WEBVTT - Opening Round wrap and final thoughts before round 1! | The Phantom’s Lair

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It is the race that stops the nation. And now

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about the Adelaide Cup today. I'm definitely

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the Melbourne Cup. It is the race

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>to the first Super Coach lockout of the year. We

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are almost there. Welcome back to the Phantom's Lair, part

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of the official AFL Super Coach Podcast for twenty twenty five.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Phantom speaking, always the best show of

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the year. We're all excited. We're almost there, three days away.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It is a public holiday here in Adelaide. You can

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>tell five names has had a good long weekend. He's

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>shown up for the people. Wanted to cap off his

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>brilliant summer with a closing show before we kick off.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome sim Simme and Kingsley Thomas Wilson.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Phantom, how are you? I'm dumb.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>It's good to see your smiling face at the moment,

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, which is maybe a little bit of alph

0:00:59.360 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>in the room.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Can talk about now New year? Knew me? I mean,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 2>should you have warned the people?

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Not about me? I'm always been about the people, the fans,

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>always been about the people. Not going to make a

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>big deal about it, but it's about time time.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm still just warned to say you don't know what

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 3>was coming, you know, distressing scenes, you know, all that

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of feedback to Yep, Jack Grimes, remember

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the Melbourne Poor Melbourne Offenders, Supercoach Hero Yep. Check it

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>out on x. Yeah.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 4>So if you are listening on the audio platform the fans,

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 4>big face reveal revealed he was indeed Jack Crimes from

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 4>former Demon.

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm a real person. And of course you can see

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that on the Code Sports YouTube channel. Get on there,

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>watch it, like subscribe, let us know what you think

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>that is. Of course, the voice of the Chief Hayden

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Phantom Junior, Kenny, welcome.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me again. Yes, we can ditch the Chief.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 4>I reckon at the end of the preseason. We're nearly

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 4>in the season, proper, I reckon, we ditch the Chief. No,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 4>so we DOSSI Phantom Junior.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I reckon. We revealed. Can you start putting chief on

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>your little graphics now? Can't produce the show? Watch four

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 1>or five names? Has been given five names. I don't

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think the five names his parents would be happy that's

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>calling him five names, but he goes along with it

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for the show. So you're a Chief, Have you been

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>chiefed again? We revealed on the show last week that

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a second chiefing in two weeks.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Like an incident another one I did copper chief you

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 4>no no chiefings across the week, thank.

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 3>You as you do see DOSSI around Colon Chief yep,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe with the questions like you just said, Torl Chief.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, the only thing bigger than five names fronting up

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>here today and delivering is the show ahead and the

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>weak ahead. What have we got? What have we got

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>coming up this week? Before we talk about a big shows?

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so coming up this week we have a massive

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 4>schedule before obviously Round one kicks off, opening Round is over.

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 4>The scores didn't count over the weekend, but they do

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>count for price changels. So coming up this week we've

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 4>got this show, massive show to come here. Then we've

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 4>got the Rookie Bible, your Final Verdict. Hoping Dan Baton

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 4>can join us for that one that's on there. There's

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 4>breaking even without on Wednesday, the show for the people

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 4>questioning what your questions in?

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>When Ol does that tweet?

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Has he got horn? Francs?

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Has he got horn?

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Francis did last show he had it in clearly not

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>listening to you guys, got to get on with our

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 4>pay Wednesday show.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a great one.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Super Coach Live that is on the Thursday, and that's

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 4>there that's happening before you before the first game of

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 4>the season Richmond Verse Carlton. Thursday night there will be

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 4>the Super Coach AFL Live, So if you missed the

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 4>first episode of that, that's going to be going on

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 4>the Super Coach Socials and of course the Code Sport

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>YouTube channel. We'll chuck it up on audio afterwards. But

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 4>get in first, get in on the live platform, get

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 4>your questions in. It's a great experience. So they'll be

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 4>there Matt Forrest and our pay and going through Thursday

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 4>nights during the season.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night we'll be out to you know tradition, Phantom's

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Lair Tradition will be out somewhere in Adelaide. So if

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you do find us, you come and tell us that

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he listen to the lair. The Chief by your refreshment,

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So come and find us. But big show, big show,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>big weekend of footy. A lot of news to talk about,

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>our takeaways, all the scores from opening round of course,

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>our final thoughts on the season. Who you'd need to

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>pick who should leave out who we're picking? So a

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>big show, Ossie. Let's start at the top. The biggest

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>talking point in super coach Nick Dakos. What happened on Sunday.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You know a man who would not go down with cramp,

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who he would keep on fighting five days. Look at him,

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 1>he's just fronting up no matter what. Four on show

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for the people. Nick Dakos could barely run the second half.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Got Toby Bedford as well as we did, expect sixty

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>six super coach points from him on the weekend, and

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they're jumping off. The super coaches are jumping off in

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>their droves.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:16.119
<v Speaker 4>Yep, unless you weren't on from the staff vance. Yeah,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 4>well that was just my situation. Lots of coaches were

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 4>on board. But yeah, as you say, jumping off, what

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 4>do you think sim You know, obviously he's now got

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 4>so as we said, scores didn't count last week, but

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 4>that rolling average sixty six points into his rolling average.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 4>He's now going to have to score above and beyond

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 4>that to keep his price. But as we know, Nick Daekos,

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 4>he's going to be a keeper for the season. You

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 4>don't necessarily need to worry about his price. Changing, but

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 4>other coaches if you don't start with him, could get

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 4>a benefit by not doing that and bringing him in

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 4>at a cheaper price.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do you sit at it?

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>I haven't had I haven't had daycos because of that,

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess one of the bye but also there are

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 3>tads coming up. Paul probably said Willem drew to him

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 3>round one Saturday night. Obviously he got the Bedford one.

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I just I've been off him just as

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 3>much as absolute star. Just he's more of a guy

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 3>like waiting to see also and try again after the

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 3>buye for mine?

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Are you fans? I probably lean towards the same as sim.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 4>I just think you're fighting an uphill battle. You're going

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 4>to get a cheaper price unless he does just absolutely

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 4>go Ham, you know, fight back on the critics that

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 4>the corns is of the world, saying he's not fit

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 4>enough in the preseason. But yeah, we did know that

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 4>he was coming in a little bit. I guess underdone

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 4>for his standards, given he had the plan to Fashia,

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 4>but we forgot about it when he dropped about a

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 4>one fifty and a half a game against Richmond.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 2>So where do you sit fans down to fifty two.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Ownership Nick Deakos at the time recording here on Monday

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>before round one. I think the point you made there

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>about he's a keeper, you're not picking Nick Dakos for

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>your price. I think the opening round scores that affected

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in really helped. With these bargains. The rookies, you've got

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that locked in score. They're one step closer to a

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>price rise. That's what you're going for with those cheaper selections.

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>You're not going for that with Nick Dacos.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>It would seem obvious you try it. There's not a

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>lot splitting these options at the top end. We know

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they can play, we know they can score, so you're

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>always looking for something, So the obvious thing would be

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>underdone score sixty six. These are two reasons leave him out,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but it is Nick Dakos. I haven't taken him out

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>just yet. I think back at the g this week

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>than the Bulldogs the week after, I believe no one

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>will definitely planning that night. So I'm backing him in.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Could he become a bit of a pod maybe not

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>giving up hope just yet. What do you think you're

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at me? A little bit funny? They're chief I

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>know we've had this discussion off air. I put it

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on X last night. Who's off Nick Daykos. A lot

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of people are doing so already citing those reasons that

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you've discussed. Is it too, Is it just an obvious

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>move for you?

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 4>I just think, yeah, I mean I've probably gone towards

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 4>a more value approach this year as to I think

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people in the community are kind of

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>going towards not paying up full price in general, and

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 4>I've kind of gone towards that mine of thinking. So

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of the way that jovin the format, the winner

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 4>last year twenty twenty four reigning champ, has sort of

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 4>talked about the way that he approaches the game, coming

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 4>in not paying full price for basically anyone. So that's

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 4>just where I'm sitting at the moment. And look, Nick

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 4>Dakos may be underpriced for what we see him for

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 4>him across the season, but given that he's now fighting

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 4>an uphill battle, you know, he's got a sixty six

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 4>in his score cycle. I'm happy to you know, follow

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 4>the crowd in not you know, bringing him in. I personally,

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 4>as I said, I didn't have him myself, but people

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 4>that did have him in their plans.

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it's really up to the Honestly, you could

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 4>go either way. I'm personally, based on my strategy, I'm

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 4>going to go against it. But you know, I think

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 4>if you had him in your plans and your affirm

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 4>that he's going to go up across the season and

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 4>average more than he is priced at, I don't think

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 4>you should change your plans if that was what you thought.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yep. A flag mantle here on X you know, sums

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>up the replies I got for his price by a

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>limited preseason, I'm not going there. Yeah, I think that's

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>where I see it as well. Pies were pretty ordinary too.

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Didn't look great in the midfield when he wasn't up

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and going. Is the support going to come? Jordan to go.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>He won't play against the Power on Saturday Night either,

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So a lot a lot saying to drop him. Yep,

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>did pair them.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>We do enough.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Jumping to perim I think. So I was not looking

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>for reasons not to pick him, but it was pretty

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>happy with my structure without him at the price though

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he probably did. I think there's the obvious value there,

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the roles there, he did some heavy lifting, he's going

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to do going to need to do even more heavy lifting.

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But what we saw from Colinwood on Sunday, Let's jump.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Back to the first game though. This was a massive

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 4>talking point on the first game of the round. Will

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 4>Day one hundred and forty eight super coach points, I'm

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 4>with you on Perryman. He he you know, he did enough.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 4>I think if he was in your plans, you can

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 4>keep him. But if you didn't have this guy on

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 4>your plans, Will Day, I think you've been big on him.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 3>But I got him out of my team, so now

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to find a way to get him back

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>into my team.

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 2>That was I wasn't saying, wasn't.

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It unbelieved three goals.

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>In the first half.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess the thing was he did get tagged by Jordan,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>but but.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Awful, still one and that's always a cheap thing.

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Chance your opinion on will Day twenty six disposals, four mark,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 4>six tackles, nine clearances to go with those three goals

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 4>and seven score involvements. Notable played seventy three percent tome

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 4>of ground he did get hobbled at one point too, yep,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 4>and fifty five percent center bounce attendances which probably where

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 4>we were thinking. You know, we were wondering whether he

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 4>was going to play pure inside mid We're wondering which

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 4>what the mix is going to be. I think it's

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be a mixture of both. But where do

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 4>you sit with will Day?

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Very impressive, no doubt about that, and we've spoken about

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on the show. We spoke about will Day's comments earlier

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>in January about he acknowledged the best midfielders in the

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>comp do get forward have an impact on the scoreboard.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>That's where his progression is set it. It's one thing

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to say it, another thing to then go and do it.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Kick three goals in your first game. He wants to

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>get forward, have an impact. He definitely did that. The

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>tag did work though after halftime he was pretty good

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>in the last quarter. Will Day, after those issues in

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that third, got wet game, become a bit more of

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a scrap. I like him as we all do. One

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty eight, though Super Coach points that his

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>high score for the year. Potentially, are we this guy

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a star and a super Coach guy.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not downing that, but are we chasing the points

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>here with him? What can we expect. It's obviously good

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>art to that you probably win Dussie, so.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, seeing as I'm going to win our concert for you.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Will Fade is the name of the game. This you've

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 4>been waiting to use that.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting a long time. I think I called

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it Thursday night.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 4>When I was having a little bit of a nerdy

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 4>catch up with the Fantasy lads.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Where's my nuff alarm here?

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 4>I went down Fantasy lads, yea, caught up with the

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 4>boys over the weekend, called him will fade. Now this

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 4>is why, Okay, down the brow and flagged. Turn the

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 4>cameras on. I flag this pretty early days looking at

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 4>his schedule, obviously wasn't expecting as big a score round

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 4>zero against Sydneys ones who have deployed a tag before

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 4>they did as you said in the second half, but

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 4>not early days when he was just dominating one undred

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 4>and forty eight points in the rolling average. Does make

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 4>you think twice he's got Essenon up first in the

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 4>proper season for Super Coach Round one the Blues GWS,

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 4>and then of course, given he had the opening round,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 4>he's then got the buy. I think you'll get tagged

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 4>every single week up until he's buy from here, and

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 4>for that reason, I'm happy to fade and go against

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 4>the will Day train. So like Droot will tag him

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 4>from Giants who Bedford, He's going to definitely cot Bedford

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 4>without a doubt at the essenon does Sam Durham go

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 4>to him, given we know that he can do the

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 4>run with roll, does it? I don't know, Like I

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 4>don't know how they're going to do it. All I

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 4>know is that coach, a coach watching opening round and

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 4>seeing what Wilde did will not go without putting somebody

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 4>on him after seeing you know how we've seen him

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 4>get his influence curtailed in the second half, You've seen

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 4>what's happened with Dekos. I think this might be the

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 4>first year in a few years we're we're actually going

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 4>to see tags right from the get go, Whereas you

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 4>know in previous years there's been a few weeks where

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 4>coaches have let him run free and then income the tags.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>This year round one tag we will not. That's the

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>line Will not. A couple of thoughts coming through on

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>X about this obviously Finn Callahan as well on Sunday,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Huge similar price bracket. We'll talk about him in a minute,

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Matthew here on next can you start Day older Callahan

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Cherah in the same starting side, and Martin

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Lovett the Hips is number one fan. But with the

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>first time I think five names ever delivered something serious

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about supercoaching, hasn't clipped the hips to say, Martin, we

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>want you to add the clip of the hips the

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>next time. So too serious from you. But fans, as

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a mantra of don't jump at shadows in the preseason

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>stick fat in round zero. Huge love for Callahan and Day,

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but the big scores only stay in the system for

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.479
<v Speaker 1>one week. Anyway, in the lair jumping on to Callahan

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and Day, so her thoughts about will Day Finn Callahan

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:19.359
<v Speaker 1>into your side.

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Strongly consider it?

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I love a look at it like I reckon, Yeah,

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 3>it's just looking at them for Tom Green's out obviously,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>so you know, is he There's a reason why we've

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>all rate people, teams have rated Finn Callahan. You know,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 3>sin Kilda wanted to pay an amazing amount of money,

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 3>which you don't.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why you're not bout that contraver.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 3>That's fine, this guy can this guy should in theory

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 3>be a very good player. Eventually you want that breakout.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 3>It looks like it's going to happen, so yeah, then

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>if then if I like it, it's nice A little word.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 4>I think the roles Tom agree with either. Yeah say

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 4>that now? Yeah, I mean center bounce is to your point,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 4>last year, including finals, for Finn Callahan, he was at

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 4>center bounces at forty three percent at the time, and

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 4>that's just looking at how many times he obviously a

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 4>tens of center bounce after a goal, but forty three percent.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 4>Last year he was at eighty eight percent in opening rounds,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 4>so he was their number one center bounce mid To

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 4>your point that I think Tom Green coming in may

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 4>impact it a little bit.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah maybe, but.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Playing that well, you know you're going to play Tom

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Green and you're going to play Finn Callahan.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>They play different styles.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 4>They're not the same sort of player as well, which

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 4>if they are two big bodied, slow sort of type midfielders,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 4>you can get away with playing both of them. So

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 4>he's not all of a sudden they play on a wing. Okay,

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 4>The only thing for me is he's got the round

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 4>two by so as opposed to Will Dave. If you

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>think Will Day can break those those potential tags that

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 4>I've mentioned. If you think he can beat those, you

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 4>know you're going to get a price rise out of

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 4>him immediately. In those first three weeks, you're not going

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 4>to get the same out of Finn Callahan. You're getting

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 4>one game and then you're you're getting a buy, and

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 4>then you've got a second a game after that buy

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 4>in which his price will change. So the way I

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 4>think i'd approach Finn Callahan is like without a doubt,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 4>or have some sort of failed pick after round After

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>round two we've seen I think, I think is why

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 4>not just wait after round one we see how it goes.

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 4>If he looks incredible again, you haven't lost out yet,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 4>his price is not going to change. Good point, you're

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 4>going to have the buy around in round three when

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 4>he comes back.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got to.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember what his matchup is after that, but regardless,

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 4>I think if you're happy with the price change, if

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 4>he's got some stupid negative break even heading into round

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 4>three after his round two by that's when I think

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 4>you can make your little adjustment. You can trade out

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 4>a failed pick, bring in a Finn Callahan, and away

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 4>you go.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree because then it becomes you know, you

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>can just take it for the money train aspect of

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as well, make a lot of early money with that,

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>be a bit more sure about it. So I do

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like it.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 4>I think you'll be I do think you'll be pretty

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 4>good this year after seeing that. If you start him

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 4>and you're confident fielding, you know, fielding your rookies, and

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 4>you've got a pretty good structure.

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an issue starting. But that's just where

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>my thinking is. Hawk's Eagles and Saints for the Giants.

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 4>Get him in a round three at least, or just

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 4>start with him. Look, honestly, no, I think that's the

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 4>way to go. Wait and see on him.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Both probably neither coming into my team to start, okay,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>sticking fat yep.

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 4>What about another player where we're all searching for a ruckman.

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 4>We've struggled. If you're not starting a Cherry or you're

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 4>not starting at Gorn, we're.

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>All starting, we're starting, you're.

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Looking for a ruckman see camerone one hundred and sixty

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 4>four super Coach points Obviously here and Rick went down early,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 4>hoping all the best for him. Recovery that looked pretty

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 4>nasty for Kieran Briggs went down very early. Cameron got

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 4>to ruck against one Lachlan Keith. Now you're a good

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 4>size old chief. You could probably do a better job

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 4>than Locky Keith. I think, don't don't do lucky Keif

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 4>do like that, don't mind a bit of Keith. So

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 4>he tried, he tried hard, but yeah, it was I

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 4>think fantasy Freco put out the tweet and it was ugly.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 4>The moment that Keith took over dark, Cameron really took

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 4>control of the game.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And he won sixty four nine of those against Briggs

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>nine nine. Who the Giants play next week?

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Giants have gore im sorry round one.

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, actually gone for a two hundred round one.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Back to Darcy Cameron, are you buying that? Are we

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>buying the height?

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 4>It's a big score in the rolling average. I know

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Joey Montagna who had Darcy Cameron in his team early,

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 4>so he wouldn't be taking him out. So if he

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 4>was in your plans by all means, if you think

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 4>he's going to improve the average like Mason Cox, I

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 4>think still a little bit away if he's even in

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 4>the team anymore.

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Listening to the radio, I hate it. I don't hate it.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Listening to the radio on Sunday, Joey actually half an

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>hour before the bounce, made his big call and said,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Darcie Cameron's going to be Australian been this year. Came

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>out and deliver bit that.

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, man, Joey Montagna, Yeah, I don't hate it, he certainly.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean he finished last year strong, so I don't know.

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 4>I'd have to see what his rock matchups are like

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 4>coming up. They're obviously not going to be Lockie Keith

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 4>every week, so take it with a grain of salt. Yeah,

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 4>I think he was a nice score though, so I'm

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I can go there personally anyway.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>He buried the opening round lead here, Chief Maddie Roberts.

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>If he wasn't he was a lock already in our sides, well,

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I think so locked in mine, locked in a lot

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>of other sides now and for good reason. Twenty six touches,

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>nine marks, one hundred and twenty four super Coach points.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And like we've said, you try to argue against me

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>about if he doesn't have the kickings, can he do enough?

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 1>He can again, if he's the man they kick too

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>from the kickings, the man they go to as the

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>s out there as well. That's what they do. I

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like to use him, very efficient, bull user, makes good decisions.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Lock him in, I think, my if you can go

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>back on Code Sports, you you're trying to watch our

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>bold predictions show. I had Matt Roberts top six in defense.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not that out there anymore. There's a chance if

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>he plays like that. Yeah, I want to go back

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to your point, Roberts. The kickings.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 4>So there was a stat by Jaden Popowski which stat

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 4>whiz on the Twitter.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But this.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Proves your point perfectly. So didn't take only took the

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>one kit the enough button. Ready three he doesn't deserve that. Yeah,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 4>three Mark kicks coming directly from Blakey out of those

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 4>kick ins that Blake he had. So as to your point,

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 4>they're using each other, he's he's sort of that in

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 4>between guy. But yeah, I think he's a lock for me.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Perraman and Roberts, so get him both into defense, I think.

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 1>So yep, I think so five names yep. Obviously all

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in on Joel Freezer.

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 2>So yep, we're still there, yep.

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But I like him too. Was in my team. He's

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in my team in the moment, but I want to

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>get pyramid. So you got all three of those guys.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't have Roberts, I will I will ring Roberts.

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you fit all those three in easily? What do

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you think?

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you'd have to, you'd have to back in that

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 4>Fraser's really freezer. He's really going to take it to

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 4>the next level.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know.

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's as a broader question, where are you guys sitting

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 4>in your defense and you're going pure value? Are we

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 4>still sticking with some some real premiums up the top end?

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Like in general? Where's I've found the defenders? I think

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned it early in the preseason. It's stuck that way.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 4>I thought maybe we'd get more options emerge, I mean

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Maddi Roberts, because we're already high on him. I think

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 4>we already had him in our plans. But where are

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 4>you guys sitting at defense? I'm kind of I think

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm learning full value at the moment, so I think

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 4>you can fit them all in.

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I'm going to go with Robert someone and

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 3>actually bring him in for Nazz, so a.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Bit more sure thing, I think in terms of one

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 2>And he's also cheaper, so Shecheesel.

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm happy to start with him because I think, like

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 3>on your thing before about you know, I guess full

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 3>full price players you probably you know, with midfields especially,

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 3>you can always find value there. I think Shecheesel's one

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>guy that I'm happy to have full price just so

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 3>this guy's he'll.

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Be a top ten.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 4>He's got the top five, top six defender, like he

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 4>should be likely top he should be.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Top three at the least. Let's say that.

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 3>So like, you know, have you go here and then

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 3>you can just get value, you know, value like I guess,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm also been on Jaden Short.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>In the team you've been Yeah, haven't.

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Changed that one, I reckon. I'm happy to do that. Yeah.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 2>One thing I'm a little bit concerned about why the

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 2>defense rookies. You know it's not my boy James Leak.

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Yep, he saved him. Everyone rode him off, everyone wrote

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>him off.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 3>But no we didn't hear low time on ground low

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 3>still sixty take sixty four points?

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>No you will?

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 2>You take sixty four points?

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, get a snag.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just going to be what else is out there?

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Because yeah, we'll get onto rookies. But with James Leak,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, could go glass half four half empt without

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty four percent game time. Is it a sign that

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>he could be the first one out or is it

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a sign hot day debut? Maybe they plan to sub

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>him off anyway, Kiaran Briggs got injured early, so they

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't nursed him through his debut a little bit as well.

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 4>Also went to as well as like Petling's out of

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 4>that team and he had that really low time on

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 4>ground roll like that's I guess while we're keen on

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 4>to start with because he had such low time on

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 4>ground and he was kind of that grunt player as well.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 4>Maybe that's just where Leak's coming in. He's going to

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 4>play low time on ground. But maybe that job security

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 4>is higher than we think and let's yeah, let's hope that.

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, it was just seeing the time on ground,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 4>I was a bit like, oh, it's probably not as

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 4>much as I'd want, but yeah, it was a hot day,

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 4>gross out there with the cramps.

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So well, I've changed my defense a little bit since

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the last episode. We'll see the no early buy for

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the Lions anymore. We know West Coast and Richmond in

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the first month squeezing in Dane's Orco five ninety five k.

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>That could go pear shape. We know it has before

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Dane's Orco Richmond and West Coast. Yeah, I've spoke about

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a lucky Neil could do ye last week. Okay, round

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>two again, one is on the cart. Hilarious the change

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of opinion on Zorco. Though last year we were petrified

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>to pay up for him at like three, like it

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>would rise. It was rise in the price, like we

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>can't pay that much with SOCCA. Now we're willing to

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>pay what six hundred k? How much is he? There's

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:10.719
<v Speaker 1>no I can't do that.

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, thirty six like the time he's undefeated, I

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 4>just can't. It might be underpriced after four reuns. I

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 4>know I'm seven for a season. I'm not playing for

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 4>four rounds.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Fans to New ball game, got the boose, got the trades.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I want to fit him in Lockie Whitfield

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't do barely anything. Yes, they had on undred, one

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eleven super coach points. He's there locked in.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think at D two, Zorko at D three at

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment, just got to work out Roberts at D four.

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna work out what happens after that. Is it

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the rookies? Is it Periman? Is he too? Is that

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>too deep? Well, I've also go on.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 4>I like, now I don't know if he might even

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 4>be a point of difference now and maybe I should

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 4>have saved this.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>We are going through our pews later on.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Actually he might be so, but I've got another defender

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 4>that Liam Hagen very keen on. Yeah, let's talk about

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 4>him later. I like it should we get onto some

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 4>of the sort of just broader topics. I think we

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 4>should quickly just touch on some of the injuries. We

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 4>did mention Kieran Briggs. He was out subbed. James Warple

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 4>probably more draft relevant out Angus Sheldrick was probably the

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 4>really big one from the weekend fans.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Scratch him off. We know there's a lot of top

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>price options in the rookie category in the midfield. Almost

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>had too many. I think we could now probably cut

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>him off. That was still could come out surprise as

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>play a full game. But we've spoken about the stub

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>risk with him. We saw it last year. Swans didn't

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>get the job done. Cayden clear he will be back

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at some point eventually. Think our food suspension obviously Taylor Adams.

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Another injury helps Sheldrick maybe, but I think there's enough now,

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>especially with a low score in his rolling average already,

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I think you could probably overlook him. Ed Allen in

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the midfield superstar seventy one super Coach points for him,

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you've locked that into his rolling average for me, automatically

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>jumps way over Sheldrick in terms of starting options in

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the midfield.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, let's get onto just some broad topics here.

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Where do we sit at the moment? Mid price madness,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 4>guns and rookies or a fine balance of both. I've

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of already mentioned I'm I guess you could classify

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 4>me going mid price madness because I'm going to try it.

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I think this year.

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 4>I always say I'm going to do it. I never

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 4>follow through. I don't think I'm going to pay up

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 4>for one top price premium. I'm going to try and

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 4>get under price premiums everywhere, value value value, See if

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 4>I stick to my guns by the first partial lockout Thursday.

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But where are you sitting? Firstly, who's in one?

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.959
<v Speaker 4>Then Andrew Brayshaw? So I mean you could count him

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 4>as a top price premium.

0:28:59.160 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>But he's.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 4>He's not fair, he's under so lucky hundred k and

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 4>shout out to Pig of the Doctor super Coach, one

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 4>of my super coach friends Button nothing, No, look, we

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 4>are big. He's big on not paying over six hundred k.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 4>That's the line he set six hundred k. I'm backing

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 4>him in this year. I don't want to pay over

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 4>six hundred k. And that includes the likes of a

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Harry Sheesel, includes the likes of a Nick Dakos.

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think these you can get them off Harry's. You

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>know what my best trade is? Could you leave this five? Now?

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Do you know what my best trade was last year?

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Waiting for Harry She's and bring him in under when

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 4>he finally dropped price.

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Where did you finish last year? I started? Yeah, I started.

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I was doing no Harry Sheesel. I get the values

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>there as well, but sometimes you get what you pay for.

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Interesting about balancing the team out, balancing that team out.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I sit. Where are you at?

0:29:55.200 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Sim I've got I've got lucky Neil Sheesel, So yeah,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm happy to pay up for maybe one, one or

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 3>two guys like that. I don't but outside there's a

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of more mid mid price guys after that, I

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 3>reckon it's like, you know, Neil actually, if I'm watching

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 3>my team now, yeah, Neil M one, brace Shaw M

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 3>two and there's all of M three still got Jason

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Lego in there, so it goes very yes, quite mid

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 3>price after that.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So Lego's still in there, sticking to his guns though.

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah one and then yeah, like the defense is talking about,

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, can you get short Roberts, Perryman Fraser in

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 3>at the moment?

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 2>So there, so yeah, well see there we go lock

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and he was.

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Still only in twenty four percent of teams thought that

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>might skyrocket.

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 3>That changed the by change their start and actually him

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 3>being available for the buy, like yeah, his buy changing.

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just recovering from your shock.

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You sit here with you know, two of the greatest

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>super coach mines in South Australia five names, and myself

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>old mate, bold mate, well, old mate pig. Just there's

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things, have a couple of refreshments with

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>your oh fancy enough nuts, and you've changed your thinking.

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>You are I thought you weren't. I thought you were

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a man of standing chief. You've just Emily influenced.

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, this is the big question that people want to

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 4>know as well, as we said rookie Marble coming tuesday.

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 4>How many rookies have on field right now to start

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 4>the season. So you talk the big game, you've got

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 4>these big guns. How many rookies you got on field?

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Do we count flets?

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Count flex? All right, talk about flextoness. At the moment,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got on field, Sam Davidson, Yep, Mitch Nevert, Levi Ashcroft,

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Lijah statists beIN O'Sullivan and at the moment, haven't put

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Perimi in. So I've got leacln Reid in the fence

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on field. Okay, so pretty similar.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 3>I've got the Yeah, I'm not against the strategy.

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm probably balanced as well. I think, given we're

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>all looking for that value the middle parlia, midfield, in

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the forward line, there's some good mid price value in

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>defense as well. I think we're all playing a little

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of mid price madness as well. So I put

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>myself in that balanced approach as well. Still got the

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>big names at the top end, Shecheesel, Neil Jerry obviously

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the horny one I Isac Rankin. So the balance SE's

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to change too much. We're not expecting

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to be surprised with these top end rookies. It's unlikely

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that Phino Sali and Sadas Ashcroft, Oh Driscoll, these types

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>don't get picked all of a sudden, see Draper. If

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we if we find out ahead of time that he's

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty two five, names might be able to

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>give us a bit more know he wrote about the

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>selection than the lemmas at the Crows and the Power

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Today on Monday Code Sports dot com dot Au. But

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>would you start, sid Draper? Would he go ahead of

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these names we've mentioned if Matthew Nicks came

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>out and said he's not sub and he's playing, that's

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a good.

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Question because.

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Him, yeah, that has Actually it's a big if at

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the moment, big if I think I'd still the guys

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 3>that I've got, you know, your Fino Sullivan's start, as

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 3>you know Levi Astro, I'd probably rather still go there.

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.479
<v Speaker 3>Just maybe it's because you know, we see them all

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the time and we maybe I've just not in my

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>head that he's going to be a big sub risk.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 3>If it's not this week, he could be the week

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 3>after he gets taken off early because they do want

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to manage him, so they do want to you know,

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 3>bring him, you know, like trying to bring you along

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 3>gradually kind of thing. So I think the risk is

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>probably just a little too great for me given some

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of the other guys that are that are still are

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 3>still are still around, you know. Yeah, but if you

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 3>knew he's trying to play five games in a row

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 3>and not Pio need to play.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 4>It's a big price to pay for sure with the

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 4>guys that we think we've got available to us, but

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 4>time will tell if they are available.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've ranked the Rookie Price Office. Obviously. You can

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>listen and watch the Rookie Bible on Tuesday. You can

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>also find my updated rookie rankings in the Super Coach

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>News tab on your app as well. Who to pick

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 1>my best options in every line, so plenty of content.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They're all week, does.

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 4>He I've got five rookies on field, including flex so

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 4>and all rookies that I have big faith in, apart.

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>From defense where you spending your money? I don't know.

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Actually when you said that, I was like, yeah, no,

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:56.839
<v Speaker 4>I don't actually still have got a bit of rookies

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 4>on field. Now, I think I've got more depth in

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 4>my rookies on the bench. Think I've got I've paid

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 4>up for the rookies on the bench. So I think

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 4>that's where I'm at, just to get the cash gen

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 4>going on the bench.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>How much cashty on the bench? Who's only bench in

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment in the midfield? Ashcroft moved there, geez the moment. Okay,

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he might move back on, but he's there at the moment.

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Never isn't there Okay? And that's probably the two big

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 1>price yep, guys. So I mean, have you said last

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>year not paying up big time so larger? Who are

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>going to play? Larjah Hewitt's in there? Well, I think

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he will.

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean the latest I thought out of Perth was

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 4>that mcgualta was saying that he thinks he'll be right

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 4>to be available for selection now a couple of days ago.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 4>I think regardless, he's probably going to sit there, like

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 4>I'd be happy to have him as a rookie on

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 4>the bench regardless. I think he's going to play enough

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 4>games this year to be worthwhile.

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 4>On my bench to the DPP so I quite like

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 4>the DPP swing. So that's another reason. Let's move on

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 4>to my next dilemma, which it sounds like you guys

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.720
<v Speaker 4>don't have too much of a dilemma, but rucks.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>How are we looking? It's been a big conversation this

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>pre season.

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 4>We've obviously got the flex as well there which you

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 4>can use on any position, so a ruck could be

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 4>utilized there as well. We'll talk about our flex a

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 4>little bit later and who we've got there, but in

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 4>terms of rocks, maybe we talk about it now as well,

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 4>using the flex for a ruck early because I've got

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 4>the numbers of who the top popular options in flex

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 4>are from our exclusive data our patents centered across for.

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>US team play just also got some you know, we

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.439
<v Speaker 1>love the input from the listeners. Kalie Williams from over

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there and the herald son too is Flinn r to

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a terrible idea, so that goes into the mix as

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:40.280
<v Speaker 1>well at this conversation. But for me, I think five

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 1>names to a lot of super coaches around the country,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Tristan Cherry and Tom to Coning probably not moved from there.

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Flinn net Flex for me at the moment, did have

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a rookie in there, found a bit more money. I

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>think pretty much rookie. It's real top end. You know,

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he's only what forty k more expensive than Sam Lawler,

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>who will talk about as well. But I think if

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he's there number one ruckman, he makes some serious cash.

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So he's my flex for me. Three ruckmen and you're

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the same.

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I've got TDK and yeah, Cherry, but I've got a

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 3>rookie in my fleets position.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 2>No Flinn, no Flinn, Okay, don't the cash so far?

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing? Have you got Flynn Flynn R too?

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Flyin R too? For me?

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm going Tom daconing R one, trusting what I had

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 4>in that hot pat.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to get her. I'm ready to get hurt again. Guys.

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.479
<v Speaker 4>I was an owner last year. For those that didn't

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 4>listen last year, I was an owner last year. Jumped

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 4>on for the beautiful one seventy six he had against

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 4>his brother as captain, which made me a TDK fan

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 4>for life, But went through the downs after that, which

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 4>included about several weeks of donuts for no. I wasn't happy,

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 4>you weren't happy with him. But I'm back on it.

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 4>I've had time to heal. I'm bad. I'm ready to

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 4>be hurt again, as I said, So, yeah, Tom Daconey,

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 4>for me, starting the season as the solo ruck with

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 4>no pitt neet, that's enough for me. I think he

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 4>just gets the hitouts. We've talked about him plenty of times,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 4>hitouts advantage, but not just that. The contested possessions is

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 4>his differentiator. He's able to play as an extra midfielder,

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 4>but he just racks up contested possessions every touch he

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 4>gets just about contested. So I'm all about it for

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Tommy Deconey, So he flats.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>My flex is a rookie at the moment.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 4>I've got sadists there at the moment, so I'm playing

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 4>a bit more flexibility. I've got some DPP action in

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 4>the midfield as well. You know, maybe a dossy team

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 4>revealed this week's on the cards. So no Cherry or

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 4>no Gorn.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>No, although like going to probably hurt me, he wreaked. Yeah,

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, I'm worried, petrified. I'm absolutely petrified. That's how

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I was starting. Interesting. Interesting, Yep, I'm with you on TDK.

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>We're all with you on TDK.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 4>It's been talked about a bit, but the schedule that

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Tristian Cherry has is not an easy ruck schedule, which

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 4>he you know, coming home last year, every ruck match

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 4>up he had just about where he completely dominated.

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he had a few.

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:15.439
<v Speaker 4>Obviously he played amazing football, but it seemed like every

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 4>week he'd come up against a new ruck that didn't

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 4>have their ruck in.

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.439
<v Speaker 1>It was like so and so's injured. This person's easy

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:20.959
<v Speaker 1>ruck match.

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 4>It was just like a perfect It was a perfect storm.

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 4>He's a gun. It was a perfect storm. Though to

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 4>have that massive end of the season. I think he

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 4>averaged under one hundred and ten or something heading up

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.720
<v Speaker 4>to his by So I just think if we're talking,

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 4>as I said, this strategy that I'm attempting to try

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 4>and grip my teeth through of not paying full price,

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 4>that would include Tristian Cherry, who has it quite a

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 4>if we're basing it on last year's data, a reasonably

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 4>tough run to start the season in the rucke. So

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 4>we're obviously excluding round one where he'll probably dominate against

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 4>Tim English.

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're all pretty split. We're all split there in

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the rucks, be more similar in the forward line. Look

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>at super coach teams across the country. We've seen what

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>they're doing out there. There's some bargains there. It's too

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to go past. Even our man, our Peyton has conformed.

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Anyone have to have him Isaac Rank and F two

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and then the bargains that you can't ever look. Is

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that where you're at?

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I think I think four are very similar.

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah no, no, oh no, what have you changed?

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>What have you seen?

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Or so this is where I've gone, maybe tried to

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 4>get a little bit tricky.

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>So the chief, what's coming up here? To the warning?

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you enough enough warning?

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Really, I don't even.

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Know whether it's worth Maybe it's worth waiting for the

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 4>team reveal. But Luke Jackson is in my forward line

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, so same deal. I've got pretty much

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 4>all those guys. Luke Jackson is the only one that

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 4>I've got there, and it's to have a bit more

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 4>flexibility with this whole ruck situation, and two in my

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 4>case having Matt Flinn R two to have an escape

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 4>plan if it all goes wrong. I've got an archer

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 4>read as the my R three instead of Harry Boyd. Obviously,

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 4>if Boyd's named, I'll probably have to switch that up

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 4>and get him in there. But I've got an archer

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.839
<v Speaker 4>read at R three, I'm going to switch around him

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and Luke Jackson. If Matt Flynn gets hurt for a

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks, then I don't have to waste a

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 4>trade in the rock line.

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>That's really just high level stuff. Guys, who have you

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 1>left out? Then?

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 4>In the forward line, I've left no one out, so

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:37.399
<v Speaker 4>I've got them all. I've just don't have a run

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.439
<v Speaker 4>like Davidson and what I see Davidson, I think he'll

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 4>be great. I've got him still just on the bench,

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 4>but I'm just not trusting him on field to start with.

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that he scored fantastic, looked great. I'd rather

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:53.799
<v Speaker 4>just wait and see if I need to shuffle that around,

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 4>I can immediately just make some changes. Put Flynn in flex, putstartis. Admit,

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 4>it's really high level stuff, guys.

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So not trusting you know, there's eyes that CaCO there

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. We know scored wellknd of Stone from the

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Giants now has got a sixty four point score in

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>his rolling average. Probably more of a bench option now

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that he's got that score in there. Joe Barry down

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>album is going to play Tom Lynch Thursday Night Looks

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on track to play one, a K A few options there,

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 1>you're happy leaving them all off? Yeah?

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.399
<v Speaker 4>I think if Sam Davidson comes off and like he's

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 4>the one I trust the most and I'm happy, Like

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 4>I said, I can easily just shuffle things around a

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 4>bit with my vast amount of DPPs and get him

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 4>on field. That's where I'm kind of just my thinking is,

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 4>I want that flexibility. I want to have rookies that

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 4>can play, but I don't have to rely on them.

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of where this old strategy is beautiful.

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a beautiful, beautiful Have you changed five names anything

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Ford line? I like five names? It's very

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>sure with his thinking back yourself in ye, well like

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it second guessing? Oh, can't wait see your team on

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night. I just want to see where it goes

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:05.280
<v Speaker 1>from here. It's taken a new path over the weekend.

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Can I just elaborate on my Luke Jackson pick, because

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 4>that's probably just second guessing. You're just looking at it

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 4>on face value, probably sounds disgusting. But look, if Shawn

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Darcy misses a few weeks, this is the start.

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Of his season.

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 4>He's got Sam to coning round one, which I think

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 4>could be monumental.

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't think Lean Red is going to ruck anymore.

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 4>If he does, Jackson's goning to get enough time. He's

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 4>got Grundy round two. At the time when I brought

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 4>him in, I did think that was going to be

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 4>no Grundy West Coast Round three?

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Does Flint player? Does Flint not play tim English? Round four?

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 4>That's a I think that four pack of teams right

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 4>there is solid. The other thing I like about Luke

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 4>Jackson is he is a forward, and probably I think

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of years he's been a top six

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 4>forward just without even trying, really, he's just always been there. Yes,

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 4>it's usually based on him playing soul ruck for a while.

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 4>This season there's word that he's going to play as

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 4>a midfielder as well as a forward as well as

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 4>a ruck. I think I don't know if we've really

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 4>seen that before, a guy that's going to play midfield,

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 4>ruck and forward. I think he's probably saved for a

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 4>ninety five to one hundred plus and puts him in

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.479
<v Speaker 4>the frame as a top six forward. So, like I said,

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 4>it's a bit of cover for my ruck, it's a

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 4>bit of cover for my forward.

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:22.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit of as well. I don't mind it.

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind it.

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>The theory is there, Yeah, thank you, interesting, thank you.

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Should we move on? We should? We should move on?

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, that was pretty much a lot of our stuff

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about there. We've talked about the flex as well.

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 4>The most popular flex picks according to the data, Matt

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Flynn ten point five eight percent. So that's the top.

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 4>So that's, you know, not necessarily just a massive obvious

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 4>pick in the flex, Matt Flinn. We still don't know

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:50.879
<v Speaker 4>the best way to use it, do it. We're still

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 4>going to I like this, Look how low the percentages

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 4>after number two It goes all the way down to

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 4>five point nine to one percent people.

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Using Levi Ashcroft there.

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 4>WHYSA CaCO is the next one two point five eight

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 4>five five percent, So we're really dropping down now. Then

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 4>it's Sartus never never Sheldrick's probably going to drop off

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 4>there a little bit, Fino Sullivan. So it's a rookie,

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 4>a rookie, Miss Mitch Mash. Bit of Caleb Daniel in there,

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 4>if we drop a little bit further, but clearly the

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 4>favorite at the moment, Matt Flynn to your point. So

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:22.919
<v Speaker 4>people are probably enjoying the same combo as you, guys,

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 4>i'd imagine, and Matt Flynn in there at the flex.

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a few questions here on X at the Phantom

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Messy get involved in the show every week. One for you, Dossi, yep,

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Given what you've just told us, Bruno says, is it

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>worth starting a couple of super expensive players such as

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Gorn and Cherry simply for good captaincy options? What are

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you going to do for captaincy with given you're not

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 1>starting the big end guys, do you have a plan?

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 4>You worried about that side of it. Now, if this

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 4>is the Breno, I know, I was just going to

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 4>have to look, have a look. I don't think he

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 4>wants my opinion. He's a bit of a Dossi hater.

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna have to I don't think it's that Bruno.

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>That Bruno used to have a go hippie as well,

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>long time long time fans of Shower as well.

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Look, I just got a sense to check this one. Okay,

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.239
<v Speaker 4>I think we're safe. Breno alright, Sorry, sorry about that.

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 4>I think my I'm going to just back in a

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 4>bit of a VC on Tom to Conning to Coning,

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 4>sorry to start the season with the VC. He plays

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 4>the early game, a couple of eight games in a row,

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 4>had that massive ceiling on him last year. So for

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 4>me Tom to Coning and then fall back into Andrew

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 4>Brashaw type one of my top you know, one of

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 4>the players I have paid a reasonable amount for. I've

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 4>also got a Jordan Dawson in there. He or Brashaw

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:36.280
<v Speaker 4>would probably be my fallback with Tom to Coning hopeful

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 4>for that ceiling score and then you know, maybe use

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 4>one of those potentially a little doughnut on the bench to.

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Loop that over. I'm nervous for him there.

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 2>End of really bad.

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>No Neil, no cherry, no cheesel. Yeah.

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes when you just think, just approach things a little different,

0:46:57.280 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be a good show.

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 3>You just overthink it and you think you're like a genius,

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 3>and then like by thinking you're a genius and thinking

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 3>you're too clever.

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that sums up perfect. Yeah, you're just three so

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>over happy, happy with that assessment. Quick question here short

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>answers Neil a primo and a rookie, So say Neil

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and Mirsa Swett to say or Neil and James Lake

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>or two value primos, so Callahan and Day or Callahan

0:47:31.600 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and Jayden Short do you think I know we've spoken

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>about why and you would and why you wouldn't pick

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>those guys, But back the structure in this convers in

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this question here big name rookie, a big name primo

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and rookie, all the two mid price guys.

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 2>As depends on their buy with the guards, you said, like,

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I think the fact that Kneels now, yeah, they didn't

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 2>play last weekend. You know, to worry about that, it

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 2>becomes a lot more appealing as an option. You have

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 2>to worry. You're not You're not worrying.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not the end of the world if

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 3>you just say, if you start with back yourself in

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 3>you go with Callahan, but he's four hundred and forty

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 3>k or whatever. Neil, You've got your top lightly, your

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 3>top line guys missing when everyone else is.

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, in those early.

0:48:19.280 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Rounds, lean on that with you. Dossive one for you

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>from Benji Bailey. Smith still got him, but now lack

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of info in his role preseason, not missing the official

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Amy series game, a bit skeptical on him. Could he

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>be subbed out early potentially are we still on Bailey Smith?

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:39.720
<v Speaker 1>You're not worried.

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:42.879
<v Speaker 4>I think if he's I will know if he's named.

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 4>If he's named, I'm going to be picking him regardless,

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I think. I think that's an easy decision for me.

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:51.879
<v Speaker 4>I think the alternative if he doesn't perhaps get named

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 4>for whatever reason, I think we've got a couple of

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 4>nice options there, like do you back in a Riley

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Sanders who's just a little bit cheaper, or do you

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.479
<v Speaker 4>just if you didn't have one of those rookies on field,

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 4>you just punter and go. You know, whether it's a

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 4>CaCO you didn't have on field, whether it's a Davidson

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:08.480
<v Speaker 4>who you'd had on the bench, or perhaps you know,

0:49:08.640 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 4>just another player. I'd perhaps think about that. But for me,

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 4>if he's known, he's infa me yep Riley Sins I

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 4>think would be the replacement for me as well. So

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 4>it's probably some big calls to be made. What's It

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.720
<v Speaker 4>All Live? Thursday Night? The Live show as well?

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Another question to finish off with here from our lovely

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Lair family, Steve Smith could Ork might not be Australian

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>then Nick Captain Sam lawla if name round one. Do

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we fit him into our sides? Spider Names maybe on

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the bench. I would be really hesitant about starting now, Chief, Yes,

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got him into you. Ye, he's in.

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:57.720
<v Speaker 4>He was in fact going to be my because currently

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:00.959
<v Speaker 4>under ten percent owned, at least or round round about

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 4>ten percent.

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that'll skyrocket, to be honest, but will tell

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:06.960
<v Speaker 1>us about him, oakes On, he's your pod, your point

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of difference from the hip hipster's not a round five

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Names owns the segment. Now we're going to do a

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>little segment to finish off, aren't we. Okay, well, I'll

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>bring in another player. I'll talk about Sam Laula quickly.

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Then I'll bring another player tape. We could do this properly.

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Sam Lawler, though around ten percent owned, I would personally

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 4>pay up the big dollars for him. And it's only

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 4>from a little glimpse. I saw again the Mighty Beagles

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 4>in a in a pre season pre preseason match. Was

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 4>Eliot's part by the plane. I think he might have

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:45.919
<v Speaker 4>been Yeah, that was that might have been the worst. Yeah.

0:50:46.239 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I think in their lineup, job security is massive. We've

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:53.439
<v Speaker 4>heard today he played in the final sort of match

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 4>hit out or a match sim game we are recording

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 4>on a Monday afternoon. The news was that he played

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:03.720
<v Speaker 4>in a full hit out, no no contact cap wearing

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 4>on their playing full hitout And yeah, I just think

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 4>he's going to have a nice role split between mid

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 4>and forward.

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like every number.

0:51:12.200 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 4>One pick that we've had recently that plays in a midfield,

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 4>forward or mid essentially he's a mid.

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:21.760
<v Speaker 1>At heart role eventually becomes a guy that we want.

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 4>I think if he plays enough forward, he'll be he'll

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.760
<v Speaker 4>get that forward DPP nice and early job security, job security,

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 4>job security for rookies. Feel like he'll actually have some

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.839
<v Speaker 4>fieldable scores on field. From what I saw, he looked exceptional,

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 4>So he's nice. We saw, you know, Finn Callahan number

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 4>two pick. We had some questions on at the end

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:42.239
<v Speaker 4>of the day. Number two pick. Guys, this guy's the

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 4>number one as well, So just factoring that's the scouting

0:51:45.680 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 4>usually pre spot on guys, who's your other pot? Then

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 4>for kick us off, shooting from the hit the first

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 4>official segment of the year, Shooting from the hip. Our

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.279
<v Speaker 4>points of difference, that is what we go by here

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 4>on the lair.

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Spread.

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm going with Sam de Coning as my point of

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:13.880
<v Speaker 4>difference and team both of the I'm going both Da Cony.

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about defenders. Earlier, three hundred and sixty one

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 4>K did not put up a good performance in the

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 4>tri match. Everyone's jumped off. He's only look, I said,

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 4>under ten percent. He's ten point four percent owned defender

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 4>eligible three hundred and sixty K. He's going to be

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 4>playing in the ruck. Dan Batton over in Geelong, He's

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 4>saying he's going to be playing in the ruck. He's

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 4>been training up for all pre season to do so.

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Sam to Coning for me my point of difference.

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It's only been seven days since we've been in here,

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 1>five days. What has happened to the chief? He said,

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what happened on a long weekends at

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>this time of year for me full to pieces as

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the new owner of the segment, he overtook from our

0:52:53.040 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>man the hipster. I did they fright? Good night him

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>literally and then in the segment, what have you got

0:52:58.680 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for us?

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 3>Because I've been so prominent in this, I've kind of

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 3>told you all min yeads like you know, it's what

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:10.239
<v Speaker 3>It's still a pod, no way, isn't Fraser obviously still

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 3>be on here, but still got there.

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You've stuck your guns. Preasure is a pod still.

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean bray Shaw's man too, like damn. I mean

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I've kind of just given you all the gold.

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Fair fair you come into your own when we get

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to trading.

0:53:28.480 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, where we had to trade in next week, but

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:32.719
<v Speaker 2>actually don't want not actually want to. I want to

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 2>bring up just one people monitor at the moment after

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 2>this is by Josh Kelly, just for a little one

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 2>to always monitor. Here's a guy we always know can store,

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 2>has been able to store well in the past. Just

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 2>needs that.

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying do it, saying maybe just want to monitor,

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 3>especially if everyone's going Callahan, you know all the hyps

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:56.400
<v Speaker 3>around Callahan to kind of thing.

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Maybe just Kelly could run it back.

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 1>We go fans round us out here. I don't really

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>have any pods.

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Your vanilla Vanilla fan.

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what happens when you know, when you're the fan,

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:18.840
<v Speaker 1>people listen to you. They start they start picking the

0:54:18.880 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>same team. It's a compliment people listening, Dossie. But I'll

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you who my lowest own play is at the moment.

0:54:28.640 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell you two ten point two percent of teams obviously

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not listening to us any more about this guy.

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 1>James Peeling Wow, good fall down. He good four under

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>ten with the will Days, the Callahans, the rookies are

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>being named. He could be under ten percent pod. I'm

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sticking with him three point fifty two k. He didn't

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 1>do a lot or wasn't massive in Damous Hues game

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:58.799
<v Speaker 1>against Brisbane led the Croziers seat for the possessions in

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that center about smixed. Going to be in the first

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>choice every time, although he did start against Brisbane, but

0:55:05.120 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so that opportunity for him. We've seen he can score

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:11.759
<v Speaker 1>in his limited game time up in Western Sydney, so

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm backing him in Danes orco even as well. So

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Lolliams is a big pod, big high ceiling.

0:55:19.360 --> 0:55:21.960
<v Speaker 2>This is going to absolutely blow up in your face.

0:55:22.520 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>One name we'll mention though, there's a bit of a

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>pod to keep an eye on. If five names going

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>down that path. James Warpole injured. If you want a

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a cheaper option to your will Days, Ben

0:55:37.200 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Callahan's sixteen touches on Friday Night, eleven contested possessions stepped

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>up when Warpoole went off cam McKenzie speaking about high

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>draft picks ninety seven super coach points for him. We

0:55:54.160 --> 0:55:56.719
<v Speaker 1>know he in the back end of last year I

0:55:56.760 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>think I think it was around twenty four, had the

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 1>career highest boss, then was injured, then couldn't get back

0:56:01.719 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in to the side for the finals. So we know

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we can play clean as a good super coach game.

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Could he be the beneficiary of wooput injury and maybe

0:56:13.080 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>when will Da gets tagged, so Cam McKenzie keep an

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>eye on him.

0:56:15.840 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Wow, pull to finish off. I reckon that's huge. Well,

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:23.440
<v Speaker 4>what's our final thoughts? You know, as we said, we'll

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.280
<v Speaker 4>be jumping on a few pods and streams and whatnot

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:30.400
<v Speaker 4>throughout the week. The lair, the final lair before the season.

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:34.640
<v Speaker 4>You guys think my team's falling apart, Fancy's gone full

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 4>of vanilla sim sort of somewhere in the middle.

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty much.

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>What do we any final advice?

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Any final thoughts on this mad preseason, the new flex everything,

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:43.879
<v Speaker 4>what sort of.

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Back yourself in I think, and just keep an eye

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:49.520
<v Speaker 1>out this week. Plenty of news is going to happen.

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The teams are going to dictate what we do. What

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>rookie is a name what rookies aren't named, Have some

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:57.960
<v Speaker 1>backup plans. Go over your team the next few days.

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Have a look where you might pivot if something goes

0:57:00.880 --> 0:57:03.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong at team selections. You don't want to be coming

0:57:03.640 --> 0:57:07.919
<v Speaker 1>up with an alternative at six pm on Thursday night

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:10.799
<v Speaker 1>when someone's not named, just before the first bounce, So

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have some backup plans ready to go. Look at your

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:13.799
<v Speaker 1>team now.

0:57:13.920 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Also, don't schedule a haircut for Thursday night.

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Hipster ow Man, yep, if you are just joining us

0:57:24.760 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 1>here in the Lair for the first time all the

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>first season, our man the hipster almost a former former panelist,

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 1>can't find hasn't been here. Got a haircut one night

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>early in the Life of the Lair on a Thursday night,

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 1>got a haircut rup before lockout. Panic, something happened at

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 1>teams ended up with Ree Stanley. Stanley had a panic haircut,

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:53.800
<v Speaker 1>ran over just it was a mess, sums up, sums

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out our friend Gifters. So clear the time on Thursday

0:57:57.640 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>night and come and find us. If you do live

0:58:00.520 --> 0:58:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in Adelaide, the Chief will buy you will be if

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you come and find us and tell us you listen

0:58:05.080 --> 0:58:08.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Lair, we'll be out somewhere somewhere, good luck,

0:58:09.320 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it, trust your gut.

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Don't let other people tell you what to do, like

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:13.560
<v Speaker 4>I won't let these guys.

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you on the other side.

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Goodbye.