WEBVTT -  How to build a cash buffer...fast 

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody. Now, look, it's indisputable. I

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think we can say at this stage that investment markets

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>share market in particular are at an inflection point. And

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>this obviously is based on credible, logical, rational concern over

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the unleashing of the tariff policy in the US and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the consequences of that for markets. Some of the biggest

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>names and best minds, if you like, in investment are

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>openly expressing concerns. Ray Dally, Oh, I'm sure a lot

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>of you have read or heard of talking great concern

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>over ever recent days. On our own show, Chris Coff

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the which you shouldn't miss if you did miss it,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>which was the last before Easter, and he talked about

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>his concerns for the market, and you know, I thought

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it was great that he came out and expressed clearly

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>what he was thinking. Now we don't no one knows

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>who's right and who's wrong just now. No one knows

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. But he was extremely skeptical about buying the

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>dip for instance, and this is someone who's outstanding fund

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>manager legendary fund manager in Australia on the board of

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>UNI Super, the fourth biggest super fund, on the board

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of RGO, the listed investment companies. Someone really plugged into

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>investment committees and where they're coming from. So you have

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this issue that it is a time that you should

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have cash. This is the common denominator of you, like

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>among what these people are saying. Now that's not to

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>say that you shouldn't bargain hunter or whatever, but today

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I am going to concentrate on that single issue, okay,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>which is building cash buffers at a time of great

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>unease in the markets, which is exactly where we're at.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>To help me with this, I have financial planner Liam

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>short of the son of S Group, who has been

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>on the show before and is particularly expert on this issue,

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and I talked to him regularly about this. How are you, Liam,

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Good morning.

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's just talk to you, James.

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I knew nothing at all about cash, but I knew

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I should have cash. I would be aware of a

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of things that the rate cycle, as far as

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I know, has topped out. So the RBA did its

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>first cut in years, only one cut so far, everyone's

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:28.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about more cuts but in terms of cash, having cash,

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>where to put it on, how much you could get

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>for your cash at the moment. Can you give us

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>an idea what the settings are and what the momentum is.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So you always need to be aware the banks

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>are moving a lot faster than the Reserve Bank. So

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 2>for example, four months ago, we were getting five point

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>three percent for a one year term deposit. Now the

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>best right we're seeing is about four point six. Okay,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 2>so even though there's only been one rate cut, we're

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 2>almost priced in three rd cuts into the term deposit rights.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.399
<v Speaker 2>So then we have to talk about this two types

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 2>of cash. There's lazy money that you just leave sitting

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>in a check account or a low interest savings account,

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>and this cash that you get working for yourself, that

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you can afford to either not touch it for a

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 2>month or longer, and that you can make sure it's working.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>What we're seeing is some of those some of the

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 2>banks have still got their high interest cash accounts. So

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>those cash accounts where they're adding the bonus interest if

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 2>you put in an extra two hundred dollars or fifty

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars a month, they're really worth while taking care of, Okay,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and using them. But you've got to use them smartly.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 2>If it says that you've got to put in an

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>extra fifty dollars a month and you have to do

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>four transactions, set those up as automatic. Set fifty dollars

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 2>in there, automatically. Pay some small bills that you pay

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 2>on a monthly basis, Set them up as automatic so

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't miss that key bonus interest because it's often

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the base interest rate is one point five or one

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>point seventy five and the bonus is three or three

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is this is standard fair, now, isn't it like?

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>This is really yeah, this is unfortunately you can't just

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it's almost rare that you get a clean cut. Here's

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the rate. It has to be sort of strings attached.

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and don't be loyal to any one bank. Shop

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>around and see what you can get. And then we're saying,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 2>if you've got money that's available for more than one month,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 2>look at term deposits, look at laddering term deposits. Six nine,

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 2>twelve months before rights started dropping, we were lucky in two, three,

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>four and five year term deposits and also some annuity,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 2>so we were.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Able to elain if you were to the listeners about

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what laddering means exactly, and they have this in bonds

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the US, I know, but if you might just

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>explain to listeners the concept behind laddering.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'd probably talk about it in terms of

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 2>funding your retirement. We always want to have two to

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>five years pension money or income that you require in

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 2>cash and fixed interest. But if you don't need some

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 2>money till the third year to finance the third year,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 2>instead of just constantly rolling it over one year, turn deposits,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>lock it into a three year, turn deposit, lock it

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 2>into a two year, lock it into a four year,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>so that you're timing the maturities at the same time

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 2>as when you'll actually need the funds, and not leaving

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 2>yourself open to a variable interest rate on a savings

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 2>account that's a more life you're going to drop fairly

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 2>fast over that period. So it's all about making sure

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 2>that the money is invested for the times you need it,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 2>for the timescale you need it on the timeline.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the laddering approach. So it's and it's working

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on the assumption, obviously, the fairly fundamental assumption that the

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>longer you lock it up for the more you'll get,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and then what would be the range at the moment

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>between say a month and a year and four years.

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 2>So on one month you can some of the banks

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>are paying as little as three percent. For one year,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>as I said, we can get four point six. With

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the average bank nails down to four point three, you

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>can still get around four point six for two years

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and three years. So we've all some people have already

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 2>missed about. Okay, you should always be thinking about these

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.559
<v Speaker 2>things before they actually happen. You need to be thinking

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>where we're seeing. If the markets are going well, if

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 2>they're economies doing well, then it's time to start putting

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>money away for the bad times. And it was being

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 2>met very clear that the Reserve Bank was holding or

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 2>not reducing interest rights, but that there was a bias

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>towards reducing them as soon as they got the unemployment

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 2>figures where they wanted and inflation where they wanted it.

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 2>So six months ago we knew this was going to

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>be happening, and so the people who managing their own

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 2>money should have been moving money into these longer term

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>exposures at that stage.

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And if somebody was of an opinion now a regular investor,

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.239
<v Speaker 1>but was saying, oh, hang on a second, I don't

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like the markets at the moment. They are highly volatile.

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing them moving up two and three percent. We

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>had the worst day and the best day in since

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>COVID inside a week recently. That's the signal if ever

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you saw wanted, it's highly volatized. So if somebody was saying, look,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I never really had much cash. I like to be

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fully invested, but on this occasion, I am thinking about

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>putting cash and investing it as an seeing it as

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an asset class for this period. And if someone was

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>doing that, tell us that there's some guidelines. For instance,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I go out and I see that I'm going to

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to use Combank. I don't know what the rates, however,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see that Combank has a rate for cash,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to see bank Zip Zip, that I've

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>never heard of in my life, has a rate that's

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a percentage higher. They're both banks, they're both strictly and

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>legally and technically approved depositive taking institutions, which means they're

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>both covered by the guarantee. And this is the great

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>thing about cash, which we must explain to listeners and

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the unlikely event, guys, that you don't already know it.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>All cash in banks or approved to posit taking institutions

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is guaranteed by the government in Australia to the tune

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred and fifty thousand per bank. So part

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm making Liam is if they're all guaranteed, need we

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>worry about brand names or the fact that one bank

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is much smaller than another.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Not really for the government guarantee. Remember also its per institution.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>So you can put two hundred and fifty thousand with

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Saint George and put another two fifty with Westpac, can

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>expect the guarantee. It's both so and that goes back

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>to thinking about what banks merged during the after the

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>GFC and so come Bank Bank, West nab On, New

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Bank and West pack in c George. So you've got

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 2>to think in terms of institutions.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So a great point, Liam, and folks. The problem

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is the bank's virtually conceal this. If you're with Bank

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of Melbourne, you would not necessarily know that you're with

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the same group that also owns Saint George, which is

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>West Bank, because they tried to keep the brands distinct.

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>As Lean pointed out, if you're with Bank West, don't

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think that if you had half your money with Bank

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>West and half with Combank, in fact you only have

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it with the one banking institution, which is the parent

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>company Comebank, which owns Bank West. Really good point, Liam,

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>really good, especially for perhaps that's maybe older listeners that

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>had money in banks or had some faith in their

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>local bank, so Bank of Melbourne which is actually owned

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>by a Sydney bank, Westpac, for instance.

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is, yes, they're all covered by the

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>government guarantee. But if you've got your one year money

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and you need to make sure that is liquid, yes

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the government guarantee is there, but you don't know how

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 2>long it's going to be till it's paid. If a

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 2>bank did collapse, okay, so possibly with six to twelve

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>month money, we'd probably still say stick with the bank

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that's at least BBB triple B rated, so it's got

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>a good credit rating. But overall, and I tend to

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 2>not put the fill two fifteen. I'll put in two

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty five to make sure that any interest is covered.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You are conservatively sure I'm dealing.

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 2>With other people's money. So I've got a true I've

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>got to take care of it and just making sure

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that don't have the loyalty to the banks. They have

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 2>no loyalty to you anymore. So look for those best

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>interest rates if possible, look for an abrary. Look for

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>a facility that gives you access to more than one

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>or two banks than going direct to each bank, because

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that can get complicated nowadays, having to prove your identity

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 2>with all of them, having to have your logins and

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 2>everything like that. So look at that. There are services

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>out there like Australian Money Market and cashworks and stuff

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 2>like that that that are offering access to twenty or

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty different banks, and you can have it all there

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>spread across all the banks. At the end of the year,

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you get nice tax report for your SMSF for your

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>all times.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're your channel through to the different banks and

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>they clip the ticket. I assume somehow.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>They get paid by the banks, so roughly you get

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the same as you're paid in the actual bank branch.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>So the banks have allowed for what the branches custom

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>similarly allowed for what these wholesalers customers.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Gee, yeah, a bit like I suppose a bit like

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>mortgage brokers for the same sort of thing. They don't

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>advertise much. They're not very well know what would the

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>two you mentioned Again, we are not in any way

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>picking these out as the best or anything, but two

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>more popular ones. Liam.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So Australian money market is my one, and then

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 2>there's I'm not sure if cashworks called cashworks, it might

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>be called term deposit, dot com, dot au. There's a

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 2>few out there, but Australian honey markets tended to be

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the leader in the space.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Very good. One last thing before we go to the

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>break about all that. It sounds very laborious because the

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>banks do these honeymoon deals. So I go in, the

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>bank says, listen, we're offering four point five percent right

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>now on your cash. But three and a half of

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that is if you do this and this and you

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>get a one percent basic rate. I forget to do

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it one week and it's all gone. And that is

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't get the rate. You're saying. Set up direct

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>debits or automatic arrangements, which is very smart, but these

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>honeymoon deeds they only last a year or so.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, And that's why I use it for similar

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 2>money market because at the end of the six months

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>or nine months or twelve months, I just go in,

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I see the rates from twenty different banks from one

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 2>month out of five years. Flicky button, and it moves

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to the other bank automatically.

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a technical question, if you had a

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>self managed super fund and you linked up with one

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of those intermediaries cashworks, money market, whatever they are, is

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that it will that do you for all the banks

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>because traditionally, as I record, if you had an SMSF

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and you wanted to put cash in a term deposit,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got to show your superannuation deeds and everything.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 2>So you do all that upfront one time with the

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 2>actual provider, and then they researtified as advisors. It's on file.

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 2>The money marketer whoever will use that then to open

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the account. So once a year we will update the

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>IDs for example, but the trust needs is the trust aed.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So it will serve for all banks exactly. Lovely. Okay,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, okay, folks. So we'll be back in a moment.

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to develop this way of thinking about building

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>buffers fast if you need to in what is a

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>fairly wild investment market. Just now, hello and welcome back.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>To The Australian's Money Positive podcast, a fairly sober episode

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 1>this folks, and could could you blame us for having

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>this approach? Everyone that's been on the show is concerned

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>about the markets levels. As I speak. This is Easter Tuesday.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We just had another three percent drop last night on

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street because of what Trump is trying to do

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>around the Federal reserve. These are absolutely fundamental concerns about

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>how the market that we have known all our lives works.

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>How does the federal reserves work inside of the US,

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>how does the global trade order work? These are open

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and under questioned just now. And it's no surprise that

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>the share markets are showing that fairly severely. Our ASX

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is down for the year to date by about five percent.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>The global market represented by Wall Street S and P

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>five hundred is down for the year to date this

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>morning twelve percent. That's a fairly rough market to try

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and make money in. And that is why we're talking

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about cash and liquidity today. Liquidity obviously being the ability

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to catch out something fast. Right, So a notoriously i

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>liquid investment would your property right? You can't you own

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>an apartment? It's worth the three hundred thousands, but you

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can't take twenty grand out of it. You just can't deliquid.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But if you have listed investments of any description, as

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>opposed to unlisted investments, you should be able to get

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your cash out as much as you want really, at

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>any time fast, with the exception perhaps of some small

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>cap stocks. So Liam, just to develop it a little bit,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>could you repeat Also, at the start of the show,

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned this was obviously for investors. Well it wasn't all.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>This was investors who need their investments to pay their income.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I suppose you were talking about emergency funds. But let's

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just talk about liquidity tools for any investor of any

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>age at this time. If you were I, you've explained

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to us about what to do with cash? What about

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>raising cash? If I came in to you when I

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>was a fully diversified investor and I said to you,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I've always been fully invested, but I and I never

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>paid much attention to cash. I need to now, where

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>would you start the compass?

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, the first thing I'd say is stop any dividinary

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>investment plans. You've got their fools game nowadays because of

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we've got dividends stripping funds out there

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 2>that basically jump into shares before the dimendends are paid,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>stay the forty five days, and then exit. It means

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 2>that usually when the d RP price is set, it's

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 2>at the very peak of the share price. So the

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>idea that you're getting a good deal by dividend reinvesting

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>it's no longer true.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>That's very interesting, Yeah, very interesting. They have faded a bit.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Have they Have you any sense of how many give

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>them anymore? Maybe it seems to me, is it like,

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have you any idea how many of the top fifty

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>give have DRPs that's dividend reinvestment plans folks, if you.

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Have honestly, I would say it's only third of it now.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>But as they are struggling to raise casher, they're trying

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>to hold on to investors that some of them, especially

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>unlisted funds for example, they're starting to offer discounts again

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 2>under DRPs, so you can tell when they're stress for liquidity.

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, but you're telling me that in any event, the

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>do is you're getting a raw deal because you're the

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>listed company XYZ Limited that you have the d RP

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>with they apply it on the day where the thing

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>was at absolute peak because the dividends strippers are about

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to come in and play around that. See that's very interesting.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So what your I don't want to go too far

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>off track here, but are you are you generally do

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you generately tell people not to bother with dividend reinvestment

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>plans because they do have a discipline leem I suppose,

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>which is useful, just like investment property has a discipline

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>makes you pay the mortgage.

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>But if you're disciplined, you can have the same discipline

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>by taking the DRPs and every three months looking and saying,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>where's the best place to pace that toward lay uly

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>putting it into your existing portfolio. It may be the

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>time to diversify it. In a time like this, you

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>might say, well, look, instead of just divilinearlyinvesting, I'm actually

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 2>all the dividends that come out. I'm actually going to

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>specifically target it at a high yield fund or targeted

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>at something that has dropped pretty significantly. So it's far

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>better to be an investor who's actually thinking about the

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 2>investments rather than just sit and forget. Because as we've seen,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>if somebody was just pumping money into the Magnificent seven,

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>that have done great for the last couple of years,

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 2>they would have been smashed this year. I've got clients

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 2>who they take their dividary investments and they pump that

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 2>into gold and they've done really well to that over

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the last few years. And it's just for them. It's

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 2>just basically it's a regular routine of what they do

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 2>with it. But also then for younger people with a mortgage,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 2>take those any dividends you've got and shove them into

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>your offset account and build up a cash reserve. It's

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 2>not affecting your income, so the offset account doesn't earn

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 2>interest and just saves your interest on your loan, so

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 2>it's not adding any tax of linking to your account,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's basically making sure you're paying down your mortgage

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>quicker that the money is available. Money in an offset

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 2>account is your money. Money in a redraw is the

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>bank's money, so they can always take away the redraw.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>The offset account is your money. So just be smart

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 2>on things like that and just something off the cuff.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 2>I've seen a lot of people now bilding up a

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>cash reserve by just going around their house and seeing

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 2>what they don't use anymore, selling it on Facebook Marketplace

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>or gum Tree and just building up that cash reserve.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>And I think when we go two times like this,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 2>when the cost of living has gone up, people are

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>more willing to look around and go, look, I haven't

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 2>use that thing for a year. We bought that on

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>a win that we're going to go off camping, and

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>we bought the full setup. I'm gonna three hundred and

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 2>fifty dollars King's Age refrigerator. It has just been sitting

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 2>in the garage.

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Every house has some version of that. Sure, I'm sure

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>there's one in my house. Starting to think what it is,

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure it's there more for our investors. More typically,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it would mean in if you were an

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>accumulation phase, the younger investor, and you had your self,

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you had your contributions going into SUPER every month through

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>your salary the concession that is the thirty thousand you

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>can put into SUPER each year pre tax. I expect

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that it would mean that you don't that you use

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for cash accumulation.

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but what you do with that is during the

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>year you save that in your offset account, so saving

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 2>you interest, and then you just put it in the

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 2>last month of the year. Okay, so you're still getting

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>your tax deduction, but rather than sounding sacrificing or doing

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 2>it early in the year, you put it into your

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 2>offset account and then when it comes to June you

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 2>do a lump sum and claim it as a tax

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 2>deduction straight away.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>After that you put the thirty thousand one go.

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're already getting your employer contributions going in regularly,

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>so you might only have ten.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Or fifteen your voluntary contributions. Yeah, you've given one go yeah, yeah.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>And that's it. Yeah, So you're getting the best of

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 2>boath worlds there. You're saving a bit of money. And

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 2>then if you know the money that you have outside,

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 2>what we try and do with young accumulators is fifty

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 2>percent goes well, thirty three percent goes to short term savings,

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 2>medium term savings that's a cash high interest account or

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 2>the offset. Thirty three percent goes for lifestyle okay, paying

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 2>for a wholiday, paying for not grade of the car,

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 2>whatever they feel like, and then thirty three percent goes

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>into ETFs. Okay. The good thing about those ETFs is

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 2>that you can sell them down and they'll settle to

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.479
<v Speaker 2>your back cabin in three days. So it's thinking long term,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 2>but having that short term plan b that if things

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>go wrong, you can dip in and sell them if

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 2>you need to.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Does your skepticism about the dividend reinvestment plans apply to

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>ETFs as well.

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for a dividend stripper, it's very attractive for them

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>to go in there. But again it comes back to

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 2>don't do lazy investing, Try and be smart. Take the

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>dividends from the ETFs and every three to six months

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 2>look and see where the opportunities are, or look and

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>see where's the best place for my dollar. And it

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 2>may be in a time with this for the best place,

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 2>it's in the opposite the cat and you just leave

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>it there. And as Chris Cuff said, it's probably not

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 2>the time to buy the dip in the moment because

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 2>we're not sure this is the dick. There's a ninety

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 2>day tariff free zone that could come back in. Well,

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump could turn change his mind at any state and

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>just bring it back in. So now the time to

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 2>build up that buffer, and the buffers not just for

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 2>your emergency funds, it's an opportunity fund as well.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, thinking like that, of course, yes, yeah, that

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>it's a think of it. When I say build up

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>cash buffers, I'm not suggesting that you go to cash, folks.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm suggesting that you accumulate cash for either defending yourself

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio, or taking opportunities of what could be lower

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>levels than we are have at the moment. One other thing, Liam,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I supposed to go back to the thing about dividend

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.719
<v Speaker 1>reinvestment plans is there was always the notion that if

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>your investor was good enough, it was good enough to

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>do a d ORP plan with at the start. So

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>let's say I select my investment, and there was always

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that theory that if if it's good enough, it's good

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>enough to d orp. Is do you see a weakness

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in that theory.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 2>The weakness is that ninety five percent of trading now

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 2>is computer training. So those different stripping algorithms are looking

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and saying if a stock is good value, well, they'll

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 2>buy into it just before the evident I stripped the dividend,

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 2>and then it will actually fall back down as that

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 2>money leaves. So yes, long term, if you still believe

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>in a company, you can still put money into it.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 2>But I don't believe that I believe that the d

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>ORP you could be leaving three to five percent on

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the table, which in a lot of cases is you diffident.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The exactly So the algorithms have have won on that one. Interesting,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and I suppose that that ruling, or that that rule

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of thumb came from a different time. Okay, take a

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>short break, got some very interesting questions. Hello and welcome

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>back to The Australian's Money Positive podcast. James Kirby here

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>with Liam short s h o Orte of the Sonnets Group.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Is now Liam a couple of questions. Would you like

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 1>to read the first one from Andrew.

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's been a lot of discussion about the capital

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Gains tax discount being unfair. Correct me if I'm wrong. However,

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 2>it's in the purpose of the discount to address the

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 2>inflationy component of the capital gain. In other words, when

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 2>an acid appreciate and value due to inflation, why should

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the investor pay tax on it? Does something CGT discount

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>offset the inflation component, And that's exactly why inflate why

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the CGT discount was brought in nearly forty years ago.

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But basically originally it was tied to inflation. So every

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>year you've got you indexed the discount was indexed to

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the CPI, but the government or somebody decided that this

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>was way too complex to do longer term, so they

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 2>decided that they would put a flat fifty percent discount discount.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it was held for more than twelve months.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I think it was Peter Costello. I think

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe Andrew and obviously never advise or information only, but Andrew,

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the discussion is more often that the capital gains

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>discount is not so much unfair as unfairly large.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 2>At the issue, James, is the CGT discount can seem

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 2>very unfair in a period where we've had low inflation

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, okay, but if we've had high

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 2>inflation for a good number of years. So think in

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 2>terms of an investment you did for one hundred thousand

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 2>if when CPI was index link, if inflation went on

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>only two or three percent a year, and you what

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 2>you're the value of your funders worth two hundred thousand

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>at the end of a ten or fifteen year period.

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 2>You've got a very good deal because you're getting the

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent capital gain tax discount on it. But in

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 2>a period where you've got very high inflation, that one

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousands. It would have to probably grow to two

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand just to keep its own value over a

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>ten or fifteen year period. Yet you're going to have

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>to pay fifty percent capital gains tax on that rise

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 2>of one hundred thousand. So in periods of high inflation,

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the capital gains tax discount is not actually a great deal.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a poorly yes.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, And what would you classify as high inflation plus

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent?

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Plus? Yeah?

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, which we nearly touched. We came close to, didn't

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>wait in recent times? Okay, very good? All right, Peter asks,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>reading between the lines of a recent episode, your bias

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>towards managed funds versus index is apparent. Nothing wrong with that.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you have declared your interest elsewhere, But for

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the sake of transparency, don't you think it would have

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>been prudent to declare this bias during the podcast? Okay,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Peter. Your claim that I'm biased in favor

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>of I have to remember who I'm supposed to be

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in favor of managed funds versus index. No, that not

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the case. I would respectfully suggest it's not the case

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I recently had. We had another piece correspondence was it

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago saying I was a bias against industry funds.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>There's no bias, please, I would hope that there is

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>no bias of we're really looking for the best for all.

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Investors sometimes get over enthusiastic about something or other. But

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 1>there's different strokes for differ from folks, let me tell you,

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and there is no there is. I think we could

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do a show one investor bias if I could get

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the right person to talk about it. Karen Neilson. Years ago,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw him give an investment lecture which was one

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of the best lectures I ever saw, and it was

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>all about sort of unconscious bias in our subconscious bias

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>by investors. But that's a different thing that the notion

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that we are the show is pro x or y

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>not really we're looking for the best deal. I would

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>respectfully suggest to you, Peter, but thank you very much

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for the correspondent. Okay, Paul, there, Liam, if you want

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a go on that one.

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Suppaul says, I have a question regarding binding death

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 2>nominations within super I've seen it written that a BDN

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>is normally a more efficient and an effective way to

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 2>get cash to adult children rather than through the traditional

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 2>will process. Can you clarify there if there is a

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>downside to using the BDN approach to leaving money to

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>your children.

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Very good question, Paul. Can we just liam before we

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>answer it? Can we just make it really clear what's

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>going on here? The will traditionally was the key instrument

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for all inheritance. Many people now most of their money

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is in super apart from their family home, and so

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this binding death nomination is the will dimension of super

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't it right? So putting that on the table, then

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Pau's question, you might cover off

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 1>on what he asked.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 2>So the first thing to understand is with our little children,

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you're super is a separate entity to your will, So

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>your super will not automatically go to your will. So,

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 2>especially with adult children, you have to use a binding

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>death nomination either way and either send it to your

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>will or send it directly to your children. Okay, The

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 2>plus side of sending it to your children directly is

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 2>that it will often go there quicker, and nowadays there's

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>also a lot more chance of a will being challenged.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 2>So if if all the money goes into a will,

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 2>then it becomes a bigger part and people look naturally,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 2>when there's money on the table, people are looking to

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 2>get more of it. So one of the benefits of

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 2>doing a binding nomination is basically it goes directly out

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of the children. One of the downsides is if it

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 2>goes out to them directly, you're looking at the seventeen

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 2>percent tax on the taxable component of your super So

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 2>that's any money that you put into your employment or

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 2>true salary sacrifice, that's called your taxable component. If that

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 2>passes to your adult children or anybody else out of

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 2>super you're going to pay seventeen percent. If you send

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 2>us through the will, he saved two percent, okay, so

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 2>you don't pay the Medicare levey on that part of

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 2>it that goes should have.

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>A very good information just to wind back a little bit, Liam,

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>just to finish off for Paul. So the binding denominations

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in super should everyone do them if they have a

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>super fund? And how often should they update them?

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Well, look, thankfully nowadays there used to be almost

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>three years maximum. Okay, So one I believe everybody should

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>do them. And with a software superman, it's often a

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of lawyers will argue that it's better not to

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 2>do it, to leave it up to the trustee because

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>it's a husband and wife and it's the partner. I

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 2>just believe the demand of blended families nowadays you need

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>more certainty, So I believe a bonding nomination is essential.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Now most funds will offer you the ability to have

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a non lapsing body nomination. That means that it doesn't

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 2>expire every three years, it actually keeps on going beyond.

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean you don't review it. It just means

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>that just in case your circumstances change, your mental capacity declinent,

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>or something goes wrong, that it's still locked in what

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>your wishes are locked in. And we back that up

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 2>by saying, if you're doing an empower enduring power of attorney,

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 2>mention in that enduring power of attorney the power to

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>make a boding nomination on your behalf or make sure

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 2>that no, I want it fixed as to where my

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 2>super goes. I don't want the power of attorney to

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 2>have the ability to change it. So think you're the

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 2>big picture.

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Cutting through here. It's talking about fixing for sure where

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>your super goes, and if you want to fix it

0:29:55.520 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>for sure, permanently. That is permanently until you in your mind,

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a non lapsing binding death nomination should be made so

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that you say, my super goes to jack and jail

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever in the future. And that's how you wanted it

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>divided separate to your will, because your will doesn't cover effect.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Does your will not cover your super? How does it work?

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 2>No? So, because the super is a separate trust, it's

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 2>a totally separate entity. So to have it go to

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>your will, you must specifically send it there. So you'll

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>see on that binding nomination there's an option to put

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 2>in your children or your spouse. At the bottom does

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the option legal personal representative and that's your state. That's

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the executor of your state. But that you have to

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 2>use those specific world where it's legal person representative. So

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 2>you'll find a lot we'll do hunder present to the

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 2>legal personal representative and then deal with a trigger will.

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 2>With the amount of will's being challenged nowadays, the amount

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of money we're talking about, you really need to get

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 2>expert advice or from a lawyer and from your financial

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 2>panel to ook, look, what are you actually trying to achieve?

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Where do you want this money to go to? And

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.959
<v Speaker 2>also through the way you got your will set up.

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Is it set up a testamentary trust so that there's

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 2>flexibility for your beneficiary. So it's a big picture thing.

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but don't assume your will covers your super rock

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>bottom piece of information from Liam shot this morning. Okay, terrific. Hey,

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you Liam. Great to have you on the show again.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Loved it. Thank you very much, James.

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>That was Liam Short of Sonna's Wealth Group and I

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>thought that was something we should do folks. As I say,

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a time that you can have your

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>own view as to where the markets are going, whether

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a risk or whether it's an opportunity. But

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly to be cash less in this environment is risky

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and obviously the older you are, the more that is

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a pertinent and Liam basically covered that at the start

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of the show. Terrific. Okay, we've got lots of questions

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>coming in, keep them rolling, please, love to have some more.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>The Money Puzzle at the Australian dot Com dot Au

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and Today's Who was produced by Leah Sammerglue. Talk to

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you soon.