WEBVTT - POST MATCH CALLS: Crows fans fuming after 27pt loss v Hawks

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>FIVEBA Football Post Match Callers sixteen eleven one a seven

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Hawthorne for the first bounce to the last twelve eighty

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a margin of twenty seven. It was so damn disappointing

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this after the game for Ace transport solutions we've got

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for West Crowdon's John, what are your people?

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 2>How are you going?

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Not good?

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>John?

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, I'd like to say a few things, but

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 4>it won't be possible on air. But Tim Silvers came

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 4>onto your program or in the media release when they

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 4>appointed Maddie Knicks for another two years and said that

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 4>they believe that he's the premiership coach. Well, if they

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 4>believe that he's a premiership coach, I'm a giraffe walking

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 4>around West Croydon. Let me tell you, I'm sick and

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 4>tired of this club accepting the same excuses and accepting

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>the same mistakes from year one in Maddie Knicks's tenure

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 4>to year five. Nothing is going to change. If anyone

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 4>in that club thinks that this is going to be

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 4>ambership close coach, they're delusional. This club is no better

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 4>off today today than it was five years ago. It's

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 4>just not And we see the coach making the same errors,

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>putting his faith in faith in the same players. They

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 4>just don't deliver. And we talk about an AFL team

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 4>that apparently supposed to have a skill set, Well, can

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 4>you tell me what they've been practicing over the off season?

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 5>This is this is just a joke.

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 4>We have people with no courage in this in this

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 4>organization to call it as it is and say, thank you, Maddie,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 4>not good enough, we're going But what do we do?

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 4>For no reason at all, we decided to extend the

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 4>tenure for another two years. Absolute joke, this club, absolute joke.

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks John Berry passion. It's not all on Maddie.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 6>The performance invites scrutiny of his performance.

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, yes it does, but that was a group of

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>boys out there that build all week. This was like

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a final last seasons on the line and dish that out.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, But to John's point, this is not just on

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 6>today that John's angry. It's a body of boy the

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 6>first time this has a genuine expectation. Where are they

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 6>will hard again?

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>We're hard to defend. And we've got Campo sitting here

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to put him in the burner

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a year. But for the last two weeks and certainly today,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't they evening up the numbers in front of

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Why aren't they evening up the numbers in

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>front of the ball. Why aren't they evening up the

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>numbers in front of the ball. You knew what Stewart did,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>justly did it. If he didn't do it, it was well

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't even someone else, they just slaughtered us

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>from D fifty fifty.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, and the answer that, well, and clearly we're not there.

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 7>And I'm making somewhat of a I guess, an educated

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 7>guess as because we can see from the vision that

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 7>there's one up there so and you can see behind

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 7>the goals and that sort of thing that there is

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 7>an extra one there. But I just you know they.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Does that person impact enough on the game?

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 7>Correct? And then that is no, it will. But sometimes

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 7>as a coach, right, sometimes you've got to lose the

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 7>battle win the war, right, And that's a fly that

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 7>I used as a stoppage coach. Okay, so you sit

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 7>there and go, do we want to try and get

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 7>field position off the back of the stoppage. Yes, we

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 7>want to do, which is what they've done for majority

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 7>of the year. Right now. But if you've got an

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 7>influential defender who generates intercept possession and they go back

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 7>and score off the back of it, which they will

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 7>now have to make a decision. Do I need to

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 7>make this a one on one game and put it

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 7>on the midfield group? You guys don't. I can't give

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 7>you any help. You need to get it done, and

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 7>I think Adelaide's midfield can get it done without that.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 7>I absolutely think they can do it. Crouch, Dawson, lead Berry, Peddler,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 7>I reckon, there's enough grunts and everything to get it

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 7>done in there, but they continue to get I guess

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 7>beat by the same way with these intercept possession defenders.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 7>That causes grief, like in terms of when the ball

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 7>gets lost and they lose it off half back and

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 7>they get.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Scored against it, We're just done. Hello tab loss, Hello

0:03:58.760 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you're on tab.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 8>To me?

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 9>Okay, look, I'm not a Knicks fan, so let's get

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 9>that out front. And I think that you keep playing

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 9>the same team and yeah, you beat West Coast, big bill,

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 9>you know, And why have they got people like why

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 9>is we've got the worst ruckman in the whole league.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 9>And I don't care if he's friends with anybody there,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 9>but why not try something different in the ruck and

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 9>then maybe you know, we won't be losing the middle

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 9>and putting pressure on what you're talking about?

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 10>Do you fifteen?

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 9>Do everything? All that's out the window if you can't

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 9>win the ball out of the middle. So a better ruckman,

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 9>a better set up there, and it's an experiment. I mean,

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 9>just touch the players around him there. I don't know,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 9>you can't keep going with you know, the knixt what's

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 9>the name in the Ruckman O'Brien combination isn't complete and

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 9>utter failure and every Crows person knows it. And that's

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 9>all there is to it.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>Thanks tav Well. Clearly the next man in is straw

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and they don't well.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I could argue, I could argue against that

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 7>from that perspective. If he's had thirty five hitouts and

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 7>fifteen hits to advantage. If you go to Reeves, he's

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 7>had twenty hitouts and only six hits to advantage. So

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 7>in terms of Riley O'Brien's rock work, if that's what

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 7>we're critiquing him on, he was a better ruckman on

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 7>the day. But when the ball hits the ground. What's

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 7>happening at ground level? That's what the question you should

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 7>be asking, not necessarily the rockwork because those numbers fifteen

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 7>hitouts to advantage is a fair day. Actually, that's that's

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 7>a great connection rate. So you can't sit there and

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 7>go so out of thirty five he's connected one in

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 7>every two almost. But so what's happening at ground level?

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 7>That'd be the question for me in terms of and

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 7>you know what that refers to the ground ball scrambled,

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 7>That's what happens. They got beat up once the ball

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 7>hit the ground.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Jacket, Melrose Park, Hey, Steve, were yours?

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah? Yeah, Look Stephen, I think with the Crowe I

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 11>think there's a lot more issues than are matching units.

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 11>Maybe Matthew nixt questions some players like brodis Smith shouldn't

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 11>be playing I think Hrey should be playing half. But

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 11>that I think you're going to look at it trows

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 11>me to look at behind the scenes, Rashudo justin reive

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 11>Camish over. Those three people have been in the club's

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 11>a very long time now and there's there no success.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 11>Camis Sholi red. They've recruited pops in my opinions, like

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 11>Ned mc Canrey Murphy. There's no ex talent at all

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 11>in our list, And I think if we change coaches, yes, don't.

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 11>I think Nick has made some decisions that have been poor,

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 11>But honestly, I think he's just to chat to the

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 11>best out of this list as possible. And honestly, I

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 11>think if we changed coaches, not much is going to

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 11>change you too. He changed the background things.

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Could agree with you more. Jack. I've been seeing that

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for probably a fair time and you know a lot

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of Crows. People get into me for being negative about it,

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>but just have a look at the numbers, have a

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>look at what they've attracted. Now. I keep getting because

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I get phone calls. Well, but we've got Dawson Rowe

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>not bad, and we got Rankin' not banned. But it's

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the body of work. You can't just hang your hand

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>on those two.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 6>It's the body of work we got both of.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Traction and retention are the two big things. And I

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're as poor as any club with it. No

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>one wants to deal with them, and they're aggressive in

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the market. Now, anyone that's anyone who's that rooster, we're

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>going to get you one point three million. I'm embarrassed.

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm embarrassed that name is linked to my club. One

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.119
<v Speaker 1>link to the fifteen Unner eight ing clubs was linked

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to mine. Hello, Jai.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 10>Gooda boys, great call again, amazing passion, and that's why

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 10>I listened to you.

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 12>I just want to.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 10>Think about half time and think about our big, beautiful

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 10>ruckman O'Brien. He had fixed tackles, which is you know,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 10>that's pretty good for a ruckman. But I looked at

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 10>the statu sheet and there was fourteen Crows players who

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 10>had as many tackles combined as O'Brien did. And I

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 10>looked at that.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 13>That's m joy, that's an effort. Yeah, that is effort.

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 10>And our midfield, I think, rocked up today just assuming

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 10>we're going to rock out in the game, have a

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 10>kick and we take the chocolate home and get back

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 10>on the plane. But you can't do that in this competition.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, JOI, that's a damning stat and it's true. And

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>again it was build and I got seduced by it.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I got seduced by it. I looked at Hawthorne all week.

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>What can they do? What can't they do? What the

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Crows can do? And it is Brian Faith and people

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>can ring and have a fair crack and rightly so

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that is that is just an absolutely damning stat for

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole week. The boys were builders. This is our final,

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>our seasons on the line. We want to be in

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that group. You know. Now we're three games out, they're

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth on the ladder. They got beaten by a team

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>who's below them on the ladder. They've now lost not

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a hand straight at the MCG. The stats are starting

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to become very damning, and a rock up like that,

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anything else other than to say

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they didn't turn up and I think that's embarrassing. Yeah,

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you defend it?

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 12>Though?

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>They were embarrassing that first half? Yeah, well you fourteen

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>players said there's tackles.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, I just had I just I just had a

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 7>quick look. There was seven players that had one tackle

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 7>and there was two players that had zero. So there's

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 7>nine out of year twenty two or in a final

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 7>three that didn't have a tackle. But I mean, ultimately there, Yeah,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 7>the tackling is one thing, but for me, there's other

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 7>issues in the tackling big.

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>People at hands another one big picture in a year

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you're expecting to make finals after a long rebuilding period,

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the expectations you're catching teams, not having teams that were

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>behind you catching you.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 6>And that's what it looked like happened today with Hawthorne.

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Good point.

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 6>They look like they've gone past Adelaide well.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Eleven wins last year, the expectation was more and again

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I can just imagine Nixy saying, whether it's in the

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>press and now or Rankins heard us, Dawson wasn't fit,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Walker was off, we don't have feelthorpe. Now, that's all

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>pertinent points. They're probably your four best players, your most

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>talented players, the ones with the most skill and poison class.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Aren't they nothing out of those four because three were

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>injured and Dawson probably shouldn't have played pretty hard, but

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be relying on that well injury. They still

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Crow's top end talent is just three players not named

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>two of them.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 13>Hello Tom, So you guys.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 14>A couple of points. The first one is again recruiting,

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 14>which was never you know, was never held to account

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 14>during when we had publish and that look over the club.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 14>I mean, our best players that we've recruited are rookie

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 14>picks and picks in the thirties and forties, not our

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 14>first round picks who are meant to be your elite

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 14>talent with elite skills. And to use your word Rowie

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 14>class what Raschelley, You look at Roschelle, you look at

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 14>Ned Mucknry, you look at Chase Jones. I mean the

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 14>fact that Ben mu Kenry and Chase Jones are still

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 14>on the team. If they weren't first round picks, they

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 14>wouldn't be there. My other point is as well, none

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 14>of the players are worried about being dropped because Nicky's

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 14>got his favorites. It's about time and to save his

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 14>own coaching career, it's about time he stops putting blind

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 14>faith into players and goes, you know what, you're not

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 14>pulling up. You're not doing what you're meant to be doing.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 14>So you know what, I'm going to bring in some

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 14>young kids, give them a go, see what they've got,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 14>because you never know what you have unless you actually

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 14>give them a go. You know, sometimes you don't have

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 14>to always be smashing it in the sanfl to come

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 14>in and do all right. And I think we need

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 14>to give some of the other guys a go because

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 14>we're going nowhere quick, and to be honest, the best

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 14>thing that can happen is we lose every game from here,

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 14>because then heads will roll.

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh told me, don't want to wish that. There's one

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>bloke that I'd like to have a stern talking to,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's for Shelley. And I think if you want

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to put one over the bow, he's won send him

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>back till he comes back as a team man. I

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that just the basics of giving on the up,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>give the first give. Don't think he can win it

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>off your own beat every time, every time he gets

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>near the ball, he wants to do something miraculous with

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it or something brilliant with it. That's how it appears

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to me. And I don't know what he's like as

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a kid. I hear him on your show and he's

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lovely or hear positives coming out of him. But he

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play the ultimate team game. He's not a King

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>O Taylor, that that ultimate team man that does the

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>basics every damn single time. He has no defensive side

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of his game. He misses too many tackles he's intended.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The contest isn't strong enough for me. Get out, come

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>back when you're better.

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 7>So in terms of that, though you agree.

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>With those comments or of being too hard, I think

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to be a bit hardh.

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 7>No, I think they're valid, you know, and that fluctuates.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 7>Some of those things fluctuate, right, And he's still a

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 7>young player, so we've got to you know, but we're

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 7>temper our. But we've seen there's a trend there once again.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 7>And I use that word a lot row with you

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 7>when we talk about stuff. You've got to look for

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 7>trends because sometimes you know, these things happen and.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>He come off the line poorly.

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 7>He did, Yeah, he did. But the thing is now,

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 7>so the question I'll ask you two is so Adelaide

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 7>now potentially don't play finals. So do we get to

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 7>see some of those guys now we happy to be

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 7>You have to.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, who are we talking? Is Downing ready?

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 6>Dowling's had twenty five, it's through the third quarter of

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 6>the game this afternoon, they're getting towed out by West.

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 6>He's Adelaide. They're actually twenty eight points behind three quarter times,

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 6>so he's twenty five and a half. But does he

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 6>come in and play the r Ford Sean Berg death

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 6>role or do you know.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 7>Midfield we got to play. He's to be willing to.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Play him in the spot that they've been training it,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and we don't do that at our club. For midfielder

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>lights up in the sample for three weeks, like Shomberg,

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he goes in the deaf seat. Bitter lights up in

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the in the sampleing he goes into the deaf seat.

0:13:58.320 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, the deaf seat.

0:13:59.480 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>To your question, care clubs that deathly.

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 6>The position now can't be about trying to apply some

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 6>window dressing to the season. Sneak a couple of late

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 6>wins in our well was thirteenth or twelfth and other things.

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 6>It might have been playing for eighth. This needs to

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 6>be about investing time in the future.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 6>And if the people aren't there who are willing to

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 6>make a commitment now to the future the football club,

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 6>they shouldn't be in those positions.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 7>Or and or you not that this and or it's

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 7>about list management decisions as well, because you cans now,

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 7>so you go, well, instead of we'll planning on maybe

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 7>having three picks, No, no, we've got to try and

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 7>trade up and get four because we need some talent

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 7>in this particular area. So that's that's the potent now

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 7>they won't want to throw the season away or whatever.

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 7>But it's an interesting one because you're round twelve. You've

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 7>got Richmond next week and then the bye, so then

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 7>you really are.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>City then the bye is it?

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>No, I think it's Richmond on Sydney at home and

0:14:58.760 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>then the bye.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 7>Correct. Yeah. So you sit there and go, well, they

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 7>we think they should take care of Richmond. But and

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 7>Sydney they're humming. So you're seeing there going now what

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 7>happens you know at that point in time. So there's

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 7>a decision to make on you know, there's some players

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 7>that you sit there and go, well, you know, do

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 7>we need to have a look at someone else?

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm there, I'm well and truly there. Hello Keith at Highbury.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I'd like to say happy days God, but that

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 12>was absolute rubbish Hawthorne. Hawthorne players were running around like

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 12>stray dogs without a catcher and adelaide I need to

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 12>take a broom to the coaching staff and the recruiters.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 12>But I'd like just to say one thing. What's next

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 12>is North Melbourne and West Coast are going to go

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 12>to pass us now because a Hawthorne certainly has and since

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 12>when has Adelaide given a coach more than five years

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 12>without making a final. You Ro you might be able

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 12>to know that or your campo, but I can't remember

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 12>a coach that was allowed to say more than five

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 12>years and not make the finals.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah he's the number was three, wasn't it.

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it was? But he's he signed for Well this

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>year and another two after that. He's the next premiership coach.

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But you're building on the back of class in the midfield.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I look at Hawthorne and I think, wow, they've got

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Blakes in a twenty one twenty warp will still only

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. Nukim is still only twenty two, Like oh god,

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>like you think wow, so so and Campos always said it.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, midfields win premierships. We're miles off of that.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 6>After the game thanks to Acet Transport Solutions. Need something delivered,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 6>don't risk it acet Acet Transport dot A.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's all right. Rankins Apparently the midfielder who we

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>recruited at a million bucks for Ford, now he's outstanding.

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope he can be that. Rochelley was the same.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Race Shelley ain't ever going to be a midfielder. He

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>can only work one way Sligo I think is going

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to be good Schomberg. They don't look at Impeddal. They should,

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but they don't. I mean, I can put whole all

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the way through this like Swiss cheese.

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.239
<v Speaker 6>It's giving me the earth to give and just one

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 6>last bit on that. I think The thing that frustrates

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 6>fans as well is what appears to be the absence

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 6>of a development plan for these guys. Is it to

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 6>play half a season as a half forward flank and

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 6>then work your way in What do you need to

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 6>demonstrate playing in that role to get your chance? What

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 6>are you need to demonstrate at the sandful level to

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 6>get a chance to play in your preferred position. It

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 6>just seems to be a rotation of the same positions

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 6>with the same group of names, and it's difficult to

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 6>draw any sort of consistent narrative around.

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a revolving door, that's right.

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 6>Why people are getting certain opportunity to do the same thing.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 6>I don't know what's the plan for Luke Peddler. I

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 6>don't understand he's gone back today. He's got about eight

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 6>touches and three quarters of foot in the sample, so

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 6>I presume he's playing as a Ford there is that now.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 6>The way he's seen it just seems like these guys

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 6>are plug into the side sort of fingers in a

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 6>dike to try and stop stop the whole thing from willing.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>I can't answer it because I don't know.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:17:57.920 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Even scary than that, they don't know.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 15>Hello er yeah, Oi. Look, it's hard to judge Nixie.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 15>I had a lot of confidence he might be the

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 15>man the first two or three years. But I think

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 15>you've got to take into account that the Crows are

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 15>the worst field kicking team in the AFL. We watch

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 15>him every week under pressure. There's just so many of

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 15>those lads kicking skills and not up to AFL standards.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 15>So that's not the coach's fault. That Tamish Ogilby and

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 15>Justin Reeve they've brought those lads in the club knowing

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 15>their kiding was not up to scratch. Now, Nixy, fifth year,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 15>we've seen bad signs. Now they were seeing no effort today.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 15>That was one of the worst efforts in the first

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 15>half I've seen from the Crow's team for years. So now,

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 15>but now it's coming home to roost, Nixy for five

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 15>years without finals, you cannot accept mediocrity like this. We

0:18:54.800 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 15>already have accepted so much mediocrity over the last seven years.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 15>Cats have vibe this book. He's tried his best, but

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 15>he's going to look at his recruitment and his list

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 15>management and let's we get those areas tidied up first.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 15>The next coach won't have him luck either.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, passionate Cyril. There's a lot of that I can't defend. Hello,

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Douggy at blake View.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you guys. The reason why we had such a

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>good year last year because Taylor Walker had a career

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>best season. It's pretty simple. This year he's not having

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that and the Crows going crap. I've been ringing this

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 2>show for last I reckon seven or eight years. That

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>hasn't just been a recent thing. Our poor recruiting. The

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Crows have not gone to the draft and got one

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 2>player that you say, oh gee, he's.

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 8>Going to be a star.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure enough, we've got Rank and the Dawson, but we've

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>got them from other clubs. Let's go to the draft

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 2>and actually draft someone. It's I'm a twenty three year

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 2>gold member and I'm absolutely sick of this club.

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, passionate Dougie passionate Doug got a grin with.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 16>La Michael boys, great call, and thank you againting the

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 16>five double A.

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 13>But look and all.

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 16>The callers are absolutely spot on here, all of them,

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 16>I reckon. But I mean, you do wonder a few

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 16>calls ago whether coaches do have their favorites. Campaign would

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 16>probably be best to answer that. But honestly, what Pembo

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 16>could have called this one today? Sitting on the couch

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 16>with a crosser blanket in front of the heater at

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 16>bowl full of diluted custard, which would draw a parallel.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 13>With the way they play.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 16>And we need a state raw commission on both teams

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 16>in this date. So yeah, but thanks to five double.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 6>A surgery is right. He's out. So I don't think

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 6>today would have made him feel any better.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So is that the custod.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 6>He might have thrown the custod at the TV at

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 6>some point in time. He doesn't get that wrapped up

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 6>when you're lost, but he would have got he would

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 6>have started Pembe would have started gardening. Had the fifteen

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 6>minute mark of the first quarter and just going into

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 6>a z end like state that none of the rest

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 6>of us can't get to.

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So he's a gardener and a cook.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 6>Gardener and a cook, and.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a better man than me. I'm a fishman and

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a hunter. Tallo, John, and I'm on the hunt right now.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 17>Hello Johnny Ooday, gentlemen.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 18>Look, it's not all doom and gloom. You know, I

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 18>can see how this is going to play out. I'm

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 18>confidence it's you know, it's one game. I think for me,

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 18>what will happen is we'll take a big scalp later

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 18>in the year when finals are not possible. Then we'll

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 18>win the Showdown again. Then we can extend Matthew Nicks

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 18>for ten years and then everyone will be optimistic about

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 18>like next year, and then it will at least be

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 18>happy to a round three or four next year till

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 18>this until this happens again.

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>John, you just defined me. I mean, I mean, and

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm embarrassed. You're right, John, I am embarrassed by that.

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 7>That's me.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>That is me. It's called blind faith, and it just

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>disappoints It's Rick my entire weekend eight double two three

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>double a double. If you just tuned in from the

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 1>first bounce to the last, Hawthorne who were below them

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>on the ladder at the mcg beat them sixteen eleven

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>one o seven. The numbers were just damning for the

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Crows twelve eight eighty March and twenty seven. It's got

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to Edwardstown.

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 13>Michael, Good, afternoon, Fellow's air going yours?

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You there, we're yours mate, Fire up, yep.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 13>I'm not a pro supporter. I'm actually a Tiger supporter,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 13>so I feel your pain. But Rowie, I just want

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 13>to make a point. I mean, there's no point you know,

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 13>going on about coaches and all that sort of stuff,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 13>because all of that stuff will take care of itself,

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 13>you know, win wins or losses. But you were talking about,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 13>you know, talking about Josh Race Shelley. I was what

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 13>I've been watching him a bit lately. You know, I've

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 13>followed Saligo as well off what his his game has

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 13>had really picked up this year, which is good to see.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 13>But you know, when Rachelley came onto the scene, he

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 13>you know, he burst onto the scene and did a

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 13>few special things, et cetera. But ever since then he's

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 13>really done nothing. And you know, a player should improve,

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 13>but you know, really seen him go backwards. He doesn't

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 13>look fit. I reckon, he's probably about five or six

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 13>kegs over a good playing weight for him. He doesn't

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 13>push up the ground, you know, when if the ball

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 13>is struggling to get through, you know that that half

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 13>back middle, you know, you see that, you see the

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 13>forwards you know push up the ground. And it really

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 13>it really stands out when when Texas not there and

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.719
<v Speaker 13>Rankin's not there, he just he's got no tank and

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 13>he just doesn't seem to have a passion to go

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 13>and get the ball. He's always seems to be waiting

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 13>to be given the ball. And the year exact right

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 13>in what you say in regards to him having, you know,

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 13>wanting to do the special things and not play the

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 13>team game. You know, you know it's as you know,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 13>it's a team game. Yeah, you do a special thing

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 13>every now and then, you know, and that's on instinct,

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.400
<v Speaker 13>you know, it's an instinct thing that that's built into

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 13>a player that's played the game for years and years.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 13>But he's really got to go back and go back

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 13>to the basics and build himself a tank, get some

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 13>gut running into him, and get a little bit of

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 13>mongrel into his game, because like you say, you know,

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 13>he's brushed off the tackles. He doesn't go and get

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 13>the ball.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't, you know, he's.

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 13>There's no he as a forward. You know you should

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 13>put the fear of God into your into your player.

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 13>As a defender, you know they should be scared to

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 13>go and stand on you because they don't want to

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 13>get five goals kicked on it.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But Michael, I'll say it like this, I run into

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Torrance with people that you know don't quite do the

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>team thing in the basics. Well, I reckon if I

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>was his coach and campo, this is what I did.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>There was a bloke called Dylan More who's the same agent,

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>played as many games, who kicked five today. He gave

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the first gift. He got to the crumb. He didn't

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>fly three deep, he didn't try to do anything fancy.

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>He got the basics of his game right and he

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was an enormous small forward for them. Rachelley has all

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of those attributes. I don't know who's coaching him or

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>who's instilling the sense of I'm gonna be careful to

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 1>say because he's a great lead and he works for

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you at five double a will, But I was bitterly

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>disappointed in his game today.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Hello Michael, gooday, lads, Thanks taking my call, twenty five

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 5>year gold member. After the Congry game, the word I use.

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 13>I was tired.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 14>And after the game today all I.

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 5>Can play is on board.

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 13>It's it's what take what it is?

0:25:54.400 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Seven years of board. Nothing is actually progressing. I don't

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 5>club anymore any stagnant. You've got a team that's not winning,

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 5>You've got a fans inside that's not doing anything. You've

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 5>got a home base that is just.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 19>How I square.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 12>I'm just bored.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>We need something you about we did last year, Michael.

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the teas. That's the teas. It's like going to

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a dance and they really pretty girl there. You just

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>keep looking at her and you think I can get

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>her and end up not you know what I mean.

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>You end up just still sitting on the bench and

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>no girls come and ask you for a dance. Where

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you go and ask him for a dance and they say, no,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>ugly thing. How about you get your teeth fixed, in

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>your hair done, and you know you ugly thing. We're

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just ugly at the moment.

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 7>We're just getting left on the dance floor or a

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 7>graders last year if you look, if you think of

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 7>last year. So Dawson rankin Walker.

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were the three classes and best players

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in the team.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 7>But what happened last year is the guys underneath did

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 7>they I guess the question for you guys did they overperform?

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 7>And now they either haven't improved or they've dropped back

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 7>below you know where the over performance has been. And

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 7>so now the GAP's too big between the best players

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 7>and then you lose. You know, Dawson had didn't have

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 7>a great start to the year, but then his last

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 7>month was great. He didn't have a great day today.

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, Walker was in my opinion, and this is

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 7>my opinion, he was never going to have each season

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 7>like he had last year, like that was what he

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 7>did last year at his age was phenomenomenal, right, and

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 7>so he was never He's another twelve months older, another

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 7>preseason older. The service was they didn't focus on their

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 7>ball movement. They focused purely on defense. So I think

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 7>they probably got some of it wrong over preseason. Now

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 7>that was a lot of it.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 6>Maybe you've described a scenario Campo, that's every Crows fans

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 6>worse not there and no one will sleep if you

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 6>put what you just said in simple language, which is

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 6>to say that last year wasn't the continuation of a

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 6>trend towards being a final side, but Riley rather the

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 6>high watermark for an achievement for a list that isn't

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 6>was never as good as coming eleventh twelfth.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 7>That's terrifying.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>After being West Coast twice and North twice. They built

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>it up on lad if.

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 6>That's the case after what five years of rebuilt.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Well after the four losses this year, I said it

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>was fool's gold. Well, can you put fool's gold in

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>your teeth? Camp I'm not going to slay. Can I

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>use scientific language? Hello, Johnny wild on campaign? Well, don't

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have you say.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 17>John Stephen Campo. I just want to go back in

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 17>time a little bit. You was under Phil Walsh. He

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:44.719
<v Speaker 17>was a great coach, Phil watsh I had a lot

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 17>of respect and you were there with him. He would

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 17>not have set what some of these players are putting

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 17>in for the club their grand will get.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 20>He wouldn't cop that. He wouldn't count your sake, get

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 20>rid of them pretty much betrayed. Walsh wouldn't put up

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 20>with some of these guys playing for the Adelai Woody,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 20>you know I want the honest.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 7>John I one hundred and ten percent agree with that.

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 7>You know, yeah's one of those and to be honest,

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 7>you know that was something that I drove as well.

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 7>But unfortunately, whether the players have to buy into those

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 7>things right, Ultimately, that's what the players have to do.

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 7>The coaches put the game and then you have to

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 7>either go and get the talent that can execute the

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 7>game plan. Now, whiles she's timing was perfect. When he

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 7>came in and they everyone bought in. It was an

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 7>unbelievable preseason to think that the group that was there,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 7>what he was able to do to get the belief

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 7>and get the game style. It was a breath of

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 7>fresh air. But he was He was ruthless on some

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 7>of those things, but still did it in a caring way.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.719
<v Speaker 7>And you know, with this generation like it is different.

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 7>But unfortunately, if you let it go, these are fester.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They fest, and Rochelle's the boy product of that. He

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is I'm using him because he's superbly talented, should be

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>better not getting that part of it right. He's the

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>boy product of week week week, training week, coaching week. Everything.

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 21>Well.

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 6>I think I think every weather, whatever people's perspectives on

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 6>Josh Shirley Guard, I think every Crows fan has been frustrated.

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 6>They've been terming the selection Merry Go Round. We said,

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 6>the same two names go out, the same two names

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 6>come in.

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Daniel, are young boys? Who are yours?

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 19>Just what are we going to do with the midfield?

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 19>I mean, when are we going to actually put someone

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 19>in there under the age of twenty five? I've been

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 19>kicking some starts this year on a few of the boys.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 19>I'll get I'll read out some numbers for you. One

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 19>hundred and seventy four center bouncers attended twenty three to one.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 19>Now in that twenty three to one nine or against

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 19>West Coast and three against the Kangars. Any idea who

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 19>that is? Boys?

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Who the player is?

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 15>Yep?

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 6>Well one, you mean clearances cele yep.

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 19>No, No, that's look Rowie. So he goes way above

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 19>that bait. One hundred and seventy four attendances, twenty three

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 19>to one lead lead. How is he still in the midfield?

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 19>His numbers percent of bounce clearances this year one two,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 19>one two two two.

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>That's so that's first touch off ruckman's head.

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 19>That first touch off the open hands. Now he's going

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 19>at twelve to thirteen percent for the year. Other midfielders

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 19>in the competition are up eighteen twenty. How is he

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 19>still in there? And he's the first day in the

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 19>first quarter today just waltzed around in time after time?

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 6>What we just why we keep the second after? Didn't we?

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 7>Center bounce one's an interesting one that once again having

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 7>coached that roll not correct. So let's take the emotion

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 7>out of those on Paddy dangerfield. When I coached Patty

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 7>is the center bounce. He was either target or he

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 7>was reader on the opposition. He couldn't play sweeper because

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 7>he was like a dog chasing the tennis ball. And

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 7>he used to break And you remember that visionary when

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 7>I dragged him off the ground because Burgle and he

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 7>let him goal side on two occasions, and I said

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 7>to him, what are you doing? And he's a you know,

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 7>what do you mean when I said, you're not to

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 7>play sweeper because you break the system down right? So,

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 7>and the center bounce is an art in itself, Like

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 7>you have a separate meeting, you look at the dynamics

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 7>of and you look at take Adelaide out of it.

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 7>You look at how you know port Adelaide in terms

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 7>of what they do. They've got speed and power and

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 7>agility and those things around there. Now they got opened

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 7>up in the last quarter. So it happens. But some

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 7>of the times it's about the personnel and the role

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 7>that you're playing. So those numbers and I haven't looked

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 7>deep into it, but I would suggest that Rory LED's

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 7>not the target inside a center bounce. It's more Dawsons,

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 7>it's Matt Crouch, it's Celego, so he's playing more of

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 7>a defensive sweeper type role from there. So it's not

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 7>that I'm I'm trying to put some perspective on it.

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>That's hello, tenure, thanks for waiting.

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 21>Oh no, worry, t going good?

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm bit upset.

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 3>I just can't get how we're the only AFL side

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 3>to not have a home base.

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Were we getting one tenure?

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 17>Yeah?

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, maybe yeah?

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 3>And before that, like what else happens? So unbelievable. It

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 3>takes so long to get something.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not the club's fault, it's the stupid cancels

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And don't get me shut on that.

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh I know, right, So why not go out and

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 3>purchase some land. It might not be in an ideal spot,

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 3>but build it and they'll come because it's got to

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 3>be better than waiting forever, waiting for thirty trees to

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 3>get knocked down or something.

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Ten we've negotiated for three and a half years now

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the plans are done. They're too far gone. I think

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they're throwing good money after bad. But when you've spent

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that much time on something and you've got a bulldoze

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>through and we had John Oser and he said pretty

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>much that this is going to happen. Be a little

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>bit patient because I reckon by Septembumber one, the bulldozers

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and the survey peaks will go in tenure.

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 7>Is it more based around It's an interesting call because

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 7>you sit there like Hawthorne at home. Well, I want

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 7>to hoold Hawthorne. They're building out in Dingley, which is

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 7>like an hour and a half out of Melbourne, right,

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 7>So I guess the question is is and having been

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 7>inside the Four Walls when this all started, like I remember,

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 7>they want to be in Adelaide where the Adelaide crows,

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 7>and we want to be in a sanctum of Adelaide.

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 7>That's part of the issue. Now. The problem is is

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 7>these days it's not that easy because of the urban

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 7>sprawl and you know, development plans and cancels and all

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 7>those sort of things. So and to me, yes, Adelaide

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 7>being is important, But ultimately isn't it about the facility,

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 7>Like they're not going to play there. Well, they're not

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 7>playing there. No, it's about the facility and what you

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 7>know that can bring to perhaps another community. So they

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 7>got wetted on being in Adelaide.

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know where there's. What Teavy wants is

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a club. I want a clumb I want to see

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the premierships there. I want to go there and have

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a beer and a snitty, you know. I want to

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>yell over the fence. Come on, Rochelle there, Thanks, Janya, Hello, mas.

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 21>Hey, guys, how are you going?

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Rule yours mans?

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 21>I've heard that before or.

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 8>Just going on?

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 21>First of all, Daniels called back lead one hundred percent agree,

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 21>even though he's getting those twelve percent or whatever he said,

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 21>the possessions that he gets a worthless state. They don't

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 21>hit Tiger. They're very up in the air. They don't

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 21>give the fours the chance. So I agree with Daniel

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 21>and that one. I think Rochelley has been coached out

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 21>of his plays. He has no confidence. He he doesn't

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 21>think instinctively. It's always trying to do something that's not there,

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 21>Like he always tries to go for a goal when

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 21>you know it doesn't work. It's there, there'll be a

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 21>player open. It feels like a coaching thing where they've

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 21>tried to make him a player that he isn't. He's

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 21>had a lot of expactor a lot of now I

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 21>think you need to go back to that, and I

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 21>don't know how you sort of coach that insol player,

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 21>That's my opinion. My other sort of question to you

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 21>guys is what do do you guys see O'Brien as

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 21>a premiership ruckman because I don't, and I don't know

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 21>why we continue to move on with him and try

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 21>to make him better or do things he basically gave

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 21>off on players more of the ball than our own players.

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 21>And I also think Smithers needs to have a bit

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 21>of a spell. I think his possessions efficiency is going.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 19>Down the drain.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 21>He can kick sixteen met ball but kicks the straights

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 21>the opposition and I don't know how many times he's

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 21>done over the last probably this season and last season.

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 21>Just want to get your thoughts on O'Brien and Smith.

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, I could take that, Matt. If you look at O'Brien,

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 7>I mean, they don't grow on tree. So the Max

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 7>Corn's the Brodie Grundies that if you look back over

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 7>the premiership, you know, great teams. Yeah they're important, absolutely,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 7>but they don't grow on trees, those guys. But for me,

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 7>that's one part of a midfield role. For me, it's

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 7>the midfield at ground level, you know, that gets it done.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 7>So I think we're probably being a little bit hard

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 7>on Riley in terms of what he does. The Smith one,

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, if you take today, he kicked it at

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 7>eighty percent Brodie Smith, so he missed that Howler in

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 7>the first quarter. So you know, like sometimes we can

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 7>get skewed by we see one thing and then all

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 7>of a sudden that's the and a bit about you

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 7>know what happens. But you know Smith, he's not getting

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.760
<v Speaker 7>any younger, right so and he's been a wonderful servant

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 7>of the footy club, like he's not going to be

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 7>He's all Australian best. So I guess from the frustration

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 7>point of view is the supporters are saying is there

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 7>someone better or is there another opportunity for someone perhaps

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 7>to come in for Brody, and ultimately the question. We've

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 7>seen Nan Curvis, we've seen Murray come in, we've seen

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 7>Michael and he come in. So we've seen some you know,

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 7>some up and shoots in terms of some of those guys.

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 7>But I guess after year five everyone's getting frustrated around.

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 7>We want to see, well, we want to play finals

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 7>ultimately is what it is.

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 6>After the bounce. Thanks to as transport solutions, we get

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 6>to the awards in just the way. Well, I take

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 6>one more call Vassi, good afternoon.

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, good boys. Look, I just think we just

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 8>don't have the cattle. Who is our a grader. I've

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 8>watched the last two games of this round. You had

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 8>Crips that he said, come on, I'm going to win

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 8>for us, and you had Bonds said come on, I'm

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 8>going to win for it, and the last of these

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 8>their games were absolutely outstanding. We've got Dawsman, but he's

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 8>in and out. He has this not consistent enough, and

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 8>today he's captain.

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Walker goes off.

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 8>He's got to do so. He had a very poor game. Okay,

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 8>it's one game, but that we should have on paper,

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 8>we should have beaten Hawthorne. And it would either We've

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 8>got to look at our. It's not coaching a coaching

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 8>these kicks, these thirty miss meter kicks that didn't get

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 8>the target. If everyone you go totally over that game

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 8>and already watching it. Finally, how many kicks just straight

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 8>the opposition? Now, that's not a coach. That is poor

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 8>ball skills, any talent, our talent and how to you know? Like,

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 8>so we last year we probably have to really reflect

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 8>and say we overachieve and this year were people have

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 8>been hyping us up and we're not half as good

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 8>as what they're saying.

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, actually they've been hyping themselves up. I think all

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.280
<v Speaker 1>pre season we expect to make finals, expect to make folds.

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I did two on the season they did last time.

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>He asked about a graders. This an a grader. His

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>name is ranking. He didn't play. So there's one I

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>think philthought will be. He's developing, he's a big two.

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>He will be very good. He's not played. Walker was

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>off in the second quarter of the first with his

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>back half time. They pulled the trigger. He's a third

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a grade out in doors and clearly had a fitness test,

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.439
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been fit. We've heard it all week. So there's

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>your four best most talented poise A grade, I don't

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>know classy plants.

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 6>Now, then who's next, Let's go whose Hawthorne's a greater

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:17.959
<v Speaker 6>that most Crows fans did nominate.

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That that would say A grade.

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 6>It's not basketball, you need more. It's not talking about

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 6>one person.

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Well it's I mean even last year the A gras

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 7>A graders. But it's still system as well, like you

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 7>can have.

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 6>It's a sum of talent, isn't it It is?

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I predict against Port, was't it but for

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>some of the talent.

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 7>But if you have if you take Sydney for example,

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 7>and you go across and I guess this is where

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 7>the discussion is. If you go across Sydney's three and

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 7>they're the they're the number one, so you can use

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 7>them as a bit of a benchmark in terms of

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, if you look at their list profile once again,

0:40:55.280 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 7>if you go back Grundy Golden, Heni Warner like that,

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 7>that's not a bad that's arguably your all Australian midfield.

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 7>You could easily make pole an argument to go here boys,

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 7>you're the first four in pick in there, which it

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 7>won't happen, but ultimately that's what happens. But then you've

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 7>got Nick Blakey off half back. He's class. He's got

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 7>calorm Mills that hasn't even played yet.

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 3>Yea.

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 7>You know coming back in you've got Maceneronnie and these

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 7>guys on the wing, you've got Campbell. So the depth

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 7>of players coming through now do they get I guess

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 7>go to the level higher because those guys that we

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 7>mentioned do they elevate, which I think is what happened

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 7>last year. They elevated last year and unfortunately, for numerous reasons,

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 7>those guys haven't. But you know, you've got a I

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.879
<v Speaker 7>don't think every team, every club in the AFL has

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 7>depth that we think we do. You know, your top

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 7>fifteen is probably around the mark and every you know,

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 7>even Collingwood last night. You have a look at their

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 7>outs last last night that it's a fair chunk of

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 7>it's going on there, right, But there's still and they've

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 7>given guys opportunities. You could argue Collingwood they've got the

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 7>most inexperienced forward line going around.

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 1>And god they've got no one up front. They lost,

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but didn't they a bulldogs?

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.240
<v Speaker 7>They still lost and even the Bulldogs. They didn't have Norton,

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 7>they didn't have Richards last night.

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>You know. So we've got shape, we've got good shape.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Then he's out there in his boat. God, we have

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>good shape playing.

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 7>Is he playing or was he over there? Did he

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 7>fly over?

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He didn't play. He's over there.

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 7>So he's running at the MCJ now he was emergency.

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 7>This is five double a football