WEBVTT - Episode 29: Out Of Character

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Listeners are advised that this podcast series Broman contains course

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>language and adult themes. This podcast series is brought to

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you by me Headley Thomas and The Australian. In our

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>reconstructions of evidence and testimony from witnesses at the two

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two in quest, you are hearing the actual

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>questions from John's sharpshooting lawyer, Craig Leggett, as well as

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the police officer Matt Fordham, and of course the response

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>from the witnesses. We do not have the audio of

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the original proceedings, so what you are hearing is coming

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>from the official transcripts of the five days of public hearings.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The voice actor for Craig Leggett in this podcast series

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>is a senior lawyer in Brisbane and a friend, Dan Williams.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Subscribers who watched one of the three lengthy videos that

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.199
<v Speaker 1>we released in early twenty twenty five would have seen

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Dan Williams and Karina Berger talking about the recently renewed

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>police investigation. Dan expressed his view that the Unsolved Homicide

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Unit was acting appropriately and almost certainly on solid police

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>legal advice by staying at arm's length from this podcast

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>investigation Dan explained that in the event of someone being

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>charged over Bromman's alleged murder, it would be crucially important

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>for police to demonstrate their independence and to show that

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>they had not been colluding with the podcast. Dan has

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>carefully considered the evidence in Broman's case. He and Maddie Walsh,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Karina Berger and many other volunteers and committed listeners are

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge help behind the scenes in the Bromin series.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>We are all very keen and determined to see that

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence back theory about Illiwong is tested. Only a

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>professional and intrusive search of the ground beneath the garage

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>and patio concrete at the existing and well established house

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in Illawong can properly answer this theory. But should we

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>now try to undertake such a search ourselves, separately from

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the State Coroner and the unsolved Homicide Unit. I went

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to Dan's home shortly before this episode was finalized and

0:02:55.520 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked about next steps. It's about four months we

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote to the State Coroner of New South Wales, Teresa O. Sullivan,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>proposing that she used her powers to order a search,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly beneath the concrete patio slab and Garrard slab at

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>that house Inilla One where John was working in ninety

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety three when Bromwin disappeared. We don't have a definitive

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>response yet in terms of what will happen there. What

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>are the risks of us doing what many listeners would

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>probably like us to do, which is go and knock

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on the door and seek and receive the permission of

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the owners to do our own excavation work there.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the first risk is that the police may

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>quite reasonably regard that as preempting or interfering with their investigation,

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>and that would be significant concern, But perhaps a little

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>bit more than that. I think if you did that,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 3>then you've gotten yourself squarely involved in the process of

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 3>investigating the crime scene. You're a participant. Subsequently, it might

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>be suggested, perhaps wrongly and perhaps strategically, but it might

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>be suggested that there is a possibility that you have

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>changed the evidence, or even planted evidence on that site.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>And you're referring to it as a crime scene. But

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of course we don't know that's the case. We're only

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that it looks possible.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 3>So when I say crime scene, I just mean a

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 3>place where there is a reasonable speculation that there might

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 3>be evidence there which is relevant to the prosecution of

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 3>a crime.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>We're in a bit of a quandary as to what

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we should do. What is your view?

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>Heavily the owners of the Yellar Wung property could authorize

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 3>you to do a search. They're in control of their

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 3>own property. But given that the reply from the coroner

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>does indicate that there is a current investigation by the police,

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>presumably assisting the coroner to make a decision about what

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 3>powers the coroner should exercise, I would be inclined not

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 3>to proach the owners for that purpose. The police could

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 3>establish it formally as a crime scene. They may have

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 3>even done that. Even if they don't formally establish it

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 3>as a crime scene. There are some other obligations and

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 3>restrictions which you need to be conscious of, and so

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 3>with the owners, and they are that it would be

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 3>unlawful for you to do anything which might hinder a

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 3>police investigation, and the police would be concerned about the

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 3>possibility that somebody else might interfere with the site, might

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 3>allow the suggestion that it's been changed in some way,

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>or in some way evidence which the police wanted to

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 3>recover had been contaminated. And so that would be a

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>very significant concern to the police, and I would be

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>confident that they would prefer you don't do that.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 3>There may come a time when it becomes clear that

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 3>neither the coroner nor the police are going to take

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 3>the matter further, and at that point, I guess you

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 3>could revisit your options. Right at the moment, there's a

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 3>live investigation going on, there's a genuine possibility that the

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 3>police may have their own intentions in relation to the

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 3>Illawong site, and in those circumstances, I think it would

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>be prudent for you to take no steps.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between this and using side scan sona

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>with Chris Darcy and his team at Lake Ainsworth, that

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>publicly accessible lake in Lenox when we were concerned about

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of Bromin's body having been dumped there.

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Very clearly Lake Ainsworth had not been designated as a

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 3>crime scene by the police. There's no suggestion that they've

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>ever shown any interest in that site. You must certainly

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 3>have not interfered with a crime scene or in any

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 3>way with the investigation.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And the pointers to Illewong are stronger than the pointers

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to Lake Ainsworth.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I would say so the hypothesis that Lake Ainsworth

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 3>might be relevant was a reasonable one. It was certainly

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 3>worth having a look. The Illowong property might be a

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 3>crime scene. Clearly from the material that's come to light

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 3>so far, including through your podcast, there must be a prospect.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>But that's where Bromin is. There is an unexplained period

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>of time when John first traveled to Sydney clearly had

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>access to the site. Some of his behavior on that

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>day as it emerged later is really a little bit

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>hard to explain. Speaking for me, I think there must

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>be a genuine possibility that Bromin's there. I would be

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 3>confident that the police reviewing the same data would be

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 3>likely to come to the same conclusion.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's significantly about those factors you mentioned, as

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>well as the timing of the concrete pause there.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly nothing that you've uncovered so far would rule

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 3>out the possibility or even put it seriously in doubt. Personally,

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>I would think that it's a much more likely spot.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk to Andy and Karina Berger and

0:07:52.480 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Michelle about this and we'll reach a final decision. Craig

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Leggett started with an attack on Andy's theory that John

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>might have disposed of Bromwin in the septic tank near

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sandstone Crescent House.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 3>You're aware of the seriousness of the allegation that you've

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>just stated under oath that it's your view that mister

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Winfield put your sister in the septic tank and put

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>in acid and hydrate line. Are you aware of the

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 3>seriousness of what you're alleging.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 4>I didn't allege. I said it was just a thought

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 4>that was discussed or that was thought of because I

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 4>was being constantly asked questions by Graham Diskin or by

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of people and officers. Did I know of

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 4>what could have possibly happened to Bromwin?

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>When a loved one has been missing for years, speculation

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes unlikely theories about a final resting place are inevitable.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>As you heard in the previous episode and again just now,

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Andy Reid was suspicious during the inquest in two thousand

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and two that his sister had been dumped in nineteen

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>ninety three in a concrete container used for the treatment

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of raw sewage. It's a horrible thought to even contemplate privately,

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>let alone articulate in a hushed courtroom in front of

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin's other family members and friends. John's lawyer was there

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to hose down Andy's theory about the septic tank. Craig

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Leggett would put it to Handy that septic tanks had

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>ceased to exist in Sandstone Crescent before nineteen ninety three.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>As we now weigh the relatively new theory about Illawong,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the septic tank angle raised during the inquest in two

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two is another timely reminder of the crucial

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>importance of evidence. When it comes to considering the possible

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>whereabouts of a final resting place for a missing person.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>There will always be ideas, because there are potentially hundreds

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of possibilities. We are limited only by our imagination in

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this regard, but evidence of the direct and the circumstantial

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>kind pointing to a place should be taken more seriously.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Did you think that it would have been the proper

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 3>thing to do, before making a public allegation like that,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to inquire as to whether or not the sewerage in

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 3>fact is in Sandstone Crescent or whether there were septic

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 3>tanks in Sandstone Cresent.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, there is septic tanks at Sandstone Crescent. Was when

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Bromwin lived there. I do also now know that the

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 4>septic tanks are no longer used. You probably might be

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 4>able to hit me with the right date, but I

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 4>reckon that might have happened around ninety six or something

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 4>like that.

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, my instructions are that in nine to eighty three

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 3>eighty three, eighty three.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer brought Andy to the verbal dispute Jody had

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>with Bromman on the Friday night.

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 3>And you're aware, aren't you? That Jody's recollection is that

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the disagreement arose because Bronwin was going to leave the

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 3>children alone. That's right, isn't it?

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, No, my recollection isn't that.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Craig Leger took Andy to a topic that he had

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>already suggested to several witnesses. It was a clear strategy

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>by John's lawyer to suggest broman was acting strangely just

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>prior to her disappearance.

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>He put to Andy, if that, in fact was the

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>topic of the discussion, and if it was in fact

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 3>true that Bronwin was going out leaving the children at home,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 3>would that have been in or out of.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Character for Bromwin to leave the children on their own? Yes,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Bromwin wouldn't have left the children on their own without

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 4>prior arrangements for someone to be looking after them.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Putting that another way, it would have been quite out

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>of character for the Bronwin that you know to have

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 3>left the children alone on the night of Friday, fourteen

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>May nineteen ninety three.

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't see the relevance of whether the children were

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 4>here or there, or what they were doing on Friday night.

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 3>No, whether you see the relevance or not with respect

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter. You're here to answer the questions.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Mister reed. Mister legis right. I'll decide the relevance. You

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 5>just answer questions.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I would say it's out of character.

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 3>Yes, out of character. Bronwin would have been behaving unusually

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 3>in your view, if that had in fact happened. Just

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 3>yes or no, we'll yes.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer had another strategy to pursue under instructions, no

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>doubt from John.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 3>And you now know, don't you that about five months

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 3>after you were born, your mother disappeared. You know that

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 3>for a fact, now, don't you? Yes? Your mother subsequently

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 3>reappeared in nineteen seventy five, didn't she.

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 3>At no time in that ten year period did you

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 3>hear from your mother. That's so, isn't it?

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 4>I personally here?

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 3>No, Now, let me ask you this Bronwin's work history.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Can you remember a conversation with mister Winfield when you

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 3>told mister Winfield what happened with Bronlin at the Commonwealth Bank?

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Bromwin never worked at the Commonwealth Bank.

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Are you aware of a period of time when Bronwin

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 3>worked for a bank.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm quite sure she worked for Westpac on the corner

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 4>of Bathist Street and George Street in town.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know the circumstances in which she left the bank,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.719
<v Speaker 3>don't you tell his worship? I remind you that you're

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 3>on oath.

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>The deputy State Coroner, Karl Milavanovitch was paying close attention.

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 6>When is this what year?

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 3>This is when Bronwin is on my instructions? Around the

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 3>twenty years of age?

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 6>What before she met mister Winfield.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, just sit back and relax, mister reed, I'm writing

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 5>the show here.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 6>You just answer the questions.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it was prior to meeting mister Winfield.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Karl had a question for John's lawyer.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 6>Is there I relevance to this?

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 7>There?

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you say you do not have any understanding of

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>why Bronwin left a job at the bank.

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 4>To the best of my knowledge, No, I don't know

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the exact reason of.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Why she I'm asking for exact reasons.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't know the reason she seized her employment with

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 4>the bank. No, I don't. Sorry, I can't remember any

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 4>exact reason of why she ceased that form of employed.

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not asking for exact reasons. Can you remember unusual circumstances?

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't. No, I don't know.

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Let me move onto something different. Can you remember when

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>she worked from Mansours?

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Andy replied, No, he didn't recall Bromwin working at Mansur's.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Or a Manchester shop. Can you remember her working at

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 3>a Manchester shop?

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, I don't.

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Can you remember any unusual circumstances in Bronwin's working life

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 3>relating to her leaving the employee of organizations?

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Can I remember any unusual circumstances? No, I can't.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer moved on from the matter of Bromwin having

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>left jobs in her early twenties.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Now the phone call of eight in May nineteen ninety three.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 5>Just before we go any further, mister Leggett, are you

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 5>going to take this matter any further or just leave it.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 3>No, in light of the witnesses answers, No, I'm not well.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 5>You realize that I placed absolutely no way to any

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 5>inference that might be raised from that.

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes, no, quite so, and I certainly wouldn't even think

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 3>to make submissions based on the current state of the evidence.

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>The mystery phone call at the hair salon into Cuts

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>where Jody worked, was the next subject for questioning by

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer. You'll recall that Andy went to the salon

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>after he'd heard about the phone call purportedly from Bronwyn

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>saying she was never coming back, and he questioned someone there.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Craig Leggett wanted Andy to talk about his visit and

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what he discovered that day.

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 3>The owner of the salon, according to my instructions, is

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 3>one Michelle Flanagan. Does that ring a bell with you?

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Is that the person with whom you spoke or you

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 3>just can't remember.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 4>I went down to the salon. I sat outside the

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 4>salon and waited for all the clientele to leave. Once

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 4>the last client had left, when over and knocked on

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 4>the door, introduced myself, told the lady who I was,

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 4>and said that I have reason to believe that there

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 4>was a phone call here today.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 3>It was clear from speaking to that person that that

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 3>person thought genuinely that a telephone call had been received

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 3>from someone with a female voice.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 3>What was unclear to that person after you discussed it

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 3>with her was whether the female voice actually belonged to

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Bronwin or not. Is that a fair summary?

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Fair summary?

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 4>She couldn't say to me that it was one hundred

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 4>percent Bromwin. She just said a voice said to her

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 4>on the phone, this is Bromwin.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 3>But what was not in doubt was the fact that

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 3>a telephone call had been received. That's so, isn't it.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, claiming that the person was Bromwin. I'm in Queensland.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not coming back.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Craig Leggett sat down matt fordham Rose again. He wanted

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask some follow up questions.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 6>So, from your knowledge of Bronwin and her contact with Jody,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 6>would Bronwin have known what days Jody worked at the salon?

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 6>And are you certain of that or is this something

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 6>you're not quite sure about?

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm positive I know that because I've had conversations

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 4>with Bromwin, and Bromwin knew what day Jody's rostered day.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Off was with the salon and all those sorts of things.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 6>Can you think of any reason why Bronwyn would have

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 6>wrung the salon knowing that Jody wasn't working that day.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>No reason at all. And his wife Michelle walked up next.

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fordham raised again the topic of Bromwin having become

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 1>pregnant and her distress over having had an abortion at

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the insistence of her husband John.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 7>Well. Actually, I remember her saying to me that it

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 7>was very stressful because John's really upset about his mum,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 7>and that she'd felt he was a lot of time

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 7>obviously with her and at the hospital.

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 8>And she said to me, then if anything happened.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 7>She was always really worried about Crystal, particularly not so

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 7>much Lauren, that would we look after her if anything

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 7>happened to her.

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It is important to clarify something here. Michelle has told

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>me that Bromwin loved her daughters equally. Michelle explained that

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin was more worried about Crystal because John was not

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Crystal's biological father, and Bromwin suspected that Cristel would not

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get the same opportunities from John as her little sister

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Lauren would receive. Bromwin wanted to ensure that the Reed

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>family would step in to look after Crystal in the

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>event of Bromwin not being there for her daughters. Matt

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>asked Michelle about another phone call she had with Bromwin

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on March thirty one, nineteen ninety three, that's about a

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>week after Bromman had left the Sandstone Crescent House. Michelle

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>said that Bromin sounded very distressed. All she could talk

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>about on the phone was moving out and separating from John,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 1>but Bromen sounded a lot happier. The next time they spoke,

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Roman was settled with Crystal and Lauren in the new accommodation.

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Did she indicate to you any sort of plans for

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 6>the future for her and the children?

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 7>As far as I knew they were out, they were

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 7>staying out. I said, like, you know, are you sure

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 7>you want to do this? Is this what you want?

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 7>It's going to be a huge thing. And I actually

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 7>asked her if there was any chance her and John

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 7>could go to a marriage counselor, and she just went

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 7>off a brain no way, I'm not there, no way, no,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 7>flatly no, Like I was just kind of okay, I

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 7>won't suggest that again.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 6>So from that, did it appear to you as though

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 6>she'd made up her mind or that she was still

0:20:59.320 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 6>making up.

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 7>Her Oh no, no way, she was going back, No

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 7>way in the world.

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 6>You also say that you also remember Bronwin saying a

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 6>comment something like everything will be okay, you'll understand in

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 6>a few days.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 6>Did you take those comments to mean anything?

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 8>That sort of took me aback.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 7>I kind of didn't really know what she was getting

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 7>at at all, And in hindsight, I suppose, knowing that

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 7>she was going to a solicitor and that she was

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 7>trying to get property settlement and custody of the children,

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 7>that may have been what she meant that things would

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 7>work out her way.

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 6>Did you ever discuss any other options available to Bronwin,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 6>such as her leaving the family completely, or going to

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 6>stay with a male friend, or going to live in

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 6>a commune somewhere, Any of those things ever come up

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 6>in your discussions with Bromwin.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 8>That Bromwin herself was going to do that?

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 6>No, do you believe that it would have been an

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 6>option that she would have entertained leaving the child?

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 8>Never? Never? Ever?

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>The police officer then took Michelle to her surprise meeting

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>with John when he showed up on her front doorstep

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>about four pm the day after Bromin's disappearance.

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 6>Do you remember what John's demeanor was at the time.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 7>John was shaky, and I'm sure of what he was saying.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 7>The first words that he said was Broman's left, and

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 7>I kind of thought, oh, well, he's here with the

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 7>two kids.

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 8>I got the shock of my life.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 7>And the next thing, I sort of stepped outside and

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 7>I said allo to the kids, and the kids were

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 7>sort of shoot away so they couldn't hear anything. And

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 7>then he kind of said, oh, Bromin's going on a break.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 7>It was like, that's what happened. She was going on

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 7>a break. She needed a break.

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 6>Was there ever any discussion with John about the things

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 6>that Browan may have taken from the house, such as

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 6>a suitcase or a bag or both or anything.

0:22:58.280 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 8>I asked him what she took.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.719
<v Speaker 7>I was pretty surprised that Roman would just get up

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 7>and go out the door. And then he said he

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 7>didn't look. And I said to him, you didn't look.

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 7>Your wife was walking out the front door, and you

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 7>didn't look to see who she was going with. Or

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 7>what she had, and he said no, Well I couldn't

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 7>believe that either.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Michelle recalled asking John why he had left in such

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a hurry. That's when John produced the petrol receipt from Ballina.

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fordham asked Michelle if they had discussed any further

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>John's sudden drive away from his home at Lennox Head.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'd said to him, because I ask a lot

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 7>of questions. So I said to him, what time did

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 7>Bromin leave? And he said, oh, I don't know about

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 7>quarter past I passed in. I think that was what

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 7>he told me originally, although that's not what keeps getting

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 7>said the rest of the time. And I said to him,

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 7>so you just packed up and left. And we were

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 7>at this point, I think, getting things out of the car,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 7>like the boot of the car and trying to get

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 7>the clothing for the kids.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 8>And we walked back in the house and into my kitchen.

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 7>He fished out of his wallet a receipt which he

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 7>showed me, and it had eleven o six was a

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 7>petrol receipt. And I said, why did you leave in

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 7>such a hurry?

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 8>It was like half an hour later he said.

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 7>He was getting petrol, and he said his reason was

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 7>the kids travel better at nighttime.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 1>The boot of the Ford Falcon car was clearly on

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fordham's mind. He must have been considering the possibility

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of Bromwin's body having been there. Michelle replied that she

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>remembered seeing pillow cases stuffed with clothing and a small bag.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>She did not remember seeing any suitcase or heavy objects

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in the car or in the boot. When Michelle asked

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>John what he had been up to that day and said,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.719
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned that he needed to get the car registered

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>as soon as he arrived.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 6>Did he say that he'd been anywhere else in Sydney,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 6>Not that I remember. Did he indicate to you?

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 8>I know he had a job to go to.

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 7>There was some sort of job that he was working at,

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 7>but I don't know if he.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 6>Went there, And did he indicate to you when he

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 6>arrived in Sydney.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 8>He said he got there that morning, and.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 6>Did he indicate whether it was early in the morning

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 6>or in the late morning or anything like that.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 7>Actually he did say he had to wait for the

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 7>registration place to open, so I don't know what time,

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 7>probably nine o'clock.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>The police officer asked Michelle to talk about phone calls

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>John Winfield made to her and the weeks after Browin

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>went missing, John was seeking advice about how to care

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>for the two girls.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I was at home with Mitchell. He was newborn,

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 7>and I was home most of the time. Well, I

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 7>was home all of the time, really, and John used

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 7>to ring up, and I'd ring up there too and

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 7>see how everyone was going. And yeah, he'd just asked

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 7>little questions about lunches and John never really in the

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 7>time that I've known Bromin and John, I've never known John.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 8>To look after the kids.

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 7>When I first met him, he worked a gabo's run

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 7>in the morning and then went to do bricklaying. He

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 7>was never there, so he was asking me lots of

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 7>questions about the kids and things.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 6>Over the years. Have you ever known Bronwin to leave

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 6>the children for a period of time, to go away somewhere,

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 6>or to leave him in someone else's care for a

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 6>period of time.

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 7>No, she was always with the kids always.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't know whether you know the answer to this

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 6>or not. But in nineteen ninety three, do you know

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 6>how much Bronwin would have weighed?

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 7>She was tall and thin, fifty kilos something like that.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Then there was the recounting of a conversation Michelle had

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>with Jody shortly after the birth of Michelle's son, Mitchell

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in late March nineteen ninety three. Michelle wanted to know

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>about her sister in law Bromwin's relationship with John. She

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>asked Jody if Bromwin and John argued a lot. Michelle

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>recalled Jody telling her that Jody had witnessed John picked

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin up while Bromwin was sitting in a chair. He

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>held the chair with her in it in the air,

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and then he dropped her. Michelle also recalled the phone

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation John had with her and Andy in July nineteen

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>ninety three, the one in which John said Bromwin must

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have come back to the house because a Medicare check

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 1>with her signature had been left on the table, and

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Michelle recalled John saying that Bromwin must have had a

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>man with her because a pair of his jeans and

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>a jumper were missing from the house. Matt Forden was

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>almost done. He took Michelle back to the boot of

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the family's ford Falcon car on the Monday afternoon. When

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>John arrived at the Reed home in Sydney, and then.

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 6>There's the discussion about the clothes that have been arranged

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 6>for the children. Were you able to determine then what

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 6>the source of those clothes was.

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 7>He said that when he got home, or when he

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 7>got up there and packed because Rominham moved in, there

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 7>were I don't know, boxes or crates or something, but anyway,

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 7>there were things there, so the clothes weren't obviously probably

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 7>back in the cupboards and things like that. I can

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 7>remember him saying that he'd gone to his ex wife

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 7>to get clothes for Lauren, and I assume she must

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 7>have had a child there that was about the same

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 7>age as Lauren. I don't know John's ex wife, so

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 7>I don't know, but he had said that.

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer, Craig Leggett, started with the Saturday night May fifteen,

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety three, Bromwan had been to a work party

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>with people from Eden's Takeaway.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Missus reed if Bronwin had left the children alone on

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the night of Saturday, fifteen May nineteen ninety three, would

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 3>that have been in or out of character?

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 8>Out of character?

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I would think it would have been unusual behavior.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 8>I think it would be unusual behavior.

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Bromwin had arranged for the daughter of a

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>neighbor to babysit the girls that night. Bromwn had made

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>written notes about this, including the name and phone number

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of that neighbor, Virginia Bevers, but for some reason this

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was not followed up in Glenn Taylor's investigation in nineteen

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, and therefore it was not part of the

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>police brief of evidence in two thousand and two. That

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>meant that it was not known to John's lawyer when

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>he put to Michelle the incorrect suggestion that Bromwin had

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>left the girls alone to go to a party on

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the Saturday night. The babysitter's role came out during the

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>reinvestigation by police in two thousand and nine, when Inspector

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>George Radmore led a cold case review for the Unsolved

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>homicide unit. In episode three, I spoke to Virginia Bebers

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and her husband Lee about Brommin and the babysitting by

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Virginia's daughter when the party was on.

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 8>I saw her the night before she went missing.

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>My phone numbers written there.

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 6>It actually said Saturday night, Virginia phone number, et cetera.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Our oldest daughter was a babysitter or her the night

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>before she went Listen. He was a lovely lady.

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 2>She'd loved the kids.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer asked about the chair dropping incident, the one

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that Jody had recounted to Michelle in March nineteen ninety three.

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 8>No, she didn't put a date on it.

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Missus reed, don't jump the gun. Listen to the question.

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 8>Please, Well, I know what he's asking me.

0:30:58.440 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 6>Well I don't.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 3>You must be able to read a mind.

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 8>He wants to know when it happened. I don't. Wasn't

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 8>given a specific.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 6>Date, Missus reed.

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Missus reed.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Please, I know that this is in amotive case and

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 5>everybody wants to assist the court, but you're not assisting.

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Listen to me.

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 5>You're not assisting yourself if you're going to jump in

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 5>and start answering questions before you give mister legg at

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 5>the courtesy of asking the question. Okay, this is not

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 5>one hundred meters sprint. We've got all week, and for

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 5>that matter, it's been nine years since Bronwin went missing.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 5>There's no need to rush your evidence. Now take your time,

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 5>think about the questions you're being asked, and think and

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 5>consider your answer.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Thank you your worship and Michelle's recollection of Bromwin shortly

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>before her disappearance, having said words to the effect, if

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>anything happens to me, would you please look after Crystal

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>was on John's lawyer's mind.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Had that topic, that is, something potentially happening to Bronwin

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and Crystal being looked after by you? Had that ever

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 3>been raised by Bronwin prior to that.

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 8>In July of nineteen ninety one.

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 7>So sometime just after that, we had a phone call

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 7>to our house and Bromwin was upset and she was

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 7>talking about wanting to leave, and the talk was her

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 7>coming back to Sydney, and at that stage she was

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 7>kind of hinting at staying with us, but we at

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 7>that point lived in a small home and we really

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 7>didn't have a lot of room. And I said to

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 7>her that she was going to come back and live

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 7>or wanted to move back, that I'd help her try

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 7>and find somewhere to live in Cronulla. And at that

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 7>point she was talking about if anything ever happened to her,

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 7>would we look after Crystal.

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 8>She'd said that on more than one occasion.

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 3>Paragraph fourteen of your statement, it's the conversation with Bronwin

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 3>where she says words to the effect everything will be okay.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 3>You'll understand in a few days. Yes, that statement occurred

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 3>in the last conversation that you ever had with Bronwin.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 7>That conversation happened just prior to her disappearing, like just

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 7>in the day's prior.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 3>It struck you as an unusual thing to be said,

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 3>did it at the time?

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 8>It is just a comment. I couldn't put it into context, so.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I understand now, Sergeant Detective Sergeant Discan makes this entry

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 3>on three June ninety ninety three at two pm. On

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 3>three June ninety ninety three, I had a long conversation

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 3>with sister in law Bronwin, Michelle Reid zero two five

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 3>four seven five eight zero. Now is that your phone number? Yes,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen ninety three. Yes, she is very concerned about

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 3>the missing person.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 8>Can you tell me that date again.

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Third of June nineteen ninety three. Okay, So, as at

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 3>three June you would have been very concerned about Bronwin,

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>would you.

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.719
<v Speaker 7>Well, she just spit on sixteenth and May and what

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 7>day again, the third of June.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 3>The third of June, I think it was twenty seven

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 3>may was it that the missing person's noticed when it

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 3>was formally lodged?

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 8>I don't know.

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 3>And you would have said that to Detective Sergeant Discott, wouldn't.

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 8>She we're concerned about her?

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I would have said that more likely than not.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 8>What else did I say?

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 3>He says? Stated, this is you? Yeah, stated that the

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 3>actions of the missing person are identical of what her

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 3>mother did. Now did you say that?

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 8>Say that again?

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 3>I read it to you.

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 8>It's hard to I know what you mean, but no,

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 8>just read it.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'm reading it word for word. Yeah, the actions

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 3>of the MP, Yeah, are identical of what her mother did. Then, now,

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 3>just pausing there, if you could hold that in your mind.

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 3>It then goes on and says the MP and her

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 3>sister and brother.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 8>The MP and her sister and brother.

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Person.

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 8>I've got no recollection of that conversation.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's just do it step by step.

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 8>Yep.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Can you recall at some stage talking to Detective Sergeant

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Discan about bron Wan's mother's disappearance? Just a yes or no.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 3>We'll get us there to start with.

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 7>I honestly cannot recall talking to him about anything to

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 7>do with Bromman's mother's disappearance.

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 3>You can't recall one way or the other. No, So

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 3>you may have said it, but you can't recall saying

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 3>anything about it.

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 8>I know that John was suggesting.

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 3>It, ma'am. Just deal with my question, but I don't know.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 3>So what you seem to be saying is you may

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 3>well have talked to Detective Sergeant Discan about Bromlin's mother,

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 3>but you're just not sure one way or the other.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 7>I don't see what Bromlan's mother has anything to do

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 7>with it.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 8>To be honest with.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 3>You, well you might not, but if you'd be kind

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 3>enough just to answer the question.

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'm trying to, but I can't understand why I

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 7>would say it when I don't.

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 8>Know, missus reed, I don't remember saying it.

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>The deputy State Coroner spoke up to try to explain

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to Michelle why she would be better off answering the

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>questions rather than analyzing the relevance of the questions.

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 5>You may not understand the nature of the questioning. Mister

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 5>Leggatt has got reports in front of him, prepared by

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 5>Detective Sergeant Discan, and obviously in this investigation, we've got

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 5>to look at everything, including what Detective sergeant Discan wrote

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 5>down in June, which was very close to the date

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 5>when Bronwin disappeared.

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't remember the conversation now.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 5>The notes that Detective Sergeant discin are purported to be

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 5>notes of a summary of a conversation he had with you.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 5>All mister Leggot is asking you now is do you

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 5>recall that conversation and do you recall saying things? The

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 5>detective Sergeant Discan has made a note of no. A

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 5>lot of the questions you can answer with a yes

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 5>or a no answer. You don't have to comment as

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 5>to its relevance. That's for me to decide.

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 8>Okay.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 3>The detective sergeant goes on doing conversation. The MP missing

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 3>person informed her that she was involved in a relationship

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 3>with a solicitor with a name similar to Copenhagen. Can

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 3>you remember something like that being the topic of a

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 3>discussion We.

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 8>Talked about Broman going to a solicitor.

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Does that name ring any bells?

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 8>No, not a.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 7>I don't remember the part about the relationship, but the

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 7>talking about Bromwin seeing a solicitor.

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that may have been talked about. I do remember that.

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Does the name Copenhagen ring a Bell.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 8>The name Copenhagen.

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 7>I remember somebody, and it may have been Kim talking

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 7>to us, and Kim is Andrew's house sister, and she

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 7>had talked about, well, talk to Bromwin, and she had

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 7>seen and spoken about going to see a solicitor. And

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 7>I couldn't remember the name. And that name just just

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 7>a funny sounding name. I remember that because it was unusual.

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So who was the solicitor with a name like Copenhagen.

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe that the man was, in fact Graham Holland,

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and that somehow, in the way that it's been related

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to Detective Discan, Copenhagen, which is the capital city of Denmark,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>has been conflated with nearby Holland, more commonly known as

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the Netherlands. In episode five, you heard this excerpt from

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one of Detective Discin's running sheets.

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 9>On June tenth, interviewed solicitor Graham Holland of Byron Bay

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.280
<v Speaker 9>states that he had been consulted by the missing person

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 9>on May four regarding dissolution of marriage, property settlement, and

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 9>custody of the two girls, which was to take priority.

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 9>The missing person was in fear of returning to the

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 9>family home if the husband should return from Sydney whilst

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 9>she was residing there. Solicitor Holland stated that she had

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 9>very little money and was only concerned about the welfare

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 9>of her two little girls.

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody, however, has suggested to me that Graham Holland was

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in any personal relationship with Bromwin.

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Had you heard the name Pendragon mentioned by Bronwann or

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 3>anyone in the course of this.

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 8>No, that doesn't really mean anything.

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 3>The name of a clairvoyant Pendragon, not Pendragon. I've got

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 3>another topic. When he looked inside the boot of the car,

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 3>there could well have been an LPG cylinder in the back.

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 3>You just don't remember one way or the other. Is

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 3>that fair comment?

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Yep, your worship.

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm instructed to state for the record that the vehicles

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 3>purchased from Byron Bay Taxis and on my instructions there

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 3>was a seventy liter LPG cylinder in the rear of

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 3>the car when he purchased it. Subsequently, Thank you, your worship,

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, missus reed.

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>The evidence of Gary Jackson, otherwise known as Jacko, was

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>relatively short. Jacko and Bromwin were clearly very fond of

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>each other. They might i have ended up in a

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship if Bromwin had not disappeared. Matt Fordham asked Jacko

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>about that relationship.

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 6>And Sir, just a couple of matters. In your statement,

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 6>you described that you befriended Bronwin in the weeks before

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 6>she disappeared in nineteen ninety three. Is that correct?

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 3>That's true?

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 6>And then she gave you the impression that she was

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 6>keen on a relationship with you. Is that correct?

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 2>That's true?

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 6>And sir, you say in your statement that Bromwin disclosed

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 6>to you that mister Winfield used to sit in a

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 6>car outside her flat watching her flat. Is that correct?

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 2>That's true?

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, sir, do you remember how long before she went

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 6>missing she told you this?

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Jacko responded that it would have been about four to

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks before she went missing, and he mentioned that

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>he had left Lennox Head three to four weeks before

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin disappeared. Matt Fordham produced a letter that Gary Jackson

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>had written to Bromwin. It had a date stamp of

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>April twenty nine, nineteen ninety three, and the location was

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>listed as well christ Church, New Zealand.

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 6>So it's clear, sir, that you've arrived in christ Church

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 6>in late April nineteen ninety three. Is that correct?

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Jacko had told Glen Taylor in nineteen ninety eight that

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Broman was concerned about John having been harassing her on

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the phone. Jacko had said that he had only visited

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin at her Byron Street flat during daylight hours, perhaps

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>three or four times. Jacko was alive to the possibility

0:41:31.640 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that he could become embroiled in their divorce proceedings. That's

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what he had told Glen Taylor.

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.280
<v Speaker 6>Did you ever see mister Winfield sitting outside her flat

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 6>or were you ever present when any of those phone

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 6>calls were received by Bromwin.

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I was never there when a phone call was received.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I did.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Broman did point to me one day that John was

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 3>parked out there.

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 2>The car was there.

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 3>You could see the car. It was a white Falcon

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 3>with a taxi ariel in the center of the roof.

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 3>It was pretty obvious. I knew the car from around town.

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 3>The phone was disconnected from the wall on several occasions,

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 3>so as the phone calls couldn't be made in.

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 6>When you say the phone was disconnected from the wall,

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 6>that is at the flat and Byron Street. Is that correct?

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 3>The flat and Byron Street.

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 6>And did it appear to you as though the phone

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 6>had simply been moved out of the socket and taken

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 6>off the wall, or had it been ripped out? Or

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 6>how did it appear to you?

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 3>It seemed to me like it had been removed from

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 3>the wall at the socket at the wall.

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer, Craig Leggett, got up.

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Now, is it the case that Bronlin, when you were

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 3>in her company from time to time, pointed to a

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 3>vehicle and said John is in that vehicle?

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Or did you were you actually able to see him inside?

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 3>There was only one incident, only one. Yeah, I don't

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 3>know if you know the residence that Brown was in.

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 3>It's alongside the Ampholse service station. There's a fence there

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 3>and it's pretty well surrounded. You used to come through

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the back entrance and if you look down the driveway

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 3>you could see the car park across the street. There

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 3>was only the one time, but it was pointed out

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 3>to me on the one time that I remember what

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 3>time of day was that approximately? Can you remember? It

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 3>could have been mid to late afternoon, from three o'clock

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 3>to four point thirty. And did you see John in

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the car or was it empty? No, I couldn't say

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 3>that I could see John in the car.

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>The inquest heard next from Donald Apps.

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 6>And so is it the case that you live in

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 6>Lennox Head and have done so for more than twenty years?

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Is that correct?

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 2>That's correct?

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:41.479
<v Speaker 6>And is it the case that around nineteen eighty nine

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 6>or nineteen ninety you met John Winfield?

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Yep?

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 6>Is it the case that you were assisting him when

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 6>he was building his house at Sandstone Crescent, Atlantics Head.

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:53.840
<v Speaker 10>I give him a hand for a small while that

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 10>me back wouldn't put up with it. I was very

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 10>disappointed that I wasn't able to help him with it more.

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 6>And so this address in Sandstone Crescent, it's a different block,

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 6>is that right.

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 2>That's where I first met John. Yeah, at the other.

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 10>Place, because his particular work was very neat, as one

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 10>bricklayer to another.

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:16.919
<v Speaker 6>And is it the case that you're aware that mister

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 6>Winfield's marriage unfortunately failed and the house which had been

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 6>begun in Sandstone Crescence, Yeah, was eventually sold in complete.

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 6>Is that correct?

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. Yeah.

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 6>So in your statement you described that John Winfield has

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 6>quite a possessive nature towards Bronwin, and that he was

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 6>fairly dominant and liked to make the decisions. Were there

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 6>any particular incidents that you can indicate to us led

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 6>you to that conclusion.

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 10>There's one. It's only really a one time. It was persistent,

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 10>if you call it. That was they were having an

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 10>argument out in front there about some matter, and it

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 10>went on for about three hours. And I stayed in

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 10>the room because well, I hope they get rid of

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 10>their problems. It was Bronwan came back into the house

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 10>and I was just making a cup of tea and

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 10>she came down and said that she wanted some money

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 10>to go on to a wedding.

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it might have been a brother's wedding.

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 6>Is this a wedding in Lennox Head or down in Sydney?

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 10>No, No, the one in Sydney. I think it was

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 10>a wedding.

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 2>And he didn't want to give her the money, like

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 10>Because obviously, after all his problems, I thought it he'd

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 10>be very short of money actually, and I didn't know

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 10>how he could manage the way he did.

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 6>And did you see any violence between John and Bronwin?

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 2>No violence between them. No.

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 6>And you say that after the house was completed and

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 6>that John and Bronwin moved into it. You went and

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 6>visited them in that house a few times? Is that correct?

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 10>John maintained a very clean and clinical type house. I

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 10>thought it was sort of congucive with his bricklaying work.

0:45:57.680 --> 0:45:59.600
<v Speaker 10>He was always very neat and tidy.

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 6>And was this a trait that was normally exercised by

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 6>John or by Bronwin or by both of them equally?

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I'd say the neatness would be by John. Yeah.

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 10>I think Bromlin's house where I don't think she'm be

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 10>too fussy about work.

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 6>Did you ever see mister Winfield get angry about the

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 6>standard of the housework?

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Not really, nay.

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fordham asked Donald b Apps about a part of

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 1>his nineteen ninety eight statement in which Donald had said

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>he found it unbelievable that Bromwin would cease all contact

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with her two girls.

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 6>Were there any particular incidents or events that you saw

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 6>that would lead you to that conclusion.

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 10>Well, Bromlin was always pretty meticulous about the way she

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.919
<v Speaker 10>is to dress them, and also you could tell by

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.040
<v Speaker 10>her in the bathroom, shampoo and things of that nature.

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 10>They were very well looked after nice and clean and tidy, Sir.

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 6>The last paragraph of your statement, you described, Sir, that

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 6>you remember Bronwin telling you once that John could become violent,

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 6>and that you say that Bronwin said to you that

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 6>John had got very angry once with a young man

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 6>who had apparently had a relationship with his eldest daughter,

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 6>and that he pulled a paling off the fence and

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 6>was going to hit the bloke with it. Do you

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.760
<v Speaker 6>recall that conversation with Bromwin, Yeah, he got angry.

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 10>I don't know whether it was at himself or whether

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 10>it was Bromwin, or whether it was the young man

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 10>or not.

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 6>And so you also recount in your statements that you

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 6>had heard that on one occasion, John was supposed to

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 6>have smashed a fellow's windscreen with a rock after he'd

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 6>interfered with him while he was surfing at Lennox Head,

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 6>and you say that you think that it may have

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 6>been Wayne Lazarus that had told you that.

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 6>To these observations, do they surprise you about John or

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:51.280
<v Speaker 6>do they accord with your knowledge of John Winfield?

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think anybody smashing his windscreen would be a

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 10>surprise to anybody there's a lot of things happen in

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 10>the surf rage. There's some people with the laws of

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 10>surfing fraternity that certain things are not allowed to be done.

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer asked Donald Apps about a conversation that he

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>had with another man, Wayne Lazarus, about John's purported surf rage.

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 3>In the last few days, You've spoken to Wayne Lazarus,

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 3>haven't you. Yeah, And you checked with him as to

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 3>whether he told you the story about John and a

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 3>rock and some surf rage. And Wayne told you he didn't.

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 2>He can't remember, he.

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Said, he said it wasn't him who told you.

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 2>He just said he just couldn't remember.

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>One of Broman's good friends in Lennox Head, was the

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>last witness on what had been an exhausting and long

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:08.879
<v Speaker 1>day of evidence. I'm not going to disclose her full

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>name because she has asked for anonymity. We've called her

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Joan when I've interviewed her. In early episodes of the

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin podcast series, Joan was asked by Matt Forden about

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a conversation that Joan had with Bromwin about her marriage

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 1>problems with John. She remembered Bromwin telling her about a

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation Bromwin had overheard between John and his father. John's

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 1>father was visiting at Sandstone Crescent. Bromwin had told Joan

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:43.439
<v Speaker 1>that she'd heard John tell his dad that he would

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have a better chance of holding onto the house if

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the children were in John's care. Joan was one of

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the last people to see Bromwn alive. She spoke to

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin on the Sunday morning before her disappearance, and Bromwin

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>did not disclose anything that suggests she was about to

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:03.759
<v Speaker 1>go away or that she wanted to go on any

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:04.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of break.

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.359
<v Speaker 6>And when Bronwin was telling you about this conversation that

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 6>she'd overheard between John and his father, did she say

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.800
<v Speaker 6>whether she'd had any plans for the future or anything

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 6>that she was intending to do.

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, she was intending to move out.

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:19.840
<v Speaker 11>And at one stage she had told me that he

0:50:19.880 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 11>had offered her and I don't remember the amount, it

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 11>was either five thousand or ten thousand, and he offered

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 11>her that much to call it quits. And I said,

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 11>what you mean, that's it no more? And she said yes,

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 11>And I said I wouldn't be accepting that, and she said, no,

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 11>I don't intend to one day when he's out, I'll

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 11>get the place valued because there was no mortgage on it.

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 11>And she said she'd have to get one of the

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 11>real estate agents. One she couldn't get because he was

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 11>a friend of John's. She would get another one to

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 11>value it. And she did so one time when he

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:53.759
<v Speaker 11>was away, and it was two hundred and sixty five

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:56.320
<v Speaker 11>or two hundred and forty five thousand dollars.

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:58.759
<v Speaker 6>And so Bromin's gone out and had the house at

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 6>Sandstone Crescent failure. Is that correct?

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

0:51:02.680 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Did you know how long before Bromwin disappeared that that occurred.

0:51:06.520 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 11>It was before she moved out. I think before she

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 11>moved out of the house into the unit.

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Joan repeated that Bromwyn expressed concern about having custody of

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the children.

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 6>Did you get the impression that Bromwin what was the

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 6>order of priorities for Bronwin? Was it her children first

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 6>and then the house second, and then the other things

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 6>later on? Or was it different her children?

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 11>Bronwin always loved children. When I had my youngest daughter,

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:34.759
<v Speaker 11>I had her on a Friday. Bromwin was my first

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:37.799
<v Speaker 11>visit to the hospital on Saturday morning. She didn't just

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 11>bring me a present and the baby a present. She

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 11>brought my other daughter a present, And I just don't

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 11>believe that somebody who thinks about kids feelings like that,

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:46.399
<v Speaker 11>would walk out on her own.

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:51.760
<v Speaker 1>According to Joan, Bromwin had told her that John said

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>he would kill her if she ever bad mouthed him

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>around town. That was the allegation.

0:51:58.560 --> 0:51:59.880
<v Speaker 6>Do you remember that conversation.

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 11>Yes, it may have been the same day she was

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 11>telling me about the abortion. I'm not sure what day

0:52:04.960 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 11>it was, but it was at my home and she

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 11>said that he had said to her, if you ever

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 11>bad mailed me around town, I'll kill.

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 6>You, ma'am. During your discussions with bron One in the

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 6>days and weeks before she disappeared, was it ever suggested

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 6>to you by her that she would leave and go away,

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 6>or go and live with a commune, or leave her

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 6>children in any way.

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 11>No, I can't even imagine Bronwin walking down the street

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 11>in the littlone living there. She never indicated going away.

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 11>When I spoke to her that morning that Sunday morning,

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 11>she said to me, like when she'd moved into the house,

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 11>that she found out one of the doors was actually

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 11>an interior door and not an exterior door, that she'd

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 11>have to get it fixed, and she said to me,

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 11>you'll have to show me how to mow the grass.

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 11>So she obviously wasn't planning on going away. She never

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 11>mentioned going.

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 1>When John's lawyer stood up, he repeated his now well

0:52:56.200 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>worn strategy of asking about Bromin's disclosures about her view

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to the tarot card reader and clairvoyant Pendragon in nineteen

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety three. Joan had attended one of those visits with Bromwin,

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but she could not recall much about it. Craig Leggert

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 1>put a now familiar question to her.

0:53:16.120 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 3>If Bromwin had left the children alone in nineteen ninety

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 3>three in May of nineteen ninety three, without a babysitter

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 3>at night, would you have considered that to be quite

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 3>an unusual action for her?

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer appeared to be developing an argument that Bromwin's

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>behavior in the days leading up to her disappearance was

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:40.800
<v Speaker 1>strange or unusual. Joan agreed that she could not imagine

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin leaving the children alone unsupervised. Craig Legat tried to

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>press the point further, so if.

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:51.800
<v Speaker 3>She had done that, it would be just incredibly unusual behavior.

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Bizarre behavior for her, you think.

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 11>Joan responded, well, I don't know about bizarre, but it

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 11>would definitely be out of character for her, because, like

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 11>I said, she thought so much about kid's welfare. Like

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 11>I said, mine she brought my three year old at

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 11>present when I had my baby. You know, she thought

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:09.640
<v Speaker 11>of kid's feelings.

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Finally, Craig Legott asked Joan if she ever had a

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Bromwin about Broman's mother, but Joan couldn't recall

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:23.800
<v Speaker 1>any details. Day two was almost at an end.

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Your worship just before we rise. Would it assist you

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 3>to hear from Detective Sergeant Discott. We've heard evidence that

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:34.279
<v Speaker 3>he's gone on a period of six months leave or so.

0:54:35.000 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 3>We don't know when that started, whether it coincided with

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 3>the start.

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Of this hearing.

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:40.920
<v Speaker 3>We don't know whether he's just not able to do

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 3>police duties, or whether he can sit in the witness

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 3>box and give evidence, or perhaps whether you would even

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:48.520
<v Speaker 3>go to him if he's otherwise incapacitated.

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. Perhaps Sergeant Taylor might need to look

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:55.399
<v Speaker 5>at that. Yes, I mean, ideally it would have been

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:57.839
<v Speaker 5>good to have Sergeant Discott. He was the first one

0:54:57.840 --> 0:54:58.680
<v Speaker 5>involved in this matter.

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, yes, particularly given the conflict between some of

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the witnesses and what's recorded.

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fordham shed some light on this. He had learned

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>from Glenn Taylor that Sergeant Graham Diskin was off work

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and unable to attend court. Matt Fordham went on to

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:19.800
<v Speaker 1>say that he had asked Glenn Taylor to find Graham

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Discin's running sheets and documents, which he said should have

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>already been made available at the start of the inquest.

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:28.879
<v Speaker 5>All right, but I think perhaps there should be something

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 5>official put on the record. And Sergeant Diskin is a

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 5>material witness, I mean he commenced the investigation. I think

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:38.320
<v Speaker 5>I need to see some certification that he's actively unable

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 5>to attend court, the same as any civilian witness would

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:43.880
<v Speaker 5>have to satisfy me if they were appearing in coronial

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 5>or criminal matters that they can't attend and give evidence

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 5>because of sickness or some other reason.

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 1>John's lawyer raised a fair point, and he had alleged

0:55:53.480 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the day that Graham Diskin's investigation was incompetent.

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Craig Leggett pointed out that it was only fair for

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>these comments to be put to Graham Diskin, and if

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>he could not come to court, then it was appropriate

0:56:07.760 --> 0:56:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for the coroner to be supplied with an independent statement

0:56:11.000 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of this. Karl Milavanovitch agreed. Before we conclude this episode,

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 1>let's return to the question of Illawong. You heard the

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 1>view of Dan Williams right at the start. I then

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Karina Berger, who has experienced in coronial investigations,

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course Bromwin's brother Andy as his wife Michelle

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>sat with him at their home in the Shire, a

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 1>short drive from Illawongkarina, what's your view?

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 3>What do we do here?

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:45.359
<v Speaker 12>Well, for me, I think it's a no brainer that

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 12>at this stage we should wait and leave things to

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:55.280
<v Speaker 12>the police and the coroner. First of all, we haven't

0:56:55.320 --> 0:57:00.399
<v Speaker 12>received a refusal from the coroner to Andy's request. What

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:02.800
<v Speaker 12>the coroner seems to have said is that you'll consider

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 12>the application, but wants to make an informed decision and

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:09.799
<v Speaker 12>wants police to conclude their investigations. I think that's a

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 12>reasonable position for the coroner to be taking, and we

0:57:12.920 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 12>don't want to compromise anything that the police might be doing.

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 12>We don't have great visibility of the police investigation, so

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 12>we just need to be a little bit careful. But

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 12>I think there's a major advantage of waiting, which is

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:29.960
<v Speaker 12>if the coroner and the police decide that a search

0:57:30.200 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 12>a Villa Wong is appropriate, then they can use some

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 12>mandatory powers to bring about that search, whereas we would

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 12>be asking the owners of the property to cooperate voluntarily.

0:57:41.760 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 12>The police would have expertise in these types of searches,

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 12>and they'd be able to draw on those previous experiences

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:53.440
<v Speaker 12>and skills too. It's not a situation where the crucial

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 12>evidence that Illowong is likely to be lost or damaged,

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 12>so timing is not really critical in that regard. If

0:58:03.040 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 12>the police were to conduct the search, then they would

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 12>be hopefully in a good position to support both the

0:58:10.120 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 12>ill Along homeowners and also Bronwin's family through that process,

0:58:14.760 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 12>and they would have family liaison officers and people with

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 12>specialist skills who could guide both of those families.

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 12>I think where this all leaves us is that it

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 12>doesn't preclude us from rethinking our position down the track.

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 12>If there were really extensive delays and Andy wasn't given

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 12>a reasonable explanation about the delays, or if the coroner

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 12>ultimately refused Andy's application and refused to grant the order.

0:58:41.760 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 12>Then we could rethink our position. What we ultimately want

0:58:45.600 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 12>is answers for the family and justice for Bronwin. So

0:58:48.560 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 12>leaving the investigations to law enforcement, the police and the

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 12>coroner is undoubtedly the way to go at this point

0:58:56.760 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 12>in time.

0:58:58.440 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>The risk is that we would find Romin's remains and

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 1>then we'd find ourselves in a really difficult situation because

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we would have this highly incriminating evidence but being potentially

0:59:11.640 --> 0:59:14.000
<v Speaker 1>accused of disturbing a crime scene.

0:59:14.560 --> 0:59:17.360
<v Speaker 12>I think we need to give the police a good

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:22.640
<v Speaker 12>chance to undertake these searches as thoroughly and comprehensively as

0:59:22.640 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 12>they can. We should only get involved at this site

0:59:26.400 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 12>if that's the last resort, because the police and the

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 12>coroner won't act well.

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:36.919
<v Speaker 1>That all makes perfect sense. Okay, so mate, this now

0:59:37.000 --> 0:59:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is being recorded.

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:59:39.680 --> 0:59:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You've received a response which is basically saying there is

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>an active police investigation and at the end of that.

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 4>A decision will be made upon the completion of the

0:59:52.560 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 4>current running investigation.

0:59:56.360 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>This is an investigation that had been basically abandoned.

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:06.919
<v Speaker 4>It correct in May. They didn't form me and Michelle

1:00:07.800 --> 1:00:13.760
<v Speaker 4>that they finished their review, they didn't find any extenuating

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:18.920
<v Speaker 4>circumstances that they presumed that they could conduct any further

1:00:19.040 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 4>investigations upon, and basically left it at that and said

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:30.040
<v Speaker 4>that unless some new information came to light, they couldn't

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:31.920
<v Speaker 4>do anything for us at that stage.

1:00:32.360 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the brom Win podcast series started in May

1:00:35.440 --> 1:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four soon after that, and new information started

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>coming forward.

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>And here we are.

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>They've restarted their investigation behind the scenes. They don't talk

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>directly to us about what they're doing, but we're aware

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that things are happening. It's just that we don't really

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>have a bead on what it is and where it's going.

1:00:58.080 --> 1:00:59.640
<v Speaker 4>They don't want to disclose anything.

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:04.439
<v Speaker 1>We could go up to the owners of that house

1:01:04.480 --> 1:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in Illowong. We could tell them everything we presume and suspect.

1:01:11.080 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We could ask them for permission to use drills and

1:01:16.200 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>other equipment to try to determine if anything suspicious is

1:01:21.880 --> 1:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>beneath the garage and patio slab.

1:01:26.560 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Where do you see it? On?

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Where we go from here?

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Admittedly I am frustrated at the slow pace. I would

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:42.200
<v Speaker 4>like to think that we're at least now heading in

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:45.000
<v Speaker 4>the right direction. With the new information that's come to light,

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:49.480
<v Speaker 4>it should only be a matter of a couple of

1:01:49.480 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 4>months to complete the few things that they possibly think

1:01:52.000 --> 1:01:55.479
<v Speaker 4>they need to do. We should know what their point

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 4>of view is and where they're heading with a search of.

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Dan Williams earlier, and he cautioned fairly persuasively against us

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>going up to the site and proceeding with a dig

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and excavation. In his view, we really should leave that

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to the police and the coroner, even though it's a

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of a gamble as to whether they're going to

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>even do that.

1:02:26.880 --> 1:02:30.360
<v Speaker 4>Before we actually went there and found something, or skinned

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:33.840
<v Speaker 4>showed something, or a dog reacted, we'd obviously have to

1:02:33.840 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 4>hand the sight over to them. Anyway, we will see

1:02:38.680 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 4>how they progress over the next day, eight weeks or so,

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>and maybe regroup then and see where we're at.

1:02:47.040 --> 1:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It'll be thirty two years in May. You're taking a

1:02:50.640 --> 1:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of a leap of faith in saying no, let's

1:02:53.520 --> 1:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>leave it to the same people who we've felt let

1:02:57.960 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>down by it for three decades.

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:02.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we have a choice they do it.

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 4>You've got to push your faith in these organizations to

1:03:08.640 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 4>do their due diligence. It's my numbing name mind Drew Headley.

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 4>It's my numbing that they've got exactly the same documentation

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 4>or more documentation than what we have. Their review was done.

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:27.520
<v Speaker 4>They spent several months doing it with several different people

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 4>because people were coming and going and leaving and whatnot.

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Fifteenth of May four, Yeah, it was when meon Michelle

1:03:36.040 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 4>went and sat down at paramatter.

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 13>It was really close to the release of the first

1:03:43.000 --> 1:03:45.920
<v Speaker 13>episode in the Bromlin series.

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>The police were done, they were finished.

1:03:49.800 --> 1:03:54.080
<v Speaker 4>They exhausted all angles on the information that they had.

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:56.080
<v Speaker 4>That's when we were told there was nothing that they

1:03:56.080 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 4>could really do.

1:03:57.400 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You have to take some comfort from the fact that,

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding what they told you in May twenty four, almost

1:04:05.440 --> 1:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, here we are and they have a reactivated,

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>ongoing live investigation that they have clearly restarted, having told

1:04:18.680 --> 1:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you it was done, dusted over correct.

1:04:22.600 --> 1:04:26.960
<v Speaker 4>We can only just keep hoping that if iinally doing

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:29.480
<v Speaker 4>some due diligence and we're going to get somewhere.

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:32.960
<v Speaker 13>What I'm hearing from you is you want us to

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:38.160
<v Speaker 13>basically leave it to the police and the state coroner

1:04:38.960 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 13>in relation to any search subterranean search of that property

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:51.360
<v Speaker 13>in Illawan where John was working, which we suspect could

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 13>possibly be holding Bromin's remains.

1:04:55.160 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, correct, correct, err on the side of caution and

1:04:58.760 --> 1:05:00.920
<v Speaker 4>let it unfold how it runs.

1:05:15.000 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Bronwyn is written and investigated by me Headley Thomas as

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a podcast production for The Australian. If anyone has information

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>which may help solve this cold case, please contact me

1:05:28.040 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>confidentially by emailing Bronwyn at the Australian dot com dot au.

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You can read more about this case and see a

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>range of photographs and other artwork at the website Bronwyn

1:05:42.640 --> 1:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com. Our subscribers and registered users here episodes first.

1:05:49.440 --> 1:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>The production and editorial team for bromwin includes Claire Harvey,

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Kristin Amiot, Joshua Burton, Bridget, Ryan Bianca, far Marcus, Katie Burns,

1:06:00.360 --> 1:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Liam Mendez, Sean Callenon, Matthew Condon and David Murray, with

1:06:05.160 --> 1:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>assistance from Isaac Irons. Audio production for this podcast series

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is by Wasabi Wodeo and original theme music by Slade Gibson.

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>We have been assisted by Madison Walsh, a relation of

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>brom and Winfield, and a shout out for all of.

1:06:21.480 --> 1:06:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Our voice actors.

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:24.360
<v Speaker 3>There are some big parts here.

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>They're not easy to do. We are grateful to everyone

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who has lent their voice, and particularly for the time

1:06:31.560 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>consuming reconstructions of the inquest evidence. Outside the Reed family,

1:06:37.160 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>there's John ty Burton as the police officer, Matt Fordham,

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Dan Sanke as the coroner, Dan Williams as Craig Leggett,

1:06:45.080 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and Glenn Taylor as himself, the then detective sergeant in

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Ballina Police.

1:06:51.120 --> 1:06:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

1:06:52.240 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>We can only do this kind of journalism with the

1:06:54.920 --> 1:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>support of our subscribers and our major sponsors like Harvey Norman.

1:07:00.160 --> 1:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>For all of our exclusive stories, videos, maps, timelines and

1:07:04.480 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>documents about this podcast and other podcasts, including The Teacher's Pet,

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>The Teacher's Trial, The Teacher's Accuser, Shandy Story, Shandy's Legacy,

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:14.919
<v Speaker 1>and The Night Driver.

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Go to the

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Australian dot com, dot au and the subscribe