Speaker 1: On scor Wields Oskodio. This is the Weader Panalty Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Pattiy Show. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight a massive program. Joining me will be Douglas
Speaker 2: Murray on the Rise of the Center right from across
Speaker 2: Europe to South America. Nickkita will discuss a rough week
Speaker 2: for the Albanesi government. Kosher Gator will have the latest
Speaker 2: US news, including Kamala Harris's car crash interview, and later
Speaker 2: in the hour the latest celebrity and royal news with
Speaker 2: Kinsey's Schofield and Little's Losing It stars a man preaching
Speaker 2: about CIS, gender privilege and pronouns.
Speaker 3: I don't know who needs see here this, but don't
Speaker 3: ask people for their pronouns. If when they share theirs
Speaker 3: and then they ask you yours, you get offended because
Speaker 3: you think they should have assumed that's not our aship.
Speaker 3: That is you clocking someone and then thinking with your
Speaker 3: assist gender privilege and.
Speaker 2: Yes, it has been a challenge week for the Albanese
Speaker 2: government and the Prime Minister copped on tough questions from
Speaker 2: journalists as he did the media rounds this morning. And
Speaker 2: it's not just housing and tax policy causing headaches for
Speaker 2: the PM.
Speaker 4: He got into a little.
Speaker 2: Clash with Today's show hosts Sarabo about Labour's inflation line.
Speaker 5: Out there and actually the inflation rates three point five nice,
Speaker 5: Michelle Bullet, hasn't the rates the interests not brought of that?
Speaker 1: That's not right, Sah with respect.
Speaker 6: That's right.
Speaker 2: Inflation would still be around three point four percent if
Speaker 2: it were not for the government's various subsidies which have
Speaker 2: artificially brought inflation down, and a big spike in the
Speaker 2: CPI figures is expected when those subsidies expire next year.
Speaker 2: Let's bring in senior fellow at the minsi's research center,
Speaker 2: Nick Cata. Nick, the PM is struggling under some of
Speaker 2: this pressure. The questions are being asked, and he doesn't
Speaker 2: always have the answers.
Speaker 7: No, his economic literacy doesn't help, does it. I mean,
Speaker 7: this is a prime ministers of government. The things it
Speaker 7: can buy its way out of inflation. You know, it
Speaker 7: can just put money in people's pockets and that magically
Speaker 7: disappears inflation. No, it does not. It just adds to
Speaker 7: the inflationary pressures. But it has been a very bad
Speaker 7: week for him, and I think it is really the
Speaker 7: culmination of not paying attention to the economic fundamentals and
Speaker 7: all that seems to be coming home to roost, both
Speaker 7: of inflation and of course in their hunt now for
Speaker 7: more revenue by going after negative gearing and capital games
Speaker 7: tax for property investors.
Speaker 5: Well.
Speaker 2: Fresh analysis published in the Daily Telegraph shows a labor
Speaker 2: risks upsetting around a million voters, including in those critical
Speaker 2: what must win marginal electorates, if it rolls back negative
Speaker 2: gearing and capital gains tax concessions. Analysis of Tax Office
Speaker 2: Stata shows of the more than nine hundred and sixty
Speaker 2: thousand Australians who claim a tax break for their rental loss,
Speaker 2: around five hundred and nineteen thousand lived in labor held
Speaker 2: electorates and more than fifty thousand are voters in those
Speaker 2: till seats that labor hopes to win.
Speaker 1: Nick, can you really see.
Speaker 2: Labor flirting with changing these policies. It would be incredibly
Speaker 2: damaging for a sector that's already under pressure. We need
Speaker 2: to be encouraging more homes being built and that's not
Speaker 2: going to happen if you discourage property investors from entering
Speaker 2: the market.
Speaker 7: No, we know they want to go after this because
Speaker 7: that was their policy in the twenty nineteen election. And
Speaker 7: I mean, I find it hard to believe that the
Speaker 7: people in Treasury just would have got often and done
Speaker 7: this research off their own bat I think clearly they've
Speaker 7: been asked by.
Speaker 6: The government to do it.
Speaker 7: But yeah, you're right, more than half of these people
Speaker 7: with negative gearing living labor electorates. They're not buying large
Speaker 7: rich people. Rich people don't mess around with property prices.
Speaker 7: Rich people they don't best around with little homes and
Speaker 7: things they buy shopping centers and tower blocks.
Speaker 6: No, this is all.
Speaker 7: This is just the kind of people like you and
Speaker 7: me who are just trying to get something for retirement,
Speaker 7: to send side something retirement. And the government should not
Speaker 7: be punishing people for saving for their own retirement.
Speaker 2: Now, you'd think they would be doing everything to encourage
Speaker 2: that so people can be self funded in retirement and
Speaker 2: not rely on the age pension. Is so shortsighted, so
Speaker 2: idiotic for them to even contemplate this. You would hope
Speaker 2: that wiser heads are going to prevail. Talking about wise heads,
Speaker 2: let's talk about John Pursuito here has come under fire
Speaker 2: over comments he made about his tolerance for her Mass supporters.
Speaker 2: This came out during his second day in the witness
Speaker 2: box during more Deemings defamation case against him. Deeming's lawyer
Speaker 2: sue Chris through sc Press Pursuito on what views an
Speaker 2: MP would have to hold in order for him to
Speaker 2: consider an expulsion, including support for her Mass. Now you
Speaker 2: might think this was a fairly simple question for Pursuito
Speaker 2: to answer, say, of course you can't support a terror
Speaker 2: listed organization. That would be unacceptable in the Liberal Party,
Speaker 2: But instead we got this.
Speaker 1: He said, I would have.
Speaker 2: To consider the circumstances. It's not a statement I agree with,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't mean it's outrageous or heretical or worthy
Speaker 2: of some kind of referral to the disciplinary processes of
Speaker 2: the Parliamentary Liberal Party. And when asked about whether the
Speaker 2: view that the attacks on October seven were legitimate acts
Speaker 2: of resistance by her Mass is a controversial one, he said,
Speaker 2: it depends what disposition you bring to a sensitive issue.
Speaker 2: I think your honor as a broad proposition, I accept that,
Speaker 2: but I accept that that view is held. But my counsel,
Speaker 2: more broadly to everybody, is to be as temperate as
Speaker 2: possible in those debates. What is he on about Nick?
Speaker 7: There's no surprise.
Speaker 5: Does it mean you tied.
Speaker 2: Up answering this question? This would have been the simplest
Speaker 2: question for any leader, any MP to answer in the
Speaker 2: witness box, which is no, if you support her mass
Speaker 2: so if you have any sort of tolerance for her
Speaker 2: master's actions, that is utterly unacceptable within the Liberal Party.
Speaker 4: Done.
Speaker 7: But this is this is a leader who has not
Speaker 7: been prepared to say boo to the Dan Andrews government
Speaker 7: over the terrible legislation they introduced that actually makes praying
Speaker 7: illegal in certain circumstances. So I'm really I'm really astounded
Speaker 7: that anybody is surprised by this whatsoever? You know, he's
Speaker 7: I think his leadership has to be over whatever the
Speaker 7: result of this case, and how foolish, how misjudged it was.
Speaker 7: Not to settle this dispute out of court. What did
Speaker 7: he think he was going to gain from two weeks
Speaker 7: the in court and lengthies period in the witness box
Speaker 7: in front of one of the best barrister's, one of
Speaker 7: the best advocates in the legal system. He wasn't going
Speaker 7: to come out well. He's not coming out well. And
Speaker 7: I think the Liberal Party should be looking for its
Speaker 7: next leader.
Speaker 2: Quite frankly, Oh absolutely, I think we're on a unity
Speaker 2: ticket when it comes to that. We're not going to
Speaker 2: prejudge what happens with this case, but how he can
Speaker 2: remain leader whatever the result, is beyond me unless they
Speaker 2: are just determined to stay in opposition forever. Now, before
Speaker 2: you go, I'm going to ask you about ABC Managing
Speaker 2: director Kim Williams. He uses address at the annual Lowy
Speaker 2: Institute media lecture to tell us about fake news being
Speaker 2: a danger to democracy, but he seemed to ignore his
Speaker 2: own organization's rampant bias and misinformation. That's again under scrutiny
Speaker 2: after it was revealed that the ABC had dramatized, dramaticized
Speaker 2: footage from the Afghanistan ward. It added additional gunfire sounds
Speaker 2: and all sorts of manipulations to give a different impression
Speaker 2: of what actually happened. Surely, Nick, Kim Williams should be
Speaker 2: be giving these sort of speeches at the ABC canteen
Speaker 2: to the comrades, not at the lower Institute.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Look, I think he's fallen into the trap of thinking
Speaker 7: that everything that the ABC says is like the fountain
Speaker 7: of truth that they are the sole arbits of truth,
Speaker 7: because if he was really talking about fake news, he
Speaker 7: could have attacked his own or could have brought his
Speaker 7: own organization to task, particularly over that video. But as
Speaker 7: you know, that's not, by far not the only instance
Speaker 7: of fake news. What about the fake news that Donald
Speaker 7: Trump was being with a Russian puppet that was run
Speaker 7: on four calls?
Speaker 4: Oh?
Speaker 7: Yeah, never, They've never apologized, I said. In fact, the
Speaker 7: last time I looked it was still up online.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 7: I think it's a.
Speaker 6: I don't know.
Speaker 7: I thought I expected more of Kim Williams. I expected
Speaker 7: him to use his role of chairman to take them on,
Speaker 7: and certainly he doesn't seem to be doing that, and
Speaker 7: he didn't in that Lower Institute lecture last night.
Speaker 2: Nick Kita, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 2: Joining me now is best selling author Douglas Murray. Douglas
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris are sat down for an interview, and you'll
Speaker 2: never guess the hard hitting, unbiased journalist she picked to
Speaker 2: interview her.
Speaker 9: Ask Karmala, are you for a Palestinian state if hermas
Speaker 9: is going to run that steak?
Speaker 6: Okay? Yes or no?
Speaker 10: And let's say you don't like her answer, are you
Speaker 10: going to vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 11: No, I'm not running for perfect She's running against Trump.
Speaker 10: We have two choices, and so there are some things
Speaker 10: you might not know her answer to. And in twenty
Speaker 10: twenty four, unlike twenty sixteen, for a lot of the
Speaker 10: American people, we know exactly what Trump will do, who
Speaker 10: he is, and the kind of threat he is to
Speaker 10: democracyze the kind.
Speaker 2: Of threat he is. Yes, Sha peaked, Msnbass, Stephanie Rule.
Speaker 2: Let's have a look at some of that interview.
Speaker 10: You mentioned housing before giving that extra money for a
Speaker 10: first home. If you can't raise corporate taxes or if
Speaker 10: GOP takes control of the Senate, where do you get
Speaker 10: the money to do that? Do you still go forward
Speaker 10: with those plans and borrow?
Speaker 5: Well, but we're going to have to raise corporate taxes
Speaker 5: and we're going to have to raise We're going to
Speaker 5: have to make sure that the biggest corporations and billionaires
Speaker 5: pay their fair share.
Speaker 2: That's just it, Douglas. Is this interview going to convince
Speaker 2: those on decided Advisors?
Speaker 12: Well, we've just got a very good example of demonstration
Speaker 12: of why it is that Kamala Harris doesn't put herself
Speaker 12: in front of the media.
Speaker 1: She has put herself in.
Speaker 12: Front of the media like Joe Biden, less than I
Speaker 12: think anyone who has ever been running for the most
Speaker 12: senior office.
Speaker 1: In the world.
Speaker 12: And you just saw there why her team are keeping
Speaker 12: her from having to answer any questions. There's a glitch
Speaker 12: the moment that she has to think about a subject
Speaker 12: which he clearly hasn't thought about very much.
Speaker 1: Kama Harris has never in.
Speaker 12: The past particularly got into economics and borrowing and inflation
Speaker 12: and budget deficits and all of that.
Speaker 1: And you can see she just had this sort of
Speaker 1: glitch and then she.
Speaker 12: Says, well, I'll just keep doing the thing I just said.
Speaker 12: But there's no conviction there. And by the way, there's
Speaker 12: not very much sense to it. This idea that the
Speaker 12: left in America and around the world always does when on.
Speaker 1: The campaign trail.
Speaker 12: Of saying we're just gonna punish the richest people in
Speaker 12: society because they're the ones who are the problem. We're
Speaker 12: just going to attack the biggest corporations because they're the problems.
Speaker 12: They always present this as if that itself would have
Speaker 12: no knock on effect. First of all, of course, it
Speaker 12: presumes that these corporations and billionaires don't already pay tax,
Speaker 12: which of course they do.
Speaker 6: And then it gets.
Speaker 12: Into this idea that if you squeeze more at the top,
Speaker 12: you can pay for all the lunatic welfare ism down below,
Speaker 12: and that just doesn't work, and we've seen that time
Speaker 12: and again. So you know, I just think this is
Speaker 12: this is an example of the fact that everyone should
Speaker 12: demand that any candidate for the most important office in
Speaker 12: the land has to be questioned. This is why they
Speaker 12: have to be questioned. But of course, you know, she
Speaker 12: gets the light barely scratching the surface quests from a
Speaker 12: court journalist who is not there to question her but
Speaker 12: to help her. And that's just a rottenness in the
Speaker 12: media to get there, it is.
Speaker 2: And these vacuous platitudes have absolutely no follow up, like
Speaker 2: the fact that the majority of tax income tax collected
Speaker 2: is paid by the top ten percent, sometimes the top
Speaker 2: five percent, but those sort of stats are never put
Speaker 2: forward when the left are pushing these narratives. Meanwhile, we've
Speaker 2: got President Joe Biden appearing on the view of All
Speaker 2: Places where will be Goldberg compared Donald Trump to a bug,
Speaker 2: and then Biden pretended to squash it with his fist.
Speaker 1: Then he just wouldn't go.
Speaker 6: It was like a bug. He just kept being there.
Speaker 8: Who was like a bug right Thereoo?
Speaker 11: So you felt.
Speaker 2: Hah hilarious. And this comes after Joe Biden's Thomas Chafe
Speaker 2: said Trump should be extinguished for good after two assassination
Speaker 2: attempts in two months. The Democrats and certainly their media
Speaker 2: allies Douglas are just doubling down on this retoric.
Speaker 6: And this is.
Speaker 2: Again the group who says words can be violence, and
Speaker 2: there seems to be zero responsibility for what we have
Speaker 2: seen happen in recent months.
Speaker 12: Yeah, you just have to play any We just have
Speaker 12: to play it the other way around. Don't you imagine
Speaker 12: if Donald Trump or JD. Vance had gone on a
Speaker 12: I know, if they found an incredibly pliant talk show
Speaker 12: with Republican supporters constituting the panel. And imagine if on
Speaker 12: that Trump or Vance had compared Kamela to a bug
Speaker 12: and then signaled that they wanted to squash her. I
Speaker 12: reckon that wouldn't actually be laughed off. I actually think
Speaker 12: Kamala Harris amongs others would say that that was dangerous
Speaker 12: inflammatory rhetoric. They would say it was prejudiced against her.
Speaker 12: And they would say it was dangerous. Well, you know,
Speaker 12: there's got to be some consistency there. But of course,
Speaker 12: know that the different rules apply. If you're dealing with
Speaker 12: somebody from the right, you're allowed to call them a bug,
Speaker 12: You're allowed to talk about squashing them, and all of this,
Speaker 12: as you say, reata in a period where where Trump
Speaker 12: has faced multiple assassination attempts, and you would have thought
Speaker 12: that this idea of dialing down the rhetoric which we
Speaker 12: occasionally hear might actually be done.
Speaker 1: But they just can't help themselves.
Speaker 12: And I don't believe that words are violent, but I
Speaker 12: do think that when the proximity of political violence to
Speaker 12: American politics has come so close twice in a couple
Speaker 12: of months, you would have thought that people would take.
Speaker 1: Some care with their words.
Speaker 6: But oh no, it's okay.
Speaker 12: You can dehumanize so long as you're dehumanized.
Speaker 2: Right exactly now. This week all eyes were on the
Speaker 2: UN as Argentinian President Javier Millay and others. Spoker Jave
Speaker 2: Milay blasted the United Nations, saying it had moved from
Speaker 2: an organization to pursued peace to an organization that imposes
Speaker 2: an ideological agenda on its members Douglas. He also criticized
Speaker 2: the UN packed for the Future Plan and said the
Speaker 2: organization had become one of the main proponents of systematic
Speaker 2: violations of freedom. He was referring to COVID era policies there,
Speaker 2: but also the fact that they allow these dictatorships, these
Speaker 2: despot nations, to sit on the Human Rights Council and
Speaker 2: then condemn a country like Israel.
Speaker 1: This has been the case for decades with the UN.
Speaker 6: The problem with the.
Speaker 12: UN is that whatever set up you had to replace it,
Speaker 12: if you ever could replace it, would probably end up
Speaker 12: looking something like it.
Speaker 6: My view is that it's perfectly okay to.
Speaker 1: Have a talking shop like the UN.
Speaker 12: It's probably a good idea to have something where the
Speaker 12: world's leaders can meet. But nobody should be under any
Speaker 12: illusions about this entity. And many people like Seams are.
Speaker 12: You know, we have at the UN dictatorship after dictatorship
Speaker 12: holding the floor to Lambass, the world's democracies, including the
Speaker 12: only free liberal democracy in the Middle East, Israel, and
Speaker 12: they just do it day in, day out, year and
Speaker 12: year out.
Speaker 6: That's been happening for decades, and in.
Speaker 12: Part that's because you know, the dictators like to do
Speaker 12: that because it takes attention from what they do back home.
Speaker 12: It takes away attention from their own larceny and theft
Speaker 12: and corruption and much more. And yeah, they always use
Speaker 12: the punching bag of Israel. Occasionally they also use a
Speaker 12: punching bag of America. Look, the organization has always been
Speaker 12: the same, It's always been obscene. It's always allowed obscenity
Speaker 12: to go on at an international scale. But you've just
Speaker 12: got to look at it and realize that, you know,
Speaker 12: the world's democracies should not be having to take much notice.
Speaker 12: If any of you know, various despots and dictators saying
Speaker 12: they don't like something that's happening in free liberal democracies,
Speaker 12: well they wouldn't.
Speaker 6: Would they.
Speaker 12: The question is whether you take it that seriously or not.
Speaker 12: And I would argue people just shouldn't.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 2: El Salvador's wildly popular president, Nave Bukela, also addressed the
Speaker 2: United Nations and he had some pointed remarks about regimes
Speaker 2: that prosecute and seek to imprison their political opponents, and
Speaker 2: he responded to his crackdown on violent gangs in El Salvador,
Speaker 2: which has been heavily criticized in the Western media. He
Speaker 2: said in El Salvador, the safety of law abiding citizens
Speaker 2: is a higher priority than the comfort of criminals. And
Speaker 2: he said, some say that we have in prisoned thousands,
Speaker 2: but the reality is that we have freed millions. There's
Speaker 2: a new generation of leaders, Douglas, whether it's Mila in Argentina,
Speaker 2: Bucla in Elsalvador, Georgia, Maloney in Italy, and they're showing
Speaker 2: a new type of leadership and resisting the UN and
Speaker 2: this entire notion of collectivism.
Speaker 12: Well, there's certainly there's certainly something that's breaking the mold.
Speaker 12: All the people you listed are doing it in different ways.
Speaker 12: But I mean, what I think you've seen in recent
Speaker 12: years has been a backlash against a certain sort of
Speaker 12: bureaucratic World Economic Forum Davos like class which simply overplayed
Speaker 12: its hand. There's always this thing in politics of you know,
Speaker 12: the adults in the room, and the problem is is
Speaker 12: if the adults are shown to be wearing no clothes,
Speaker 12: you know, eventually somebody comes along and points it out.
Speaker 1: We've had quite a lot of those people. Now.
Speaker 12: The adults really kept on exposing themselves in every way
Speaker 12: as not as competent as they thought they were. The
Speaker 12: international financial crises in the last decades, the immigration crises
Speaker 12: that are roiling all of the developed countries. All of
Speaker 12: these things, you know, rampant criminality and a major American cities,
Speaker 12: lawlessness and much more. All of these things go on
Speaker 12: for a certain time, overseen by the alleged adults, and
Speaker 12: then at some point other people will come along. I
Speaker 12: think we've been rather lucky. Actually, that nobody really unsavory
Speaker 12: has come along is quite surprising. Although if you some
Speaker 12: of the coverage of Mille and others, you'd think, you know,
Speaker 12: that they were the worst thing that could possibly come.
Speaker 6: No, this is the beginning of some kind of.
Speaker 12: Backlash against that bureaucratic class that said they knew how
Speaker 12: to run everything and turned out to be able to
Speaker 12: run an awful lot of things into the ground.
Speaker 2: And we're seeing it in many parts of Europe as well.
Speaker 2: He really is quite a fascinating period. Before you go,
Speaker 2: I've got to ask you about the case against Sean P.
Speaker 2: Diddy Combs. So far, he's been charged with three counts
Speaker 2: of sex trafficking, racketeering, transportation to engage in prostitution. He
Speaker 2: has been denied bail, but we are starting to get
Speaker 2: some defense lines from his legal team. I don't know
Speaker 2: how good they are. His lawyer claims that the thousand
Speaker 2: bottles of baby oil and lube Homeland Security found when
Speaker 2: they raided his mansions were due to an error from Costco,
Speaker 2: and he also said that did he likes to buy
Speaker 2: in bunk Ah Dear me, how nervous. On a serious note,
Speaker 2: Douglas is Hollywood, the music industry, the A list in
Speaker 2: general about this case and what it could reveal.
Speaker 12: I have to say, I'm one of those people who's
Speaker 12: pretty unfamiliar with the work of mister Diddy.
Speaker 6: I don't know much, but I can tell you. I
Speaker 6: can tell you.
Speaker 12: That when these sorts of stories come up, there is
Speaker 12: an awful lot of worry in that class.
Speaker 6: That it's obvious that there are.
Speaker 12: Certain things that go on, certain sort of secrets that
Speaker 12: are held effectively among certain A listeners. What always happens
Speaker 12: at about this when it happened, when it comes up,
Speaker 12: is that people end up coming out saying everybody knew
Speaker 12: and all that sort of thing. I think that always
Speaker 12: shows something pathetic. My preference always is, let's see how
Speaker 12: the law progresses. This has to be a litigated in
Speaker 12: the law courts, and we'll see there's a lot of
Speaker 12: rumor around, a lot of casting of aspersions, but we've
Speaker 12: seen in cases before that where that can go wrong.
Speaker 12: I'll hope that the all hope that the system it
Speaker 12: proves to be the place where we can find out
Speaker 12: what actually has happened. But yes, in the meantime, some
Speaker 12: of the things you had just listed there suggests that
Speaker 12: perhaps mister Diddy ought to get other defense lawyers on
Speaker 12: his case, because those don't sound that great.
Speaker 2: Yes, four starters and again to me highlights when we
Speaker 2: hear these celebrities, whether it's at the Oscars or the
Speaker 2: Music Awards, opining about social and political issues and lecturing
Speaker 2: the country, these people seem to exist in a different
Speaker 2: reality and their moral compass seems to be rather different
Speaker 2: to most ordinary folk. I mean, we saw that with
Speaker 2: that whole Hervey Harvey Weinstein.
Speaker 1: Sorry, we certainly shouldn't listen.
Speaker 12: Amazingly, and something I said for many years, we shouldn't
Speaker 12: listen to celebrities about the state of the planet, state
Speaker 12: of politics, or anything else.
Speaker 1: They're not qualified to do it. They are probably qualified.
Speaker 12: To do small numbers of things that they can do.
Speaker 1: They should do that.
Speaker 12: The rest of us should absolutely ignore their proclamations. They
Speaker 12: count for zilch less than the UN.
Speaker 1: You might say.
Speaker 2: Less than the UN. Douglas Barry, thank you so much
Speaker 2: for your time this evening.
Speaker 6: Great to see you. As always coming up.
Speaker 2: Lefties Losing It and Kamala Harris sat down for an
Speaker 2: interview earlier today.
Speaker 10: It did not go well.
Speaker 2: Welcome back. It's time for lefties losing it and I
Speaker 2: regret to inform you that Kamala Harris has sat down
Speaker 2: for an interview with a leftist activist masquerading as a journalist.
Speaker 1: Will have the top.
Speaker 2: Three moments from that shortly, But first, the Veep scenes
Speaker 2: determined to produce more content for Trump. At how long
Speaker 2: before this appears in the next campaign ad for Donald Trump.
Speaker 5: We just need to move past the failed policies that
Speaker 5: we have proven don't work.
Speaker 2: Not only is she in office now, but the Democrats
Speaker 2: have been in power for twelve of the past sixteen years,
Speaker 2: but they want to turn the page.
Speaker 11: Please turn away.
Speaker 7: If we are turn bay, come by Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Gosh, she's terrifying. Can you imagine her as the second
Speaker 2: Lady Gwen Walls makes her wacky? Husband Tim walls look normal,
Speaker 2: and she has this habit of talking to the lefties
Speaker 2: at their rallies and campaign events like they're six years old.
Speaker 11: You ready, but you're loud and clear, like we said,
Speaker 11: mister Trump, mister Vance, please.
Speaker 4: Mind your own business.
Speaker 1: Oh that was excellent.
Speaker 2: Now, President Joe Biden decided to take a break from
Speaker 2: his endless beach holiday to sit down with the ladies
Speaker 2: of the View and here the hate field whoopee Goldberger
Speaker 2: hoster talks about her love for sleepy Joe and describes
Speaker 2: Donald Trump as a bug. Who Biden then crushes, You.
Speaker 8: Were my writer and I I was going.
Speaker 6: Where wherever you were going aft when I so.
Speaker 8: I just wanted to say that because I always felt
Speaker 8: you were going to probably do four years and then
Speaker 8: try to figure out where to go with Kamela. Then
Speaker 8: he just wouldn't go. Who's like a bug? He just
Speaker 8: kept being there.
Speaker 6: Who was like a like a bug right there?
Speaker 2: Zoo, So you felt, Now this dude is becoming a
Speaker 2: regular here this transactivist educates us about pronouns and cisgender privilege.
Speaker 3: I don't know who needs he hear this, but don't
Speaker 3: ask people for their pronouns. If when they share theirs,
Speaker 3: and then they ask you yours. You get offended because
Speaker 3: you think they should have assumed. That's not alaship. That
Speaker 3: is you clocking someone and then thinking, with your assist
Speaker 3: and your privilege, that they shouldn't have asked you because
Speaker 3: you're real.
Speaker 2: So basically, no matter how stupidly woke you are, it's
Speaker 2: not woke or stupid enough Triada. Now, Kamala finally sat
Speaker 2: down for a major network interview without a chaperone, and
Speaker 2: guess who she picked for this momentous occasion. The leftiest
Speaker 2: of lefty hacks you could find on the lunatic MSNBC network.
Speaker 2: Here is Stephanie Rule on Bill Maher's show, saying Kamala
Speaker 2: shouldn't be obliged to answer questions.
Speaker 9: Ask Kamala say, are you for a Palestinian state if
Speaker 9: Hamas is going to run that state?
Speaker 6: Okay?
Speaker 13: Yes or no?
Speaker 10: And let's say you don't like her answer. Are you
Speaker 10: going to vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 11: No, I'm not running for perfect, She's running against Trump.
Speaker 10: We have two choices, and so there are some things
Speaker 10: you might not know her answer to. And in twenty
Speaker 10: twenty four, unlike twenty sixteen, for a lot of the
Speaker 10: American people. We know exactly what Trump will do, who
Speaker 10: he is, and the kind of threat he is to democracy.
Speaker 2: Yes, she has late stage TDS. Let's look at some
Speaker 2: of the highlights or should that be low lights of
Speaker 2: that interview. Here are Kamala's top three moments. This is exciting.
Speaker 2: The VP has learned a new word. Here she repeats
Speaker 2: that word three times in thirteen seconds.
Speaker 12: See if you can guess what it is.
Speaker 5: Looking holistically at the connection between that and housing, and
Speaker 5: looking holistically at the incentives we in the federal government
Speaker 5: can create for local and state governments to actually engage
Speaker 5: in planning in a holistic manner.
Speaker 2: Here Kamala attempts to answer a simple question about her
Speaker 2: economic policies.
Speaker 10: Does not go well for those who say these policies
Speaker 10: aren't for me. What do you say to them.
Speaker 5: Well, if you are hardworking, if you have the dreams
Speaker 5: and the ambitions and the aspirations of what I believe
Speaker 5: you do, you're in my plan.
Speaker 6: You know.
Speaker 5: I have to tell you, I really love and am
Speaker 5: so energized by what I know to be the spirit
Speaker 5: and character of the American people. We have ambition, we
Speaker 5: have aspirations, we have dreams.
Speaker 2: Yes, she loves empty platitudes and the vacuousness did not
Speaker 2: end there and NATed it the lies, including this.
Speaker 10: Whopop polling shows that most likely voters still think Donald
Speaker 10: Trump is better to handle the economy. Why do you
Speaker 10: think that is?
Speaker 5: Well, here's what I know in terms of the facts.
Speaker 5: Donald Trump left us with the worst economy since the
Speaker 5: Great Depression. When you look at, for example, the employment numbers.
Speaker 10: It was during COVID, and employment was so high because
Speaker 10: we shut down the government.
Speaker 11: We sat on the country.
Speaker 5: Even before the pandemic, he lost manufacturing jobs by most
Speaker 5: people's estimates at least two hundred thousand.
Speaker 2: Now that is an absolute lie, one so big that
Speaker 2: even CNN has called it out. Indeed, Trump had added
Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs before COVID, He had
Speaker 2: not lost them. From the beginning of his presidency. In
Speaker 2: January twenty seventeen through February twenty twenty, just before the
Speaker 2: pandemic crash, four hundred and fourteen thousand new manufacturing jobs
Speaker 2: were created. Let's bring in Sky News contributor Kosher Gaeta Kosher.
Speaker 2: This interview was not good, and that's putting it mildly.
Speaker 2: And it was with an interviewer who did everything in
Speaker 2: her power to help Paris.
Speaker 13: It was a holistic illustration. I think that was the word.
Speaker 13: Their holisticalisation of word salad and not saying anything, and
Speaker 13: a very friendly interviewer letting all sorts of mistatements realize
Speaker 13: as you put a stand. But it's just I think
Speaker 13: it's giving us a glimpse into forty days left to go.
Speaker 13: What we're going to see very sparse media interviews, and
Speaker 13: when they occur, they're going to look like this with
Speaker 13: just platitudes and skating through with high level statements, falsehoods,
Speaker 13: with friendly media.
Speaker 6: And that's just what it's going to be.
Speaker 2: Now, some big news today from New York. The mayor there,
Speaker 2: Eric Adams, a Democrat, has been indicted following a federal
Speaker 2: corruption investigation. Let's hear from the mayor.
Speaker 14: It is now my belief that the federal government intends
Speaker 14: to charge me with crimes. If so, these charges will
Speaker 14: be entirely false based on lies.
Speaker 2: Kosher, what more can you tell us about this developing story.
Speaker 13: Yes, so, the Manhattan grand jury indicted him in federal
Speaker 13: criminal charges. We know that all other details are under
Speaker 13: seal and the DOJ has declined to provide any comment.
Speaker 13: It appears from some reporting because this had been brewing
Speaker 13: for a while where there were other people in his
Speaker 13: orbit who had been raided or questioned back in November
Speaker 13: and even as recently as February, and one aid of
Speaker 13: his actually flipped reportedly on some corruption charges relating to
Speaker 13: how he fundraised and has been receiving funding from maybe
Speaker 13: the Turkish government or Turkish airlines. But we don't really
Speaker 13: know much more than that officially. I think the big
Speaker 13: question that this is raising, and that we'll find out
Speaker 13: more in the days and weeks to come, is why
Speaker 13: now and why is the DOJ in pursuit of such
Speaker 13: criminal charges because he is a Democrat and ABOOSEI and
Speaker 13: on the eve of an election, it's interesting you wouldn't
Speaker 13: typically expect to see the Democrat run DOJ right now
Speaker 13: under the Biden administration federally go out after a blue
Speaker 13: state mayor in a blue city. So that's I think
Speaker 13: a bit curious and in a more to.
Speaker 2: Come, Yes, I heard today that he's getting the Trump
Speaker 2: treatment and why that is? Who knows that? There was
Speaker 2: conjecture that he came out strongly against the Biden administration's
Speaker 2: border protection policies, and he was quite outspoken about the
Speaker 2: impact that was having on cities across America, including his So, yeah,
Speaker 2: it will be interesting to see what the outcome of
Speaker 2: this is. And the timing itself is fascinating. Now a
Speaker 2: union that has backed Kamala Harris's campaign is causing a
Speaker 2: bit of mockery. It's a union that represents the IRS,
Speaker 2: that's the tax Office in the US. And no one's
Speaker 2: happier about this endorsement than Donald Trumps.
Speaker 9: No wonder that Kamala Harris was just officially endorsed by
Speaker 9: IRS agents.
Speaker 5: Do you believe.
Speaker 14: That's one you'd say, I'd rather.
Speaker 1: Not have that endorsement.
Speaker 2: It's probably the endorsement you don't want. There is no
Speaker 2: love for the IRS, is there in America?
Speaker 8: No?
Speaker 13: I think the tax man is probably universally loathed in
Speaker 13: every country in the US certainly, and elsewhere as well.
Speaker 13: And it just goes to show how this is such
Speaker 13: a high contrast election in terms of the candidates, in
Speaker 13: terms of their policies, and in terms of the endorsements
Speaker 13: they're attracting. With Trump, you've got the border patrol, you've
Speaker 13: got the teamsters that we talked about I think last week,
Speaker 13: and that was a big shift that they've never done
Speaker 13: in I think more decades. And then here you've got
Speaker 13: the IRS and the US Postal Service and the teachers
Speaker 13: unions and people like that on this side. I think
Speaker 13: Trump did well bringing some humor into it, and I
Speaker 13: think he's right no love lost in not having endorsement
Speaker 13: from the IRS.
Speaker 2: Before you go. There has been polling at this week
Speaker 2: that is far more promising for Donald Trump, including in
Speaker 2: some swing states. How do you see those numbers right now?
Speaker 2: If you were to make a prediction, who do you
Speaker 2: see is in the box seat?
Speaker 13: You know, it feels like Trump is very very well
Speaker 13: positioned right now with all the macro fundamentals, some of
Speaker 13: these polls coming out, the direction of the country, and
Speaker 13: how more than half of the population doesn't think it's
Speaker 13: in the right direction. All those things historically would bode
Speaker 13: well for a Trump candidate or the Change candidate. However,
Speaker 13: this really is. It's a fifty to fifty read. I
Speaker 13: just think it's going to be such a tight election.
Speaker 13: It's been described as a knife fight in a phone booth.
Speaker 13: That's how rezer. Then it's going to be one and
Speaker 13: lost on forty fifty votes and that is going to
Speaker 13: continue until November.
Speaker 2: Kosher Gata, thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 5: Coming up.
Speaker 2: Megan Markel labeled a demon who has psycho moments and
Speaker 2: anti Israeli, anti American.
Speaker 6: Rapper Macromore faces the music.
Speaker 2: Welcome back joining me now. Celebrity and royal reporter Kinsey
Speaker 2: Schofield Kinsey more revelations about Sean Combs that are known
Speaker 2: as p Diddy. According to a report in page six,
Speaker 2: he once wanted Prince Harry and Prince William to join
Speaker 2: him on his wild parties while there were still young
Speaker 2: bucks and getting into a lot of trouble themselves. What
Speaker 2: more can you tell the audience about this? And who
Speaker 2: are some of the big names that attended Ditty's freak
Speaker 2: off parties?
Speaker 4: No, Prince Harry was even mentioned in a thirty million
Speaker 4: dollar sexual assault lawsuit filed against Didty earlier this year.
Speaker 4: Harry was used as an example of celebrities that are
Speaker 4: associated with did He, but also the kines of shields
Speaker 4: that did He used to avoid consequences. Though Harry is
Speaker 4: not accused of any wrongdoing. I don't know about the
Speaker 4: freak offs. But Page six reports some of the big
Speaker 4: celebrities at these events were Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, Tommy Lee,
Speaker 4: Pam Anderson, jay Z, Beyonce, Mariah Carey. So a lot
Speaker 4: of people keeping their head down and not saying anything
Speaker 4: right now.
Speaker 2: And I noticed there's been a connection made with certain
Speaker 2: celebrities deleting their entire ex Twitter histories in the last
Speaker 2: few days, and people are this bit of conjecture about
Speaker 2: whether that's at all connected with this business. What can
Speaker 2: you tell me about that?
Speaker 4: You know, that's Usher. And I do understand why people
Speaker 4: are asking questions about Usher because Usher has spoken out
Speaker 4: about some of the vulgarity he saw while he was
Speaker 4: in Diddy's care, So, you know, would he be trying
Speaker 4: to get rid of any evidence? I'm not sure. I
Speaker 4: think that that's a fair question.
Speaker 2: And you know, Usher has talked about a lot and
Speaker 2: though a lot of people see him as a potential
Speaker 2: victim in all these because he was so young when
Speaker 2: he was sent to live with p did he essentially
Speaker 2: a lot of people are also painting him as somewhat
Speaker 2: of a villain because he introduced a very young Justin
Speaker 2: Bieber to that world. Has Biber said anything about this saga?
Speaker 4: Daley mail says that he's very upset over it and
Speaker 4: that he is having a hard time registering it, and
Speaker 4: he's kind of shut down when it comes to the topic.
Speaker 4: But you know, Usher pursued for giving a woman of
Speaker 4: venereal disease not giving her a heads up about what
Speaker 4: was going on before they got together. So the halo
Speaker 4: is a little you know, Dusty, if you ask me.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 2: We've also started to hear some defense lines from Diddy's lawyers.
Speaker 2: One of them claimed that the one thousand bottles of
Speaker 2: baby oil and lube Homeland Security found when they raided
Speaker 2: his mansion were due to some sort of a cost
Speaker 2: ERRD and some sort of a bulk buying era. Does
Speaker 2: his legal team have hopes of getting him out of jail?
Speaker 2: Is he any chance of getting bail whilst these cases
Speaker 2: are being put together?
Speaker 4: Well, first of all, I have to tell that attorney,
Speaker 4: I hope he's getting paid a small fortune for the
Speaker 4: tap dance he did when asked about the baby because
Speaker 4: that's ridiculous. I don't believe we're going to see did
Speaker 4: he get out of jail because they believe he is
Speaker 4: a danger to his victims. They believe that he would
Speaker 4: go after some of his victims and try to silence them.
Speaker 4: They're afraid that people on the outside will hurt people
Speaker 4: for him. So I think that they consider this man
Speaker 4: a very dangerous individual.
Speaker 2: And also I would imagine with his wealth and his connections,
Speaker 2: he'd be somewhat of a flight risk. He's not going
Speaker 2: to go through a major airport. He's got all sorts
Speaker 2: of other means of travel. Now let's talk about Meghan Markoul.
Speaker 2: Her reputation has taken another dive after a US magazine
Speaker 2: published a puff piece where it's said that you know
Speaker 2: the truth is that she's good ViBe's only type of
Speaker 2: boss and loves to offer sweet gestures and acts of kindness.
Speaker 2: But then The Daily Beast published a piece in response.
Speaker 2: The headline is former employees of demon Boss Meghan Markel
Speaker 2: recall psycho moments. That is not a good headline and
Speaker 2: it certainly doesn't sound like good vibes only Kinsey.
Speaker 4: My favorite line from the US weekly piece was one
Speaker 4: of her employees saying that Terry and Meghan they water
Speaker 4: the seeds to help their employees flourish. I mean, what
Speaker 4: are you on and can I have. But you know
Speaker 4: what's interesting to me. What I figured out was, remember
Speaker 4: when five of Meghan Markle's friends talked anonymously to People
Speaker 4: magazine and to defend her against her father in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 4: That publisher now works at US Weekly, and that publisher
Speaker 4: is best friends with best friend Meghan's best friend, Abigail Spencer.
Speaker 4: So the Ust Weekly magazine article is just, you know,
Speaker 4: an exchange of hands. It is just friends helping friends,
Speaker 4: and they're trying to pull this off as like some
Speaker 4: big journalistic win when the reality is Meghan's best friend
Speaker 4: called her best friend and they gave her a glossy
Speaker 4: ride up. That is not journalism. The Hollywood Reporter is
Speaker 4: a very credible source, and the Daily Beast sometimes is
Speaker 4: a very credible source, and I'm going to believe them
Speaker 4: over a tabloid rag that is friends with Megan Markle
Speaker 4: any day.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 2: Rapper Mac o'mool's anti American, anti Israel Tye Ride has
Speaker 2: seen his appearance at the Neon City Festival in Las
Speaker 2: Vegas canceled. What's the latest on this? At Kinsey Because
Speaker 2: he's been active in this area for some time. He's
Speaker 2: been a bit of a political activist, particularly when it
Speaker 2: comes to this issue.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but has he ever been so dumb? I mean,
Speaker 4: you know, the music Festival did not disclose a specific
Speaker 4: reason why he won't be involved, but the announcement did
Speaker 4: come a few days after he screamed Beep America while
Speaker 4: on stage performing at a pro Palestine benefit concert called
Speaker 4: Palestine Will Live Forever. He's unapologetic about this, he said,
Speaker 4: I've lost endorsements, I've lost business ties. I am still
Speaker 4: here unwavering in my support for a free Palestine. So
Speaker 4: good luck, buddy. I think he's going to turn off
Speaker 4: a lot of people being so vulgar and being so
Speaker 4: ungrateful to live in one of the greatest countries in
Speaker 4: the world.
Speaker 2: And also his whole rationale the ranch, I listened to
Speaker 2: the whole thing.
Speaker 13: He said.
Speaker 2: He really got interested in this issue post October seven,
Speaker 2: and he's done all this research and somehow he's come
Speaker 2: out of it on the side that he has. He's
Speaker 2: looked at October seven and decided that it's the Israelis
Speaker 2: who are in the wrong here and they need to
Speaker 2: pay a price. It's just incredible. Quickly, before you go,
Speaker 2: a video of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's daughter, Zahara,
Speaker 2: has resurfers showing her dropping her father's last name at
Speaker 2: a sorority celebration late last year. I have a look, yeah,
Speaker 2: so she famously dropped Pitt from her name. Is there
Speaker 2: any chance that these children and Brad Pitt are going
Speaker 2: to reconcile? It seems to be a really ugly split
Speaker 2: involving the children.
Speaker 4: I mean, missus called parental alienation. Angelina has definitely poisoned
Speaker 4: these children against their father. I don't doubt that Brad
Speaker 4: Pitt's children saw him at his worst, but that is
Speaker 4: clearly not man that he is today. He is sober today,
Speaker 4: He's been sober for almost seven years. And Angelina's dad,
Speaker 4: John Voight, said that these children need stability and he's
Speaker 4: really hoping that this family can find peace.
Speaker 2: Kinsey Schofield, thanks for your time this evening, and that's
Speaker 2: it from May. I'll see you tomorrow night. At nine
Speaker 2: point thirty four left, he's losing it. Newsnight is up
Speaker 2: next