WEBVTT - Dear Rachelle: Ash Hansen on the missing nine hours

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Her burning body was found nine hours later, So what happened?

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So the missing nine hours is what we're really trying

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to fill in.

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Is they planned to do this or was it a

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>last minute thing done in haste and panic, because the

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 2>disposal of the body seems to meet not to be

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>well planned at all.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Where was she going and who was she going to meet?

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Now we believe that the person that she was going

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to meet is probably the person that killed her.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Andrew Rules Life in Crimes, and today we welcome

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to our humble studio Ashley Hansen, who is interstate and

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 2>she's been working on a big project that is quite fascinating.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>I clearly don't know as much about it as Ashley

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 2>because she's done a heap of work on this, but

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>it is the big story that's currently hitting the airwaves,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>and it is about the murder of Rachelle Child's in

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and one, and really it's about the failure

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>of the system to work out who killed her twenty

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 2>four years ago. Is that about it, Ashley?

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is a big case. You are right, and

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>we do go back to the very beginning of Rochelle's

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>life and we focus it on the days and weeks

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>leading up to her murder, and then we pull apart

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the investigation and go back over the key pieces of

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>evidence to put it back out in the public domain,

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>because we think that that is the best way where

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.639
<v Speaker 1>we're out in terms of twenty twenty five to solve

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this case, because it's now been a cold case for

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>over twenty three years and the family wants justice.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, no wonder, now, I cheated before I came in

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you. I did watch some of it

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and get a little bit of an idea. It really

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>is a fascinating case because Rachelle, young woman, worked in

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 2>a car dealership and you know, I won't say rural

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 2>South Wales but provincial New South Wales. And she was

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.639
<v Speaker 2>going to meet and you'll tell us better than I can.

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 2>She was going to meet someone we don't know who

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 2>at a particular pub where she had not been before,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>and she vanished. Is that what happened?

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, her family say that they found out that she

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to meet someone in the days after her disappearance,

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>because there was this frantic search for Rochelle. As of

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Friday afternoon they realized that she was missing. But by

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>then in the early hours of Friday morning, her burning

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>body had been discovered at GIRoA, which is one hundred

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>kilometers away from her hometown in Bargo, so police hadn't

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>put two and two together, and because the body that

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was burnt at GIRoA, it took days to formally identify

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that victim. So it wasn't until the Sunday did the

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>detectives come and inform the family that was still frantically

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>looking for Rochelle and say, we've actually found her, and

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>sadly she'd been murdered. So we pull apart the case

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and the days leading up to it, as I said,

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the days and the weeks and the years

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that followed the investigation. But from the family's perspective, they

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>said that they knew that she was going out because

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>she had this urgency to go somewhere. She left work early.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>They think that she made it home, so her clothes

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that she wore to work were at home, and the

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>police and her friends found them in the days later

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Saturday, I think they confirmed that they were

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>her clothes. So the belief is and the evidence suggests

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that she did make it home, but where she went

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to after that, nobody knows, and her burning body was

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>found nine hours later, So what happened, So the missing

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>nine hours is what we're really trying to fill in

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>because there are still so many gaps in this case.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I can see that. So it's conceivable that whatever went

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>wrong could have gone wrong even at her own house,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>that someone could have been waiting for her. She gets changed,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>she puts on some other clothes, ready to go out,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and the bad guy turns up and grabs her or

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>something there possibly, or she drives off in her old

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>blue Commodore that she drove, is it right, her favorite

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 2>old car, that's right, and she heads off to perhaps

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the pub where she told her sister she was going.

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Bargo Pub.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>She didn't tell her sister that she was going there,

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and we really look into where that information came from. Oh,

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of her going to the Bargo Hotel, because

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>there aren't any verified sightings of her at the Bargo Hotel.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>So initially because her car was found there in the

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>days after her murder, and this was when the family

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was still frantically looking for her. Her car turned up

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>parked at the back of the Bargo Hotel. Now back

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and one. The Bargo Hotel was a

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rough pub. The bikes, the local rebels

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>bikes used to drink there and it's been renovated now

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and very family friendly, so I want to make sure

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I make that distinction. But at the time, it wasn't

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>somewhere where Rochelle would have gone. And a couple of

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons for that of this, well, she'd never been known

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to go there before. Thursday night was pull competition night

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was also topless waitress night, so mostly the

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>pub was full of men. That was the clientele usually

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on a Thursday night. So the fact that her car

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>turned up there really stunned her friends and family because

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they were like, what's that car doing here, Like, we've

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>never known her to go there, And then the other

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>clues that police and family have always have come to

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion and belief that she didn't drive her car there,

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>but possibly it was a staged crime scene, so whoever

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>killed her may have dumped her car there to cover

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>his tracks in some way, And in the beginning, certainly

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it worked because the media reports all around Rochelle and

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>her disappearance was this belief that she went to the

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Bargo Hotel and certainly someone who is a key person

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of interest did say that she was going there to

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>meet someone. So we go into that and we explore

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all of that, but it's a vital piece of the

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>puzzle because who did drive that car to the pub?

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>The pub manager at the time, he gave evidence and

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>did a statement with police and he said, there's no

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>way she was in this pub. He would have known.

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>She was really recognizable because she was blonde, she was attractive,

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>she was twenty three, and she would have stood out,

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>especially given it was a really bloky night at the pub.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And there was this other sighting of her at the pub,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is where we think, you know, things could

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have been confused over the years. There was a sighting

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of another twenty three year old that night and the

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>bartender said, I did serve this blonde woman and she

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>was twenty three because she checked her ID. Now that

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>person was identified and just by coincidence, that person looked

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>very simil to Rochelle, but wasn't Rochelle Noe. So that's

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>all part of it too. So we go back over Yeah,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the case and the car is just such a yeah.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>As I said, the car is really the key to

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this because who drove it and where did

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they go back to? So if the killer drove the

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>car there, then how did the killer get home and

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>get away? And so we're going we're trying to retrace

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the killer's steps and also Rachelle's to try and ultimately

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>bring about new witnesses that could potentially be the breakthrough

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that this case needs.

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Where else could she have been going? She spoke to

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>her sister very briefly because the sister was busy. This

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.559
<v Speaker 2>is after work on the night in question.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So on Thursday, she left Camden Holden shortly after five

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>pm and there was this phone call with Christy, her sister,

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and she was talking really fast on the phone and

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Christy was on the other line. So she said, I'll

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>call you back, and she never did, cause that plays

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on her mind still to this day, and she holds

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guilt about not calling her back because

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>she didn't really get into what she was doing. And

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously Christy had no idea that that would have that

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>would be the last time she'd ever speak to her sister.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's that phone call which left Christie believing that

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>she was definitely going somewhere because she was excited, and

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>she was speaking really fast, and that was something that

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>she used to do, and she was obviously heading somewhere

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and heading to bargo her home to get changed, so

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>she had somewhere to be And a lot of other

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>people gave us that evidence and have said that to us,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like the last customer that served her, So there's no

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of confusion around that she was going somewhere, it's

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>just where was she going and who was she going

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to meet. Now we believe that the person that she

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was going to meet is probably the person that killed her.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is because no one came

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>forward afterwards and said, well, Rachelle didn't turn up, she

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't met me. So no one's come forward and said

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that she failed to turn up to meet them. So

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>that almost rules out the fact that there was this

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>random attacker going around and she just happened to cross

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>spas with someone, you know, a really dangerous man just

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>by chance that she you know, unlikely, highly unlikely because

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>of her actions leading up to it and her excitement.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But another really important part of this case is her

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>excitement about being loaned a hold in Walking Shaw. Now, yes,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I'd never heard of a walking Shaw Andrew had you, I.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Had, But then again I'm older and you know, different generation,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and I had heard of walking Shaws. I think I

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 2>remember the original walking Shaw.

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Well, you'll probably know a bit more

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>than I do. But I have had to do a

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of research into walking Shaws because I've never heard

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of them before. But why it's important is because Rochelle

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was a whole and fanatic. She was mad about cars

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>and particular Holdens. So she held this belief and had

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>set it to a couple of people that leading up

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to the June Long Weekend, which is the weekend before

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>she was murdered. She was murdered on the Thursday night.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The time of her death isn't exactly known, but her

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>burning body was found at two just after two am

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Friday morning before the June Long Weekend in

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one. Now, she'd told her sister, and

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>she'd also told a few other people close to her

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time that she was super excited about being

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>loaned a Holden walking Shaw from Camden Holden. So that

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>was her belief for whatever reason. So we really look

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>into whether or not there was any truth to that.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Did a walking shaw exist. Was there ever a walkn saw?

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Why did she hold that belief and why did someone

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>promise her a walking shaw for the long weekend? And

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>being the car found that she was, she was super

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>excited about that.

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Great bait to get her in would be to mension

0:10:58.920 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 2>something like.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>That possibly, and that is a very very strong theory

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that you know, was that the bait that got her

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhere and got her in a place where she was

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable because she was excited about it. And no walking

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>shaw ever turned up. You know, there wasn't one that

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>turned up to Camden Holden and that's where she was

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>working as a saleswoman. And you can probably give some

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>insights on this, but the walkingshur at the time they

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>were incredibly rare. And also a car yard bringing a

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>walk Inshaw into their yard and onto the lot, it

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>would need to be ensured. It's not something that would

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>be done in secret. It wouldn't just be a surprise

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to the manager or to the owner of the car

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>yard if a car like that was coming in. Everyone

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of told us, look, they'd make a big deal

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>about it. There'd be a lot of plans in place

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as to where are we going to store it. Even then,

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>if there was one coming in, it's highly unlikely they

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>would be loaning it out such an expense in sidcar

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to a twenty three year old saleswoman. And what are

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on that?

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I suspect you're right. If this was a kosher offer,

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 2>you'd think there'd be some trace of it. Now. I

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether they'd lend it to her or not.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they would if there was a reason, you know,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>but there ought to be someone somewhere that knows which

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 2>car it was and who had the control of it.

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 2>It sounds as if it's a made up car, doesn't it.

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a made up bait to hook her

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in by a manipulative person.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's either true or false, really, isn't it. So

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we look into was there a walking shaw? Did one

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Edward exist?

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And so we follow that path and explore that theory

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as well, because it is a really important part of

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Rochelle's case. The family believes that all the investigators that

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have worked on it have also believed that as well,

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, why was she promised this walking share and

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened to it? What happened to Rochelle. You know,

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the main part of this case and the biggest unsold

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>question is what happened to Rochelle. We don't even know

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>where she was killed, you know, as I said, those

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>nine missing hours from her possibly going home and getting

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>changed yep, And it was nine hours later that her

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>burning body was found. So in episode three, which is

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are now available, we go through all the witness accounts

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>down at GIRoA at seven Mile Beach, which is one

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred kilometers away from her home, and some of her

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>friends hadn't even heard of GIRoA or seven Mile Beach,

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so again they were shocked that she not only had

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>been murdered, but that her body had turned up there.

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So it was a bit of a mystery to why

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that location. So we really look into the location and

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to experts about the mind of a killer and

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the disposal of a body and what goes into that

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that thought process, and that's fascinating stuff because you know,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the experts give that really psychological insights into what people

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do to try and cover their tracks. And so we

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>explore the area down there as well, seven Mile Beach,

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and the car sightings as well, because her car or

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a car very similar to Rachelle's. So police have the

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>view that her car was used to go to GIRoA,

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>whether the killer took her body down there, or whether

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the killer drove her down there and she was murdered

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>down at GIRoA. But there was all these car sightings

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of the car moving near where her body was found,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>moving from one side of the road to the other.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>So we look at whether or not burning her body

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was planned b which goes to the mindset of the

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>killer as well, which helps to profile this killer as well.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Was it planned because if her murder was planned, it

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't planned very well. But at the same time, this

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>person or these people responsible have got away with it,

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and they had a lot of things go their way, unfortunately,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>because there were so many failures in the initial investigation.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Sadly, yes, you can see that if this had happened

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in the last five years, parts of this puzzle would

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 2>not be a mystery because there'd be more CCTV footage,

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera. Now, even the fact that this

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>person had accelerant, they had petrol or kerosene or whatever

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 2>they had that already with them because they'd planned to

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 2>do this, or was it a last minute thing done

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 2>in haste and panic, because the disposal of the body

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>seems to me not to be well planned at all.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 2>It's right beside the busy road, as one of the

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 2>investigators points out, if you stand where her body was found,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>people can see you from the road. It's not a

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 2>great spot to hide a body. So it looks as

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>if it was done really quick and in haste. And

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>they've said, oh, hell, I've got a burner because my

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 2>DNA will be on it. So they've just burnt her.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>But did they go and get some fuel to do that?

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 2>So you know, did they go to a service station

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 2>three kilometers away and buy some fuel and come back

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 2>and burn the body, there'd be all these little possibilities.

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is I noticed that she was pictured

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 2>with Peter Brock at some stage.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>When was that, I'm not exactly sure, but it was

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years before her death, and Peter Brock

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>was her idol. Yes, and that was even the number

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>his number which I think it was number five, was

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on her headstone and it was it was really touching

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>when I went to the cemetery with her sister to

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>see her headstone, and she has a picture there of

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>herself and I think it's Peter Brock's car or a

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>picture of her and Peter Brock as well, but definitely

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>pays tribute to him because he was her idol and

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as I said, she was a huge Holden fan. So

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we're hoping that we might get some Holden fans following

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>us in the podcast as well. Probably will Filling in

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>any gaps in the case as well would help a lot.

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>It could happen. Sometimes experts can help with subtle things.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even putting out the walking Shaw story, it

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 2>might produce someone with specific knowledge out there who goes, well,

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you where they all were right then or

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 2>where they weren't, and the people that know all these

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 2>things might be able to help triangulate something about the

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>walking Shaw story.

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we're very much interested in any of that kind

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of information because it wasn't uncommon at the time as

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>well to mock up a Holden walking Shaw. So we

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if okay, the fakes and the genuine walking

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Shaws were all checked.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Of course, there's that. It's a very interesting thing. And see,

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the person that made the offer to her must know

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>about walking shores. They must know something, because you can't

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>make up what you don't know, really, can you. They

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 2>must have some knowledge in order to raise that who

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>attract her attention. So that tells us that this manipulative killer,

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>sex killer probably has some knowledge of Australian cars and

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 2>racing cars and hot cars, that sort of stuff. I know,

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 2>that's a broad church.

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe that strongly, and I think most of the

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>investigators on the case would agree to Yeah.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>So that at least gives them a broad group of people.

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I've noticed in just checking before we've spoke that you

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>investigators have found something like nine people ex boyfriends or

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 2>whatever of Rochelle's and eight of them have sort of

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 2>been able to ali by themselves or whatever. That hasn't yes,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 2>So what can you say about that?

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, so there were nine initially, there were nine persons

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of interest in Rochelle's murder. And if you think about it,

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>she was a single woman, She worked in a male

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>dominated industry. She was a bit of a tomboy, so

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>her circle of friends she had a lot of male

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>friends as well. Because of her love of cars. She

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>rode horses, but she also played cricket, so her social

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>circle was quite large. As well as her work circle.

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So they started off with nine persons of interest, and

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>then during the inquest, which was held in two thousand

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and six to two thousand and eight, it really just

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>narrowed down to one man, her boss. Now he was

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>named as a prime suspect in her murder, and still

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to this day he remains the prime suspect in her murder.

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>He was her boss at Camden Holden, so she worked

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>with him for about a year and according to in

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 1>all of her work colleagues, she really looked up to

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>him like a father figure. And there were a lot

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of people that also felt like he had this obsession

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>with her, that he had this Yeah, there's just a

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly interest in her. He may have been favoring her

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and affording her perks of the job that weren't afforded

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to everyone else, for example, letting her alone whatever cars

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and pushing her into sales. And you know, was he

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>being a mentor, because certainly a lot of people say

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that his behavior wasn't really in line with a genuine mentor.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>People have said that he liked her, you know, and

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he was a lot older than her, and I think

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it was the dynamic, you know, she was twenty three.

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>She was described as naive and she was also learning

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot. She loved her job and he was the

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>one that used to teach her. So she had a

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of faith in him and a lot of trust.

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we look into him and his past and yeah,

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>his alibi. We do a deep dive on his alibi.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Where is he now and why are we talking so

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 2>frankly about him?

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't disclose where he is now, but he is

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>still considered a suspect in Rochelle's murder, and he has

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>always strenuously denied any involvement in Rochelle's death. The coroner

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>had an open finding in two thousand and eight, so

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>basically didn't identify or didn't refer the matter to the DPP.

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>But she did say that Rochelle was a victim of homicide,

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>but who killed her was never determined by the inquest.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But through that process, all the other persons of interest

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>by one man were ruled out.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>So we'd perhaps call him a person of interest.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you could call him a significant person of interest,

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I think would be very fair.

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 2>So he's still with us, He's up there somewhere in

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he's still he's still in the community. As I say,

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he's never been charged over Rochelle's murder. He did participate

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>willingly in three records of interview with detectives and he

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>was very closely looked at. His alibi was looked at.

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>He gave a very involved alibi on the seventh of

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>June two thousand and one, but not a single person

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>can back that up. There wasn't another witness to back

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>up his alibi. So that's interesting, and we just take

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive into his past and just re examine

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the evidence that we know about and also look at

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>new evidence and people that are coming forward and speaking

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>out after all of these years, and they're prompted to

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>speak out because of Rochelle and because of the injustice

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that really is centered on this case. You know, someone

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>has got away with murder for over twenty three years.

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>And someone or the people that would do that to

0:22:55.760 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a young, innocent, beautiful woman who was loved by so many,

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're a dangerous person. And what I will

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 1>say as well is most investigators. The theory is that

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>investigators believe that this was a sexually motivated attack. So

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>because she was found partially naked from the waist down,

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and because of the fire, you couldn't determined whether they'd

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>been a sexual attack. But from investigators and police perspective,

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they always treated this as a sexually motivated attack, and

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the fire was to destroy evidence, to destroy DNA. So

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the killer, you know, essentially has got away with murder

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and a very very dangerous man.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 2>The person of interest that you refer to have they

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 2>got an interesting past or a dull past.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's an interesting past. Yeah, I would

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>say it's a very interesting past.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 2>Interesting and relevant relevant to this sort of thing.

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Relevant. Yeah, Relevant's a good word.

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Probably. We won't say much more about that as my thoughts,

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 2>but that is interesting indeed. I mean in your experience

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 2>of mind, we know that often these matters concerned people

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 2>well known to the victim, usually don't they That's it

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 2>probably eight out of ten.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And what we do know, as I said before, is

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that we know that her personality was the type of

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 1>person she was a little bit shy. Even though she

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was outgoing in one sense, she had a bit of

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>shyness about her. It's been described to me as she

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>was someone that didn't like to go places on her

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>own and We do know of an instance where she

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>met to meet another man in Queensland and she took

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>her girlfriends because she didn't know him. She hadn't met

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>him before, so it would be out of line of

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>her personality. It wouldn't be characteristic of her to go

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and meet someone she didn't know and that she didn't trust,

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So she wasn't a risk taker in that sense.

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's why police and people closest to Rochelle are

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>so convinced that whoever she went to meat she knew

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and she trusted.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Sketch a bit of a pen picture or perhaps a

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 2>word picture of the Rochelle that you've come to know

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 2>in a secondhand way she come from. One of her parents.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Do tell us about her sister? What sort of girl

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 2>was she?

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Look, she's the sort of girl that I wish

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I would have known because she sounds so lovable and likable,

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and she was cheeky, she was witty, she was she

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>was really going and just always up for a good time.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>She loved her animals. She was a big animal lover.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Has she had horses, she had dogs, she had a cat,

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and she was just that sort of person that everyone

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>has a memory of and really fond memories of her.

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>So her death had a huge impact and there was

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>almost I think it was almost one thousand people turned

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>out to her funeral. Beautiful family. And look, I've only

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>met her sister, her younger sister, Christie, and she's the

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>real driver of this podcast and the person that prompted

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>this investigation really because she was the person I went

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to over twelve months ago and said, look, would you

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>consider doing a podcast about your sister's unsolved murder? And

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the timing was just right for her. So her sister's

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an assistant principal and she's incredible. You know, she's so motivated,

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>she's so determined to get this case solved after so

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>many years, and we'll just keep fighting and won't give up.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And her mom's the same and she's beautiful too. They

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>lost their dad. Christie lost her dad a couple of

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago during COVID Sadly, he died of brain tumor,

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>which was really sad because he was the leader, the

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>advocate for the family. He was the one that dealt

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>with police. He had interactions with detectives down at Goldburn

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>when they were training to be officers, and he would

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>give that insight into dealing with victims' families. He's a

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really strong, stoic just a really likable guy as well

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>from the sounds of it. So it really fell into

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Christie's possession this baton that she's you know, has taken

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>on to be the charge and the leader to try

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and get this solved and to keep it out in

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the public domain and to motivate police as well to

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>re examine her case. But not just relook at it.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about reinvestigating it, so just doing things that

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>could lead to a breakthrough in the case. And they're

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>just things like the reward. I mean, it's sitting at

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand dollars and you know what house prices

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>are in Melbourne and Sydney that you know that is well,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like a lot of money. It's still not

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a life changing amount of money if you're going to

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>break a loyalty or go out on a limb and

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>speak out about someone who maybe you're very fearful of

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. But relationships change over the years, and that's

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're hoping that maybe someone who knew something at

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the time but was too scared to come forward or

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the confidence. Maybe maybe an increase in the

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>reward could bring them out, could.

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Loosen tongues over time. And is there anybody in particular

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that might have helped with an alibi? Is the reward

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 2>aimed at certain people?

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, well, we're hoping that an increase of

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the reward could reach anyone that has any intimate knowledge

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>about someone's behavior. Either on the night that Rochelle was murdered,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>or the days that followed, or even the weeks and

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the months that followed, there would have been a suspicion.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You would think that there may have been people that

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>thought or heard things over time that maybe didn't add

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>up or they sounded a little bit strange. And yeah,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we're just asking for this reward to be increased. The

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>family is pushing for it, and we certainly believe that

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not money that you have to pay unless somebody

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is convicted. Usually that's what a reward is only ever paid,

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and it would be well worth it and money well

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>spent in my view. So we're just asking for that reward,

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and we think it's important because you just don't know

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what that money could motivate someone to do. To tell

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the truth to come forward and maybe just give a

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>little piece of information that could potentially solve this case.

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Ashley, what attracted you to it or who attracted you

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 2>to this?

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just remembered it as a young journalist. So

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I was working in Woollongong at the time, and I

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think it must have been the time when her inquest

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was on in two thousand and eight or around that time,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and reading a story about it and just I remember

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>just feeling shocked and sad. And then I went on

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and I did TV reporting for years, and I worked

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>at Channel seven for about ten years, and then when

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I left Channel seven, I went into and was doing

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit of freelance news reading. And I was just

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of spot in my career where I

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do something new and different but still be

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, but just delve into one case. And so

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought I'd love to do a podcast. I was

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>inspired by Headley Thomas's work yep, as you know his success,

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and I just really got into podcasting and I thought

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to just yeah, have a look at one

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>case and see if I could do a podcast. So

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to Christy because this is the first

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>case that came to mind was Rochelle's case, and I

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>did a bit of googling, obviously that's how you start,

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and one of the first articles that came up was

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>about Christie just a few years earlier saying I would

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>look at doing a podcast and I'm wondering if Headley

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Thomas might be interested in this case or whatnot. So

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I reached out to her and she was already talking

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to Headley but he hadn't really started on her case

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>because she didn't know at the time, and obviously Headly

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't say it at the time, but he was very

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>much invested in Bronwin's case, which is the podcast that's

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>now out, so you can see the huge amount of

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>work that went into that podcast. So yeah, so Christy

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>thought about it and she's sort of agreed, No, now's

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the time. I'm ready to do it now, because it's

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge investment emotionally and time wise as well to

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>have a journalist go back and through the case like that,

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you're opening wounds. But she's been so forthcoming and it's

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just been an absolute joy to work with her. She's

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>an incredible person and I would love for them to

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>get the outcome that they so desperately want.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course, where did those girls grow up with

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 2>their parents at Bargo.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>No, they actually grew up at Glenfield. They grew up

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in Glenfield in Sydney's southwest, I believe near Campbelltown area, Glenfield,

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and they grew up out there. They were into dancing

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think they had horses when they were growing

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>up as well. And what prompted Rochelle to move She

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>was going out with the guy and they wanted more

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>space because she wanted to have the horses on her property.

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think because of house prices and whatnot, she

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>rented at Bargo because she could get this, you know,

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of acres there. And she was living there

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>with her boyfriend for a little while, I'm not sure

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>how long, and then they broke up and so that

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what prompted Christy to move in. But Christie'd only

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be living there for sort of a month or six

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks so, and Christi is Rochelle's youngest sister, so she'd

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>only been living there for about six weeks and then

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this tragedy happened. And yeah, the story sort of goes

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>from there.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 2>It goes from there. Actually, how can our listeners tune

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 2>in and listen to this.

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, they can visit the website dear Rochelle dot com

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>dot au. So that's d e A r r A

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>c h ewl e dot com dot au.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Perfect and that name is yes as you spelled it

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>out at Rochelle r A not that's it. We will

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>put the URL in the description of the episode. Actually,

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>wish you all the best and we look forward to

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 2>tuning into your most excellent work. It's a fascinating case

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 2>and if there's any justice or luck in the world,

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 2>something that you do will loosen someone's tongue and get

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 2>a result.

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Andrew, that would be an absolute dream.

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening. Life and Crimes is a Sunday Herald

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Sun production for True crime Australia. Our producer is Johnty Burton.

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 2>For my columns, features and more, go to Heroldsun dot

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 2>com dot au forward slash Andrew rule one word. For

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 2>advertising inquiries, go to news Podcasts sold at news dot

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 2>com dot au. That is all one word news podcasts

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 2>sold And if you further information about this episode, links

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>are in the description