WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 26 September

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>On scor Wields Oskodio. This is the Weader Panalty Show.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Pattiy Show. Coming

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 2>up tonight a massive program. Joining me will be Douglas

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Murray on the Rise of the Center right from across

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Europe to South America. Nickkita will discuss a rough week

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>for the Albanesi government. Kosher Gator will have the latest

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>US news, including Kamala Harris's car crash interview, and later

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>in the hour the latest celebrity and royal news with

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Kinsey's Schofield and Little's Losing It stars a man preaching

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 2>about CIS, gender privilege and pronouns.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know who needs see here this, but don't

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 3>ask people for their pronouns. If when they share theirs

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 3>and then they ask you yours, you get offended because

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>you think they should have assumed that's not our aship.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 3>That is you clocking someone and then thinking with your

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.319
<v Speaker 3>assist gender privilege and.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it has been a challenge week for the Albanese

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>government and the Prime Minister copped on tough questions from

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>journalists as he did the media rounds this morning. And

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not just housing and tax policy causing headaches for

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 2>the PM.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 4>He got into a little.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Clash with Today's show hosts Sarabo about Labour's inflation line.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Out there and actually the inflation rates three point five nice,

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 5>Michelle Bullet, hasn't the rates the interests not brought of that?

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not right, Sah with respect.

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 6>That's right.

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Inflation would still be around three point four percent if

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>it were not for the government's various subsidies which have

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>artificially brought inflation down, and a big spike in the

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>CPI figures is expected when those subsidies expire next year.

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in senior fellow at the minsi's research center,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Nick Cata. Nick, the PM is struggling under some of

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>this pressure. The questions are being asked, and he doesn't

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>always have the answers.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 7>No, his economic literacy doesn't help, does it. I mean,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 7>this is a prime ministers of government. The things it

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 7>can buy its way out of inflation. You know, it

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 7>can just put money in people's pockets and that magically

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 7>disappears inflation. No, it does not. It just adds to

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 7>the inflationary pressures. But it has been a very bad

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 7>week for him, and I think it is really the

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 7>culmination of not paying attention to the economic fundamentals and

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 7>all that seems to be coming home to roost, both

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 7>of inflation and of course in their hunt now for

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 7>more revenue by going after negative gearing and capital games

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 7>tax for property investors.

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Fresh analysis published in the Daily Telegraph shows a labor

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>risks upsetting around a million voters, including in those critical

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>what must win marginal electorates, if it rolls back negative

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 2>gearing and capital gains tax concessions. Analysis of Tax Office

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Stata shows of the more than nine hundred and sixty

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand Australians who claim a tax break for their rental loss,

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 2>around five hundred and nineteen thousand lived in labor held

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>electorates and more than fifty thousand are voters in those

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 2>till seats that labor hopes to win.

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick, can you really see.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Labor flirting with changing these policies. It would be incredibly

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 2>damaging for a sector that's already under pressure. We need

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>to be encouraging more homes being built and that's not

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>going to happen if you discourage property investors from entering

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the market.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 7>No, we know they want to go after this because

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 7>that was their policy in the twenty nineteen election. And

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I find it hard to believe that the

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 7>people in Treasury just would have got often and done

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 7>this research off their own bat I think clearly they've

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 7>been asked by.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 6>The government to do it.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 7>But yeah, you're right, more than half of these people

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 7>with negative gearing living labor electorates. They're not buying large

0:03:55.880 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 7>rich people. Rich people don't mess around with property prices.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 7>Rich people they don't best around with little homes and

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 7>things they buy shopping centers and tower blocks.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 6>No, this is all.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 7>This is just the kind of people like you and

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 7>me who are just trying to get something for retirement,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 7>to send side something retirement. And the government should not

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 7>be punishing people for saving for their own retirement.

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, you'd think they would be doing everything to encourage

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>that so people can be self funded in retirement and

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>not rely on the age pension. Is so shortsighted, so

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>idiotic for them to even contemplate this. You would hope

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that wiser heads are going to prevail. Talking about wise heads,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about John Pursuito here has come under fire

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 2>over comments he made about his tolerance for her Mass supporters.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 2>This came out during his second day in the witness

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:59.239
<v Speaker 2>box during more Deemings defamation case against him. Deeming's lawyer

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 2>sue Chris through sc Press Pursuito on what views an

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 2>MP would have to hold in order for him to

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>consider an expulsion, including support for her Mass. Now you

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>might think this was a fairly simple question for Pursuito

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to answer, say, of course you can't support a terror

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 2>listed organization. That would be unacceptable in the Liberal Party,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 2>But instead we got this.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>He said, I would have.

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 2>To consider the circumstances. It's not a statement I agree with,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>but it doesn't mean it's outrageous or heretical or worthy

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 2>of some kind of referral to the disciplinary processes of

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the Parliamentary Liberal Party. And when asked about whether the

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 2>view that the attacks on October seven were legitimate acts

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>of resistance by her Mass is a controversial one, he said,

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>it depends what disposition you bring to a sensitive issue.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I think your honor as a broad proposition, I accept that,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>but I accept that that view is held. But my counsel,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 2>more broadly to everybody, is to be as temperate as

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 2>possible in those debates. What is he on about Nick?

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:14.679
<v Speaker 7>There's no surprise.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:15.799
<v Speaker 5>Does it mean you tied.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Up answering this question? This would have been the simplest

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 2>question for any leader, any MP to answer in the

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>witness box, which is no, if you support her mass

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 2>so if you have any sort of tolerance for her

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 2>master's actions, that is utterly unacceptable within the Liberal Party.

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Done.

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 7>But this is this is a leader who has not

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 7>been prepared to say boo to the Dan Andrews government

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 7>over the terrible legislation they introduced that actually makes praying

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 7>illegal in certain circumstances. So I'm really I'm really astounded

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 7>that anybody is surprised by this whatsoever? You know, he's

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 7>I think his leadership has to be over whatever the

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 7>result of this case, and how foolish, how misjudged it was.

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 7>Not to settle this dispute out of court. What did

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 7>he think he was going to gain from two weeks

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 7>the in court and lengthies period in the witness box

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 7>in front of one of the best barrister's, one of

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 7>the best advocates in the legal system. He wasn't going

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 7>to come out well. He's not coming out well. And

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 7>I think the Liberal Party should be looking for its

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 7>next leader.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Quite frankly, Oh absolutely, I think we're on a unity

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>ticket when it comes to that. We're not going to

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 2>prejudge what happens with this case, but how he can

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>remain leader whatever the result, is beyond me unless they

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>are just determined to stay in opposition forever. Now, before

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>you go, I'm going to ask you about ABC Managing

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 2>director Kim Williams. He uses address at the annual Lowy

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Institute media lecture to tell us about fake news being

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 2>a danger to democracy, but he seemed to ignore his

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>own organization's rampant bias and misinformation. That's again under scrutiny

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>after it was revealed that the ABC had dramatized, dramaticized

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>footage from the Afghanistan ward. It added additional gunfire sounds

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and all sorts of manipulations to give a different impression

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of what actually happened. Surely, Nick, Kim Williams should be

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>be giving these sort of speeches at the ABC canteen

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.239
<v Speaker 2>to the comrades, not at the lower Institute.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 7>Look, I think he's fallen into the trap of thinking

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 7>that everything that the ABC says is like the fountain

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 7>of truth that they are the sole arbits of truth,

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 7>because if he was really talking about fake news, he

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 7>could have attacked his own or could have brought his

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 7>own organization to task, particularly over that video. But as

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, that's not, by far not the only instance

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 7>of fake news. What about the fake news that Donald

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 7>Trump was being with a Russian puppet that was run

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 7>on four calls?

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, never, They've never apologized, I said. In fact, the

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 7>last time I looked it was still up online.

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 7>I thought I expected more of Kim Williams. I expected

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 7>him to use his role of chairman to take them on,

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 7>and certainly he doesn't seem to be doing that, and

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 7>he didn't in that Lower Institute lecture last night.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Nick Kita, thank you so much for your time this evening.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now is best selling author Douglas Murray. Douglas

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris are sat down for an interview, and you'll

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 2>never guess the hard hitting, unbiased journalist she picked to

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>interview her.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 9>Ask Karmala, are you for a Palestinian state if hermas

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 9>is going to run that steak?

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 6>Okay? Yes or no?

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 10>And let's say you don't like her answer, are you

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 10>going to vote for Donald Trump?

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 11>No, I'm not running for perfect She's running against Trump.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 10>We have two choices, and so there are some things

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 10>you might not know her answer to. And in twenty

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 10>twenty four, unlike twenty sixteen, for a lot of the

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 10>American people, we know exactly what Trump will do, who

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 10>he is, and the kind of threat he is to

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 10>democracyze the kind.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Of threat he is. Yes, Sha peaked, Msnbass, Stephanie Rule.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's have a look at some of that interview.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 10>You mentioned housing before giving that extra money for a

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 10>first home. If you can't raise corporate taxes or if

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 10>GOP takes control of the Senate, where do you get

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 10>the money to do that? Do you still go forward

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 10>with those plans and borrow?

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, but we're going to have to raise corporate taxes

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 5>and we're going to have to raise We're going to

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 5>have to make sure that the biggest corporations and billionaires

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 5>pay their fair share.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 2>That's just it, Douglas. Is this interview going to convince

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>those on decided Advisors?

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 12>Well, we've just got a very good example of demonstration

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 12>of why it is that Kamala Harris doesn't put herself

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 12>in front of the media.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>She has put herself in.

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 12>Front of the media like Joe Biden, less than I

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 12>think anyone who has ever been running for the most

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 12>senior office.

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>In the world.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 12>And you just saw there why her team are keeping

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 12>her from having to answer any questions. There's a glitch

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 12>the moment that she has to think about a subject

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 12>which he clearly hasn't thought about very much.

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Kama Harris has never in.

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 12>The past particularly got into economics and borrowing and inflation

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 12>and budget deficits and all of that.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And you can see she just had this sort of

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>glitch and then she.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 12>Says, well, I'll just keep doing the thing I just said.

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 12>But there's no conviction there. And by the way, there's

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 12>not very much sense to it. This idea that the

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 12>left in America and around the world always does when on.

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>The campaign trail.

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 12>Of saying we're just gonna punish the richest people in

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 12>society because they're the ones who are the problem. We're

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 12>just going to attack the biggest corporations because they're the problems.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 12>They always present this as if that itself would have

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 12>no knock on effect. First of all, of course, it

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 12>presumes that these corporations and billionaires don't already pay tax,

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 12>which of course they do.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 6>And then it gets.

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 12>Into this idea that if you squeeze more at the top,

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 12>you can pay for all the lunatic welfare ism down below,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 12>and that just doesn't work, and we've seen that time

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 12>and again. So you know, I just think this is

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 12>this is an example of the fact that everyone should

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 12>demand that any candidate for the most important office in

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 12>the land has to be questioned. This is why they

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 12>have to be questioned. But of course, you know, she

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 12>gets the light barely scratching the surface quests from a

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 12>court journalist who is not there to question her but

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 12>to help her. And that's just a rottenness in the

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 12>media to get there, it is.

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 2>And these vacuous platitudes have absolutely no follow up, like

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the majority of tax income tax collected

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 2>is paid by the top ten percent, sometimes the top

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 2>five percent, but those sort of stats are never put

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 2>forward when the left are pushing these narratives. Meanwhile, we've

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>got President Joe Biden appearing on the view of All

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Places where will be Goldberg compared Donald Trump to a bug,

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>and then Biden pretended to squash it with his fist.

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Then he just wouldn't go.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 6>It was like a bug. He just kept being there.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 8>Who was like a bug right Thereoo?

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 11>So you felt.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Hah hilarious. And this comes after Joe Biden's Thomas Chafe

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 2>said Trump should be extinguished for good after two assassination

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>attempts in two months. The Democrats and certainly their media

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 2>allies Douglas are just doubling down on this retoric.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 6>And this is.

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Again the group who says words can be violence, and

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>there seems to be zero responsibility for what we have

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>seen happen in recent months.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you just have to play any We just have

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 12>to play it the other way around. Don't you imagine

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 12>if Donald Trump or JD. Vance had gone on a

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 12>I know, if they found an incredibly pliant talk show

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 12>with Republican supporters constituting the panel. And imagine if on

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 12>that Trump or Vance had compared Kamela to a bug

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 12>and then signaled that they wanted to squash her. I

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 12>reckon that wouldn't actually be laughed off. I actually think

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 12>Kamala Harris amongs others would say that that was dangerous

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 12>inflammatory rhetoric. They would say it was prejudiced against her.

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 12>And they would say it was dangerous. Well, you know,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 12>there's got to be some consistency there. But of course,

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 12>know that the different rules apply. If you're dealing with

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 12>somebody from the right, you're allowed to call them a bug,

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 12>You're allowed to talk about squashing them, and all of this,

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 12>as you say, reata in a period where where Trump

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 12>has faced multiple assassination attempts, and you would have thought

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 12>that this idea of dialing down the rhetoric which we

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 12>occasionally hear might actually be done.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>But they just can't help themselves.

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 12>And I don't believe that words are violent, but I

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 12>do think that when the proximity of political violence to

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 12>American politics has come so close twice in a couple

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 12>of months, you would have thought that people would take.

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Some care with their words.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 6>But oh no, it's okay.

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 12>You can dehumanize so long as you're dehumanized.

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly now. This week all eyes were on the

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 2>UN as Argentinian President Javier Millay and others. Spoker Jave

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Milay blasted the United Nations, saying it had moved from

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 2>an organization to pursued peace to an organization that imposes

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>an ideological agenda on its members Douglas. He also criticized

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the UN packed for the Future Plan and said the

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>organization had become one of the main proponents of systematic

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>violations of freedom. He was referring to COVID era policies there,

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>but also the fact that they allow these dictatorships, these

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>despot nations, to sit on the Human Rights Council and

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>then condemn a country like Israel.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>This has been the case for decades with the UN.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 6>The problem with the.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 12>UN is that whatever set up you had to replace it,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 12>if you ever could replace it, would probably end up

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 12>looking something like it.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 6>My view is that it's perfectly okay to.

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Have a talking shop like the UN.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 12>It's probably a good idea to have something where the

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 12>world's leaders can meet. But nobody should be under any

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 12>illusions about this entity. And many people like Seams are.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 12>You know, we have at the UN dictatorship after dictatorship

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 12>holding the floor to Lambass, the world's democracies, including the

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 12>only free liberal democracy in the Middle East, Israel, and

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 12>they just do it day in, day out, year and

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 12>year out.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 6>That's been happening for decades, and in.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 12>Part that's because you know, the dictators like to do

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 12>that because it takes attention from what they do back home.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 12>It takes away attention from their own larceny and theft

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 12>and corruption and much more. And yeah, they always use

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 12>the punching bag of Israel. Occasionally they also use a

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 12>punching bag of America. Look, the organization has always been

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 12>the same, It's always been obscene. It's always allowed obscenity

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 12>to go on at an international scale. But you've just

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 12>got to look at it and realize that, you know,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 12>the world's democracies should not be having to take much notice.

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 12>If any of you know, various despots and dictators saying

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 12>they don't like something that's happening in free liberal democracies,

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 12>well they wouldn't.

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 6>Would they.

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 12>The question is whether you take it that seriously or not.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 12>And I would argue people just shouldn't.

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 2>El Salvador's wildly popular president, Nave Bukela, also addressed the

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>United Nations and he had some pointed remarks about regimes

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>that prosecute and seek to imprison their political opponents, and

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 2>he responded to his crackdown on violent gangs in El Salvador,

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>which has been heavily criticized in the Western media. He

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>said in El Salvador, the safety of law abiding citizens

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 2>is a higher priority than the comfort of criminals. And

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 2>he said, some say that we have in prisoned thousands,

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 2>but the reality is that we have freed millions. There's

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 2>a new generation of leaders, Douglas, whether it's Mila in Argentina,

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Bucla in Elsalvador, Georgia, Maloney in Italy, and they're showing

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 2>a new type of leadership and resisting the UN and

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>this entire notion of collectivism.

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 12>Well, there's certainly there's certainly something that's breaking the mold.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 12>All the people you listed are doing it in different ways.

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 12>But I mean, what I think you've seen in recent

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 12>years has been a backlash against a certain sort of

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 12>bureaucratic World Economic Forum Davos like class which simply overplayed

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 12>its hand. There's always this thing in politics of you know,

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 12>the adults in the room, and the problem is is

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 12>if the adults are shown to be wearing no clothes,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 12>you know, eventually somebody comes along and points it out.

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>We've had quite a lot of those people. Now.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 12>The adults really kept on exposing themselves in every way

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 12>as not as competent as they thought they were. The

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 12>international financial crises in the last decades, the immigration crises

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 12>that are roiling all of the developed countries. All of

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 12>these things, you know, rampant criminality and a major American cities,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 12>lawlessness and much more. All of these things go on

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 12>for a certain time, overseen by the alleged adults, and

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 12>then at some point other people will come along. I

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 12>think we've been rather lucky. Actually, that nobody really unsavory

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 12>has come along is quite surprising. Although if you some

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 12>of the coverage of Mille and others, you'd think, you know,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 12>that they were the worst thing that could possibly come.

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 6>No, this is the beginning of some kind of.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 12>Backlash against that bureaucratic class that said they knew how

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 12>to run everything and turned out to be able to

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 12>run an awful lot of things into the ground.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 2>And we're seeing it in many parts of Europe as well.

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 2>He really is quite a fascinating period. Before you go,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>I've got to ask you about the case against Sean P.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Diddy Combs. So far, he's been charged with three counts

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>of sex trafficking, racketeering, transportation to engage in prostitution. He

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 2>has been denied bail, but we are starting to get

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 2>some defense lines from his legal team. I don't know

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 2>how good they are. His lawyer claims that the thousand

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 2>bottles of baby oil and lube Homeland Security found when

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 2>they raided his mansions were due to an error from Costco,

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and he also said that did he likes to buy

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 2>in bunk Ah Dear me, how nervous. On a serious note,

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Douglas is Hollywood, the music industry, the A list in

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 2>general about this case and what it could reveal.

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 12>I have to say, I'm one of those people who's

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 12>pretty unfamiliar with the work of mister Diddy.

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 6>I don't know much, but I can tell you. I

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 6>can tell you.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 12>That when these sorts of stories come up, there is

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 12>an awful lot of worry in that class.

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 6>That it's obvious that there are.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 12>Certain things that go on, certain sort of secrets that

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 12>are held effectively among certain A listeners. What always happens

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 12>at about this when it happened, when it comes up,

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 12>is that people end up coming out saying everybody knew

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 12>and all that sort of thing. I think that always

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 12>shows something pathetic. My preference always is, let's see how

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 12>the law progresses. This has to be a litigated in

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 12>the law courts, and we'll see there's a lot of

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 12>rumor around, a lot of casting of aspersions, but we've

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 12>seen in cases before that where that can go wrong.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 12>I'll hope that the all hope that the system it

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 12>proves to be the place where we can find out

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 12>what actually has happened. But yes, in the meantime, some

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 12>of the things you had just listed there suggests that

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 12>perhaps mister Diddy ought to get other defense lawyers on

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 12>his case, because those don't sound that great.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, four starters and again to me highlights when we

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 2>hear these celebrities, whether it's at the Oscars or the

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Music Awards, opining about social and political issues and lecturing

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>the country, these people seem to exist in a different

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 2>reality and their moral compass seems to be rather different

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 2>to most ordinary folk. I mean, we saw that with

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that whole Hervey Harvey Weinstein.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, we certainly shouldn't listen.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 12>Amazingly, and something I said for many years, we shouldn't

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 12>listen to celebrities about the state of the planet, state

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 12>of politics, or anything else.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>They're not qualified to do it. They are probably qualified.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 12>To do small numbers of things that they can do.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>They should do that.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 12>The rest of us should absolutely ignore their proclamations. They

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 12>count for zilch less than the UN.

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You might say.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Less than the UN. Douglas Barry, thank you so much

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 2>for your time this evening.

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 6>Great to see you. As always coming up.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Lefties Losing It and Kamala Harris sat down for an

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>interview earlier today.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 10>It did not go well.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back. It's time for lefties losing it and I

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 2>regret to inform you that Kamala Harris has sat down

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 2>for an interview with a leftist activist masquerading as a journalist.

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Will have the top.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Three moments from that shortly, But first, the Veep scenes

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>determined to produce more content for Trump. At how long

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>before this appears in the next campaign ad for Donald Trump.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 5>We just need to move past the failed policies that

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 5>we have proven don't work.

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Not only is she in office now, but the Democrats

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 2>have been in power for twelve of the past sixteen years,

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 2>but they want to turn the page.

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 11>Please turn away.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 7>If we are turn bay, come by Donald Trump.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, she's terrifying. Can you imagine her as the second

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 2>Lady Gwen Walls makes her wacky? Husband Tim walls look normal,

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and she has this habit of talking to the lefties

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 2>at their rallies and campaign events like they're six years old.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 11>You ready, but you're loud and clear, like we said,

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 11>mister Trump, mister Vance, please.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 4>Mind your own business.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was excellent.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, President Joe Biden decided to take a break from

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 2>his endless beach holiday to sit down with the ladies

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of the View and here the hate field whoopee Goldberger

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 2>hoster talks about her love for sleepy Joe and describes

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump as a bug. Who Biden then crushes, You.

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 8>Were my writer and I I was going.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 6>Where wherever you were going aft when I so.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 8>I just wanted to say that because I always felt

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 8>you were going to probably do four years and then

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 8>try to figure out where to go with Kamela. Then

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 8>he just wouldn't go. Who's like a bug? He just

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 8>kept being there.

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 6>Who was like a like a bug right there?

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Zoo, So you felt, Now this dude is becoming a

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 2>regular here this transactivist educates us about pronouns and cisgender privilege.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know who needs he hear this, but don't

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 3>ask people for their pronouns. If when they share theirs,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 3>and then they ask you yours. You get offended because

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 3>you think they should have assumed. That's not alaship. That

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 3>is you clocking someone and then thinking, with your assist

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 3>and your privilege, that they shouldn't have asked you because

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 3>you're real.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>So basically, no matter how stupidly woke you are, it's

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>not woke or stupid enough Triada. Now, Kamala finally sat

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 2>down for a major network interview without a chaperone, and

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 2>guess who she picked for this momentous occasion. The leftiest

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 2>of lefty hacks you could find on the lunatic MSNBC network.

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Here is Stephanie Rule on Bill Maher's show, saying Kamala

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be obliged to answer questions.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 9>Ask Kamala say, are you for a Palestinian state if

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 9>Hamas is going to run that state?

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 6>Okay?

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 13>Yes or no?

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 10>And let's say you don't like her answer. Are you

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 10>going to vote for Donald Trump?

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 11>No, I'm not running for perfect, She's running against Trump.

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 10>We have two choices, and so there are some things

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 10>you might not know her answer to. And in twenty

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 10>twenty four, unlike twenty sixteen, for a lot of the

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 10>American people. We know exactly what Trump will do, who

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 10>he is, and the kind of threat he is to democracy.

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, she has late stage TDS. Let's look at some

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>of the highlights or should that be low lights of

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that interview. Here are Kamala's top three moments. This is exciting.

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>The VP has learned a new word. Here she repeats

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>that word three times in thirteen seconds.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 12>See if you can guess what it is.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 5>Looking holistically at the connection between that and housing, and

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 5>looking holistically at the incentives we in the federal government

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 5>can create for local and state governments to actually engage

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 5>in planning in a holistic manner.

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Here Kamala attempts to answer a simple question about her

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 2>economic policies.

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 10>Does not go well for those who say these policies

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 10>aren't for me. What do you say to them.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, if you are hardworking, if you have the dreams

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 5>and the ambitions and the aspirations of what I believe

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 5>you do, you're in my plan.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 5>I have to tell you, I really love and am

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 5>so energized by what I know to be the spirit

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 5>and character of the American people. We have ambition, we

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 5>have aspirations, we have dreams.

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, she loves empty platitudes and the vacuousness did not

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>end there and NATed it the lies, including this.

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 10>Whopop polling shows that most likely voters still think Donald

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 10>Trump is better to handle the economy. Why do you

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 10>think that is?

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, here's what I know in terms of the facts.

0:29:56.120 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump left us with the worst economy since the

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 5>Great Depression. When you look at, for example, the employment numbers.

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 10>It was during COVID, and employment was so high because

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 10>we shut down the government.

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 11>We sat on the country.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Even before the pandemic, he lost manufacturing jobs by most

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 5>people's estimates at least two hundred thousand.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Now that is an absolute lie, one so big that

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>even CNN has called it out. Indeed, Trump had added

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs before COVID, He had

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 2>not lost them. From the beginning of his presidency. In

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.959
<v Speaker 2>January twenty seventeen through February twenty twenty, just before the

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 2>pandemic crash, four hundred and fourteen thousand new manufacturing jobs

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>were created. Let's bring in Sky News contributor Kosher Gaeta Kosher.

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 2>This interview was not good, and that's putting it mildly.

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 2>And it was with an interviewer who did everything in

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>her power to help Paris.

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 13>It was a holistic illustration. I think that was the word.

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 13>Their holisticalisation of word salad and not saying anything, and

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 13>a very friendly interviewer letting all sorts of mistatements realize

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 13>as you put a stand. But it's just I think

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 13>it's giving us a glimpse into forty days left to go.

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 13>What we're going to see very sparse media interviews, and

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 13>when they occur, they're going to look like this with

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 13>just platitudes and skating through with high level statements, falsehoods,

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 13>with friendly media.

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 6>And that's just what it's going to be.

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, some big news today from New York. The mayor there,

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Eric Adams, a Democrat, has been indicted following a federal

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 2>corruption investigation. Let's hear from the mayor.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 14>It is now my belief that the federal government intends

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 14>to charge me with crimes. If so, these charges will

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 14>be entirely false based on lies.

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Kosher, what more can you tell us about this developing story.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 13>Yes, so, the Manhattan grand jury indicted him in federal

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 13>criminal charges. We know that all other details are under

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 13>seal and the DOJ has declined to provide any comment.

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 13>It appears from some reporting because this had been brewing

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 13>for a while where there were other people in his

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 13>orbit who had been raided or questioned back in November

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 13>and even as recently as February, and one aid of

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 13>his actually flipped reportedly on some corruption charges relating to

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 13>how he fundraised and has been receiving funding from maybe

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 13>the Turkish government or Turkish airlines. But we don't really

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 13>know much more than that officially. I think the big

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 13>question that this is raising, and that we'll find out

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 13>more in the days and weeks to come, is why

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 13>now and why is the DOJ in pursuit of such

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 13>criminal charges because he is a Democrat and ABOOSEI and

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 13>on the eve of an election, it's interesting you wouldn't

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 13>typically expect to see the Democrat run DOJ right now

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 13>under the Biden administration federally go out after a blue

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 13>state mayor in a blue city. So that's I think

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 13>a bit curious and in a more to.

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Come, Yes, I heard today that he's getting the Trump

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 2>treatment and why that is? Who knows that? There was

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 2>conjecture that he came out strongly against the Biden administration's

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 2>border protection policies, and he was quite outspoken about the

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 2>impact that was having on cities across America, including his So, yeah,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>it will be interesting to see what the outcome of

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 2>this is. And the timing itself is fascinating. Now a

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 2>union that has backed Kamala Harris's campaign is causing a

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 2>bit of mockery. It's a union that represents the IRS,

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 2>that's the tax Office in the US. And no one's

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 2>happier about this endorsement than Donald Trumps.

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 9>No wonder that Kamala Harris was just officially endorsed by

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 9>IRS agents.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Do you believe.

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 14>That's one you'd say, I'd rather.

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Not have that endorsement.

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 2>It's probably the endorsement you don't want. There is no

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.800
<v Speaker 2>love for the IRS, is there in America?

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 13>I think the tax man is probably universally loathed in

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 13>every country in the US certainly, and elsewhere as well.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 13>And it just goes to show how this is such

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 13>a high contrast election in terms of the candidates, in

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 13>terms of their policies, and in terms of the endorsements

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 13>they're attracting. With Trump, you've got the border patrol, you've

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 13>got the teamsters that we talked about I think last week,

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 13>and that was a big shift that they've never done

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 13>in I think more decades. And then here you've got

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 13>the IRS and the US Postal Service and the teachers

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 13>unions and people like that on this side. I think

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 13>Trump did well bringing some humor into it, and I

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 13>think he's right no love lost in not having endorsement

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 13>from the IRS.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Before you go. There has been polling at this week

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>that is far more promising for Donald Trump, including in

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>some swing states. How do you see those numbers right now?

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 2>If you were to make a prediction, who do you

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 2>see is in the box seat?

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 13>You know, it feels like Trump is very very well

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 13>positioned right now with all the macro fundamentals, some of

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 13>these polls coming out, the direction of the country, and

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 13>how more than half of the population doesn't think it's

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 13>in the right direction. All those things historically would bode

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 13>well for a Trump candidate or the Change candidate. However,

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 13>this really is. It's a fifty to fifty read. I

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 13>just think it's going to be such a tight election.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 13>It's been described as a knife fight in a phone booth.

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 13>That's how rezer. Then it's going to be one and

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 13>lost on forty fifty votes and that is going to

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 13>continue until November.

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Kosher Gata, thank you so much for your time this evening.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 5>Coming up.

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Megan Markel labeled a demon who has psycho moments and

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 2>anti Israeli, anti American.

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 6>Rapper Macromore faces the music.

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back joining me now. Celebrity and royal reporter Kinsey

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Schofield Kinsey more revelations about Sean Combs that are known

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 2>as p Diddy. According to a report in page six,

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 2>he once wanted Prince Harry and Prince William to join

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 2>him on his wild parties while there were still young

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 2>bucks and getting into a lot of trouble themselves. What

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 2>more can you tell the audience about this? And who

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>are some of the big names that attended Ditty's freak

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 2>off parties?

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 4>No, Prince Harry was even mentioned in a thirty million

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 4>dollar sexual assault lawsuit filed against Didty earlier this year.

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 4>Harry was used as an example of celebrities that are

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 4>associated with did He, but also the kines of shields

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 4>that did He used to avoid consequences. Though Harry is

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 4>not accused of any wrongdoing. I don't know about the

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 4>freak offs. But Page six reports some of the big

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 4>celebrities at these events were Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, Tommy Lee,

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 4>Pam Anderson, jay Z, Beyonce, Mariah Carey. So a lot

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 4>of people keeping their head down and not saying anything

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>And I noticed there's been a connection made with certain

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:27.760
<v Speaker 2>celebrities deleting their entire ex Twitter histories in the last

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 2>few days, and people are this bit of conjecture about

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 2>whether that's at all connected with this business. What can

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 2>you tell me about that?

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's Usher. And I do understand why people

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 4>are asking questions about Usher because Usher has spoken out

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 4>about some of the vulgarity he saw while he was

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 4>in Diddy's care, So, you know, would he be trying

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 4>to get rid of any evidence? I'm not sure. I

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 4>think that that's a fair question.

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 2>And you know, Usher has talked about a lot and

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 2>though a lot of people see him as a potential

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 2>victim in all these because he was so young when

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.719
<v Speaker 2>he was sent to live with p did he essentially

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people are also painting him as somewhat

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of a villain because he introduced a very young Justin

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Bieber to that world. Has Biber said anything about this saga?

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Daley mail says that he's very upset over it and

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 4>that he is having a hard time registering it, and

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 4>he's kind of shut down when it comes to the topic.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 4>But you know, Usher pursued for giving a woman of

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 4>venereal disease not giving her a heads up about what

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:40.240
<v Speaker 4>was going on before they got together. So the halo

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 4>is a little you know, Dusty, if you ask me.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:45.439
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 2>We've also started to hear some defense lines from Diddy's lawyers.

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 2>One of them claimed that the one thousand bottles of

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 2>baby oil and lube Homeland Security found when they raided

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 2>his mansion were due to some sort of a cost

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.399
<v Speaker 2>ERRD and some sort of a bulk buying era. Does

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 2>his legal team have hopes of getting him out of jail?

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Is he any chance of getting bail whilst these cases

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:12.760
<v Speaker 2>are being put together?

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, I have to tell that attorney,

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 4>I hope he's getting paid a small fortune for the

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 4>tap dance he did when asked about the baby because

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 4>that's ridiculous. I don't believe we're going to see did

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 4>he get out of jail because they believe he is

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 4>a danger to his victims. They believe that he would

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 4>go after some of his victims and try to silence them.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 4>They're afraid that people on the outside will hurt people

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 4>for him. So I think that they consider this man

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 4>a very dangerous individual.

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And also I would imagine with his wealth and his connections,

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 2>he'd be somewhat of a flight risk. He's not going

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to go through a major airport. He's got all sorts

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 2>of other means of travel. Now let's talk about Meghan Markoul.

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Her reputation has taken another dive after a US magazine

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 2>published a puff piece where it's said that you know

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the truth is that she's good ViBe's only type of

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 2>boss and loves to offer sweet gestures and acts of kindness.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 2>But then The Daily Beast published a piece in response.

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 2>The headline is former employees of demon Boss Meghan Markel

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>recall psycho moments. That is not a good headline and

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it certainly doesn't sound like good vibes only Kinsey.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 4>My favorite line from the US weekly piece was one

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 4>of her employees saying that Terry and Meghan they water

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 4>the seeds to help their employees flourish. I mean, what

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 4>are you on and can I have. But you know

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 4>what's interesting to me. What I figured out was, remember

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 4>when five of Meghan Markle's friends talked anonymously to People

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 4>magazine and to defend her against her father in twenty eighteen.

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 4>That publisher now works at US Weekly, and that publisher

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 4>is best friends with best friend Meghan's best friend, Abigail Spencer.

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 4>So the Ust Weekly magazine article is just, you know,

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 4>an exchange of hands. It is just friends helping friends,

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 4>and they're trying to pull this off as like some

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 4>big journalistic win when the reality is Meghan's best friend

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 4>called her best friend and they gave her a glossy

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 4>ride up. That is not journalism. The Hollywood Reporter is

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 4>a very credible source, and the Daily Beast sometimes is

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 4>a very credible source, and I'm going to believe them

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 4>over a tabloid rag that is friends with Megan Markle

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 4>any day.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Rapper Mac o'mool's anti American, anti Israel Tye Ride has

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.760
<v Speaker 2>seen his appearance at the Neon City Festival in Las

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Vegas canceled. What's the latest on this? At Kinsey Because

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 2>he's been active in this area for some time. He's

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 2>been a bit of a political activist, particularly when it

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 2>comes to this issue.

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but has he ever been so dumb? I mean,

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, the music Festival did not disclose a specific

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 4>reason why he won't be involved, but the announcement did

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.959
<v Speaker 4>come a few days after he screamed Beep America while

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 4>on stage performing at a pro Palestine benefit concert called

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 4>Palestine Will Live Forever. He's unapologetic about this, he said,

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 4>I've lost endorsements, I've lost business ties. I am still

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 4>here unwavering in my support for a free Palestine. So

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 4>good luck, buddy. I think he's going to turn off

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people being so vulgar and being so

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 4>ungrateful to live in one of the greatest countries in

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 4>the world.

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 2>And also his whole rationale the ranch, I listened to

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:45.879
<v Speaker 2>the whole thing.

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 13>He said.

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 2>He really got interested in this issue post October seven,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 2>and he's done all this research and somehow he's come

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 2>out of it on the side that he has. He's

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 2>looked at October seven and decided that it's the Israelis

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 2>who are in the wrong here and they need to

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 2>pay a price. It's just incredible. Quickly, before you go,

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 2>a video of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's daughter, Zahara,

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 2>has resurfers showing her dropping her father's last name at

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a sorority celebration late last year. I have a look, yeah,

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 2>so she famously dropped Pitt from her name. Is there

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 2>any chance that these children and Brad Pitt are going

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to reconcile? It seems to be a really ugly split

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 2>involving the children.

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, missus called parental alienation. Angelina has definitely poisoned

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 4>these children against their father. I don't doubt that Brad

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Pitt's children saw him at his worst, but that is

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 4>clearly not man that he is today. He is sober today,

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 4>He's been sober for almost seven years. And Angelina's dad,

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 4>John Voight, said that these children need stability and he's

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 4>really hoping that this family can find peace.

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.959
<v Speaker 2>Kinsey Schofield, thanks for your time this evening, and that's

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 2>it from May. I'll see you tomorrow night. At nine

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 2>point thirty four left, he's losing it. Newsnight is up

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 2>next