WEBVTT - Paul Murray | 2 July

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>From the Skyinging Center. This is Paul Murray live boy. Hello,

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Do you want to show we

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>have for you tonight? Seriously some great stuff, great debate.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that as always You've always send me

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in my Paul. It's Gonews dot com dot you. But

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of stuff that you may will not have

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>heard to this point in time. I think we're going

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it breaks in new ground for you today. Now. One

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of the great lines that Peter Dutton has been able

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to use against this Prime Minister is that he's weak

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and rattled. Now almost each every day there's an example

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>of the week and every couple of days as an

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>example of a bloke who is panicking that he's going

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to lose his majority in the parliament. Now he is

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>confident that at the next election the teals will mean

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be a change of government. But

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>believe you me, if they're not a majority government, there

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>is going to be problems for Anthony Abernezi. Him and

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>his ministers are a little overly confident at times, a

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>little of the belief that they're there forever, but of

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>course nothing is forever. And one of the examples about

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the weak and rattled nature of Anthony Abernezi is he

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't actually learnt the lesson that the last election was

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just the last election, it's not the forever election. And

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>yes there's a moment where all the planets line up

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and you get the result that you want. But three

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>years earlier the Labor Party didn't get the result that

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they wanted in the so called miracle victory of Scott

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Morrison that you and I saw coming. And who knows

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly where we're going to land at the election, either

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of this year or early next year,

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell you the idea of a government

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>being returned with its current majority well is pretty damn slim.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>There's an indicies that I have been mentioning to you

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for a long time now, because it has been building

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and I think mirrors our worldview

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and certainly mine that I present to you each and

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>every evening that the Prime Minister's politics and spin and

0:01:55.760 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the gallery playing the narrative and the get Dutton is

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>not actually connecting with normal people. It's a pole which

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>comes out every couple of weeks. The Essential poll published

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in the turbul Times otherwise known as the Guardian right track,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong track. Have a look at today, because today it

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't just bust through fifty percent, it roared past half

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of the country saying that we're in the wrong place.

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Sixteen point turnaround from May of last year. The numbers

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at times were even lower, of course at the very

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>start of the electoral cycle. But where we are now

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>more than half of the country believes we are headed

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong direction. That's why I think weak and

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>rattled actually applies. Have a look. These are the numbers

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>which have stretched all the way past the last election,

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>all the way through to where we are today. The

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>blue line is the wrong track. It has been steadily building.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>As I say, May of twenty twenty three is when

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>things started to a round. They held for a while,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they went up, they came ever so slightly down before

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>going back up again to basically fifty and then a

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>huge jump. Now, the reason this took place was because

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of those inflation numbers. That is the big thing that

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>happened since the last pole. Now, if there's an ability

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to slightly tweak the numbers or slightly ask different people questions,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that number may change by the next pole. But when

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a big change in a poll. You think, well, okay,

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>what's happened now fifty to fifty which has become fifty

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>one to forty nine in favor of labor. Well, of

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>course that's the nuclear announcement. The number of undecideds has tightened.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be the issue for the opposition. But

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what changed and went badly for the government it was

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that inflation that they had promised they were dealing with

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in actual fact had started to roar up again. Remember,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the Reserve Bank will make a decision on interest rates

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to get the inflation figure between two and

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>three percent. It's currently four percent off the monthly numbers. Also,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister is weak and rattled because a very

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>significant number of Australians do not approve of his leadership.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Now again, this was something that in June of twenty

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, a new prime minister, only eighteen percent of

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>people were disapproving of his approach to things. And we

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>were in that camp. I was well and truly in

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that camp. Remember the countdown. I knew what this government

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>would be. I did not give it a benefit of

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the doubt, because they use that benefit of the doubt

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to build an arrogance that eventually gets them to where

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they are today. Forty nine percent of people disapprove of

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister's leadership. That is a phenomenal change since

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the early parts of his Prime ministership. Now, principally it's

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>about cost of living. Principally, it's about a bloke who

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>does not take responsibility. Principally, it is about political solutions

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to real life problems. And how often have I used

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>the term too little, too late when it comes to

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the tax cuts? Well, guess what that worldview has now

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>made it all the way into the heart of the beast.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>This question was asked of the Prime Minister tonight on

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Channel two, a question that I have been placing as

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>too little, too late since all of these numbers started

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>getting fiddled with six seven months ago. We were right then,

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we are right now, and we will be right into

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the future. It is too little, it is too late,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and even the ABC brings it up with the Prime Minister.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Roll this tape.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>For someone earning fifty thousand dollars, the tax cut's worth

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>just over seventeen dollars a week. Is that going to

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 2>alleviate the very clear suffering of thousands of Australians and

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 2>thousands more than last year who are now regularly accessing

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 2>food banks.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Too little, too late, because it is too little too late.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Huge reaction last night to people sending me emails and

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>also news stories around Emma who was on a current

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>affair last night. Her and her partner work ninety hours

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>a week. Yet they are the people who were promised

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>by this Prime minister a better world. But no that

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>on his watch week and rattled leader is not stepping.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Up pretty much nothing at all, not just the tax

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 3>cuts come in, but everything else that is armed. So

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 3>it's not justifiable.

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 4>So I know you're going to have this little extra

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 4>in your account each week, but as.

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 5>You just kind of pointed out, everything else is going

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 5>up at the same time, right including childcare.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's one of the biggest things that has gone

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 3>up with our budget. We got an email a couple

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago saying that our daily rate is increasing

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>by seventeen dollars a day, which is quite a lot

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>realistically when you think about everything else going up, like

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 3>car insurance, food prices, fuel rent rates, all of that

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 3>type of stuff.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Every time we've talked about cost of living, start, middle

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>or end of the show Emma and people like her

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>other focus. I explained that in great detail last night.

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I played again for you tonight. Because fifty four percent

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of the country is like Emma, is like you, is

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like me. They think the joint is headed in the

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction. They think it's headed in the wrong direction

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for a whole bunch of different reasons. But the single

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest change that has happened since that industy was under

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent and is now at fifty four percent is

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>because this government is failing on inflation. Its solution to

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the problems last year was to take fifteen hundred dollars

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>away from ten million workers, ten minium workers like Emma.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>They now want credit for handing back crumbs off the table. Well,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>guess what. People won't give it to them. But they

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>also won't change your government unless the opposition actually has

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a solution to their problem, not just saying what the

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>problem is. They actually have to say what is their

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>solution to cost a living Now at some point they're

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have to serve that up before the election.

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.679
<v Speaker 1>But these people are winnable because they have been lied

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to by the Labor Party, lied to about energy, lied

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to about inflation, lied to about tax cuts. These people

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>are willing to move because they are angry and they

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are desperate. And the Prime Minister's spin and the canber

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>press gallery trying to pretend that it's anything but this

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest issue in the country, means they are

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>ripe for moving. We'll all find out what happens at

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>an election whenever it comes. It's Prime Minister's decision, obviously

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>not ours when that happens. So when it comes to energy,

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the opposition is where well and truly

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in the nuclear camp. Their belief is that the system

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is essentially one where the existing sites of power stations

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>get replaced and turned into nuclear generation. It's a plug

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>in and play system, you don't have to rewire the

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>nation and it costs less than the renewables. Of course,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to nuclear we have the scenario where

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dutton is all in its.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 6>Likely disruption to power, which means not just that your

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 6>fridge goes off at home, but that the could rooms

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.239
<v Speaker 6>go off at the supermarket, that we don't have reliable

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 6>energy for the manufacturing process, so jobs are lost in

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 6>the Australian economy. Why would we tolerate that situation. That's

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 6>why I think we need to have a proper, mature

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 6>discussion about how we migrate to a new energy system

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 6>where we can have renewables that are firmed up by

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 6>zero mission's latest generation nuclear technology.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>But as you know, the Prime Minister thinks that this

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>will save his political bacon by pretending that three eyed

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Koalas and all of that will move people all.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 7>The time when the rest of us are working to

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 7>get power bills down. He's picked the one option guaranteed

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 7>to priss power prices up.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>What Chris power price is up? The economics of nuclear

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>do not stack up.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 7>That doesn't worry those opposite. They spent a decade in

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 7>power without a single surface and then left Australia with

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 7>a trillion dollars of debt.

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because job keeper wasn't a thing. I think that

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party wanted to be bigger. And remember they

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted us to buy an airline. Please they of course,

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll take it up to one point two trillion dollars

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in debt, but don't tell anyone. And of course we

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>know the Prime Minister is all in when it comes

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to renewables and the building of them, despite the fact

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>that the CSIOO toll is at one point it was

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be more than a trillion dollars. Now it's

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>half a trillion dollars and the cost of nuclear is

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>way less than half a trillion dollars. But don't tell anyone.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But fascinating again, more of this polling which comes out today.

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And I do appreciate the detail that they make publicly

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>available to people, even though I'm sure they love that.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I use this detail to make our points as regularly

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>as we do. But I want you to think before

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I show you the pole. Where do you think most

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Australians get their information about this issue? How are they

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>putting two and two together about whether the government is

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to race as far as it can down its pathway,

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>or that that pathway is foolish and there is a

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>better option. Would you think that it's scientists or government

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>experts or political figures. According to this polling, No, Almost

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of people trust their friends and family on

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this issue. How much do you trust the following sources

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of information when it comes to providing accurate information about

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>energy transition? Now you put together the two blues, which

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is where you trust a little bit, or you trust

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and then you end up with seventy nine

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>percent of people having a conversation at home. This is

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>why it's so important to what shows like this to

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>commit to channels like ours to get information because my

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>belief is that while we have this conversation, I know

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of other stuff on the Tellian, there's lots

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of other people doing other things. But the information, the

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>data that I try to give you here is all

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>about arming you with the tools to have the conversations

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with your families. Now, this was also the major source

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of information when it came to people about the voice

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>last year. All of the experts, all of the media,

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we all know where they were. Well, of course we

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>all know where it ended up. Now this is really

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinating here because we have a scenario where obviously that

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>information isn't all uniformally pro nuclear or pro renewables. But

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>if this is the big source of information, then the

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>people you have to convince, the people who have the

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>power are you to have the conversation with your mates

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and with your family. Put it up again, because the

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>next best community members and spokespeople. Now I'm not entirely

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sure what that means, but your local community groups potentially

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>having issues with offshore wind or more solar, perhaps that's

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>what people are turning to. And then it starts to

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>fall away. Yes, the majority of people do trust the

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>information that comes from government agencies, but that is still

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>well below the number. So the CSIRO and their numbers,

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>which are obviously thrown around a lot dwarfed to the

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>information that people are finding out on their own researching

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and their own and having the discussion at home. The

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>least trusted the federal government. That's the third from the bottom.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I repeat, the federal government is the least trusted source

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of information about the energy transition. All of that feeds

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>back into a country that believes by fifty four percent

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we're in the wrong direction. Action means lots of different things.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you can conclude that when it comes to

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the two seventy five promise that never happened, the over

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>commitment towards renewables, the obsession with cutting x percent of

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the world's global emissions, where all of

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>course China it can be thirty times more polluting than

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we are and nothing gets measured until twenty thirty. It

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>can be the handling of the immigration system, lots of

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>different things, but people believe the joints centered in the

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction. That number has only grown since this government

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>came to power and does what it does. The Prime

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Minister's disapproval numbers have only become more serious the longer

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>his stays in power. Now, people who will defend a

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>certain type of politics or certain type of politician or

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>certain type of party will say, well, but it's just

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>one part. Yeah, but the trend is clear. The trend

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is clear disapproval of the Prime Minister's leadership and fifty

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>twy four percent of people saying we're headed in the

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction. And that's why when we do the documentaries

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that we do here, we do the editorials in our programs,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we have the discussions that we do. I am so

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>thankful that you are here each and every night. I'm

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so thankful that we share the information, and then you're

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>able to share the information with friends and family who

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimately make the decisions when it comes to the polsters

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>first and then at the polling booth. Each and every time,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing is inevitable. We say it for a long time,

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's because off of the real world is a

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>very different place than where most of the media and

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly the politicians would pretend they are the most important

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>people in it. Now, a couple of little things to

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>say about the most recent movements in and around the

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Senator from Western Australia is stepping slowly but surely out

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Labor Party. But I want to get to

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>some again data which kind of is going to pour

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>some cold water on this idea that the Muslim vote

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is about to run away from the Labour Party. As

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course, outside of the Parliament, Senator Payment

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is someone who as we know, was effectively not quite

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>booted out of the Labor Party officially, but she's not

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>really talking to any of her colleagues. She's not allowed

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to meet with any of her colleague She's getting the

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>formal version of the cold shoulder after crossing the floor.

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But before I talk about her apparent moves towards considering

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>some sort of weaponization of the Islamic community for political purposes,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can we just deal with a little bit of each

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>way elbow, Because there was a bit of spin. I

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>meant to get to it last night, but there was

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so much other information and I did quickly mention it

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in the debate last night with Steve with the Sam Crosman.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But have a look at the spin that the Prime

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Minister put on why he permanently suspended this senator for

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>crossing the floor. It wasn't because of Palestine, it wasn't

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>because of her vote, but it was because she was

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a distraction from the two little too late tax cuts. Well,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>unsurprisingly that didn't really float with anyone. But these were

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the excuses. He didn't ever want to punish her. He

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ended up having to punish her. Remember, he wanted to

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>slap on the wrist, but he had to punish because

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the colleague said, hang on one rule for everyone. That's

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of the point of the way we do things. Well,

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>now he's out and about and apparently saying people saying

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of him that he's shown strength in restraint by not

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>expelling her further. So firstly he apparently put it on

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>one side because she was a political distraction. But now

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>he's amazing because he hasn't booted her out of the

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 1>party because of what she did. That would be what

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we call each way albo, right, which is it it's

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Palestine vote, or it's not about the Palestine vote.

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But let's get to this concept of the Muslim vote,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>whether the Labour Party is about to lose it or

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>could be punished by it, all the rest of it. Now,

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as you know, certain sections of the Arab community and

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the non Arab community of course, had been marching quite

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>relentlessly in support of people in Palestine by proxy. Some

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>people have been doing so because they are happy with

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>what her Mass has done, and some are doing it

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>specifically because of course they are not happy with what

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Israel has been doing. But this group also occupies an

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of noise in the media and online, which

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>is why you get a senator from Western Australia crossing

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the floor to vote with the Greens on essentially a

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>one state solution, not a two state solution. But you've

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>heard all of this. Now, what is fascinating is in

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of days this person has been kind

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of winging about getting the cold shoulder from the organization

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of which she joined. And we all know where this

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to end up, which is that she's either

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>going to end up as an independent. She of course

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>has got another four years left in the Senate before

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>she'd have to go up for reelection or should go

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>out and join the Greens. Now I don't think you're

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>going to go and join the Green because I'll get

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to that reason in a second. But you may well

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>have also heard that potentially there have been some discussions

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>happening behind the scenes with Glenn Duruy, the Preference Whisperer,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to try to work out is there a way to

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>crowd a new political force, one that of course at

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>its heart and center, would have the key issues that

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>she has been talking about that are forcing her breakup

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>with the Labor Party. But okay, if that's the case,

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>remember she's from Western Australia. How many people in Western

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Australia would have Gaza as kind of the a one

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>issue one where they want to punish the Labor Party

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and they think the Greens aren't even good enough. Well,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the census. Two point five percent of

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Western Australians listed their religion in the most recent census

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as being Islamic. Fourteen percent of the vote voted Green,

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>yet it only produced one senator. Now, those existing senators

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are hardly going to get out of the way for

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>her to have a new spot, and it's very unlikely

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that the preferences that you would need to pull together

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to eventually become a Senator would be able to get

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you there. If they're not Labor, who obviously wouldn't send

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>her anything, Liberals who obviously wouldn't send her anything, one

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Nation who obviously wouldn't send her anything. You're notited Australian

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Party who obviously wouldn't send her anything. And the Greens

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>only just get enough of a vote to get one person.

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So even if she got all of the Greens preferences

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Socialists preferences and whatever the invented parties might be,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of her being able to get into the

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Senate at a normal half Senate election, not the Malcolm

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Turnbull genius half the quota, it's pretty unlikely. But interestingly,

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>here we keep hearing that the Muslim vote is now

0:20:55.320 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 1>going to move from just protesting at the Labour Party,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but apparently there's a particular focus maybe on four specific

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>MPs to try to get rid of those Labor MPs

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>at the next federal election. The reason the fuse that

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>lights the fire, yes is what's happening in Gaza. But

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically they're going to try to use this senator issue

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the reason the Islamic community is apparently going

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to hold as Bowler's move away from the Labor Party

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and either towards a series of independence rather than the Greens,

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>who already have the same position that all of those

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>independence would end up having. How do I know because

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this bloke told Channel nine so.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 8>How Anthony Albernizi has treated senator payment. It is disgusting,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 8>It is deplorable, and we expected a lot better.

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 9>Marmoodh Willa says he's advising a collection of Muslim organizations tonight,

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 9>vowing to target for Amps in multicultural seats, including two

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 9>members of cabinet, whether.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 8>She forms her unpiety, whether she becomes an independent, whether

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 8>she goes to the Green. She has the Arab, Muslim

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 8>and past ten and communities support.

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you're gonna hear a lot about this. It

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was a big obsession with the seven point thirty report

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>when they were talking with Elbow. But let's actually have

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a look right. Apparently the seats. Now they claim that

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got a significant capacity to impact about twenty different seats,

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>but according to that report on Channel nine, the four

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>seats that would be of particular focus for whatever this

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 1>movement may be. Well, the seats are Blackslain, Watsman where

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>are were and Wills Blackslan Watson where we're all in Sydney,

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Wills is in Victoria. But have a look the Islamic

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 1>population Blaxland about a third, Watson about a quarter lower

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in where or were lower in Wills. Now imagine those

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers one hundred percent voting the way that this new

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>movement would want it to be. That's the only way

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>you're going to unsee labor MPs with very big margins.

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But can I also say before I show you the

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>next graph, why I don't think a bunch of labor

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>MPs at this election are going to be swept away

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>by this movement Because for it to work, you basically

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have to do a teals And the way that that

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>works is that you want the teal to end up

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>with the second most votes before preferences start kicking in,

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and then basically everyone but the liberal preference the teal.

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>A teal gets over fifty percent, the Teal becomes the MP.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But for that to be the case, the Labor Party

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of had to run dead in those seats. Now

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they're never a chance of winning those seats, as the

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Party is never a chance of winning the seats

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>in these so called Islamic areas of places like Western

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Sydney and Outer Melbourne. But they're not going to run

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>dead at the next election. They're also not going to

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>send their preferences towards candidates who would obviously have a

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>different worldview on what's happening right now and since October

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>seven than their worldview. So the preference system doesn't work,

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why I should show you the Liberal vote

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in each of those seats. Now, remember to pull off

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>atial to knock off a major party, you've got to

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>get to finish second. Currently in blackslen Watson, where are

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party finished second At the last election. The

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Greens finished second in the seat of Wills. But do

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you really think the Liberal Party is going to preference

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Greens over the Labor Party. If it does, it's

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a disgrace. So my point is this is it interesting

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Sure, maybe one day demographically and statistically

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it becomes more of a chance. But if I was

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a betting person right now, would the Muslim vote move

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in such a fashion that the Labor Party would completely

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>lose its capacity to get into a two way fight

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to preferences. I don't think so. It

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>could be wrong, but again, the data is always our friend.

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Now forgive me for going back to the each way

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>elbow thing, but there's another example of it tonight. In fact,

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this one has to do with a meeting of NATO. Now, NATO,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of course is largely the European nations post World War two,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>getting together to try to have a universal Pact, where

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>basically an attack on one is an attack on all,

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's a way of trying to prevent World War III.

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>You will know how complicated this has been in relation

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>to which nations pay, America ends up paying the most,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and of course what's happened right now in Ukraine. But

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>as you will have noticed, Airbus Elbow loves going to

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>an international meeting. He has been to the last two

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>NATO meetings. Why well, i'll let him say it.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, thank you so much, Secretary General. It is good

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 7>to be here at my second NATO summit.

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But he's not going to this year's NATO meeting. Why

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>because we might be getting ready for an election. And

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely the airbus albow thing really hurts him. Hence the

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>weak and rattled. Remember the two new planes that are

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>coming and how they desperately tried to debunk that as

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>any sort of a thing to attack the Prime Minister

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>with yes ordered by the previous government, but not canceled

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>by this government. This bloke, of course loves overseas traveler.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It has been now baked into his personality about Airbus

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Albo and because he's afraid of the airbus elbow tag,

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he is not going to the third of these meetings.

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>But what I find is that we've got to get

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of each way elbow here. He was justifying

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on the seven thirty report tonight why he is not

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>going to attend the meeting that he has already attended

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>last year and the year before that that in part

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>led to the each way Sorry to the airbus elbow tag.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>There's so many to remember.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 7>I'm not going because we're not members of NATO. Now,

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 7>what I find extraordinary is that Peter Dutton who moved

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 7>a motion in the Parliament last year saying that demanding

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 7>that I not go to APEC where Australia is a member,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 7>where we are a founding member of APEC and needed

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 7>to participate in that forum as opposed to NATO where

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 7>for a lot of the NATO summit as an observer country,

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 7>we're not there. We're not in the room with the

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 7>NATO members when that takes place.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going because we're not a member. And

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>even if you go, you're not really part of the

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>real thing, kind of on the side of it. So

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>why did you go last year? Why did you go

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the year before? You learned this lesson the first year,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>but you went back the second year. But because you

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>know airbus albow is going to be pinned on you,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you now say, oh, there's no real reason for us

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to go. We're not really members. Hence why we say

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>each way albo ridiculous. Right now, a couple of things

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>out of the States, huge massive news out of the

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, which you may well have heard now the

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy and I'll get to that in a second. But

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially they have said that anything that a president does

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>while they're the president that is called an official act,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be held legally responsible for after you leave

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the presidency. Now, for the left ease, they view this

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>exclusively through the world of Donald Trump, because of course

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there is the charges there are the cases, and he's

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the one who argued it. But think about this as

0:28:55.320 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>a principle. Joe Biden was part of a drone strike

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that killed civilians. Oops, sorry, mistake. Because he's the president.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Because it's an official act, there is no consequences once

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he leaves office. George W. Bush, he said there were

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>weapons of mass destruction. They're clearly weren't, and how many

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>people died, including his own soldiers. No consequences because once

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you leave office. That's it. Now, that is what is

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>at heart of being debated in and around the January

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>sixth stuff. Now we will learn collectively together because a

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>court is now going to have to work out everything

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that the prosecution will allege is the proof of Trump

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the wrong thing, Whether those things are official acts

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>just like dropping bombs, just like picking up the phone

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and trying to negotiate a piece of legislation, Whether those

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>things are presidential acts. If so, nothing to see here,

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.959
<v Speaker 1>or their personal acts. The debate will of course be, well,

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if you are the president, then you are the president

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven, so all of it is an

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>official act. I would suggest eating dinner and watching Telly.

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, but you get my point. But of course

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this is Trump soque some of the reaction from the

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>lefties who now believe that this will result in the

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>enemies of Donald Trump being lined up and taken out.

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 10>This is a clarion call to every American. By the way,

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 10>that debate is like thirty four felony counsel and.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 11>It does not matter anymore.

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 10>All that matters is that you do not allow the

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 10>person back into office who will use this power that

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 10>he has been given by this court, this Imperial Court,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 10>to implement that agenda they wrote down and published because

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 10>they know that no one will stop them except voters.

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh god again, I'm not a lawyer, don't play one

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on television. But this common sense here in the same way,

0:30:57.960 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and remember this is nonsense about oh now he's got

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the PA. If he wants to order Seal Team six

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to kill his enemies, then he'll be able to not

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>face criminal prosecution. Well again, in the same way that

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the use of the military to make mistakes to kill

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>civilians or send us off to wars that we all

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>know we shouldn't have been part of. There's no consequences

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>except one massive consequence, which is under the American system,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you can be impeached and removed from office. So God forbid,

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst did happen where a president, any president, Trump

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>as president did something like oil seeds, seem to seek

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to kill his political opponent. Even a Republican House and

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Senate would vote to get rid of him and bar

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>him from office. Ever, again, it had happened almost as

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>fast as whatever the reason for it was. And certainly

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's a divided government where it's a Democrat president,

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a Republican House and Senate, or the other way around,

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they do it like that, which brings me to old

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>mate Joe Biden. So you often hear about opinion polls,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and these opinion polls again, I want to try to

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>explain they sort of break down in different ways. A

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people will turn around and say, well, the

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>national numbers between Trump and Biden, which assumes there's only

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>two people running for president and there's one national election, Well,

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the most recent of those all show that Trump is

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>up anywhere from one to four points, so all of

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it leaning in his favor. But as we've told you

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a thousand times before, it's not just two people running

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for president, it's five people who are on the ballot

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>nationally so it's Trump, Biden, it's Kennedy, it's Cornell West,

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of them. Well, these numbers grow where

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes from tie all the way to ten percent.

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And then again, it's not really about the national numbers,

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's about the swing states. And the latest numbers from

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>those swing states show that Wisconsin a tie, Michigan low margin,

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but then Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, at North Carolina, and Georgia

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>all of them starting to run away. So Trump is

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in front. He's in front on the measure that he

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was never in front of in twenty twenty when it

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>came to the two way race, and never in front

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty when it came to the swing states,

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>which again brings us to old mate Joe and Joe

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>ain't going to go, And despite the fact that Joe

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>should go, Joe's family, because it's kind of the family business,

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>are desperately going to try to hold him up no

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>matter how bad that performance was. So, as we told

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you last night, one of the reasons why the family

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>apparently think it all went wrong was because and I

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>quote that CNN and their makeup staff had made him

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>appear too pale, and this was three different people who

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>said that the family believes the reason he had a

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>terrible debate flubb was the word. By the way I

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>was looking for just in case was because apparently, according

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to the footage, he was not sick and old, not

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>dottery and losing it. He just had got the makeup

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>that made him look too pale. Do we have that

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>footage well for us if we can, where he apparently

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>was again looking to pale during the debate. Well, I

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>noticed something today in Biden's response to the court case

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in around presidential power. See if you notice a slight

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>difference and perhaps a new makeup artist for the President

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, because he was kind of orange today.

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you not notice he went from white to orange?

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Is he trying to trick the voters of America that

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he's Donald Trump, that it's not a battle of two

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of older guys. It's a battle of two orange guys,

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and you should vote for that orange guy, not this

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>orange guy. As for the actual serious news today in

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and around the Biden camp, the way they're going to

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>try to stay in office is they're going to move

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>up the meeting to maybe the middle of this month

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to actually formally lock him in as the Democratic nominee.

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So the family ain't going anywhere. The machine is going

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to be working out to lock him in, and apparently

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if he keeps adding orange makeup, you somehow will like

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy. Good luck, mister Biden. Quick break, lots to

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about, lots of debate. We'll get him to eight

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>moment or two here on Pal Murray Life. Thanks for watching,

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching. Joining us right now

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are two of our favorites. So I'm the wonderful James

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Ashby running for One Nation in the set of Keppel

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>at the upcoming Queensland election. Back him in as hard

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.399
<v Speaker 1>as you possibly can. And the wonderful Linda Scott, who's

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in Canbra Because four hundred and twenty eight thousand mayors

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>are currently in Canberra for the Local government conference. What

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>was first on the list international affairs, the Trump presidency

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or rates roads? And what did we get to, Linda?

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Because a lot of people are named.

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 4>Clime change, Paul Mury, but look we do have. We

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 4>got twelve hundred men's and councils here in Camber this week.

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 4>It's huge, and most of them are here to talk

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 4>about their own financial sustainability.

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 12>We've seen the cost and.

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Outlays of local government's flat line, while the expenditure of

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 4>state and federal governments has gone up.

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 12>Across the board. We're doing much more with less.

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 4>We're very efficient, but we are not financially sustainable. We

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 4>do need a bit more funding from the commwealth.

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the poll. Fifty four percent

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of people saying Australia is heading in the wrong direction

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister disapproval. We can get into that, James, I'm

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>deliberately going to make this an open question, but why

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think fifty four percent of Australians now think

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we're headed in the wrong direction? A major change even

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in the past eighteen months.

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, the simple fact is that people are seeing less

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:52.280
<v Speaker 5>bang for buck.

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 11>They appear to be doing it tougher.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 5>There's less money in their accounts at the end of

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 5>the week, there's no savings, there's no money left over.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.439
<v Speaker 11>The kids are offering, the mums and dads.

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 5>Are certainly cutting back on a raft of different measures.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 5>And if you actually click on the female contingent of

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 5>those surveyed, they have a higher dislike what's going on

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 5>in society right now. So it's the women. The bloke's

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 5>probably a little less likely to feel the pinch because

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 5>they're probably not handling the pay packets if there are.

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Anything like my mum, she used to take dad's paypacket

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the week and she managed it,

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 5>so she knew the full effects of.

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 11>What was happening to the household budget. So that's why.

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 5>People don't have much confidence in the economy and certainly

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 5>in this labor government.

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Lud, why do you think fifty four percent of the

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>country thinks we're headed in the wrong direction?

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, it's a significant figure, but the reality is, of

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:48.879
<v Speaker 4>course people have not yet seen most of the omnisi's

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 4>cost of living measures which kick in, of course this week.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Every Australian who's working gets a pay gets a tax cut,

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 4>increased superannuation in increased paper and to leave. There's so

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 4>many different cost of living measures that kick in with

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 4>a new financial year, which of course has only begun

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 4>this year. I do want to say that it also

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 4>of course matters which pole you look at.

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 12>Of course, a recent.

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 4>Poles from the Center of Australians Watch Out, seventy three

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 4>percent of Australians think moving towards renewables is the right direction.

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 4>So a huge majority of Australians when you poll across

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 4>the board don't think that moving towards twelve nuclear power plants.

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 12>Is the right direction.

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 4>You've got to look at all these poles across time

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 4>and across the issues.

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's about I think too across the floor.

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 11>Lender.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but she's not going to I think that. I

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>truly think that it's the inflation fear. Right. When the

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation number came out last week, that the verbal bomb

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>of that right, and it goes into it and it's

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those things. There are these moments when James,

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know this right, which is as does Linda. But

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>there are these moments where there's a certain type of

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>news that we'll get all fired up about, the zeven

0:38:58.200 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>type of news at the six pm news or fire back,

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>certain type of news and papers will be into. And

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>then there's the type of news that makes it to

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>FM radio right or TikTok or social media. And the

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation figure last week made it to that level. It

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>went far wide and loud because it helps inform the

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>potential of the rate rise. Again, it's not me making

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it up. It's not me cheering it on. It's the

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Reserve Bank saying that they didn't even talk about cutting.

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Instead they were right on the verge of lifting. The

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>information going back up pushes them back in that direction.

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think if there is an interest rate rise, and

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously I hope not, I don't want to pay any

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.879
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone else does. But if it does, that's

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the one that the government's going to have to own,

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to own it hard. And I think

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the politics, as it did positively and negatively for Howard,

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>as it did positively and negatively for Rudd, it's going

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to turn on elbow. And this meeting in August is

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the stakes couldn't be higher, James, the politics behind it massive.

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, you've only got to talk to businesses like I

0:39:57.719 --> 0:39:59.760
<v Speaker 5>have this week. I've spoken to a couple of restaurants

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 5>change their menu list to actually make cheaper menu items.

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 11>You may not get as much on your.

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:07.439
<v Speaker 5>Plate, but at the end of the day, they're making

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 5>it more affordable for people to go and eat out.

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 5>And if you go and talk to the blake behind

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:13.919
<v Speaker 5>the counter of the butcher, he's telling you red meat

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 5>cells are way down because people cannot afford the red

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 5>meat at the moment because costs of livings just through

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 5>the roof. More sausages, more chicken, more cheaper cuts. That's

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 5>what people are going for to be able to sustain

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 5>the family. It's hard now. Cole's used to run that

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 5>ad feeder family for ten bucks. Good luck, you can't

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 5>do it these days. And that's the pinch that people

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 5>are feeling. So no matter which way you carve this up,

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 5>it can be interest rates, can be inflation. Whichever way

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 5>people are feeling the pinch, they just know at the

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 5>end of the week they don't have as much to

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 5>play with in their bank balances.

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Linda, let's talk about the Greens, because you know, my

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>world view is that I think they're the most dangerous

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>thing on the ballot. But I'm also aware that they

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have a stubborn number of supporters. It sits somewhere around ten,

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it goes up to twelve in a poll that goes

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>up to fourteen. But there is a significant number of

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>people who keep wanting to park their vote with the Greens. Right,

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you're a progressive member of the Labor Party, so you

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>prefer them to vote for you than vote for the Greens.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But how does nothing ever happen to their support when

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.839
<v Speaker 1>their senators come out like Jordan Steel John did and

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>basically back in the use of graffiti on a war

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>memorial to make a point about a war on the

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.399
<v Speaker 1>other side of the world, Like, how is there no

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 1>line that ever seems to hurt them? Why do you

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>think the criticism of them is seemingly so impenetrable. I'm

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not talking about mine, I'm just talking about the general

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Australian public that there are people who go, you know what,

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to keep backing in these people who say

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and do stupid things all the time.

0:41:57.560 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 12>Well, look, it is not new news, is it.

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 4>That the Green have taken some pretty nutty public policy positions,

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 4>And I do agree with you that this is one

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.919
<v Speaker 4>of them. Obviously, As you know, I tried to get

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 4>my own counsel the City of Sydney to remove hate

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 4>speech graffiti in an hour. Unfortunately Clover Wore voted that down.

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 4>But you know, we do believe in removing graffiti. But

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 4>I've had Greens on my own council say that we

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 4>should just let graffiti run wild wherever it is, that

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 4>it's just such a great feature of our cities, something

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 4>that I certainly don't agree with.

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 12>So look, I mean, I think.

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 4>It is true though, and your right to identify that

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 4>there are a group of rusted on Greens voters and

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 4>that is something that's emerged in our lifetimes. They're pretty

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 4>stuck on the Greens. They're not going to shift their vote.

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 4>For many young Australians, it is also the case that

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 4>they've been Green's voters for much of their voting life,

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 4>for all of their voting life. And as we see

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 4>that generational slide change through Australia, as we start to

0:42:55.960 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 4>see younger voters becoming middle aged voters, what will happen.

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 12>I think it's a really interesting question.

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 4>The big problem, though, I want to counter to that, though, Paul,

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:08.760
<v Speaker 4>is the Liberals. The Liberals are not able to pick

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:11.760
<v Speaker 4>up these young voters. And so what we are seeing

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.919
<v Speaker 4>is as young voters start to vote progressive, unlike other

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 4>demographics in the past, they're sticking with their progressive vote,

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 4>be that Labor or Greens. And that is a real

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 4>demographic problem for the conservative side of politics that they

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 4>have not yet confronted.

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 7>The rule.

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you know, James, obviously the raw numbers.

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>If you put say the Liberal Party of the UAP

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>one nation all kind of in the same world, that

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>number is bigger than the left number in Australia. It's

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the preference discipline in part in and around the Greens

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>that gets us there. I've got to go to a

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>break in a second, but just a quick response to

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this here James, about why they are seemingly so impenetrable,

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because even you know the stories and criticism of them,

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and this senator today about the graffiti that was on

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the ABC, but it just bounces off like I now right.

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, But the problem is, Linda, you say vote for

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:08.800
<v Speaker 5>Labor first, but the problem is you're saying vote Greens second.

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 11>That's Labour's mantra.

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:14.800
<v Speaker 5>If you know you do preference arrangements with the Greens

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 5>and you let them off lightly, you let them get

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 5>away with everything.

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 11>And that is the problem that we face today.

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 5>The other big thing I'll recognize is the Greens play

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 5>a very good game when it comes to door knocking.

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 5>If you have a look at seats around Brisbane, they're

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 5>knocking on doors left, right and center.

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 11>And I've seen young kids answer the doors.

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 5>Friends of mine who've got eighteen year olds just about

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 5>the vote and the eight ends year old say.

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:40.879
<v Speaker 11>I'm going to vote for them. They seem really nice

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 11>people when they come to the door. Well it helps

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 11>when a really good door knocking game.

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it also helps win. You know, let's get the

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen year old vote and let's legalize pot. I mean

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all of that as part of the issue too. Thank

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>you mate, appreciate it right quick breakback when more less

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it, including amazing number came out today

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about how many people are relying upon inheritance when it

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>comes to the financial future, and in my view a

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>strange number about how many would prefer it before someone dies.

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that about about a third of Australians

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>doing financial calculations that the inheritance they will receive from

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>their parents, from their grandparents is part of their financial

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>plan and about forty percent of people would prefer the

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>inheritance to come as a gift before they passed on,

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to when they didn't need the money anymore

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 1>post life. Let's talk about it with Linda Scott from

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Party and none other than James Ashbeet from

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>One Nation. James, again to you on this right. It

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make It doesn't surprise me at all that that

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>many people it's part of their plan. That's fine, But

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I am a little bit wobbly on forty percent of

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>people saying, hey, can you give it to me before?

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 11>It might be good for your kids you've got that

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 11>bloody mansion in Sydney, but for.

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>My mega, mega, incredible, my mum and dad.

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 5>I've said that my folks spend it, enjoy life. I

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:10.399
<v Speaker 5>don't expect that anything out so with you. They've worked

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 5>hard for everything they've got. I just want to see

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.439
<v Speaker 5>them enjoy life. For what they've got left. They've probably

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 5>got another good twenty twenty five years left in them.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 11>I hope they spend a whole lot of it, leave

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 11>us nothing.

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm completely the same, right like I want you

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to spend it on your care, take care. Look look again,

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I understand the memories. Yeah, I mean I get it, Linda.

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Where you know, if there are people who understand it,

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what the financial impact. I get all of that, right,

0:46:34.200 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So please don't write me letters. But the idea that

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>forty percent of people would like it up front, I

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know that very It's a bit squaremy for me,

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that.

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, look, I think it is important that across the

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 4>world intergenerational wealthy inequality is growing and governments should have

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 4>a think about how best to address that.

0:46:54.600 --> 0:46:56.680
<v Speaker 12>Or you know this, but I should be you.

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Are retiring to the policies death taxes.

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 12>No, that's not what I'm proposing. I should disclose.

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 4>Of course, as you know, I'm the chair of an

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 4>industry superannuation fund. People should go and talk to their

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 4>superannuation funds about this issue and to see whether they

0:47:12.040 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 4>both have enough, but also how to spend it, how

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:17.319
<v Speaker 4>to make sure that as James has rightly pointed out,

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 4>people are spending in their retirement on all those beautiful

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 4>things if you want to, because of the magic of

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 4>compound interest, like having holidays and spending time with their families.

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 4>So people should go and get some advice, talk to

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 4>your superannuation fund and make a good financial plan. But

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 4>so often when you talk to people about this, they're

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 4>just anxious and they hold on to money and don't

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 4>spend it on doing lovely things in retirement, when in

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 4>fact they're really financially secure and they're able to do that.

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 12>So I think getting advice is a good way forward.

0:47:52.160 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, as I used to say, who's that person on television?

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>It didn't matter what it was. There was to say

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>shop around. Shop around was constantly at six p shop around.

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Now that's the easiest job in news that person. Thank you, guys,

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate it.

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 8>Love you.

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll see all again very soon. Now. If you would

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch at anytime, you know what

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to do. Paul at sky News dot com. Do au

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is the way you can get in touch via email

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:12.719
<v Speaker 1>if you've got story ideas, all the rest of it.

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Things we'd like to do on the show. Well, maybe

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you think the investigations team or anything else will try

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and push you in the right direction to help you

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>out wherever you happen to be. Well, see you again

0:48:21.080 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow night. Plenty to talk about on the show. The

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>American thing is fascinating. I love that Biden. You know,

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:30.879
<v Speaker 1>firstly the orange makeup. That's hilarious. But secondly, really watch

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in the next twenty four hours how the Biden machine

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to kind of try and brick itself in

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that no one can come at them

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to the extent now where they're now talking about the

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.960
<v Speaker 1>convention which is normally where they announce and vote and

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>make him the candidate. Do it on Zoom a couple

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of weeks early wait, watch and see unbelievable Here comes

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 1>to late debate. We'll see you again tomorrow night for

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 1>more Sky news Cot up