. So to climate crusaders in

0:08:36.970 --> 0:08:42.059
<v Speaker 1>Bowen's taxpayer-funded army, it's not a fact at all. There

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>has to be a climate crisis, whether the temperature is

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:50.619
<v Speaker 1>24 degrees in spring or crops are setting new records

0:08:50.780 --> 0:08:53.310
<v Speaker 1>or hurricanes are falling in numbers. There's got to be

0:08:53.330 --> 0:08:55.650
<v Speaker 1>a crisis, otherwise they don't get money and they don't

0:08:55.690 --> 0:08:57.650
<v Speaker 1>get the travel, et cetera, et cetera. And you know

0:08:57.670 --> 0:09:02.010
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate madness? I'm sure you know it already. I've

0:09:02.290 --> 0:09:07.380
<v Speaker 1>said it often enough. Nothing Australia does makes any noticeable

0:09:07.500 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>difference to the climate anyway. Ask any of those crusaders.

0:09:11.980 --> 0:09:16.230
<v Speaker 1>They can't tell you. Our emissions are too small. So

0:09:16.260 --> 0:09:18.990
<v Speaker 1>Bowen is spending billions of dollars we don't have to

0:09:19.030 --> 0:09:21.890
<v Speaker 1>make no difference that anyone can measure to a climate

0:09:21.929 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>crisis we can't see. Why is he still there? Now,

0:09:31.620 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we do need a fact check on this madness from

0:09:36.140 --> 0:09:39.490
<v Speaker 1>a real expert, and joining me is the former head

0:09:39.530 --> 0:09:43.510
<v Speaker 1>of Australia's then National Climate Centre and a former consultant

0:09:43.530 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to the World Meteorological Organisation, William Kinnamith. William, great to

0:09:48.460 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>see you again. There are three keys to the global

0:09:51.540 --> 0:09:55.870
<v Speaker 1>warming scare, of course. Global warming is dangerous. Humans cause

0:09:55.910 --> 0:09:59.530
<v Speaker 1>almost all of it and we can stop it. Let's

0:09:59.590 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>tick them off. for viewers, drawing on a fascinating paper

0:10:02.059 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that you've just written for the Climate Intelligence Group. First,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:09.990
<v Speaker 1>is global warming dangerous, or is there maybe a benefit

0:10:10.030 --> 0:10:11.969
<v Speaker 1>or two that we should take into consideration?

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 11>Andrew, there's very good benefits coming out of the global

0:10:15.780 --> 0:10:19.110
<v Speaker 11>warming because what we're finding, we've got now 45 years

0:10:19.190 --> 0:10:22.450
<v Speaker 11>of very good climate data, global climate data over the

0:10:22.490 --> 0:10:26.070
<v Speaker 11>satellite period. And what that's showing is that in the

0:10:26.110 --> 0:10:32.250
<v Speaker 11>northern hemisphere, in the agricultural areas, the spring thaw is

0:10:32.570 --> 0:10:37.230
<v Speaker 11>arriving earlier and the autumn freeze is coming later. So

0:10:37.309 --> 0:10:40.270
<v Speaker 11>you've got a much longer growing season. And that's part

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:44.050
<v Speaker 11>of the reason why... NASA satellites are showing a greening

0:10:44.070 --> 0:10:47.670
<v Speaker 11>of the planet because the biosphere is reacting to this

0:10:47.809 --> 0:10:51.530
<v Speaker 11>much longer growing season. And we're getting not only a

0:10:51.929 --> 0:10:54.650
<v Speaker 11>much more vigorous environment, but we're also getting much more

0:10:54.690 --> 0:10:55.370
<v Speaker 11>food production.

0:10:57.070 --> 0:11:00.410
<v Speaker 1>And that is a very, very important consideration, of course.

0:11:01.070 --> 0:11:03.490
<v Speaker 1>When the planet was colder in the Middle Ages, of course,

0:11:03.510 --> 0:11:08.810
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were starving. Second, do humans cause

0:11:08.850 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>almost all the warming we've seen? And here, of course,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.020
<v Speaker 1>is where your paper is so interesting.

0:11:15.500 --> 0:11:20.590
<v Speaker 11>Well, I'd suggest, Andrew, that carbon dioxide causes, changing carbon

0:11:20.610 --> 0:11:24.329
<v Speaker 11>dioxide causes almost no influence on the climate at all.

0:11:24.990 --> 0:11:29.030
<v Speaker 11>A couple of reasons for that. One is that the

0:11:29.130 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 11>IPCC talks about annual global average temperature. And so what

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.140
<v Speaker 11>we're trying to do is to reduce the increase in

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:42.090
<v Speaker 11>that by 1.5 degrees. Every year, there's an annual cycle

0:11:42.110 --> 0:11:45.390
<v Speaker 11>in the global temperature with a range of about three degrees.

0:11:45.970 --> 0:11:48.929
<v Speaker 11>And that's much more than what we're actually trying to

0:11:49.190 --> 0:11:49.730
<v Speaker 11>stop the.

0:11:51.450 --> 0:11:51.850
<v Speaker 5>Rise.

0:11:52.670 --> 0:11:56.770
<v Speaker 11>The other point about that is that the warmest time

0:11:56.809 --> 0:11:59.729
<v Speaker 11>of the year for the globe is in the Northern

0:11:59.770 --> 0:12:03.620
<v Speaker 11>Hemisphere summer. And that's the time when carbon dioxide is

0:12:03.660 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 11>being taken up by the plants and so forth of

0:12:05.900 --> 0:12:09.179
<v Speaker 11>the Northern Hemisphere and the concentration in the atmosphere is

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 11>actually decreasing. So the temperature and carbon dioxide are actually

0:12:13.100 --> 0:12:16.650
<v Speaker 11>out of phase. And so the third point, of course,

0:12:16.690 --> 0:12:20.130
<v Speaker 11>is that the fastest warming pattern on the planet is,

0:12:20.210 --> 0:12:23.470
<v Speaker 11>in fact, over the Arctic in winter, when there's almost

0:12:23.530 --> 0:12:27.810
<v Speaker 11>no sunshine, there's no solar radiation coming in, so there's

0:12:27.870 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 11>no greenhouse effect, and so you can't have an enhanced

0:12:30.740 --> 0:12:35.580
<v Speaker 11>greenhouse effect. So carbon dioxide really has got no influence

0:12:35.900 --> 0:12:36.459
<v Speaker 11>on our climate.

0:12:37.890 --> 0:12:39.790
<v Speaker 1>Now, I know that there are a lot of experts,

0:12:39.970 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>many of them pay to think that way, would disagree

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.500
<v Speaker 1>with you, but you're retired. You can say what the

0:12:45.540 --> 0:12:48.599
<v Speaker 1>hell you like without fear of losing your job or

0:12:48.620 --> 0:12:48.860
<v Speaker 1>your grant.

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 11>The reason they disagree is because of these computer models

0:12:53.340 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 11>and the way they put carbon dioxide into computer models

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:02.490
<v Speaker 11>is logically inconsistent. They say that carbon dioxide is going

0:13:02.530 --> 0:13:06.620
<v Speaker 11>to warm the atmosphere, but in fact... the greenhouse gases

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 11>of the atmosphere, mainly water vapour, they actually emit more

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.810
<v Speaker 11>radiation than they absorb. The greenhouse gases tend to cool

0:13:13.830 --> 0:13:16.630
<v Speaker 11>the atmosphere. It doesn't cool, of course, because we're getting

0:13:16.670 --> 0:13:19.370
<v Speaker 11>heat and latent energy coming from the surface, flowing from

0:13:19.390 --> 0:13:22.170
<v Speaker 11>the surface all the time. So there's a basic problem

0:13:22.330 --> 0:13:23.290
<v Speaker 11>with the computer models.

0:13:25.770 --> 0:13:28.740
<v Speaker 1>And, of course, it's been long notorious that the computer

0:13:28.780 --> 0:13:31.980
<v Speaker 1>models don't properly factor in the effect of cloud formation

0:13:32.660 --> 0:13:37.630
<v Speaker 1>in them. Now, lastly... and this is related, of course,

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.900
<v Speaker 1>is it in our power to stop the warming, even

0:13:40.940 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>if we did think it was dangerous? And I came

0:13:44.059 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>across a really interesting graphic tracking carbon dioxide concentrations in

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:53.010
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere, along with all the UN climate conferences over

0:13:53.030 --> 0:13:56.470
<v Speaker 1>the years, and of course, Chris Bowens, President of Negotiations

0:13:56.490 --> 0:14:00.810
<v Speaker 1>for the next one. I can't see any interruption in

0:14:00.830 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the steady growth of emissions as a result. There's a

0:14:02.940 --> 0:14:06.020
<v Speaker 1>little blip when You know, the world went into lockdowns

0:14:06.100 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and all that with the COVID pandemic, but I don't

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:13.500
<v Speaker 1>see the conferences making any real difference to that.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.380
<v Speaker 11>Well, carbon dioxide is just doing its normal thing and increasing,

0:14:19.470 --> 0:14:23.090
<v Speaker 11>and it's increasing because the oceans are warming, and so

0:14:23.110 --> 0:14:25.650
<v Speaker 11>there's much more carbon dioxide coming out of the oceans

0:14:25.990 --> 0:14:29.770
<v Speaker 11>than what there previously was when the oceans were cooler, say,

0:14:29.790 --> 0:14:31.150
<v Speaker 11>during the Little Ice Age period.

0:14:31.730 --> 0:14:32.010
<v Speaker 10>And so.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.300
<v Speaker 11>Carbon dioxide largely follows the temperature there.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.970
<v Speaker 1>It's not the other way around. And, in fact, that

0:14:41.010 --> 0:14:45.830
<v Speaker 1>was the lesson of the previous times that the world

0:14:46.910 --> 0:14:49.890
<v Speaker 1>increased in temperature. I'm going back hundreds of thousands of years.

0:14:50.150 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I tried to point that out to Al Gore at

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a climate conference where I was foolishly asked to ask

0:14:58.300 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a question and he just went nuts. He didn't want

0:15:00.820 --> 0:15:05.250
<v Speaker 1>to admit to it. Chris Bowen's approach then, what do

0:15:05.270 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you make of it?

0:15:07.390 --> 0:15:10.970
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think this whole business of trying to reduce

0:15:11.050 --> 0:15:14.390
<v Speaker 11>carbon or decarbonise our industries is actually just sending us

0:15:14.450 --> 0:15:17.660
<v Speaker 11>all broke because essentially it's not going to make any

0:15:17.940 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 11>difference at all. We're putting a lot of our money

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:27.350
<v Speaker 11>into these schemes to decarbonise the atmosphere and and industry

0:15:27.370 --> 0:15:30.070
<v Speaker 11>and does not make any difference at all. It's just

0:15:30.550 --> 0:15:33.450
<v Speaker 11>using money that could be done for much more beneficial

0:15:33.990 --> 0:15:39.210
<v Speaker 11>purposes in this hope to try and change the climate,

0:15:39.390 --> 0:15:40.930
<v Speaker 11>which it's not going to do.

0:15:42.550 --> 0:15:45.850
<v Speaker 1>It is so foolish. Books will be written about this

0:15:45.850 --> 0:15:48.630
<v Speaker 1>100 years from now, about this madness. It would be

0:15:49.070 --> 0:15:52.340
<v Speaker 1>put in equivalent to burning witches or something. I don't know.

0:15:53.260 --> 0:15:57.030
<v Speaker 1>William Kinnaman, thank you so much for your time. After

0:15:57.070 --> 0:16:01.260
<v Speaker 1>the break, amazing footage showing just how hard it is

0:16:01.300 --> 0:16:04.540
<v Speaker 1>for the Prime Minister to admit to even probably an

0:16:04.580 --> 0:16:12.500
<v Speaker 1>honest mistake. Matt Canavan after this. Look, incredible proof today

0:16:12.540 --> 0:16:15.140
<v Speaker 1>of how hard it is for Anthony Albanese to admit

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he was wrong, let alone that he lied, you know.

0:16:20.620 --> 0:16:22.950
<v Speaker 1>We've seen, of course, how the Prime Minister has claimed

0:16:23.110 --> 0:16:26.780
<v Speaker 1>he didn't fall off his stage and He didn't lie

0:16:26.830 --> 0:16:29.450
<v Speaker 1>when he promised more than 50 times not to hit

0:16:29.510 --> 0:16:32.570
<v Speaker 1>us with housing taxes. Just changed his mind. How he

0:16:32.610 --> 0:16:34.950
<v Speaker 1>last week even claimed a dirt sheet that he put

0:16:35.050 --> 0:16:38.980
<v Speaker 1>out on MP Helen Haynes was in fact actually praise

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:43.540
<v Speaker 1>for a woman of integrity. But in this case, all

0:16:43.580 --> 0:16:46.460
<v Speaker 1>he needed to do was to own up what you

0:16:46.500 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>could say was an innocent mistake or at worst, you know,

0:16:49.340 --> 0:16:53.330
<v Speaker 1>just a very sloppy bit of excuse making. Last month,

0:16:53.950 --> 0:16:58.250
<v Speaker 1>Albanese claimed the dodgy $ 6 million grant that he gave

0:16:58.270 --> 0:17:00.950
<v Speaker 1>to the Marrickville Golf Club was for this reason.

0:17:01.790 --> 0:17:06.570
<v Speaker 6>When it floods in Marrickville, raw sewage flows into the

0:17:06.609 --> 0:17:07.230
<v Speaker 6>Cooks River.

0:17:07.830 --> 0:17:10.230
<v Speaker 5>That is what the funding is for.

0:17:11.550 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, last night at Senate Estimates, his own department staff said, actually,

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:18.830
<v Speaker 1>that it didn't have anything to do with the sewage, so... Look,

0:17:18.890 --> 0:17:21.470
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister had nowhere to go, caught short. The

0:17:21.510 --> 0:17:25.750
<v Speaker 1>opposition today went for his throat. But Albanese still couldn't

0:17:25.790 --> 0:17:29.770
<v Speaker 1>just straight off the bat, front up, I made a mistake,

0:17:29.830 --> 0:17:30.490
<v Speaker 1>couldn't say that.

0:17:31.750 --> 0:17:35.770
<v Speaker 12>The Prime Minister told this House his $ 6 million taxpayer-funded

0:17:35.810 --> 0:17:39.930
<v Speaker 12>grant to Marrickville Golf Club was to fix sewerage flows into.

0:17:39.770 --> 0:17:40.510
<v Speaker 1>The Cooks River.

0:17:40.730 --> 0:17:44.629
<v Speaker 12>Last week, the Department of Infrastructure confirmed to a Senate

0:17:44.710 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 12>inquiry sewerage works were not in the scope of the

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.900
<v Speaker 12>$ 6 million grant. This was confirmed again at Senate Estimates

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 12>last night. Will the Prime Minister give Australians a straight answer,

0:17:55.580 --> 0:17:59.980
<v Speaker 12>admit he misled the House and correct the record?

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 6>Sewage issues are a long-standing concern on this site and

0:18:03.740 --> 0:18:08.820
<v Speaker 6>I'm advised that in September 2025, that is after we

0:18:08.859 --> 0:18:12.700
<v Speaker 6>had made the commitment, the New South Wales Government committed

0:18:12.780 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 6>funding towards the sewage-related aspects of the club.

0:18:17.230 --> 0:18:21.780
<v Speaker 1>He twisted, he turned, he obfuscated, and it took a long,

0:18:21.859 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>long time, repeated questioning before Albanese finally coughed up the truth,

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.619
<v Speaker 1>or is it, that yes, I had been.

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:32.620
<v Speaker 5>Wrong.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.230
<v Speaker 6>It was not correct to save. that the federal grant

0:18:37.470 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 6>would deal with the Sewer Row, well, to quote the

0:18:44.390 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 6>State Government media release of 17 September 2025, I assume

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.939
<v Speaker 6>it's from the State Government, putting an end to Sewer

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 6>Row's marital golf course to get a whole lot better.

0:18:55.220 --> 0:18:58.020
<v Speaker 6>After we made the commitment to the club, which included

0:18:58.180 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 6>fixing this issue, which has been an issue since 1947,

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.100
<v Speaker 6>the State Government have stepped in.

0:19:04.619 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 5>That is a good thing.

0:19:06.140 --> 0:19:10.420
<v Speaker 6>I was not aware of the state government grant. Why

0:19:10.460 --> 0:19:11.100
<v Speaker 6>would I be?

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:16.510
<v Speaker 1>Well, bottle that one for future posterity. I mean, it's crazy.

0:19:16.810 --> 0:19:19.330
<v Speaker 1>It made me wonder, you know, is it that it's

0:19:19.350 --> 0:19:21.790
<v Speaker 1>got a bit of imposter syndrome, that he's not really

0:19:21.850 --> 0:19:24.090
<v Speaker 1>cut out to be Prime Minister, that he doesn't dare?

0:19:24.900 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>give any sign that he could be wrong or something?

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it is, the lying and the this

0:19:30.020 --> 0:19:32.180
<v Speaker 1>and the that and the twisting? Is that really what

0:19:32.220 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>it is? I mean, a really confident person would say, yeah,

0:19:34.790 --> 0:19:37.070
<v Speaker 1>I got it wrong, you know, and everyone's like, oh, well,

0:19:37.270 --> 0:19:41.350
<v Speaker 1>good on you, but he just can't do it. Anyway,

0:19:41.630 --> 0:19:43.510
<v Speaker 1>more to come on that story, I'm sure. Joining me

0:19:43.609 --> 0:19:46.670
<v Speaker 1>a short while ago was our Tuesday regular commentator, Matt Canavan,

0:19:46.690 --> 0:19:49.949
<v Speaker 1>the Nationals leader. Matt Canavan, thank you so much for

0:19:50.020 --> 0:19:55.310
<v Speaker 1>joining me. What does this tell you, Anthony Albanese's unbelievable

0:19:55.810 --> 0:19:58.570
<v Speaker 1>reluctance to simply say, I made a mistake?

0:20:01.430 --> 0:20:04.090
<v Speaker 13>Well, look, it's a pattern of behaviour, Andrew, a pattern

0:20:04.109 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 13>of behaviour from a Prime Minister where It seems easier

0:20:06.900 --> 0:20:09.150
<v Speaker 13>for a dentist to pull out teeth than it is

0:20:09.210 --> 0:20:12.370
<v Speaker 13>to pull out the truth from our Prime Minister. Time

0:20:12.390 --> 0:20:18.190
<v Speaker 13>and time again, he has a hard relationship with the truth,

0:20:18.670 --> 0:20:22.660
<v Speaker 13>whether it's not admitting to falling off stage, whether it's

0:20:22.700 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 13>not admitting that he did say that his digital duty

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.140
<v Speaker 13>of care legislation is to deal with misinformation and disinformation.

0:20:28.180 --> 0:20:30.050
<v Speaker 9>We have him on tape saying that. and then the

0:20:30.070 --> 0:20:30.540
<v Speaker 9>very next.

0:20:30.410 --> 0:20:35.669
<v Speaker 13>Day he denies it, and now this Grant debacle as well.

0:20:36.570 --> 0:20:38.990
<v Speaker 13>Why can't the Prime Minister just admit a mistake when

0:20:39.030 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 13>he makes it? And then, of course, the biggest mistake,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 13>which is at the origins of the second term of

0:20:43.740 --> 0:20:46.340
<v Speaker 13>the Anthony Albanese government, is the lies he told the

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 13>Australian people. He told the Australian people... 50 times at

0:20:49.700 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 13>the last election, he wouldn't raise taxes on a variety

0:20:52.180 --> 0:20:53.300
<v Speaker 13>of things like negative.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.140
<v Speaker 9>Gearing, on capital gains. And he did. He did.

0:20:58.180 --> 0:21:01.310
<v Speaker 13>And that lack of trust now is, I think, eroding

0:21:01.670 --> 0:21:07.150
<v Speaker 13>our social harmony. It's a lack of trust is contributing

0:21:07.230 --> 0:21:10.630
<v Speaker 13>to a lack of business confidence in our future. And

0:21:11.030 --> 0:21:12.310
<v Speaker 13>I think the government just has to be up front

0:21:12.330 --> 0:21:13.369
<v Speaker 13>with us. And the best thing they could do is

0:21:13.390 --> 0:21:15.070
<v Speaker 13>just have an election. get an election out of the

0:21:15.109 --> 0:21:18.230
<v Speaker 13>way and actually take their policies to the people and

0:21:18.270 --> 0:21:18.930
<v Speaker 13>be judged by that.

0:21:19.869 --> 0:21:24.340
<v Speaker 1>I have been shocked, Matt, by politicians exploiting that terrible

0:21:24.390 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>attack on independent MP Helen Haynes to push their own

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>agenda when all we know so far is that she

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.740
<v Speaker 1>was rammed, allegedly, by a mentally disturbed man who frightened

0:21:37.780 --> 0:21:40.820
<v Speaker 1>his neighbours with his erratic behaviour. He had ranted at

0:21:40.859 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>his father, who was actually a friend of Haynes's, Last

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>night I showed the Greens leader, David Shoebridge, somehow link

0:21:48.740 --> 0:21:50.660
<v Speaker 1>this to the war in Gaza and I thought that

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:55.390
<v Speaker 1>was appalling. Now we've got this disgusting example from independent

0:21:55.430 --> 0:22:00.050
<v Speaker 1>Senator Fatima Payman exploiting it to get more staff. Now,

0:22:00.090 --> 0:22:02.570
<v Speaker 1>the grab is long, but I tell you, it is

0:22:02.650 --> 0:22:03.870
<v Speaker 1>so damning. Have a look.

0:22:05.070 --> 0:22:07.250
<v Speaker 2>Has the Prime Minister refused to make a decision on

0:22:07.290 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 2>my request because unlike all the other defectors I defected

0:22:11.020 --> 0:22:12.219
<v Speaker 2>from the Labor Party....

0:22:13.650 --> 0:22:14.740
<v Speaker 5>I will have to ask him.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Am I being made an example of?

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to ask him that question.

0:22:19.420 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, please do. And I'm glad this is on the record.

0:22:21.900 --> 0:22:26.350
<v Speaker 2>Please look into the fact that my staff are burning out.

0:22:27.970 --> 0:22:32.870
<v Speaker 2>They can't take this any longer. And is the Prime

0:22:32.890 --> 0:22:35.970
<v Speaker 2>Minister waiting for something like what happened to Dr Helen

0:22:35.990 --> 0:22:39.660
<v Speaker 2>Haynes to occur to my office, to me, for him

0:22:39.700 --> 0:22:41.540
<v Speaker 2>to take our request seriously?

0:22:43.530 --> 0:22:47.970
<v Speaker 8>Look, I personally think that's an outrageous suggestion, Senator Payman.

0:22:48.410 --> 0:22:51.149
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can't believe that I'm saying that or making

0:22:51.170 --> 0:22:54.130
<v Speaker 2>that suggestion because it's been two years.

0:22:55.970 --> 0:22:57.590
<v Speaker 9>That was quite an outrageous statement.

0:22:57.750 --> 0:22:59.260
<v Speaker 5>I would ask you to withdraw it.

0:22:59.350 --> 0:23:01.130
<v Speaker 9>I appreciate your frustration.

0:23:01.490 --> 0:23:03.150
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not sure that conflating those two issues.

0:23:03.170 --> 0:23:07.669
<v Speaker 2>Chair, with all due respect, I haven't made any accusation.

0:23:07.869 --> 0:23:08.750
<v Speaker 8>I think you just did.

0:23:09.109 --> 0:23:12.310
<v Speaker 9>It wasn't... I've been waiting two years, Chair.

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.620
<v Speaker 2>And I am tired of looking in my staff's eyes

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:18.830
<v Speaker 2>and saying, you just have to deal with this because

0:23:18.869 --> 0:23:20.750
<v Speaker 2>the Prime Minister is petty.

0:23:20.770 --> 0:23:24.010
<v Speaker 7>And we thought particularly on a day like today.

0:23:24.830 --> 0:23:25.950
<v Speaker 5>We should all be better than that.

0:23:26.190 --> 0:23:27.189
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely.

0:23:27.910 --> 0:23:28.210
<v Speaker 10>I agree.

0:23:28.230 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But you're not going to be. Matt, that is just

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>such an astonishing and shocking insight.

0:23:37.420 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 13>Look, Andrew, I mean, I have some sympathy for the

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.740
<v Speaker 13>crossbench senators who are being used as political playthings by

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 13>the Prime Minister. If you look at the staffing allocations,

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.940
<v Speaker 13>it's no doubt that favourites are being played and that

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:51.020
<v Speaker 13>shouldn't happen.

0:23:51.140 --> 0:23:53.460
<v Speaker 9>It's not the right thing to do.

0:23:54.030 --> 0:23:58.010
<v Speaker 13>But I also agree with you, as we discussed last week, that, look,

0:23:58.090 --> 0:24:02.550
<v Speaker 13>I find it distasteful to use personal and family tragedy.

0:24:02.850 --> 0:24:05.530
<v Speaker 9>It's a horrific tragedy that's occurred. uh, to Dr.

0:24:05.570 --> 0:24:09.270
<v Speaker 13>Haynes, uh, uh, to pursue, uh, uh, things you were

0:24:09.310 --> 0:24:12.150
<v Speaker 13>doing anyway. And Fatima Payne has been, Panna Payne, sorry,

0:24:12.170 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 13>has been on this crusade, uh, for more staff for

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.510
<v Speaker 13>some time, uh, I just think there's a time and

0:24:19.530 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 13>a place. Despite, I do think the Prime Minister is

0:24:23.390 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 13>weaponising the allocation of staff. I don't think he's doing

0:24:26.300 --> 0:24:30.820
<v Speaker 13>it to in any way put people at risk. I'm

0:24:30.859 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 13>not making that claim. But there is politics being played here.

0:24:34.580 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 13>There's a political way you could raise these issues without

0:24:38.220 --> 0:24:40.740
<v Speaker 13>seeking to do so off the platform of other people's grief.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.379
<v Speaker 13>I do think it's distasteful. I've tried to avoid it

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 13>and I'll continue to take that approach.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.619
<v Speaker 1>Well said. I think two things can be true at

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time, that the Prime Minister's behaving disgracefully with

0:24:51.780 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>playing politics with staff, particularly regarding One Nation, but to

0:24:56.540 --> 0:25:01.379
<v Speaker 1>use this tragedy to try to get him and morally

0:25:01.420 --> 0:25:04.659
<v Speaker 1>blackmail him into giving you more staff or her more staff,

0:25:04.700 --> 0:25:07.980
<v Speaker 1>that is just out of bounds. That's not the only

0:25:08.030 --> 0:25:10.250
<v Speaker 1>thing that's come out of Senate estimates that's got you

0:25:10.290 --> 0:25:10.970
<v Speaker 1>stirred up, Matt.

0:25:14.369 --> 0:25:17.810
<v Speaker 13>No, we've had a number of issues come up, Andrew,

0:25:17.830 --> 0:25:22.030
<v Speaker 13>but one in particular is the government's just taking water

0:25:22.050 --> 0:25:29.689
<v Speaker 13>back from farmers with no consideration of the impact on

0:25:29.950 --> 0:25:34.909
<v Speaker 13>their livelihoods. Last night it was revealed that the government's

0:25:35.010 --> 0:25:37.670
<v Speaker 13>signed up or effectively letting the New South Wales government

0:25:38.410 --> 0:25:41.370
<v Speaker 13>put water over farmers' land without their consent.

0:25:42.010 --> 0:25:44.869
<v Speaker 9>New South Wales changed legislation last year to allow this

0:25:44.910 --> 0:25:45.290
<v Speaker 9>to happen.

0:25:45.609 --> 0:25:48.030
<v Speaker 13>The Commonwealth Government says that, oh, no, we don't use

0:25:48.130 --> 0:25:50.770
<v Speaker 13>our water to take over people's farms, to damage their

0:25:50.790 --> 0:25:51.389
<v Speaker 13>farm property.

0:25:52.270 --> 0:25:54.669
<v Speaker 9>But when I drill down, actually.

0:25:54.690 --> 0:25:58.690
<v Speaker 13>They are sitting back and washing their hands, quite literally,

0:25:59.010 --> 0:26:00.909
<v Speaker 13>while the New South Wales Government does this to our

0:26:00.950 --> 0:26:04.229
<v Speaker 13>farmers and our landowners. I think it's disgraceful. I think

0:26:04.250 --> 0:26:06.050
<v Speaker 13>we need to protect property rights. We particularly need to

0:26:06.310 --> 0:26:08.910
<v Speaker 13>help our farmers who are doing it very tough. potentially

0:26:08.930 --> 0:26:11.530
<v Speaker 13>facing going into dry conditions. They don't need a government

0:26:11.550 --> 0:26:13.230
<v Speaker 13>that makes their life so much harder.

0:26:13.850 --> 0:26:18.420
<v Speaker 1>Now, the seat of Capricorn is very interesting. Michelle Landry's

0:26:18.460 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>stepping aside. She's retiring. There's a lot of speculation that

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:23.850
<v Speaker 1>you're going to run for it.

0:26:24.420 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 7>Are you?

0:26:24.780 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Because if you do, you'll probably be running against either

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:32.669
<v Speaker 1>James Ashby or Pauline Hanson herself for that seat for

0:26:32.750 --> 0:26:33.190
<v Speaker 1>One Nation.

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 13>Look, I know what I'm going to do, Andrew, but

0:26:36.859 --> 0:26:40.020
<v Speaker 13>I'm not going to tell you here tonight, sorry. Like

0:26:40.220 --> 0:26:44.460
<v Speaker 13>Michelle's announcement last week, any announcement about the LNP's candidate

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.950
<v Speaker 13>Capricornium will be made locally. We'll make it among our

0:26:47.050 --> 0:26:50.490
<v Speaker 13>people in central Queensland. So I'll wait till at the

0:26:50.510 --> 0:26:53.390
<v Speaker 13>very least I'm back there to say anything about my future.

0:26:53.470 --> 0:26:55.970
<v Speaker 13>I'm stuck down here in Canberra, unfortunately. I've got a

0:26:55.970 --> 0:26:58.730
<v Speaker 13>job to do here, but my job here is to

0:26:58.790 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 13>fight for those people back who I represent all through Queensland,

0:27:01.820 --> 0:27:04.340
<v Speaker 13>but I take special interest in central Queensland, given where

0:27:04.380 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 13>I'm from, and very proud of what we've achieved in

0:27:07.770 --> 0:27:10.129
<v Speaker 13>the area in getting the Adani mine going. I think

0:27:10.170 --> 0:27:11.889
<v Speaker 13>you might be able to see that in the background.

0:27:11.910 --> 0:27:13.629
<v Speaker 13>I think there's a pineapple in the background. We're trying

0:27:13.650 --> 0:27:16.790
<v Speaker 13>to protect our local pineapple industry right now from foreign imports,

0:27:17.730 --> 0:27:21.429
<v Speaker 13>and we've delivered massive amounts of infrastructure from dams to

0:27:21.470 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 13>roads for the region. I'm very passionate about that because

0:27:24.580 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 13>we need to open up new parts of our country

0:27:26.660 --> 0:27:29.219
<v Speaker 13>like central Queensland, especially to take the pressure off our

0:27:29.260 --> 0:27:29.740
<v Speaker 13>major cities.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:34.050
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting. I think I got a steer there, but

0:27:34.570 --> 0:27:36.730
<v Speaker 1>I don't dare say in case I'm wrong, but I

0:27:36.770 --> 0:27:39.430
<v Speaker 1>think viewers will make up their own minds. Matt Canavan,

0:27:39.530 --> 0:27:41.590
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to that announcement. Thank you so much for

0:27:41.609 --> 0:27:42.030
<v Speaker 1>your time.

0:27:42.050 --> 0:27:43.230
<v Speaker 9>Thanks, Andrew.

0:27:44.609 --> 0:27:47.330
<v Speaker 1>Just going back to the Prime Minister's $ 6 million grant

0:27:47.369 --> 0:27:50.510
<v Speaker 1>to the golf club, which he argued was really... His

0:27:50.570 --> 0:27:53.340
<v Speaker 1>passion about it was for the surge works. That was

0:27:53.380 --> 0:27:55.620
<v Speaker 1>a really important thing. If it turns out New South

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Wales ended up paying for it so the money wasn't

0:27:57.540 --> 0:28:00.570
<v Speaker 1>needed for that, Why did this grant still go ahead?

0:28:00.690 --> 0:28:05.260
<v Speaker 1>Why did they still get the six mil? After the break,

0:28:05.820 --> 0:28:10.379
<v Speaker 1>the viciously anti-Jewish ad for a Democrat candidate as Donald

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:19.660
<v Speaker 1>Trump faces defeat next week in America's midterm elections. That's true.

0:28:19.700 --> 0:28:21.780
<v Speaker 1>I've been critical of some of the things that Donald

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.230
<v Speaker 1>Trump has said and done lately, and Some people say, oh,

0:28:25.430 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what kind of conservative are you? You've gone woke, as if,

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know. Well, what they should consider is that what

0:28:34.900 --> 0:28:38.290
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is doing with this crazy behaviour and some

0:28:38.310 --> 0:28:41.690
<v Speaker 1>of this crazy talk is helping to elect Democrats in

0:28:41.730 --> 0:28:46.030
<v Speaker 1>next Tuesday's midterm elections. And bad as Trump is, some

0:28:46.070 --> 0:28:50.580
<v Speaker 1>of those Democrats are worse than Now, one, for instance,

0:28:50.660 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is Abdullah El-Sayed. There's a virulently anti-Israel Muslim hardline and

0:28:56.810 --> 0:29:01.030
<v Speaker 1>far-left agitator running for the Senate in Michigan. And if

0:29:01.070 --> 0:29:04.650
<v Speaker 1>he wins, the Democrats could take over the Senate from

0:29:04.670 --> 0:29:08.710
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans and cripple Donald Trump's power. Now, for an

0:29:08.750 --> 0:29:12.550
<v Speaker 1>example of the people backing this bloke, here is an

0:29:12.630 --> 0:29:16.270
<v Speaker 1>ad in his support, put together by the viciously anti-Israel

0:29:16.370 --> 0:29:21.580
<v Speaker 1>Young Turks group. and not condemned by Al-Sayed. And its

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.780
<v Speaker 1>argument that Americans are paying more for eggs and bananas

0:29:26.700 --> 0:29:30.900
<v Speaker 1>to help Jews murder Palestinians. What about the bananas?

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:32.270
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I got them too.

0:29:33.270 --> 0:29:34.270
<v Speaker 14>But, honey.

0:29:35.050 --> 0:29:35.230
<v Speaker 9>What?

0:29:35.870 --> 0:29:37.590
<v Speaker 5>You're going to have to put those eggs back.

0:29:37.890 --> 0:29:38.750
<v Speaker 1>They don't like eggs anymore?

0:29:38.770 --> 0:29:39.870
<v Speaker 5>No, they like.

0:29:40.410 --> 0:29:40.670
<v Speaker 14>eggs.

0:29:41.210 --> 0:29:43.070
<v Speaker 9>But we have to set that $ 7 aside.

0:29:44.170 --> 0:29:45.310
<v Speaker 5>For killing Palestinians?

0:29:46.300 --> 0:29:46.490
<v Speaker 9>What?

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.300
<v Speaker 1>I mean, don't we give Israel $ 4 billion a year anyways?

0:29:49.380 --> 0:29:53.180
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and now we're giving them another $ 26 billion.

0:29:53.220 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you know how much that is per American taxpayer?

0:29:57.620 --> 0:29:59.810
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the yearly aid to Israel for its

0:29:59.890 --> 0:30:04.650
<v Speaker 1>defence from terrorist attack, that is funding originally set up

0:30:04.710 --> 0:30:09.650
<v Speaker 1>by one of al-Sayed's fellow Democrats, then President Barack Obama.

0:30:10.530 --> 0:30:13.969
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is Donald Trump's first White House spokesman, Sean Spicer.

0:30:14.190 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to him a short while ago. Sean Spicer,

0:30:17.500 --> 0:30:21.500
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your time. Al-Sayed's campaign says, no,

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.340
<v Speaker 1>this ad is not his ad. He hasn't condemned it,

0:30:25.340 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he just says it's not my ad. Do you buy that?

0:30:29.170 --> 0:30:32.110
<v Speaker 10>Well, technically, he might be right, but the reality is

0:30:32.430 --> 0:30:35.390
<v Speaker 10>that that's a group that's speaking on his behalf.

0:30:35.410 --> 0:30:37.540
<v Speaker 5>I mean, what's so hard? Andrew, here's what I don't understand.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 10>It's the same thing with the Muslim Brotherhood. Just say,

0:30:40.820 --> 0:30:43.380
<v Speaker 10>I condemn it. What's so hard about that? I don't

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.060
<v Speaker 10>understand it. It's offensive, and it's anti-Semitic. All you have

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.070
<v Speaker 10>to say is, yeah, I think it's offensive.

0:30:49.460 --> 0:30:50.180
<v Speaker 5>It's not mine.

0:30:50.310 --> 0:30:52.350
<v Speaker 10>I condemn it. I wish the people would take it down,

0:30:52.570 --> 0:30:55.110
<v Speaker 10>put it up. And I understand where there's outrage.

0:30:55.170 --> 0:30:57.090
<v Speaker 5>And you know what? The issue would go away in

0:30:57.130 --> 0:30:57.670
<v Speaker 5>two seconds.

0:30:58.110 --> 0:31:01.470
<v Speaker 10>And once again, he's doubling down because you've got to

0:31:01.490 --> 0:31:03.610
<v Speaker 10>think to yourself, if you don't condemn that, and this

0:31:03.670 --> 0:31:05.650
<v Speaker 10>is something that we on the right face all the time,

0:31:05.990 --> 0:31:09.500
<v Speaker 10>where everyone has to condemn every single thing that anybody says.

0:31:09.900 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 5>But here on the left, he just gets dismissed it as, oh,

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:13.180
<v Speaker 5>it's not mine.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>You said anti-Semitic. I totally agree with you. It feeds

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.700
<v Speaker 1>into an anti-Semitic trope that any trouble you have, you know,

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:27.010
<v Speaker 1>those Jews are behind it. What scares me about this

0:31:27.550 --> 0:31:30.340
<v Speaker 1>is that it's seen now, that kind of stuff, as

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.270
<v Speaker 1>something you can do mainstream now and kind of get

0:31:34.310 --> 0:31:36.450
<v Speaker 1>away with, in fact, win an election with it, when

0:31:36.490 --> 0:31:39.490
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, for a start, egg prices are actually

0:31:39.870 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>set almost entirely by domestic factors like, you know, avian

0:31:43.660 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>flu killing chickens or whatever, not by defending Jews in

0:31:46.940 --> 0:31:51.460
<v Speaker 1>Israel from terrorist armies. How is it that this ad

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:54.090
<v Speaker 1>could go to air as an election winner?

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.100
<v Speaker 10>Well, the one thing I'll say that's fascinating today is

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 10>that a lot of Democrats, prominent Democrats, have come out

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 10>and said, no way. This is no matter where you

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 10>come down, including Haley Stevens, who is one of his

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:09.490
<v Speaker 10>primary opponents in Michigan.

0:32:09.890 --> 0:32:11.570
<v Speaker 5>So I will give at least.

0:32:11.510 --> 0:32:14.890
<v Speaker 10>Some elements of the Democratic Party credit for denouncing this

0:32:14.930 --> 0:32:16.470
<v Speaker 10>and saying he's got to do this. One of the

0:32:16.870 --> 0:32:19.870
<v Speaker 10>former chairs of the Democratic National Committee equally called and

0:32:19.890 --> 0:32:22.650
<v Speaker 10>condemned it. This is what baffles me. If you want

0:32:22.690 --> 0:32:25.190
<v Speaker 10>this issue to go away, if you're El Saeed, This

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:26.900
<v Speaker 10>is not a good thing to have to deal with

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.860
<v Speaker 10>eight days out from election. Just say, yeah, of course.

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.140
<v Speaker 5>I condemn it, and the news cycle would end and

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 5>we'd move on.

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.900
<v Speaker 10>The best thing for Republicans right now is that if

0:32:35.940 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 10>we can have the discussion about this ad for another

0:32:39.020 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 10>day or two or three, this just hurts him.

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:43.220
<v Speaker 5>And it's a reminder to.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.790
<v Speaker 10>The Jews that live in Michigan that have traditionally voted

0:32:46.830 --> 0:32:49.890
<v Speaker 10>Democrat about how crazy and out of touch this guy is.

0:32:50.710 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But you say this guy like it's a one-off, right?

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:58.030
<v Speaker 1>This is a one-off. Or, Sean, is this part of

0:32:58.130 --> 0:33:01.420
<v Speaker 1>a wider group within the Democrats... It's a.

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 5>Growing group, and you make a really good distinction. It's

0:33:04.100 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 5>not a one-off.

0:33:05.620 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 10>You look at some of the comments that Mayor Mandami

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 10>of New York has made, some of these other DSA

0:33:11.370 --> 0:33:15.590
<v Speaker 10>candidates in particular. This is becoming more of the mainstream position.

0:33:16.010 --> 0:33:16.830
<v Speaker 5>And the reason you.

0:33:16.770 --> 0:33:19.830
<v Speaker 10>Know that is even the ones who may not agree

0:33:19.870 --> 0:33:23.050
<v Speaker 10>with it policy-wise or have been traditional friends of Israel—

0:33:23.770 --> 0:33:26.950
<v Speaker 10>rarely speak out now, right? Think of the silence of

0:33:26.990 --> 0:33:30.650
<v Speaker 10>a guy like Chuck Schumer, who should be on record saying, no, no, no,

0:33:30.790 --> 0:33:31.710
<v Speaker 10>this is offensive.

0:33:31.750 --> 0:33:33.910
<v Speaker 5>Bernie Sanders, he's Jewish as well.

0:33:34.270 --> 0:33:37.790
<v Speaker 10>These tropes that are being peddled in the Democratic Party

0:33:37.830 --> 0:33:41.070
<v Speaker 10>right now used to be things that would get called out. Now,

0:33:41.630 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 10>even if you probably don't entirely agree with that, you

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.820
<v Speaker 10>have to be, you're silenced because you're afraid of stating

0:33:47.860 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 10>that position.

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.540
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was interesting that Barack Obama has been

0:33:51.580 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>now addressing rallies too chipped at Donald Trump. Of all

0:33:56.060 --> 0:33:58.500
<v Speaker 1>the things he said about Donald Trump, it seems that

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.660
<v Speaker 1>this one is the one that got under his skin.

0:34:01.700 --> 0:34:02.140
<v Speaker 1>Have a listen.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.310
<v Speaker 15>I don't know if you've noticed, but he seems very

0:34:06.370 --> 0:34:11.110
<v Speaker 15>focused on home renovations. Guy's building a ballroom that's bigger

0:34:11.130 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 15>than the White House. Paved over the Rose Garden, put

0:34:14.620 --> 0:34:19.820
<v Speaker 15>a helicopter pad on the South Lawn, and there's gold everywhere.

0:34:19.860 --> 0:34:24.460
<v Speaker 15>What's up with the gold? Everything, more gold. He's got

0:34:24.500 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 15>the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a cheesecake factory.

0:34:29.010 --> 0:34:32.029
<v Speaker 14>I've taken care of the White House. I fixed it

0:34:32.070 --> 0:34:36.030
<v Speaker 14>with the finest artisans in the world. Guys like Obama,

0:34:36.570 --> 0:34:39.410
<v Speaker 14>they would pass the front door, they'd see the broken windows,

0:34:40.210 --> 0:34:44.670
<v Speaker 14>masonry that see the broken, the beautiful pilasters that were

0:34:44.730 --> 0:34:48.450
<v Speaker 14>all broken. For years they were broken and he wouldn't

0:34:48.510 --> 0:34:51.390
<v Speaker 14>notice because he doesn't notice that. He doesn't notice dirt

0:34:51.860 --> 0:34:52.390
<v Speaker 14>and filth.

0:34:53.010 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, Sean, I've actually slept in one of Saddam Hussein's palaces.

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.460
<v Speaker 1>I didn't notice that much gold, to be honest, and

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.259
<v Speaker 1>I thought the workmanship was so shabby. So I think

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.060
<v Speaker 1>that's a real insult if you think if you're likening

0:35:05.100 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>what Trump is doing to Saddam Hussein.

0:35:08.030 --> 0:35:09.410
<v Speaker 5>Well, you and I share that.

0:35:09.469 --> 0:35:11.969
<v Speaker 10>We both spent a night in one of Saddam's palaces,

0:35:11.989 --> 0:35:12.770
<v Speaker 10>and I'm with you.

0:35:12.790 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it was the nicest thing ever.

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:16.940
<v Speaker 10>Now, maybe it was rated before I got in there,

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 10>but it certainly wasn't ornate.

0:35:19.100 --> 0:35:19.940
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't nice.

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 10>It didn't have any gold in it, as a matter

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:23.790
<v Speaker 10>of fact. I've got some pictures to prove it. But

0:35:23.810 --> 0:35:25.469
<v Speaker 10>the other thing is, and I don't know if the

0:35:25.550 --> 0:35:28.130
<v Speaker 10>Australian audience got this. But the idea that he was

0:35:28.150 --> 0:35:31.110
<v Speaker 10>trying to make a reference to the Cheesecake Factory is

0:35:31.190 --> 0:35:33.570
<v Speaker 10>such an elitist thing. This is where a lot of

0:35:33.610 --> 0:35:36.390
<v Speaker 10>families save up to spend a good family dinner.

0:35:36.430 --> 0:35:38.260
<v Speaker 5>It's actually, I will.

0:35:38.110 --> 0:35:40.500
<v Speaker 10>Say that I do love a good Cheesecake Factory. The

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.060
<v Speaker 10>meals are amazing. The desserts are fantastic. But it's so

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.700
<v Speaker 10>insulting to hear President Obama snub his nose at that.

0:35:47.820 --> 0:35:49.700
<v Speaker 10>And the Cheesecake Factory, I don't know that there's a

0:35:49.739 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 10>single ounce of gold in the entire place. It was

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.779
<v Speaker 10>sort of, it just showed and exposed how out of

0:35:55.820 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 10>touch these guys are.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.020
<v Speaker 1>Well, there you go. Versailles has got a lot of

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>gold in it too. I don't see people knocking the

0:36:01.219 --> 0:36:08.469
<v Speaker 1>design of that. Just quickly, Sean, just very close now

0:36:08.510 --> 0:36:14.210
<v Speaker 1>to this election, how's it looking? You were a bit

0:36:14.230 --> 0:36:19.860
<v Speaker 1>depressed before. Any chance that the Republicans will hold on

0:36:19.900 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate and the House?

0:36:23.150 --> 0:36:25.290
<v Speaker 5>So I do this every Tuesday and Wednesday night on

0:36:25.310 --> 0:36:25.750
<v Speaker 5>my show.

0:36:25.830 --> 0:36:27.950
<v Speaker 10>Tonight, I actually went through all the governor's races with

0:36:27.969 --> 0:36:29.990
<v Speaker 10>the chair of the Republican Governor's Association.

0:36:30.010 --> 0:36:32.790
<v Speaker 5>Let me start in reverse order. I don't feel great

0:36:32.830 --> 0:36:33.350
<v Speaker 5>about the House.

0:36:33.410 --> 0:36:35.660
<v Speaker 10>I'm not a doomsdayer, but I don't feel great about

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 10>where some of these races are.

0:36:37.380 --> 0:36:40.259
<v Speaker 5>I'm feeling better and better about the Senate. Susan Collins'

0:36:40.340 --> 0:36:42.020
<v Speaker 5>main is now up in the polls there.

0:36:42.620 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 10>There's some very, very bright signs that some of the

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 10>rallies the president has done, the money is starting to

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 10>have an effect. So I feel better about the Senate.

0:36:49.980 --> 0:36:52.420
<v Speaker 10>I think there's a really decent chance We hold the

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 10>Senate there. And I will tell you one little piece

0:36:55.140 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 10>of a nugget for.

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.860
<v Speaker 5>You, Andrew, and your audience. The Democrats technically need four.

0:37:00.340 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 10>I believe that if they got to four, which I

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:05.100
<v Speaker 10>don't think they'll do, if they did, John Fetterman would

0:37:05.140 --> 0:37:08.700
<v Speaker 10>become an independent and conference with the Republicans. So stop

0:37:08.739 --> 0:37:11.300
<v Speaker 10>that one there. And then I had the governor's chairman

0:37:11.380 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 10>on tonight. And I actually feel really good about a

0:37:14.420 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 10>lot of the governor's races.

0:37:15.860 --> 0:37:18.540
<v Speaker 5>So it depends on where you look. The House doesn't

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 5>look fantastic. The Senate's OK. The governors look really good.

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.610
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, John Fetterman's very interesting. He's been very bolshy about

0:37:26.190 --> 0:37:29.489
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the Democrats and some of their policy positions.

0:37:29.550 --> 0:37:34.250
<v Speaker 1>So if he defects, huge. Sean Spicer, thank you so

0:37:34.510 --> 0:37:35.430
<v Speaker 1>much for your time.

0:37:36.330 --> 0:37:36.649
<v Speaker 14>You bet.

0:37:38.300 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Just had some news. You know, I said at the

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.739
<v Speaker 1>top of this segment, you know, people are now saying, oh,

0:37:43.860 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Bolt, you're too woke, you know, something's changed. Well, no,

0:37:47.739 --> 0:37:50.140
<v Speaker 1>I haven't changed. Have a look at the rest of

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:50.540
<v Speaker 1>the show.

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 7>But.

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>There's someone else, you know, parts of the right have

0:37:55.000 --> 0:38:01.810
<v Speaker 1>just splintered out to this conspiracy-minded, weird, tribal outfit. But anyway,

0:38:02.410 --> 0:38:04.569
<v Speaker 1>one of the people also being attacked for being as

0:38:04.650 --> 0:38:07.410
<v Speaker 1>woke as Get Out is quite a savage campaign to

0:38:07.450 --> 0:38:12.129
<v Speaker 1>get her is Chrissy Barrett, the AFP chief commissioner. And

0:38:12.410 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I've spent some time with her privately. She doesn't deserve

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.260
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it. I've criticised her to her face

0:38:19.340 --> 0:38:21.540
<v Speaker 1>about a couple of mistakes she's made. But she's coming

0:38:21.580 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>on the show in a week or so, and let's

0:38:23.780 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>see whether she really is what she deserves. I mean,

0:38:26.420 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I've heard, you know, she won't go to the Royal

0:38:28.700 --> 0:38:32.029
<v Speaker 1>Commission and say what she knows about, you know, the

0:38:32.590 --> 0:38:36.790
<v Speaker 1>anti-Semitism and the shooting and all that. She wasn't invited.

0:38:36.890 --> 0:38:38.930
<v Speaker 1>As Josh Frydenberg will tell you, if you're not invited,

0:38:38.950 --> 0:38:41.010
<v Speaker 1>you can't come, which is supposed to do. A phalanx

0:38:41.090 --> 0:38:43.830
<v Speaker 1>of AFP officers bang down the door. I want to

0:38:43.850 --> 0:38:47.569
<v Speaker 1>give evidence. It doesn't work that way. That's just one thing.

0:38:47.810 --> 0:38:50.089
<v Speaker 1>I know it's gone around in a big meme, but,

0:38:50.150 --> 0:38:53.739
<v Speaker 1>you know, Gosh almighty. Anyway, we'll talk to her. Hard

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.500
<v Speaker 1>questions as well. And that'll be in the first week

0:38:56.520 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of next month. Coming up after the break, why this

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.540
<v Speaker 1>Albanese government minister is the last politician to tell us

0:39:04.780 --> 0:39:11.860
<v Speaker 1>not to be mean to politicians. I tell you what,

0:39:11.969 --> 0:39:14.950
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of the tributes in Parliament to

0:39:14.989 --> 0:39:18.310
<v Speaker 1>Helen Haynes are moving. A lot of the promises to

0:39:18.350 --> 0:39:22.650
<v Speaker 1>be nicer are very welcomed. particularly with Haynes in hospital

0:39:22.690 --> 0:39:25.750
<v Speaker 1>having lost her legs in that brutal attack. But I

0:39:25.790 --> 0:39:30.100
<v Speaker 1>have to say there are some politicians who, from sheer shame...

0:39:30.219 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 1>should just shut up, especially Finance Minister Katie Gallagher, who's

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.500
<v Speaker 1>apparently now an angel of kindness.

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.980
<v Speaker 7>I think in the last two years, 18 months to

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:47.049
<v Speaker 7>two years, the political temperature has been significantly elevated, much

0:39:47.110 --> 0:39:49.690
<v Speaker 7>hotter than I have ever experienced in my career.

0:39:51.660 --> 0:39:55.450
<v Speaker 1>I don't forget. This is the same Katie Gallagher who

0:39:55.850 --> 0:39:58.990
<v Speaker 1>the late Labor Senator Kimberley Kitchen called one of Labor's

0:39:59.090 --> 0:40:03.870
<v Speaker 1>three mean girls and who bullied former Liberal Defence Minister

0:40:03.910 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Linda Reynolds, falsely suggesting she'd covered up the rape of

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:12.700
<v Speaker 1>Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins. Now, before Gallagher says another word,

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>let her say sorry for this.

0:40:16.430 --> 0:40:18.860
<v Speaker 7>Senator Gallagher, I did answer your questions to the point

0:40:18.900 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 7>that you ground me to the ground and ended up

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:22.060
<v Speaker 7>in hospital.

0:40:22.620 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 5>But I'm back here.

0:40:23.940 --> 0:40:25.100
<v Speaker 9>I'm answering questions.

0:40:25.260 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 7>Were you just alleged that we put you in hospital?

0:40:28.070 --> 0:40:30.430
<v Speaker 7>That I put you in hospital, Senator Reynolds?

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, if.

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:35.180
<v Speaker 9>So you're the victim?

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:36.610
<v Speaker 5>Not Ms Higgins, is that what it is?

0:40:36.620 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 2>Order.

0:40:36.890 --> 0:40:39.189
<v Speaker 5>Senator Wong, that's not what I'm saying. Nobody takes pleasure

0:40:39.210 --> 0:40:40.550
<v Speaker 5>in asking these questions.

0:40:40.570 --> 0:40:42.190
<v Speaker 7>Senator Gallagher. Nobody takes pleasure in.

0:40:42.190 --> 0:40:47.089
<v Speaker 9>Asking these questions. I'd like to respond to that.

0:40:47.110 --> 0:40:49.750
<v Speaker 16>Having two senators yell at me at the same time.

0:40:49.790 --> 0:40:53.210
<v Speaker 7>My final question, Senator Reynolds, was it your decision to

0:40:53.270 --> 0:40:55.210
<v Speaker 7>send Ms Higgins to Perth for.

0:40:55.090 --> 0:40:56.850
<v Speaker 5>The duration of the election campaign?

0:40:56.910 --> 0:40:57.570
<v Speaker 8>Senator Gallagher.

0:40:58.190 --> 0:40:58.490
<v Speaker 15>Again?

0:40:58.810 --> 0:41:00.810
<v Speaker 7>That's also subject to police investigation.

0:41:00.850 --> 0:41:02.820
<v Speaker 5>How handy. And that was your final question.

0:41:02.860 --> 0:41:04.739
<v Speaker 9>Thank you. Senator Gallagher, that was beneath you.

0:41:05.300 --> 0:41:07.500
<v Speaker 7>Well, don't give me a lesson in that.

0:41:08.700 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Joining me are Mia Schlicht, Executive Director of the Samuel

0:41:12.060 --> 0:41:16.370
<v Speaker 1>Griffith Society, and Michael Damby, former Federal Labor politician and

0:41:16.510 --> 0:41:19.030
<v Speaker 1>former Chairman of the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs,

0:41:19.070 --> 0:41:22.380
<v Speaker 1>Defence and Trade... Michael Danby, when you see that, do

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you think Katie Gallagher is the kind of person who

0:41:24.820 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>really should be lecturing everyone else now about being nicer?

0:41:28.219 --> 0:41:35.670
<v Speaker 3>They're grim socialist laparachics, the both of them, Wong and Gallagher.

0:41:36.650 --> 0:41:37.890
<v Speaker 9>If they didn't have their arm.

0:41:37.730 --> 0:41:40.730
<v Speaker 3>In corner at the ABC and The Guardian to protect them,

0:41:41.090 --> 0:41:43.610
<v Speaker 3>they might have been driven from public life by that

0:41:43.910 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Higgins saga, both over Reynolds and and particularly over what

0:41:48.620 --> 0:41:52.260
<v Speaker 3>Wong did to Kitching. Imagine a man, Mia, had said

0:41:52.340 --> 0:41:56.930
<v Speaker 3>to a woman, you can't speak on climate change because

0:41:56.989 --> 0:42:00.230
<v Speaker 3>you don't have children. It was lucky for Wong, it

0:42:00.250 --> 0:42:04.270
<v Speaker 3>was just before the election, because I believe even she

0:42:05.350 --> 0:42:08.370
<v Speaker 3>and even the Labor Party would have launched an inquiry

0:42:08.410 --> 0:42:11.310
<v Speaker 3>into her. As it is, she got away scot-free, but

0:42:11.330 --> 0:42:13.530
<v Speaker 3>she contributed greatly to Kimberley's stress.

0:42:13.590 --> 0:42:14.350
<v Speaker 9>As you know, Andrew.

0:42:16.030 --> 0:42:18.370
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that she contributed to the death. I

0:42:18.670 --> 0:42:20.089
<v Speaker 1>do know that Kimberly... I didn't say to the death.

0:42:20.110 --> 0:42:24.660
<v Speaker 1>I said to her stress. Oh, without a doubt. I mean,

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:27.899
<v Speaker 1>as you know, she was at my house a couple

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of days before her death and spoke of the stress

0:42:30.580 --> 0:42:34.830
<v Speaker 1>she was under from... I won't go further. Let's all

0:42:34.870 --> 0:42:37.370
<v Speaker 1>be nice. But, Mia, what did you make of this

0:42:37.950 --> 0:42:40.930
<v Speaker 1>bracing lecture of niceness from Katie Gallagher?

0:42:42.500 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 16>I find it really frustrating, Andrew. I cannot stand when

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.029
<v Speaker 16>a political tragedy like this occurs that we've seen with

0:42:49.070 --> 0:42:51.670
<v Speaker 16>Helen Haynes and you've got individuals who use the opportunity

0:42:52.290 --> 0:42:54.150
<v Speaker 16>to get up on a soapbox and start preaching a

0:42:54.190 --> 0:42:58.330
<v Speaker 16>certain political issue, particularly when somebody like Katie Gallagher has

0:42:58.370 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 16>remained so silent. in so many really critical times when

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 16>many women across the political spectrum have been victims of violence.

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.630
<v Speaker 16>I find her silence remarkable when the ABC, the nationally

0:43:11.950 --> 0:43:17.250
<v Speaker 16>funded broadcaster, produced that segment of Gina Reinhart threats about

0:43:17.670 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 16>her being very violently assaulted. And of course, there was

0:43:20.700 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 16>no commentary from Katie Gallagher then about violence against women.

0:43:25.739 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 16>So I find it frustrating when an opportunity like this

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:30.620
<v Speaker 16>is used to then start talking about those issues when

0:43:30.660 --> 0:43:33.379
<v Speaker 16>it's only some kind of women who are afforded that

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.739
<v Speaker 16>protection and other women who sit on another side of

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:38.450
<v Speaker 16>the political spectrum. Well, we're never spoken about needing to

0:43:38.489 --> 0:43:39.790
<v Speaker 16>be protected from such violence.

0:43:40.930 --> 0:43:44.250
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I can't believe how few of those Labor women

0:43:44.730 --> 0:43:48.670
<v Speaker 1>spoke up, when they should have, about that disgusting, filthy

0:43:48.730 --> 0:43:52.170
<v Speaker 1>attack on the ABC on Gina Reinhart. That was a

0:43:52.250 --> 0:43:55.140
<v Speaker 1>moment where they just showed they're not for a principal,

0:43:55.180 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they're for a tribe, right? Talking about people who are

0:43:59.660 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 1>giving lectures who shouldn't, and literally so, Michael, the University

0:44:04.820 --> 0:44:06.700
<v Speaker 1>of Sydney had to apologise, as you know, for showing

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so little empathy to student... Jewish students being harassed. It's now, though,

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 1>appointed former New Zealand Labor Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:20.450
<v Speaker 1>lecture on, and I quote, empathetic leadership, as well as

0:44:20.530 --> 0:44:25.570
<v Speaker 1>global health challenges and social cohesion. Now, seriously, Jacinda Ardern

0:44:25.610 --> 0:44:28.109
<v Speaker 1>on empathetic leadership when she locked up New Zealanders during

0:44:28.130 --> 0:44:32.070
<v Speaker 1>the COVID panic, and shouldn't it the university actually hire

0:44:32.110 --> 0:44:35.890
<v Speaker 1>an expert for its students, not in empathetic leadership, but

0:44:36.070 --> 0:44:39.900
<v Speaker 1>effective leadership, given Ardern left a party a wreck and

0:44:39.940 --> 0:44:41.460
<v Speaker 1>a country an economic mess.

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:45.060
<v Speaker 3>Well, she had to flee to Australia because she's so

0:44:45.100 --> 0:44:47.940
<v Speaker 3>unpopular in New Zealand. It all goes one way with

0:44:47.980 --> 0:44:50.779
<v Speaker 3>Mark Scott, doesn't it? He's the man who presided over

0:44:50.820 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 3>the ABC as it did its far-left turn. He's the

0:44:54.219 --> 0:44:57.390
<v Speaker 3>man who presided over Q &amp; A week after week

0:44:57.510 --> 0:45:01.359
<v Speaker 3>after week having that incredible bias that it did. He's

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.540
<v Speaker 3>the man who, as you pointed out just before, did

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.980
<v Speaker 3>so little during the three years with those engagements of

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:11.609
<v Speaker 3>the pro-Palestinian students barring Jewish students from going to lectures.

0:45:12.150 --> 0:45:14.830
<v Speaker 9>I mean, really, all goes one way with Mark Scott.

0:45:15.070 --> 0:45:15.990
<v Speaker 9>Who would be surprised?

0:45:16.210 --> 0:45:18.610
<v Speaker 3>But the question the taxpayer should ask is, why does

0:45:18.630 --> 0:45:20.709
<v Speaker 3>he earn double what the Prime Minister earns?

0:45:22.530 --> 0:45:25.540
<v Speaker 1>Yep, well, Mark Scott being the Vice-Chancellor there, I think

0:45:25.580 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's got big questions to answer about the university under him,

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:35.310
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere there. Mia, and also Jacinda Ardern, another left-wing politician, failed.

0:45:36.430 --> 0:45:38.210
<v Speaker 1>Here's a university looking after its own.

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:43.219
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, it's not surprising, Andrew, and we wonder why attendance

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.140
<v Speaker 16>at university is so low. Well, because students simply don't

0:45:46.180 --> 0:45:48.330
<v Speaker 16>want to turn out to listen to leaders like this,

0:45:48.430 --> 0:45:52.089
<v Speaker 16>particularly lecturing on things like empathetic leadership, when I'm not

0:45:52.130 --> 0:45:54.990
<v Speaker 16>sure how empathetic it was for Jacinta Ardern to leave

0:45:55.030 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 16>her country in absolute rubble and jump on the first

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:00.180
<v Speaker 16>plane out of there. or when she increased government spending

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:03.020
<v Speaker 16>so much that inflation increased and families had to make

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 16>serious economic sacrifices. Or let's not forget the Royal Commission

0:46:07.739 --> 0:46:11.110
<v Speaker 16>into how she dealt with COVID in the country and

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.610
<v Speaker 16>how it found that she didn't follow all measures accurately

0:46:14.650 --> 0:46:16.089
<v Speaker 16>and there were better things she could have done. There

0:46:16.110 --> 0:46:18.870
<v Speaker 16>was no apology that was made for that. But, of course,

0:46:18.890 --> 0:46:20.509
<v Speaker 16>she jumps on the first flight out of there. But

0:46:20.530 --> 0:46:23.570
<v Speaker 16>let's not forget Jacinta Ardern is the darling of the

0:46:23.610 --> 0:46:25.850
<v Speaker 16>globalist left, and this is what they do. They get

0:46:25.870 --> 0:46:28.330
<v Speaker 16>out of their country's... at the first chance they can

0:46:28.370 --> 0:46:30.030
<v Speaker 16>to try and head off to a job in the UN.

0:46:30.530 --> 0:46:32.510
<v Speaker 16>And I'm sure that's what she's vowing for in the future.

0:46:32.530 --> 0:46:35.410
<v Speaker 16>But for now, one of our universities here in Australia

0:46:35.450 --> 0:46:35.820
<v Speaker 16>will do.

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:40.299
<v Speaker 1>And to the New Zealanders who so outrageously contacted me,

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>demanding we say something about this, consider it said. Michael Danby,

0:46:46.219 --> 0:46:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the Israeli election tonight, what are you expecting?

0:46:49.660 --> 0:46:51.660
<v Speaker 3>Well, I hope for the Israelis' sake that there is

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:55.290
<v Speaker 3>a national unity government between the moderate elements of Likud

0:46:55.650 --> 0:46:57.710
<v Speaker 3>and the moderate elements of the centre-left, that would be

0:46:57.770 --> 0:47:02.779
<v Speaker 3>much better for their international standing. But look for the success, Andrew,

0:47:02.930 --> 0:47:07.060
<v Speaker 3>of the Russian party led by Avigdor Liberman and by

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:11.900
<v Speaker 3>Einat Wilf and the other centrists in the reservist party.

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.060
<v Speaker 3>If they do well, if they get above the quota,

0:47:15.100 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 3>particularly the reservists, there'll be a swing factor in what

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the new government is composed of.

0:47:22.810 --> 0:47:24.630
<v Speaker 1>Mia, what are you hoping for from Israel?

0:47:27.020 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 16>I'll have to wait and see for the result, Andrew,

0:47:29.020 --> 0:47:32.100
<v Speaker 16>but I think, make no mistake, Netanyahu shouldn't be underestimated.

0:47:32.180 --> 0:47:34.819
<v Speaker 16>He's somewhat of a political mastermind and has been able

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:36.740
<v Speaker 16>to pull a rabbit out of a bag many times

0:47:36.780 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 16>in the past. But I think, make no mistake, this

0:47:39.469 --> 0:47:42.739
<v Speaker 16>is a referendum on Netanyahu's leadership. I think if he

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:44.770
<v Speaker 16>wins this election, this will be a vote of confidence

0:47:44.790 --> 0:47:47.930
<v Speaker 16>for the way he has brought the country forward since

0:47:48.050 --> 0:47:51.930
<v Speaker 16>October 7th in 2023. And if he loses, then that

0:47:51.969 --> 0:47:53.890
<v Speaker 16>is a vote of no confidence in his leadership. But

0:47:53.910 --> 0:47:56.589
<v Speaker 16>I think this election is all about Netanyahu.

0:47:58.150 --> 0:48:00.509
<v Speaker 1>And I think, Michael, one of the factors is, you know,

0:48:00.530 --> 0:48:03.530
<v Speaker 1>when Mia talks about a referendum, it's also a referendum

0:48:03.570 --> 0:48:08.130
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that October 7 happened on his watch. Absolutely.

0:48:08.330 --> 0:48:10.370
<v Speaker 3>And there are a lot of people who are good

0:48:10.430 --> 0:48:12.850
<v Speaker 3>right-wingers who think that that is something that should have

0:48:12.870 --> 0:48:16.470
<v Speaker 3>been a State Commission of Inquiry. And the other big issue,

0:48:16.510 --> 0:48:20.910
<v Speaker 3>which I have to praise SBS, unlike the dolts at

0:48:21.110 --> 0:48:25.420
<v Speaker 3>the ABC, that looked into was the... that the orthodox,

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 3>the ultra-orthodox should do military service like all of the others,

0:48:29.100 --> 0:48:32.259
<v Speaker 3>particularly after three years with all of their children going

0:48:32.300 --> 0:48:33.569
<v Speaker 3>to the reserves and that kind of stuff.

0:48:33.870 --> 0:48:35.230
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Israeli mothers.

0:48:34.989 --> 0:48:36.890
<v Speaker 3>And parents are very agitated about that.

0:48:38.110 --> 0:48:40.770
<v Speaker 1>And so they should be. Mia Schlith, Michael Damby, thank

0:48:40.790 --> 0:48:44.090
<v Speaker 1>you very much to you both. Up next, Shari Markson

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>from me. Good night.