WEBVTT - Labor’s hydrogen hopes fade

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Kristin Amiot.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Wednesday, March five, twenty twenty five. Prime Minister Anthony

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Albernizi says he's open to sending Australian troops to Ukraine

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep the peace. In a surprise statement on Tuesday,

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 1>the PM said he'll consider any request by Britain to

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>join a coalition of the willing in providing security to

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the wartor nation. The coalition has pledged to overhaul indigenous

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>heritage laws if it wins government at the next election,

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>after an indigenous group who sunk and New South Wales

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>coal mine were revealed as one of the most litigious

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>groups operating within the current system. That exclusive story is

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>live right now at the Australian dot com dot AU.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Just a tiny fraction of the government's grand green hydrogen

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>plans have seen the light of day. They're being held

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>up by bottlenecks and waning market demand. So should the

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>government stay the course or spend its millions elsewhere? That's

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>today's episode. A couple of years ago, Fortescue mining magnate

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew twiggy Forest gave Elon Musk a very public dressing

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>down at a conference in Morocco.

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, anyone, including Elon, who says hygien hasn't got

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>a massive future are muppets.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Twiggy was a ways into his big pivot to something

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>called green hydrogen at that point, and he was in

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>town to spook Fortescue's new hydrogen hub. Green hydrogen is

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>made by splitting oxygen into its component atoms using renewable technologies,

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and it can be used to power everything from vehicles

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to generating electricity and manufacturing.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>This is hard edged ec economic choice, but it's also

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 2>social and environmental rationalism, a fuel that you can make

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 2>right here in Australia, clean as the day is long,

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and made by hard working locals, not by foreign companies

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>controlling our standards of living at their whim buoid.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>By the optimism of one of Australia's richest men, the

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>government dived in giving green hydrogen a central role in

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>its future Made in Australia Net zero plan and announcing

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a handful of hydrogen hubs around the country.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Because what potentially we have here with the hydrogen industry

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 3>is some fifty billion dollars potential of benefit to our

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>national economy, driving our GDP, driving our economy into the future.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But by the middle of last year, Twiggy Forest's green

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen vision was crumbling.

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 4>The most celebrated advocate for the Albanesi government's green hydrogen

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 4>plan forced to slam on the brakes and back off

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 4>a prized target, the iron Ore billionaire announcing seven hundred

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 4>redundancies and a slow down in developing green hydrogen, and now.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>The government's own green hydrogen scheme has hit the skids.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 5>The size of the hydrogen and green hydrogen industry sort

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 5>of anywhere from about one hundred billion to two hundred

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 5>and fifty billion dollars in Australia, so there's a lot

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 5>of hype and a lot of hope for it. What

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 5>we've discovered is a lot of the projects have quietly

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 5>been shelved.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Harry Williams is The Australian's chief business correspondent.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 5>Probably about two thirds of the projects have either been

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 5>paused or shelved completely, and the pipeline some sort of

0:03:54.160 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 5>ninety nine percent have failed to move beyond the concept stage. Really,

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 5>just a handful of projects have actually moved into formal development.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of the sixty one big name projects unlikely to

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>see the light of day, were pitched by the likes

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of AGL and the Macquarie Group. Perry, what does it

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>actually mean that most of these projects haven't progressed past

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the concept stage? And why aren't they getting there?

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Do we know that? There's probably sort of three main

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 5>things to look at. Really high production costs is one.

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 5>It's difficult to actually get the scale to bring down

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 5>the cost for green hydrogen. There's some infrastructure sort of

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 5>bottlenecks or sort of hurdles which are often sort of

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 5>the bane of big resources projects in Australia. And perhaps

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 5>one that's been overlooked is the buyers of this hydrogen,

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 5>So we're typically looking at Asian nations as the buyers.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 5>There just hasn't really been the demand that you'd expect.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Those three things all combined have just made it a

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 5>really tough cell.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>The government's prized green hydrogen projects have been dropping like flies.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 5>Taxpayers will pour two point four billion dollars.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Into a plan to secure the future of the troubled

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>wireless steelworks.

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 6>Just a todd day after the country's biggest green hydrogen

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 6>project bit the dust in Queensland, BP has announced that

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 6>it's six hundred million dollar green hydrogen project at Quanana

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 6>south of Perth has been part.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Origin Energy is abandoning its plans to develop hydrogen at

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 3>its Hunter Valley hydrogen hub, deeming the project too expensive

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 3>and too risky.

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So where does that leave Labour's promised hydrogen economy and

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>export sector.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Look, it's important to say that all is not

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 5>lost without over complicating things. There's three forms of hydrogen

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 5>which you might build a big industry. We're focusing in

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 5>this story on moving sort of hydrogen to buyers in Asia,

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 5>other ways of doing it as a feedstock in ammonia,

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 5>which still has some potential, and perhaps the other really

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 5>big hope which has become quite a big focus recently,

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 5>is the likes of green steel. Again, sounds great, the

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 5>actual market for that is quite small at the moment.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 5>And we speak to Alan Finkel in this story, obviously

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 5>the former chief scientist, and he says the other issue

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:41.119
<v Speaker 5>is whether buyers are prepared to pay more for green

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 5>steel because it's going to be tough for it to

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 5>match the cheaper generation of coal and iron. It's definitely

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 5>a big focus for a lot of the big miners

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 5>at the moment, but again it's still got a little

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 5>way to go.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we know how much this has cost tax payers

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to date and does it line up with the government's calculatations.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 5>There has been enthusiasm across the political divide for this,

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 5>but the Albanezy government's really invested a lot nearly nine

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars outlined in last year's budget, and the really

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 5>critical thing is that green hydrogen is one of their

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 5>main hopes for heading net zero targets. In terms of

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 5>how much has been spent on this, there are reasonably

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 5>modest numbers I think so far, but you're looking at

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 5>a really substantial spend coming up in the next few years,

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 5>and you're looking at a sort of potential election issue

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 5>and that the coalition is going down a different path

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 5>and will obviously prioritize nuclear over hydrogen. It's set to

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 5>be a talking point as we get closer to the election.

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Just lastly, Perry, what's the government saying about these new

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>figures and about the deviation of its green hydrogen plans.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Look, we went to Energy Minister Chris Bowen on this.

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 5>They sent us a statement the remaining committed to working

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 5>alongside commercial interests to deliver on green hydrogen's potential. Probably

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 5>the other thing from their side is that the incentives

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 5>and subsidies that they outlined in the budget are set

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 5>to start from twenty seven to twenty eight, so I

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 5>guess they would say, look, there may be some teething

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 5>issues at the moment, but long term there could still

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 5>be a viable industry here.

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Coming up should labor break up with hydrogen. Last year,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Opposition leader Peter Dutton unveiled a radical new plan to

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>establish nuclear reactors at seven locations around Australia if the

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Liberals win the next election.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 7>No other country in the world can keep the lights

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 7>on twenty four to seven with the renewables only policy.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 7>We need to make sure that hospitals can stay on

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 7>twenty four to seven. We need to make sure that

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 7>cold rooms can stay on twenty four seven. We need

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 7>to make sure that our economy can function twenty four

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 7>to seven, and we can only do that with a

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 7>strong base low power.

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>When the price tag of the nuclear plan was finally

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>revealed in December, Peter Dutton said it would cost taxpayers

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and sixty four billion dollars less to reach

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>our twenty fifty net zero target. Then Labour's renewables only

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>energy plan. The Prime Minister says that's hogwash.

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 8>It is bizarre that you're looking at the most expensive

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 8>form of new energy, So a six hundred billion dollar

0:09:54.160 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 8>taxpayer funded program for an industry that doesn't exist. It's

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 8>a fantasy.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But as we've just heard, the government's own hydrogen plans

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't faring much better. Here's The Australian's Environment editor Graham Lloyd.

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's a couple of things to say here, and

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 9>I think that the most important is that when politicians

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 9>talk about the energy industry in general, they often don't

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 9>understand the facts of what they're talking about. I think

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 9>there's been an ideological hope that the hydrogen industry would succeed.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 9>There's been a lot of money put into it, but

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 9>it's been obvious for some time now that a lot

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 9>of that initial hope was misplaced, that the economics and

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 9>the science of it as a substitute for natural gas

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 9>really isn't going to be as feasible as people were hoping.

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 9>I think you can say the same thing about the

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 9>nuclear debate. The Albanese government is very critical of it

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.119
<v Speaker 9>and they're sort of putting it out there as less perspective,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 9>if you like, than hydrogen. But the difference is that

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 9>the nuclear industry is a mature industry that's well established

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 9>in many parts of the world. But again it's a

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 9>matter of cost as much as anything else. But the

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 9>real nuclear industry is around big base load operations that

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 9>deliver emissions free power. The good thing really from the

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 9>hydrogen experience is that the private sector has shown that

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 9>it's not interested in throwing good money after bad. It's

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 9>found it's more expensive and more difficult to do and

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 9>the global market that is supposed to finance it just

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 9>isn't there and willing at this stage, which leaves the

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 9>government money. The government should really take a leaf out

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 9>of industry's book and know when to cover its losses.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>With the cost of living top of mind for most

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Australian voters as we head into an election, the question

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is should we expect them to know or care about

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the difference.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it's a big ask to expect ordinary

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 9>voters to really understand the complexities of the energy market

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 9>and what the supplies of cheap energy actually mean for

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 9>the cost of living. This is an issue that responsible

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 9>governments have to manage and the best thing they can

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 9>do is manage it in such a way that it's

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 9>not in the headlines. And the starting point for that

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 9>is to do a proper cost benefit analysis of what

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 9>you get out of the public funds that are applied.

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 9>Take a lead from the private sector in pursuing things

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 9>that are worthwhile and don't distort the market with unreasonable

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 9>rules and regulations.

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Graham Lloyd is The Australian's Environment editor and Perry Williams

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is our chief business correspondent. You can read that story

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>right now at the Australian dot com dot a.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 8>You