WEBVTT - ROUND 24 PREVIEW: PANTHERS V ROOSTERS. Sam Walker's contract gamble goes to the biggest stage

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Looking to the Code NRL show.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Here we are boys, another week of great rugby league headlines.

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 3>I think before we start we just have to pull

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 3>the curtains back a little bit. This is almost a

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 3>nogo the podcast.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Are you saying because Dave was sick?

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Because you've saved the day, mate, You've saved the day?

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Wield influence some construction work going on in Touchwood News

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Limited again News Limited h Q.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 4>I went and head hunted them and told them, guys,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 4>the most important podcast at Code Sports, in fact at

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 4>news Corps, one of the highest rating podcasts on rugby

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 4>league in the world.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>In the world.

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Can you just give us a bit of peace? And

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 4>the banging stopped? Bang, it doesn't start again, because that's

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 4>what it was like. It was like that.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>It was more drilling and hammering than.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Drilling, really thrilling. You would know what a drill sounds like.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Aither of you off with you any day?

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Really?

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I used to work on the truck. I'm not

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 3>gonna lawyer. Worked on a truck doing.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 4>What delivered goods for pizza?

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Like again, what's that got to do with it?

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>So you're a driver.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Just just to unload the truck. When I was at UNI.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 4>What's that's hard labor.

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Buddy, what's that going to do with having a trade?

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's rip into a rugby league.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Yet another week of drama, particularly down in the nation's capital.

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Corey Halls bro Ricky Stewart makes his feelings clear in

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 2>a post match press conference and from there it's gone

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>effectively south.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it was already headed that direction, Dave. This

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>has been brewined for a little while. They had given

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Corey permission to negotiate with rival clubs or a couple

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago now before this incident, and Ricky just

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>looked like a guy that was fed up. All right,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>this is not a nice feels an isolated incident. I'd say, well,

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>that's completely over the top, right, But this has been simmering. Yeah,

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I think Ricky has just had a loss to try

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 3>and we'll get the best out of Corey. So there'll

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>be a natural parton of the ways with him taking

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>up a three year deal to join the Bears.

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 4>I was going to say, you said gone south, because

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 4>it's actually gone west, because that's where Corey's gone. Corey's

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 4>ended up going.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, how did you contain yourself? That's a good line,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 3>wasn't it? But how did you contain?

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Allow you to have? You say? Because I do that?

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 4>How other people are talking? Then I come in with

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 4>the pearls. Right, So it's gone west, baby hasn't gone south.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's a great result for Corey. It

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 4>feels like mixed right. They just need a clean break

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 4>from each other, right, because there's been times when Ricky's

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 4>got the best out of Corey and it's worked, but

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 4>inevitably they've always ended up button heads because it's like

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>oil and water. Right, it's a bit like you and

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 4>me on this podcast. The things don't it just doesn't

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>work like water, right. So that's what's happened at the end,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>and it's gone to w A And I think I

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 4>think it'd be a great signing for them.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I like it as a signing. Good player, yeah, best,

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:06.119
<v Speaker 1>he's a good football.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 3>You look at that starting front row now, Liam Harry,

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Corey haws Bro much better, got a bit much better.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a good front row pair and I

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 3>think they've done well to get that deals obviously.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Long they don't end up in the sin bin every game. Okay,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 4>it's a bit loose, he's a bit mad. I like

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 4>his madness.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>I like I like it. I think that's a good

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>front row pair and I think you take that if

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 3>you're the Perth Bears, and you know they flirted and

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>you know went with try to sign Junior Parlor, and

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I think Corey Hawes Brough at this stage of their careers,

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 3>is a better signing for him.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 4>I actually think it's really important they've got the front

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 4>row is so important in the game now. Was seeing

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 4>that in the way the salaries of props of skyrocketed, right,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 4>there's a real value of premium on good front rowers,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 4>good guys who can win the forward battle for you.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 4>As you said, I think that's a combo that helps

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 4>them on that front. They've got some other holes and

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 4>areas are going to fill, we know that, but I

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 4>think it's a they're starting to put together at least

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 4>the team that's going to be reasonably competitive, right, So

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 4>that's important.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 3>For August Corey Hawes brother good signs to their fort.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Corey has played his last game for Camera?

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, no. I think you'll play again. I

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 4>think you'll play. Josh Pop's got his last game coming

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 4>up week or so. When two weeks, two weeks maybe,

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I think I would imagine you're playing that game. They've

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 4>had a long relationship over a long time, and I

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 4>think I think you'll play again the Camera. It's at

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 4>least one more game.

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>We lost for it. Like Camera, you look at the

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>middle that they've lost over the last couple of years.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Obviously Trey Mooney, Corey Hawes, bro Josh Propo, it's a

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 3>blow for him.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Uncertainly Hudson youngering around.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>As well, so it's a yeah, it's a tough there's

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 3>a tough situation for Canberra in terms of that that

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Ford pack, Joy tipe and is obviously outstanding. No Martin,

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Hudson Young on either edge, and the song it's it's

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>played sound up a back roll.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 4>So they've got some kids coming through.

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 2>David picked up lip Boy hot Boy from the Dogs

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 2>as a younger forward. Joe Roddy is one they have

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of time for. Yeah, but you're right, let's

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 2>talk about Hudson Young.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>How does this pan out?

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Look? I mean, Sam's agent's going down to Camp Canberra

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 4>for the Brisbane game. So in about a week's time,

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 4>some meat talks with Don Ferner. I think about that.

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Those two talks. Sam says to Don that Hudson would

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 4>like to explore P and G, explore the possibility of

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 4>going there. I would imagine Camber will open a small

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 4>window for him to go to P and G and

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 4>have a look around, and then hudsonall be armed with

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 4>all the information he needs to make a decision. That's

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 4>how I think it plays out date. I don't know

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 4>where it lands right, I don't know how he whether

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 4>he goes to P engine enjoys himself, everyone at the

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 4>moment he goes there seems to sign for them. So

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 4>if he if he actually besides he wants to explore

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 4>that option, I'd be concerned. If I'm a camera fan.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Big he would be a huge blow. Huge blow. But

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 3>that's a good camera will put in a huge offer

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 3>to keep him. Yeah, so and they feel like they're

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 3>probably the only side that they could potentially lose him

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to is to P and G. But yeah, you can't

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>from Canberra and you lose Huts and Young off the

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 3>back of Hawsebra off the back of Trey Mooney, off

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>the back it's they're blows to your forward pack for

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 3>players that still have a tremendous amount of foot he's

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>still in them, so, uh you know, I know I

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>mentioned before Noel Martin's a really good player, and he's

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be an outstanding NRL player. You've got, you know,

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 3>ideally Sims Song on an edge, so it's not the

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 3>worst back row of combination with. But yeah, Huts and

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Young's elite.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Regardless of where he lands. Huts and Young, he's going

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 4>to be a very well paid young man.

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if he stays in camera, he's gonna be

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 4>earning over a million dollars a year. He goes to

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 4>P and G. We all know how that.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Works, it'd be the highest paid back on the game.

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's going to evolve, right, I mean, this is

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 4>how much more that's about them?

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, Sel wants one point too.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 4>That's if you're paying Hudson Young. I think Cameras offered

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>around eight fifty nine hundred. With a ratchet, right, that'll

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 4>end up one one, one two. Potentially, someone was obviously

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 4>looking at one two. I would imagine wants to ratchet

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 4>that as well. If you're West Tigers. I've said it before,

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't someone is a really good play, he's young.

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be a long time.

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's be wind a little bit. Someone I find is

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>asking for one point, that's it. That's the suggestion a season.

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you haven't picked up on that's the My response

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>is your response too, I'm the same.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 4>I'd be saying good luck, Yeah, you go on the market.

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is why, Mick, this is with the West Tigers.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>This was the decision we need to let your own

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>go early from next season that we can use that

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>money to keep the asking price of Sam Weller.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Find it, you don't have to pay it.

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, the West Tigers have gone on the record and

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>so we're going to do everything possible to keep Sam

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Weller final and lat.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but whatever possible doesn't mean you go. I'll give

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 4>you whatever he wants.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's look at the back rollers that had been like

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 3>that are on the market.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Yep. Jacob Preston, he'll probably end up with about eight

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 4>hundred with a ratchet.

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Talis Duncan.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's worth that.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>You don't think Jake Preston's worth eight hundred with a

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 4>ratchet in the market.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 3>He is just WA's Talis Duncan probably end up.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Seven eight hundred. Ratchet nine with the ratchet.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 3>Are we saying Sam Well?

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>No, we're not saying it.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 4>No, we're not saying management. I never said one point

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 4>to me in that's the claim that that cannot be right. Well,

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's not.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's management are thick that cannot be right,

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>very thick with this is what we're here.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 4>That makes some calls me ring right now.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not ringing anyone right now. One point, what's you.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 4>What's your cap? What's your limit on SMI you reckon?

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 4>See no less scaling up?

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 3>He's twenty two, yep, all right, a five years deal.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm scaling up to a mill I'm not starting there.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>He's behind Dylan Lucas who just resigned. I'm sure Dylan

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Lucas didn't resign for a million dollars. That's a young

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Jacob Preston Talas Duncan Britney correct?

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Do you have him behind Talis dunk? I reckon, I'd

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 4>have him.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I'd have him just because of the consistency of Sam

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 3>Well is a great twenty two, great player. I would

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>love to sign him right like, I'm not giving him

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 3>a million dollars one point two.

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Let's got a play out let's se how that plays.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Are you guys?

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, And I hope the Tigers don't feel

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 4>like the Tigers don't get as I said, hell.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Over, this is a monster game tonight, Fellas Panthers Roosters,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a Grand final.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Preview declaring it.

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he said, my bulldog only two?

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>What about your wars uh wars and sharkies can get there?

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Hey what am i am? I going out on

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a limon say there's a potential Grand Final?

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 4>You said you didn't say potentially, you said it is ad.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm back and dave in because finally, this is what

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 3>is what I predicted in the preseason Pends Roosters.

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>That's almost to guarantee it won't happened.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>The Sharks might lose a game. Again about that game.

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 3>Okayna.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Quick quick change the subject tonight.

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 3>This is not changing the subject on the coast you

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 3>We're sticking it tonight. Your Sharks annoyed me, but they

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Dragon smashed them. But just when you think it's safe

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>to say something good about Cronella and they dish up

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 3>that rubbish. I'm off them. They cannot win the camp.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Tonight's game tonight, It's game.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Huge massive game, massive games.

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a shame to heed you need something.

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 4>I would say it's a huge game for me, a

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 4>huge game for the US.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm disappointed to desk is not playing.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, but I think it's a huge game for

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 4>the russ Yeah.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they can win without James.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they've been that good.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 4>Let's yeah, it's both missing a big but.

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I understand all this. Penrith can win the camp without

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 3>his I the Roosters cannot win the camp.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>With that matter of fact, what you're saying, you've never

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>seen it, what pen Y.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but they can.

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Because they can.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, they got Nathan in the in the game, You've

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>got him in the Grand Final. Yeah, so that means

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 3>they can win it. I've got I've got your coming back. Well,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 3>they still have to get to the ground final without him.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 4>We could come back before then, could be back for

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 4>the past. I think it's a huge game. I think

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 4>it's a bigger game tonight for the Roosters than just

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 4>for Penrith because the Roosters record against penstylebolical, one of

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 4>their last thirteen. Sammy Walker's gone go into the game

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 4>under immense scrutiny and pressure after rejecting the contract offer

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 4>huge pressure on the rooster. Yeah, they need to perform.

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 2>And this is this is the fascination with this timing

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of the story dropping that management don't want to get

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>this deal done right now. The thing is and mate,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>good luck to the Roosters if they win tonight, but

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 2>if they lose and then they lose again next week

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.479
<v Speaker 2>and whatever happened, like if they get on this rush

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 2>of all.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Focus will come on seeing him.

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 3>It's all on Sam. This whole, this whole end of

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>season watch is on Sam Walker. He determines his value now. Yeah,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>he's taking it out of everyone else's hands, placed it

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>in his hands. He determines how much he's worth now.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 4>He's a confident. I don't think it will affect him

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 4>because he's that sort of guy, pretty unflappable, doesn't get

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 4>phased by much. I don't think it worries him.

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.359
<v Speaker 3>But as Dave said, might work in the roosters.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 4>Could work and the Ruster, well, this is I think

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 4>this is what It also could work against them.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>It cannot work against it because if he wins them

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 3>a comp he's one of my comp.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Goes through the roof.

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 3>They've got to pay a lot more money for the camp.

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 4>But I'm talking in relation to what they've got to

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 4>pay him, not in relation to whether they win the compro.

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 4>This is about the deal are trying to get done

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 4>with Sam and the fact they can't get it done

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, at the price level they wanted. That

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 4>he wins a camp, his price level goes.

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 3>And it deserves to go.

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but it goes up.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>It does so.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>In the but it also goes up for the buying

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>club too.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean if he leaves? If he leaves,

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 4>of course.

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right, so everyone's on the same But I'm.

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Sure there's club's out there now. He'd probably gives Sam

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 4>huge money.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now, taking them Rubbish about.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Sam needing to prove himself a big games? Did you

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 4>watch him in Origin this year? The first two Games

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 4>of Origin? He was unbelievable. Sam's got nothing to prove

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 4>in big games?

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes he does.

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he does. I think that's rubbish.

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 3>He does why because he needs to lead his side

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to a Grand Final.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 4>He's shown he can perform in big games. Are you

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 4>saying it's all on Sam Walker? Okay, He's basically saying

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 4>if they don't win the Grand finals, Sam Walkers.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 3>To prove in big games.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 4>Of course he does.

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't done at a club.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Level, No, but that's Sam's done it. In big games

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 4>He's won too.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>He's won one Origin game.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 4>He's played well in two games he played. He's played

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 4>well in two Origin games.

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 3>How many games he's won Origin to go back, that's

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>how games Origin He's one.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but you're just saying he didn't play well in

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Origin mine, but he's won one Origin game. He's played

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 4>well in two Origin games. They should have won the

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 4>first one. If there wasn't a sad enough McCallum ponger,

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 4>they should have won the series. He probably would have

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 4>won the Wall Medal. Right, So he played well in

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 4>two Origin games, and he's played well in big games.

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 3>And didn't play well in Game three when the series

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 3>of them, none of them did. I'm just this is

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 3>not Sam Walker hate. This is still smells like it's

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely not. It's still no, it's definitely not. He's an

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 3>elite half back. He's one of the top halves in

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the game.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 4>You just said he's got something to prove, though, how

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 4>can you say that if he's saying he's got something

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 4>to prove, saying he's the lead half, one of the

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 4>best salves in the game. If you consider that, now,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 4>what's he got to prove? Have ever saying are already

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 4>at that level?

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 3>But is at the bottom of that level. Wins a comp,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>he'd be top two half in the game, top three

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 3>half in the game.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>If he never wins a camp, he's twenty three or

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, or.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 2>He never wins a comp. Has he been worth the

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>money that you're talking about?

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 4>One the one talking about the money his management's talking about.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 3>We're actually not that far off in what we think

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 3>he's worth.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Three's No, I agree. I'm just arguing he doesn't meaning

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 4>to proven big games. I think he's shown he can

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 4>get it done in big games.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>I think I think the Roisters have reservations about.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 4>That too, understand they do.

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Guided bombed out the most recent final series.

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, he came back from a knee recoont play.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 3>And for a young half, you're not going to be

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 3>in a better situation than which I have been at

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>the Roosters with Kiri Tedesco. And then you've got d

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 3>C there now so it's a pretty good existence for

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 3>a young half. Yeah, he's a great environment for him.

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't agree.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd find it stunning if you lose.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. I don't think he leaves at all.

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's all the big dance.

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I actually quite like it because, as I said,

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the values now in his hands goes out dominates the price.

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So good tonight against Nathan Cleary tonight.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I do a matchup for him? Is that against

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 4>the Gun?

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you tipping in this one? Fellas?

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's Penrith without Teddy.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably still tip Penrith, would you? But without Teddy

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 3>he's got a bit.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Of a psychological grip on the room. Yeah.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Well Penrith got that lot with everyone except Melbourne. To

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 2>be honest, this is a cracking weekend of footy, fellas,

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>But there's one on Sunday afternoon. It's the final game

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of the entire round. The West Tiger is a back

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 2>after a buye. I think my male is they put

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>their feet up a little bit. So we'll see if

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>if a mental re fresh away from football has helped

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the West Tigers against the Saint George La Horrors side

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 2>that played. Look, it was their grand final last week

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>against Coronella that terrific. Haimis Stewart's a gun. I want

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to ask you a question, Fellows West Tigers, Dragons. Who's

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>got the most upside?

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Easy? Easy?

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 3>Not even close?

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Dragons?

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that fifty to fifty on the weekend right,

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 3>Like the Dragons aren't certain is to win, but Dragons

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>will finish ahead of the Tigers on the ladder next year.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Lock it in.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's not even where we're coming from on the

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>basis of recruitment.

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Just not recruitment, just development of players. We've seen how

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 3>their young players have come on this year, and plus

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the players that they've bought compared to where the Tigers

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 3>are at, players that they've lost, the players they've got

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 3>coming in. I think I think the Dragons are streets

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 3>ahead of the Tigers.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't agree heads a bit of a wretch. I mean,

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 4>the Tigers won five with the first seven games this

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:06.479
<v Speaker 4>year when everyone was fit. They showed their competitive football

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 4>team as opposed to the Dragons, who won three games

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 4>all year and really haven't shown her that competitive. I

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 4>know they have been recently, but they've also had mixed

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 4>in with some of those performances recently, there's been some shockers. Yeah,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 4>and I understand the sign players for next year, but

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 4>I've said to you, you both keep talking about him

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 4>making the eight or pushing for the eight. It's not

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 4>going to happen. It's not gonna happen, right, Yes it is.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 4>It's not. You're okay, So you're now saying they will

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 4>make the.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Ad push for the eight. I'm saying push for the

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 3>quite clear, its not going to happen. Who finishes high

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 3>on the ladder next year?

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Tigers believe that where are you getting hope from. We'll

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 4>get hope from the opening seven games this year when

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 4>they are really competitive, When they're really competitive, sign Jake

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 4>who they signed for next year, Jake Abilla, Jad and

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Brady Jayden Bradley. I think it's gonna be a great

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 4>signing for It is a great He may not be

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 4>a great contributed on the field, it's going.

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 3>To be we can't play eighty minutes.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but he's going to be an amazing contributor off the field.

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 4>That's really important.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Did you stand that other signing up yet?

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Kurt Man.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Just dropping bombs, are chasing him.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 4>I think I looked at him, but I think the

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Dogs are looking keeping him as well. Wait and see,

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 4>do not have said that? Or it'll be done by

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 4>next week somewhere it will be done, I think. Yeah,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 4>I think I've realized is going to be a good

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 4>signing for or can he be really handy for them?

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Who plays in the harf ro? I'm actually ready.

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 4>Probably do we in this bit of Talkavan Andrews are

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 4>playing the house with him, so we'll see him. Ever

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 4>has got the potential playing the halves, right, they've got

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 4>a lots too far too, you know, but do we

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 4>all run the show obviously, and when.

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>That I'm going to miss k.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Injuries. Yeah, their injuries have been terrible, no doubt, no doubt.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>And I was super impressed with the Tigers at the

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>halfway point, and my fear was that they'd fall away

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 3>with me. Well, if the teams were as they were

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 3>this year going into next year and there was no movement,

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I'd say Tigers are ahead of the Dragons. But when

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 3>you add what the dragons Dragons easy, yes, with what

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 3>they've got.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Coming, yeah, yes, I think about six losses by eight

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 2>points or less with the recruitment they've got they will standout.

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 4>It makes me vomit. You're still lost. It doesn't matter

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 4>what you lost.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 3>By I'm with you on that lost.

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 2>How many points Dragons buying players that will turn those

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 2>results around.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Dragons have been bad this year. This is not This

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 3>is not like Sunday's a toss of the coin Dragons.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 3>I'll tip the dragons. But it's a toss.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Of the coin for mine, right, But I don't see

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 2>how you can even have a toss of the coin

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the Dragons.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Do. You watch the West Tigers going to have But

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 3>you watch the Dragons against the Titans a couple of

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, like they still one, They've still got it

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 3>in them them. They are far from the finished product.

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>The actually go better against teams above them, the one

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>above them. What I'm saying is around their level, around

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>their level, Titans, Tigers.

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 3>They're far from their their last for a good reason.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 3>The Dragons a right, So let's not sugarcoat how bad

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 3>they've been this year.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 4>But I haven't given up.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 3>What will to take ready? They are rubbish?

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I just keep thinking back to those

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.959
<v Speaker 4>opening seven games when I drank the kool aid they

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 4>were playing.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 3>It was good It was also great to watch.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 4>They were entertaining and they look like a finals team

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 4>and then they got smash boy injuries and they never

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 4>lost all their confidence and they haven't little I.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Jumped on a plane.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Next year Dragons finished eight, Tigers finished ninth.

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Three d I'll take seventh to eighth. Let's get them both.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Who are you tipping?

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Tigers? Ready Dragons for me?

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Dragons really dragons next year? Dragons ahead of Tigers on

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 3>the ladder.

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 4>What do you what do you suggestion they'll come? Make

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 4>those two teams next year? Get an early prediction from me.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Tenth and fifteenth won't make the.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Fellas as far as levels of importance, Dogs, Bunnies, Friday

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Night footy. Massive, massive for Canterbury.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Huge for House, I'll tell you what.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've got problems with the House. They're just so

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what they stand.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Problems with a lot of people today, don't clubs.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they stand.

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 3>They must be so annoying to follow. I don't know

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 3>what they look.

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Like and what they're trying to be. What do you

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>mean what some clubs?

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 4>What?

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm with Dave.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean though?

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you mean help explain?

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Explain it to me.

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 3>They just look like a side that doesn't want to

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 3>do the hard work. And you can't win finals games

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 3>if you don't do the hard work. So it's frustrating

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Fire because they've got all the talent. I know they've

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 3>had injuries, but they've got that's side that could contend

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>for the title or fit, fit and firing right, but inexcusable.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 3>That's second half against Paramatta last week. Inexcusable. There's the

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 3>side of playing for their season still and you dish

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>that up in the second half. It's just yack. You disagree, No,

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you.

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 2>New halves this week. Ashton Wood's gone for the rest

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of the season with a torn hammy. Bud Sullivan comes in.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 3>Their attacks, nothing about it. I know you got Cody

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Walker without him, their attack is no good.

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's an interesting stand about Bud Sullivan today.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm.

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 4>Apparently he started fourteen games and half back in the NRL.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 4>I guess somebody is one.

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Four zero.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 4>A bit of an ominous.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Sign, sorry, Bunny, really yeah, he's got a.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 4>Great record coming off the interchange bench, but the starting

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 4>half in the NRL, that's good.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Research by you and have occasionally now and then.

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, anyway, can someone fact check?

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Ready?

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 4>I like Bud he has a red hot gay, But

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 4>that's that sort of makes me concerned him for all

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 4>their losses. I'm just saying that. What makes me concerned.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.479
<v Speaker 2>Bulldogs have to be favorite to you, right, like if

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 2>they find their foot eat like that they led the Roosters.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 4>That game, but that game I should have won that

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 4>game terrible and that could come back. I fear that

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 4>might come back to hold them.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>That loss shattering. And I wonder if I think I

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have tips, I hope.

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if.

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 2>They're just carrying, like if we're saying it, they're feeling it,

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>they're feeling it how big that loss was, and whether

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>they just carry this weight disappointment in this one if

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 2>they get done, Yeah, they have to find if they

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 2>get done, that's it done.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so gone.

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I'm tipping Cannabury.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, you know what they are if they lose

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 4>this game, they're knocking on death door. But like the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 4>hammer that's going on in the background, he started.

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Who you dip, Mick?

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 4>I think I tip's house.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 2>He has no idea who he's tipped Bulldogs for me.

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Boy's my favorite time of the week.

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh is what he got?

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Bs messages of the week, those soft calls, those dodgy reviews,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 2>those by rounds, nobody wanted. Send us a message coach

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 2>sports dot Com, DoD I you give us, Get it

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 2>off your chest, Mick, that's what That's what we're trying

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>to say to everyone. Send us a question that really

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>lets you vents drill eels. Fans are up and about shock.

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 4>What have they got for us?

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 2>Tommy from Westmead he asks, what will happen to Junior Barlow?

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Now that Corey Horsbrough has signed with the Perth Beers.

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 4>He's got no option does He's got to stay at

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 4>paramatter they've got one year deal on the table for

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 4>him and a job after that. Well, well they're not

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 4>ruling out another year for him half after next.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say they need him.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they do it.

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 2>They desperately need to keep you. Would they drop they

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 2>get to drop the price?

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't think they'd do that to Junior. No, they

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 3>were pretty steadfast on this is our price. If you

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 3>want to go to Perth, we understand, but we'd love

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 3>to keep Yup. I don't think they'd do that to

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 3>I'd be shocked if they started junior stays.

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>They still have cap spaces to get it.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because they budgeted enforcing them in the pack. Yeah,

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 3>they budgeted for they need to.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, the Spencer stuff has just gone cold.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 4>I think, I think, I think it's still flatting around it.

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't rule it out.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 3>Still, they'd love to have Spencer and Jack how there

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 3>next year. Whether or not they get one too, none,

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 3>not sure.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Why do they go massive for Zabier Willison should really I.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Need to get big.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 3>That's for the following year.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 4>It's not a bad shout though, Dave.

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you think of another player that.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Passion? Obviously, but Wilson's a good one. I get the

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 4>feeling Willison may stay. Yeah. Interesting the Brisbane boys have

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 4>got a column mode and he's gone with the same

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 4>agent that did the pain ass deal. Right, yeah, armed

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 4>armed murhy.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So that suggests that there could be movement.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, just suggests a couple of things. Right, One, he

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 4>did keon he did pain asks how much money those

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 4>guys get about one point two men? Right? It suggests

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 4>a Willison ain't coming cheap and the second part of it.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 4>It suggests that if he has to move arm it

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 4>will move him. So Brisbane I have to pay through

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 4>the nose to keep him yep, which will put pressure

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 4>on other places in their roster.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, Benny writes from Merriweather. Clearly a Nights fan up there, so.

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 4>I should say he hasn't He hasn't officially changed. He's

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 4>about to we you.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Understand, Benny from Merriweather.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 2>He asked, come on, lads, don't you think Justin Holberl's

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 2>dallim coach of the year. I said, any other thing.

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 2>He's got a point to argue from last to a

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 2>potential final series.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 4>What about if Robbi wins the minor Premiership?

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>No, no, you should the Roosters my minor Premiership favorite.

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>That's who I chose.

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't have thought, so put a little vo my man, Robbie,

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I've got whole rook and Webster ahead of the Roosters.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Well you got Websterster, I ask They've gone through a

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 4>bit of pretty good team last year.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what's so?

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 4>They finished? So they finished third?

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>What's fascinating about the big deal?

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, you keeps shaking your head for you what you

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 3>just relax.

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Webster Dallim. Coach of the Year is a funny thing.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We give it to the bloke the ladder more than anyone,

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but not the guy that held a lot.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 3>I haven't the other three. I wouldn't have I wouldn't

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 3>have Robbo and my mix.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, then why would you consider.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 3>My three like the three No and eas are for

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>the daily.

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't get this.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't get this right, Andrew, So you're warriors came.

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 4>I asked this question, Cleary, Why are you saying but

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 4>not Robo justin Hobrook. What you're saying Ivan but not Robbo?

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't understand what I say Ivan Robot.

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because they've just maintained a level of consistency, right, you're.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Given to doing for years gone by.

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like years gone by they still first finished

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 3>my press in.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he's held them there for years. M hmm, yeah,

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>m hmm.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 4>But not Robo. If Robbo wins the minor Premiership, not

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 4>Robot the year. Well, I think if Robinson wins, Trent

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 4>Robinson wins the minor premiership, for me, it's Trent Robinson

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Justin Hobrook. Well, it depends how they finished the season

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 4>the Nights if they finished seventh or eight? Yeah, he

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 4>runs second for me, right, but I think Trent sixth. Well,

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 4>the Russ went round one of the finals last year, right,

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 4>sixth finished? What six did they?

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying nights? If they finished sixth?

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that enough?

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Let me just get to the Russ first. What the

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 4>Ruster is finished last year? Sixth?

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Okay? Or seventh, it's outside the four. That's the four.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 4>So he gets some of the minor premiership for me.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 4>He's telling him coach of the year. We should be

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh you bat, you're with me?

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>No, no, so we should minor premiership is where the

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>rooster should be the Knights, well, you probably question the final.

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 4>You're saying they should be minor premiership.

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I fifty gets the Sharks of the top two.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 2>He's done an unbelievable job with what he has compared

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 2>to what Robbo has.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Just on Ready's point. So the Warriors finished sixth last year, okay,

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>top four, Panthers finished seventh last year, Right, the Rousters

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 3>finished eighth. Yep, right, by your metric?

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 4>If they win the minor premiership if the metrics right?

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>So no, so if the Panthers win the minor premiership. Well,

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 3>they would have moved the same same level up the ladder.

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 4>They wouldn't have because they had gone. Didn't you say there.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Were six seventh first, first, yeah, the second.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. But I'm not saying Robbers should win it if

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 4>you finished the.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Second, but so should I haven't win it.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 4>It should be yes, in the consideration he's in charge

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 4>of a team that's won four premierships in the past

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 4>five years. A bit different to Trent Robins.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I still thing is, I don't know. I think it's

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 3>just a whole book.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyway back, thanks for joining us on the Cutdown. You

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>next week.