WEBVTT - Danica De Giorgio | 14 November

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Why on Skyn's Australia.

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 2>This is to Nika Degeorgio, Hello and welcome to the

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 2>show coming up tonight.

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 3>The Liberals ditch net zero.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Now the hard work begins for Susan Lee taking.

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Up the fight to labor on power prices. A ridiculous

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 3>report calls for softer.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Bail laws, more proof labor is completely disconnected from community expectations.

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Plus the BBC caught out again with a second show

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>doctoring Donald Trump's January sixth address. But first tonight, day

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the Liberal Party's hard sell on energy has begun.

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Opposition leader Susan Lee was up early on the front

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>foot on Breakfast TV, explaining why the party had to

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>dump net zero twenty fifty, a.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 4>Policy that delivers affordable energy and responsible emissions reduction. That

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 4>we have to be agnostic about what technologies we bring

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 4>to bear. We do very well at exporting that natural gas,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 4>but we're not using it for Australians and we believe

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 4>in using those Australian resources for Australian families.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>First.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, the message from the Liberal Party is clear, but

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.559
<v Speaker 2>they have to convert this decision into results and bring

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>voters with them. And given this as a party that

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>has not known for some time what it actually stands for.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 2>It's basically starting from the bottom again. Already the left

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>have begun the climate hysteria, meltdowns and lies and this

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>is what Susan Lee is going to face day in

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 2>day out from the Greens, the Teals, labor and left

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 2>wing parts of the media. They will demonize this as

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>climate zealotry, and.

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Of course we know it's just not the case.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 2>The starting gun on energy policy has been fired and

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 2>we are finally getting the debate we so desperately need,

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>allowing voters you at home, a chance to have the

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>say on how we keep the lights on in this country.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Do we continue down a tricky pathway into the never

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>never via Labour's experiment of renewables only, or do we

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>add cheap reliable energy into the mix through coal, nuclear

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and gas to keep the lights on. You now get

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to decide. And that is why the hard cell matters

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>now more than ever before, because this is the sort

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 2>of nonsense already being peddled. Haven't listened to the Prime

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Minister this morning?

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 5>We're seen a capitulation by the Liberal Party to the

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 5>policy that was announced effectively by the National Party. Susan

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Lee has said that she would be a moderate and

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 5>that she'd modernize the Liberal Party's agenda after their twenty

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 5>twenty five result. Instead, she's chosen to take Australia backwards.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 5>They're walking away from climate action. They fundamentally dismissive of

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 5>the science of climate change.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 2>Look, the Prime Minister is running scared for the first time.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>His energy policies are back on the agenda. His science

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>simply does not stack up. Australia is too small of

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 2>a player to have any climate impact.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 3>So in essence, the.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Coalition has forced his hand on this because he's going

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>to have to confront his own policies, which have seen

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 2>our bills go up by forty percent. Then there was

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 2>former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, still suffering from an acute

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>case of relevance deprivation syndrome.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, with the Liberal Party room that think they've

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 6>got the memory of goldfish in the dining habits of Piranhas.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>They're just they forgot.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 6>They seem to just keep on forgetting and making the

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 6>same mistake.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Again and again.

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 6>But do not just sound like an echo for Alberanezi.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 6>But what he said to you about the energy economics

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 6>is absolutely right and anyone in the industry knows that.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, guess what, Malcolm, You are sounding like an echo

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 2>chamber for the Labor Party.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>And here was Till and p o Legrispender on Sky News.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 7>What this does is it injects more uncertainty into investments

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 7>that people are making, not for the next three years.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But for decades at the same.

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 7>Time, without providing a clear plan on actually how the

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 7>coalition is planning to reduce to reduce prices and or

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 7>emissions if they care or not care.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Look, this is just wrong. How can she say this?

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 2>The Financial Review held its Energy and Climate summit last month,

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 2>and let me show you how the paper summed up

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the event. It said, quote Chris Bowen tells us the

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>economics for investing in renewables remain utterly convincing.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 3>But new wind and solar farms have stalled.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>And we've heard about little other than challengers for the

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 2>past two days. Why because industry needs certainty. But this

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>highlights the key issue now for the liberals. Net zero

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 2>is gone. Great, but is Susan Lee the leader who

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 2>can defend all these attacks from the left and turn

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>it around into an attack on labor and its horrendous

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 2>energy policies. She says she.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Can does this secure your leader?

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Susan Absolutely, and I'm determined to fight every day for Australians.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, look, I think she's going to need a lot

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 2>of help to sell this. There is no blueprint for

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>the Liberal Party to follow on selling energy. In the

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>dying days of this year's election, the word nuclear wasn't

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 2>even mentioned. It was as if the policy which they

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>took to the election never even existed, even though it

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 2>was their boldest policy announcement in years.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Everyone has to play a part.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, why not bring Andrew Hasty and just sent a

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>nampajimper Price back to the front bench. Who better to

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>help sell dumping net zero than two politicians who have

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 2>been arguing against it from the start. Senator Price knows

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>how to successfully run a campaign. She proved that during

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the Voice, the formula then worked. Now, of course this

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 2>is not the voice. This is very different and this

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>is a very divided Liberal Party, with some moderates even

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>today claiming they don't know if they can even sell

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the policy. But why not bring Senator Price and Andrew

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Hasty back and give yourself every chance possible of getting

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 2>this right. It makes no sense to me to waste

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 2>good talent at such a crucial time. Now, whether or

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>not both would want to, whether they actually support Susan

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Lee as leader is a different story. But this is

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:29.239
<v Speaker 2>what the cell comes down to. When under Labour's plans,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 2>where we see household power wills actually come down.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, what's very clear is that the upward pressure on

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 8>electricity prices doesn't come from the new renewable, reliable, cleaner

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 8>and cheaper energy.

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Can you actually provide a time from though?

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 8>Now I'll leave the energy forecasting to others. We've made

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 8>it very clear that we will give Australia the best

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 8>chance of getting those electricity prices over time.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, look, the Coalition must prosecute that day in, day out.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Our economy relies on energy, Our livelihoods rely on energy,

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Our defense industry relies on energy. Now is the time

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 2>to expose this nonsense being peddled by the Left because

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>we are still waiting for our bills to come down.

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, Labour doesn't do.

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Energy policy, or migration policy, or economic policy, and the

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 2>list goes on, and now it can add law and

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 2>order to that list as it may seek to push

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>what can only be described as an offender, first, victim

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>last approach. According to the Australian Are report, authored by

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 2>officials from every Commonwealth, state and territory government, is urging

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 2>all jurisdictions to loosen their bail laws.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Attorney General Michelle Roland.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Is pushing to release this report, which recommends all governments

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>insure bail laws explicitly provide that imprisonment be a last resort. Really,

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean this to me provides the perfect blueprint, doesn't

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>it for any left wing guns across the country to

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 2>adopt under the guise of recommendations to keep the hard

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>left of the party happy, the inner city hippies happy,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 2>and to stop votes.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Bleeding to the Greens. But here is the real kicker, and.

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the real reason for this report and it's

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>all based on race based politics. The SAG Spail and

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>romand Reform Working Groups report aims to reduce the gap

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>in incarceration rates between Indigenous and non Indigenous Australians under

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the Closing the Gap Agreement.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>It calls for a requirement.

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 2>That quote courts consider a person's status as an Aboriginal

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>or Torres Strait islander before making a bail decision, so

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 2>provisions for one group based on the color of their

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 2>skin versus everyone else.

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's just deal with facts here.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Indigenous Australians have a disproportionate incarcination rate, maybe because they

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>commit a disproportionate amount of crime.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Aboriginal and torrestrate Islander prisoners account.

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>For thirty seven percent of all persons in custody, despite

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>comprising just under four percent of the population.

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, this report.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Suggests to me the comparatively high rates of Indigenous incarceration

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>are driving this left wing agenda to loosen bail laws.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So it's you at home, good law.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Abiding citizens that could be exposed to criminal activity and

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 2>out of control youths simply to reduce the gap in

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 2>incarceration rates between Indigenous and non Indigenous Australians. Now, don't

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>get me wrong, we need to work towards closing the gap,

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>but that should not come at the expense of basic safety.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Why should everyone have to suffer for it.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Bail is a privilege, not a right, and quite frankly,

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if you're black, White, or Aboriginal. You

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>commit a crime, you deserve to be punished, You deserve

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to learn your lesson. This is a youth crime crisis

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing play out already across the country. So

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 2>what example would be set if these kids knew that

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>they can and we'll get away with anything, and let's

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>not kid ourselves.

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>It's already happening.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Look at Victoria just into Allen's toughest bail laws in

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>the country have been reminiscent of a marshmallow, and tough

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>bail laws may as well be rendered useless. They only

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 2>work if the justice system obliges. According to the agenda

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for a meeting of Attorneys General in Brisbane today, Michelle

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Roland wants her state and territory counterparts to publish this

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 2>report with a caveat.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Allowing them to not endorse it.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 2>But several states reportedly want it buried, and if it's

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 2>made public, are expected to distance themselves from it. Queensland's

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Attorney generals certainly made that known this morning.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 9>Queensland will not be forced into backing down on our

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 9>tough laws by the federal government.

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>No way.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 9>If the Albanezy government think that they can push Queensland

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 9>into ordering down our laws, absolutely not.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 2>And in a shock to no one, Victoria won't oppose

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 2>the release of the report, but.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Is unlikely to support all of.

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 2>The recommendations, though it's unclear whether that state will agree

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 2>to re establish the working group to undertake further work

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 2>as is recommended. Now look Premier just Into Allen certainly

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't need any more encouragement for her weight and see

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 2>youth crime approach. But this report is more proof that

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>labor is totally and utterly disconnected from community expectations. Nobody

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 2>voted for race based politics. In fact, sixty percent of

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 2>us said no to it. Well, the BBC over in

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the UK has done it again with its dodgy and

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 2>deliberate editing of Donald Trump's January sixth speech. It's now

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 2>been revealed a second show also doctor footage of the

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Capitol Hill speech and even ignored concerns that were raised

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:51.359
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Its Newsnight program.

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Spliced footage of the speech, which aired in twenty twenty two,

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>making it appear as though the President was encouraging his

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 2>orders to riot.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at this.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 2>We're going to.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 10>Cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 10>we fight.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We fight like hell. We're going to.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 10>Cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 11>We're probably not going to be cheering so much for

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 11>some of them.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Two totally different clips, insinuating two very different meanings. In fact,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 2>the second part of that clip on BBC Newsnight was

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 2>delivered over fifty minutes after the first part. So, as

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I said, it's done it again, and you will call

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 2>this tricky edit on its Panorama program that this week

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 2>forced two of its executives to resign.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 11>We're going to walk down to the Capitol and I'll

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 11>be there with.

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You, and we fight. We fight like hell.

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 11>We're going to walk down to the Capitol and we're

0:12:59.400 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 11>going to cheer.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 2>You're on our.

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 10>Brave senators and congressmen and women.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, the BBC has today apologized. It's chair Samir Shah,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 2>sent a personal letter to the White House, but claims

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>there is no basis for a defamation suit.

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Have they watched the footage?

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>The President has threatened to sue the pants off them,

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 2>and why wouldn't he because there's a clear pattern here. Now,

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>this is happening on the other side of the world,

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>but back home, the ABC is not immune. The public

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 2>broadcaster is just as institutionally biased, entrenched in ideology that

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 2>only serves for people who seem to think that the

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>majority of us are either stupid or racist. And my

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 2>colleague Chris Kenny revealed this week that Four Corners did

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. It's managing director, Hugh Mark said, comparing

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the BBC's Panorama to the ABC's Four Corners program is

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>opportunistic and false, claiming it to.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Be powerful journalism of the highest standard.

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when was the last time you saw the

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 2>public broadcaster here in Australia make a mistake that unfairly

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 2>boosted a conservative politician. It just doesn't happen, and the

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 2>ABC should be worried about what Trump might do. And

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 2>after the BBC's second indiscretion, a spokesperson for President Trump's

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 2>legal team said, quote, the BBC defamed President Trump by

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 2>intentionally and deceitfully editing its documentary in order to try

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and interfere in the presidential election. President Trump will continue

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to hold accountable those who traffic in lies, deception and

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 2>fake news. And it's not like Trump doesn't already have

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>his eye on the ABC.

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 12>Bet he appropriate President Trump that a president in offers

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 12>should be engaged in so.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Much business activity.

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'm really not.

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 10>My kids are running the business and you know what

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 10>the activity.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 11>Where are you from, I'm from the Australian Broadcasting Operation

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 11>and Paul.

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 10>Corn and provoking the Australias you're hurting Australia rate.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 11>In my opinion, you are hurting Australia very much right now.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Now, with two dodgy edits on the BBC, I

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 2>think we can safely say Donald Trump is watching. Let's

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 2>go straight to liberal MP Garth Hamilton. Now, Garth, good

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>to see you, Thanks so much for joining me.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Obviously net zero huge week.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Was this just a compromise to keep everyone in the

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 2>party happy because you're dumping net zero twenty fifty but

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you're staying in the Paris Agreement?

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 3>How does that make sense?

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 12>Well, Denika, I'm happy to report I didn't make much

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 12>for a compromise. I've got everything I wanted, which was

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 12>a full and complete dumping of net zero and that

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 12>was the target for me. Look, the thing with Paris

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 12>it doesn't have any implication on domestic policies. Whilst it

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 12>might not be my favorite thing in the world, it

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 12>can't control what's happening within Australia, so I don't.

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Share those concerns.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 12>We held the Paris Agreement for five years before we

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 12>signed up to net zero, we would just fine then.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 12>I'm sure we'll be just fine.

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 2>On the other side too, Are the Moderate's going to

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>be a hindrance to this policy moving forward?

0:15:59.800 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 13>Me?

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Some have even claimed today that they don't know whether

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>they can sell this compromised policy.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 12>Come sure, they'll find a way, and I'm sure we'll

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 12>join together as a team. Now we've got through this

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 12>very difficult conversation and found the right answer. On the

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 12>other side, I would point out to the moderates, for

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 12>four years I was in that compromised position. I was

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 12>against net zero whilst the party's position was for it,

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 12>and I managed to prosecute that and hold my convictions.

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 12>And I'd say to anyone who wants to continue their

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 12>convictions of being pro net zero, there's a great place

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 12>for that, and that's on the back bench where you

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 12>get to express your views.

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Look, I think that's an absolutely fair point. If you're

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>not happy, go to the back bench. Absolutely perfect.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Look, let's talk about the sell. How are you going

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 3>to sell this energy policy? Now?

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>How do you, in particular win over the inner city

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>till seats and younger voters gen Z and millennials.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 3>How do you go about this?

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 12>Look, I don't think this is something that we should

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 12>shy away from it all and want to point out

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 12>we haven't tried it before, we haven't actually prosecuted this

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 12>case before. I think we can do it very easily

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 12>just by simply talking to the economics, which is Labour's

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 12>soft point. I mean, we've got a government that's been

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 12>telling us for ages that the more renewable energy will

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 12>lower our energy bills and it hasn't been. And the

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 12>proof is in front of every single Australian every time

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 12>they get their electricity bill. We know that they're wrong

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 12>on this issue. We simply need to prosecute it. And

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 12>the best part is other people have been trying to

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 12>prosecute this with us. We saw that report from Princeton University, Queensland,

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 12>University of Melbourne that showed the figure was around nine

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 12>to seven trillion dollars to get to our targets.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 14>You break that down.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 12>On a monthly basis, it's twenty billion dollars a month.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 12>You know how you sell that in till seats, that's hospitals,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 12>that's schools, that's road upgrades, that's police stations, all the

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 12>things that we need and we should be building to

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 12>make Australia great, the things, quite frankly, that we've been

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 12>leaving behind and should now become our priorities.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Look, I agree to you very great.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's about going into those till seats and

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 2>explaining that decision and pushing it forward over the next

0:17:58.400 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 2>few years between now and an election.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Is Susan Lee the leader who can.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 2>Defend the attacks from the left, turn this around and

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>get it back on track.

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 12>Look, I very much hope she is, and she has

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 12>my support. But I think the bigger thing is that

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 12>we need a full team and our best team on

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 12>the court prosecuting this case. This is something that's going

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 12>to take everyone in every seat going forward and arguing

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 12>that there is an economic consideration with net zero that

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 12>we must take into consideration and pushing that case. That's

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 12>going to be every single MP and eventually every single

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 12>candidate that we put into the field being willing to

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 12>fullheartedly say, look, there is a better way. There is

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 12>a better way, and it's by considering the cost to

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 12>Australians to making sure that we're still competitive, to making

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 12>sure that we can still have industry stay in Australia.

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 12>These are things we need to prosecute. I believe we can.

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 2>So what's the vision we're just playing on our screen

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>now of a bunch of Conservatives. You're at the back,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you were standing there, could see you very clearly there, Gar.

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 3>What was with that vision? Then? What message were you

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>trying to send? Was there a message to Susan Lee.

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 12>I think everyone's tried to take something more out of

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 12>it than what it was. It was just a group

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 12>of like minded people getting together beforehand and enjoying the

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 12>opportunity to go and express their views on net zero,

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 12>which is something that was denied us back in twenty

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 12>twenty one when the previous Morrison government brought forward our

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 12>position on net zero without a debate. So I think

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 12>there's just a lot of people who were very excited

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 12>about finally being able to make a contribution in the

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 12>party room on a debate on net zero, and we

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 12>enjoyed each other's company.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>That's about it, right.

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>So this was not an image for Susan Lee of

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 2>lookout the Conservatives are.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 12>In goodness me No, No, this was a group of

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 12>like minded people, Birds of a feather flocking together.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 3>I like that analogy.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>And so you backed Susan Lee in Now she's a

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 2>leader that's going to take the party to the election.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 12>Well, look she has my support and we have to

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 12>get on with this job.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, I want to play some audio of Chris Bowen today.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 2>He was asked should Australians believe labor to bring down

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 2>power prices?

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 15>I think Australians had their say in May. You know,

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 15>mister Dutton, I wish him well, said he wanted to

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 15>referend him on climate and energy. We were okay with that.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 15>That happened in May. Australian people told us to get

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 15>on with the job. That's what we're doing. I don't

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 15>think the coalition got the memo from the Australian people

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 15>in May though.

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 14>Your response to that one, Garth, Look, this probably answers

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 14>your earlier question, how are we going to win over

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 14>those seats? Just roll out more, Chris Bowen, you want

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 14>to talk about that election in May. Labor put that

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 14>bloke into hiding. They hit him away.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 12>They didn't want him out there sprouting his nonsense for

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 12>people because labor not Labour.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>No, this is their week.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 12>Labour know that what he says doesn't resonate with the

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 12>experience of Australians out there. The higher energy prices that

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 12>we're all seeing. Chris Bowen can't deny that it's real,

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 12>it's happening. His vision of Australia of more and more

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 12>renewable is not one that Australians are now feeling very

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 12>comfortable with. So look, good luck Chris. I think he's

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 12>going to be very nervous as we start to prosecute

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 12>this case.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's put it back on the agenda.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't It's in front and center again and lab we're

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 2>going to have to front up to the fact that

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 2>our energy.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 3>Bills have gone to the other directions.

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So Chris Bowen can say whatever he likes, but it's

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>not doing any favors Garth Hamilton, nice to see you

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>as always, Thanks so much for joining me on the

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 2>show this evening, or joining me now is Zoe Hilton

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 2>as senior policy analyst for the Center for Independent Studies. Zoe,

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 2>thanks for joining me. I asked this question of Garth,

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 2>but I'm interested to get your perspective of this. What's

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the point of dropping net zero? But staying in the

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Paris Agreement.

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 16>So I think we should definitely take this as a

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 16>big win that net zero has actually been ditched by

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 16>both the NATS and the Liberals now. And I think

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 16>look massive credit to Matt Canaman in the NATS, just

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 16>Internatmaging Proprice, Andrew Hasty, and all the other politicians who

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 16>really showed conviction and stuck to what they believed was

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 16>best for the country even when it seemed like it

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 16>wasn't the best thing in a short term political sense.

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 16>They were willing to stick with their convictions, and I

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 16>think that that's really been thrown in this decision. That

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 16>being said, I think there still is this sort of

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 16>soft acceptance that, oh, we need to keep emissions reduction

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 16>targets on the table, which is why they're deciding to

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 16>stick with staying in Paris agreements. So that does raise

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 16>a few questions because if we still have targets, and

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 16>if we're required to ratchet them up continuously, which seems

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 16>to be the case, then what does that mean for

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 16>things like transmission planning? Because those targets, once they're legislated,

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 16>they go into the regulatory system and they result in

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 16>multi billion dollar projects being approved and that goes on

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 16>to consumer bills. So I think I'd be interested to

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 16>see what would end up happening once a coalition does

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 16>eventually get back into government. What do they do with

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 16>those targets and do they actually end up making them

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 16>lax enough that we don't have all of these projects

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 16>that we don't actually need economically in our system, which

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 16>would push up prices exactly.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 2>And I mean being part of Paris means actually having

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 2>these targets and working towards these targets. So that was

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 2>my confusion as well, what support of being half in

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>and half out? But I do I absolutely agree with you.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is a good start at least. Sousan

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Lee has been quite coy on how much power bills

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>will go down by, But when you compare the cost

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>of Labour's renewables only approach and actually getting to net zero,

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 2>our power bills will just keep going up and up,

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 2>won't they.

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 16>Yes, it's very clear, and we've done some research on this.

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 16>The renewables honeymoon is over as we've gotten more and

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 16>more renewables, just like all the other countries that have

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 16>gotten into relatively high penetration of wind and solar in

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 16>their systems, prices do continue to go up. There are

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 16>no so high wind and solar low cost countries, they

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 16>just don't exist. So what that means is as Labour's

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 16>policy continues to be enacted, and I mean we've heard

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 16>from Chris Bow and he's literally said this on the record,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 16>he wants to lock in this transition so no future

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 16>government can undo it. That means that if the Collosi

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 16>does get back into government, will they be able to

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 16>unravel all these transmission projects that are going to come

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 16>on to consumers' bills in the next several years and

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 16>cause even higher price bikes. Will they be able to

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 16>unravel capacity investment scheme contracts which I think are going

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 16>to be about twenty years for these wind and solar

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 16>developers that are being paid taxpayer dollars. All of these

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 16>things mean that these are long term commitments. So a

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 16>government coming in, they're not necessarily going to be able

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 16>to make prices come down in the short term straight away.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 16>But the sooner we turn this ship around the better.

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 16>So the sooner we refurbish our coal assets, we build

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 16>new coal units, we build new coal plants, and potentially

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 16>even if we can lift the nuclear band. We can

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 16>build nuclear stations. The sooner we can do that. The

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 16>sooner we get dispatchable capacity into the system and stop

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 16>building renewables, the faster our bills will be able to

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 16>come down.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's exactly what I think every Aussie is

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 2>waiting for. They've gone up around forty percent under labor

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>on the renewables only fantasy.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 3>And it will be great to open a.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Bill and actually goes in the downwards trajectory. Zoe Hilton,

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 2>We've got to leave it there. Thank you very much

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 2>for joining me this evening. Really appreciate it. Coming up

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>after the break, taxpayers hit with a massive bill to

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 2>fly the East Safety Commissioner to eleven countries.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:42.959
<v Speaker 3>Would you believe that? Are more with my panel?

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Next come back joining me now is new South Wales

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Independent MP Tanya Mahalic and form a new South Wales

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Police Minister David Elliott.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Here we go for another week back, doesn't it okay? Now?

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Look, let's start with the economy. The Commonwealth Bank is

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 2>tipping interest rates will be left on hold until.

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 3>The end of the year.

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 2>It comes as the unemployment rate dropped to four point

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>three percent. Look, this is interesting we're not good news

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>for mortgage holders. But what do you think, Tanny, this

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 2>says about the economy.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 17>What's interesting because Jim Chalmers was this morning sprooking the

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 17>Australian economy to some investors at the Sydney Opera House.

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 17>But you know, I don't know how honesty he is

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 17>with the outlook for the economy in Australia because at

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 17>the moment we've got some real issues around productivity. We

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 17>know that real business investment has been a lull on

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 17>stagnating for the last eighteen months.

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 3>We've come in and.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 17>Out of for the last two and a half years

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 17>of per capita GDP recessions, which has been a huge problem.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 17>And GDP growth is slow. It's one point eight percent

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 17>this year. It's email to be two point one percent.

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 17>But if you read some of these economists, not a

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 17>lot of them are convinced that they'll actually eventuate.

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 3>The only thing growing in.

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 17>Australia at the moment is the public service. It's a

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 17>ballooning bureaucracy and anything related to NDOS. That's the only

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 17>job going in Australia. But the private sector is suffering

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 17>and it's weakening our economy as a result, and that's

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 17>the real issue.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that NDIS is a complete behemoth. But you raise

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 2>a good point about productivity. Wasn't the labor talk fest

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 2>a couple of months ago, David, Wasn't that supposed to

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>solve all of the economic issues, including productivity.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 3>And look how swimmingly it's going.

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 18>And no child's going to live in poverty.

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 3>This is right?

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, this isla economics one O one. I mean four

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 18>point three percent is. I grew up when working families

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 18>were paying ten percent, so I don't panic when interest

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 18>rates are at a four and when you consider that

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 18>the unemployment figure is so low and therefore there is

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 18>there is healthy employment levels around the around Australia. If

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 18>that's the price we have to pay, is just a

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 18>little bit of an interest burden, interest rate burden, I'm

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 18>comfortable with that. But again, as we've all said, productivity

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 18>should be the name of the game, right and so

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 18>should and so should so should the red tape and

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 18>the green tape the business is facing, because I think

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 18>that's probably fifty percent of the productivity burden that they're carrying.

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, who.

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Would want to go into business right now into this

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 2>country with energy prices on red tape. You know, you've

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 2>got the unions with their finger in every pie, and

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 2>it's not a nightmare right now. Now, Look, the Victorian

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Premier just Into Allen has now officially signed a treaty

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 2>with Indigenous people into law, claiming it marks a new

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 2>chapter in the story of our state. Quote new chapter

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 2>for the sixty five thousand to identify as Aboriginal, not

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the overarching seven million residents of the state. Tanya. Look,

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>there was no debate. Nobody actually voted for this. In fact,

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the majority of Victorians said no to the voice. So

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 2>why is it there do you think?

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 17>Well, look, the Layer Party was always going to do this,

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 17>so I think there was no question of that. You know,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 17>they had a referendum. I don't think anyone believes that

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 17>they really cared what the outcome of the referend would

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 17>be and just sit to Allen has twelve months left

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 17>we hope of her term before an election, and as

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 17>always this is legacy building for Labor Party two.

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 3>They're going to rush and make sure that anything they've.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 17>Already announced, like the treaty, is well and truly in place.

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 17>That will make it almost impossible if a liberal government

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 17>is elected in Victoria to scale it back, and of

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 17>course they've got to reward all these activists right back

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 17>the Labor Party. And this is all about unelected activists

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 17>getting a job. And that's the only people that will.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Be rewarded as a result of this treaty. It's not the.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 17>Sixty five thousand Indigenous that live in Victoria that will

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 17>be supported. It's all the activists that were part of

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 17>the Voice campaign that all need a job.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, well, I mean, and that's a good point.

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 2>And I was having a look, David at some of

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>the immediate changes. So schools children between prep and year

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 2>ten will be indoctrinated into truth telling curriculum. There will

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be an Indigenous body which will oversee training programs for

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 2>public servants to ensure they are culturally capable. What on

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 2>earth does that mean?

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 18>This will not assist one child get a better education,

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 18>This will not assist one child to get to break

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 18>away from malnutrition or sexualist abuse. This will not make

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 18>the life of one Indigenous kid in Victoria better.

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 3>It is very, very.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 18>Dangerous and indeed silly for Jacintarellen to do this. What

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 18>part of no don't you understand? And I think that

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 18>this will rightly become an election issue. She doesn't have

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 18>the electoral mandate to do it. And I'd say that

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 18>what we're going to find at the next election is

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 18>that if the Liberal party in the coalition is smart,

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 18>they without wanting to make it a partisan political issue,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 18>they will highlight the fact that you can't trust these

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 18>people with policy because when you give them their opinion,

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 18>they ignore it exactly.

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 2>And as I said, nobody ever voted for this. There

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>was no public debate. It was thrust upon victorians. The

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 2>voice was thrust on all of us and sixty percent

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 2>said no rightly. So now, look, taxpayers have been slugged

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 2>more than four hundred and twenty five thousand dollars to

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 2>fly the e Safety Commissioner duly In Grant and her

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 2>staff to eleven countries in three years. Have a look

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 2>at this schedule. Just gone to the US, the UK, Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy, Singapore, Japan, Belgium,

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Ireland and the Netherlands for a whole heap of meetings.

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 2>It's quite the itinery Tanua for someone who's quite desperate

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>to censor the whole Internet.

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>We had a lot of self care. This hurts great

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Safety commissioner.

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 17>I thought the whole remit of the E Safety Commission

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 17>was that it's about safety online. Why not actually go

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 17>to these conferences by zooming in or on teams do

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 17>an online conference. It's unbelievable that in Tinary Swiss Alps

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 17>as well, and don't look.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I think people should be rightly.

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 17>Concerned about the level of expense coming out of this authority.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 17>And it is an independent authority unfortunately, so they can't

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 17>even be questioned in Parliament. It's unbelievable what they're about

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 17>to get away with and have got away with. And

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 17>David knows as politicians we get a little small story

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 17>if we've gone and spent five thousand dollars on a

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 17>trip up to Brisbane or something, you know.

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Let alone four hundred and twenty five dollars.

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 18>Well, I mean ten is right. I would have thought

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 18>that a commissioner in charge of technology use technology to

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 18>attend these events. I mean, if I can use zoom

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 18>meetings to have CEO hookups from around the country, surely

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 18>she can have zoom meetings to have these this correspondence

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 18>with them, with the Swiss and the Americans and the like.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 18>It's just bad juju. It's just it's a bad image

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 18>for the public sector, it's a bad image for her,

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 18>and it just highlights the fact that some of these

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 18>people in the camera bubble live in a completely different world.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 2>They live in a bubble. They live in a bubble. Now, David,

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about your Daily Telegraph column this week. Why

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 2>is Christmas drinks calls will save your inner elf? So

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 2>people would judge you based on your drink? Is that

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>what you're saying at Christmas party?

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 18>I think judging people at Christmas parties is a healthy

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 18>thing to do.

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 18>We get so hung up on how much they consume.

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 18>I think quality and quantity is somebody you drink, Well,

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 18>I have a cheeky champagne to start, and well I'm

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 18>probably a lady, all right, so I'm probably going I

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 18>can now.

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 17>I was really concerned that you said that Bankstown people

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 17>have VB.

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 18>And I normally start the day with VB. I's a

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 18>great breakfast drink. Don't be judgmental.

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't drink be but I did a survey.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Apparently it's lashes.

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Because you people have gone middle classes.

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Side left have.

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:33.719
<v Speaker 18>Become too middle class and star Left I'm going to

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 18>come back and start.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 2>You have to go back. Well, look, if you want

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to know what your drink says about you, do catch

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 2>up with David Elliott's colum in the Daily Telegraph. It

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 2>is quite a laugh and it's quite so. It's quite good.

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, I'll tell you everything you need

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to know about yourself.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 18>Self assessment, self assessment.

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 3>We all have a bit of self assessment.

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 2>David Elliott, Daniam Halem, Thank you as always to both

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 2>of you. Will see you again next week. Coming up

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>after the break, we'll head to the US as the

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 2>BBC apologizes to Donald Trump, but is it enough to

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 2>stop a lawsuit? Plus, I'll show you the sweet moment

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 2>at the White House as the President invites.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Kids into the Oval office. That's next come back.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Let's return now to that ridiculous bail law's proposal I

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 2>brought you earlier in the show. Are report authored by

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 2>officials from every Commonwealth, state and territory government is urging

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 2>all jurisdictions to loosen their bail laws. Joinning me now

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 2>is Shadow Attorney General Andrew Wallace. Andrew, thanks for your

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 2>time as always. What do you make of this report?

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 13>Well, I haven't a chance to read it. I don't

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 13>even know whether it's been released publicly yet or not.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 13>I know that the Attorney General has been calling for

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 13>it to be released. Look this morning, when the news

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 13>hit The Australian the news piece, I was just absolutely

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 13>flabbergasted as to how in goodness name could a commonwealth

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 13>get this so wrong the rest of the country, Australians

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 13>across this country are calling upon state and territory governments

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 13>to strengthen bail laws. We've seen what happened in Queensland

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 13>under the Labor government before David Cruse fully was elected.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 13>We're seeing live what's happening in Victoria now with the

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 13>weakening of bail laws and how that has.

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Driven crime through the roof.

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 13>And Australians across the country are calling out for their

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 13>state and territory governments to get tougher on crime. And

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 13>yet here's the Commonwealth government coming out and saying, oh,

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 13>you know, we think you should loosen bail laws across

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 13>the country. It makes absolutely no sense and I'm sure

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 13>that many Australians would be just dumbfounded.

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's completely out of step with community expectations in

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 2>my view, actually The Australian was reporting today that this

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 2>cause for a requirement that courts consider a person's status

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 2>as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait islander before making a

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 2>bail decision.

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Why is it always about race based politics, Andrew?

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I mean it shouldn't be.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 13>The Greek god of Thesises is supposed to be blind,

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 13>and it troubles me that we are treating people differently

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 13>in the eyes of the law by virtue of the

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 13>color of their skin. Now, everybody, most Australians would recognize

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 13>that our prisons are overpopulated from a population perspective, with

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 13>our indigenous people.

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to see that.

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 13>But at the end of the day, if people break

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 13>the law, particularly those whether you're white, black or brindle,

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 13>If you break the law, and if it's a if

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 13>it's a serious violent of fence, this kind of round

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.959
<v Speaker 13>table of you know, in and straight back out onto

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 13>the streets. If people aren't, if they don't suffer the

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 13>consequences for their actions, well then people are just going

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 13>to keep committing more and more crimes.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I couldn't agree with you more. I mean,

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>we shouldn't be divided by the color of our skin.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you just quickly on net zero Andrew.

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 3>We pleased that the party's finally come to a position.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Denika, We've been talking about this now for six

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 13>months and I've kept saying to you please be patient.

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll get there in the end.

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 13>And I want to thank people for their patients because

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 13>I know that this has been a challenging thing for

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 13>many Conservative voters. But at the end of the day,

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 13>the Liberal Party has decided that we will back Australian businesses,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 13>we will back mums and dads. We know that they

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 13>are doing it incredibly tough. So we want to restore

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 13>affordability and reliability as the number one factor that we've

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 13>got to look at now. Yes we want to reduce emissions,

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 13>of course we do, but we've got to restore affordability

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 13>and reliability and that's not what we've had under this

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 13>Labor government. This Labor government has driven costs increases in

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 13>energy costs by around forty in the last three and

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 13>a half years. That's on top of the cost of

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 13>living in crisis. And to boot, emissions reductions have flatlined

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 13>under the coalition had when we were in government, not

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 13>only were our energy prices lower, but so were our emissions.

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you look at your spot on and look, I'm

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 2>glad we finally got an answer to the question to

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 2>ask you weekly on.

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 3>This show for the last six months.

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to ask you about it again, so

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that makes it very very happy. Andrew Wallace,

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 2>nice to see you as always, Thanks very much for

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 2>joining me.

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Aniga well.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 2>As I mentioned earlier in the show, the BBC has

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 2>done it again with its dodgy and deliberate editing of

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump's January sixth speech.

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 3>A second show, this time, Newsnight.

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Also adopted footage of the Capitol Hill speech.

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Have a look, We're going.

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 10>To cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 11>And we fight.

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:56.839
<v Speaker 1>We fight like hell.

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 10>We're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 10>and women, and we're probably not going to.

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 11>Be cheering so much for some of them.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I Meanwhile, the BABC has apologized to Donald Trump for

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 2>its Panorama episode that spliced together parts of that speech,

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 2>but has rejected his demands for compensation. Joining me now

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 2>is Brad Palumbo, host of Brad Versus Everyone podcast. Brad

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 2>great to catch up with you again, Thanks for joining me.

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think an apology will cut it for the president?

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 2>He's already threatened to sue the UK's public broadcaster for

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a billion dollars.

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 19>Well, look, the BBC is turning into an absolute joke

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 19>in the ice of the American public. The way they

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 19>deceptively edited this Trump speech is pretty blatant.

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 2>And it's not just that.

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 19>I mean they recently sanctioned or found that a journalist

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 19>had violated their policies by saying women instead of pregnant person.

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 19>So they're turning into a laughing stock. I would be

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 19>very frustrated if I was a brit that I would have

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 19>to pay a license fee to them. But Trump, frankly,

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 19>I think is better served by just letting leaving this

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 19>in the rear view mirror. He's already got plenty of money,

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 19>He's already won lawsuits against media companies. Don't bet against

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 19>him pursuing it against the BBC. He loves to get revenge,

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 19>but frankly, I think they are doing a good enough

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 19>job of running themselves out of business and out of

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 19>credibility for him to even be worth going after them.

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>At this point.

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I agree They've done it to themselves twice

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 2>now in the space of a week.

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Extraordinary.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, Brad, the Democrats are trying to implicate Donald Trump

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 2>again with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein releasing three emails that they

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:46.959
<v Speaker 2>kind of mentioned the President and his knowledge of Epstein's activities. Brad,

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 2>do you think this is just another desperate attempt by

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats.

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 19>Well, I don't think these emails change that much. The

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 19>Democrats are acting like they're a huge bombshell, and I

0:40:59.120 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 19>just really.

0:40:59.480 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't see it.

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 19>They had to omit the victim's name because in the

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 19>version they released, because if you actually include it, while

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 19>she has said that she never saw Donald Trump ever

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 19>do anything wrong to her or anyone else. So I

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 19>do think they are weaponizing this in a partisan manner.

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 19>But Donald Trump promised to release the full Ebstein files.

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 19>It was a key campaign promise, and I'm hearing not

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 19>from partisan opponents, but from people on his side of

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 19>the aisle. They still want that, and I don't think

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 19>this is going to go away until as long as

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 19>he doesn't release them. Democrats can drip by drips selectively

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 19>release a piece here or a piece there. I don't

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 19>know who exactly he is protecting by not releasing them

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:47.240
<v Speaker 19>so far. I don't think it implicates him, but maybe

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 19>somebody else powerful or important in his orbit. But this

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 19>issue is going to be a cloud over Trump's presidency

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 19>until he just fulfills his campaign promise that his supporters

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 19>are still calling on him to do and releases the

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 19>whole file and let it all go out there for

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 19>the sunshine to see.

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 2>Good point, look of interesting to see what he does

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.919
<v Speaker 2>with it. And that look finally, the government shutdown has ended.

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 2>After forty three days of the Democrats holding the country

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 2>to ransom, here was Donald Trump officially reopening it.

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 11>It's an honor out to sign this incredible bill and

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 11>get our country working again.

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Thanks you.

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, Brad.

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Look finally what happens now?

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 19>Well, the Democrats have egg on their face because this

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.760
<v Speaker 19>was an absurd failure for them. It was really a farce.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 19>They claimed they didn't shut the government down, but of

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 19>course they always did. They withheld the votes that Republicans

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 19>needed to pass clean budget legislation. But then when some

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 19>Democrats have broke ranks to finally end the shutdown, the

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 19>other ones got mad at them and said, you caved totally.

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 19>Nuking their argument that it had never been them at all,

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 19>it had always been the publicans. And then all they

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 19>got was a vote on the Obamacare subsidies they were

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 19>always going to get. So they caused weeks of suffering

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 19>and chaos, made a whole little stand, and accomplished nothing

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.879
<v Speaker 19>other than I guess some virtue signaling. But I think

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:18.840
<v Speaker 19>they burned a lot of political capital on what ultimately

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.320
<v Speaker 19>proved a futile stunt.

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they've absolutely wasted their time forty three days of

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 2>holding the country to ransom and for what absolutely nothing. Now, look,

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 2>let's end on something from Brad. Have a look at

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 2>this sweet moment at the White House when Donald Trump

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 2>invited Kins into the Oval office.

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Have a look, my name is Donald Okay, do you

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:48.760
<v Speaker 1>want to bet one? Two three?

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Brad, he's just a grandpa at heart after all.

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, it's a sweet moment, and I hope he showed

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 19>them the diet coke. But it's good to see. It's

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 19>good to see the lighthearted side of the presidency. And

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 19>just you know, we could all use some more positivity

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.440
<v Speaker 19>in the news cycle these days. Things are looking bleak,

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 19>but we should all remember the beautiful part what we

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 19>all fate for to protect.

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, yeah, that's actually a good point. The news

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 2>cycle is so bleak, so when we do see nice

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that, it's good to show it. Brad Palumbo,

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:25.840
<v Speaker 2>great to see you as always, Thanks for joining me

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 2>on the show. Thanks coming up half the break the

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 2>winners and losers of the week, including the conservative liberals

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 2>killing off net zero, plus the shocking moment a light

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 2>rail driver falls asleep behind the controls. Is that time

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 2>of the week where we saw the winners from the

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 2>losers and helping me to do that is Sky News

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 2>contributor James Bolt.

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 3>James, great to have you back. Thanks so much for

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 3>joining me.

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 2>You're winner this week are the victorious conservative liberal MPs.

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:54.840
<v Speaker 20>You got to give it to him. It's been a

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 20>debate that's been raging for six months on what the

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 20>policy is going to be. And you knew that they

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 20>were feeling pretty goo about themselves when they walked into

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 20>the meetings. So you can see that there. That's just

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 20>they're ready to they're rolling deep, they're ready to party.

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 3>So I just.

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 20>Thought, look, I'm not a liberal voter, I'm not a

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 20>member of the party, but I can offer them one

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.479
<v Speaker 20>piece of advice, which is that's the kind of vision

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:16.280
<v Speaker 20>that you can use for marketing campaigns.

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 2>And I just like I was throwing some.

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 20>Ideas around for your producer, and I think I've come

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 20>up with something that they could use. It's just a

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 20>free one for me, so you know, I look notes

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 20>get off my back if they use it or not.

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 20>But it's just something I thought abuseful.

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Dry and the Liberal Party, whoa, it's a it's

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a good big so I wonder if they would take

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 2>it up.

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 3>I will see they gotta win over younger voters, don't do.

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, and doctor j you know he's probably not the

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 20>young demographic anymore. We are we're getting so but it

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 20>could play.

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 2>James, I actually love that idea. That's one of your

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>best work. Sell it to the party. Now look my

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 2>winner this week. Just for a bit of fun, just

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 2>to end the week, have a look at this porky

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 2>perpetrator who led police in New Mexico on to chase

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 2>through Albertquerque.

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at this vision.

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 2>This shows the police department chasing this loose pig along

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 2>an interstate highway. Decided to take a joy ride through traffic,

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>dodging cars and officers.

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 3>After a brief.

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Foot pursuit, the team managed to safely detain the porky

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 2>perpetrator put it in the back of the wagon. No

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 2>one was hurt, the pigs in now safe hands. So

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I just thought, you know what, that's what we're going

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 2>to end Friday with James.

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 20>We were just talking my first instance of yoga just

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 20>before the break, and then I see this clip here

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 20>and I just go, I'm less athletic than a pig, Like,

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 20>there's no way I could outrun the federals for that long.

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 2>No, we gave yoga a James gave yoga a go.

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.759
<v Speaker 2>Everybody got that on TV in the Winner of the Week.

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Actually he's doing yoga.

0:46:58.080 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 3>For the first winn of the week.

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Me, that's a little all right, now your Loser of

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 2>the Week the ABC. Yeah.

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 20>So if I'm with the ABC and I was embroiled

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.439
<v Speaker 20>in so many doctoring footage scanners, We've got the Jane

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 20>Hume one. We've got our colleague Sky News host Chris

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 20>Kenny's beautiful reporting on what they've been doing for don

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 20>Trump speech. I'd been keeping a little bit of a

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 20>lid on my criticism of others, but not the ABC

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 20>because Justin Stevens and Hu Marks in a staff white email,

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:29.839
<v Speaker 20>have said there is just this opportunistic criticism of them.

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 20>They're the victims of a smear campaign. And I just

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 20>would not do that on the same week that you've

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 20>doctored the photos of Jane Hume, that you've done what

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 20>I what I say is very similar editing new techniques

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 20>to the BBC. I would keep a lid on it.

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely well. I said it was. It showed he was proud.

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I think Hugh Marx's words well.

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 20>Out of the reporting.

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Proud of the report.

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, because like what the ABC did, which was similar

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:56.240
<v Speaker 20>to the BBC scanner, which I mean you've been covering

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 20>on this show. So I'm not going to go over

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 20>too much. But when you say when you played Trump

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:01.799
<v Speaker 20>saying we're going to go down to the Capitol, but

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:04.720
<v Speaker 20>edit out him saying to cheer on our brave senators

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 20>in congressmen, you're making a point in my view.

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, Well, I mean the BBC's doctored footage basically

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 2>it insinuated something that was not there. So we'll see

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:16.240
<v Speaker 2>what Trump does, whether he actually sues.

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Him or not.

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:19.399
<v Speaker 2>Now, my loser of the week, James is this US

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 2>light rail driver who fell asleep in San Francisco.

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at the vision.

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:45.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, relax, relag relate, we are crash. Relag Yeah,

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure relax is the right word to be

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 2>using after you almost crashed the tram.

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 20>The bar for me relaxing is not whether or not

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 20>we crashed. It's whether or not you're awake on the

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 20>job when you're driving.

0:48:57.600 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that I look.

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 2>A full investigation is being conducted, but luckily nobody was injured.

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 3>That is frightening.

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 2>James Bold, great to see you again. Have a nice weekend.

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for joining me. Really appreciate it.

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 3>That's all I've got time for.

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I'll be back at seven pm on Sunday for denekro

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and James. Steve Price is next.

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 3>Good night,